Book contents
- The Romantic Overture and Musical Form from Rossini to Wagner
- The Romantic Overture and Musical Form from Rossini to Wagner
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Tables and Examples
- Acknowledgments
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- I Making Overtures
- II Form as Formula
- III Potpourri Overtures
- IV Beginning Before the Beginning
- V Strong Subordinate Themes
- VI Open-Ended Expositions
- VII Recomposed Recapitulations
- Appendix: List of Works
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 19 May 2017
Book contents
- The Romantic Overture and Musical Form from Rossini to Wagner
- The Romantic Overture and Musical Form from Rossini to Wagner
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Tables and Examples
- Acknowledgments
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- I Making Overtures
- II Form as Formula
- III Potpourri Overtures
- IV Beginning Before the Beginning
- V Strong Subordinate Themes
- VI Open-Ended Expositions
- VII Recomposed Recapitulations
- Appendix: List of Works
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Romantic Overture and Musical Form from Rossini to Wagner , pp. 268 - 279Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
Primary Sources
Secondary Sources
Abrams, M. H., The Mirror and the Lamp: Romantic Theory and the Critical Tradition (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1953).Google Scholar
Adorno, Theodor W., Mahler. Eine musikalische Physiognomik, in Die musikalischen Monographien, ed. Adorno, Gretel and Tiedemann, Rolf (Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1971), 149–319.Google Scholar
Agawu, V. Kofi, Playing with Signs: A Semiotic Interpretation of Classic Music (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Alegant, Brian and McLean, Don, “On the Nature of Structural Framing,” Nineteenth-Century Music Review 4 (2007): 3–29.Google Scholar
Andersch, Johann Daniel, Musikalisches Wörterbuch für Freunde und Schüler der Tonkunde zusammengetragen (Berlin: Natorff, 1829).Google Scholar
Applegate, Celia and Potter, Pamela, “Germans as the ‘People of Music’: Genealogy of an Identity,” in Applegate, Celia and Potter, Pamela (eds.), Music and German National Identity (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2002), 1–35.Google Scholar
Ashbrook, William, Donizetti and His Operas (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982).Google Scholar
Bartha, Dénes, “Song Form and the Concept of ‘Quatrain’,” in Larsen, Jens Peter, Serwer, Howard, and Webster, James (eds.), Haydn Studies: Proceedings of the International Haydn Conference, Washington, D.C., 1975 (New York: Norton, 1981), 353–55.Google Scholar
Berlioz, Hector, Mémoires (Paris: Lévy, 1870). English translation: The Memoirs of Hector Berlioz, trans. David Cairns (New York: Knopf, 2002).Google Scholar
Bernsdorf, Eduard, Neues Universal-Lexikon der Tonkunst, 3 vols (Dresden: Schaefer, 1857).Google Scholar
Berton, Henri[-Montan], “De la Musique mécanique et de la musique philosophique,” L’Abeille 3 (1821): 149–56, 195–206, 292–98.Google Scholar
Bickley, Diane, “The Concert Overtures,” in Bloom, Peter (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Berlioz (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000), 69–80.Google Scholar
Birnbach, Heinrich, “Über die verschiedene Form größerer Instrumentaltonstücke aller Art und deren Bearbeitung,” Berliner allgemeine musikalische Zeitung 4 (1827): 269–72, 277–81, 285–7, 361–63, 369–73.Google Scholar
Birnbach, Heinrich, “Über die einzelnen Sätze und Perioden eines Tonstücks und deren Verbindung,” Cäcilia 10 (1829): 97–120.Google Scholar
Bloom, Peter, “Berlioz and Wagner: Épisodes de la vie des artistes,” in Bloom, Peter (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Berlioz (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000), 235–50.Google Scholar
Bogel, Fredric, New Formalist Criticism: Theory and Practice (New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 2013).Google Scholar
