Abrahamsen, A. A. (1977). Child language: An interdisciplinary guide to theory and research. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.Google Scholar

Acocella, J. (November 11, 2013). Renaissance man: Boccaccio’s Decameron. The New Yorker, 78–81.Google Scholar

Adams, M. J. (2011). Advancing our students’ language and literacy: The challenge of complex texts. American Educator, 34(4), 3–11.Google Scholar

Adams, M. J., Treiman, R. & Pressley, M. (1998). Reading, writing, and literacy. In Damon, W. (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 275–356). New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar

Adonis, A. (2012). Education, education, education: Reforming England’s schools. London, UK: Biteback.Google Scholar

Allen, D. (2013). Our declaration: A reading of the Declaration of Independence in defense of equality. New York, NY: Liveright.Google Scholar

Apperly, I. (2011). Mindreaders: The cognitive basis of “theory of mind.” New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Appleby, A. & Langer, J. (1987). How writing shapes thinking. Washington, DC: National Council for the Teaching of English.Google Scholar

Aram, D., Fine, Y. & Ziv, M. (2013). Enhancing parent–child shared book reading interaction. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 28, 111–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arendt, H. (1954). The crisis in education. Between past and future. New York, NY: Viking.Google Scholar

Assman, J. (2012). Cultural memory and the myth of the Axial Age. In Bellan, R. N & Joas, H (Eds.), The Axial Age and its consequences (pp. 366–407). Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Astington, J. & Baird, J. (2005). Why language matters for theory of mind. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Astington, J., Harris, P. & Olson, D. R. (1988). Developing theories of mind. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Astington, J. W. & Hughes, C. (2013). Theory of mind: Self-reflection and social understanding. In Zelazo, P. D (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of developmental psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 398–424). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Astington, J. W. & Olson, D. R. (1990). Metacognitive and metalinguistic language: Learning to talk about thought. Applied Psychology, 39, 77–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ayer, F. (1936). Language, truth and logic. London: Victor Gollancz.Google Scholar

Baines, J. (2008). The earliest Egyptian writing: development, context, purpose. In Houston, S. (Ed.), The first writing: Script invention as history and process (pp. 150–189). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bakhurst, D. (2011). The formation of reason. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Banfield, A. (1993). Where epistemology, style, and grammar meet literary history: The development of represented speech and thought. In Lucy, J (Ed.), Reflexive language: Reported speech and metapragmatics (pp. 339–364). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an ecology of mind. New York, NY: Chandler Publishing.Google Scholar

Beal, C. (1990). Development of knowledge about the role of inference in text comprehension. Child Development, 61, 1011–1023.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Beal, C. R. & Flavell, J. H. (1984). Development of the ability to distinguish communicative intention and literal message meaning. Child Development, 55, 920–928.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bereiter, C. & Scardamalia, M. (1987). The psychology of written composition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Berman, R. & Ravid, D. (2009). Becoming a literate language user: Oral and written text construction across adolescence. In Olson, D. R & Torrance, N (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of literacy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bernstein, R. (2010). The pragmatic turn. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Bialystok, E. (2000). Symbolic representation across domains in preschool children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 76, 173–189.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Biber, D. (1986). Spoken and written textual dimensions in English: Resolving the contradictory findings. Language, 62, 384–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Biber, D. (2009). Are there linguistic consequences of literacy? In Olson, D. R. & Torrance, N. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of literacy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bloom, A. (1968). The Republic of Plato. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Bogdan, R. (2009). Predicative minds: The social ontogeny of propositional thinking. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bradley, L. & Bryant, P. (1983). Categorizing sounds and learning to read: A causal connection. Nature, 301, 419–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Braine, M. & Rumain, B. (1981). Children’s comprehension of “or”: Evidence for a sequence of competencies. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 31, 46–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brandom, R. (1994). Making it explicit: Reasoning, representing and discursive commitment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Brandom, R. (2011). Perspectives on Pragmatism: Classical, recent and contemporary. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Bredo, E. (1994). Reconstructing educational psychology: Situated cognition and Deweyan pragmatism. Educational Psychologist, 29, 23–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, A. (1997). Transforming schools into communities of thinking and learning about serious matters. American Psychologist, 52, 399–413.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bruner, J. S. (1960). The process of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Bruner, J. S. (1983). Child’s talk: Learning to use language. New York, NY: Norton.Google Scholar

Bruner, J. S. (2002). Narrative distancing: A foundation for literacy. In Brockmeier, J, Wang, M & Olson, D. R (Eds.), Literacy, narrative and culture. Richmond, UK: Curzon.Google Scholar

Bruner, J. S., Olver, R. & Greenfield, P. (Eds.). (1966). Studies in cognitive growth. New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar

Caines, M. (May 15, 2009). Arrange one’s face: Review of H. Mantel’s “Wolf Hall.” Times Literary Supplement. Retrieved from www.the-tls.co.uk/tls/public/article758550.ece.Google Scholar

Calkins, L. (2006). A guide to the writing workshop. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.Google Scholar

Carlyle, E. I. (1947). The life of William Cobbett. London, UK: Home & Van Thal.Google Scholar

Carroll, J. M., Snowling, M. J., Stevenson, J. & Hulme, C. (2003). The development of phonological awareness in preschool children. Developmental Psychology, 39, 913–923.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Carruthers, M. (1990). The book of memory: A study of memory in medieval culture. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Carruthers, P. (2007). The illusion of conscious will. Synthese, 159, 197–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chafe, W. (1985). Linguistic differences produced by differences between speaking and writing. In Olson, D. R., Torrance, N. & Hildyard, A. (Eds.), Literacy, language and learning. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Cheng, P. W. & Holyoak, K. J. (1985). Pragmatic reasoning schemas. Cognitive Psychology, 17, 391–416.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Chomsky, N. (1980). Rules and representations. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clanchy, M. (1993). From memory to written record: England 1066–1307 (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Clanchy, M. (1997). Abelard: A medieval life. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Clark, A. (1988). Magic words: How language augments computation. In Carruthers, P & Boucher, J (Eds.), Language and thought. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Clark, A. (2008). Supersizing the mind. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clark, A. & Chalmers, D. (1998). The extended mind. Analysis, 58, 7–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cole, M. (1996). Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Cole, M. & Cole, J. (2006). Rethinking the Goody myth. In Olson, D. R. & Cole, M. (Eds.), Technology, literacy, and the evolution of society. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Cooper, J. S. (2008). Babylonian beginnings: The origin of the cuneiform writing system in comparative perspective. In Houston, S. (Ed.), The first writing: Script invention as history and process (pp. 71–99). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Corson, D. (1985). The lexical bar. Oxford, UK: Pergamon.Google Scholar

Coulmas, F. (2013). Writing and society. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Council of Ministers of Education for Canada. (2013). Measuring up: Canadian results of the OECD PISA study for 2012. Toronto, ON: CMEC.Google Scholar

Cowen, J. (2003). A balanced approach to beginning reading instruction. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.Google Scholar

Crain, S. & Khlentzos, D. (2010). The logic instinct. Mind and language, 25, 30–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cronin, V. S. (2002). The syntagmatic–paradigmatic shift and reading development. Journal of Child Language, 29(1), 189–204.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Crupi, V. & Tentori, K. (2016). Noisy probability judgment, the conjunction fallacy and rationality. Psychological Review, 123, 97–102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Damasio, A. (2012). Self comes to mind: Constructing the conscious brain. New York, NY: Knopf Doubleday.Google Scholar

Daniels, P. (2009). Grammatology. In Olson, D. R & Torrance, N (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of literacy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Davidson, D. (2001). Subjective, intersubjective, objective. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dehaene, S. (2009). Reading in the brain. New York, NY: Viking.Google Scholar

Dennett, D. (1991). Consciousness explained. Toronto, ON: Little, Brown and Company.Google Scholar

Derry, J. (2008). Abstract rationality in education: From Vygotsky to Brandom. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 27, 49–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Derry, J. (2013). Vygotsky philosophy and education. Oxford, UK: Wiley Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

de Villiers, J. (2005). Can language acquisition give children a point of view? In Astington, J. W & Baird, J (Eds.), Why language matters for theory of mind. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Dewey, J. (1986a). Experience and nature. In Boydston, J. A (Ed.), John Dewey – The later works: Vol. 12. 1938. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar

Dewey, J. (1986b). Logic: The theory of inquiry. In Boydston, J. A (Ed.), John Dewey – The later works: Vol. 12. 1938. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar

Dewey, J. (2003). Art as experience. In Boydston, J. A & Hickman, L (Eds.), John Dewey – The later works: Vol. 30. 1934. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar

Diringer, D. (1968). The alphabet: A key to the history of mankind (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Funk & Wagnalls.Google Scholar

Doherty, M. & Perner, J. (1998). Metalinguistic awareness and theory of mind. Cognitive Development, 13, 279–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Donald, M. (2012). An evolutionary approach to culture: Implications for the study of the Axial Age. In Bellah, R. N & Joas, H (Eds.), The Axial Age and its consequences. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.Google Scholar

Donaldson, M. (1978). Children’s minds. Glasgow, UK: Fontana/Collins.Google Scholar

Downing, J. (1984). Task awareness in the development of reading skill. In Downing, J. & Valtin, R (Eds.), Language awareness and learning to read (pp. 27–56). New York, NY: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Downing, J. & Valtin, R. (Eds.). (1984). Language awareness and learning to read. New York, NY: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dummett, M. (1993). Frege: Philosophy of language (3rd ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Eagleman, D. (2011). Incognito: The secret lives of the brain. New York, NY: Vintage.Google Scholar

Edelman, G. (2004). Wider than the sky: The phenomenological gift of consciousness. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Ehri, L. & Wilce, L. (1980). The influence of orthography on readers’ conceptualization of the phonemic structure of words. Applied Psycholinguistics, 1, 371–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

EQAO [Education Quality and Accountability Office]. (2014). (Source: EQAO: www.eqao.com/ProvincialReport/Files/14/PDF/provincial-report-elementary-findings-2014.pdf).Google Scholar

Erneling, C. (2010). Towards discursive education. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eskritt, M. & Olson, D. R. (2012). From depiction to notation: How children use symbols to represent objects and events. Journal of Cognition and Development, 13, 189–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Feldman, C. (1991). Oral metalanguage. In Olson, D. R & Torrance, N (Eds.), Literacy and orality. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Ferreiro, E. (1985). Literacy development: A psychogenic perspective. In Olson, D. R., Torrance, J & Hildyard, A. (Eds.), Literacy, language and learning. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Ferreiro, E. & Teberosky, A. (1982). Literacy before schooling. Exeter, NY: Heinemann.Google Scholar

Flavell, J., Flavell, E. & Green, E. (1983). Development of the appearance–reality distinction. Cognitive Psychology, 15, 95–120.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Fodor, J. (1972). Some reflections on L. S. Vygotsky’s Thought and Language. Cognitive Psychology, 1, 83–95.Google Scholar

Foucault, M. (1970). The order of things: An archaeology of human sciences. New York, NY: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar

Francis, H. (1973). Children’s experience of reading and notions of units in language. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 43, 17–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frank, T. (2015). Easy chair. Harper’s Magazine, 330, p. 27.Google Scholar

Fromkin, V., Rodman, R. & Hymes, N. (2007). An introduction to language. Boston, MA: Thomson Publishing.Google Scholar

Frye, N. (1957). Anatomy of criticism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gee, J. (1990). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses. Brighton, UK: Falmer Press.Google Scholar

Gelb, I. J. (1963). A study of writing (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Giedion, S. (1948). Mechanization takes command. New York, NY: Norton.Google Scholar

Gigerenzer, G. (1991). How to make cognitive illusions disappear. European Review of Social Psychology, 2, 83–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gigerenzer, G., Todd, P. & the ABC Research Group. (1999). Simple heuristics that make us smart. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Gillory, J. (2004). The memo and modernity. Critical Inquiry, 31, 108–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ginzburg, C. (1980). The cheese and the worms: The cosmos of a sixteenth-century miller. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Gleick, J. (1993). Genius: The life and science of Richard Feynman. New York, NY: Vintage.Google Scholar

Gleitman, L. R., Gleitman, H. & Shipley, E. F. (1972). The emergence of the child as grammarian. Cognition, 1, 137–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goldhill, S. (2002). The invention of prose. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Goldstein, R. N. (October 8, 2015). What philosophers really know. New York Review of Books, 62, 48–50.Google Scholar

Goody, J. (1977). The domestication of the savage mind. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Gopnik, A. & Astington, J. (1988). Children’s understanding of representational change and its relationship to the understanding of false belief and the appearance–reality distinction. Child Development, 59, 26–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gopnik, A., Meltzoff, A. & Kuhl, P. (1999). The scientist in the crib: Minds, brains, and how children learn. New York, NY: William Morrow.Google Scholar

Greeno, J. G. (1997). On claims that answer the wrong questions. Educational Researcher, 27, 5–17.Google Scholar

Grendler, P. F. (1989). Schooling in Renaissance Italy: Literacy and learning, 1300–1600. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grice, H. P. (1989). Studies in the ways with words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Grieve, R. (1990). Children’s awareness. In Grieve, R & Hughes, M (Eds.), Understanding children: Essays in honour of Margaret Donaldson. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Hass, C. & Flower, L. (1988). Rhetorical reading strategies and the recovery of meaning. College Composition and Communication, 39, 30–47.Google Scholar

Hacking, I. (1975). Why does language matter to philosophy? Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hacking, I. (1983). Representing and intervening. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hacking, I. (1996). Normal people. In Olson, D. R & Torrance, N (Eds.), Modes of thought. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K. (1985). Spoken and written language. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Halverson, J. (1991). Olson on literacy. Language in Society, 20, 619–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hanson, N. R. (1958). Patterns of discovery: An inquiry into the conceptual foundations of science. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Harris, P. (2000). The work of the imagination. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Harris, R. (2009). Rationality and the literate mind. London, UK: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Havelock, E. A. (1982). The literate revolution in Greece and its cultural consequences. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Hayes, J. R. & Flower, L. (1980). Identifying the organization of writing processes. In Gregg, L. W. & Steinberg, E. R. (Eds.), Cognitive processes in writing. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Heath, J. (2011). Enlightenment 2.0: Restoring sanity to our politics, our economy, and our lives. Toronto, ON: HarperCollins.Google Scholar

Heath, S. (1983). Ways with words: Language, life and work in communities and classrooms. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hedelin, E. & Hjelmquist, E. (1988). Preschool children’s mastery of the form/content distinction in spoken language. In Ekberg, K & Mjaavatn, P (Eds.), Growing into the modern world. Trondheim: Norwegian Centre for Child Research.Google Scholar

Heeschen, V. (1978). The metalinguistic vocabulary of a speech community in the highlands of Irian Jaya (West New Guinea). In Sinclair, A, Jarvella, R. & Levelt, W (Eds.), The child’s conception of language. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar

Henle, M. (1962). On the relation between logic and thinking. Psychological Review, 69, 366–378.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Himmelmann, N. P. (2006). The challenges of segmenting spoken language. In Himmelmann, N. P. & Mosel, V. (Eds.), Essentials of language documentation. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Hirsch, E. D., Jr. (1987). Cultural literacy: What every American needs to know. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar

Hoffman, M. & Murphy, P. (2005). Introduction. In Hoffman, M & Murphy, P (Eds.), Essentials of the theory of fiction. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar

Homer, B. (2009). Literacy and metalinguistic development. In Olson, D. R & Torrance, N. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of literacy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Homer, B. & Olson, D. R. (1999). Literacy and children’s conception of words. Written Language and Literacy, 2, 113–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Householder, F. (1971). Linguistic speculations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Huey, E. B. (1910). The psychology and pedagogy of reading. New York, NY: Appleton Century Croft.Google Scholar

Hume, D. (1978). Treatise on human nature (Nidditch, P. H., Ed.). Oxford, UK: Clarendon. (Original work published 1739.)Google Scholar

Huttenlocher, J. (1964). Children’s language: Word–phrase relationship. Science, 143, 264–265.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Jackendoff, R. (2002). Foundations of language. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Janack, M. (2012). What we mean by experience. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jaspers, K. (2011). The origin and goal of history. London, UK: Routledge Revivals. (Original work published 1949)Google Scholar

Jaynes, J. (1976). The origin of consciousness in the breakdown of the bicameral mind. New York, NY: Mifflin.Google Scholar

Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2006). How we reason. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Joos, M. (1967). The five clocks: Five styles of English usage. New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace and World.Google Scholar

Jung, C. G. (1969). Studies in word association (trans. Eder, M. D). London, UK: Routledge & Kegan Paul. (Original work published 1918)Google Scholar

Kafka, F. (1946). A little fable. In The Great Wall of China: Stories and reflections. Prague: Schocken Books.Google Scholar

Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking fast and slow. Toronto, ON: Penguin.Google Scholar

Karanth, P. & Suchitra, M. (1993). Literacy acquisition and grammaticality judgments in children. In Scholes, R (Ed.), Literacy and language analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1992). Beyond modularity: A developmental perspective on cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books.Google Scholar

Katz, J. & Fodor, J. (1963). The structure of a semantic theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Katz, S. (2001). The knower and the known in folk pedagogies. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, OISE/University of Toronto.Google Scholar

Kneale, W. & Kneale, M. (1984). The development of logic (Rev. ed.). Oxford, UK: Clarendon.Google Scholar

Koterski, A. (2015). The silhouette of ISOTYPE [Published in Polish as: Zarys ISOTYPE’u: Idea statystyki obrazkowej Metoda Wiedenska, Przeglad Filozoficzny, NS, nr 1 (2015), 227–250].Google Scholar

Kozulin, A. (1986). Introduction. In Vygotsky, L., Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Kramer, S. (2912). The “eye of the mind” and the eye of the body: Descartes and Leibniz on truth, mathematics, and visuality. In Barth, F. G, Giampieri Deutsch, P & Klein, H. D (Eds.), Sensory perception: Mind and matter. Vienna: Springer.Google Scholar

Krashen, S. D. (1989). We acquire vocabulary and spelling by reading: Additional evidence for the input hypothesis. Modern Language Journal, 73, 440–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kuhn, D. (2005). Education for thinking. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google ScholarPubMed

Kuhn, D. (2015). Thinking together and alone. Educational Researcher, 44, 46–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lagemann, E. C. (2000). The elusive science: The troubling history of educational research. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Lancashire, I. (2002). “Dumb significants” and Early Modern English definition. In Brockmeier, J, Wong, M. & Olson, D. R (Eds.), Literacy, narrative and culture. Richmond, UK: Curzon.Google Scholar

Landgrafova, R. (2013). The classical art of memory as immaterial writing. Pragmatics and Cognition, 21, 505–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lantolf, J. & Poehner, M. (1994). Vygotskyan approaches to second language research. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar

Lantolf, J. P. & Poehner, M. E. (2014). Sociocultural theory and the pedagogical imperative in L2 education: Vygotskian praxis and the research/practice divide. London, UK: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Latour, B. & Woolgar, S. (1986). Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Lee, E., Torrance, N. & Olson, D. R. (2001). Young children and the say/mean distinction: Verbatim and paraphrase recognition in narrative and nursery rhyme contexts. Journal of Child Language, 28, 531–543.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Leiper, K. (2013). Education, literacy and its cognitive effects: Problem-solving and decision-making in Homer and archaic and fifth-century BC Athens. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Department of History, Macquarie University, Australia.Google Scholar

Leong, C. K. (1982). Reading in perspective. In Downing, J & Leong, C. K (Eds.), Psychology of reading. New York, NY: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Leslie, A. (1988). Some implications of pretense for mechanisms underlying the child’s theory of mind. In Astington, J. W, Harris, P & Olson, D. R (Eds.), Developing theories of mind. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Leslie, S. J. & Gelman, S. A. (2012). Quantified statements are recalled as generics: Evidence from preschool children and adults. Cognitive Psychology, 64, 186–214.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Levinson, S. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levi-Strauss, C. (1961). Tristes tropiques. New York, NY: Atheneum.Google Scholar

Levi-Strauss, C. (1963). Structural anthropology. New York, NY: Doubleday Anchor Books.Google Scholar

Liberman, I. Y. & Shankweiler, D. (1985). Phonology and the problems of learning to read and write. Remedial and Special Education, 6(6), 8–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Liberman, I. & Shankweiler, D. (1991). Phonology and beginning reading: A tutorial. In Rieben, L & Perfetti, C (Eds.), Learning to read: Basic research and its implications. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Linell, P. (2005). The written language bias in linguistics: Its nature, origins and transformations. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar

Locke, J. (1961). An essay concerning human understanding. London, UK: Dent. (Original work published 1690)Google Scholar

Logan, R. (2004). The alphabet effect: A media ecology understanding of the making of Western civilization. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.Google Scholar

Lundberg, I., Olofsson, A. & Wall, S. (1980). Reading and spelling skills in the first years predicted from phonemic awareness skills in kindergarten. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 21, 159–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Luria, A. R. (1961). The role of speech in the regulation of normal and abnormal behavior. London, UK: Pergamon.Google Scholar

Luria, A. R. (1976). Cognitive development: Its cultural and social foundations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Lyotard, J.-F. (1984). The postmodern condition. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar

Macbeth, K. (2006). Diverse, unforeseen, and quaint difficulties: The sensible responses of novices learning to follow instructions in academic writing. Research in the Teaching of English, 41, 180–207.Google Scholar

March, J. (1978). Bounded rationality, ambiguity, and the engineering of choice. The Bell Journal of Economics, 9, 587–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McCallister, C. (2011). Unison reading: Socially inclusive group instruction for equity and achievement. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Sage.Google Scholar

McCullers, C. (1953). The heart is a lonely hunter. New York, NY: Bantam Books.Google Scholar

McDowell, J. (1994). Mind and world. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

McLuhan, M. (1964). Understanding media. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar

Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self and society. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Mehan, H. (1979). What time is it Denise? Some observations on the organization and consequences of asking known information questions in classroom discourse. Theory into Practice, 18(4), 285–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Menand, L. (2001). The Metaphysical Club: A story of ideas in America. New York, NY: Farrer, Straus & Giroux.Google Scholar

Milligan, K., Astington, J. W. & Dack, L. A. (2007). Language and theory of mind: Meta-analysis of the relation between language ability and false-belief understanding. Child Development, 78, 622–646.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Misak, S. (2013). The American Pragmatists. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Montaigne, M. de. (1993). The complete essays. London: Penguin. (Original work published 1580)Google Scholar

Moore, C. (2006). The development of commonsense psychology. Mahwah, NJ: LEA.Google Scholar

Moore, J. & Newell, A. (1973). How can MERLIN understand? In Gregg, L. W. (Ed.), Knowledge and cognition. Baltimore, MD: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Morais, J., Alegria, J. & Content, A. (1987). The relationship between segmental analysis and alphabetic literacy: An interactive view. Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive, 7, 415–438.Google Scholar

Morison, E. (1966). Men, machines, and modern times. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Murphy, J. P. (1990). Pragmatism: From Peirce to Davidson. San Francisco, CA: Westview Press.Google Scholar

Nagel, T. (1986). The view from nowhere. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Nagy, W. E. & Anderson, R. C. (1984). How many words are there in printed English? Reading Research Quarterly, 19, 304–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

National Center for Educational Statistics. (2010). The nation’s report card: Grade 12 reading and mathematics 2009 national and pilot state results (NCES 2011–455). Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.Google Scholar

National Reading Panel and National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel: Teaching children to read. Washington, DC: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.Google Scholar

Nelson, K. (Ed.). (1989). Narratives in the crib. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

New York Times. (October 25, 2015). Obama administration, sharing blame, calls for limits on testing in schools (Kate Zernike, reporter).Google Scholar

Noveck, I. A. (2001). When children are more logical than adults: Experimental investigation of scalar implicatures. Cognition, 78, 165–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nunez, T. & Bryant, P. (2009). Children’s reading and spelling: Beyond the first steps. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Oatley, K. (1996). Inference in narrative and science. In Olson, D. R & Torrance, N (Eds.), Modes of thought. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Oatley, K. (2013). Worlds of the possible: Abstraction, imagination, consciousness. Pragmatics and Cognition, 21, 448–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Oatley, K. & Djikic, M. (2008). Writing as thinking. Review of General Psychology, 12, 9–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Oatley, K. & Djikic, M. (in press). The creativity of literary writing. In Kaufman, J., Baer, J. & Glaveanu, V. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity across different domains. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Olson, D. R. (1970). Language and thought: Aspects of a cognitive theory of semantics. Psychological Review, 77(4), 257–273.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Olson, D. R. (1975). The languages of experience: On natural language and formal education. Bulletin of the British Psychological Society, 28, 363–373.Google Scholar

Olson, D. R. (1977). From utterance to text: The bias of language in speech and writing. Harvard Educational Review, 47(3), 257–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Olson, D. R. (1994). The world on paper: The conceptual and cognitive implications of writing and reading. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Olson, D. R. (2003). Psychological theory and educational reform: How schooling remakes mind and society. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Olson, D. R. (2007). The self-ascription of intention: Responsibility, obligation and self-control. Synthese, 159, 297–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Olson, D. R. (2012). Narrative, cognition and rationality. In Gee, J. P. & Handford, M. (Eds.), Routledge handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 604–615). London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar

Olson, D. R. & Astington, J. (1990). Talking about text: How literacy contributes to thought. Journal of Pragmatics, 14, 705–721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Olson, D. R. & Astington, J. W. (2013). Preschool children conflate pragmatic agreement and semantic truth. First Language, 33, 617–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Olson, D. R. & Campbell, R. (1993). Constructing representations. In Pratt, C & Garton, A. F (Eds.), Systems of representation in children: Development and use (pp. 11–26). Chichester, UK: Wiley.Google Scholar

Olson, D. R. & Oatley, K. (2014). The quotation theory of writing. Written Communication, 31, 4–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Olver, R. & Hornsby, J. (1966). On equivalence. In Bruner, J. S., Olver, R. & Greenfield, P. (Eds.), Studies in cognitive growth. New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar

Ontario Teachers’ Manuals: Primary Reading. (1920). Toronto: Copp Clark.Google Scholar

Osgood, C. E., Suci, G. & Tannenbaum, P. (1957). The measurement of meaning. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar

Papafragou, A. & Musolino, J. (2003). Scalar implicatures: Experiments at the semantic–pragmatic interface. Cognition, 86, 253–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Papandropoulou, I. & Sinclair, H. (1974). What is a word? Experimental study of children’s ideas on grammar. Human Development, 17, 241–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pelletier, J. (2002). Young children’s “clever misunderstandings” about print. In Brockmeier, J., Wong, M & Olson, D. R (Eds.), Literacy, narrative and culture. Richmond, UK: Curzon.Google Scholar

Perfetti, C. (1991). Representations and awareness in the acquisition of reading competence. In Riben, L & Perfetti, C (Eds.), Learning to read: Basic research and its implications. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Perner, J. (1991). Understanding the representational mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Perner, J. & Roessler, J. (2012). From infants’ to children’s appreciation of belief. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16, 519–525.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Peskin, J. & Astington, J. W. (2004). The effects of adding metacognitive language to story texts. Cognitive Development, 19, 253–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Petsinis, T. (1997). The French mathematician. New York, NY: Walker and Company.Google Scholar

Piaget, J. (1962). Play, dreams and imitation. New York, NY: Norton.Google Scholar

Pinker, S. (1994). The language instinct: How the mind creates language. New York, NY: HarperCollins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Popper, K. (1972). Objective knowledge: An evolutionary approach. Oxford, UK: Clarendon.Google Scholar

Powell, B. B. (1991). Homer and the origin of the Greek alphabet. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Premack, D. & Premack, A. (1996). Why animals lack pedagogy and why some cultures have more of it than others. In Olson, D. R. & Torrance, N. (Eds.), The handbook of education and human development. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Proctor, M. (2002). The essay as a literary and academic form: Closed gate or open door? In Brockmeier, J, Wang, M. & Olson, D. R (Eds.), Literacy, narrative and culture. Richmond, UK: Curzon.Google Scholar

Proust, J. (2013). The philosophy of metarepresentation: Mental agency and self-awareness. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Proust, M. (1982). Remembrance of things past: Vol. 1. Swann’s Way. New York, NY: Vintage.Google Scholar

Quine, W. (1960). Word and object. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Ravitch, D. (2014, November 20). The myth of China’s super schools. New York Review of Books, 61, 18.Google Scholar

Rayner, K., Foorman, B. R., Perfetti, C. A., Pesetsky, D. & Seidenberg, M. S. (2001). How psychological science informs the teacher of reading. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 2, 31–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Read, C., Zhang, Y., Nie, H. & Ding, B. (1986). The ability to manipulate speech sounds depends on knowing alphabetic reading. Cognition, 24, 31–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reid, J. (1960). Learning to think about reading. Educational Research, 9, 56–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Renfrew, C., Frith, C. & Malafouris, L. (2009). The sapient mind: Archaeology meets neuroscience. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Roberts, A. D. (2011). The role of metalinguistic awareness in the effective teaching of foreign languages. New York, NY: Peter Lang.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Robinson, E., Goelman, H. & Olson, D. R. (1983). Children’s understanding of the relationship between expressions (what was said) and intentions (what was meant). British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 1, 75–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rorty, R. (1981). Nineteenth-century idealism and twentieth-century textualism. The Monist, 64, 155–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rose, S. (2011, February 12). Self comes to mind: Constructing the conscious brain by Antonio Damasio – Review. Guardian. Retrieved from www.theguardian.com/books/2011/feb/12/self-comes-mind-damasio-review.Google Scholar

Rosenthal, D. (1993). Thinking that one thinks. In Davis, M & Humphries, G (Eds.), Consciousness. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Rozeboom, W. (1972). Problems in the psycho-philosophy of knowledge. In Royce, J & Rozeboom, W (Eds.), The psychology of knowing. New York, NY: Gordon & Beach.Google Scholar

Sady, W. (2013). Quanta appeared not in Max Planck’s mind, but on paper. Pragmatics & Cognition, 21(3), 521–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Saenger, P. (1982). Silent reading: Its impact on late medieval script and society. Viator, 13, 367–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sahlberg, P. (2011). Finnish lessons. New York, NY: Teachers College, Columbia University.Google Scholar

Saussure, F. de. (1983). Course in general linguistics. London: Duckworth. (Original work published 1916)Google Scholar

Schmandt-Besserat, D. (1986). Tokens: Facts and interpretations. Visible Language, 20, 250–272.Google Scholar

Schmandt-Besserat, D. (1992). Before writing. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar

Schmandt-Besserat, D. (2007). When writing met art: From symbol to story. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar

Scribner, S. & Cole, M. (1981). The psychology of literacy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Searle, J. (1983). Intentionality: An essay in the philosophy of mind. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sellars, W. (1997). Empiricism and the philosophy of mind. Introduction by Rorty, R. and study guide by Brandom, R. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Originally published in 1956)Google Scholar

Shallice, T. (1988). From neuropsychology to mental structure. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shapin, S. (1985). Pump and circumstance: Robert Boyle’s literary technology. Social Studies of Science, 14, 481–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Share, D. (2008). Orthographic learning, phonology, and the self-teaching hypothesis. Advances in Child Development and Behavior, 36, 31–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Simon, H. A. (1957). Models of man. New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar

Simon, H. A. (1996). The sciences of the artificial (3rd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Small, J. P. (1997). Wax tablets of the mind: Cognitive studies of memory and literacy in Classical Antiquity. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar

Smith, D. (1990). Texts, facts, and femininity: Exploring the relations of ruling. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar

Smith, F. (1971). Understanding reading. Toronto, ON: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. (Sixth edition, Routledge Classics, 2014)Google Scholar

Snow, C. & Uccelli, P. (2009). The challenge of academic language. In Olson, D. R. & Torrance, N. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of literacy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Snowling, M. & Hulme, C. (Eds.). (2005). The science of reading: A handbook. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Sousa, R. de (2004). Rational animals. Croatian Journal of Philosophy, 4(3), 365–386.Google Scholar

Spelke, E. (1994). Initial knowledge: Six suggestions. Cognition, 50, 431–455.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Spelke, E. (2003). What makes us smart? Core knowledge and natural language. In Gentner, D & Goldin-Meadow, S (Eds.), Language in mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Spiro, R., DeSchryver, M., Hagerman, M., Morsink, M. & Thompson, P. (Eds.). (2015). Reading at the crossroads? New York, NY: Routledge/Taylor & Francis.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Spratt, T. (1966). History of the Royal Society of London for the improving of natural knowledge (Cope, J. & Jones, H., Eds.). St. Louis, MO: Washington University Press. (Original work published 1667)Google Scholar

Standish, P. (2013). Series editor’s preface. In Derry, J., Vygotsky philosophy and education. Oxford, UK: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar

Stanovich, K. (2009). What intelligence tests miss: The psychology of rational thought. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Stanovich, K. & West, R. (2000). Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 645–665.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Stewart, C. (1922). Moonlight schools: For the emancipation of adult illiterates. New York, NY: E. P. Dutton & Company.Google Scholar

Stock, B. (2015). Savoir lire et ecrire en perspective globale: Biologie, culture et societe. In Wieviorka, M, Levi-Strauss, L & Lieppe, G (Eds.), Penser global: Internationalisation et globalization des sciences humaines et sociales. Paris: Editions de la Maison des sciences de l’homme.Google Scholar

Street, B. (1984). Literacy in theory and practice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Taylor, C. (2012). What was the Axial Revolution? In Bellah, R. N & Joas, H (Eds.), The Axial Age and its consequences. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.Google Scholar

Tetlock, P. E. & Gardner, D. (2014). Superforecasting: The art and science of prediction. New York, NY: Crown Publishers.Google Scholar

Theiner, G. (2011). Res Cogitans Extensa. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Tolchinsky, L. (2003). The cradle of culture and what children know about writing and numbers before being taught. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tolchinsky-Landsmann, L. & Levin, I. (1987). Writing in four- to six-year-olds: Representation of semantic and phonetic similarities and differences. Journal of Child Language, 14, 127–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tomasello, M. (2014). A natural history of human thinking. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Torrance, N. & Olson, D. R. (1985). Oral and literate competencies in the early school years. In Olson, D. R, Torrance, N & Hildyard, A (Eds.), Literacy, language, and learning: The nature and consequences of reading and writing (pp. 256–284). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Traugott, E. C. (1987). Literacy and language change. Interchange: A Quarterly Review of Education, 18, 32–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Treiman, R. & Zukowsky, A. (1991). Levels of phonological awareness. In Brady, S. A & Shankweiler, D. P (Eds.), Phonological processes in literacy: A tribute to Isabelle Y. Liberman (pp. 67–83). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Tunmer, W. & Bowey, J. (1984). Metalinguistic awareness and reading acquisition. In Tunmer, W., Pratt, C. & Herriman, M. (Eds.), Metalinguistic awareness in children. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tunmer, W., Pratt, C. & Herriman, M. (1984). Metalinguistic awareness in children: Theory, research, and implications. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Turner, M. & Thomas, F.-N. (2011). Clear and simple as the truth: Writing about prose. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Uccelli, P., Barr, C. D., Dodds, C. L., Phillips Galloway, E., Meneses, A. & Sanchez, E. (2014). Core academic language skills (CALS): An expanded operational construct and a novel instrument to chart school relevant language proficiency in pre-adolescent and adolescent learners. Applied Psycholinguistics, 36, 1077–1109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Valtin, R. (2014). About the dubious role of phonological awareness in the discussion of literacy policies. Paper presented in the FELA endorsed symposium “Kindergarten literacy in Europe” at the 18th European Conference on Reading, Mons, Belgium, August 2011.Google Scholar

Van Dijk, T. & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Vellutino, F. (1979). Dyslexia: Theory and research. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Vendler, Z. (1970). Say what you think. In Cowan, J. L. (Ed.), Studies in thought and language. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar

Vernon, S. (2002). Children’s analysis of oral and written words. In Brockmeier, J., Wang, M. & Olson, D. R. (Eds.), Literacy, narratives and culture. London, UK: Curzon.Google Scholar

Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (Cole, M. et al., Eds.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and language (Kozulin, A., Ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Watson, P. (2014). The age of atheists: How we have sought to live since the death of God. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar

Watson, R. & Horowitz, W. (2011). Writing science before the Greeks: A naturalistic analysis of the Babylonian astronomical treatise MUL. APIN. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weir, R. (1962). Language in the crib. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar

Wells, G. (1999). Dialogic inquiry: Towards a socio-cultural practice and theory of education. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wertsch, J. (1991). Voices of the mind: A sociocultural approach to mediated action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Wertsch, J., Tulviste, P. & Hagstrom, F. (1993). A sociocultural approach to agency.In Forman, E., Minick, N. & Stone, C. (Eds.),Contexts for learning (pp. 336–356). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wiersbicka, A. (2010). Experience, evidence, and sense: The hidden cultural legacy of English. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Williams, J. (1965). Stoner. New York, NY: Viking.Google Scholar

Wilson, E. O. (2014). The meaning of human existence. New York, NY: Liveright/Norton.Google Scholar

Wilson, R. & Keil, F. (2000). The shadows and shallows of explanation. In Keil, F. & Wilson, R. (Eds.), Explanation and cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Wimmer, H. & Perner, J. (1983). Beliefs about beliefs: Representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children’s understanding of deception. Cognition, 13, 103–128.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Wiseberg, J. (2014). Consciousness. Cambridge, UK: Polity.Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, L. (1958). Philosophical investigations. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Wolf, M. (2008). Proust and the squid: The story and science of the reading brain. New York, NY: Harper Perennial.Google Scholar

Zelazo, P. D. & Jacques, S. (1996). Children’s rule use: Representation, reflection, and cognitive control. Annals of Child Development, 12, 119–176.Google Scholar