Book contents
- Cambridge Handbook of Research Approaches to Business Ethics and Corporate Responsibility
- Cambridge Handbook of Research Approaches to Business Ethics and Corporate Responsibility
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Introduction
- Part I Philosophical Approaches
- Part II Empirical Approaches
- Qualitative Approaches
- Quantitative and Experimental Approaches
- Contemporary Approaches
- Case Study Approaches
- Chapter 14 Wide Reflective Equilibrium as a Case-Based Research Approach to Business Ethics
- Chapter 15 Casuistry as a Case-Based Research Approach to Business Ethics
- Chapter 16 Building on Actor-Network Analysis to Study Corporate Social Responsibility
- Part III A Researcher in the Spotlight
- Index
- References
Chapter 15 - Casuistry as a Case-Based Research Approach to Business Ethics
from Case Study Approaches
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 10 November 2017
Book contents
- Cambridge Handbook of Research Approaches to Business Ethics and Corporate Responsibility
- Cambridge Handbook of Research Approaches to Business Ethics and Corporate Responsibility
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Introduction
- Part I Philosophical Approaches
- Part II Empirical Approaches
- Qualitative Approaches
- Quantitative and Experimental Approaches
- Contemporary Approaches
- Case Study Approaches
- Chapter 14 Wide Reflective Equilibrium as a Case-Based Research Approach to Business Ethics
- Chapter 15 Casuistry as a Case-Based Research Approach to Business Ethics
- Chapter 16 Building on Actor-Network Analysis to Study Corporate Social Responsibility
- Part III A Researcher in the Spotlight
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Cambridge Handbook of Research Approaches to Business Ethics and Corporate Responsibility , pp. 221 - 231Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
Aquinas, Saint Thomas. Treatise on the Virtues. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. Summa Theologica. Translated by Fathers of the English Dominican Province. 3 vols. New York: Benziger Brothers, Inc., 1947.Google Scholar
Aristotle, . Nicomachean Ethics. Translated by Ostwald, Martin. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall, Inc., 1962.Google Scholar
Arras, John D. “Common Law Morality.” Hastings Center Report, July/August (1990): 35–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, Louis B., Roland Christensen, C., and Hansen, Abby J.. Teaching and the Case Method: Texts, Cases, and Readings. 3rd ed. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Beauchamp, Tom L., ed. Case Studies in Business, Society, and Ethics 4th ed. Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1998.Google Scholar
Boeyink, David E. “Casuistry: A Case-Based Method for Journalists.” Journal of Mass Media Ethics 7, 2 (1992): 107–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brinkmann, Johannes and Ims, Knut J.. “A Conflict Case Approach to Business Ethics.” Journal of Business Ethics 53 (2004): 123–136.Google Scholar
Buchholz, Rogene A. Fundamental Concepts and Problems in Business Ethics. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1989.Google Scholar
Calkins, Martin. “Casuistry and the Business Case Method.” Business Ethics Quarterly 11, 2 (April 2001): 237–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calkins, Martin “How Casuistry and Virtue Ethics Might Break the Ideological Stalemate Troubling Agricultural Biotechnology.” Business Ethics Quarterly 12, 3 (July 2002): 305–330.Google Scholar
Calkins, Martin “Developing a Virtue-Imbued Casuistry for Business Ethics.” Vol. 42 Issues in Business Ethics. New York: Springer Science and Business Media, 2014.Google Scholar
Cavanagh, Gerald F. American Business Values with International Perspectives. 4th ed. Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1998.Google Scholar
Ciulla, Joanne B. “Casuistry and the Case for Business Ethics.” In Business as a Humanity, ed. Donaldson, Thomas J. and Edward Freeman, R., 167–183. New York: Oxford University Press, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, Kari Gwen. “Casuistry and Computer Ethics.” Metaphilosophy 38, 4 (July 2007): 471–488.Google Scholar
Copeland, Melvin T. “The Genesis of the Case Method in Business Instruction.” In The Case Method at the Harvard Business School: Papers by Present and Past Members of the Faculty and Staff, ed. McNair, Malcolm P., 25–33. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company Inc., 1954.Google Scholar
Culliton, James W. “Writing Business Cases.” In The Case Method at the Harvard Business School: Papers by Present and Past Members of the Faculty and Staff, ed. McNair, Malcolm P.. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc., 1954.Google Scholar
De George, Richard T. Business Ethics. 5th ed. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall, Inc., 1999.Google Scholar
Dewing, Arthur Stone. “An Introduction to the Use of Cases.” In The Case Method at the Harvard Business School: Papers by Present and Past Members of the Faculty and Staff, ed. McNair, Malcolm P., 1–5. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc., 1954.Google Scholar
Donahue, James A. “The Use of Virtue and Character in Applied Ethics.” Horizons 17 (1990): 228–243.Google Scholar
Donaldson, Thomas and Werhane, Patricia H., eds. Ethical Issues in Business: A Philosophical Approach 6th ed. Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1999.Google Scholar
Drucker, Peter F. “What is ‘business ethics’?” National Affairs 63 (Spring 1981): 18–36.Google Scholar
Hanson, K. O. and Weiss, S.. Merck & Co., Inc.: Addressing Third-World Needs. Cambridge: Harvard Business School Publishing, 1991, no. 9–991-021 to 024.Google Scholar
Hunter, Kathryn Montgomery. “A Science of Individuals: Medicine and Casuistry.” Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 14, April (1989): 193–212.Google Scholar
James, William. Pragmatism and Four Essays from The Meaning of Truth, ed. Perry, Ralph Barton. Cleveland: Meridian Books, 1969.Google Scholar
Johansen, Baber. “Casuistry: Between Legal Concept and Social Praxis.” Islamic Law and Society 2, 2 (1995): 135–156.Google Scholar
Jonsen, Albert R. “Casuistry and Clinical Ethics.” Theoretical Medicine 7 (1986): 65–74.Google Scholar
Jonsen, Albert R. “Casuistry as Methodology in Clinical Ethics.” Theoretical Medicine 12, December (1991): 295–307.Google Scholar
Jonsen, Albert R. and Toulmin, Stephen. The Abuse of Casuistry: A History of Moral Reasoning. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Fundamental Principles of the Metaphysics of Morals. Trans. Abbott, Thomas Kingsmill, 2004. Accessed 30 August 2016. Internet. Available from http://philosophy.eserver.org/kant/metaphys-of-morals.txt.Google Scholar
Keenan, S. J., James, F. Virtues for Ordinary Christians. Kansas City: Sheed & Ward, 1996.Google Scholar
Lundberg, Craig C. “Case Method.” In Mastering Management Education: Innovations in Teaching Effectiveness, ed. Vance, Charles M., 45–52. Newbury Park: Sage Publications Inc., 1993.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, Alasdair. After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory. 2nd ed. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1984.Google Scholar
McLaren, B.M. “Computational Models of Ethical Reasoning: Challenges, Initial Steps, and Future Directions.” Intelligent Systems, IEEE 21, 4 (July-August 2006): 29–37.Google Scholar
McMahon, Thomas F. “Creed, Cult, Code and Business Ethics.” Journal of Business Ethics 5, 6 (1986): 453–463.Google Scholar
Porter, Jean. The Recovery of Virtue: The Relevance of Aquinas For Christians. Louisville: Westminster/John Knox Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Rawls, John “Kantian Constructivism in Moral Theory.” Journal of Philosophy 77 (1980).Google Scholar
Reporter. “Miracle Worker.” Time, 2 November 1987, 78.Google Scholar
Rotch, William. Casewriting. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Darden School Foundation, 1992, no. UVA-G-0364.Google Scholar
Rotch, William “Casewriting Workshop Handout.” Charlottesville: Unpublished, 20 May 1996.Google Scholar
Statman, Daniel, ed. Virtue Ethics: A Critical Reader. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Sunstein, Cass R. “Commentary on Analogical Reasoning.” Harvard Law Review 106, January (1993): 741–791.Google Scholar
Tomlinson, Tom. “Casuistry in Medical Ethics: Rehabilitated, or Repeat Offender?” Theoretical Medicine 15, March (1994): 5-20.Google Scholar
van der Burg, Wibren and van Willigenburg, Theo, eds. Reflective Equilibrium: Essays in Honour of Robert Heeger, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1998.Google Scholar
Velasquez, Manuel G. “Some Lessons and Nonlessons of Casuist History.” In Business as a Humanity, ed. Donaldson, Thomas J. and Edward Freeman, R., 184–195. New York: Oxford University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
- 1
- Cited by