Book contents
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 June 2017
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Carnap, Quine, and Putnam on Methods of Inquiry , pp. 261 - 272Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
Alspector-Kelly, Marc, 2001. “On Quine on Carnap on Ontology,” Philosophical Studies Vol. 102: 93–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Austin, J. L. 1946. “Other Minds,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volumes Vol. 20: 148–187; reprinted in J. L. Austin, Philosophical Papers, 3rd ed., J. O. Urmson and G. J. Warnock (eds.) (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1979), pp. 76–116.Google Scholar
Auxier, R. E., and Hahn, L. E., 2007. The Philosophy of Michael Dummett. La Salle, IL: Open Court.Google Scholar
Baldwin, Thomas, 2006. “Philosophy of Language in the Twentieth Century,” in Lepore, Ernie and Smith, Barry (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Language (Oxford: Oxford University Press 1996), pp. 60–99.Google Scholar
Barrett, Robert, and Gibson, Roger (eds.), 1990. Perspectives on Quine. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Becker, Edward. 2012. The Themes of Quine’s Philosophy: Meaning, Reference, and Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, David and Vossenkuhl, Willhelm (eds.), 1992. Science and Subjectivity: The Vienna Circle and Twentieth Century Philosophy. Berlin: Akademie.Google Scholar
Benacerraf, Paul. 1973. “Mathematical Truth,” Journal of Philosophy Vol. 70, No. 19: pp. 661–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ben-Menahem, Yemima. 2005. “Black, White and Gray: Quine on Conventionalism,” Synthese Vol. 146: 245–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beth, Evert Willem. 1963. “Carnap’s Views on the Advantages of Constructed Systems over Natural Languages in the Philosophy of Science,” in Schilpp 1963, pp. 469–502.Google Scholar
Bird, Graham, 1995. “Internal and External Questions,” Erkenntnis Vol. 42, No. 1: pp. 41–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boër, Stephen E. 1977. “Logical Truth and Indeterminacy,” Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic Vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 85–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boghossian, Paul. 2000. “Knowledge of Logic,” in Boghossian and Peacocke 2000, pp. 229–255.Google Scholar
Boghossian, Paul. 2001. “How Are Objective Reasons Possible?” Philosophical Studies Vol. 106: 1–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boghossian, Paul, and Peacocke, Christopher (eds.), 2000. New Essays on the A Priori. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonjour, Laurence, 1998. In Defense of Pure Reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Boyer, Carl B. 1968. A History of Mathematics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Buldt, Bernd. 2004. “On RC 102-43-14,” in Awodey, Steve and Klein, Carsten (eds.), Carnap Brought Home: The View from Jena (La Salle, IL: Open Court), pp. 225–246.Google Scholar
Burge, Tyler. 1986. “Intellectual Norms and Foundations of Mind,” Journal of Philosophy Vol. 83: pp. 697–720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carnap, Rudolf. 1928. The Logical Structure of the World, 2nd ed., 1967. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Carnap, Rudolf. 1932. “The Elimination of Metaphysics through Logical Analysis of Language,” an English Translation by Arthur Pap of “Überwindung der Metaphysik durch Logische Analyse der Sprache,” in Erkenntnis, Vol. 2 (1932). The Pap translation is published in Ayer, A. J. (ed.), Logical Positivism (Glencoe, IL: The Free Press, 1959), pp. 60–81.Google Scholar
Carnap, Rudolf. 1934. “The Task of the Logic of Science,” an English translation of a paper originally published in German in 1934, in McGuinness, Brian (ed.), Unified Science: The Vienna Circle Monographs Series Originally Edited by Otto Neurath. Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 1987, pp. 46–66.Google Scholar
Carnap, Rudolf. 1935b. “Formal and Factual Science.” First published in German in Erkenntnis 5 (1935); translated and reprinted in Feigl, Herbert and Brodbeck, May (eds.) Readings in the Philosophy of Science (New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1953), pp. 123–128.Google Scholar
Carnap, Rudolf. 1936–1937. “Testability and Meaning,” Parts I and II, from Philosophy of Science Vol. III, 1936, pp. 419–471, and Vol. IV, 1937, pp. 1–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carnap, Rudolf. 1937. The Logical Syntax of Language. An expanded version of what was originally published in German in 1934. Translated by A. Smeaton. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co.Google Scholar
Carnap, Rudolf. 1939. “Foundations of Logic and Mathematics,” Encyclopedia of Unified Science Vol. 1, No. 3, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Carnap, Rudolf. 1942. Introduction to Semantics. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Carnap, Rudolf. 1950. “Empiricism, Semantics, and Ontology,” Revue Internationale de Philosophie Vol. 4: 20–40; reprinted, with changes, in Carnap 1956, pp. 205–221.Google Scholar
Carnap, Rudolf. 1952a. “Quine on Analyticity,” in Creath 1990, pp. 427–432. A transcription and translation of item 102-62-04 in the Rudolf Carnap Collection at the University of Pittsburgh. The manuscript, dated February 3, 1952, is in German shorthand and was transcribed in German by Richard Nollan and translated into English by Richard Creath.Google Scholar
Carnap, Rudolf. 1952b. “Meaning Postulates,” Philosophical Studies Vol. 3: 65–73; reprinted in Carnap 1956, pp. 222–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carnap, Rudolf. 1956. Meaning and Necessity, 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Carnap, Rudolf. 1958. Introduction to Symbolic Logic and its Applications. Toronto: Dover.Google Scholar
Carnap, Rudolf. 1963b. “E. W. Beth on Constructed Language Systems,” in Schilpp 1963, pp. 927–933.Google Scholar
Carroll, Lewis 1895. ‘What the Tortoise Said to Achilles’, Mind Vol. 4, No. 14: 278–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chalmers, David 2011.“Revisability and Conceptual Change in ‘Two Dogmas of Empiricism’,” Journal of Philosophy Vol. 108, No. 8: 387–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coffa, J. Alberto. 1991. The Semantic Tradition from Kant to Carnap: To the Vienna Station. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Creath, Richard. 2007. “Quine’s Challenge to Carnap,” in Creath and Friedman 2007, pp. 316–335.Google Scholar
Creath, Richard. 1990. Dear Carnap, Dear Van: the Quine-Carnap Correspondence and Related Work. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Creath, Richard, and Friedman, Michael (eds.), 2007. The Cambridge Companion to Carnap. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
David, Marian. 1994. Correspondence and Disquotation: An Essay on the Nature of Truth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, Donald, 1990. “Meaning, Truth, and Evidence,” in Barrett and Gibson 1990, pp. 68–79.Google Scholar
Davidson, Donald, and Hintikaa, Jaakko (eds.), 1969. Words and Objections. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.Google Scholar
Deckert, Marion 1973. “Strawson and Logical Truth,” Philosophical Studies Vol. 24, No. 1: 52–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dummett, Michael, 1978. “The Justification of Deduction,” in Dummett, Michael, Truth and Other Enigmas (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1978), 290–318.Google Scholar
Dummett, Michael, 1981. Frege: Philosophy of Language, 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Dummett, Michael, 1993. “Wittgenstein on Necessity: Some Reflections,” in Dummett, Michael, The Seas of Language (New York: Oxford University Press, 1993), pp. 446–461.Google Scholar
Dummett, Michael, 2007. “Reply to Brian McGuinness,” in Auxier and Hahn 2007, pp. 51–54.Google Scholar
Earman, John, 1992. Bayes or Bust? A Critical Examination of Bayesian Confirmation Theory, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Ebbs, Gary. 1992. “Realism and Rational Inquiry,” Philosophical Topics, vol. 20 (1992): 1–33.Google Scholar
Ebbs, Gary. 1997. Rule-Following and Realism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ebbs, Gary. 2000. “The Very Idea of Sameness of Extension across Time,” American Philosophical Quarterly Vol. 27: 245–268.Google Scholar
Ebbs, Gary. 2003. “A Puzzle about Doubt,” in Nuccetelli, S. (ed.), New Essays on Semantic Externalism and Self-Knowledge (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press), pp. 143–168.Google Scholar
Ebbs, Gary. 2015. “Satisfying Predicates: Kleene’s Proof of the Hilbert-Bernays Theorem,” History and Philosophy of Logic Vol. 36, No. 4: 346–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Etchemendy, John, 1990. The Concept of Logical Consequence. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Etchemendy, John, 2008. “Reflections on Consequence,” in Patterson, Douglas (ed.), New Essays on Tarski and Philosophy (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 263–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enderton, Herbert B. 1972. A Mathematical Introduction to Logic. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Feferman, Solomon. 1993. “Why a Little Bit Goes a Long Way: Logical Foundations of Scientifically Applicable Mathematics,” first published in PSA 1992, Vol. 2 (1993): 442–455; reprinted in Solomon Feferman, In the Light of Logic (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998), pp. 284–298.Google Scholar
Field, Hartry, 1977. “Logic, Meaning, and Conceptual Role,” Journal of Philosophy Vol. 74: 379–409.Google Scholar
Field, Hartry, 1994. “Deflationist Views of Meaning and Content,” Mind Vol. 103: 249–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foley, Richard, 1992. “The Epistemology of Belief and the Epistemology of Degrees of Belief,” American Philosophical Quarterly Vol. 29, No. 2: 111–121.Google Scholar
Frege, Gottlob. 1893. Grundgesetze Der Arithmetik, vol. I. Jena: Verlag von Hermann Pohle. Translated into English and edited by Philip A. Ebert and Marcus Rossberg, in Basic Laws of Arithmetic, vols. I and II (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Frege, Gottlob. 1902 “Letter to Russell, 22.6.1902. Extract,” in Beaney, Michael (ed.), The Frege Reader (Oxford: Blackwell, 1997), pp. 253–254.Google Scholar
Frege, Gottlob. 1903. Grundgesetze Der Arithmetik, vol. II. Jena: Verlag von Hermann Pohle, 1903. Translated into English and edited by Philip A. Ebert & Marcus Rossberg, in Basic Laws of Arithmetic, vols. I and II (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Frege, Gottlob. 1914. “Logic in Mathematics,” translated by Peter Long and Roger White, in Hermes, H., Kambartel, F., and Kaulback, F. (eds.), Gottlob Frege: Posthumous Writings (Chicago: Chicago University press, 1979), pp. 203–250.Google Scholar
Friedman, Michael. 1988. “Logical Truth and Analyticity in Carnap’s Logical Syntax of Language,” in Asprey, W. and Kitcher, P. (eds.), History and Philosophy of Modern Mathematics (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press), 82–94. Reprinted as “Analytic Truth in Carnap’s Logical Syntax of Language,” in Friedman 1999b, pp. 165–176.Google Scholar
Friedman, Michael. 1999a. “Tolerance and Analyticity in Carnap’s Philosophy of Mathematics,” in Friedman 1999b, 198–233.Google Scholar
Friedman, Michael. 1999b. Reconsidering Logical Positivism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, Michael. 2007a. “Coordination, Constitution, and Convention: The Evolution of the A Priori in Logical Empiricism,” in Richardson, Alan and Uebel, Thomas (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Logical Empiricism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 91–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, Michael. 2007b. “Introduction: Carnap’s Revolution in Philosophy,” in Creath and Friedman 2007, pp. 1–18.Google Scholar
Frost-Arnold, Greg. 2013. Carnap, Tarski, and Quine at Harvard: Conversations on Logic, Mathematics, and Science. Chicago: Open Court.Google Scholar
George, Alexander, 2000. “On Washing the Fur without Wetting It: Quine, Carnap, and Analyticity,” Mind Vol. 109: pp. 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gergonne, Joseph Diaz, 1818. “Essai sur la Théorie des Définitions,” Annales de Mathematiques Pure et Appliquees, Vol. 9: pp. 1–35.Google Scholar
Giere, Ronald, and Richardson, Alan (eds.), 1996. Origins of Logical Empiricism: Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. 16. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Gödel, Kurt. 1947. “What is Cantor’s Continuum Problem?” First published in American Mathematical Monthly Vol. 54: pp. 515–525, 1947; reprinted in Paul Benacerraf and Hilary Putnam (eds.), Philosophy of Mathematics: Selected Readings (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press) pp. 470–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gödel, Kurt. 1995. “Is Mathematics Syntax of Language?,” Versions III and V, in Feferman, Solomon, Dawson, John W., Goldfarb, Warren, Parsons, Charles, and Solovay, Robert N. (eds.), Kurt Gödel, Collected Works, vol. III (Oxford: Clarendon Press) pp. 334–362.Google Scholar
Goldfarb, Warren. 1983. “I Want You to Bring Me a Slab: Remarks on the Opening Sections of the Philosophical Investigations,” Synthese Vol. 56, No. 3 (September 1983): 265–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldfarb, Warren. 1995. Introductory note to Gödel, ‘Is Mathematics Syntax of Language?’ Versions III and V, Gödel, K. 1995: 324–333.Google Scholar
Goldfarb, Warren. 1996. “The Philosophy of Mathematics in Early Positivism,” in Giere and Richardson, 1996, pp. 213–230.Google Scholar
Goldfarb, Warren, and Ricketts, Thomas, 1992. “Carnap’s Philosophy of Mathematics,” in Bell and Vossenkuhl 1992, pp. 61–78.Google Scholar
Gottlieb, Dale. 1974. “Foundations of Logical Theory,” American Philosophical Quarterly Vol. 11, No. 4: pp. 337–343Google Scholar
Grice, H. P. and Strawson, P. F., 1956. “In Defense of a Dogma,” Philosophical Review Vol. 65, No. 2: 141–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gupta, A. 1993. “A Critique of Deflationism,” Philosophical Topics Vol. 21, No. 2: 57–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hacking, Ian, 1990. “Probability,” in Eatwell, J., Milgate, M., and Newman, P., The New Palgrave: Utility and Probability (New York: Macmillan Press, 1990), pp. 163–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hahn, Lewis E., and Schilpp, Paul A. (eds.), 1986. The Philosophy of W. V. Quine. La Salle, IL: Open Court.Google Scholar
Harman, Gilbert. 1967. “Quine on Meaning and Existence. I. The Death of Meaning,” Review of Metaphysics Vol. 21, No. 1: 124–151.Google Scholar
Harman, Gilbert 1974. “Meaning and Semantics,” first published in Munitz, Mildton K. and Unger, Peter K. (eds.), Semantics and Philosophy (New York: New York University Pres, 1974), pp. 1–16; reprinted, with changes, in Harman 1999, pp. 192–205Google Scholar
Harman, Gilbert 1976. “Inferential Justification,” Journal of Philosophy Vol. 73, No. 17: 570–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harman, Gilbert 1994. “Doubts about Conceptual Analysis,” first published in Michael, M. and O’Leary-Hawthorne, J. (eds.), Philosophy and Mind: The Place of Philosophy in the Study of Mind (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1994), pp. 43–48; reprinted, with changes, in Harman 1999, pp. 138–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hylton, Peter. 1982. “Analyticity and Indeterminacy of Translation,” Synthese Vol. 52: pp. 167–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Isaacson, Daniel. 1992. “Carnap, Quine, and Logical Truth,” in Bell and Vossenkuhl 1992, pp. 100–130.Google Scholar
Johnsen, Bredo, 2005. “How to Read ‘Epistemology Naturalized’,” Journal of Philosophy Vol. 102, No. 2: 78–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Jaegwon, 1988. “What Is ‘Naturalized Epistemology?’,” Philosophical Perspectives Vol. 2: 381–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kripke, Saul, 1976. “Is There a Problem about Substitutional Quantification?” in Evans, G. and McDowell, J. (eds.), Truth and Meaning: Essays in Semantics (Oxford: Clarendon Press), pp. 325–417.Google Scholar
Kripke, Saul, 1982. Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Language: An Elementary Exposition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Koppelberg, Dirk, 1990. “Why and How to Naturalize Epistemology,” in Barrett and Gibson 1990, pp. 200–211.Google Scholar
Lavers, Gregory. 2015. “Carnap, Quine, Quantification and Ontology,” in Torza, A., (ed.), Quantifiers, Quantifiers, and Quantifiers: Themes in Logic, Metaphysics and Language (Berlin: Springer, 2015), pp. 271–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lepore, Ernie, and Ludwig, Kirk, 2005. Donald Davidson: Meaning, Truth, Language, and Reality. New York: Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levi, Issac. 1980. The Enterprise of Knowledge: An Essay on Knowledge, Credal Probability, and Chance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Lewis, David. 1969. Convention: A Philosophical Study. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lindley, D. V. 1982. “The Well-Calibrated Bayesian: Comment,” Journal of the American Statistical Association Vol. 77, No. 379 (1982): 611–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lycan, William. 1991. “Definition in a Quinean World,” in Fetzer, J. H., Shatz, D. and Schlesinger, G. (eds.), Definitions and Definability: Philosophical Perspectives (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers), pp. 111–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maddy, Penelope. 2007. Second Philosophy: A Naturalistic Method. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mancosu, Paulo. 2005. “Harvard 1940–1941: Tarski, Carnap and Quine on a Finitistic Language of Mathematics for science,” History and Philosophy of Logic Vol. 26: 327–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mancosu, Paulo (ed.), 2008. The Philosophy of Mathematical Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mates, Benson. 1951 “Analytic Sentences,” Philosophical Review Vol. 60. 525–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDowell, John, 1984 “Wittgenstein on Following a Rule,” Synthese Vol. 58 No. 3: 325–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, G. E. 1939. “Proof of an External World.” First published in Proceedings of the British Academy Vol. 25 (1939): 273–300; reprinted in Thomas Baldwin (ed.), G. E. Moore: Selected Writings (London: Routledge, 1993), pp. 147–170.Google Scholar
Morton, Adam. 1973. “Denying the Doctrine and Changing the Subject,” Journal of Philosophy Vol. 70. 503–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parsons, Charles. 1995. “Platonism and Mathematical Intuition in Kurt Gödel’s Thought,” Bulletin of Symbolic Logic Vol. 1, No. 1: 44–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peacocke, Christopher, 2000. “Explaining the A Priori: The Programme of Moderate Rationalism,” in Boghossian and Peacocke 2000, pp. 255–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, Hilary. 1962a. “It Ain’t Necessarily So,” reprinted in Putnam 1975b, pp. 237–249.Google Scholar
Putnam, Hilary. 1962b. “The Analytic and the Synthetic,” reprinted in Putnam 1975c, pp. 33–69.Google Scholar
Putnam, Hilary. 1971. Philosophy of Logic. First published by Harper and Row; reprinted in Hilary Putnam 1975b, pp. 323–357.Google Scholar
Putnam, Hilary. 1973. “Explanation and Reference,” first published in Pearce, G. and Maynard, P. (eds.), Conceptual Change (Dordrecht: Reidel, 1973), pp. 199–221; reprinted in Putnam 1975c, pp. 196–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, Hilary. 1975a. “The Meaning of ‘Meaning’,” reprinted in Putnam 1975c, pp. 215–271.Google Scholar
Putnam, Hilary. 1975b. Mathematics, Matter, and Method: Philosophical Papers, vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Putnam, Hilary. 1975c. Mind, Language, and Reality: Philosophical Papers, vol. 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, Hilary. 1978. “Reference and Understanding,” in Putnam, Hilary, Meaning and the Moral Sciences (London: Routledge and Kegal Paul), pp. 97–119.Google Scholar
Putnam, Hilary. 1979. ‘Analyticity and Apriority: Beyond Wittgenstein and Quine’, first published in French, P. et al (eds.), Midwest Studies in Philosophy, vol. IV (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press); reprinted in Putnam 1983c, pp. 115–138.Google Scholar
Putnam, Hilary. 1983b. “There is at Least One A Priori Truth,” in Putnam 1983c, pp. 98–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, Hilary. 1983c. Realism and Reason: Philosophical Papers, vol. 3. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, Hilary. 1983d. “On Truth”, first published in Cauman, Leigh S., Levi, Issac, Parsons, Charles, and Schwartz, Robert (eds.), How Many Questions? Essays in Honor of Sidney Morgenbesser (Indianapolis: Hackett); reprinted in Putnam 1994a, pp. 315–329.Google Scholar
Putnam, Hilary. 1985. “A Comparison of Something With Something Else,” first published in New Literary History Vol. 17: 61–79; reprinted in Putnam 1994a, pp. 330–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, Hilary. 1991. “Does the Disquotational Theory of Truth Solve All Philosophical Problems?” first published in Metaphilosophy Vol. 22, Nos. 1–2: pp. 1–13; reprinted in Putnam 1994a, pp. 264–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, Hilary. 1994a. Words and Life, edited by Conant, James. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Putnam, Hilary. 1994b. “The Dewey Lectures 1994: Sense, Nonsense, and the Senses: An Inquiry into the Powers of the Human Mind,” Journal of Philosophy Vol. 91, No. 9: pp. 445–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, Hilary. 1994c. “Rethinking Mathematical Necessity,” in Putnam 1994a, pp. 245–263.Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. 1934. “Lectures on Carnap at Harvard University, November 8–22, 1934,” in Creath, Richard (ed.), Dear Carnap, Dear Van: The Quine-Carnap Correspondence and Related Work (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1990), pp. 47–103.Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. 1936. “Truth by Convention,” first published in Lee, O. H. (ed.), Philosophical Essays for A. N. Whitehead. New York: Longmans; reprinted in Quine 1976, pp. 77–106.Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. 1940. Mathematical Logic, revised ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1951. First ed. published in 1940 by Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. 1949. “Animadversions on the Notion of Meaning,” in Quine, W. V., Confessions of a Confirmed Extensionalist and Other Essays (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2008), pp. 152–156.Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. 1951. “On Carnap’s Views on Ontology,” Philosophical Studies Vol. 2, No. 5: 65–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quine, W. V. 1952. “On an Application of Tarski’s Theory of Truth.” First published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Vol. 38: pp. 430–433; reprinted in W. V. Quine, Selected Logic Papers, enlarged ed. (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1995), pp. 141–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quine, W. V. 1953a. “On What There Is,” Review of Metaphysics Vol. 2 (1948): 21–38; reprinted in Quine 1953e, pp. 1–19.Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. 1953d. “Mr. Strawson on Logical Theory.” First published in Mind Vol. 62, No. 48 (1953): 433–451, reprinted in Quine 1976, pp. 136–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quine, W. V. 1953e. From a Logical Point of View. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. 1963b. Set Theory and Its Logic. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quine, W. V. 1969e. Ontological Relativity and Other Essays. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quine, W. V. 1971. “Homage to Carnap.” First published in Buck, Roger C. and Cohen, Robert S. (eds.), Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 8 (Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 1971); reprinted in Creath 1990, pp. 463–466.Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. 1975. “The Nature of Natural Knowledge,” in Guttenplan, Samuel (ed.), Mind and Language (Oxford: Clarendon Press), pp. 67–81.Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. 1976. The Ways of Paradox, revised and enlarged ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. 1981. “Things and Their Place in Theories,” in Quine, W. V., Theories and Things (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1981), pp. 1–23.Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. 1986b. “Reply to Herbert G. Bohnert,” in Hahn and Schilpp 1986, pp. 93–5.Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. 1986c. “Reply to Geoffrey Hellman,” in Hahn and Schilpp 1986, pp. 206–208.Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. 1986d. “Reply to Charles Parsons,” in Hahn and Schilpp 1986, pp. 396–403.Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. 1986f. Philosophy of Logic, 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. 1991. “Two Dogmas in Retrospect,” first published in Canadian Journal of Philosophy Vol. 21; reprinted in Quine 2008, pp. 390–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quine, W. V. 1992. Pursuit of Truth, rev. ed., Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. 1994. “Exchange between Donald Davidson and W. V. Quine following Davidson’s lecture,” Theoria 60: pp. 226–231.Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. 1995. From Stimulus to Science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quine, W. V. 2008. Confessions of a Confirmed Extensionalist and Other Essays, edited by Follesdal, Daginn and Quine, Douglas B.. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reichenbach, Hans, 1958. The Philosophy of Space and Time. Maria Reichenbach and John Freund, translators. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Richardson, Alan. 1996. “From Epistemology to the Logic of Science,” in Giere and Richardson 1996, pp. 309–330.Google Scholar
Ricketts, Thomas. 1982. “Rationality, Translation, and Epistemology Naturalized,” Journal of Philosophy Vol. 79: pp. 117–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, Alan. 1994. “Carnap’s Principle of Tolerance, Empiricism, and Conventionalism,” in Clark, P. and Hale, B. (eds.), Reading Putnam (Oxford: Blackwell), pp. 176–200.Google Scholar
Richardson, Alan. 1996. “Carnap: from Logical Syntax to Semantics,” in Giere and Richardson 1996, pp. 231–250.Google Scholar
Richardson, Alan. 2009. “From Tolerance to Reciprocal Containment,” in Wagner 2009, pp. 217–235.Google Scholar
Richardson, Alan. 1997. “Two Dogmas about Logical Empiricism: Carnap and Quine on Logic, Epistemology, and Empiricism,” Philosophical Topics Vol. 25: pp. 145–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, Alan. 1998. Carnap’s Construction of the World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Richardson, Alan. 2007. “Carnapian Pragmatism,” in Creath and Friedman 2007, pp. 295–315.Google Scholar
Richardson, Alan, and Uebel, Thomas (eds.) 2007. The Cambridge Companion to Logical Empiricism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosen, Gideon. 1999. Review of Penelope Maddy, Naturalism in Mathematics. British Journal of the Philosophy of Science Vol. 50: pp. 467–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, Bertrand. 1903. The Principles of Mathematics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Russell, Gillian. 2014. “Quine on the Analytic/Synthetic Distinction,” in Harman, G. and Lepore, E. (eds.), A Companion to W. V. O. Quine (Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell), pp. 181–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarkar, Sahotr. 1992. “‘The Boundless Ocean of Unlimited Possibilites’: Logic in Carnap’s Logical Syntax of Language,” Synthese Vol. 93: pp. 191–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savage, Leonard J. 1967. “Difficulties in the Theory of Personal Probability,” Philosophy of Science Vol. 34, No. 4: 305–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sayward, Charles 1975. “The Province of Logic,” Analysis Vol. 36, No. 1, pp. 47–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scanlan, Michael. 1991. “Who Were the American Postulate Theorists?” Journal of Symbolic Logic Vol. 56: pp. 981–1002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schilpp, Paul A. (ed.), 1963. The Philosophy of Rudolf Carnap. La Salle, IL: Open Court.Google Scholar
Searle, John R., 1987. “Indeterminacy, Empiricism, and the First Person,” Journal of Philosophy Vol. 84, No. 3: 123–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seidenfeld, Teddy, Schervish, Mark J., and Kadane, Joseph B., 2012. “What Kind of Uncertainty Is That? Using Personal Probability for Expressing One’s Thinking about Logical and Mathematical Propositions,” Journal of Philosophy Vol. 109, No. 12: 516–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapere, Dudley. 1969. “Towards a Post-Positivistic Interpretation of Science,” in Achinstein, P. and Barker, S. (eds.), The Legacy of Logical Positivism (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press), pp. 115–160.Google Scholar
Sklar, Laurence, 1974. Space, Time, and Spacetime. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Shimony, Abner. 1970. “Scientific Inference,” in Colodny, R. G. (ed.), The Nature and Function of Scientific Theories (Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press), pp. 79–172.Google Scholar
Soames, Scott. 1984. “What Is a Theory of Truth?” Journal of Philosophy Vol. 81: pp. 411–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soames, Scott. 2003. Philosophical Analysis in the Twentieth Century, Vol. 1: The Dawn of Analysis. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Soames, Scott. 2009. “Ontology, Analyticity, and Meaning: the Quine-Carnap Dispute,” in Chalmers, David j., Manley, David and Wasserman, Ryan (eds.), Metametaphysics: New Essays on the Foundations of Ontology (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009), pp. 424–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strawson, P. F. 1950a. “Truth,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volumes Vol. 24: 129–156; reprinted in Strawson 1971, pp. 190–213.Google Scholar
Strawson, P. F. 1950b. “On Referring,” first published in Mind Vol. 59, No. 235: 320–344; reprinted in Strawson 1971, pp. 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strawson, P. F. 1957. “Propositions, Concepts, and Logical Truths,” Philosophical Quarterly Vol. 7, no. 26: pp. 15–25; reprinted in Strawson 1971, pp. 116–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stroud, Barry. 1969. “Conventionalism and the Indeterminacy of Translation,” in Davidson and Hintikaa 1969, pp. 82–96.Google Scholar
Stroud, Barry. 1984a. “Skepticism and the Possibility of Knowledge,” Journal of Philosophy Vol. 81, No. 10: 545–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stroud, Barry. 1984b. The Significance of Philosophical Scepticism. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stroud, Barry. 2000. “Quine on Exile and Acquiescence,” first published in Leonardi, P. and Santambrogio, M. (eds.), On Quine (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995), pp. 37–52; reprinted in Barry Stround, Meaning, Understanding, and Practice (New York: Oxford, 2000), pp. 151–169.Google Scholar
Talbott, William, 2015. “Bayesian Epistemology,” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2015 ed.) Edward M. Zalta (ed.), URL: <http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2015/entries/epistemology-bayesian>Google Scholar
Tarski, Alfred. 1936. “The Concept of Truth in Formalized Languages,” in Tarski, Alfred, Logic, Semantics, Meta-Mathematics: Papers from 1923 to 1938, 2nd ed., translated by J. H. Woodger, edited by John Corcoran (Indianapolis: Hackett, 1983), pp. 152–277.Google Scholar
Tarski, Alfred. 1941. Introduction to Logic and to the Methodology of Deductive Sciences. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wagner, Pierre (ed.), 2009. Carnap’s Logical Syntax of Language. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, Timothy. 2007. The Philosophy of Philosophy. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1921. Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. First published in German in Annalen der Naturphilosophie, 1921. Translated by D. F. Pears and B. F. McGuinness. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1961.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1968. Philosophical Investigations, 3rd ed., translated by G. E. M. Anscombe. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1969. On Certainty, edited by Anscombe, G. E. M. and von Wright, G. H. (Oxford: Basil Backwell, 1969).Google Scholar
Yablo, Stephen, 1998. “Does Semantics Rest on a Mistake?” in Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society Supplementary Vol. 72: 229–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar