Adams, J. A., DeLoach, S. A., & Scheutz, M. (2014). Shared mental models for human–robot teams. Presented at the 2014 AAAI Fall Symposium Series, Arlington, VA, November 13–15.Google Scholar

Algesheimer, R., Dholakia, U. M., & Gurău, C. (2011). Virtual team performance in a highly competitive environment. Group and Organization Management, 36, 161–190.Google Scholar

Andres, H. P. (2012). Technology-mediated collaboration, shared mental model and task performance. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing, 24, 64–81.Google Scholar

Au, Y., & Marks, A. (2012). Virtual teams are literally and metaphorically invisible: Forging identity in culturally diverse virtual teams. Employee Relations, 34, 271–287.Google Scholar

Austin, J. R. (2003). Transactive memory in organizational groups: The effects of content, consensus, specialization, and accuracy on group performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 866–878.Google Scholar

Baker, D. P., & Salas, E. (1992). Principles for measuring teamwork skills. Human Factors: Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 34, 469–475.Google Scholar

Baldwin, T. T., & Ford, J. K. (1988). Transfer of training: A review and directions for future research. Personnel Psychology, 41, 63–106.Google Scholar

Barnwell, D., Nedrick, S., Rudolph, E., Sesay, M., & Wellen, W. (2014). Leadership of international and virtual project teams. International Journal of Global Business, 7, 1–8.Google Scholar

Barrick, M. R., Bradley, B. H., Kristof-Brown, A. L., & Colbert, A. E. (2007). The moderating role of top management team interdependence: Implications for real teams and working groups. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 544–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beersma, B., Hollenbeck, J. R., Conlon, D. E., Humphrey, S. E., Moon, H., & Ilgen, D. R. (2009). Cutthroat cooperation: The effects of team role decisions on adaptation to alternative reward structures. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 108, 131–142.Google Scholar

Bell, S. T. (2007). Deep-level composition variables as predictors of team performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 595–615.Google Scholar

Bell, S. T., Brown, S. G., Abben, D. R., & Outland, N. B. (2015). Team composition issues for future space exploration: A review and directions for future research. Aerospace Medicine and Human Performance, 86, 548–556.Google Scholar

Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar

Blau, P. M. (1977). Inequality and heterogeneity. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Bluedorn, A. C., Kalliath, T. J., Strube, M. J., & Martin, G. D. (1999). Polychronicity and the Inventory of Polychronic Values (IPV): Development of an instrument to measure a fundamental dimension of organizational culture. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 14, 205–230.Google Scholar

Bray, S. R., & Brawley, L. R. (2002). Role efficacy, role clarity, and role performance effectiveness. Small Group Research, 33, 233–253.Google Scholar

Bryant, S. M., Albring, S. M., & Murthy, U. (2009). The effects of reward structure, media richness and gender on virtual teams. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 10, 190–213.Google Scholar

Burke, C. S., DiazGranados, D., & Salas, E. (2011). Team leadership: A review and look ahead. In Bryman, A., Collinson, D., Grint, K., Jackson, B., & Uhl-Bien, M. (eds.), The SAGE handbook of leadership (pp. 338–351). Los Angeles: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Burke, C. S., Salas, E., Wilson-Donnelly, K., & Priest, H. (2004). How to turn a team of experts into an expert medical team: Guidance from the aviation and military communities. Quality and Safety in Health Care, 13, 96–104.Google Scholar

Burke, C. S., Stagl, K. C., Klein, C., Goodwin, G. F., Salas, E., & Halpin, S. M. (2006a). What type of leadership behaviors are functional in teams? A meta-analysis. The Leadership Quarterly, 17, 288–307.Google Scholar

Burke, C. S., Stagl, K. C., Salas, E., Pierce, L., & Kendal, D. (2006b). Understanding team adaptation: A conceptual analysis and model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 1189–1207.Google Scholar