Bonds, Mark Evan, Wordless Rhetoric: Musical Form and the Metaphor of the Oration (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Bonds, Mark Evan, “The Spatial Representation of Musical Form,” Journal of Musicology 27 (2010): 265–303.Google Scholar
Braam, Gunther and Jacobshagen, Arnold (eds.), Hector Berlioz in Deutschland. Texte und Dokumente zur deutschen Berlioz-Rezeption (1829–1843) (Göttingen: Hainholz, 2002).Google Scholar
Burnham, Scott, Aesthetics, Theory and History in the Works of Adolph Bernhard Marx (PhD diss. Brandeis University, 1988).Google Scholar
Burnham, Scott, “A.B. Marx and the Gendering of Sonata Form,” in Bent, Ian (ed.), Music Theory in the Age of Romanticism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996), 163–86.Google Scholar
Burnham, Scott, “Making Overtures,” in Mathew, Nicholas and Walton, Benjamin (eds.), The Invention of Beethoven and Rossini: Historiography, Analysis, Criticism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013), 197–209.Google Scholar
Caplin, William E., Classical Form: A Theory of Formal Functions for the Instrumental Music of Haydn, Mozart, and Beethoven (New York: Oxford University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Caplin, William E., “The Classical Cadence: Conceptions and Misconceptions,” Journal of the American Musicological Society 57 (2004): 51–117.Google Scholar
Caplin, William E., “What Are Formal Functions?” in Caplin, , Hepokoski, James, and Webster, James, Musical Form, Forms & Formenlehre: Three Methodological Reflections, ed. Bergé, Pieter (Leuven: Leuven University Press, 2009), 21–40.Google Scholar
Caplin, William E., Analyzing Classical Form: An Approach for the Classroom (New York: Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Caplin, William E., “Beyond the Classical Cadence: Thematic Closure in Early Romantic Music,” paper read at The Form Forum, University of Toronto, 24 October 2013.Google Scholar
Caplin, William E. and Martin, Nathan John, “The Continuous Exposition and the Concept of Subordinate Theme,” Music Analysis 35 (2016): 5–43.Google Scholar
Celenza, Anna Harwell, The Early Works of Niels W. Gade: In Search of the Poetic (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2001).Google Scholar
Christensen, Thomas, “Four-Hand Piano Transcription and Geographies of Nineteenth-Century Musical Reception,” Journal of the American Musicological Society 52 (1999): 255–98.Google Scholar
Citron, Marcia J., Gender and the Musical Canon (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Comettani, Oscar, “Daniel François Esprit Auber,” in Thomas, Theodore, Paine, John Knowles, and Klauser, Karl (eds.), Famous Composers and Their Music, vol. V (Boston: Millet, 1901), 653–64.Google Scholar
Corvin, Matthias, Formkonzepte der Ouvertüre von Mozart bis Beethoven (Kassel: Bosse, 2005).Google Scholar
Czerny, Carl, School of Practical Composition, trans. Bishop, John, 3 vols (London: Cocks, 1848).Google Scholar
Dahlhaus, Carl, “Der rhetorische Formbegriff H. Chr. Kochs und die Theorie der Sonatenform,” Archiv für Musikwissenschaft 35 (1978): 155–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahlhaus, Carl, Die Musiktheorie im 18. und 19. Jahrhundert. Zweiter Teil: Deutschland, ed. Müller, Ruth E. (Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1989).Google Scholar
Dahlhaus, Carl, Nineteenth-Century Music, trans. Robinson, J. Bradford (Berkeley – Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Daub, Adrian, Four-Handed Monsters: Four-Hand Piano Playing and Nineteenth-Century Culture (New York: Oxford University Press, 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, Andrew, “Chopin and the Romantic Sonata: The First Movement of Op. 58,” Music Theory Spectrum 36 (2014): 270–94.Google Scholar
Deane, Basil, “The French Operatic Overture from Grétry to Berlioz,” Proceedings of the Royal Musical Association 99 (1972–73): 67–80.Google Scholar
Deruchie, Andrew, The French Symphony at the Fin-de-siècle: Style, Culture, and the Symphonic Tradition (Rochester: Rochester University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Deutsch, Otto Erich, Franz Schubert: Thematisches Verzeichnis seiner Werke (Kassel: Bärenreiter, 1950, rev. edn 1978).Google Scholar
