Agha, A. (2011) ‘Meet mediatisation’, Language & Communication 31 (3), pp. 163–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Albawardi, A. (2016) ‘Digital literacy practices of Saudi university students’. Conference on Social Media in the Arab World, University of Reading, 3 June.Google Scholar

Androutsopoulos, J. (2010) ‘Localising the global on the participatory web’, in Coupland, N. (ed.) Handbook of language and globalization. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 203–231.Google Scholar

Androutsopoulos, J. (2011) ‘From variation to heteroglossia in the study of computer mediated discourse’, in Thurlow, C. and Mroczek, K. (eds) Digital discourse: Language in the new media. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 277–298.Google Scholar

Annunziato, S. (2011) ‘The Amanda Knox case: The representation of Italy in American media coverage’, Historical Journal of Film, Radio and Television 31 (1), pp. 61–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anthony, L. (2014) AntConc (3.4.4) [Computer Software]. Tokyo: Waseda University. Available at: www.laurenceanthony.net (accessed 27 March 2017).Google Scholar

Antony, M. G. and Thomas, R. J. (2010) ‘“This is citizen journalism at its finest”: YouTube and the public sphere in the Oscar Grant shooting incident’, New Media & Society 12 (8), pp. 1280–1296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baker, P. (2004) ‘Querying keywords: questions of difference, frequency and sense in keywords analysis’, Journal of English Linguistics 32 (4), pp. 346–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baker, P. and Egbert, J. (eds) (2016) Triangulating methodological approaches in corpus linguistic research. London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baker, P., Gabrielatos, C., Khosravinik, M., Kryzanowski, M., McEnery, A. M. and Wodak, R. (2008) ‘A useful methodological synergy? Combining critical discourse analysis and corpus linguistics to examine discourses of refugees and asylum seekers in the UK press’, Discourse and Society 19 (3), pp. 273–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baker, P., Gabrielatos, C. and McEnery, T. (2013) Discourse analysis and media attitudes: The representation of Islam in the British press. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bakhtin, M. (1984) Rabelais and his world [1965]. Translated by Iswolsky, H. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Bamberg, M. and Georgakopoulou, A. (2008) ‘Small stories as a new perspective in narrative and identity analysis’, Text & Talk 28 (3), pp. 377–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baron, N. S. and Ling, R. (2011) ‘Necessary smileys and useless periods’, Visible Language 45 (1), pp. 45–67.Google Scholar

Bauman, R. and Briggs, C. (1990) ‘Poetics and performances as critical perspectives on language and social life’, Annual Review of Anthropology 191 (1), pp. 59–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bednarek, M. and Caple, H. (2012) ‘“Value added”: Language, image and news values’, Discourse, Context & Media 1, pp. 103–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bednarek, M. and Caple, H. (2014) ‘Why do news values matter? Towards a new methodological framework for analyzing news discourse in Critical Discourse Analysis and beyond’, Discourse & Society 25 (2), pp. 135–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bednarek, M. and Caple, H. (2017) The discourse of news values: How news organizations create ‘newsworthiness’. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bell, A. (1991) The language of news media. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Biber, D., Egbert, J. and Davies, M. (2015) ‘Exploring the composition of the searchable Web: A corpus-based taxonomy of web registers’, Corpora 10 (1), pp. 11–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blackledge, A., Creese, A. and Hu, R. (2016) ‘The structure of everyday narrative in a city market: An ethnopoetics approach’, Journal of Sociolinguistics 20 (5), pp. 654–676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blitvich, P. G. C., Bou-Franch, P. and Lorenzo-Dus, N. (2013) ‘Identity and impoliteness: The expert in the talent show Idol’, Journal of Politeness Research 9 (1), pp. 97–121.Google Scholar

Blommaert, J., Arnaut, K., Rampton, B. and Spotti, M. (2016) Language and superdiversity. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Bober, M. (2014) ‘Twitter and TV events: An exploration of how to use social media for student-led research’, ASLIB Journal for Information Management 66 (3), pp. 297–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bogaerts, J. and Carpentier, N. (2012) ‘The postmodern challenge to journalism: Strategies for constructing a trustworthy identity’, in Peters, C. and Broersma, M. (eds) Rethinking journalism: trust and participation in a transformed news landscape. London: Routledge, pp. 60–71.Google Scholar

Bolander, B. (2012) ‘Disagreements and agreements in personal/diary blogs: A closer look at responsiveness’, Journal of Pragmatics 44, pp. 1607–1622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bolander, B. and Locher, M. (2014) ‘Doing sociolinguistic research on computer-mediated data: A review of four methodological issues’, Discourse, Context & Media 3, pp. 14–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bondi, M. and Scott, M. (2010) Keyness in texts. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Bou Franch, P. and Blitvich, P. G. C. (2012) ‘Conflict management in massive polylogues: A case study from YouTube’, Journal of Pragmatics 73, pp. 19–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boyd, D. (2014) It's complicated: The social lives of networked teens. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Boyd, D., Golder, S. and Lotan, G. (2010) ‘Tweet, tweet, retweet: Conversational aspects of retweeting on Twitter’, 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), 5–8 January. Available at: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5428313/ (accessed 27 March 2017).Google Scholar

British Association for Applied Linguistics (2016) ‘Recommendations on good practice in applied linguistics’. Available at: https://baalweb.files.wordpress.com/2017/08/goodpractice_stud.pdf (accessed 5 September 2017).Google Scholar

Brown, P. and Levinson, S. (1987) Politeness: Some universals in language use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brubaker, J. and Hayes, G. (2011) ‘“We will never forget you [online]”: An empirical investigation of post-mortem MySpace comments’, CSCW 2011, March 19–23, Hangzhou, China.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bruner, J. (1986) ‘Two modes of thought’, in Actual Minds, Possible Worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 11–43.Google Scholar

Bruner, J. (1991) ‘The narrative construction of reality’, Critical Inquiry 18, pp. 1–21.Google Scholar

Bruns, A (2008) Blogs, Wikipedia, Second Life and beyond: From production to produsage. Berlin: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Bruns, A. and Highfield, T. (2013) ‘Political networks on Twitter’, Information, Communication and Society 16 (5), pp. 667–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brunton, F. (2012) ‘Constitutive interference: Spam and online communities’, Representations 117 (1), pp. 30–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burgess, J. and Green, J. (2009) YouTube: Online video and participatory culture. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Bury, R., Deller, R., Greenwood, A. and Jones, B. (2013) ‘From Usenet to Tumblr: The changing role of social media’, Participations 10 (1), pp. 299–319.Google Scholar

Buschow, C., Schneider, B. and Ueberheide, S. (2014) ‘Tweeting television: Exploring communication activities on Twitter while watching TV’, Communications 39 (2), pp. 129–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Caldas-Coulthard, C. (1992) ‘Reporting speech in narrative discourse: Stylistic and ideological implications’, Ilha do Desterro 27, pp. 67–82.Google Scholar

Caple, H. (2010) ‘Doubling-up: allusion and bonding in multi-semiotic news stories’, in Bednarek, M. and Martin, J. R. (eds) New discourse on language: Functional perspectives on multimodality, identity, and affiliation. London and New York: Continuum, pp. 111–133.Google Scholar

Caple, H. (2013) Photojournalism: A social semiotic approach. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Caple, H. (2017) ‘Results, resolve, reaction: Words, images and the functional structure of online match reports’, in Caldwell, D., Walsh, J., Vine, E. W. and Jureidini, J. (eds) The discourse of sport: Analyses from social linguistics. London and New York: Routledge, 209–227.Google Scholar

Chess, S. and Newsom, E. (2015) Folklore, horror stories and The Slender Man: The development of an internet mythology. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chibba, S. (2014) A media guide to the Oscar Pistorius trial. Available at: www.mediaclubsouthafrica.com/land-and-people/3727-a-multimedia-guide-to-the-oscar-pistorius-trial (accessed 17 March 2017).Google Scholar

Clark, K. (1992) ‘The linguistics of blame: Representations of women in The Sun's reporting of crimes of sexual violence’, in Toolan, M. (ed.) Language, text and context. London: Routledge, pp. 208–224.Google Scholar

Clifford, K. (2014) ‘Amanda Knox: A picture of innocence’, Celebrity Studies 5 (4), pp. 504–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Conboy, M. (2006) Tabloid Britain: Constructing a community through language. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Cotter, C. (2010) News talk: Investigating the language of journalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coupland, J. (2000) Small talk. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar

Culpeper, J. (2011) Impoliteness: Using language to cause offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davies, B. and Harré, R. (1990) ‘Positioning: The discursive construction of selves’, Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 20, pp. 43–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dawson, G. (2012) ‘Paleontology in parts: Richard Owen, William John Broderip and the serialization of science in early Victorian Britain’, Isis 103, pp. 637–667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dayter, D. (2015) ‘Small stories and extended narratives on Twitter’, Discourse, Context & Media 5, pp. 19–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

De Beaugrande, R. and Dressler, W. (1981) Introduction to text linguistics. London: Longman.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

De Fina, A. (2003) Identity in narrative: A study in immigrant discourse. Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

De Fina, A. and Georgakopoulou, A. (2012) Analyzing narrative: Discourse and sociolinguistic perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

De Robillard, B. (2014) ‘“Our Caster” and “The Blade Runner”: “Improper” corporealities cripqueering the post/apartheid body politic’, Image & Text 24, pp. 79–115.Google Scholar

Deery, J. (2014) ‘Mapping commercialization in reality television’, in Oullette, L. (ed.) A companion to reality television. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 11–28.Google Scholar

Deller, R. (2011) ‘Twittering on: Audience research and participation using Twitter’, Participations 8 (1). Available at: www.participations.org/volume%208/issue%201/deller.htm (accessed 27 March 2017).Google Scholar

Deumert, A. (2014) Sociolinguistics and mobile communication. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Doughty, M., Rowland, D. and Lawson, S. (2012) ‘Who is on your Sofa? TV audience communities and second screening social networks’, Proceedings of the 10th European Conference on Interactive TV and Video, Berlin, Germany, 4–6 July, 2012, pp. 79–86. Available at: http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2325635 (accessed 27 March 2017).Google Scholar

Draucker, F. and Collister, L. B. (2015) ‘Managing participation through modal affordances on Twitter’, Open Library of Humanities 1 (1). Available at: https://olh.openlibhums.org/articles/10.16995/olh.21/ (accessed 27 March 2017).Google Scholar

Du Bois, J. W. (2007) ‘The stance triangle’, in Englebretson, R. (ed.) Stancetaking in discourse: Subjectivity, evaluation, interaction. Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, pp. 139–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Duranti, A. and Goodwin, C. (1992) Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Duszak, A. (ed.) (2002) Us and others. Social identities across languages, discourses and cultures. Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dynel, M. (2009) ‘Beyond a joke: Types of conversational humour’, Language and Linguistics Compass 3 (5), pp. 1284–1299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eelen, G. (2001) A critique of politeness theory. Manchester: St Jerome Publishing.Google Scholar

Ekström, M. (2000) ‘Information, storytelling and attractions: TV journalism in three modes of communication’, Media, Culture and Society 22, pp. 465–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Evans, A. (2016) ‘Stance and identity in Twitter hashtags’, Language@Internet 13 (1). Available at: www.languageatinternet.org/articles/2016/evans (accessed 27 March 2017).Google Scholar

Facebook Helpdesk (2016) What names are allowed on Facebook. Available at: www.facebook.com/help/112146705538576 (accessed 27 March 2017).Google Scholar

Fairclough, N. (1989) Language and power. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Firer-Blaess, S. and Fuchs, C. (2014) ‘Wikipedia: An info-communist manifesto’, Television and New Media 15 (2), pp. 87–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fiske, J. (1987) Television culture. London: Methuen.Google Scholar

Fiske, J. (1992) ‘Audiencing: A cultural studies approach to watching television’, Poetics 21 (4), pp. 345–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fitzgerald, R. and Rintel, S. (2013) ‘From lifeguard to bitch: How a story character becomes a promiscuous category in a couple's video call’, Australian Journal of Communication 40 (2), pp. 101–118.Google Scholar

Forceville, C. and Clark, B. (2014) ‘Can pictures have explicatures?’, Linguagem Em Discurso 14 (3), pp. 1–21.Google Scholar

Forman, A., Kern, R. and Gil-Egui, G. (2012) ‘Death and mourning as sources of community participation in online social networks: RIP pages in Facebook’, First Monday 17 (9). Available at: http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/3935/3288 (accessed 27 March 2017).Google Scholar

Fowler, R. (1991) Language in the news. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Gee, J. (2004) Situated language and learning: A critique of traditional schooling. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Genette, G. (1980) Narrative discourse: An essay in method. Translated by Lewin, J. E. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Georgakopoulou, A. (2005) ‘“Same old story?” On the interactional dynamics of shared narratives’, in Quasthoff, U. and Becker, T. (eds) Narrative interaction. Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, pp. 223–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Georgakopoulou, A. (2007) Small stories, interaction and identities. Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Georgakopoulou, A. (2008) ‘“On MSN with buff boys”: Self- and other- identity claims in the context of small stories’, Journal of Sociolinguistics 15, pp. 597–626.Google Scholar

Georgakopoulou, A. (2013a) ‘Small stories research and social media: The role of narrative stance-taking in the circulation of a Greek news story’. Working Papers in Urban Language and Literacies, Paper 100.Google Scholar

Georgakopoulou, A. (2013b) ‘Small stories and identities analysis as a framework for the study of im/politeness-in-interaction’, Journal of Politeness Research 9 (1), pp. 55–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Georgakopoulou, A. (2014) ‘Small stories, transposition and social media: A micro-perspective on the Greek crisis’, Discourse & Society 25 (4), pp. 519–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Georgakopoulou, A. (2015) ‘Sharing as rescripting: Place manipulations on YouTube, between narrative and social media affordances’, Discourse, Context & Media 9, pp. 64–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Georgakopoulou, A. (2016) ‘From narrating the self to posting self(ies): A small stories approach to selfies’, Open Linguistics 2(1), pp. 300–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Giaxoglou, K. (2015a) ‘Entextualising mourning on Facebook: stories of grief as acts of sharing’, New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia 21(1–2) pp. 87–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Giaxoglou, K. (2015b) ‘#JesuisCharlie: Narrative stance-taking in shared stories of global mourning’. The 6th International Language in the Media Conference, Hamburg, 7–9 September 2015.Google Scholar

Gibson, J. (1977) ‘The theory of affordances’, in Shaw, R. and Bransford, J. (eds) Perceiving, acting, and knowing. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 67–82.Google Scholar

Goddard, M., Halligan, B. and Hegarty, P. (2012) Reverberations: The philosophy, aesthetics and politics of noise. London and New York: Continuum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goffman, E. (1974) Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar

Goffman, E. (1981) Forms of talk. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar

Goode, L. (2009) ‘Social news, citizen journalism and democracy’, New Media & Society 11 (8), pp. 1287–1305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goode, L., McCollough, A. and O'Hare, G. (2011) ‘Unruly publics and the fourth estate on YouTube’, Participations 8 (2), pp. 594–615.Google Scholar

Goodson, M. and Kwasny, R. (2016) ‘Apparently false news attracts widespread coverage in UK newspapers’. Available at: https://evolution.ai/jo-cox-twitter (accessed 14 December 2016).Google Scholar

Gray, J. (2005) ‘Antifandom and the moral text: Television without pity and textual dislike’, American Behavioral Scientist 48 (7), pp. 840–858.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grice, H. P. (1975) ‘Logic and conversation’, in Cole, P. and Morgan, J. L. (eds) Syntax and semantics, Volume 3: Speech Acts. New York: Academic Press, pp. 41–58.Google Scholar

Grishakova, M. and Ryan, M. L. (eds) (2010) Intermediality and storytelling. Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gumperz, J. (1982) Discourse strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Günther, S. (2005) ‘Narrative reconstructions of past experiences: Adjustments and modifications in the process of recontextualizing a past experience’, in Quasthoff, U. and Becker, T. (eds) Narrative interaction. Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, pp. 285–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K. (1994) An introduction to functional grammar, 2nd edition. London and New York: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar

Hardaker, C. (2013) ‘“Uh…..not to be nitpicky,,,,,but…the past tense of drag is dragged, not drug.”: An overview of trolling strategies’, Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 1 (1), pp. 57–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hardaker, C. (2015) ‘“I refuse to respond to this obvious troll”: An overview of responses to (perceived) trolling’, Corpora 10 (2), pp. 201–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hardaker, C. and McGlashan, M. (2016) ‘“Real men don't hate women”: Twitter rape threats and group identity’, Journal of Pragmatics 91, pp. 80–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harman, S. and Jones, B. (2013) ‘Fifty shades of ghey: Snark fandom and the figure of the anti-fan’, Sexualities 16 (8), pp. 951–968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harrington, S. (2013) ‘Tweeting about the telly: Live TV, audiences and social media’, in Weller, K., Bruns, A., Mahrt, M., Puschmann, C. and Jean Burgess, J. (eds) Twitter and society. Berlin: Peter Lang, pp. 276–248.Google Scholar

Harvey, C. (2015) ‘What's disability got to do with it? Changing constructions of Oscar Pistorius before and after the Death of Reeva Steenkamp’, Disability & Society 30 (2), pp. 299–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haugh, M. (2015) Im/politeness implicatures. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Herman, D. (1997) ‘Scripts, sequences and stories: Elements of a postclassical narratology’, Publications of the Modern Language Association 112 (5), pp. 1046–1059.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Herman, D. (2002) Story logic: Problems and possibilities of narrative. Lincoln, NE and London: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar

Herman, D. (2004) ‘Toward a transmedial narratology’, in Ryan, M. L. (ed.) Narrative across media: The languages of storytelling. Lincoln, NE and London: University of Nebraska Press, pp. 47–75.Google Scholar

Herman, L. and Vervaeck, B. (2005) Handbook of narrative analysis. Lincoln, NE and London: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar

Herring, S. (1994) ‘Politeness in computer culture: Why women thank and men flame’, in Bucholtz, M. (ed.) Cultural performances: Proceedings of the Third Berkeley Women and Language Conference. Berkeley, CA: Women and Language Group, pp. 278–294.Google Scholar

Herring, S. (2007) ‘A faceted classification scheme for computer-mediated discourse’, Language@Internet 4. Available at: www.languageatInternet.org/articles/2007/761 (accessed 27 March 2017).Google Scholar

Herring, S. (2013) ‘Discourse in web 2.0: Familiar, reconfigured, and emergent’. In Tannen, D. (ed.) Georgetown University Round Table on Language and Linguistics 2011: discourse 2.0: language and new media. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, pp. 1–25.Google Scholar

Herring, S. and Dainas, A. R. (2017) ‘“Nice picture comment!” Graphicons in Facebook comment threads’. Proceedings of the Fiftieth Hawai'I International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-50). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE. Available at: http://ella.slis.indiana.edu/~herring/hicss.graphicons.pdf (accessed 10 March 2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hicks, M. (2010) ‘Connecting to everything you care about’. Notes by Facebook, 19 April 2010. Available at: www.facebook.com/notes/facebook/connecting-to-everything-you-care-about/382978412130 (accessed 30 January 2017).Google Scholar

Highfield, T., Harrington, S. and Bruns, A. (2013) ‘Twitter as a technology of audiencing and fandom’, Information, Communication and Society 16 (3), pp. 315–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hoey, M. (2001) Textual interaction: An introduction to written discourse. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Hoffmann, C. R. (ed.) (2010) Telling a story in the age of new media. Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Hogan, P. (2014) ‘Intertextuality and allusion’, in Stockwell, P. and Whiteley, S. (eds) The Cambridge handbook of stylistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 117–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Huddleston, J. T. (2016) ‘Nielsen is adding Facebook to its social TV ratings’. Available at: http://fortune.com/2016/01/20/nielsen-facebook-social-tv (accessed 8 September 2015).Google Scholar

Hutchby, I. (1996) Confrontation talk: Arguments, asymmetries and power on talk radio. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Hutcheon, L. (2006) A theory of adaptation. London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jefferson, G. (2004) ‘A note on laughter in “male-female” interaction’, Discourse Studies 6 (1), pp. 117–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jenkins, H. (2006) Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar

John, N. (2013) ‘Sharing and Web 2.0: The emergence of a keyword’, New Media & Society 15 (2), pp. 167–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jones, R. (2005) ‘Sites of engagement as sites of attention: Time, space and culture in electronic discourse’, in Norris, S. and Jones, R. (eds) Discourses in action: Introducing mediated discourse analysis. New York: Routledge, pp. 141–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jones, R. (2012) Discourse and creativity. London and New York: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar

Jones, R. and Hafner, C. (2012) Understanding digital literacies: A practical introduction. London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Keating, P. (2013) ‘Narrative dynamics in the competitive reality show’, Storyworlds: A Journal of Narrative Studies 5, pp. 55–75.Google Scholar

Kellner, D. (2009) ‘Media spectacle and the 2008 Presidential election’, Cultural Studies – Critical Methodologies 9 (6), pp. 707–716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kern, R., Forman, A. E. and Gil-Egui, G. (2013) ‘R.I.P.: Remain in perpetuity: Facebook memorial pages’, Telematics and Informatics 30 (1), pp. 2–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Klink, M. (2010) Laugh out loud in real life: Women's humor and fan identity. Unpublished Master of Science in Comparative Media Studies Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar

Koller, V. (2012) ‘How to analyse collective identity in discourse: Textual and contextual parameters’, Critical approaches to discourse analysis across disciplines 5 (2), pp. 19–38.Google Scholar

Kress, G. and van Leeuwen, T. (1996) Reading images. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Labov, W. (1972) Language in the inner city: Studies in the Black English Vernacular. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar

Labov, W. (2013) The language of life and death: The transformation of experience in oral narrative. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Labov, W. and Waletzky, J. (1967) ‘Narrative analysis: oral versions of personal experience’, in Helm, J. (ed.) Essays on the verbal and visual arts: Proceedings of the 1966 annual spring meeting of the American Ethnological Society. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press, pp. 12–44.Google Scholar

Lambrou, M. (2014) ‘Narrative, text and time: Telling the same story twice in the oral narrative reporting of 7/7’, Language and Literature 23 (1), pp. 32–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Langlotz, A. and Locher, M. (2012) ‘Ways of communicating stance in online disagreements’, Journal of Pragmatics 44 (12), pp. 1591–1606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Larsson, A. O. and Moe, H. (2011) ‘Studying political microblogging: Twitter users in the 2010 Swedish election campaign’, New Media & Society 14 (5), pp. 729–47.Google Scholar

Lee, C. K. (2007) ‘Affordances and text-making practices in online instant messaging’, Written Communication 24 (3), pp. 223–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leitch, T. (2008) ‘Adaptation studies at a crossroads’, Adaptation 1 (1), pp. 63–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Liddle, R. (2011) ‘What does it take to save a she-devil? Good PR’, Spectator 8. Available at: www.spectator.co.uk/2011/10/what-does-it-take-to-save-a-shedevil-good-pr/ (accessed 13 March 2017).Google Scholar

Linde, C. (1993) Life stories: The creation of coherence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lindgren, S. (2012) ‘“It took me about half an hour, but I did it!”: Media circuits and affinity spaces around how-to videos on YouTube’, European Journal of Communication 27(2), pp. 152–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Locher, M. and Watts, R. (2005) ‘Politeness theory and relational work’, Journal of Politeness Research 1 (1): 9–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Locher, M. and Watts, R. (2008) ‘Relational work and impoliteness: Negotiating norms of linguistic behaviour’, in Bousfield, D. and Locher, M. (eds) Impoliteness in language: Studies on its interplay with power in theory and practice. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 77–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Loveland, J. and Reagle, J. (2013) ‘Wikipedia and encyclopedic production’, New Media & Society 15 (8), pp. 1294–1311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lyotard, J. F. (1984) The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge [1979]. Translated by Bennington, G. and Massumi, B. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar

Maagaard, C. (2014) ‘Employee testimonials: Animating corporate messages through employees’ stories’, Discourse, Context & Media 6, pp. 22–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Machin, D. (2004) ‘Building the world's visual language: the increasing global importance of image banks in corporate media’, Visual Communication 3 (3), pp. 316–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Machin, D. and Mayr, A. (2012) How to do Critical Discourse Analysis: A multimodal introduction. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Machin, D. and Mayr, A. (2013) ‘Personalising crime and crime-fighting in factual television: an analysis of social actors and transitivity in language and images’, Critical Discourse Studies 10 (4), pp. 356–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mahlberg, M. (2016) ‘Corpus stylistics’, in Sotirova, V. (ed.) The Bloomsbury companion to stylistics. London and New York: Bloomsbury, pp. 139–156.Google Scholar

Mahrt, M., Weller, K. and Peters, I. (2013) ‘Twitter in scholarly communication’, in Weller, K., Bruns, A., Burgess, J., Mahrt, M., Puschmann, C. (eds) Twitter and society. Peter Lang, New York, pp. 399–410.Google Scholar

Markham, A. (2013) ‘Remix cultures, remix methods: Reframing qualitative inquiry for social media contexts’, in Denzin, N. K. and Giardina, M. D. (eds) Global dimensions of qualitative inquiry. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press, pp. 63–81.Google Scholar

Markham, A. and Buchanen, E. (2012) ‘Ethical decision-making and Internet research: Recommendations from the AoIR Ethics Working Committee (Version 2.0)’. Available at: https://aoir.org/reports/ethics2.pdf (accessed 10 March 2017).Google Scholar

Martinec, R. and Salway, A. (2005) ‘A system for image-text relations in new (and old) media’, Visual Communication 4 (3), pp. 339–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marwick, A. (2013) Status update. Celebrity, publicity and branding in the social media age. New Haven, CT and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Marwick, A. and Boyd, D. (2011) ‘To see and be seen: Celebrity practice on Twitter’, Convergence 17 (2), pp. 139–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marwick, A. and Ellison, N. (2012) ‘“There isn't Wifi in heaven!” Negotiating visibility on Facebook memorial pages’, Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media 56 (3), pp. 378–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McCloud, S. (1993) Understanding comics. New York: Harper Perennial.Google Scholar

McCosker, A. (2014) ‘Trolling as provocation: YouTube's agonistic publics’, Convergence 20 (2), pp. 201–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McCosker, A. (2015) ‘Social media activism at the Margins: Managing visibility, voice and vitality affects’, Social Media and Society 1 (2).Google Scholar

McEnery, T. and Baker, P. (2015) Corpora and discourse studies: Integrating discourse and corpora. London: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar

McKerrell, S. (2015) ‘Social distance and the multimodal construction of the Other in sectarian song’, Social Semiotics 25 (5), pp. 614–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McSweeney, M. (2016) Literacies of bilingual youth: A profile of bilingual, academic, social, and txt literacies. Unpublished PhD thesis, The Graduate Center at CUNY, New York.Google Scholar

Mildorf, J. and Thomas, B (2017) Dialogue across media. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mitchell, N. (2015) ‘Goading as social action: non-polite evaluations in targeted banter’, in Terkourafi, M. (ed.) Interdisciplinary perspectives on impoliteness. Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, pp. 121–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Montgomery, M. (2005) ‘Television news and narrative: How relevant are narrative models for explaining the coherence of television news?’ in Thornborrow, J. and Coates, J. (eds) Sociolinguistics of narrative. Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, pp. 239–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Montgomery, M. (2007) The discourse of broadcast news: A linguistic approach. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moreau, E. (2016) ‘Snapchat stories explained. Share snaps in a narrative style’. Available at: www.lifewire.com/what-is-a-snapchat-story-3486000 (accessed 28 March 2017).Google Scholar

Myers, G. (2010) The discourse of blogs and wikis. London and New York: Continuum.Google Scholar

Newton, C. (2016) ‘Instagram's new stories are a near-perfect copy of Snapchat stories’. Available at: www.theverge.com/2016/8/2/12348354/instagram-stories-announced-snapchat-kevin-systrom-interview (accessed 28 March 2017).Google Scholar

Norrick, N. (2000) Conversational narrative: Storytelling in everyday talk. Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Norrick, N. (2005) ‘Contextualizing and recontextualizing interlaced stories in conversation’, in Thornborrow, J. and Coates, J. (eds) The sociolinguistics of narrative. Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, pp. 107–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Norrick, N. (2007) ‘Conversational storytelling’, in Herman, D. (ed.) The Cambridge companion to narrative. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 127–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Norrick, N. (2008) ‘Using large corpora of conversation to investigate narrative: the case of interjections in conversational storytelling performance’, International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 13, pp. 438–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Norris, S. and Jones, R. (2005) Discourse in action: Introducing mediated discourse analysis. London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ochs, E. and Capps, L. (2001) Living narrative: Creating lives in everyday storytelling. Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Onega, S. and Landa, J. A. G. (1996) Narratology: An introduction. London and New York: Longman.Google Scholar

Page, R. (2003) ‘“Cherie: lawyer, wife, mum”: Contradictory patterns of representation in media reports of Cherie Booth/Blair’, Discourse and Society 14 (5): 559–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Page, R. (ed.) (2010) New perspectives on narrative and multimodality. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Page, R. (2012a) Stories and social media: Identities and interaction. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Page, R. (2012b) ‘The linguistics of self-branding and micro-celebrity: The role of hashtags’, Discourse and Communication 6 (2), pp. 181–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Page, R. (2013) ‘Seriality and storytelling in social media’, Storyworlds 5, pp. 31–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Page, R. and Thomas, B. (eds) (2011) New narratives: Stories and storytelling in the digital age. Lincoln, NE and London: University of Nebraska Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Page, R., Harper, R. and Frobenius, M. (2013) ‘From small stories to networked narrative’, Narrative Inquiry 23 (1), pp. 192–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Papacharissi, Z. (2014) Affective publics: Sentiment, technology and politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Papacharissi, Z. and de Fatima Oliveira, M. (2012) ‘Affective news and networked publics: The rhythms of news storytelling on #Egypt’, Journal of Communication 62 (2), pp. 266–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Partington, A. (2006) The linguistics of laughter: A corpus assisted study of laughter talk. London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Peters, C. (2011) ‘Emotion aside or emotional side? Crafting an “experience of involvement” in the news’, Journalism 12 (3), pp. 297–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Phillips, W. (2011) ‘LOLing at tragedy: Facebook trolls, memorial pages and resistance to grief online’, First Monday 16 (12). Available at: http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/3168/3115 (accessed 28 March 2017).Google Scholar

Polanyi, L. (1985) Telling the American story: A structural and cultural analysis of conversational storytelling. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar

Porter Abbott, H. (2002) The Cambridge introduction to narrative. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Potts, A., Simm, W., Whittle, J. and Unger, J. (2014) ‘Exploring “success” in digitally augmented activism: A triangulated approach to analysing UK activist Twitter use’, Discourse, Context & Media 2 (1), pp. 65–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Puschmann, C. (2015) ‘The form and function of quoting in digital media: The case of retweets’, Discourse, Context & Media 7, pp. 28–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reilly, P. (2015) ‘Every little helps? YouTube, sousveillance and the “anti-Tesco” riot in Bristol’, New Media & Society 17 (5), pp. 755–771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reisigl, M. and Wodak, R. (2001) Discourse and discrimination: Rhetorics of racism and antisemitism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Richardson, B. and Langford, R. (2015) ‘A shifting collective identity: A critical discourse analysis of child care advocacy association of Canada's public messaging in 2005 and 2008’, Critical Discourse Studies 1, pp. 78–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Richardson, J. (2006) Analysing newspapers: An approach from Critical Discourse Analysis. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar

Rieder, B. (2013) ‘Studying Facebook via data extraction: the Netvizz application’. WebSci '13 Proceedings of the 5th Annual ACM Web Science Conference, May 2–4, Paris. Available at: http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2464475 (accessed 11 September 2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ryan, M. L. (2004) Narrative across media: The languages of storytelling. Lincoln, NE and London: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar

Ryan, M. L. (2007) ‘Toward a definition of narrative’, in Herman, D. (ed.) The Cambridge companion to narrative. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 22–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Salway, A. and Herman, D. (2011) ‘Digitized corpora as theory-building resource: New methods for narrative inquiry’, in Page, R. and Thomas, B. (ed.) New narratives: Stories and storytelling in the digital age. Lincoln, NE and London: University of Nebraska Press, pp. 120–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sanderson, J. and Cheong, P. H. (2010) ‘Tweeting prayers and communicating grief over Michael Jackson online’, Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society 30 (5), pp. 328–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Scollon, R. (2002) Mediated discourse: The nexus of practice. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Scollon, R. (2008) Discourse itineraries: Nine processes of resemioticization. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Scott, K. (2015) ‘The pragmatics of hashtags: inference and conversational style on Twitter’, Journal of Pragmatics 81, pp. 8–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shah, C. (2009) ‘ContextMiner: Supporting the mining of contextual information for ephemeral digital video preservation’, International Journal of Digital Curation 4 (2), pp. 171–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shuman, A. (2005) Other people's stories: Entitlement claims and the critique of empathy. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar

Sinclair, J. (2004) Trust the text. Language, corpus and discourse. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, C. (2017) ‘160 Amazing YouTube Statistics (February 2017)’. Available at: http://expandedramblings.com/index.php/youtube-statistics/ (accessed 28 March 2017).Google Scholar

Soukup, P. (2014) ‘Looking at, with, and through YouTube’, Communication Research Trends 33 (3), pp. 1–32.Google Scholar

Spencer-Oatey, H. (2002) ‘Managing rapport in talk: Using rapport-sensitive incidents to explore the motivational concerns underlying the management of relations’, Journal of Pragmatics 34 (5), pp. 529–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Spencer-Oatey, H. (2005) ‘(Im)Politeness, face and perceptions of rapport: Unpacking their bases and interrelationships’, Journal of Politeness Research 1 (1), pp. 95–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Spencer-Oatey, H. (2007) ‘Theories of identity and the analysis of face’, Journal of Pragmatics 39 (4), pp. 639–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Spencer-Oatey, H. (2008) Culturally speaking: Culture, communication and politeness theory, 2nd edition. London and New York: Continuum.Google Scholar

Stefanone, M., Lackaff, D. and Rosen, D. (2010) ‘The relationship between traditional mass media and “social media”: Reality television as a model for social network site behaviour’, Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 54 (3) pp. 508–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stein, L. (2013) ‘Policy and participation on social media: The cases of YouTube, Facebook and Wikipedia’, Communication, Culture and Critique 6, pp. 353–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stenglin, M. (2004) Packaging curiosities: Towards a grammar of three-dimensional space. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Sydney.Google Scholar

Stever, G. S. and Lawson, K. (2013) ‘Twitter as a way for celebrities to communicate with fans: Implications for the study of parasocial interaction’, North American Journal of Psychology 15 (2), pp. 339–354.Google Scholar

Stivers, T., Mondada, L. and Steensig, J. (2011) ‘Knowledge, morality and affiliation in social interaction’, in Stivers, T., Mondada, L. and Steensig, J. (eds) The morality of knowledge in conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 3–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stokoe, E. and Edwards, D. (2007) ‘“Black this, black that”: Racial insults and reported speech in neighbour complaints and police interrogations’, Discourse & Society 18 (3), pp. 337–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Suh, B., Hong, L., Pirolli, P. and Chi, E. H. (2010) ‘Want to be retweeted? Large scale analytics on factors impacting retweet in Twitter network’. Social Computing IEEE Second International Conference, 2010, pp. 177–184. Available at: http://www.parc.com/content/attachments/want-to-be-retweeted.pdf (accessed 27 March 2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tagliamonte, S. A. and Denis, D. (2008) ‘Linguistic ruin? LOL! Instant Messaging and teen language’, American Speech 83 (1), pp. 3–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tann, K. (2010) Semogenesis of a nation: An iconography of Japanese identity. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Sydney.Google Scholar

Tashakkori, A. and Creswell, J. (2007) ‘The new era of mixed methods’, Journal of Mixed Methods Research 1 (1), pp. 3–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thompson, R. (2012) ‘Screwed up, but working on it: Disordering the self through e-stories’, Narrative Inquiry 22 (1), pp. 86–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tognini-Bonelli, E. (2001) Corpus linguistics at work. Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Toolan, M. (2009) Narrative progression in the short story. Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Toolan, M. (2016) Making sense of narrative text: Situation, repetition and picturing in the reading of short stories. London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Turner, G. (2010) Ordinary people and the media: The demotic turn. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Uygur-Distexhe, D. (2014) ‘Lol, mdr and ptdr: An inclusive and gradual approach to discourse markers’, in Cougnon, L., Fairon, C. and Crystal, D. (eds) SMS communication: A linguistic approach. Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, pp. 239–263.Google Scholar

Van Dijck, J. (2013) The culture of connectivity: A critical history of social media. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Van Dijck, J. and Nieborg, D. (2009) ‘Wikinomics and its discontents: A critical analysis of Web 2.0 business manifestos’, New Media & Society 11 (5), pp. 855–874.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Van Dijk, T. (1991) Racism and the press. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Van Dijk, T. (2009) Society and discourse: How social contexts influence text and talk. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Van Leeuwen, T. (1991) ‘Conjunctive structure in documentary film and television’, Continuum 5 (1), pp. 76–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Van Leeuwen, T. (1996) ‘The representation of social actors’, in Caldas Coulthard, C. R. and Coulthard, M. (eds) Texts and practices: Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Routledge, pp. 32–70.Google Scholar

Van Leeuwen, T. (2008) Discourse and practice: New tools for Critical Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Van Leeuwen, T. (2012) ‘The critical analysis of musical discourse’, Critical Discourse Studies 9 (4), pp. 319–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Van Zoonen, L., Vis, F. and Mihelj, S. (2010) ‘Performing citizenship on YouTube: Activism, satire and online debate around the anti-Islam video Fitna’, Critical Discourse Studies 7, pp. 249–262.Google Scholar

Vasquez, C. (2014) The discourse of online consumer reviews. London and New York: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar

Viégas, F. (2007) ‘The visual side of Wikipedia’. HICSS '07 Proceedings of the 40th Annual Hawaii Conference on System Sciences. 3–6 January 2007. Available at: http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1255492 (accessed 27 March 2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Walker Rettberg, J. (2014) Seeing ourselves through technology: How we use selfies, blogs and wearable devices to see ourselves. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wall, M. and El Zahed, S. (2011) ‘The Arab Spring: “I'll be waiting for you guys”: A YouTube call to action in the Egyptian revolution’, International Journal of Communication 5, pp. 1333–1343.Google Scholar

Wall, T. (2013) ‘The X Factor’, in Bennett, P. and McDougall, J. (eds) Mythologies today: Barthes reimagined. New York: Routledge, pp. 19–23.Google Scholar

Way, L. C. S. (2016) ‘Protest music, populism, politics and authenticity’, Journal of Language and Politics 15 (4), pp. 422–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

West, L. (2013) ‘Facebook sharing: A sociolinguistic analysis of computer-mediated storytelling’, Discourse, Context & Media 2, pp. 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

West, L. (2015) Responding (or not) on Facebook: A sociolinguistic study of Liking, Commenting, and other reactions to posts. Unpublished PhD thesis, Georgetown University.Google Scholar

West, L. and Trester, A. (2013) ‘Facework on Facebook: Conversations on social media’, in Tannen, D. and Trester, A. (eds) Discourse 2.0: Language and new media. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, pp. 133–153.Google Scholar

White, P. (1997) ‘Death, disruption and the moral order: The narrative impulse in mass-media hard news reporting’, in Christie, F. and Martin, J. R. (eds) Genres and institutions: Social processes in the workplace and school. London: Cassell, pp. 101–133.Google Scholar

Wikipedia Contributors (2014a) ‘Wikipedia’. Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Available at: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia&oldid=637722569 (accessed 13 March 2017).Google Scholar

Wikipedia Contributors (2014b) ‘Identifying reliable sources’. Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Available at: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Identifying_reliable_sources&oldid=635915178 (accessed 13 March 2017).Google Scholar

Wikipedia Contributors (2014c) ‘Quotations’. Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Available at: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Quotations&oldid=638008390 (accessed 13 March 2017).Google Scholar

Wikipedia Contributors (2015a) ‘Neutral point of view’. Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Available at: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view&oldid=714753741 (accessed 13 March 2017).Google Scholar

Wikipedia Contributors (2015b) ‘Wikipedia conduct policies’. Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Available at: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Category:Wikipedia_conduct_policies&oldid=676241977 (accessed 13 March 2017).Google Scholar

Wikipedia Contributors (2017a) ‘Talk: Murder of Meredith Kercher’. Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Available at: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Murder_of_Meredith_Kercher&oldid=751912364 (accessed 13 March 2017).Google Scholar

Wikipedia Contributors (2017b) ‘Verifiability’. Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Available at: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Verifiability&oldid=798245920 (accessed 15 September 2017).Google Scholar

Wodak, R. (2007) ‘Pragmatics and Critical Discourse Analysis: A cross-disciplinary inquiry’, Pragmatics & Cognition 15 (1), pp. 203–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wood, M. and Baughman, L. (2012) ‘Glee fandom and Twitter: Something new, or more of the same old thing?’ Communication Studies 63 (3), pp. 328–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wu, X. (2017) ‘Discursive strategies of resistance in Weibo – A case study of Tianjin explosions in Sina Weibo in China’. The Ross Priory Broadcast Talk Seminar Group. University of Strathclyde, 3–6 July 2017.Google Scholar

Yasseri, T., Sumi, R., Rung, A., Kornai, A. and Kertesz, J. (2012) ‘Dynamics of conflicts in Wikipedia’, PLoS ONE 7 (6). Available at: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0038869 (accessed 27 March 2017).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Zappavigna, M. (2011) ‘Ambient affiliation: A linguistic perspective on Twitter’, New Media & Society 13 (5), pp. 788–806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zappavigna, M. (2014a) ‘Coffeetweets: Bonding around the bean on Twitter’, in Seargeant, P. and Tagg, C. (eds) The language of social media: Communication and community on the Internet. London: Palgrave, pp. 139–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zappavigna, M. (2014b) ‘Enacting identity in microblogging through ambient affiliation’, Discourse and Communication 8 (2), pp. 209–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zappavigna, M. (2015) ‘Searchable talk: The linguistic functions of hashtags’, Social Semiotics 25, pp. 274–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zappavigna, M. (2016) ‘Social media photography: Construing subjectivity in Instagram images’, Visual Communication 15 (3), pp. 271–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zappavigna, M. and Zhao, S. (2017) ‘The selfie as a genre of visual self-representation’, Discourse, Context & Media. In production.Google Scholar