Book contents
References
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 09 November 2017
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Self-Governance in ScienceCommunity-Based Strategies for Managing Dangerous Knowledge, pp. 271 - 294Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
4C Association. 2007. Annual Report, www.4c-coffeeassociation.org/uploads/media/4C_Annual_Report_2007.pdf.Google Scholar
4C Association. 2010. Annual Report, www.4c-coffeeassociation.org/uploads/media/4C_AnnualReport2009_web_lr_en.pdf.Google Scholar
Abbott, KW, Green, JF, and Keohane, RO. 2016. “Organizational Ecology and Organizational Diversity in Global Governance,” International Organization/First View Article (Apr.): 1–31.Google Scholar
Abbott, KW and Snidal, D. 1996. “International ‘Standards’ and International Governance,” Journal of European Public Policy 8(3): 345–370.Google Scholar
Abbott, KW and Snidal, D. 2009a. “Strengthening International Regulation Through Transnational New Governance: Overcoming the Orchestration Deficit,” Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 42: 501.Google Scholar
Abbott, KW and Snidal, D. 2009b. “The Governance Triangle: Regulatory Standards Institutions and the Shadow of the State,” pp. 44–88 in Mattli, W and Woods, N (eds.), The Politics of Global Regulation (Princeton University Press: Princeton NJ).Google Scholar
Abreu, D, Pearce, D, and Stacchetti, E. 1990. “Toward a Theory of Discounted Repeated Games with Imperfect Monitoring,” Econometrica 58(5): 1041–1063.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Administrative Conference of the United States (ACUS). 1978. “Recommendation 78-4, Federal Agency Interaction with Private Standard-Setting Organizations in Health and Safety Regulation.”Google Scholar
Akerlof, GA. 1970. “The Market for ‘Lemons’: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 84(3): 488–500.Google Scholar
Albright, D and Hibbs, M. 1992. “Iraq’s Bomb: Blueprints and Artifacts,” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists (Jan–Feb): 30.Google Scholar
Aldhous, P. 2006. “Synthetic Biologists Reject Controversial Guidelines,” New Scientist (May 23), www.newscientist.com/article/dn9211-synthetic-biologists-rejectcontroversial-guidelines.html.Google Scholar
Anchustegui, IH. 2015. “Competition Law through an Ordoliberal Lens,” Oslo Law Review 2(3): 139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anon. 1963. “Developments in the Law: Judicial Control of Actions of Private Associations: Association Action Affecting Nonmembers,” Harvard Law Review 76: 1037.Google Scholar
Anon. 2004. “The First International Meeting on Synthetic Biology, Synthetic Biology 1.0, June 10–12, 2004,” openwetware.org/images/7/79/SB1.0_overview.pdf.Google Scholar
Anon. 2005a. “Editorial: Genes for Sale,” New Scientist (Nov. 12): 5, www.precaution.org/lib/05/genes_for_sale.051112.htm.Google Scholar
Anon. 2005b. “Craig Venter Institute Press Release: Major New Policy Study Will Explore Risks, Benefits of Synthetic Genomics,” Biospace (Jun. 28), www.biospace.com/news_story.aspx?NewsEntityId=20467320.Google Scholar
Anon. 2008a. “Carbon Fibre: Sustained Increase in Production Capacities,” JEC Magazine 41 (Jun.), www.jeccomposites.com/knowledge/international-composites-news/carbon-fibre-sustained-increase-production-capacities.Google Scholar
Anon. 2008c. “A Stitch in Time: How Companies Manage Risks to Their Reputation,” The Economist (Jan. 17).Google Scholar
Anon. 2010a. “Global and China Carbon Fiber Industry Report 2009–2010,” www.researchinchina.com/Htmls/Report/2010/5939.html.Google Scholar
Anon. 2010b. “Has Emmer Donation Cost Target on Stock Market?” Pioneer Press (Aug. 3), www.twincities.com/2010/08/03/has-emmer-donation-cost-target-on-stock-market.Google Scholar
Anon. 2011. “Scientists Asked Not to Reveal Bird Flu Details,” Wall Street Journal (Dec. 22).Google Scholar
Anon. 2013a. “Market Outlook: Surplus in Carbon Fiber’s Future?” CompositesWorld (Mar. 2013), www.compositesworld.com/articles/market-outlook-surplus-in-carbon-fibers-future.Google Scholar
Answers.com n.d. “How Wide Is a Human Hair?” wiki.answers.com/Q/What_is_the_average_thickness_of_a_human_hair.Google Scholar
AstraZeneca. 2009. “Code of Conduct,” www.astrazeneca.com/Responsibility/Code-policies-standards/Code-of-Conduct.Google Scholar
Auld, G. 2010. “Assessing Certification as Governance: Effects and Broader Consequences for Coffee,” Journal of Environment and Development 19: 216.Google Scholar
Auld, G, Bernstein, S, and Cashore, B. 2008. “The New Corporate Social Responsibility,” Annual Review of Environment and Resources 33: 413–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Auld, G, Bozzi, L, Cashore, B, Levin, K, and Renckens, S. 2007. “Can Non-State Governance ‘Ratchet Up’ Global Standards? Assessing Their Indirect Effects and Evolutionary Potential,” Review of European Community and International Environmental Law 16(2): 158.Google Scholar
Auld, G, Cashore, B, Balboa, C, Bozzi, L, and Renckens, S. 2010. “Can Technological Innovations Improve Private Regulation in the Global Economy?” Business and Politics 12(3).Google Scholar
Auld, G, Cashore, B, and Newsom, D. 2002. “Perspectives on Forest Certification: A Survey Examining Differences Among the US Forest Sectors’ Views of Their Forest Certification Alternatives,” pp. 271ff in Teeter, LD, Cashore, B, and Zhang, D (eds.), Forest Policy for Private Forestry (CABI Publishing: Oxford and New York).Google Scholar
Bäckstrand, K. 2006. “Democratizing Global Environmental Governance? Stakeholder Democracy after the World Summit on Sustainable Development,” European Journal of International Relations 12(4): 467–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balleisen, EJ and Eisner, M. 2009. “The Promise and Pitfalls of Co-Regulation: How Governments Can Draw on Private Governance for Public Purpose” pp. 127–149 in Moss, D and Cisternino, J (eds.), New Perspectives on Regulation (The Tobin Project: Cambridge MA).Google Scholar
Balmer, A and Martin, P. 2008. “Synthetic Biology: Social and Ethical Challenges” (Institute for Science and Society), www.synbiosafe.eu/uploads///pdf/synthetic_biology_social_ethical_challenges.pdf.Google Scholar
Balter, M. 1999. “EMBL Faces Huge Bill Following Adverse Pay Dispute Ruling,” Science 286: 1058–1059.Google Scholar
Banjo, S. 2014. “Inside Nike’s Struggle to Balance Cost and Worker Safety in Bangladesh,” Wall Street Journal (Apr. 21).Google Scholar
Baron, DP. 2003. “Private Politics,” Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 12: 31.Google Scholar
Bartley, T. 2011. “Transnational Governance as the Layering of Rules: Intersections of Public and Private Standards,” Theoretical Inquiries in Law 12(2).Google Scholar
BASF. n.d. “Guide to Safe Manufacture and for Activities Involving Nanoparticles at Workplaces in BASF AG,” www.basf.com/group/corporate/en/function/conversions:/publish/content/sustainability/dialogue/in-dialogue-with-politics/nanotechnology/images/BASF_Guide_to_safe_manufacture_and_for_activities_involving_nanoparticles.pdf.Google Scholar
Beisheim, M and Kaan, C. 2010. “Transnational Standard-Setting Partnerships in the Field of Social Rights: The Interplay of Legitimacy, Institutional Designs, and Process Management,” pp. 122 ff in Bexell, M and Mörth, U (eds.), Democracy and Public-Private Partnerships in Global Governance (Palgrave: Basingstoke UK).Google Scholar
Bennett, C. 2015. “Kremlin’s Ties to Russian Cyber Gangs Sow US Concerns,” The Hill (Oct. 11), thehill.com/policy/cybersecurity/256573-kremlins-ties-russian-cyber-gangs-sow-us-concerns.Google Scholar
Berg, P. 2008. “Meetings that Changed the World: Asilomar 1975,” Nature 455: 290–291.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berg, P, Baltimore, D, Boyer, HW, Cohen, SN, Davis, RW, Hogness, DS, Nathans, D, Roblin, R, Watson, JD, Weissman, S, and Zinder, ND. 1974. “Potential Biohazards of Recombinant DNA Molecules,” Science 185: 303.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berg, P and Singer, MF. 1995. “The Recombinant DNA Controversy: Twenty Years Later,” PNAS 92: 9011–9013.Google Scholar
Berg, S and Cantrell, R. 1999. “Sustainable Forestry Initiative: Toward a Higher Standard,” Journal of Forestry 97: 33.Google Scholar
Berger, K. 2012. Bridging Science and Security for Biological Research: A Dialogue between Universities and the Federal Bureau of Investigation. Report of a Meeting February 21–22, 2012, www.aaas.org/sites/default/files/AAAS-AAU-APLU-FBI-Final-Report_Feb.pdf.Google Scholar
Berger, K. 2013. Meeting Report: Bridging Science and Security for Biological Research: Personnel Security Programs (National Assn. for the Advancement of Science: Washington).Google Scholar
Bernauer, H, Christopher, J, Deininger, W, Fischer, M, Habermeier, P., Heumann, K, Maurer, S, Schwer, H, Stähler, P, and Wagner, T. 2008. Report on the Workshop “Technical Solutions for Biosecurity in Synthetic Biology” (International Association Synthetic Biology: mimeo), www.ia-sb.eu/go/synthetic-biology/activities/press-area/press-information/iasb-report-on-biosecurity-and-biosafety.Google Scholar
