Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-05T01:57:50.629Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 5 - Assisted Reproduction Techniques (ART) and Fetal Growth

from Section 1 - Basic Principles

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 July 2018

Christoph Lees
Affiliation:
Imperial College London
Gerard H. A. Visser
Affiliation:
Universiteit Utrecht, The Netherlands
Kurt Hecher
Affiliation:
University Medical Centre, Hamburg
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

(HFEA), H.F.a.E.A. Fertility Treatment in 2013: Facts and Figures.Google Scholar
O’Flynn, N. Assessment and treatment for people with fertility problems: NICE guideline. Br J Gen Pract 2014;64(618):50–1.Google Scholar
Stojnic, J, et al. Perinatal outcome of singleton pregnancies following in vitro fertilization. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol 2013;40(2):277–83.Google ScholarPubMed
Koudstaal, J, et al. Obstetric outcome of singleton pregnancies after IVF: a matched control study in four Dutch university hospitals. Hum Reprod 2000;15(8):1819–25.Google Scholar
Wang, JX et al. The obstetric outcome of singleton pregnancies following in-vitro fertilization/gamete intra-fallopian transfer. Hum Reprod 1994;9(1):141–6.Google Scholar
Doyle, P, Beral, V, Maconochie, N. Preterm delivery, low birthweight and small-for-gestational-age in liveborn singleton babies resulting from in-vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod 1992;7(3):425–8.Google Scholar
Valenzuela-Alcaraz, B, et al. Differential effect of mode of conception and infertility treatment on fetal growth and prematurity. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2016:16.Google ScholarPubMed
Kondapalli, LA, Perales-Puchalt, A. Low birth weight: Is it related to assisted reproductive technology or underlying infertility? Fertil Steril 2013. 99(2):303–10.Google Scholar
Malchau, SS, et al. Perinatal outcomes in 6,338 singletons born after intrauterine insemination in Denmark, 2007 to 2012: The influence of ovarian stimulation. Fertil Steril 2014;102(4):1110–16 e2.Google Scholar
Wisborg, K, Ingerslev, HJ, Henriksen, TB. IVF and stillbirth: A prospective follow-up study. Hum Reprod 2010;25(5):1312–16.Google Scholar
Bensdorp, AJ, et al. Dizygotic twin pregnancies after medically assisted reproduction and after natural conception: Maternal and perinatal outcomes. Fertil Steril 2016.Google Scholar
Takeshima, K, et al. Impact of single embryo transfer policy on perinatal outcomes in fresh and frozen cycles-analysis of the Japanese Assisted Reproduction Technology registry between 2007 and 2012. Fertil Steril 2016;105(2):337–46 e3.Google Scholar
Tomic, V, Tomic, J. Neonatal outcome of IVF singletons versus naturally conceived in women aged 35 years and over. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2011;284(6)1411–16.Google Scholar
Wennberg, AL, et al. Effect of maternal age on maternal and neonatal outcomes after assisted reproductive technology. Fertil Steril 2016.Google Scholar
Luke, B, et al. Factors associated with ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) and its effect on assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatment and outcome. Fertil Steril 2010;94(4):1399–404.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Imudia, AN, et al. Peak serum estradiol level during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation is associated with increased risk of small for gestational age and preeclampsia in singleton pregnancies after in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 2012;97(6):1374–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kalra, SK, et al. Ovarian stimulation and low birth weight in newborns conceived through in vitro fertilization. Obstet Gynecol 2011;118(4):863–71.Google Scholar
Zhu, J, et al. Does IVF cleavage stage embryo quality affect pregnancy complications and neonatal outcomes in singleton gestations after double embryo transfers? J Assist Reprod Genet 2014;31(12):1635–41.Google Scholar
Li, Z, et al. Clinical outcomes following cryopreservation of blastocysts by vitrification or slow freezing: A population-based cohort study. Hum Reprod 2014;29(12):2794–801.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kato, O, et al. Neonatal outcome and birth defects in 6623 singletons born following minimal ovarian stimulation and vitrified versus fresh single embryo transfer. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2012;161(1):4650.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haavaldsen, C, Tanbo, T, Eskild, A. Placental weight in singleton pregnancies with and without assisted reproductive technology: a population study of 536,567 pregnancies. Hum Reprod 2012;27(2):576–82.Google Scholar
Nelissen, EC, et al. Altered gene expression in human placentas after IVF/ICSI. Hum Reprod 2014;29(12):2821–31.Google Scholar
Bloise, E, Feuer, SK, Rinaudo, PF. Comparative intrauterine development and placental function of ART concepti: Implications for human reproductive medicine and animal breeding. Hum Reprod Update 2014;20(6):822–39.Google Scholar
Bertolini, M, et al. Morphology and morphometry of in vivo- and in vitro-produced bovine concepti from early pregnancy to term and association with high birth weights. Theriogenology 2002;58(5):973–94.Google Scholar
Zhang, Y, et al. Ultrastructural study on human placentae from women subjected to assisted reproductive technology treatments. Biol Reprod 2011;85(3):635–42.Google Scholar
Bonduelle, M, et al. Prenatal testing in ICSI pregnancies: Incidence of chromosomal anomalies in 1586 karyotypes and relation to sperm parameters. Hum Reprod 2002;17(10):2600–14.Google Scholar
Whitelaw, N, et al. Epigenetic status in the offspring of spontaneous and assisted conception. Hum Reprod 2014;29(7):1452–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Allen, C, Reardon, W. Assisted reproduction technology and defects of genomic imprinting. BJOG 2005;112(12):1589–94.Google Scholar
Dupont, C, Sifer, C. A review of outcome data concerning children born following assisted reproductive technologies. ISRN Obstet Gynecol 2012:405382.Google ScholarPubMed
Zhu, JL, et al. Infertility, infertility treatment, and congenital malformations: Danish national birth cohort. BMJ 2006;333(7570):679.Google Scholar
Sanchez-Calabuig, MJ, et al. Potential health risks associated to ICSI: Insights from animal models and strategies for a safe procedure. Front Public Health 2014;2:241.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×