Ainslie, G. (1991). Derivation of ’Rational’ Economic Behaviour from Hyperbolic Discount Curves. American Economic Review, 81(2), 334–340.Google Scholar

Allingham, M. G. and Sandmo, A. (1972). Income Tax Evasion: A Theoretical Analysis. Journal of Public Economics, 1(3-4), 323–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alm, J. Expanding the Theory of Tax Compliance from Individual to Group Motivations, in Forte, F., Mudambi, R. and Navarra, P. M. (eds.) (2014). A Handbook of Alternative Theories of Public Economics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 260–277.Google Scholar

Andreoni, J. (1989). Giving with Impure Altruism: Applications to Charity and Ricardian Equivalence. Journal of Political Economy, 97(6), 1447–1458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baddeley, M. (2011). Energy the Environment and Behavioural Change: A Survey of Insights from Behavioural Economics, CWPE 1162, University of Cambridge. Available at: www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/242028.Google Scholar

Banford, N. D., Knetsch, J. L., and Mauser, G. A. (1979). Feasibility Judgements and Alternative Measures of Benefits and Costs. Journal of Business Administration, 11(1), 25–35.Google Scholar

Barile, L., Cullis, J. and Jones, P. (2015). Will One Size Fit All? Incentives Designed to Nurture Pro-Social Behaviour. Journal of Behavioural and Experimental Economics, 57, 9–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Becker, G. S. (1971). Economic Theory. New York: A. A.Knopf.Google Scholar

Berglund, C. (2006). The Assessment of Households’ Recycling Costs: The Role of Personal Motives. Ecological Economics, 56(4), 560–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bernheim, B. D. (2016). The Good, the Bad and the Ugly: A Unified Approach to Behavioural Welfare Economics. Journal of Cost Benefit Analysis, 7(1), 12–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beverly, S., Schneider, D. and Tufano, P. (2006). Splitting Tax Refunds and Building Savings: An Empirical Test, in Poterba, J. M. (ed.), Tax Policy and Economy, Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, 111–162.Google Scholar

Bishop, R. C., and Heberlein, T. A. (1979). Measuring values of extramarket goods: Are indirect measures biased? American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 61(5), 926–930.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brekke, K. A., Kipperberg, G. and Nyborg, K. (2007). Reluctant Recyclers: Social Interaction in Responsibility Ascription. Available at: ssrn.com/abstract=1116149 or dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1116149.Google Scholar

Brennan, G. and Lomasky, L. (1993). Democracy and Decision: The Pure Theory of Electoral Preference. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Camerer, C. and Weber, M. (1992). Recent Developments in Modeling Preferences: Uncertainty and Ambiguity. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5(4), 325–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carlsson, F. and Johansson-Stenman, O. (2012). Behavioural Economics and Environmental Economics. Annual Review of Resource Economics, 4(1), 75–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chapman, G. B. (1996). Temporal Discounting and Utility for Health and Money. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 22(3), 771–791.Google ScholarPubMed

Christian, R. C. and Alm, J. (2014). Empathy, Sympathy and Tax Compliance. Journal of Economic Psychology, 40, 62–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clark, C. F., Kotchenb, M. J. and Moorea, M. R. (2003). Internal and External Influences on Pro-EnviEmpathy, Sympathy and Tax Compliance. ronmental Behaviour: Participation in a Green Electricity Program. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 22(3), 237–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Congdon, W., Kling, J. R. and Mullainathan, S. (2009). Behavioural Economics and Taxation. National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) Working Paper No. 15328.Google Scholar

Cullis, J. and Jones, P. (2009). Public Finance and Public Choice (3rd Ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Czajkowski, M., Hanley, N. and Nyborg, K. (2017). Social Norms, Morals and Self-interest as Determinants of Pro-Environment Behaviours: The Case of Household Recycling. Environmental and Resource Economics, 66(4), 647–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Daskalakis, M. (2016). Specification Required? A Survey of Scientists’ Views About the Role of Behavioural Economics for Assessing Environmental Policy Instruments, in Beckenbach, F. and Kahlenborn, W. (eds.), New Perspectives for Environmental Policies Through Behavioural Economics, Berlin: Springer, 69–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Deci, E. L. (1975). Intrinsic Motivation. New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Deci, E. L. and Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behaviour. New York: Pantheon.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fehr, E. and Gächter, S. (2000a). Cooperation and Punishment in Public Goods Experiments. American Economic Review, 90(4), 980–994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fehr, E. and Gächter, S. (2000b). Fairness and Retaliation: The Economics of Reciprocity. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14(3), 159–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fehr, E. and Schmidt, K. M. (1999). A Theory of Fairness, Competition and Co-operation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(3), 817–868.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Feldman, Y. and Perez, O. (2009). How Law Changes the Environmental Mind: An Experimental Study of the Effect of Legal Norms on Moral Perceptions and Civic Enforcement. Journal of Law and Society, 36(4), 501–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fischbacher, U. and Gächter, S. (2006). Heterogeneous Social Preferences and the Dynamics of Free Riding in Public Goods. Centre for Decision Research and Experimental Economics (CeDEx) Discussion Paper No. 2006-01. Available at: www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/67967/1/506605825.pdf.Google Scholar