Berners-Lee, T and Fischetti, M. 2000. Weaving the Web: The Original Design and Ultimate Destiny of the World Wide Web (Harper Business: New York).Google Scholar
Bernstein, S. 2011. “Legitimacy in Intergovernmental and Non-State Global Governance,” Review of International Political Economy 18(1): 17–51.Google Scholar
Bernstein, S and Cashore, B. 2007. “Can Non-State Global Governance Be Legitimate? An Analytical Framework,” Regulation & Governance 1: 347–371.Google Scholar
Berry, JM. 1989. “Subgovernments, Issue Networks, and Political Conflict,” pp. 239–260 in Harris, RA and Miklis, S (eds.), Remaking American Politics (Westview Press: Boulder CO).Google Scholar
Besley, T and Ghatak, M. 2007. “Retailing Public Goods: The Economics of Corporate Social Responsibility,” Journal of Public Economics 91: 1645.Google Scholar
Biospace.com. 2010. “GENEART AG Will Become Part of the US-Based Biotechnology Company Life Technologies” (Apr. 9), www.biospace.com/News/geneart-ag-will-become-part-of-the-us-based/176354.Google Scholar
Bisson, TA. 1954. Zaibatsu Dissolution in Japan (University of California Press: Berkeley).Google Scholar
Black, J. 2008. “Constructing and Contesting Legitimacy and Accountability in Polycentric Regulatory Regimes,” Regulation & Governance 2: 137–164.Google Scholar
Boccone, A. 2003. “Specialty Chemicals,” pp. 85–110 in Spitz, PH (ed.), The Chemical Industry at the Millennium: Maturity, Restructuring, and Globalization (Chemical Heritage Foundation: Philadelphia PA).Google Scholar
Bodansky, DM. 2008. “Legitimacy in International Environmental Law,” pp. 704–726 in Bodansky, D, Brunnée, J, and Hey, E (eds.), Oxford Handbook of International Environmental Law (Oxford University Press: New York).Google Scholar
Borelli, D. 2016. “The Financial Consequences of Target’s New Bathroom Policy,” Conservative Review (May 4), www.conservativereview.com/commentary/2016/05/financial-consequences-of-targets-new-bathroom-policy.Google Scholar
Bornmann, L. 2011. “Scientific Peer Review,” Annual Review of Information Science and Technology 45(1): 197–245.Google Scholar
Börzel, TA, Thauer, CR, and Hönke, J. 2011. “Racing to the Top? Regulatory Competition Among Firms in Areas of Limited Statehood,” pp. 144ff in Risse, T (ed.), Governance Without A State (Columbia University Press: New York).Google Scholar
Boswell, C. 2009. “Microreactors Gain Popularity Among Producers,” ICIS Chemical Business, www.icis.com/resources/news/2009/05/04/9211877/microreactors-gain- popularity-among-producers.Google Scholar
Bowen, D. 2012. “Cost of Government Day: 2012 Report” costofgovernment.org/files/files/COGD2012_hi%20res.pdf.Google Scholar
Bowman, DM and Hodge, GA. 2009. “Counting on Codes: An Examination of Transnational Codes as a Regulatory Governance Mechanism for Nanotechnologies,” Regulation & Governance 3: 145–164.Google Scholar
Breton, A and Wintrobe, R. 1982. The Logic of Bureaucratic Conduct: An Economic Analysis of Competition, Exchange, and Efficiency in Private and Public Organizations (Cambridge University Press: New York).Google Scholar
Brokenpipeline.org. 2008. “A Broken Pipeline? Flat Funding of the NIH Puts a Generation of Science at Risk,” www.brokenpipeline.org.Google Scholar
Brousseau, E and Raynaud, E. 2011. “Climbing the Hierarchical Ladders of Rules: A Life-Cycle Theory of Institutional Evolution,” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 79: 65.Google Scholar
Brown, R and Zhang, D. 2005. “The Sustainable Forestry Initiative’s Impact on Stumpage Markets in the US South,” Canadian Journal of Forest Resources 35: 2056.Google Scholar
Buchanan, JM and Tullock, G. 1974 [1962]. The Calculus of Consent (University of Michigan Press: Ann Arbor MI).Google Scholar
Bügl, H, Danner, JP, Molinari, RJ, Mulligan, JT, Park, H-O, Reichert, B, et al. 2007. “DNA Synthesis and Biological Security,” Nature Biotechnology 25: 627–629.Google Scholar
Bumas, Lester O. 1999. Intermediate Microeconomics: Neoclassical and Factually-Oriented Models. New York: M.E. Sharpe, Inc.Google Scholar
Bush, SR, Toonen, H, Oosterveer, P, and Mol, APJ. 2012. “The ‘Devils Triangle’ of MSC Certification: Balancing Credibility, Accessibility and Continuous Improvement,” Marine Policy 37: 288.Google Scholar
Bush, V. 1945. Science, the Endless Frontier (US Government Printing Office: Washington DC).Google Scholar
Büthe, T. 2010a. “Engineering Uncontestedness? The Origins and Institutional Development of the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC),” Business and Politics 12(3).Google Scholar
Büthe, T. 2010b. “Global Private Politics: A Research Agenda,” Business and Policy (Oct.).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Büthe, T. 2010c. “Private Regulation in the Global Economy: A (P)Review,” Business and Policy 12(3): 1–38.Google Scholar
Büthe, T. 2010d. “Private Regulation in the Global Economy: Guest Editor’s Note,” Business and Policy 12(3): 1–2.Google Scholar
Büthe, T and Mattli, W. 2011. The New Global Rulers: The Privatization of Regulation in the World Economy (Princeton University Press: Princeton NJ).Google Scholar
Butler, D. 1999. “Life Science Facilities in Crisis as Brussels Switches Off Funding,” Nature 402: 3–4.Google Scholar
Cabral, LMB. 2005. The Economics of Trust and Reputation: A Primer (Preliminary), pages.stern.nyu.edu/~lcabral/reputation/Reputation_June05.pdf.Google Scholar
Cafaggi, F and Renda, A. 2012. “Public and Private Regulation: Mapping the Labyrinth,” CEPS Working Paper No. 370.Google Scholar
California Environmental Associates. 2012. “A Literature and State-of-Knowledge Review of Fisheries Certification and Standards,” pp. A-70–A-87 in Steering Committee of the State of Knowledge Assessment of Standards and Certification, Toward Sustainability: The Roles and Limitations of Certification.Google Scholar
Calliess, GP and Renner, M. 2009. “Transnationalizing Private Law,” The German Law Journal 10: 1341–1356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, E, Clarridge, B, Gokhale, M, Birenbaum, L, Hilgartner, S, Holtzman, N, and Blumenthal, D. 2002. “Data Withholding in Academic Genetics: Evidence from a National Survey,” Journal of the American Medical Association 287: 473.Google Scholar
Campbell, H and Le Heron, R. 2007. “Supermarkets, Producers, and Audit Technologies: The Constitutive Micro-Politics of Food, Legitimacy, and Governance,” pp. 131–153 in Burch, D and Lawrence, G (eds.), Supermarkets and Agri-Food Supply Chains (Elgar: Cheltenham UK).Google Scholar
Carlson, R. 2005. “Synthetic Biology 1.0,” Futurebrief, www.futurebrief.com/robertcarlsonbio.pdf.Google Scholar
Carman, T. 2012. “WTO: ‘Dolphin-Safe’ Label Discriminates Against Mexico,” Washington Post “All We Can Eat” Blog (May 16), www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/all-we-can-eat/post/wto-dolphin-safe-label-discriminates-against-mexico/2012/05/16/gIQAwnCcUU_blog.html.Google Scholar
Carnegie Fund for Peace. 2012. Guiding Principles and Nuclear Proliferation: An Industry-Based Approach to Strengthening Nonproliferation, library.fundforpeace.org/library/ttcvr1204-threatconvergence-guidingprinciples-02d.pdf.Google Scholar
Carter, GM, Cooper, WD, Lai, CS, and March, DMS. 1978. The Consequences of Unfunded NIH Applications for the Investigator and His Research, RAND Report No. R-2229-NIH (RAND: Santa Monica CA).Google Scholar
Cashore, B. 2004. “Environmental Governance: How Non-State Market-Driven (NSMD) Governance Systems Gain Rule-Making Authority,” Governance 15(4): 503–529.Google Scholar
Cashore, B and Auld, G. 2012. “Forestry Review,” pp. A-88–A-124 in Steering Committee of the State of Knowledge Assessment of Standards and Certification, Toward Sustainability: The Roles and Limitations of Certification.Google Scholar
Cashore, B, Auld, G, and Newsom, D. 2004. Governing Through Markets: Forest Certification and the Emergence of Non-State Authority (Yale University Press: New Haven CT).Google Scholar
Cello, J, Paul, AV, and Wimmer, E. 2002. “Chemical Synthesis of Polio-Virus cDNA: Generation of Infectious Virus in the Absence of a Natural Template,” Science 297: 1016–1018.Google Scholar
Cesaroni, B, Gambardella, A, and Mariani, M. 2007. “The Evolution of Networks in the Chemical Industry, pp. 21–52 in Galamos, L, Hikino, T, and Zamagni, V, The Global Chemical Industry in the Age of the Petrochemical Revolution (Cambridge University Press: New York).Google Scholar
Chait, J. 2012. “The Vast Left-Wing Conspiracy Is on Your Screen,” New York Magazine (Aug. 19).Google Scholar
Challenger, C. 2003. “The Balancing Act of Small to Medium Sized Custom Manufacturers,” Chemical Market Reporter (Apr. 14).Google Scholar
Check Hayden, E. 2003. “US Officials Urge Biologists to Vet Publications for Bioterror Risk,” Nature 421: 197.Google Scholar
Check Hayden, E. 2009a. “Gene-Makers Form Security Coalition,” Nature News (Nov. 18), www.nature.com/news/2009/091118/full/news.2009.1095.Google Scholar
Chilvers, J and Macnaghten, P. 2011. “The Future of Science Governance: A Review of Public Concerns, Governance, and Institutional Response,” www.sciencewise-erc.org.uk/cms/assets/Uploads/Project-files/Future-of-Science-Governance-Lit-Review-Apr11-new.pdf.Google Scholar
Chubin, DE and Hackett, EJ. 1990. Peerless Science: Peer Review and US Science Policy (SUNY Press: Albany NY).Google Scholar
Committee on Advances in Technology and the Prevention of Their Application to Next Generation Biowarfare Threats. 2006. Globalization, Biosecurity and the Future of the Life Sciences (National Research Council: Washington DC).Google Scholar
Committee on Research Standards & Practices to Prevent the Destructive Application of Biotechnology. See Fink CommitteeGoogle Scholar
Committee on Scientific Milestones for the Development of a Gene Sequence-Based Classification System for the Oversight of Select Agents. 2010. Sequence-Based Classification of Select Agents: A Brighter Line (National Research Council: Washington DC).Google Scholar
Conroy, ME. 2007. Branded! How the “Certification Revolution” Is Transforming Global Corporations (New Society Publishers: Gabriola Island Canada).Google Scholar
Cummins, A. 2004. “The Marine Stewardship Council: A Multi-Stakeholder Approach to Sustainable Fishing,” Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 11: 85.Google Scholar
Dando, M. 2010. “Synthetic Biology: Harbinger of an Uncertain Future?” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists (Aug. 16), www.thebulletin.org/web-edition/columnists/malcolm-dando/synthetic-biology-harbinger-of-uncertain-future.Google Scholar
Davies, P and Lynch, D. 2002. Routledge Companion to Fascism and the Far Right (Routledge: London).Google Scholar
Dawson, NL and Segerson, K. 2008. “Voluntary Agreement with Industries: Participation Incentives with Industry-Wide Targets,” Land and Economics 84: 97.Google Scholar
de Vriend, H. 2006. “Constructing Life: Early Social Reflections on the Emerging Field of Synthetic Biology,” Rathenau Institute Working Doc. No. 97 (Rathenau Inst.: The Hague), depot.knaw.nl/4935/1/WED97_Constructing_Life_2006.pdf.Google Scholar
DeLoeker, J and Eeckhout, J. 2017. “The Rise of Market Power and Macroeconomic Implications,” National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 23687 (NBER: Boston, MA). Available at http://www.nber.org/papers/w23687.Google Scholar
Dingwerth, K. 2007. The New Transnationalism: Transnational Governance and Democratic Legitimacy (Palgrave: Houndmills).Google Scholar
Dixon, RG Jr. 1978. Standards Development in the Private Sector: Thoughts on Interest Representation and Procedural Fairness (National Fire Protection Assn.: Quincy MA).Google Scholar
Djama, M, Fouilleux, E, and Vagneron, I. 2011. “Standard-Setting, Certifying and Benchmarking: A Governmentality Approach to Sustainability Standards in the Agro-Food Sector,” ch. 8 in Ponte, S, Gibbon, P, and Vestergaard, J (eds.), Governing through Standards: Origins, Drivers and Limitations (Palgrave: New York).Google Scholar
Doyle, C. 1997. “Self Regulation and Statutory Regulation,” Business Strategy Review 8: 35.Google Scholar
DuPont Chemical Co. and Environmental Defense Fund. 2007. “NanoRisk Framework,” www.edf.org/documents/6496_Nano%20Risk%20Framework.pdf.Google Scholar
Dupre, AP. 1992. “Foreign Duty: Export Control Goes Private,” Business Law Today 2: 46.Google Scholar
Earth Island Institute. 2011. International Tuna Monitoring Program 2011 Annual Report, www.earthisland.org/dolphinSafeTuna/assets/2011MonitorReport.pdf.Google Scholar
Earth Island Institute. n.d.(a). “Approved Dolphin Safe Tuna Processing Companies and Fishing Companies,” www.earthisland.org/dolphinSafeTuna/DolphinSafeCanners.html.Google Scholar
Earth Island Institute. n.d.(b). “International ‘Dolphin Safe’ Standards For Tuna,” www.earthisland.org/immp/Dol_Safe_Standard.html.Google Scholar
Earth Island Institute. n.d.(c). Web Page: “International Dolphin Safe Monitoring Program,” www.earthisland.org/dolphinSafeTuna.Google Scholar
Eberlein, B, Abbott, KW, Black, J, Meidinger, E, and Wood, S. 2014. “Transnational Business Governance Interactions: Conceptualization and Framework for Analysis,” Regulation & Governance (2014) 8: 1–21.Google Scholar
Edmunds, T and Wheeler, R. 2009. “Setting Priorities: Assessing Threats and Identifying Cost-Effective Responses to WMD Terrorism,” pp. 191–210 in Maurer, SM (ed.), WMD Terrorism: Science and Policy Choices (MIT Press: Cambridge MA).Google Scholar
Eisenstein, M. 2010. “Synthetic DNA Firms Embrace Hazardous Agents Guidance But Remain Wary of Automated ‘Best Match,’” Nature Biotechnology 28: 1225.Google Scholar
Enloe, C. 2017. “ Liberal Boycott of Sean Hannity Backfires and Puts Multiple MSNBC Stars in Crosshairs, ” The Blaze (May 29, 2017) available at www.theblaze.com/news/2017/05/29/liberal-boycott-of-sean-hannity-backfires-and-puts-multiple-msnbc-stars-in-crosshairs/.Google Scholar
ETC Group. 2006. “Backgrounder: Open Letter on Synthetic Biology” (May 17), www.etcgroup.org/en/node/11.Google Scholar
European Cetacean ByCatch Campaign. n.d. Web Page: “The Tuna Boycott That Led to the Dolphin Safe Label,” www.eurocbc.org/page322.htmls.Google Scholar
FAO. See United Nations Food & Agricultural OrganisationGoogle Scholar
Farrell, J and Saloner, G. 1988. “Coordination Through Committees and Markets,” RAND Journal of Economics 19: 235.Google Scholar
Ferguson, CD and Lubenau, JO. 2003. “Securing US Radioactive Sources,” Issues in Science and Technology Policy XX(1), issues.org/20–1/ferguson.Google Scholar
Feynman, M. 2005 [1966]. Perfectly Reasonable Deviations (from the Beaten Track): The Letters of Richard P. Feynman (Basic Books: New York).Google Scholar
Fink Committee: See National Academy of Sciences Committee on Genomic Databases for BioterrorismGoogle Scholar
Fiorino, DJ. 2010. Voluntary Initiatives, Regulation and Nanotechnology Oversight: Charting a Path, www.nanotechproject.org/process/assets/files/8347/pen-19.pdf.Google Scholar
Fischer, C and Lyon, TP. 2014. “Competing Environmental Labels,” Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 23: 692.Google Scholar
Fischer, M and Maurer, SM. 2010. “Harmonizing Biosecurity Oversight for Gene Synthesis,” Nature Biotechnology 28: 20–22.Google Scholar
Fitzpatrick, M. 2007. Nuclear Black Markets: Pakistan, AQ Khan, and the Rise of Proliferation Networks (International Institute for Strategic Studies: Washington DC).Google Scholar
Foreman, CH. 1988. Signals from the Hill: Congressional Oversight and the Challenge of Social Regulation (Yale University Press: New Haven CT).Google Scholar
ForestEthics. 2010. SFI: Certified Greenwash – Inside the Sustainable Foresty Initiative’s Deceptive Eco-Label, forestethics.org//sites/forestethics.huang.radicaldesigns.org/files/SFI-Certified-Greenwash-Report-ForestEthics.pdf.Google Scholar
Forest Stewardship Council. 2012. “FSC International Standard: FSC Principles and Criteria for Forest Stewardship 7,” ic.fsc.org/download.fsc-std-01-001-v5-0-revised-principles-and-criteria-for-forest-stewardship.a-1780.pdf.Google Scholar
Forest Stewardship Council. n.d. Web Page: “FSC General Assembly,” www.ga.fsc.org/generalassembly.html.Google Scholar
Forsythe, M and Sanger, DE. 2015. “China Calls Hacking of U.S. Workers’ Data a Crime, Not a State Act” (Dec. 2).Google Scholar
Frederickson, DS. 1991. “Asilomar and Recombinant DNA: The End of the Beginning,” pp. 258–307 in Hanna, KE (ed.), Biomedical Politics (National Academy Press: Washington DC).Google Scholar
Friedrichs, S. 2007. “Deciphering Nanotechnology Codes,” Nanotechnology Now, www.nanotech-now.com/columns/?article=093.Google Scholar
FSC. See Forest Stewardship Council.Google Scholar
FTC. See U.S. Federal Trade Commission.Google Scholar
Fuchs, D and Kalfagianni, A. 2010. “The Causes and Consequences of Private Food Governance,” Business and Policy 12(3): 5.Google Scholar
Fuchs, D, Kalfagianni, A, and Arendtsen, M. 2009. “Retail Power, Private Standards, and Sustainability in the Global Food System,” pp. 29 ff. in Clapp, J and Fuchs, D (eds.), Corporate Power in Global Agrifood Governance (MIT Press: Cambridge MA).Google Scholar
Fuchs, D, Kalfagianni, A, and Havinga, T. 2008. “Actors in Private Food Governance: The Legitimacy of Retail Standards and Multistakeholder Initiatives with Civil Society Participation,” Agriculture and Human Values 28: 353.Google Scholar
Fudenberg, D and Maskin, E. 1986. “The Folk Theorem in Repeated Games With Discounting or Incomplete Information,” Econometrica 54(3): 533–554.Google Scholar
Furger, F. 1997. Accountability and Systems of Self-Governance: The Case of the Maritime Industry, Law and Policy 19: 445.Google Scholar
Garfinkel, M, Endy, D, Epstein, G, and Friedman, R. 2007. Synthetic Genomics: Options for Governance (Center for Security and International Studies: Washington DC), www.synbiosafe.eu/uploads/pdf/Synthetic%20Genomics%20Options%20for%20Governance.pdf.Google Scholar
Geiger, RL. 1986. To Advance Knowledge: The Growth of American Research Universities, 1900–1940 (Oxford University Press: New York).Google Scholar
Gerber, DJ. 1994. “Constitutionalizing the Economy: German Neo-liberalism, Competition Law and the ‘New’ Europe,” American Journal of Comparative Law 42: 25.Google Scholar
Gereffi, G. 1994. “The Organization of Buyer-Driven Global Commodity Chains: How U.S. Retailers Shape Overseas Production Networks,” in pp. 95–122 Gereffi, G and Korzeniewicz, M (eds.), Commodity Chains and Global Capitalism, (Praeger: Westport CT).Google Scholar
Gereffi, G. 1999. “International Trade and Industrial Upgrading in the Apparel Commodity Chain,” Journal of International Economics 48(1): 37–70.Google Scholar
Gereffi, G, Humphrey, J, and Sturgeon, T. 2005. “The Governance of Global Value Chains,” Review of International Political Economy 12(1): 78–104.Google Scholar
GFSI. See Global Food Safety Initiative.Google Scholar
Gilmore, J. 2008. “Case Study 3: MSC Certification of the Alaska Pollock Fishery,” pp. 269–284 in Ward, T and Philips, B (eds.), Seafood Ecolabelling: Principles and Practice (Wiley: Hoboken NJ).Google Scholar
Global Food Safety Initiative. 2013. GFSI Benchmarking Process, www.mygfsi.com/gfsi-benchmarking-general/applications-update.html.Google Scholar
Global Food Safety Initiative. 2016. “GFSI Guidance Document Sixth Edition Overview,” www.mygfsi.com/technical-resources/guidance-document.html.Google Scholar
GLOBALG.A.P. n.d.(a). “Technical Committees,” www.globalgap.org/uk_en/who-we-are/governance/technical-committees.Google Scholar
GLOBALG.A.P. n.d.(b). “The GLOBALG.A.P. Database,” www.globalgap.org/uk_en/what-we-do/the-gg-system/GLOBALG.A.P.-Database.Google Scholar
Golan, E, Kuchler, F, and Mitchell, L. 2001. “Economics of Food Labeling,” Journal of Consumer Policy 24: 117.Google Scholar
Gosden, E. 2016. “China to Build Nuclear Reactor in Essex After Hinkley Deal Approved,” The (UK) Telegraph (Sept. 15).Google Scholar
Grant, RW and Keohane, RO. 2005. “Accountability and Abuses of Power in World Politics,” American Political Science Review 99(1): 29–43.Google Scholar
Green, EJ and Porter, RH. 1984. “Noncooperative Collusion Under Imperfect Price Information,” Econometrica 52(1): 87–100.Google Scholar
Greenberg, A. 2015. “Here’s a Spy Firm’s Price List for Secret Hacker Techniques,” Wired (Nov. 18), www.wired.com/2015/11/heres-a-spy-firms-price-list-for-secret-hacker-techniques.Google Scholar
Gulbrandsen, LH 2009. “The Emergence and Effectiveness of the Marine Stewardship Council,” Marine Policy 33: 654–660.Google Scholar
Gulbrandsen, LH 2014. “Dynamic Governance Interactions: Evolutionary Effects of State Responses to Non-State Certification Programs,” Regulation & Governance 8: 74–92.Google Scholar
Gupta, AK and Lad, LJ. 1983. “Industry Self-Regulation: An Economic, Organizational, and Political Analysis,” Academy of Management Review 8(3): 416–425.Google Scholar
Guston, DH. 2003. “The Expanding Rule of Peer Review Processes in the United States,” pp. 81–97 in Shapira, P and Kuhlmann, S (eds.), Learning from Science and Technology Policy Evaluations: Experiences in the United States and Europe (Elgar: Cheltenham UK).Google Scholar
Hale, T. 2011. “Marine Stewardship Council,” pp. 308ff in Hale, T and Held, D (eds.), Handbook of Transnational Governance: Institutions and Innovations (Wiley: Hoboken NJ).Google Scholar
Hamilton, RW. 1982. “Prospects for the Nongovernmental Development of Regulatory Standards,” American University Law Review 32(2): 455.Google Scholar
Harris, R and Paxman, J. 2002. A Higher Form of Killing: The Secret History of Chemical and Biological Warfare (Random House: New York).Google Scholar
Harris, S and Germaine, R. 2002. “Improving Forest Management Through the Supply Chain: An Assessment of Wood Procurement Management Systems in the Forest Products Industry,” pp. 259–269 in Teeter, LD, Cashore, B, and Zhang, D (eds.), Forest Policy for Private Forestry (CABI: Wallingford UK).Google Scholar
Havinga, T. 2006. “Private Regulation of Food Safety by Supermarkets,” Law and Policy 28: 515.Google Scholar
Havinga, T. 2008. “Actors in Private Food Regulation: Taking Responsibility or Passing the Buck to Someone Else?” Nimigen Sociology of Law Working Paper Series No. 2008/1.Google Scholar
Health and Human Services, U.S. Department of See HHS.Google Scholar
Heilbron, JL and Seidel, RW. 1990. Lawrence and His Laboratory: A History of the Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, vol. 1 (University of California: Berkeley).Google Scholar
Hellman, A, Oxman, MN, and Pollack, R. 1973. Biohazards in Biological Research: Proceedings of a Conference at Asilomar, January 22–24, 1973 (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory: Cold Spring Harbor NY).Google Scholar
Héritier, A and Rhodes, M (eds.). 2011. New Modes of Governance in Europe: Governing in the Shadow of Hierarchy (Palgrave: New York).Google Scholar
HHS. See U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services.Google Scholar
Hicks, JR. 1935. “Annual Survey of Economic Theory: The Theory of Monopoly.” Econometrica 3(1).Google Scholar
Higgins, KJ. 2011. “A Call to Disarm Black Hat Hackers in China,” Dark Reading, www.darkreading.com/vulnerabilities---threats/a-call-to-disarm-black-hat-hackers-in-china/d/d-id/1136365.Google Scholar
Hobson, C. 2009. “Beyond the End of History: The Need for a ‘Radical Historicisation’ of Democracy in International Relations,” Millennium 37(3): 631–657.Google Scholar
Hofstadter, R. 1991 [1964]. “What Happened to the Antitrust Movement?” pp. 20–31 in Sullivan, ET (ed.), The Political Economy of the Sherman Act: The First One Hundred Years (Oxford University Press: New York).Google Scholar
Home Depot. 2010. Press Release: “The Home Depot Introduces Eco Options” (Apr. 17), www.newswire.ca/en/story/84479/the-home-depot-introduces-eco-options.Google Scholar
Home Depot. n.d.(a) Web Page: “Frequently Asked Questions,” corporate.homedepot.com/Corporate Responsibility/Environment/WoodPurchasing/Pages/FAQs.aspx.Google Scholar
Home Depot. n.d.(b). Web Page: “Wood Purchasing Policy,” corporate.homedepot.com/CorporateResponsibility/Environment/WoodPurchasing/Pages/default.aspx.Google Scholar
Howes, R. 2008. “The Marine Stewardship Council Programme,” pp. 81–103 in T Ward and B Philips (eds.), Seafood Ecolabelling: Principles and Practice (Wiley: Hoboken NJ).Google Scholar
Humphreys, D. 1996. Forest Politics: The Evolution of International Cooperation (Routledge: London and New York).Google Scholar
Hund, G and Elkhamri, O. 2005. “Industry Self-Regulation as a Means to Promote Nonproliferation,” Report No. PNNL-15355 (Pacific Northwest National Laboratory: Seattle WA).Google Scholar
Hund, G and Seward, AM. 2008. “Broadening Industry Governance to Include Nonproliferation,” PNNL-17521 (Pacific Northwest National Laboratory: Seattle WA), cgs.pnnl.gov/pdfs/IndustryCorporateGovernance-Security_11-12-08Final.pdf.Google Scholar
Hvistendahl, M. 2010. “China’s Hacker Army,” Foreign Policy (Mar. 3), foreignpolicy.com/2010/03/03/chinas-hacker-army.Google Scholar
IASB. See International Association Synthetic Biology.Google Scholar
ICO. See International Coffee Organization.Google Scholar
ICPS. See International Consortium for Polynucleotide Synthesis.Google Scholar
IG DHS. 2008. “Code of Conduct for Nanotechnologies,” www.innovationsgesellschaft.ch/media/archive2/publikationen/Factsheet_CoC_engl.pdf.Google Scholar
IGSC. 2012. Harmonized Screening Protocol (Amended), www.genesynthesisconsortium.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/IGSC-Harmonized-Screening-Protocol1.pdf.Google Scholar
International Association Synthetic Biology. 2009. “Code of Conduct for Best Practices in Gene Synthesis,” www.ia-sb.eu/go/synthetic-biology/activities/press-area/press-information/code-of-conduct-for-best-practices-in-gene-synthesis.Google Scholar
International Association Synthetic Biology. 2014. Press Release: “Code of Conduct for Best Practices in Gene Synthesis” (Feb. 3), webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:UccsWkDSPwEJ:synthetic-biology.net/2014/02/code-of-conduct-for-best-practices-in-gene-synthesis/+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us.Google Scholar
International Coffee Organization. 2013. The International Coffee Organization 1963–2013: 50 Years Serving the World Coffee Community (ICO: London).Google Scholar
International Consortium for Polynucleotide Synthesis. n.d. Web Page: “About the ICPS,” available from the author.Google Scholar
International Gene Synthesis Consortium. 2009. “Harmonized Screening Protocol,” available from the author.Google Scholar
International Social and Environmental Accreditation and Labelling Alliance (ISEAL). 2013. “Credibility Principles Brochure: What’s Essential for a Standards System to Deliver Positive Impact?” issuu.com/isealalliance/docs/credibility_principles_booklet?e=3335187/3992107.Google Scholar
International Social and Environmental Accreditation and Labelling Alliance (ISEAL). 2014. “Setting Social and Environmental Standards: ISEAL Code of Good Practice Version 6.0,” issuu.com/isealalliance/docs/iseal_standard_setting_code_v6_dec_?e=3335187/11610938.Google Scholar
International Wood Markets Group. 2013. Press Release: “Canada and U.S. ‘Top 20’ Lumber Producers’ Report Indicates Renewed Industry Optimism” (Mar. 21).Google Scholar
ISEAL. See International Social and Environmental Accreditation and Labelling Alliance.Google Scholar
ISIS (Institute for Science and International Security). n.d. “Case Studies of Illicit Procurement Networks,” exportcontrols.info/case_studies.htm.Google Scholar
