Masao, Abe. 1989. Zen and Western Thought. Ed. LaFleur, W. R.. University of Hawai‘i Press.Google Scholar

Achinstein, P. 1983. The Nature of Explanation. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Achinstein, P. 1991. Particles and Waves: Historical Essays in the Philosophy of Science. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Achinstein, P. (ed.). 2005. Scientific Evidence: Philosophical Theories and Applications. Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Achterhuis, H. 2001. American Philosophy of Technology: The Empirical Turn. Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Adams, M. M. 1999. Horrendous Evils and the Goodness of God. Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Adams, R. 1976. “Motive utilitarianism,” Journal of Philosophy 73:467–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adams, R. 2006. A Theory of Virtue: Excellence in Being for the Good. Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adorno, T. W. 1973 [1964]. The Jargon of Authenticity. Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar

Adorno, T. W. 1973 [1966]. Negative Dialectics. Trans. Ashton, E. B.. Routledge.Google Scholar

Adorno, T. W. 1998. Critical Models: Interventions and Catchwords. Trans. Pickford, H. W.. Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Adorno, T. W. and Becker, H.. 1999. “Education for maturity and responsibility,” History of the Human Sciences 12(3):21–34. Trans. R. French, J. Thomas, and D. Weymann.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adorno, T. W. and Horkheimer, M.. 1944. Dialectic of Enlightenment: Philosophical Fragments. Published in book form 1947; ed. Noerr, G. S., trans. Jephcott, E.. Stanford University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Agamben, G. 1999. Remnants of Auschwitz: The Witness and the Archive. Zone Books.Google Scholar

Ahmed, L. 1992. Women and Gender in Islam: Historical Roots of a Modern Debate. Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Albert, D. 2000. Time and Chance. Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alcoff, L. 1999. “Toward a phenomenology of racial embodiment,” Radical Philosophy 95:15–26.Google Scholar

Alexander, M. 2012. The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness. The New Press.Google Scholar

al-Hibri, A. 1999. “Is Western patriarchal feminism good for third world/minority women?” in, as reply to Okin, S. (author), Is Multiculturalism Bad for Women? Princeton University Press, 41–6.Google Scholar

Alicke, M., Rose, D., and Bloom, D.. 2011. “Causation, norm violation, and culpable control,” Journal of Philosophy 108(12):670–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Allen, W. S. 1966 [1957]. “On the linguistic study of languages,” in Strevens, P. D. (ed.), Five Inaugural Lectures. Oxford University Press, 3–26.Google Scholar

Allhoff, F. (ed.). 2007. Wine and Philosophy: A Symposium on Thinking and Drinking. Wiley.Google Scholar

Allhoff, F. and Adams, M. P. (eds.). 2009. Whiskey and Philosophy: A Small Batch of Spirited Ideas. Wiley.Google Scholar

Allison, H. 1990. Kant’s Theory of Freedom. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Allison, H. 2011. Kant’s Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals: A Commentary. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alpyagil, R. 2014. “Virtue in Islam,” in van Hooft, S. (ed.), Handbook of Virtue Ethics. Routledge, 318–27.Google Scholar

Alston, W. P. 1955. “Pragmatism and the verifiability theory of meaning,” Philosophical Studies 6:65–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alston, W. P. 1991. Perceiving God: The Epistemology of Religious Experience. Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Alvarez, M. 2010. Kinds of Reasons. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alvarez, M. and Hyman, J.. 1998. “Agents and their actions,” Philosophy 73:219–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Améry, J. 1966. At the Mind’s Limits: Contemplations by a Survivor on Auschwitz and its Realities. Trans. Sidney and Rosenfeld, Stella P.. Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Ames, R. 2011. Confucian Role Ethics: A Vocabulary. University of Hawai‘i Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anderson, A. and Belnap, N.. 1975. Entailment: The Logic of Relevance and Necessity, vol. 1. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Anderson, E. 2006. “The epistemology of democracy,” Episteme: A Journal of Social Epistemology 3(1–2):8–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Angle, S. C. and Slote, M. (eds.). 2013. Virtue Ethics and Confucianism. Routledge.Google Scholar

Ankersmit, F. R. 1983. Narrative Logic: A Semantic Analysis of the Historian’s Language. Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar

Ankersmit, F. R. 2001. Historical Representation. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Ankersmit, F. R. 2007. “Danto’s philosophy of history in retrospective,” in Danto 2007: 364–93; also in Journal of the Philosophy of History 3(2):109–45.Google Scholar

Ankersmit, F. R. 2009. “Narrative and interpretation,” in Tucker 2009: 199–208.Google Scholar

Ankersmit, F., Bevir, M., Roth, P., Tucker, A., and Wylie, A.. 2007. “The philosophy of history: an agenda,” Journal of the Philosophy of History 1(1):1–9.Google Scholar

Ankersmit, F. and Kellner, H. (eds.). 1995. A New Philosophy of History. Reaktion Books.Google Scholar

Annas, J. 1993. The Morality of Happiness. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Annas, J. 2011. Intelligent Virtue. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Annas, J. 2014. “Why virtue ethics does not have a problem with right action,” in Timmons, M. (ed.), Oxford Studies in Normative Ethics, vol. 4. Oxford University Press, 13–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anon. 1949. Notes on a discussion on “The mind and the computing machine,” at the Manchester Philosophy Seminar 27 October. Written by a member of the Philosophy Department.Google Scholar

Anscombe, G. E. M. 1957. Intention. Blackwell.Google Scholar

Anscombe, G. E. M. 1958. “Modern moral philosophy,” Philosophy 33(124):1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anscombe, G. E. M. 1974. “Comment on Professor R. L. Gregory’s paper,” in Brown, Stuart C. (ed.), Philosophy of Psychology. Macmillan, 211–20, 235ff, 243ff.Google Scholar

Anscombe, G. E. M. 1979. “Under a description,” Noûs 13:219–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anscombe, G. E. M. 1989. “Von Wright on practical inference,” in Schlipp, P. A. and Hahn, L. E. (eds.), The Philosophy of Georg Henrik Von Wright. Open Court, 377–404.Google Scholar

Antognazza, M. R. 2015. “The benefit to philosophy of the study of its history,” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 23(1):161–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Antony, L. 2008. “Meta-linguistics: methodology and ontology in Devitt’s Ignorance of Language,” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 86(4):643–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Antony, L. 2016. “Things oughta make sense,” Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 90:21–39.Google Scholar

Antony, L. and Hornstein, N. (eds.). 2003. Chomsky and His Critics. Blackwell.Google Scholar

Apel, K.-O. 1980. “The apriori of the communication community and the foundation of ethics,” in Toward a Transformation of Philosophy. Trans. Adey, G. and Frisby, D.. Routledge & Kegan Paul, 225–300.Google Scholar

Apel, K.-O. 1990. “Is ethics of the ideal communication community a Utopia? On the relationship between ethics, Utopia, and the critique of Utopia,” in Benhabib, S. and Dallmary, F. (eds.), The Communicative Ethics Controversy. The MIT Press, 23–59.Google Scholar

Apel, K.-O. et al. 1981 [1971]. Hermeneutik und Ideologiekritik. Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

Apple, M. 2004a. “Race and the politics of educational reform,” in Olssen, M. (ed.), Culture and Learning: Access and Opportunity in the Classroom. Information Age, 299–313.Google Scholar

Apple, M. 2004b. “Creating difference: neo-Liberalism, neo-Conservatism and the politics of educational reform,” Educational Policy 18(1):18–44.Google Scholar

Applebaum, B. 2003. “Social justice, democratic education and the silencing of words that wound,” Journal of Moral Education 32(2):151–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aquinas, Thomas. 1964–73. Summa Theologiae. Blackfriars.Google Scholar

Aquinas, Thomas. 1964. Sententia Libri Ethicorum: Commentary on the Nicomachean Ethics, 2 vols. Trans. Litzinger, C. I.. Library of Living Catholic Thought. Regnery.Google Scholar

Åqvist, L. 1973. “Modal logic with subjunctive conditionals and dispositional predicates,” Journal of Philosophical Logic 1:1–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Archambault, R. D. (ed.). 1965. Philosophical Analysis and Education. Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Arendt, H. 1977. Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil. Penguin Books.Google Scholar