Fischbacher, U., Gächter, S. and Fehr, E. (2001). Are People Conditionally Cooperative? Evidence from a Public Goods Experiment. Economics Letters, 71(3), 397–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frank, R. H. and Sunstein, C.R. (2001). Cost–Benefit Analysis and Relative Position. University of Chicago Law Review, 68(2), 323–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frederick, S., Loewenstein, G. and O’Donoghue, T. (2002). Time Discounting and Time Preference: A Critical Review. Journal of Economic Literature, 40(2), 351–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frey, B. S. (1997). Not Just for the Money, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Frey, B. S. and Eichenberger, R. (1994). Economic Incentives Transform Psychological Anomalies. Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organisation, 23(2), 215–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frey, B. and Stutzer, A. (2006). Environmental Morale and Motivation. Available at: www.iew.uzh.ch/wp/iewwp288.pdf.Google Scholar

Gneezy, U., Meier, S. and Rey-Biel, P. (2011). When and Why Incentives (Don’t) Work to Modify Behaviour. Journal of Economic Perspectives 25(4), 191–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goodin, R. E. (1982). Discounting Discounting. Journal of Public Policy, 2(1), 53–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guth, W. and Ortmann, A. (2006). A Behavioural Approach to Distribution and Bargaining, in Altman, M. (ed.), Handbook of Contemporary Behavioural Economics. New York: M. E. Sharpe, 379–404.Google Scholar

Hammack, J. and BrownJr., G. M. (1974). Waterfowl and Wetlands: Toward Bioeconomic Analysis. Baltimore: John Hopkins Press.Google Scholar

Hanley, N. and Shogren, J. (2005). Is Cost-Benefit Analysis Anomaly Proof? Environmental and Resource Economics, 32(1), 13–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hanneman, W. M. (1991). Willingness to Pay and Willingness to Accept: How Much Can They Differ? American Economic Review, 81(3), 635–647.Google Scholar

Heberlein, T. A., and Bishop, R. C. (1985). Assessing the Validity of Contingent Valuation: Three Field Experiments. Paper presented at the International Conference on Man’s Role in Changing Global Environment, Italy.Google Scholar

Henderson, N. and Bateman, I. (1995). Empirical and Public Choice Evidence for Hyperbolic Social Discount Rates and the Implications for Intergenerational Discounting. Environmental and Resource Economics, 5(4), 413–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Her Majesty’s Treasury (2003). Green Book: Appraisal and Evaluation in Central Government. London: HMSO.Google Scholar

Howarth, R. B. and Wilson, M. A. (2006). A Theoretical Approach to Deliberative Valuation: Aggregating by Mutual Consent. Land Economics, 82(1), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L. and Thaler, R.H. (1990). Experimental Tests of the Endowment Effect and the Coase Theorem. Journal of Political Economy, 98(6), 1325–1348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kahneman, D. and Sugden, R. (2005). Experienced Utility as a Standard of Policy Evaluation. Environmental and Resource Economics, 32(1), 161–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Khalil, E. L. (2003). Behavioural Economics and the Transactional View. Transactional Viewpoints, 11(1), 1–8.Google Scholar

Knetsch, J. L. (1990). Environmental Policy Implication of Disparities Between Willingness to Pay and Compensation Demanded. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 18(3), 227–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Knetsch, J. L. (2010). Values of Gains and Losses: Reference States and Choices of Measure. Environmental and Resource Economics 46(2), 179–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Knight, F. (1921). Risk, Uncertainty and Profit. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar

Knox, T. M. (1952). Hegel’s Philosophy of Right: Translated with Notes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Lange, A., Loschel, A., Vogt, C. and Ziegler, A. (2010). On the Self-Interested Use of Equity in International Climate Negotiations. European Economic Review, 54(3), 359–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lerner, J. S., Small, D. A. and Loewenstein, G. (2004). Heart Strings and Purse Strings. Psychological Science, 15(5), 337–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Loewenstein, G. (1987). Anticipation and the Valuation of Delayed Consumption. Economic Journal, 97(387), 666–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Loewenstein, G. (2007). Exotic Preferences: Behavioural Economics and Human Motivation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Löfgren, Å., Martinsson, P., Hennlock, M. and Sterner, T. (2012). Does Experience Eliminate the Effect of a Default Option? A Field Experiment on CO₂-Offsetting for Air Transport. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 63, 66–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Loock, C.-M., Staake, T. and Thiesse, F. (2013). Motivating Energy-Efficient Behaviour with Green IS: An Investigation of Goal Setting and the Role of Defaults. MIS Quarterly, 37(4), 1313–1332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McCaffery, E. J. and Slemrod, J. (2006). Behavioral Public Finance, New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar

Mishan, E. J. and Quah, E. (2007). Cost-Benefit Analysis (5th Ed.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Oberholzer-Gee, F., Bohnet, I. and Frey, B. S. (1997). Fairness and Competence in Democratic Decisions. Public Choice 91(1), 89–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ostrom, E. (1998). A Behavioural Approach to the Rational Choice Theory of Collective Action: Presidential Address, American Political Science Association, 1997. American Political Science Review, 92(1), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pasche, M. (2016). What Can Be Learned from Behavioural Economics and Environmental Policy? in Beckenbach, F. and Kahlenborn, W. (eds.), New Perspectives for Environmental Policies Through Behavioural Economics. Berlin: Springer, 109–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pichert, D. and Katsikopoulos, K. V. (2008). Green Defaults: Information Presentation and Pro-Environmental Behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 28(1), 63–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rabin, M. (2013). An Approach to Incorporating Psychology into Economics. American Economic Review, 103(3), 1281–1302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Robinson, L. A. and Hammitt, J. K. (2011). Behavioural Economics and the Conduct of Benefit-Cost Analysis: Toward Principles and Standards. Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, 2(2), 1–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sandford, C. T., Godwin, M. R. and Hardwick, P. J. W. (1989). Administrative and Compliance Costs of Taxation. Bath: Fiscal Publications.Google Scholar

Schelling, T. C. (1981). Economic Reasoning and the Ethics of Policy. Public Interest, 63, 37–61.Google Scholar

Shefrin, H. M. and Thaler, R. H. (1988). The Behavioural Life-Cycle Hypothesis. Economic Inquiry, 26(4), 609–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shogren, J. F. and Taylor, L. O. (2008). On Behavioural-Environmental Economics. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy Advance Access, 2(1), 26–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shogren, J. F. and Thunstrőm, L. (2016). Do We Need a New Behavioural Benchmark for BCA? Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, 7(1), 92–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Simon, H. A. (1979). Rational Decision Making in Business Organisations. American Economic Review, 69(4), 493–513.Google Scholar

Slovic, P. (2000). The Perception of Risk, Sterling, VA: Earthscan.Google Scholar

Smith, A. (1776/1937). The Wealth of Nations. New York: Random House.Google Scholar

Stern, N. (2007). The Economics of Climate Change: The Stern Review. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Stigler, G. and Becker, G. (1977). ‘De gustibus non est disputandum’. American Economic Review, 67(2), 76–90.Google Scholar

Sunstein, C. R. and Reisch, L. A. (2016). Behaviourally Green: Why, Which and When Defaults Can Help, in Beckenbach, F. and Kahlenborn, W. (eds.), New Perspectives for Environmental Policies Through Behavioural Economics. Berlin: Springer, 161–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thaler, R. H. (1981). Some Empirical Evidence on Dynamic Inconsistency. Economic Letters, 8(3), 201–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thaler, R. H. (2016). Behavioral Economics: Past, Present, and Future. American Economic Review, 106(7), 1577–1600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thaler, R. and Shefrin, H. M. (1981). An Economic Theory of Self-Control. Journal of Political Economy, 89, 392–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Torgler, B., Frey, B. S. and Wilson, C. (2009). Environmental and Pro-Social Norms: Evidence on Littering. BE Journal of Economic Analysis and Policy, 9(1), 1–39.Google Scholar

Venkatacalam, L. (2008). Behavioural Economics for Environmental Policy. Ecological Economics, 67(4), 640–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Viscusi, W. K. and Gayer, T. (2016). Rational Benefit Assessment for an Irrational World: Toward a Behavioural Transfer Test. Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, 7(1), 69–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weber, T. O., Fooken, J. and Herrmann, B. (2014). Behavioural Economics and Taxation. European Commission Working Paper No. 41.Google Scholar

Willig, R. (1976). Consumer’s Surplus Without Apology. American Economic Review, 66(4), 589–97.Google Scholar

Wittman, D. A. (1995). The Myth of Democratic Failure: Why Political Institutions Are Efficient. London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar