Book contents
- Simonides the Poet
- Simonides the Poet
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Preface
- Introduction
- Part I Simonides and the Poets of the Past
- Part II Simonidea: Simonides through Ancient Receptions
- Appendix: Simonides’ Poems Concerning Battles of the Persian Wars
- Bibliography
- Index of Subjects
- Index of Passages Discussed
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 29 March 2018
Book contents
- Simonides the Poet
- Simonides the Poet
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Preface
- Introduction
- Part I Simonides and the Poets of the Past
- Part II Simonidea: Simonides through Ancient Receptions
- Appendix: Simonides’ Poems Concerning Battles of the Persian Wars
- Bibliography
- Index of Subjects
- Index of Passages Discussed
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Simonides the PoetIntertextuality and Reception, pp. 281 - 299Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2018
References
Acosta-Hughes, B. (2010). Arion’s Lyre: Archaic Lyric into Hellenistic Poetry, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Adrados, F. R. (1982). ‘Neue jambische Fragmente aus archaischer und klassischer Zeit’, Philologus 126: 157–79.Google Scholar
Agócs, P. (2011). Talking song in early Greek poetry. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of London.Google Scholar
Agócs, P., Carey, C., and Rawles, R. (eds.) (2012a). Reading the Victory Ode, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Agócs, P., Carey, C., and Rawles, R. (eds.) (2012b). Receiving the Komos: Ancient and Modern Receptions of the Victory Ode, BICS Suppl. 112, London.Google Scholar
Aloni, A. (2001). ‘The proem of Simonides’ Plataea Elegy and the circumstances of its performance’, in Boedeker and Sider (2001), 86–105.Google Scholar
Argentieri, L. (1998). ‘Epigramma e libro: Morfologia delle raccolte epigrammatiche premeleagree’, ZPE 121: 1–20.Google Scholar
Asheri, D., Lloyd, A., and Corcella, A. (2007). A Commentary on Herodotus Books I–IV, ed. Murray, O. and Moreno, A., trans. B. Graziosi et al. Oxford.Google Scholar
Athanassaki, L., and Bowie, E. (eds.) (2011). Archaic and Classical Choral Song: Performance, Politics and Dissemination, Berlin.Google Scholar
Barbantani, S. (2001). Φάτις Νικήφορος: Frammenti di elegia encomiastica nell’età delle guerre galatiche, Supplementum Hellenisticum 958 e 959, Milan.Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. (1996). ‘Poetry, praise and patronage: Simonides in Book 4 of Horace’s Odes’, CA 15: 5–47.Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. (2001). ‘Simonides and Horace on the death of Achilles’, in Boedeker and Sider (2001), 255–60.Google Scholar
Barkhuizen, J. H. (1975). Etymologisering by Pindaros. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Pretoria (non uidi).Google Scholar
Bastianini, G., and Gallazzi, C. (2001). Posidippo di Pella: Epigrammi (P. Migl. Vogl. VIII 309), with collaboration of C. Austin, Milan.Google Scholar
Bearzot, C. (1997). ‘P. Oxy. 3965: Considerazioni sulla data e sull’ ispirazione dell’ elegia di Simonide per la battaglia di Platea’, in Kramer, B., W. Luppe and H. Maehler et al. (eds), Akten des 21. Internationalen Papyrologenkongresses: Berlin, 13–19.8.1995, Stuttgart, Vol. 1, 71–9.Google Scholar
Bell, J. M. (1978). ‘Κίμβιξ καὶ σοφός: Simonides in the anecdotal tradition’, QUCC 28: 29–86.Google Scholar
Bentley, R. (1697). Dissertations upon the Epistles of Phalaris, Themistocles, Socrates, Euripides, and upon the Fables of Aesop, London.Google Scholar
Beresford, A. (2008). ‘Nobody’s perfect: A new text and interpretation of Simonides PMG 542’, CP 103: 237–56.Google Scholar
Bernardini, P. A. (1984). ‘La penia nella vicenda storico-politica di Alceo (frr. 360 e 364 V.)’, in Lirica greca da Archiloco a Elitis: Studi in onore di Filippo Maria Pontani, Padua, 93–104.Google Scholar
Bing, P. (1988). The Well-Read Muse: Present and Past in Callimachus and the Hellenistic Poets, Göttingen.Google Scholar
Boardman, J., and Kurtz, D. (1986). ‘Booners’, Greek Vases in the J. Paul Getty Museum 3: 35–70.Google Scholar
Boedeker, D. (1995). ‘Simonides on Plataea: Narrative Elegy, Mythodic History’, ZPE 107: 217–29.Google Scholar
Boedeker, D. (2001). ‘Paths to heroization at Plataea’, in Boedeker and Sider (2001), 148–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boedeker, D., and Sider, D. (eds.) (2001). The New Simonides: Contexts of Praise and Desire, Oxford and New York.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. (1986). ‘Early Greek elegy: Symposium and public festival’, JHS 106: 13–35.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. (2001). ‘Ancestors of historiography in early Greek elegiac and iambic poetry?’, in Luraghi, N. (ed.), The Historian’s Craft in the Age of Herodotus, Oxford, 45–66.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. (2010a). ‘Stobaeus and early Greek lyric, elegiac and iambic poetry’, in Horster, M. and Reitz, C. (eds.), Condensing texts: Condensed Texts, Stuttgart, 587–617.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. (2010b). ‘Simonides of Eretria (redivivus?)’, in Catling, R. W. V. and Marchand, F. (eds.), Onomatologos: Studies in Greek Personal Names presented to Elaine Matthews, Oxford, 6–14.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. (2012a). ‘Epinicians and “patrons”’, in Agócs, Carey and Rawles (2012a), 83–92.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. (2012b). ‘An early chapter in the history of the Theognidea’, in Riu, X. and Pòrtulas, J. (eds.), Approaches to Archaic Greek Poetry, Messina, 121–48.Google Scholar
Braswell, B. K. (1976). ‘Notes on the prooemium to Pindar’s Seventh Olympian Ode’, Mnemosyne 29: 239–42.Google Scholar
Bravi, L. (2005). ‘Gli epigrammi di Simonide e il P.Mil.Vogl. VIII 309’, in Di Marco, M., Palumbo Stracca, B. and Lelli, E. (eds.), Posidippo e gli altri: Il genere, il contesto culturale e letterario, Appunti Romani di Filologia, Vol. 6, Pisa and Rome, 1–7.Google Scholar
Bremer, J. M. (1991). ‘Poets and their patrons’, in Hofmann, H. and Harder, A. (eds.), Fragmenta Dramatica: Beiträge zur Interpretation der griechischen Tragikerfragmente und ihrer Wirkungsgeschichte, Göttingen, 39–60.Google Scholar
Brown, C. G. (2006). ‘Pindar on Archilochus and the gluttony of blame’, JHS 126: 36–46.Google Scholar
Budelmann, F., and Power, T. (2013). ‘The in-betweenness of sympotic elegy’, JHS 133: 1–19.Google Scholar
Bundy, E. (1962). Studia Pindarica I: The Eleventh Olympian Ode. University of California Publications in Classical Philology, Vol. 18, Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
Burgess, J. S. (2012). ‘Intertextuality without text in early Greek epic’, in Andersen, Ø. and Haug, D. T. T. (eds.), Relative Chronology in Early Greek Epic Poetry, Cambridge, 168–83.Google Scholar
Burkert, W. (1979). ‘Kynaithos, Polycrates, and the Homeric Hymn to Apollo’, in Bowersock, G. W. (ed.), Arktouros: Hellenic Studies Presented to Bernard M. W. Knox, Berlin and New York, 53–62.Google Scholar
Burkert, W. (1983). Homo Necans: The Anthropology of Ancient Greek Sacrificial Ritual and Myth, Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
Byre, C. S. (1982). ‘Per aspera (et arborem) ad astra: Ramifications of the allegory of Arete in Quintus Smyrnaeus “Posthomerica” 5, 49–69’, Hermes 110: 184–95.Google Scholar
Cairns, D. L. (2010). Bacchylides: Five Epinician Odes (3, 5, 9, 11, 13), trans. D. L. Cairns and J. G. Howie, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Capra, A. (2004). ‘Simonide e le corone di Omero (Simon. 47k Campbell = 10, 2 Lanata e fr. 11 West2’, in Zanetto, G., Canavero, D., Capra, A. and Sgobbi, A. (eds.), Momenti della ricezione omerica: Poesia arcaica e teatro, Quaderni di Acme Vol. 67. Milan, 101–26.Google Scholar
Capra, A., and Curti, M. (1995). ‘Semidei Simonidei: Note sull’elegia di Simonide per la battaglia di Plataea’, ZPE 107: 27–32.Google Scholar
Carey, C. (2000). ‘The panegyrist’s persona’, in Cannatà Fera, M. and Grandolini, S. (eds.), Poesia e religione in Grecia: Studi in onore di G. Aurelio Privitera, 2 vols. Naples, 165–77.Google Scholar
Carey, C. (2003). ‘Ipponatte e la tradizione giambica’, in Benedetti, F. and Grandolini, S. (eds.), Studi di filologia e tradizione greca in memoria di Aristide Colonna, 2 vols. Perugia, 213–28.Google Scholar
Carson, A. (1992). ‘How not to read a poem: Unmixing Simonides from Protagoras’, CP 87: 110–30.Google Scholar
Carson, A. (1999). The Economy of the Unlost (Reading Simonides of Keos with Paul Celan), Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Cingano, E. (1990). ‘L’opera di Ibico e di Stesicoro nella classificazione degli antichi e dei moderni’, AION (fil.) 12: 189–224.Google Scholar
Cingano, E. (1993). ‘Indizi di esecuzione corale in Stesicoro’, in Pretagostini, R. (ed.), Tradizione e innovazione nella cultura greca da Omero all’ età ellenistica: Scritti in onore di Bruno Gentili, 3 vols. Rome, 347–61.Google Scholar
Cingano, E. (2004). ‘Tradizioni epiche intorno ad Argo da Omero al 6o sec. a. C.’, in Bernardini, P. A. (ed.), La città di Argo: Mito, storia, tradizioni poetiche, Rome, 59–78.Google Scholar
Collins, L. (1987). ‘The wrath of Paris: Ethical vocabulary and ethical type in the Iliad’, AJP 108: 220–32.Google Scholar
Conte, G. B. (1986). The Rhetoric of Imitation: Genre and Poetic Memory in Virgil and Other Latin Poets, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Currie, B. (2004). ‘Reperformance scenarios for Pindar’s Odes’, in Mackie, C. J. (ed.), Oral Performance and its Context, Mnemosyne Suppl. 248, Leiden, 49–69.Google Scholar
D’Alessio, G. B. (1992). ‘Pindaro Peana VIIb (fr. 52 h. Sn.-M.)’, in El-Mosalamy, A. H. S. (ed.), Proceedings of the XIXth International Congress of Papyrology, Cairo 2–9 September 1989, 2 vols. Cairo, 353–73.Google Scholar
D’Alessio, G. B. (1995). ‘Una via lontana dal cammino degli uomini (Parm. frr. 1+6 D.–K.; Pind. Ol. VI 22–27; pae. VIIb 10–20)’, SIFC 13: 143–81.Google Scholar
D’Alessio, G. B. (2009). ‘Defining local communities in Greek lyric poetry’, in Hunter, R. and Rutherford, I. (eds.), Wandering Poets in Ancient Greek Culture: Travel, Locality, and Panhellenism, Cambridge, 137–67.Google Scholar
D’Alessio, G. B., and Ferrari, F. (1988). ‘Pindaro, Peana 6, 175–83: Una ricostruzione’, SCO 38: 159–80.Google Scholar
D’Alfonso, F. (1994). Stesicoro e la performance: Studio sulle modalità esecutive dei carm stesicorei, Rome.Google Scholar
Davidson, J. N. (1997). Courtesans and Fishcakes: The Consuming Passions of Classical Athens, London.Google Scholar
Davies, M. (1988). ‘Monody, choral lyric and the tyranny of the hand-book’, CQ 38: 52–64.Google Scholar
Davison, J. A. (1968). From Archilochus to Pindar: Papers on Greek Literature of the Archaic Period, London.Google Scholar
Degani, E. (1971). ‘Metafore ipponattee’, in Studi filologici e storici in onore di Vittorio De Falco, Naples, 89–103.Google Scholar
De Martino, F., and Vox, O. (1996). Lirica Graeca, I: Prontuari e lirica dorica, Bari.Google Scholar
Detienne, M. (1996). The Masters of Truth in Ancient Greece, Cambridge, MA. [French orig. 1967]Google Scholar
Dijk, G. J. van (1997). ΑΙΝΟΙ, ΛΟΓΟΙ, ΜΥΘΟΙ: Fables in Archaic, Classical and Hellenistic Greek Literature, Mnemosyne Suppl. 166, Leiden.Google Scholar
Di Lello-Finuoli, A. L. (1971). Un esemplare autografo di Arsenio e il Florilegio di Stobeo, con studio paleografico di Paul Canart, Rome.Google Scholar
Dilts, M. R. (1971). Heraclidis Lembi: Excerpta politiarum, GRBS monograph 5, Durham, NC.Google Scholar
Dübner, F. et al. (1864–90). Epigrammatum anthologia palatina cum Planudeis et appendice nova epigrammatum veterum ex libris et marmoribus ductu, Paris.Google Scholar
Fairweather, J. (1974). ‘Fiction in the biographies of ancient writers’, Ancient Society 5: 231–75.Google Scholar
Fantuzzi, M. (2000). ‘Theocritus and the “demythologizing” of poetry’, in Depew, M. and Obbink, D. (eds.), Matrices of Genre: Authors, Canons and Society, Cambridge, MA, 135–51.Google Scholar
Faulkner, A. (2008). The Homeric Hymn to Aphrodite: Introduction, Text, and Commentary, Oxford.Google Scholar
Fearn, D. (2013). ‘Kleos versus stone? Lyric poetry and contexts for memorialization’, in Liddel, P. and Low, P. (eds.), Inscriptions and their Uses in Greek and Latin Literature, Oxford, 231–53.Google Scholar
Fehling, D. (1985). Die sieben Weisen und die frühgriechische Chronologie: Eine traditionsgeschichtliche Studie, Berne.Google Scholar
Flower, M. A. (2000). ‘From Simonides to Isocrates: The fifth-century origins of fourth-century pan-hellenism’, CA 19: 65–101.Google Scholar
Ford, A. (1997). ‘The inland ship: Problems in the performance and reception of Homeric epic’, in Bakker, E. J. and Kahane, A. (eds.), Written Voices, Spoken Signs: Tradition, Performance, and the Epic Text, Cambridge, MA, 83–109.Google Scholar
Ford, A. (1999). ‘Odysseus after dinner: Od. 9.2–11 and the traditions of sympotic song’, in Kazazis, J. N. and Rengakos, A. (eds.), Euphrosyne: Studies in Ancient Epic and its Legacy in honour of Dimitris N. Maronitis, Stuttgart, 109–23.Google Scholar
Ford, A. (2002). The Origins of Criticism: Literary Culture and Poetic Theory in Classical Greece, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Ford, A. (2003). ‘From letters to literature: Reading the “song culture” of classical Greece’, in Yunis, H. (ed.), Written Texts and the Rise of Literate Culture in Ancient Greece, Cambridge, 15–37.Google Scholar
Fowler, D. (1995). ‘Horace and the aesthetics of politics’, in Harrison, S. (ed.), Homage to Horace, Oxford, 248–66.Google Scholar
Fowler, D. (1997). ‘On the shoulders of giants: Intertextuality and classical studies’, MD 39: 13–34.Google Scholar
Fränkel, H. (1975). Early Greek Poetry and Philosophy, trans. Moses Hadas and James Willis, Oxford.Google Scholar
Garner, R. (1990). From Homer to Tragedy: The Art of Allusion in Greek Poetry. London.Google Scholar
Garner, R. (1994). ‘Stesichorus’ Althaia: P.Oxy.LVII. 3876. frr. 1–36’, ZPE 100: 26–38.Google Scholar
Gavrilov, A. K. et al. (2004). Korpus bosporskikh nadpiseĭ: Al’bom illiustratsiĭ = Corpus inscriptionum regni Bosporani: Album imaginum, St Petersburg.Google Scholar
Gelenczey-Mihálcz, A. (2000). ‘Thoughts on tyranny: Xenophon’s Hiero’, Acta Ant. Hung 40: 113–21.Google Scholar
Gentili, B. (1969). ‘L’interpretazione dei lirici greci arcaici nella dimensione del nostro tempo’, QUCC 8: 7–21.Google Scholar
Gentili, B. (1976). Review of D. L. Page, Poetae Melici Graeci, Lyrica Graeca Selecta and Supplementum Lyricis Graecis, Gnomon 48: 740–51.Google Scholar
Gentili, B. (1988). Poetry and its Public in Ancient Greece, Baltimore, MD. [Italian original, 1985]Google Scholar
Gentili, B., Bernardini, A. B., Cingano, E., and Giannini, P. (1995). Pindaro le Pitiche, Milan.Google Scholar
Georges, P. (1994). Barbarian Asia and the Greek Experience: From the Archaic Period to the Age of Xenophon, Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar
Gerber, D. E. (1982). Pindar’s Olympian One: A Commentary, Phoenix Suppl. 15, Toronto.Google Scholar
Gerber, D. E. (1984). ‘Semonides fr. 1 West: A commentary’, in Gerber, D. E. (ed.), Greek Poetry and Philosophy (Festschrift Woodbury), Chico, CA, 125–35.Google Scholar
Gerber, D. E. (2002). A Commentary on Pindar Olympian Nine, Hermes Einzelschrift 87, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Gianotti, G. F. (1973). ‘Mito e encomio: Il carme di Ibico in onore di Policrate’, RFIC 101: 401–10.Google Scholar
Goldhill, S. (1991). The Poet’s Voice: Essays on Poetics and Greek Literature, Cambridge.Google Scholar
González, J. M. (2010). ‘Theokritos’ Idyll 16: The Χάριτες and civic poetry’, HSCP 105: 65–116.Google Scholar
Graham, D. W. (2010). The Texts of Early Greek Philosophy: The Complete Fragments and Selected Testimonies of the Major Presocratics, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Gray, V. J. (1986). ‘Xenophon’s Hieron and the meeting of the wise man and tyrant in Greek literature’, CQ 36: 115–23.Google Scholar
Greene, E., and Skinner, M. (eds.) (2009). The New Sappho on Old Age: Textual and Philosophical Issues, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Grethlein, J. (2010). The Greeks and their Past: Poetry, Oratory and History in the Fifth Century bce, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Grossardt, P. (2001). Die Erzählung von Meleagros: Zur literarischen Entwicklung der kalydonischen Kultlegende, Leiden.Google Scholar
Grossardt, P. (2012). Stesichoros zwischen kultischer Praxis, mythischer Tradition und eigenem Kunstanspruch: Zur Behandlung des Helenamythos im Werk des Dichters aus Himera, Leipziger Studien zur klassischen Philologie 9, Tübingen.Google Scholar
Halliwell, S. (1984). ‘Ancient interpretations of ὀνομαστὶ κωμῳδεῖν in Aristophanes’, CQ 34: 83–8.Google Scholar
Hans, L.-M. (1985). ‘Theokrits XVI. Idyll und die Politik Hierons II. von Syrakus’, Historia 34: 117–25.Google Scholar
Hansen, M. H., and Nielsen, T. H. (eds.) (2004). An Inventory of Archaic and Classical Greek Poleis, Oxford.Google Scholar
Harder, A. (2012). Callimachus: Aetia: Introduction, Text, Translation, and Commentary, 2 vols. Oxford.Google Scholar
Haslam, M. (1993). Review of M. L. West, Iambi et Elegi Graeci2, Vol. II, BMCR 04.02.14 (http://ccat.sas.upenn.edu/bmcr/1993/04.02.14.html).Google Scholar
Haubold, J. (2007). ‘Xerxes’ Homer’, in Bridges, E., Hall, E. and Rhodes, P. J. (eds.), Cultural Responses to the Persian Wars: Antiquity to the Third Millennium, Oxford, 47–63.Google Scholar
Hinds, S. (1998). Allusion and Intertext: Dynamics of Appropriation in Roman Poetry, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Heubeck, A., and Hoekstra, A. (1989). A Commentary on Homer’s Odyssey, vol. 2, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hornblower, S. (1992) ‘The Religious Dimension to the Peloponnesian War or What Thucydides does not tell us’, HSCP 94: 169–97.Google Scholar
Hornblower, S. (2004). Thucydides and Pindar: Historical Narrative and the World of Epinician Poetry, Oxford.Google Scholar
Hornblower, S. (2007). ‘“Dolphins in the sea” (Isthmian 8.7): Pindar and the Aeginetans’, in Hornblower, S. and Morgan, C. (eds.), Pindar’s Poetry, Patrons, and Festivals, Oxford, 287–308.Google Scholar
Hornblower, S. (2009). ‘Greek lyric and the politics and sociologies of archaic and classical Greek communities’, in Budelmann, F. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Greek Lyric, Cambridge, 39–57.Google Scholar
Hubbard, T. K. (1994). ‘Elemental psychology and the date of Semonides of Amorgos’, AJPh 115: 175–97.Google Scholar
Hubbard, T. K. (2001). ‘“New Simonides” or old Semonides? Second thoughts on P.Oxy. 3965 fr. 26’, in Boedeker and Sider (2001), 226–31.Google Scholar
Hubbard, T. K. (2004). ‘The dissemination of epinician lyric: Pan-Hellenism, performance, written texts’, in Mackie, C. J. (ed.), Oral Performance and its Context, Mnemosyne Suppl. 248, Leiden, 71–93.Google Scholar
Hubbard, T. K. (2011). ‘The dissemination of Pindar’s non-epinician choral lyric’, in Athanassaki and Bowie (2011), 347–63.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. (2012). Plato and the Traditions of Ancient Literature: The Silent Stream, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. (2014). Hesiodic Voices: Studies in the Ancient Reception of Hesiod’s Works and Days, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. (in press). ‘“Clever about verses”? Plato and the Scopas-ode’, in Agócs, P. and Prauscello, L. (eds.), Proceedings of the Conference ‘Simonides Lyricus’, Cambridge, 2010.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, G. O. (2001). Greek Lyric Poetry: A Commentary on Selected Larger Pieces, Oxford.Google Scholar
Irigoin, J. (ed.) (1993). Bacchylide: Dithyrambes, épinicies, fragments, trans. J. Duchemin and L. Bardollet, Paris.Google Scholar
Jong, I. J. F. de (1987). Narrators and Focalisers: The Presentation of the Story in the Iliad, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Jong, I. J. F. de (1997). ‘Homer and narratology’, in Morris, I. and Powell, B. (eds.), A New Companion to Homer, Leiden, 305–25.Google Scholar
Jong, I. J. F. de (2006). ‘The Homeric narrator and his own kleos’, Mnemosyne 59: 188–207.Google Scholar
Jung, M. (2006). Marathon und Plataiai: Zwei Perserschlachten als ‘lieux de mémoire’ im antiken Griechenland, Göttingen.Google Scholar
Kanowski, M. G. (1984). Containers of Classical Greece: A Handbook of Shapes, St. Lucia, Queensland, Australia.Google Scholar
Kakridis, J. Th. (1971). ‘Ἀεὶ φιλέλλην ὁ ποιητής?’, in Kakridis (ed.), J. Th. Homer Revisited, Lund, 54–67.Google Scholar
Kearns, E. (1994). ‘Cakes in Greek sacrifice regulations’, in Hägg, R. (ed.), Ancient Greek Cult Practice from the Epigraphical Evidence, Stockholm, 65–70.Google Scholar
Kelly, A. (2015). ‘Stesichorus’ Homer’, in P. Finglass and A. Kelly (eds.), Stesichorus in Context, Cambridge, 21–44.Google Scholar
Kelly, T. (1970). ‘The traditional enmity between Argos and Sparta: The birth and development of a myth’, AHR 75: 971–1003.Google Scholar
Keyser, P. T. (1998). ‘Orreries, the Date of [Plato] Letter ii, and Eudoros of Alexandria’, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 80: 241–67.Google Scholar
King, B. (1999). ‘The rhetoric of the victim: Odysseus in the swineherd’s hut’, CA 18: 74–93.Google Scholar
Kirkwood, G. M. (1984). ‘Blame and envy in the Pindaric epinician’, in Gerber, D. E. (ed.), Greek Poetry and Philosophy: Studies in Honour of Leonard Woodbury, Chico, CA, 167–83.Google Scholar
Komornicka, A. M. (1972). ‘Quelques remarques sur la notion d’ ἀλάθεια et de ψεῦδος chez Pindare’, Eos 60: 235–53.Google Scholar
Kowerski, L. M. (2005). Simonides on the Persian Wars: A Study of the Elegiac Verses of the “New Simonides”, New York and London.Google Scholar
Kowerski, L. M. (2008). ‘A competition in praise: An allusion to Simon. fr. 11 in Theocr. Idyll 22.214–223’, Mnemosyne 61: 568–85.Google Scholar
Kraut, B. H. (2004). ‘The Princeton Simonides’, in Cowey, J. M. S. and Kramer, B. (eds.), Paramone: Editionen und Aufsätze von Mitgliedern des Heidelberger Instituts für Papyrologie zwischen 1982 und 2004, Archiv für Papyrusforschung und Verwandte Gebiete 16, Leipzig, 1–5.Google Scholar
Kurke, L. (1990). ‘Pindar’s Sixth Pythian and the tradition of advice poetry’, TAPA 120: 85–107.Google Scholar
Kurke, L. (1991). The Traffic in Praise: Pindar and the Poetics of Social Economy, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Kurke, L. (1999). Coins, Bodies, Games and Gold: The Politics of Meaning in Archaic Greece, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Kurke, L. (2005). ‘Choral lyric as “ritualization”: Poetic sacrifice and poetic ego in Pindar’s Sixth Paian’, CA 24: 81–130.Google Scholar
Kyriakou, P. (2004). ‘Κλέος and poetry in Simonides fr. 11 W2 and Theocritus, Id. 16’, Rh. Mus. 147: 221–46.Google Scholar
Lardinois, A. P. M. H. (2006). ‘Have we Solon’s Verses?’, in Blok, J. H. and Lardinois, A. P. M. H. (eds.), Solon of Athens: New Historical and Philological Approaches, Leiden, 15–35.Google Scholar
Lasserre, F. (1984). ‘La Fable en Grèce dans la poésie archaique’, in Adrados, F. R. (ed.), La Fable, Geneva, 61–96.Google Scholar
Ledger, G. R. (1989). Re-counting Plato: A Computer Analysis of Plato’s Style, Oxford.Google Scholar
Lehmler, C. (2005). Syrakus unter Agathokles und Hieron II: Die Verbindung von Kultur und Macht in einer hellenistischen Metropole, Frankfurt am Main.Google Scholar
Lewis, D. M. (1992). ‘Mainland Greece, 479–451 bc’, in Lewis, D., Boardman, J., Davies, J. K. and Ostwald, M. (eds.), The Cambridge Ancient History, Vol. V: The Fifth Century bc, 2nd edn (CAH2), Cambridge, 96–120.Google Scholar
Lloyd-Jones, H. (1958). Review of E. Lobel (1956), The Oxyrhynchus Papyri: Part XXIII, CR 8: 16–22.Google Scholar
Lloyd-Jones, H. (1961). Review of E. Lobel and E. G. Turner (1959), The Oxyrhynchus Papyri: Part XXV, CR 11: 17–21.Google Scholar
Lloyd-Jones, H. (1967). ‘Heracles at Eleusis: P.Oxy. 2622 and PSI 1391’, Maia 19: 206–29. [repr. in (1990) Greek Epic, Lyric and Tragedy: The Academic Papers of Sir Hugh Lloyd-Jones, Oxford, 167–87]Google Scholar
Lloyd-Jones, H. (1973). ‘Modern interpretation of Pindar: The Second Pythian and Seventh Nemean Odes’, JHS 93: 109–37. [repr. in (1990) Greek Epic, Lyric and Tragedy: The Academic Papers of Sir Hugh Lloyd-Jones, Oxford, 110–53]Google Scholar
Lobel, E. (1981). ‘Simonides’, in Papyri Greek and Egyptian, Edited by Various Hands, in Honour of E. G. Turner on the Occasion of his Seventieth Birthday, London, 21–3.Google Scholar
Luppe, W. (1993). ‘Zum neuesten Simonides: P.Oxy. 3965 Fr. 1/2327 Fr. 6’, ZPE 99: 1–9.Google Scholar
Maas, M., and Snyder, J. M. (1989). Stringed Instruments of Ancient Greece, New Haven, CT.Google Scholar
Maciver, C. A. (2007). ‘Returning to the mountain of Arete: Reading ecphrasis, constructing ethics in Quintus Smyrnaeus’ Posthomerica’, in Baumbach, M. and Bär, S. (eds.), Quintus Smyrnaeus: Transforming Homer in Second Sophistic Epic, Berlin, 259–84.Google Scholar
Maddoli, G., Nafissi, M., and Saladino, V. (1999). Pausania: Guida della Grecia: Libro VI (l’Elide e Olimpia), Milan.Google Scholar
Maehler, H. (1982). Die Lieder des Bakchylides, Erster Teil: Die Siegeslieder, Leiden.Google Scholar
Magnani, M. (2009). ‘P. Oxy. LIX 3965 fr. 1 r. 6 + XXII 2327 fr. 6 r. 10 (Sim. fr. 11, 14 W2 [= 3b, 10 G.-P.2])’, ZPE 168: 19–26.Google Scholar
Manuwald, B. (2010). ‘Ist Simonides Gedicht an Skopas (PMG 542) vollständig überliefert?’, Rh. Mus. 153: 1–24.Google Scholar
Marrou, H.-I. (1981). Histoire de l’éducation dans l’Antiquité, I: Le Monde grec, Paris. [orig. edn (1965)].Google Scholar
Martano, A. (2012). ‘Chamaeleon of Heraclea Pontica: The sources, text and translation’, in Martano, A., Matelli, E. and Mirhady, D. (eds.), Praxiphanes of Mytilene and Chamaeleon of Heraclea: Text, Translation, and Discussion, New Brunswick, 157–337.Google Scholar
Martin, R. (1984). ‘Hesiod, Odysseus, and the instruction of princes’, TAPhA 114: 29–48.Google Scholar
Martin, R. (1989). The Language of Heroes: Speech and Performance in the Iliad, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Martin, R. (1998). ‘The Seven Sages as performers of wisdom’, in Dougherty, C. and Kurke, L. (eds.), Cultural Poetics in Archaic Greece: Cult, Performance, Politics, Oxford, 108–28.Google Scholar
Martin, R. (2009). ‘Read on arrival’, in Hunter, R. and Rutherford, I. (eds.), Wandering Poets in Ancient Greek Culture: Travel, Locality and Pan-Hellenism, Cambridge, 80–104.Google Scholar
Massaro, D. (1991). ‘Plato e la παιδεία tirannica: Per una lettura dell’“Ipparco”’, Atene e Roma 36: 57–69.Google Scholar
Mayer, P. (2007). ‘Überlegungen zum Vortragskontext und zur Aussage der “Plataia-Elegie” des Simonides (Frr. 10–19 W2)’, Hermes 135: 373–88.Google Scholar
Meiggs, R., and Lewis, D. M. (1988). A Selection of Greek Historical Inscriptions to the End of the Fifth Century bc, 2nd edn, Oxford.Google Scholar
Meister, K. (1967). Die sizilische Geschichte bei Diodor von den Anfängen bis zum Tod des Agathokles: Quellenuntersuchungen zu Buch IV–XXI, Munich. [diss. Munich]Google Scholar
Merkelbach, R. (1952). ‘Bettelgedichte (Theokrit, Simonides und Walther von der Vogelweide)’, Rh. Mus. 95: 312–27.Google Scholar
Miller, M. C. (1997). Athens and Persia in the Fifth Century bc: A Study in Cultural Receptivity, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Morris, I. (1996). ‘The strong principle of equality and the archaic origins of Greek democracy’, in Ober, J. and Hendrick, C. (eds.), Demokratia: A Conversation on Democracies, Ancient and Modern, Princeton, NJ, 19–48.Google Scholar
Morrison, A. D. (2007). Performers and Audiences in Pindar’s Sicilian Victory Odes, BICS Suppl. 95, London.Google Scholar
Morrison, A. D. (2013). ‘Speaking from the Tomb? The disappearing epitaph of Simonides in Callimachus, Aetia fr. 64 Pf.’, in Liddel, P. and Low, P. (eds.), Inscriptions and their Uses in Greek and Latin Literature, Oxford, 289–301.Google Scholar
Most, G. W. (1985). The Measures of Praise: Structure and Function in Pindar’s Second Pythian and Seventh Nemean Odes, Göttingen.Google Scholar
Most, G. W. (1994). ‘Simonides’ Ode to Scopas in contexts’, in de Jong, I. J. F. and Sullivan, J. P. (eds.), Modern Critical Theory and Classical Literature, Leiden, 127–52.Google Scholar
Most, G. W. (1996). ‘Reflecting Sappho’, in Greene, E. (ed.), Re-Reading Sappho: Reception and Transmission, Berkeley, CA, 11–35.Google Scholar
Muellner, L. (1990). ‘The simile of the cranes and the Pygmies: A study of Homeric metaphor’, HSCP 93: 59–101.Google Scholar
Nafissi, M. (1991). La nascita del kosmos: Studi sulla storia e società di Sparta, Naples.Google Scholar
Nagy, G. (1990). Pindar’s Homer: The Lyric Possession of an Epic Past, Baltimore, MD and London.Google Scholar
Napolitano, M. (2012). I Kolakes di Eupoli: Introduzione, traduzione, commento, Mainz.Google Scholar
Nicholson, N. (2005). Aristocracy and Athletics in Archaic and Classical Greece, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Nilsson, M. P. (1906). Griechische Feste von religioser Bedeutung mit Ausschluss der Attischen, Leipzig.Google Scholar
Noussia, M. (2010). Solon the Athenian, the Poetic Fragments, Mnemosyne Suppl. 326, Leiden.Google Scholar
Obbink, D. (2001). ‘The genre of Plataea: Generic unity in the New Simonides’, in Boedeker and Sider (2001), 65–85.Google Scholar
Page, D. L. (1936). ‘The elegiacs in Euripides’ Andromache’, in Bailey, C. (ed.), Greek Poetry and Life: Essays Presented to Gilbert Murray on His Seventieth Birthday, Oxford, 206–30.Google Scholar
Page, D. L. (1971). ‘Poetry and prose: Simonides, P.M.G. 531, Ibycus 298’, CR 21: 317–18.Google Scholar
Parsons, P. J. (1992a). ‘3965. Simonides, Elegies’, in The Oxyrhynchus Papyri, Vol. LIX, Graeco-Roman Memoirs of the Egypt Exploration Society 79, London, 4–50.Google Scholar
Parsons, P. J. (1992b). ‘Poesia ellenistica: testi e contesti’, Aevum Antiquum 5: 9–19.Google Scholar
Parsons, P. J. (2001). ‘These fragments we have shored against our ruin’, in Boedeker and Sider (2001), 55–64.Google Scholar
Pavlou, M. (2008). ‘Metapoetics, Poetic Tradition, and Praise in Pindar Olympian 9’, Mnemosyne 61: 533–67.Google Scholar
Pelliccia, H. N. (2002). ‘The Interpretation of Iliad 6.145–9 and the Sympotic Contribution to Rhetoric’, Colby Review 38: 197–230 (http://digitalcommons.colby.edu/cq/vol38/iss2/8/).Google Scholar
Pelliccia, H. N. (2009). ‘Simonides, Pindar and Bacchylides’, in Budelmann, F. (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Greek Lyric, Cambridge, 240–62.Google Scholar
Pellizer, E. (1981). ‘Simonide κίμβιξ e un nuovo trimetro di Semonide Amorgino’, QUCC 38: 47–51.Google Scholar
Perrotta, G., Gentili, B., and Catenacci, C. (2007). Polinnia: Poesia greca arcaica, 3rd edn, Messina.Google Scholar
Pfeiffer, R. (1968). A History of Classical Scholarship from the Beginnings to the End of the Hellenistic Age, Oxford.Google Scholar
Pfeijffer, I. (1999). Three Aeginetan Odes of Pindar: A Commentary on Nemean V, Nemean III, & Pythian VIII, Leiden.Google Scholar
Pfeijffer, I. (2000). First Person Futures in Pindar, Hermes, Einzelschrift 81, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Poliakoff, M. (1982). Studies in the Terminology of the Greek Combat Sports, Königstein.Google Scholar
Poltera, O. (1998). ‘Von Seleukos zu Simonides und zurück: Simon. PMG 540’, MH 55: 129–30.Google Scholar
Poltera, O. (2005). ‘Deliaka (Simon. PMG 539): Zu einer vermeintlichen Gedichtsammlung’, SIFC 3: 183–7.Google Scholar
Prauscello, L. (2012). ‘Epinician sounds: Pindar and musical innovation’, in Agócs, Carey and Rawles (2012a), 58–82.Google Scholar
Puelma, M. (1996). ‘Ἐπίγραμμα – epigramma: Aspekte einer Wortgeschichte’, MH 53: 123–39.Google Scholar
Purcell, N. (1995). ‘Eating fish: The paradoxes of seafood’, in Wilkins, J., Harvey, D. and Dobson, M. (eds.), Food in Antiquity, Exeter: 132–49.Google Scholar
Rawles, R. (2008a). ‘Simonides fr. 11.14 W: “Close-fighting Danaans”’, Mnemosyne 61: 459–66.Google Scholar
Rawles, R. (2011a). ‘Eros and praise in early Greek lyric’, in Athanassaki and Bowie (2011), 39–59.Google Scholar
Rawles, R. (2012). ‘Early epinician: Ibycus and Simonides’, in Agócs, Carey and Rawles (2012a), 3–27.Google Scholar
Rawles, R. (2013). ‘Aristophanes’ Simonides: Lyric models for praise and blame’, in Bakola, E., Prauscello, L. and Telò, M. (eds.), Greek Comedy and the Discourse of Genres. Cambridge, 175–201.Google Scholar
Rawles, R. (2015). ‘Lysimeleia (Thucydides 7.53, Theocritus 16.84): What Thucydides does not tell us about the Sicilian expedition’, JHS 135: 132–46.Google Scholar
Rawles, R. (in press). ‘Simonides on tombs and the “Tomb of Simonides”’, in Goldschmidt, N. and Graziosi, B. (eds.), Tombs of the Ancient Poets: Between Text and Material Culture, Durham.Google Scholar
Reinhardt, K. (1997). ‘The judgement of Paris’, in Jones, P. V. and Wright, G. M., Homer: German Scholarship in Translation, Oxford, 170–91. [Ger. orig. Reinhardt, K. (1960), ‘Der Parisurteil’, in Tradition und Geist, Göttingen, 16–36; 1st edn Frankfurt, 1938]Google Scholar
Richardson, N. J. (1975). ‘Homeric professors in the age of the sophists’, PCPS 21: 65–81.Google Scholar
Rissman, L. (1983). Love as War: Homeric Allusion in the Poetry of Sappho, Königstein.Google Scholar
Ross, S. A. (2005). ‘Barbarophonos: Language and panhellenism in the Iliad’, CP 100: 299–316.Google Scholar
Rutherford, I. C. (1997). ‘For the Aeginetans to Aiakos a Prosodion: An unnoticed title at Pindar Paean 6, 123, and its significance for the poem’, ZPE 118: 1–21.Google Scholar
Rutherford, I. C. (2001a). ‘The New Simonides: Towards a commentary’, in Boedeker and Sider (2001), 33–54.Google Scholar
Rutherford, I. C. (2001b). Pindar’s Paeans: A Reading of the Fragments with A Survey of the Genre, Oxford.Google Scholar
Rutherford, I. C. (2012). ‘On the impossibility of Centaurs: The reception of Pindar in the Roman empire’, in Agócs, Carey and Rawles (2012b), 93–104.Google Scholar
Sbardella, L. (2000). ‘Achille e gli eroi di Platea: Simonide, frr. 10–11 W2’, ZPE 129: 1–11.Google Scholar
Sbardella, L. (2004). ‘Teocrito pindarico. Il κέρδος, la fama e la poesia omerica in Nemea 7.17–31 e nell’ Idillio XVI’, Sem. Rom. 7: 65–83.Google Scholar
Schachter, A. (1998). ‘Simonides’ Elegy on Plataea: The occasion of its performance’, ZPE 123: 25–30.Google Scholar
Schmidt, M. (1854). Didymi Chalcenteri grammatici Alexandrini quae supersunt omnia, Leipzig.Google Scholar
Schorn, S. (2012). ‘Chamaeleon: Biography and literature: Peri tou deina’, in Martano, A., Matelli, E. and Mirhady, D. (eds.), Praxiphanes of Mytilene and Chamaeleon of Heraclea: Text, translation, and discussion, New Brunswick, 411–44.Google Scholar
Shaw, P.-J. (2001). ‘Lords of Hellas, old men of the sea: The occasion of Simonides’ elegy on Plataea’, in Boedeker and Sider (2001), 164–81.Google Scholar
Sider, D. (2001). ‘“As is the generation of leaves” in Homer, Simonides, Horace and Stobaeus’, in Boedeker and Sider (2001), 272–88.Google Scholar
Sider, D. (2004). ‘Posidippus old and new’, in Acosta-Hughes, B., Kosmetatou, E. and Baumbach, M. (eds.), Labored in Papyrus Leaves: Perspectives on an Epigram Collection Attributed to Posidippus (P. Mil. Vogl. VIII 309), Washington, DC, 29–41.Google Scholar
Sider, D. (2007). ‘Sylloge Simonidea’, in Bing, P. and Bruss, J. S. (eds.), The Brill Companion to Hellenistic Epigram, Leiden, 113–30.Google Scholar
Sommerstein, A. (2005). ‘A lover of his art: The art-form as wife and mistress in Greek poetic imagery’, in Stafford, E. and Herrin, J. (eds.), Personification in the Greek World: From Antiquity to Byzantium, Aldershot, 161–71.Google Scholar
Stehle, E. (2001). ‘A bard of the Iron Age and his auxiliary Muse’, in Boedeker and Sider (2001), 106–19.Google Scholar
Struck, P. T. (2004). Birth of the Symbol: Ancient Readers at the Limits of Their Texts, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Struve, V. V. et al. (1965). Korpus bosporskikh nadpiseĭ = Corpus inscriptionum Regni Bosporani, Moscow. Texts also at http://epigraphy.packhum.org/inscriptions/ (consulted August 2013).Google Scholar
Svenbro, J. (1976). La Parole et le marbre: aux origines de la poétique grecque, Lund.Google Scholar
Svenbro, J. (1993). Phrasikleia: An Anthropology of Reading in Ancient Greece, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Svensson, L., and Grant, P. J. (1999). Collins Bird Guide, illustrated by Mullarney, K. and Zetterström, D., London.Google Scholar
Swain, S. C. R. (1988). ‘A note on Iliad 9.524–99: The story of Meleager’, CQ 38: 271–6.Google Scholar
Thiel, R. (2011). ‘Ein Staatsfeind als Held? Simonides’ Plataiai-Elegie im politischen Kontext des griechischen Sieges über das Perserreich’, APF 57.2: 381–91.Google Scholar
Valk, M. van der (1953). ‘Homer’s nationalistic attitude’, L’Antiquité Classique 22: 5–26.Google Scholar
Verdenius, W. J. (1982). ‘Pindar’s Second Isthmian Ode: A commentary’, Mnemosyne 35: 1–37.Google Scholar
Verdenius, W. J. (1988). Commentaries on Pindar, Vol. 2, Mnemosyne Suppl. 101, Leiden.Google Scholar
Vetta, M. (1984). Review of B. Gentili, ‘Poesia e pubblico nella Grecia antica da Omero al v secolo’, RIFC 112: 341–7.Google Scholar
Vian, F. (ed. and trans.) (1966). Quintus de Smryne: La Suite d’ Homère, Tome II, Livres V–IX, Paris.Google Scholar
Vox, O. (2002). ‘ἀγαθὸν κλέος: poeta e committente nelle Cariti (Theocr. 16)’, Kleos 7: 193–209.Google Scholar
West, M. L. (2001). Studies in the Text and Transmission of the Iliad, Munich and Leipzig.Google Scholar
West, M. L. (2003a). Greek Epic Fragments from the Seventh to the Fifth Centuries bc, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
West, M. L. (2011). The Making of the Iliad: Disquisition and Analytical Commentary, Oxford.Google Scholar
White, H. (1981). ‘Four textual and interpretative problems in Theocritus’ Idyll XVI’, in Giangrande, G. (ed.), Corolla Londiniensis, London Studies in Classical Philology 8, Amsterdam, 137–47.Google Scholar
Wilamowitz-Moellendorff, U. von. (1900). Die Textgeschichte der griechischen Lyriker, Berlin.Google Scholar
Wilamowitz-Moellendorff, U. von. (1913). Sappho und Simonides: Untersuchungen über griechische Lyriker, Berlin.Google Scholar
Wilhelm, A (1972). ‘Simonideische Gedichte’, in Pfohl, G. (ed.), Die griechische Elegie. Darmstadt, 290–322. [= Jahreshefte des Österreichischen Archäologischen Instituts Wien (1899) 2: 221–44]Google Scholar
Wilkinson, C. L. (2013). The Lyric of Ibycus: Introduction, Text and Commentary, Berlin.Google Scholar
Willcock, M. M. (1976). A Companion to the Iliad, Based on the Translation by Richmond Lattimore, Chicago.Google Scholar
Willcock, M. M. (1995). Pindar: Victory Odes. Olympians 2, 7 and 11; Nemean 4; Isthmians 3, 4 and 7, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Willett, S. J. (2000). Review of Carson 1999, BMCR 2000.02.28 (http://ccat.sas.upenn.edu/bmcr/2000/2000-02-28.html).Google Scholar
Winkler, J. (1996). ‘Gardens of nymphs: Public and private in Sappho’s lyrics’, in Greene, E. (ed.), Reading Sappho: Contemporary Approaches, Berkeley, CA, 89–109.Google Scholar