Arendt, H. 2008. “The history of a great crime,” in Kahn, J. (ed.), The Jewish Writings. Schocken, 453–61. Originally published in Commentary, March 1952.Google Scholar

Aristotle, . 2000. Nicomachean Ethics. Ed. Crisp, Roger. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Armstrong, D. M. 1968. A Materialist Theory of the Mind. Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Armstrong, D. M. 1978. “Naturalism, materialism and first philosophy,” Philosophia 8(2–3):261–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Armstrong, D. M. 1985. What Is a Law of Nature? Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Armstrong, D. M. 1989. Universals: An Opinionated Introduction. Westview Press.Google Scholar

Armstrong, D. M. 1993 [1968]. A Materialist Theory of Mind, revised edition. Routledge.Google Scholar

Armstrong, D. M. 1997. A World of States of Affairs. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Armstrong, D. M. 1999. The Mind–Body Problem: An Opinionated Introduction. Westview Press.Google Scholar

Armstrong, D. M. 2004. Truth and Truthmakers. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arneson, R. 2000. “Perfectionism and politics,” Ethics 111:37–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arneson, R. 2005. “Sophisticated rule consequentialism: some simple objections,” Philosophical Issues 15:235–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arnold, D. 2005. Buddhists, Brahmins, and Belief. Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Arnold, D. 2009. “Svasaṃvitti as methodological solipsism: ‘narrow content’ and the problem of intentionality in Buddhist philosophy of mind,” in D’Amato, M., Garfield, J. L., and Tillemans, T. J. F. (eds.), Pointing at the Moon: Buddhism, Logic, Analytic Philosophy. Oxford University Press, 135–59.Google Scholar

Arnold, D. 2012. Brains, Buddhas, and Believing: The Problem of Intentionality in Classical Buddhist and Cognitive-Scientific Philosophy of Mind. Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Arnsperger, C. and Picavet, E. B.. 2004. “More than modus vivendi, less than overlapping consensus: towards a political theory of social compromise,” Social Science Information 43:167–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arp, K. 2012. “Simone de Beauvoir’s existentialism: freedom and ambiguity in the human world,” in Crowell 2012a: 252–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aschheim, S. 1992. The Nietzsche Legacy in Germany, 1890–1990. University of California Press.Google Scholar

Audi, P. 2012a. “A clarification and defense of the notion of grounding,” in Correia, F. and Schneiders, B. (eds.), Metaphysical Grounding: Understanding the Structure of Reality. Cambridge University Press, 101–21Google Scholar

Audi, P. 2012b. “Grounding: toward a theory of the in-virtue-of relation,” Journal of Philosophy 109(1):685–711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Audi, R. and Wainwright, W. J. (eds.). 1986. Rationality, Religious Belief, and Moral Commitment: New Essays in the Philosophy of Religion. Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Augustine, . 1998. The City of God against the Pagans. Ed. and trans. Dyson, R. W.. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Augustine, . 2010. On the Free Choice of the Will, On Grace and Free Choice, and Other Writings. Ed. and trans. King, Peter. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Aune, B. 1979. Kant’s Theory of Morals. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Aurobindo, . 1942. The Life Divine. Lotus Press.Google Scholar

Austin, John L. 1961. “Other minds,” in John L. Austin, Philosophical Papers. Ed. Urmson, J. O. and Warnock, G. J.. Clarendon Press, 76–116.Google Scholar

Austin, John L. 1962. Sense and Sensibilia. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Austin, John L. 1975 [1962]. How to Do Things with Words. Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Austin, John L. 1979. Philosophical Papers, 3rd edition. Ed. Urmson, J. O. and Warnock, G. J.. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Auxier, R., Anderson, D. R., and Hahn, L. E.. 2015. The Philosophy of Hilary Putnam. Open Court.Google Scholar

Ayer, A. J. 1936. Language, Truth, and Logic. Gollancz.Google Scholar

Ayer, A. J. 1952. Language, Truth, and Logic, 2nd (revised) edition. Dover.Google Scholar

Ayer, A. J. 1956. “What is a law of nature?” Revue Internationale de Philosophie 10(2/36):144.Google Scholar

Ayer, A. J. (ed.). 1959. Logical Positivism. The Free Press.Google Scholar

Ayer, A. J. 1967. “Has Austin refuted the sense-datum theory?” Synthese 17:117–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ayers, M. and Garber, D.. 1998. “Introduction,” in Garber and Ayers 1998: 1–5.Google Scholar

Bach, K. 1994. “Conversational implicature,” Mind & Language 9:124–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bach, K. 2010. “Refraining, omitting, and negative acts,” in O’Connor, T. and Sandis, C. (eds.), A Companion to the Philosophy of Action. Blackwell, 50–7.Google Scholar

Baehr, J. 2011. The Inquiring Mind: On Intellectual Virtues and Virtue Epistemology. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baert, P. 2015. The Existentialist Moment: The Rise of Sartre as a Public Intellectual. Polity Press.Google Scholar

Baier, K. 1995. The Rational and the Moral Order: The Social Roots of Reason and Morality. Open Court.Google Scholar

Baker, C. L. and McCarthy, J. (eds.). 1981. The Logical Problem of Language Acquisition. The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Baker, G. 2002. “Wittgenstein on metaphysical/everyday use,” Philosophical Quarterly 52:289–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baker, G. and Hacker, P. M. S.. 1980. Wittgenstein, Understanding and Meaning. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Baker, G. and Hacker, P. M. S.. 1985. Wittgenstein, Rules, Grammar, and Necessity. Blackwell.Google Scholar

Bakhurst, D. 1991. Consciousness and Revolution in Soviet Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baldwin, T. 1979. “The original choice in Sartre and Kant,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 80:31–44.Google Scholar

Baldwin, T. 2004. “G. E. Moore,” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Ed. Zalta, E. N.. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/moore/.Google Scholar

Bales, R. 1971. “Act utilitarianism: account of right-making characteristics or decision-making procedure?” American Philosophical Quarterly 8:257–65.Google Scholar

Ball, S. J. (ed.). 1990. Foucault and Education: Disciplines and Knowledge. Routledge.Google Scholar

Ball, S. J. 2006. Education Policy and Social Class: The Selected Works of Stephen J. Ball. Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ball, S. J. 2009. “Lifelong learning, subjectivity and the totally pedagogical society,” in Peters, M. A. et al. (eds.), Governmentality Studies in Education. Sense, 201–16.Google Scholar

Ball, S. J. 2013. Foucault, Power, and Education. Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barad, K. 2007. Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Duke University Press.Google Scholar

Barcan, R. 1946. “A functional calculus of first order based on strict implication,” Journal of Symbolic Logic 11:1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baril, A. 2013. “The role of welfare in eudaimonism,” Southern Journal of Philosophy 51(4):511–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barnes, B. 1982. T. S. Kuhn and Social Science. Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barnes, B. and Bloor, D.. 1982. “Relativism, rationalism and the sociology of knowledge,” in Hollis, M. and Lukes, S. (eds.), Rationality and Relativism. Blackwell, 21–47.Google Scholar

Barnes, E. 2008. The Paradox of Predictivism. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barnes, E. 2018. “Symmetric dependence,” in Bliss, R. L. and Priest, G. (eds.), Reality and Its Structure. Oxford University Press, 50–69.Google Scholar

Baron, M. 1995. Kantian Ethics almost without Apology. Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Barrett, W. 1958. Irrational Man: A Study in Existential Philosophy. Doubleday. Revised edition Anchor Books, 1990.Google Scholar

Barry, B. 1995. “John Rawls and the search for stability.” Ethics 105(4):874–915.Google Scholar

Barwise, K. J. (ed.). 1977. Handbook of Mathematical Logic. North Holland.Google Scholar

Baudrillard, J. 1994 (1981). Simulacra and Simulation. University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Baumgartner, H. M. 1972. Kontinuität und Geschichte. Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

Baxley, A. 2010. Kant’s Theory of Virtue: The Value of Autocracy. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baxley, A. 2015. “Virtue, self-mastery and the autocracy of practical reason,” in Denis, L. and Sense, O. (eds.), Kant’s Lectures on Ethics: A Critical Guide. Cambridge University Press, 223–38.Google Scholar

