Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-01T07:38:04.573Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 August 2017

Michael Ruse
Affiliation:
Florida State University
Robert J. Richards
Affiliation:
University of Chicago
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbot, Patrick, Jun Abe, John Alcock, Samuel Alizon, Joao A. C. Alpedrinha, Malte Andersson, Jean-Baptiste Andre, et al. 2011. “Inclusive Fitness Theory and Eusociality.” Nature 471 (March 24): E1E4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Abend, G. 2010. “What’s New and What’s Old about the New Sociology of Morality?” In Handbook of the Sociology of Morality, eds. Hitlin, S. and Vaisey, S., 561584. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Adams, Robert M. 1999. Finite and Infinite Goods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Adams, R. S., et al. 1995. “Calculating Drinking Water Intake for Lactating Cows.” Dairy Reference Manual (NRAES-63). Ithaca, NY: Northeast Regional Agricultural Engineering Service.Google Scholar
Addams, Jane. 1893. “The Subjective Necessity for Social Settlements.” In Philanthropy and Social Progress: Seven Essays, ed. Adams, Henry C., 126. New York: Thomas Y. Crowell.Google Scholar
Addams, Jane. 1902. Democracy and Social Ethics. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Addams, Jane. 1907. Newer Ideals of Peace. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Alcock, John. 2003. The Triumph of Sociobiology. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Alexander, R. 1985. “A Biological Interpretation of Moral Systems.” Zygon 20 (1): 320.Google Scholar
Alexander, Samuel. 1889. Moral Order and Progress: An Analysis of Ethical Conceptions. London: Trübner.Google Scholar
Alexander, Samuel. 1920. Space, Time and Deity. London: MacMillan and Co.Google Scholar
Allee, Warder Clyde. 1927. “Animal Aggregations.” Quarterly Review of Biology 2: 367398.Google Scholar
Allee, Warder Clyde. 1938. The Social Life of Animals. Norton: New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allee, Warder Clyde. 1940. “Concerning the Origin of Sociality in Animals.” Scientia LXVII: 154160.Google Scholar
Allen, Elizabeth, Barbara Beckwith, Jon Beckwith, Steven Chorover, David Culver, Margaret Duncan, Steven Gould, et al. 1975. “Against Sociobiology.” New York Review of Books 22: 4344.Google Scholar
Allhoff, Fritz. 2003. “Evolutionary Ethics from Darwin to Moore.” History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 25: 5179.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anderson, Elizabeth. 1991. “John Stuart Mill and Experiments in Living.” Ethics 102: 426.Google Scholar
Anderson, Elizabeth. 1998. “Pragmatism, Science, and Moral Inquiry.” In In Face of the Facts: Moral Inquiry in American Scholarship, eds. Fox, Richard Wightman and Westbrook, Robert B., 1039. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center.Google Scholar
Anderson, Elizabeth. 2014a. “Dewey’s Moral Philosophy.” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2014/entries/dewey-moral/.Google Scholar
Anderson, Elizabeth. 2014b. “Social Movements, Experiments in Living, and Moral Progress: Case Studies from Britain’s Abolition of Slavery.” Lindley Lectures. University of Kansas. http://hdl.handle.net/1808/14787.Google Scholar
Anderson, Melissa E. 2004. “Jane Addams’ Democracy and Social Ethics: Defending Care Ethics.” Macalester Journal of Philosophy 13(1): Article 2.Google Scholar
Annas, J., and Barnes., J. 2000. Sextus Empiricus: Outlines of Scepticism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Appiah, K. 2008. Experiments in Ethics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. Summa Theologica (1265–1274 – 3 vols.).Google Scholar
Arumugam, Manimozhiyan, Raes, Jeroen, Pelletier, Eric, Paslier, Denis Le, Yamada, Takuji, Mende, Daniel R., Fernandes, Gabriel R., et al. 2011. “Enterotypes of the Human Gut Microbiome.” Nature 473 (7346): 174180. doi:10.1038/nature09944.Google Scholar
Atran, S., and Henrich, J.. 2010. “The Evolution of Religion: How Cognitive By-Products, Adaptive Learning Heuristics, Ritual Displays, and Group Competition Generate Deep Commitments to Prosocial Religions.” Biological Theory 5 (1): 1830.Google Scholar
Audi, R. 1993. “Ethical Reflectionism.” The Monist 76: 295315.Google Scholar
Audi, R. 1996. The Good in the Right. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Audi, R. 2004. The Good in the Right: A Theory of Intuition and Intrinsic Value. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Axelrod, R. 1984. The Evolution of Cooperation. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Ayala, F. 2010. “The Difference of Being Human: Morality.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 107: 90159022.Google Scholar
Baillargeon, R. 2008. “Innate Ideas Revisited for a Principle of Persistence in Infants’ Physical Reasoning.” Perspectives on Psychological Science 3: 213.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bandura, A. 1999. “Moral Disengagement in the Perpetration of Inhumanities.” Personality and Social Psychology Review 3: 193–209.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barkow, J. H., Cosmides, L. and Tooby., J. 1992. The Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Baron, S. 2007. Thinking and Deciding, 4th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bartels, D., Bauman, C., Cushman, F., Pizarro, D. and McGraw., A. P. 2016. “Moral Judgment and Decision Making.” In The Wiley Blackwell Handbook of Judgment and Decision Making, Volume 1, eds. 479491. Chichester, UK: Wiley.Google Scholar
Beck, N. 2012. “Be Fruitful and Multiply: Growth, Reason and Cultural Group Selection in Hayek & Darwin. Biological Theory 6(4): 413423.Google Scholar
Beck, N. 2013. “Social Darwinism.” In The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Darwin and Evolutionary Thought, ed. Ruse, M., 195201. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bedke, Matt. “Intuitive Non-Naturalism Meets Cosmic Coincidence.” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 90: 188209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bentham, J. 1978. “Offences Against One’s Self.” Journal of Homosexuality 4 (3): 389405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bentley, Michael. 2011. The Life and Thought of Herbert Butterfield: History, Science and God. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bergman, M., and Kain, P., eds. 2014. Challenges to Moral and Religious Belief: Disagreement and Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bergson, Henri. 1911. Creative Evolution. New York: Henry Holt and Co.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berker, S., 2009. “The Normative Insignificance of Neuroscience.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 37: 293329.Google Scholar
Berker, Selim. 2014. “Does Evolutionary Psychology Show that Normativity Is Mind-Dependent?” In Moral Psychology & Human Agency. Philosophical Essays on the Science of Ethics, eds. D’Arms, Justin and Jacobson, Daniel, 215252. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bernhardi, F. V. 1912. Germany and the Next War (Deutschland und der Nächster Krieg), trans. A. H. Powells. Stuttgart und Berlin: J. G. Cotta.Google Scholar
Besaude-Vincent, Bernadette. 2014. “Concluding Remarks: A View of the Past through the Lens of the Present.” Osiris 29: 298309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Binmore, K. 2005. Natural Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackburn, Simon. 1984. Spreading the Word. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Blackburn, Simon. 1985. “Supervenience Revisited.” In Exercises in Analysis, ed. Hacking, Ian, 4767. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Blackburn, Simon. 1993. Essays in Quasi-Realism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Boehm, C. 2012. Moral Origins: The Evolution of Virtue, Altruism and Shame. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Borrello, Mark. 2004. “‘Mutual Aid’ and ‘Animal Dispersion’: An Historical Analysis of Alternatives to Darwin.” Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 47: 1531.Google Scholar
Borrello, Mark. 2005. “The Rise, Fall, and Resurrection of Group Selection.” Endeavour 29: 4347.Google Scholar
Bouchard, Frédéric. 2009. “Understanding colonial traits using symbiosis research and ecosystem ecology.” Biological Theory 4 (3): 240246.Google Scholar
Bouchard, Frédéric. 2013. “What Is a Symbiotic Superindividual and How Do You Measure Its Fitness.” In From Groups to Individuals Evolution and Emerging Individuality, Vienna Series in Theoretical Biology, eds. Bouchard, Frédéric and Huneman, Philippe, 243264. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouchard, Frédéric, and Huneman, Philippe, eds. 2013. From Groups to Individuals Evolution and Emerging Individuality, Vienna Series in Theoretical Biology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bowles, S., and Gintis, H.. 2006. “The Evolutionary Basis of Collective Action.” In The Oxford Handbook of Political Economy, eds. Barry G. Weingast and Donald A. Wittman, 951–70. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bowles, S., and Gintis, H.. 2011. A Cooperative Species: Human Reciprocity and Its Evolution. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Boyd, Robert, and Richerson, Peter J.. 1995. “Why Culture Is Common, but Cultural Evolution Is Rare.” Proceedings of the British Academy 88: 77–93.Google Scholar
Boyd, Robert, and Richerson, Peter J.. 2004. The Origin and Evolution of Cultures (Evolution and Cognition). New York: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Boyer, P. 2002. Religion Explained: The Evolutionary Origins of Religious Thought. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Braddock, Matthew, Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter, and Mogensen, Andreas. 2012. “Comments on Justin Clarke-Doane’s ‘Morality and Mathematics: The Evolutionary Challenge.” Ethics at PEA Soup. http://peasoup.typepad.com/peasoup/2012/03/ethics-discussions-at-pea-soup-justin-clarke-doanes-morality-and-mathematics-the-evolutionary-challe-1.html.Google Scholar
Brink, David O. 1989. Moral Realism and the Foundations of Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Broad, C. D. 1925. The Mind and Its Place in Nature. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Co.Google Scholar
Broad, C. D. 1944. “Critical Notice of Julian Huxley’s Evolutionary Ethics.” Mind 53: 156187.Google Scholar
Broad, C. D. 1944. “Review of Evolution & Ethics by Julian S. Huxley.” Mind 53: 344367.Google Scholar
Brobjer, Thomas. 2008. Nietzsche’s Philosophical Context. Champaign: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Brosnan, K. 2011. “Do the Evolutionary Origins of Our Moral Beliefs Undermine Moral Knowledge?Biology and Philosophy 26: 5164.Google Scholar
Brosnan, S., and de Waal, F.. 2003. “Monkeys Reject Unequal Pay.” Nature 425: 297299.Google Scholar
Browne, Janet. 2010. “Asa Gray and Charles Darwin: Corresponding Naturalists.” Harvard Papers in Botany 15: 209220.Google Scholar
Budziszewski, J. 2011. What We Can’t Not Know: A Guide. Rev. ed. San Francisco: Ignatius.Google Scholar
Bulbulia, J. 2004. “Religious Costs as Adaptations that Signal Altruistic Intention.” Evolution and Cognition 10 (1): 1938.Google Scholar
Buller, David J. 2005. Adapting Minds: Evolutionary Psychology and the Persistent Quest for Human Nature. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Burgess, J. 2007. “Against Ethics.” Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 10 (5): 427439.Google Scholar
Buss, D. M. 1996. “Evolutionary Insights into Feminism and the ‘Battle of the Sexes.’” In Sex, Power, Conflict: Evolutionary and Feminist Perspectives, eds. Buss, D. M. and Malamuth, N.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Buss, D. M. 1998. Evolutionary Psychology: The New Science of the Mind. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
Buss, D. M. 2005.The Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
Buss, D. M., and Schmitt, D. P.. 2011. “Evolutionary Psychology and Feminism.” Sex Roles 64: 768787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butterfield, Herbert. 1931. The Whig Interpretation of History. London: Bell and Sons.Google Scholar
Butterworth, Brian. 1999. What Counts? How Every Brain Is Hardwired for Math. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Callebaut, Werner, and Rasskin-Gutman, Diego, eds. 2005. Modularity: Understanding the Development and Evolution of Natural Complex Systems, Vienna Series in Theoretical Biology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, R. 1996. “Can Biology Make Ethics Objective?Biology and Philosophy 11: 2131.Google Scholar
Cannon, Walter B. 1932. The Wisdom of the Body. New York: Norton and Co.Google Scholar
Caplan, Arthur L. 1980. Sociobiology Debate: Readings on Ethical and Scientific Issues. New ed. New York: Joanna Cotler Books.Google Scholar
Carabotti, Marilia, Scirocco, Annunziata, Maselli, Maria Antonietta, and Severi, Carola. 2015. “The Gut-Brain Axis: Interactions between Enteric Microbiota, Central and Enteric Nervous Systems.” Annals of Gastroenterology: Quarterly Publication of the Hellenic Society of Gastroenterology 28 (2): 203209.Google Scholar
Carr-Saunders, A.M. 1922. The Population Problem; A Study in Human Evolution. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Casebeer, W. D. 2003. Natural Ethical Facts: Evolution, Connectionism, and Moral Cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cavalli-Sforza, Luigi Luca, and Feldman, Marcus W.. 1981. Cultural Transmission and Evolution: A Quantitative Approach. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. 1959. “Review of Skinner’s Verbal Behavior.” Language 35: 2658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chudek, M., Zhao, W., and Henrich, J.. 2013. “Gene-Culture Coevolution, Large-Scale Cooperation, and the Shaping of Human Social Psychology.” In Cooperation and Its Evolution, eds. Sterelny, K., Joyce, R., Calcott, B., and Fraser, B., 425458. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Churchland, P. 2011. Braintrust: What Neuroscience Tells Us About Morality. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Maudemarie, and Dudrick, David. 2012. The Soul of Nietzsche’s Beyond Good & Evil. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Clarke-Doane, Justin. 2012. “Morality and Mathematics: The Evolutionary Challenge.” Ethics 122: 313340.Google Scholar
Clarke-Doane, Justin. 2015. “Justification and Explanation in Mathematics and Morality.” In Oxford Studies in Metaethics, Volume 10, ed. Shafer-Landau, Russ80–104. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Clarke-Doane, Justin. 2016. “Debunking and Dispensability.” In Explanation in Ethics and Mathematics, eds. Sinclair, Neil and Leibowitz, Uri. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Clarke-Doane, Justin. 2017. “What is the Benacerraf Problem?” In New Perspectives on the Philosophy of Paul Benacerraf: Truth Objects Infinity, ed.Pataut, Fabrice, 17–43. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Clements, Frederic. 1905. Research Methods in Ecology. Nebraska: University Pub. Co.Google Scholar
Clements, Frederic. 1916. Plant Succession. Washington DC: Carnegie Institution.Google Scholar
Clements, Frederic. 1949. “Competition in Plant Societies (1933).” In Dynamics of Vegetation, ed. Allred, B. W.. New York: H. W. Wilson Company.Google Scholar
Cobbe, F. P. 1872. Darwinism in Morals and Other Essays. London: Williams and Norgate.Google Scholar
Coe, Sophie D. 1994. America’s First Cuisines. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, G. E. 2003. “Facts and Principles.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 31: 211245.Google Scholar
Cohen, T., Montoya, R., and Insko, C.. 2006. “Group Morality and Intergroup Relations: Cross-cultural and Experimental Evidence.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 32 (11): 15591572.Google Scholar
Cook, L. 2003. “The Rise and Fall of the Carbonaria Form of the Peppered Moth.” Quarterly Review of Biology 78 (4): 399417.Google Scholar
Copp, David. (2008). “Darwinian Skepticism about Moral Realism.Philosophical Issues 18: 186206.Google Scholar
Coren, S., Ward, L. M. and Enns, J. T.. 2004. Sensation and Perception, 6th ed. Hobokan, NJ: John Wiley & Sons Inc.Google Scholar
Corning, Peter. 2005. Holistic Darwinism: Synergy, Cybernetics, and the Bioeconomics of Evolution. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Cosmides, Leda, and Tooby, John. 1987. “From Evolution to Behavior: Evolutionary Psychology as the Missing Link.” In The Latest on the Best: Essays on Evolution and Optimality, 1st ed., ed. Dupré, John, 277–306. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cosmides, L., Tooby, J., and Barkow, J. H.. 1995. “Introduction: Evolutionary Psychology and Conceptual Integration.” In The Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture, eds. Barkow, J. H., Cosmides, L. and Tooby, J., 163–228. Oxford University Press: Oxford.Google Scholar
Cottingham, J. 2005. The Spiritual Dimension. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cracraft, James. 2012. Two Shining Souls: Jane Addams, Leo Tolstoy, and the Quest for Global Peace. Lanham, MD: Lexington.Google Scholar
Crippen, Matthew. 2010. “William James on Belief: Turning Darwinism against Empiricist Skepticism.” Transactions of the Charles S. Pierce Society 46: 477502.Google Scholar
Crisp, Roger. 2006. Reasons and the Good. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Cross, Stephen J., and Albury, William R.. 1987. “Walter B. Cannon, L. J. Henderson, and the Organic Analogy.” Osiris 3: 165–192.Google Scholar
Cuneo, Terence, and Shafer-Landau, Russ. 2014. “The Moral Fixed Points: New Directions for Moral Nonnaturalism.Philosophical Studies. doi:10.1007/s11098-013-0277-5.Google Scholar
Cunningham, S. 1996. Philosophy and the Darwinian Legacy. Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.Google Scholar
Cushman, F., Gray, K., Gaffey, A., and Mendes, W.. 2012. “Simulating Murder: The Aversion to Harmful Action.” Emotion 12: 17.Google Scholar
Dahaene, Stanislas. 1997. The Number Sense: How the Mind Creates Mathematics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Daly, C., and Liggins., D. 2010. “In Defence of Error Theory.Philosophical Studies 149: 209230.Google Scholar
Dancy, J. 1985. An Introduction to Contemporary Epistemology. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Daniels, Norman. 1979. “Wide Reflective Equilibrium and Theory Acceptance in Ethics.” Journal of Philosophy 76: 256282.Google Scholar
Darwall, S., Gibbard, A., and Railton, P.. 1992. “Toward Fin de siècle Ethics: Some Trends.Philosophical Review, 101(1): 115189.Google Scholar
Darwin, C. 1859. On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Darwin, C. 1871. The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Darwin, C. 1872. The Origin of Species, 6th ed. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Darwin, C. (1879) 2004. The Descent of Man. London: Penguin Classics.Google Scholar
Darwin, C. 1881. Letter 13230. Darwin Correspondence Database. http://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/entry-13230.Google Scholar
Darwin, C. 1882. The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex, 2nd ed. New York: D. Appleton & Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daston, Lorraine, and Richards, Robert J., eds. 2016. “Introduction.” In Structure of Scientific Revolutions at Fifty, 1–11. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Dawkins, Richard. 1976. The Selfish Gene. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dawkins, Richard. 2006. The God Delusion. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Dawkins, Richard. 2012. “The Descent of Edward Wilson.” Prospect Magazine (May 24). http://www.prospectmagazine.co.uk/magazine/edward-wilson-social-conquest-earth-evolutionary-errors-origin-species/.Google Scholar
de Araujo, Ivan E., Lin, Tammy, Veldhuizen, Maria G., and Small, Dana M.. 2013. “Metabolic Regulation of Brain Response to Food Cues.” Current Biology 23 (10): 878883. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2013.04.001.Google Scholar
de Lazari-Radek, K., and Singer., P. 2012. “The Objectivity of Ethics and the Unity of Practical Reason.” Ethics 123: 931.Google Scholar
DeMarco, J. P. 1996. Moral Theory, A Contemporary Overview. Boston, MA: Jones and Bartlett Publishers.Google Scholar
DePaul, Michael. 1993. Balance and Refinement: Beyond Coherence Methods of Moral Inquiry. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
De Waal, Frans. 1997. Good Natured: The Origins of Right and Wrong in Humans and Other Animals. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
De Waal, Frans. 2006. Primates and Philosophers: How Morality Evolved. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Deegan, Mary Jo. 1988. Jane Addams and the Men of the Chicago School, 1892–1918. New Brunswick: Transaction.Google Scholar
Dennett, D. 1995. Darwin’s Dangerous Idea: Evolution and the Meanings of Life. New York: Simon and Shuster.Google Scholar
Dennett, D. 2003. Freedom Evolves. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Dennett, D. 2006. Breaking the Spell: Religion as a Natural Phenomenon. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Dewey, John. 1891. Outlines of a Critical Theory of Ethics. Ann Arbor, MI: Inland Press.Google Scholar
Dewey, John. 1892. “Green’s Theory of the Moral Motive.” Philosophical Review 1: 593612.Google Scholar
Dewey, John. 1894. “Moral Philosophy.” In Johnson’s Universal Cyclopaedia: A New Edition, Volume 5, ed. Adams, Charles Kendall 880885. New York: A. J. Johnson.Google Scholar
Dewey, John. 1898. “Evolution and Ethics.” The Monist 8: 321341.Google Scholar
Dewey, John. 1902. “The Evolutionary Method as Applied to Morality.” Philosophical Review 11: 107124, 353371.Google Scholar
Dewey, John. 1910. The Influence of Darwin on Philosophy, and Other Essays in Contemporary Thought. New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
Dewey, John. 2010. “Sociology of Ethics (1902–1903).” In The Class Lectures of John Dewey, Vol. 1, ed. Koch, Donald F., 22462650. Charlottesville: Intelex.Google Scholar
Dewey, John, and Tufts, James H.. 1908. Ethics. New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
Donnellan, Brendan. 1982. “Friedrich Nietzsche and Paul Rée: Cooperation and Conflict.” Journal of the History of Ideas, 43: 595612.Google Scholar
Douglas, H. 2011. “Domestic Violence Research: Valuing Stories.” In Qualitative Criminology, 129139.Google Scholar
Driesch, H. 1908. The Science and Philosophy of the Organism. Aberdeen: University of Aberdeen Press.Google Scholar
Dugatkin, Lee Alan. 1997. Cooperation among Animals: An Evolutionary Perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dupré, John. 1993. The Disorder of Things: Metaphysical Foundations of the Disunity of Science, New ed. Harvard, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Dupree, A. Hunter. 1959. “The First Darwinian Debate in America: Gray versus Agassiz.” Daedalus 88: 560569.Google Scholar
Durkheim, É . 1973. “The Division of Labour in Society.” Extracts in On Morality and Society, ed. Bellah, R. N.. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Durkheim, É . 1982. The Rules of Sociological Method, ed. Lukes, S.. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Durkheim, É . 1993. Ethics and the Sociology of Morals, ed. Hall, R. T.. New York: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
Dwyer, S. 2006. “How Good Is the Linguistic Analogy?” In The Innate Mind, Volume 2: Culture and Cognition, eds.Carruthers, P., Laurence, S., and Stich, S., 237255. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Eddy, Beth. 2010. “Struggle or Mutual Aid: Jane Addams, Petr Kropotkin, and the Progressive Encounter with Social Darwinism.” The Pluralist 5: 2143.Google Scholar
Eddy, Beth. 2016. Evolutionary Pragmatism and Ethics. Lanham, MD: Lexington.Google Scholar
Eldakar, Omar Tonsi, and Wilson, David Sloan. 2011. “Eight Criticisms Not to Make about Group Selection.” Evolution 65: 15231526.Google Scholar
Emerson, Alfred E. 1939. “Social Coordination and the Superorganism.” American Midland Naturalist 21: 182209.Google Scholar
Enoch, David. 2010. “The Epistemological Challenge to Metanormative Realism.” Philosophical Studies 148: 413438.Google Scholar
Enoch, David. 2011. Taking Morality Seriously. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Feffer, Andrew. 1993. The Chicago Pragmatists and American Progressivism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Fesmire, Steven. 2003. John Dewey and the Moral Imagination: Pragmatism in Ethics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Field, Hartry. 1989. Realism, Mathematics, and Modality. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Field, Hartry. 2005. “Recent Debates about the A Priori.” In Oxford Studies in Epistemology, Volume I, eds. Gendler, Tamar Szabo and Hawthorne, John, 69–88. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fischer, Marilyn. 2013. “Reading Addams’s Democracy and Social Ethics as a Social Gospel, Evolutionary Idealist Text.” The Pluralist 8: 1731.Google Scholar
FitzPatrick, William. 2008. “Morality and Evolutionary Biology.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2008 Edition), ed. Zalta, Edward N.. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2008/entries/morality-biology/.Google Scholar
FitzPatrick, William. 2014. “Why There Is No Darwinian Dilemma for Ethical Realism.” In Challenges to Moral and Religious Belief: Disagreement and Evolution, eds. Bergmann, M. and Kain, P., 237–255. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
FitzPatrick, William. 2015. “Debunking Evolutionary Debunking of Ethical Realism.” Philosophical Studies 172: 883904.Google Scholar
Foot, Philippa. 2001. Natural Goodness. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Francis, M. 2007. Herbert Spencer and the Invention of Modern Life. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Francis, Mark. 2014. Herbert Spencer and the Invention of Modern Life. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Francis, Mark, and Taylor, Michael. 2015. Herbert Spencer: Legacies. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Frank, R. H. 1988. Passions within Reason: The Strategic Role of the Emotions. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Fraser, B. 2014. “Evolutionary Debunking Arguments and the Reliability of Moral Cognition.” Philosophical Studies 168: 457473.Google Scholar
Fry, Iris. 1996. “On the Biological Significance of the Properties of Matter: L. J. Henderson’s Theory of the Fitness of the Environment.” Journal of the History of Biology 29: 155196.Google Scholar
Gardner, Andy. 2011. “Kin Selection Under Blending Inheritance.” Journal of Theoretical Biology 284: 125129.Google Scholar
Garner, R. 1994. Beyond Morality. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Garner, R. 2007. “Abolishing Morality.” Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 10(5): 499–513.Google Scholar
Gaulin, S. J. C., and McBurney, D.. 2001. Psychology: An Evolutionary Approach. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Gayon, Jean. 1999. Nietzsche and Darwin. In Biology and the Foundation of Ethics, eds. Maienschein, Jane and Ruse, Michael. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gert, B. 2012. “The Definition of Morality.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2012 Edition), ed. Edward N. Zalta. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2012/entries/morality-definition/.Google Scholar
Gibbard, Alan. 2003. Thinking How to Live. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gintis, H., Henrich, J., Bowles, S., Boyd, R., and Fehr., E. 2008. “Strong Reciprocity and the Roots of Human Morality.” Social Justice Research 21: 241253.Google Scholar
Girón, Alvaro. 2003. “Kropotkin between Lamarck and Darwin: The Impossible Synthesis.” Asclepio 55: 189213.Google Scholar
Gissing, G. 1891. New Grub Street. Melbourne: E.A. Petherick.Google Scholar
Gladwell, M. 2005. Blink: The Power of Thinking without Thinking. New York: Back Bay Books.Google Scholar
Godfrey-Smith, Peter. 1996. Complexity and the Function of Mind in Nature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goodwin, G., and Darley, J.. 2008. “The Psychology of Metaethics: Exploring Objectivism.” Cognition 106 (3): 13391366.Google Scholar
Goodwin, G., and Darley, J.. 2010. “The Perceived Objectivity of Ethical Beliefs: Psychological Findings and Implications for Public Policy.” Review of Philosophy and Psychology 1 (2): 161188.Google Scholar
Goodwin, G., and Darley, J.. 2012. “Why Are Some Moral Beliefs Seen as More Objective than Others?” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 48 (1): 250256.Google Scholar
Gouinlock, James. 1972. John Dewey’s Philosophy of Value. New York: Humanities.Google Scholar
Gould, Stephen Jay. 1977. Ever since Darwin Reflections in Natural History. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Gould, Stephen Jay. 1978. “Sociobiology: The Art of Storytelling.” New Scientist 80: 530533.Google Scholar
Gould, Stephen Jay. 1987. “The Panda’s Thumb of Technology.” Natural History 1 (Jan.): 6874.Google Scholar
Gould, Stephen Jay. 1988. “On Replacing the Idea of Progress with an Operational Notion of Directionality.” In Evolutionary Progress, ed. Nitecki, M. H., 319338. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gould, Stephen Jay. 1989. Wonderful Life: The Burgess Shale and the Nature of History. New York: W. W. Norton Co.Google Scholar
Gould, S. J., and Lewontin., R. C. 1979. “The Spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossion Paradigm: A Critique of the Adaptationist Programme.” Proceedings of the Royal Society: Biological Sciences, Series B 205: 581598.Google Scholar
Grant, B. 1999. Fine Tuning the Peppered Moth Paradigm. Evolution 53 (3): 980984.Google Scholar
Gray, Asa. 1877. Darwiniana: Essays and Reviews Pertaining to Darwinism. New York: Appleton.Google Scholar
Gray, J. 1984. Hayek on Liberty. New York: Basil Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
Green, Judith M. 2010. “Social Democracy, Cosmopolitan Hospitality, and Intercivilizational Peace: Lessons from Jane Addams.” In Feminist Interpretations of Jane Addams, ed. Hamington, Maurice, 223253. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Green, Judith M. 2013. Moral Tribes. Emotion, Reason, and the Gap between Us and Them. New York: Penguin Press.Google Scholar
Greene, Joshua D. 2008. “The Secret Joke of Kant’s Soul.” In Moral Psychology, Vol. 3. The Neuroscience of Morality: Emotion, Brain Disorders, and Development, ed. Walter Sinnott-Armstrong, 3580. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Greene, J. 2014. “Beyond Point-and-Shoot Morality: Why Cognitive (Neuro)science Matters for Ethics.” Ethics 124: 694726.Google Scholar
Greene, J., Sommerville, R., Nystrom, L., Darley, J., and Cohen., J. 2001. “An fMRI Investigation of Emotional Engagement in Moral Judgment.” Science 293 (5537): 21052108.Google Scholar
Greenwald, A., and Banaji., M. 1995. “Implicit Social Cognition: Attitudes, Self-esteem, and Stereotypes.” Psychological Review 102 (1): 427.Google Scholar
Guttenplan, Samuel. 1994. A Companion to the Philosophy of Mind. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Haber, Matt. 2013. “Colonies Are Individuals: Revisiting the Superorganism Revival.” In From Groups to Individuals: Perspectives on Biological Associations and Emerging Individuality, Vienna Series in Theoretical Biology, eds. Bouchard, Frédéric and Huneman, Philippe, 195–217. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Haidt, J. 2001. ‘The Emotional Dog and Its Rational Tail: A Social Intuitionist Approach to Moral Judgment.” Psychological Review 108: 814834.Google Scholar
Haidt, J. 2012. The Righteous Mind: Why Good People Are Divided by Politics and Religion. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Haidt, J. and Graham, J.. 2007. “When Morality Opposes Justice: Conservatives Have Moral Intuitions that Liberals May Not Recognize.” Social Justice Research 20 (1): 98116.Google Scholar
Haidt, J. and Joseph, C.. 2007. “The Moral Mind: How Five Sets of Innate Intuitions Guide the Development of Many Culture-Specific Virtues, and Perhaps Even Modules.” The Innate Mind 3: 367392.Google Scholar
Haines, Valerie. 1991. “Spencer, Darwin, and the Question of Reciprocal Influence.” Journal of the History of Biology 24: 409431.Google Scholar
Haldane, . 1932. The Causes of Evolution. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Hale, Piers J. 2014. Political Descent: Malthus, Mutualism, and the Politics of Evolution in Victorian England. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hamilton, W. D. 1964a. “The Genetical Evolution of Social Behaviour I.” Journal of Theoretical Biology 7: 116.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hamilton, W. D. 1964b. “The Genetical Evolution of Social Behaviour II.” Journal of Theoretical Biology 7: 1752.Google Scholar
Hamilton, W. D. 1975. “Innate Social Aptitudes of Man: An Approach from Evolutionary Genetics.” In ASA Studies 4: Biosocial Anthropology, ed. R. Fox, 133–153. London: Malaby Press.Google Scholar
Hamington, Maurice. 2009. The Social Philosophy of Jane Addams. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Hardin, G. 1968. “The Tragedy of the Commons.” Science 162 (3859): 12431248.Google Scholar
Harman, Gilbert. 1977. The Nature of Morality: An Introduction to Ethics. New York: Oxford.Google Scholar
Harman, Oren. 2010. The Price of Altruism: George Price and the Search for the Origins of Kindness. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Harms, W. F. 2000. “Adaption and Moral Realism.” Biology and Philosophy 15: 699712.Google Scholar
Harrington, . 1996. Reenchanted Science. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Harris, S. 2004. The End of Faith: Religion, Terror and the Future of Reason. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Hauser, Mark. 2006. Moral Minds: How Nature Designed Our Universal Sense of Right and Wrong. New York: Ecco.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. A. 1958. “Freedom, Reason and Tradition.” Ethics LXVIII(4): 229245.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. A. (1960) 1971. The Constitution of Liberty. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. A. 1967. Studies in Philosophy, Politics and Economics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayek, F. A. 1973. Law, Legislation and Liberty. Volume I: Rules and Order. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. A. 1976. Law, Legislation and Liberty. Volume II: The Mirage of Social Justice. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. A. 1978. New Studies in Philosophy, Politics, Economics and the History of Ideas. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. A. 1979. Law, Legislation and Liberty. Volume III: The Political Order of a Free People. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. A. 1984. The Essence of Hayek, eds. Nishiyama, C. and Leube, K. R.. Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution Press.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. A. 1988. The Fatal Conceit: The Errors of Socialism. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Helfand, Michael S. 1977. “T. H. Huxley’s ‘Evolution and Ethics’: The Politics of Evolution and the Evolution of Politics.” Victorian Studies 20: 159177.Google Scholar
Henderson, Lawrence J. 1917. The Order of Nature. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Henson, Pamela. 2008. “Alfred Edwards Emerson.” Complete Dictionary of Scientific Biography 20: 389393.Google Scholar
Herrel, Anthony Huyghe. 2008. “Rapid Large-Scale Evolutionary Divergence in Morphology and Performance Associated with Exploitation of a Different Dietary Resource.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 105 (12): 47924795.Google Scholar
Hinckfuss, I. 1987. The Moral Society: Its Structure and Effects. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar
Hitchens, C. 2007. God Is Not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything. New York: Twelve.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas. (1651) 2008. Leviathan. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Reprint, Gaskin, J. C. A. Leviathan, edited with introduction.Google Scholar
Hodge, M. J. S. 2009. “Capitalist Contexts for Darwinian Theory: Land, Finance, Industry and Empire.” Journal of the History of Biology 42: 399416.Google Scholar
Hodgson, G. M. 1991. “Hayek’s Theory of Cultural Evolution: An Evaluation in the Light of Vanberg’s Critique.” Economics and Philosophy 7: 6782.Google Scholar
Hodgson, G. M. 1993. Economics and Evolution: Bringing Life Back into Economics. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Hodgson, G. M. 2004. “Social Darwinism in Anglophone Academic Journals: A Contribution to the History of the Term.” Journal of Historical Sociology 17(4): 428463.Google Scholar
Hofstadter, Richard. 1944. Social Darwinism in American Thought. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Huemer, Michael. 2005. Ethical Intuitionism. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Huemer, Michael. 2008. “Revisionary Intuitionism.” Social Philosophy and Policy 25: 368392.Google Scholar
Hull, David L. 1978. “A Matter of Individuality.” Philosophy of Science 45 (3): 335360.Google Scholar
Hull, David L. 1980. “Individuality and Selection.” Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 11: 311332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hume, David. (1739) 2000. A Treatise of Human Nature. London: John Noon. Reprint, eds. Norton, David Fate and Norton, Mary J.. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hurka, T. 2014. British Ethical Theorists from Sidgwick to Ewing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hutter, Thiago, Gimbert, Carine, Bouchard, Frédéric, and Lapointe, François-Joseph. 2015. “Being Human Is a Gut Feeling.” Microbiome 3 (1): 9. doi:10.1186/s40168-015-0076-7.Google Scholar
Huxley, J., ed. 1961. The Humanist Frame. New York: Harper & Brothers Publishers.Google Scholar
Huxley, Julian. 1912. The Individual in the Animal Kingdom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Huxley, Julian. (1923) 1970. Essays of a Biologist. Freeport, NY: Books for Libraries Press.Google Scholar
Huxley, Julian. 1926. “The Biological Basis of Individuality.” Journal of Philosophical Studies 1 (July): 305319.Google Scholar
Huxley, Julian. 1934. If I Were Dictator. New York: Harper and Brothers.Google Scholar
Huxley, Julian. 1942. Evolution: The Modern Synthesis. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Huxley, Julian. 1943. TVA: Adventure in Planning. London: Scientific Book Club.Google Scholar
Huxley, Julian. 1948. UNESCO: Its Purpose and Its Philosophy. Washington, DC: Public Affairs Press.Google Scholar
Huxley, Leonard. 1900. Life and Letters of Thomas Henry Huxley (2 vols). New York: D. Appleton.Google Scholar
Huxley, Thomas Henry. 1871. “Administrative Nihilism.” Fortnightly Review 16: 525543.Google Scholar
Huxley, Thomas Henry. (1888) 2011. “The Struggle for Existence in Human Society.” In Collected Essays, Volume 9: Evolution and Ethics, 195236. Cambridge: Cambridge Library Collection.Google Scholar
Huxley, Thomas Henry. 1888. “The Struggle for Existence: A Programme.” Nineteenth Century 23: 161180.Google Scholar
Huxley, Thomas Henry. (1893) 2011. “Evolution and Ethics.” In: Collected Essays, Volume 9: Evolution and Ethics, 46116. Cambridge: Cambridge Library Collection.Google Scholar
Huxley, Thomas Henry. 1893 Evolution and Ethics: The Romanes Lecture 1893. London: MacmillanGoogle Scholar
Huxley, Thomas Henry. 1894. Evolution and Ethics and Other Essays. London: MacMillan and Co.Google Scholar
Huxley, T. H., and Huxley., J. S. 1947. Evolution and Ethics 1893–1943. London: Pilot.Google Scholar
Ichikawa, J., and Steup., M. 2014. “The Analysis of Knowledge.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2014 Edition), ed. Edward N. Zalta. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2014/entries/knowledge-analysis/.Google Scholar
Irons, W. 1996. “Morality, Religion, and Human Nature.” In Religion and Science: History, Method, Dialogue, eds. Richardson, W. M. and Wildman, W., 375399. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jackson, Frank. 1998. From Metaphysics to Ethics: A Defense of Conceptual Analysis. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
James, William. 1904. “The Chicago School.” Psychological Bulletin 1: 15.Google Scholar
Janaway, Christopher. 2007. Beyond Selflessness: Reading Nietzsche’s Genealogy. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Oxford Scholarship Online, 2007. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199279692.001.0001.Google Scholar
Janaway, Christopher. 2012. Nietzsche on Morality, Drives, and Human Greatness. In Nietzsche, Naturalism, and Normativity, eds. Janaway, Christopher and Robertson, Simon. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Oxford Scholarship Online, 2013. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199583676.003.0008.Google Scholar
Jardine, Nicholas. 2003. “Whigs and Stories: Herbert Butterfield and the Historiography of Science.” History of Science 41: 125140.Google Scholar
Jaworska, Agnieszka, and Tannenbaum, Julie. 2013. “The Grounds of Moral Status.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2013 Edition), ed. Edward N. Zalta. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2013/entries/grounds-moral-status/.Google Scholar
Jennings, Herbert Spencer. 1906. Behavior of the Lower Organisms. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Jennings, Herbert Spencer. 1927. “Diverse Doctrines of Evolution, Their Relation to the Practice of Science and Life.” Science 65: 1925.Google Scholar
Jensen, Christopher X. J. 2010. “Robert Trivers and Colleagues on Nowak, Tarnita, and Wilson’s ‘The Evolution of Eusociality.’” Christopherxjjensen.com (October 10). http://www.christopherxjjensen.com/2010/10/13/robert-trivers-and-colleagues-on-nowak-tarnita-and-wilsons-the-evolution-of-eusociality.Google Scholar
Joyce, R. 2001. The Myth of Morality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Joyce, R. 2005. “Moral Fictionalism.” In Fictionalism in Metaphysics, ed. Kalderon, M., 287313. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Joyce, R. 2006a. The Evolution of Morality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Joyce, R. 2006b. “Is Human Morality Innate?” In The Innate Mind: Culture and Cognition, eds.,Carruthers, P., Laurence, S., and Stich, S., 257279. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Joyce, R. 2008. “Precis of Evolution of Morality and Reply to Critics.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 77: 213267.Google Scholar
Joyce, R. 2013. “Irrealism and the Genealogy of Morals.” Ratio 26: 351–372. doi:10.1111/rati.12027.Google Scholar
Joyce, R. 2014. “The Evolutionary Debunking of Morality.” In Reason and Responsibility: Readings in Some Basic Problems of Philosophy, 15th ed., eds. J. Feinberg and R. Shafer-Landau, 527–534. Boston: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
Joyce, R. 2016. “Reply: Confessions of a Modest Debunker.” In Explanation in Ethics and Mathematics: Debunking and Dispensibility, eds. Leibowitz, U. and Sinclair, N.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jumonville, Neil. 2002. “The Cultural Politics of the Sociobiology Debate.” Journal of the History of Biology 35: 569593.Google Scholar
Kahane, Guy. 2011. “Evolutionary Debunking Arguments.Noûs 45: 103125.Google Scholar
Kant, I. 1959. Foundations of the Metaphysics of Morals. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
Katsafanas, Paul. 2013. “Nietzsche’s Philosophical Psychology.” In The Oxford Handbook of Nietzsche, eds. Richardson, John and Gemes, Ken, 727757. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kelly, Thomas, and McGrath, Sarah. 2010. “Is Reflective Equilibrium Enough?Philosophical Perspectives 24: 325359.Google Scholar
Kettlewell, B. 1973. The Evolution of Melanism. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Kinna, Ruth. 1992. “Kropotkin and Huxley.” Politics 12: 4147.Google Scholar
Kitcher, P. 1985. Vaulting Ambition: Sociobiology and the Quest for Human Nature. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kitcher, P. 2005. “Biology and Ethics.” In Oxford Handbook of Ethical Theory, ed. Copp, David, 575–586. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kitcher, P. 2006. “Four Ways of ‘Biologicizing’ Ethics.” In Conceptual Issues in Evolutionary Biology, 3rd ed. (Bradford Books), ed. Sober, Elliott, 439–450. New York: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kitcher, P. 2011. The Ethical Project. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kley, R. 1994. Hayek’s Social and Political Thought. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Kozo-Polyansky, Boris. 2010. Symbiogenesis: A New Principle of Evolution, trans. Victor Fet, eds. Fet, Victor and Margulis, Lynn. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Krebs, D. 2011. The Origins of Morality: An Evolutionary Account. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kropotkin, Pyotr. 1887. “The Scientific Bases of Anarchy.” Nineteenth Century 21: 238252.Google Scholar
Kropotkin, Pyotr. 1890. “Mutual Aid among Animals.” Nineteenth Century 28: 337354, 699719.Google Scholar
Kropotkin, Pyotr. 1891. “Mutual Aid among Savages.” Nineteenth Century 29: 538559.Google Scholar
Kropotkin, Pyotr. 1896. “Mutual Aid amongst Ourselves.” Nineteenth Century 39: 914936.Google Scholar
Kropotkin, Pyotr. 1902. Mutual Aid: A Factor in Evolution. Boston, MA: Extending Horizons Books.Google Scholar
Kvanvig, Jonathan. 1992. The Intellectual Virtues and the Life of the Mind: On the Place of the Virtues in Contemporary Epistemology. Savage, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Laham, S. 2009. “Expanding the Moral Circle.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 45 (1): 250253.Google Scholar
Lakatos, I. 1970. “Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes.” In Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, eds. Lakatos, I. and Musgrave, A., 91195. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Leach, C., Ellemers, N. and Barreto, M.. 2007. Group Virtue: The Importance of Morality (vs. Competence and Sociability) in the Positive Evaluation of In-Groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 93 (2): 234249.Google Scholar
Leibowitz, U. D. 2011. “Scientific Explanation and Moral Explanation.” Noûs 45: 472503.Google Scholar
Leibowitz, U. D. 2014. “Explaining Moral Knowledge.” Journal of Moral Philosophy 11: 3556.Google Scholar
Leibowitz, U. D., and Sinclair, N. eds. 2016. Explanation in Ethics and Mathematics: Debunking and Indispensability. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Leiter, Brian. 2002. Nietzsche on Morality. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lekan, Todd. 2003. Making Morality: Pragmatist Reconstruction in Ethical Theory. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.Google Scholar
Levins, R., and Lewontin, R. C.. 1985. The Dialectical Biologist. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lévy-Bruhl, L. 1905. Ethics and Moral Science. London: Archibald Constable & Co.Google Scholar
Lewis, D. 1973. Counterfactuals. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lewontin, Richard. 1976. “Sociobiology: A Caricature of Darwinism.” Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 2: 2223, 30.Google Scholar
Lillehammer, H. 2003. “Debunking Morality: Evolutionary Naturalism and Moral Error Theory.” Biology and Philosophy 18: 567581.Google Scholar
Lillehammer, H. 2010. “Methods of Ethics and the Descent of Man: Sidgwick and Darwin on Ethics and Evolution.” Biology and Philosophy 25: 361378.Google Scholar
Lillehammer, H. 2011. “The Epistemology of Ethical Intuitions.” Philosophy 86: 175200.Google Scholar
Lillehammer, H. 2016. “‘An Assumption of Extreme Significance’: Moore, Ross and Spencer on Ethics and Evolution.” In Explanation in Ethics and Mathematics: Debunking and Dispensability, eds. Uri D. Leibowitz and Neil Sinclair, 103–123. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Linville, Mark. 2012. “The Moral Argument.” In The Blackwell Companion to Natural Theology, eds. Craig, William Lane and Moreland, J. P., 391448. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lloyd, E., Wilson, D. and Sober, E.. 2011. Evolutionary Mismatch and What To Do about It: A Basic Tutorial. Wesley Chapel: The Evolution Institute.Google Scholar
Locke, Dustin. “Darwinian Normative Skepticism.” In Challenges to Moral And Religious Belief: Disagreement and Evolution, eds. Michael Bergmann and Patrick Kain, 220236, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Losco, Joseph. 2011. “From Outrage to Orthodoxy? Sociobiology and Political Science at 35.” Politics and the Life Sciences 30: 8084.Google Scholar
Machery, E., and Mallon., R 2010. “The Evolution of Morality.” In The Moral Psychology Handbook, eds. Doris, J., Harman, G., Nichols, S., Prinz, J., Sinnott-Armstrong, W., and Stich, S., 346. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, A. 1984. After Virtue. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Mackie, J. 1977. Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Mackie, J. (1978) 1985. “The Law of the Jungle: Moral Alternatives and Principles of Evolution.” Republished in Persons and Values: Selected Papers, Volume II, eds. Mackie, J. and Mackie, P., 120131. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mackie, J. 1979. Hume’s Moral Theory. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Mackie, J. 1980. “Review of Sociobiology: Sense or Nonsense, by Michael Ruse.” Erkenntnis 15: 189194.Google Scholar
Mackie, J. 1982a. “Co-operation, Competition, and Moral Philosophy.Erkenntnis 17: 152–169.Google Scholar
Mackie, J. 1982b. “Morality and Retributive Emotions.” Erkenntnis 15: 206219.Google Scholar
Mackie, J. L., 1982, “Morality and the Retributive Emotions,” Criminal Justice Ethics, 1: 3–10.Google Scholar
Marciano, A. 2007. “Economists on Darwin’s Theory of Social Evolution and Human Behaviour.” European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 14(4): 681700.Google Scholar
Margulis, Lynn. 1993. Symbiosis in Cell Evolution: Microbial Communities in the Archean and Proterozoic Eons. New York: W. H. Freeman & Co.Google Scholar
Mason, K. 2010. “Debunking Arguments and the Genealogy of Religion and Morality.” Philosophy Compass 5: 770778.Google Scholar
Marett, R. R. 1902. “Origin and Validity in Ethics.” In Personal Idealism: Philosophical Essays by Eight Members of the University of Oxford, ed., 221287. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Mates, B. 1996. The Skeptic Way: Sextus Empiricus’s Outlines of Pyrrhonism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Matheson, C., and Dallmann., J. 2015. “Historicist Theories of Scientific Rationality.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2015 Edition), ed. Zalta, Edward N.. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2015/entries/rationality-historicist/.Google Scholar
Maund, B. 1995. Colors: Their Nature and Representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mayr, Ernst. 1990. “When Is Historiography Whiggish?Journal of the History of Ideas 51: 301309.Google Scholar
Mayr, Ernst. 2001. What Evolution Is. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Mayr, E. and Provine, W. B., eds. 1980. The Evolutionary Synthesis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
McDonald, R., Newell, B. and Denson, T.. 2014. “Would You Rule Out Going Green? The Effect of Inclusion Versus Exclusion Mindset on Pro-environmental Willingness.” European Journal of Social Psychology 44 (5): 507513.Google Scholar
McDowell, J. 1985. “Values and Secondary Properties.” In Morality and Objectivity, ed. T. Honderich, 110–29. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
McDowell, J. 1988. “Values and Secondary Properties.” In Essays on Moral Realism, ed. Sayre-McCord, G., 110–129. Ithica, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
McFarland, D. F. 1998. “Watering Dairy Cattle.” Dairy Feeding Systems Management, Components and Nutrients (NRAES-116). Ithaca, NY: Natural Resources, Agriculture and Engineering Services.Google Scholar
McGranahan, Lucas. 2011. “William James’s Social Evolutionism in Focus.” Pluralist 6: 8092.Google Scholar
Melis, A., Altricher, K., Schneider, A., and Tomasello., M. 2013. “Allocation of Resources to Collaborators and Free-Riders by 3-Year-Olds.” Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 114: 364370.Google Scholar
Mendelson, Everett. 2008. “Locating ‘Fitness’ and L. J. Henderson.” In Fitness of the Cosmos for Life: Biochemistry and Fine-Tuning, ed. Barrow, John D., Simon Conway Morris, Stephen J. Freeland, and Charles L. Harper Jr., 3–96. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Midgley, M. 1978. Beast and Man: The Roots of Human Nature. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Midgley, M. 1979. “Gene-juggling.” Philosophy 54: 439–58.Google Scholar
Mikhail, J. 2011. Elements of Moral Cognition: Rawls’ Linguistic Analogy and the Cognitive Science of Moral and Legal Judgment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. 1863. On Liberty. Boston, MA: Ticknor and Fields.Google Scholar
Mitman, Gregg. 1992. The State of Nature: Ecology, Community, and American Social Thought, 1900–1950. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Moore, A.W 1910. Pragmatism and Its Critics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Moore, G. E. 1903. Principia Ethica, rev. ed., ed. Baldwin, Tom. Cambridge: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Moore, G. E. 1912. Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Moore, Gregory. 2002. Nietzsche, Biology, and Metaphor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Morgan, C. Lloyd. 1923. Emergent Evolution. London: Williams and Norgate, Ltd.Google Scholar
Morris, Paul J. 1997. “Louis Agassiz’s Arguments against Darwinism in his Additions to the French Translation of the ‘Essay on Classification.’” Journal of the History of Biology 30: 121134.Google Scholar
Murphy, J. 1982. Evolution, Morality, and the Meaning of Life. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Myers, F. W. H. 1881. “George Eliot.” Century Magazine 23 (November): 57–64.Google Scholar
Nagel, Ernest. 1954. “Naturalism Reconsidered.” Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 28: 517.Google Scholar
Nagel, T. 2012. Mind and Cosmos: Why the Materialist Neo-Darwinian Conception of Nature is Almost Certainly False. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nanay, B. 2005. “Can Cumulative Selection Explain Adaptation?Philosophy of Science 72: 10991112.Google Scholar
Neander, K. 1988. “What Does Natural Selection Explain? Correction to Sober.” Philosophy of Science 55: 422426.Google Scholar
Nichols, S. 2004. Sentimental Rules: On the Natural Foundations of Moral Judgment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich. 1954. The Antichrist, trans. W. Kaufmann. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich. 1966. Beyond Good and Evil, trans. W. Kaufmann. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich. 1968. The Will to Power, trans. W. Kaufmann and R. J. Hollingdale. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich. 1983. Untimely Meditations, trans. R. J. Hollingdale. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich. 1986. Human, All-too-Human, trans. R. J. Hollingdale. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich. 1997. Daybreak: Thoughts on the Prejudices of Morality, eds. Clark, Maudemarie and Leiter, Brian, trans. R. J. Hollingdale. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich. 1998. On the Genealogy of Morality, trans. Maudemarie Clark and Alan Swensen. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich. 2001. The Gay Science, trans. Josephine Nauckhoff. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nolan, D., Restall, G. and West, C.. 2005. “Moral Fictionalism Versus the Rest.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 83 (3): 307330.Google Scholar
Nowak, Martina A., Tarnita, Corina E., and Wilson, Edward O.. 2010. “The Evolution of Eusociality.” Nature 446 (August 26): 10571062.Google Scholar
Nozick, Robert. 1981. Philosophical Explanations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Okasha, Samir. 2006. Evolution and the Levels of Selection. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Okasha, Samir. 2010. “Altruism Researchers Must Cooperate.” Nature 467 (October 7): 653655.Google Scholar
Olsen, J. 2011. “Getting Real About Moral Fictionalism.” Oxford Studies in Metaethics 6: 181.Google Scholar
Olson, Jonas. 2011. “In Defence of Moral Error Theory.” In New Waves in Metaethics, ed. Brady, M., 6284. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Olson, Jonas. 2014. Moral Error Theory: History, Critique, Defence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Osborn, Henry Fairfield. 1894. “The Discussion between Spencer and Weismann.” Psychological Review 1: 312315.Google Scholar
Pappas, Gregory Fernando. 2008. John Dewey’s Ethics: Democracy as Experience. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Parascandola, John. 1971. “Organismic and Holistic Concepts in the Thought of L. J. Henderson.” Journal of the History of Biology 4: 63113.Google Scholar
Parfit, D. 1984. Reasons and Persons. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Parfit, D. 2011. On What Matters, 2 vols. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Parker, George Howard. 1924a. “Some Implications of the Evolutionary Hypothesis.” Philosophical Review 33 (November): 593603.Google Scholar
Parker, George Howard. 1924b. “Organic Determinism.” Science 59: 517521.Google Scholar
Parker, George Howard. 1938. “Biographical Memoir of William Morton Wheeler.” Biographical Memoirs 19 (National Academy of Science, 1938): 203241.Google Scholar
Peacocke, C. 2004. The Realm of Reason. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pearce, Trevor. 2010a. “From ‘Circumstances’ to ‘Environment’: Herbert Spencer and the Origins of the Idea of Organism-Environment Interaction.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 41: 241252.Google Scholar
Pearce, Trevor. 2010b. “‘A Great Complication of Circumstances’ – Darwin and the Economy of Nature.” Journal of the History of Biology 43: 493528.Google Scholar
Pearce, Trevor. 2014a. “The Dialectical Biologist, circa 1890: John Dewey and the Oxford Hegelians.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 52: 747778.Google Scholar
Pearce, Trevor. 2014b. “The Origins and Development of the Idea of Organism-Environment Interaction.” In Entangled Life: Organism and Environment in the Biological and Social Sciences, eds. Barker, Gillian, Desjardins, Eric and Pearce, Trevor, 1332. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Pearce, Trevor. 2017. [Review of] Beth Eddy, Evolutionary Pragmatism and Ethics, Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 53.Google Scholar
Peterson, Erik L. 2011. “The Excluded Philosophy of Evo-Devo? Revisiting C. H. Waddington’s Failed Attempt to Embed Alfred North Whitehead’s ‘Organicism’ in Evolutionary Biology.” History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 33: 301320.Google Scholar
Peterson, Michael. 2012. Reason and Religious Belief. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Peterson, Michael, and Ruse, Michael. 2017. Science, Evolution, and Religion: A Debate about Atheism and Theism. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Philipse, Herman. 2012. God in the Age of Science: A Critique of Religious Reason. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Phillips, Paul T. 2007. “One World, One Faith: The Quest for Unity in Julian Huxley’s Religion of Evolutionary Humanism.” Journal of the History of Ideas 68 (October): 613633.Google Scholar
Pinker, S. 2009. How the Mind Works. New York: W. W. Norton & Co.Google Scholar
Pinker, S. 2012. The Better Angels of Our Nature: Why Violence Has Declined. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Plantinga, Alvin. 1993. Warrant and Proper Function. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Plantinga, Alvin, and Dennett, Daniel. 2011. Science and Religion: Are They Compatible? New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pollock, John. 1986. Contemporary Theories of Knowledge. Savage, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Pollock, John, and Cruz, Joseph. 1991. Contemporary Theories of Knowledge, 2nd ed. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Portier, . 1918. Les Symbiotes. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Library.Google Scholar
Pradeu, Thomas. 2012. The Limits of the Self: Immunology and Biological Identity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Prinz, J. 2007. The Emotional Construction of Morals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Prinz, J. 2008. “Is Morality Innate?” In Moral Psychology, Volume 1: The Evolution of Morality: Adaptations and Innateness, ed. Sinnott-Armstrong, W., 367406. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Prinz, J. 2009. “Against Moral Nativism.” In Stich and his Critics, eds. Murphy, D. and Bishop, M., 1 Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Pritchard, H. A. 2002. Moral Writings, ed. MacAdam, J., Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Putnam, H. 1981. Reason, Truth and History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. O. 1951. “Two Dogmas of Empiricism.” The Philosophical Review 60: 20–43.Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. O. 1969. “Epistemology Naturalized.” Reprint, Ontological Relativity and Other Essays, 6990. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Quinn, W. 1986. “Truth and Explanation in Ethics.” Ethics 96: 524544.Google Scholar
Railton, P. 2003. Facts, Values and Norms: Essays Toward a Morality of Consequence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rakison, D., and Derringer., J. 2008. “Do Infants Possess an Evolved Spider-Detection Mechanism?” Cognition 107: 381393.Google Scholar
Rashdall, H. 1907. The Theory of Good and Evil, 2 vols. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ratnieks, Francis L. W., Kevin R. Foster, and Tom Wenseleers. 2011. “Darwin’s Special Difficulty: The Evolution of ‘Neuter Insects’ and Current Theory.” Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 65: 481492.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rée, Paul. 2003. Basic Writings, ed. and trans. Small, Robin. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Richards, R. A. 2005. “Evolutionary Naturalism and the Logical Structure of Valuation.” Cosmos and History: The Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy 1(2): 270294.Google Scholar
Richards, Robert J. 1986. “A Defense of Evolutionary Ethics.” Biology and Philosophy 1: 265293.Google Scholar
Richards, Robert J. 1987. Darwin and the Emergence of Evolutionary Theories of Mind and Behavior. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Richards, Robert J. 1993. The Meaning of Evolution: The Morphological Construction and Ideological Reconstruction of Darwin’s Theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Richards, Robert J. 2013. Was Hitler a Darwinian? Disputed Questions in the History of Evolutionary Theory. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Richards, Robert J., and Ruse, Michael. 2016. Debating Darwin. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Richardson, John. 2004. Nietzsche’s New Darwinism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Richerson, P., and Henrich, J.. 2012. “Tribal Social Instincts and the Cultural Evolution of Institutions to Solve Collective Action Problems.” Cliodynamics 3 (1): 3880.Google Scholar
Richerson, Peter J., and Boyd, Robert. 2005. Not by Genes Alone: How Culture Transformed Human Evolution. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Robinson, S. J. 2008. “How to Be an Error Theorist about Morality.Polish Journal of Philosophy 2: 107125.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Eugene, and Zilber-Rosenberg, Ilana. 2011. “Symbiosis and Development: The Hologenome Concept.” Birth Defects Research Part C: Embryo Today: Reviews 93 (1): 5666. doi:10.1002/bdrc.20196.Google Scholar
Ross, W. D. 1930. The Right and the Good. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ross, W. D. 1939. The Foundations of Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ross, W. D. 1995. Aristotle, 6th ed. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rottschaefer, W. A., and Martinsen., D. 1995. “Really Taking Darwin Seriously: An Alternative to Michael Ruse’s Darwinian Metaethics.” In Issues in Evolutionary Ethics, ed. Thompson, P., 375–408. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. 1762. “Du Contrat Social.” In Collected Writings, 13 vols., eds. Masters, Roger and Kelly, Christopher. Dartmouth: University Press of New England, 1990–2010.Google Scholar
Royce, Josiah. 1885. The Religious Aspect of Philosophy. Boston, MA: Houghton, Mifflin.Google Scholar
Ruse, Michael. 1979a. The Darwinian Revolution: Science Red in Tooth and Claw. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ruse, Michael. 1979b. Sociobiology: Sense or Nonsense?. London: D. Reidel.Google Scholar
Ruse, Michael. 1986. Taking Darwin Seriously. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ruse, Michael. 1989. The Darwinian Paradigm. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ruse, Michael. 1993. “The New Evolutionary Ethics.” In Evolutionary Ethics, eds. Nitecki, M. H. and Nitecki, D. V., 133162. Albany, NY: Suny Press.Google Scholar
Ruse, Michael. 1995. Evolutionary Naturalism. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ruse, Michael. 1998. Taking Darwin Seriously. A Naturalistic Approach to Philosophy. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
Ruse, Michael. 2006. “Is Darwinian Metaethics Possible (And If It Is, Is It Well Taken)?” In Giovanni Boniolo an Gabriele de Anna, Evolutionary Ethics and Contemporary Biology, 1326. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ruse, Michael.2009a. “Evolution and Ethics: The Sociobiological Approach.” In Philosophy After Darwin, ed. Ruse, Michael, 489511. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ruse, Michael. 2009b. “Introduction.” In Evolution and Ethics, Huxley, Thomas Henry, viixxxvi. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ruse, Michael. 2011. “Harvard Holism.” Chronicle of Higher Education (March 30). http://chronicle.com/blogs/brainstorm/harvard-holism/33763.Google Scholar
Ruse, Michael. 2012. The Philosophy of Human Evolution. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ruse, Michael. 2013. The Gaia Hypothesis: Science on a Pagan Planet. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ruse, Michael. 2017. Darwinism as Religion: What Literature Tells Us about Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ruse, Michael, and Wilson, E. O.. 1985. “The Evolution of Morality.” New Scientist 1478: 108128.Google Scholar
Ruse, Michael, and Wilson, E. O.. 1986. “Moral Philosophy as Applied Science.” Philosophy 61 (236): 173192.Google Scholar
Ruse, Michael, 1989. “The Evolution of Ethics.” New Scientist 17: 108128.Google Scholar
Russell, B. (1912) 1988. The Problems of Philosophy. Great Books in Philosophy. Buffalo). New York: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
Russell, B. (1950) 2009. Unpopular Essays. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Russell, Doug. 2015. “Toward a Pragmatist Epistemology: Arthur O. Lovejoy’s and H. S. Jennings’s Biophilosophical Responses to Neovitalism, 1909–1914.” Journal of the History of Biology 48: 3766.Google Scholar
Russett, C. E. 1976. Darwin in America: The Intellectual Response. 1865-1912. San Francisco: Freeman.Google Scholar
Rutland, Adam, Killen, Melanie, and Abrams, Dominic. 2010. “A New Social-Cognitive Developmental Perspective on Prejudice.” Perspectives on Psychological Science 5(3): 279–291.Google Scholar
Sagan, C., and Druyan, A.. 1993. Shadows of Forgotten Ancestors. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Sapp, Jan. 1994. Evolution by Association: A History of Symbiosis. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sarkissian, H., Parks, J., Tien, D., Wright, J. and Knobe, J.. 2011. “Folk Moral Relativism.” Mind and Language 26 (4): 482505.Google Scholar
Sayre-McCord, G. 1986. “The Many Moral Realisms.” Southern Journal of Philosophy 12 (1): 122.Google Scholar
Sayre-McCord, G. ed. 1988. Essays on Moral Realism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Sayre-McCord, G. 2015. “Moral Realism.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2015 Edition), ed. Edward N. Zalta. Available at https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/moral-realism/.Google Scholar
Schafer, Karl. 2010. “Evolution and Normative Skepticism.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 88 (3): 471488.Google Scholar
Schermer, M. 2015. The Moral Arc: How Science and Reason Lead Humanity toward Truth, Justice, and Freedom. New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
Schloss, J., and Murray, M., eds. 2009. The Believing Primate: Scientific, Philosophical and Theological Reflections on the Origin of Religion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schmidt, M., Rakoczy, H., and Tomasello., M. 2013. “Young Children Understand and Defend the Entitlements of Others.” Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 116(4): 930944.Google Scholar
Schneewind, J. 2003. Moral Philosophy from Montaigne to Kant. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schweber, S. S. 1980. “Darwin and the Political Economists: Divergence of Character.” Journal of the History of Biology 13(2): 195289.Google Scholar
Sclafani, Anthony. 2004. “Oral and Postoral Determinants of Food Reward.” Physiology & Behavior, Proceedings from the 2003 Meeting of the Society for the Study of Ingestive Behavior (SSIB) 81 (5): 773779. doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2004.04.031.Google Scholar
Seabright, P. 2010. The Company of Strangers: A Natural History of Economic Life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Searle, John R. 1964. “How to Derive ‘Ought’ from ‘Is.’Philosophical Review 73 (1): 4358.Google Scholar
Segerstrale, Ullica. 2000. Defenders of the Truth: the Battle for Science in the Sociobiology Debate and Beyond. Oxford: University Press.Google Scholar
Seigfried, Charlene Haddock. 1996. Pragmatism and Feminism: Reweaving the Social Fabric. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Seigfried, Charlene Haddock. 1999. “Socializing Democracy: Jane Addams and John Dewey.” Philosophy of the Social Sciences 29: 207230.Google Scholar
Sellars, Roy Wood. 1922. Evolutionary Naturalism. Chicago: Open Court.Google Scholar
Shafer-Landau, R. 2003. Moral Realism: A Defense. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Shafer-Landau, R. 2007. “Moral and Theological Realism: The Explanatory Argument.” Journal of Moral Philosophy 4 (3): 311329.Google Scholar
Shafer-Landau, R. 2012. “Evolutionary Debunking, Moral Realism and Moral Knowledge.Journal of Ethics & Social Philosophy 7 (1): 137.Google Scholar
Sidgwick, H. 1876. “The Theory of Evolution in its Application to Practice.” Mind 1: 52–67.Google Scholar
Sidgwick, H. 1907. The Methods of Ethics, 7th ed. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Simion, F., Regolin, L., and Bulf, H.. 2008. “A Predisposition for Biological Motion in the Newborn Baby.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105: 809813.Google Scholar
Simpson, B., Harrell, A., and Willer., R. 2013. “Hidden Paths from Morality to Cooperation: Moral Judgments Promote Trust and Trustworthiness.” Social Forces 91: 15291548.Google Scholar
Simpson, G. G. 1949. The Meaning of Evolution. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Simpson, G. G. 1964. This View of Life. New York: Harcourt, Brace, and World.Google Scholar
Sinclair, N. 2012. “Metaethics, Teleosemantics and the Function of Moral Judgements.” Biology and Philosophy 27: 639662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singer, P. 1972. Famine, Affluence and Morality. Philosophy and Public Affairs 1: 229–43.Google Scholar
Singer, P. 1981. The Expanding Circle: Ethics and Sociobiology. New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.Google Scholar
Singer, P. 1995. How Are We to Live? New York: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
Singer, P. 2005. “Ethics and Intuitions.” Journal of Ethics 9: 331352.Google Scholar
Singer, P. 2011. The Expanding Circle: Ethics, Evolution and Moral Progress. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singer, P. and de Lazari-Radek, K.. 2012. “The Objectivity of Ethics and the Unity of Practical Reason.” Ethics 123: 931.Google Scholar
Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter. 2006. Moral Skepticisms. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Skarsaune, Knut. 2011. “Darwin and Moral Realism: Survival of the Iffiest.” Philosophical Studies 152: 229243.Google Scholar
Slater, A., and Quinn., P. 2001. “Face Recognition in the Newborn Infant.” Infant and Child Development 10: 2124.Google Scholar
Small, D., Loewenstein, G., and Slovic., P. 2007. “Sympathy and Callousness: The Impact of Deliberative Thought on Donations to Identifiable and Statistical Victims.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 102(2): 143153.Google Scholar
Small, Robin. 2005. Nietzsche and Rée: A Star Friendship. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Oxford Scholarship Online, 2005. doi: 10.1093/0199278075.001.0001.Google Scholar
Small, Robin. 2007. “Nietzsche’s Evolutionary Ethics.” In Nietzsche and Ethics, ed. Gudrun von Tevenar, 119–135. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Smocovitis, Betty. 1992. “Unifying Biology: The Evolutionary Synthesis and Evolutionary Biology.” Journal of the History of Biology 25: 165.Google Scholar
Smocovitis, Betty. 1996. Unifying Biology: The Evolutionary Synthesis and Evolutionary Biology. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Smocovitis, Betty. 2008. “The Unifying Vision: Julian Huxley, Evolutionary Humanism, and the Evolutionary Synthesis.” In Pursuing the Unity of Science: Ideology and Scientific Practice between the Great War and the Cold War. Ashgate Press.Google Scholar
Smuts, Jan C. 1926. Holism and Evolution. New York: MacMillan Company.Google Scholar
Sober, Elliott. 1984. The Nature of Selection: Evolutionary Theory in Philosophical Focus. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Sober, Elliott. 1994. “Prospects for an Evolutionary Ethics.” From a Biological Point of View: Essays in Evolutionary Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sober, Elliott, and Wilson, David Sloan. 1998. Unto Others: The Evolution and Psychology of Unselfish Behavior. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sommers, Tamler, and Rosenberg, Alex. 2003. “Darwin’s Nihilistic Idea: Evolution and the Meaningless of Life.” Biology and Philosophy 18 (5): 653668.Google Scholar
Sosa, Ernest. 1999. “How to Defeat Opposition to Moore.” Noûs (Supplement: Philosophical Perspectives 13, Epistemology) 33: 141153.Google Scholar
Sosa, Ernest. 2002. “Reliability and the A Priori.” In Conceivability and Possibility, eds. Gendler, Tamar Szabo and Hawthorne, John, 369–384. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Spaulding, Edward Gleason. 1918. The New Rationalism. New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
Spencer, Herbert. 1851. Social Statics: Or, the Conditions Essential to Human Happiness Specified, and the First of them Developed. London: John Chapman.Google Scholar
Spencer, Herbert. 1852. “A Theory of Population, Deduced from the General Law of Animal Fertility.” Westminster Review 1: 468501.Google Scholar
Spencer, Herbert. 1853. “The Universal Postulate.Westminster Review 60: 513550.Google Scholar
Spencer, Herbert. 1855. The Principles of Psychology. London: Longman, Brown, Green, and Longmans.Google Scholar
Spencer, Herbert. 1857. “Progress: Its Law and Cause.” Westminster Review 67 (April): 244–267.Google Scholar
Spencer, Herbert. 1860. “The Social Organism.” Westminster Review XVII: 90121.Google Scholar
Spencer, Herbert. 1864. The Principles of Biology, Volume 1. London: Williams and Norgate.Google Scholar
Spencer, Herbert. 1871. “Specialized Administration.” Fortnightly Review 16: 628654.Google Scholar
Spencer, Herbert. 1879. The Data of Ethics. London: Williams and Norgate.Google Scholar
Spencer, Herbert. 1881. The Principles of Sociology I. New York: Appleton and Co.Google Scholar
Spencer, Herbert. 1884. The Man versus the State. London: Williams and Norgate.Google Scholar
Spencer, Herbert. 1892. The Principles of Ethics. London: Williams and Northgate.Google Scholar
Sterelny, K. 2007. Dawkins vs Gould: Survival of the Fittest. Thriplow: Totem Books.Google Scholar
Sterelny, K. 2014a. “A Paleolithic Reciprocation Crisis: Symbols, Signals and Norms.” Biological Theory 9 (1): 6577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sterelny, K. 2014b. Cooperation, Culture and Conflict. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science. doi: 10.1093/bjps/axu024.Google Scholar
Stich, S. Forthcoming. “The Moral Domain.” In The Atlas of Moral Psychology: Mapping Good and Evil in the Mind, eds. Gray, K. and Graham, J.. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
Strauss, David Friedrich. 1872. The Old Faith and the New, trans. Mathilde Blind. New York: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
Street, Sharon. 2006. “A Darwinian Dilemma for Realist Theories of Value.” Philosophical Studies 127 (1): 109166.Google Scholar
Street, Sharon. 2008a. “Reply to Copp: Naturalism, Normativity, and the Varieties of Realism Worth Worrying about.Philosophical Issues 18: 207228.Google Scholar
Street, Sharon. 2008b. “Constructivism about Reasons.” In Oxford Studies in Mathematics, ed. Shafer-Landau, Russ, 207–45. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Street, Sharon. 2009. “In Defense of Future Tuesday Indifference: Ideally Coherent Eccentrics and the Contingency of What Matters.” Philosophical Issues 19: 273298.Google Scholar
Street, Sharon. 2011. “Mind-Independence without the Mystery: Why Quasi-Realists Can’t Have It Both Ways.” In Oxford Studies in Metaethics, Volume 6, ed. Shafer-Landau, Russ, 1–32. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Street, Sharon. 2016. “Objectivity and Truth: You’d Better Rethink It.” In Oxford Studies in Metaethics, Volume 11, ed. Russ Shafer-Landau. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Streumer, B. 2013. “Can We Believe the Error Theory?Journal of Philosophy 110: 194212.Google Scholar
Stroud, Scott R. 2011. John Dewey and the Artful Life: Pragmatism, Aesthetics, and Morality. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Sturgeon, Nicholas. 1985. “Moral Explanations.” In Morality, Reason, and Truth: New Essays on the Foundations of Ethics, eds. Copp, David and Zimmerman, David, 49–78. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Allanheld.Google Scholar
Sturgeon, Nicholas. 1988. “Moral Explanations.” In Essays on Moral Realism, ed. Sayre-McCord, G., 229–255. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Sturgeon, Nicholas. 2002. “Ethical Intuitionism and Ethical Naturalism.” In Ethical Intuitionism: Re-Evaluations, ed. Philip Stratton-Lake, 184–211. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sullivan, Shannon. 2001. Living Across and Through Skins: Transactional Bodies, Pragmatism, and Feminism. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Tangney, J., and Fischer., K. 1995. Self-Conscious Emotions: The Psychology of Shame, Guilt, Embarrassment, and Pride. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Teehan, John. 2002. “Evolution and Ethics: The Huxley/Dewey Exchange.” Journal of Speculative Philosophy 16: 225238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tenbrunsel, A. E., and Smith-Crowe., K. 2008. “Ethical Decision Making: Where We’ve Been and Where We’re Going.” Academy of Management Annals 2: 545607.Google Scholar
Thompson, E. 2000. “Comparative Color Vision: Quality Space and Visual Ecology.” In Color Perception: Philosophical, Psychological, Artistic and Computational Perspectives, ed. Davis, S.. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, R. Paul 2011. Agro-Technology: A Philosophical Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Thornhill, R., and Palmer, C. T.. 2001. A Natural History of Rape: Biological Bases of Sexual Coercion. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Todes, Daniel P. 1989. Darwin without Malthus: The Struggle for Existence in Russian Evolutionary Thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M., Carpenter, M., Call, J., Behne, T., and Moll., H. 2005. “Understanding and Sharing Intentions: The Origins of Cultural Cognition.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28: 675691.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M., and Vaish., A. 2013. “Origins of Human Cooperation and Morality.” Annual Review of Psychology 64: 231255.Google Scholar
Toner, C. 2010. “Evolution, Naturalism, and the Worthwhile: A Critique of Richard Joyce’s Evolutionary Debunking of Morality.” Metaphilosophy 42: 520546.Google Scholar
Trachtenberg, Alan. 1982. The Incorporation of America: Culture and Society in the Gilded Age. New York: Hill and Wang.Google Scholar
Tremaroli, Valentina, and Bäckhed, Fredrik. 2012. “Functional Interactions between the Gut Microbiota and Host Metabolism.” Nature 489 (7415): 242249. doi:10.1038/nature11552.Google Scholar
Trivers, R. 1971. “The Evolution of Reciprocal Altruism.” Quarterly Review of Biology 46 (1): 3557.Google Scholar
Tufts, James H. 1895. “[Review of] History and Natural Science. W. Windelband. Inaugural Address as Rector. Strassburg, May, 1894.” Psychological Review 2: 9697.Google Scholar
Turnbaugh, Peter J., Hamady, Micah, Yatsunenko, Tanya, Cantarel, Brandi L., Duncan, Alexis, Ley, Ruth E., Sogin, Mitchell L., et al. 2009. “A Core Gut Microbiome in Obese and Lean Twins.” Nature 457: 480484.Google Scholar
Turner, J. Scott. 2000. The Extended Organism the Physiology of Animal-Built Structures. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Turner, J. Scott. 2004. “Extended Phenotypes and Extended Organisms.” Biology and Philosophy 19(3): 327–352.Google Scholar
Turner, J. Scott. 2013. “Superorganisms and Superindividuality: The Emergence of Individuality in a Social Insect Assemblage.” In From Groups to Individuals Evolution and Emerging Individuality, eds. Bouchard, Frédéric and Huneman, Philippe, 219241. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Tversky, Amos and Kahneman, Daniel. 1981. “The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice.” Science 211(4481): 453–458.Google Scholar
Van der Linden, S. 2011. “Charitable Intent: A Moral or Social Construct? A Revised Theory of Planned Behavior Model.” Current Psychology 30: 355374.Google Scholar
Vavova, Katia. 2014. “Debunking Evolutionary Debunking.” In Oxford Studies in Metaethics, 76101. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Vavova, Katia. 2015. “Evolutionary Debunking of Moral Realism.” Philosophy Compass 10: 104116.Google Scholar
Vavova, Katia. n.d. “A Dilemma for the Darwinian Debunker.”Google Scholar
Vlerick, Michael. 2012. “How Can Human Beings Transgress Their Biologically Based Views?South African Journal of Philosophy 31 (4): 717735.Google Scholar
Vlerick, Michael. 2014. “Biologising Putnam: Saving the Realism in Internal Realism.” South African Journal of Philosophy 33 (3): 271283.Google Scholar
Vlerick, Michael. 2016. “Explaining Universal Social Institutions: A Game-Theoretic Approach.” Topoi 35: 291–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wainwright, William. 2010. “In Defense of Non-Natural Theistic Realism: A Response to Wielenberg.” Faith and Philosophy 27 (4): 457463.Google Scholar
Wallin, Ivan E. 1927. Symbionticism and the Origin of Species. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins Company.Google Scholar
Wallis Budge, E. A. 1901. Book of the Dead. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trübner, and Co.Google Scholar
Walls, Ramona L., Deck, John, Guralnick, Robert, Baskauf, Steve, Beaman, Reed, Blum, Stanley, Bowers, Shawn, et al. 2014. “Semantics in Support of Biodiversity Knowledge Discovery: An Introduction to the Biological Collections Ontology and Related Ontologies.” PLoS ONE 9 (3): e89606. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0089606.Google Scholar
Warneken, F., Lohse, K., Melis, A., and Tomasello., M. 2011. “Young Children Share the Spoils after Collaboration.” Psychological Science 22: 267273.Google Scholar
Watson, J. D and Crick, F. H.. April 1953. "Molecular Structure of Nucleic Acids; a Structure for Deoxyribose Nucleic Acid (PDF).” Nature 171(4356): 737–738.Google Scholar
Welchman, Jennifer. 1995. Dewey’s Ethical Thought. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Wharton, E. 1905. The House of Mirth. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.Google Scholar
Wheeler, William Morton. 1910. Ants: Their Structure, Development and Behavior. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Wheeler, William Morton. 1911. “The Ant Colony as an Organism.” Journal of Morphology 22: 307326.Google Scholar
Wheeler, William Morton. 1918. “A Study of Some Ant Larvae, with a Consideration of the Origin and Meaning of the Social Habit among Insects.” Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 57: 293343.Google Scholar
Wheeler, William Morton. 1923. “Social Life among the Insects.” Scientific Monthly 16: 160177.Google Scholar
Wheeler, William Morton. 1926. “Emergent Evolution and the Social.” Science 64(1662): 433–440.Google Scholar
Wheeler, William Morton. 1927. Emergent Evolution and the Social. London: Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Wheeler, William Morton. 1928. Emergent Evolution and the Development of Societies. New York: Norton and Company.Google Scholar
White, R. 2010. “You Just Believe That Because....Philosophical Perspectives 24: 573615.Google Scholar
Whitehead, Alfred North. 1925. Science and the Modern World. New York: MacMillan.Google Scholar
Whitman, Charles Otis. 1891. “Specialization and Organization.” In Biological Lectures Delivered at Marine Biological Laboratory. Boston: Ginn and Company.Google Scholar
Whitman, Charles Otis. 1894. “The Inadequacy of the Cell-Theory of Development.” In Biological Lectures Delivered at the Marine Biological Laboratory. Boston: Ginn and Company.Google Scholar
Wielenberg, Eric. 2005. “In Defense of Non-Natural Non-Theistic Moral Realism.” Faith and Philosophy 26 (1): 2341.Google Scholar
Wielenberg, Eric. 2009. “A Defense of Moral Realism.” Faith and Philosophy 26 (1): 2341.Google Scholar
Wielenberg, Eric. 2010. “On the Evolutionary Debunking of Morality.” Ethics 120: 441464.Google Scholar
Wielenberg, Eric. 2014. Robust Ethics: The Metaphysics and Epistemology of Godless Normative Realism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wielenberg, Eric. 2016. “Evolutionary Debunking Arguments in Religion and Morality.” In Explanation in Ethics and Mathematics: Debunking and Dispensibility, eds. Leibowitz, U. and Sinclair, N.. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198778592.001.0001Google Scholar
Williams, B. 1985. Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy. London: Fontana.Google Scholar
Williams, G. C. 1966. Adaptation and Natural Selection: A Critique of Some Current Evolutionary Thought. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Williamson, T. 2009. “Reply to Alvin Goldman.” In Williamson on Knowledge, eds. Greenough, P. and Pritchard, D., 305–312. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, D. 2002. Darwin’s Cathedral: Evolution, Religion and the Nature of Society. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, D. 2004. “The New Fable of the Bees: Multilevel selection, Adaptive Societies, and the Concept of Self Interest.” Ed. Koppl, R., 201220. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Wilson, D. S., Dietrich, E., and Clark, A. B.. 2003. “On the Inappropriate Use of the Naturalistic Fallacy in Evolutionary Psychology.Biology and Philosophy 18: 669682.Google Scholar
Wilson, David Sloan, and Wilson, Edward O.. 2007. “Rethinking the Theoretical Foundations of Sociobiology.” Quarterly Review of Biology 82: 327348.Google Scholar
Wilson, David Sloan, and Wilson, Edward O.. 2008. “Evolution for the Good of the Group.” American Scientist 96: 380389.Google Scholar
Wilson, D. S, and Sober, E.. 1989. “Reviving the Superorganism.” Journal of Theoretical Biology 136 (3): 337356.Google Scholar
Wilson, Edward O. 1953. “The Origin and Evolution of Polymorphism in Ants.” Quarterly Review of Biology 28: 136156.Google Scholar
Wilson, Edward O. 1971. The Insect Societies. Cambridge: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, Edward O. 1975. Sociobiology: The New Synthesis. Cambridge: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, Edward O. 1976. “Academic Vigilantism and the Political Significance of Sociobiology.” BioScience 26: 187190.Google Scholar
Wilson, Edward O. 1978. On Human Nature: With a New Preface, rev. ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, Edward O. 1992. The Diversity of Life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, Edward O. 1994. Naturalist. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, Edward O. 2005. “Kin Selection as the Key to Altruism: Its Rise and Fall.” Social Research 72: 159166.Google Scholar
Wilson, Edward O. 2012. The Social Conquest of Earth. New York: Norton and Co.Google Scholar
Wilson, H. V. 1907. Migration and Rearrangement of Cells Within Sponges.Google Scholar
Wilson, H. V. 2014. The Meaning of Human Existence. Liveright: NYC.Google Scholar
Wilson, Jack. 1999. Biological Individuality the Identity and Persistence of Living Entities. Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, Robert A. 2004. Genes and the Agents of Life: The Individual in the Fragile Sciences Biology. Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wittig, M., Jensen, K., and Tomasello., M. 2013. Five-Year-Olds Understand Fair as Equal in a Mini-Ultimatum Game. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 116(2): 324337.Google Scholar
Wolfe, Elaine Claire Daughetee. 1975. “Acceptance of the Theory of Evolution in America: Louis Agassiz vs. Asa Gray.” American Biology Teacher 37: 244247.Google Scholar
Wright, J., Grandjean, P. and McWhite, C.. 2013. “The Meta-Ethical Grounding of our Moral Beliefs: Evidence for Meta-Ethical Pluralism.” Philosophical Psychology 26 (3): 336361.Google Scholar
Wright, J. C., McWhite, C. B. and Grandjean, P. T.. 2014. “The Cognitive Mechanisms of Intolerance: Do Our Meta-Ethical Commitments Matter.” In Oxford Studies in Experimental Philosophy, Volume 1, eds. Lombrozo, T., Knobe, J. and Nichols, S., 2861. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wright, L. 1976. Teleological Explanations. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Wright, R. 1994. The Moral Animal: Why We Are The Way We Are. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Wynne-Edwards, V. C. 1962. Animal Dispersion in Relation to Social Behaviour. New York: Hafner Publishing.Google Scholar
Young, L., and Durwin, A.. 2013. “Moral Realism as Moral Motivation: The Impact of Meta-Ethics on Everyday Decision-making.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 49 (2): 302306.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Michael Ruse, Florida State University, Robert J. Richards, University of Chicago
  • Book: The Cambridge Handbook of Evolutionary Ethics
  • Online publication: 31 August 2017
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316459409.021
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Michael Ruse, Florida State University, Robert J. Richards, University of Chicago
  • Book: The Cambridge Handbook of Evolutionary Ethics
  • Online publication: 31 August 2017
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316459409.021
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Michael Ruse, Florida State University, Robert J. Richards, University of Chicago
  • Book: The Cambridge Handbook of Evolutionary Ethics
  • Online publication: 31 August 2017
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316459409.021
Available formats
×