Ajia minshō hōtei junbikai [The association for the preparation of the Asian people's trial], ed. Toinaosu Tōkyō saiban [Questioning the Tokyo Trial afresh]. Tokyo: Ryokufō shuppan, 1995.Google Scholar

Asahi shinbun hōtei kishadan [The Asahi Newspaper court reporters], ed. Tōkyō saiban [The Tokyo Trial]. 3 Vols. Tokyo: Tōkyō saiban kankō kai, 1962.Google Scholar

Awaya, Kentarō. Tōkyō saiban ron [A treatise on the Tokyo Trial]. Tokyo: ōtsuki shoten, 1989.Google Scholar

Awaya, Kentarō. Tōkyō saiban e no michi [The road to the Tokyo Trial]. 2 Vols. Tokyo: Kōdansha, 2006.Google Scholar

Awaya, Kentarō. Tōkyō saiban e no michi [The road to the Tokyo Trial]. Tokyo: Kōdansha, 2013.Google Scholar

Beevor, Antony. Stalingrad: The Fateful Siege: 1942–1943. New York: Viking, 1998.Google Scholar

Beevor, Antony. The Fall of Berlin, 1945. New York: Viking, 2002.Google Scholar

Bergerud, Eric. Touched with Fire: The Land War in the South Pacific. New York: Penguin Books, 1996.Google Scholar

Blakeslee, George Hubbard. The Far Eastern Commission: A Study in International Cooperation: 1945 to 1952. Washington, DC: Department of State, 1953.Google Scholar

Bōeichō bōei kensyōjo sensishitsu (Military History Room, Defense Research Institute, Defense Agency), ed. Senshi sōsho [The war history series]. 102 Vols. Tokyo: Asagumo shinbunsha, 1966–80.Google Scholar

Boister, Neil, and Cryer, Robert. The Tokyo International Military Tribunal: A Reappraisal. Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Brackman, Arnold C. The Other Nuremberg: The Untold Story of the Tokyo War Crimes Trials. New York: William Morrow and Company, 1987.Google Scholar

Brook, Timothy. “The Tokyo Judgment and the Rape of Nanking.” The Journal of Asian Studies, Vol. 60, No. 3 (August 2001): 673–700.Google Scholar

Chadani, Seiichi. Shōwa senzenki no kyōchō seiryoku to seiji [The power of the court's inner circle and politics in the prewar Shōwa period]. Tokyo: Yoshikawa kōbunkan, 2009.Google Scholar

Cheah, Wui Ling. “Post-World War II British ‘Hell-Ship’ Trials in Singapore: Omissions and the Attribution of Responsibility.” Journal of International Criminal Justice, Vol. 8 (2010): 1035–58.Google Scholar

Cohen, David. “Beyond Nuremberg: Individual Responsibility for War Crimes.” In Human Rights in Political Transitions: Gettysburg to Bosnia. Edited by Hesse, Carla and Post, Robert. New York: Zone Books, 1999, pp. 53–92.Google Scholar

Cohen, David. “Military Justice from WWII to Guantanamo: Fair Trials, Judicial Murder, and International Standards in WWII War Crimes Trials in Asia.” In Summa Dieter Simon zum 70. Gebeurtstag. Edited by Kiesow, Rainer Maria, Ogorek, Regina, and Simitis, Spiros. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann, 2005, pp. 59–80.Google Scholar

Cohen, David. “The Singapore War Crimes Trials and Their Relevance Today.” Singapore Law Review, Vol. 31 (2013): 1–38.Google Scholar

Cohen, David. “The Historiography of the Historical Foundations of Theories of Responsibility in International Criminal Law.” In Historical Origins of International Criminal Law, Vol. 1. Edited by Bergsmo, Morten, Ling, Cheah Wui, and Ping, Yi. New York: Torkel Opsahl Academic EPublisher, 2014, pp. 23–83.Google Scholar

Cryer, Robert. “Roeling in Tokyo: A Dignified Dissenter.” Journal of International Criminal Justice, Vol. 8 (2010): 1109–26.Google Scholar

Dandō, Shigemitsu. “Sensō hanzai no rironteki kaibō” [The theoretical anatomy of war crimes]. In Keihō no kindaiteki tenkai. [The modern development of criminal law]. Edited by Dandō, Shigemitsu. Tokyo: Kōbundō, 1948, pp. 159–84.Google Scholar

Esmein, Jean. “Le juge Henri Bernard au procès de Tôkyô.” Vingtième Siècle. Revue d'histoire Année, Vol. 59 (1998): 3–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fitzpatrick, Georgina, McCormack, Tim, and Morris, Narrelle, eds. Australia's War Crimes Trials 1945–51. Leiden: Brill Nijhoff, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frank, Richard. Downfall: The End of Imperial Japanese Empire. New York: Penguin Books, 1999.Google Scholar

Fujita, Hisakazu. “Tōkyō saiban no konnichiteki imi” [The present-day significance of the Tokyo Trial]. Hōritsu jihō [Law reports] Vol. 61, No. 9 (1989): 24–30.Google Scholar

Fujita, Hisakazu. Sensō hanzai to wa nani ka [What is a war crime?]. Tokyo: Iwanami shoten, 1995.Google Scholar

Fujita, Hisakazu. Kokusai jindō hō [International Humanitarian Law]. Tokyo: Yōshindō kōbunsha, 2000.Google Scholar

Furuya, Hisatsuna. Système représentatif au Japon. Bruxelles: H. Lamertin, 1899.Google Scholar

Futamura, Madoka. War Crimes Tribunals and Transitional Justice: The Tokyo Trial and the Nuremberg Legacy. London; New York: Routledge, 2008.Google Scholar

Harris, Sheldon H. Factories of Death: Japanese Biological Warfare 1932–45 and the American Cover-up. London; New York: Routledge, 1994.Google Scholar

Harries, Meirion, and Susie, Harries. Sheathing the Sword: The Demilitarization of Postwar Japan. New York: Macmillan, 1987.Google Scholar

Hayashi, Hirofumi. Sabakareta sensō hanzai: Igirisu no tai-Nichi senpan saiban [War crimes tried: The British war crimes trials against the Japanese]. Tokyo: Iwanami shoten, 1998. https://apjjf.org/-Hayashi-Hirofumi/3187/article.htmlGoogle Scholar

Hayashi, Hirofumi, “The Battle of Singapore, the Massacre of Chinese and Understanding of the Issue in Postwar Japan.” The Asia-Pacific Journal, Vol. 7, Issue 28, No. 4 (July 13, 2009): 1–20.Google Scholar

Hayashi, Hirofumi. Shingapōru kakyō shukusei: Nihongun wa Shingapōru de nani o shitanoka [The purge of Chinese in Singapore: What did the Japanese military do in Singapore?]. Tokyo: Kōbunken, 2007.Google Scholar

Higurashi, Yoshinobu. “Kyokutō kokusai gunji saibansho kōseikoku no jōken: Indo saibankan ninmei mondai o megutte” [The conditions for becoming a member of the International Military Tribunal for the Far East: Concerning the appointment of the Indian judge]. Kokusai seiji, No. 95 (October 1990): 151–66.Google Scholar

Higurashi, Yoshinobu. “Paru hanketsu saikō: Tōkyō saiban ni okeru bekko iken no kokusai kankyō” [Rethinking Pal's Judgment: The international environment surrounding the separate opinion at the Tokyo Trial]. In Nihon kindaishi no saikōchiku [Reconstruction of modern Japanese history]. Edited by Takashi, Itō. Tokyo: Yamakawa shuppansha, 1993, pp. 384–411.Google Scholar

Higurashi, Yoshinobu. Tōkyō saiban no kokusai kankei: kokusai seiji ni okeru kenryoku to kihan [International relations of the Tokyo Trial: power and norm in international politics]. Tokyo: Bokutakusha, 2002.Google Scholar

Higurashi, Yoshinobu. Tōkyō saiban [The Tokyo Trial]. Tokyo: Kōdansha, 2008.Google Scholar

Hilberg, Raul. The Destruction of the European Jews, Student Edition. New York: Holmes & Meier, 1985.Google Scholar

Honjō, Shigeru. Honjō nikki [The Honjō diary]. Tokyo: Hara shobō, 1967.Google Scholar

Horiba, Kazuo. Shina jihen sensō shido shi [The history of the directing of the war during the China Incident]. Tokyo: Jiji tsōshinsha, 1962.Google Scholar

Horwitz, Solis. “The Tokyo Trial.” International Conciliation, No. 465 (November 1950): 473–584.Google Scholar

Hosoya, Chihiro, Nisuke, Andō, and Yasuaki, ōnuma. Kokusai shinpojiumu: Tōkyō saiban o tou [An International Symposium: Questioning the Tokyo Trial]. Tokyo: Kōdansha, 1984.Google Scholar

Hosoya, Chihiro, Nisuke, Andō, and Yasuaki, Ōnuma. The Tokyo War Crimes Trial: An International Symposium. Tokyo: Kodansha, 1986.Google Scholar

Irie, Keishirō. “Tōkyō hanketsu no yōryō to sono shōkai” [A summary and explanation of the Tokyo Judgment]. Hōritsu jihō [Law reports], Vol. 21, No. 2 (1949): 29–45, 12.Google Scholar

Ishii, Itarō. Gaikōkan no isshō: tai-Chōgoku gaikō no kaisō [The life of a diplomat: Reminiscences of diplomacy with China]. Tokyo: Taihei shuppansha, 1972.Google Scholar

Ishii, Itarō. Ishi Itarō nikki [The diary of Ishii Itarō]. Tokyo: Chōō kōronsha, 1993.Google Scholar

Itō, Hirobumi. Commentaries on the Constitution of the Empire. Translated by Itō, Miyoji. Tokyo: Igirisu-hōritsu gakkō, 1889.Google Scholar

Jackson, Robert H. Report of Robert H. Jackson United States Representative to the International Conference on Military Trials. Department of State Publication, 3080. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, February 1949.Google Scholar

Jescheck, Hans-Heinrich. Die Verantwortlichkeit der Staatsorgane nach Voelkerstrafrecht: Eine Studie zu der Nuernberger Prozessen. Bonn: Roehrscheid, 1952.Google Scholar

Jescheck, Hans-Heinrich. “The General Principles of International Law as Set Out in Nuremberg, as mirrored in the ICC Statute.” Journal of International Criminal Justice (2004) 2: 38–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Joerges, Christian, and Ghaleigh, Navraj Singh, eds. Darker Legacies of Law in Europe: The Shadow of National Socialism and Fascism Over Europe and Its Legal Traditions. Oxford; Portland, OR: Hart, 2003.Google Scholar

Kainō, Michitaka. “Sensō saiban no hōritsu riron” [Legal theory of a war trial]. Rekishi hyōron, Vol. 3, No. 6 (1948): 13–24.Google Scholar

Kainō, Michitaka. “Kyokutō saiban” [The Far Eastern Trial]. In Nihon shihonshugi kōza 1 [Lectures on Japanese capitalism, Vol. 1]. Edited by Kainō, Michitaka. Tokyo: Iwanami shoten, 1953, pp. 385–96.Google Scholar

Kainō, Michitaka. “Kyokutō saiban: sono go” [The Far Eastern Trial: Afterwards]. In Kainō Michitaka chosakushō 3. saiban [Kainō Michitaka's writings, Vol. 3. trials]. Edited and annotated by Toshitaka, Shiomi. Tokyo: Nihon hyōronsha, 1977, pp. 275–84.Google Scholar

Kainō, Michitaka. “Hōtei gijutsu” [Court techniques]. In Kainō Michitaka chosakushō 3. saiban [Kainō Michitaka's writings, Vol. 3. trials]. Edited and annotated by Toshitaka, Shiomi. Tokyo: Nihon hyōronsha, 1977, pp. 3–116.Google Scholar

Kajii, Sumihiro. “Tōkyō saiban ni okeru ‘BC-kyō hanzai’ tsuikyō” [The pursuit of Class BC war crimes at the Tokyo Trial]. Ritsumeikan hōgaku gakusei ronshō (bessatsu) [The compilation of law students’ essays at Ritsumeikan University (the extra issue)], No. 42 (1996): 492–531.Google Scholar

Kido, Kōichi. Heiwa e no doryoku: Kido Kōichi nikki, Tōkyō saibanki [The Kido Kōichi diary, The record of the Tokyo Trial]. Tokyo: Tōkyō daigaku shuppankai, 1980.Google Scholar

Konoe, Fumimaro. Heiwa e no doryoku: Konoe Fumimaro shuki [An endeavor toward peace: A personal record of Konoe Fumimaro]. Tokyo: Nihon denpō tōshinsha, 1946.Google Scholar

Kopelman, Elizabeth. “Ideology and International Law: The Dissent of the Indian Justice at the Tokyo War Crimes Trial.” New York University International Law and Politics, Vol. 23, No. 2 (Winter 1991): 373–444.Google Scholar

Lebra, Joyce C. Jungle Alliance: Japan and the Indian National Army. Singapore: Donald Moore for Asia Pacific Press, 1971.Google Scholar

Linton, Suzannah, ed. Hong Kong's War Crimes Trials. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lord, Wright. “War Crimes and International Law.” International Law Review, Vol. 62, No. 1 (January 1946): 40–52.Google Scholar

Maga, Tim. Judgment at Tokyo: The Japanese War Crimes Trials. Lexington, KY: University Press of Kentucky, 2001.Google Scholar

Matsumoto, Naotoshi, ed. Tōkyō saiban shinri yōmoku [The summary of proceedings at the Tokyo Trial]. Tokyo: Yōshōdō shuppan, 2010.Google Scholar

Minear, Richard H. Victor's Justice: The Tokyo War Crimes Trial. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1971. Reprinted in 2001.Google Scholar

Morimura, Seiichi. Akuma no hōshoku: “Kantōgun saikin butai” [Devil's Gluttony: “The bacteriological unit of the Kwantung Army”]. Tokyo: Kobunsha, 1981.Google Scholar

Mouralis, Guillaume. “The Rejection of International Criminal Law in Germany after the Second World War.” In History, Memory and Politics in Central and Eastern Europe: Memory Games. Edited by Mink, Georges and Neumayer, Laure. London: Palgrave MacMillan, 2013, pp. 226–41.Google Scholar

Nagai, Hitoshi, ed. Sensō hanzai chōsa shiryō: furyo chōsa chōō iinkai chōsa hōkokusho tsuzuri [Sources on war crimes investigations: The compilation of investigation reports by the central committee for investigations concerning prisoners of war]. Tokyo: Higashi shuppan, 1995.Google Scholar

Nagai, Hitoshi, Firipin to tai-Nichi senpan saiban, 1945–1953 [The Philippines and war crimes trials against the Japanese, 1945–1953]. Tokyo: Iwanami shoten, 2010.Google Scholar

Nagai, Hitoshi. “Wasurerareta Tōkyō saiban Firipin hanji: Derufin Haranīrya hanji no shōgai” [The forgotten Philippine justice at the Tokyo Trial: The life of Delfin Jaranilla]. In Kingendai Nihon no sensō to heiwa [War and peace in modern Japan]. Edited by Kentarō, Awaya. Tokyo: Gendai shiryō shuppan, 2011, pp. 303–66.Google Scholar

Nakajima, Takeshi. “The Tokyo Tribunal, Justice Pal and the Revisionist Distortion of History.” The Asia-Pacific Journal Japan, Vol. 9, Issue 33, No. 3 (October 2011): 1–20.Google Scholar

Nakano, Tomio. The Ordinance Power of the Japanese Emperor. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Press, 1923.Google Scholar

Nakazato, Nariaki. Neonationalist Mythology in Postwar Japan: Pal's Dissenting Judgment at the Tokyo War Crimes Tribunal. Lanham, Boulder, New York, and London: Lexington Books, 2016.Google Scholar

Nandy, Ashis. “The Other Within: The Strange Case of Radhabinod Pal's Judgment on Culpability.” New Literary History, Vol. 23, No. 1 (Winter 1992): 45–67.Google Scholar

Nichigai Associates, ed. Taiheiyō sensō tosho mokuroku 1945–1994 [The Pacific War books, 1945–1994: A catalog]. Tokyo: Kinokuniya shoten, 1995.Google Scholar

Nichigai Associates, ed. Taiheiyō sensō tosho mokuroku: 1995–2004 [The Pacific War books, 1995–2005: A catalog]. Tokyo: Kinokuniya shoten, 2005.Google Scholar

Nichigai Associates, ed. Taiheiyō sensō tosho mokuroku: 2005–2015 [The Pacific War books, 2005–2015: A catalog]. Tokyo: Kinokuniya shoten, 2016.Google Scholar

Okinawa taimusu sha [The Okinawan Times], ed. Tetsu no bōfō [The iron storm]. Tokyo: Asahi shinbunsha, 1950.Google Scholar

Okuhara, Toshio. “Tōkyō saiban ni okeru kyōdō bōgi riron” [The theory of conspiracy at the Tokyo Trial]. 3 installments. Kokushikan daigaku seikei ronsō [Kokushikan University, political economy debate series], no. 5 (September 1966), 155–92; no. 7 (January 1968), 387–413; and no. 12 (June 1970), 181–204.Google Scholar

ōnuma, Yasuaki. Sensō sekinin josetsu: “heiwa ni taisuru tsumi” no keisei katei ni okeru ideologī-sei to kōsoku-sei [The introduction to war responsibility: Ideological features and constraints in the formation of “crimes against peace”]. Tokyo: Tōkyō daigaku shuppankai, 1975.Google Scholar

Ōnuma, Yasuaki. Tōkyō saiban kara sengo sekinin no shisō e: zōhoban [From the Tokyo Trial to the concept of postwar responsibility, expanded edition]. Tokyo: Tōshindō, 1987.Google Scholar

ōoka, Yōichirō. Tōkyō saiban: Furansujin hanji no muzairon [The Tokyo Trial: The not-guilty thesis by the French justice]. Tokyo: Bungei shunjō, 2012.Google Scholar

Oppenheim, L. International Law: A Treatise. 6th edn. 2 Vols. Edited by Lauterpacht, H.. London, New York, and Toronto: Longmans, Green and Co., 1940.Google Scholar

Oppenheim, L. International Law: A Treatise. 7th edn. 2 Vols. Edited by Lauterpacht, H.. London, New York, and Toronto: Longmans, Green and Co., 1951.Google Scholar

Osten, Philipp. “Tōkyō saiban ni okeru hanzai kōsei yōken no saihō: shoki kokusai keihōshi no ichi danmen no sobyō” [Revisiting the elements of crimes at the Tokyo Trial: Sketches of an aspect in the early phase of the history of international criminal law]. Hōgaku kenkyō: hōritsu, seiji, shakai [Journal of law, politics, and sociology], Vol. 82, No. 1 (January 2009): 315–38.Google Scholar

Overy, Richard. The Bombers and the Bombs: Allied Air War Over Europe, 1940–1945. New York: Viking Penguin, 2013.Google Scholar

Ozaki, Yukio. The Voice of Japanese Democracy: Being an Essay on Constitutional Loyalty. Translated by Becker, J. E. De. Yokohama: Kelly and Walsh, 1918.Google Scholar

Pal, Radhabinod. Zen'yaku, Nihon muzairon: Kyokutō kokusai gunji saiban Indo daihyō hanji R. Pōru jutsu [The complete translation: The Japan-Is-Not Guilty view: Written by Justice R. Pal, the Indian member of the International Military Tribunal for the Far East]. Tokyo: Nihon shobō, 1952.Google Scholar

Powell, John. “Japan's Germ Warfare: The U.S. Cover-Up of a War Crimes.” Bulletin of Concerned Asian Scholars, Vol. 12, No. 4 (October–December 1980): 2–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Powell, John. “A Hidden Chapter in History.” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, Vol. 37, No. 8 (October 1981): 44–53.Google Scholar

Radbruch, Gustav. Rechtsphilosophie. 4th edn. Stuttgart: Koehler, 1950.Google Scholar

Radbruch, G. “Fuenf Minuten Rechtsphilosophie.” In Gesamtausgabe Radbruch. Edited by Kaufmann, Arthur, Vol. 3. 1990, pp. 78–82.Google Scholar

Reel, A. Frank. The Case of General Yamashita. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1949.Google Scholar

Röling, B. V. A., and Cassese, Antonio. The Tokyo Trial and Beyond: Reflections of a Peacemonger. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Russell, Edward F. L. The Knights of Bushido: A Short History of Japanese War Crimes. London: Cassell, 1958.Google Scholar

Ryan, Allan A. Yamashita's Ghost: War Crimes, MacArthur's Justice, and Command Accountability. Lawrence, KS: University of Kansas Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Satō, Kenryō. Tōjō Hideki to Taiheiyō sensō [Tōjō Hideki and the Pacific War]. Tokyo: Bungei shunjō shinsha, 1960.Google Scholar

Sellars, Kirsten. “The Legacy of the Tokyo Dissents on ‘Crimes against Peace’.” In The Crime of Aggression: A Commentary. Edited by Kress, Claus and Barriga, Stefan. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2016.Google Scholar

Shigemitsu, Mamoru. Sugamo nikki [The Sugamo diary]. Tokyo: Bungei shunjō, 1953.Google Scholar

Sissons, D. C. S. “Australian War Crimes Trials and Investigations (1942–1951).” Available at the University of California–Berkeley War Crimes Studies Center website. www.ocf.berkeley.edu/∼changmin/documents/Sissons%20Final%20War%20Crimes%20Text%2018-3-06.pdfGoogle Scholar

Sugawara, Yutaka. Tōkyō saiban no shōtai [The true character of the Tokyo Trial]. Tokyo: Jiji tsōshinsha, 1961.Google Scholar

Sumitani, Takeshi. “Sensō hanzai saiban ron, sensō seknin ron no dōkō: Bunken shōkai o chōshin ni” [Trends in the debates on war crimes trials and war responsibility: Centering on the introduction of historical literature]. Shisō [Idea] No. 719 (May 1984): 123–31.Google Scholar

Sumitani, Takeshi, Aiko, Utsumi, and Shirō, Akazawa. “Tōkyō saiban, BC-kyō sensō hanzai, sensō sekinin kankei shuyō bunken mokuroku” [The bibliographic catalog to major literature on the Tokyo Trial, Class BC war crimes, war responsibility]. Shisō [Idea] No. 719 (May 1984): appendix (28 pages).Google Scholar

Takeda, Kiyoko. Tennō kan no sōkoku: 1945-nen zengo [Competing views concerning the emperor: Around the year 1945]. Tokyo: Iwanami shoten, 1978.Google Scholar

Takeda, Kiyoko. The Dual-Image of the Japanese Emperor. New York: New York University Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Takeda, Kayoko. Interpreting the Tokyo War Crimes Tribunal: A Sociopolitical Analysis. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tanaka, Masaaki, ed. Pōru hakase jutsu, shinri no sabaki, Nihon muzai ron [The judgment of truth, as told by Dr. Pal: The Japan-Is-Not Guilty view]. Tokyo: Taiheiyō shuppansha, 1952.Google Scholar

Tanaka, Masaaki. Pōru hakase no Nihon muzai ron [Japan Is Not Guilty: The view propounded by Dr. Pal]. Kanagawa: Keibunsha, 1963, reprinted in 1992. Also available in a new edition by Shōgakukan, 2001.Google Scholar

Tanaka, Yuki, McCormack, Timothy L. H., and Simpson, Gerry, eds. The Tokyo War Crimes Trial Revisited. International Humanitarian Law Series. Leiden, The Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff, 2010.Google Scholar

Taylor, Telford. The Anatomy of the Nuremberg Trials: A Personal Memoir. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1992.Google Scholar

Terasaki, Hidenari. Shōwa tennō dokuhakuroku: Terasaki Hidenari goyōgakari nikki [Emperor Showa's monologue: The diary of an imperial assistant, Terasaki Hidenari]. Tokyo: Bungei shunjō, 1991.Google Scholar

Tōkyō, saiban kenkyōkai [The Tokyo Trial research group], ed. Kyōdō kenkyō: Paru hanketsusho [Collaborative research on Pal's Judgment]. Tokyo: Tōkyō saiban kankōkai, 1966. Reprint in 2 Vols. Tokyo: Kōdansha gakujutsu bunko, 1984.Google Scholar

Totani, Yuma. The Tokyo War Crimes Trial: The Pursuit of Justice in the Wake of World War II. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Asia Center, 2008.Google Scholar

Totani, Yuma. Justice in Asia and the Pacific Region, 1945–1952: Allied War Crimes Prosecutions. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Totani, Yuma. “Zhanfan shenpan yanjiu de lishi yiyi: Cong Dongjing shenpan dao geguo shenpan de yanshen” [The historical significance of the studies of war crimes trials: From the Tokyo Trial to the national trials]. Translated by Chen Aiguo. ed. Center for the Tokyo Trial Studies. In Donjing shenpan zai taolun [The restudy of the Tokyo Trial]. Shanghai: Shanghai jiaotong daxue chubanshe, 2016, pp. 30–63.Google Scholar

Uchida, Rikizō. “Kyokutō saiban no hōrironteki igi: Shu to shite Eibei hōgaku no tachiba kara” [The significance of the Far Eastern Trial in legal theory: Primarily from the viewpoint of the field of Anglo-American Law]. Chō [Current]. Vol. 3, No. 8 (September 1948): 22–30.Google Scholar

Udagawa, Kōta. “Tōkyō saiban to Nihon kaigun: shinri katei to bengogawa no saiban taisaku ni chakumoku shite” [The Tokyo Trial and the Imperial Japanese Navy: Focusing on the court proceedings and the defense policy on the trial]. Nihonshi kenkyō [Studies of Japanese history], No. 609 (May 2013): 1–25.Google Scholar

United Nations War Crimes Commission, comp. History of the United Nations War Crimes Commission and the Development of the Laws of War. London: His Majesty's Stationery Office, 1948.Google Scholar

United Nations War Crimes Commission, comp. ed. Law Reports of Trials of War Criminals. 15 Vols. London: His Majesty's Stationery Office, 1947–9.Google Scholar

Ushimura, Kei. “Pal's ‘Dissentient Judgment’ Reconsidered: Some Notes on Postwar Japan's Responses to the Opinion.” Japan Review, Vol. 19 (2007): 215–23.Google Scholar

Van der Wilt, Harmen. “A Valiant Champion of Equity and Humaneness: The Legacy of Bert Röling for International Criminal Law.” Journal of International Criminal Justice, Vol. 8, No. 4 (September 2010): 1127–40.Google Scholar

Van Poelgeest, L. Tōkyō saiban to Oranda [The Tokyo Trial and the Netherlands]. Translated by Mizushima Jirō and Tsukahara Tōgo. Annotated by Awaya Kentarō. Tokyo: Misuzu shobō, 1997.Google Scholar

Van Poelgeest, L. Nederland en het Tribunaal van Tokio: Volkenrechtelijke polemiek en internationale politiek rond de berechting en gratiëring van de Japanse oorlogsmisdadigers. Arnhem: Gouda Quint, 1989.Google Scholar

Welch, Jeanie M., ed. The Tokyo Trial: A Bibliographic Guide to English-Language Sources. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Werrell, Kenneth P. Blankets of Fire. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Yamada, Akira. Gunbi kakuchō no kindaishi: Nihongun no bōchō to hōkai [The modern history of armament: expansion and dissolution of the Japanese Army]. Tokyo: Yoshikawa kōbunkan, 1997.Google Scholar

Yamada, Akira. Shōwa tennō no gunji shisō to senryaku [The military thought and strategy of Emperor Shōwa]. Tokyo: Azekura shobō, 2002.Google Scholar

Yamada, Akira. Rikugun Noborito kenkyōjo: Inpeisareta bōryaku himitsu heiki kaihatsu [The Noborito Army Research Institute: Cover-up of the development of conspiratorial secrete weapons]. Tokyo: Aoki shoten, 2003.Google Scholar

Yokota, Kisaburō. Sensō hanzai ron [A treatise on war crimes]. Tokyo: Yōhikaku, 1947; expanded edition, 1949.Google Scholar

Yokota, Kisaburō. “Sekai no shinpan: jiei ron o funsai” [The verdict of the world; The doctrine of self-defense destroyed]. Published in Mainichi shinbun [Mainichi newspaper] on 13 November 1948. Reproduced in Shinbun shiryō ni miru Tōkyō saiban, BC-kyō saiban 1: Tōkyō saiban [The Tokyo Trial and Class BC trials seen in newspaper sources, Vol. 1: The Tokyo Trial]. Edited by Hitoshi, Nagai and Aiko, Utsumi. Tokyo: Gendai shiryō shuppan, 2000, p. 346.Google Scholar

Yokota, Kisaburō. “Tōkyō hanketsu to jiei ron” [The Tokyo Judgment and the doctrine of self-defense]. Hroītsu jihō, Vol. 21, No. 2 (1949): 5–12.Google Scholar

Yoshida, Yutaka. Shōwa tennō no shōsenshi [Emperor Shōwa's history in the termination of the war]. Tokyo: Iwanami shoten, 1992.Google Scholar

Yoshida, Yutaka. “Haisen go ni okeru kōbunsho no shōkyaku to intoku” [The burning and concealment of government records at the time of defeat]. In Gendai rekishigaku to sensō sekinin [Studies of modern history and the issues of responsibility for the war]. Edited by Yutaka, Yoshida. Tokyo: Aoki shoten, 1997, pp. 127–41.Google Scholar

Yoshida, Yutaka. “Gunji kankei shiryō no sengoshi: jōhō kōkai hō no shikō to Nihon kindaishi kenkyō” [The postwar history of military-related historical records: The implementation of the Freedom of Information Act and the research of the modern Japanese history]. In ōkaibuzu no kagaku: 1. kiroku shiryō to bunsho kan [The archival science. Vol. 1. Historical documents and records offices]. Edited by Kokubungaku kenkyō shiryōkan shiryōkan [The national literature research archives and the historical records offices]. Tokyo: Kashiwa shobō, 2003, pp. 262–75.Google Scholar

Yoshimi, Yoshiaki. Jōgun ianfu [Military comfort women]. Tokyo: Iwanami shoten, 1995.Google Scholar

Yoshimi, Yoshiaki. Comfort Women: Sexual Slavery in the Japanese Military during World War II. Translated by O'Brien, Suzanne. New York: Columbia University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Yoshimi, Yoshiaki. “Sensō no kioku, sensō no kiroku: ‘jōgun ianfu’ kankei kiroku no mondai o rei to shite” [War memory and war records: In the case of the issues on the records relating to “military comfort women]. In ōkaibuzu no kagaku: 1. kiroku shiryō to bunsho kan [The archival science. Vol. 1. Historical documents and records offices]. Edited by Kokubungaku kenkyō shiryōkan shiryōkan [The national literature research archives and the historical records offices] Tokyo: Kashiwa shobō, 2003, pp. 276–96.Google Scholar

Yui, Masaomi, ed. Sōmitsuin no kenkyō [Studies of the Privy Council]. Tokyo: Yoshikawa kōbunkan, 2003.Google Scholar