Bayne, T. and Montague, M. (eds.). 2011. Cognitive Phenomenology. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beaney, M. 2004. “Carnap’s conception of explication: from Frege to Husserl?” in Awodey, S. and Klein, C. (eds.), Carnap Brought Home: The View from Jena. Open Court, 117–50.Google Scholar

Beaney, M. (ed.). 2013a. The Oxford Handbook of the History of Analytic Philosophy. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beaney, M. 2013b. “What is analytic philosophy?” in Beaney 2013a: 3–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beaney, M. 2013c. “The historiography of analytic philosophy,” in Beaney 2013a: 30–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beaney, M. 2013d. “Analytic philosophy and history of philosophy: the development of the idea of rational reconstruction,” in Reck 2013: 231–60.Google Scholar

Beaney, M. 2013e. “Twenty years of the British Journal for the History of Philosophy,” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 21(1):1–12.Google Scholar

Beaney, M. 2014. “Analysis,” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Ed. Zalta, E. N.. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/analysis/.Google Scholar

Beaney, M. 2016. “Historiography, philosophy of history and the historical turn in analytic philosophy,” Journal of the Philosophy of History 10(2):211–34.Google Scholar

Beaney, M. 2018. “Twenty-five years of the British Journal for the History of Philosophy,” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 26(1):1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beaney, M. 2019. “First steps and conceptual creativity,” in Conant, J. and Sunday, S. (eds.), Wittgenstein on Philosophy, Objectivity, and Meaning. Cambridge University Press, pp. 119–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beardsley, M. C. 1958. Aesthetics: Problems in the Philosophy of Criticism. Harcourt and Brace and World.Google Scholar

Beardsley, M. C. 1966. Aesthetics from Classical Greece to the Present. Macmillan.Google Scholar

Beardsley, M. C. 1983. “An aesthetic definition of art,” in Curtler, H. (ed.), What Is Art? Haven, 15–29.Google Scholar

Beaty, M. D. 1990. Christian Theism and the Problems of Philosophy. University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar

Beauvoir, S. de. 1976 [1947]. The Ethics of Ambiguity. Trans. Frechtman, B.. Philosophical Library.Google Scholar

Beauvoir, S. de. 1989 [1949]. The Second Sex. Trans. Parshley, H. M.. Vintage.Google Scholar

Beauvoir, S. de. 2009 [1949]. The Second Sex. Trans. Borde, C. and Malovany-Chevallier, S.. Random House.Google Scholar

Bechtel, W. 1985. “Attributing responsibility to computer systems,” Metaphilosophy 16:296–306.Google Scholar

Bechtel, W. 1994. “Levels of descriptions and explanation in cognitive science,” Minds and Machines 4:1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bechtel, W. and Richardson, R. C.. 2010 [1993]. Discovering Complexity: Decomposition and Localization as Strategies in Scientific Research, 2nd edition. The MIT Press/Bradford Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beck, L. W. 1960. A Commentary on Kant’s Critique of Practical Reason. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Becker, K. 2007. Epistemology Modalized. Routledge.Google Scholar

Becker, L. C. 1998. A New Stoicism. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Beckermann, A., Flohr, H., and Kim, J.. 1992. Emergence or Reduction? Essays on the Prospects of Nonreductive Physicalism. International Phenomenological Society.Google Scholar

Behme, C. 2014a. Evaluating Cartesian Linguistics: From Historical Antecedents to Computational Modeling. Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Behme, C. 2014b. “A ‘Galilean’ science of language,” Journal of Linguistics 50(3):671–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bekoff, M. and Goodall, J.. 2007. The Emotional Lives of Animals: A Leading Scientist Explores Animal Joy, Sorrow, and Empathy – And Why They Matter. New World Library.Google Scholar

Bellah, N., Madsen, R., Sullivan, W. M., Swidler, A., and Tipton, S. M.. 1985. Habits of the Heart. University of California Press.Google Scholar

Benjamin, W. 1968. “Theses on the philosophy of history,” in Illuminations. Ed. Arendt, H., trans. Zohn, H.. Schocken Books, 253–64.Google Scholar

Bennett, J. 1971. Locke, Berkeley, Hume: Central Themes. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bennett, J. 1995. The Act Itself. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bennett, K. 2011. “By our bootstraps,” Philosophical Perspectives 25(1):27–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bennett, K. 2017. Making Things Up. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bennett, M. R. S., Dennett, D., Hacker, P., and Searle, J.. 2007. Neuroscience and Philosophy. Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Bennett, M. R. S. and Hacker, P. M. S.. 2003. Philosophical Foundations of Neuroscience. Blackwell.Google Scholar

Bergoffen, D. 2001. “The politics of the vulnerable body,” Hypatia 18(1):116–34.Google Scholar

Berker, S. 2007. “Particular reasons,” Ethics 118:109–39.Google Scholar

Berker, S. 2018. “The unity of grounding,” Mind 127(507):729–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berleant, A. 2002. Environment and the Arts: Perspectives on Environmental Aesthetics. Ashgate.Google Scholar

Berlin, I. 1969. Four Essays on Liberty. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bernasconi, R. 2006. How to Read Sartre. W. W. Norton.Google Scholar

Bernstein, R. J. 2008. “The conversation that never happened (Gadamer/Derrida),” Review of Metaphysics 61(3):577–603.Google Scholar

Bernstein, S. 2014. “Omissions as possibilities,” Philosophical Studies 167(1):1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bernstein, S. 2015. “A closer look at trumping,” Acta Analytica 1(1):1–22.Google Scholar

Bernstein, S. 2016a. “Omission impossible,” Philosophical Studies 173:2,575–89.Google Scholar

Bernstein, S. 2016b. “Grounding is not causation,” Philosophical Perspectives 30:21–38.Google Scholar

Berto, F. 2013. “Impossible worlds,” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Ed. Zalta, E. N.. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2013/entries/impossible-worlds/.Google Scholar

Besley, T. [A. C.]. 2007. “Foucault, truth-telling and technologies of the self: confessional practices of the self and schools,” in Peters, M. and Besley, T. [A. C.] (eds.), Why Foucault? Peter Lang, 55–70.Google Scholar

Besley, T. 2009. “Governmentality of youth: beyond cultural studies,” in Peters, M., Besley, A., Olson, M., Maurer, S., and Weber, S., Governmentality Studies in Education. Sense, 165–200.Google Scholar

Besley, T. [A. C.] and Peters, M.. 2007. Subjectivity and Truth: Foucault, Education, and the Culture of Self. Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Betzler, M. (ed.). 2008. Kant’s Ethics of Virtue. Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Bhushan, N. and Garfield, J.. 2011. Indian Philosophy in English. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bickle, J. 1992. “Mental anomaly and the new mind–brain reductionism,” Philosophy of Science 59(2):217–30.Google Scholar

Biesta, G. 2010. “A new ‘logic’ of emancipation: the methodology of Jacques Rancière,” Educational Theory 60(1):39–59.Google Scholar

Bilimoria, P. 2014. “Ethics and virtue in classical Indian thinking,” in van Hooft, S. (ed.), Handbook of Virtue Ethics. Routledge, 294–305.Google Scholar

Bird, A. 2000. Thomas Kuhn. Princeton University Press and Acumen Press.Google Scholar

Bird, A. 2007. Nature’s Metaphysics: Laws and Properties. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar

Birkhoff, G. and von Neumann, J.. 1936. “The logic of quantum mechanics,” Annals of Mathematics 37:823–43.Google Scholar

Birnbaum, D. and Olson, A.. 2009. “An interview with Jacques Derrida on the limits of digestion,” Journal #02. www.e-flux.com/journal/02/68495/an-interview-with-jacques-derrida-on-the-limits-of-digestion/, accessed May 26, 2018.Google Scholar

Bìro, A. 2005. Denaturalizing Ecological Politics: Alienation from Nature from Rousseau to the Frankfurt School and Beyond. University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bishop, J. 1989. Natural Agency: An Essay on the Causal Theory of Action. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bittner, R. 2001. Doing Things for Reasons. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Blake, N., Smeyers, P., Smith, R., and Standish, P.. 1998. Thinking Again: Education after Postmodernism. Bergin and Garvey.Google Scholar