Burleson, W., Picard, R., Perlin, K., & Lippincott, J. (2004). A platform for affective agent research. Presented at the Workshop on Empathetic Agents, 3rd International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems. New York, July 19–23.Google Scholar

Cannon-Bowers, J. A., & Bowers, C. (2011). Team development and functioning. In Zedeck, S. (ed.), APA handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 597–650). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar

Cannon-Bowers, J. A., Salas, E., & Converse, S. (1993). Shared mental models in expert team decision making. In Castellan, J. N. (ed.), Individual and group decision making: Current issues (pp. 221–246). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Cannon-Bowers, J. A., Salas, E., & Milham, L. (2000). The transfer of team training: Propositions and guidelines. Advances in Developing Human Resources: Managing and Changing Learning Transfer Systems in Organizations, 8, 63–74.Google Scholar

Choudhury, T., & Pentland, A. (2003). Sensing and modeling human networks using the sociometer. Presented at the 7th International Symposium on Wearable Computers, White Plains, NY, October 21–23.Google Scholar

Cooke, N. J., Gorman, J. C., Myers, C. W., & Duran, J. L. (2013). Interactive team cognition. Cognitive Science, 37, 255–285.Google Scholar

Cramton, C. D., & Hinds, P. J. (2005). Subgroup dynamics in internationally distributed teams: Ethnocentrism or cross-national learning? Research in Organizational Behavior, 26, 231–263.Google Scholar

Crisp, C. B., & Jarvenpaa, S. L. (2013). Swift trust in global virtual teams: Trusting beliefs and normative actions. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 12, 45–56Google Scholar

Cropanzano, R., & Mitchell, M. S. (2005). Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of Management, 31, 874–900.Google Scholar

Day, D. V., Gronn, P., & Salas, E. (2006). Leadership in team-based organizations: On the threshold of a new era. The Leadership Quarterly, 17, 211–216.Google Scholar

DeChurch, L. A., Burke, C. S., Shuffler, M. L., Lyons, R., Doty, D., & Salas, E. (2011). A historiometric analysis of leadership in mission critical multiteam environments. Leadership Quarterly, 22, 152–169.Google Scholar

DeChurch, L. A., & Mesmer-Magnus, J. R. (2010a). The cognitive underpinnings of effective teamwork: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 32–53.Google Scholar

DeChurch, L. A., & Mesmer-Magnus, J. R. (2010b). Measuring shared team mental models: A meta-analysis. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 14, 1–14.Google Scholar

Denison, D. R. (1990). Corporate culture and organizational effectiveness. Oxford: John Wiley.Google Scholar

Eisenberg, J., Gibbs, J., & Erhardt, N. (2016). The role of vertical and shared leadership in virtual team collaboration. In Graham, C. (ed.), Strategic management and leadership for systems development in virtual spaces (pp. 22–43). Hershey, PA: Business Science Reference.Google Scholar

Entin, E. E., & Serfaty, D. (1999). Adaptive team coordination. Human Factors: Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 41, 312–325.Google Scholar

Espinosa, J. A., Lerch, J., & Kraut, R. (2004). Explicit vs. implicit coordination mechanisms and task dependencies: One size does not fit all. In Salas, E. & Fiore, S. M. (eds.), Team cognition: Understanding the factors that drive process and performance (pp. 7–129). Washington, DC: APA Books.Google Scholar

Fanning, R. M., & Gaba, D. M. (2007). The role of debriefing in simulation-based learning. Simulation in Healthcare, 2, 115–125.Google Scholar

Ford, J. K., Quiñones, M. A., Sego, D. J., & Sorra, J. S. (1992). Factors affecting the opportunity to perform trained tasks on the job. Personnel Psychology, 45, 511–527.Google Scholar

Furumo, K. (2009). The impact of conflict and conflict management style on deadbeats and deserters in virtual teams. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 49, 66–73.Google Scholar

Gibson, C. B., & Cohen, S. G. (eds.) (2003). Virtual teams that work: Creating conditions for virtual team effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar

Gilson, L. L., Maynard, M. T., Young, N. C. J., Vartiainen, M., & Hakonen, M. (2015). Virtual teams research: 10 years, 10 themes, and 10 opportunities. Journal of Management, 41, 1313–1337.Google Scholar

Gilson, L. L., & Shalley, C. E. (2004). A little creativity goes a long way: An examination of teams’ engagement in creative processes. Journal of Management, 30, 453–470.Google Scholar

Goodman, P. S., Ravlin, E., & Schminke, M. (1987). Understanding groups in organization. In Cummings, L. L. & Staw, B. M. (eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 9, pp. 121–173). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar

Gregory, M. E., Feitosa, J., Driskell, T., Salas, E., & Vessey, W. B. (2013). Designing, delivering, and evaluating team training in organizations. In Salas, E., Tannenbaum, S., Cohen, D., & Latham, G. (eds.), Developing and enhancing teamwork in organizations: Evidence-based best practices and guidelines (pp. 442–487). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar

Gu, J., Chen, Z., Huang, Q., Liu, H., & Huang, S. (2016). A multilevel analysis of the relationship between shared leadership and creativity in inter‐organizational teams. Journal of Creative Behavior. DOI: 10.1002/jocb.135.Google Scholar

Guzzo, R. A., & Dickson, M. W. (1996). Teams in organizations: Recent research on performance and effectiveness. Annual Review of Psychology, 47, 307–338.Google Scholar

Hackman, J. R. (1987). The design of work teams. In Lorsch, J. W. (ed.), Handbook of organizational behavior (pp. 315–342). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Healy, M. P., Vuori, T., & Hodgkinson, G. P. (2015). When teams agree while disagreeing: Reflexion and reflection in shared cognition. Academy of Management Review, 40, 399–422.Google Scholar

Heibeck, T., & Pentland, A. (2010). Honest signals: How they shape our world. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Henderson, L. S. (2008). The impact of project managers’ communication competencies: Validation and extension of a research model for virtuality, satisfaction, and productivity on project teams. Project Management Journal, 39, 48–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Henning, R. A., Boucsein, W., & Gil, M. C. (2001). Social–physiological compliance as a determinant of team performance. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 40, 221–232.Google Scholar

Hinds, P., Liu, L., & Lyon, J. (2011). Putting the global in global work: An intercultural lens on the practice of cross-national collaboration. Academy of Management Annals, 5, 135–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hite, D. M., Daspit, J. J., & Dong, X. (2015). Examining the influence of transculturation on work ethic in the United States. Cross Cultural Management, 22, 145–162.Google Scholar

Hoch, J. E., & Kozlowski, S. W. (2014). Leading virtual teams: Hierarchical leadership, structural supports, and shared team leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99, 390–403.Google Scholar

Hoegl, M., & Muethel, M. (2016). Enabling shared leadership in virtual project teams: A practitioners’ guide. Project Management Journal, 47, 7–12.Google Scholar

Homans, G. C. (1958). Social behavior as exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 63, 597–606.Google Scholar

Hughes, A. M., Gregory, M. E., Joseph, D. L., Sonesh, S. C., Benishek, L. E., Marlow, S., … & Salas, E. (2016). Saving lives: A meta-analysis of team training in healthcare. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101, 1266–1304.Google Scholar

Ilgen, D. R., Hollenbeck, J. R., Johnson, M., & Jundt, D. (2005). Teams in organizations: From input-process-output models to IMOI models. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 517–543.Google Scholar

Jarman, R. (2005). When success isn’t everything: Case studies of two virtual teams. Group Decision and Negotiation, 14, 333–354.Google Scholar

Jawadi, N. (2013). E-leadership and trust management: Exploring the moderating effects of team virtuality. International Journal of Technology and Human Interaction, 9, 18–35.Google Scholar

Johnson, M. D., Hollenbeck, J. R., Ilgen, D. R., Humphrey, S. E., Meyer, C. J., & Jundt, D. K. (2006). Cutthroat cooperation: Asymmetrical adaptation of team reward structures. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 103–120.Google Scholar

Jung, D. D., & Sosik, J. J. (2002). Transformational leadership in work groups: The role of empowerment, cohesiveness, and collective-efficacy on perceived group performance. Small Group Research, 33, 313–336.Google Scholar

Kahol, K., Vankipuram, M., Patel, V. L., & Smith, M. L. (2011). Deviations from protocol in a complex trauma environment: Errors or innovations? Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 44, 425–431.Google Scholar

Kanawattanachai, P., & Yoo, Y. (2007). The impact of knowledge coordination on virtual team performance over time. MIS Quarterly, 31, 783–808.Google Scholar

Kapoor, A., Burleson, W., & Picard, R. W. (2007). Automatic prediction of frustration. International Journal of Human–Computer Studies, 65, 724–736.Google Scholar

Kapoor, B. (2011). Impact of globalization on human resource management. Journal of International Management Studies, 6, 1–8.Google Scholar

Kim, T., Chang, A., & Pentland, A. S. (2007). Enhancing organizational communication using sociometric badges. Presented at the IEEE 11th International Symposium on Wearable Computers, Boston, MA, October 11–13.Google Scholar

Kirkman, B. L., & Mathieu, J. E. (2005). The dimensions and antecedents of team virtuality. Journal of Management, 31, 700–718.Google Scholar

Kirkman, B. L., Rosen, B., Tesluk, P. E., & Gibson, C. B. (2004). The impact of team empowerment on virtual team performance: The moderating role of face-to-face-interaction. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 175–192.Google Scholar

Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Bell, B. S. (2003). Work groups and teams in organizations. In Borman, W. C. & Ilgen, D. R. (eds.), Handbook of psychology: Industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 12, pp. 333–375). New York: John WileyGoogle Scholar

Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Bell, B. S. (2008). Team learning, development, and adaptation. In Sessa, V. I. & London, M. (eds.), Work group learning: Understanding, improving, and assessing how groups learn in organizations (pp. 15–44). New York: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar

Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Klein, K. J. (2000). A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: Contextual, temporal, and emergent processes. In Klein, K. J. & Kozlowski, S. W. J. (eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions (pp. 3–90). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar

Kozlowski, S. W., Mak, S., & Chao, G. T. (2016). Team-centric leadership: An integrative review. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 3, 21–54.Google Scholar

Latham, G. P., Stajkovic, A. D., & Locke, E. A. (2010). The relevance and viability of subconscious goals in the workplace. Journal of Management, 36, 234–255.Google Scholar

Lemieux-Charles, L., & McGuire, W. L. (2006). What do we know about health care team effectiveness? A review of the literature. Medical Care Research and Review, 63, 263–300.Google Scholar

LePine, J. A., Piccolo, R. F., Jackson, C. L., Mathieu, J. E., & Saul, J. R. (2008). A meta‐analysis of teamwork processes: Tests of a multidimensional model and relationships with team effectiveness criteria. Personnel Psychology, 61, 273–307.Google Scholar

Levine, J. M., & Moreland, R. L. (1990). Progress in small group research. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 585–634.Google Scholar

Lewis, K. (2003). Measuring transactive memory systems in the field: Scale development and validation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 587–603.Google Scholar

Lim, D. H. (2000). Training design factors influencing transfer of training to the workplace within an international context. Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 52, 243–257.Google Scholar

Lim, D. H. (2001). The effect of work experience and job position on international learning transfer. International Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 9, 59–74.Google Scholar

Lim, B. C., & Klein, K. J. (2006). Team mental models and team performance: A field study of the effects of team mental model similarity and accuracy. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27, 403–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lin, C. P., Chiu, C. K., Joe, S. W., & Tsai, Y. H. (2010). Assessing online learning ability from a social exchange perspective: A survey of virtual teams within business organizations. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 26, 849–867.Google Scholar

Lipshitz, R. (2005). There is more to seeing than meets the eyeball: The art and science of observation. In Montgomery, H., Lipshitz, R., & Brehmer, B. (eds.), How professionals make decisions (pp. 365–378). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Lowry, P. B., Roberts, T. L., Romano, N. C. Jr., Cheney, P. D., & Hightower, R. T. (2006). The impact of group size and social presence on small-group communication. Small Group Research, 37, 631–661.Google Scholar

Luca, L. M. D., & Atuahene-Gima, K. (2007). Market knowledge dimensions and cross-functional collaboration: Examining the different routes to product innovation performance. Journal of Marketing, 71, 95–112.Google Scholar

Lyons, S. T., Ng, E. S., & Schweitzer, L. (2014). Changing demographics and the shifting nature of careers: Implications for research and human resource development. Human Resource Development Review, 13, 181–206.Google Scholar

Mach, M., & Baruch, Y. (2015). Team performance in cross cultural project teams: The moderated mediation role of consensus, heterogeneity, faultlines and trust. Cross Cultural & Strategic Management, 22, 464–486.Google Scholar

Marks, M. A., Mathieu, J. E., & Zaccaro, S. J. (2001). A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes. Academy of Management Review, 26, 356–376.Google Scholar

Marks, M. A., Sabella, M. J., Burke, C. S., & Zaccaro, S. J. (2002). The impact of cross-training on team effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 3–13.Google Scholar

Marks, M. A., Zaccaro, S. J., & Mathieu, J. E. (2000). Performance implications of leader briefings and team-interaction training for team adaptation to novel environments. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 971–986.Google Scholar

Mathieu, J., Maynard, M. T., Rapp, T., & Gilson, L. (2008). Team effectiveness 1997–2007: A review of recent advancements and a glimpse into the future. Journal of Management, 34, 410–476.Google Scholar

Mathieu, J. E., Tannenbaum, S. I., Donsbach, J. S., & Alliger, G. M. (2014). A review and integration of team composition models moving toward a dynamic and temporal framework. Journal of Management, 40, 130–160.Google Scholar

Maynard, M. T., & Gilson, L. L. (2014). The role of shared mental model development in understanding virtual team effectiveness. Group and Organization Management, 39, 3–32.Google Scholar

Maynard, M. T., Kennedy, D. M., & Sommer, S. A. (2015). Team adaptation: A fifteen-year synthesis (1998–2013) and framework for how this literature needs to “adapt” going forward. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 24, 652–677.Google Scholar

Maynard, M. T., Mathieu, J. E., Rapp, T. L., & Gilson, L. L. (2012). Something(s) old and something(s) new: Modeling drivers of global virtual team effectiveness. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33, 342–365.Google Scholar

McComb, S. A., Lemaster, M., Henneman, E. A., & Hinchey, K. T. (2015). An evaluation of shared mental models and mutual trust on general medical units: Implications for collaboration, teamwork, and patient safety. Journal of Patient Safety. DOI: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000151.Google Scholar

McGrath, J. E. (1984). Groups: Interaction and performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Mehra, A., Smith, B. R., Dixon, A. L., & Robertson, B. (2006). Distributed leadership in teams: The network of leadership perceptions and team performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 17, 232–245.Google Scholar

Mesmer-Magnus, J. R., DeChurch, L. A., Jimenez-Rodriguez, M., Wildman, J., & Shuffler, M. (2011). A meta-analytic investigation of virtuality and information sharing in teams. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 115, 214–225.Google Scholar

Mohammed, S., & Nadkarni, S. (2014). Are we all on the same temporal page? The moderating effects of temporal team cognition on the polychronicity diversity–team performance relationship. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99, 404–422.Google Scholar

Muethel, M., & Hoegl, M. (2013). Shared leadership effectiveness in independent professional teams. European Management Journal, 31, 423–432.Google Scholar

O’Leary, M. B., & Mortensen, M. (2010). Go (con)figure: Subgroups, imbalance, and isolates in geographically dispersed teams. Organization Science, 21, 115–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Olguín Olguín, D. (2007). Sociometric badges: Wearable technology for measuring human behavior. Master’s thesis, Cambridge, MA, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar

Olguín Olguín, D., Gloor, P. A., & Pentland, A. (2009a). Capturing individual and group behavior with wearable sensors. Presented at the AAAI Spring Symposium, Stanford, CA, March 23–25.Google Scholar

Olguín Olguín, D., Gloor, P. A., & Pentland, A. (2009b). Wearable sensors for pervasive healthcare management. Presented at the 3rd International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare, London, April 1–3.Google Scholar

Olguín Olguín, D., & Pentland, A. (2010). Assessing group performance from collective behavior. Presented at the CSCW Workshop on Collective Intelligence in Organizations, Savannah, GA, February 6.Google Scholar

Olguín Olguín, D., Waber, B., Kim, T., Mohan, A., Ara, K., & Pentland, A. (2009c). Sensible organizations: Technology and methodology for automatically measuring organizational behavior. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Part B: Cybernetics, 39, 43–55.Google Scholar

Orasanu, J. (1990). Shared mental models and crew decision making. Cognitive Sciences Laboratory, Princeton University.Google Scholar

Ortega, A., Sanchez-Manzanares, M., Gil, F., & Rico, R. (2010). Team learning and effectiveness in virtual project teams: The role of beliefs about interpersonal context. Spanish Journal of Psychology, 13, 267–276.Google Scholar

Ostroff, C., Kinicki, A. J., & Tamkins, M. M. (2003). Organizational culture and climate. In Borman, W. C. & Ilgen, D. R. (eds.), Handbook of psychology: Industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 12, pp. 565–593). New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar

Penarroja, V., Orengo, V., Zornoza, A., & Hernandez, A. (2013). The effects of virtuality level on task-related collaborative behaviors: The mediating role of team trust. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 967–974.Google Scholar

Pentland, A. (2008). Honest signals. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Perry, B. (2008). Virtual teams now a reality: Two out of three companies say they will rely more on virtual teams in the future. www.pr.com/press-release/103409.Google Scholar

Post, C. (2012). Deep-level team composition and innovation: The mediating roles of psychological safety and cooperative learning. Group and Organization Management, 37, 555–588.Google Scholar

Poulton, B. C., & West, M. A. (1999). The determinants of effectiveness in primary health care teams. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 13, 7–18.Google Scholar

Quigley, N. R. (2013). A longitudinal, multilevel study of leadership efficacy development in MBA teams. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 12, 579–602.Google Scholar

Rapp, T. L., Bachrach, D. G., Rapp, A. A., & Mullins, R. (2014). The role of team goal monitoring in the curvilinear relationship between team efficacy and team performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99, 976–987.Google Scholar

Rico, R., Sánchez-Manzanares, M., Gil, F., & Gibson, C. (2008). Team implicit coordination processes: A team knowledge-based approach. Academy of Management Review, 33, 163–184.Google Scholar

Rodríguez-Sánchez, A. M., Devloo, T., Rico, R., Salanova, M., & Anseel, F. (2016). What makes creative teams tick? Cohesion, engagement, and performance across creativity tasks: A three-wave study. Group & Organization Management, 42, 521–547.Google Scholar

Rosen, M. A., Bedwell, W. L., Wildman, J. L., Fritzsche, B. A., Salas, E., & Burke, C. S. (2011). Managing adaptive performance in teams: Guiding principles and behavioral markers for measurement. Human Resource Management Review, 21, 107–122.Google Scholar

Rosen, M. A., Dietz, A. S., Yang, T., Priebe, C. E., & Pronovost, P. J. (2014). An integrative framework for sensor-based measurement of teamwork in healthcare. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 22, 11–18.Google Scholar

Rosen, B., Furst, S., & Blackburn, R. (2006). Training for virtual teams: An investigation of current practices and future needs. Human Resource Management, 45, 229–247.Google Scholar

Rosen, M. A., Salas, E., Wilson, K. A., King, H. B., Salisbury, M., Augenstein, J. S., … & Birnbach, D. J. (2008). Measuring team performance in simulation-based training: Adopting best practices for healthcare. Simulation in Healthcare, 3, 33–41.Google Scholar

Russ-Eft, D. (2002). A typology of training design and work environment factors affecting workplace learning and transfer. Human Resource Development Review, 1, 45–65.Google Scholar

Salas, E., Almeida, S. A., Salisbury, M., King, H., Lazzara, E. H., Lyons, R., … & McQuillan, R. (2009a). What are the critical success factors for team training in health care? The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety, 35, 398–405.Google Scholar

Salas, E., DiazGranados, D., Klein, C., Burke, C. S., Stagl, K. C., Goodwin, G. F., & Halpin, S. M. (2008a). Does team training improve team performance? A meta-analysis. Human Factors: Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 50, 903–933.Google Scholar

Salas, E., Klein, C., King, H., Salisbury, M., Augenstein, J. S., Birnbach, D. J., … & Upshaw, C. (2008b). Debriefing medical teams: 12 evidence-based best practices and tips. The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety, 34, 518–527.Google Scholar

Salas, E., Rosen, M. A., Burke, C. S., and Goodwin, G. F. (2009b). The wisdom of collectives in organizations: An update of the teamwork competencies. In Salas, E., Goodwin, G. F., & Burke, S. (eds.), Team effectiveness in complex organizations: Cross-disciplinary perspectives and approaches (pp. 39–79). New York: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar

Salas, E., Rosen, M. A., Burke, C. S., Goodwin, G. F., & Fiore, S. (2006). The making of a dream team: When expert teams do best. In Ericsson, K. A., Charness, N., Hoffman, R. R., & Feltovich, P. J. (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 439– 453). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Salas, E., Rosen, M. A., & DiazGranados, D. (2010). Expertise based intuition and decision making in organizations. Journal of Management, 36, 941–973.Google Scholar

Salas, E., Sims, D. E., & Burke, C. S. (2005). Is there a “Big Five” in teamwork? Small Group Research, 36, 555–599.Google Scholar

Santos, C. M., Passos, A. M., & Uitdewilligen, S. (2016). When shared cognition leads to closed minds: Temporal mental models, team learning, adaptation and performance. European Management Journal, 34, 258–268.Google Scholar

Smith-Jentsch, K. A. (2009). Measuring team-related cognition: The devil is in the details. In Salas, E., Goodwin, G. F., & Burke, S. (eds.), Team effectiveness in complex organizations: Cross-disciplinary perspectives and approaches (pp. 491–508). New York: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar

Smith‐Jentsch, K. A., Campbell, G. E., Milanovich, D. M., & Reynolds, A. M. (2001a). Measuring teamwork mental models to support training needs assessment, development, and evaluation: Two empirical studies. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 179–194.Google Scholar

Smith-Jentsch, K. A., Cannon-Bowers, J. A., Tannenbaum, S. I., & Salas, E. (2008). Guided team self-correction impacts on team mental models, processes, and effectiveness. Small Group Research, 39, 303–327.Google Scholar

Smith-Jentsch, K. A., Kraiger, K., Cannon-Bowers, J. A., & Salas, E. (2009). Do familiar teammates request and accept more backup? Transactive memory in air traffic control. Human Factors: Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 51, 181–192.Google Scholar

Smith-Jentsch, K. A., Salas, E., & Brannick, M. T. (2001b). To transfer or not to transfer? Investigating the combined effects of trainee characteristics, team leader support, and team climate. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 279–292.Google Scholar

Society for Human Resource Management (2012). Virtual teams. www.shrm.org/research/surveyfindings/articles/pages/virtualteams.aspx.Google Scholar

Somech, A., & Drach-Zahavy, A. (2013). Translating team creativity to innovation implementation: The role of team composition and climate for innovation. Journal of Management, 39, 684–708.Google Scholar

Sonesh, S., Rico, R., & Salas, E. (2013). Team decision making in naturalistic environments: A framework for and introduction to illusory shared cognition. In Highhouse, S., Dalal, R. S., & Salas, E. (eds.), Judgment and Decision Making at Work (pp. 199–227). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Stark, E. M., & Bierly, P. E. III (2009). An analysis of predictors of team satisfaction in product development teams with differing levels of virtualness. R&D Management, 39, 461–472.Google Scholar

Steiner, I. D. (1972). Group process and productivity. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Suh, A., Shin, K. S., Ahuja, M., & Kim, M. S. (2011). The influence of virtuality on social networks within and across work groups: A multilevel approach. Journal of Management Information Systems, 28: 351–386.Google Scholar

Tannenbaum, S. I., & Cerasoli, C. P. (2013). Do team and individual debriefs enhance performance? A meta-analysis. Human Factors: Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 55, 231–245.Google Scholar

Tannenbaum, S. I., & Goldhaber-Fiebert, S. N. (2012). Medical team debriefs: Simple, powerful, underutilized. In Salas, E. & Frush, K. (eds.), Improving patient safety through teamwork and team training (pp. 249–254). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Tekleab, A. G., & Quigley, N. R. (2014). Team deep-level diversity, relationship conflict, and team members’ affective reactions: A cross-level investigation. Journal of Business Research, 67, 394–402.Google Scholar

Tekleab, A. G., Quigley, N. R., & Tesluk, P. E. (2009). A longitudinal study of team conflict, conflict management, cohesion, and team effectiveness. Group and Organization Management, 34, 170–205.Google Scholar

Townsend, A. M., DeMarie, S. M., & Hendrickson, A. R. (1998). Virtual teams: Technology and the workplace of the future. Academy of Management Perspectives, 12, 17–29.Google Scholar

Valentine, M. A., & Edmondson, A. C. (2014). Team scaffolds: How mesolevel structures enable role-based coordination in temporary groups. Organization Science, 26, 405–422.Google Scholar

Valentine, M. A., Nembhard, I. M., & Edmondson, A. C. (2015). Measuring teamwork in health care settings: A review of survey instruments. Medical Care, 53, 16–30.Google Scholar

Vashdi, D. R., Bamberger, P. A., & Erez, M. (2013). Can surgical teams ever learn? The role of coordination, complexity, and transitivity in action team learning. Academy of Management Journal, 56, 945–971.Google Scholar

Volpe, C. E., Cannon-Bowers, J. A., Salas, E., & Spector, P. E. (1996). The impact of cross-training on team functioning: An empirical investigation. Human Factors: Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 38, 87–100.Google Scholar

Wakefield, R. L., Leidner, D. E., & Garrison, G. (2008). A model of conflict, leadership, and performance in virtual teams. Information Systems Research, 19, 434–455.Google Scholar

Wang, D., Waldman, D. A., & Zhang, Z. (2014). A meta-analysis of shared leadership and team effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99, 181–198.Google Scholar

Wildman, J. L., Thayer, A. L., Rosen, M. A., Salas, E., Mathieu, J. E., & Rayne, S. R. (2012). Task types and team-level attributes: Synthesis of team classification literature. Human Resource Development Review, 11, 97–129.Google Scholar

Woods, D. D., & Sarter, N. B. (1993). Evaluating the impact of new technology on human–machine cooperation. In Wise, J. A., Hopkin, V. D., & Stager, P. (eds.), Verification and validation of complex systems: Human factors issues (pp. 133–158). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar

Xiang, C. (2015). The role of social capital and shared mental model in virtual R&D teams. Presented at the Wuhan International Conference on E-Business, Wuhan, June 19–21, Paper 36.Google Scholar

Zakaria, N., Yusof, M., Affendi, S., Muton, R., & Ab, N. (2015). Virtually, you are there! Exploring the teamwork challenges to swift trust formation when working in global virtual team. Advanced Science Letters, 21, 1206–1210.Google Scholar