Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-mwx4w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-30T04:59:05.144Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - Geriatric Cardiac Procedures

from Section 3 - Intraoperative Considerations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 January 2018

By
John D. Mitchell
Edited by
Sheila Ryan Barnett  and
Sara E. Neves
Sheila Ryan Barnett
Affiliation:
Harvard University Medical School, Massachusetts
Sara E. Neves
Affiliation:
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Perioperative Care of the Elderly Patient , pp. 108 - 118
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Philip, F, Athappan, G, Tuzcu, EM, Svensson, LG, Kapadia, SR. MitraClip for severe symptomatic mitral regurgitation in patients at high surgical risk: a comprehensive systematic review. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014; 84(4):581–590.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meco, M, Biraghi, T, Panisi, P, et al. Aortocoronary bypass grafting in high-risk patients over 75 years. Propensity score analysis of on versus off-pump, early and midterm results. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2007; 48(3):339–347.Google Scholar
Buzzatti, N, Taramasso, M, Latib, A, et al. Transcatheter mitral repair and replacement: state of the art and future directions. J Heart Valve Dis. 2014; 23(4):492–505.Google Scholar
D'ascenzo, F, Moretti, C, Marra, WG, et al. Meta-analysis of the usefulness of Mitraclip in patients with functional mitral regurgitation. Am J Cardiol. 2015; 116(2):325–331.Google Scholar
Jensen, BØ, Hughes, P, Rasmussen, LS, Pedersen, PU, Steinbrüchel, DA. Health-related quality of life following off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in elderly moderate to high-risk patients: a randomized trial. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2006; 30(2):294–299.Google Scholar
Maisano, F, Alfieri, O, Banai, S, et al. The future of transcatheter mitral valve interventions: competitive or complementary role of repair vs. replacement? Eur Heart J. 2015; 36(26):1651–1659.Google Scholar
Raja, SG. Myocardial revascularization for the elderly: current options, role of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting and outcomes. Curr Cardiol Rev. 2012; 8(1):26–36.Google Scholar
Alexander, KP, Anstrom, KJ, Muhlbaier, LH, et al. Outcomes of cardiac surgery in patients > or = 80 years: results from the National Cardiovascular Network. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000; 35(3):731–738.Google Scholar
Rashedi, N, Otto, CM. Aortic stenosis: changing disease concepts. J Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2015; 23(2):59–69.Google Scholar
Nicolini, F, Agostinelli, A, Vezzani, A, et al. The evolution of cardiovascular surgery in elderly patient: a review of current options and outcomes. BioMed Res Int. 2014:1–10.Google Scholar
Panesar, SS, Chikwe, J, Mirza, SB, et al. Off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery may reduce the incidence of stroke in patients with significant left main stem disease. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008; 56(5):247–255.Google Scholar
Seco, M, Edelman, JJ, Forrest, P, et al. Geriatric cardiac surgery: chronology vs. biology. Heart Lung Circ. 2014; 23(9):794–801.Google Scholar
Kodali, SK, Williams, MR, Smith, CR, et al. Two-year outcomes after transcatheter or surgical aortic-valve replacement. N Engl J Med. 2012; 366(18):1686–1695.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cheng, DC, Bainbridge, D, Martin, JE, Novick, RJ; Evidence-Based Perioperative Clinical Outcomes Research Group. Does off-pump coronary artery bypass reduce mortality, morbidity, and resource utilization when compared with conventional coronary artery bypass? A meta-analysis of randomized trials. Anesthesiology. 2005; 102(1):188–203.Google Scholar
Srinivasan, AK, Oo, AY, Grayson, AD, et al. Mid-term survival after cardiac surgery in elderly patients: analysis of predictors for increased mortality. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2004; 3(2):289–293.Google Scholar
Thourani, VH, Myung, R, Kilgo, P, et al. Long-term outcomes after isolated aortic valve replacement in octogenarians: a modern perspective. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008; 86(5):1458–1465.Google Scholar
Denti, P, Maisano, F, Alfieri, O. Devices for mitral valve repair. J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2014; 7(3):266–281.Google Scholar
Likosky, DS, Dacey, LJ, Baribeau, YR, et al. Long-term survival of the very elderly undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008; 85(4):1233–1237.Google Scholar
Abel, NJ, Rogal, GJ, Burns, P, Saunders, CR, Chamberlain, RS. Aortic valve replacement with and without coronary artery bypass graft surgery in octogenarians: is it safe and feasible? Cardiology. 2013; 124(3):163–173.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zingone, B, Gatti, G, Rauber, E, et al. Early and late outcomes of cardiac surgery in octogenarians. ATS. 2009; 87(1):71–78.Google ScholarPubMed
Dacey, LJ, Likosky, DS, Ryan, TJ Jr., et al. Long-term survival after surgery versus percutaneous intervention in octogenarians with multivessel coronary disease. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007; 84(6):1904–1911.Google Scholar
Sheridan, BC, Stearns, SC, Rossi, JS, et al. Three-year outcomes of multivessel revascularization in very elderly acute coronary syndrome patients. ATS. 2010; 89(6):1889–1895.Google ScholarPubMed
Coylewright, M, Cabalka, AK, Malouf, JA, et al. Percutaneous mitral valve replacement using a transvenous, transseptal approach: transvenous mitral valve replacement. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv. 2015; 8(6):850–857.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Athanasiou, T, Al-Ruzzeh, S, Kumar, P, et al. Off-pump myocardial revascularization is associated with less incidence of stroke in elderly patients. ATS. 2004; 77(2):745–753.Google ScholarPubMed
Rashedi, N, Otto, CM. When should we operate in asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis? 2015. Available from: www.acc.org/latest-in-cardiology/articles/2015/02/04/14/49/when-should-we-operate-in-asymptomatic-severe-aortic-stenosis (Accessed July 19, 2017).Google Scholar
Wiedemann, D, Bernhard, D, Laufer, G, Kocher, A. The elderly patient and cardiac surgery: a mini-review. Gerontology. 2010; 56(3):241–249.Google Scholar
Osnabrugge, RL, Arnold, SV, Reynolds, MR, et al. Health status after transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients at extreme surgical risk: results from the CoreValve U.S. Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv. 2015; 8(2):315–323.Google Scholar
Yamamoto, M, Mouillet, G, Meguro, K, et al. Clinical results of transcatheter aortic valve implantation in octogenarians and nonagenarians: insights from the FRANCE-2 Registry. ATS. 2014; 97(1):29–36.Google Scholar
Timek, TA, Turfe, Z, Hooker, RL, et al. Aortic valve replacement in octogenarians with prior cardiac surgery. ATS. 2015; 99(2):518–523.Google ScholarPubMed
Maganti, M, Rao, V, Armstrong, S, et al. Redo valvular surgery in elderly patients. ATS. 2009; 87(2):521–525.Google Scholar
Kaneko, T, Loberman, D, Gosev, I, et al. Reoperative aortic valve replacement in the octogenarians: minimally invasive technique in the era of transcatheter valve replacement. J Thoracic Cardiovasc Surg. 2014; 147(1):155–162.Google Scholar
Reardon, MJ, Adams, DH, Kleiman, NS, et al. 2-year outcomes in patients undergoing surgical or self-expanding transcatheter aortic valve replacement. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015; 66(2):113–121.Google Scholar
Saxena, A, Dinh, DT, Yap, CH, et al. Critical analysis of early and late outcomes after isolated coronary artery bypass surgery in elderly patients. ATS. 2011; 92(5):1703–1711.Google Scholar
Grossi, EA, Schwartz, CF, Yu, P-J, et al. High-risk aortic valve replacement: are the outcomes as bad as predicted? Ann Thorac Surg. 2008; 85(1):102–107.Google Scholar
Gallo, M, Gerosa, G. Multiparameter approach to evaluate elderly patients undergoing aortic valve replacement. J Thoracic Cardiovasc Surg. 2014; 148(4):1749–1751.Google Scholar
Afilalo, J, Karunananthan, S, Eisenberg, MJ, Alexander, KP, Bergman, H. Role of frailty in patients with cardiovascular disease. Am J Cardiol. 2009; 103(11):1616–1621.Google Scholar
Afilalo, J, Eisenberg, MJ, Morin, JF, et al. Gait speed as an incremental predictorof mortality and major morbidity in elderly patients undergoing cardiac surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010; 56(20):1668–1676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canvasser, LD, Mazurek, AA, Cron, DC, et al. Paraspinous muscle as a predictor of surgical outcome. Surg Res. 2014; 192(1):76–81.Google Scholar
Englesbe, MJ, Terjimanian, MN, Lee, JS, et al. Morphometric age and surgical risk. J Am Coll Surg. 2013; 216(5):976–985.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×