Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-swr86 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T22:13:31.710Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

25 - Stress, Dyadic Coping, and Social Support

Moving toward Integration

from Part VII - Threats to Relationships

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2018

By
Carolyn Cutrona ,
Guy Bodenmann ,
Ashley K. Randall ,
Frederick D. Clavél  and
Melissa Johnson
Edited by
Anita L. Vangelisti  and
Daniel Perlman
Anita L. Vangelisti
Affiliation:
University of Texas, Austin
Daniel Perlman
Affiliation:
University of North Carolina, Greensboro
Get access

Summary

It is well-recognized that close relationships influence emotional well-being and psychological outcomes, however often overlooked is the influence close relationships have on physical health. This chapter summarizes the evidence supporting taking close relationships seriously for one’s physical health. Epidemiological evidence linking close relationships to risk for premature mortality and experimental evidence in animals, together point to a directional and causal effect on health. Major theoretical approaches (Attachment, Social Network, Social Support), general models (Direct effects, Social Control/Influence), stress-based models (Stress buffering, Matching hypothesis/Responsiveness, Allostasis) and models of relationship thriving (Social Capitalization) further explain why such an association may exist. Importantly, evidence has accumulated documenting behavioral and biological pathways. Close relationships influence a variety of behavioral processes, including health behaviors, medical adherence/compliance, sleep, physical touch/affection—all of which influence physical health. There is also substantial evidence supporting the influence of close relationships on biological pathways, including cardiovascular, neuroendocrine, and immune functioning, that can have direct influences on health. The quality of close relationships may moderate such associations and therefore further attention to relationship quality in future research. Finally, future research is needed examining the role and implications of changing technology on the broader associations between close relationships and physical health.
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Personal Relationships , pp. 341 - 352
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acitelli, L. (1996). The neglected links between marital support and marital satisfaction. In Acitelli, L. (ed.) Handbook of social support and the family (pp. 83–103). New York, NY: Plenum. doi: 10.1007/978–1-4899–1388-3_5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Badr, H., & Acitelli, L. K. (2005). Dyadic adjustment in chronic illness: Does relationship talk matter? Journal of Family Psychology, 19, 465–469. doi: 10.1037/0893–3200.19.3.465CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Badr, H., Carmack, C. L., Kashy, D. A., Cristofanilli, M., & Revenson, T. A. (2010). Dyadic coping in metastatic breast cancer. Health Psychology, 29, 169–180. doi: 10.1037/a0018165CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berg, C. A., Wiebe, D. J., Butner, J., Bloor, L., Bradstreet, C., Upchurch, R., … Patton, G. (2008). Collaborative coping and daily mood in couples dealing with prostate cancer. Psychology and Aging, 23, 505–516. doi: 10.1037/a0012687CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bodenmann, G. (1995). A systemic-transactional conceptualization of stress and coping in couples. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 54, 34–49.Google Scholar
Bodenmann, G. (1997a). Coding system for dyadic coping. Fribourg, Switzerland: University of Fribourg.Google Scholar
Bodenmann, G. (1997b). Dyadic coping: A systemic-transactional view of stress and coping among couples: Theory and empirical findings. European Review of Applied Psychology, 47, 137–140.Google Scholar
Bodenmann, G. (2000). Stress und Coping bei Paaren. [Stress and coping in couples]. Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
Bodenmann, G. (2005). Dyadic coping and its significance for marital functioning. In Revenson, T. A., Kayser, K., & Bodenmann, G. (eds.) Couples coping with stress: Emerging perspectives on dyadic coping (pp. 33–50). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi: 10.1037/11031–002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bodenmann, G. (2008). Dyadic Coping Inventory (DCI). Test Manual. Retrieved from Bern/Gottingen.Google Scholar
Bodenmann, G. (2015, July 10). Dyadic coping: What we already know and what we don’t know. Paper presented at the International Association for Relationship Research, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Bodenmann, G., Meuwly, N., Bradbury, T. N., Gmelch, S. & Lerermann, T. (2010). Stress, anger, and verbal aggression in intimate relationships: Moderating effects of individual and dyadic coping. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 27, 408–424. doi: 10.1177/0265407510361616CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bodenmann, G., Meuwly, N., & Kayser, K. (2011). Two conceptualizations of dyadic coping and their potential for predicting relationship quality and individual well-being. European Psychologist, 16, 255–266. doi: 10.1027/1016–9040/a000068CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bodenmann, G., & Shantinath, S. D. (2004). The Couples Coping Enhancement Training (CCET): A new approach to prevention of marital distress based upon stress and coping. Family Relations, 53, 477–484. doi: 10.1111/j.0197–6664.2004.00056.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolger, N., & Amarel, D. (2007). Effects of social support visibility on adjustment to stress: experimental evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 458–475. doi: 10.1037/0022–3514.92.3.458CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bolger, N., Zuckerman, A., & Kessler, R. C. (2000). Invisible support and adjustment to stress. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 953–961.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brock, R. L., & Lawrence, E. (2008). A longitudinal investigation of stress spillover in marriage: Does spousal support adequacy buffer the effects? Journal of Family Psychology, 22, 11–20. doi: 10.1037/0893–3200.22.1.11CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, G. W., & Harris, T. (1978). The social origins of depression: A study of psychiatric disorder in women. New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
Burkert, S., Knoll, N., Luszczynska, A., & Gralla, O. (2012). The interplay of dyadic and individual planning of pelvic-floor exercise in prostate-cancer patients following radical prostatectomy. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 35, 305–317. doi: 10.1007/s10865-012–9416-2CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cassel, J. (1976). The contribution of the social environment to host resistance. American Journal of Epidemiology, 104, 107–123.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cobb, S. (1976). Social support as a moderator of life stress. Psychosomatic Medicine, 38, 300–314.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Collins, N. L., & Feeney, B. C. (2000). A safe haven: An attachment theory perspective on support-seeking and caregiving in adult romantic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 1053–1073. doi: 10.1037/0022–3514.78.6.1053CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, N. L., & Feeney, B. C. (2010). An attachment theoretical perspective on social support dynamics in couples: Normative processes and individual differences. In Sullivan, K. T. & Davila, J. (eds.) Support processes in intimate relationships (pp. 89–120). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coyne, J. C., & Fiske, V. (1992). Couples coping with chronic and catastrophic illness. In Stephens, M. A. P., Hobfoll, S. E., & Crowther, J. (eds.) Family health psychology (pp. 129–149). Washington, DC: Hemisphere Publication Services.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cutrona, C. E. (1996). Social support in couples: Marriage as a resource in times of stress. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. doi: 10.4135/9781483327563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cutrona, C. E., & Russell, D. W. (1990). Type of social support and specific stress: Toward a theory of optimal matching. In Sarason, I. G., Sarason, B. R., & Pierce, G. R. (eds.) Social support: An interactional view (pp. 319–366). New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
Cutrona, C. E., Russell, D. W., & Gardner, K. A. (2005). The relationship enhancement model of social support. In Kayser, K., Bodenmann, G., & Revenson, T. (eds.) Couples coping with stress: Emerging perspectives on dyadic coping (pp. 73–95). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cutrona, C. E., Shaffer, P. A., Wesner, K. A., & Gardner, K. A. (2007). Optimally matching support and perceived spousal sensitivity. Journal of Family Psychology, 21, 754–758. doi: 10.1037/0893–3200.21.4.754CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DeLongis, A., & O’Brien, T. B. (1990). An interpersonal framework for stress and coping: An application to the families of Alzheimer’s patients. In Stephens, M. A. P., Hobfoll, S. E., & Crowther, J. H. (eds.) Stress and coping in later life families (pp. 221–239). Washington, DC: Hemisphere Publication Services.Google Scholar
Donato, S., Iafrate, R., Bradbury, T. N., & Scabini, E. (2012). Acquiring dyadic coping: Parents and partners as models. Personal Relationships, 19, 386–400. doi: 10.1111/j.1475–6811.2011.01368.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falconier, M. K., Jackson, J. B., Hilpert, P., & Bodenmann, G. (2015). Dyadic coping and relationship satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 42, 28–46. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2015.07.002CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Falconier, M. K., Nussbeck, F., & Bodenmann, G. (2013). Dyadic coping in Latino couples: Validity of the Spanish version of the Dyadic Coping Inventory. Anxiety Stress Coping, 26, 447–466. doi: 10.1080/10615806.2012.699045CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Falconier, M. K., Randall, A. K., & Bodenmann, G. (2016). Couples coping with stress: A cross-cultural perspective. New York, NY: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feeney, B. C. (2004). A secure base: Responsive support of goal strivings and exploration in adult intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 631–648. doi: 10.1037/0022–3514.87.5.631CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gable, S. L., Gonzaga, G. C., & Strachman, A. (2006). Will you be there for me when things go right? Supportive responses to positive event disclosures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 904–917. doi: 10.1037/0022–3514.91.5.904CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gamarel, K. E., Comfort, M., Wood, T., Neilands, T. B., & Johnson, M. O. (2015). A qualitative analysis of male couples’ coping with HIV: Disentangling the “we”. Journal of Health Psychology, 21, 2125–2137. doi: 10.1177/1359105315571975CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gleason, M. E., Iida, M., Shrout, P. E., & Bolger, N. (2008). Receiving support as a mixed blessing: Evidence for dual effects of support on psychological outcomes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 824–838. doi: 10.1037/0022–3514.94.5.824CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hilpert, P., Kuhn, R., Anderegg, V., & Bodenmann, G. (2015). Comparing simultaneously the effects of extra-dyadic and intra-dyadic positive and negative outcomes, Family Science, 6, 129–142. doi: 10.1080/19424620.2015.1082018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
House, J. S. (1981). Work stress and social support. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Kaplan, B. H., Cassel, J. C., & Gore, S. (1977). Social support and health. Medical Care, 15, 47–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Karney, B., & Bradbury, T. N. (1995). The longitudinal course of marital quality and stability: A review of theory, method, and research. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 3–34. doi: 10.1037/0033–2909.118.1.3CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kayser, K., Watson, L. E., & Andrade, J. T. (2007). Cancer as a “we-disease”: Examining the process of coping from a relational perspective. Families, Systems, and Health, 25, 404–418. doi: 10.1037/1091–7527.25.4.404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiecolt-Glaser, J. K., & Newton, T. L. (2001). Marriage and health: His and hers. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 472–503. doi: 10.1037/0033–2909.127.4.472CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
Meuwly, N., Bodenmann, G., Germann, J., Bradbury, T. N., Ditzen, B., & Heinrichs, M. (2012). Dyadic coping, insecure attachment, and cortisol stress recovery following experimentally induced stress. Journal of Family Psychology, 26, 937–947. doi: 10.1037/a0030356CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mireskandari, S., Meiser, B., Sherman, K., Warner, B. J., Andrews, L., & Tucker, K. M. (2006). Evaluation of the needs and concerns of partners of women at high risk of developing breast/ovarian cancer. Psycho-oncology, 15, 96–108. doi: 10.1002/pon.925CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O’Brien, T. B., & DeLongis, A. (1997). Coping with chronic stress: An interpersonal perspective. In Gottlieb, B. (ed.) Coping with chronic stress (pp. 161–190). New York, NY: Plenum. doi: 10.1007/978–1-4757–9862-3_6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pasch, L. A., & Bradbury, T. N. (1998). Social support, conflict, and the development of marital dysfunction. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 219–230. doi: 10.1037/0022-006x.66.2.219CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Randall, A. K., & Bodenmann, G. (2009). The role of stress on close relationships and marital satisfaction. Clinical Psychology Review, 29, 105–115. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2008.10.004CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Regan, T. W., Lambert, S. D., Kelly, B., McElduff, P., Girgis, A., Kayser, K., & Turner, J. (2014). Cross-sectional relationships between dyadic coping and anxiety, depression, and relationship satisfaction for patients with prostate cancer and their spouses. Patient Education and Counseling, 96, 120–127. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2014.04.010CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Revenson, T. A. (1994). Social support and marital coping with chronic illness. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 16(2), 122–130.Google Scholar
Rini, C., & Dunkel Schetter, C. (2010). The effectiveness of social support attempts in intimate relationships. In Sullivan, K. T. & Davila, J. (eds.) Support processes in intimate relationships (pp. 26–67). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195380170.003.0002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rini, C., Dunkel Schetter, C., Glynn, L. M., Hobel, C., & Sandman, C. A. (2006). Effective social support: Antecedents and consequences of partner support during pregnancy. Personal Relationships, 13, 207–229. doi: 10.1111/j.1475–6811.2006.00114.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robbins, M. L., Mehl, M. R., Smith, H. L., & Weihs, K. L. (2013). Linguistic indicators of patient, couple, and family adjustment following breast cancer. Psycho-oncology, 22, 1501–1508. doi: 10.1002/pon.3161CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rohrbaugh, M. J., Mehl, M. R., Shoham, V., Reilly, E. S., & Ewy, G. A. (2008). Prognostic significance of spouse we talk in couples coping with heart failure. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 76, 781–789. doi: 10.1037/a0013238CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rohrbaugh, M. J., Shoham, V., Skoyen, J. A., Jensen, M., & Mehl, M. R. (2012). We-talk, communal coping, and cessation success in a couple-focused intervention for health-compromised smokers. Family Process, 51, 107–121. doi: 10.1111/j.1545–5300.2012.01388.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rottmann, N., Hansen, D. G., Larsen, P. V., Nicolaisen, A., Flyger, H., Johansen, C., & Hagedoorn, M. (2015). Dyadic coping within couples dealing with breast cancer: A longitudinal, population-based study. Health Psychology, 34(5), 486–495. doi: 10.1037/hea0000218CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Skerrett, K. (1998). Couple adjustment to the experience of breast cancer. Families, Systems, and Health, 16, 281–298. doi: 10.1037/h0089855CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, K. T., & Davila, J. (eds.) (2010). Support processes in intimate relationships. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195380170.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uchino, B. N., Cacioppo, J. T., & Kiecolt-Glaser, J. K. (1996). The relationship between social support and physiological processes: A review with emphasis on underlying mechanisms and implications for health. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 488–531. doi: 10.1037//0033–2909.119.3.488CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vaux, A. (1988). Social support: Theory, research, and intervention. New York, NY: Praeger.Google Scholar
Widmer, D., Cina, A., Charvoz, L., Shantinath, S. D., & Bodenmann, G. (2005). A model dyadic-coping intervention. In Revenson, T. A., Kayser, K., & Bodenmann, G. (eds.) Couples coping with stress: Emerging perspectives on dyadic coping (pp. 159–174). New York, NY: American Psychological Association. doi: 10.1037/11031–008CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×