Blattner, W. 2007. “Ontology, the a priori, and the primacy of practice,” in Crowell, S. and Malpas, J. (eds.), Transcendental Heidegger. Stanford University Press, 10–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blattner, W. 2013. “Some thoughts about ‘analytic’ and ‘continental’ philosophy.” www.georgetown.edu/faculty/blattner/contanalytic.html, accessed September 1, 2017.Google Scholar

Bliss, R. L. 2013. “Viciousness and the structure of reality,” Philosophical Studies 166(2):399–418.Google Scholar

Bliss, R. L. 2014. “Viciousness and circles of ground,” Metaphilosophy 45(2):245–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bliss, R. L. and Trogdon, K.. 2014. “Metaphysical grounding,” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Ed. Zalta, E. N.. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2013/entries/grounding/.Google Scholar

Block, N. 1978. “Troubles with functionalism,” in Block, N. (ed.), Readings in the Philosophy of Psychology, vol. 1. University of Minnesota Press, 261–325.Google Scholar

Block, N. 1990. “Inverted Earth,” in Tomberlin, James (ed.), Action Theory and the Philosophy of Mind (vol. 4 of Philosophical Perspectives). Ridgeview, 53–79.Google Scholar

Block, N. 1995. “On a confusion about the function of consciousness,” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 18:227–47.Google Scholar

Block, N. 2011. “Perceptual consciousness overflows cognitive access,” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 15:567–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Block, N., Flanagan, O., and Güzeldere, G. (eds.). 1997. The Nature of Consciousness: Philosophical Debates. The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Block, N. and Fodor, J. A.. 1972. “What psychological states are not,” Philosophical Review 81:159–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bloomfield, L. 1933. Language. Henry Holt.Google Scholar

Bloor, D. 1976. Knowledge and Social Image. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Boas, F. 1911. “Introduction,” in Boas, F. (ed.), Handbook of American Indian Languages, Part I. US Government Printing Office.Google Scholar

Bobik, J. and Sayre, K. M.. 1963. “Pattern recognition mechanisms and St. Thomas’ theory of abstraction,” Revue Philosophique de Louvain 61:24–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boden, M. A. 1965. “McDougall revisited,” Journal of Personality 33:1–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Boden, M. A. 1970. “Intentionality and physical systems,” Philosophy of Science 37:200–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boden, M. A. 1972. Purposive Explanation in Psychology. Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boden, M. A. 1988. Computer Models of Mind: Computational Approaches in Theoretical Psychology. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Boden, M. A. 2006. Mind as Machine: A History of Cognitive Science, 2 vols. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Boden, M. A. 2014. “Aaron Sloman: a bright tile in AI’s mosaic,” in Wyatt, J. L., Petters, D. D., and Hogg, D. C. (eds.), From Animals to Robots and Back: Reflections on Hard Problems in the Study of Cognition. A Collection in Honour of Aaron Sloman. Springer, 9–30.Google Scholar

Boghossian, P. 1996. “Analyticity reconsidered,” Noûs 30(3):360–91.Google Scholar

Bohman, J. and Richardson, H. S.. 2009. “Liberalism, deliberative democracy, and ‘reasons that all can accept’,” Journal of Political Philosophy 17:253–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boler, M. 1999. Feeling Power: Emotions and Education. Routledge.Google Scholar

Bolzano, B. 1837. Wissenschaftslehre, 4 vols. Seidel.Google Scholar

Bondy, A. S. 1968. Existe una filosofía de nuestra América? Siglo XXI Editores.Google Scholar

Bookchin, M. 1982. The Ecology of Freedom: The Emergence and Dissolution of Hierarchy. Cheshire Books.Google Scholar

Bordo, S. 2004. Unbearable Weight, 2nd edition. University of California Press.Google Scholar

Bordwell, D. and Carroll, N.. 1996. Post-Theory: Reconstructing Film Studies. University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar

Borgmann, A. 1984. Technology and the Character of Contemporary Life. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Botts, T. F. 2015. “Hermeneutics, race, and gender,” in Malpas, J. and Gander, H.-H. (eds.), The Routledge Companion to Hermeneutics. Routledge, 498–518.Google Scholar

Bourdieu, P., Passeron, J.-C., and de Saint Martin, M., with Baudelot, C. and Vincent, G.. 1965. Academic Discourse: Linguistic Misunderstanding and Professorial Power. Trans. Teese, R.. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Bourgeois, P. L. 2006. “Marcel and Ricoeur: mystery and hope at the boundary of reason in the postmodern situation,” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 80(3):421–33.Google Scholar

Bovens, L. and Hartmann, S.. 2003. Bayesian Epistemology. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bowles, S. and Gintis, H.. 1979. Schooling in Capitalist America: Education Reform and the Contradictions of Economic Life. Basic Books.Google Scholar

Boyd, D. 2004. “The legacies of liberalism and oppressive relations: facing a dilemma for the subject of moral education,” Journal of Moral Education 33(1):3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boyd, R. 1999. “Species, homeostasis and higher taxa,” in Wilson, R. A. (ed.), Species: New Interdisciplinary Essays. The MIT Press, 141–85.Google Scholar

Boyd, R. and Richerson, P.. 2007. “Culture, adaptation, and innateness,” in Carruthers, P., Laurence, S., and Stich, S. (eds.), The Innate Mind, vol. 2: Culture and Cognition. Oxford University Press, 23–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bradshaw, G. A. 2009. Elephants on the Edge: What Animals Teach Us about Humanity. Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Braithwaite, R. 1953. Scientific Explanation. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Brand, P. Z. and Korsmeyer, C. (eds.). 1995. Feminism and Tradition in Aesthetics. Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar

Brandis, C. A. 1815. Von dem Begriff der Geschichte der Philosophie. G. Bonnier.Google Scholar

Brandom, R. 1994. Making It Explicit: Reasoning, Representing, and Discursive Commitment. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Brandom, R. 2008. Between Saying and Doing: Towards Analytic Pragmatism. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brandom, R. 2009. Reason in Philosophy: Animating Ideas. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Brandom, R. 2010. “Reply to Danielle Macbeth’s ‘Inference, Meaning, and Truth’,” in Weiss, B. and Wanderer, J. (eds.), Reading Brandom: On Making It Explicit. Routledge, 338–41.Google Scholar

Brandon, R. N. 1978. “Adaptation and evolutionary theory,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science (Part A) 9(3):181–206.Google Scholar

Brandt, R. 1992 [1956]. “Some merits of one form of rule-utilitarianism,” reprinted in Brandt, Morality, Utilitarianism, and Rights. Cambridge University Press, 111–36.Google Scholar

Bratman, M. 1987. Intentions, Plans, and Practical Reason. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Bratman, M. 1999. Faces of Intention: Selected Essays on Intention and Agency. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Braudy, L. and Cohen, M. (eds.). 1999. Film Theory and Criticism: Introductory Readings. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bredo, E. 1989. “After positivism, what?” Educational Theory 39(4):401–13.Google Scholar

Breton, A. 1969. Manifestoes of Surrealism. Trans. Seaver, R. and Lane, H. R.. University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Bridges, D. (ed.). 1997. Education, Autonomy and Democratic Citizenship: Philosophy in a Changing World. Routledge.Google Scholar

Bridges, J. 2014. “Rule-following skepticism, properly so-called,” in Conant, J. and Kern, A. (eds.), Varieties of Skepticism. de Gruyter, 249–88.Google Scholar

Briggs, R. 2012. “Interventionist counterfactuals,” Philosophical Studies 160(1):139–66.Google Scholar

Brink, D. 1993. “The separateness of persons, distributive norms, and moral theory,” in Frey, R. and Morris, C. (eds.), Value, Welfare, and Morality. Cambridge University Press, 252–89.Google Scholar

Brink, D. 2013. Mill’s Progressive Principles. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Brogaard, B. and Salerno, J.. 2013. “Remarks on counterpossibles,” Synthese 190(4):639–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bronkhorst, J. 2011. “A note on ‘nirvikalpaka’ and ‘savikalpaka’ perception,” Philosophy East and West 61(2):373–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Broome, J. 1999. “Normative requirements,” Ratio 12(4):398–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Broome, J. 2004. “Reasons,” in Wallace, R. J., Pettit, P., Scheffler, S., and Smith, M. (eds.), Reason and Value: Themes from the Moral Philosophy of Joseph Raz. Oxford University Press, 28–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, C. and Toadvine, T.. 2003. Eco-Phenomenology: Back to the Earth Itself. SUNY Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, H. 1993. Perception, Theory and Commitment. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Brown, H. R. and Harré, R. (eds.). 1988. Philosophical Foundations of Quantum Field Theory. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Brown, J. 1995. “The incompatibility of anti-individualism and privileged access,” Analysis 55:149–56.Google Scholar

Brown, J. 2004. Anti-Individualism and Knowledge. The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Brown, L. B. 1991. “The theory of jazz music: ‘it don’t mean a thing …’,” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 49:115–27.Google Scholar

Brown, L. B., Goldblatt, D., and Gracyk, T.. 2018. Jazz and the Philosophy of Art. Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, S. 2014. “The professionalization of British philosophy,” in Mander, W. J. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of British Philosophy in the Nineteenth Century. Oxford University Press, 619–40.Google Scholar

Brucker, J. J. 1742–4. Historia critica philosophiae, 5 vols. B. C. Breitkopf.Google Scholar

Brueckner, A. 1994. “The structure of the skeptical argument,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 54:827–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bruner, J. S., Goodnow, J. J., and Austin, G. A.. 1956. A Study of Thinking. Wiley.Google Scholar

Brunner, O., Conze, W., and Koselleck, R. (eds.). 1972–97. Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe. Historisches Lexikon zur politisch-sozialen Sprache in Deutschland, 8 vols. Klett.Google Scholar

Brush, S. G. 2007. “Predictivism and the periodic table,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 38(1):256–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bruya, B. 2010. “The rehabilitation of spontaneity: a new approach in philosophy of action,” Philosophy East and West 60(2):207–50.Google Scholar

Bryson, N. 1986. Vision and Painting: The Logic of the Gaze. Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Bubner, R., Cramer, K., and Weihl, R. (eds.). 1970. Hermeneutik und Dialektik. J. C. B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck).Google Scholar

Budd, M. 1995. The Values of Art: Pictures, Poetry, and Music. Allen Lane, The Penguin Press.Google Scholar

Budd, M. 2002. The Aesthetic Appreciation of Nature. Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Bunge, M. 1966. “Technology as applied science,” Technology and Culture 7(3):329–47.Google Scholar

Bunge, M. 1979. “Philosophical inputs and outputs of technology,” in Bugliarello, G. and Doner, D. B. (eds.), The History of Philosophy and Technology. University of Illinois Press, 262–81.Google Scholar

Burbules, N. 2000. “Lyotard on Wittgenstein,” in Dhillon, P. A. and Standish, P. (eds.), Lyotard: Just Education. Routledge, 36–53.Google Scholar

Burbules, N. 2008. “Tacit teaching,” Educational Philosophy and Theory 40(5 Sept.):666–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burge, T. 1979. “Individualism and the mental,” Midwest Studies in Philosophy 4:73–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burge, T. 1986. “Individualism and psychology,” Philosophical Review 95(1):3–45.Google Scholar

Burge, T. 1988. “Individualism and self-knowledge.” Journal of Philosophy 85(11):649–63.Google Scholar

Burge, T. 2010. Origins of Objectivity. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burgess, J. P. 1998. “Quinus ab omni naevo vindicatus,” in Kazmi, Ali (ed.), Meaning and Reference, Canadian Journal of Philosophy Supplement 23:25–65.Google Scholar

Burgess, J. P. 1999. “Which modal logic is the right one?” Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 40:81–93.Google Scholar

Burgess, J. P. 2005. Fixing Frege. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Burgess, J. P. Kripke. Polity Press.Google Scholar

Butler, J. 1990. Gender Trouble. Routledge.Google Scholar

Butler, J. 1997. “Merely cultural,” Social Text 52–3:265–77.Google Scholar

Butler, J. 2004. Precarious Life: The Powers of Mourning and Violence. Verso.Google Scholar

Butler, J. 2011 [1993]. Bodies that Matter: On the Discursive Limits of Sex. Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Byrne, A. 2001. “Intentionalism defended,” Philosophical Review 110:199–240.Google Scholar

Byrne, A. 2004. “How hard are the sceptical paradoxes?” Noûs 38:299–325.Google Scholar

Byrne, A. and Thau, M.. 1996. “In defence of the hybrid view,” Mind 105(417):139–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cage, J. 1961. Silence: Lectures and Writings by John Cage. Wesleyan University Press.Google Scholar

Cahill, A. 2001. Rethinking Rape. Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Calle-Gruber, M. (ed.). 2016. Heidegger, Politics, and Philosophy: The Heidelberg Conference. Trans. Fort, J.. Fordham University Press.Google Scholar

Callicott, J. B. 1986. “The metaphysical implications of ecology,” Environmental Ethics 8(4):301–16.Google Scholar

Callicott, J. B. 1989. In Defense of the Land Ethic: Essays in Environmental Philosophy. SUNY Press.Google Scholar

Cameron, R. 2008. “Truthmakers and ontological commitment: or how to deal with complex objects and mathematical ontology without getting into trouble,” Philosophical Studies 140(1):1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Campbell, J. 2006. A Thoughtful Profession: The Early Years of the American Philosophical Association. Open Court.Google Scholar

Candlish, S. 2007. The Russell/Bradley Dispute and Its Significance for Twentieth-Century Philosophy. Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Caputo, J. D. 1987. Radical Hermeneutics: Repetition, Deconstruction, and the Hermeneutic Project. Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Carlson, A. 1999. Aesthetics and the Environment: The Appreciation of Nature, Art and Architecture. Routledge.Google Scholar

Carnap, R. 1928. Der Logische aufbau der Welt. Weltkreis-Verlag. Trans. R. A. George, The Logical Structure of the World. University of California Press, 1967.Google Scholar

Carnap, R. 1934a. “The task of the logic of science” (English translation of a paper originally published in German in 1934), in McGuinness, B. (ed.), Unified Science: The Vienna Circle Monographs Series Originally Edited by Otto Neurath. Reidel, 46–66.Google Scholar

Carnap, R. 1934b. The Unity of Science (English translation of an article originally published in German in 1931). Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Carnap, R. 1936–37. “Testability and meaning,” parts I and II, Philosophy of Science 3:419–71 and 4:1–40.Google Scholar

Carnap, R. 1937. The Logical Syntax of Language (expanded version of original German of 1934. Trans. Smeaton, A.). Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co.Google Scholar

Carnap, R. 1942. Introduction to Semantics. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Carnap, R. 1945. “The two concepts of probability,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 5(4):513–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carnap, R. 1946. “Modalities and quantification,” Journal of Symbolic Logic 11:33–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carnap, R. 1947. Meaning and Necessity. University of Chicago Press. 2nd, expanded edition, 1956.Google Scholar

Carnap, R. 1950. Logical Foundations of Probability. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Carnap, R. 1955. “Meaning and synonymy in natural language,” Philosophical Studies 6:33–47.Google Scholar

Carnap, R. 1956. “Empiricism, semantics, and ontology,” in Meaning and Necessity, 2nd edition. University of Chicago Press, 205–21.Google Scholar

Carnap, R. 1958. “Beobachtungssprache und theoretische sprache,” Dialectica 12(3–4):236–48. Reprinted (in a translation by Herbert Bonhert) as “Observation language and theoretical language,” in J. Hintikka (ed.), Rudolf Carnap, Logical Empiricist: Materials and Perspectives. D. Reidel Publishing Co. (1975), 75–85. (References in the text are to the latter publication.).Google Scholar

Carnap, R. 1959. “Psychology in physical language” (English translation of an article originally published in German in 1932 ). In A. J. Ayer (ed.), Logical Positivism. Macmillan,165?98.Google Scholar

Carnap, R. 1963a. “Intellectual autobiography,” in Schilpp, 1963: 3–84.Google Scholar

Carnap, R. 1963b. “Carl G. Hempel on scientific theories,” in Schilpp, 1963: 958–66.Google Scholar

Carnap, R. 1963c. “W. V. Quine on logical truth,” in Schilpp, 1963: 915–22.Google Scholar

