Book contents
- Risks, Rewards and Regulation of Unconventional GasA Global Perspective
- Risks, Rewards and Regulation of Unconventional Gas
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Preface
- Acknowledgements
- 1 The Rise of Unconventional Gas: The Story So Far
- 2 Geopolitical Dimensions of Global Unconventional Gas Perspectives
- 3 Unconventional Gas Development in Asia–Pacific: Looking for Common Ground
- 4 Unconventional Hydrocarbons and the US Technology Revolution
- 5 Risks and Opportunities of Unconventional Natural Gas: Australia and the United States
- 6 Economics of Shale Gas in the United States
- 7 Unconventional Natural Gas in China
- 8 The Argentinian Approach for Developing Unconventional Gas Resources
- 9 Unconventional Gas in the United Kingdom
- 10 Alberta Natural Gas – Landlocked Largesse
- 11 Managing the Regulatory Risk of Unconventional Natural Gas
- 12 Regulation of Unconventional Gas in Colombia
- 13 Regulation of Unconventional Gas in India
- 14 Failure to Frack: Pitfalls of Governance and Risk in Polish Shale Gas
- 15 Unconventional Gas Regulation in Australia and the US: Case Studies of Four Jurisdictions
- 16 Regulation of Unconventional Hydrocarbons in Alberta, Canada
- 17 When Unconventional Becomes Conventional: Regulation of Natural Gas Development in British Columbia, Canada
- 18 Leading Practice Regulation for Unconventional Reservoir Development in South Australia
- 19 Best Practice for Community Engagement: Determining Who is Affected and What is at Stake
- 20 Managing the Impact of Coal Seam Gas Water Extraction in the Surat Basin
- 21 Whole-of-Landscape Assessment and Planning in the Management of Unconventional Gas Exploration and Production in Australia
- 22 Unconventional Energy in British Columbia: A Post-Tsilhqot'in View
- 23 Fugitive Emissions from Coal Seam Gas Production
- Appendix: Units
- Glossary and Acronyms
- Index
- References
3 - Unconventional Gas Development in Asia–Pacific: Looking for Common Ground
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 21 January 2017
Book contents
- Risks, Rewards and Regulation of Unconventional GasA Global Perspective
- Risks, Rewards and Regulation of Unconventional Gas
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Preface
- Acknowledgements
- 1 The Rise of Unconventional Gas: The Story So Far
- 2 Geopolitical Dimensions of Global Unconventional Gas Perspectives
- 3 Unconventional Gas Development in Asia–Pacific: Looking for Common Ground
- 4 Unconventional Hydrocarbons and the US Technology Revolution
- 5 Risks and Opportunities of Unconventional Natural Gas: Australia and the United States
- 6 Economics of Shale Gas in the United States
- 7 Unconventional Natural Gas in China
- 8 The Argentinian Approach for Developing Unconventional Gas Resources
- 9 Unconventional Gas in the United Kingdom
- 10 Alberta Natural Gas – Landlocked Largesse
- 11 Managing the Regulatory Risk of Unconventional Natural Gas
- 12 Regulation of Unconventional Gas in Colombia
- 13 Regulation of Unconventional Gas in India
- 14 Failure to Frack: Pitfalls of Governance and Risk in Polish Shale Gas
- 15 Unconventional Gas Regulation in Australia and the US: Case Studies of Four Jurisdictions
- 16 Regulation of Unconventional Hydrocarbons in Alberta, Canada
- 17 When Unconventional Becomes Conventional: Regulation of Natural Gas Development in British Columbia, Canada
- 18 Leading Practice Regulation for Unconventional Reservoir Development in South Australia
- 19 Best Practice for Community Engagement: Determining Who is Affected and What is at Stake
- 20 Managing the Impact of Coal Seam Gas Water Extraction in the Surat Basin
- 21 Whole-of-Landscape Assessment and Planning in the Management of Unconventional Gas Exploration and Production in Australia
- 22 Unconventional Energy in British Columbia: A Post-Tsilhqot'in View
- 23 Fugitive Emissions from Coal Seam Gas Production
- Appendix: Units
- Glossary and Acronyms
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Risks, Rewards and Regulation of Unconventional GasA Global Perspective, pp. 35 - 58Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2016
References
Andrews-Speed, P. and Len, C. (2014). The legal and commercial determinants of unconventional gas production in East Asia. Journal of World Energy Law and Business, 7 (5), 408–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
APEC (Asia–Pacific Economic Cooperation) (2010). 2010 APEC Energy Ministerial Meeting. [Online] Available at: http://apec.org/Meeting-Papers/Ministerial-Statements/Energy/2010_energy.aspx [accessed 3 November 2015].Google Scholar
APEC (Asia–Pacific Economic Cooperation) (2012a). 2012 APEC Energy Ministerial Meeting. [Online] Available at: http://apec.org/Meeting-Papers/Ministerial-Statements/Energy/2012_energy.aspx [accessed 3 November 2015].Google Scholar
APEC (Asia–Pacific Economic Cooperation) (2012b). 2012 Leaders Declaration. Annex B – Strengthening APEC Energy Security. [Online] Available at: http://apec.org/Meeting-Papers/Leaders-Declarations/2012/2012_aelm/2012_aelm_annexB.aspx [accessed 3 November 2015].Google Scholar
APEC (Asia–Pacific Economic Cooperation) (2014). http://www.apec.org/Meeting-Papers/Ministerial-Statements/Energy/2014_energy.aspx. [Online] Available at: http://www.apec.org/Meeting-Papers/Ministerial-Statements/Energy/2014_energy.aspx [accessed 5 November 2015].Google Scholar
APEC EGEDA (Asia–Pacific Economic Cooperation Expert Group on Energy Data Analysis) (2015). APEC Energy Database. [Online] Available at: http://www.ieej.or.jp/egeda/database/ [accessed 2 November 2015].Google Scholar
APEC EWG (Asia–Pacific Economic Cooperation Energy Working Group) (2013). APEC Unconventional Natural Gas Census. Singapore: Asia–Pacific Economic Cooperation.Google Scholar
APERC (Asia–Pacific Energy Research Centre) (2013). APEC Energy Demand and Supply Outlook – 5th Edition. Tokyo: Asia–Pacific Economic Cooperation.Google Scholar
APERC (Asia–Pacific Energy Research Centre) (2015). Pathways to Shale Gas Development. [Online] Tokyo: Asia Pacific Energy Research Centre. Available at: http://aperc.ieej.or.jp [accessed 6 November 2015].Google Scholar
Binnion, M. (2012). How the technical differences between shale gas and conventional gas projects lead to a new business model being required to be successful. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 31 (1), 3–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Council of Canadian Academies (2014). Annual Report 2013/14. [Online] Available at: http://www.scienceadvice.ca [accessed 6 Nov 2015].Google Scholar
De la Vega Navarro, A. and Ramírez Villegas, J. (2015). El gas de lutitas (shale gas) en México. Recursos, explotación, usos impactos. Economía UNAM, 12 (34), 79–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deemer, P. and Song, N. (2014). China's ‘Long March’ to shale gas production – exciting potential and lost opportunities. Journal of World Energy and Business, 7 (5), 448–67.Google Scholar
EIA (Energy Information Administration) (2011). World Shale Gas Resources: An Initial Assessment of 14 Regions outside the United States. Washington: United States Energy Information Administration.Google Scholar
EIA (Energy Information Administration) (2013). Technically Recoverable Shale Oil and Shale Gas Resources: An Assessment of 137 Shale Formations in 41 Countries outside the United States. Washington: United States Energy Information Administration.Google Scholar
Hall, N., Lacey, J., Carr-Cornish, S. and Anne-Maree, D. (2015). Social licence to operate: understanding how a concept has been translated into practice in energy industries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 86, 301–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hewitt, T.E.G. (2014). A progress report on Indonesian coal bed methane development. Journal of World Energy Law and Business, 7 (5), 468–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
IEA (International Energy Agency) (2014). Natural Gas Information 2014. Paris: International Energy Agency.Google Scholar
Krahmann, E. (2003). National, regional and global governance: one phenomenon or many? Global Governance, 9, 323–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krupnick, A., Wang, Z. and Wang, Y. (2014). Environmental risks of shale gas development in China. Energy Policy, 75, 117–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lajous, A. (2015). Mexican Oil Reform: The First Two Bidding Rounds, Farmouts and Contractual Conversions in A Lower Oil Price Environment. New York: Columbia SIPA Center on Global Energy Policy.Google Scholar
Lozano Maya, J.R. (2013). The United States’ experience as a reference of success for shale gas development: the case of Mexico. Energy Policy, 62, 70–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nülle, G.M. (2015). Prospects for shale development outside the USA: evaluating nations' regulatory and fiscal regimes for unconventional hydrocarbons. Journal of World Energy Law and Business, 8 (3), 232–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oil and Gas Journal (2013). Worldwide look at reserves and production. Oil and Gas Journal, 111 (12), 32–3.Google Scholar
Shaw, K., Hill, S. D., Boyd, A. D. et al. (2015). Conflicted or constructive? Exploring community responses to new energy developments in Canada. Energy Research and Social Science, 8, 41–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tian, L., Wang, Z., Krupnick, A. and Liu, X. (2014). Stimulating shale gas development in China: a comparison with the US experience. Energy Policy, 75, 109–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Umbach, F. (2013). The unconventional gas revolution and the prospects for Europe and Asia. Asia Europe Journal, 11 (3), 305–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar