Abney, Drew H., Dale, Rick, Yoshimi, Jeff, Kello, Chris T., Tylén, Kristian, and Fusaroli, Ricardo (2014): “Joint Perceptual Decision-Making: A Case Study in Explanatory Pluralism”, Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 5, pp. 1–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Achinstein, Peter (1983): The Nature of Explanation, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Acierno, Louis (1994): The History of Cardiology, London and New York: The Parthenon Publishing Group.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adams, Marcus (2009): “Empirical Evidence and the Knowledge-that/Knowledge-how Distinction”, Synthese, vol. 170, pp. 97–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aird, W.C. (2011): “Discovery of the Cardiovascular System: From Galen to William Harvey”, Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, vol. 9 (Suppl. 1), pp. 118–129.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Albert, Hans (1968/1985): Treatise on Critical Reason, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Albert, Hans (1978): Traktat über Rationale Praxis, Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck).Google Scholar

Albert, Hans (1982): Die Wissenschaft und die Fehlbarkeit der Vernunft, Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck).Google Scholar

Albert, Hans (1987): Kritik der Reinen Erkenntnislehre, Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck).Google Scholar

Alt, James (2009): “Comment: Conditional Knowledge: An Oxymoron?” in Mantzavinos, C. (ed.): Philosophy of the Social Sciences. Philosophical Theory and Scientific Practice, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 146–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anderson, John R. (2010): Cognitive Psychology and Its Implications, 7th edition, New York: Worth Publishers.Google Scholar

Arabatzis, Theodore (2006): “On the Inextricability of the Context of Discovery and the Context of Justification”, in Schickore, Jutta and Steinle, Friedrich (eds.): Revisiting Discovery and Justification, Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 215–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Axelrod, Robert (1986): “An Evolutionary Approach to Norms”, American Political Science Review, vol. 80, pp. 1095–1111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Celsius, Aulus Cornelius (1935): De Medicina (On Medicine), vol. 1, Loeb Classical Library edition, translated by Spencer, W.G., Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Baker, Alan (2012): “Science-Driven Mathematical Explanations”, Mind, vol. 121, pp. 243–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bandura, Albert (1986): Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Bargh, John A. and Chartrand, Tanya L. (1999): “The Unbearable Automaticity of Being”, American Psychologist, vol. 54, pp. 462–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barnes, Barry, Bloor, David, and Henry, John (1996): Scientific Knowledge. A Sociological Analysis, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Bartelborth, Thomas (2002): “Explanatory Unification”, Synthese, vol. 130, pp. 91–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bartelborth, Thomas (2007): Erklären, Berlin and New York: de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bartlett, Frederic (1932): Remembering, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Batterman, Robert W. (2010): “On the Explanatory Role of Mathematics in Empirical Science”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, vol. 61, pp. 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bechtel, William (2006): Discovering Cell Mechanisms, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bechtel, William (2008): Mental Mechanisms: Philosophical Perspectives on Cognitive Neuroscience, London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Bechtel, William (2011): “Mechanism and Biological Explanation”, Philosophy of Science, vol. 78, pp. 533–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bechtel, William and Abrahamsen, Adele (2005): “Explanation: A Mechanist Alternative”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, vol. 36, pp. 421–441.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Becker, Gary (1976): The Economic Approach to Human Behavior, Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Becker, Gary and Posner, Richard (2009): Uncommon Sense: Economic Insights from Marriage to Terrorism, Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bernholz, Peter, Streit, Manfred E. and Vaubel, Roland (1998): Political Competition, Innovation and Growth, Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bible, Old Testament.Google Scholar

Binmore, Ken and Samuelson, Larry (1994): “An Economist’s Perspective on the Evolution of Norms”, Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, vol. 150, pp. 45–63.Google Scholar

Bird, Alexander (2005): “Explanation and Metaphysics”, Synthese, vol. 143, pp. 89–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blaug, Marc (1997): Economic Theory in Retrospect, 5th edition, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bogen, Jim and Machamer, Peter (2011): “Mechanistic Information and Causal Continuity”, in Illari, Phyllis McKay, Russo, Federica, and Williamson, Jon (eds.): Causality in the Sciences, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 845–864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boudon, Raymond (1974): Education, Opportunity and Social Inequlity, New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Boyer, Pascal (2000): “Evolution of the Modern Mind and the Origins of Culture: Religious Concepts as a Limiting-Case”, in Carruthers, Peter and Chamberlain, Andrew (eds.): Evolution and the Human Mind. Modularity, Language and Meta-Cognition, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 93–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boyle, Robert (1688): A Disquisition About the Final Causes of Natural Things: Wherein It is Inquired, Whether, and, (if at all) with What Cautions a Naturalist Should Admit Them? London: John Caplot.Google Scholar

Brain, Peter (1986): Galen on Bloodletting, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Braine, David (1972): “Varieties of Necessity”, Supplementary Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, vol. 46, pp. 139–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Braithwaite, Richard B. (1953): Scientific Explanation. A Study of the Function of Theory, Probability and Law in Science, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Brandt, Karl (1993): Geschichte der Deutschen Volkswirtschaftslehre, vol. 2, Freiburg i. Br.: Rudolf Haufe Verlag.Google Scholar

Brennan, Geoffrey and Buchanan, James (1985): The Reason of Rules – Constitutional Political Economy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Brewer, William F., Chinn, Clark A., and Samarapungavan, Ala (2000): “Explanation in Scientists and Children”, in Keil, Frank C. and Wilson, Robert A. (eds.): Explanation and Cognition, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 279–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bromberger, Sylvain (1966): “Why-Questions”, in Colodny, Robert (ed.): Mind and Cosmos, Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, pp. 86–111.Google Scholar

Brown, Matthew J. (2013): “Values in Science beyond Underdetermination and Inductive Risk”, Philosophy of Science, Vol. 80, pp. 829–839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Buchanan, James (1975): The Limits of Liberty. Between Anarchy and Leviathan, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Buchanan, James and Tullock, Gordon (1962): The Calculus of Consent – Logical Foundations of Constitutional Democracy, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Bueno, Otávio and French, Steven (2012): “Can Mathematics Explain Physical Phenomena?” British Journal for Philosophy of Science, vol. 63, pp. 85–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bueter, Anke (2015): “The Irreducibility of Value-Freedom to Theory Assessment”, Studies in History and philosophy of Science, Vol. 49, pp. 18–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Burkert, Walter (1999): “The Logic of Cosmogony”, in Buxton, Richard (ed.): From Myth to Reason? Studies in the Development of Greek Thought, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 87–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Butterfield, Herbert (1957): The Origins of Modern Science 1300–1800, rev. edition, New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Campbell, Donald T. (1965): “Variation and Selective Retention in Socio-Cultural Evolution”, in Barringer, Herbert R., Blanksten, George I., and Mack, Raymond W. (eds.): Social Change in Developing Areas, Cambridge, MA: Schenkman, pp. 19–49.Google Scholar

Campbell, Donald T. (1974/1987): “Evolutionary Epistemology”, originally published in Schlipp, Paul A. (ed.): The Philosophy of Karl Popper, La Salle, IL: Open Court, pp. 413–463, and reprinted in Radnitzky, Gerard and Bartley, W.W. III (eds.) (1987): Evolutionary Epistemology, Rationality and the Sociology of Knowledge, La Salle, IL: Open Court, pp. 48–114.Google Scholar

Carey, Susan (1985): Conceptual Change in Childhood, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Carnap, Rudolf (1932): “Überwindung der Metaphysik durch logische Analyse der Sprache”, Erkenntnis, vol. 2, pp. 219–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carrier, Martin (2013): “Values and Objectivity in Science: Value-Ladeness, Pluralism and the Epistemic Attitude”, Science & Education, vol. 22, pp. 2547–2568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carruthers, Peter (2002): “The Roots of Scientific Reasoning: Infancy, Modularity and the Art of Trucking”, in Carruthers, Peter, Stich, Stephen, and Siegal, Michael (eds.): The Cognitive Basis of Science, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 73–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cartwright, Nancy (1999): The Dappled World. A Study of the Boundaries of Science, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cartwright, Nancy (2007): Hunting Causes and Using Them, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Celsus, , On Medicine, Prooemium, Loeb Classical Library edition, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Cesalpino, Andrea (1571): Peripateticarum Questionum, Libri Quinque, Venice: Apud Iuntas.Google Scholar

Cesalpino, Andrea (1593): Quaestionum Medicarum, Libri II, Venice: Apud Iuntas.Google Scholar

Cesalpino, Andrea (1606): Praxis Universae Artis Medicae, Treviso: Sumptibus Robert Meietti.Google Scholar

Chang, Hasok (2012): Is Water H₂O? Evidence, Realism and Pluralism, Berlin and New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clark, Matthew (2012): Exploring Greek Myth, Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Cohen, Neal J. and Squire, Larry R. (1980): “Preserved Learning and Retention of Pattern-Analyzing Skill in Amnesia: Dissociation of Knowing How and Knowing That”, Science, vol. 210, pp. 207–210.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Coleman, James S. (1990a): Foundations of Social Theory, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Coleman, James S. (1990b): “The Emergence of Norms”, in Hechter, Michael, Opp, Karl-Dieter, and Wippler, Reinhard (eds.): Social Institutions, Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter, pp. 35–59.Google Scholar

Colombo, Matteo and Hartmann, Stephan (2015): “Bayesian Cognitive Science, Unification, and Explanation”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science (Advanced Access) published September 30, 2015.Google Scholar

Colombo, Matteo, Hartmann, Stephan, and van Iersel, Robert (2015): “Models, Mechanisms, and Coherence”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, vol. 66, pp. 181–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Colombo, Realdo (1559): De Re Anatomica, Libri XV, Venice: Nicolai Beuilacquae.Google Scholar

Coppola, Edward D. (1957): “The Discovery of the Pulmonary Circulation: A New Approach”, Bulletin of the History of Medicine, vol. 21, pp. 44–77.Google Scholar

Cosmides, Leda and John, Tooby (eds.) (1992): The Adapted Mind, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Cournot, Augustin (1838): Recherches sur les Principes Mathématiques de la Théorie des Richesses, Paris: Chez L. Hachette.Google Scholar

Craver, Carl (2007): Explaining the Brain. Mechanisms and the Mosaic Unity of Neuroscience, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crupi, Vincenzo and Tentori, Katya (2012): “A Second Look at the Logic of Explanatory Power (with Two Novel Representation Theorems)”, Philosophy of Science, vol. 79, pp. 365–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Currie, Adrian Mitchell (2014): “Narratives, Mechanisms and Progress in Historical Science”, Synthese, vol. 191, pp. 1163–1183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

D’Andrade, Roy (1995): The Development of Cognitive Anthropology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Darden, Lindley (2006): Reasoning in Biological Discoveries. Essays in Mechanisms, Interfield Relations and Anomaly Resolution, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Daston, Lorraine and Galison, Peter (2010): Objectivity, New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar

Davidson, Janet E. and Sternberg, Robert J. (eds.) (2003): The Psychology of Problem Solving, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davies, Martin (2015): “Knowledge (Explicit, Implicit and Tacit): Philosophical Aspects”, International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2nd edition, vol. 13, London: Elsevier, pp. 74–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

de Regt, Henk W. (2006): “Wesley Salmon’ s Complementarity Thesis: Causalism and Unificationism Reconciled?” International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. 20, pp. 129–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Debru, Armelle (2008): “Anatomy”, in Hankinson, Robert J. (ed.): The Cambridge Companion to Galen, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 263–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Demeulenaere, Pierre (ed.) (2011): Analytical Sociology and Social Mechanisms, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Denzau, Arthur and North, Douglass C. (1994): “Shared Mental Models: Ideologies and Institutions”, Kyklos, vol. 47, pp. 3–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Devitt, Michael (2011): “Methodology and the Nature of Knowing How”, Journal of Philosophy, vol. 108, pp. 205–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Díez, José, Kareem, Khalifa, and Bert, Leuridan (2013): “General Theories of Explanation: Buyer Beware”, Synthese, vol. 190, pp. 379–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Donald, Merlin (1991): The Origins of the Modern Mind. Three Stages in the Evolution of Culture and Cognition, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Douglas, Heather (2013): “The Value of Cognitive Values”, Philosophy of Science, vol. 80, pp. 796–806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dowe, Philip (2000): Physical Causation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Downes, Anthony (1957): An Economic Theory of Democracy, New York: Harper.Google Scholar

Dupré, John (1993): The Disorder of Things, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Eknoyan, Garabed and De Santo, Natale G. (1997): “Realdo Colombo (1516–1559). A Reappraisal”, American Journal of Nephrology, vol. 17, pp. 261–268.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Elster, Jon (1989a): The Cement of Society. A Study of Social Order, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Elster, Jon (1989b): “Social Norms and Economic Theory”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 3, pp. 99–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Elster, Jon (2007): Explaining Social Behavior, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Epictetus, (1916): Epicteti Dissertationes ab Arriano digestae, ed. Schenkl, Heinrich, Leipzig: B.G.Teubner.Google Scholar

Fogan, Melinda Bonnie (2015): “Collaborative Explanation and Biological Mechanism”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, vol. 52, pp. 67–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fancy, Nahyan (2013): Science and Religion in Mamluk Egypt: Ibn al-Nafis, Pulmonary Transit and Bodily Resurrection, London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Faucher, Luc, Mallon, Ron, Nazer, Daniel, Nichols, Shaun, Ruby, Aaron, Stich, Stephen, and Weinberg, Jonathan (2002): “The Baby in the Lab-Coat: Why Child Development Is Not an Adequate Model for Understanding the Development of Science”, in Carruthers, Peter, Stich, Stephen, and Siegal, Michael (eds.): The Cognitive Basis of Science, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 335–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Faye, Jan (2012): After Postmodernism. A Naturalistic Reconstruction of the Humanities, Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Faye, Jan (2014): The Nature of Scientific Thinking. On Interpretation, Explanation and Understanding, Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ferguson, Adam (1792): Principles of Moral and Political Science, Edinburgh: W. Creech.Google Scholar

Feyerabend, Paul (1975/2010): Against Method, 4th edition, London and New York: Verso.Google Scholar

Files, Craig (1996): “Goodman’s Rejection of Resemblance”, British Journal of Aesthetics, vol. 36, pp. 398–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fisher, George Jackson (1880): “Hieronymus Fabricius ab Acquapendente”, Annals of Anatomy and Surgery, pp. 373–379.Google Scholar

Fodor, Jerry (1983): The Modularity of Mind, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Franklin-Hall, Laura R. (2014): “High-Level Explanation and the Interventionist’s ‘Variables Problem’”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science (Advance Access), published December 18, 2014.Google Scholar

Frede, Michael (ed.) (1985): Galen: Three Treatises on the Nature of Science, Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.Google Scholar

Frede, Michael (1987): “On the Method of the So-Called Methodical School of Medicine”, in Frede, Michael (ed.): Essays in Ancient Philosophy, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 261–278 [originally published in Barnes, Jonathan, Brunschwig, Jacques, Burnyeat, Myles, and Schofield, Malcolm (eds.) (1982): Science and Speculation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–23].Google Scholar

Frege, Gottlob (1893/1998): Grundgesetze der Arithmetik, Hildesheim, Zürich and New York: Georg Olms Verlag.Google Scholar

Friedman, Michael (1974): “Explanation and Scientific Understanding”, Journal of Philosophy, vol. 71, pp. 5–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Friedman, Michael (2001): Dynamics of Reason, Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar

Friedman, Michael (2002): “Kant, Kuhn and the Rationality of Science”, Philosophy of Science, vol. 69, pp. 171–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Friedman, Michael (2011): “Extending the Dynamics of Reason”, Erkenntnis, vol. 75, pp. 431–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Friedman, Michael (2012): “Reconsidering the Dynamics of Reason: Response to Ferrari Mormann, Nordmann, and Uebel”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, vol. 43, pp. 47–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fries, Jakob Friedrich (1828–1831): Neue oder anthropologische Kritik der Vernunft, vols. 1–3, 2nd edition, Heidelberg: Christian Friedrich Winter.Google Scholar

Frigg, Roman and Hunter, Matthew (eds.) (2010): Beyond Mimesis and Convention. Representation in Art and Science, Dordrecht, Heidelberg, London and New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fullbrook, Edward (ed.) (2008): Ontology and Economics: Tony Lawson and His Critiques, London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Furley, David. J. and Wilkie, J.S. (1984): Galen on Respiration and the Arteries, Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gentner, Dedre and Gentner, Donald R. (1983): “Flowing Waters or Teeming Crowds: Mental Models of Electricity”, in Gentner, Dedre and Stevens, Albert (eds.): Mental Models, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 99–129.Google Scholar

Gervais, Raoul (2014): “A Framework for Inter-Level Explanations: Outlines for a New Explanatory Pluralism”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, vol. 48, pp. 1–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Giere, Ronald (1996): “The Scientist as Adult”, Philosophy of Science, vol. 63, pp. 538–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Giere, Ronald (2004): “How Models are Used to Represent Reality”, Philosophy of Science, vol. 71, pp. 742–752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Giere, Ronald (2006): Scientific Perspectivism, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gigerenzer, Gerd (2008): “Why Heuristics Work”, Perspectives on Psychological Science, vol. 3, pp. 20–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gigerenzer, Gerd, Todd, Peter, and the ABC Research Group (1999): Simple Heuristics that Make Us Smart, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Gigerenzer, Gerd, Hertwig, Ralph, and Pachur, Thorsten (eds.) (2011): Heuristics: The Foundations of Adaptive Behavior, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gijsbers, Victor (2007): “Why Unification is Neither Necessary Nor Sufficient for Explanation”, Philosophy of Science, vol. 74: pp. 481–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Glennan, Stuart (2002): “Rethinking Mechanistic Explanation”, Philosophy of Science, vol. 69, pp. 342–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Glennan, Stuart (2010): “Ephemeral Mechanisms and Historical Explanation”, Erkenntnis, vol. 72, pp. 251–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Glymour, Clark (2015): “Probability and the Explanatory Virtues”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, vol. 66, pp. 591–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Godfrey-Smith, Peter (2003): Theory and Reality, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goodman, Nelson (1976): Languages of Art. An Approach to a Theory of Symbols, Indiana: Hackett Publishing Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gopnik, Alison (1996a): “The Scientist as Child”, Philosophy of Science, vol. 63, pp. 485–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gopnik, Alison (1996b): “Reply to Commentators”, Philosophy of Science, vol. 63, pp. 552–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gopnik, Alison (2000): “Explanation as Orgasm and the Drive for Causal Knowledge: The Function, Evolution, and Phenomenology of the Theory Formation System”, in Keil, Frank C. and Wilson, Robert A. (eds.): Explanation and Cognition, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 299–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gopnik, Alison (2012): “Scientific Thinking in Young Children: Theoretical Advances, Empirical Research, and Policy Implications”, Science, vol. 337 (no. 6102), pp. 1623–1627.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gopnik, Alison and Meltzhoff, Andrew (1998): Words, Thoughts, and Theories, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gossen, Hermann Heinrich (1854): Entwicklung der Gesetze des menschlichen Verkehrs, und der daraus fließenden Regeln für menschliches Handeln, Braunschweig: Friedrich Vieweg & Sohn.Google Scholar

Grantham, Todd A. (1999): “Explanatory Pluralism in Paleobiology”, Philosophy of Science, vol. 66, pp. S223–S236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grantham, Todd A. (2004): “Conceptualizing the (Dis)unity of Sciences”, Philosophy of Science, vol. 71, pp. 133–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Greenberg, Gabriel (2013): “Beyond Resemblance”, Philosophical Review, vol. 122, pp. 215–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grimm, Stephen R. (2008): “Explanatory Inquiry and the Need for Explanation”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, vol. 59, pp. 481–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hacking, Ian (2002): Historical Ontology, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Halonen, Ilpo and Hintikka, Jaako (2005): “Toward a Theory of the Process of Explanation”, Synthese, vol. 143, pp. 5–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hankinson, Robert J. (2008): “The Man and His Work”, in Hankinson, Robert J. (ed.): The Cambridge Companion to Galen, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harbecke, Jens (2010): “Mechanistic Constitution in Neurobiological Explanations”, International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. 24 (3), pp. 267–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harman, Gilbert (1965): “The Inference to the Best Explanation”, Philosophical Review, pp. 88–95.Google Scholar

Harvey, William (1628/1989): Exercitatio Anatomica de Motu Cordis et Sanguinis in Animalibus, English translation by Willis, Robert in The Works of Harvey, William, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hayek, Friedrich A. (1955): “Degrees of Explanation”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, vol. 6, pp. 209–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hayek, Friedrich A. (1967): “The Theory of Complex Phenomena”, in von Hayek, Friedrich A.: Studies in Philosophy, Politics, and Economics, London: Routledge, pp. 22–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hayek, Friedrich A. (1982): Law, Legislation and Liberty, 3 volumes, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Hedström, Peter and Swedberg, Richard (eds.) (1996): Social Mechanisms. An Analytical Approach to Social Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Helmreich, G. (1907–1909): Galeni. De Usu Partium Libri XVII, Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar

Hempel, Carl G. (1965): Aspects of Scientific Explanation and Other Essays in the Philosophy of Science, New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar

Hempel, Carl G. and Oppenheim, Paul (1948): “Studies in the Logic of Explanation”, Philosophy of Science, vol. 15, 135–175 [Reprinted in Hempel (1965)].CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Herfeld, Catherine (2012): The Many Faces of Rational Choice Theory, Ph.D. Dissertation, Witten/Herdecke University.Google Scholar

Herrick, James Bryan (1942): A Short History of Cardiology, Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.Google Scholar

Hesiod, : Theogony, Penguin Classics, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hey, Spencer Phillips (2014): “Heuristics and Meta-Heuristics in Scientific Judgment”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science (Advance Access), published December 24, 2014.Google Scholar

Hieronymus Fabricius ab Acquapendendte (1603): De Venarum Ostiolis, facsimile edition, English translation by Franklin, K.J., , D.M., 1933, Springfeld, IL, and Baltimore, MD: Charles C. Thomas.Google Scholar

Holland, John H., Holyoak, Keith J., Nisbett, Richard, and Thagard, Paul (1986): Induction: Processes of Inference, Learning and Discovery, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Hull, David (1988): Science as a Process, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Humphreys, Paul. (1981): “Aleatory Explanation”, Synthese, 48, pp. 225–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Humphreys, Paul (1989): The Chances of Explanation, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Hutchins, Edwin and Brian, Hazlehurst (1992): “Learning in the Culture Process”, in Langdon, Christopher G., Taylor, Charles, Doyne Farmer, J., and Steen, Rasmussen (eds.): Artificial Life II, Redwood City, CA: Addison-Wesley, pp. 689–706.Google Scholar

Iskandar, A.Z. (ed.) (1988): Galeni De Optimo Medico Cognoscendo, Corpus Medicorum Graecorum, Suppl. Or. IV [Arabic], Berlin: Berlin-Bradenburgische Akademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar

Jackson, Frank and Pettit, Philip (1992): “In Defense of Explanatory Ecumenism”, Economics and Philosophy, vol. 8, pp. 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jaffé, William (ed.) (1965): Correspondence of Léon Walras and Related Papers, vol. II, Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company.Google Scholar

Jansson, Lina (2014): “Causal Theories of Explanation and the Challenge of Explanatory Disagreement”, Philosophy of Science, vol. 81, pp. 332–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jevons, William Stanley (1871): The Theory of Political Economy, London and New York: MacMillan & Co.Google Scholar

Johnson-Laird, Philip N. (1983): Mental Models, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Johnson-Laird, Philip N. (2006): How We Reason, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Jones, Eric L. (2003): The European Miracle, 3rd edition, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Keil, Frank C. and Wilson, Robert A. (2000): “Explaining Explanation”, in Keil, Frank C. and Wilson, Robert A. (eds.): Explanation and Cognition, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kellert, Stephen H., Longino, Helen E., and Kenneth Waters, C. (2006): “Introduction: The Pluralist Stance”, in Kellert, Stephen H., Longino, Helen E., and Kenneth Waters, C. (eds.): Scientific Pluralism, Minneapolis and London: University of Minnesota Press, pp. vii–xxix.Google Scholar

Keuth, Herbert (1993): Erkenntnis oder Entscheidung. Zur Kritik der kritischen Theorie, J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck).Google Scholar

Key, Jack D., Keys, Thomas E., and Callahan, John A. (1979): “Historical Development of Concept of Blood Circulation”, The American Journal of Cardiology, vol. 43, pp. 1026–1032.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Khalifa, Kareem (2012): “Inaugurating Understanding or Repackaging Explanation?” Philosophy of Science, vol. 79, pp. 15–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Khan, Ijaz A., Daya, Samantapudi K., and Gowda, Ramesh M. (2005): “Evolution of the Theory of Circulation”, International Journal of Cardiology, vol. 98, pp. 519–521.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kitcher, Philip (1981): “Explanatory Unification”, Philosophy of Science, vol. 48, pp. 251–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kitcher, Philip (1985): “Two Approaches to Explanation”, Journal of Philosophy, vol. 82, pp. 632–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kitcher, Philip (1989): “Explanatory Unification and the Causal Structure of the World”, in Kitcher, Philip and Salmon, Wesley (eds.): Scientific Explanation, volume 13 of Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 410–505.Google Scholar

Kitcher, Philip (1993): The Advancement of Science, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Kitcher, Philip (2001): Science, Truth, and Democracy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kitcher, Philip (2011a): The Ethical Project, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kitcher, Philip (2011b): Science in a Democratic Society, New York: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar

Kitcher, Philip and Varzi, Achille (2000): “Some Pictures Are Worth 2^N₀ Sentences”, Philosophy, vol. 75, pp. 377–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Knight, Jack (2009): “Causal Mechanisms and Generalizations”, in Mantzavinos, C. (ed.): Philosophy of the Social Sciences. Philosophical Theory and Scientific Practice, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 179–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Koertge, Noretta (1992): “Explanation and Its Problems”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, vol. 43, pp. 85–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Koethe, John (2002): “Stanley and Williamson on Knowing How”, The Journal of Philosophy, vol. 99, pp. 325–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kühn, Carl Gottlob (ed.) (1821–1833): Claudii Galeni Opera Omnia, Leipzig: C. Cnobloch, rpt. Hildesheim: Georg Olms, 1964–1965.Google Scholar

Kuhn, Thomas (1962/1970): The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, second enlarged edition, Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar

Kuhn, Thomas (1977): “Objectivity, Value Judgment, and Theory Choice”, in Kuhn, Thomas: The Essential Tension, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, pp. 320–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kybourg, Henry E. (1965): “Comment”, Philosophy of Science, vol. 32, 147–151.Google Scholar

Lange, Marc (2013): “What Makes a Scientific Explanation Distinctively Mathematical?”, British Journal for Philosophy of Science, vol. 64, pp. 485–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lange, Marc (2014): “Aspects of Mathematical Explanation: Symmetry, Unity, and Salience”, Philosophical Review, vol. 123, pp. 485–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Larkin, Jill H. and Simon, Herbert (1987): “Why a Diagram is (Sometimes) Worth Ten Thousand Words”, Cognitive Science, vol. 11, pp. 65–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Laudan, Larry (1977): Progress and Its Problems. Towards a Theory of Scientific Growth, Berkeley, Los Angeles and London: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Laudan, Larry (1984): Science and Values, Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Laudan, Larry (2004): “The Epistemic, the Cognitive, and the Social”, in: Peter, Machamer and Gereon, Wolters (eds.): Science, Values, and Objectivity, Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, pp. 14–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lawson, Tony (1997): Economics and Reality, London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lawson, Tony (2003): Reorienting Economics, London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Lewis, David (1986): “Causal Explanation”, Philosophical Papers, vol. 2, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 214–240.Google Scholar

Lipton, Peter (2004): Inference to the Best Explanation, 2nd edition, London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Little, Daniel (2009): “The Heterogeneous Social: New Thinking About the Foundations of the Social Sciences”, in Mantzavinos, C. (ed.): Philosophy of the Social Sciences. Philosophical Theory and Scientific Practice, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 154–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lloyd, G.E.R. (2008): “Galen and His Contemporaries”, in Hankinson, Robert J. (ed.): The Cambridge Companion to Galen, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 34–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Longino, Helen (1990): Science as Social Knowledge, Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Longino, Helen (2002): The Fate of Knowledge, Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Longino, Helen (2013): Studying Human Behavior: How Scientists Investigate Aggression and Sexuality, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lorenz, Konrad (1941): “Kants Lehre vom Apriorischen im Lichte gegenwärtiger Biologie”, Blätter für deutsche Philosophie, vol. 15 (1), pp. 95–124.Google Scholar

Lorenz, Konrad (1943): “Die angeborenen Formen möglicher Erfahrung”, Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie, vol. 5, pp. 235–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lorenz, Konrad (1965): Evolution and Modification of Behavior, Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar

Lorenz, Konrad (1973): Die Rückseite des Spiegels. Versuch einer Naturgeschichte menschlicher Erkennens, München and Zürich: Pieper.Google Scholar

Love, Alan C. (2015): “Collaborative Explanation, Explanatory Roles, and Scientific Explaining in Practice”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, vol. 52, pp. 88–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Lütge, Christoph (2001): Ökonomische Wissenschaftstheorie, Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann.Google Scholar

Lütge, Christoph (2004): “Economics in Philosophy of Science: A Dismal Contribution?” Synthese, vol. 140 (3), pp. 279–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Machamer, Peter (2009): “Explaining Mechanisms”, unpublished paper.Google Scholar

Machamer, Peter, Darden, Lindley, and Craver, Carl (2000): “Thinking about Mechanisms”, Philosophy of Science, vol. 67, pp. 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mäki, Uskali (2001): “Explanatory Unification: Double and Doubtful”, Philosophy of the Social Sciences, vol. 31, pp. 488–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mäki, Uskali (2002): “Symposium on Explanations and Social Ontology 2: Explanatory Ecumenism and Economics Imperialism”, Economics and Philosophy, vol. 18, pp. 235–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mäki, Uskali and Marchionni, Caterina (2009): “On the Structure of Explanatory Unification: The Case of Geographical Economics”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, vol. 40, pp. 185–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Malpighi, Marcello (1661/1929): De Pulmonibus epistolae II ad Borellium, translated into English by Young, James: Malpighi’s “De Pulmonibus”, in Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine, vol. 23, pp. 1–11.Google Scholar

Malthus, Thomas Robert (1814): Observations on the Effects of Corn Laws on the Agriculture and General Wealth of the Country, London: J. Johnson & Co.Google Scholar

Mantzavinos, C. (1994): Wettbewerbstheorie. Eine kritische Auseinandersetzung, Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.Google Scholar

Mantzavinos, C. (1999): “Carl Menger und die Wettbewerbstheorie”, Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik, vol. 219, pp. 685–691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mantzavinos, C. (2001): Individuals, Institutions and Markets, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mantzavinos, C. (2005): Naturalistic Hermeneutics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mantzavinos, C. (2007): “Interpreting the Rules of the Game”, in Engel, Christoph and Strack, Fritz (eds.): The Impact of Court Procedure on the Psychology of Judicial Decision Making, Baden-Baden: Nomos, pp. 13–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mantzavinos, C. (ed.) (2009): Philosophy of the Social Sciences. Philosophical Theory and Scientific Practice, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mantzavinos, C., Douglass, North, and Shariq, Syed (2004): “Learning, Institutions and Economic Performance”, Perspectives on Politics, vol. 2, pp. 75–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marchionni, Caterina (2008): “Explanatory Pluralism and Complementarity. From Autonomy to Integration”, Philosophy of the Social Sciences, vol. 38, pp. 314–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marshall, Alfred (1890/1920): Principles of Economics, 8th edition, London: MacMillan.Google Scholar

Mattern, Susan P. (2008): Galen and the Rhetoric of Healing, Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mayer, Richard E. (1992): Thinking, Problem Solving, Cognition, 2nd edition, New York: W.H. Freeman.Google Scholar

McAdams, Richard (1997): “The Origin, Development, and Regulation of Norms”, Michigan Law Review, vol. 96, pp. 338–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McCauley, Robert (2000): “The Naturalness of Religion and the Unnaturalness of Science”, in Keil, Frank C. and Wilson, Robert A. (eds.): Explanation and Cognition, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 61–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McCauley, Robert (2009): “Time is of the Essence: Explanatory Pluralism and Accommodating Theories About Long Term Processes”, Philosophical Psychology, vol. 22, pp. 611–635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McCauley, Robert (2013): “Explanatory Pluralism and the Cognitive Science of Religion: Or Why Scholars in Religious Studies Should Stop Worrying About Reductive Elimination of the Religious and Why Cognitive Science Poses No Threat to Religious Studies”, Working Paper.Google Scholar

McCauley, Robert and Bechtel, William (2001): “Explanatory Pluralism and Heuristic Identity Theory”, Theory and Psychology, vol. 11, pp. 736–760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McMullen, Emerson Thomas (1995): “Anatomy of a Physiological Discovery: William Harvey and the Circulation of the Blood”, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, vol. 88, pp. 491–498.Google Scholar

McMullin, Ernan (1983/2012): “Values in Science”, in PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, vol. 182, vol. Two: Symposia and Invited Papers, and reprinted in Zygon, vol. 47, pp. 686–709.Google Scholar

McMullin, Ernan (2008): “The Virtues of a Good Theory”, in Psillos, Stathis and Curd, Martin (eds.): The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Science, London and New York: Routledge, pp. 498–508.Google Scholar

Menger, Carl (1871/1968): Grundsätze der Volkswirtschaftslehre, Wien: Wilhelm Braumüller, and 2nd edition 1968 by von Hayek, Friedrich A.: Carl Menger: Gesammelte Werke, Band I, Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck).Google Scholar

Menger, Carl (1976): Principles of Economics, translated by Dingwall, James and Hoselitz, Bert F., Arlington, VA: The Institue for Humane Studies.Google Scholar

Meyerhof, Max (1935): “Ibn An-Nafis (XIIIth cent.) and His Theory of the Lesser Circulation”, Isis, vol. 23, pp. 100–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mill, John Stuart (1843/1974): A System of Logic. Ratiocinative and Inductive, vol. VII of the Collected Works of Mill, John Stuart, ed., Robson, J.M. and McRae, R.F., Toronto: University of Toronto Press and Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Mill, John Stuart (1848/1909): Principles of Political Economy with Some of Their Applications to Social Philosophy, 7th edition, London: Longmans Green and Co.Google Scholar

Mitchell, Sandra (2003): Biological Complexity and Integrative Pluralism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mitchell, Sandra (2009a): Unsimple Truths. Science, Complexity and Policy, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mitchell, Sandra (2009b): “Complexity and Explanation in the Social Sciences”, in: Mantzavinos, C. (ed.): Philosophy of the Social Sciences. Philosophical Theory and Scientific Practice, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 130–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mithen, Steven (1996): The Prehistory of the Mind: The Cognitive Origins of Art, Religion and Science, New York: Thames and Hudson.Google Scholar

Mithen, Steven (2002): “Human Evolution and the Cognitive Basis of Sciences”, in Carruthers, Peter, Stephen, Stich, and Siegal, Michael (eds.): The Cognitive Basis of Science, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 23–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morrison, Margaret (2000): Unifying Scientific Theories, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mueller, Dennis (2003): Public Choice III, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nagel, Ernst (1961): The Structure of Science: Problems in the Logic of Scientific Explanation, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nathan, Marco J. (2015): “Unificatory Explanation”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science (Advance Access), published July 8, 2015.Google Scholar

Nee, Victor (1998): “Norms and Networks in Economic and Organizational Performance”, American Economic Review (Papers and Proceedings), vol. 88, pp. 85–89.Google Scholar

Nee, Victor and Ingram, Paul (1998): “Embeddedness and Beyond: Institutions, Exchange and Social Structure”, in Nee, Victor and Brinton, Mary C. (eds.): The New Institutionalism in Sociology, New York: Russell Sage Foundation, pp. 19–45.Google Scholar

Nee, Victor and Strang, David (1998): “The Emergence and Diffusion of Institutional Forms”, Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, vol. 154, pp. 706–715.Google Scholar

Nelson, Richard and Winter, Sidney (1982): An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Nersessian, Nancy (1992): “How Do Scientists Think? Capturing the Dynamics of Conceptual Change in Science”, in Giere, Ronald (ed.): Cognitive Models of Science, Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. XV, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 3–44.Google Scholar

Nersessian, Nancy (2008a): Creating Scientific Concepts, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nersessian, Nancy (2008b): “Mental Modeling in Conceptual Change”, in Vosniadou, Stella (ed.): International Handbook of Research on Conceptual Change, London and New York: Routledge, pp. 391–416.Google Scholar

Neumann, John and Morgenstern, Oskar (1944): Theory of Games and Economic Behavior, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Newell, Allen and Simon, Herbert (1972): Human Problem Solving, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

Nickel, Bernhard (2010): “How General Do Theories of Explanation Need to Be?” Noûs, vol. 42, pp. 305–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nickles, Thomas (2006): “Heuristic Appraisal: Context of Discovery or Justification?”, in Schickore, Jutta and Steinle, Friedrich (eds.): Revisiting Discovery and Justification, Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 159–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nietzsche, Friedrich (1887): Zur Genealogie der Moral. Eine Streitschrift, Leigzig: Verlag C.G. Naumann.Google Scholar

Nisbett, Richard and Ross, Lee (1980): Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

North, Douglass C. (1990): Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nozick, Robert (1994): “Invisible-Hand Explanations”, American Economic Review (Papers and Proceedings), vol. 84, pp. 314–318.Google Scholar

Nutton, Vivian (2004): Ancient Medicine, London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nutton, Vivian (2008): “The Fortunes of Galen”, in Hankinson, Robert J. (ed.): The Cambridge Companion to Galen, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 355–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Olson, Mancur (1965): The Logic of Collective Action, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

O’Malley, Charles Donald (1970): “The Lure of Padua”, Medical History, vol. 14, pp.1–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Opp, Karl-Dieter (1979): “The Emergence and Effects of Social Norms. A Confrontation of Some Hypotheses of Sociology and Economics”, Kyklos, vol. 32, pp. 775–801.Google Scholar

Opp, Karl-Dieter (1982): “The Evolutionary Emergence of Norms”, British Journal of Social Psychology, vol. 21, pp. 139–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ott, Alfred E. and Winkel, Harald (1985): Geschichte der theoretischen Volkswirtschaftslehre, Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar

Overton, James A. (2013): “‘Explain’ in Scientific Discourse”, Synthese, vol. 190, pp. 1383–1405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Palmieri, Paolo (2012): “Signals, Cochlear Mechanics and Pragmatism: A New Vista on Human Hearing?”, Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, vol. 24, pp. 527–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Papineau, David (2009): “Physicalism and the Human Sciences”, in Mantzavinos, C. (ed.): Philosophy of the Social Sciences. Philosophical Theory and Scientific Practice, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 103–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Perini, Laura (2005a): “The Truth in Pictures”, Philosophy of Science, vol. 72, pp. 262–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Perini, Laura (2005b): “Visual Representations and Confirmation”, Philosophy of Science, vol. 72, pp. 913–926.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Perini, Laura (2005c): “Explanation in Two Dimensions: Diagrams and Biological Explanation”, Biology and Philosophy, vol. 20, pp. 257–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Perini, Laura (2013): “Diagrams in Biology”, The Knowledge Engineering Review, vol. 28, pp. 273–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Petkov, Stefan (2015): “Explanatory Unification and Conceptualization”, Synthese, vol. 192, pp. 3695–3717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Piaget, Jean (1936): La Naissance de l’ Intelligence chez l’Enfant, Neuchatel and Paris: Delachau et Niestle.Google Scholar

Pincock, Christopher (2012): Mathematics and Scientific Representation, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pincock, Christopher (2015): “Abstract Explanations in Science”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, vol. 66, pp. 857–882.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Plutynski, Anya (2004): “Explanation in Classical Population Genetics”, Philosophy of Science, vol. 71, pp. 1201–1214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Polanyi, Michael (1958): Personal Knowledge, London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Popper, Karl R. (1934): Logik der Forschung, Vienna: Springer, Imprint 1935, actually published 1934.Google Scholar

Popper, Karl R. (1949): “Naturgesetze und theoretische Systeme,” in Moser, Simon (ed.): Gesetze und Wirklichkeit, Innsbruck: Tyrolia-Verlag, pp. 43–60.Google Scholar

Popper, Karl R. (1957): “The Aim of Science”, Ratio, I, pp. 24–35 [and reprinted in Objective Knowledge. An Evolutionary Approach, rev. edition, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1979, pp. 191–205].Google Scholar

Popper, Karl R. (1958/1989): “Back to the Presocratics”, in Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, N.S. vol. 59, and reprinted in: Conjectures and Refutations. The Growth of Scientific Knowledge, 5th revised edition, London: Routledge, pp. 136–165.Google Scholar

Popper, Karl R. (1959/2002): The Logic of Scientific Discovery, London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Popper, Karl R. (1963/1989): Conjectures and Refutations. The Growth of Scientific Knowledge, 5th revised edition, London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Popper, Karl R. (1970): “Normal Science and Its Dangers”, in Lakatos, Imre and Musgrave, Alan (eds.): Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 51–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Popper, Karl R. (1972/1992): Objective Knowledge. An Evolutionary Approach, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Popper, Karl R. (1987): “Die erkenntnistheoretische Position der evolutionären Erkenntnistheorie”, in Riedl, Rupert and Wuketits, Franz (eds.): Die Evolutionäre Erkenntnistheorie. Bedingungen. Lösungen. Kontroversen, Berlin: Parcy.Google Scholar

Popper, Karl R. and Eccles, John C. (1977/1983): The Self and Its Brain. An Argument for Interactionism, London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Posner, Richard (2010): Economic Analysis of Law, 8th edition, New York: Aspen Publishers.Google Scholar

Potochnik, Angela (2010): “Levels of Explanation Reconceived”, Philosophy of Science, vol. 77, pp. 59–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Prioreschi, Plinio (2004): “Andrea Cesalpino and Systemic Circulation”, Annales Pharmaceutiques Francaises, vol. 62, pp. 382–400.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Psillos, Stathis (2002): Causation and Explanation, Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Psillos, Stathis (2007): “Past and Contemporary Perspectives on Explanation”, in Kuipers, Theo (ed.): Handbook of the Philosophy of Science. Focal Issues, Amsterdam and Oxford: Elsevier, pp. 97–174.Google Scholar

Railton, Peter (1978): “A Deductive-Nomological Model of Probabilistic Explanation”, Philosophy of Science, vol. 45, pp. 206–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Railton, Peter (1981): “Probability, Explanation and Information”, Synthese, vol. 48, pp. 233–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reutlinger, Alexander (2014): “Why Is There Universal Macrobehavior? Renormalization Group Explanation as Noncausal Explanation”, Philosophy of Science, vol. 81, pp. 1157–1170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ricardo, David (1817/1951): On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation, ed. Sraffa, Pierro, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Rice, Collin (2015): “Moving Beyond Causes: Optimality Models and Scientific Explanation”, Noûs, vol. 49, pp. 589–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Richardson, Alan W. (2006): “The Many Unities of Science: Politics, Semantics, and Ontology”, in Kellert, Stephen H., Longino, Helen E., and Kenneth Waters, C. (eds.): Scientific Pluralism, Minneapolis and London: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 1–25.Google Scholar

Rocca, Julius (2008): “Anatomy”, in Hankinson, Robert J. (ed.): The Cambridge Companion to Galen, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 242–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rogers, Brian and Cassandra, Rogers (2009): “Visual Globes, Celestial Spheres, and the Perception of Straight and Parallel Lines”, Perception, vol. 38, pp. 1295–1312.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Rosefeld, Tobias (2004): “Is Knowing-how Simply a Case of Knowing-that?” Philosophical Investigations, vol. 27, pp. 370–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Roth, Moritz (1892): Andreas Vesalius Bruxellensis, Berlin: George Reimer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ruben, David-Hillel (2012): Explaining Explanation, 2nd edition, Boulder and London: Paradigm Publishers.Google Scholar

Ruphy, Stéphanie (2011): “From Hacking’s Plurality of Styles of Scientific Reasoning to ‘Foliated Pluralism’: A Philosophically Robust Form of Ontologico-Methodological Pluralism”, Philosophy of Science, vol. 78, pp. 1212–1222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Russell, Bertrand (1912): “On the Notion of Cause”, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society New Series, vol. 13, pp. 1–26.Google Scholar

Ryle, Gilbert (1949): The Concept of Mind, London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar

Saatsi, Juha and Pexton, Mark (2013): “Reassessing Woodward’s Account of Explanation: Regularities, Counterfactuals, and Noncausal Explanations”, Philosophy of Science, vol. 80, pp. 613–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Salmon, Wesley (1970): “Statistical Explanation”, in Colodny, Robert G. (ed.): The Nature and Function of Scientific Theories, Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, pp. 173–231. [Reprinted in Salmon, Wesley (1971): Statistical Explanation and Statistical Relevance, Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, pp. 29–87.]Google Scholar

Salmon, Wesley (1984): Scientific Explanation and the Causal Structure of the World, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Salmon, Wesley (1990): Four Decades of Scientific Explanation, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

Salmon, Wesley (1998): Causality and Explanation, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Samarapungavan, Ala (1992): “Children’s Judgments in Theory Choice Tasks: Scientific Rationality in Childhood”, Cognition, vol. 45, pp. 1–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Schank, Roger and Abelson, Robert (1977): Scripts, Plans, Goals and Understanding, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Schiffer, Stephen (2002): “Amazing Knowledge”, Journal of Philosophy, vol. 99, pp. 200–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schmid, Michael (2006): Die Logik mechanismischer Erklärungen, Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar

Schrödinger, Erwin (1958): Mind and Matter, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Schupbach, Jonah N. and Sprenger, Jan (2011): “The Logic of Explanatory Power”, Philosophy of Science, vol. 78, pp. 105–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schurz, Gerhard (1999): “Explanation as Unification”, Synthese, vol. 120, pp. 95–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schurz, Gerhard and Lambert, Karel (1994): “Outline of a Theory of Scientific Understanding”, Synthese, vol. 101, pp. 65–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Servetus, Miguel (1553): Christianismi Restitutio, Vienne, English translation: The Restoration of Christianity, by Hoffmann, Christopher A. and Hiller, Marian, Lewiston, NY: The Edwin Mellen Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Sextus, Empiricus (1933): Outlines of Pyrrhonism, translated by Bury, R.G., Loeb Classical Library, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Sheredos, Benjamin, Daniel, Burnston, Adele, Abrahamsen and William, Bechtel (2013): “Why Do Biologists Use So Many Diagrams?”, Philosophy of Science, vol. 80, pp. 931–944.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shulman, Robert G. and Shapiro, Ian (2009): “Reductionism in the Human Sciences: A Philosopher’s Game”, in Mantzavinos, C. (ed.): Philosophy of the Social Sciences. Philosophical Theory and Scientific Practice, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 124–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Simon, Herbert (1992): “Scientific Discovery as Problem Solving”, in Egidi, Massimo and Marris, Robin (eds.): Economics, Bounded Rationality and the Cognitive Revolution, Hants: Edward Elgar, pp. 102–119.Google Scholar

Simon, Herbert (2000): “Discovering Explanations”, in Keil, Frank C. and Wilson, Robert A. (eds.): Explanation and Cognition, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 21–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Siraisi, Nancy (1981): Tadeo Alderotti and His Pupils: Two Generations of Italian Medical Learning, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Skow, Bradford (2014): “Are There Non-Causal Explanations (of Particular Events?)” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, vol. 65, pp. 445–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Skow, Bradford (2015): “Are There Genuine Physical Explanations of Mathematical Phenomena?” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, vol. 66, pp. 69–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, Adam (1759/1976): The Theory of Moral Sentiments, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Smith, Adam (1776/1976): An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, ed. Cannan, Edwin, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Smith, Ryan (2014): “Explanation, Understanding, and Control”, Synthese, vol. 191, pp. 4169–4200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Snellen, H.A. (1984): History of Cardiology, Rotterdam: Donker Academic Publications.Google Scholar

Sober, Elliott (1983): “Equilibrium Explanation”, Philosophical Studies, vol. 43, pp. 201–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sober, Elliott (2002): “What is the Problem of Simplicity?” in Zellner, Arnold, Keuzenbach, Hugo and McAleer, Michael (eds.): Simplicity, Inference and Econometric Modelling, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 13–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sokal, Alan and Bricmont, Jean (1997): Les Impostures Intellectuelles, Paris: Editions Odile Jacob.Google Scholar

Staden, Heinrich von (1995): “Anatomy as Rhetoric: Galen on Dissection and Persuasion”, Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences, vol. 50, pp. 47–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stanley, Jason (2011): Know How, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stanley, Jason and Williamson, Timothy (2001): “Knowing How”, The Journal of Philosophy, vol. 98, pp. 411–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Steel, Daniel (2004): “Can a Reductionist Be a Pluralist?”, Biology and Philosophy, vol. 19, pp. 55–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Steiner, Mark (1978a): “Mathematical Explanation”, Philosophical Studies, vol. 34, pp. 135–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Steiner, Mark (1978b): “Mathematics, Explanation, and Scientific Knowledge”, Noûs, vol. 12, pp. 17–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sterelny, Kim (1996): “Explanatory Pluralism in Evolutionary Biology”, Biology and Philosophy, vol. 11, pp. 193–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sterelny, Kim (2014): The Evolved Apprentice. How Evolution Made Humans Unique, Cambridge, MA, and London: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Streissler, Erich (1989): “Carl Menger”, in Starbatty, Joachim (ed.): Klassiker des ökonomischen Denkens, vol. II, München: Beck, pp. 118–127.Google Scholar

Strevens, Michael (2008): Depth. An Account of Scientific Explanation, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Stump, David (1992): “Naturalized Philosophy of Science with a Plurality of Methods”, Philosophy of Science, vol. 59, pp. 456–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Suárez, Mauricio (2004): “An Inferential Conception of Scientific Representation”, Philosophy of Science, vol. 71, pp. 767–779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Suárez, Mauricio (2015): “Deflationary Representation, Inference, and Practice”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, vol. 49, pp. 36–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sugden, Robert (1998): “Normative Expectations: The Simultaneous Evolution of Institutions and Norms”, in Ben-Ner, Avner and Putterman, Louis (eds.): Economics, Values, and Organization, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 73–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sun, Ron, Merrill, Edward, and Peterson, Todd (2001): “From Implicit Skills to Explicit Knowledge: A Bottom-Up Model of Skill Learning”, Cognitive Science, vol. 25, pp. 203–244.Google Scholar

Suppes, Patrick (1978): “The Plurality of Science”, Philosophy of Science, Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, Vol. 2: Symposia and Invited Papers, pp. 3–16.Google Scholar

Teller, Paul (2008): “Representation in Science”, in Psillos, Stathis and Curd, Martin (eds.): The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Science, London and New York, pp. 435–441.Google Scholar

Thagard, Paul (1988): Computational Philosophy of Science, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thagard, Paul (1996): Mind. An Introduction into Cognitive Science, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Thagard, Paul (2012): The Cognitive Science of Science. Explanation, Discovery and Conceptual Change, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thalos, Mariam (2002): “Explanation is a Genus: An Essay on the Varieties of Scientific Explanation”, Synthese, vol. 130, pp. 317–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thiene, Gaetano (1997): “The Discovery of Circulation and the Origin of Modern Medicine during the Italian Renaissance”, Cardiovascular Pathology, vol. 6 (2), March/April, pp. 79–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Thünen, Johann Heinrich (1842): Der isolierte Staat in Beziehung auf Landwirtschaft und Nationalökonomie, zweite erweiterte Ausgabe, Rostock: Leopold.Google Scholar

Topitsch, Ernst (1958): Vom Ursprung und Ende der Metaphysik. Eine Studie zur Weltanschauungskritik, Wien: Springer Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Trivers, Robert (1971): “The Evolution of Reciprocal Altruism”, Quarterly Review of Biology, vol. 46, pp. 45–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ullmann-Margalit, Edna (1978): “Invisible-Hand Explanations”, Synthese, vol. 39, pp. 263–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

van Bouwel, Jeroen (2004): “Explanatory Pluralism in Economics: Against the Mainstream?” Philosophical Explorations, vol. 7, pp. 299–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

van Bouwel, Jeroen and Weber, Erik (2008): “A Pragmatist Defense of Non-Relativistic Explanatory Pluralism in History and Social Science”, History and Theory, vol. 47, pp. 168–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

van Fraassen, Bas C. (1980): The Scientific Image, Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

van Fraassen, Bas C. (2008): Scientific Representation, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vesalius, Andreas (1538): Tabulae Anatomicae Sex, Venice.Google Scholar

Vesalius, Andreas (1543): De Humani Corporis Fabrica Libri Septem, Basel: Johannes Oporinus, English Translation: On the Fabric of the Human Body, by William Frank Richardson and John Burd Carman, volume 5 containing Books VI: The Heart and Associated Organs and Book VI: The Brain, Novato CA: Norman Anatomy Series, No 5.Google Scholar

Vollmer, Gerhard (1975/2002): Evolutionäre Erkenntnistheorie, 8th edition, Stuttgart: Hirzel.Google Scholar

Vosniadou, Stella and Brewer, William F. (1992): “Mental Models of the Earth: A Study of Conceptual Change in Childhood”, Cognitive Psychology, vol. 24, pp. 535–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vosniadou, Stella and Brewer, William F. (1994): “Mental Models of the Day/Night Cycle”, Cognitive Science, vol. 18, pp. 123–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vosniadou, Stella, Vamvakoussi, Xenia, and Skopeliti, Irini (2008): “The Framework Theory Approach to the Problem of Conceptual Change”, in Vosniadou, Stella (ed.): International Handbook of Research on Conceptual Change, New York and London: Routledge, pp. 3–34.Google Scholar

Wallis, Charles (2008): “Consciousness, Context, and Know-How”, Synthese, vol. 160, pp. 123–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Walras, Leon (1874): Éléments d’Économie Politique Pure, ou Théorie de la Richesse Sociale, Lausanne: L. Corbaz & Cie.Google Scholar

Weatherall, James Owen (2011): “On (Some) Explanations in Physics”, Philosophy of Science, vol. 78, pp. 421–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weber, Erik and van Bouwel, Jeroen (2002): “Symposium on Explanations and Social Ontology 3: Can We Dispense with Structural Explanations of Social Facts?”, Economics and Philosophy, vol. 18, pp. 259–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weber, Erik, van Bouwel, Jeroen, and de Vreese, Leen (2013): Scientific Explanation, Heidelberg, New York and London: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weber, Max (1985): Gesammelte Aufsätze für Wissenschaftslehre, 6th revised edition, Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck).Google Scholar

Weslake, Brad (2010): “Explanatory Depth”, Philosophy of Science, vol. 77, pp. 273–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Whitehead, Alfred N. (1911): An Introduction to Mathematics, London: Williams and Norgate.Google Scholar

Wiberg, Julius (1937): “The Medical Science of Ancient Greece: The Doctrine of the Heart”, Janus, vol. 41, pp. 225–254.Google Scholar

Wilkenfeld, Daniel A. (2014): “Functional Explaining. A New Approach to the Philosophy of Explanation”, Synthese, vol. 191, pp. 3367–3391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Willius, Fredrick A. and Dry, Thomas J. (1948): A History of the Heart and the Circulation, Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co.Google Scholar

Wimsatt, William C. (1976): “Reductionism, Levels of Organization, and the Mind-Body Problem”, in Globus, G., Maxwell, G. and Savodnik, I. (eds.), Consciousness and the Brain: A Scientific and Philosophical Inquiry, New York: Plenum, pp. 202–267.Google Scholar

Wimsatt, William C. (2007): Re-Engineering Philosophy for Limited Beings. Piecewise Approximations to Reality, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Winter, Susan (2013): The Prince of Medicine: Galen in the Roman Empire, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, Ludwig (1953): Philosophische Untersuchungen/Philosophical Investigations, translated by Anscombe, G.E.M., Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Wong, Wai-hung and Zanja, Yudell (2015): “A Normative Account of the Need for Explanation”, Synthese, vol. 192, pp. 2863–2885.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Woodward, James (2000): “Explanation and Invariance in the Special Sciences,” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, vol. 51, pp. 197–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Woodward, James (2003): Making Things Happen, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Woodward, James (2014): “Interventionism and Causal Exclusion”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, DOI:10.1111/phpr.12095.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Woody, Andrea I. (2004): “More Telltale Signs: What Attention to Representation Reveals About Scientific Explanation”, Philosophy of Science, vol. 71, pp. 780–793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Woody, Andrea I. (2015): “Re-orienting Discussions of Scentific Explanation: A Functional Perspective”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, vol. 52, pp. 79–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wright, Cory (2015): “The Ontic Conception of Scientific Explanation”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, vol. 54, pp. 20–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ylikoski, Petri and Kuorikoski, Jaako (2010): “Dissecting Explanatory Power”, Philosophical Studies, vol. 148, pp. 201–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar