Abramson, C. M., The End Game: How Inequality Shapes Our Final Years (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

ACAS, The Right to Request Flexible Working: An ACAS Guide (UK: ACAS, 2014).Google Scholar

Adamitis, E. M., ‘Appearance Matters: A Proposal to Prohibit Appearance Discrimination in Employment’, Washington Law Review 75 (2000), 195–223.Google Scholar

Adams, L., McAndrew, F., and Winterbotham, M., Pregnancy Discrimination at Work: A Survey of Women (EOC, 2005).Google Scholar

Adams, S. J. and Neumark, D., ‘Age Discrimination in U.S. Labor Markets: A Review of the Evidence’, in Rodgers, W. M., Bluestein, E. J., and Heldrich, J. J. (eds.), Handbook on the Economics of Discrimination (Edward Elgar, 2006).Google Scholar

Age UK, Grey Matters – A Survey of Ageism across Europe (Age UK, 2011).Google Scholar

Akel, D., Boozer, C., Bigdeli, T., Huyck, M., Fernandez, M., Steier, C., Frazier, L., and Dykes, S., 2012 Mother’s Day Report: Women and the Workforce – Challenges and Opportunities Facing Women as They Age (Older Women’s League, 2012).Google Scholar

Alakeson, V., Childcare: Failing to Meet the Needs of Working Parents (Resolution Foundation, 2011).Google Scholar

Alakeson, V. and Hurrell, A., Counting the Costs of Childcare (Resolution Foundation, 2012).Google Scholar

Angel, J. L., Jiménez, M. A., and Angel, R. J., ‘The Economic Consequences of Widowhood for Older Minority Women’, The Gerontologist 47:2 (2007), 224–234.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Angel, J. L., Prickett, K. C., and Angel, R. J., ‘Retirement Security for Black, Non-Hispanic White, and Mexican-Origin Women’, Journal of Women, Politics & Policy 35 (2014), 222–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Antonucci, T. C., Blieszner, R., and Denmark, F., ‘Psychological Perspectives on Older Women’, in Landrine, H. and Russo, N. F. (eds.), Handbook of Diversity in Feminist Psychology (Springer, 2010).Google Scholar

Appelbaum, E., ‘Paid Sick Days in Connecticut Not a Burden for Employers’, Center for Economic and Policy Research (2014). http://cepr.net/publications/op-eds-columns/paid-sick-days-in-connecticut-not-a-burden-for-employers.Google Scholar

Appelbaum, E. and Milkman, R., ‘Paid Family Leave Pays Off in California’, Harvard Business Review (2011). https://hbr.org/2011/01/paid-family-leave-pays-off-in/.Google Scholar

Bagenstos, S. R., ‘The Structural Turn and the Limits of Antidiscrimination Law’, California Law Review 94 (2006), 1–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baker, C. and Cracknell, R., Women in Public Life, the Professions and the Boardroom (House of Commons Library, 2013).Google Scholar

Bakst, D. and Taubman, P., ‘From the Great Depression to the Great Recession: Advancing Women’s Economic Security through Tough Economic Times and Beyond’, Women’s Rights Law Reporter 32 (2010), 25–44.Google Scholar

Bartlett, K. T., ‘Making Good on Good Intentions: The Critical Role of Motivation in Reducing Implicit Workplace Discrimination’, Virginia Law Review 95 (2009), 1895–1904.Google Scholar

Beede, D., Julian, T., Langdon, D., McKittrick, G., Khan, B., and Doms, M., Women in STEM: A Gender Gap to Innovation (US Department of Commerce, 2011).Google Scholar

Begum, F. A., Ageing, Discrimination and Older Women’s Human Rights from the Perspectives of CEDAW Convention (UN CEDAW Committee, 2008).Google Scholar

Behrendt, C. and Woodall, J., ‘Pensions and Other Social Security Income Transfers’, in Berg, J. (ed.), Labour Markets, Institutions and Inequality (Edward Elgar, 2015).Google Scholar

Bell, M., ‘Achieving the Objectives of the Part-Time Work Directive? Revisiting the Part-Time Workers Regulations’, Industrial Law Journal 40:3 (2011), 254–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ben-Galim, D. and Silim, A., The Sandwich Generation: Older Women Balancing Work and Care (Institute for Public Policy Research, 2013).Google Scholar

Berg, J., ‘Labour Market Institutions’, in Berg, J. (ed.), Labour Markets, Institutions and Inequality (Edward Elgar, 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bernhardt, A., ‘Labor Standards and the Reorganization of Work: Gaps in Data and Research’, IRLE Working Paper #100–4, U.C. Berkeley (2014).Google Scholar

Berthoud, R. and Blekesaune, M., ‘Persistent Employment Disadvantage’, Department for Work and Pensions Research Report No. 416 (2007).Google Scholar

Best, R. K., Edelman, L. B., Krieger, L. H., and Eliason, S. R., ‘Multiple Disadvantages: An Empirical Test of Intersectionality Theory in EEO Litigation’, Law & Society Review 45 (2011), 991–1025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bettio, F. and Verashchagina, A., Gender Segregation in the Labour Market Root Causes, Implications and Policy Responses in the EU (European Commission, 2009).Google Scholar

Bisom-Rapp, S., ‘Bulletproofing the Workplace: Symbol and Substance in Employment Discrimination Law Practice’, Florida State University Law Review 26 (1999), 959–1041.Google Scholar

Bisom-Rapp, S., ‘Learning from Troubled Times: Pursuing Equality Outside an Anti-Discrimination Law Frame by Rethinking the Promotion of Safe Work during the Bush Administration’, University of San Francisco Law Review 45 (2011), 603–619.Google Scholar

Bisom-Rapp, S., Frazer, A., and Sargeant, M., ‘Decent Work, Older Workers, and Vulnerability in the Economic Recession: A Comparative Study of Australia, the United Kingdom, and the United States’, Employment Rights and Employment Policy Journal 15:101 (2011), 43.Google Scholar

Bisom-Rapp, S. and Sargeant, M., ‘Diverging Doctrine, Converging Outcomes: Evaluating Age Discrimination Law in the United Kingdom and the United States’, Loyola University Chicago Law Journal 44 (2013), 717–770.Google Scholar

Bisom-Rapp, S. and Sargeant, M., ‘It’s Complicated: Age, Gender, and Lifetime Discrimination against Working Women – The United States and the U.K. as Examples’, Elder Law Journal 22 (2014), 1–110.Google Scholar

Blackwell, L. and Guinea-Martin, D., Occupational Segregation by Sex and Ethnicity in England and Wales, 1991 to 2001 (Office for National Statistics, 2005).Google Scholar

Blaine, B. E., Understanding the Psychology of Diversity (Sage Publishing, 2013).Google Scholar

Blair-Loy, M., Pecenco, L., and Cech, E., The Persistence of Male Power and Prestige in the Professions: Report on the Professions of Law, Medicine, and Science & Engineering (Center for Research on Gender in the Professions, 2013).Google Scholar

Blanpain, R., Bisom-Rapp, S., Corbett, W. R., Josephs, H. K., and Zimmer, M. J., The Global Workplace (2nd ed., Aspen/Wolters Kluwer, 2012).Google Scholar

Blau, F. D., Brummund, P., and Liu, A. Yung-Hsu, ‘Trends in Occupational Segregation by Gender – 1970–2009: Adjusting for the Impact of Changes in the Occupational Coding System 27’, IZA Discussion Paper Series (April 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blau, F. D. and Kahn, L. M., ‘Female Labor Supply: Why Is the US Falling Behind?’, Discussion Paper Series, German Institute for the Study of Labor No. 7140 (2013).Google Scholar

Bohan, M., Combating Gender Stereotypes in Education (Steering Committee for Equality between Women & Men, Council of Europe, 2011).Google Scholar

Bornstein, S., ‘The Law of Gender Stereotyping and the Work-Family Conflicts of Men’, Hastings Law Journal 63 (2012), 1297−1344.Google Scholar

Bornstein, S., ‘Work, Family, and Discrimination at the Bottom of the Ladder’, Georgetown Journal on Poverty Law & Policy 19 (2012), 1−42.Google Scholar

Botcherby, S. and Buckner, L., Women in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics: From Classroom to Boardroom – UK Statistics 2012 (WISE, 2012).Google Scholar

Boushey, H. and Glynn, S. J., There Are Significant Costs to Replacing Employees (Center for American Progress, 2012).Google Scholar

Branson, D. M., ‘Initiatives to Place Women on Corporate Boards of Directors – A Global Snapshot’, Journal of Corporation Law 37:4 (2012), 793−814.Google Scholar

Brewer, M. and Wren-Lewis, L., Why Did Britain’s Households Get Richer? Decomposing UK Household Income Growth between 1968 and 2008–09 (Resolution Foundation, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Budig, M. J. and England, P., ‘The Wage Penalty for Motherhood’, American Sociological Review 66:2 (2001), 204−225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Butrica, B. A. and Smith, K. E., ‘The Retirement Prospects of Divorced Women’, Social Security Bulletin 72:1 (February 2012), 23−36.Google ScholarPubMed

Cabrelli, D., Employment Law in Context (Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Campbell, N. D., Our Moment: An Economic Agenda for Women and Families (National Women’s Law Center, 2015).Google Scholar

Canetto, S. S., ‘Older Adult Women: Issues, Resources, and Challenges’, in Unger, R. K. (ed.), Handbook of Psychology of Women and Gender (Wiley, 2001).Google Scholar

Cantalupo, N. C., ‘Comparing Single-Sex and Reformed Coeducation: A Constitutional Analysis’, San Diego Law Review 49 (2012), 725–790.Google Scholar

Cappelli, P. H. and Keller, J. R., ‘A Study on the Extent and Potential Causes of Alternative Employment Arrangements’, Industrial and Labor Relations Review 66 (2013), 874–901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carers UK, Alone and Caring (Carers UK, 2015).Google Scholar

Carers UK, Facts about Carers 2012 (Carers UK, 2012).Google Scholar

Carers UK, It Could Be You: A Report on the Chances of Becoming a Carer (Carers UK, 2001).Google Scholar

Carles, I. and Jubany-Baucells, O. (eds.), Genderace: The Use of Race Antidiscrimination Laws – Gender and Citizenship in a Multicultural Context (European Commission, 2010).Google Scholar

Catalyst, Pyramid: Women in S&P 500 Companies (New York: Catalyst, 2015).Google Scholar

Cech, E. and Blair-Loy, M., ‘Consequences of Flexibility Stigma among Academic Scientists and Engineers’, Work and Occupations 41 (2014), 86–110 at 86, 105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Center for Law and Social Policy, Tackling Unstable and Unpredictable Work Schedules (Center for Law and Social Policy, 2014).Google Scholar

Chamallas, M., ‘Deepening the Legal Understanding of Bias: On Devaluation and Biased Prototypes’, Southern California Law Review 74 (2001), 747–806.Google Scholar

Chanfreau, J., Gowland, S., Lancaster, Z., Poole, E., Tipping, S., and Toomseet, M., Maternity and Paternity Rights and Women Returners Survey 2009–10 (Department for Work and Pensions, 2011).Google Scholar

CIPD, ‘Zero Hours Contracts: Myth and Reality’, Research Report (November 2013).Google Scholar

Clegg, R., Interpreting Labour Market Statistics (Office for National Statistics, 2012).Google Scholar

Clermont, K. M. and Schwab, S. J., ‘Employment Discrimination Plaintiffs in Federal Court: From Bad to Worse?’ Harvard Law & Policy Review 3 (2009), 103–132.Google Scholar

Coates, D., ‘The UK: Less a Liberal Market Economy, More a Post-Imperial One’, Capital & Class 38 (2014), 171–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cohany, Sharon, ‘US Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, “Ranks of Discouraged Workers and Others Marginally Attached to the Labor Force Rise during Recession”’, Issues in Labor Statistics 09–04:1 (2009), 1–3.Google Scholar

The Commission on Older Women, Interim Report (2013),Google Scholar

Conglianese, C. and D’Ambrosio, J., ‘Policymaking under Pressure: The Perils of Incremental Responses to Climate Change’, Connecticut Law Review 40 (2008), 1411–1429.Google Scholar

Connolly, M. and Gregory, M., ‘Moving Down: Women’s Part-Time Work and Occupational Change in Britain 1991–2001’, The Economic Journal 118 (2008), F52–F76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Connolly, M. and Gregory, M., ‘The Part-Time Pay Penalty: Earnings Trajectories of British Women’, Oxford Economic Papers 1–22 61:S1 (2009), i76–i97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Correll, S. J. et al., ‘Getting a Job: Is There a Motherhood Penalty?’, American Journal of Sociology 112 (2007), 1297–1339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cox, J., ‘Pregnancy as “Disability” and the Amended Americans with Disabilities Act’, Boston College Law Review 53 (2012), 443–487.Google Scholar

Crenshaw, K., ‘Demarginalizing the Intersection between Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Anti-Discrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Anti-Racist Politics’, University of Chicago Legal Forum 1989 (1989), 139–167.Google Scholar

Crocette, S. F., ‘Considering Hybrid Sex and Age Discrimination Claims by Women: Examining Approaches to Pleading and Analysis’, Golden Gate University Law Review 28 (1998), 115–175.Google Scholar

Crowley, N., A Policy Response to Gender Perceptions (European Institute for Gender Equality, 2014).Google Scholar

Davies, R. and Pierre, G., ‘The Family Gap in Pay in Europe: A Cross-Country Study’, Labour Economics 12:4 (2005), 469–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davies Review Annual Report, ‘Women on Boards’ (2015).Google Scholar

Declercq, E. R., Sakala, C., Corry, M. P., Applebaum, S., and Herrlich, A., ‘Listening to Mothers III: New Mothers Speak Out’, Report of National Surveys of Women’s Childbearing Experiences (2013).Google Scholar

Deo, M., ‘The Ugly Truth About Legal Academia’, Brooklyn Law Review 80 (2015), 943–1014.Google Scholar

Department for Work and Pensions, Security in Retirement: Towards a New Pensions System (Department for Work and Pensions, 2006).Google Scholar

DeRigne, L. and Ferrante, S., ‘The Sandwich Generation: A Review of the Literature’, Florida Public Health Review 9 (2012), 95–104.Google Scholar

DeSilver, D., Rising Cost of Childcare May Help Explain Recent Increase in Stay-at-Home Moms (Pew Research Center, 2014).Google Scholar

DeWitt, L., Research Note #1: The Origins of the Three-Legged Stool Metaphor for Social Security (SSA Historian’s Office, 1996).Google Scholar

Dhir, A. A., Challenging Boardroom Homogeneity (Cambridge University Press, 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Diver, C. S., ‘Policymaking Paradigms in Administrative Law’, Harvard Law Review 95 (1981), 393–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dowling, D. C., ‘International HR Best Practice Tips: Spring 2010’, International Human Resources Journal 19:2 (2010), 1–4.Google Scholar

Dubay, L., Moylan, C., and Oliver, T. R., ‘Advancing toward Universal Coverage: Are States Able to Take the Lead?’, Journal of Health Care Policy and the Law 7 (2004), 1–41.Google Scholar

Dworkin, T. M., Ramaswami, A., and Schipani, C. A., ‘The Role of Networks, Mentors, and the Law in Overcoming Barriers to Organizational Leadership for Women with Children’, Michigan Journal of Gender and Law 20 (2013), 83–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eagly, A. H. and Koenig, A. M., ‘Gender Prejudice: On the Risks of Occupying Incongruent Roles’, in Borgida, E. and Fiske, S. T. (eds.), Beyond Common Sense: Psychological Science in the Courtroom (Wiley Blackwell, 2008).Google Scholar

Edelman, L. B., Working Law: Courts, Corporations, and Symbolic Legal Rights (University of Chicago, 2016).Google Scholar

Edwards, P., Non-Standard Work and Labour Market Re-Structuring in the UK (Industrial Relations Research Unit, Warwick Business School, University of Warwick, 2006).Google Scholar

Eisenberg, D. T., ‘Shattering the Equal Pay Act’s Glass Ceiling’, SMU Law Review 63 (2010), 17–72.Google Scholar

Eisenberg, D. T., ‘Wal-Mart Stores v. Dukes: Lessons for the Legal Quest for Equal Pay’, New England Law Review 46 (2012), 229–273.Google Scholar

Ellison, G., Barker, A., and Kulasuriya, T., Work and Care: A Study of Modern Parents (Equality and Human Rights Commission, 2009).Google Scholar

Entmacher, J., Robbins, K. Gallagher, Vogtman, J., and Frohlich, L., Insecure & Unequal: Poverty and Income among Women and Families 2000–2012 (National Womens Law Center, 2013).Google Scholar

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Age Discrimination in the 21st Century – Barriers to the Improvement of Older Workers (Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, 2009).Google Scholar

Equal Opportunities Commission, Greater Expectations: Summary Final Report EOC’s Investigation into Pregnancy Discrimination 10 (Equal Opportunities Commission, 2005).Google Scholar

Equality and Human Rights Commission, Financial Services Enquiry Sex Discrimination and Gender Pay Gap (Equality and Human Rights Commission, 2009).Google Scholar

Equality and Human Rights Commission, How Fair Is Britain? Equality, Human Rights and Good Relations in 2010 (Equality and Human Rights Commission, 2011).Google Scholar

Equality and Human Rights Commission, Inquiry into Recruitment and Employment in the Meat and Poultry Processing Sector Treatment of Pregnant Workers: Our Findings (Equality and Human Rights Commission, 2011).Google Scholar

Equality and Human Rights Commission, BIS Research paper No 235. Pregnancy and Maternity-Related Discrimination and Disadvantage (Equality and Human Rights Commission, 2015).Google Scholar

Equality and Human Rights Commission, Tackling Pensioner Poverty (Equality and Human Rights Commission, 16 January 2007).Google Scholar

Estes, C., O’Neill, T., Hartmann, H., and Institute for Women’s Policy Research, Breaking the Social Security Glass Ceiling: A Proposal to Modernize Women’s Benefits (Institute for Women’s Policy Research, 2012).Google Scholar

European Commission, The Gender Pay Gap – Origins and Policy Responses a Comparative Review of 30 European Countries (European Commission, 2006).Google Scholar

European Commission, Tackling Multiple Discrimination: Practices, Policies and Laws 15 (European Commission, 2007).Google Scholar

European Commission, The 2015 Pensions Adequacy Report: Current and Future Income Adequacy in Old Age in the EU (European Commission, 2015).Google Scholar

European Commission and Directorate-General for Justice, Tackling the Gender Pay Gap in the European Union (European Commission and Directorate-General for Justice, 2014).Google Scholar

Evandrou, M., Falkingham, J., and Sefton, T., Women’s Family Histories and Incomes in Later Life in the UK, US and West Germany (Centre for Research on Ageing, School of Social Sciences, University of Southampton, 2009).Google Scholar

Evans, C. and Stroud, D., ‘Greening Steel Work: Varieties of Capitalism, the Environmental Agenda and Innovating for the Greening of the Labour Process’, in Hauptmeier, M. and Vidal, M. (eds.), Comparative Political Economy (Palgrave Macmillan, 2014).Google Scholar

Executive Office of the President, Women and Girls in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (Executive Office of the President, 2011).Google Scholar

Fairfax, L. M., ‘Board Diversity Revisited: New Rationale, Same Old Story?’, North Carolina Law Review 89 (2011), 855–885.Google Scholar

Fawcett Society, The Changing Labour Market: Delivering for Women, Delivering for Growth (Fawcett Society, 2013).Google Scholar

Feinberg, L. and Choula, R., Understanding the Impact of Family Caregiving on Work (AARP Public Policy Institute, 2012).Google Scholar

Feinberg, L., Reinhard, S. C., and Choula, R., Valuing the Invaluable: 2011 Update – The Growing Contributions and Costs of Family Caregiving (AARP Public Policy Institute, 2011).Google Scholar

Fineman, J., ‘The Vulnerable Subject at Work: A New Perspective on the Employment At-Will Debate’, Southwestern Law Review 43 (2013), 275–317.Google Scholar

Fineman, M. A., ‘“Elderly” as Vulnerable: Rethinking the Nature of Individual and Societal Responsibility’,Elder Law Journal 20 (2012), 71–111.Google Scholar

Fineman, M. A., The Neutered Mother, the Sexual Family, and Other Twentieth Century Tragedies (Routledge, 1995).Google Scholar

Fineman, M. A., ‘The Vulnerable Subject and the Responsive State’, Emory Law Journal 60 (2010), 251–275.Google Scholar

Fineman, M. A. and Grear, A., ‘Introduction’, in Grear, A. and Fineman, M. A. (eds.), Vulnerability: Reflections on a New Ethical Foundation for Law and Politics (Surrey, UK: Ashgate, 2014).Google Scholar

Gangl, M. and Ziefle, A., ‘Motherhood, Labor Force Behaviour, and Women’s Careers: An Empirical Assessment of the Wage Penalty for Motherhood in Britain, Germany, and the United States’, Demography 46:2 (2009), 341–369.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gatta, M., Older Women Need More from the Workforce Development System (Future of Work@50+ AARP Public Policy Institute, June 2015).Google Scholar

Gault, B., Hartmann, H., Hegewisch, A., Milli, J., and Reichlin, L., Paid Parental Leave in the United States (Institute for Women’s Policy Research, 2013).Google Scholar

Gely, R. and Bierman, L., ‘Pay Secrecy/Confidentiality Rules and the National Labor Relations Act’, University of Pennsylvania Journal of Labor and Employment Law 6 (2003), 121.Google Scholar

Glaser, K., Price, D., Di Gessa, G., Ribe, E., Stuchbury, R., and Tinker, A., Grandparenting in Europe: Family Policy and Grandparenting in Providing Childcare (London: Grandparents Plus, 2013).Google Scholar

Glass, J., ‘Blessing or Curse? Work-Family Policies and Mothers’ Wage Growth over Time’, Work and Occupations 31 (2004), 367–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Glass Ceiling Commission, Good for Business: Making Full Use of the Nation’s Human Capital (Glass Ceiling Commission, 1995).Google Scholar

Glick, P. and Fiske, S. T., ‘Sex Discrimination: The Psychological Approach’, in Crosby, F., Stockdale, M. S., and Ropp, A. S. (eds.), Sex Discrimination in the Workplace (Malden: Blackwell Publishing, 2007), 155–187.Google Scholar

Glynn, S. J. and Wu, N., The Gender Wage Gaps Differ by Occupation (Center for American Progress, 2013).Google Scholar

Glynn, T. P., ‘Taking the Employer Out of Employment Law? Accountability for Wage and Hour Violations in an Age of Enterprise Disaggregation’, Employee Rights & Employment Policy Journal 15 (2011), 201–235.Google Scholar

Golden, L., Irregular Work Scheduling and Its Consequences (Economic Policy Institute, 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Government Equalities Office, Closing the Gender Pay Gap Government Consultation (Government Equalities Office, 2015).Google Scholar

Government Equalities Office, Think, Act, Report: One Year on 3 (Government Equalities Office, 2012).Google Scholar

Government Equalities Office, Women and the Economy: Government Action Plan (Government Equalities Office, 2013).Google Scholar

Grandparents Plus, Grandparenting in Europe: The Health and Wellbeing of Grandparents Caring for Grandchildren: The Role of Cumulative Advantage/Disadvantage (Grandparents Plus, 2014).Google Scholar

Grant, D., ‘Older Women, Work and the Impact of Discrimination’, in Sargeant, M. (ed.), Age Discrimination and Diversity: Multiple Discrimination from an Age Perspective (Cambridge University Press, 2011).Google Scholar

Grant, L., Yeandle, S., and Buckner, L., ‘Working Below Potential: Women and Part-Time Work’, EOC Working Paper Series No. 40. Equal Opportunities Commission (2005).Google Scholar

Green, T. K., ‘Discrimination in Workplace Dynamics: Toward a Structural Account of Disparate Treatment Theory’, Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review 38 (2003),91–145.Google Scholar

Grimshaw, D. and Rubery, J., The Motherhood Pay Gap: A Review of the Issues, Theory and International Evidence (Inclusive Labour Markets, Labour Relations and Working Conditions Branch ILO, 2015).Google Scholar

Grossman, J. L., ‘Job Security without Equality: The Family and Medical Leave Act of 1983’, Washington University Journal Law and Policy 15 (2004), 17–63.Google Scholar

Grossman, J. L., ‘Pregnancy, Work, and the Promise of Equal Citizenship’, Georgetown Law Journal 98 (2010), 567–628.Google Scholar

Guardian Newspaper, ‘Younger Generation of British Muslims Showing Shift in Attitude to Gender Roles’ (13 July 2015).Google Scholar

Hacker, J. S., The Great Risk Shift: The New Economic Insecurity and the Decline of the American Dream (Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2008).Google Scholar

Haggard, T. R., Understanding Employment Discrimination (2nd ed., LexisNexis, 2008).Google Scholar

Hall, P. A. and Soskice, D., ‘An Introduction to Varieties of Capitalism’, in Hall, P. and Soskice, D. (eds.), Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage (Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hammer, L. B. and Neal, M. B., ‘Working Sandwich-Generation Caregivers: Prevalence, Characteristics, and Outcomes’, Psychologist-Manager Journal 11:1 (2008), 93–112.Google Scholar

Hannett, S., ‘Equality at the Intersections: The Legislative and Judicial Failure to Tackle Multiple Discrimination’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 23 (2003), 65.Google Scholar

Hart, M., ‘Skepticism and Expertise: The Supreme Court and the EEOC’, Fordham Law Review 74 (2006), 1937–1962.Google Scholar

Hayes, M. T., Incrementalism and Public Policy (Longman, 1992).Google Scholar

Hazen, T. L., ‘Diversity on Corporate Boards: Limits of the Business Case and the Connection between Supporting Rationales and the Appropriate Response of the Law’, North Carolina Law Review 89 (2011), 887–899.Google Scholar

Hegewisch, A., et al., Separate but Not Equal? Gender Segregation in the Labor Market and the Gender Wage Gap (Institute for Women’s Policy Research, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hegewisch, A. and Hartmann, H., Occupational Segregation and the Gender Wage Gap: A Job Half Done (Institute for Women’s Policy Research, 2014).Google Scholar

Hegewisch, A. and O’Farrell, B., Women in Construction and the Economic Recovery (Institute for Women’s Policy Research, 2014).Google Scholar

HelpAge International, Discrimination in Old Age: Multiple, Cumulative and on the Increase (HelpAge International, 2011).Google Scholar

Herring, J., Caring and the Law (London: Hart Publishing, 2013).Google Scholar

Heymann, J. and McNeill, K., Changing Children’s Chances New Findings on Child Policy Worldwide (UCLA World Policy Analysis Centre, 2013).Google Scholar

Hicks, J. and Allen, G., ‘A Century of Change: Trends in UK Statistics since 1900’, House of Commons Library Research Paper 99/111 (1999).Google Scholar

Hipple, S. ‘Contingent Work: Results from the Second Survey’, Monthly Labor Review 121:11 (1998), 22–35.Google Scholar

Hochschild, J. L., The New American Dilemma: Liberal Democracy and School Desegregation (Yale University Press, 1984).Google Scholar

House of Commons Business, Innovation and Skills Committee, Women in the Workplace (House of Commons Business, Innovation and Skills Committee, 2013).Google Scholar

House of Commons Trade and Industry Committee, ‘Jobs for the Girls: The Effect of Occupational Segregation on the Gender Pay Gap’, Sixteenth Report of Session 2004–05 HC 300–1 (2005).Google Scholar

House of Commons Trade and Industry Committee, Occupational Segregation on the Gender Pay Gap; 2004–05, HC 6 (House of Commons Trade and Industry Committee, 2005).Google Scholar

House of Lords Select Committee on Communications, ‘Women in News and Current Affairs Broadcasting’, 2nd Report of Session 2014–15 (2015), HL Paper 91.Google Scholar

Hotchkiss, J. L., Pitts, M. M., Walker, M. B., To Work or Not to Work: The Economics of a Mother’s Dilemma, Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta Working Paper Series, Working Paper 2011–2, (2011).Google Scholar

Huang, A., ‘Year of the Female Dean’, National Jurist, 8 July 2015.Google Scholar

Hudson, M., The Experience of Discrimination on Multiple Grounds (2, ACAS, 2012).Google Scholar

Hurrell, G. P. and Whittaker, M., Credit Worthy: Assessing the Impact of Tax Credits in the Last Decade and Considering What This Means for Universal Credit, (Resolution Foundation, 2012).Google Scholar

ILO, ABC of Women Workers’ Rights and Gender Equality (2d ed., ILO, 2007).Google Scholar

ILO, Global Wage Report 2012/13 (ILO, 2013).Google Scholar

ILO, Global Wage Report 2014/15: Wages and Income Inequality (ILO, 2014).Google Scholar

ILO, Rights, Jobs and Social Security (2008).Google Scholar

ILO, Social Protection for Older Persons (ILO, 2014).Google Scholar

Institute for Women’s Policy Research, Maternity, Paternity, and Adoption Leave in the United States (Institute for Women’s Policy Research, May 2013).Google Scholar

Institute for Women’s Policy Research, The Status of Women in the States (Institute for Women’s Policy Research, 2015).Google Scholar

Jacobsen, J. P. and Levin, L. M., ‘Effects of Intermittent Labor Force Attachment on Women’s Earnings’, Monthly Labor Review 118:9 (1995), 14–19.Google Scholar

Jarboe, N., Women Count: Leaders in Higher Education 2013 (KPMG, 2013).Google Scholar

Jarman, J., Blackburn, R. M., and Racko, G., ‘The Dimensions of Occupational Segregation in Industrial Countries’, Sociology 46:6 (2012), 1003–1019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jaumotte, F., ‘Female Labour Force Participation: Past Trends and Main Determinants in OECD Countries’, OECD Working Paper No. 376 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jayaweera, H., Hockley, C. A., Redshaw, M. E., and Quigley, M. A., Millennium Cohort Study First Survey Demographic and Socio-Economic Characteristics of Ethnic Minority Mothers in England (University of Oxford, 2007).Google Scholar

Jelking, R. and Sajous, E., Stereotyping (Public Services Commission of Canada, 1995).Google Scholar

Kahn Best, R., Edelman, L. B., Krieger, L. Hamilton, and Eliason, S. R., ‘Multiple Disadvantages: An Empirical Test of Intersectionality Theory in EEO Litigation’, Law and Society Review 45 (2011), 991–1025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kessler, L., ‘The Attachment Gap: Employment Discrimination Law, Women’s Cultural Caregiving, and the Limits of Economic and Liberal Theory’, University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform 34:3 (2001), 371–469.Google Scholar

Kim, S., Kalev, A., and Dobbin, F., ‘Progressive Corporations at Work’, New York University Review of Law and Social Change 36:2 (2012), 171–213.Google Scholar

King, E. M. and Winthrop, R., Today’s Challenges for Girls’ Education (Brookings Institution, 2015).Google Scholar

Kingdon, J. W., Agendas, Alternative, and Public Policies (New York: Longman, 1995).Google Scholar

Kitchen, R. K., ‘Eradicating the Mothering Effect: Women as Workers and Mothers, Successfully and Simultaneously’, Wisconsin Journal of Law, Gender and Society 26 (2011), 167–212.Google Scholar

Kittay, E. F., Love’s Labor: Essays on Women, Equality, and Dependency (New York: Routledge, 1999).Google Scholar

Kotkin, M. J., ‘Diversity and Discrimination: A Look at Complex Bias’, William & Mary Law Review 50 (2009), 1439–1500.Google Scholar

Krekula, C., ‘The Intersection of Age and Gender: Reworking Gender Theory and Social Gerontology’, Current Society 55 (2007), 155–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krieger, L. H., ‘The Content of Our Categories: A Cognitive Bias Approach to Discrimination and Equal Employment Opportunity’, Stanford Law Review 47 (1995), 1161–1248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kruger, K. J., ‘Pregnancy and Policing: Are They Compatible? Pushing the Legal Limits on Behalf of Equal Employment Opportunities’, Wisconsin Women’s Law Journal 22 (2007), 61–89.Google Scholar

Kulow, M. D., ‘Beyond the Paycheck Fairness Act: Mandatory Wage Disclosure Laws – A Necessary Tool for Closing the Residual Gender Wage Gap’, Harvard Journal on Legislation 50 (2013), 385–435.Google Scholar

Lane, C. M., A Company of One: Insecurity, Independence, and the New World of White Collar Unemployment (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2011).Google Scholar

Lee, R. K., ‘Implementing Grutter’s Diversity Rationale: Diversity and Empathy in Leadership’, Duke Journal of Gender Law and Policy 19 (2011), 133–178.Google Scholar

Lewis, T., Multiple Discrimination: A Guide to Law and Evidence (Central London Law Centre, 2010).Google Scholar

Lindblom, C. E., ‘Still Muddling, Not Yet Through’, Public Administration Review 39:6 (1979), 517–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Liotard, K. T., Report of the Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender Equality: On Eliminating Gender Stereotypes in the EU (European Parliament, 2012).Google Scholar

Livesy, N., The Future Ageing of the Ethnic Minority Population of England and Wales (Runneymede and the Centre for Policy on Ageing, 2010).Google Scholar

Livingston, G., Among Hispanics, Immigrants More Likely to be Stay-At-Home Moms (Pew Research Center, 2014).Google Scholar

Livingston, G., In Terms of Childlessness, U.S. Ranks Near the Top Worldwide (Pew Research Center, 2014).Google Scholar

Livingston, G. and Cohn, D., Childlessness Up among All Women; Down among Women with Advanced Degrees (Pew Research Center, 2010).Google Scholar

Livingston, G. and Parker, K., Since the Start of the Recession, More Children Raised by Grandparents (Pew Research Center, 2010).Google Scholar

Lord Davies of Abersoch, Women on Boards (Department for Business, Innovation and Skills, 2011).Google Scholar

Lundberg, S. and Rose, E., ‘Parenthood and the Earnings of Married Men and Women’, Labour Economics 7:6 (2009), 689–710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lyonette, C., Baldauf, B., and Behle, H., ‘Quality’ Part-Time Work: A Review of the Evidence (Government Equalities Office, 2010).Google Scholar

MacKenzie, C., Rogers, W., and Dodds, S., ‘Introduction: What Is Vulnerability and Why Does It Matter for Moral Theory?’, in MacKenzie, C., Rogers, W., and Dodds, S. (eds.), Vulnerability: New Essays in Ethics and Feminist Philosophy (New York: Oxford University Press, 2014).Google Scholar

Makkonen, T., Multiple, Compound and Intersectional Discrimination: Bringing the Experiences of the Most Marginalized to the Fore (Institute for Human Rights, Abo Akademi University, 2002).Google Scholar

Malin, M. H., ‘Father’s and Parental Leave Revisited’, Northern Illinois University Law Review 19 (1998), 25–56.Google Scholar

Maloney, C. B., ‘Joint Economic Committee’, The Earnings Penalty for Part-Time Work: An Obstacle to Equal Pay (2010).Google Scholar

Manning, A. and Petrongolo, B., ‘The Part-Time Pay Penalty for Women in Britain’, Economic Journal 118 (2008), F28–F51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marinker, V., ‘The Truth About Being Pregnant at Work’, The Huffington Post (July 2015).Google Scholar

Matos, K. and Galinnsky, E., National Study of Employers 2014 (Family and Works Institute, 2014).Google Scholar

McCormick, M. L., ‘Decoupling Employment’, Lewis & Clark Law Review 16 (2012), 499–525.Google Scholar

McGinn, K. L., Lingo, E. L., and Castro, M. R.., ‘Mum’s the Word! Cross-National Effects of Maternal Employment on Gender Inequalities at Work and at Home’, Harvard Business School, Working Paper 15–94 (2015).Google Scholar

McGregor, J., ‘Stereotypes and Older Workers’, Social Policy Journal of New Zealand 18 (2002), 163–177.Google Scholar

McMullin, J. A. and Berger, E. D., ‘Gendered Ageism/Age(ed) Sexism: The Case of Unemployed Older Workers’, in Calasanti, T. M. and Slevin, K. F. (eds.), Age Matters: Realigning Feminist Thinking (Routledge, 2006).Google Scholar

McOrmond, T., ‘Changes in Working Trends over the Past Decade’, Labour Market Trends 112 (2004), 25.Google Scholar

Metlife Mature Market Institute, Grandparents Investing in Grandchildren (Metlife Mature Market Institute, 2012).Google Scholar

Millar, J., Ridge, T., and Bennett, F., ‘Part-Time Work and Social Security: Increasing the Options’, Department For Work & Pensions, Research Report No 351 10 (2006).Google Scholar

Mintz, B. and Krymkowski, D. H., ‘The Intersection of Race/Ethnicity and Gender in Occupational Segregation’, International Journal of Sociology 40:4 (Winter 2010–11), 31–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moore, S., ‘Age as a Factor Defining Older Women’s Experience of Labour Market Participation in the UK’, Industrial Law Journal 36 (2007), 383–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moore, S., ‘No Matter What I Did I Would Still End Up in the Same Position: Age as a Factor Defining Older Women’s Experience of Labour Market Participation’, Work, Employment & Society 23 (2009), 655–671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morsy, L. and Rothstein, R., Five Social Disadvantages that Depress Student Performance (Economic Policy Institute, 2015).Google Scholar

Murphy, E. F. and Graff, E. J., Getting Even: Why Women Don’t Get Paid Like Men – And What to Do About It (New York: Touchstone, 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

National Alliance for Caregiving and AARP, Caregiving in the U.S. 4 (National Alliance for Caregiving and AARP, 2009).Google Scholar

National Coalition for Women and Girls in Education, Title IX at 40: Working to Ensure Gender Equity in Education (National Coalition for Women and Girls in Education, 2012).Google Scholar

National Equal Pay Task Force, Fifty Years after the Equal Pay Act: Assessing the Past, Taking Stock of the Future (National Equal Pay Task Force, 2013).Google Scholar

National Institute on Aging, Growing Older in America: The Health and Retirement Study (National Institute of Health and US Department of Health and Human Services, 2007).Google Scholar

National Partnership for Women and Families, Listening to Mothers: The Experiences of Expecting and New Mothers in the Workplace (National Partnership for Women and Families, 2014).Google Scholar

National Women’s Law Center, Finishing Last: Girls of Color and School Sports Opportunities (National Women’s Law Center, 2015).Google Scholar

National Women’s Law Center, Our Moment: An Economic Agenda for Women and Families (National Women’s Law Center, 2015).Google Scholar

National Women’s Law Center, Underpaid & Overloaded: Women in Low Wage Jobs (National Women’s Law Center, 2014).Google Scholar

National Women’s Law Center, Women in the Federal Judiciary: Still a Long Way to Go (National Women’s Law Center, May 2015).Google Scholar

National Women’s Law Center, Women and Social Security Fact Sheet (National Women’s Law Center, 2015).Google Scholar

National Women’s Law Center Fact Sheet, Combating Punitive Pay Secrecy Policies 2 (National Women’s Law Center, 2012).Google Scholar

Nielsen, L. B., Nelson, R. B., and Lancaster, R., ‘Individual Justice or Collective Legal Mobilization? Employment Discrimination Litigation in the Post-Civil Rights United States’, Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 7 (2010), 175–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nightingale, D. S. and Wandner, S. A., Informal and Nonstandard Employment in the United States: Implications for Low-Income Working Families (The Urban Institute, 2011).Google Scholar

Nikolka, T., ‘The Gender Wage Gap in OECD Countries’, CESifo DICE Report 11: 1 (2013), 69–71.Google Scholar

Note, ‘Facial Discrimination: Extending Handicap Law to Employment Discrimination on the Basis of Appearance’, Harvard Law Review 100 (1987), 2035–2052.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

OECD, The ABC of Gender Equality in Education (OECD, 2015).Google Scholar

OECD, Education at a Glance (OECD, 2012).Google Scholar

OECD, In It Together: Why Less Inequality Benefits All … in the United Kingdom (OECD, 2015).Google Scholar

Office for National Statistics, Employee Contracts That Do Not Guarantee a Minimum Number of Hours (Office for National Statistics, 2015).Google Scholar

Office for National Statistics, The Gender Gap in Unpaid Care Provision: Is There an Impact on Health and Economic Position? (Office for National Statistics, 2013).Google Scholar

Office for National Statistics, Live Births in England and Wales by Characteristics of Mother 1, 2013 (Office for National Statistics, 2014).Google Scholar

Office for National Statistics, 170 Years of Industrial Change Across England and Wales (Office for National Statistics, 2013).Google Scholar

Office of Civil Rights, Gender Equity in Education: A Data Snapshot (US Department of Education, 2012).Google Scholar

Olsen, W., Heuvelman, H., Gash, V., Vandecasteele, L., The Gender Pay Gap in the UK 1995–2007, Part 2, (Government Equalities Office, 2010).Google Scholar

Omori, M. and Smith, S. A., ‘Women’s Occupational Mobility after Work Interruption’, Sociation Today 4 (2006), 1–16.Google Scholar

Papke, L. E., Walker, L., and Dworsky, M., Retirement Security for Women: Progress to Date and Policies for Tomorrow (Retirement Security Project, 2008).Google Scholar

Parker, K., 5 Facts about Today’s Fathers (Pew Research Center, 2015).Google Scholar

Parker, K. and Patten, E., The Sandwich Generation: Rising Financial Burdens for Middle-Aged Americans (Pew Research Center, 2013).Google Scholar

Parker, K. and Wang, W., Modern Parenthood: Roles of Moms and Dads Converge as They Balance Work and Family (Pew Research Center, 2013).Google Scholar

Pedersen, N. B., ‘The Hazards of Dukes: The Substantive Consequences of a Procedural Decision’, University of Toledo Law Review 44 (2012),123–143.Google Scholar

Pedulla, D. S. and Thébaud, S., ‘Can We Finish the Revolution? Gender, Work-Family Ideals, and Institutional Constraint’, American Sociological Review 80 (2015), 116–139.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Pendleton, A. and Gospel, H. F., ‘Markets and Relationships: Finance, Governance, and Labour in the United Kingdom’, in Pendleton, A. and Gospel, H. F. (eds.), Corporate Governance and Labour Management: An International Comparison (Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2004).Google Scholar

Pensions Commission, Pensions: Challenges and Choices: First Report of the Pensions Commission 262 (Pensions Commission, 2004).Google Scholar

Perez, T. E., The Cost of Doing Nothing: The Price We All Pay Without Paid Leave Policies to Support America’s 21st Century Working Families (Department of Labor, 2015).Google Scholar

Perfect, D., Gender Pay Gaps (UK Equality and Human Rights Commission, 2011).Google Scholar

Pew Research Center, After Decades of Decline a Rise in Stay-at-Home-Mothers (Pew Research Center, 2014).Google Scholar

Pew Research Center, Stay-at-Home Mothers by Demographic Group (Pew Research Center, 2014).Google Scholar

Pierret, C. R., ‘The “Sandwich Generation”: Women Caring for Parents and Children’, Monthly Labor Review 129:9 (2006), 3–9.Google Scholar

Polivka, A. E., ‘A Profile of Contingent Workers’, Monthly Labor Review 119:10 (1996), 10–21.Google Scholar

Porter, N. B., ‘Sex Plus Age Discrimination: Protecting Older Women Workers’, Denver University Law Review 81 (2003), 79–111.Google Scholar

Porter, N. B., ‘Synergistic Solutions: An Integrated Approach to Solving the Caregiver Conundrum for “Real Workers” ’, Stetson Law Review 39 (2010), 777–860.Google Scholar

Porter, N. B., ‘Why Care about Caregivers? Using Communitarian Theory to Justify Protection of “Real” Workers’, University of Kansas Law Review 58 (2010), 355–414.Google Scholar

Posthuma, R. and Campion, P., ‘Age Stereotypes in the Workplace: Common Stereotypes, Moderators, and Future Research Directions’, Journal of Management 35 (2009), 158–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rabindrakumar, S., Paying the Price: The Long Road to Recovery (Gingerbread, 2014).Google Scholar

Ramachandran, G., ‘Pay Transparency’, Penn State Law Review 116 (2012), 1043–1079.Google Scholar

Rhee, N., and Boivie, I., The Continuing Retirement Savings Crisis (National Institute on Retirement Security, 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rhode, D. L., The Beauty Bias: The Injustice of Appearance in Life and Law (New York: Oxford University Press, 2010).Google Scholar

Root, K. A. and Park, R. J., Forced Out: Older Workers Confront Job Loss (Boulder, CO: FirstForumPress, 2009).Google Scholar

Rostron, A., ‘Incrementalism, Comprehensive Rationality, and the Future of Gun Control’, Maryland Law Review 67 (2008), 511–569.Google Scholar

Roth, L. M., Selling Women Short: Gender Inequality on Wall Street (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2006).Google Scholar

Rubery, J., Fagan, C., Grimshaw, D., Figueiredo, H., and Smith, M., Indicators of Gender Equality in Employment (OECD, 2002).Google Scholar

Rubio-Marín, R., ‘A New European Parity-Democracy Sex Equality Model and Why It Won’t Fly in the United States’, American Journal of Comparative Law 60 (2012), 99–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Runneymede, Researching Older and Black Minority Ethnic People and Financial Inclusion (Runneymede, 2012).Google Scholar

Sargeant, M., Age Discrimination (Gower Publishing, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sargeant, M., Age Discrimination (Gower Publishing, 2013).Google Scholar

Sargeant, M., ‘Age Stereotypes and the Media’, Communications Law 13:4 (2008), 119–124.Google Scholar

Sargeant, M., Discrimination and the Law (Routledge, 2013).Google Scholar

Sargeant, M., ‘Gender Equality and the Pensions Acts 2007–2008’, Industrial Law Journal 38 (2009), 143–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Savage, R., ‘Older Women Don’t Like Their Jobs as much as Men’, Management Today (24 September 2015).Google Scholar

Schmidt, D. F. and Boland, S., ‘Structure of Perceptions of Older Adults: Evidence for Multiple Stereotypes’, Psychology & Ageing, 1:1 (1986), 55–60, cited in Blaine, B. E., Understanding the Psychology of Diversity (Sage Publishing, 2013).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Scottish Widows, Women and Pensions Report What Women Think (Scottish Widows, 2008).Google Scholar

Sealy, R. and Vinnicombe, S., The Female FTSE Board Report 2013: False Dawn of Progress for Women on Boards? (Cranfield University School of Management, 2013).Google Scholar

Selmi, M., ‘The Price of Discrimination: The Nature of Class Action Employment Discrimination Litigation and Its Effects’, Texas Law Review 81 (2003), 1249–1336.Google Scholar

Sen, A. and Razza, C., Hour by Hour: Women in Today’s Workweek (Center for Popular Democracy, 2015).Google Scholar

Shelton, Alison, Social Security: A Key Retirement Resource for Women (AARP Public Policy Institute, March 2016).Google Scholar

Sheppard, C., ‘Multiple Discrimination in the World of Work’, International Labour Organisation Working Paper No. 66 (2011).Google Scholar

Sleight, J. and Farshi, Z., ‘The Experience of Age Discrimination of Older People from Two Minority Communities in Leeds’, RoAD Research Reports 6 (2006).Google Scholar

Smeaton, D., Hudson, M., Radu, D., and Vowden, K., The EHRC Triennial Review: Developing the Employment Evidence Base (Policy Studies Institute, 2010).Google Scholar

Smeaton, D. and Marsh, A., Maternity and Paternity Rights and Benefits: Survey of Parents 2005. Employment Relations Research Series No. 50 DTI. (Department for Work and Pensions, 2006).Google Scholar

Spencer, A. B., ‘Class Actions, Heightened Commonality, and Declining Access to Justice’, Boston University Law Review 93 (2013), 441–491.Google Scholar

Staff, J. and Mortimer, J. T., ‘Explaining the Motherhood Wage Penalty during the Early Occupational Career’, Demography 49:1 (2012), 1–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Stone, K. V. W., ‘The Decline of the Standard Contract of Employment in the United States: A Socio-Regulatory Perspective’, in Stone, K. V. W. and Arthurs, H. (eds.), Rethinking Workplace Regulation: Beyond the Standard Contract of Employment (Russel Sage Foundation, 2013).Google Scholar

Sturm, S., ‘Second Generation Employment Discrimination: A Structural Approach’, Columbia Law Review 101 (2001), 458–568.Google Scholar

Sweiry, D. and Willitts, M., Attitudes to Age in Britain 2010/11 (Department for Work and Pensions, 2012).Google Scholar

Swiebel, J., ‘Unpaid Work and Policy-Making towards a Broader Perspective of Work and Employment’, Discussion Paper of the United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (1999).Google Scholar

Templin, B. A., ‘Social Security Reform: Should the Retirement Age Be Increased?’, Oregon Law Review 89 (2011), 1179–1256.Google Scholar

Todd, N. D., ‘Ageism: The Strange Case of Prejudice against the Older You’, in Wiener, R. L. and Willborn, S. L. (eds.), Disability and Aging Discrimination: Perspectives in Law and Psychology (Springer, 2011).Google Scholar

Tomlinson, J., Olsen, W., Neff, D., Purdam, K., and Mehta, S., ‘Examining the Potential for Women Returners to Work in Areas of High Occupational Gender Segregation’, Final Report to the DTI (2005).Google Scholar

Ton, Z., ‘Why Good Jobs are Good for Retailers’, Harvard Business Review (January–February 2012), 125–131.Google Scholar

TUC, Age Immaterial Women over 50 in the Workplace (TUC, 2014).Google Scholar

TUC, Older Women and the Labour Market; a report for the TUC Women’s Conference (2013).Google Scholar

TUC, Women and Casualisation (TUC, 2014).Google Scholar

UK, United Kingdom’s Seventh Periodic Report, Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW) (UK, 2011).Google Scholar

UNESCO, Teaching and Learning: Achieving Equality for All (UNESCO, 2014).Google Scholar

UNFPA & HelpAge International, Ageing in the Twenty-First Century (UNFPA & HelpAge International, 2012).Google Scholar

United Nations, World Fertility Report: 2012 (United Nations, Economic and Social Affairs, 2013).Google Scholar

United Nations, The World’s Women 2010: Trends and Statistics (United Nations, 2011).Google Scholar

United Nations Development Programme, Human Development Report 1995 (United Nations Development Programme, 1995).Google Scholar

United Nations Economic and Social Council, ‘Follow-up to the Fourth World Conference on Women: Emerging Issues, Trends and New Approaches to Issues Affecting the Situation of Women or Equality between Women and Men’, Gender and Ageing: Problems, Perceptions and Policies. Available at www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/csw/aging.htm and www.un.org/documents/ecosoc/cn6/1998/ecn61998-4.htmGoogle Scholar

Unterhalter, E., North, A., Arnot, M., Lloyd, C., Moletsane, L., Murphy-Graham, E., Parkes, J., and Saito, M., Girls’ Education and Gender Equality (UK Department of International Development, Rigorous Literature Review, 2014).Google Scholar

US Administration on Aging, A Profile of Older Americans (US Administration on Aging, 2014).Google Scholar

US Bureau of Labor Statistics, Women in the Labor Force: A Databook (US Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2014).Google Scholar

US Department of Commerce Economics and Statistics and Executive Office of the President Office of Management and Budget, Women in America: Indicators of Social and Economic Well-Being (US Department of Commerce Economics and Statistics and Executive Office of the President Office of Management and Budget, 2011).Google Scholar

US Department of Labor, The African-American Labor Force in the Recovery (US Department of Labor, 2012).Google Scholar

US Department of Labor, Leading Occupations of Employed Women (US Department of Labor, 2010).Google Scholar

US Government Accountability Office, Contingent Workforce: Size, Characteristics, Earnings, and Benefits (US Government Accountability Office, 2015).Google Scholar

US Government Accountability Office, Employment Arrangements: Improved Outreach Could Ensure Proper Worker Classification (US Government Accountability Office, 2006).Google Scholar

US Government Accountability Office, Most Households Approaching Retirement Have Low Savings (US Government Accountability Office, 2015).Google Scholar

US Government Accountability Office, Retirement Security: Women Still Face Challenges (US Government Accountability Office, 2012).Google Scholar

US Government Accountability Office, Trends in Marriage and Work Patterns May Increase Economic Vulnerability for Some Retirees (US Government Accountability Office, 2014).Google Scholar

US Joint Economic Committee, The Earnings Penalty for Part-Time Work: An Obstacle to Equal Pay (US Joint Economic Committee, 2010).Google Scholar

US Social Security Administration, Income of the Population Aged 55 or Older (US Social Security Administration, 2008).Google Scholar

Vendramin, P. and Valenduc, G., ‘A Gender Perspective on Older Workers’ Employment and Working Conditions’, Working Paper 2014.03, European Trade Union Institute (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Venn, D., Legislation, ‘Collective Bargaining and Enforcement: Updating the OECD Employment Protection Indicators’, OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers No. 89 (2009).Google Scholar

Walby, S. and Olsen, W., The Impact of Women’s Position in the Labour Market on Pay and Implications for UK Productivity (DTI Women and Equality Unit, 2002).Google Scholar

Waldfogel, J., ‘Understanding the Family Gap in Pay for Women with Children’, Journal of Economic Perspectives 12:1 (Winter 1998), 137–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wang, W., Breadwinner Moms: Mothers Are the Sole or Primary Provider in Four-in-Ten Households with Children (Pew Research Center, 2013).Google Scholar

Wang, W., Mothers and Work: What’s ‘Ideal’? (Pew Research Center, 19 August 2013).Google Scholar

Waring, M., Counting for Nothing: What Men Value and What Women Are Worth (2nd ed., University of Toronto Press, 2004).Google Scholar

Watson, L., Johnston, E., Robbins, K. G., and Morrison, A., Collateral Damage: Scheduling Challenges for Workers in Low-Wage Jobs and Their Consequences (National Women’s Law Center, 2015).Google Scholar

Weaver, J. D., ‘Grandma in the White House: Legal Support for Intergenerational Caregiving’, Seton Hall Law Review 43:1 (2013), 1–74.Google Scholar

Wellard, S., Doing It All? Grandparents, Childcare and Employment: An Analysis of British Social Attitudes Survey Data from 1998 and 2009 (Grandparents Plus, 2011).Google Scholar

White House Council on Women and Girls, Women in America: Indicators of Social and Economic Well Being (White House Council on Women and Girls, 2011).Google Scholar

Whittaker, M. and Hurrell, A., Low Pay in Britain (Resolution Foundation, 2013).Google Scholar

Wider Opportunities for Women, Living Below the Line: Economic Insecurity and Older Americans (Wider Opportunities for Women, 2015).Google Scholar

Wilde, E. T., Batchelder, L., and Ellwood, D. T., ‘The Mommy Track Divides: The Impact of Childbearing on Wages of Women of Differing Skill Levels’, National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) Working Paper No. w16582 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Williams, J., Unbending Gender: Why Family and Work Conflict and What to Do About It (Oxford University Press, 2000).Google Scholar

Williams, J. C., Devaux, R., and Petrac, P., Protecting Family Caregivers from Employment Discrimination (AARP Public Policy Institute, 2012).Google Scholar

Williams, J. C., Phillips, K. W., and Hall, E. V., Double Jeopardy Gender Bias against Women in Science (UC Hastings College of Law, 2015).Google Scholar

Williams, J. C. and Segal, N., ‘Beyond the Maternal Wall: Relief for Family Caregivers Who Are Discriminated against on the Job’, Harvard Women’s Law Journal 26 (2003), 77–162.Google Scholar

Women and Work Commission, Shaping a Fairer Future (Women and Work Commission, 2006).Google Scholar

Women’s Bureau US Department of Labor, Fact Sheet on Older Women and Work (Women’s Bureau US Department of Labor, 2015).Google Scholar

Women’s Bureau, US Department of Labor Issue Brief, Older Women Workers and Economic Security (Women’s Bureau, US Department of Labor Issue Brief, 2015).Google Scholar

Women’s Business Council, Maximising Women’s Contribution to Future Economic Growth (Women’s Business Council, 2013).Google Scholar

World Economic Forum, The Global Gender Gap Report 2015 (World Economic Forum, 2015).Google Scholar

Yuracko, K. A., ‘Soul of a Woman: The Sex Stereotyping Prohibition at Work’, University of Pennsylvania Law Review 161 (2013), 757–805.Google Scholar

Zhang, X., ‘Can Motherhood Earnings Losses Be Ever Regained? Evidence from Canada’, Journal of Family Issues 31:12 (2010), 1671–1688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zimmer, M. J., ‘Binders Full of Women & Closing the Gap’, Florida International University Law Review 8 (2013), 541–557.Google Scholar