Dewilde, Jan, “Die Beziehungen Robert und Clara Schumanns nach Belgien,” Schumann Studien 10 (2012): 279–318.Google Scholar
Dießner, Peter, Knechtges-Obrecht, Irmgard, and Synofzik, Thomas (eds.), Briefwechsel Robert und Clara Schumanns mit Leipziger Verlegern III (Cologne: Dohr, 2008).Google Scholar
Eggebrecht, Hans Heinrich, “Klassisch, Klassik,” in Eggebrecht, , Riethmüller, Albrecht, and Bandur, Markus (eds.), Handwörterbuch der musikalischen Terminologie, 27th installment (Stuttgart: Steiner, 1998), 1–11.Google Scholar
Erle, Thomas, Die Instrumentation in den Symphonien und Ouvertüren von Felix Mendelssohn Bartholdy (Wiesbaden: Breitkopf & Härtel, 1983).Google Scholar
Erler, Hermann, Robert Schumann’s Leben, aus seinen Briefen, 2 vols (Berlin: Ries & Erler, 1887).Google Scholar
Fétis, François-Joseph, La Musique mise à la portée de tout le monde (Paris: Mesnier, 1830).Google Scholar
Fifield, Christopher, The German Symphony between Beethoven and Brahms: The Fall and Rise of a Genre (Farnham: Ashgate, 2015).Google Scholar
Fink, Gottfried Wilhelm, “Ouverture,” in Ersch, Johann Samuel and Gruber, Johann Gottfried (eds.), Allgemeine Encyclopädie der Wissenschaften und Künste, vol. III part 8 (Leipzig: Brockhaus, 1836), 12–18.Google Scholar
Fink, Robert W., “Arrows of Desire”: Long-Range Linear Structure and the Transformation of Musical Energy (PhD diss. University of California Berkeley, 1994).Google Scholar
Finson, Jon, “Schumann, Popularity, and the ‘Ouvertüre, Scherzo, and Finale’,” Musical Quarterly 69 (1983), 1–26.Google Scholar
Foster, Myles B., The History of the Philharmonic Society of London, 1813–1912: A Record of A Hundred Years’ Work in the Cause of Music (London: Lane, 1913).Google Scholar
Frisch, Walter, Brahms and the Principle of Developing Variation (Berkeley – Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1984).Google Scholar
Gathy, August, Musikalisches Conversations-Lexikon. Encyclopädie der gesammten Musikwissenschaft für Künstler, Kunstfreunde und Gebildete (Hamburg: Niemeyer, 1835, 2nd edn 1840).Google Scholar
Gjerdingen, Robert, Music in the Galant Style (New York: Oxford University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Gossett, Philip, “Le sinfonie di Rossini,” Bollettino del centro rossiniano di studi 13 (1979): 7–123.Google Scholar
Gossett, Philip, “The Overtures of Rossini,” 19th-Century Music 3 (1979): 3–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gossett, Philip, “Compositional Methods,” in Senici, Emanuele (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Rossini (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004), 68–84.Google Scholar
Grétry, André-Modeste, Mémoires, ou Essais sur la musique, 3 vols (Paris: Imprimerie de la République, 1796–97).Google Scholar
Grey, Thomas, “Fingal’s Cave and Ossian’s Dream: Music, Image, and Phantasmagoric Audition,” in Morton, Marsha L. and Schmunk, Peter L. (eds.), The Arts Entwined: Music and Painting in the Nineteenth Century (New York – London: Garland Publishing, 2000), 63–99.Google Scholar
Grey, Thomas (ed.), Richard Wagner: “Der fliegende Holländer” (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Grey, Thomas, “Wagner, the Overture, and the Aesthetics of Musical Form,” 19th-Century Music 12 (1988): 3–22.Google Scholar
Hadamowsky, Franz, Die Wiener Hoftheater (Staatstheater) 1779–1966: Verzeichnis der aufgeführten Stücke mit Bestandsnachweis und täglichen Spielplan, 2 vols (Vienna: Prachner, 1966).Google Scholar
Hagels, Bert, “Vorwort,” in Ferdinand Ries: Ouvertüre zu “Don Carlos” Op. 94 (Berlin: Ries & Erler, 2007), i–iv.Google Scholar
Hagels, Bert, Konzerte in Leipzig, 1779/80–1847/48. Eine Statistik (Berlin: Ries & Erler, 2009).Google Scholar
Hamilton, Kenneth, “Wagner and Liszt: Elective Affinities,” in Grey, Thomas (ed.), Richard Wagner and His World (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2009), 27–64.Google Scholar
Haney, Joel, “Navigating Sonata Space in Mendelssohn’s Meeresstille und glückliche Fahrt,” 19th-Century Music 28 (2004): 108–32.Google Scholar
Hepokoski, James, “Fiery-Pulsed Libertine or Domestic Hero? Strauss’s Don Juan Reinvestigated,” in Gilliam, Bryan (ed.), Richard Strauss: New Perspectives on the Composer and His Work (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1992), 135–75.Google Scholar
Hepokoski, James, Sibelius: Symphony No. 5 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Hepokoski, James, “Beethoven Reception: the Symphonic Tradition,” in Samson, Jim (ed.), The Cambridge History of Nineteenth-Century Music (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001), 424–59.Google Scholar
Hepokoski, James, “Beyond the Sonata Principle,” Journal of the American Musicological Society 55 (2002): 91–154.Google Scholar
Hepokoski, James, “Sonata Theory and Dialogic Form,” in Caplin, William E., Hepokoski, James, and Webster, James, Musical Form, Forms & Formenlehre: Three Methodological Reflections, ed. Bergé, Pieter (Leuven: Leuven University Press, 2009), 71–89.Google Scholar
Hepokoski, James, “The Second Cycle of Tone Poems,” in Youmans, Charles (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Richard Strauss (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010), 78–104.Google Scholar
Hepokoski, James, “Dahlhaus’s Beethoven-Rossini Stildualismus: Lingering Legacies of the Text-Event Dichotomy,” in Mathew, Nicholas and Walton, Benjamin (eds.), The Invention of Beethoven and Rossini: Historiography, Analysis, Criticism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013), 15–48.Google Scholar
Hepokoski, James and Darcy, Warren, Elements of Sonata Theory: Norms, Types, and Deformations in the Late-Eighteenth-Century Sonata (New York: Oxford University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Hibberd, Sarah, French Grand Opera and the Historical Imagination (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Hinrichsen, Hans-Joachim, “Die kleineren Orchesterwerke,” in Dürr, Walther and Krause, Andreas (eds.), Schubert Handbuch (Kassel – Stuttgart: Bärenreiter and Metzler, 1997).Google Scholar
Hinrichsen, Hans-Joachim, “Sonatenform, Sonatenhauptsatzform,” in Eggebrecht, Hans-Heinrich, Riethmüller, Albrecht, and Bandur, Markus (eds.), Handwörterbuch der musikalischen Terminologie, 25th installment (Stuttgart: Steiner, 1997), 1–20.Google Scholar
Holoman, D. Kern, The Société des concerts du conservatoire, 1828–1967 (Berkeley – Los Angeles: University of California Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Horton, Julian, “John Field and the Alternative History of Concerto First-Movement Form,” Music & Letters 92 (2011): 43–83.Google Scholar
Horton, Julian, “Formal Type and Formal Function in the Postclassical Piano Concerto,” in Moortele, Steven Vande, Pedneault-Deslauriers, Julie, and Martin, Nathan John (eds.), Formal Functions in Perspective: Studies in Musical Form from Haydn to Adorno (Rochester: University of Rochester Press, 2015), 77–122.Google Scholar
Hughes, Spike, “How to Write an Overture: A Rossini Recipe,” Musical Times 97 (1956): 247–49.Google Scholar
Kaiser, Georg (ed.), Sämtliche Schriften von Carl Maria von Weber (Berlin – Leipzig: Schuster & Loeffler, 1908).Google Scholar
Kinsky, Georg, “Was Mendelssohn Indebted to Weber? An Attempted Solution of an Old Controversy,” trans. Strunk, W. Oliver, Musical Quarterly 19 (1933): 178–86.Google Scholar
Kirby, Frank E., “The Germanic Symphony of the Nineteenth Century: Genre, Form, Instrumentation, Expression,” Journal of Musicological Research 14 (1995): 193–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, Michael, “Chopin’s Fourth Ballade as Musical Narrative,” Music Theory Spectrum 26 (2004): 23–55.Google Scholar
Klein, Michael, “Liszt and the Idea of Transcendence,” in Cannuta, David B. (ed.), Flores Musicais: A Festschrift in Honor of Fernando Laires upon His 80th Birthday (Journal of the American Liszt Society 54–56 [2003–2005]), 102–24.Google Scholar
Krawohl, Friedemund, “Organismusmetaphern,” in de la Motte-Haber, Helga and Schwab-Felisch, Oliver (eds.), Musiktheorie (Laaber: Laaber Verlag, 2005), 156–67.Google Scholar
Krüger, Eduard, Beiträge zum Leben und Wissenschaft der Tonkunst (Leipzig: Breitkopf & Härtel, 1847).Google Scholar
Krummacher, Friedhelm, “‘… fein und geistreich genug’. Versuch über Mendelssohns Musik zum Sommernachtstraum,” in Dahlhaus, Carl (ed.), Das Problem Mendelssohn (Regensburg: Bosse, 1974), 89–118.Google Scholar
Kunze, Stefan, Die Sinfonie im 18. Jahrhundert. Von der Opernsinfonie zur Konzertsinfonie (Laaber: Laaber Verlag, 1993).Google Scholar
Liszt, Franz, “Tannhäuser et le combat des poëtes-chanteurs à la Wartbourg, grand opéra romantique de R. Wagner” [1851], in Kleinertz, Rainer (ed.), Franz Liszt: Sämtliche Schriften, vol. IV (Wiesbaden: Breitkopf & Härtel, 1989), 94–153.Google Scholar
Lobe, Johann Christian, Compositions-Lehre, oder umfassende Theorie von der thematischen Arbeit und den modernen Instrumentalformen (Weimar: Voigt, 1844).Google Scholar
Lobe, Johann Christian, Consonanzen und Dissonanzen: Gesammelte Schriften aus älterer und neuerer Zeit (Leipzig: Baumgärtner, 1869).Google Scholar
Lobe, Johann Christian, Lehrbuch der musikalischen Komposition, 4 vols (Leipzig: Breitkopf & Härtel, 1850–67).Google Scholar
Lomnitzer, Helmut, Das musikalische Werk Friedrich Schneiders (1786–1853), insbesondere die Oratorien (PhD diss. Philipps-Universität Marpurg, 1961).Google Scholar
MacDonald, Claudia, Robert Schumann and the Piano Concerto (New York: Routledge, 2005).Google Scholar
Mahling, Christoph-Hellmut, “Zum ‘Musikbetrieb’ Berlins und seinen Institutionen in der ersten Hälfte des 19. Jahrhunderts,” in Dahlhaus, Carl (ed.), Studien zur Musikgeschichte Berlins im frühen 19. Jahrhundert (Regensburg: Bosse, 1980), 27–284.Google Scholar
Martin, Nathan John and Moortele, Steven Vande, “Formal Functions and Retrospective Reinterpretation in the First Movement of Schubert’s String Quintet,” Music Analysis 33 (2014): 130–55.Google Scholar
Marvin, William, “Subverting the Conventions of Number Opera from Within: Hierarchical and Associational Uses of Tonality in Act I of Der fliegende Holländer,” in Matthew Bribitzer-Stull, Alex Lubet, and Wagner, Gottfried (eds.), Richard Wagner for the New Millennium: Essays in Music and Culture (New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 2007), 71–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marx, Adolf Bernhard, Die Lehre von der musikalischen Komposition, praktisch-theoretisch, 4 vols (Leipzig: Breitkopf & Härtel, 1837–47).Google Scholar
Marx, Adolf Bernhard, Ludwig van Beethoven: Leben und Schaffen, 2 vols (Berlin: Janke, 1859).Google Scholar
Marx, Adolf Bernhard, Musical Form in the Age of Beethoven: Selected Writings on Theory and Method, ed. and trans. Burnham, Scott (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Mathiassen, Finn, “Preface to This Volume,” in Mathiassen, (ed.), Niels W. Gade, Concert Overtures Op. 1, 7, 14 (Copenhagen: Foundation for the Publication of the Works of Niels W. Gade, 2002), VIII–X.Google Scholar
Mazzatini, Giuseppe, Manis, Fanny, and Manis, Giovanni (eds.), Lettere di G. Rossini (Florence: Barbèra, 1902).Google Scholar
McKay, Elisabeth Norman, “Rossinis Einfluß auf Schubert,” Österreichische Musikzeitschrift 18 (1963): 17–22.Google Scholar
McVeigh, Simon, Concert Life in London from Mozart to Haydn (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Mendelssohn Bartholdy, Felix, Sämtliche Briefe, ed. Loos, Helmut and Seidel, Wilhelm, 9 vols (Kassel: Bärenreiter, 2008–).Google Scholar
Mendelssohn Bartholdy, Felix, Symphonie in d “Reformations-Symphonie” Op. 107, ed. Hogwood, Christopher (Kassel: Bärenreiter, 2009).Google Scholar
Meyer, Leonard, Style and Music: Theory, History, and Ideology (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Miller, Norbert and Dahlhaus, Carl, Europäische Romantik in der Musik, 2 vols (Stuttgart: Metzler, 1999–2007).Google Scholar
Mintz, Donald, “Mendelssohn as Performer and Teacher,” in Seaton, Douglas (ed.), The Mendelssohn Companion (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 2001), 87–142.Google Scholar
Momigny, Jérôme-Joseph, “Pot-Pourri,” in Framery, Nicolas Etienne, Ginguené, Pierre Louis, and de Momigny, Jérôme-Joseph (eds.), Encyclopédie méthodique: Musique, vol. II (Paris: Agasse, 1818), 280.Google Scholar
Monahan, Seth, “Success and Failure in Mahler’s Sonata Recapitulations,” Music Theory Spectrum 33 (2011): 37–58.Google Scholar
Morrow, Mary Sue, Concert Life in Haydn’s Vienna: Aspects of a Developing and Social Institution (Stuyvesant, NY: Pendragon Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Morrow, Mary Sue and Churgin, Bathia (eds.), The Eighteenth-Century Symphony (The Symphonic Repertoire, vol. I) (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Mosel, Ignaz, Versuch einer Ästhetik des dramatischen Tonsatzes (Vienna: Strauss, 1813).Google Scholar
Mozart, Wolfgang Amadé, Briefe und Aufzeichnungen, 4 vols, ed. Bauer, Wilhelm A. and Deutsch, Otto Erich (Kassel: Bärenreiter, 1962–75).Google Scholar
Neubauer, John, “Organicism and Music Theory,” in Crispin, Darla (ed.), New Paths: Aspects of Music Theory and Aesthetics in the Age of Romanticism (Leuven: Leuven University Press, 2009), 11–35.Google Scholar
Neuwirth, Markus, “Joseph Haydn’s ‘Witty’ Play on Hepokoski and Darcy’s Elements of Sonata Theory,” Zeitschrift der Gesellschaft für Musiktheorie 8 (2011): 199–220.Google Scholar
Neuwirth, Markus, Recomposed Recapitulations in the Sonata-Form Movements of Joseph Haydn and His Contemporaries (PhD diss. Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, 2013).Google Scholar
Newcomb, Anthony, “Those Images That Yet Fresh Images Beget,” Journal of Musicology 2 (1983): 227−45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pederson, Sanna, “A. B. Marx, Berlin Concert Life, and German National Identity,” 19th-Century Music 18 (1992): 87–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pederson, Sanna, “Defining the Term ‘Absolute Music’ Historically,” Music & Letters 90 (2009): 240–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pelker, Bärbel, Die deutsche Konzertouvertüre (1825–1865), 2 vols (Frankfurt am Main: Lang, 1993).Google Scholar
Piontek, Frank, “‘Auch bin ich wahrlich nicht gleichgültig gegen ihn’: Wagner und Berlioz,” in Döhring, Sieghart, Jacobshagen, Arnold, and Braam, Gunther (eds.), Berlioz, Wagner und die Deutschen (Munich: Dohr, 2003), 25–52.Google Scholar
Rehding, Alexander, Music and Monumentality: Commemoration and Musical Wonderment in Nineteenth-Century Germany (New York: Oxford University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Reicha, Antoine, Traité de haute composition musicale, 2 vols (Paris: Zetter, 1824–26).Google Scholar
Richter, Ernst Friedrich, Die Grundzüge der musikalischen Formen und ihre Analyse (Leipzig: Wigand, 1852).Google Scholar
Rigaudière, Marc, La Théorie musicale germanique du XIXe siècle et l’idée de cohérence (Paris: Société française de musicologie, 2009).Google Scholar
Riley, Matthew, “Hermeneutics and the New Formenlehre: An Interpretation of Haydn’s ‘Oxford’ Symphony, First Movement,” Eighteenth-Century Music 7 (2010): 199–219.Google Scholar
Ritzel, Fred, Die Entwicklung der “Sonatenform” im musiktheoretischen Schrifttum des 18. und 19. Jahrhunderts (Wiesbaden: Breitkopf & Härtel, 1968).Google Scholar
Rodgers, Stephen, Form, Program, and Metaphor in the Music of Berlioz (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Rosen, Charles, The Romantic Generation (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Rothstein, William, “Common-tone Tonality in Italian Opera: An Introduction,” Music Theory Online 14 (2008), www.mtosmt.org/issues/mto.08.14.1/mto.08.14.1.rothstein.html.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothstein, William, “National Metrical Types in Music of the Eighteenth and Early Nineteenth Centuries,” in Mirka, Danuta and Agawu, Kofi (eds.), Communication in Eighteenth-Century Music (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009), 112–59.Google Scholar
Samson, Jim, “Analysis in Context,” in Cook, Nicholas and Everist, Mark (eds.), Rethinking Music (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999), 35–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schachter, Carl, “[Book Review:] The Music of Chopin by Jim Samson and The Music of Brahms by Michael Musgrave,” Music Analysis 8 (1989): 187–97.Google Scholar
Schenker, Heinrich, Der freie Satz, Anhang: Figurentafeln (Vienna: Universal Edition, 1935).Google Scholar
Schilling, Gustav, Musikalisches Conversations-Handlexikon, 2 vols (Mergentheim: Encyclopädie der gesammten musikalischen Wissenschaften, oder Universal-Lexicon der Tonkunst (Stuttgart: Köhler, 1840).Google Scholar
Schlegel, August Wilhelm, A Course of Lectures on Dramatic Art and Literature [Vorlesungen über dramatische Kunst und Literatur, 1809–11], trans. Black, John (London: Templeman – Smith, 2nd edn 1840).Google Scholar
Schmalfeldt, Janet, “Form as the Process of Becoming: The Beethoven-Hegelian Tradition and the ‘Tempest’ Sonata,” Beethoven Forum 4 (1995): 37–71.Google Scholar
Schmalfeldt, Janet, In the Process of Becoming: Analytic and Philosophical Perspectives on Form in Early Nineteenth-Century Music (New York: Oxford University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Schmidt, Christian Martin, “Einleitung,” in Schmidt, (ed.), Felix Mendelssohn Bartholdy: Overtures I (Wiesbaden: Breitkopf & Härtel, 2006), xii–xxi.Google Scholar
Schopenhauer, Arthur, “Zur Metaphysik des Schönen und Ästhetik,” in Parerga und Paralipomena, vol. II (Arthur Schopenhauer sämtliche Werke, ed. von Löhneysen, Wolfgang, vol. V) (Stuttgart: Cotta and Frankfurt am Main: Insel, 1965), 490–532.Google Scholar
Shank, Robert C. and Abelson, Robert P., Scripts, Plans, Goals and Understanding: An Inquiry into Human Knowledge (Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1977).Google Scholar
Silber Ballan, Judith, “Marxian Programmatic Music: A Stage in Mendelssohn’s Musical Development,” in Todd, R. Larry (ed.), Mendelssohn Studies (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992), 149–61.Google Scholar
Silvestri, Lodovico Settimo, Della vita e delle opere di Gioachino Rossini (Milan: The Author, 1874).Google Scholar
Smith, Peter, “Cadential Content and Cadential Function in the First-Movement Expositions of Schumann’s Violin Sonatas,” Music Theory & Analysis 3 (2016): 27–57.Google Scholar
Solie, Ruth, “The Living Work: Organicism and Musical Analysis,” 19th-Century Music 4 (1980): 147–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Somfai, László, “The London Revision of Haydn’s Instrumental Style,” Proceedings of the Royal Musical Association 100 (1973–74): 159–74.Google Scholar
Slatin, Sonia, “Opera and Revolution: ‘La Muette de Portici’ and the Belgian Revolution of 1830 Revisited,” Journal of Musicological Research 3 (1979): 45–62.Google Scholar
Sponheuer, Bernd, “Reconstructing Ideal Types of the ‘German’ in Music,” in Applegate, Celia and Potter, Pamela (eds.), Music and German National Identity (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2002), 36–58.Google Scholar
Steinbeck, Susanne, Die Ouvertüre in der Zeit von Beethoven bis Wagner: Probleme und Lösungen (Munich: Katzbichler, 1973).Google Scholar
Steinbeck, Wolfram, “Ouvertüre zu Coriolan op. 62,” in Dahlhaus, Carl, Ringer, Alexander L., and Riethmüller, Albrecht (eds.), Beethoven: Interpretationen seiner Werke, (Laaber: Laaber Verlag, 1994, rev. edn 1996), vol. I, 471–78.Google Scholar
Stollberg, Arne, Tönend bewegte Dramen. Die Idee des Tragischen in der Orchestermusik vom späten 18. bis zum frühen 20. Jahrhundert (Munich: Edition Text+Kritik, 2014).Google Scholar
Strohm, Reinhard, “Gedanken zu Wagners Opern-Ouvertüren,” in Dahlhaus, Carl and Voss, Egon (eds.), Wagnerliteratur – Wagnerforschung (Mainz: Schott, 1985), 69–84.Google Scholar
Sulzer, Johann Georg, Allgemeine Theorie der schönen Künste (Leipzig: Weidmann, 1774).Google Scholar
Suurpää, Lauri, Music and Drama in Six Beethoven Overtures: Interaction between Programmatic Tensions and Structure (Helsinki: Hakapaino Oy, 1997).Google Scholar
Taïeb, Patrick, L’Ouverture d’opéra en France: de Monsigny à Méhul (Paris: Société française de musicologie, 2007).Google Scholar
Thaler, Lotte, Organische Form in der Musiktheorie des 19. und beginnenden 20. Jahrhundert (Munich: Katzbichler, 1984).Google Scholar
Todd, R. Larry, “Mendelssohn’s Ossianic Manner, with a New Source—On Lena’s Gloomy Heath,” in Finson, Jon and Todd, R. Larry (eds.), Mendelssohn and Schumann: Essays on Their Music and Its Context (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1984), 137–60.Google Scholar
Todd, R. Larry, Mendelssohn: The Hebrides and Other Overtures (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Todd, R. Larry, Mendelssohn: A Life in Music (New York: Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Tovey, Donald Francis, Illustrative Music (Essays in Musical Analysis, IV) (London: Oxford University Press, 1937).Google Scholar
Tovey, Donald Francis, The Classics of Music: Talks, Essays, and Other Writings Previously Uncollected, ed. Tilmouth, Michael, Kimbell, David, and Savage, Roger (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Uribe, Patrick, “A.B. Marx’s Sonatenform: Coming to Terms with Beethoven’s Rhetoric,” Journal of Music Theory 55 (2011): 221–51.Google Scholar
Vallières, Michel, Tan, Daphne, Caplin, William E., and McAdams, Stephen, “Perception of Intrinsic Formal Functionality: An Empirical Investigation of Mozart’s Materials,” Journal of Interdisciplinary Music Studies 3 (2009): 17−43.Google Scholar
Vande Moortele, Steven, “Sentences, Sentence Chains, and Sentence Replication: Intra- and Interthematic Formal Functions in Liszt’s Weimar Symphonic Poems,” Intégral 25 (2011): 121–58.Google Scholar
Vande Moortele, Steven, “Form, Narrative, and Intertextuality in Wagner’s Overture to Der fliegende Holländer,” Music Analysis 32 (2013): 46–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vande Moortele, Steven, “In Search of Romantic Form,” Music Analysis 32 (2013): 404–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vande Moortele, Steven, “Turning Inward—Turning Outward—Turning Around: Strong Subordinate Themes in Romantic Overtures,” Res Musica 6 (2015): 9–31.Google Scholar
Voss, Egon, Richard Wagner und die Instrumentalmusik. Wagners symphonischer Ehrgeiz (Wilhelmshaven: Heinrichshofen, 1977).Google Scholar
Wagner, Cosima, Die Tagebücher, 2 vols, ed. Gregor-Dellin, Martin and Mack, Dietrich (Munich: Piper, 1977).Google Scholar
Wagner, Richard, Sämtliche Schriften und Dichtungen, 12 vols (Leipzig: Breitkopf & Härtel, 5th edn 1911).Google Scholar
Wagner, Richard, Oper und Drama [1851], ed. Kropfinger, Klaus (Stuttgart: Reclam, 1984, 2nd edn 1994).Google Scholar
Weber, Max Maria, Carl Maria von Weber: Ein Lebensbild, 2 vols (Leipzig: Keil, 1862–64).Google Scholar
Weber, William, The Great Transformation of Musical Taste: Concert Programming from Haydn to Brahms (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Wendt, Amadeus, Über die Hauptperioden der schönen Kunst, oder die Kunst im Laufe der Weltgeschichte (Leipzig: Barth, 1831).Google Scholar
Wendt, Amadeus, Über den gegenwärtigen Zustand der Musik besonders in Deutschland und wie er geworden (Göttingen: Dieterich, 1836).Google Scholar
Whistling, Carl Friedrich, Handbuch der musikalischen Literatur oder allgemeines, systematisch geordnetes Verzeichnis der in Deutschland und in den angrenzenden Ländern gedruckten Musikalien […], 3rd edn revised by Hofmeister, Adolph, 2 vols (Leipzig: Hofmeister, 1844).Google Scholar
Wingfield, Paul, “Beyond ‘Norms and Deformations’: Towards a Theory of Sonata Form as Reception History,” Music Analysis 27 (2008): 137–77.Google Scholar
Wingfield, Paul and Horton, Julian, “Norm and Deformation in Mendelssohn’s Sonata Forms,” in Grimes, Nicole and Mace, Angela (eds.), Mendelssohn Perspectives (Farnham: Ashgate, 2012), 83–112.Google Scholar
Zaslaw, Neal, Mozart’s Symphonies: Context, Performance Practice, Reception (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989).Google Scholar