Engel, GL. The need for a new medical model: a challenge for biomedicine. Science 1977; 196: 129–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Engelhardt, H.T Jr. The discourses of Orthodox Christian medical ethics. In Baker, RB, McCullough, LB, eds. Cambridge World History of Medical Ethics. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009: 211–217.Google Scholar

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG committee opinion. Condom availability for adolescents. Int J Obstet Gynecol 1995; 49: 347–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 392. Intrauterine device and adolescents. Obstet Gynecol 2007; 110: 1493–1495.Google Scholar

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Store. Available at https://sales.acog.org/Default/aspx. (Accessed March 1, 2019)Google Scholar

Coverdale, J, Chervenak, FA, McCullough, LB, Bayer, T. Ethically justified clinically comprehensive guidelines for the management of the depressed pregnant patient. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996; 174: 169–173.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Coverdale, J, McCullough, LB, Chervenak, FA, Bayer, T, Weeks, S. Clinical implications of respect for autonomy in the psychiatric treatment of pregnant patients with depression. Psychiatr Serv 1997; 48: 209–212.Google ScholarPubMed

McCullough, LB, Coverdale, J, Chervenak, FA. Ethical challenges of decision making with pregnant patients who have schizophrenia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002; 187: 696–702.Google Scholar

Coverdale, J, McCullough, LB, Chervenak, FA. Assisted and surrogate decision making for pregnant patients who have schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull 2004; 30: 659–664.Google Scholar

Beauchamp, TL, Childress, JF. Principles of Biomedical Ethics, 7th ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

American Academy of Pediatrics. Committee on Bioethics. Informed consent, parental permission, and assent in pediatric practice. Pediatrics 1995; 95: 314–317.Google Scholar

Katz, AL, Webb, SA. Committee on Bioethics. American Academy of Pediatrics. Informed consent in decision-making in pediatric practice. Pediatrics 2016; 138: pii: e20161485.Google Scholar

Board of Trustees. American Medical Association. Requirements or incentives for the use of long-acting contraceptives. JAMA 1992; 267: 1818–1821.Google Scholar

Percival, T. Medical Ethics; or, A Code of Institutes and Precepts, adapted to the Professional Conduct of Physicians and Surgeons. London: Johnson & Bickerstaff, 1803.Google Scholar

Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. Embryo. In “Topics.” Available at www.sart.org/topics/topics-index/embryo/ (accessed March 1, 2019).Google Scholar

American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology. How your fetus grows during pregnancy. Frequently Asked Questions. 156 Pregnancy. Available at www.acog.org/-/media/For-Patients/faq156.pdf?dmc=1&ts=20180615T1523286650 (accessed March 1, 2019).Google Scholar

Gracia, JE. Introduction to the Problem of Individuation in the Early Middle Ages, 2nd ed. Munich: Philosophia Verlag, 1988.Google Scholar

Engelhardt, HT Jr. The Foundations of Bioethics, 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Beauchamp, TL, Childress, JF. Principles of Biomedical Ethics, 7th ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Griswold v. Connecticut 381 U.S. 479 (1965).Google Scholar

Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Performing the embryo transfer: a guideline. Fertil Steril 2017; 107: 882–896.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 144: Multifetal gestation: twin, triplet, and higher-order multifetal pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol 2014; 123: 1118–1132.Google Scholar

European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. ESHRE Revised Guidelines for Good Practice in IVF Laboratories. Available at file:///C:/Users/mccullou/Documents/Downloads/ESHRE_IVF_labs_guideline_15122015_FINAL.pdf (accessed March 1, 2019).Google Scholar

Faden, RR, Becker, C, Lewis, C, Freeman, J, et al. Disclosure of information to patients in medical care. Med Care 1981; 19: 718–733.Google Scholar

McCullough, LB, Brothers, KB, Chung, WK, Joffe, S, Koenig, BA, Wilfond, B, Yu, JH. Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research (CSER) Consortium Pediatrics Working Group. Professionally responsible disclosure of genome sequencing results in pediatric practice. Pediatrics 2015; 136: e974–982.Google Scholar

Chervenak, FA, McCullough, LB, Brent, RL. The perils of the imperfect expectation of the perfect baby. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010; 203: 101.e1–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Chervenak, FA, McCullough, LB. Preventing enthusiasm in response to clinical advances. BJOG 2019; 126: 890.Google Scholar

Chervenak, FA, McCullough, LB, Brent, RL. The professional responsibility model of obstetric ethics: avoiding the perils of clashing rights. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011; 205: 515.e1–5.Google Scholar

