Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T15:44:21.340Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 26 - Postpartum Sterilization/Tubal Ligation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 March 2019

By
Christopher R. Cambic
Edited by
Tauqeer Husain ,
Roshan Fernando  and
Scott Segal
Tauqeer Husain
Affiliation:
Ashford and St Peter’s NHS Foundation Trust, Surrey
Roshan Fernando
Affiliation:
Womens Wellness and Research Centre, Hamad Medical Corporation, Qatar
Scott Segal
Affiliation:
Wake Forest University, North Carolina
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Obstetric Anesthesiology
An Illustrated Case-Based Approach
 , pp. 140 - 146
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Peterson, HB, Xia, Z, Hughes, JM, et al. The risk of pregnancy after tubal sterilization: findings from the U.S. Collaborative Review of Sterilization. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996; 174:1161–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chan, LM, Westhoff, CL. Tubal sterilization trends in the United States. Fertil Steril 2010; 94:1–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hillis, SD, Marchbanks, PA, Tylor, LR, et al. Poststerilization regret: findings from the United States Collaborative Review of Sterilization. Obstet Gynecol 1999; 93:889–95.Google ScholarPubMed
Thurman, AR, Janecek, T. One-year follow-up of women with unfulfilled postpartum sterilization requests. Obstet Gynecol 2010; 116:1071–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Obstetric Anesthesia and The Society for Obstetric Anesthesia and Perinatology. Practice guidelines for obstetric anesthesia: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Obstetric Anesthesia and The Society for Obstetric Anesthesia and Perinatology. Anesthesiology 2016; 124:270–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pati, S, Cullins, V. Female sterilization: evidence. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2000; 27:859–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vincent, RD Jr, Reid, RW. Epidural anesthesia for postpartum tubal ligation using epidural catheters placed during labor. J Clin Anesth 1993; 5:289–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Viscomi, CM, Rathmell, JP. Labor epidural catheter reactivation or spinal anesthesia for delayed postpartum tubal ligation: a cost comparison. J Clin Anesth 1995; 7:380–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goodman, EJ, Dumas, SD. The rate of successful reactivation of labor epidural catheters for postpartum tubal ligation surgery. Reg Anesth Pain Med 1998; 23:258–61.Google ScholarPubMed
Bishton, IM, Martin, PH, Vernon, JM, et al. Factors influencing epidural catheter migration. Anaesthesia 1992; 47:610–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Phillips, DC, Macdonald, R. Epidural catheter migration during labour. Anaesthesia 1987; 42:661–63.Google Scholar
D’Angelo, R, Berkebile, BL, Gerancher, JC. Prospective examination of epidural catheter insertion. Anesthesiology 1996; 84:88–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beilin, Y, Bernstein, HH, Zucker-Pinchoff, B. The optimal distance that a multiorifice epidural catheter should be threaded into the epidural space. Anesth Analg 1995; 81:301–4.Google ScholarPubMed
Hamilton, CL, Riley, ET, Cohen, SE. Changes in the position of epidural catheters associated with patient movement. Anesthesiology 1997; 86:778–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Furst, SR, Reisner, LS. Risk of high spinal anesthesia following failed epidural block for cesarean delivery. J Clin Anesth 1995; 7:71–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hogan, QH, Prost, R, Kulier, A, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of cerebrospinal fluid volume and the influence of body habitus and abdominal pressure. Anesthesiology 1996; 84:1341–49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Datta, S, Hurley, RJ, Naulty, JS, et al. Plasma and cerebrospinal fluid progesterone concentrations in pregnant and nonpregnant women. Anesth Analg 1986; 65:950–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Visser, WA, Dijkstra, A, Albayrak, M, et al. Spinal anaesthesia for intrapartum caesarean delivery following epidural labor analgesia: a retrospective cohort study. Can J Anaesth 2009; 56:577–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Portnoy, D, Vadhera, RB. Mechanisms and management of an incomplete epidural block for cesarean section. Anesthesiol Clin North Am 2003; 21:39–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dadarkar, P, Philip, J, Weidner, C, et al. Spinal anesthesia for cesarean section following inadequate labor epidural analgesia: a retrospective audit. Int J Obstet Anesth 2004; 13:239–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Simmons, SW, Taghizadeh, N, Dennis, AT, et al. Combined spinal-epidural versus epidural analgesia in labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; (10):CD003401.Google ScholarPubMed
Norris, MC. Are combined spinal-epidural catheters reliable? Int J Obstet Anesth 2000; 9:3–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, HH, Norman, P, DeLima, LG, et al. The minimum alveolar concentration of isoflurane in patients undergoing bilateral tubal ligation in the postpartum period. Anesthesiology 1995; 82:1364–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chan, MT, Gin, T. Postpartum changes in the minimum alveolar concentration of isoflurane. Anesthesiology 1995; 82:1360–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gin, T, Yau, G, Jong, W, et al. Disposition of propofol at caesarean section and in the postpartum period. Br J Anaesth 1991; 67:49–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Oliveira, GS Jr, Theilken, LS, McCarthy, RJ. Shortage of perioperative drugs: implications for anesthesia practice and patient safety. Anesth Analg 2011; 113:1429–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chang, CC, Wang, IT, Chen, YH, et al. Anesthetic management as a risk factor for postpartum hemorrhage after cesarean deliveries. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011; 205:462e1–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shnider, SM. Serum chlonesterase activity during pregnancy, labor and the puerperium. Anesthesiology 1965; 26:335–39.Google ScholarPubMed
Leighton, BL, Cheek, TG, Gross, JB, et al. Succinylcholine pharmacodynamics in peripartum patients. Anesthesiology 1986;64:202–5.Google ScholarPubMed
Khuenl-Brady, KS, Koller, J, Mair, P, et al. Comparison of vecuronium- and atracurium-induced neuromuscular blockade in postpartum and nonpregnant patients. Anesth Analg 1991; 72:110–13.Google Scholar
Gin, T, Derrick, JL, Chan, MT, et al. Postpartum patients have slightly prolonged neuromuscular block after mivacurium. Anesth Analg 1998; 86:82–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gin, T, Chan, MT, Chan, KL, et al. Prolonged neuromuscular block after rocuronium in postpartum patients. Anesth Analg 2002; 94:686–89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
White, PF, Kehlet, H, Neal, JM, et al. The role of the anesthesiologist in fast-track surgery: from multimodal analgesia to perioperative medical care. Anesth Analg 2007; 104:1380–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Habib, AS, Muir, HA, White, WD, et al. Intrathecal morphine for analgesia after postpartum bilateral tubal ligation. Anesth Analg 2005; 100:239–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marcus, RJ, Wong, CA, Lehor, A, et al. Postoperative epidural morphine for postpartum tubal ligation analgesia. Anesth Analg 2005; 101:876–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Neuraxial Opioids and the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine. Practice guidelines for the prevention, detection, and management of respiratory depression associated with neuraxial opioid administration: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Neuraxial Opioids and the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine. Anesthesiology 2016; 124:535–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×