Akman, Pinar. 2009. The Role of Exploitation in Abuse under Article 82 EC. In Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies 11, 165–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Besen, Stanley M. and Levinson, Robert J.. 2009. Standards, Intellectual Property Disclosure, and Patent Royalties after Rambus. North Carolina Journal of Law & Technology, 10, 233, 249–53.Google Scholar

Chin, Yee Wah. 2015. Intellectual Property Rights and Intellectual Property in China. In Suchy, Donna (ed.), IP Protection in China. ABA, pp. 313, 314.Google Scholar

Contreras, Jorge L. 2015a. Standards, Royalty Stacking, and Collective Action. CPI Antitrust Chronicle, March (1). Available at www.competitionpolicyinternational.com/file/view/7353.Google Scholar

Contreras, Jorge L. 2015b. A Market Reliance Theory for FRAND Commitments and Other Patent Pledges. Utah Law Review, 501–17.Google Scholar

Cotter, Thomas F. 2009. Patent Holdup, Patent Remedies, and Antitrust Responses. Iowa Journal of Corporate Law, 34, 1151, 1194–1200.Google Scholar

Crane, Daniel A., 2010. Patent Pools, RAND Commitments, and the Problematics of Price Discrimination. In Dreyfuss, Rochelle C., First, Harry, and Zimmerman, Diane L. (eds.), Working Within the Boundaries of Intellectual Property. New York: Oxford University Press, 372–8.Google Scholar

Dou, Eva. 2015. Qualcomm Spared Some of the Worst Penalties by Chinese Authorities, Wall Street Journal, February 10.Google Scholar

Dreyfuss, Rochelle C. 1986. Dethroning Lear: Licensee Estoppel and the Incentive to Innovate. Virginia Law Review, 72, 709–12.Google Scholar

First, Harry. 2007. Controlling the Intellectual Property Grab: Protect Innovation, Not Innovators. Rutgers Law Review, 38, 365–98.Google Scholar

Gandhi, Samir R., Metanios, Fadi, and Dadwal, Hemangini. 2015. Competition Law and FRAND: Developments and Challenges in India. CPI Antitrust Chronicle, October (1). Available at www.competitionpolicyinternational.com/assets/Uploads/GandhietalOct-151.pdf.Google Scholar

Harris, H. Stephen Jr. 2015. An Overview of the NDRC Decision in the Qualcomm Investigation. CPI Antitrust Chronicle, July, 2, 4. Available at www.competitionpolicyinternational.com/file/view/7409.Google Scholar

Hou, Liyang. 2015a. Antitrust Regulation of Intellectual Property Rights in China, 6–7. Available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=2648736.Google Scholar

Hou, Liyang. 2015b. The Qualcomm Decision: Protectionism? And for Whom? Available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=2648741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

InterDigital, Inc., Form 10-K Annual Report for 2015 (2016). Available at http://files.shareholder.com/downloads/IDCC/1618089504x0xS1405495-16-47/1405495/filing.pdf.Google Scholar

Kim, Yoonhee and Yang, Hui-Jin. 2015. A Brief Overview of Qualcomm v. Korea Fair Trade Commission. CPI Antitrust Chronicle, 2, 6, 7. Available at www.competitionpolicyinternational.com/file/view/7352.Google Scholar

Lee, In Ho, 2012. Qualcomm’s Abuse of Dominance, at 22–23. Available at http://eng.ftc.go.kr/bbs.do?command=getList&type_cd=54&pageId=0302.Google Scholar

Lee, William F. and Melamed, A. Douglas. 2016. Breaking the Vicious Cycle of Patent Damages. Cornell Law Review, 101, 385–466.Google Scholar

Lemley, Mark A. and Shapiro, Carl. 2007. Patent Holdup and Royalty Stacking. Texas Law Review, 85, 1991–2049.Google Scholar

Maldonado, Kassandra. 2014. Breaching RAND and Reaching for Reasonable: Microsoft v. Motorola and Standard-Essential Patent Litigation. Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 29, 419–20.Google Scholar

Mozur, Paul and Hardy, Quentin. 2015. China Hits Qualcomm with Fine, New York Times, February 9.Google Scholar

Mu-hyun, Cho. 2015. Qualcomm Facing Penalty from South Korean Antitrust Regulator. ZD Net. Available at www.zdnet.com/article/qualcomm-facing-penalty-from-south-korean-antitrust-regulator/.Google Scholar

O’Donoghue, Robert and Padilla, Jorge. 2006. The Law and Economics of Article 82 EC 174. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar

Qualcomm, Inc. 2015. 10-Q for period ending 12/28/14, at 13. Available at http://files.shareholder.com/downloads/QCOM/343973291x0xS1234452-15-24/804328/filing.pdf.Google Scholar

Scotchmer, Suzanne. 1991. Standing on the Shoulders of Giants: Cumulative Research and the Patent Law. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5, 31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shapiro, Carl. 2001. Navigating the Patent Thicket: Cross-Licenses, Patent Pools, and Standard Setting. In Jaffe, Adam B. et al. (eds.), Innovation Policy and the Economy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Tsai, Joanna and Wright, Joshua D.. 2015. Standard Setting, Intellectual Property Rights, and the Role of Antitrust in Regulating Incomplete Contracts. Antitrust Law Journal, 80, 157, 162–65.Google Scholar

US Department of Justice and U.S. Patent & Trademark Office. 2013. Policy Statement on Remedies for Standards-Essential Patents Subject to Voluntary F/Rand Commitments, 4.Google Scholar

US Federal Trade Commission 2011. The Evolving IP Marketplace: Aligning Patent Notice and Remedies with Competition, 189, 190, 192.Google Scholar

Wright, Joshua D. and Ginsburg, Douglas H.. 2015. Comment Regarding the Japan Fair Trade Commission’s Draft Partial Amendment to the Guidelines for the Use of Intellectual Property Under the Antimonopoly Act. Available at www.ftc.gov/system/files/documents/public_statements/693631/150803japantradecomments.pdf.CrossRefGoogle Scholar