Chervenak, FA, McCullough, LB. An ethically justified practical approach to offering, recommending, performing, and referring for induced abortion and feticide. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009; 201: 560.e1–6.Google Scholar

American Medical Association. Code of Medical Ethics Opinion 4.2.7. Abortion. Available at www.ama-assn.org/delivering-care/ethics/abortion (accessed March 1, 2019).Google Scholar

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Committee on Ethics. Ethics in Obstetrics and Gynecology. Available at www.acog.org/-/media/Committee-Opinions/Committee-on-Ethics/co390.pdf?dmc=1&ts=20181231T2040174286 (accessed March 1, 2019).Google Scholar

Stedman’s Medical Dictionary. Available at online.statref.com/DictionaryHelp/DictionaryHelp (accessed March 1, 2019).Google Scholar

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Committee on Ethics. Multifetal Pregnancy Reduction. ACOG Committee Opinion Number 369. Obstet Gynecol 2007; 109: 1511–1515.Google Scholar

Chervenak, FA, McCullough, LB, Campbell, S. Is third trimester abortion justified? Brit J Obstet Gynaecol 1995; 102: 434–435.Google Scholar

Chervenak, FA, McCullough, LB, Campbell, S. Third trimester abortion: is compassion enough? Brit J Obstet Gynæcol 1999; 106: 293–296.Google Scholar

Chervenak, FA, McCullough, LB, Knapp, RC, Caputo, TA, Barber, HR. A clinically comprehensive ethical framework for offering and recommending cancer treatment before and during pregnancy. Cancer 2004; 100(2): 215–222.Google Scholar

Chervenak, FA, McCullough, LB, Sharma, G, Davis, J, Gross, S. Enhancing patient autonomy with risk assessment and invasive diagnosis: an ethical solution to a clinical challenge. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008; 199: 19.e1–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Coverdale, J, Chervenak, FA, McCullough, LB, Bayer, T. Ethically justified clinically comprehensive guidelines for the management of the depressed pregnant patient. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996; 174: 169–173.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Coverdale, J, McCullough, LB, Chervenak, FA, Bayer, T, Weeks, S. Clinical implications of respect for autonomy in the psychiatric treatment of pregnant patients with depression. Psychiatr Serv 1997; 48: 209–212.Google Scholar

McCullough, LB, Coverdale, J, Chervenak, FA. Ethical challenges of decision making with pregnant patients who have schizophrenia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002; 187: 696–702.Google Scholar

Coverdale, J, McCullough, LB, Chervenak, FA. Assisted and surrogate decision making for pregnant patients who have schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull 2004; 30: 659–664.Google Scholar

Chervenak, FA, McCullough, LB. The ethics of direct and indirect referral for termination of pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008; 199: 232.e1–232.e3.Google Scholar

Chervenak, FA, McCullough, LB. Does obstetric ethics have any role to place in the obstetrician’s response to the abortion controversy? Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990; 163: 1425–1429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chervenak, FA, McCullough, LB, Dudenhausen, J. Fetal analysis with invasive method (FA-I) and fetal analysis with non-invasive method (FA-NI): replacing current, deceptively imprecise clinical nomenclature. J Perinal Med 2017; 45: 985–987.Google Scholar

Chervenak, FA, McCullough, LB. Ethical dimensions of first-trimester aneuploidy screening. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2014; 57: 226–231.Google Scholar

Chervenak, J, McCullough, LB, Chervenak, FA. Surgery without consent or miscommunication? A new look at a landmark case. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 212: 586–590.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Wielgos, M, Chervenak, FA, McCullough, LB, Dudenhausen, JW. Deliberative clinical ethical judgment: an essential component of contemporary obstetrics. J Perinat Med 2013; 41: 627–630.Google Scholar

Chervenak, FA, McCullough, LB, Brent, RL. The perils of the imperfect expectation of the perfect baby. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010; 203: 101.e1–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Engel, G. A unified concept of health and disease. IRE Trans Med Electron 2009; 10.1109/IRET-ME.1960.5008004. Originally appeared in Perspect Biol Med 1960; 13: 48–57.Google Scholar

Kon, AA. The shared decision-making continuum. JAMA 2010; 304: 903–904.Google Scholar

Chervenak, FA, McCullough, LB, Sharma, G, Davis, J. Gross, G. Enhancing patient autonomy with risk assessment and invasive diagnosis: an ethical solution to a clinical challenge. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008; 199: 19.e1–19.e4.Google Scholar

Faden, RR, Becker, C, Lewis, C, Freeman, J, et al. Disclosure of information to patients in medical care. Med Care 1981; 19: 718–733.Google Scholar

Beauchamp, TL, Childress, JF. Principles of Biomedical Ethics, 7th ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Committee on Practice Bulletins. Screening for fetal chromosomal abnormalities. Obstet Gynecol 2007; 109: 217–227.Google Scholar

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Committee on Genetics. The Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine. Publications Committee. Noninvasive prenatal testing for aneuploidy. Obstet Gynecol 2012; 120: 1532–1534.Google Scholar

Norton, ME, Rose, NC, Benn, P. Noninvasive prenatal testing for fetal aneuploidy: clinical assessment and a plea for restraint. Obstet Gynecol 2013; 121; 847–850.Google Scholar

Nicolaides, KH, Chervenak, FA, McCullough, LB, Avgidou, K, Papageorghiou, A. Evidence-based obstetrics ethics and informed decision-making by pregnant woman about invasive diagnosis after first-trimester assessment of risk for trisomy 21. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 193: 322–326.Google Scholar

Chervenak, FA, McCullough, LB, Levene, MI. An ethically justified, clinically comprehensive approach to peri-viability: gynaecological, obstetric, perinatal, and neonatal dimensions. J Obstet Gynaecol 2007; 21: 3–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973).Google Scholar

Oklahoma State Department of Health. Definition of Live Birth. Available at www.ok.gov/health/Birth_and_Death_Certificates/Birth_and_Death_Registration_(ROVER)/Stillbirth_Registration_Training/Definition_of_Live_Birth.html (accessed March 1, 2019).Google Scholar

World Health Organization. 1950 definition of live birth. Available at www.gfmer.ch/Medical_education_En/Live_birth_definition.htm (accessed March 1, 2019).Google Scholar

Tyson, JE, Parikh, NA, Langer, J, et al. Intensive care for extreme prematurity – moving beyond gestational age. N Engl J Med 2008; 358: 1672–1681.Google Scholar

Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. NICHD Neonatal Research Network (NRN). Extremely preterm birth outcome data. Available at www1.nichd.nih.gov/epbo-calculator/Pages/epbo_case.aspx (accessed March 1, 2019).Google Scholar

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine. Ecker, JL, Kaimal, A, Mercer, BM, Blackwell, SC, et al. Obstetric Care Consensus. #6 Periviable Birth. Obstet Gynecol 2017; 130: e187–e198.Google Scholar

Raju, TNK, Mercer, BM, Burchfield, DJ, Joseph, GF. Periviable birth. Executive summary of a joint workshop by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Society for Maternal–Fetal Medicine, American Academy of Pediatrics, and American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol 2014; 123: 1083–1096.Google Scholar

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine. Obstetric Care Consensus, Number 6: Periviable Birth. Obstet Gynecol 2017; 130: 926–928.Google Scholar

American Academy of Pediatrics. Committee on Bioethics. Informed consent, parental permission, and assent in pediatric practice. Pediatrics 1995; 95: 314–317.Google Scholar

American Academy of Pediatrics. Katz, AL, Webb, SA, AAP Committee on Bioethics. Informed consent in decision-making in pediatric practice. Pediatrics 2016; 138: e20161485.Google Scholar

Skupski, DW, McCullough, LB, Levene, M, Chervenak, FA. Improving obstetric estimation of outcomes of extremely premature neonates: an evolving challenge. J Perinat Med 2010; 38: 19–22.Google Scholar

Brett, AS, McCullough, LB. When patients request specific interventions: defining the limits of the physician’s obligation. N Engl J Med 1986; 315: 1347–1351.Google Scholar

Brett, AS, McCullough, LB. Addressing requests by patients for nonbeneficial interventions. JAMA 2012; 307: 149–150.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Whitney, SN, McCullough, LB, Frugé, E, McGuire, AL, Volk, RJ. Beyond breaking bad news: the roles of hope and hopefulness. Cancer 2008; 114: 442–445.Google Scholar

Kalish, RB, McCullough, LB, Chervenak, FA. Decision-making about caesarean delivery. Lancet 2006; 367: 883–845.Google Scholar

Nguyen, MT, McCullough, LB, Chervenak, FA. The importance of clinically and ethically fine-tuning decision-making about cesarean delivery. J Perinat Med 2017; 45: 551–557.Google Scholar

McCullough, LB. The professional medical ethics model of decisionmaking under conditions of uncertainty. Med Care Rev Res 2013; 70(1 Suppl): 141S–58S.Google Scholar

Kon, AA. The shared decision-making continuum. JAMA 2010; 304: 903–904.Google Scholar

