Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T17:44:09.811Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 December 2016

Brian R. Farrell
Brian R. Farrell
Affiliation:
University of Iowa
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Habeas Corpus in International Law , pp. 243 - 250
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abresch, William, “A Human Rights Law of Internal Armed Conflict: The European Court of Human Wrongs in Chechnya” (2005) 16 European Journal of International Law 741–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agamben, Giorgio, State of Exception, Attell, Kevin (trans.) (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Amann, Diane, “‘Raise the Flag and Let it Talk’: On the Use of External Norms in Constitutional Decision-Making” (2004) 2 International Journal of Constitutional Law 597–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas, Summa Theologica, Fathers of English Dominican Province (trans.), 5 vols. (London: Burns, Oates, and Washbourne, 1915).Google Scholar
Bassiouni, M. Cherif, “Human Rights in the Context of Criminal Justice: Identifying International Procedural Protections and Equivalent Protections in National Constitutions” (1993) 3 Duke Journal of Comparative and International Law 235–97.Google Scholar
Bellinger, John, and Padmanabhan, Vijay, “Detention Operations in Contemporary Conflicts: Four Challenges for the Geneva Conventions and Other Existing Laws” (2011) 105 American Journal of International Law 201–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ben-Naftali, Orna, “Introduction: International Humanitarian Law and International Human Rights Law – Pas de Deux,” in Ben-Naftali, Orna (ed.), International Humanitarian Law and International Human Rights Law (New York: Oxford University Press, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bingham, Tom, The Rule of Law (London: Allen Lane, 2010).Google Scholar
Blackstone, William, Commentaries on the Laws of England (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1765–69).Google Scholar
Brierly, J. L., The Law of Nations: An Introduction to the International Law of Peace, 6th edn (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1963).Google Scholar
Brody, Reed and González, Felipe “Nunca Más: An Analysis of International Instruments on ‘Disappearances’” (1997) 19 Human Rights Quarterly 365–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buergenthal, Thomas, “The Advisory Practice of the Inter-American Human Rights Court” (1985) 79 American Journal of International Law 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buergenthal, Thomas “The Evolving International Human Rights System” (2006) 100 American Journal of International Law 783–807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buergenthal, Thomas “The OAS and the Protection of Rights” (1988) 3 Emory Journal of International Dispute Resolution 1–52.Google Scholar
Buergenthal, Thomas “The Revised OAS Charter and the Protection of Human Rights” (1975) 69 American Journal of International Law 828–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buergenthal, Thomas, and Norris, Robert (eds.), Human Rights: The Inter-American System (Dobbs Ferry, N.Y.: Oceana Publications, 1993).Google Scholar
Campos, Francisco, Nieto del Rio, F., Fenwick, Charles, and Robledo, A. Gómez, “Report to Accompany the Draft Declaration of the International Rights and Duties of Man” (1946) 40 American Journal of International Law: Supplement 100.Google Scholar
Carlson, Scott, and Gisvold, Gregory, Practical Guide to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (Ardsley, N.Y.: Transnational Publishers, 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carothers, Thomas, “The Rule of Law Revival” (1998) 77 Foreign Affairs 95–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cassel, Douglass, “International Human Rights Law and Security Detention” (2009) 40 Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law 383.Google Scholar
Cassel, Douglass “Liberty, Judicial Review, and the Rule of Law at Guantánamo: A Battle Half Won” (2003) 43 New England Law Review 37–59.Google Scholar
Cassel, Douglass “Pretrial and Preventative Detention of Suspected Terrorists: Options and Constraints Under International Law” (2008) 98 Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 811–52.Google Scholar
Cerone, John, “Jurisdiction and Power: The Intersection of Human Rights Law and the Law of Non-International Armed Conflict in Extraterritorial Context” (2007) 40 Israel Law Review 396–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chafee, Zechariah Jr., “The Most Important Human Right in the Constitution” (1952) 32 Boston University Law Review 143–61.Google Scholar
Chesney, Robert, “Judicial Review, Combatant Status Determinations, and the Possible Consequences of Boumediene” (2007) 48 Harvard International Law Journal Online 62–68.Google Scholar
Clark, David and McCoy, Gerard, The Most Fundamental Legal Right: Habeas Corpus in the Commonwealth (New York: Oxford University Press, 2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, Alan, “Habeas Corpus: The Historical Debate” (1998) 14 New York Law School Journal of Human Rights 375–434.Google Scholar
Coke, Edward, Institutes of the Laws of England (1671).Google Scholar
Council of Europe, Collected Edition of the “Travaux Préparatoires” of the European Convention of Human Rights (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1975).Google Scholar
Crawford, Clarence, “The Suspension of the Habeas Corpus Act and the Revolution of 1689” (1915) 30 The English Historical Review 613–30.Google Scholar
Crysler, Edward, “Brannigan and McBride v. U.K.: A New Direction on Article 15 Derogations under the European Convention on Human Rights?” (1996) 65 Nordic Journal of International Law 91–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Londras, Fiona, “The Right to Challenge the Lawfulness of Detention: An International Perspective of US Detention of Suspected Terrorists” (2007) 12 Journal of Conflict & Security Law 223–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Zayas, Alfred, “The United Nations and the Guarantees of a Fair Trial in the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment of Punishment,” in Weissbrodt, David and Wolfrum, R. (eds.), The Right to a Fair Trial (Berlin: Springer, 1998).Google Scholar
Deeks, Ashley, “Administrative Detention in Armed Conflict” (2009) 40 Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law 403–36.Google Scholar
Denbeaux, Mark, and Denbeaux, Joshua, “No-Hearing Hearings: An Analysis of the Proceedings of the Combatant Status Review Tribunals at Guantánamo” (2011) 41 Seton Hall Law Review 1231–67.Google Scholar
Dennis, Michael J., “Application of Human Rights Treaties Extraterritorially in Times of Armed Conflict and Military Occupation” (2005) 99 American Journal of International Law 119–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dennis, Michael J., “Non-Application of Civil and Political Rights Treaties Extraterritorially During Times of International Armed Conflict” (2007) 40 Israel Law Review 453–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dicey, A. V., An Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution, 8th edn (London, Macmillan and Co., 1924).Google Scholar
The Digest of Justinian, ed. Watson, Alan, vol. 4 (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Dinstein, Yoram, “The Right to Life, Physical Integrity, and Liberty,” in Henkin, Louis (ed.), The International Bill of Rights – The Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (New York: Columbia University Press, 1981).Google Scholar
Dobie, Armistead M., “Habeas Corpus in the Federal Courts” (1927) 13 Virginia Law Review 433–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Draper, G. I. A. D., “The Relationship between the Human Rights Regime and the Law of Armed Conflicts” (1971) 1 Israel Yearbook on Human Rights 191–207.Google Scholar
Duker, William F., A Constitutional History of Habeas Corpus (Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press, 1980).Google Scholar
Farbey, Judith, Sharpe, R. J., and Atrill, Simon, The Law of Habeas Corpus, 3rd edn (New York: Oxford University Press, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farrell, Brian, “Habeas Corpus in Times of Emergency: A Historical and Comparative View” (2010) Pace International Law Review Online Companion 74–95.Google Scholar
Faulkner, Elizabeth A., “The Right to Habeas Corpus: Only in the Other Americas” (1994) 9 American University Journal of International Law and Policy 653–87.Google Scholar
Feinrider, Martin, “Judicial Review and the Protection of Human Rights under Military Governments in Brazil and Argentina” (1981) 5 Suffolk Transnational Law Review 171–99.Google Scholar
Fenwick, Charles G., “The Inter-American Regional System: Fifty Years of Progress” (1956) 50 American Journal of International Law 18–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, S.G., “The Suspension of Habeas Corpus during the War of the Rebellion” (1888) 3 Political Science Quarterly 454–88.Google Scholar
Fitzpatrick, Joan, Human Rights in Crisis: The International System for Protecting Rights During States of Emergencies (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitzpatrick, Joan, “Speaking Law to Power: The War Against Terrorism and Human Rights” (2003) 14 European Journal of International Law 241–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fix Zamudio, Hector, “A Brief Introduction to the Mexican Writ of Amparo” (1979) 9 California Western International Law Journal 306–48.Google Scholar
Fix Zamudio, Hector, “The Writ of Amparo in Latin America” (1981) 13 Lawyer of the Americas 361–91.Google Scholar
Foley, Brian J., “Guantánamo and Beyond: Dangers of Rigging the Rules” (2007) 97 Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology 1009–70.Google Scholar
Freedman, Eric, Habeas Corpus: Rethinking the Great Writ of Liberty (New York: New York University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Friedrich, Carl J., Constitutional Government and Democracy (Boston: Little, Brown and Company, 1941).Google Scholar
Gardiner, Samuel (ed.), Constitutional Documents of the Puritan Revolution 1625–1660, 3rd edn (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1906).Google Scholar
Gearty, C. A., “The European Court of Human Rights and the Protection of Civil Liberties: An Overview” (1993) 52 Cambridge Law Journal 89–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gioia, Andrea, “The Role of the European Court of Human Rights in Monitoring Compliance with Humanitarian law in Armed Conflict,” in Ben-Naftali, Orna (ed.), International Humanitarian Law and International Human Rights Law (New York: Oxford University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Glendon, Mary Ann, “The Forgotten Crucible: The Latin American Influence on the Universal Human Rights Idea” (2003) 16 Harvard Human Rights Journal 27–39.Google Scholar
Glendon, Mary Ann, “The Rule of Law in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights” (2004) 2 Northwestern Journal of International Human Rights 1–19.Google Scholar
Glendon, Mary Ann, A World Made New: Eleanor Roosevelt and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (New York: Random House, 2001).Google Scholar
Goldman, Robert, “Extraterritorial Application of the Human Rights to Life and Personal Liberty, Including Habeas Corpus, During Situations of Armed Conflict,” in Kolb, Robert and Gaggioli, Gloria (eds.), Research Handbook on Human Rights and Humanitarian Law (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, 2013).Google Scholar
Grant, William W. Jr., “Suspension of the Habeas Corpus in Strikes” (1916) 3 Virginia Law Review 249–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grey, Anchitell, Debates of the House of Commons (1769).Google Scholar
Hakimi, Monica, “A Functional Approach to Targeting and Detention” (2012) 110 Michigan Law Review 1365–420.Google Scholar
Hall, Robert, “The Writ of Habeas Corpus” (1948) 11 Dallas Bar Speaks 88–95.Google Scholar
Halliday, Paul, Habeas Corpus: From England to Empire (Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, Paul, and White, G. Edward, “The Suspension Clause: English Text, Imperial Contexts, and American Implications” (2008) 94 Virginia Law Review 575–714.Google Scholar
Hannum, Hurst, “The Status of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights in National and International Law” (1995–96) 25 Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law 287–397.Google Scholar
Happold, Matthew, “Bankovic v. Belgium and the Territorial Scope of the European Convention on Human Rights” (2003) 3 Human Rights Law Review 77–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartman, Joan F., “Derogation from Human Rights Treaties in Public Emergencies” (1981) 22 Harvard International Law Journal 1–52.Google Scholar
Henckaerts, Jean-Marie, and Doswald-Beck, Louise, Customary International Humanitarian Law (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2005), vol. 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henkin, Louis, The Age of Rights (New York: Columbia University Press, 1990).Google Scholar
Holdsworth, W. S., A History of English Law (London: Methuen, 1926).Google Scholar
Holt, J. C., Magna Carta, 1st edn (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1965).Google Scholar
Howard, A. E. Dick, Magna Carta: Text and Commentary (Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia, 1998).Google Scholar
Humphrey, John, Human Rights and the United Nations: A Great Adventure (New York: Transnational Publishers, 1984).Google Scholar
Hurd, Rollin, A Treatise on the Right of Personal Liberty, and on the Writ of Habeas Corpus, 2nd edn (Albany: W. C. Little & Co., 1876).Google Scholar
Inter-American Juridical Council, “Draft Declaration of the International Rights and Duties of Man” (1946) 40 American Journal of International Law Supplement 93–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Committee of the Red Cross, International Humanitarian Law and the Challenges of Contemporary Armed Conflicts (2011).Google Scholar
International Committee of the Red Cross, Strengthening Legal Protection for Victims of Armed Conflict (2011).Google Scholar
Jackson, Vicki C., “World Habeas Corpus” (2006) 91 Cornell Law Review 303–67.Google Scholar
Janis, Mark, Kay, Richard, and Bradley, Anthony, European Human Rights Law: Text and Materials, 2nd edn (New York: Oxford University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Jenkins, David, “Habeas Corpus and Extraterritorial Jurisdiction after Boumediene: Towards a Doctrine of ‘Effective Control’ in the United States” (2009) 9 Human Rights Law Review 306–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, Harry, “The Common Law in the United States: English Themes and American Variations,” in Jones, Harry (ed.), Political Separation and Legal Continuity, 1st edn (Chicago: The American Bar Association, 1976).Google Scholar
Joseph, Sarah, “Human Rights Committee: General Comment 29” (2002) 2 Human Rights Law Review 81–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joseph, Sarah, Schultz, Jenny, and Castan, Melissa, The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights: Cases, Materials and Commentary, 2nd edn (New York: Oxford University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Koh, Harold Hongju, “America’s Offshore Refugee Camps” (1994) 29 University of Richmond Law Review 139–73.Google Scholar
Koh, Harold Hongju, The National Security Constitution: Sharing Power After the Iran–Contra Affair (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press: 1990).Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti, “Occupied Zone – ‘A Zone of Reasonableness?’” (2008) 41 Israel Law Review 13–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti, ‘The Politics of International Law – 20 Years Later” (2009) 20 European Journal of International Law 7–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti, and Leino, Paivi, “Fragmentation of International Law? Postmodern Anxieties” (2002) 15 Leiden Journal of International Law 553–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kutner, Luis (ed.), The Human Right to Individual Freedom: A Symposium on World Habeas Corpus (Coral Gables, Fla.: University of Miami Press, 1970).Google Scholar
Kutner, Luis (ed.), “‘International’ Due Process for Prisoners of War: The Need for a Special Tribunal of World Habeas Corpus” (1967) 21 University of Miami Law Review 721–50.Google Scholar
Kutner, Luis (ed.), “A Proposal for a United Nations Writ of Habeas Corpus and an International Court of Human Rights” (1954) 28 Tulane Law Review 417–41.Google Scholar
Kutner, Luis (ed.), World Habeas Corpus (Dobbs Ferry, N.Y.: Oceana Publications, 1962).Google Scholar
Kutner, Luis (ed.), “World Habeas Corpus and International Extradition” (1964) 41 University of Detroit Law Journal 525–51.Google Scholar
Kutner, Luis (ed.), “World Habeas Corpus for International Man: A Credo for International Due Process of Law” (1959) 36 University of Detroit Law Journal 235–76.Google Scholar
Kutner, Luis (ed.), “World Habeas Corpus, Human Rights and World Community” (1967) 17 DePaul Law Review 3–37.Google Scholar
Kutner, Luis (ed.), “World Habeas Corpus: A Legal Absolute for Survival” (1962) 39 University of Detroit Law Journal 279–340.Google Scholar
Kutner, Luis (ed.), “World Habeas Corpus: The Legal Ultimate for the Unity of Mankind” (1964) 40 Notre Dame Lawyer 570–605.Google Scholar
Kutner, Luis (ed.), “World Habeas Corpus: Ligament for Political Diversity” (1965) 43 University of Detroit Law Journal 79–94.Google Scholar
Kutner, Luis (ed.), “World Habeas Corpus: Ombudsman for Mankind” (1970) 24 University of Miami Law Review 352–88.Google Scholar
Kutner, Luis, and Carl, Beverly May, “An International Writ of Habeas Corpus: Protection of Personal Liberty in a World of Diverse Systems of Public Order” (1961) 22 University of Pittsburgh Law Review 469–560.Google Scholar
Lauterpacht, Hersch, An International Bill of the Rights of Man (New York: Columbia University Press, 1940).Google Scholar
Linderfalk, Ulf, “The Effect of Jus Cogens Norms: Whoever Opened Pandora’s Box, Did You Ever Think About the Consequences?” (2007) 18 European Journal of International Law 853–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Longsdorf, George F., “Habeas Corpus – A Protection Writ and Remedy” (1949) 10 Ohio State Law Journal 301–17.Google Scholar
Lubell, Noam, “Parallel Application of International Humanitarian Law and International Human Rights Law: An Examination of the Debate” (2007) 40 Israel Law Review 648–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
May, Larry, Global Justice and Due Process (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Meltzer, Daniel J., “Habeas Corpus, Suspension, and Guantánamo: The Boumediene Decision” (2008) 2008 Supreme Court Review 1–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendez, Juan E., and Vivanco, José Miguel, “Disappearances and the Inter-American Court: Reflections on a Litigation Experience” (1990) 13 Hamline Law Review 507–77.Google Scholar
Meron, Theodor, “The Humanization of Humanitarian Law” (2000) 94 American Journal of International Law 239–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milanovic, Marko, “Al-Skeini and Al-Jedda in Strasbourg” (2012) 23 European Journal of International Law 121–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milanovic, Marko, “Norm Conflicts, International Humanitarian Law, and Human Rights Law,” in Ben-Naftali, Orna (ed.), International Humanitarian Law and International Human Rights Law (New York: Oxford University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Ministerio de Relaciones Exteriores de Colombia, Novena Conferencia Internacional Americana: Actas y Documentos (Ministerio de Relaciones Exteriores de Colombia, 1953).Google Scholar
Møse, Erik, “Article 8,” in Alfredsson, Gundmundur and Eide, Asbjørn (eds.), The Universal Declaration of Human Rights: A Common Standard of Achievement (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1999).Google Scholar
Moyn, Samuel, The Last Utopia: Human Rights in History (Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap, 2010).Google Scholar
Neuman, Gerald L., “Counter-terrorist Operations and the Rule of Law” ( 2004) 15 European Journal of International Law 1019–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niemi-Kiesiläinen, Johanna, “Article 9,” in Eide, Asbjørn (ed.), The Universal Declaration of Human Rights: A Commentary (Oslo: Scandinavian University Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Nowak, Manfred, U.N. Covenant on Civil and Political Rights: CCPR Commentary (Kehl am Rein: N. P. Engel Club, 1993).Google Scholar
Nowak, Manfred, and Kozma, Julia, A World Court of Human Rights (Vienna: University of Vienna, 2009).Google Scholar
Nutting, Helen, “The Most Wholesome Law – The Habeas Corpus Act of 1679” (1960) 65 American Historical Review 527–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Connell, Mary Ellen, “Jus Cogens: International Law’s Higher Ethical Norms,” in Childress, Donald (ed.), The Role of Ethics in International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Orakhelashvili, Alexander, “The Interaction between Human Rights and Humanitarian Law: Fragmentation, Conflict, Parallelism, or Convergence?” (2008) 19 European Journal of International Law 161–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ouguergouz, Fatsah, The African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights: A Comprehensive Agenda for Human Dignity and Sustainable Democracy in Africa (The Hague: Marinus Nijhoff, 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oxford Pro Bono Publico, “The Use of Secret Evidence in Judicial Proceedings: A Comparative Survey” (2011).Google Scholar
Pasqualucci, Jo, The Practice and Procedure of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pejic, Jelena, “Procedural Principles and Safeguards for Internment/Administrative Detention in Armed Conflict and Other Situations of Violence” (2005) 87 International Review of the Red Cross 375–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pictet, Jean, Commentary – III Geneva Convention Relative to Prisoners of War, de Henry, A. P. (trans.) (Geneva: International Committee of the Red Cross, 1960).Google Scholar
Pictet, Jean, Commentary – IV Geneva Convention Relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War, Griffin, Ronald and Dumbleton, C. W. (trans.) (Geneva: International Committee of the Red Cross, 1958).Google Scholar
Pictet, Jean, Humanitarian Law and Protection of War Victims (Geneva: Henry Dunant Institute, 1975).Google Scholar
Posner, Eric, “‘Global Justice and Due Process’ by Larry May” (2011) 25 Ethics & International Affairs 481–84.Google Scholar
Potter, Harold, A Historical Introduction to English Law and its Institutions, (London: Sweet & Maxwell, 1932).Google Scholar
Powell, H. Jefferson, “Parchment Matters: A Meditation on the Constitution as Text” (1986) 71 Iowa Law Review 1427–35.Google Scholar
“Remarks on the Writ of Habeas Corpus ad Subjiciendum, and the Practice Connected Therewith” (1856) 4 American Law Register 257–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, A. H., and Merrills, J. G. Human Rights in Europe: A Study of the European Convention on Human Rights, 3rd edn (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Roosevelt, Eleanor, “The Promise of Human Rights” (1948) 26 Foreign Affairs 470–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rossiter, Clinton, Constitutional Dictatorship: Crisis Government in the Modern Democracies (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1948).Google Scholar
Sassòli, Marco, “The Role of Human Rights and International Humanitarian Law in New Types of Armed Conflicts,” in Ben-Naftali, Orna (ed.), International Humanitarian Law and International Human Rights Law (New York: Oxford University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Sassòli, Marco, and Olson, Laura, “The Relationship between International Humanitarian and Human Rights Law Where it Matters: Admissible Killing and Internment of Fighters in Non-International Armed Conflicts” (2008) 90 International Review of the Red Cross 599–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schabas, William A., The Abolition of the Death Penalty in International Law, 3rd edn (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schabas, William A., Inaugural Lecture at Leiden University: “The Three Charters: Making International Law in the Post-War Crucible” (Jan. 25, 2013).Google Scholar
Schabas, William A., “Invalid Reservations to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights: Is the United States Still a Party?” (1995) 21 Brooklyn Journal of International Law 277–325.Google Scholar
Schabas, William A., “Lex Specialis? Belt and Suspenders? The Parallel Operation of Human Rights Law and the Law of Armed Conflict, and the Conundrum of Jus ad Bellum” (2007) 40 Israel Law Review 592–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schabas, William A., “Reservations to Human Rights Treaties: Time for Innovations and Reform” (1994) 32 Canadian Yearbook of International Law 39–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schabas, William A., “The Right to a Fair Trial,” in Lattanzi, Flavia and Schabas, William A. (eds.), Essays on the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (Ripa di Fagnano Alto: Editrice il Sirente, 2003), vol. 2.Google Scholar
Schabas, William A. (ed.), The Universal Declaration of Human Rights: The Travaux Préparatoires (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheppele, Kim Lane, “Law in a Time of Emergency: States of Exception and the Temptations of 9/11” (2004) 6 University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law 1001–83.Google Scholar
Schindler, Dietrich, “Human Rights and Humanitarian Law: Interrelationship of the Laws” (1981) 31 American University Law Review 935–77.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Carl, Political Theology, Schwab, George (trans.) (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seervai, H. M., The Emergency, Future Safeguards and the Habeas Corpus Case: A Criticism (Bombay: N. M. Tripathi, 1978).Google Scholar
Shapiro, David L., “Habeas Corpus, Suspension, and Detention: Another View” (2006) 82 Notre Dame Law Review 59–95.Google Scholar
Smith, Goldwin, A Constitutional and Legal History of England (New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1955).Google Scholar
Smith, Goldwin, A History of England (New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1949).Google Scholar
Somer, Jonathan, “Jungle Justice: Passing Sentence on the Equality of Belligerents in Non-International Armed Conflict” (2007) 89 International Review of the Red Cross 655–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sutton, Leonard v. B., “Habeas Corpus – Its Past, Present, and Possible Worldwide Future,” in Kutner, Luis (ed.), The Human Right to Individual Freedom (Coral Gables, Fla: University of Miami Press, 1970).Google Scholar
Tamanaha, Brian, On the Rule of Law: History, Politics, Theory (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomuschat, Christian, Human Rights: Between Idealism and Realism, 1st edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Vladeck, Stephen, “The New Habeas Revisionism” (2010) 124 Harvard Law Review 941–92.Google Scholar
Voight, Christina, “The Role of General Principles in International Law and their Relationship to Treaty Law” (2008) 121 Retfaerd: Nordic Journal of Law and Justice 3–25.Google Scholar
Weissbrodt, David, The Right to a Fair Trial: Articles 8, 10, and 11 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (Cambridge, Mass.: Martinus Nijhoff, 2001).Google Scholar
Weissbrodt, David, and Hallendorff, Mattias, “Travaux Préparatoires of the Fair Trial Provisions – Articles 8 to 11 – of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights” (1999) 21 Human Rights Quarterly 1061–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weissbrodt, David, and Wolfrum, R. (eds.), The Right to a Fair Trial (Berlin: Springer, 1998).Google Scholar
Wells, H. G., The Rights of Man or What are We Fighting for? (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1940).Google Scholar
Wilkes, Donald, “The Writ of Habeas Corpus,” in Kritzer, Herbert M. (ed.), Legal Systems of the World: A Political, Cultural, and Social Encyclopedia (Santa Barbara, Calif.: ABC-CLIO, 2002), vol. 2.Google Scholar
Wise, Steven M., “The Entitlement of Chimpanzees to the Common Law Writs of Habeas Corpus and De Homine Replegiando” (2007) 37 Golden Gate University Law Review 219–80.Google Scholar
Wittes, Benjamin, Chesney, Robert, and Reynolds, Larkin, The Emerging Law of Detention 2.0: The Guantánamo Habeas Cases as Lawmaking (Washington, D.C.: Governance Studies at Brookings, 2011).Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Brian R. Farrell, University of Iowa
  • Book: Habeas Corpus in International Law
  • Online publication: 15 December 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316585184.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Brian R. Farrell, University of Iowa
  • Book: Habeas Corpus in International Law
  • Online publication: 15 December 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316585184.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Brian R. Farrell, University of Iowa
  • Book: Habeas Corpus in International Law
  • Online publication: 15 December 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316585184.011
Available formats
×