Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T04:16:23.930Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - EU Sanctions Policy and the Protection of Subsistence Rights: Learning from the Early Mover

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2017

Monika Heupel
Affiliation:
Otto-Friedrich-Universität Bamberg, Germany
Michael Zürn
Affiliation:
Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Protecting the Individual from International Authority
Human Rights in International Organizations
, pp. 111 - 128
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alter, Karen and Meunier, Sophie 2009. ‘The politics of regime complexity’. Perspectives on Politics 7(1): 1324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brzoska, Michael 2001. Smart Sanctions: The Next Steps. The Debate on Arms Embargoes and Travel Sanctions within the ‘Bonn–Berlin Process’. Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
Cameron, Iain 2008. ‘Respecting Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms and EU/UN Sanctions: State of Play’. Study commissioned by the European Parliament. www.pedz.uni-mannheim.de/daten/edz-ma/ep/08/EST23015.pdf (8 October 2015).Google Scholar
Cameron, Iain 2013. ‘Introduction’, in Cameron, (ed.), EU Sanctions: Law and Policy Issues Concerning Restrictive Measures. Cambridge: Intersentia, pp. 140.Google Scholar
Commission on Human Rights 2000. ‘The Adverse Consequences of Economic Sanctions on the Enjoyment of Human Rights’. Working paper prepared by Mr Marc Bossuyt, E/CN.4/Sub.2/2000/33, 21 June 2000.Google Scholar
Costa, Oriol and Jørgensen, Knud Erik 2013. ‘The influence of international institutions on the EU: A framework for analysis’, in Costa, and Jørgensen, (eds.), The Influence of International Institutions on the EU: When Multilateralism Hits Brussels. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 122.Google Scholar
Dai, Xinyuan and Martinez, Gina 2013. ‘How do international institutions influence the EU? Advances and challenges’, in Costa, and Jørgensen, (eds.), The Influence of International Institutions on the EU: When Multilateralism Hits Brussels. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 207227.Google Scholar
De Vries, Anthonius W. 2002. ‘European Union sanctions against the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia from 1998–2000: A special exercise in targeting’, in Cortright, and Lopez, (eds.), Smart Sanctions: Targeting Economic Statecraft. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, pp. 87108.Google Scholar
De Vries, Anthonius W. and Hazelzet, Hadewych 2005. ‘The EU as a new actor on the sanctions scene’, in Wallensteen, and Staibano, (eds.), International Sanctions: Between Words and Wars in the Global System. London and New York: Frank Cass, pp. 95107.Google Scholar
Elgström, Ole and Jönsson, Christer 2000. ‘Negotiation in the European Union: Bargaining or problem-solving?Journal of European Public Policy 7(5): 684704.Google Scholar
Eriksson, Mikael 2008. Operational Conflict Prevention and the Use of Targeted Sanctions: Conditions for Effective Implementation by the EU and UN. Center on International Cooperation, New York University.Google Scholar
Eriksson, Mikael 2009. ‘In Search of Due Process – Listing and Delisting Practices of the European Union’. Department of Peace and Conflict Research Uppsala University. www.uu.se/digitalAssets/99/99245_in_search_091119.pdf (8 October 2015).Google Scholar
Eriksson, Mikael 2010. ‘Unintended consequences of targeted sanctions’, in Daase, and Friesendorf, (eds.), Rethinking Security Governance. The Problem of Unintended Consequences. London: Routledge, pp. 157175.Google Scholar
Gehring, Thomas and Oberthür, Sebastian 2009. ‘The causal mechanisms of interaction between international institutions’. European Journal of International Relations 15(1): 125156.Google Scholar
Hazelzet, Hadewych 2001. ‘Carrots or sticks. EU and US reactions to human right violations (1989–2000)’. PhD dissertation, European University Institute, Florence, Italy.Google Scholar
Jørgensen, Knud Erik and Costa, Oriol 2013. ‘When multilateralism hits Brussels: Generalizations and an agenda for further research’, in Costa, and Jørgensen, (eds.), The Influence of International Institutions on the EU: When Multilateralism Hits Brussels. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 248257.Google Scholar
Juncos, Ana E. and Pomorska, Karolina 2006. ‘Playing the Brussels game: Strategic socialization in the CFSP council working groups’. European Integration Online Papers 10: 11. http://eiop.or.at/eiop/pdf/2006-011.pdf (9 January 2017).Google Scholar
Kreutz, Joakim 2005. ‘Hard Measures by a Soft Power? Sanctions Policy of the European Union’. BICC Paper 45. www.bicc.de/uploads/tx_bicctools/paper45.pdf (11 October 2015).Google Scholar
Portela, Clara 2005. ‘Where and why does the EU impose sanctions?’. Politique européenne 17: 83111.Google Scholar
Portela, Clara 2007. ‘The EU’s “Sanctions Paradox”’. SWP Comments 18, October 2007.Google Scholar
Portela, Clara and Raube, Kolja 2009. ‘(In-)Coherence in EU Foreign Policy: Exploring Sources and Remedies’. Paper presented at the European Studies Association Bi-Annual Convention, Los Angeles, April 2009. http://aei.pitt.edu/33122/1/portela._clara_%282%29.pdf (7 October 2015).Google Scholar
Raustiala, Kal and Victor, David G. 2004. ‘The regime complex for plant genetic resources’. International Organization 58(2): 277309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallensteen, Peter, Staibano, Carina and Eriksson, Mikael 2003. ‘Making Targeted Sanctions Effective: Guidelines for the Implementation of UN Policy Options’. The Stockholm Process on the Implementation of Targeted Sanctions, Department of Peace and Conflict Research, Uppsala University. www.smallarmssurvey.org/fileadmin/docs/L-External-publications/2003/2003%20Uppsala%20Targeted%20sanctions%20effective.pdf (8 October 2015).Google Scholar
Watson Institute 2001. ‘Targeted Financial Sanctions: A Manual for Design and Implementation. Contributions from the Interlaken Process’. Watson Institute for International Studies, Brown University, Providence, RI. www.watsoninstitute.org/tfs/TFS.pdf (8 October 2015).Google Scholar
Zaidi, Sarah and Smith Fawzi, Mary C. 1995. ‘Health of Baghdad’s children’. The Lancet 346(8988): 1485.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×