Chervenak, FA, McCullough, LB. The unlimited-rights model of obstetric ethics threatens professionalism. BJOG 2017; 124: 1144–1147.Google Scholar

Whitney, SN, McGuire, AL, McCullough, LB. A typology of shared decision making, informed consent, and simple consent. Ann Intern Med 2003; 140: 54–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chervenak, FA, McCullough, LB. Clinical guides to preventing ethical conflicts between pregnant women and their physicians. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990; 162: 303–307.Google Scholar

Nicolaides, KH, Chervenak, FA, McCullough, LB, et al. Evidence-based obstetric ethics and informed decision-making about invasive diagnosis after first-trimester assessment for risk of trisomy 21. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 193: 322–326.Google Scholar

Salmeen, K, Brincat, C. Time from consent to cesarean delivery during labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013; 209: 212.e1–6.Google Scholar

Martin, JA, Hamilton, BE, Ventura, SJ, Osterman, MJK, Wilson, EC, Mathews, TJ. Births: final data for 2010. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Vital Statistics Report. August 28, 2012; 61(1): 1–72. Available at www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr61/nvsr61_01.pdf (accessed March 1, 2019).Google Scholar

National Institutes of Health consensus development conference statement: vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights, March 8–10, 2010. Obstet Gynecol 2010; 115: 1279–1295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chervenak, FA, McCullough, LB. An ethical framework for the informed consent process for trial of labor after cesarean delivery. Clin Perinatol 2011; 38: 227–231.Google Scholar

Chervenak, FA, McCullough, LB. Preventive ethics for cesarean delivery: the time has come. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013; 209: 166–167.Google Scholar

Chervenak, FA, Romero, R. Is there a role for fetal cephalocentesis in modern obstetrics? Am J Perinatol 1984; 1: 170–173.Google Scholar

Chasen, S, Chervenak, FA, McCullough, LB. The role of cephalocentesis in modern obstetrics. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001; 185: 734–736.Google Scholar

Chervenak, FA, Isaacson, G, Campbell, S. Anomalies of the cranium and its contents. In Textbook of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. Boston: Little, Brown, 1993: 825–852.Google Scholar

Chervenak, FA, Berkowitz, RL, Tortora, M, et al. Management of fetal hydrocephalus. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985; 151: 933–937.Google Scholar

Raimondi, AJ, Soare, P. Intellectual development in shunted hydrocephalic children. Am J Dis Child 1974; 127: 664.Google ScholarPubMed

McCullough, DC, Balzer-Martin, LA. Current prognosis in overt neonatal hydrocephalus. J Neurosurg 1982; 57: 378.Google Scholar

Sutton, LN, Bruce, DA, Schut, L. Hydranencephaly versus maximal hydrocephalus: an important clinical distinction. Neurosurgery 1980; 6: 35.Google Scholar

Lorber, J. The results of early treatment on extreme hydrocephalus. Med Child Neurol (Suppl) 1968; 16: 21.Google Scholar

Chervenak, FA, McCullough, LB. An ethically justified, clinically comprehensive management strategy for third-trimester pregnancies complicated by fetal anomalies. Obstet Gynecol 1990; 75: 311–316.Google Scholar

Chervenak, FA, McCullough, LB. Justified limits on refusing intervention. Hastings Cent Rep 1991; 21: 12–18.Google Scholar

Brett, AS, McCullough, LB. When patients request specific interventions: defining the limits of the physician’s obligation. N Engl J Med 1986; 315: 1347–1351.Google Scholar

Brett, AS, McCullough, LB. Addressing requests by patients for non-beneficial interventions. JAMA 2012; 307: 149–150.Google Scholar

McCullough, LB. Was bioethics founded on historical and conceptual mistakes about medical paternalism? Bioethics 2011; 25: 66–74.Google Scholar

Annas, GJ. Protecting the liberty of pregnant patients. N Engl J Med 1987; 316: 1213–1214.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Minkoff, H, Marshal, MF, Liashenko, J. The fetus and the “potential child,” and the ethical obligations of obstetricians. Obstet Gynecol 2014; 123: 1100–1103.Google Scholar

DeSisto, MJ, Harding, CM, McCormick, RV, et al. The Maine and Vermont three-decade studies of serious mental illness.I. Matched comparison of cross-sectional outcome. Brit J Psychiatry 1995; 167: 331–338.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Howard, LM, Kumar, C, Leese, M, et al. The general fertility rate in women with psychotic disorders. Am J Psychiatry 2002; 159: 991–997.Google Scholar

Miller, LJ, Finnerty, M. Sexuality, pregnancy, and childrearing among women with schizophrenia-spectrum disorders. Psychiatr Serv 1996; 47: 502–506.Google Scholar

Teplin, LA, McClelland, GM, Abram, KM, et al. Crime victimization in adults with severe mental illness: comparison with the National Crime Victimization Survey. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2005; 62: 911–921.Google Scholar

McCullough, LB, Coverdale, JH, Chervenak, FA. Ethical challenges of decision making with pregnant patients who have schizophrenia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002; 187: 696–702.Google Scholar

McCullough, LB, Coverdale, J, Bayer, T, Chervenak, FA. Ethically justified guidelines for family planning interventions to prevent pregnancy in female patients with chronic mental illness. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992; 167: 19–25.Google Scholar

Miller, LJ. Psychotic denial of pregnancy: phenomenology and clinical management. Hosp Community Psychiatry 1990; 41: 1233–1137.Google Scholar

Webb, R, Abel, K, Pickles, A, Appleby, L. Mortality in offspring of parents with psychotic disorders: a critical review and meta-analysis. Am J Psychiatry 2005; 162: 1045–1056.Google Scholar

Jablensky, AV, Morgan, V, Zubrick, SR, Bower, C, Yellachich, L-A. Pregnancy, delivery, and neonatal complications in a population cohort of women with schizophrenia and major affective disorders. Am J Psychiatry 2005; 62: 79–91.Google Scholar

Schneid-Kofman, N, Sheiner, E, Levy, A. Psychiatric illness and adverse pregnancy outcome. Int J Gynecol Obstet 2008; 101: 52–56.Google Scholar

Spielvogel, A, Wile, J. Treatment and outcomes of psychotic patients during pregnancy and childbirth. Birth 1992; 19: 131–137.Google Scholar

Coverdale, JH, McCullough, LB, Chervenak, FA. Assisted and surrogate decision making for pregnant patients who have schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull 2004; 30: 659–664.Google Scholar

Babbitt, KE, Bailey, KJ, Coverdale, JH, Chervenak, FA, McCullough, LB. Professionally responsible management of patients with major mental disorders. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014; 210: 27–31.Google Scholar

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.Use of psychiatric medications during pregnancy and lactation. ACOG Pract Bull 2008; 111: 1001–1020.Google Scholar

Ryding, EL, Wijma, B, Wijma, K. Posttraumatic stress reactions after emergency cesarean section. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1997; 76: 856–861.Google Scholar

Giacino, JT, Katz, DI, Schiff, ND, Whyte, J, et al. Practice guideline update recommendations summary: disorders of consciousness: Report of the Guideline Development, Dissemination, and Implementation Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology; the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine; and the National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research. Neurology 2018; 91: 450–460.Google Scholar

Russell, JA, Epstein, LG, MD, Greer, DM, Kirschen, M, et al., on behalf of the Brain Death Working Group. AAN Position Statement. Brain death, the determination of brain death, and member guidance for brain death accommodation requests. Neurology 2019; 92: 1–5.Google Scholar

Esmaeilzadeh, M, Dictus, C, Kayvanpour, E, et al. One life ends, another begins: management of a brain-dead pregnant mother – a systematic review. BMC Medicine 2010; 8: 74.Google Scholar

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Committee Opinion Number 761. Cesarean delivery on maternal request. Obstet Gynecol 2019; 133: e.73–77.Google Scholar

Chervenak, FA, McCullough, LB. An ethically justified algorithm for offering, recommending, and performing cesarean delivery and its application in managed care practice. Obstet Gynecol 1996; 87: 302–305.Google Scholar

Kingwani, P. Risk Management – An Analytical Study. IOSR Journal of Business and Management. February 2014, 83–89. Available at http://iosrjournals.org/iosr-jbm/papers/Vol16-issue3/Version-3/K016338389.pdf (accessed July 31, 2019).Google Scholar

Sheen, JJ, Wright, JD, Goffman, D, et al. Maternal age and risk for adverse outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2018; 219: 390.e1–15.Google Scholar

Tita, ATN, Jablonski, KA, Bailit, JL, et al. Neonatal outcomes of elective early-term births after demonstrated fetal lung maturity. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2018; 219: 296.e1–8.Google Scholar

Johnson, JK, Miller, SH, Horowitz, SD. Systems-based practice: improving the safety and quality of patient care by recognizing and improving the systems in which we work. In Henriksen, K, Battles, JB, Keyes, MA, et al., eds. Advances in Patient Safety: New Directions and Alternative Approaches (Vol. 2: Culture and Redesign). Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); August 2008. Available at www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK43731/ (accessed January 13, 2019).Google Scholar

Sanhedrin, Mishna 4.9. Available at www.goodreads.com/author/quotes/14110064.Mishnah_Sanhedrin_4_9_Yerushalmi_Talmud_Tractate_Sanhedrin_37a_(accessed March 1, 2019).Google Scholar

Grünebaum, A, McCullough, LB, Sapra, KJ, et al. Early and total neonatal mortality in relation to birth setting in the United States, 2006–2009. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014; 211: 390.e1–7.Google Scholar

Grünebaum, A, McCullough, LB, Sapra, KJ, et al. Apgar score of 0 at 5 minutes and neonatal seizures or serious neurologic dysfunction in relation to birth setting. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013; 209: 323.e1–6.Google Scholar

Grünebaum, A, McCullough, LB, Brent, RL, Arabin, B, Levene, MI, Chervenak, FA. Perinatal risks of planned home births in the United States. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 212: 350.e1–6.Google Scholar

Wax, JR, Lucas, FL, Lamont, M, Cartin, A, Blackstone, J. Maternal and newborn outcomes in planned home birth vs planned hospital births: a metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010; 203: 243.e1–8.Google Scholar

Snowden, JM, Tilden, EL, Snyder, J, Quigley, B, Caughey, AB, Cheng, YW. Planned out-of-hospital birth and birth outcomes. N Engl J Med 2015; 373: 2642–2653.Google Scholar

American Academy of Pediatrics: Policy Statement Planned Home Birth. Pediatrics 2013; 131: 1016–1020.Google Scholar

Gigerenzer, G, Galesic, M. Why do single event probabilities confuse patients? statements of frequency are better for communicating risk. BMJ; 2012; 344: e245.Google Scholar

Publications Committee, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine. Placenta accreta. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010; 203: 430–439.Google Scholar

ACOG Practice bulletin no. 115: Vaginal birth after previous cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2010; 116: 450–463.Google Scholar

Rasmussen, SA, Jamieson, DJ, Uyeki, TM. Effects of influenza on pregnant women and infants. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012; 207: S3–8.Google Scholar

Farr, A, Chervenak, FA, McCullough, LB, Baergen, RN, Grünebaum, A. Human placentophagy: a review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2017; 218: 401.e1–11.Google Scholar

Ecker, J. Minkoff home birth: what are physicians’ ethical obligations when patient choices may carry increased risk? Obstet Gynecol 2011; 117: 1179–1182.Google Scholar

Minkoff, H, Ecker, J. A reconsideration of home birth in the United States. J Clin Ethics 2013; 24: 207–214.Google Scholar

Chervenak, FA, McCullough, LB. The unlimited-rights model of obstetric ethics threatens professionalism. BJOG 2017; 124: 1144–1147.Google Scholar

Chervenak, FA, McCullough, LB, Brent, RL. The perils of the imperfect expectation of the perfect baby. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010; 203: 101.e1–101.e5.Google Scholar

Hawthorne, N. The Birth-Mark. 1843. www.online-literature.com/hawthorne/125/ (accessed March 1, 2019).Google Scholar

Chervenak, FA, McCullough, LB. Clinical guides to preventing ethical conflicts between pregnant women and their physicians. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990; 162: 303–307.Google Scholar

Foucault, M. Naissance de la Clinique: une archéologie du régard médical 1963. Translated as The Birth of the Clinic: An Archeology of Medical Perception. Sheridan Smith AM, trans. New York: Pantheon, 1973.Google Scholar

Chervenak, FA, McCullough, LB, Brent, RL. The professional responsibility model of obstetric ethics: avoiding the perils of clashing rights. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011; 205: 315.e1–5.Google Scholar

Brent, RL. Saving lives and changing family histories: appropriate counseling of pregnant women and men and women of reproductive age, concerning the risk of radiation exposures during and before pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009; 200: 4–24.Google Scholar

Brent, RL, Oakley, GP. Triumph or tragedy: the present FDA program of enriching grains with folic acid. Pediatrics 2006; 117: 930–932,Google Scholar

Bell, KN, Oakley, GP Jr. Update on prevention of folic acid-preventable spina bifida and anencephaly. Birth Defects Res (Pt A) 2009; 85: 102–107.Google Scholar

Jones, M. A miracle, and yet. New York Times Magazine. July 15, 2001. www.nytimes.com/2001/07/15/magazine/a-miracle-and-yet.html?scp=1&sq=A%20Miracle,%20and%20Yet&st=cse (accessed March 1, 2019).Google Scholar

Kalish, RB, McCullough, LB, Chervenak, FA. Decision-making about cesarean delivery. Lancet 2006; 367(9514): 883–885.Google Scholar

Brent, RL. Utilization of developmental basic science principles in the evaluation of reproductive risks from pre- and postconception environmental radiation exposures. Paper presented at the Thirty-third Annual Meeting of the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements. The Effects of Pre- and Postconception Exposure to Radiation, April 2–3, 1997, Arlington, Virginia. Teratology 1999; 59: 182–204.Google Scholar

Brent, RL. Environmental causes of human congenital malformations: the pediatrician’s role in dealing with these complex clinical problems caused by a multiplicity of environmental and genetic factors. Pediatrics 2004; 113(4 Suppl.): 957–968.Google Scholar

Brent, RL, Oakley, GP Jr. Commentary: The FDA must require the addition of more folic acid in “enriched” flour and other grains. Pediatrics 2005; 116: 753–755.Google Scholar

Brent, RL. How does the physician avoid prescribing drugs and medical procedures that have reproductive and developmental risks? Medical legal issues in perinatal medicine. Clin Perinatol 2007; 34: 233–262.Google Scholar

Brent, RL. Litigation-produced pain, disease and suffering: an experience with congenital malformation lawsuits. Teratology 1977; 16: 1–14.Google Scholar

Papp, Z and International Academy of Perinatal Medicine. Ethical challenges of genomics for perinatal medicine: the Budapest Declaration. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009; 201: 336.Google Scholar

Lidz, CW, Appelbaum, PS, Grisso, T, Renaud, M. Therapeutic misconception and the appreciation of risks in clinical trials. Soc Sci Med 2004; 58: 1689–1697.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hippocrates. The Art. In WHS Jones, trans. Hippocrates, Vol. I. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Nicolaides, KH, Chervenak, FA, McCullough, LB, Avgidou, K, Papageorghiou, A. Evidence-based obstetric ethics and informed decision-making by pregnant women about invasive diagnosis after first-trimester risk assessment of risk of trisomy 21. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 193: 322–326.Google Scholar

Chervenak, FA, McCullough, LB, Knapp, RC, Caputo, TA, Barber, HRK. A clinically comprehensive ethical framework for offering and recommending cancer treatment before and during pregnancy. Cancer 2004; 100: 215–222.Google Scholar

Jemal, A, Thomas, A, Murray, T, et al: Cancer statistics, 2002. CA, A Cancer Journal for Clinicians 2002; 52: 34–35.Google Scholar

Barber, HRK. Malignant disease in pregnancy. J Perinat Med 29; 2001: 97–106.Google Scholar

Botha, MH, Rajaram, R, Karunaratne, K. Cancer in pregnancy. In J Gynecol Obstet 2018; 143 (Suppl. 2): 137–142.Google Scholar

Salani, R, Billingsley, CC, Crafton, SM. Cancer and pregnancy: an overview for obstetricians and gynecologists. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014; 211: 7–14.Google Scholar

Albright, CM, Wenstrom, KD. Malignancies in pregnancy. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynecol 2016; 33: 2–18.Google Scholar

Thorny, S, McCullough, LB, Chervenak, FA. Ethical and spiritual considerations for treatment decision associated with cancer in pregnancy. Cancer Bull 1994; 5: 391–394.Google Scholar

Sood, AK, Sorosky, JI. Invasive cervical cancer complicating pregnancy. How to manage the dilemma. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 1998; 2: 343–352.Google Scholar

Zemlickis, D, Lishner, M, Degendorfer, P, et al. Maternal and fetal outcome after invasive cervical cancer in pregnancy. J Clin Oncol 1991;9:1956–61.Google Scholar

Berek, J, Hacker, NF, eds. Practical Gynecologic Oncology. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2000.Google Scholar

Weisz, B, Schiff, E, Lishner, M. Cancer in pregnancy: maternal and fetal implications. Hum Reproduct Update 2001; 7: 390–393.Google Scholar

Aulisio, MP. Double effect, principle or doctrine of. In Jennings, B, ed. Encyclopedia of Bioethics, 4th ed. Farmington Hills, MI: Gale, Cengage Learning 2014, 889–894.Google Scholar

McCormick, RA. To save or let die: the dilemma of modern medicine. JAMA 1974; 229: 172–176.Google Scholar

Baker, RB, McCullough, LB. The Cambridge World History of Medical Ethics. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Hippocrates. The Art. In Reiser, SJ, Dyck, AJ, Curran, WJ, eds. Ethics in Medicine: Historical Perspectives and Contemporary Concerns. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1977: 6.Google Scholar

Gregory, J. Lectures on the Duties and Qualifications of a Physician. London: W. Strahan and T. Cadell, 1772. Reprinted in McCullough LB, ed. John Gregory’s Writings on Medical Ethics and the Philosophy of Medicine. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1998: 161–248.Google Scholar

Placencia, FX, McCullough, LB. The history of ethical decision making in neonatal intensive care. J Intensive Care Med 2011; 26: 368–384.Google Scholar

Placencia, FX, McCullough, LB. Biopsychosocial risks of parental care for high-risk neonates: implications for evidence-based parental counseling. J Perinatol 2012; 32: 381–386.Google Scholar

In re Quinlan. 70 N.J. 10; 355 A.2d 647 (1976).Google Scholar

Rabeneck, L, McCullough, LB, Wray, NP. Ethically justified, clinically comprehensive guidelines for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube placement. Lancet 1997; 349: 496–498.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Blackhall, L. Must we always use CPR? N Engl J Med 1987; 317: 1281–1285.Google Scholar

Kon, AA, Shepard, EK, Sederstrom, NO, Swoboda, SM, et al. Defining futile and potentially inappropriate interventions: a policy statement from the Society of Critical Care Medicine Ethics Committee. Crit Care Med 2016; 44: 1679–1774.Google Scholar

McCullough, LB, Jones, JW. Postoperative futility: a clinical algorithm for setting limits. Brit J Surg 2001; 88: 1153–1154.Google Scholar

Saigal, S, Tyson, J. Measurement of quality of life of survivors of neonatal intensive care: critique and implications. Semin Perinatol 2008; 32: 59–66.Google Scholar

Leplège, A, Hunt, S. The problem of quality of life in medicine. JAMA 1997; 278: 47–50.Google Scholar

Consensus statement of the Society of Critical Care Medicine’s Ethics Committee regarding futile and other possibly inadvisable treatments. Crit Care Med 1997; 25: 887–891.Google Scholar

Verhagen, E, Sauer, PJJ. The Groningen Protocol: euthanasia in severely ill newborns. N Engl J Med 2005; 352: 959–962.Google Scholar

Verhagen, AAE, Sol, JJ, Brouwer, OF, Sauer, PJ. Actieve levens-beendiging bij pasgeborenen in Nederland, Een analyse can alle meldingen van 1997–2004. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2005; 149: 183–188.Google Scholar

Chervenak, FA, McCullough, LB, Arabin, B. Why the Groningen Protocol should be rejected. Hastings Cent Rep 2006; 36: 30–33.Google Scholar

Kon, AA. Neonatal euthanasia is unsupportable: the Groningen Protocol should be abandoned. Theor Med Bioeth 2007; 28: 453–463.Google Scholar

Kodish, E. Paediatric ethics: a repudiation of the Groningen Protocol. Lancet 2008; 371: 892–893.Google Scholar

Braun, UK, McCullough, LB. Preventing pathways to life-sustaining treatment by default. Ann Fam Med 2011; 9: 250–256.Google Scholar

Lantos, JD. Ethical problems in decision making in the neonatal ICU. N Engl J Med 2018; 379: 1851–1860.Google Scholar

American Academy of Pediatrics. Committee on Bioethics. Informed consent, parental permission, and assent in pediatric practice. Pediatrics 1995; 95: 314–317.Google Scholar

Katz, AL, Webb, SA. Committee on Bioethics. American Academy of Pediatrics. Informed consent in decision-making in pediatric practice. Pediatrics 2016; 138: pii: e20161485.Google Scholar

Chervenak, FA, McCullough, LB. Justified limits on refusing intervention. Hastings Cent Rep 1991; 21: 12–18.Google Scholar

Brett, A, McCullough, LB. When patients request specific interventions: defining the limits of the physician’s obligations. N Engl J Med 1986; 315: 1347–1351.Google Scholar

Brett, AS, McCullough, LB. Addressing requests by patients for non-beneficial interventions. JAMA 2012; 307: 149–150.Google Scholar

Braun, UK, Beyth, RJ, Ford, ME, McCullough, LB. Voices of African American, Caucasian, and Hispanic surrogates on the burdens of end-of-life decision-making. J Gen Intern Med 2008; 23: 267–274.Google Scholar

Braun, UK, Naik, AD, McCullough, LB. Reconceptualizing the experience of surrogate decision making: reports vs genuine decisions. Ann Fam Med 2009; 7: 249–253.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed