Book contents
- Biblical Criticism in Early Modern Europe
- Biblical Criticism in Early Modern Europe
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Foreword
- Book part
- Glossary
- Introduction
- Chapter 1 Erasmus
- Chapter 2 The Johannine comma in sixteenth-century bibles after Erasmus
- Chapter 3 Raising the ghost of Arius: the Johannine comma and Trinitarian debate in the sixteenth century
- Chapter 4 From Civil War to Enlightenment
- Chapter 5 The Johannine comma in the long nineteenth century
- Conclusion
- Book part
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2016
Book contents
- Biblical Criticism in Early Modern Europe
- Biblical Criticism in Early Modern Europe
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Foreword
- Book part
- Glossary
- Introduction
- Chapter 1 Erasmus
- Chapter 2 The Johannine comma in sixteenth-century bibles after Erasmus
- Chapter 3 Raising the ghost of Arius: the Johannine comma and Trinitarian debate in the sixteenth century
- Chapter 4 From Civil War to Enlightenment
- Chapter 5 The Johannine comma in the long nineteenth century
- Conclusion
- Book part
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Biblical Criticism in Early Modern EuropeErasmus, the Johannine Comma and Trinitarian Debate, pp. 323 - 374Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2016
References
Abbot, Ezra. The Authorship of the Fourth Gospel. Ed. Thayer, J. H.. Boston: Ellis, 1888.Google Scholar
Abbott, Thomas Kingsmill. ‘Note on the Codex Montfortianus.’ Hermathena 7 (1893): 203.Google Scholar
Abbott, Thomas Kingsmill. Catalogue of the Manuscripts in the Library of Trinity College, Dublin. Dublin: Hodges, Figgis, & Co., 1900.Google Scholar
Acta oder Handlungen, betreffend die Irrthümer und anstößige Lehren H[errn] J[ohann] J[akob] W[etsteins] gewesenen Diac. Leonh. enthaltend. Basel: Decker, 1730.Google Scholar
Adriaenssen, Cornelis. Historie van B. Cornelis Adriaensen van Dordrecht/ Minrebroeder binnen der Stadt van Brugghe. The second volume has the title: Het tweede boeck, vande sermoenen. 2 vols. Amsterdam: Cornelis Claesz and Albert Bouwmeester, 1607–1608.Google Scholar
Aland, Barbara. ‘Der textkritische und textgeschichtliche Nutzen früher Papyri, demonstriert am Johannesevangelium.’ In Recent Developments in Textual Criticism. Ed. Weren, Wim and Koch, Dietrich-Alex. Assen: Van Gorcum, 2003: 19–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aland, Barbara, Aland, Kurt, Mink, Gerd, Strutwolf, Holger and Wachtel, Klaus, ed. Novum Testamentum Graecum, Editio Critica Maior IV: Catholic Letters. Stuttgart: Deutsche Bibelgesellschaft, 1997–2006; rev. ed. 2013.Google Scholar
Aland, Barbara, and Juckel, Andreas, ed. Das Neue Testament in syrischer Überlieferung. 4 vols. Berlin: De Gruyter, 1986–2002.Google Scholar
Aland, Kurt, and Aland, Barbara. The Text of the New Testament. Trans. Rhodes, Erroll F.. 2nd ed. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1995.Google Scholar
Aland, Kurt, Benduhn-Mertz, Annette and Mink, Gerd, ed. Text und Textwert der griechischen Handschriften des Neuen Testaments. Die Katholischen Briefe. 3 vols. Berlin: De Gruyter, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aland, Kurt, Welte, Michael, Köster, Beate and Junack, Klaus. Kurzgefaßte Liste der griechischen Handschriften des Neuen Testaments. 2nd ed. Berlin: De Gruyter, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexandre, Noël. Commentarius litteralis et moralis in omnes epistolas Sancti Pauli Apostoli, et in VII. epistolas catholicas. Rouen: Herault and Le Boucher, 1710.Google Scholar
Allen, William, ed. Scripture Lessons, for Schools on the British System of Mutual Instruction. London: British and Foreign School Society, 1820.Google Scholar
Alter, Franz Carl. ‘Philologische Bemerkungen aus Briefen von Herrn Prof. Alter.’ Memorabilien 8 (1796): 179–220.Google Scholar
Alting, Heinrich. Scriptorum theologicorum Heidelbergensium tomi. 3 vols. Amsterdam: Jansson, 1646.Google Scholar
Amelote, Denis, trans. Le Nouveau Testament de Nostre Seigneur Jesus-Christ. 3 vols. Paris: Muguet, 1666–1670.Google Scholar
Amelote, Denis. Le Nouveau Testament de Nostre Seigneur Jesus-Christ. 2 vols. Paris: Muguet, 1687–1688.Google Scholar
Anon, . The Charitable Samaritan: or, a Short and Impartial Account of that Eminent, and Publick-spirited Citizen Mr. Tho. Firmin. London: [n. p.], 1698a.Google Scholar
Anon, . Some Considerations upon the Bill for the more Effectual Suppressing Blasphemy and Prophaness. [London]: [n. p.], [1698b].Google Scholar
Anon, . The Considerations upon the Bill for the more Effectual Suppressing of Blasphemy and Prophaneness, Animadverted. [London]: [n. p.], [1698c].Google Scholar
Anon, . ‘Mémoire envoyé à l’Auteur du Journal Britannique, au sujet des Lettres de Mr. de Missy sur le passage des trois témoins célestes.’ Journal Britannique 10 (1753): 127–134.Google Scholar
Anon, . Review of Pappelbaum 1796. Neue allgemeine deutsche Bibliothek 33 (1797a): 115–120.Google Scholar
Anon, . ‘Deaths in and near London.’ The Monthly Magazine, and British Register, for 1797. From January to June, inclusive 3 (1797c): 238–240.Google Scholar
Anon, . ‘British and Foreign School Society.’ The Quarterly Journal of Education 5 (1833): 52–71.Google Scholar
Anon, . ‘The Revision of the New Testament.’ The Dublin Review, 3rd series, 6 (1881b): 127–144.Google Scholar
Anon, . ‘The Decree of the Holy Office on the Authenticity of 1 John, V. 7.’ The Tablet 89, nº 2979 (12 June 1897b): 921–922.Google Scholar
Antiphonarium Romanum. Venice: Giunta, 1596.Google Scholar
Antoniades, Vasileios, ed. Ἡ Καινὴ Διαθήκη. Istanbul: Patriarchal Printer, 1904 [1907].Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. Summa Theologiae. Ed. Gilby, Thomas and O’Brien, T. C.. 61 vols. London: Blackfriars, 1964–1981.Google Scholar
Arnauld, Antoine. Difficultez proposées à Mr. Steyaert. 9 parts in 4 vols. Cologne: Le Grand, 1691.Google Scholar
Asso, Cecilia. La teologia e la grammatica. La controversia tra Erasmo ed Edward Lee. Florence: Olschki, 1993.Google Scholar
Asso, Cecilia. ‘Erasmus redivivus. Alcune osservazioni sulla filologia neotestamentaria di Jean Le Clerc.’ In Vico nella storia della filologia. Ed. Caianello, Silvia and Viana, Amadeu. Naples: Alfredo Guida, 2004: 79–115.Google Scholar
Atkin, Nicholas, and Tallett, Frank. Priests, Prelates and People. A History of European Catholicism since 1750. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkinson, John. The Father, the Word, or (Son) and the Holy Ghost, the one true God together with the necessity of believing it. London: Cox, 1726.Google Scholar
Auvray, Paul. Richard Simon, 1638–1712. Étude bio-bibliographique avec des textes inédits. Paris: PUF, 1974.Google Scholar
Avilés, Miguel. Erasmo y la Inquisición. Madrid: Fundación Universitaria Española, 1980.Google Scholar
Ayuso Marazuela, Teófilo. ‘Nuevo estudio sobre el Comma Johanneum.’ Biblica 28 (1947): 83–112, 216–235; 29 (1948): 52–76.Google Scholar
Azpilcueta, Martín de. Consiliorum sive responsorum libri quinque. 2 vols. Rome: Tornieri, 1590.Google Scholar
Bang, Willy. ‘Acta Anglo-Lovaniensia: John Heywood und sein Kreis.’ Englische Studien 38 (1907): 234–250.Google Scholar
Barker, Edmund Henry. Literary Anecdotes and Contemporary Reminiscences of Professor Porson and Others. 2 vols. London: Smith, 1852.Google Scholar
Barmann, Larence F. Baron Friedrich von Hügel and the Modernist Crisis in England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1972.Google Scholar
Barrett, John. Evangelium secundum Matthaeum ex codice rescripto in bibliotheca Collegii SSae. Trinitatis juxta Dublin. Dublin: Mercier, 1801.Google Scholar
Bartholomew, Augustus Theodore. Richard Bentley, D.D. A bibliography of his works. Cambridge: Bowes and Bowes, 1908.Google Scholar
Barton, William. A Century of Select Hymns. Collected Out of Scripture. London: ‘T. R.’ and Francis Tyson for Francis Eglesfield and Thomas Underhill, 1659.Google Scholar
Basset, William. An Answer to the Brief History of the Unitarians, Called Also Socinians. London: Everingham, 1693.Google Scholar
Bauer, Walter. Rechtgläubigkeit und Ketzerei im ältesten Christentum. Tübingen: Mohr (Siebeck), 1934.Google Scholar
Bauer, Walter. Orthodoxy and Heresy in Earliest Christianity. Ed. and trans. Kraft, Robert A. and Kroedel, Gerhard. Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Baumgarten, Siegmund Jakob. Nachrichten von einer hallischen Bibliothek. 8 vols. Halle: Gebauer, 1748–1751.Google Scholar
Bécamel, Marcel. ‘Autres lettres de Loisy à Mgr. Mignot.’ Bulletin de littérature ecclésiastique 69 (1968): 241–268.Google Scholar
Becker, Bruno. ‘Nederlandsche vertalingen van Sebastiaan Franck’s geschriften.’ Nederlandsch Archief voor Kerkgeschiedenis, n. s. 21 (1928): 149–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Béda, Noël. Annotationum [...] in Iacobum Fabrum Stapulensem libri duo: et in Desiderium Erasmum Roterodamum liber unus. Paris: Bade, 1526.Google Scholar
Bellarmino, Roberto. Disputationes de controversiis Christianae fidei. Ingolstadt: Sartorius, 1586.Google Scholar
Belsham, Thomas. Freedom of Enquiry, and Zeal in the Diffusion of Christian Truth, Asserted and Recommended in a Discourse Delivered at Bristol, July 9, 1800. London: Woodfall, 1800.Google Scholar
Belsham, Thomas. ed. The New Testament, in an Improved Version, upon the Basis of Archbishop Newcome’s New Translation: with a Corrected Text, and Notes Critical and Explanatory. London: Taylor, 1808.Google Scholar
Beltrán de Heredia, Vicente. Cartulario de la universidad de Salamanca. 6 vols. Salamanca: Universidad de Salamanca, 1970–1973.Google Scholar
‘Ben David’ [Jones, John]. ‘Letters to the Editor.’ The Monthly Repository of Theology and General Literature 20 (1825), 533–534; 21 (1826): 15–20, 91–94, 146–152, 214–221, 274–280, 318–322, 468–473.Google Scholar
Bengel, Johann Albrecht, ed. Ἡ Καινὴ Διαθήκη. Novum Testamentum graecum. Tübingen: Cotta, 1734.Google Scholar
Bengel, Johann Albrecht. Apparatus criticus ad novum testamentum. 2nd ed. Tübingen: Cotta, 1763.Google Scholar
Bengel, Johann Albrecht. Briefwechsel: Briefe 1723–1731. Ed. Ising, Dieter. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2012.Google Scholar
Benson, George. A Paraphrase and Notes on the Seven (Commonly Called) Catholic Epistles [...] Attempted in Imitation of Mr. Locke’s Manner. London: Waugh and Fenner, 1756.Google Scholar
Bentley, Jerry H. ‘Erasmus, Jean Le Clerc, and the Principle of the Harder Reading.’ Renaissance Quarterly 31 (1978): 309–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bentley, Jerry H. ‘New Light on the Editing of the Complutensian New Testament.’ Bibliothèque d’Humanisme et Renaissance 42 (1980): 145–156.Google Scholar
Bentley, Jerry H. Humanists and Holy Writ. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bentley, Richard. Remarks upon a late Discourse of Free-Thinking. London: Morphew, 1713.Google Scholar
Bentley, Richard. Ἡ Καινὴ Διαθήκη Graece. Novum Testamentum versionis Vulgatae, per Stum Hieronymum ad vetusta Exemplaria Graeca castigatae & exactae. [...] Proposals for Printing. [London]: [Knapton], [1720].Google Scholar
Bentley, Richard. Dr Bentley’s Proposals For Printing a New Edition of the Greek Testament and St. Hierom’s Latin Version. With a Full Answer to all the Remarks of a Late Pamphleteer. London: Knapton, 1721.Google Scholar
Bentley, Richard. Correspondence. Ed. Wordsworth, John and Wordsworth, Christopher. 2 vols. London: Murray, 1842.Google Scholar
Bentley, Richard. Bentleii Critica Sacra. Ed. Ellis, Arthur Ayres. Cambridge: Deighton, Bell & Co., 1862.Google Scholar
Berger, Samuel. Histoire de la Vulgate pendant les premiers siècles du moyen age. Paris: Hachette, 1893.Google Scholar
Bernard-Maître, Henri. ‘Lettres d’Henri Bremond à Alfred Loisy.’ Bulletin de littérature ecclésiastique 69 (1968): 3–24, 161–184, 269–289; 70 (1969): 44–56.Google Scholar
Bernus, Auguste. Richard Simon et son Histoire critique du Vieux Testament. Lausanne: Bridel, 1869.Google Scholar
Berriman, John. Θεὸς ἐφανερώθη ἐν σαρκί. Or, a Critical Dissertation upon 1 Tim. iii. 16. Wherein Rules are Laid Down to Distinguish, in Various Readings, which is Genuine. London: Innys and Nourse, 1741.Google Scholar
Best, Paul. Mysteries Discovered, or, a Mercuriall Picture Pointing Out the Way from Babylon to the Holy City. [London]: [n. p.], 1647.Google Scholar
Bèze, Théodore de, ed. and trans. Novum D. N. Iesu Christi Testamentum Latine iam olim à Veteri interprete, nunc denuò à Theodoro Beza versum: cum eiusdem annotationibus, in quibus ratio interpretationis redditur. Geneva: Robert Estienne, 1556.Google Scholar
Bèze, Théodore de. Iesu Christi D. N. Nouum testamentum, siue Nouum foedus. Cuius Graeco textui respondent interpretationes duae: vna, vetus: alter, noua, Theodori Bezae, diligenter ab eo recognita. Geneva: Henri Estienne, 1565.Google Scholar
Bèze, Théodore de. The New Testament of Our Lord Iesus Christ, Translated Out of Greeke by Theod Beza: With briefe Summaries and expositions [...]. Englished by L. Tomson. 1599. London: Deputies of Christopher Barker, 1599.Google Scholar
Bianchi, Daniela. ‘Some Sources for a History of English Socinianism: A Bibliography of 17th Century English Socinian Writings.’ Topoi 4 (1985): 91–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biandrata, Giorgio and Dávid, Ferenc. De falsa et vera unius Dei Patris, Filii, et Spiritus Sancti cognitione, libri duo. Alba Iulia [Gyulafehérvár]: [n. p.], [1567].Google Scholar
Biandrata, Giorgio and Dávid, Ferenc. Demonstratio falsitatis doctrinae Petri Melii, & reliquorum Sophistarum. Alba Iulia [Gyulafehérvár]: [n. p.], [n. d.].Google Scholar
The Bible and Holy Scriptures conteyned in the Olde and Newe Testament. Geneva: Hall, 1560.Google Scholar
Biblia Das ist / Die gantze heilige Schrifft / Teutsch. Frankfurt/Main: Egenolff for Adam Lonicer, 1576.Google Scholar
Biblia Das ist / Die gantze heilige Schrifft / Deudsch. Wittenberg: Lehman, 1596.Google Scholar
Biblia, Dat is: De gantsche H. Schrifture. Leiden: Paulus Aertsz van Ravensteyn, 1637.Google Scholar
Biblia. Hebraea, Chaldaea, Graeca & Latina. Paris: Estienne, 1540.Google Scholar
Biblia sacra juxta versionem simplicem quae dicitur Peschitta. Mosul: Typis Fratrum Praedicatorum, 1887–1891.Google Scholar
Biblia sacra Vulgatae editionis tribus tomis distincta. Rome: Typographia Apostolica Vaticana, 1590.Google Scholar
Biblia sacra Vulgatae editionis. Rome: Typographia Apostolica Vaticana, 1592.Google Scholar
Biblīa sirēch knigy vetkhago i novago zaveēta po jazykū slovenskū. Ostroh: Ivan Fedorov, 1581.Google Scholar
Biblia swięta, tho iest, Księgi Starego y Nowego Zakonu. [II:] Księgi Nowego Testamentu. Brześć Litewski: Mikołaj Radziwiłł Czarny, 1563.Google Scholar
Biddle, John. Twelve arguments drawn out of the Scripture, wherein the commonly received opinion touching the deity of the Holy Spirit, is clearly and fully refuted. [London]: [n. p.], 1647.Google Scholar
Biddle, John. A Brief Scripture-Catechism for Children. London: J. Cottrel for R. Moone, 1654b.Google Scholar
Bietenholz, Peter G. Encounters with a Radical Erasmus. Toronto: Toronto University Press, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bikhchandani, Sushil, Hirshleifer, David and Welch, Ivo. ‘A Theory of Fads, Fashion, Custom, and Cultural Change as Informational Cascades.’ Journal of Political Economy 100 (1992): 992–1026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[Binckes, William.] A Prefatory Discourse to an Examination of a Late Book, Entituled an Exposition of the Thirty Nine Articles of the Church of England, by Gilbert, Bishop of Sarum. London: Clavell, 1702.Google Scholar
Bludau, August. Die beiden ersten Erasmus-Ausgaben des Neuen Testaments und ihre Gegner. Freiburg i. B.: Herder, 1902a.Google Scholar
Bludau, August. ‘Der Beginn der Kontroverse über die Aechtheit des Comma Johanneum (1 Joh. 5, 7. 8.) im 16. Jahrhundert.’ Der Katholik 82 (1902b): 25–51, 151–175.Google Scholar
Bludau, August. ‘Das Comma Johanneum im 16. Jahrhundert.’ Biblische Zeitschrift 1 (1903a): 280–302, 378–407.Google Scholar
Bludau, August. ‘Das Comma Johanneum (1. Joh. 5, 7) in den orientalischen Übersetzungen und Bibeldrucken.’ Oriens Christianus 3 (1903b): 126–147.Google Scholar
Bludau, August. ‘Das Comma Johanneum (1 Joh. 5, 7) in den Schriften der Antitrinitarier und Sozinianer des 16. und 17. Jahrhunderts.’ Biblische Zeitschrift 2 (1904a): 275–300.Google Scholar
Bludau, August. ‘Richard Simon und das Comma Johanneum.’ Der Katholik 84 (1904b): 29–42, 114–122.Google Scholar
Bludau, August. ‘Das Comma Johanneum bei den Griechen.’ Biblische Zeitschrift 13 (1915): 26–50, 130–162, 222–243.Google Scholar
Bludau, August. ‘Das Comma Johanneum (1. Joh. 5, 7) in dem Glaubensbekenntnis von Karthago vom Jahre 484.’ Theologie und Glaube 11 (1919a): 9–15.Google Scholar
Bludau, August. ‘Der hl. Augustinus und 1 Joh. 5,7–8.’ Theologie und Glaube 11 (1919b): 379–386.Google Scholar
Bludau, August. ‘Das Comma Johanneum bei Tertullian und Cyprian.’ Theologische Quartalschrift 101 (1920): 1–28.Google Scholar
Bludau, August. ‘Der Prolog des Pseudohieronymus zu den katholischen Briefen.’ Biblische Zeitschrift 15 (1921): 15–34, 125–137.Google Scholar
Bludau, August. ‘The Comma Johanneum in the Writings of English Critics of the Eighteenth Century.’ Irish Theological Quarterly 17 (1922): 128–139, 201–218.Google Scholar
Bludau, August. ‘Das Comma Johanneum 1. Joh. 5, 7 bei Eucherius und Cassiodor.’ Theologie und Glaube 19 (1927): 149–155, 418.Google Scholar
The Book of Common Prayer, and Administration of the Sacraments. London: Baskett, 1724.Google Scholar
Boran, Elizabethanne, ed. The Correspondence of James Ussher, Archbishop of Armagh 1600–1656. 3 vols. Dublin: Irish Manuscript Commission, 2015.Google Scholar
Borger, Rykle. ‘Das Comma Johanneum in der Peschitta.’ Novum Testamentum 29 (1987): 280–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bossuet, Jacques-Bénigne. Seconde instruction: sur les passages particuliers de la version du Nouveau Testament, imprimée à Trévoux en l’année M.DCC.II. Paris: Anisson, 1703.Google Scholar
Boucat, Antoine. Theologia patrum scholastico-dogmatica, sed maxime positiva. Venice: Ghirardi, 1766.Google Scholar
Bowyer, William, ed. Novum Testamentum Graecum, ad fidem Graecorum solum Codicum MSS. nunc primum expressum. 2 vols. London: Bowyer, 1763.Google Scholar
Boyle, Marjorie O’Rourke. ‘Reopening the Conversation on Translating Jn 1,1.’ Vigiliae Christianae 31 (1977): 161–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boys, James. A Practical Exposition upon the Thirty-Nine Articles of the Church of England. London: Caldecott, 1716.Google Scholar
Brandscheidt, Friedrich, ed. Novum Testamentum Graece et Latine. Freiburg i. B.: Herder, 1893. 2nd ed., 1901. 3rd ed., 1906–1907.Google Scholar
Brandt, Geeraert. Verhaal van de Reformatie, in en ontrent de Nederlanden. Amsterdam: Rieuwertsz, 1663.Google Scholar
Brandt, Geeraert. The History of the Reformation and Other Ecclesiastical Transactions in and about the Low-Countries. Trans. Chamberlayne, John. 3 vols. London: Wood for Childe, 1720–1723.Google Scholar
Brandt, Pierre-Yves. ‘Manuscrits grecs utilisés par Erasme pour son édition du Novum Instrumentum de 1516.’ Theologische Zeitschrift 54 (1998): 120–124.Google Scholar
[Breval, John]. The Church Scuffle: or, News from St. Andrew’s: A Ballad. To the Tune of a Begging We Will Go, &c. Written by Mr. Joseph Gay. London: Currl, 1719.Google Scholar
Breviarium Romanum, Ex Decreto Sacrosancti Concilij Tridentini restitutum. Rome: Paolo Manuzio, 1568.Google Scholar
Brewer, J. S., et al., ed. Letters and Papers, Foreign and Domestic, of the Reign of Henry VIII. 21 vols. London: Longman, 1862–1908.Google Scholar
Brewster, David. Memoirs of the Life, Writings, and Discoveries of Sir Isaac Newton. 2 vols. Edinburgh: Constable, 1855.Google Scholar
Briquet, C. M. Les filigranes. Dictionnaire historique des marques du papier dès leur apparition vers 1282 jusqu’en 1600. 4 vols. Paris: Picard, 1907.Google Scholar
Briscoe-Eyre, George Edward, ed. A Transcript of the Registers of the Worshipful Company of Stationers, from 1640–1708 a.d. 3 vols. London: Company of Stationers, 1913–1914.Google Scholar
Brochmand, Jesper Rasmussen. Universae theologiae systema, tomus I. Ulm: Kühne for Görlin, 1638.Google Scholar
Brocklesby, Richard. An Explication of the Gospel-Theism and the Divinity of the Christian Religion. London: Heptinstall, 1706.Google Scholar
Brown, Andrew J. ‘The Date of Erasmus’ Latin Translation of the New Testament.’ Transactions of the Cambridge Bibliographical Society 8 (1984): 351–380.Google Scholar
Brown, Keith Duncan. ‘The Franciscan Observants in England, 1482–1559.’ Diss. Oxford, 1986.Google Scholar
[Brown, Timothy, ed.]. A New Testament; or the New Covenant according to Luke, Paul, and John. Published in Conformity to the Plan of the Late Rev. Edward Evanson, A. M. London: Taylor for Phillips, 1807.Google Scholar
Browne, Gregory. An Introduction to Pietie and Humanitie. London: E. A[llde] for Edmund Weaver, 1613.Google Scholar
Browne, Peter. A Letter in Answer to a Booke, Intituled, Christianity Not Mysterious. London: Clavell, 1697.Google Scholar
Browne, Peter. The Procedure, Extent, and Limits of the Human Understanding. London: Innys, 1728.Google Scholar
[Browne, Simon]. A Sober and Charitable Disquisition Concerning the Importance of the Doctrine of the Trinity. London: Gray, 1732.Google Scholar
Bruce, Frederick Fyvie. The Book of Acts. Rev. ed. The New International Commentary on the New Testament. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brucker, Joseph. Review of Novum Testamentum Vulgatae Editionis. Ed. Hetzenauer, Michael. Études publiées par des Pères de la Compagnie de Jésus 82 (1900): 402–403.Google Scholar
Bruns, Paul Jacob. ‘Zu 1 Joh. V, 7.’ Repertorium für biblische und morgenländische Litteratur 3 (1778): 258–260.Google Scholar
Bryennius, Joseph. Ἰωσήφ Μοναχοῦ τοῦ Βρυεννίου τὰ Εὑρεθέντα ἀξιώσει τοῦ Ὑψηλοτάτου καὶ εὐσεβεστάτου πρώην ἡγεμόνος Μολδοβλαχίας Κυρίου Κυρίου Γρηγορίου Ἀλεξάνδρου Γκίκα Βοεβόδα δι᾽ ἐπιμελείας Εὐγενίου διακόνου τοῦ Βουλγάρεως ἤδη τὸ πρῶτον τύποις ἐκδοθέντα. 2 vols. Leipzig: Breitkopf, 1786.Google Scholar
Buchwald, Jed Z. and Feingold, Mordechai. Newton and the Origin of Civilization. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Budny, Szymon, trans. Biblia. To iest / księgi starego y nowego przymierza / znowu z ięzyka Ebreyskiego, Greckiego, Łacińskiego / na polski przełożone. Nieśwież: Daniel z Łęczycy and Maciej Kawęczyński, 1572.Google Scholar
Budny, Szymon. Nowy Testament znowu przełożony. Łosk: [Daniel z Łęczycy for] Kiszka, 1574.Google Scholar
Budny, Szymon. Nowy Testament w tłum. S. Budnego. [Łosk]: [Bolemowski for Kiszka], [1589].Google Scholar
Bugenhagen, Johannes. Ionas propheta expositus in tertio capite. Wittenberg: Creutzer, 1550.Google Scholar
Bullinger, Heinrich. Brevis ἀντιβολὴ sive responsio secunda Heinrychi Bullingeri ad maledicam implicitamque Ioannis Cochlaei de Scripturae & ecclesiae authoritate replicam. Zürich: Froschauer, 1544.Google Scholar
Bullinger, Heinrich. In omnes apostolicas epistolas, divi videlicet Pauli XIIII. et VII. canonicas, commentarii. Zürich: Froschauer, 1549.Google Scholar
Burder, George. The Doctrine of the Trinity. A Sermon. Hartford: Lincoln and Gleason, 1805.Google Scholar
Burgess, Thomas. A Vindication of 1 John v. 7. from the objections of M. Griesbach. London: Rivington, 1821.Google Scholar
Burgess, Thomas. ed. Adnotationes Milli, Auctae et Correctae ex Prolegomenis suis, Wetstenii, Bengelii, et Sabaterii, ad 1. Joann. V. 7. St Davids: Evans, 1822.Google Scholar
Burgess, Thomas. A Selection of Tracts and Observations on 1 John v. 7. London: Rivington, 1824.Google Scholar
Burgess, Thomas. A letter to the clergy of the diocese of St. David’s on a passage of the second Symbolum Antiochenum of the fourth century as an evidence of the authenticity of 1 John v. 7. London: Rivington, 1825.Google Scholar
Burgess, Thomas. A letter to the Reverend Thomas Benyon, Archdeacon of Cardigan: in reply to A Vindication of the Literary Character of Professor Porson by Crito Cantabrigiensis; and in further Proof of the Authenticity of 1 John, v. 7. Salisbury: Brodie, 1829.Google Scholar
Burgess, Thomas. Remarks on the General Tenour of the New Testament, Regarding the Nature and Dignity of Jesus Christ. 2nd ed. Salisbury: Brodie, 1832.Google Scholar
Burgess, Thomas. An introduction to the controversy on the disputed verse of St. John, as revived by Mr. Gibbon: to which is added, Christian theocracy; or, a second letter to Mrs. Joanna Baillie, on the doctrine of the Trinity. Salisbury: Brodie, 1835.Google Scholar
Burgess, Thomas. Three letters to the Rev. Dr. Scholz, editor of a new edition of the Greek Testament, Lips., 1836, on the contents of his note, on 1 John, v., 7 in his edition of the Greek Testament. Southampton: King, 1837.Google Scholar
Burnet, Gilbert. The History of the Reformation of the Church of England. 2 vols. London: Chiswell, 1679–1681.Google Scholar
Burnet, Gilbert. Some Letters. Containing, An Account of What Seemed Most Remarkable in Switzerland, Italy, &c. Rotterdam: Acher, 1686.Google Scholar
Burnet, Gilbert. An Exposition of the Thirty-Nine Articles of the Church of England. London: Chiswell, 1699.Google Scholar
The Byble in Englyshe. [London]: Grafton and Whitchurch, 1539.Google Scholar
Cajetan, Tommaso de Vio. Epistolae Pauli et aliorum apostolorum ad graecam veritatem castigatae. Venice: Giunta, 1531.Google Scholar
Calamy, Edmund. Thirteen Sermons Concerning the Doctrine of the Trinity. Preach’d at the Merchant’s-Lecture, at Salter’s-Hall. Together with a Vindication of that Celebrated Text, 1 John v. 7. from being Spurious; and an Explication of it, upon the Supposition of its being Genuine. London: Clark, 1722.Google Scholar
Calvin, Jean. Commentarii in Epistolas Canonicas, Vnam Petri. Vnam Ioannis. Vnam Iacobi. Petri alteram. Iudae vnam. Geneva: Jean Crispin, 1551b.Google Scholar
Campanus, Johannes. Göttlicher und heiliger Schrifft, vor vilen jaren verdunckelt, und durch unheylsame leer und Lerer (auß Gottes zůlassung) verfinstert, Restitution und besserung. [Strasbourg]: [Cammerlander], 1532.Google Scholar
Campbell, Gordon, Corns, Thomas N., Hale, John K. and Tweedie, Fiona J.. Milton and the Manuscript of De Doctrina Christiana. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canones et decreta, sacrosancti oecumenici, & generalis concilij Tridentini. Alcalá: Robles, 1564.Google Scholar
Capecelatro, Alfonso. Codices Manuscripti Graeci Ottoboniani. Rome: Typographeum Vaticanum, 1893.Google Scholar
Capp, Bernard. England’s Culture Wars: Puritan Reformation and Its Enemies in the Interregnum, 1649–1660. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cappel, Louis. Critica sacra, sive de variis quae in sacris Veteris Testamenti libris occurrunt lectionibus libri six. Paris: Cramoisy, 1650.Google Scholar
Carlsson, Eric Wilhelm. ‘Johann Salomo Semler, the German Enlightenment, and Protestant theology’s historical turn.’ Diss. Wisconsin-Madison, 2006.Google Scholar
Casley, David. A Catalogue of the Manuscripts of the King’s Library. London: Casley, 1734.Google Scholar
Cassiodorus, Flavius Magnus Aurelius. Complexiones in Epistolas et Acta Apostolorum et Apocalypsin. Ed. Maffei, Scipione. Florence: Manni, 1721.Google Scholar
Castellio, Sebastian, trans. Biblia, interprete Sebastiano Castalione. Basel: Oporinus, 1556.Google Scholar
Castellio, Sebastian. Biblia Sacra ex Sebastiani Castalionis postrema recognitione. Basel: Peter Perna, 1573.Google Scholar
Castello, Alberto da, ed. Biblia cum concordantijs veteris et noui testamenti & sacrorum canonum: nec non & additione in marginibus varietatis diuersorum textuum. Venice: Giunta, 1511.Google Scholar
Catechesis ecclesiarum quae in Regno Poloniae, & magno Ducatu Lithuaniae, & aliis ad istud Regnum pertinentibus Provinciis, affirmant, neminem alium, praeter Patrem Domini nostri Jesu Christi, esse illum unum Deum Israëlis. Raków: [Sternacius], 1609.Google Scholar
Catharinus, Ambrosius. Annotationes [...] in excerpta quaedam de commentarijs Reuerendissimi Cardinalis Caietani S. Xisti, dogmata. Paris: Simon de Colines, 1535.Google Scholar
Catharinus, Ambrosius. Annotationes in Commentaria Caietani denuò multò locupletiores & castigatiores redditae. Lyon: Bonhomme, 1542.Google Scholar
Champion, Justin A. I. ‘Père Richard Simon and English Biblical Criticism, 1680–1700.’ In Everything Connects. Ed. Force, James E. and Katz, David S.. Leiden: Brill, 1999a: 37–61.Google Scholar
Champion, Justin A. I. ‘“Acceptable to Inquisitive Men”: Some Simonian Contexts for Newton’s Biblical Criticism, 1680–1692.’ In Force and Popkin 1999b: 77–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chauncy, Isaac. A Rejoynder to Mr. Daniel Williams His Reply to the First Part of Neomianism Unmaskt. London: Barnard, 1693.Google Scholar
Chevalier, Jacques. ‘The Biblical Commission.’ The Expository Times 18 (1906–1907): 235–237.Google Scholar
Cheynell, Francis. Chillingworthi novissima. Or, the Sicknesse, Heresy, Death, and Buriall of William Chillingworth. London: Gellibrand, 1644.Google Scholar
Cheynell, Francis. The Divine Trinunity of the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. London: Gellibrand, 1650.Google Scholar
‘Christicola’ [Bevans, John, Jr.], ed. Some Tracts Relating to the Controversy Between Hannah Barnard and the Society of Friends. London: Darton and Harvey, 1802.Google Scholar
Chrysostom, Johannes. Τοῦ ἐν Ἁγίοις Πατρὸς ἡμών Ἰωάννου Ἀρχιεπισκόπου Κωνσταντινουπόλεως τοῦ Χρυσοστόμου τῶν Εὐρισκομένων. Ed. Savile, Henry. 3 vols. Eton: Norton, 1610–1612.Google Scholar
Clarke, Adam. Observations on the Text of the Three Divine Witnesses: accompanied with a Plate containing two very correct Facsimiles of I John, Chap. V. Ver. 7, 8 and 9, as they stand in the first edition of the New Testament, printed at Complutum, 1514, and in the Codex Montfortii, a Manuscript marked G. 97, in the Library of Trinity College, Dublin. Manchester: R. & W. Dean, 1805.Google Scholar
Clarke, Adam. An Account of the Religious, and Literary Life of Adam Clarke. 2 vols. London: Clarke, 1833.Google Scholar
Clarke, Adam. ed. The Holy Bible, containing the Old and New Testaments. London: Tegg, 1836.Google Scholar
Clarke, Martin Lowther. Richard Porson: A Biographical Essay. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1937.Google Scholar
Clarke, Samuel. A Demonstration of the Being and Attributes of God: more particularly in Answer to Mr. Hobbs, Spinoza, and their Followers. London: Botham, 1705.Google Scholar
Clarke, Samuel. A Discourse concerning the Unchangeable Obligations of Natural Religion, and the Truth and Certainty of the Christian Revelation. London: Botham, 1706.Google Scholar
Clarke, Samuel. A Reply to the Objections of Robert Nelson, Esq; and of an anonymous Author, against Dr Clarke’s Scripture-Doctrine of the Trinity. London: Knapton, 1714b.Google Scholar
Clarke, Samuel. A Collection of Papers, which passed between the late Learned Mr. Leibnitz, and Dr. Clarke, in the Years 1715 and 1716. Relating to the Principles of Natural Philosophy and Religion. London: Knapton, 1717.Google Scholar
Clarke, Samuel. [ed.] Select Psalms and Hymns for the Use of the Parish-Church, and Chappels belonging to the Parish of St. James’s Westminster. With Proper Tunes in three Parts. London: Pearson, 1718.Google Scholar
Clarke, Samuel. The Scripture-Doctrine of the Trinity. 2nd ed. London: Wilkins for Knapton, 1719.Google Scholar
Clarke, Samuel. The Book of Common Prayer Reformed according to the Plan of the late Dr. Samuel Clarke. London: J. Johnson, 1774.Google Scholar
‘Clemens Anglicanus’ [Turton, Thomas]. Remarks upon Mr. Evanson’s preface to his translation of Knittel’s New Criticisms on 1 John, v. 7. Cambridge: Smith for Deighton, 1829.Google Scholar
Close, Francis. ‘The British and Foreign School Society.’ The Standard, 30 April 1839: 4.Google Scholar
Cochlaeus, Johannes. Septiceps Lutherus, ubique sibi, suis scriptis contrarius. Leipzig: Schumann, 1529.Google Scholar
Cochlaeus, Johannes. Replica brevis Iohannis Cochlaei, aduersus prolixam responsionem Henrici Bullingeri de scripturae & ecclesiae authoritate. Ingolstadt: Weissenhorn, 1544.Google Scholar
Colligan, J. Hay. The Arian Movement in England. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1913.Google Scholar
Collins, Anthony. A Discourse of Free-Thinking, Occasion’d by The Rise and Growth of a Sect call’d Free-Thinkers. London: [n. p.], 1713.Google Scholar
Combefis, François, ed. Bibliothecae graecorum patrum auctarium novissimum. 2 vols. Paris: Hotot, 1672.Google Scholar
The Confession of Faith, and the Larger and Shorter Catechisme, First agreed upon by the Assembly of Divines at Westminster. And now appointed by the General Assembly of the Kirk of Scotland. Edinburgh: Gedeon Lithgow, 1649.Google Scholar
Coogan, Robert. Erasmus, Lee and the Correction of the Vulgate: The Shaking of the Foundations. Geneva: Droz, 1992.Google Scholar
Cooper, Charles Henry and Cooper, Thompson. Athenae Cantabrigienses. Volume I: 1500–1585. Cambridge: Deighton, Bell & Co, 1858.Google Scholar
Cornwall, N. E. ‘The genuineness of I. John, v. 7: proved by neglected witnesses.’ The American Church Review 29 (1877): 509–528.Google Scholar
Courcelles[Curcellaeus], Etienne de, ed. Ἡ Καινὴ Διαθήκη. Novum Testamentum. Editio nova: In qua diligentius quàm unquam antea variantes lectiones tam ex manuscriptis quàm impressis codicibus collectae, & parallela Scripturae loca annotata sunt. Amsterdam: Elzevier, 1658.Google Scholar
Coverdale, Myles, trans. Biblia The Bible / that is, the holy Scripture of the Olde and New Testament. [Antwerp]: [M. de Keyser], 1535.Google Scholar
Coverdale, Myles. The Byble which is all the holy Scripture: in whych are contayned the Olde and Newe Testament. [Antwerp]: Crom, 1537.Google Scholar
Coxe, H. O. Codicum Manuscriptorum Bibliothecae Bodleianae pars prima. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1853.Google Scholar
Cramer, Eugene Casjen. Tomás Luis de Victoria: a guide to research. London: Routledge, 1998.Google Scholar
[Craven, Joseph.] Two letters to the reverend Dr. Bentley, Master of Trinity-College in Cambridge, concerning his intended edition of the Greek Testament. London: Morphew, 1717.Google Scholar
Crehan, F. J. ‘The Bible in the Roman Catholic Church from Trent to the Present Day.’ In The Cambridge History of the Bible. The West from the Reformation to the Present Day. Ed. Greenslade, S. L.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1963: 199–237.Google Scholar
[Crell, Johann and Stegmann, Joachim, trans.] Das Newe Testament, Das ist / Alle Bücher des newen Bundes / welchen Gott durch Christum mit den menschen gemacht hat / Trewlich aus dem Griechischen ins Teutsche versetzet. Raków: [Sternacius], 1630.Google Scholar
Crell, Johann. Catechesis ecclesiarum Polonicarum. Stauropolis [Amsterdam]: Eulogetus Philalethes [Christiaan Petzold?], 1680.Google Scholar
‘Criticus’ [Orme, William]. Memoir of the Controversy Respecting the Three Heavenly Witnesses, 1 John v. 7. London: Holdsworth and Ball, 1830.Google Scholar
‘Crito Cantabrigiensis’ [Turton, Thomas]. A vindication of the Literary Character of the late Professor Porson from the Animadversions of the Right Reverend Thomas Burgess. Cambridge: Smith for Deighton, 1827.Google Scholar
Cross, Frank Leslie and Livingstone, Elizabeth A., ed. The Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church. 3rd edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Curley, Edwin. ‘Hobbes and the Cause of Religious Toleration.’ In The Cambridge Companion to Hobbes’s Leviathan. Ed. Springborg, Patricia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007: 309–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Czechowic, Marcin. Wuiek, To iest / krotki odpis / na pisanie X. Jakuba Wuyka z Wągrowca / Theologa Societatis Iesu / o Bostwie syna Bożego / y ducha ś. Kraków: Rodecki, 1590.Google Scholar
Damrosch, Leo. Jonathan Swift: His Life and His World. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Darlow, Thomas Herbert and Moule, Horace Frederick. Historical Catalogue of the Printed Editions of the Holy Scripture in the Library of the British and Foreign Bible Society [DM]. 2 vols. London: Bible House, 1903–1911.Google Scholar
Das Neue Testament / Oder: Der Neue Bund / Welchen GOtt Durch JEsum CHristum Mit Uns Menschen gemachet [...]. Wandsbek: Holle, 1710.Google Scholar
Dat heylich Euangelium, dat leuende woort gods wtghesproken door onsen salichmaker Jesum Christum. [Antwerp]: [Christoffel van Ruremund], 26 September 1525.Google Scholar
Dat heylich Euangelium dat leuende woort Godts wtghesproken door onsen salichmaker Jesum Christum. Antwerp: Christoffel van Ruremund, [c. 1526].Google Scholar
Dat nieuwe Testament ons Heeren Iesu Christi. Emden: Biestkens, 1560.Google Scholar
Dauderstadt, Caspar Christophorus. Dissertatio theologica inauguralis ad Cap. I.I. Joh. Epist. V. 7. Jena: Samuel Krebs, [1674].Google Scholar
Dávid, Ferenc, ed. Brevis enarratio disputationis Albanae de Deo trino et Christo duplici coram Serenissimo Principe, & tota ecclesia decem diebus habita. Alba Iulia: Widow of Raphael Hoffhalter, 1568.Google Scholar
Dávid, Ferenc and Biandrata, Giorgio. Refutatio scripti Georgii Maioris, in quo Deum trinum in personis, et unum in Essentia: Vnicum deinde eius Filium in persona, & duplicem in naturis, ex lacunis Antichristi probare conatus est. [Cluj-Napoca]: [n. p.], 1569.Google Scholar
Davies, Myles. Athenae Britannicae: or, a Critical History of the Oxford and Cambridge Writers and Writings, with those of the Dissenters and Romanists. London: Davies, 1716.Google Scholar
Davis, Virginia. Clergy in London in the Late Middle Ages. A Register of Clergy Ordained in the Diocese of London Based on Episcopal Ordination Lists, 1361–1539 [Database]. London: University of London Centre for Metropolitan History, 2000.Google Scholar
Dawson, Thomas. Disceptatio epistolaris de coelestibus testimoniis 1 Joh. v. 7. in qua ex binis Manuscriptis Eximiis, Indubio evincitur αὐθεντία istius versiculi. London: Wilcox, 1734.Google Scholar
De Bruyne, Donatien. Les Fragments de Freising (épîtres de S. Paul et épitres catholiques). Rome: Biblioteca Apostolica Vaticana, 1921.Google Scholar
De Jonge, Henk Jan. Daniel Heinsius and the Textus Receptus of the New Testament. Leiden: Brill, 1971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Jonge, Henk Jan. ‘Erasmus und die Glossa ordinaria zum Neuen Testament.’ Nederlands Archief voor Kerkgeschiedenis 56 (1975): 51–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Jonge, Henk Jan. ‘À propos des premiers apparats critiques dans la Bible latine imprimée.’ Nederlands Archief voor Kerkgeschiedenis N. S. 57 (1977): 145–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Jonge, Henk Jan. ‘Caro in Spiritum. Delenus en zijn uitlegging van Joh. 6:51.’ In De Geest in het geding. Ed. Horst, I. B., de Jong, A. F. and Visser., D. Alphen aan den Rijn: Tjeenk Willink, 1978a: 145–168.Google Scholar
De Jonge, Henk Jan. ‘Jeremias Hoelzlin: Editor of the ‘Textus Receptus’ Printed by the Elzeviers Leiden 1633.’ In Miscellanea Neotestamentica I. Ed. Baarda, T., Klijn, A. F. J. and van Unnik, W. C.. Leiden: Brill, 1978b: 105–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Jonge, Henk Jan. De bestudering van het Nieuwe Testament aan de Noordnederlandse universiteiten en het Remonstrants Seminarie van 1575 tot 1700. Amsterdam: Noord-Hollandse Uitgevers Maatschappij, 1980a.Google Scholar
De Jonge, Henk Jan. ‘Erasmus and the comma Johanneum.’ Ephemerides Theologicae Lovanienses 56 (1980b): 381–389.Google Scholar
De Jonge, Henk Jan. ‘Hugo Grotius: exégète du Nouveau Testament.’ In The World of Hugo Grotius (1583–1648), intro. by Feenstra, R.. Amsterdam/Maarsen: APA Holland University Press, 1984a: 97–115.Google Scholar
De Jonge, Henk Jan. ‘Novum Testamentum a nobis versum: the essence of Erasmus’ edition of the New Testament.’ Journal of Theological Studies N. S. 35 (1984b): 394–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Jonge, Henk Jan. ‘The Date and Purpose of Erasmus’ Castigatio Novi Testamenti: A Note on the Origins of the Novum Instrumentum.’ In The Uses of Greek and Latin. Ed. Dionisotti, A. C., Grafton, A. and Kraye, J.. London: Warburg Institute, 1988a: 97–110.Google Scholar
De Jonge, Henk Jan. ‘Wann ist Erasmus’ Übersetzung des Neuen Testaments entstanden?’ In Erasmus of Rotterdam. The Man and the Scholar. Ed. Weiland, J. Sperna and Frijhoff, W. T. M.. Leiden: Brill, 1988b: 151–157.Google Scholar
De Jonge, Henk Jan. ‘Comma Johanneum.’ In Religion in Geschichte und Gegenwart. Ed. Betz, H. D. et al. 4th ed. Tübingen: Mohr (Siebeck), 1999, 2:429.Google Scholar
De Jonghe, M. ‘Declaratio circa decretum de authentia 1 Jo., V, 7.’ Collationes Brugenses 27 (1927): 452–455.Google Scholar
De la Roche, Michel. Review of Martin 1719b and Emlyn 1720. Mémoires litéraires de la Grande Bretagne 3 (1720): 1–6.Google Scholar
Delitzsch, Franz. Studien zur Entstehungsgeschichte der Polyglottenbibel des Cardinals Ximenes. Leipzig: Edelmann, 1871.Google Scholar
Den Bybel met groter neersticheyt ghecorrigeert. Antwerp: Jacob van Liesveldt, 1542.Google Scholar
Den gheheelen Bybel / Inhoudende het oude ende nieuwe Testament. Leuven: Bartholomeus van Grave, 1548. DM 3287.Google Scholar
Dennett, Daniel. Darwin’s Dangerous Idea. Evolution and the Meanings of Life. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1995.Google Scholar
Denzinger, Heinrich. Enchiridion symbolorum definitionum et declarationum de rebus fidei et morum. Kompendium der Glaubensbekenntnisse und kirchlichen Lehrentscheidungen. Trans. Hoping, Helmut and Hünermann, Peter. 39th ed. Freiburg i. B.: Herder, 2001.Google Scholar
De Rossi, Johannes Franciscus Bernardus Maria. De tribus in caelo testibus, Patre, Verbo et Spiritu Sancto, qui tres unum sunt, I. Ep. Joan. Cap. V. ℣. 7. Dissertatio Adversus Samuelem Crellium, aliosque. Venice: Occhi, 1755.Google Scholar
Determinatio facultatis theologicae in Schola Parisiensi super quamplurimis assertionibus D. Erasmi Roterodami. Paris: Badius Ascensius, 1531.Google Scholar
De Vet, Jan. ‘In Search of Spinoza in the Histoire des Ouvrages des Savans.’ In Disguised and overt Spinozism around 1700. Ed. van Bunge, Wiep and Klever, Wim. Leiden: Brill, 1996: 83–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Vocht, Henry. Monumenta Humanistica Lovaniensia. Texts and Studies about Louvain Humanists in the First Half of the XVth Century. Leuven: Uystpruyst, 1934.Google Scholar
De Vocht, Henry. History of the Foundation and the Rise of the Collegium Trilingue Lovaniense 1517–1550. 4 vols. Humanistica Lovaniensia 10–13. Leuven: Bibliothèque de l’Université, 1951–1955.Google Scholar
Dharmapustaker Antabhag. The New Testament of Our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ, in Bengali and English. 2 vols. London: British and Foreign Bible Society, 1839.Google Scholar
Didiot, Jules. ‘Commentaire traditionnel de la IVe session du Concile de Trente.’ Revue des sciences ecclésiastiques 62 (1890): 193–226, 385–400.Google Scholar
Die kerstelijcke Epistelen ende leeringhen der eerwaerdigher apostelen. Antwerp: Van Ghelen, [1524].Google Scholar
Dionisotti, A. C. ‘On the Greek Studies of Robert Grosseteste.’ In The Uses of Greek and Latin. Ed. Dionisotti, A. C., Grafton, A. and Kraye, J.. London: Warburg Institute, 1988: 19–39.Google Scholar
Dixon, Philip. ‘Nice and Hot Disputes’: The Doctrine of the Trinity in the Seventeenth Century. London: T & T Clark, 2003.Google Scholar
Dodds, Gregory D. Exploiting Erasmus: The Erasmian Legacy and Religious Change in Early Modern England. Toronto: Toronto University Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dodsley, Robert. The Correspondence of Robert Dodsley, 1733–1764. Ed. Tierney, James E.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Dorsche, Johann Georg. Dissertatio theologica de spiritu, aqua et sanguine in terra tribus testibus pro Christo Dei filio, ex I. Johan. cap. V. vers. IIX. sive de verbo et duobus Nov. Test. sacramentis. Frankfurt/Main: Fischer, 1653.Google Scholar
Drummond, Robert Blackley. Erasmus, His Life and Character as Shown in His Correspondence and Works. 2 vols. London: Smith, Elder & Co, 1873.Google Scholar
Düsterdieck, Friedrich Hermann Christian. Die drei johanneischen Briefe. 2 vols. Göttingen: Dieterich, 1852–1856.Google Scholar
Duffy, Eamon. ‘“Whiston’s Affair”: The Trials of a Primitive Christian 1709–1714.’ The Journal of Ecclesiastical History 27 (1976): 129–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Du Moulin[Molinaeus], Charles. Commentarii in Parisienses totius Galliae supremi Parlamenti consuetudines. Lausanne: François Le Preux, 1576.Google Scholar
Du Pin, Louis-Ellies. Dissertation préliminaire ou prolégomènes sur la bible. 2 vols. Paris: A. Pralard, 1699a.Google Scholar
Du Pin, Louis-Ellies. A Compleat History of the Canon and Writers, of the Books of the Old and New Testament. 2 vols. London: H. Rhodes, 1699b.Google Scholar
Edwards, John. Some Thoughts Concerning the Several Causes and Occasions of Atheism, Especially in the Present Age. With Some Brief Reflections on Socinianism: and on a Late Book. London: Robinson, 1695.Google Scholar
Edwards, John. Some Brief Critical Remarks on Dr. Clarke’s Last Papers. London: Burleigh, 1714.Google Scholar
Edwards, Jonathan. A Preservative against Socinianism. First Part. 3rd ed. Oxford: Clements, 1698.Google Scholar
Edwards, Thomas. Gangraena: or a Catalogue and Discovery of Many of the Errours, Heresies, Blasphemies and Pernicious Practices of the Sectaries of This Time, Vented and Acted in England in These Last Four Years. London: Ralph Smith, 1646a.Google Scholar
Egerton, Stephen. A Briefe Methode of Catechising. 5th ed. London: R. F. for Robert Dexter, 1597.Google Scholar
Ehrman, Bart D. The Orthodox Corruption of Scripture. New York: Oxford University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Elliott, J. Keith. Review of Greenlee 2008. Review of Biblical Literature 11 (2009a): 538–543.Google Scholar
Elliott, J. Keith. ‘Manuscripts Cited by Stephanus.’ New Testament Studies 55 (2009b): 390–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elliott, J. Keith. ‘The Text of the New Testament.’ In A History of Biblical Interpretation. Vol. 2: The Medieval through the Reformation Periods. Ed. Hauser, Alan J. and Watson, Duane F.. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2009c: 227–253.Google Scholar
Emden, Alfred B. A Biographical Register of the University of Cambridge to 1500. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1963.Google Scholar
Emden, Alfred B. A Biographical Register of the University of Oxford, A. D. 1501 to 1540. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1974.Google Scholar
Emlyn, Thomas. An Humble Inquiry into the Scripture-Account of Jesus Christ: or, a Short Argument Concerning His Deity and Glory, According to the Gospel. [London?]: [n. p.], 1702.Google Scholar
Emlyn, Thomas. A Full Inquiry into the Original Authority of That Text, 1 John V. 7. There are Three That bear Record in Heaven. London: Baker, 1715.Google Scholar
Emlyn, Thomas. A Full Inquiry into the Original Authority of That Text, 1 John V. 7. 2nd ed. London: Harrison and Dodd, 1717.Google Scholar
Emlyn, Thomas. A Full Inquiry into the Original Authority of That Text, 1 John V. 7. 3rd ed. London: Darby, 1719a.Google Scholar
Emlyn, Thomas. An Answer to Mr. Martin’s Critical Dissertation on 1 John v. 7. London: Darby, 1719b.Google Scholar
Emlyn, Thomas. A True Narrative of the Proceedings of the Dissenting Ministers of Dublin against Mr. Thomas Emlyn. London: Darby, 1719c.Google Scholar
Emlyn, Thomas. A Reply to Mr. Martin’s Examination of the Answer to His Dissertation on 1 John 5. 7. London: Darby, 1720.Google Scholar
Emlyn, Thomas. A Collection of Tracts, Relating to the Deity, Worship, and Satisfaction of the Lord Jesus Christ. 2nd ed. 2 vols. London: [n. p.], 1731.Google Scholar
Emlyn, Thomas. The Works of Mr. Thomas Emlyn. 3 vols. 4th ed. London: Noon and Whiston, 1746.Google Scholar
Emser, Hieronymus. Auß was gründ vnnd vrsach Luthers dolmatschung / vber das nawe testament / dem gemeinen man billich vorbotten worden sey. Leipzig: Stöckel, 1523.Google Scholar
Enyedi, György. Explicationes locorum Veteris & Novi Testamenti, ex quibus Trinitatis dogma stabiliri solet. [Cluj-Napoca]: [Heltai], [1598].Google Scholar
Enzinas, Francisco de, trans. El nuevo testamento de nuestro Redemptor y Salvador Iesu Christo. Antwerp: Mierdmans, 1543.Google Scholar
Epp, Eldon Jay. ‘The Multivalence of the Term “Original Text” in New Testament Textual Criticism.’ The Harvard Theological Review 92 (1999): 245–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epp, Eldon Jay. ‘In the Beginning was the New Testament Text, but Which Text?’ In Texts and Traditions. Ed. Doble, Peter and Kloha, Jeffrey. Leiden: Brill, 2014: 35–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erasmus, Desiderius, ed. Omnia opera divi Eusebii Hieronymi Stridonensis. 10 vols. Basel: Froben and Amerbach, 1516–1520.Google Scholar
Erasmus, Desiderius, Des. Erasmi Roterodami in Novum Testamentum ab eodem denuo recognitum, Annotationes. Basel: Froben, 1519b.Google Scholar
Erasmus, Desiderius. Ratio seu methodus compendio perueniendi ad veram theologiam. Mainz: Schöffer, May 1519c.Google Scholar
Erasmus, Desiderius. Responsio ad annotationes Lei nouas. Basel: Froben, 21 July 1520.Google Scholar
Erasmus, Desiderius, D. Erasmi Roterodami Apologia respondens ad ea quae Iacobus Lopis Stunica taxauerat in prima duntaxat noui Testamenti aeditione. Leuven: Dirk Martens, 1521b.Google Scholar
Erasmus, Desiderius, ed. Novum Testamentum omne, tertio iam ac diligentius ab Erasmo Roterodamo recognitum. Basel: Froben, February 1522a.Google Scholar
Erasmus, Desiderius, Des. Erasmi Roterodami in Novum Testamentum ab eodem tertio recognitum, Annotationes. Basel: Froben, 1522b.Google Scholar
Erasmus, Desiderius. Tomus secundus continens Paraphrasim D. Erasmi Rot. In omneis epistolas apostolicas. Basel: Froben, 1523a.Google Scholar
Erasmus, Desiderius, ed. Diui Hilarii Pictauorum episcopi lucubrationes per Erasmum Roterodamum non mediocribus sudoribus emendatae. Basel: Froben, 1523b.Google Scholar
Erasmus, Desiderius, ed. Novum Testamentum, ex Erasmi Roterodami recognitione, iam quartum. Basel: Froben, March 1527a.Google Scholar
Erasmus, Desiderius, Des. Erasmi Roterodami in Novum Testamentum Annotationes, ab ipso iam quartum recognitae. Basel: Froben, 1527b.Google Scholar
Erasmus, Desiderius. Prologus supputationis errorum in censuris Bedae. Basel: Froben, March 1527c.Google Scholar
Erasmus, Desiderius. Supputationes errorum in censuris Natalis Bedae. Basel: Froben, March 1527d.Google Scholar
Erasmus, Desiderius. Io. Frob. Studioso Lectori S. D. Tria noua dabit hic libellus, Epistolam Erasmi, de modestia profitendi linguas [...]. Basel: Froben, August 1527e.Google Scholar
Erasmus, Desiderius. Apologia aduersus articulos aliquot per monachos quosdam in Hispanijs, exhibitos. Basel: Froben, 1528.Google Scholar
Erasmus, Desiderius, ed. Divi Caecilii Cypriani episcopi Carthaginensis et martyris opera iam quartum accuratiori uigilantia à mendis repurgata, per Des. Erasmum Roterod. Accessit liber eiusdem apprimè pius ad Fortunatum De duplici martyrio, antehac nunquàm excusus. Basel: Froben, 1530.Google Scholar
Erasmus, Desiderius. Apologia adversus rhapsodias calumniosarum querimoniarum Alberti Pij. Basel: Froben, 1531.Google Scholar
Erasmus, Desiderius. Declarationes Des. Erasmi Roterodami, ad Censuras Lutetiae uulgatas sub nomine Facultatis Theologiae Parisiensis. Basel: Froben, September 1532.Google Scholar
Erasmus, Desiderius, ed. Novum Testamentum iam quintum accuratissima cura recognitum à Des. Erasmo Roter. Basel: Froben and Episcopius, March 1535a.Google Scholar
Erasmus, Desiderius, Des. Erasmi Roterodami in Novum Testamentum Annotationes, ab ipso autore iam quintum sic recognitae, ac locupletatae, ut propemodum nouum opus uideri possit. Basel: Froben and Episcopius, March 1535b; fascimile in Reeve and Screech, 1990 and 1993.Google Scholar
Erasmus, Desiderius, ed. D. Hilarii Pictavorum episcopi lucubrationes quotquot extant. Basel: Froben, 1535c.Google Scholar
Erasmus, Desiderius, The newe testament in Englyshe translated after the texte of Master Erasmus of Roterodame in Anno. 1539. London: Grafton and Whitchurch, 1539.Google Scholar
Erasmus, Desiderius, Ausgewählte Werke. Ed. Holborn, Hajo and Holborn, Annemarie. Munich: Beck, 1933.Google Scholar
Erasmus, Desiderius. Controversies: Apologia qua respondet invectivis Lei; Responsio ad annotationes Lei. Collected Works of Erasmus 72. Ed. Phillips, Jane E.. Trans. Rummel, Erika. Toronto: Toronto University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Estienne, Robert, ed. Τῆς Καινῆς Διαθήκης ἅπαντα. Paris: Robert Estienne, 1550. DM 4622.Google Scholar
Etliche schöne Christliche Geseng / wie sie in der Gefengkniß zu Passaw im Schloß von den Schweitzer Brüdern durch Gottes gnad geticht vnd gesungen worden. [n. p.]: [n. p.], 1564.Google Scholar
Evelyn, John. Diary and Correspondence. Ed. Bray, William. 2nd ed. 4 vols. London: Colburn, 1850–1857.Google Scholar
Exley, Thomas. Reply to Mr. Watson’s Remarks on the Eternal Sonship of Christ. London: Butterworth, 1818.Google Scholar
Farley, Frederick A. Grounds for Rejecting the Text of the Three Heavenly Witnesses; 1 John, V, 7. Boston: Munroe for the American Unitarian Association, 1845.Google Scholar
Farley, Frederick A. Unitarianism Defined: The Scripture Doctrine of the Father, Son and Holy Ghost. Boston: Walker, Wise & Co, 1860.Google Scholar
Felbinger, Jeremias, trans. Das Neue Testament / Treulich aus dem Grichischen ins Deutsche übersetzet. Amsterdam: Christoph Cunrad, 1660.Google Scholar
Fell, John, ed. Τῆς Καινῆς Διαθήκης ἅπαντα. Novi Testamenti Libri Omnes. Accesserunt Parallela Scripturae Loca, nec non Variantes Lectiones ex plus 100 MSS. Codicibus, et Antiquis Versionibus Collectae. Oxford: Sheldonian Theatre, 1675. DM 4711.Google Scholar
Ferguson, James P. Dr. Samuel Clarke, an Eighteenth-Century Heretic. London: Roundwood Press, 1976.Google Scholar
Figueiredo, Anthony J. The Magisterium-Theology Relationship. Rome: Editrice Pontificia Università Gregoriana, 2001.Google Scholar
Firmin, Thomas. Some Proposals for the Imploying of the Poor, Especially in and about the City of London. London: Aylmer, 1681.Google Scholar
Fischer, Bonifatius. Lateinische Bibelhandschriften im frühen Mittelalter. Freiburg: Herder, 1985.Google Scholar
Fisher, Samuel. Rusticus ad Academicos in Exercitationibus Expostulatoriis, Apologeticis quatuor. The Rustick’s Alarm to the Rabbies. London: Wilson, 1660.Google Scholar
Fleck, Niels. ‘Die allegorisch-emblematischen Bildprogramme in Schloß und Schloßkirche Saalfeld.’ Marburger Jahrbuch für Kunstwissenschaft 34 (2007): 217–249.Google Scholar
Fogarty, Gerald. ‘The Catholic Church and Historical Criticism of the Old Testament.’ In Hebrew Bible/Old Testament: The History of Its Interpretation. III/1: The Nineteenth Century. Ed. Saebø, Magne. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2013: 244–261.Google Scholar
Force, James E. William Whiston, Honest Newtonian. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Force, James E. and Popkin, Richard H., ed. Newton and Religion: Context, Nature, and Influence. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forster, Charles. A New Plea for the Authenticity of the Text of the Three Heavenly Witnesses. Cambridge: Deighton, Bell and Co., 1867.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. Dits et écrits. Ed. Defert, Daniel and Ewald, François. 2 vols. Paris: Gallimard, 1994.Google Scholar
Fowler, Thomas. The History of Corpus Christi College. Oxford: Oxford Historical Society, 1893.Google Scholar
François, Wim. ‘Augustine and the Golden Age of Biblical Scholarship in Louvain (1550–1650).’ In Shaping the Bible in the Reformation. Ed. Gordon, Bruce and McClean, Matthew. Leiden: Brill, 2012: 235–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franck, Sebastian. Chronica, Zeytbůch vnd geschychtbibell. Strasbourg: Balthasar Beck, 1531.Google Scholar
Franck, Sebastian. Chronica, Tytboeck ende gheschiet bibel. [Emden]: [Willem Gailliart], 1558.Google Scholar
Franzelin, Johann Baptist. Tractatus de Deo trino secundum personas. Rome: Sacra congregatio de propaganda fide, 1869.Google Scholar
Freeman, Curtis W. ‘God in Three Persons: Baptist Unitarianism and the Trinity.’ Perspectives in Religious Studies 33 (2006): 323–344.Google Scholar
Frick, David A. Polish Sacred Philology in the Reformation and the Counter-Reformation. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Frick, David A. ‘The Uses of Authority and the Authority of Use: Philological Praise and Blame in Early Modern Rus´.’ Harvard Ukrainian Studies 18 (1994): 76–93.Google Scholar
Frick, David A. ‘Sailing to Byzantium: Greek Texts and the Establishment of Authority in Early Modern Muscovy.’ Harvard Ukrainian Studies 19 (1995): 138–157.Google Scholar
Fries, Heinrich. Fundamental Theology. Trans. Daly, Robert J.. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Froidmont, Libert. Commentaria in omnes B. Pauli Apostoli, et septem canonicas aliorum apostolorum epistolas. Leuven: Nempaeus, 1663.Google Scholar
Gamble, John. Sketches of History, Politics and Manners Taken in Dublin. London: Cradock, 1811.Google Scholar
Gamillscheg, Ernst and Harlfinger, Dieter. Repertorium der griechischen Kopisten, 800–1600. 1. Teil: Handschriften aus Bibliotheken Großbritanniens. 3 vols. Vienna: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, 1981.Google Scholar
Gamillscheg, Ernst Repertorium der griechischen Kopisten, 800–1600. 2. Teil: Handschriften aus Bibliotheken Frankreichs. 3 vols. Vienna: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, 1989.Google Scholar
Gaza, Theodore of. In hoc volumine haec insunt. Introductivae grammatices libri quatuor. Venice: Aldus, 1495.Google Scholar
Geddes, Michael. The History of the Church of Malabar. London: Smith and Walford, 1694.Google Scholar
Gémeau[Gumelli], Adrien, ed. Biblia cum pleno apparatu summariorum concordantiarum. Paris: Tielman Kerver for Jean Petit, 1504.Google Scholar
Gerhard, David Gottfried. Dictum Ioanneum 1. Ep. V. 7. Ab exceptionibus recentissimis summorum quorundam virorum modeste vindicatum. Breslau: J. E. Meyer, 1763.Google Scholar
Gerhard, Johann. Loci theologici cum pro adstruenda veritate, tum pro destruenda quorumvis contradicentium falsitate per Theses nervosè, solidè & copiosè explicati. 6 vols. Jena: Steinmann, 1610–1619.Google Scholar
Gerhard, Johann. Disputationis Theologicae Ex dicto Apostolico I. Joh. 5. v. 7 [...] Orationem [...] habebit. Jena: Steinmann, 1619.Google Scholar
Gerhard, Johann. Dissertatio Theologica bipartita ex dicto apostolico 1. Joh. v, 7. [...]. Jena: Marggraf, 1714.Google Scholar
Gerhard, Johann. Commentatio uberior in dictum Johanneum 1. Joh. V, 7. de tribus in coelo testibus: Von denen dreyen Zeugen im Himmel, ob argumenti dignitatem, atque tractationis praestantiam luci publicae vindicata. Jena: Marggraf, 1721.Google Scholar
Gerhard, Johann. Commentatio qua dictum Johanneum de tribus testibus in coelo sive Von den Dreyen Zeugen im Himmel, 1. Epistol. V, 7. fuse enarratur atque explicatur. Jena: Marggraf, 1746.Google Scholar
Gerhard, Johann. Commentatio qua dictum Johanneum de tribus testibus in coelo sive Von den Dreyen Zeugen im Himmel, 1. Epistol. V, 7. fuse enarratur atque explicatur. Jena: Marggraf, 1747.Google Scholar
Gibbon, Edward. History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire. 6 vols. London: Strahan and Cadell, 1776–1788.Google Scholar
Gibbon, Edward. Miscellaneous Works. 2 vols. London: Strahan, Cadell and Davies, 1796.Google Scholar
Gibert, Pierre. L’invention critique de la Bible, XVe–XVIIIe siècle. Paris: Gallimard, 2010.Google Scholar
Gibson, William, Ashbourne, Baron. ‘An Outburst of Activity in the Roman Congregations.’ The Nineteenth Century 45 (1899): 785–794.Google Scholar
Gibson, William. ‘Brother of the More Famous Ben: The Theology of Archbishop John Hoadly.’ Anglican and Episcopal History 75 (2006a): 401–422.Google Scholar
Gibson, William. ‘The Persecution of Thomas Emlyn, 1703–05.’ A Journal of Church and State 48 (2006b): 525–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilly, Carlos. Spanien und der Basler Buchdruck bis 1600. Basel: Helbing & Lichtenhahn, 1985.Google Scholar
Gilly, Carlos. ‘Erasmo, la Reforma radical y los heterodoxos radicales españoles.’ In Les lletres hispàniques als segles XVI, XVII i XVIII. Ed. Martínez Romero, Tomàs. Castelló de la Plana: Publicacions de la Universitat Jaume I, 2005: 225–376.Google Scholar
Giustiniani, Benedetto. In omnes canonicas Epistolas Explanationes. Lyon: Cavellat, 1621.Google Scholar
Glossa ordinaria. In Biblia sacra cum glossa ordinaria iam ante quidem à Strabo Fulgensi collecta. 6 vols. Venice: Giunta, 1603.Google Scholar
Goldhill, Simon. Who Needs Greek? Contests in the Cultural History of Hellenism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Gordon, Thomas. A Cordial for Low Spirits. 3rd ed. 3 vols. London: Wilson and Fell, 1763.Google Scholar
Grabe, Martin Silvester. Programma de Canonica auctoritate Dicti I. Joh. V, 7. 5 vols. Königsberg: Reusner, 1675–1677.Google Scholar
Graduale sacrosanctae Romanae ecclesiae. Paris: Desclée, 1952.Google Scholar
Graham, Michael F. The Blasphemies of Thomas Aikenhead: Boundaries of Belief on the Eve of the Enlightenement. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, Robert. Letters During the Course of a Tour through Germany, Switzerland and Italy. London: Rivington, 1794.Google Scholar
Greenlee, Jacob Harold. The Text of the New Testament. Peabody, Mass.: Hendrickson, 2008.Google Scholar
Gregory, Caspar René. Textkritik des Neuen Testamentes. 3 vols. Leipzig: Hinrichs, 1900–1909.Google Scholar
Gregory, Caspar René. ‘Critical note: 1 John 5:7, 8.’ The American Journal of Theology 11 (1907): 131–138.Google Scholar
Gregory, John. Notes and Observations upon Some Passages of Scripture. Oxford: H. Hall for E. Forrest Jr., 1646.Google Scholar
Greiff, A. ‘Die drei Zeugen in 1 Joh. 5:7f.’ Theologische Quartalschrift 114 (1933): 465–480.Google Scholar
Greig, Martin. ‘Heresy Hunt: Gilbert Burnet and the Convocation Controversy of 1701.’ The Historical Journal 37 (1994): 569–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griesbach, Johann Jakob. Symbolae criticae ad supplendas et corrigendas variarum N. T. lectionum collectiones. 2 vols. Halle: Curtius, 1785–1793.Google Scholar
Griesbach, Johann Jakob. Bemerkungen über des Herrn Geheimen Regierungsraths Hezel Vertheidigung der Aechtheit der Stelle 1 Joh. 5, 7. Giessen: Heyer, 1794.Google Scholar
Griesbach, Johann Jakob. Novum Testamentum Graece. 2nd ed. 2 vols. Halle: Curtius, 1796–1806.Google Scholar
Grotius, Hugo. Annotationes in Novum Testamentum. 3 vols. Paris: Pelé (vols. 1–2), Pepingué and Maucroy (vol. 3), 1641–1650.Google Scholar
Guilday, Peter. ‘The English Catholic Refugees at Louvain, 1559–1575 (Vatican Library, MS. Regina, 2020, f. 445–446).’ In Mélanges d’histoire offerts à Charles Moeller. Leuven: Bureaux du Recueil, 1914: 2:175–189.Google Scholar
Gustavson, Royston. ‘Competitive Strategy Dynamics in the German Music Publishing Industry 1530–1550.’ In NiveauNischeNimbus: 500 Jahre Musikdruck nördlich der Alpen. Ed. Lodes, Birgit. Wiener Forum für ältere Musikgeschichte 3. Tutzing: Schneider, 2010: 185–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gutbier, Aegidius. Novum Domini nostri Jesu Christi testamentum Syriace. Hamburg: Gutbier, 1664.Google Scholar
Gutbier, Aegidius. Lexicon Syriacum, continens omnes N. T. Syriaci dictiones et particulas. Hamburg: Gutbier, 1667.Google Scholar
Gwilliam, G. H., ed. The New Testament in Syriac. 2 vols. London: British and Foreign Bible Society, 1905–1920.Google Scholar
Gwynn, John, ed. Liber Ardmachanus. The Book of Armagh. Dublin: Hodges Figgis & Co, 1913.Google Scholar
Haak, Theodore, trans. The Dutch Annotations upon the Whole Bible. London: Henry Hills for John Rothwell, Joshua Kirton and Richard Tomlins, 1657. DM 518.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere. Trans. Burger, Thomas and Lawrence, Frederick. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Hallyn, Fernand. ‘Le fictif, le vrai et le faux.’ In Le topos du manuscrit trouvé. Ed. Herman, Jan, Hallyn, Fernard and Peeters, Kris. Leuven: Peeters, 1999: 489–506.Google Scholar
Hamilton, Adam. The Chronicle of the English Augustinian Canonesses Regular of the Lateran, at St. Monica’s in Louvain (now at St. Augustine’s Priory, Newton Abbot, Devon) 1548–1644. 2 vols. Edinburgh: Sands, 1904–1906.Google Scholar
[Hare, Francis.] The Difficulties and Discouragements Which Attend the Study of the Scriptures in the Way of Private Judgment. London: Baker, 1714.Google Scholar
Harrington, Daniel J. ‘The Reception of Walter Bauer’s Orthodoxy and Heresy in Earliest Christianity During the Last Decade.’ The Harvard Theological Review 73 (1980): 289–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, James Rendel. The Origin of the Leicester Codex of the New Testament. London: Clay, 1887.Google Scholar
Harrison, John and Laslett, Peter. The Library of John Locke. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Harrison, John. The Library of Isaac Newton. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Harwood, Edward ed. Ἡ Καινὴ Διαθήκη. The New Testament, Collated with the Most Approved Manuscripts, with Select Notes in English. 2 vols. London: Cornish, 1776. DM 4762.Google Scholar
Hastings, James. ‘Notes of Recent Exposition.’ The Expository Times 18 (1906–1907): 49–57.Google Scholar
Hatch, William H. P. ‘An Early Edition of the New Testament in Greek.’ The Harvard Theological Review 34 (1941): 69–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haugen, Kristine Louise. Richard Bentley: Poetry and Enlightenment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[Haynes, Hopton.] Causa Dei contra Novatores: or, the Religion of the Bible and the Religion of the Pulpit compared. London: Noone, 1747.Google Scholar
Haynes, Hopton, The Scripture Account of the Attributes and Worship of God and of the Character and Offices of Jesus Christ. London: Noone, 1750.Google Scholar
Hearne, Thomas. Remarks and Collections. Ed. Doble, C. E. et al. 10 vols. Oxford: Oxford Historical Society, 1885–1915.Google Scholar
Heide, Martin. Der einzig wahre Bibeltext? Erasmus von Rotterdam und die Frage nach dem Urtext. 5th ed. Nuremberg: Verlag für Theologie und Religionswissenschaft, 2006.Google Scholar
Ἡ Καινὴ Διαθήκη. Novum Testamentum. Ex Regiis aliisque optimis editionibus cum cura expressum. Leiden: Elzevier, 1624.Google Scholar
Helfling, Charles and Shattuck, Cynthia L.. The Oxford Guide to the Book of Common Prayer. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Henderson, Judith Rice. ‘Humanism and the Humanities: Erasmus’ Opus de conscribendis epistolis in Sixteenth-Century Schools.’ In Letter-writing Manuals and Instruction from Antiquity to the Present. Ed. Poster, Carol and Mitchell, Linda C.. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press, 2007: 141–177.Google Scholar
Henke, Heinrich Philipp Konrad and Bruns, Paul Jacob. Review of Travis 1784. Annales Literarii May 1786: 385–394.Google Scholar
Henten, Johannes, ed. Biblia ad vetustissima exemplaria nunc recens castigata. Leuven: Bartholomaeus van Grave, November 1547. DM 6129.Google Scholar
Henten, Johannes, Novum Jesu Christi Testamentum. Quid in hac editione, à theologis Lovaniensibus, sit praestitum, sequenti praefatione indicatur. Antwerp: Plantin, 1584.Google Scholar
[Herne, Thomas.] An Account of All the Considerable Books and Pamphlets That Have Been Wrote on Either Side in the Controversy Concerning the Trinity, since the Year MDCCXII. London: Knapton, 1720.Google Scholar
Hessayon, Ariel and Keene, Nicholas, ed. Scripture and Scholarship in Early Modern England. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2006.Google Scholar
Hessels, Jan. In primam B. Ioannis Apostoli et Evangelistae canonicam epistolam absolutissimus commentarius. Leuven: Bogaert, 1568.Google Scholar
Hetzenauer, Michael. Wesen und Principien der Bibelkritik auf katholischer Grundlage. Innsbruck: Wagner’sche Universitäts-Buchhandlung, 1900.Google Scholar
Hezel, Wilhelm Friedrich. Ueber die Aechtheit der Stelle Johannis (1 Joh. v. 7), Drey sind die da zeugen im Himmel, etc. aus Gründen der höhern Kritik. Giessen: Heyer, 1793.Google Scholar
Hilgert, Earle. ‘Johann Froben and the Basel University Scholars, 1513–1523.’ The Library Quarterly 41 (1971): 141–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hills, Edward F. The King James Version Defended. 4th ed. Des Moines, IA: Christian Research Press, 1984.Google Scholar
[Hoadly, John.] A Defence of the Right Reverend the Lord Bishop of Sarum. In Answer to a Book, Entituled, A Prefatory Discourse to an Examination of the Bishop of Sarum’s Exposition of the XXXIX Articles of the Church of England, &c. London: Baldwin, 1703.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas. Leviathan or the Matter, Forme and Power of a Commonwealth Ecclesiastical and Civil. London: A. Crooke, 1651.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Melchior. Außlegung der heimlichen Offenbarung Joannis des heyligen Apostels vnnd Euangelisten. Strasbourg: Balthasar Beck, 1530.Google Scholar
Hofmann, Carl Gottlob. De prudentia in disquisitione αὐθεντίας dicti Ioannei 1. Io. V, 7. observanda. Wittenberg: Dürr, 1766.Google Scholar
The Holy Bible, Conteyning the Old Testament, and the New. London: R. Barker, 1611.Google Scholar
The Holy Bible, Containing the Old Testament and the New. London: Hills and Field, 1660.Google Scholar
Homza, Lu Ann. ‘Erasmus as Hero, or Heretic? Spanish Humanism and the Valladolid Assembly of 1527.’ RQ 50 (1997): 78–118.Google Scholar
Homza, Lu Ann. Religious Authority in the Spanish Renaissance. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Horne, Thomas H. An Introduction to the Critical Study and Knowledge of the Holy Scriptures. London: Cadell and Davies, 1818.Google Scholar
Horne, Thomas H. Introduction. 7th ed. Philadelphia: Desilver, Thomas & Co., 1835–1836.Google Scholar
Hornig, Gottfried. Johann Salomo Semler. Studien zu Leben und Werk des Hallenser Aufklärungstheologen. Tübingen: Niemeyer, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoskier, Herman Charles. Concerning the Text of the Apocalypse. 2 vols. London: Quaritch, 1929.Google Scholar
Hottinger, Johann Heinrich. Bibliothecarius quadripartitus. Zürich: Stauffacher, 1664.Google Scholar
Howard, John. The Trinity Asserted. A sermon preach’d before the Lord-Mayor and aldermen of the City of London, at the cathedral church of St. Paul, upon Trinity-Sunday, Anno Dom. 1700. London: Lawrence, 1700.Google Scholar
Howell, William. The Doctrine of the Trinity prov’d from Scripture. A sermon preach’d before the University of Oxford, at St. Mary’s, on Sunday, May 13. 1711. Oxford: Peisley for Knapton, Clements and Morphew, 1711.Google Scholar
Hügel, Friedrich von. ‘The Comma Johanneum.’ The Tablet 89, nº 2978 (5 June 1897): 896–897.Google Scholar
Hunwick, Andrew trans. Richard Simon: Critical History of the Text of the New Testament. New Testament Tools, Studies, and Documents 43. Leiden: Brill, 2013.Google Scholar
Hutter, Elias, ed. Novum Testamentum Domini nostri Iesu Christi. 2 vols. Nuremberg: [Dietrich], 1599–1600.Google Scholar
Hylton, Raymond. Ireland’s Huguenots and Their Refuge, 1662–1745: An Unlikely Haven. Brighton: Sussex Academic Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Ibenthal, Lorenz Jakob. Erweis daß die Worte I. Joh. V. 7. 8. göttlichen Ursprunges. Hamburg: Reuß, 1772.Google Scholar
IJsewijn, Jozef, Tournoy, G., Sacré, D., IJsewijn-Jacobs, Line, Verweij, M. and Mund-Dopchie, M.. ‘Litterae ad Craneveldium Balduinianae. A Preliminary Edition. 4. Letters 86–116.’ Humanistica Lovaniensia 44 (1995): 1–78.Google Scholar
Iliffe, Rob. ‘Those “Whose Business It Is To Cavill”: Newton’s Anti-Catholicism.’ In Force and Popkin 1999: 97–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iliffe, Rob. ‘Friendly Criticism: Richard Simon, John Locke, Isaac Newton and the Johannine Comma.’ In Hessayon and Keene 2006: 137–157.Google Scholar
Iliffe, Rob. Priest of Nature: The Religious Worlds of Isaac Newton. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Index expurgatorius librorum qui hoc seculo prodierunt. Lyon: Mareschall, 1586.Google Scholar
‘Inspector.’, ‘Sabellian, or Unitarian Controversy. Letter XI.’ The Antijacobin Review and True Churchman’s Magazine 50 (1816): 495–513.Google Scholar
Israel, Jonathan. ‘Spinoza and the Religious Radical Enlightenment.’ In The Intellectual Consequences of Religious Heterodoxy, 1600–1750. Ed. Mortimer, Sarah and Robertson, John. Leiden: Brill, 2012: 181–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ives, Eric William. The Common Lawyers of Pre-Reformation England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, John. Three Letters to Dr Clarke, from a Clergyman of the Church of England; Concerning His Scripture-Doctrine of the Trinity. London: Baker, 1714.Google Scholar
Jackson, John. A Collection of Queries. Wherein the Most Material Objections from Scripture, Reason, and Antiquity, Which Have as Yet Been Alleged Against Dr Clarke’s Scripture-Doctrine of the Trinity, and the Defenses of It, Are Proposed and Answered. London: Knapton, 1716.Google Scholar
Jackson, W. A., Ferguson, F. S and Pantzer, Katharine F.. A Short-Title Catalogue of Books Printed in England, Scotland, & Ireland and of English Books Printed Abroad 1475–1640. First compiled by A. W. Pollard and G. R. Redgrave. 2nd ed. London: Bibliographical Society, 1986.Google Scholar
Jäger, Karl Friedrich. De moderatione theologica in probanda vel non probanda Trinitate ex dicto 1 Joh. V. 7: dissertatio inauguralis. Tübingen: Sigmund, 1767.Google Scholar
, Jerome of Stridon. Sancti Eusebii Hieronymi Stridonensis presbyteri Divina bibliotheca antehac inedita. Ed. Martianay, Jean and Pouget, Antoine. 5 vols. Paris: Roulland and Anisson, 1693–1706.Google Scholar
Jowett, Benjamin. ‘On the Interpretation of Scripture.’ In Essays and Reviews. Ed. Parker, John William. London: Parker, 1860: 330–433.Google Scholar
Jülicher, Adolf. Review of Künstle 1905a. Göttingische gelehrte Anzeigen 167 (1905): 930–935.Google Scholar
Jülicher, Adolf. Einleitung in das Neue Testament. 5th ed. Tübingen: Mohr (Siebeck), 1906.Google Scholar
Junius, Franciscus and Marshall, Thomas, ed. Quatuor D. N. Jesu Christi euangeliorum Versiones perantiquae duae, Gothica scil. & Anglo-Saxonica. Dordrecht: Typis et sumptibus Junianis excudebant Henricus et Joannes Essaei, urbis typographi ordinarii, 1665.Google Scholar
Junius, Franciscus. Quatuor D. N. Jesu Christi euangeliorum Versiones. Amsterdam: Apud Janssonio- Waesbergios, 1684.Google Scholar
Junius, Johannes. Examen responsionis Fausti Socini, ad Librum Jacobi Wieki, de Divinitate Filij Dei & Spiritus Sancti. Amsterdam: Henricus Laurentius, 1628.Google Scholar
Kallipolites, Maximos, trans. Ἡ Καινὴ Διαθήκη τοῦ Κυρίου ἡμῶν Ἰησοῦ Χριστοῦ δίγλωττος. 2 vols. Geneva: Heirs of Pierre Aubert, 1638.Google Scholar
Kannegiesser, Bartholomäus. Kern und Safft der erbaulichen Schrifft des [...] D. Philipp Jacob Speners Vertheidigung des Zeugnisses von der ewigen GOttheit JEsu CHristi. Erfurt: Engelhardt, 1714.Google Scholar
Károlyi, Péter. Brevis, erudita, et perspicua explicatio orthodoxae fidei de vno vero Deo, Patre, Filio & Spiritu sancto, aduersus blasphemos Georgij Blandratae, & Francisci Dauidis errores. Wittenberg: Schleich and Schöne, 1571.Google Scholar
Kassler, Jamie C. Seeking Truth: Roger North’s Notes on Newton and Correspondence with Samuel Clarke c. 1704–1713. Farnham: Ashgate, 2014.Google Scholar
Kawecka-Gryczowa, Alodia. Les imprimeurs des antitrinitaires polonais Rodecki et Sternacki. Geneva: Droz, 1974.Google Scholar
Kell, Edmund. Unitarians, Not Socinians. An Appeal to the Good Sense and Candour of Professing Christians, Against the Improper Use of the Term ‘Socinian’. 2nd ed. London: Hunter, 1830.Google Scholar
Kelly, William. Lectures Introductory to the Study of the Acts, the Catholic Epistles, and the Revelation. London: Broom, 1870.Google Scholar
Kettner, Friedrich Ernst. Insignis ac Celeberrimi De SS. Trinitate Loci, qui 1. Joh. V. 7. extat, divina autoritas sensus et usus Dissertatione Theologica demonstratus. Leipzig: Heinrich Richter for the heirs of Friedrich Lanckisius, 1696.Google Scholar
Kettner, Friedrich Ernst. Vindiciae novae dicti vexatissimi: De tribus in coelo testibus I. Joh. V, v. 7. Oppositae Christophori Sandii interpretationibus paradoxis, Richardi Simonii historiae criticae Novi Testamenti, Stephani Curcellaei, Johannis Clerici et quibusdam monachorum Benedictorum objectionibus recentissimis. Delitzsch: Vogelgesang, [c. 1702].Google Scholar
Kettner, Friedrich Ernst. Historia dicti Johannei de sanctissima Trinitate 1. Joh. Cap. V. vers. 7. per multa secula omissi, seculo v. restituti, et exeunte seculo xvi. in versionem vernaculam recepti. Frankfurt and Leipzig: Calvisius, 1713.Google Scholar
[King, Peter.] An Enquiry into the Constitution, Discipline, Unity & Worship, of the Primitive Church. London: Robinson, 1691.Google Scholar
Kís, Tímea. ‘“Olyan Istent ... hordoznak a lelkükben, amilyent meg is festettek.” Illusztrációk két 16. századi antitrinitárius kiadványban.’ In Ars perennis. Ed. Tüskés, Anna Szerkesztette. Budapest: CentrArt Egyesület, 2010: 71–80.Google Scholar
Klauck, Hans-Josef. Der erste Johannesbrief. Evangelisch-Katholischer Kommentar zum Neuen Testament XXIII/1. Zürich: Benzinger, 1991.Google Scholar
[Knight, James]. The Scripture Doctrine of the Most Holy and Undivided Trinity Vindicated from the Misinterpretations of Dr. Clarke. To Which Is Prefixed a Letter to the Reverend Doctor, by Robert Nelson, Esq. 2nd ed. London: Smith, 1714.Google Scholar
Knight, James. The True Scripture Doctrine of the Most Holy and Undivided Trinity, Continued and Vindicated From the Misinterpretations of Dr. Clarke. In Answer to his Reply. By the Author of the Scripture-Doctrine. Published and Recommended by Robert Nelson, Esq. London: Smith, 1715.Google Scholar
Knittel, Franz Anton. Neue Kritiken über den berühmten Spruch: Drey sind, die da zeugen im Himmel, der Vater, das Wort und der heilige Geist; und diese drey sind eins. Braunschweig: Meyer, 1785.Google Scholar
Knittel, Franz Anton. New criticisms on the celebrated text, 1 John V. 7. ‘For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost; and these three are one.’ Trans. Evanson, William Alleyn. London: Rivington, 1829.Google Scholar
Knox, Ronald A. The Holy Bible: A Translation from the Latin Vulgate in the Light of the Hebrew and Greek Originals. New York: Sheed & Ward, 1950a.Google Scholar
Koffmanne, Georg. ‘Ist Luther Verfasser einer Schrift, welche das Komma Johanneum behandelt?’ In Theologische Studien Herrn Wirkl. Oberkonsistorialrath Professor D. Bernhard Weiss [...] dargebracht. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1897: 30–51.Google Scholar
Kortholt, Christian. De variis scripturae editionibus tractatus theologico- historico-philologicus. Kiel: Richelius, 1686.Google Scholar
Krans, Jan. Beyond What Is Written: Erasmus and Beza as Conjectural Critics of the New Testament. Leiden: Brill, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kraye, Jill. ‘Erasmus and the Canonization of Aristotle: The Letter to John More.’ In England and the Continental Renaissance. Ed. Chaney, Edward and Mack, Peter. Woodbridge: Boydell, 1990: 37–52.Google Scholar
Künstle, Karl. Das Comma Ioanneum. Auf seine Herkunft untersucht. Freiburg i. B.: Herder, 1905.Google Scholar
Kurtzman, Jeffrey G. ‘The Monteverdi Vespers of 1610 and Their Relationship with Italian Sacred Music of the Early Seventeenth Century.’ Diss. Illinois, 1972.Google Scholar
Kurtzman, Jeffrey G. The Monteverdi Vespers of 1610: Music, Context, Performance. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Lachmann, Karl. ‘Rechenschaft über seine Ausgabe des Neuen Testaments.’ Theologische Studien und Kritiken 3 (1830): 817–845.Google Scholar
Lachmann, Karl. ‘De ordine narrationum in evangeliis synopticis.’ Theologische Studien und Kritiken 8 (1835): 570–590.Google Scholar
La Croze, Maturin Veyssière. Thesaurus epistolicus Lacrozianus. 3 vols. Leipzig: Gleditsch, 1742–1746.Google Scholar
Lambe, Patrick J. ‘Biblical Criticism and Censorship in Ancien Régime France: The Case of Richard Simon.’ The Harvard Theological Review 78 (1985): 149–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laridius, Gobelinus, ed. Biblia iuxta divi Hieronymi Stridonensis tralationem. Cologne: Cervicornus for Hittorp, 1530.Google Scholar
Laurence, John, ed. An Apology for Dr Clarke. Containing an Account of the Late Proceedings in Convocation Upon His Writings Concerning the Trinity. London: Burleigh, 1714.Google Scholar
The Layman’s Humble Address to the Bishops and Clergy in Convocation Assembled, Concerning an Attempt to Subvert the Christian Faith, Lately Made by Sam. Clarke, D.D. and Also of Some Dangerous Opinions That Perplex the Minds of Pious People, Lately Advanced by the Bishop of Bangor, Mr. Whiston, and Others. London: Rivington, 1717.Google Scholar
Lebreton, Jules. Les origines du dogme de la Trinité. 5th ed. Paris: Beauchesne, 1919.Google Scholar
Lechat, Robert. Les refugiés anglais dans les Pays-Bas espagnols durant le règne d’Elisabeth, 1558–1603. Leuven: Roulers, 1914.Google Scholar
Le Clerc, Jean. ‘Lettre latine, sur l’édition du N. T. par Mr. Mill.’ Bibliothèque choisie 16 (1708): 311–342.Google Scholar
Le Clerc, Jean. Epistolario. Ed. Sina, Maria Grazia and Sina, Mario. 4 vols. Florence: Olschki, 1987–1997.Google Scholar
Lee, Edward. Annotationes Edoardi Leei in Annotationes Novi Testamenti Desiderii Erasmi. Paris: De Gourmont, [January/February 1520a].Google Scholar
Lee, Edward. Annotationes Edoardi Leei in Annotationes Novi Testamenti Desiderii Erasmi. Basel: Froben, May 1520b.Google Scholar
Lee, John A. L. ‘Dimitrios Doukas and the Accentuation of the New Testament Text of the Complutensian Polyglot.’ Novum Testamentum 47 (2005): 250–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Samuel, ed. Novum Testamentum Syriace. London: British and Foreign Bible Society, 1816. DM 8979.Google Scholar
Lefèvre de la Boderie, Guy, ed. דיתיקא הדתא. Ἡ Καινὴ Διαθήκη. Nouum Iesu Christi D. N. Testamentum. Paris: Benenatus, 1584. DM 6174.Google Scholar
Lefèvre d’Étaples, Jacques. Commentarii in Epistolas Catholicas. Basel: Cratander, 1527.Google Scholar
Leigh, Edward. A Treatise of Religion & Learning, and of Religious and Learned Men. London: Adams, 1656.Google Scholar
Leisentrit, Johann. Geistliche Lieder vnd Psalmen / der alten Apostolischer recht vnd warglaubiger Christlicher Kirchen. Bautzen: Wolrab, 1567.Google Scholar
Le Long, Jacques. Bibliotheca sacra. Ed. Boerner, Christian Friedrich. 2 vols. Leipzig: Gleditsch, 1709b.Google Scholar
Le Long, Jacques. ‘Lettre du Pere le Long à Monsieur Martin, Ministre d’Utreck. De Paris, ce 12. Avril 1720.’ Journal des Sçavans 1720: 298–303.Google Scholar
Lente, Willem Johan. Het leven en werken van Johan Jakob Wettstein. Leiden: Adriani, 1902.Google Scholar
Leusden, Johannes and Schaaf, Karel, ed. Novum Domini Nostri Jesu Christi Testamentum Syriacum, cum versione Latina. Leiden: Müller, Boutesteyn and Luchtmans, 1709.Google Scholar
Levine, Joseph M. The Autonomy of History: Truth and Method from Erasmus to Gibbon. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Lewis, John, ed. The New Testament of Our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ, Translated Out of the Latin Vulgat by John Wiclif. London: Page and Mount, 1731.Google Scholar
Liber Usualis. Paris: Desclée, 1961.Google Scholar
Lim, Paul Chang-Ha. Mystery Unveiled: The Crisis of the Trinity in Early Modern England. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lim, Paul Chang-Ha. Review of Mortimer 2010. The Journal of Ecclesiastical History 74 (2013): 855–857.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lio, Ermenegildo. Humanae vitae e infallibilità: Paolo VI, il Concilio e Giovanni Paolo II. Rome: Libreria Editrice Vaticana, 1986.Google Scholar
Little, Andrew George. Franciscan Papers, Lists, and Documents. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1943.Google Scholar
Locke, John. The Correspondence of John Locke. Ed. de Beer, E. S.. 8 vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1976–1989.Google Scholar
[Löscher, Valentin Ernst]. Review of Das Neue Testament (Wandsbek: Holle, 1710). Unschuldige Nachrichten von alten und neuen theologischen Sachen 10 (1710): 615–618.Google Scholar
Long, Thomas. Apostolical Communion in the Church of England. 2nd ed. Exeter: Farley, 1703.Google Scholar
Lorenzo da Brindisi, . Opera omnia. 11 vols. Padua: Officina typographica Seminarii, 1928–1959.Google Scholar
Lossius, Lucas. Annotationes scholasticae in epistolas dominicales. Frankfurt/Main: Egenolph, 1552.Google Scholar
Lucas Brugensis, Franciscus. Notationes in sacra biblia, quibus, variantia discrepantibus exemplaribus loca, summo studio discutiuntur. Antwerp: Plantin, 1580.Google Scholar
Lucas Brugensis, Franciscus. Romanae correctionis in latinis bibliis editionis vulgatae, iussu Sixti V. Pont. Max. recognitis, loca insigniora. Antwerp: Plantin, 1603.Google Scholar
Luther, Martin. D. Martin Luthers sämtliche Schriften. Ed. Walch, Johann Georg. 24 vols. Halle: Gebauer, 1739–1753.Google Scholar
Lyell, James P. Cardinal Ximenes: Statesman, Ecclesiastic, Soldier and Man of Letters. London: Grafton, 1919.Google Scholar
Lynall, Gregory. Swift and Science: The Satire, Politics, and Theology of Natural Knowledge, 1690–1730. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[Mace, Daniel, ed. and trans.]. The New Testament in Greek and English. 2 vols. London: Roberts, 1729.Google Scholar
Maclear, J. F. Church and State in the Modern Age. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Maertens, Heinrich Richard. De tribus in terra testibus ad 1. Joh. V, 8. Helmstedt: Buchholz, 1725.Google Scholar
Mahoney, Robert. ‘Certainty and Irony in Swift: Faith and the Indeterminate.’ In Swift as Priest and Satirist. Ed. Parker, Todd C.. Cranbury, NJ: Associated University Presses, 2009: 37–57.Google Scholar
Major, Georg. Commonefactio B. Georgii Maioris, ad Ecclesiam Catholicam, Orthodoxam, de fugiendis et execrandis blasphemijs Samosatenicis, Arianis, Eunomianis, et alijs, quae hoc tempore à Francisco Dauidis, et quodam Italo Georgio Blandrata, et nonnullis alijs, ab Orco et Stygia palude reuocantur, et paßim sparguntur. Wittenberg: Lufft, 1569.Google Scholar
Mandelbrote, Scott. ‘“A Duty of the Greatest Moment”: Isaac Newton and the Writing of Biblical Criticism.’ The British Journal for the History of Science 26 (1993): 281–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mandelbrote, Scott. ‘The English Bible and its Readers in the Eighteenth Century.’ In Books and their Readers in Eighteenth-Century England. Ed. Rivers, Isabel. London: Continuum, 2001: 35–78.Google Scholar
Mandelbrote, Scott. ‘Eighteenth-Century Reactions to Newton’s Anti-Trinitarianism.’ In Newton and Newtonianism, New Studies. Ed. Force, James E. and Hutton, Sarah. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 2004: 93–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mandelbrote, Scott. ‘English Scholarship and the Greek Text of the Old Testament, 1620–1720: The Impact of Codex Alexandrinus.’ In Hessayon and Keene 2006: 74–93.Google Scholar
Mangan, John Joseph. Life, Character and Influence of Desiderius Erasmus of Rotterdam. 2 vols. New York: Macmillan, 1927.Google Scholar
Manoury, Auguste-François. Commentaire sur les Épîtres catholiques de S. Jacques, S. Pierre, S. Jean et S. Jude. Paris: Bloud et Barral, 1888.Google Scholar
Manoury, Auguste-François. ‘Le verset des trois témoins célestes.’ Revue des sciences ecclésiastiques 59 (1889): 289–297.Google Scholar
Maran, Prudent. Divinitas Domini Nostri Jesu Christi, manifesta in scripturis et traditione. Paris: Collombat, 1746.Google Scholar
Marsh, Herbert. A Course of Lectures, Containing a Description and Systematic Arrangement of the Several Branches of Divinity. 7 vols. Cambridge: Hilliard and Smith, 1812–1823.Google Scholar
Marsh, Herbert. A Comparative View of the Churches of England and Rome. London: Rivington, 1816.Google Scholar
Marshall, John. John Locke: Resistance, Religion and Responsibility. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, John. ‘Locke, Socinianism, “Socinianism”, and Unitarianism.’ In English Philosophy in the Age of Locke. Ed. Stewart, Michael Alexander. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000: 111–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, David. Le Nouveau Testament, de nôtre Seigneur Jesus-Christ. Utrecht: Halma, 1696.Google Scholar
Martin, David. La Sainte Bible qui contient le Vieux et le Nouveau Testament. 2 vols. Amsterdam: Desbordes, 1707.Google Scholar
Martin, David. Deux dissertations critiques: La premiere sur le verset 7. du ch. 5 de la I. Epist. de S. Jean; Il y en a trois au Ciel, &c. Dans laquelle on prouve l’authenticité de ce texte; La seconde sur le passage de Joseph touchant Jésus-Christ, où l’on fait voir que ce passage n’est point supposé. Utrecht: Van der Water, 1717.Google Scholar
Martin, David. A Critical Dissertation upon the Seventh Verse of the Fifth Chapter of St John’s First Epistle, There Are Three, That Bear Record in Heaven, &c. Wherein the Authentickness of This Text Is Fully Prov’d Against the Objections of Mr. Simon and the Modern Arians. London: Innys, 1719a.Google Scholar
Martin, David. Examen de la Réponse de Mr. Emlyn à la Dissertation Critique sur le Verset 7. du Chap. 5. de la 1 Epître de St. Jean. Il y en a trois, qui rendent témoignage dans le Ciel. London: Innys, 1719b.Google Scholar
Martin, David. An Examination of Mr. Emlyn’s Answer to the Dissertation upon the Seventh Verse of the Fifth Chapter of the First Epistle of St. John, for There are Three That Bear Record in Heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and These Three Are One. London: Innys, 1719c.Google Scholar
Martin, David. ‘Réponse de M. Martin, Ministre d’Utrecht à la Lettre de P. Le Long de L’Oratoire de Paris, dattée du 12. Avril 1720.’ L’Europe savante 12 (1720): 279–301.Google Scholar
Martin, David. La Vérité du Texte de la 1. Epistre de saint Jean, ch. 5, vs. 7. Car il y en a trois au Ciel, &c. Démontrée par des preuves qui sont au dessus de toute exception, prises des témoignages de l’Eglise Latine, & de l’Eglise Grecque, & en particulier d’un Manuscrit Grec du N. Testament, trouvé en Irlande. Utrecht: Broedelet, 1721.Google Scholar
Martin, David. The Genuineness of the Text of the First Epistle of Saint John. Chap. v. ℣. 7. There Are Three in Heaven, &c. Demonstrated by Proofs Which Are Beyond All Exception, Taken from the Testimonies of the Greek and Latin Churches, and Particularly from a Greek MS. of the New Testament, Found in Ireland. London: Innys, 1722.Google Scholar
Martin, Jean-Pierre Paulin. Introduction à la critique textuelle du Nouveau Testament. 6 vols. Paris: Leclerc, 1884–1886.Google Scholar
Martin, Jean-Pierre Paulin. ‘Le verset des trois témoins célestes, I Jean, V. 7, et la critique biblique contemporaine.’ Revue des sciences ecclésiastiques 56 (1887): 97–129, 193–223.Google Scholar
Martin, Jean-Pierre Paulin. ‘Les trois témoins célestes.’ La controverse et le contemporain, n. s. 13 (1888): 408–425.Google Scholar
Martin, Jean-Pierre Paulin. ‘Le verset des trois témoins célestes est-il authentique?’ Revue des sciences ecclésiastiques 59 (1889a): 97–140, 209–243, 385–389.Google Scholar
Martin, Jean-Pierre Paulin. ‘Un dernier mot sur le verset des trois témoins célestes.’ Revue des sciences ecclésiastiques 60 (1889b): 538–560.Google Scholar
Mattaire, Michel. A Short Essay or Dissertation Upon the Doxology of the Church of England. London: Bowyer, 1718.Google Scholar
Matthaei, Christian Friedrich, ed. SS. apostolorum septem epistolae catholicae ad codd. mss. Mosqq. Riga: Hartknochen, 1782.Google Scholar
Matthews, William, ed. The Recorder: Being a Collection of Tracts and Disquisitions, Chiefly Relative to the Modern State and Principles of the People Called Quakers. 2 vols. Bath: Crutwell for Matthews, 1802–1803.Google Scholar
[Mawer, John.] Letters in answer to some queries sent to the Author, concerning the genuine Reading of the Greek Text, I Tim. iii. 16. ΘΕΟΣ ἐφανερώθη ἐν σαρκί. GOD was manifest in the Flesh. Now first published on Occasion of Sir Isaac Newton’s Two Letters to Mr. Le Clerc, lately published. York: Ward, 1758.Google Scholar
Maxey, David W. ‘New Light on Hannah Barnard, a Quaker “Heretic”.’ Quaker History 78 (1989): 61–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayer, Thomas F. and Walters, Courtney B. The Correspondence of Reginald Pole. Volume 4. A Biographical Companion: The British Isles. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2008.Google Scholar
Maynard, Michael. A History of the Debate Over 1 John 5:7–8. Tempe, AZ: Comma Publications, 1995.Google Scholar
Mayor, J. E. B., ed. Cambridge under Queen Anne. Cambridge: Cambridge Antiquarian Society, 1911.Google Scholar
McConica, James. ‘The Rise of the Undergraduate College.’ In The History of the University of Oxford, vol. 3: The Collegiate University. Ed. McConica, James. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986: 1–68.Google Scholar
McDonald, Grantley Robert. ‘Raising the Ghost of Arius. Erasmus, the Johannine Comma and Religious Difference in Early Modern Europe.’ Diss. Leiden, 2011.Google Scholar
McDonald, Grantley Robert. ‘Thomas More, John Clement and the Palatine Anthology.’ Bibliothèque d’Humanisme et Renaissance 75 (2013): 259–270.Google Scholar
McGrath, Alister E. Darwinism and the Divine. Evolutionary Thought and Natural Theology. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLachlan, Herbert. ‘An Almost Forgotten Pioneer in New Testament Criticism.’ Hibbert Journal 37 (1938/1939): 617–625.Google Scholar
McLachlan, Herbert. ‘Daniel Mace (d. 1758), a Pioneer in New Testament Criticism.’ In idem, Essays and Addresses. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1950: 230–247.Google Scholar
McLachlan, H. John. Socinianism in Seventeenth-Century England. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1951.Google Scholar
Meehan, Thomas More. ‘John 19:32–25 and 1 John 5:6–8: A Study in the History of Interpretation.’ Diss. Drew University, 1986.Google Scholar
Meinelff, Johann Christoph. Vindicatio Testimonii, Trium testium in coelo, 1. Joh. V. commate 7. Qvod genuina Divinitus inspiratae atque Canonicae Scripturae Particula sit, non adjecta ab aliis, sed ab ipso Johanne Apostolo scripta ac relicta: Adversus Christophorum Sandium potissimum instituta [...] Sub Praesidio [...] Gothofridi Wegneri [...] examini submittit, Joh. Christoph. Meinelffus. Frankfurt/Oder: Wegner, 1690.Google Scholar
Melanchthon, Philipp. Loci theologici recens collecti & recogniti. Wittenberg: Klug, 1535.Google Scholar
Melanchthon, Philipp. La somme de théologie, ou lieux communs, reueuz & augmentez pour la dernière foys, par M. Philippe Melancthon. Trans. Calvin, Jean. [Geneva]: [Jean Girard], 1546.Google Scholar
Melanchthon, Philipp. Opera quae supersunt omnia. Ed. Bretschneider, C. G. and Bindseil, H. E. 28 vols. Halle and Braunschweig: Schwetschke, 1834–1860.Google Scholar
Mendes da Costa, M. B. and Berg, J.. Catalogus der Handschriften VII. De Handschriften, Krachtens Bruikleencontract in de Universiteitsbibliotheek berustende. Eerste gedeelte: De handschriften van de Remonstrantsche Kerk [...]. De handschriften van het Evangelisch-Luthersche Seminarium. Amsterdam: Stadsdrukkerij, 1923.Google Scholar
Mercati, Giovanni. ‘Sopra Giovanni Clement e i suoi manoscritti.’ La Bibliofilia 28 (1926): 81–99.Google Scholar
Merriam, Thomas. ‘John Clement, His Identity, and His Marshfoot House in Essex.’ Moreana 25 (1988): 145–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merritt, J. F. The Social World of Early Modern Westminster. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Metzger, Bruce M. 1964. Review of The Cambridge History of the Bible: The West from the Reformation to the Present Day. Ed. Greenslade, S. L. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1963). Journal of Biblical Literature 83 (1964): 448–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Metzger, Bruce M. 1977. The Early Versions of the New Testament: Their Origin, Transmission, and Limitations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Metzger, Bruce M. and Ehrman, Bart D.. The Text of the New Testament: Its Transmission, Corruption and Restoration. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Michaelis, J. D. Einleitung in die göttlichen Schriften des Neuen Bundes. 2nd ed. 2 vols. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck, 1765–1766.Google Scholar
Michaelis, J. D. Einleitung in die göttlichen Schriften des Neuen Bundes. 3rd ed. 2 vols. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1777.Google Scholar
Michaelis, J. D. Einleitung in die göttlichen Schriften des Neuen Bundes. 4th ed. 2 vols. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1788.Google Scholar
Michaelis, J. D. Introduction to the New Testament, trans. and augmented by Marsh, H.. 4 vols. Cambridge: Archdeacon for Rivington, 1793–1801.Google Scholar
Michaelis, J. D. Introduction to the New Testament, trans. and augmented by Marsh, H.. 2nd ed. 4 vols. Cambridge: Archdeacon for Rivington, 1802–1803.Google Scholar
Michaelis, J. D. Introduction to the New Testament, trans. and augmented by Marsh, H.. 4th ed. 4 vols. London: Rivington, 1823.Google Scholar
[Middleton, Conyers.] Remarks, Paragraph by Paragraph, upon the Proposals Lately Publish’d by Richard Bentley, for a New Edition of the Greek Testament and Latin Version. London: Roberts, [1721].Google Scholar
Middleton, Conyers. Some Farther Remarks, Paragraph by Paragraph, upon Proposals Lately Publish’d for a New Edition of a Greek and Latin Testament by Richard Bentley, Containing a Full Answer to the Editor’s Late Defence of His Said Proposals as Well as to All His Objections There Made Against My Former Remarks. London: Bickerton, 1721.Google Scholar
Mill, John, ed. Ἡ Καινὴ Διαθήκη. Novum Testamentum. Cum lectionibus variantibus MSS Exemplarium, Versionum, Editionum, SS Patrum et Scriptorum Ecclesiasticorum; & in easdem Notis. Oxford: Sheldonian Theatre, 1707.Google Scholar
Mill, John. Novum Testamentum graecum. 2nd ed. Ed. Küster, Ludolf. Rotterdam: Fritsch and Böhm, 1710.Google Scholar
Mill, John. Novum Testamentum graecum. 2nd ed. Ed. Küster, Ludolf. Leipzig: Gleditsch, 1723.Google Scholar
Milton, John. De doctrina Christiana. Ed. Sumner, Charles R.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1825a.Google Scholar
Milton, John. A Treatise on Christian Doctrine. Trans. Sumner, Charles R.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1825b.Google Scholar
Minnich, Nelson H. and Meissner, W. W.. ‘The Character of Erasmus.’ The American Historical Review 83 (1978): 598–624.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Missy, César de. ‘Lettre de Mr. de Missy sur le MS. du Vatican cité par le P. Amelote, en faveur du passage des trois Témoins célestes.’ Journal Britannique 8 (1752): 194–211.Google Scholar
Missy, César de. ‘Seconde Lettre de Mr. de Missy sur le MS du Vatican cité par le P. Amelote, en faveur du passage des trois Témoins célestes.’ Journal Britannique 8 (1752): 274–296.Google Scholar
Missy, César de. ‘Troisième Lettre de Missy sur le MS. du Vatican cité par le P. Amelote, en faveur du passage des trois Témoins célestes.’ Journal Britannique 9 (1752): 44–66.Google Scholar
Missy, César de. ‘Lettre de Mr. de Missy sur tout ce qui a été écrit contre lui en faveur de Mr. Martin: & principalement sur le Mémoire inséré dans l’avant-dernier volume de ce Journal.’ Journal Britannique 11 (1753): 66–98.Google Scholar
Missy, César de. ‘Lettre de M. de Missy à l’Auteur du Journal sur l’Article suivant.’ Journal Britannique 15 (1754): 148–151.Google Scholar
Modus baptizandi, preces et benedictiones, quibus ecclesia Aethiopum utitur. Leuven: Verhasselt, 1550.Google Scholar
Momigliano, Arnaldo. ‘Gibbon’s Contribution to Historical Method.’ Historia: Zeitschrift für Alte Geschichte 2 (1954): 450–463.Google Scholar
Monk, James Henry. The Life of Richard Bentley. 2 vols. 2nd ed. London: Rivington, 1833.Google Scholar
Montano, Benito Arias, ed. Biblia sacra Hebraice, Chaldaice, Graece, & Latine. 8 vols. Antwerp: Plantin, 1569–1572.Google Scholar
Montano, Benito Arias, ed. Novum Testamentum graece, cum vulgata interpretatione latina graeci contextus lineis inserta. Antwerp: Plantin, 1583.Google Scholar
Montano, Benito Arias, Elucidationes in omnia sanctorum apostolorum scripta. Eiusdem in S. Ioannis Apostoli et Evangelistae Apocalypsin. Antwerp: Plantin, 1588.Google Scholar
Montclos, Xavier de. ‘Le Ralliement: intentions de Léon XIII et réactions françaises.’ In Monseigneur d’Hulst fondateur de l’Institut catholique de Paris. Ed. Beretta, Francesco. Paris: Beauchesne, 1996.Google Scholar
Moorman, Jack A. When the KJV Departs from the ‘Majority’ Text. A New Twist in the Continuing Attack on the Authorized Version. Collingswood, NJ: Bible for Today, 1988.Google Scholar
Moorman, John R. H. The Grey Friars in Cambridge, 1225–1538. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1952.Google Scholar
Mortimer, Sarah. Reason and Religion in the English Revolution. The Challenge of Socinianism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mortimer, Sarah. ‘Freedom, Virtue and Socinian Heterodoxy.’ In Freedom and the Construction of Europe. Ed. Skinner, Quentin and Van Gelderen, Martin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013: 1: 77–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mulsow, Martin. ‘The “New Socinians”. Intertextuality and Cultural Exchange in Late Socinianism.’ In Socinianism and Arminianism: Antitrinitarians, Calvinists and Cultural Exchange in Seventeenth-Century Europe. Ed. Mulsow, Martin and Rohls, Jan. Leiden: Brill, 2005: 49–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murdock, Graeme. ‘Multiconfessionalism in Transylvania.’ In A Companion to Multiconfessionalism in the Early Modern World. Ed. Safley, Thomas Max. Leiden: Brill, 2011: 393–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murr, Christoph Theophilus von. Memorabilia bibliothecarum publicarum Norimbergensium et Vniversitatis Altdorfinae. 3 vols. Nuremberg: Hoesch, 1786–1791.Google Scholar
Naogeorgus, Thomas. In primam D. Ioannis Epistolam annotationes, qui vice prolixi commentarii esse possunt. Frankfurt/Main: Braubach, 1544.Google Scholar
Naud, André. Un aggiornamento et son éclipse: la liberté de la pensée dans la foi et dans l’Église à Vatican II et aujourd’hui. Montréal: Les Editions Fides, 1996.Google Scholar
Nestle, Eberhard. Einführung in das Griechische Neue Testament. 2nd ed. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1899.Google Scholar
Nestle, Eberhard. Introduction to the Textual Criticism of the Greek New Testament. Trans. Edie, William. London: Williams and Norgate, 1901.Google Scholar
The New Testament of Iesus Christ, Translated Faithfully into English, Out of the Authentical Latin. Reims: Fogny, 1582.Google Scholar
A New Testament; or, the New Covenant According to Luke, Paul and John. Published in Conformity to the Plan of the Late Rev. Edward Evanson. London: Taylor for Phillips, 1807.Google Scholar
The New Testament of Our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ, Translated Out of the Greek: Being the Version Set Forth a.d. 1611, Compared with the Most Ancient Authorities and Revised, a.d. 1881. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1881.Google Scholar
Newcome, William. An Attempt toward Revising Our English Translation of the Greek Scriptures, or the New Covenant of Jesus Christ: and Toward Illustrating the Sense by Philological and Explanatory Notes. 2 vols. Dublin: Exshaw, 1796.Google Scholar
Newton, Isaac. Philosophiae naturalis principia mathematica. 2nd ed. Cambridge: [Crownfield], 1713.Google Scholar
Newton, Isaac. The Chronology of Ancient Kingdoms Amended. London: Tonson, Osborn and Longman, 1728.Google Scholar
Newton, Isaac. Two Letters of Sir Isaac Newton to Mr. Le Clerc, Late Divinity Professor of the Remonstrants in Holland. The Former Containing a Dissertation upon the Reading of the Greek Text, 1 John, v. 7. The Latter Upon That of 1 Timothy, iii. 16. Published from authentick MSS in the Library of the Remonstrants in Holland. London: Payne, 1754a.Google Scholar
Newton, Isaac. ‘Traduction libre [by César de Missy] de la Lettre du Chevalier Newton sur le passage des trois Témoins célestes, 1 Jean, V, 7 & 8.’ Journal Britannique 15 (1754b): 151–190.Google Scholar
Newton, Isaac. Opera quae extant omnia. Ed. Horsley, Samuel. 5 vols. London: Nichols, 1779–1785.Google Scholar
Newton, Isaac. An Historical Account of Two Notable Corruptions of Scripture: in a Letter to a Friend. London: Green, 1841.Google Scholar
Newton, Isaac. The Correspondence of Sir Isaac Newton. Ed. Turnbull, H. W. et al. 7 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1959–1977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nichols, John, ed. Literary Anecdotes of the Eighteenth Century. 6 vols. London: Nichols, 1812.Google Scholar
Nijenhuis, Willem. ‘Riskante Toleranz. Martinus Lydius’ “Apologia pro Erasmo”.’ Zwingliana 19 (1993): 245–261.Google Scholar
Nolan, Frederick. An Inquiry into the Integrity of the Greek Vulgate or Received Text of the New Testament. London: Rivington, 1815.Google Scholar
Norton, William. A Translation, in English Daily Used, of the Peshito-Syriac Text, and of the Received Greek Text, of Hebrews, James, 1 Peter, and 1 John. London: Bloom, 1889.Google Scholar
Nova vulgata bibliorum sacrorum editio. Rome: Libreria Editrice Vaticana, 1979.Google Scholar
Novum Testamentum Syriacum, et Arabicum. 2 vols. Rome: Sacra congregatio de propaganda fide, 1703. DM 8968.Google Scholar
Nowy Testament Pana Naszego Jezusa Chrystusa z Greckiego na polski Jężyk z pilnośćią przełożony. Gdańsk: Drukowano v Wdowy Guilhelma Guilmothana, 1606.Google Scholar
[Nye, Stephen]. A Brief History of the Unitarians, Called Also Socinians. In Four Letters, Written to a Friend. [Bristol]: [Kienton], 1687.Google Scholar
Nye, Stephen. An Accurate Examination of the Principal Texts Usually Alleged for the Divinity of Our Saviour; and for the Satisfaction by Him Made to the Justice of God, for the Sins of Men. London: [n. p.], 1692.Google Scholar
Nye, Stephen. Considerations on the Explications of the Doctrine of the Trinity. [London]: [n. p.], 1694.Google Scholar
O’Connell, Marvin Richard. Critics on Trial: An Introduction to the Catholic Modernist Crisis. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Oecolampadius, Johannes. In epistolam Ioannis apostoli catholicam primam, Ioannis Oecolampadii demegoriae, hoc est, homiliae una & viginti. Nuremberg: J. Petreius, 1524.Google Scholar
Oecolampadius, Johannes and Zwingli, Huldrych. Epistolarum libri quatuor, praecipua cum religionis à Christo nobis traditae capita, tum ecclesiasticae administrationis officia [...] exprimentes. Basel: Thomas Platter and Balthasar Lasius, 1536.Google Scholar
Oecumenius, . Enarrationes vetustissimorum theologorum, in Acta quidem Apostolorum et in omnes D. Pauli ac Catholicas epistolas ab Oecumenio: in Apocalypsim verò, ab Aretha Caesareae Cappadociae episcopo magna cura collectae. Trans. Henten, Johannes. Antwerp: Steelsius, 1545.Google Scholar
Oemler, Georg. Epistolae, quae dominicis atque Festis diebus in Ecclesia, ueteri more proponi solent, Heroico carmine, ceu prius Euangelia, à Georgio Aemylio redditae. Basel: Oporinus, 1551.Google Scholar
An Ordinance of the Lords and Commons Assembled in Parliament, for the Punishing of Blasphemies and Heresies: With the Severall Penalties Therein Expressed. Die Martis, 2 Maii 1648. London: John Wright, 1648.Google Scholar
Owen, John. Vindiciae Evangelicae or The Mystery of the Gospell vindicated, and Socinianisme Examined, in the Consideration, and Confutation of a Catechisme, Called a Scripture Catechisme, Written by J. Biddle, M.A., and the Catechisme of Valentinus Smalcius, Commonly Called the Racovian Catechisme. Oxford: Lichfield, 1655.Google Scholar
Oxford Dictionary of National Biography [ODNB]. Ed. Matthew, H. C. G. and Harrison, Brian Howard. 60 vols. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Pabel, Hilmar M. ‘Credit, Paratexts, and the Editorial Strategies in Erasmus of Rotterdam’s Editions of Jerome.’ In Cognition and the Book. Ed. Enenkel, K. A. E. and Neuber, Wolfgang. Leiden: Brill, 2005: 217–256.Google Scholar
Paget, James Carleton and Schaper, Joachim, ed. The New Cambridge History of the Bible: From the Beginnings to 600. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pak, G. Sujin. The Judaizing Calvin: Sixteenth-Century Debates over the Messianic Psalms. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ἡ Παλαιά Διαθήκη. London: R. Daniel, 1653.Google Scholar
Pappelbaum, Georg Gottlieb. Untersuchung der Rauischen griechischen Handschrift des Neuen Testaments. Berlin: Maurer, 1785.Google Scholar
Pappelbaum, Georg Gottlieb. Codicis manuscripti N. T. Graeci Raviani in bibliotheca regia Berolinensi publica asservati Examen. Berlin: Wegener for Himburg, 1796.Google Scholar
Parker, David C. ‘The New Testament Text and Versions.’ In Paget and Schaper 2013: 412–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, Todd C. ‘“The Idlest Trifling Stuff That Ever Was Writ”, or, Why Swift Hated His Sermons.’ In Swift as Priest and Satirist. Ed. Parker, Todd C.. Cranbury, NJ: Associated University Presses, 2009: 58–71.Google Scholar
Patrick, Simon. The Witnesses to Christianity; or, The Certainty of Our Faith and Hope: In a Discourse upon 1 S. John v. 7, 8. London: Royston, 1675.Google Scholar
Paulus, Heinrich Eberhard Gottlob. ‘Kritische Vergleichung des Codex Montfortianus im 1. Br. des Joh. mit Anmerkungen.’ Memorabilien 6 (1794): 14–31.Google Scholar
Payne, J. B. ‘Toward the Hermeneutics of Erasmus.’ In Scrinium Erasmianum. Ed. Coppens, J.. Leiden: Brill, 1969–1970: 2:13–49.Google Scholar
Pellicanus, Konrad. In omnes apostolicas epistolas, Pauli, Petri, Iacobi, Ioannis et Iudae D. Chuonradi Pellicani [...] Commentarij. Zürich: Froschauer, 1539.Google Scholar
Pellicanus, Konrad. Biblia sacrosancta Testamenti Veteris & Noui, [...] translata in sermonem Latinum. Zürich: Froschauer, 1543.Google Scholar
Perceval, John. Diary of Viscount Percival Afterwards First Earl of Egmont. 3 vols. London: HMSO, 1920–1923.Google Scholar
Pfaff, Christoph Matthäus. Dissertatio critica de genuinis librorum Novi Testamenti lectionibus. Leiden: Boutesteyn, 1716.Google Scholar
Pfeiffer, Joachim Ehrenfried. De tribus testibus in terris, ad I. Johann. V. 5. 8. Jena: Heller, 1743.Google Scholar
Pfeiffer, Joachim Ehrenfried. Differentia spiritus in terra cum aqua et sanguine testantis a spiritu teste caelesti ex 1. Joh. V, 8. proposita. Erlangen: Camerarius, 1764.Google Scholar
Pfeiffer, Joachim Ehrenfried. Triada testium in caelo qui unum sunt ut I. Joh. V, 7, legitur contra D. Bensonium vindicat. Erlangen: Camerarius, [c. 1767–1772].Google Scholar
Pfizenmaier, Thomas C. The Trinitarian Theology of Dr. Samuel Clarke (1675–1729): Context, Sources, and Controversy. Leiden: Brill, 1997a.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfizenmaier, Thomas C. ‘Was Isaac Newton an Arian?’ Journal of the History of Ideas 58 (1997b): 57–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfizenmaier, Thomas C. ‘Why the Third Fell Out: Trinitarian Dissent.’ In Religion, Politics and Dissent, 1660–1832. Ed. Cornwall, Robert D. and Gibson, William. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2009: 17–33.Google Scholar
‘Pharez, J.’ The Critique in the Eclectic Review, on 1 John v. 7. Confuted by Martin’s Examination of Emlyn’s Answer; to Which Is Added an Appendix, Containing Remarks on Mr. Porson’s Letters to Archdeacon Travis, Concerning the Three Heavenly Witnesses. London: Ogle, Hamilton, Button, 1809.Google Scholar
‘Pharez, J.’ [Crell, Samuel]. ‘Explication de trois Passages de la Sainte Écriture, savoir Gen. III.17. & IV. 15. & 1 Jean V. 8.’ Bibliothèque angloise 7 (1720): 248–284.Google Scholar
Pietkiewicz, Rajmund. ‘Pismo Święte w języku polskim w latach 1518–1638: sytuacja wyznaniowa w Polsce a rozwój edytorstwa biblijnego.’ Diss. Wrocław, 2002.Google Scholar
Pirnát, Antal. Die Ideologie der siebenbürger Antitrinitarier in der 1570er Jahren. Trans. Roth, Edith. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó, 1961.Google Scholar
Pio, Alberto. Tres & viginti libri in locos lucubrationum variarum D. Erasmi Roterodami. Paris: Bade, 1531.Google Scholar
Pohle, Joseph. The Divine Trinity. Trans. Preuss, Arthur. 2nd ed. St Louis: Herder, 1915.Google Scholar
Polanus von Polansdorff, Amandus. Das gantz Newe Testament vnsers Herren Jesu Christi [...] Mit den besten getruckten / vnnd auff Pergament geschribenen alten Griechischen Exemplaren collationiert / vnd mit allen trewen vbersehen. Basel: [n. p.], 1603.Google Scholar
Polanus von Polansdorff, Amandus. Syntagma theologiae christianae. Hanau: Wechel, 1609.Google Scholar
Poole, Matthew. Synopsis criticorum. 4 vols in 5. London: Flesher and Roycroft for Smith, 1669–1676.Google Scholar
Pope, John. Observations on the Miraculous Conception and the Testimonies of Ignatius and Justin Martyr on That Subject. London: Johnson, 1792.Google Scholar
Popkin, Richard H. ‘Newton as a Biblical Scholar.’ In Essays on the Context, Nature and Influence of Isaac Newton’s Theology. Ed. Force, James E. and Popkin, Richard H.. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1990: 103–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popkin, Richard H. ‘Spinoza and Biblical Scholarship.’ In The Cambridge Companion to Spinoza. Ed. Garrett, Don. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996: 383–407.Google Scholar
Porson, Richard. Letters to Mr. Archdeacon Travis in Answer to His Defence of the Three Heavenly Witnesses, 1 John V. 7. London: Egerton, 1790.Google Scholar
Porson, Richard. The Correspondence of Richard Porson. Ed. Luard, Henry Richards. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1867.Google Scholar
Posset, Franz. ‘John Bugenhagen and the Comma Johanneum.’ Concordia Theological Quarterly 49 (1985): 245–252.Google Scholar
Poussines, Pierre. Catena graecorum patrum in evangelium secundum Marcum. Rome: Michael Hercules at the Barberini Press, 1673.Google Scholar
[Priestley, Joseph]. A Familiar Illustration of Certain Passages of Scripture Relating to the Power of Man to Do the Will of God, Original Sin, Election and Reprobation, The Divinity of Christ, and Atonement for Sin by the Death of Christ. By a Lover of the Gospel. London: Johnson, 1785.Google Scholar
Przypkowski, Samuel. Catechesis ecclesiarum quae in Regno Poloniae, & magno Ducatu Lithuaniae, & aliis ad istud Regnum pertinentibus provinciis, affirmant, Neminem alium praeter Patrem Domini nostri Iesu Christi, esse illum unum Deum Israëlis: Hominem autem illum Iesum Nazarenum, qui ex Virgine natus est, nec alium, praeter aut ante ipsum, Dei Filium unigenitum & agnoscunt & confitentur. Cui accedit Fausti Socini Senensis vita. Et Dissertatio Operibus suis ab Equite Polono praemissa. Cum Catalogo Operum ejusdem Fausti Socini. Raków [London]: [William Dugard], 1651.Google Scholar
Pseudo-Athanasius, . Enarratio pseudo-Athanasiana in Symbolum. Ed. Bianchini, Giuseppe. Verona: Berno, 1732.Google Scholar
[Pye-Smith, John.]. Review of Brown 1807 and Belsham 1808. The Eclectic Review 5 (1809a): 24–39, 236–251, 329–346.Google Scholar
Pye-Smith, John. Review of ‘Pharez’ 1809. The Eclectic Review 6 (1810): 61–71, 155–164.Google Scholar
Quentin, Henri. Mémoire sur l’établissement du texte de la Vulgate. Ière partie. Octateuque. Rome: Desclée, 1922.Google Scholar
The Racovian Catechisme. Amsterdam: Brooer Janz, 1652.Google Scholar
Rambouillet, Pierre. ‘L’authenticité du verset des trois témoins célestes.’ Revue des sciences ecclésiastiques 58 (1888): 230–244.Google Scholar
Rappolt, Johann Jakob. Dissertatio academica, de authoritate canonica dicti Johannis I. Epist. V. 7. de tribus in coelo testibus. Tübingen: Widow of Roebel, 1745.Google Scholar
Reader, Thomas. The Three Witnesses in Heaven: Or the Divine Inspiration of I. John v. 7. Proved from the Scripture Itself. Taunton: Norris, 1791.Google Scholar
Reed, A. W. ‘John Clement and His Books.’ The Library, Fourth Series, 6 (1926): 329–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reedy, Gerard. The Bible and Reason: Anglicans and Scripture in Late Seventeenth- Century England. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reeve, Anne and Screech, Michael A.. Erasmus’ Annotations on the New Testament: Acts, Romans, I and II Corinthians. Leiden: Brill, 1990.Google Scholar
Reeve, Anne and Screech, Michael A.. Erasmus’ Annotations on the New Testament: Galatians to the Apocalypse. Leiden: Brill, 1993.Google Scholar
Reeves, William, ed. and trans. The Apologies of Justin Martyr, Tertullian, and Minutius Felix. 2 vols. London: W. B. for Churchill, 1709.Google Scholar
Reid, James. Memoirs of the Lives and Writings of Those Eminent Divines, Who Convened in the Famous Assembly at Westminster, in the Seventeenth Century. London: Young, 1811.Google Scholar
Reinhart, Elias Sigismund. Dissertatio Praeliminaris ad intimiora, cum Deo dieque penetralia Socinianae & Socinianizantis scholae, Hoc potissimum exhibitura nunc Argumentum: etiamsi dictitasset nunquam Spiritus S. Certissimam Illam Canonis Graeci Particulam 1. Joh. V, 7: Tres In Celis Unum Sunt; Eandem tamen Concludendi Vim contineri iam in Illustrissimo pariter Commate Matth. XXVIII. vers. 19: Baptizate In Nomen Patris, Filii & Spiritus S. Leipzig: Wittigau, 1666.Google Scholar
Reiser, Marius. ‘Theologie und Kritik. Richard Simon und das Comma Johanneum.’ Studien zum Neuen Testament und seiner Umwelt, Serie A (Aufsätze) 37 (2012): 151–165.Google Scholar
Report from Select Committee on the State of Education; With the Minutes of Evidence, and Index. Ordered, by the House of Commons, to be Printed, 7 August 1834. [London]: [n. p.], 1834.Google Scholar
Reventlow, Henning, Graf. The Authority of the Bible and the Rise of the Modern World. Trans. Bowden, John. Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Rex, Richard. ‘Lady Margaret Beaufort and her Professorship, 1502–1559.’ In Lady Margaret Beaufort and Her Professors of Divinity at Cambridge, 1502–1649. Ed. Collinson, Patrick. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003: 19–56.Google Scholar
Richter, Nicolaus. Stephanum Curcellaeum, in editione originalis Novi Testamenti textus, variantium lectionum, et parallelorum Scripturae locorum, additamentis vestita, ut Socinizantem [...] praeside [...] Joh. Gotlieb Möllero [...] adumbrare instituet. Rostock: Richelius, 1696.Google Scholar
Ridpath, George. An appeal to the Word of God for the Trinity in Unity, or the Godhead of the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost; as asserted in the first article of the Church of England, and the fifth and sixth answers of the Assemblys Catechism, prov’d to be the Scripture-Doctrine of the Trinity. With arguments in Defence of the Controverted Text, 1 John V. 7. of our Translation of Philip. ii. 5, 6, and of Scripture Cousequences [sic]. London: Tookey for Bell and Popping, 1719.Google Scholar
Rietschel, Georg. Lehrbuch der Liturgik. 2 vols. Berlin: Reuther & Reichard, 1900–1909.Google Scholar
Rife, John M. ‘The Antoniades Greek Testament.’ In Prolegomena to the Study of the Lectionary Text of the Gospels. Ed. Colwell, E. C. and Riddle, D. W.. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1933: 57–66.Google Scholar
Robertson, Archibald and Plummer, Alfred, A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on The First Epistle of St Paul to the Corinthians. 2nd ed. Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark, 1914.Google Scholar
[Robinson, John.] A Letter from the Lord Bishop of London, to the Incumbents of All Churches and Chappels in His Diocess, Concerning Their Not Using Any New Forms of Doxology, and the Reading the Common-Prayer at Least Once a Month. London: Motte for Roberts; 2nd ed. Dublin: Sadlier, 1722.Google Scholar
Roffey, Simon. The Medieval Chantry Chapel: An Archaeology. Woodbridge: Boydell, 2007.Google Scholar
Roger, Louis. Dissertationes duae critico-theologicae: Ia De his Joannis Evangelistae verbis: Tres sunt qui testimonium dant in coelo, &c. adversùs Socinianos, nuperosque Criticos. IIa. De Isaiae Prophetiâ: Ecce Virgo concipiet & pariet, & contra Judaeos. Paris: Girin, 1713.Google Scholar
Rogers, Samuel. Recollections of the Table-talk of Samuel Rogers. To Which Is Added Porsoniana. New York: Appleton, 1856.Google Scholar
Ruckman, Peter S. The Christian’s Handbook of Manuscript Evidence. Pensacola: Pensacola Bible Press, 1973.Google Scholar
Rummel, Erika. Erasmus’ Annotations on the New Testament: From Philologist to Theologian. Toronto: Toronto University Press, 1986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rump, Justus Wessel. Commentatio critica ad libros Novi Testamenti in genere. Leipzig: Haeredes Friderici Lanckisii, 1730.Google Scholar
Sánchez, Tomás. Disputationes de sancto matrimonii sacramento. Madrid: Ludovicus Sánchez, 1602–1605.Google Scholar
Sand, Christoph. Interpretationes Paradoxae quatuor evangeliorum: Quibus affixa est dissertatio de Verbo. ‘Cosmopolis’ [Amsterdam]: ‘Apud Libertum Pacificum’, 1669.Google Scholar
Sand, Christoph. Scriptura S. Trinitatis Revelatrix, Authore Hermanno Cingalio. Gouda: Jacobus de Graef, 1678.Google Scholar
Sander, Nicholas. De visibili monarchia ecclesiae, libri octo. Leuven: Reynerus Velpius for John Fowler, 1571.Google Scholar
Sardella, Louis-Pierre. Mgr Eudoxe Irénée Mignot (1842–1918): un évêque français au temps du modernisme. Paris: Éditions du Cerf, 2004.Google Scholar
Saubert, Johannes. Variae lectiones textus graeci evangelii S. Matthaei. Helmstedt: Müller, 1672.Google Scholar
Scacchi, Fortunato, ed. Sacra Biblia Vulgata Editione, translat. ex Hebraeo Sanctis Pagnini, Transl. Romana ex Septuag. & Chaldaicae Paraphrasis Transl. congesta Fratris Fortunati Fanensis Ordinis Erem. S. Augustini Studio & labore. Venice: Pinelli, 1609.Google Scholar
Schaff, Philip. Bibliotheca Symbolica Ecclesiae Universalis. The Creeds of Christendom with a History and Critical Notes. 3 vols. New York: Harper, 1919.Google Scholar
Sherlock, William. A Vindication of the Doctrine of the Holy and Ever Blessed Trinity, and the Incarnation of the Son of God. Occasioned by the Brief Notes on the Creed of St. Athanasius, and the Brief History of the Unitarians, or Socinians, and Containing an Answer to Both. London: Rogers, 1690.Google Scholar
Schmalz[Smalcius], Valentinus. Refutatio thesium, De Sacrosancta unitate Divinae essentiae, & in eadem Sacrosancta personarum Trinitate, a Iacobo Schoppero SS. Theologiae Doctore & professore primario Altorfii anno 1613 propositarum. Cui addita est responsio ad ea, quae Hermannus Ravenspergerus S. Th: Doctor, in Gymnasio Steinfurtensi praeter haec attulit, in scripto, cui titulum fecit: SS. Mysterium unitatis essentiae divinae in personarum Trinitate, duabus sectionibus per Theses & exegeses explicatum, &c. Raków: Sternacius, 1614.Google Scholar
Schmaus, M. ‘Die Texte der Trinitätslehre in den Sententiae des Simon von Tournai.’ Recherches de théologie ancienne et médiévale 4 (1932): 59–72; 187–198; 294–307.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Erasmus and Gerganos, Zacharias, ed. Ἡ Καινὴ Διαθήκη Ἰησοῦ Χριστοῦ. Wittenberg: August Boreck, 1622.Google Scholar
Scholz, Johann Martin Augustin. Biblisch-kritische Reise in Frankreich, der Schweitz, Italien, Palästina und im Archipel. Leipzig: F. Fleischer, 1823.Google Scholar
Scholz, Johann Martin Augustin. ed. Novum Testamentum graece. 2 vols. Leipzig: F. Fleischer, 1830–1836.Google Scholar
Schüller, Volkmar. ‘Samuel Clarke’s annotations in Jacques Rohault’s Traité de Physique, and How They Contributed to Popularising Newton’s Physics.’ In Between Leibniz, Newton, and Kant: Philosophy and Science in the Eighteenth Century. Ed. Lefèvre, Wolfgang. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 2001: 95–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schürer, Emil. Review of Kölling 1893. Theologische Literaturzeitung 9 (1894): 109–110.Google Scholar
Scrivener, Frederick Henry Ambrose, ed. Ἡ Καινὴ Διαθήκη. Novum Testamentum textûs Stephanici A. D. 1550. Accedunt variae lectiones editionum Bezae, Elzeviri, Lachmanni, Tischenendorfii, Tregellesii. Cambridge: Deighton, Bell & Co., 1859.Google Scholar
Scrivener, Frederick Henry Ambrose. A Plain Introduction to the Criticism of the New Testament. London: Deighton, Bell & Co., 1861.Google Scholar
Scrivener, Frederick Henry Ambrose. ed. Ἡ Καινὴ Διαθήκη. Novum Testamentum textûs Stephanici a.d. 1550. Cambridge: Deighton, Bell & Co., 1876.Google Scholar
Scrivener, Frederick Henry Ambrose. The New Testament in the Original Greek According to the Text Followed in the Authorised Version Together with the Variations Adopted in the Revised Version. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1881.Google Scholar
Scrivener, Frederick Henry Ambrose. ed. Ἡ Καινὴ Διαθήκη. Novum Testamentum textûs Stephanici a.d. 1550. Cambridge: Deighton, Bell & Co., 1886.Google Scholar
Scrivener, Frederick Henry Ambrose. ed. The New Testament in the Original Greek According to the Text Followed in the Authorised Version Together with the Variations Adopted in the Revised Version. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1894a.Google Scholar
Scrivener, Frederick Henry Ambrose. A Plain Introduction to the Criticism of the New Testament, 4th ed. 2 vols. London: Bell, 1894b.Google Scholar
Scrivener, Frederick Henry Ambrose. ed. Ἡ Καινὴ Διαθήκη. Novum Testamentum textûs Stephanici, [...] curante F. H. A. Scrivener. [...] Editio quarta ab Eb. Nestle correcta. London: Bell, 1906.Google Scholar
‘Scrutator.’ Review of Pharez 1809. The Watchman, or Theological Inspector 1 (1809): 225–237.Google Scholar
Seager, Nicholas. ‘John Bunyan and Socinianism.’ The Journal of Ecclesiastical History 65 (2014): 580–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seidel Menchi, Silvana. ‘Un’opera misconosciuta di Erasmo? Il trattato pseudo-ciprianico De duplici martyrio.’ Rivista storica italiana 90 (1978): 709–743.Google Scholar
Selden, John. De Synedriis & Praefecturis Iuridicis veterum Ebraeorum liber secundus. London: Flesher, 1653.Google Scholar
[Semler, Johann Salomo.] Review of Whiston 1711–1712. Nachrichten von einer hallischen Bibliothek 4 (1749): 237–254.Google Scholar
Semler, Johann Salomo. Vindiciae plurium praecipuarum lectionum codicis graeci Novi Testamenti adversus Guilielmum Whiston Anglum atque ab eo latas leges criticas. Halle: Gebauer, 1750.Google Scholar
Semler, Johann Salomo. Vorbereitung zur theologischen Hermenevtik, zu weiterer Beförderung des Fleisses angehender Gottesgelerten. 4 vols in 3. Halle: Hemmerde, 1760–1769.Google Scholar
Semler, Johann Salomo. ‘Anmerkung über die lange Fortdauer mancher irrigen Meinungen, über die Stelle 1 Joh. 5, 7.’ Wöchentliche Hallische Anzeigen vom Jahr 1762, 48:761–769; 49:777–782; 50:793–802; 51:809–820.Google Scholar
Semler, Johann Salomo. D. Joh. Sal. Semlers historische und kritische Sammlungen über die so genannten Beweisstellen in der Dogmatik. Erstes Stück. über 1 Joh. 5, 7. Halle: Hemmerde, 1764.Google Scholar
Semler, Johann Salomo. Zum Andenken einer würdigen Frau, Frauen Christina Magdal. Philipp. Semlerin gebornen Döbnerin. Halle: Hendel, 1772.Google Scholar
Servet, Miguel. Sept livres sur les erreurs de la Trinité. Ed. and trans. Bénin, Rolande-Michelle and Gicquel, Marie-Louise. Paris: Honoré Champion, 2008.Google Scholar
Sheehan, Jonathan. The Enlightenment Bible: Translation, Scholarship, Culture. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Simon, Richard. A Critical History of the Old Testament. Trans. Dickinson, Henry. London: Davis, 1682.Google Scholar
Simon, Richard. Histoire critique du texte du Nouveau Testament. Rotterdam: Leers, 1689a.Google Scholar
Simon, Richard. Critical History of the Text of the New Testament. London: Taylor, 1689b.Google Scholar
Simon, Richard. Histoire critique des versions du Nouveau Testament. Rotterdam: Leers, 1690.Google Scholar
Simon, Richard. Histoire critique des principaux commentateurs du Nouveau Testament. Rotterdam: Leers, 1693 [1692].Google Scholar
Simon, Richard, trans. Le Nouveau Testament de nôtre Seigneur Jesus-Christ. 4 vols. Trevoux: Ganeau, 1702.Google Scholar
Simon, Richard. Critique de la bibliothèque des auteurs ecclésiastiques et des prolegomènes de la bible, publiez par M. Elies Du-Pin. 2 vols. Paris: Ganeau, 1730.Google Scholar
Simon, Richard. Critical History of the Text of the New Testament. Trans. Hunwick, Andrew. New Testament Tools, Studies, and Documents 43. Leiden: Brill, 2013.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin. ‘Hobbes on Persons, Authors and Representatives.’ In The Cambridge Companion to Hobbes’s Leviathan. Ed. Springborg, Patricia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007: 157–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[Smalbroke, Richard.] Reflections on the Conduct of Mr. Whiston, in His Revival of the Arian Heresy. London: Childe, 1711.Google Scholar
Smalbroke, Richard. An Enquiry into the Authority of the Primitive Complutensian Edition of the New Testament, as Principally Founded on the Most Ancient Vatican Manuscript; Together with Some Research after That Manuscript. In order to decide the Dispute about 1 John v. 7. In a Letter to the Reverend Mr. Archdeacon Bentley, Master of Trinity-College in Cambridge. London: J. Nicks, 1722.Google Scholar
Smith, Thomas. A Sermon of the Credibility of the Mysteries of the Christian Religion. London: Roycroft, 1675.Google Scholar
Smith, Thomas. Miscellanea, In quibus continentur Responsio ad nuperas D. Simonii in libro super fide Graecorum de dogmate Transsubstantiationis cavillationes. Dissertatio, in qua Integritas & αὐθεντία istius celeberrimi loci 1. Epist. S. Joannis, cap. V. vers. 7. vindicatur. Defensio superioris Dissertationis contra exceptiones D. Simonii in Criticâ historiâ novi Testamenti. Commentarius in secundam S. Petri Apostoli Epistolam. London: S. Smith, 1690.Google Scholar
Snobelen, Stephen D. ‘Caution, Conscience and the Newtonian Reformation: The Public and Private Heresies of Newton, Clarke and Whiston.’ Enlightenment and Dissent 16 (1997): 151–183.Google Scholar
Snobelen, Stephen D. ‘Isaac Newton, Heretic: The Strategies of a Nicodemite.’ The British Journal for the History of Science 32 (1999): 381–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snobelen, Stephen D. ‘“God of Gods, and Lord of Lords”: The Theology of Isaac Newton’s General Scholium to the Principia.’ Osiris, 2nd Series, 16 (2001): 169–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snobelen, Stephen D. ‘William Whiston, Isaac Newton and the Crisis of Publicity.’ Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 35 (2004): 573–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snobelen, Stephen D. ‘Isaac Newton, Socinianism and the “One Supreme God”.’ In Socinianism and Arminianism: Antitrinitarians, Calvinists and Cultural Exchange in Seventeenth-Century Europe. Ed. Mulsow, Martin and Rohls, Jan. Leiden: Brill, 2005a: 241–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snobelen, Stephen D. ‘Socinianism and Newtonianism: The Case of William Whiston.’ In Szczucki 2005b: 373–413.Google Scholar
Snobelen, Stephen D. ‘“To Us There Is But One God, the Father”: Antitrinitarian Textual Criticism in Seventeenth- and Eighteenth-Century England.’ In Hessayon and Keene 2006: 116–136.Google Scholar
Snobelen, Stephen D. ‘Isaac Newton, Heresy Laws and the Persecution of Dissent.’ Enlightenment and Dissent 25 (2009): 204–259.Google Scholar
Sommer, Johann. Refutatio scripti Petri Carolii editi Wittebergae. Ingolstadt [Kraków]: Ravisius, 1582.Google Scholar
Sommer, Johann. Tractatus aliquot Christianae religionis. Ed. Vehe-Glirius, Matthias (Theodosius Schimberg). Ingolstadt [Kraków]: [Rodecki], 1583.Google Scholar
Sotheby’s, . Books from the John Rylands University Library of Manchester. Day of Sale: Thursday 14th April 1988. London: Sotheby’s, 1988.Google Scholar
Souverain, Matthieu. Le Platonisme dévoilé. Cologne [Amsterdam]: Pierre Marteau [Sebastiaan Petzold], 1700.Google Scholar
Sozzini, Fausto. Commentarius in epistolam Iohannis apostoli primam. Raków: Sternacius, 1614.Google Scholar
Sozzini, Fausto. Assertiones theologicae de trino et uno deo, Adversus novos Samosatenicos. 3rd ed. Raków: Sternacius, 1618.Google Scholar
Sozzini, Fausto. Responsio ad libellum Iacobi Wuieki Iesuitae Polonicè editum De Divinitate Filii Dei, & Spiritus sancti. Raków: Sternacius, 1624.Google Scholar
Sparks, Jared, ed. A Collection of Essays and Tracts in Theology. 6 vols. Boston: Everett, 1823–1826.Google Scholar
Sparks, Jared. ‘Sir Isaac Newton’s History of the Text of the Three Heavenly Witnesses.’ The Unitarian Miscellany and Christian Monitor 5 (1824): 292–310.Google Scholar
Spinoza, Baruch. Tractatus Theologico-Politicus. Hamburg [Amsterdam]: Heinrich Künrath [Israel de Paul for Jan Rieuwertsz], 1670.Google Scholar
Spufford, Margaret. ‘Literacy, Trade and Religion in the Commercial Centres of Europe.’ In A Miracle Mirrored: The Dutch Republic in European Perspective. Ed. Davids, Karel and Lucassen, Jan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995: 229–283.Google Scholar
Statutes of the Realm. [London]: [Eyre and Strahan], 1810–1828.Google Scholar
Steuber, Johannes. Exegesis dicti 1 Jo. V, 7. Tres sunt, qui testimonium perhibent in coelo. Marburg: Chemlin, 1640.Google Scholar
Stewart, Larry. ‘Seeing Through the Scholium: Religion and Reading Newton in the Eighteenth Century.’ History of Science 34 (1996): 123–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stillingfleet, Edward. A Discourse in Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity. 2nd ed. London: Henry Mortlock, 1697.Google Scholar
Stockhausen, Anette von. ‘Die pseud-athanasianische Disputatio contra Arium. Eine Auseinandersetzung mit “arianischer” Theologie in Dialogform.’ In Von Arius zum Athanasianum. Studien zur Edition der ‘Athanasius Werke’. Ed. von Stockhausen, Anette and Brennecke, Hanns Christof. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2010: 133–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stunica, Jacobus Lopis [Diego Lopez de Zúñiga]. Annotationes Iacobi Lopidis Stunicae contra Erasmum Roterodamum in defensionem tralationis novi testamenti. Alcalá: Arnald Guillén de Brocar, 1520.Google Scholar
Sullivan, William L. ‘The Three Heavenly Witnesses.’ The New York Review 2 (1906–1907): 175–188.Google Scholar
Swift, Jonathan. Mr. C—ns’s Discourse of Free-Thinking, Put into Plain English, by Way of Abstract, for the Use of the Poor. By a Friend of the Author. London: Morphew, 1713.Google Scholar
Swift, Jonathan. Three Sermons: I. On Mutual Subjection. II. On Conscience. III. On the Trinity. London: Dodsley, 1744.Google Scholar
Swift, Jonathan. The Works of Dr Jonathan Swift. 8 vols. Edinburgh and Glasgow: Kincaid and Donaldson, 1756.Google Scholar
Swift, Jonathan. ‘Original Letters of Dean Swift to Dr Windar.’ The Gentleman’s Magazine 44 (1794): 625–626.Google Scholar
[Sykes, Arthur Ashley.] An Humble Apology for St. Paul, and the Other Apostles; or, a Vindication of Them and Their Doxologies from the Charge of Heresy. By Cornelius Paets. London: Roberts, 1719a.Google Scholar
Sykes, Arthur Ashley. A Modest Plea for the Baptismal and Scripture-Notion of the Trinity. Wherein the Schemes of the Reverend Dr Bennet and Dr Clarke Are Compared. London: Knapton, 1719b.Google Scholar
Sykes, Norman. Church and State in England in the XVIIIth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1934.Google Scholar
Szczucki, Lech, ed. Faustus Socinus and His Heritage. Kraków: Polish Academy of Arts and Sciences, 2005.Google Scholar
Tejero, Emilia Fernández and Marcos, Natalio Fernández. ‘Scriptural Interpretation in Renaissance Spain.’ In Hebrew Bible-Old Testament. The History of its Interpretation. II: From the Renaissance to the Enlightenment. Ed. Saebø, Magne. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 2008: 231–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tennent, James Emerson. The History of Modern Greece. 2 vols. London: Colburn and Bentley, 1830.Google Scholar
Text und Textwert. Text und Textwert der griechischen Handschriften des Neuen Testaments. Ed. Aland, Kurt et al. Berlin: De Gruyter, 1987–2013.Google Scholar
Thiele, Walter, ed. Vetus Latina: die Reste der altlateinischen Bibel 26/1, Epistulae Catholicae. Freiburg i. B.: Herder, 1956–1969.Google Scholar
Thuesen, Peter Johannes. ‘Some Scripture Is Inspired by God: Late- Nineteenth-Century Protestants and the Demise of a Common Bible.’ Church History 65 (1996): 609–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Timpanaro, Sebastiano. The Genesis of Lachmann’s Method. Ed. and trans. Most, Glenn W.. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Tischendorf, Constantin von. Novum Testamentum graece. Ad antiquos testes. Paris: Didot, 1842a.Google Scholar
Tischendorf, Constantin von. Ἡ Καινὴ Διαθήκη. Novum Testamentum graece et latine. In antiquis testibus textum versionis vulgatae latinae indagavit lectioneque variantes Stephani et Griesbachii notavit V. S. Venerabili Jager in consilium adhibito Constantinus Tischendorf. Paris: Didot, 1842b.Google Scholar
Tischendorf, Constantin von. ‘Theologie.’ Neue Jenaische allgemeine Literatur-Zeitung 2 (1843): 326–334.Google Scholar
Tischendorf, Constantin von. Novum Testamentum latine interprete Hieronymo. Ex celeberrimo codice Amiatino omnium et antiquissimo et praestantissimo. Leipzig: Avenarius, 1850.Google Scholar
Tischendorf, Constantin von. Novum Testamentum graece. Ad antiquos testes. 7th ed. 2 vols. Leipzig: Winter, 1859.Google Scholar
Tischendorf, Constantin von. Novum Testamentum graece. Ad antiquissimos testes. 8th ed. Leipzig: Hinrichs, 1872–1894.Google Scholar
Titelmans, François. In omnes epistolas apostolicas [...] Elucidatio, una cum Textu suo loco ad marginem translato. Paris: [n. p.], 1543.Google Scholar
Tnyeuwe Testament al geheel. Antwerp: Forsterman, 1531.Google Scholar
Toland, John. Christianity Not Mysterious, or, A Treatise Shewing, That There Is Nothing in the Gospel Contrary to Reason, Nor Above It: And That No Christian Doctrine Can Be Properly Call’d a Mystery. London: [n. p.], 1696.Google Scholar
Tollius, Jacob. Epistolae itinerariae. Ed. Henninius, H. C.. Amsterdam: Halm for van Oosterwijk, 1700.Google Scholar
Toulmin, Joshua, ed. A Dialogue between a Dutch Protestant, and a Franciscan Friar of Dort. London: J. Johnson, 1784.Google Scholar
Tournoy, Gilbert, Roegiers, Jan and Coppens, Christiaan, ed. Vives te Leuven. Leuven: Leuven University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Tracy, James D. ‘Erasmus and the Arians: Remarks on the Consensus Ecclesiae.’ The Catholic Historical Review 67 (1981): 1–10.Google Scholar
Trapman, Johannes. ‘Erasmus on Lying and Simulation.’ In On the Edge of Truth and Honesty. Ed. van Houdt, Toon, de Jong, Jan L., Kwak, Zoran, Spies, Marijke and van Vaeck, Marc. Leiden: Brill, 2002: 33–46.Google Scholar
Travis, George. Letters to Edward Gibbon [...] In Defence of the Authenticity of the Seventh Verse, of the Fifth Chapter, of the First Epistle of St. John. London: Rivington, 1784.Google Scholar
Tregelles, Samuel Prideaux. An Account of the Printed Text of the Greek New Testament. London: Bagster, 1854.Google Scholar
Tremellius, Immanuel, ed. and trans. Ἡ Καινὴ Διαθήκη. Testamentum novum. דיתיקא חדתא. Est autem interpretatio Syriaca Noui Testamenti, Hebraeis typis descripta, plerisque etiam locis emendata. Eadem latino sermone reddita. Geneva: H. Estienne, 1569.Google Scholar
Trevor-Roper, Hugh R. ‘Gibbon and the Publication of The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire 1776–1976.’ Journal of Law and Economics 19 (1976): 489–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Triglandus, Jacobus. Disputatio theologica de tribus in coelo testibus. 5 parts. Leiden: Elzevier, 1693–1696.Google Scholar
Trost, Martin, ed. Divi Johannis apostoli et evangelistae epistola catholica prima Syriace. Köthen: [Fürstliche Druckerei], 1621.Google Scholar
Trumpp, Ernst. ‘Das Taufbuch der Aethiopischen Kirche. Aethiopisch und Deutsch.’ Abhandlungen der philosophisch-philologischen Classe der Königlich Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften 14 no. 3 (1878): 147–183.Google Scholar
Turchetti, Mario. ‘Une question mal posée: Érasme et la tolérance. L’idée de sygkatabasis.’ Bibliothèque d’Humanisme et Renaissance 53 (1991): 379–395.Google Scholar
Turnbull, Joseph. The Seven Epistles of James, Peter, John and June, and the Revelation, Translated from the Original Greek; with Critical Notes, and a Dissertation on the Authenticity of I John V. 7, 8, Respecting the Three Heavenly Witnesses. London: Bagster, 1858.Google Scholar
Turner, Cuthbert Hamilton. The Early Printed Editions of the Greek Testament. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1924.Google Scholar
Turrettin, François. Institutio theologiae elencticae. 3 vols. Geneva: Samuel de Tournes, 1679–1686.Google Scholar
Turrettin, François. De necessaria secessione nostra ab Ecclesia romana, et Impossibili cum Eâ syncretismo, disputationes. 2nd ed. Geneva: Samuel de Tournes, 1687.Google Scholar
Turvasi, Francesco. The Condemnation of Alfred Loisy and the Historical Method. Rome: Edizioni di Storia e Letteratura, 1979.Google Scholar
Twells, Leonard. A Critical Examination of the Late New Text and Version of the New Testament. 3 vols. London: Gosling, 1731–1732.Google Scholar
Tyndale, William. The Exposition of the Fyrst Epistle of Seynt Jhon with a Prologge Before It. [Antwerp]: [De Keyser], September 1531.Google Scholar
Tyndale, William, trans. The newe Testament / dylygently corrected and compared with the Greke by Willyam Tindale. [Antwerp]: [De Keyser], November 1534.Google Scholar
Tyndale, William, trans. The New Testament Yet Once Again Corrected by William Tyndale. Antwerp: De Keyser for van der Haghen, 1535.Google Scholar
Ussher, James. A Body of Divinitie. London: M. F. for Thomas Downes and George Badger, 1645.Google Scholar
Ussher, James. The Whole Works. Ed. Elrington, Charles Richard (vols. 1–15) and Todd, J. H. (vols. 15–16). Dublin: Hodges and Smith, 1847–1864.Google Scholar
Vacant, Jean-Michel-Alfred. ‘Revue theologique.’ La controverse et le contemporain, n. s. 13 (1888): 125–141, 426–445.Google Scholar
Vaccari, Alberto. Institutiones Biblicae scholis accomodatae. 3 vols. Rome: Pontificio Istituto Biblico, 1925–1929.Google Scholar
Van der Erven, Gillis, trans. Het niewe Testament, dat is, het nievve verbont onses Heeren Iesu Christi, In Nederduytsch na der Grieckscher waerheyt ouergheset. [Emden]: [Van der Erven], 1561.Google Scholar
Van Gemert, Guillaume. ‘Die niederländischen Texte Sebastian Francks.’ In Editionsdesiderate zur Frühen Neuzeit. Ed. Roloff, H.-G.. 2 vols. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 1997: 669–685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Poll-van de Lisdonk, Miekske. ‘Erasmus’ Annotations on 1. Cor. 15, 51: “We shall indeed all rise” or “We shall not all sleep”.’ In Ultima Aetas. Time, Tense and Transience in the Ancient World. Ed. Kroon, Caroline and den Hengst, Daan. Amsterdam: VU Press, 2000: 163–174.Google Scholar
Vasileiadis, Pavlos D. ‘Comma Johanneum (1 John 5:7, 8): A Study on Its Interpolation and Removal from the Biblical Text.’ MTheol thesis, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 2013.Google Scholar
‘Vindex.’ ‘Zur Frage von der Authenticität der Vulgata.’ Historisch-politische Blätter für das katholische Deutschland 124 (1899): 102–114.Google Scholar
Völkel, Johann. De vera religione libri quinque: quibus praefixus est Iohannis Crellii Franci liber De deo et eius attributis, ita ut unum cum illis opus constituat. Raków: Sternacius, 1630.Google Scholar
Vossius, Gerard. De theologia gentili et physiologia christiana; sive de origine ac progressu idololatriae. 3 vols. Amsterdam: Blaauw, 1641.Google Scholar
Votes of Parliament Touching the Book Commonly Called the Racovian Catechism. London: John Field, 1652.Google Scholar
Wagner, Johann Ehrenfried. Integritas commatis VII. cap. V. primae Ioannis epistolae ab impugnationibus novatoris cujusdam denuo vindicata. Chemnitz: Stoessel, 1740.Google Scholar
Waite, D. A. ‘Most Frequent Questions We’ve Been Asked: What Is the Evidence Supporting 1 John 5:7?’ The Dean Burgon News 1/5 (1979): 1–3.Google Scholar
Wallace, Daniel B. ‘The Majority Text Theory: History, Methods, and Critique.’ In The Text of the New Testament in Contemporary Research. Ed. Ehrman, Bart D. and Holmes, Michael W.. 2nd ed. Leiden: Brill, 2013: 711–744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walters, Alice N. ‘Ephemeral Events: English Broadsides of Early Eighteenth- Century Solar Eclipses.’ History of Science 37 (1999): 1–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, Valentine. A Brief Statement of Facts, Designed for the Information of Those Who from Good Motives Enquire, What Are These Methodists? 2nd ed. Edinburgh: Stewart for Nichols and Blanshard, 1815.Google Scholar
Warfield, Benjamin B. The Printing of the Westminster Confession. Philadelphia: MacCalla, 1901.Google Scholar
Waterland, Daniel. A Vindication of Christ’s Divinity: Being a Defense of Some Queries, Relating to Dr. Clarke’s Scheme of the H. Trinity. Cambridge: Crownfield, 1719.Google Scholar
[Welchman, Edward.] Concentus veterum, sive appendix ad [IX. articulos Ecclesiae Anglicanae. Oxford: Sheldonian Theatre, 1713.Google Scholar
Welchman, Edward. Dr. Clarke’s Scripture Doctrine of the Trinity Examined. Oxford: Lichfield, 1714.Google Scholar
Welchman, Edward. A Conference with an Arian, Occasion’d by Mr. Whiston’s Reply to the Right Honourable the Earl of Nottingham. Oxford: Lichfield, 1721.Google Scholar
Wells, Edward. An Help for the More Easy and Clear Understanding of the Holy Scriptures. 11 vols. Oxford: Sheldonian Theatre. 1709–1719.Google Scholar
Wells, Edward. Remarks on Dr Clarke’s Introduction to His Scripture-doctrin of the Trinity. Oxford: Peisley, 1713.Google Scholar
Wenkebach, Ernst August. John Clement: ein englischer Humanist und Arzt des sechzehnten Jahrhunderts. Leipzig: Barth, 1925.Google Scholar
Wesley, John. A Sermon on 1st John, v. 7. Dublin: William Kidd for William Whitestone, 1775.Google Scholar
Wesley, John. The Sunday Service of the Methodists in North America. With Other Occasional Services. London: [n. p.], 1784.Google Scholar
Wesley, John. The Journal of the Rev. John Wesley. Ed. Curnock, Nehemiah and Telford, John. 8 vols. London: Kelly, 1909–1916.Google Scholar
Westfall, Richard S. Never at Rest: A Biography of Isaac Newton. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Westfall, Richard S. ‘Newton’s Theological Manuscripts.’ In Contemporary Newtonian Research. Ed. Bechler, Zev. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1982: 129–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wettstein, Jakob and Smith, George. Catalogus librorum [...] Joannis Clerici. Amsterdam: Wettstein and Smith, 1735.Google Scholar
Wettstein, Johann Jakob. Prolegomena ad Novi Testamenti Graeci editionem accuratissimam. Amsterdam: Wetstein and Smith, 1730.Google Scholar
Wettstein, Johann Jakob. Novum Testamentum Graecum. 2 vols. Amsterdam: Dommer, 1751–1752.Google Scholar
Wheatly, Charles. The Church of England Man’s Companion. Oxford: Sheldonian Theatre, 1710.Google Scholar
Whiston, William. An Historical Preface to Primitive Christianity Reviv’d. London: Whiston, 1711a.Google Scholar
Whiston, William. An Account of the Convocation’s Proceedings with Relation to Mr. Whiston. London: Whiston, 1711b.Google Scholar
Whiston, William. Mr. Whiston’s Letter of Thanks to the Right Reverend the Lord Bishop of London, for His Late Letter to His Clergy against the Use of New Forms of Doxology. London: Senex, 1719a.Google Scholar
Whiston, William. Mr. Whiston’s Second Letter to the Right Reverend the Lord Bishop of London, Concerning the Primitive Doxologies. 2nd ed. London: Senex, 1719b.Google Scholar
Whiston, William. Mr. Whiston’s Account of Dr. Sacheverell’s Proceedings in Order to Exclude Him from St. Andrew’s Church in Holborn. London: Senex, 1719c.Google Scholar
Whiston, William. A Commentary on the Three Catholick Epistoles of St. John. London: Senex, 1719d.Google Scholar
Whiston, William. Mr Whiston’s Scheme of the Solar System Epitomis’d. To Which Is Annex’d. A Translation of Part of Ye General Scholium at Ye Second Edition of Sir Isaac Newton’s Principia Concerning God. London: Senex, c. 1721.Google Scholar
Whiston, William. A Collection of Authentick Records Belonging to the Old and New Testament. 2 vols. London: Whiston, 1727–1728.Google Scholar
Whiston, William. Historical Memoirs of the Life of Dr. Samuel Clarke. 2nd ed. London: Gyles, 1730.Google Scholar
Whiston, William. Athanasian Forgeries, Impositions, and Interpolations. London: Noon, 1736.Google Scholar
Whiston, William. trans. Mr. Whiston’s Primitive New Testament. Stamford and London: Whiston, 1745.Google Scholar
Whiston, William. Sacred History of the Old and New Testament. 6 vols. London: Whiston, 1745–1746.Google Scholar
Whiston, William. Memoirs of the Life and Writings of Mr. William Whiston. 3 vols. London: Whiston and Bishop, 1749–1750.Google Scholar
Whitby, Daniel. Examen Variantium Lectionum Johannis Millii, S. T. P. in Novum Testamentum. London: Bowyer, 1710.Google Scholar
White, James R. The King James Only Controversy: Can You Trust the Modern Translations? 2nd ed. Minneapolis: Bethany House, 2009.Google Scholar
Widmannstetter, Johann Albrecht and Postel, Claude, ed. Liber sacrosancti evangelii de Iesu Christo Domino & Deo nostro. Vienna: Michael Zimmerman, 1555.Google Scholar
Wigand, Johannes. De Deo, contra Arianos novos, nuper in Polonia exortos. [Frankfurt/Main]: Peter Braubach, 1566.Google Scholar
Wilbur, Earl Morse. A History of Unitarianism. 2 vols. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1945–1952.Google Scholar
Wiles, Maurice. Archetypal Heresy: Arianism Through the Centuries. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Wiles, Maurice. Review of Pfizenmaier 1997. The Journal of Ecclesiastical History 50 (1999): 389–390.Google Scholar
Wilhelmi, Peter Sigmund. Dissertationum-theologicarum octava de genuitate loci 1. Ioh. v. 7. Bern: Officina typographica Reipublicae Bernensis, 1715.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, Robert J. Orientalism, Aramaic and Kabbalah in the Catholic Reformation. The First Printing of the Syriac New Testament. Leiden: Brill, 2007a.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkinson, Robert J. The Kabbalistic Scholars of the Antwerp Polyglot Bible. Leiden: Brill, 2007b.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Harold H. Dean Swift’s Library. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1932.Google Scholar
Wiseman, Nicholas Patrick. Two Letters on Some Parts of the Controversy Concerning 1. John V. 7. Rome: Salviucci, 1835.Google Scholar
Wordsworth, Christopher, ed. The New Testament of Our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ. 2 vols. London: Rivington, 1866.Google Scholar
Wordsworth, John, White, Henry J. and Sparks, H. F. D., ed. Nouum Testamentum Domini nostri Iesu Christi latine secundum editionem Sancti Hieronymi ad codicum manuscriptorum fidem. 3 vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1889–1954.Google Scholar
Wouters, Martinus. Dilucidatio selectarum S. Scripturae quaestionum. 6 vols. Leuven: Van Overbeke, 1753–1758.Google Scholar
Wujek, Jakub. Nowy Testament Pana naszego Iesusa Christusa. Z nowu z Laćińskiego y z Gręckiego na Polskie. Kraków: Piotrkowczyk, 1593.Google Scholar
Zegers, Niklaas. Epanorthotes. Castigationes in Novum Testamentum. Cologne: Birckmann, 1555.Google Scholar
Zwick, Johannes, ed. Novum Testamentum omne latina versione, oppositum aeditioni uulgari siue Germanice, in usus studiosorum uulgatum. Das gantz Neüw Testament zu Teütsch dem Latinen entgägen gesetzt. Zürich: Froschauer, 1535.Google Scholar
Zwingli, Huldrych. In plerosque Novi Testamenti libros, quorum elenchum post Praefationem & Indicem reperies, Annotationes ex ipsius ore exceptae per Leonem Iudae. Zürich: Froschauer, 1581.Google Scholar
Zwingli, Huldrych. Opera. Ed. Schuler, Melchior and Schulthess, Johann. 8 vols. Zürich: Schulthess, 1828–1842.Google Scholar