Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-5nwft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-01T04:44:38.879Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part III - Language Regard and Language Change

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 January 2018

Betsy E. Evans
Affiliation:
University of Washington
Erica J. Benson
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin, Eau Claire
James N. Stanford
Affiliation:
Dartmouth College, New Hampshire
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Language Regard
Methods, Variation and Change
, pp. 237 - 299
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Chambers, J.K. 1994. An introduction to dialect topography. English World-Wide 15. 3553.Google Scholar
Kurath, Hans 1949. Word Geography of the Eastern United States. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Preston, Dennis R. 2011. The power of language regard – discrimination, classification, comprehension and production. Dialectologia II. 933.Google Scholar

References

Allport, Gordon. 1935. Attitudes. In Murchison, Carl (ed.), A Handbook of Social Psychology, 789844. Worcester, MA: Clark University Press.Google Scholar
Anders, Christina. 2010. Wahrnehmungsdialektologie. Das Obersächsische im Alltagsverständnis von Laien. Linguistik – Impulse & Tendenzen 36. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Auer, Peter. 2005. Europe’s sociolinguistic unity, or: A typology of European dialect/standard constellations. In Delbecque, Nicole, Auwera, Johan van der, & Geeraerts, Dirk (eds.), Perspectives on Variation: Sociolinguistic, Historical, Comparative, 842. Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs 163. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Auer, Peter. 2013. State borders and language change. The (non-)effects of political border permeability on language. In Gilles, Peter, Koff, Harlan, Maganda, Carmen, & Schulz, Christian (eds.), Theorizing Borders through Analyses of Power Relationships, 225247. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Auer, Peter & Schmidt, Jürgen Erich (eds.). 2010. Language and Space: An International Handbook of Linguistic Variation, Vol. 1. Theories and Methods. Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science 30.1. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Augoustinos, Martha, Walker, Iain, & Donaghue, Ngaire (eds.). 2014. Social Cognition. 3rd edn. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Barbour, Stephen & Stevenson, Patrick. 1990. Variation in German: A Critical Approach to German Sociolinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bassili, John & Brown, Rick. 2005. Implicit and explicit attitudes: Research, challenges, and theory. In Albarracín, Dolores, Johnson, Blair, & Zanna, Mark (eds.), The Handbook of Attitudes, 543573. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Blume, Thomas. 2003. Ideologie. In Rehfus, Wulff (ed.), Handwörterbuch Philosophie. Stuttgart: UTB, 401.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Eagly, Alice & Chaiken, Shelly. 1993. The Psychology of Attitudes. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace & Company.Google Scholar
Fishbein, Martin & Ajzen, Icek. 1975. Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Frings, Theodor. 1956. Sprache und Geschichte. Vol. 1–3. Mitteldeutsche Studien 16–18. Halle (Saale): Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony. 1984. The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1974. Frame Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hartmann, Dirk. 1996. Kulturalistische Handlungstheorie. In Hartmann, Dirk & Janich, Peter (eds.), Methodischer Kulturalismus – zwischen Naturalismus und Postmoderne, 70114. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Herrgen, Joachim. 2010. The Linguistic Atlas of the Middle Rhine (MRhSA): A study on the emergence and spread of regional dialects. In Auer, & Schmidt, (eds.), 668686.Google Scholar
Hinskens, Frans, Auer, Peter, & Kerswill, Paul. 2005. The study of dialect convergence and divergence: Conceptual and methodological considerations. In Auer, Peter, Hinskens, Frans, & Kerswill, Paul (eds.), Dialect Change: The Convergence and Divergence of Dialects in Contemporary Europe, 150. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hobsbawm, Eric. 1983. Introduction: Inventing traditions. In Hobsbawm, Eric & Ranger, Terence (eds.), The Invention of Tradition, 114. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund. 1970 [1936]. The Crisis of the European Sciences. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Jung, Carl. 1971 [1921]. Psychological Types. The Collected Works of C. G. Jung, Vol. 6. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kasper, Simon. 2015. Instruction Grammar. From Perception via Grammar to Action. Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs 293. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kehrein, Roland. 2012. Regionalsprachliche Spektren im Raum – zur linguistischen Struktur der Vertikale. ZDL Beihefte 152. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lahire, Bernard. 2003. From the habitus to an individual heritage of dispositions. Towards a sociology at the level of the individual. Poetics 31. 329355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lameli, Alfred. 2013. Strukturen im Sprachraum: Analysen zur arealtypologischen Komplexität der Dialekte in Deutschland. Linguistik – Impulse und Tendenzen 54. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Lenz, Alexandra. 2010. Emergence of varieties through restructuring and reevaluation. In Auer, & Schmidt, (eds.), 295315.Google Scholar
Mattheier, Klaus. 1996. Varietätenkonvergenz. Überlegungen zu einem Baustein einer Theorie der Sprachvariation. In Auer, Peter, Hinskens, Frans, & Mattheier, Klaus (eds.), Convergence and Divergence of Dialects in Europe. Sociolinguistica, special issue 10. 3152.Google Scholar
Myers, David. 2006. Social Psychology. 9th edn. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Potter, Jonathan. 1998. Discursive social psychology: From attitudes to evaluative practices. European Review of Social Psychology 9(1). 233–66.Google Scholar
Potter, Jonathan & Wetherell, Margaret. 1987. Discourse and Social Psychology: Beyond Attitudes and Behaviour. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Preston, Dennis R. 2010. Variation in language regard. In Gilles, Peter, Scharloth, Joachim, & Ziegler, Evelyn (eds.), Varatio delectat: Empirische Evidenzen und theoretische Passungen sprachlicher Variation, für Klaus J. Mattheier zum 65. Geburtstag, 727. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Preston, Dennis R. 2015. Does Language Regard Vary? In Prikhodkine, & Preston, (eds.), 136.Google Scholar
Prikhodkine, Alexei & Preston, Dennis R. (eds.). Responses to Language Varieties: Variability, Processes, and Outcomes. IMPACT: Studies in Language and Society 39. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Purschke, Christoph. 2008. Regionalsprachlichkeit im Hörerurteil. In Christen, Helen & Ziegler, Evelyn (eds.), Sprechen, Schreiben, Hören – zur Produktion und Perzeption von Dialekt und Standardsprache zu Beginn des 21. Jahrhunderts, 183202. Wien: Edition Praesens.Google Scholar
Purschke, Christoph. 2011a. Regionalsprache und Hörerurteil. Grundzüge einer perzeptiven Variationslinguistik. ZDL Beihefte 149. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.Google Scholar
Purschke, Christoph. 2011b. Regional linguistic knowledge and perception – On the conceptualization of Hessian. In Nerbonne, John, Grondelaers, Stefan, Speelman, Dirk, & Perea, Maria-Pilar (eds.), Production, Perception and Attitude. Dialectologia, Special Issue II. 91118.Google Scholar
Purschke, Christoph. 2014a. “I remember it like it was interesting.” Zur Theorie von Salienz und Pertinenz. In Christen, Helen & Ziegler, Evelyn (eds.), Die Vermessung der Salienz(forschung). Linguistik Online 66. 3150.Google Scholar
Purschke, Christoph. 2014b. REACT – Einstellungen als evaluative Routinen in sozialen Praxen. In Cuonz, Christina & Studler, Rebekka (eds.), Sprechen über Sprache: Perspektiven und neue Methoden der linguistischen Einstellungsforschung, 123142. Stauffenberg Linguistik 81. Tübingen: Stauffenberg.Google Scholar
Purschke, Christoph. 2014c. Wort und Totschlag – Zur sozio-symbolischen Bedeutung sprachlicher Divergenz. In Krefeld, Thomas & Pustka, Elissa (eds.), Perzeptive Linguistik. Phonetik – Semantik – Varietäten, 5164. ZDL Beihefte 157. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.Google Scholar
Purschke, Christoph. 2015a. REACT – A constructivist theoretic framework for attitudes. In Prikhodkine, & Preston, (eds.), 3754.Google Scholar
Purschke, Christoph. 2015b. Das Holz, die Axt, der Hieb: Über den Zusammenhang von Einstellung und Handeln am Beispiel des Handlungsschemas ‘Holz hacken’. In Langhanke, Robert (ed.), Sprache, Literatur, Raum: Festgabe für Willy Diercks, 145162. Bielefeld: Verlag für Regionalgeschichte.Google Scholar
Purschke, Christoph. in preparation. Praxis und Struktur. Eine Philosophie der Selbstbehauptung. Luxembourg.Google Scholar
Rocholl, Josephine. 2015. Ostmitteldeutsch – eine moderne Regionalsprache? Eine Untersuchung zu Konstanz und Wandel im thüringisch-obersächsischen Sprachraum. Deutsche Dialektgeographie 118. Hildesheim: Olms.Google Scholar
Russ, Charles (ed.). 1990. The Dialects of Modern German. A Linguistic Survey. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Schirmunski, Viktor. 1962. Deutsche Mundartkunde. Vergleichende Laut- und Formenlehre der deutschen Mundarten. Trans. Wolfgang Fleischer. Deutsche Akademie der Wissenschaft zu Berlin. Veröffentlichungen des Instituts für deutsche Sprache und Literatur 25. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Jürgen Erich. 1986. Die mittelfränkischen Tonakzente: (Rheinische Akzentuierung). Mainzer Studien zur Sprach- und Volksforschung 8. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.Google Scholar
Purschke, Christoph. 2010. Language and Space: The Linguistic Dynamics Approach. In Auer, & Schmidt, (eds.), 201225.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Jürgen Erich & Herrgen, Joachim. 2011. Sprachdynamik: Eine Einführung in die moderne Regionalsprachenforschung. Berlin: Erich Schmidt.Google Scholar
Schütz, Alfred. 1970. Reflections on the Problem of Relevance. Zaner, Richard (ed.). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Simmel, Georg. 1903. Soziologie des Raumes. Jahrbuch für Gesetzgebung, Verwaltung und Volkswirtschaft im Deutschen Reich 27(1). 2771.Google Scholar
Soukup, Barbara. 2012. Current issues in the social psychological study of ‘language attitudes’: constructionism, context, and the attitude-behavior link. Language and Linguistics Compass 6(4). 212224.Google Scholar
Soukup, Barbara. 2015. Mixing methods in the study of language attitudes. In Prikhodkine, & Preston, (eds.), 5584.Google Scholar
Vorberger, Lars. in press. Sprachvariation in Büdingen. In Ganswindt, Brigitte & Purschke, Christoph (eds.), Variation und Wandel im Blickpunkt. Beiträge aus dem Forum Sprachvariation. Germanistische Linguistik 237/238, 395–431. Hildesheim: Olms.Google Scholar
Wiesinger, Peter. 1980. Die Stellung der Dialekte Hessens im Mitteldeutschen. In Friebertshäuser, Hans & Hildebrandt, Reiner (eds.), Sprache und Brauchtum: Bernhard Martin zum 90. Geburtstag, 68148. Deutsche Dialektgeographie 100. Marburg: Elwert.Google Scholar
Wiesinger, Peter. 1983. Die Einteilung der deutschen Dialekte. In Besch, Werner, Knoop, Ulrich, Putschke, Wolfgang, & Wiegand, Herbert Ernst (eds.), Dialektologie: Ein Handbuch zur deutschen und allgemeinen Dialektforschung, Vol. 2, 807900. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar

References

Algeo, John. 2001. External history. In Algeo, John (ed.), The Cambridge History of the English Language, Vol. 6: English in North America, 158. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernard, J.R. 1981. Australian pronunciation. In The Macquarie Dictionary, 1827. Sydney: Macquarie Library.Google Scholar
Branford, William.1994. English in South Africa. In Burchfield, Robert (ed.), The Cambridge History of the English Language vol. 5: English in Britain and Overseas – Origins and Development, 182429. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Britain, David. 2005. Where did New Zealand English come from? In Bell, Allan, Harlow, Ray, & Starks, Donna (eds.), The Languages of New Zealand, 156193. Wellington: Victoria University Press.Google Scholar
Capella, Joseph. 1997. The development of theory about automated patterns of face-to-face human interaction. In Philipsen, G. & Albrecht, T. (eds.), Developing Communication Theories, 5783. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Chapman, Kenneth. 1962. Icelandic-Norwegian Linguistic Relationships. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
Combrink, Johan. 1978. Afrikaans: Its origin and development. In Lanham, Len & Prinsloo, K. P. (eds.), Language and Communication Studies in South Africa, 6995. Cape Town: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Coupland, Nikolas. 2008. The delicate constitution of identity in face-to-face accommodation: A response to Trudgill. Language in Society 37. 267270.Google Scholar
Darot, Mireille & Pauleau, Christine. 1993. Situation du français en Nouvelle-Calédonie. In Robillard, Didier de & Beniamino, Michel (eds.), Le français dans l’espace francophone, 283301. Paris: Champion.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Charles. 1959. The Arabic koiné. Language 25. 616630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernandes, Maria Alice. 2011. The diminutive suffixes of southern Portuguese: An example of new dialect formation by koineization. International symposium on limits and areas in dialectology. Lisbon: UL.Google Scholar
Ferrando, Antoni. 1989. La formació històrica del valencià. In Ferrando, Antoni (ed.), Segon Congrés Internacional de la Llengua Catalana Vol. 8, 399428. València: Institut de Filologia Valenciana.Google Scholar
Frings, Theodor. 1957. Grundlegung einer Geschichte der deutschen Sprache. 3rd edn. Halle: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Hammarström, Göran. 1980. Australian English: Its Origins and Status. Hamburg: Buske.Google Scholar
Hollyman, K. J. 1979. Le français en Nouvelle-Calédonie. In Valdmann, A. (ed.), Le français hors de France, 621629. Paris: Champion.Google Scholar
Holmes, Janet & Kerswill, Paul. 2008. Contact is not enough: A response to Trudgill. Language in Society 37. 273277.Google Scholar
Juneau, Marcel. 1972. Contribution à l’histoire de la prononciation Française au Québec: études des graphies des documents d’archives. Sainte-Foy: Laval University Press.Google Scholar
Karabulatova, Irina, Sayfulina, Flera & Akhmetova, Bigaysha. 2013. Ethno-lingual aspect of modern functioning of Russian dialects in North Kazakhstan. World Applied Sciences Journal 27. 137140.Google Scholar
Keller, Rudi. 1994. On Language Change: The Invisible Hand in Language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kurath, Hans. 1949. A Word Geography of the Eastern United States. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Lanham, Len. 1967. The Pronunciation of South African English. Cape Town: Balkema.Google Scholar
Lipski, John. 1994. Latin American Spanish. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Macaulay, R.K.S. 2002. I’m off to Philadelphia in the morning. American Speech 77. 227241.Google Scholar
McDavid, Raven. 1985. Dialect areas of the Atlantic seaboard. In Benes, Peter (ed.), American Speech: 1600 to the Present, 1526. Boston: Boston University.Google Scholar
Matthews, William K. 1953. The Structure and Development of Russian. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mattoso Camara, Joaquim. 1972. The Portuguese Language. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Moag, Rodney. 1977. Fiji Hindi. Canberra: Australian National University Press.Google Scholar
Moore, Bruce. 1999. Australian English: Australian identity. Lingua Franca. RN. Aired November 27, 1999. www.abc.net.au/rn/arts/ling/stories/s68786.htm.Google Scholar
Mougeon, Raymond & Beniak, Édouard (eds.) 1994. Les origines du Français Québécois. Sainte-Foy: Laval University Press.Google Scholar
Pelech, William. 2002. Charting the interpersonal underworld: The application of cluster analysis to the study of interpersonal coordination in small groups. Currents: New Scholarship in the Human Services 1. 112.Google Scholar
Penny, Ralph. 2000 . Variation and Change in Spanish. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rivard, Adjutor. 1914. Études sur les parlers de France au Canada. Quebec: Garneau.Google Scholar
Samuels, Michael. 1972. Linguistic Evolution: With Special Reference to English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schneider, Edgar. 2003. The dynamics of New Englishes: From identity construction to dialect birth. Language 79(2). 233281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sibata, Takeshi. 1999. The evolution of the common language in Hokkaido. In Shibata, Takeshi, Kunihiro, Tetsuya, Inoue, Fumio, & Long, Daniel (eds.), Sociolinguistics in Japanese contexts, 229248. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Siegel, Jeff. 1987. Language Contact in a Plantation Environment: A Sociolinguistic History of Fiji. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sussex, Roland & Cubberley, Paul. 2006. The Slavic Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thráinsson, Höskuldur. 1994. Icelandic. In König, Ekkehard & der Auwera, Johan van (eds.), The Germanic Languages. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. 2004. New-Dialect Formation: On the Inevitability of Colonial Englishes. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. 2008. Colonial dialect contact in the history of European languages: On the irrelevance of identity to new-dialect formation. Language in Society 37(2). 241254.Google Scholar
Tuten, Donald. 2003. Koineization in Medieval Spanish. Berlin: de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Urbańczyk, Stanisław. 1976. Zarys dialektologii polskiej [An Outline of Polish Dialectology]. Warsaw: PWN.Google Scholar
Wagner, Max. 1920. Amerikansich-Spanisch und Vulgärlatein. Zeitschrift für romanische Philologie 40. 286312, 385–404.Google Scholar
Wall, Arnold. 1938. New Zealand English: How It Should Be Spoken. Auckland: Whitcombe & Tombs.Google Scholar
Wells, J.C. 1982. Accents of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

References

Brink, Lars & Lund, Jørn. 1975. Dansk Rigsmål. Copenhagen: Gyldendal.Google Scholar
Brink, Lars 1974. Udtaleforskelle i Danmark. Copenhagen: Gjellerup.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. 2011. Gender and sociolinguistic variation. In Coates, Jennifer & Pichler, Pia (eds.), Language and Gender: A Reader, 2nd edn., 5766. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. 2012. Three waves of variation study: The emergence of meaning in the study of variation. Annual Review of Anthropology 41. 87100.Google Scholar
Kristiansen, Tore. 1991. Sproglige normidealer på Næstvedegnen. Kvantitative sprogholdningsstudier. Copenhagen: University of Copenhagen PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. 2009. The macro-level social meanings of late-modern Danish accents. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 41. 167192.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. 2011. Attitudes, ideology and awareness. In Wodak, Ruth, Johnstone, Barbara, & Kerswill, Paul (eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Sociolinguistics, 265278. Washington, DC: SAGE.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1963. The social motivation of a sound change. Word 19. 273309.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1966. The Social Stratification of English in New York City. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1972. Sociolinguistic Patterns. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 2001. Principles of Linguistic Change: Social Factors. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Maegaard, Marie, Jensen, Torben Juel, Kristiansen, Tore, & Jørgensen, Jens Normann. 2013. Diffusion of language change: Accommodation to a moving target. Journal of Sociolinguistics 17(1). 336.Google Scholar
Preston, Dennis R. 2010. Variation in language regard. In Gilles, Peter, Scharloth, Joachim, & Ziegler, Evelyn (eds.), Variatio delectat: Empirische Evidenzen und theoretische Passungen sprachlicher Variation, für Klaus J. Mattheier zum 65. Geburtstag, 727. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Preston, Dennis R. 2011. The power of language regard – Discrimination, classification, comprehension, and production. Dialectologia (special issue) II. 933.Google Scholar
Preston, Dennis R. 2015. Does language regard vary? In Prikhodkine, Alexei & Preston, Dennis R. (eds.), Responses to Language Varieties: Variability, Processes, and Outcomes, 136. IMPACT: Studies in Language and Society 39. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Preston, Dennis R. & Niedzielski, Nancy. 2013. Approaches to the study of language regard. In Kristiansen, Tore & Grondelaers, Stefan (eds.), Language (De)standardisation in Late Modern Europe: Experimental Studies, 287307. Oslo: Novus.Google Scholar
Smith, Philip M. 1979. Sex markers in speech. In Scherer, Klaus R. & Giles, Howard (eds.), Social Markers in Speech, 109146. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Philip M. 1985. Language, the Sexes and Society. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Thorne, Barrie & Henley, Nancy (eds.). 1975. Language and Sex: Difference and Dominance. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Thøgersen, Jacob & Pharao, Nicolai. 2013. Changing pronunciation but stable social evaluation? University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 19(2). Selected Papers from NWAV 41. Article 41. http://repository.upenn.edu/pwpl/vol19/iss2/21Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. 1972. Sex, covert prestige and linguistic change in the urban British English of Norwich. Language in Society 1(2). 179195.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. 1974. The Social Differentiation of English in Norwich. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×