ITS Global. 2011. Forest Certification – Sustainability, Governance, and Risk, www.itsglobal.net/sites/default/files/itsglobal/Forestry%20Certification-Sustainability%20Governance%20and%20Risk%20%282011%29.pdf.Google Scholar
Jackson, MO. 2008. Social and Economic Networks (Princeton University Press: Princeton and Oxford UK).Google Scholar
Jaffee, D and Russell, T. 2009. “Responding to WMD Terrorism Threats: The Role of Insurance Markets,” pp. 251–286 in Maurer, SM (ed.), WMD Terrorism: Science and Policy Choices (MIT Press: Cambridge MA).Google Scholar
Jones, A. 2011. “Law Blog: Is China Finally Getting Tough on Piracy?” Wall Street Journal (Apr. 20) (online edition), blogs.wsj.com/chinarealtime/2011/04/20/is-china-finally-getting-tough-on-piracy.Google Scholar
Journal Editors and Authors Group. 2003. “Statement on Scientific Publication and Security,” Science 299: 1149.Google Scholar
Joyner, DH. 2004. “The Enhanced Proliferation Control Initiative: National Security Necessity or Unconstitutionally Vague?” Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law 32: 107–123.Google Scholar
Kalfagianni, A. 2010. “The Effectiveness of Private Food (Retail) Governance for Sustainability,” Institute for Environmental Studies 12: 1.Google Scholar
Kan, M. 2011. “Pledge Asks Chinese Hackers to Reject Cybertheft,” Computer World (Sept. 16), www.computerworld.com/article/2511219/security0/pledge-asks-chinese-hackers-to-reject-cybertheft.html.Google Scholar
Katz, MA and Shapiro, C. 1994. “Systems Competition and Network Effects,” Journal of Economic Perspectives 8: 93–115.Google Scholar
Kelle, A. 2009. “Synthetic Biology and Biosecurity: From Low Levels of Awareness to a Comprehensive Strategy,” EMBO Reports 10: S23–S27, www.nature.com/embor/journal/v10/n1s/pdf/embor2009119.pdf.Google Scholar
King, AA and Lenox, MJ. 2000. “Industry Self-Regulation Without Sanctions: The Chemical Industry’s Responsible Care Program,” Academy of Management Journal 43: 698.Google Scholar
King, AA, Lenox, MJ, and Barnett, ML. 2002. “Strategic Responses to the Reputation Commons Problem,” pp. 393–406 in Hoffman, AJ and Ventresca, MJ (eds.), Organizations, Policy, and the Natural Environment: Institutional and Strategic Perspectives (Stanford University Press: Redwood Village CA).Google Scholar
Kirby, WT and Weymouth, TC. 1985. “Antitrust and Amateur Sports: The Role of Noneconomic Values,” Indiana Law Journal 61: 31.Google Scholar
Kolk, A. 2005. “Corporate Social Responsibility in the Coffee Sector: The Dynamics of MNC Responses and Code Development,” European Management Journal 23: 228.Google Scholar
Kolk, A. 2012. “Towards a Sustainable Coffee Market: Paradoxes Faced by a Multinational Company,” Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 19: 79.Google Scholar
Kosoff, Maya. 2016. “Grubhub Shares Plunge After C.E.O. Sends Memo Telling Employees Who Share Trump’s Views to Quit,” Vanity Fair November 11.Google Scholar
Kotchen, MJ and van ’t Veld, K. 2009. “An Economics Perspective on Treating Voluntary Programs as Clubs,” in pp. 67–85 Potoski, M and Prakash, A (eds.), Voluntary Programs: A Club Theory Perspective (MIT Press: Cambridge MA).Google Scholar
Kreuter, N. 2012. “Salary Realities,” Inside Higher Ed (Sept. 5), www.insidehighered.com/advice/2012/09/05/essay-what-new-faculty-members-need-know-about-salaries.Google Scholar
Krimsky, S. 1982. Genetic Alchemy: The Social History of the Recombinant DNA Controversy (MIT Press: London and Cambridge).Google Scholar
Künkel, P, Fricke, V, and Cholakova, S. 2008. “The Common Code for the Coffee Community (4C),” pp. 85–88 in D. Vollmer, Enhancing the Effectiveness of Sustainability Partnerships: Summary of a Workshop, (National Academies Press: Washington DC), www.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=12541&page=85.Google Scholar
Kydd, AH. 2015. International Relations Theory: The Game Theoretic Approach (Cambridge University Press: New York).Google Scholar
LaChappelle, J. 2013. Blog: “Landing the Big Fish: 5 Questions with MSC about the McDonald’s USA Announcement” (ISEAL Alliance) (Mar. 19), www.isealalliance.org/online-community/blogs/landing-the-big-fish-5-questions-with-msc-about-the-mcdonald%E2%80%99s-usa-announcement.Google Scholar
Landeweerd, L, Townend, D, Mesman, J, and Van Hoyweghen, I. 2015. “Reflections on Different Governance Styles in Regulating Science: A Contribution to ‘Responsible Research and Innovation,’” Life Sciences, Society and Policy 11: 8.Google Scholar
Langley, M. 2014. “Inside Target, CEO Struggles to Regain Shoppers’ Trust,” Wall Street Journal (Feb. 19).Google Scholar
Langner, R. 2013. “To Kill a Centrifuge: A Technical Analysis of What Stuxnet’s Creators Tried to Achieve,” www.langner.com/en/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/To-kill-a-centrifuge.pdf.Google Scholar
Leary, TB. 2004. FTC Chairman’s Remarks: “Self-Regulation and the Interface Between Consumer Protection and Antitrust” (Jan. 28), www.ftc.gov/public-statements/2004/01/self-regulation-and-interface-between-consumer-protection-and-antitrust.Google Scholar
Leibowitz, J. 2005. Speech: “The Good, the Bad and the Ugly: Trade Associations and Antitrust” (Mar. 30) www.ftc.gov/public-statements/2005/03/good-bad-and-ugly-trade-associations-and-antitrust.Google Scholar
Leighley, JE and Nagler, J. 2013. Who Votes Now? Demographics, Issues, Inequality, and Turnout in the United States (Princeton University Press: Princeton NJ).Google Scholar
Lemon Committee. See Committee on Advances in Technology and the Prevention of Their Application to Next Generation Biowarfare Threats.Google Scholar
Lenox, MJ and Nash, J. 2003. “Industry Self-Regulation and Adverse Selection: A Comparison Across Four Trade Association Programs,” Business Strategy and Environment 12: 343.Google Scholar
Locke, RM. 2013. The Promise and Limits of Private Power: Promoting Labor Standards in a Global Economy (Cambridge University Press: New York).Google Scholar
Lok, C. 2009. “Gene-Makers Put Forward Security Standards,” Nature News (Nov. 4), www.nature.com/news/2009/091104/full/news.2009.1065.html.Google Scholar
Lu, Y. 2014. “White Knights of Cyber Security,” Global Times (Jun. 2), www.globaltimes.cn/content/863423.shtml.Google Scholar
Luongo, KN and Williams, I. 2007. “The Nexus of Globalization and Next-Generation Nonproliferation: Tapping the Power of Market-Based Solutions,” Nonproliferation Review 14(3): 459–470.Google Scholar
Lytton, TD. 2014. “Competitive Third-Party Regulation: How Private Certification Can Overcome Constraints that Frustrate Government Regulation,” Theoretical Inquiries in Law, 15: 539.Google Scholar
Lytton, TD and McAllister, LK. 2014. “Oversight in Private Food Safety Auditing: Addressing Auditor Conflict of Interest,” Wisconsin Law Review: 289–335.Google Scholar
Maher, I. 2011. “Competition Law and Transnational Private Regulatory Regimes: Marking the Cartel Boundary,” Journal of Law and Society 38(1): 119.Google Scholar
Maitland, I. 1985. “The Limits of Business Self-Regulation,” California Management Review XXVII(3): 132–147.Google Scholar
Mann, T. 2013. “Rail Safety and the Value of a Life,” Wall Street Journal (Jun. 17), online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424127887323582904578485061024790402.Google Scholar
Mattli, W and Woods, N. 2009. “In Whose Benefit? Explaining Regulatory Change in Global Politics,” pp. 1–43 in Mattli, W and Woods, N (eds.), The Politics of Global Regulation (Princeton University Press: Princeton NJ).Google Scholar
Maurer, SM. 2006. “Inside the Anticommons: Academic Scientists’ Struggle to Build a Commercially Self-Supporting Human Mutations Database, 1999–2001,” Research Policy 35: 839–853.Google Scholar
Maurer, SM. 2009. “Technologies of Evil: Chemical, Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear Weapons,” pp. 47–110 in Maurer, S (ed.), WMD Terrorism: Science and Policy Choices (MIT Press: Cambridge MA).Google Scholar
Maurer, SM. 2011a. “End of the Beginning or Beginning of the End? Synthetic Biology’s Stalled Security Agenda and the Prospects for Restarting It,” Valparaiso University Law Review 45(4): 1387.Google Scholar
Maurer, SM. 2012. “The Penguin and the Cartel: Rethinking Antitrust and Innovation Policy for the Age of Commercial Open Source,” Utah Law Review 2012(1): 269.Google Scholar
Maurer, SM. 2014. “ Public Problems, Private Answers: Reforming Industry Self- Governance Law for the 21st Century, ” DePaul Business and Commercial Law Journal 12(3) (Spring).Google Scholar
Maurer, SM and von Engelhardt, S. 2013. “Industry Self-Governance: A New Way to Manage Dangerous Technologies,” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists (May).Google Scholar
Maurer, SM, Firestone, R, and Scriver, C. 2000. “Science’s Neglected Legacy,” Nature 405: 117.Google Scholar
Maurer, SM and Fischer, M. 2010. “How to Control Dual-Use Technologies in the Age of Global Commerce,” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists (Jan./Feb.).Google Scholar
Maurer, SM, Fischer, M, Schwer, H, Stähler, C, and Stähler, P. 2009. “Making Commercial Biology Safer: What the Gene Synthesis Industry Has Learned About Screening Customers and Orders” (ITHS Working Paper), gspp.berkeley.edu/assets/uploads/page/Maurer_IASB_Screening.pdf.Google Scholar
Maurer, SM, Lucas, K, and Terrell, S. 2006. “From Understanding to Action: Community-Based Options for Increasing Safety and Security in Synthetic Biology” (ITHS Working Paper).Google Scholar
Maurer, SM and Scotchmer, S. 1999. “Database Protection: Is It Broken and Should We Fix It?” Science 284: 1129.Google Scholar
Maurer, SM and Scotchmer, S. 2004. “Procuring Knowledge,” pp. 1–31 in Libecap, GD (ed.), Intellectual Property and Entrepreneurship: Advances in the Study of Entrepreneurship, Innovation and Economic Growth, vol. 15, Elsevier: Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Maurer, SM and Scotchmer, S. 2007.“Profit Neutrality in Licensing: The Boundary Between Antitrust Law and Patent Law,” American Law and Economics Review 8: 476.Google Scholar
Maurer, SM and Scotchmer, S. 2014. “The Essential Facilities Doctrine: The Lost Message of Terminal Railroad,” California Law Review: Circuit (Oct. 8): 278–316.Google Scholar
Maurer, SM and Zoloth, L. 2007. “Synthesizing Biosecurity,” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 63(6).Google Scholar
Maxwell, JW, Lyon, TP, and Hackett, SC. 2000. “Self-Regulation and Social Welfare: The Political Economy of Corporate Environmentalism.” Journal of Law and Economics 43(2): 583–617.Google Scholar
May, M. 2010. “Seeking Security for Synthetic Genes,” Scientific American Worldview, www.saworldview.com/article/seeking-security-for-synthetic-genes.Google Scholar
May, B, Leadbitter, D, and Weber, M. 2003. “The Marine Stewardship Council (MSC): Background, Rationale, and Challenges,” pp. 14-33 in B Phillips, T Ward, and C Chaffee (eds.), Ecolabelling in Fisheries: What Is It All About? (Blackwell Science: Oxford).Google Scholar
Mayer, F and Gereffi, G. 2010. “Regulation and Economic Globalization: Prospects and Limits of Private Governance,” Business and Politics: 12(3).Google Scholar
McCubbins, MD, Noll, RG, and Weingast, BR. 1987. “Administrative Procedures as Instruments of Political Control,” Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 3(2): 243–277.Google Scholar
McCubbins, MD and Schwartz, T. 1984. “Congressional Oversight Overlooked: Police Patrols Versus Fire Alarms,” American Journal of Political Science 28: 165–179.Google Scholar
McElwee, S. 2014. “Why the Voting Gap Matters,” Demos (Oct. 23), www.demos.org/publication/why-voting-gap-matters.Google Scholar
Mechel, F, Meyer-Ohlendorf, N, Sprang, P, and Tarasofsky, RG. 2006. “Public Procurement and Forest Certification: Assessing the Implications for Policy, Law, and International Trade,” Law and International Trade, www.ecologic.eu/sites/files/project/2013/933_final_report.pdf.Google Scholar
Meidinger, E. 2006. “The Administrative Law of Global Private-Public Regulation: The Case of Forestry,” European Journal of International Law 17: 47.Google Scholar
Meidinger, E. 2007. “Beyond Westphalia: Emerging Transnational Regulatory Systems,” pp. 121–143 in Brütsch, C and Lehmkuhl, D (eds.), Law and Legalization in Transnational Relations (Routledge: Abingdon UK).Google Scholar
Meidinger, E. 2008. “Competitive Supragovernmental Regulation: How Could It Be Democratic?” Chicago Journal of International Law 8(2): 513–534.Google Scholar
Microsoft. 2007. “New Study Finds 14.7 Million Jobs Created Globally by Microsoft and Its Ecosystem” (Oct. 18), news.microsoft.com/2007/10/18/new-study-finds-14-7-million-jobs-created-globally-by-microsoft-and-its-ecosystem/#sm.0012apazy18hrf2wraa10b3axpmdr.Google Scholar
Millon, D. 1991 [1988]. “The Sherman Act and the Balance of Power,” pp. 85–115 in Sullivan, ET (ed.), Political Economy of the Sherman Act: The First One Hundred Years (Oxford University Press: New York).Google Scholar
Milne, CP and Tait, J. 2009. “Evolution Along the Government-Governance Continuum: Impacts of Regulation on Medicines Innovation in the United States,” pp. 107–132 in Lyall, C, Papaioannou, T, and Smith, J (eds.), Limits to Governance: The Challenge for Policymaking in the Life Sciences (Ashgate: Farnham UK).Google Scholar
MIT News Office. 2005. Press Release: “Study to Explore Risks, Benefits of Synthetic Genomics,” web.mit.edu/newsoffice/2005/syntheticbio.html.Google Scholar
Moe, TM. 1998. “The Presidency and the Bureaucracy: The Presidential Advantage,” pp. 437–468 in Nelson, M (ed.), The Presidency and the Political System, 5th ed., (CQ: Washington DC).Google Scholar
Morris, FA, Seward, AM, and Kurzrok, AJ. 2012. “A Nonproliferation Third Party for Dual-Use Industries – Legal Issues for Consideration,” Report No. PNNL-21908 (Pacific Northwest National Laboratories: Seattle).Google Scholar
MSC. See Marine Stewardship Council.Google Scholar
Nanowerk. 2008. “Swiss Retailers Introduce the World’s First Code of Conduct for Nanotechnology in Consumer Products” (Apr. 18), www.nanowerk.com/news/newsid=5375.php.Google Scholar
Nanowerk. n.d. “Developing a Nanotechnology Code for European Industry,” www.nanowerk/com/news/newside=2841.php.Google Scholar
Nassauer, S. 2015. “Wal-Mart Shrinks the Big Box, Vexing Vendors,” Wall Street Journal (Oct. 25).Google Scholar
National Academy of Sciences Committee on Genomic Databases for Bioterrorism. 2004. Biotechnology Research in an Age of Terrorism (National Research Council: Washington DC).Google Scholar
National Academy of Sciences Committee on Genomic Databases for Bioterrorism Threat Agents (Fink Committee). 2004. Seeking Security: Pathogens, Open Access, and Genome Databases 25–27 (National Research Council: Washington DC).Google Scholar
National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity. 2006. “Addressing Biosecurity,” osp.od.nih.gov/sites/default/files/resources/Final_NSABB_Report_on_Synthetic_Genomics.pdf.Google Scholar
Nelson, R. 2015. “The Secret Republicans of Silicon Valley,” National Journal (Apr. 8).Google Scholar
Newman, M. 2016. Web Page: “Starting Spots Still in the Air in NL All-Star Voting,” MLB.com (Jun. 15), m.mlb.com/news/article/184177190/national-league-all-star-voting-update.Google Scholar
Nguyen, TH. 2005. “Microchallenges of Chemical Weapons Proliferation,” Science 390: 1021.Google Scholar
NTI. See Nanotechnology Industries.Google Scholar
NuclearPrinciples.org. n.d. “Nuclear Power Plant and Reactor Exporters’ Principles of Conduct – Participants,” nuclearprinciples.org/participants.Google Scholar
Ostrom, E. 1990. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action (Cambridge University Press: New York).Google Scholar
Ottolenghi, E. 2013. “Iran Is Really Good at Evading Sanctions,” The Tower, www.thetower.org/article/iran-is-really-good-at-evading-sanctions.Google Scholar
Overdevest, C and Zeitlin, J. 2014. “Assembling an Experimentalist Regime: Transnational Governance Interactions in the Forest Sector,” Regulation & Governance 8: 22–48.Google Scholar
Oxonica Corp. 2007. “Industry Leaders to Develop Nanotech Code of Conduct” (Aug. 9), www.advfn.com/news_NanoTech-Code-of-Conduct_21800513.html.Google Scholar
Ozoliņa, Ž, Mitcham, C, Stilgoe, J, Andanda, R, Kaiser, M, Nielen, L, Stehr, N, and Qiu, R. 2009. “Global Governance of Science,” European Commission Report EUR 23616 EN.Google Scholar
Pan-European Forest Certification Council. See PEFC.Google Scholar
Parens, E, Johnston, J, and Moses, J. 2009. “Ethical Issues in Synthetic Biology: An Overview of the Debates” (Woodrow Wilson Center: Washington DC), www.synbioproject.org/process/assets/files/6334/synbio3.pdf.Google Scholar
Pearson, GR. 2006. “The Iraqi Biological Weapons Program,” pp. 169–190 in Wheelis, M, Rozsa, L, and Dando, M (eds.), Deadly Cultures: Biological Weapons Since 1945 (Harvard: Cambridge MA).Google Scholar
PEFC. 2004. Web Page: “Leadership Interview with Ben Gunneberg,” pefc.org/news-a-media/general-sfm-news/61-leadership-interview-with-ben-gunneberg-pefc-s-secretary-general.Google Scholar
PEFC. n.d.(a). “Facts and Figures,” www.pefc.org/about-pefc/who-we-are/facts-a-figures.Google Scholar
PEFC. n.d.(b). Web Page: “What Makes PEFC Unique,” pefc.co.uk/about-pefc/what-makes-pefc-unique.Google Scholar
Perkovich, G and Radzinsky, B. 2012. “A Common High Standard for Nuclear Power Plant Exports: Overview and Analysis of the Nuclear Power Plant Exporters’ Principles of Conduct,” Nuclear Law Bulletin 90(2): 7–22.Google Scholar
Peters, BG and Pierre, J. 2010. “Public-Private Partnerships and the Democratic Deficit: Is Performance-Based Legitimacy the Answer?” pp. 41–54 in Bexell, M and Mörth, U (eds.), Democracy and Public-Private Partnerships in Global Governance (Palgrave: New York).Google Scholar
Peters, M and Silverman, RE. 2016. “Big Business Speaks Up on Social Issues,” Wall Street Journal (Apr. 17).Google Scholar
Pickering, A. 1984. Constructing Quarks: A Sociological History of Particle Physics (University of Chicago Press: Chicago).Google Scholar
Pitofsky, R. 1998. “FTC Chairman Address to D.C. Bar Association Symposium on Self-Regulation and Antitrust” (Feb. 19).Google Scholar
Pizer, WA, Morgenstern, R, and Shih, J. 2008. “Evaluating Voluntary Climate Programs in the United States,” Resources for the Future Discussion Paper 08-13.Google Scholar
Polanyi, M. 1962 [1942]. “The Republic of Science: Its Political and Economic Theory,” Minerva 1: 54.Google Scholar
Pollack, A. 2016. “Scientists Talk Privately About Creating a Synthetic Human Genome,” New York Times (May 13).Google Scholar
Ponsoldt, JF. 1981. “The Application of Sherman Act Antiboycott Law to Industry Self-Regulation: An Analysis Integrating Nonboycott Sherman Act Principles,” Southern California Law Rev. 55: 1.Google Scholar
Ponte, S, Gibbon, P, and Vestergaard, J. 2011. “Governing through Standards: An Introduction,” pp. 1–24 in Ponte, S, Gibbon, P, and Vestergaard, J (eds.), Governing through Standards: Origins, Drivers and Limitations (Palgrave: New York).Google Scholar
Potts, J. 2004. “Multi-Stakeholder Collaboration for a Sustainable Coffee Sector,” www.iisd.org/pdf/2004/sci_coffee_background2.pdf.Google Scholar
Prakash, A. 2000. “Responsible Care: An Assessment,” Business and Society, 39(2): 183–209.Google Scholar
Pritchett, Jon L., and Tiryakian, E. 2017. “When CEOs Play Politics, Shareholders Can Take Them to Court,” Wall Street Journal (Aug. 18).Google Scholar
Pulitzer, R and Grasty, CH. 1919. “Forces at War in Peace Conclave,” New York Times (Jan. 18).Google Scholar
Purbawiyatna, A and Simula, M. 2008. Developing Forest Certification: Towards Increasing the Comparability and Acceptability of Forest Certification Systems Worldwide (International Tropical Timber Organization: London).Google Scholar
Purnhagen, K. 2014. “Mapping Private Regulation – Classification, Market Access and Market Closure Policy, and Law’s Response,” Wageningen University Law and Governance Group Working Paper 2014/04.Google Scholar
Rabinow, P. 2011. The Accompaniment: Assembling the Contemporary (University of Chicago Press: Chicago).Google Scholar
Rabinow, P and Bennett, G. 2012. Designing Human Practices: An Experiment with Synthetic Biology (University of Chicago Press: Chicago).Google Scholar
Rappert, B. 2004. “Responsibility in the Life Sciences: Assessing the Role of Personal Codes,” Biosecurity and Bioterrorism 2(3): 164–74.Google Scholar
Relman Committee. See Committee on Advances in Technology and the Prevention of Their Application to Next Generation Biowarfare Threats.Google Scholar
Responsible Nanocode. 2008. “Information on the Responsible Nano Code Initiative,” www.nanocap.eu/Flex/Site/Download.aspx?ID=2736.Google Scholar
Responsible NanoCode. n.d. “The Working Group Participants,” responsiblenanocode.org/pages/participants/index.html.Google Scholar
Rhodes, R. n.d. “Richard Rhodes on: Edward Teller’s Role in the Oppenheimer Hearings,” www.pbs.org/wgbh/amex/bomb/filmmore/reference/interview/rhodes12.html.Google Scholar
Richelson, JT. 2006. Spying on the Bomb: American Nuclear Intelligence from Nazi Germany to Iran and North Korea (Norton: New York).Google Scholar
Ripley, RB and Franklin, GA. 1976. Congress, the Bureaucracy, and Public Policy (Dorsey Press: Homewood IL).Google Scholar
Roheim, CA, Asche, F, and Insignares Santos, J. 2011. “The Elusive Price Premium for Ecolabelled Products: Evidence from Seafood in the UK Market,” Journal of Agricultural Economics 62: 655–668.Google Scholar
Rose, F. 2016. “Notable and Quotable: The Milton Friedman Prize,” Wall Street Journal (Jun. 1).Google Scholar
Rotherham, T. 2011. “Forest Management Certification Around the World – Progress and Problems,” Forestry Chronicle 87: 603.Google Scholar
Royal Society and Wellcome Trust. 2004. “Do No Harm: Reducing the Potential for the Misuse of Life Science Research,” royalsociety.org/~/media/Royal_Society_Content/policy/publications/2004/9671.pdf.Google Scholar
Rudder, CE. 2008. “Private Governance as Public Policy: A Paradigmatic Shift,” Journal of Politics 70(4): 899–913.Google Scholar
Russell, AL. 2014. Open Standards and the Digital Age: History, Ideology, and Networks (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge).Google Scholar
Russolillo, S. 2016. “GrubHub CEO Backtracks on Trump Criticism, But Damage Done,” Wall Street Journal (Nov. 14).Google Scholar
RussSoft Association. 2015. “Export of Russian Software Development Industry – 12th Annual Survey,” russoft.org/docs/?doc=3358.Google Scholar
Rutherford, GW and Maurer, SM. 2009. “The New Bioweapons: Infectious and Engineered Diseases,” pp. 111–138 in Maurer, SM (ed.), WMD Terrorism: Science and Policy Choices (MIT Press: Cambridge MA).Google Scholar
Safdar, K. 2017. “How Target Botched Its Response to North Carolina Bathroom Law,” Wall Street Journal. (Apr. 5 2017)Google Scholar
Sasser, EN. 2002. “Gaining Leverage: NGO Influence on Certification Institutions in the Forest Products Sector,” pp. 229ff in Teeter, LD, Cashore, B, and Zhang, D (eds.), Forest Policy for Private Forestry (CABI: New York).Google Scholar
Scarpa, C. 1999. “The Theory of Quality Regulation and Self-Regulation: Towards an Application to Financial Markets,” pp. 236–260 in Bortolotti, B and Fiorentini, G (eds.), Organized Interests and Self-Regulation (Oxford University Press: New York and Oxford UK).Google Scholar
Schaller, S. 2007. The Democratic Legitimacy of Private Governance: An Analysis of the Ethical Trading Initiative, INEF Report 91/2007, Institute for Development and Peace (University Duisburg-Essen: Duisburg FRG).Google Scholar
Scharpf, FW. 1999. Governing in Europe: Effective and Democratic? (Oxford University Press: London).Google Scholar
Scherer, FM. 1970. Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance, 1st ed. (Rand McNally: Chicago).Google Scholar
Scherer, FM and Ross, D. 1990. Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance, 3d ed. (Houghton-Mifflin: Boston).Google Scholar
Schleifer, P and Bloomfield, M. 2015. “When Institutions Fail: Legitimacy, (De)legitimation, and the Failure of Private Governance Systems,” Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies Working Paper 2015/36.Google Scholar
Schwartzel, E and McWhirter, C. 2015. “Group Backed by Koch Brothers Takes Aim at Tax Credits for Films,” Wall Street Journal (Mar. 25).Google Scholar
Scotchmer, S and Farrell, J. 1988. “Partnerships,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 103(2): 279.Google Scholar
Scott, C, Cafaggi, F, and Senden, L. 2011. “The Conceptual and Constitutional Challenge of Transnational Private Regulation, Journal of Law and Society 38(1): 1.Google Scholar
Seib, JE. 1985. “Antitrust and Nonmarket Goods: The Supreme Court Fumbles Again,” Washington Law Review 60: 721.Google Scholar
Selgelid, MJ. 2007. “A Tale of Two Studies: Ethics, Bioterrorism, and the Censorship of Science,” Hastings Center Reports (May–Jun.): 35.Google Scholar
Service, RF. 2006. “Synthetic Biologists Debate Policing Themselves,” Science 312: 1116.Google Scholar
SFI. See Sustainable Forestry Initiative.Google Scholar
Shapiro, C. 1983. “Premiums for High Quality Products as Returns to Reputations,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 98(4): 659.Google Scholar
Shiell, A and Chapman, D. 2000. “The Inertia of Self-Regulation: A Game-Theoretic Approach to Reducing Passive Smoking in Restaurants,” Social Science and Medicine 51: 1111.Google Scholar
Short, JL. 2013. “Self-Regulation in the Regulatory Void: ‘Blue Moon’ or ‘Bad Moon’?” Annals of the AAPSS 649.Google Scholar
Simirenko, L, Harmon-Smith, M, Visel, A, Rubin, EM, and Hillson, NJ. 2015. “The Joint Genome Institute’s Synthetic Biology Internal Review Process,” Journal of Responsible Innovation (Jan. 27).Google Scholar
Simpson, C. 2014. “NBA Commissioner Adam Silver Bans Donald Sterling for Life,” The Atlantic (Apr. 29).Google Scholar
Sinclair, D. 1997. “Self-Regulation Versus Command and Control? Beyond False Dichotomies,” Law and Policy 19: 529.Google Scholar
Singer, MD. n.d. The Maxine Singer Papers, profiles.nlm.nih.gov/ps/retrieve/Narrative/DJ/p-nid/218/p-docs/true.Google Scholar
Sloan, J. 2013. “Market Outlook: Surplus in Carbon Fiber’s Future?” CompositesWorld (Mar. 1), www.compositesworld.com/articles/market-outlook-surplus-in-carbon-fibers-future.Google Scholar
Steering Committee of the State-of-Knowledge Assessment of Standards and Certification. 2012. Toward Sustainability: The Roles and Limitations of Certification (Final Report), www.resolv.org/site-assessment/towardsustainability.Google Scholar
Steinbruner, JD and Harris, ED. 2003. “Controlling Dangerous Pathogens,” Issues in Science and Technology (Spring) www.issues.org/19.3/steinbruner.htm.Google Scholar
Stemerding, D, de Vried, H, Walhout, B, and Van Est, R. 2009. “Synthetic Biology and the Role of Civil Society Organizations Shaping the Agenda and Arena of the Public Debate,” pp. 155ff. in Schmidt, M., Kalle, A, Ganuli-Mitra, A, and de Vried, H (eds.), Synthetic Biology: The Technoscience and Its Societal Consequences (Springer: New York and London).Google Scholar
Stoyanov, R. 2015. “Russian Financial Cybercrime: How It Works,” securelist.com/files/2015/11/Kaspersky_Lab_cybercrime_underground_report_eng_v1_0.pdf.Google Scholar
Strassel, K. 2016. The Intimidation Game: How the Left Is Silencing Free Speech (Hachette: New York and Boston).Google Scholar
Stringham, E. 2016. Private Governance: Creating Order in Economic and Social Life (Oxford University Press: New York).Google Scholar
Suchman, MC. 1995. “Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches,” Academy of Management Review 20(3): 571–610.Google Scholar
Sunstein, CR. 1999. “Winner-Take-Less Codes: The Case of Private Broadcasting,” University of Chicago Law School Roundtable 6: 39.Google Scholar
Sustainable Forestry Initiative. 2009. Web Page: “International Acceptance Through PEFC,” www.sfiprogram.org/files/pdf/pefc-international-2009-02pdf.Google Scholar
Synberc Collaboration. 2015. “Synberc: Ten Years at the Genesis of Synthetic Biology,” www.synberc.org.Google Scholar
Thomas.net. n.d. “Bioreactor Suppliers,” www.thomasnet.com/products/bioreactors- 5288006-1.html.Google Scholar
Tomasky, M. 2010. “Turnout: Explains a Lot” (Nov. 3), www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/michaeltomasky/2010/nov/03/us-midterm-elections-2010-turnout-says-a-lot.Google Scholar
Tozzi, J. 2009. “Watchdogs: Shell Schemes Are on the Rise.” BusinessWeek.com (Nov. 5) www.businessweek.com/smallbiz/content/nov2009/sb2009115_791003.htm.Google Scholar
Tucker, JB. 2010. “Double-Edged DNA: Preventing the Misuse of Gene Synthesis,” Issues in Science and Technology 26(3), issues.org/26-3/tucker-2.Google Scholar
Tumpey, TM, Basler, CF, Aguilar, PV, et al. 2008. “Characterization of the Reconstructed 1918 Spanish Influenza Pandemic Virus,” Science 310: 77–80.Google Scholar
Unilever Corp. 2003 Fishing for the Future II: Unilever’s Fish Sustainability Initiative (FSI).Google Scholar
United Nations Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO). 2009. Guidelines for the Ecolabelling of Fish and Fishery Products from Marine Capture Fisheries.Google Scholar
U.S. Census Bureau. n.d.(a). “Voting and Registration in the Election of November 2008 – Detailed Tables,” www.census.gov/hhes/www/socdemo/voting/publications/p20/2008/Table%2007.xls.Google Scholar
U.S. Census Bureau. n.d.(b). “Reported Voting and Registration of Family Members, by Age and Family Income: November 2010,” www.census.gov/hhes/www/socdemo/voting/publications/p20/2010/Table7_2010.xls.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. 2009. “Screening Framework Guidance for Synthetic Double-Stranded DNA Providers, Federal Register Vol. 74 at p. 62820 (Oct. 13).Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. 2010. “Screening Framework Guidance for Synthetic Double-Stranded DNA Providers, Federal Register Vol. 75 at p. 62820 (Oct. 13). Available at http://www.phe.gov/Prepredness/legal/guidance/sydna/Documents/synda-guidance.pdf.Google Scholar
U.S. Federal Elections Commission. 2012. “Federal Elections 2012,” www.fec.gov/pubrec/fe2012/federalelections2012.pdf.Google Scholar
U.S. Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues. 2010. “New Directions: The Ethics of Synthetic Biology and Emerging Technologies,” www.bioethics.gov/documents/synthetic-biology/PCSBI-Synthetic-Biology-Report-12.16.10.pdf.Google Scholar
U.S. Federal Trade Commission and Department of Justice. 2000. “Antitrust Guidelines for Collaborations Among Competitors” (US Government Printing Office: Washington DC).Google Scholar
Vanderburgh, MP 2006/2007. “The New Wal-Mart Effect: The Role of Private Contracting in Global Governance,” UCLA Law Review 54: 913.Google Scholar
van der Kloet, J and Havinga, T. 2008. “Private Food Regulation from a Regulatee’s Perspective,” Nigmegen Sociology of Law Working Papers Series No. 2008/07.Google Scholar
Varian, H and Shapiro, C. 1999. Information Rules (Harvard Business School: Boston MA).Google Scholar
Verbruggen, P. 2013. “Gorillas in the Closet? Public and Private Actors in the Enforcement of Transnational Private Regulation,” Regulation and Governance 7: 512–532.Google Scholar
VerifiedVoting.org. n.d. “Internet Voting,” www.verifiedvoting.org/resources/internet-voting.Google Scholar
Verkuil, PR. 2006. “Public Law Limitations on Privatization of Government Functions,” North Carolina Law Review 84: 397.Google Scholar
Visseren-Hamakers, IJ and Glasbergen, P. 2006. “Partnerships in Forest Governance,” Global Environmental Change 17: 408.Google Scholar
Vogel, D. 2005. The Market for Virtue: The Potential and Limits of Corporate Social Responsibility (Brookings Institution Press: Washington DC).Google Scholar
Vogel, D. 2010. “Taming Globalization? Civil Regulation and Corporate Capitalism,” pp. 472–494 in Coen, D, Grant, W, and Wilson, G (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Business and Government (Oxford University Press: New York).Google Scholar
von Engelhardt, S and Maurer, SM. 2012. “Industry Self-Governance and National Security: On the Private Control of Dual-Use Technologies,” Goldman School of Public Policy Working Paper GSPP12-005.Google Scholar
Wade, N. 1975. “Genetics: Conference Sets Strict Controls to Replace Moratorium,” Science 187: 931–935.Google Scholar
Ward, TJ. 2008. “Measuring the Success of Seafood Ecolabelling,” pp. 207–243 in T Ward and B Philips (eds.), Seafood Ecolabelling: Principles and Practice (Wiley: Hoboken NJ).Google Scholar
Weaver, C. 2012. “Panel Backs Publishing Bird-Flu Research.” Wall Street Journal (Mar. 30).Google Scholar
Webb, K. 2004. “Voluntary Codes: Where To From Here?” in Webb, K (ed.) Voluntary Codes: Private Governance, the Public Interest and Innovation (Carleton Research Unit for Innovation, Science and Environment).Google Scholar
Weber, M. 1919. “Politics as Vocation,” anthropos-lab.net/wp/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/Weber-Politics-as-a-Vocation.pdf.Google Scholar
Wellik, R. 2012. “Global Food Safety Initiative Improves Organizational Culture, Efficiency in Food Industry,” Food Quality & Safety (Apr./May).Google Scholar
Wikipedia. n.d.(a). “Charles Robert Scriver,” en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Scriver.Google Scholar
Wikipedia. n.d.(b). “Dominique Lorentz,” en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dominique_Lorentz.Google Scholar
Wikipedia. n.d.(c). “Georges Besse,” en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georges_Besse.Google Scholar
Wikipedia. n.d.(d). “Herfindahl Index,” en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Herfindahl_index.Google Scholar
Wikipedia. n.d.(e). “National Institutes of Health,” en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Institutes_of_Health.Google Scholar
Wikipedia. n.d.(f). “Nuclear Program of Iran,” en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_program_of_Iran.Google Scholar
Wikipedia. n.d.(g). “Research Reactor,” en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Research_reactor.Google Scholar
Wikipedia. n.d.(h). “Richard Cotton (Geneticist),” en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Cotton_(geneticist)#The_Human_Variome_Project_.28Founder.29.Google Scholar
Wikipedia. n.d.(i). “Profit (Economics),” en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Profit_(economics).Google Scholar
Wikipedia. n.d.(j). “Serials Crisis,” en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serials_crisis.Google Scholar
Wikipedia. n.d.(k). “Software Industry in China,” en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_industry_in_China.Google Scholar
Wikipedia. n.d.(l). “Walter Eucken,” en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walter_Eucken.Google Scholar
Williamson, O. 1975. Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications: A Study in the Economics of Internal Organization (Free Press: New York and London).Google Scholar
Wilson, JQ. 1989. Bureaucracy: What Government Agencies Do and Why They Do It (Basic Books: New York).Google Scholar
Wirtz, R. 2010. “Role and Responsibility of the Civil Sector in Managing Trade in Specialized Materials,” in Hinderstein, C (ed.), Cultivating Confidence: Verification, Monitoring, and Enforcement for a World Free of Nuclear Weapons (Nuclear Threat Initiative: Washington DC).Google Scholar
Wisconsin Project on Nuclear Arms Control. n.d.(a). Webpage: “About Us,” www.wisconsinproject.org/aboutus.html.Google Scholar
Wisconsin Project on Nuclear Arms Control. n.d.(b) Webpage: “Iranwatch: Alphabetical List of Iranian Entities,” www.iranwatch.org/iranian-entities.Google Scholar
Wolfinger, RE and Rosenstone, SJ. 1980. Who Votes? (Yale University Press: New Haven CT).Google Scholar
Wolsey, M. 2007. “Interview with Robert Reich: Supercapitalism: Transforming Business,” www.forbes.com/2007/09/06/book-qanda-reich-oped-cx_mw_0906reichqanda.html.Google Scholar
Woodrow Wilson Center Synthetic Biology Project. n.d. “Maps Inventory,” www.synbioproject.org/inventories/maps-inventory.Google Scholar
World Nuclear Association. 2016. Web Page: “Research Reactors,” www.world-nuclear.org/information-library/non-power-nuclear-applications/radioisotopes-research/research-reactors.aspx.Google Scholar
Zerodium Corporation. n.d. “Our Exploit Acquisition Program,” www.zerodium.com/program.html.Google Scholar
Zilinskas, RA and Tucker, JB. 2002. “Limiting the Contribution of the Open Scientific Literature to the Biological Weapons Threat,” Journal of Homeland Security (Dec. 3), www.homelandsecurity.org/newjournal/articles/tucker.html.Google Scholar