Carnap, R. 1966. The Philosophical Foundations of Physics: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Science. Ed. Gardner, M.. Basic Books. Reprinted in a slightly revised edition as An Introduction to the Philosophy of Science, Dover, 1995. (References in the text are to the Dover edition.)Google Scholar

Carnap, R. 1967. The Logical Structure of the World. Trans. George, R. A.. University of California Press. Reprinted Open Court, 2003.Google Scholar

Carnap, R., Hahn, H., and Neurath, O.. 1929. “The scientific conception of the world,” in Sarkar, Sahotra (ed.), The Emergence of Logical Empiricism. Garland, 1996, 321–41.Google Scholar

Carney, J. D. 1991. “The style theory of art,” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 72:273–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carr, D. 1986. Time, Narrative and History. Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Carr, D. 2006. “The moral roots of citizenship: towards a virtue ethical reconciliation of principle and character in education for effective citizenship,” Journal of Moral Education 35(4):443–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carr, D. 2008. “Character education as the cultivation of virtue,” in Nucci, L. P. and Navaez, D. (eds.), Handbook of Moral and Character Education. Routledge.Google Scholar

Carroll, N. 1988. “Art, practice, and narrative,” Monist 71:140–56.Google Scholar

Carroll, N. 1990. The Philosophy of Horror or Paradoxes of the Heart. Routledge.Google Scholar

Carroll, N. 1996. Theorizing the Moving Image. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Carroll, N. 1998. A Philosophy of Mass Art. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Carroll, N. 2007a. The Philosophy of Motion Pictures. Blackwell.Google Scholar

Carroll, N. 2007b. “Vertigo and the pathologies of romantic love,” in Baggett, D. and Drumin, W. A. (eds.), Hitchcock and Philosophy: Dial M for Metaphysics. Open Court, 101–14.Google Scholar

Carroll, N. 2013. Minerva's Night Out: Philosophy, Pop Culture, and Moving Pictures. Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Carroll, N. 2014. Humour: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carruthers, P. 2000. Phenomenal Consciousness. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Carston, R. 2002. Thoughts and Utterances. Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cartwright, N. 1983. How the Laws of Physics Lie. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Cartwright, N. 1989. Nature’s Capacities and Their Measurement. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Cartwright, N. 1994. “Fundamentalism vs. the patchwork of laws,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 94:279–92.Google Scholar

Cartwright, N. 1999. The Dappled World. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carus, A. W. 2007. Carnap and Twentieth-Century Thought: Explication as Enlightenment. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Carus, P. 2001 [1911]. “Truth on trial: an exposition of the nature of truth,” in Shook, J. (ed.), Early Critics of Pragmatism. Thoemmes Press, vol. 3, 1–143.Google Scholar

Catana, L. 2008. The Historiographical Concept “System of Philosophy”: Its Origin, Nature and Legitimacy. Brill.Google Scholar

Catana, L. 2012. “The history of the history of philosophy, and the lost biographical tradition,” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 20(3):619–25.Google Scholar

Catana, L. 2013. “Philosophical problems in the history of philosophy: what are they?” in Laerke, , Smith, , and Schliesser, 2013: 115–33.Google Scholar

Cavell, S. 1962. “The availability of Wittgenstein’s later philosophy,” Philosophical Review 71:67–93.Google Scholar

Cavell, S. 1976. “A matter of meaning it,” in Must We Mean What We Say? Cambridge University Press, 197–219.Google Scholar

Cavell, S. 1979a. The Claim of Reason: Wittgenstein, Skepticism, Morality, and Tragedy. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Cavell, S. 1979b. The World Viewed: Reflections on the Ontology of Film. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Cavell, S. 1981. Pursuits of Happiness: The Hollywood Comedy of Remarriage. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Cavell, S. 1994. A Pitch of Philosophy. Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cerbone, D. R. 2003. “The limits of conservatism: Wittgenstein on ‘our life’ and ‘our concepts’,” in Heyes, C. (ed.), The Grammar of Politics. Cornell University Press, 43–62.Google Scholar

Chadha, M. 2001. “Perceptual cognition: a Nyāya-Kantian approach,” Philosophy East and West 51(2):197–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chadha, M. 2004. “Perceiving particulars-as-such is incoherent: a reply to Mark Siderits,” Philosophy East and West 54(3):382–9.Google Scholar

Chadha, M. 2011. “Self-awareness: eliminating the myth of the ‘invisible subject’,” Philosophy East and West 61(3):453–67.Google Scholar

Chakrabarti, A. 1997. Denying Existence: The Logic, Epistemology, and Pragmatics of Negative Existentials and Fictional Discourse. Kluwer Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chakrabarti, A. 2000. “Against immaculate perception: seven reasons for eliminating nirvikalpaka perception from Nyāya,” Philosophy East and West 50(1):1–8.Google Scholar

Chakrabarti, A. 2001. “Reply to Stephen Phillips,” Philosophy East and West 51(1):114–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chakrabarti, A. and Matilal, B. K. (eds.). 1994. Knowing from Words: Western and Indian Philosophical Analysis of Understanding and Testimony. Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar

Chakrabarti, K. K. 1975. “The Nyāya-Vaiśeṣika theory of universals,” Journal of Indian Philosophy 3(3/4):363–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chakrabarti, K. K. 1999. Classical Indian Philosophy of Mind: The Nyāya Dualist Tradition. SUNY Press.Google Scholar

Chakrabarti, K. K. 2010. Classical Indian Philosophy of Induction. Lexington Books.Google Scholar

Chalmers, A. 1976. What Is This Thing Called Science? University of Queensland Press.Google Scholar

Chalmers, A. 2011. “Drawing philosophical lessons from Perrin’s experiments on Brownian motion: a response to van Fraassen,” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 62(4):711–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chalmers, D. 1996. The Conscious Mind. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Chalmers, D. (ed.). 2002. Philosophy of Mind: Classical and Contemporary Readings. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Chalmers, D. 2003. “The content and epistemology of phenomenal belief,” in Smith, Q. and Jokic, A. (eds.), Consciousness: New Philosophical Essays. Oxford University Press, 220–72.Google Scholar

Chalmers, D. 2004. “The representational character of experience,” in Leiter, B. (ed.), The Future for Philosophy. Oxford University Press, 153–80. Reprinted as chapter 11 of Chalmers 2010, 181–94.Google Scholar

Chalmers, D. 2006a. “The foundations of two-dimensional semantics,” in Garcia-Carpintero, M. and Macia, J. (eds.), Two-Dimensional Semantics: Foundations and Applications. Oxford University Press, 55–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chalmers, D. 2006b. “Perception and the Fall from Eden,” in Szabó Gendler, T. and Hawthorne, J. (eds.), Perceptual Experience. Oxford University Press, 49–125. Reprinted as chapter 12 of Chalmers 2010: 195–209.Google Scholar

Chalmers, D. 2010. The Character of Consciousness. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chalmers, D., Manley, D., and Wasserman, R. (eds.). 2009. Metametaphysics: New Essays on the Foundations of Ontology. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Chastain, C. 1975. “Reference and context,” in Gunderson, K. (ed.), Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science VII: Language, Mind, and Knowledge. University of Minnesota Press, 194–269.Google Scholar

Chatterjee, A. K. 1962. The Yogācāra Idealism. Banaras Hindu University Press.Google Scholar

Chatterjee, D. 1977. “Skepticism and Indian philosophy,” Philosophy East and West 27(2):195–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chaudhuri, H. 1953. “The integralism of Sri Aurobindo,” Philosophy East and West 3(2):131–6.Google Scholar

Cheng, Chung-ying and Bunnin, N. (eds.). 2002. Contemporary Chinese Philosophy. Blackwell.Google Scholar

Cheng, L. 2002. “Zhang Dainian: creative synthesis and Chinese philosophy,” in Cheng, and Bunnin, 2002: 235–45.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 1953. “Systems of syntactic analysis,” Journal of Symbolic Logic 18:242–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chomsky, N. 1957. Syntactic Structures. Mouton.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 1958. “Linguistics, logic, psychology, and computers,” in Carr, J. W. (ed.), Computer Programming and Artificial Intelligence, An Intensive Course for Practicing Scientists and Engineers: Lectures Given at the University of Michigan (Summer 1958). University of Michigan College of Engineering, 429–56.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 1959a. “On certain formal properties of grammars,” Information and Control 1:91–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chomsky, N. 1959b. “Review of B. F. Skinner, Verbal Behavior,” Language 35:26–58.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 1964. Current Issues in Linguistic Theory. Mouton.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 1965. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 1966. Cartesian Linguistics. Harper & Row.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 1967. “Recent contributions to the theory of innate ideas,” Synthese 17(1):2–11.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 1968. Language and Mind. Harper & Row.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 1969a. “Quine’s empirical assumptions,” in Davidson, D. and Hintikka, J. (eds.), Words and Objections. Reidel, 53–68.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 1969b. “Linguistics and philosophy,” in Hook, S. (ed.), Language and Philosophy: A Symposium. New York University Press, 51–94.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 1969c. “Some empirical assumptions in modern philosophy of language,” in Morgenbesser, S., Suppes, P., and Gabriel White, M. (eds.), Philosophy, Science and Method: Essays in Honor of Ernest Nagel. St. Martin’s Press, 260–85.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 1971. Problems of Knowledge and Freedom. Pantheon.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 1975a. The Logical Structure of Linguistic Theory. Plenum. (Written in 1955–6.)Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 1975b. Reflections on Language. Pantheon.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 1980. Rules and Representations. Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 1986. Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin and Use. Praeger.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. 2000. “Explaining language use,” in Chomsky, N., New Horizons in the Study of Language and Mind. Cambridge University Press, 19–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chomsky, N. 2012. The Science of Language: Interviews with James McGilvray. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chomsky, N. and Miller, G. A.. 1958. “Finite state languages,” Information and Control 1(2):91–112.Google Scholar

Chrisley, R. 1998. “What might dynamical intentionality be, if not computation? Peer commentary on T. van Gelder,” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21(4):634–5.Google Scholar

Chrisley, R. 2000. “Transparent computationalism,” in Scheutz, M. (ed.), New Computationalism. Academia Verlag, 105–20.Google Scholar

Chrisley, R. and Sloman, A.. 2016. “Functionalism, revisionism, and qualia,” APA Newsletter on Philosophy and Computers 16(1):2–13.Google Scholar

Christensen, C. 1998. “Getting Heidegger off the West Coast,” Inquiry 41(1):65–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Church, A. 1949. “Review of Ayer, Language, Truth, and Logic, 2nd edition,” Journal of Symbolic Logic 14:52–3.Google Scholar

Churchland, P. M. 1979. Scientific Realism and the Plasticity of Mind. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Churchland, P. M. 1981. “Eliminative materialism and the propositional attitudes,” Journal of Philosophy 78:67–90.Google Scholar

Churchland, P. M. 1986a. “Cognitive neurobiology: a computational hypothesis for laminar cortex,” Biology and Philosophy 1:25–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Churchland, P. M. 1986b. “Some reductive strategies in cognitive neurobiology,” Mind 95:279–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Churchland, P. M. 1989. A Neurocomputational Perspective: The Nature of Mind and the Structure of Science. The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Churchland, P. M. 1995. The Engine of Reason, the Seat of the Soul: A Philosophical Journey into the Brain. The MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Churchland, P. M. and Churchland, P. S.. 1981. “Functionalism, qualia, and intentionality,” Philosophical Topics 12:121–45.Google Scholar

Churchland, P. M. and Hooker, C. A. (eds.). 1985. Images of Science: Essays on Realism and Empiricism. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Churchland, P. S. 2012. Braintrust: What Neuroscience Tells Us about Morality. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Clark, A. J. 1989. Microcognition: Philosophy, Cognitive Science, and Parallel Distributed Processing. The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Clark, A. J. 1991. “Systematicity, structured representations and cognitive architecture: a reply to Fodor and Pylyshyn,” in Horgan, T. and Tienson, J. (eds.), Connectionism and the Philosophy of Mind. Kluwer, 198–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clark, A. J. 1993. Associative Engines: Connectionism, Concepts, and Representational Change. The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Clark, A. J. 1997. Being There: Putting Brain, Body, and World Together Again. The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Clark, A. J. 2003. Natural-Born Cyborgs: Why Minds and Technologies Are Made to Merge. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Clark, A. J. 2013. “Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science,” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36(3):181–204.Google Scholar

Clark, A. J. 2016. Surfing Uncertainty: Prediction, Action, and the Embodied Mind. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Clark, A. J. and Chalmers, D.. 1998. “The extended mind,” Analysis 58:7–19.Google Scholar

Clark, A. J. and Karmiloff-Smith, A.. 1993. “The cognizer’s innards: a psychological and philosophical perspective on the development of thought,” Mind and Language 8:487–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clark, A. J. and Thornton, C.. 1997. “Trading spaces: computation, representation, and the limits of uninformed learning,” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20:57–90.Google Scholar

Clark, M. 1963. “Knowledge and grounds: a comment on Mr. Gettier’s paper,” Analysis 24(2):46–8.Google Scholar

Clark, M. and Liggins, D.. 2012. “Recent work on grounding,” Analysis 72(4):812–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clarke, T. 1972. “The legacy of skepticism,” Journal of Philosophy 68:754–69.Google Scholar

Cleveland, T. 1997. Trying without Willing: An Essay in the Philosophy of Mind. Ashgate.Google Scholar

Cobb, J. B. Jr. and Ives, C.. 1990. The Emptying God: A Buddhist–Jewish–Christian Conversation. Orbis Books.Google Scholar

Coetzee, P. H. and Roux, A. P. J. (eds). 2004. The African Philosophy Reader. Routledge.Google Scholar

Cohen, M. R. and Nagel, E.. 1934. An Introduction to Logic and Scientific Method. Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Cohen, P. J. 1966. Set Theory and the Continuum Hypothesis. Benjamin.Google Scholar

Cohen, S. 1984. “Justification and truth,” Philosophical Studies 46(3):279–95.Google Scholar

Cohen, S. 1986. “Knowledge and context,” Journal of Philosophy 83(10):574–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cohen, S. 1998. “Two kinds of sceptical argument,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 58:143–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cohen, S. 1999. “Contextualism, skepticism, and the structure of reasons,” Philosophical Perspectives 13:57–89.Google Scholar

Cohen, S. 2000. “Contextualism and skepticism,” Philosophical Issues 10:94–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cohen, T. 1999. Jokes: Philosophical Thoughts on Joking Matters. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Cole, D. 2014. “The Chinese room argument,” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Ed. Zalta, E. N.. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/ sum2014/entries/chinese-room/.Google Scholar

Coliva, A. 2015. Extended Rationality: A Hinge Epistemology. Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Collingwood, R. G. 1992 [1942]. The New Leviathan. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Collingwood, R. G. 1994 [1946]. The Idea of History. Ed. van der Dussen, J.. Oxford University Press (revised edition).Google Scholar

Collingwood, R. G. 1999. The Principles of History. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Collingwood, R. G. 2005 [1933]. An Essay on Philosophical Method. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Collins, James. 1952. The Existentialists: A Critical Study. Henry Regnery.Google Scholar

Collins, John. 2007. “Counterfactuals, causation, and preemption,” in Jacquette, D. (ed.), Philosophy of Logic. Elsevier, 1,127–44.Google Scholar

Collins, P. H. 2002. Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment. Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Collins, R. 1998. The Sociology of Philosophies: A Global Theory of Intellectual Change. Belknap Press.Google Scholar

Collins, S. 1982. Selfless Persons. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Conant, J. 1998. “Wittgenstein on meaning and use,” Philosophical Investigations 21:222–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Conant, J. 2002. “The method of the Tractatus,” in Reck, E. (ed.), From Frege to Wittgenstein: Perspectives on Early Analytic Philosophy. Oxford University Press, 374–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Conant, J. 2016. “The emergence of the concept of the analytic tradition,” in Bell, J. A., Cutrofello, A., and Livingston, P. M. (eds.), Beyond the Analytic-Continental Divide: Pluralist Philosophy in the Twenty-First Century. Routledge, 17–58.Google Scholar

Connolly, W. E. 1991. Identity/Difference: Democratic Negotiations of Political Paradox. Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Conze, E. 1962. Buddhist Thought in India. Routledge.Google Scholar

Cook, S. 2006. “The P versus NP problem” [Official Cray Foundation Millennium Prize Description]. www.claymath.org/sites/default/files/pvsnp.pdf.Google Scholar

Cooper, D. E. 1998. “Interpretation, construction and the ‘postmodern ethos’,” in Carr, D. (ed.), Education, Knowledge and Truth: Beyond the Postmodern Impasse. Routledge, 37–49.Google Scholar

Cooper, D. E. 1999. Existentialism: A Reconstruction. Blackwell.Google Scholar

Cooper, D. E. 2012. “Existentialism as a philosophical movement,” in Crowell, 2012a: 27–49.Google Scholar

Cooper, R. V. 2005. Classifying Madness: A Philosophical Examination of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. Springer.Google Scholar

Copleston, F. 1946–86. A History of Philosophy, 11 vols. Continuum.Google Scholar

Copp, D. 1997. “The Ring of Gyges: overridingness and the unity of reason,” Social Philosophy of Policy 14:86–106.Google Scholar

Copp, D. 2009. “Toward a pluralist and teleological theory of normativity,” Philosophical Issues 19 (Metaethics):21–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Correia, F. 2005. Existential Dependence and Cognate Notions. Philosophia Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Correia, F. 2010. “Grounding and truth-functions,” Logique et Analyse 53(211):251–79.Google Scholar

Correia, F. 2013. “Metaphysical grounds and essence,” in Hoeltje, M., Schnieder, B., and Steinberg, A. (eds.), Varieties of Dependence: Ontological Dependence, Grounding, Supervenience, Response-Dependence. Philosophia Verlag, 271–96.Google Scholar

Correia, F. 2014. “Logical grounds,” Review of Symbolic Logic 7(1):31–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Correia, F. and Schnieder, B.. 2012. “Grounding: an opinionated introduction,” in Correia, F. and Schnieder, B. (eds.), Metaphysical Grounding: Understanding the Structure of Reality. Cambridge University Press, 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coseru, C. 2012. Perceiving Reality: Consciousness, Intentionality, and Cognition in Buddhist Philosophy. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Cowherds, . 2011. Moonshadows: Conventional Truth in Buddhist Philosophy. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Cowherds, . 2016. Moonpaths: Ethics and Emptiness. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Cowie, F. 1999. What’s Within? Nativism Reconsidered. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Craik, K. J. W. 1943. The Nature of Explanation. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Crary, A. and Read, R. (eds.). 2000. The New Wittgenstein. Routledge.Google Scholar

Crisp, R. 1996. “Modern moral philosophy and the virtues,” in Crisp, R. (ed.), How Should One Live? Essays on the Virtues. Oxford University Press, 1–18.Google Scholar

Critchley, S. 2001. Continental Philosophy: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cronin, H. 1991. The Ant and the Peacock: Altruism and Sexual Selection from Darwin to Today. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Cronon, W. 1995. “The trouble with wilderness; or, getting back to the wrong Nature,” in Cronon, (ed.), Uncommon Ground: Rethinking the Human Place in Nature. W. W. Norton & Co, 69–90.Google Scholar

Crowe, B. D. 2006. Heidegger’s Phenomenology of Religion: Realism and Cultural Criticism. Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Crowell, S. (ed.). 2012a. The Cambridge Companion to Existentialism. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Crowell, S. 2012b. “Sartre’s existentialism and the nature of consciousness,” in Crowell, 2012a: 199–226.Google Scholar

Crutzen, P. 2002. “Geology of mankind,” Nature 415:23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cua, A. S. (ed.). 2003. Encyclopedia of Chinese Philosophy. Routledge.Google Scholar

Cua, A. S. 2009. “The emergence of the history of Chinese philosophy,” in Mou, 2009: 43–68.Google Scholar

Cureton, A. and Hill, T. E. Jr. 2014. “Kant on virtue and the virtues,” in Snow, N. (ed.), Cultivating Virtue. Oxford University Press, 87–110.Google Scholar

Currie, G. 1988. An Ontology of Art. Macmillan.Google Scholar

Currie, G. 1990. The Nature of Fiction. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Currie, G. 1995. Image and Mind: Film, Philosophy, and Cognitive Science. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Currie, G. 2004. Arts and Minds. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Currie, G. 2010. Narratives and Narrators: A Philosophy of Stories. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Currie, G. and Ravenscroft, I.. 2002. Recreative Minds: Imagination in Philosophy and Psychology. Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Currie, G., Kieran, M., Meskin, A., and Robson, J. (eds.). 2014. Aesthetics and the Sciences of the Mind. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Cushman, P. 1990. “Why the self is empty: toward a historically situated psychology,” American Psychologist 45(5):599–611.Google Scholar

D’Agostino, F. 1996. Free Public Reason: Making It Up as We Go. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dahlstrom, D. O. 2001. Heidegger’s Concept of Truth. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

D’Amato, M., Garfield, J. L., and Tillemans, T. J. F. (eds.). 2009. Pointing at the Moon: Buddhism, Logic, Analytic Philosophy. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Dancy, J. 1981. “On moral properties,” Mind 90(359):367–85.Google Scholar

Dancy, J. 2000. Practical Reality. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Dancy, J. 2004. Ethics without Principles. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Alighieri, Dante. 2008 [1308–20]. The Divine Comedy. Ed. Higgins, D. H., trans Sisson, C. H.. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Danto, A. C. 1964. “The artworld,” Journal of Philosophy 61:571–84.Google Scholar

Danto, A. C. 1965. Analytical Philosophy of History. Cambridge University Press. Reprinted in Danto 1985.Google Scholar

Danto, A. C. 1975. Jean-Paul Sartre. Viking.Google Scholar

Danto, A. C. 1981. The Transfiguration of the Commonplace. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Danto, A. C. 1985. Narration and Knowledge. Columbia University Press. Reprinted in Danto 2007.Google Scholar

Danto, A. C. 1986. The Philosophical Disenfranchisement of Art. Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Danto, A. C. 1995. “The decline and fall of the analytical philosophy of history,” in Ankersmit, and Kellner, 1995: 70–85.Google Scholar

Danto, A. C. 2007 [1965]. Narration and Knowledge. With a new introduction by Goehr, L. and a new conclusion by Ankersmit, F.. Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Darwall, S. 1990. “Autonomous internalism and the justification of morals,” Noûs 24(2):257–67.Google Scholar

Darwall, S. 1997. “Reasons, motives, and the demands of morality: an introduction,” in Darwall, S., Gibbard, A., and Railton, P. (eds.), Moral Discourse and Practice. Oxford University Press, 305–12.Google Scholar

Darwin, C. 1859. On the Origin of Species. London: John Murray.Google Scholar

Dasgupta, Shamik. 2014a. “On the plurality of grounds,” Philosophers’ Imprint 14(20).Google Scholar

Dasgupta, Shamik. 2014b. “The possibility of physicalism,” Journal of Philosophy 111(9/10):557–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dasgupta, Surendranath. 1953. Indian Idealism. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Dasti, M. 2012. “Parasitism and disjunctivism in Nyāya epistemology,” Philosophy East and West 62(1):1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dasti, M. (ed.). 2014. Free Will, Agency, and Selfhood in Indian Philosophy. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Davidson, D. 1963. “Actions, reasons, and causes,” Journal of Philosophy 60:685–700. Reprinted in Davidson 1980a: 3–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davidson, D. 1967a. “The logical form of action sentences,” in Rescher, N. (ed.), The Logic of Decision and Action. University of Pittsburgh Press, 113–14. Reprinted in Davidson 1980a: 105–21.Google Scholar

Davidson, D. 1967b. “Truth and meaning,” Synthese 17:304–23. Reprinted in Davidson 2001: 17–36.Google Scholar

Davidson, D. 1970. “Mental events,” in Foster, L. and Swanson, J. W. (eds.), Experience and Theory. Duckworth, 137–49. Reprinted in Davidson 1980a: 207–28.Google Scholar

Davidson, D. 1974. “On the very idea of a conceptual scheme,” Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 47:5–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davidson, D. 1978. “Intending,” Philosophy of History and Action 11:41-60. Reprinted in Davidson 1980a: 83–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davidson, D. 1980a. Essays on Actions and Events. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar