Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T11:41:34.873Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 38 - Biopsychosocial Factors in Postnatal Care

from Section 4 - Obstetrics and Maternal Health

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 August 2017

Leroy C. Edozien
Affiliation:
Manchester Academic Health Science Centre
P. M. Shaughn O'Brien
Affiliation:
Keele University School of Medicine
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Buultjens, M., et al., The perinatal period: a literature review from the biopsychosocial perspective. Clinical Nursing Studies, 2013. 1(3): 19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furuta, M., et al., The relationship between severe maternal morbidity and psychological health symptoms at 6–8 weeks postpartum: A prospective cohort study in one English maternity unit. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 2014. 14(1): 133.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knight, M., et al., Saving Lives, Improving Mothers’ Care Lessons learned to inform future maternity care from the UK and Ireland Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths and Morbidity 2009–2012. London; MBRRACE-UK 2014. Available at www.npeu.ox.ac.uk/mbrrace-uk/reports. Accessed 27 March 2017.Google Scholar
MacArthur, C., et al., Effects of redesigned community postnatal care on womens’ health 4 months after birth: A cluster randomised controlled trial. Lancet, 2002. 359(9304): 378385.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bick, D.E., et al., Improving inpatient postnatal services: Midwives’ views and perspectives of engagement in a quality improvement initiative. BMC Health Serv Res, 2011. 11: 293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fahey, J.O. and Shenassa, E., Understanding and meeting the needs of women in the postpartum period: The perinatal maternal health promotion model. Journal of Midwifery & Women’s Health, 2013. 58(6): 613621.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Webb, D.A., et al., Postpartum physical symptoms in new mothers: Their relationship to functional limitations and emotional well-being. Birth, 2008. 35(3): 179187.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), Routine Postnatal Care of Women and their Babies, in Clinical Guideline 37, NICE 2006.Google Scholar
Lewis, I. and Lenehan, C.. Report of the children and young people’s health outcomes forum. London: Children and Young People’s Health Outcomes Forum. 2012.Google Scholar
DH, National service framework for children, young people and maternity services. Department of Health London, 2004.Google Scholar
DH, Maternity matters: Choice, access and continuity of care in a safe service, Department of Health London, 2007.Google Scholar
HSCIC, Hospital Episode Statistics: NHSMaternity Statistics, England 2013–2014. Health and Social Care Information Centre, 2015.Google Scholar
Brown, S., et al., Early postnatal discharge from hospital for healthy mothers and term infants. The Cochrane Library, 2002.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bhavnani, V. and Newburn, M., Left to your own devices: The postnatal care experiences of 1260 first-time mothers. London: NCT, 2010.Google Scholar
Beake, S., Bick, D., and Weavers, A., Revising care to meet maternal needs post birth: An overview of the hospital to home postnatal study. The Practising Midwife, 2012. 15(6): 1013.Google ScholarPubMed
Bick, D., et al., Improving postnatal outcomes using continuous quality improvement: A pre and post intervention study in one English maternity unit. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 2012. 12(1): 41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schmied, V. and Bick, D., Postnatal care–Current issues and future challenges. Midwifery, 2014. 30(6): 571574.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacArthur, C., et al., Effects of redesigned community postnatal care on womens’ health 4 months after birth: A cluster randomised controlled trial. The Lancet, 2002. 359(9304): 378385.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Woolhouse, H., et al., Physical health after childbirth and maternal depression in the first 12 months post partum: Results of an Australian nulliparous pregnancy cohort study. Midwifery, 2014. 30(3): 378384.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Darvill, R., Skirton, H., and Farrand, P., Psychological factors that impact on women’s experiences of first-time motherhood: A qualitative study of the transition. Midwifery, 2010. 26(3): 357366.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Emmanuel, E.N., et al., Maternal role development: The impact of maternal distress and social support following childbirth. Midwifery, 2011. 27(2): 265272.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cargill, Y., et al., Postpartum maternal and newborn discharge. Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada : JOGC = Journal d’obstetrique et gynecologie du Canada : JOGC, 2007. 29(4): 357363.Google ScholarPubMed
Malkin, J.D., et al., Infant Mortality and Early Postpartum Discharge. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2000. 96(2): 183188.Google ScholarPubMed
Yonemoto, N., et al., Schedules for home visits in the early postpartum period. Evidence-Based Child Health: A Cochrane Review Journal, 2014. 9(1): 599.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacArthur, C., et al., Redesigning postnatal care: A randomised controlled trial of protocol-based midwifery-led care focused on individual women’s physical and psychological health needs. National Co-ordinating Centre for Health Technology Assessment, 2003.Google ScholarPubMed
Bick, D.E., MacArthur, C., and Lancashire, R.J., What influences the uptake and early cessation of breast feeding? Midwifery, 1998. 14(4): 242247.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Logsdon, M.C. and Davis, D.W., Social and professional support for pregnant and parenting women. MCN: The American Journal of Maternal/Child Nursing, 2003. 28(6): 371376.Google ScholarPubMed
Razurel, C. and Kaiser, B., The Role of Satisfaction with Social Support on the Psychological Health of Primiparous Mothers in the Perinatal Period. Women & Health, 2015. 55(2): 167186.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilkins, C., A qualitative study exploring the support needs of first-time mothers on their journey towards intuitive parenting. Midwifery, 2006. 22(2): 169180.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leahy-Warren, P., McCarthy, G., and Corcoran, P., First-time mothers: Social support, maternal parental self-efficacy and postnatal depression. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 2012. 21(3-4): 388397.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harwood, K., McLean, N., and Durkin, K., First-time mothers’ expectations of parenthood: What happens when optimistic expectations are not matched by later experiences? Developmental Psychology, 2007. 43(1): 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tulman, L. and Fawcett, J., Functional status during pregnancy and the postpartum: A framework for research. Image: The Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 1990. 22(3): 191194.Google ScholarPubMed
Romano, M., et al., Postpartum period: Three distinct but continuous phases. Journal of Prenatal Medicine, 2010. 4(2): 22.Google ScholarPubMed
Hay-Smith, J., et al., Pelvic floor muscle training for prevention and treatment of urinary and faecal incontinence in antenatal and postnatal women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2008. 4. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyle, R., et al., Pelvic floor muscle training for prevention and treatment of urinary and faecal incontinence in antenatal and postnatal women. The Cochrane Library, 2012;10:CD007471. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007471.pub2.Google ScholarPubMed
Hannestad, Y.S., Rortveit, G., and Hunskaar, S., Help-seeking and associated factors in female urinary incontinence. The Norwegian EPINCONT Study. Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care, 2002. 20(2): 102107.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Solans-Domènech, M., et al., Urinary and anal incontinence during pregnancy and postpartum: Incidence, severity, and risk factors. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2010. 115(3): 618628.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koch, L.H., Help-Seeking behaviors of women with urinary incontinence: An integrative literature review. Journal of Midwifery & Women’s Health, 2006. 51(6): e39e44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, S., et al., Consultation about urinary and faecal incontinence in the year after childbirth: A cohort study. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 2015. 122(7): 954962.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wray, J., Bouncing back?: An ethnographic study exploring the context of care and recovery after birth through the experiences and voices of mothers, 2011, University of Salford.Google Scholar
WHO, Exclusive breastfeeding for six months best for babies everywhere, 2011, World Health Organisation: Geneva.Google Scholar
Brown, A., Raynor, P., and Lee, M., Healthcare professionals’ and mothers’ perceptions of factors that influence decisions to breastfeed or formula feed infants: A comparative study. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 2011. 67(9): 19932003.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Renfrew, M.J., et al., Support for healthy breastfeeding mothers with healthy term babies. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2012. 5: CD001141.Google ScholarPubMed
Lee, E., Feeding babies and the problems of policy. Centre for Parenting Culture Studies, University of Kent. 2011. Available at https://blogs.kent.ac.uk/parentingculturestudies/files/2011/02/CPCS-Briefing-on-feeding-babies-FINAL-revised1.pdf. Accessed 27 March 2017.Google Scholar
Knaak, S.J., Contextualising risk, constructing choice: Breastfeeding and good mothering in risk society. Health, risk & society, 2010. 12(4): 345355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoddinott, P., et al., A serial qualitative interview study of infant feeding experiences: Idealism meets realism. BMJ Open, 2012. 2(2): e000504.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de Jager, E., et al., Psychosocial correlates of exclusive breastfeeding: A systematic review. Midwifery, 2013. 29(5): 506518.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
LeMasters, E.E., Parenthood as crisis. Marriage and family living, 1957;19: 352355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gavin, N.I., et al., Perinatal depression: A systematic review of prevalence and incidence. Obstet Gynecol, 2005. 106(5 Pt 1): 10711083.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goodman, S.H., et al., Maternal depression and child psychopathology: A meta-analytic review. Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev, 2011. 14(1): 127.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beck, C.T., Postpartum depression: A metasynthesis. Qual Health Res, 2002. 12(4): 453472.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Khan, L., Falling through the gaps: Perinatal mental health and general practice, 2015, Royal College of General Practitioners and Centre for Mental Health: London.Google Scholar
Stewart, D.E., et al., Postpartum depression: Literature review of risk factors and interventions. Toronto: University Health Network Women’s Health Program for Toronto Public Health, 2003.Google Scholar
Harwood, K., McLean, N., and Durkin, K., First-time mothers’ expectations of parenthood: What happens when optimistic expectations are not matched by later experiences? Dev Psychol, 2007. 43(1): 112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newburn, M., Becoming a mother–regaining the balance. The practising midwife, 2006. 9(7): 13.Google ScholarPubMed
Sandall, J., et al., Midwife-led continuity models versus other models of care for childbearing women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016. 4: CD004667. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004667.pub5.Google ScholarPubMed
Rayment-Jones, H., Murrells, T., and Sandall, J., An investigation of the relationship between the caseload model of midwifery for socially disadvantaged women and childbirth outcomes using routine data–a retrospective, observational study. Midwifery, 2015. 31(4): 409417.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cowan, C.P. and Cowan, P.A., Interventions to ease the transition to parenthood: Why they are needed and what they can do. Family Relations, 1995; 44:412423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huston, T. and Holmes, E.K., Becoming parents. Family Communication. 2003. 105.Google Scholar
Coleman, L. and Glenn, F., The varied impact of couple relationship breakdown on children: Implications for practice and policy. Children & Society, 2010. 24(3): 238249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amato, P.R., Children of divorce in the 1990s: An update of the Amato and Keith (1991) meta-analysis. J Fam Psychol, 2001. 15(3): 355370.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Doss, B.D., et al., The effect of the transition to parenthood on relationship quality: An 8-year prospective study. J Pers Soc Psychol, 2009. 96(3): 601619.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bryanton, J., Beck, C.T., and Montelpare, W., Postnatal parental education for optimizing infant general health and parent-infant relationships. The Cochrane Library, 2013.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gerhardt, S., Why love matters: How affection shapes a baby’s brain. Infant Observation, 2006. 9(3): 305309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gagnon, A.J. and Sandall, J., Individual or group antenatal education for childbirth or parenthood, or both. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2007(3): CD002869.Google ScholarPubMed
Mercer, R.T. and Walker, L.O., A review of nursing interventions to foster becoming a mother. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs, 2006. 35(5): 568582.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Magill-Evans, J., et al., Interventions with fathers of young children: Systematic literature review. J Adv Nurs, 2006. 55(2): 248264.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
El-Mohandes, A.A., et al., The effect of a parenting education program on the use of preventive pediatric health care services among low-income, minority mothers: A randomized, controlled study. Pediatrics, 2003. 111(6 Pt 1): 13241332.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Skovgaard, A.M., et al., Predictors (0–10 months) of psychopathology at age 1½ years–a general population study in the Copenhagen child cohort CCC 2000*. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 2008. 49(5): 553562.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barlow, J., et al., Parent-infant psychotherapy for improving parental and infant mental health. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2015; 8;1:CD010534. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010534.pub2.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×