Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-01T13:19:37.728Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 50 - Ethics in office practice

from Section VI - Nongynecologic conditions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2016

By
Elizabeth A. Ferries-Rowe
Edited by
Martin Olsen  and
Botros Rizk
Martin Olsen
Affiliation:
East Tennessee State University
Botros Rizk
Affiliation:
University of South Alabama
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Office Care of Women , pp. 535 - 544
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

US Public Health Service Syphilis Study at Tuskegee 2013 [updated September 24, 2013]. Available from: www.cdc.gov/tuskegee/timeline.htm.Google Scholar
Reilly, PR. Involuntary sterilization in the United States: a surgical solution. Quarterly Review of Biology 1987;62(2):153–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beauchamp, T, Childress, J. Principles of Biomedical Ethics. New York: Oxford University Press; 1977.Google Scholar
Clouser, K. Bioethics and philosophy. Hastings Center Report 1993;23(6):S10e1.Google ScholarPubMed
Beauchamp, T, Childress, J. Principles of Biomedical Ethics. New York: Oxford University Press; 2009: 417 p.Google Scholar
Emanuel, E, Pearson, S. Physician autonomy and health care reform. JAMA 2012;307(4):367–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pope, T. Legal briefing: conscience clauses and conscientious refusal. Journal of Clinical Ethics 2010;21(2):163–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, D. The creation of fetal rights: conflicts with women’s constitutional rights to liberty, privacy, and equal protection. Yale Law Journal 1986;95:599–625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Street, R, Makoul, G, Arora, N, Epstein, R. How does communication heal? Pathways linking clinician-patient communication to health outcomes. Patient Education and Counseling 2008;74:295–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duggan, A, Thompson, T. Provider-Patient Interactions and Related Outcomes. In: Thompson, T, Parrott, R, Nussbaum, J (eds.). Routledge Handbook of Health Communication, 2nd ed. New York: Routledge; 2011: 414–28.Google Scholar
Emanuel, E, Emanuel, L. Four models of the physician-patient relationship. JAMA 1992;267(16):2221–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van den Berg, M, Timmermans, D, ten Kate, L, et al.Informed decision making in the context of prenatal screening. Patient Education and Counseling 2006;63:110–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van den Huevel, A, Chitty, L, Dormandy, E, et al. Will the introduction of non-invasive prenatal diagnostic testing erode informed choices? An experimental study of health care professionals. Patient Education and Counseling 2010;78:24–8.Google Scholar
Press, N, Browner, C. Why women say yes to prenatal diagnosis. Social Science and Medicine 1997;45(7):979–89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Macer, DR. Ethics and prenatal diagnosis. Milunsky, A (ed.). Genetic Disorders and the Fetus: Diagnosis, Prevention and Treatment. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press; 1998: 999–1024.Google Scholar
Harrison, D, Cooke, C. An elucidation of factors influencing physicians’ willingness to perform elective female sterilization. Obstetrics and Gynecology 1988;72(4):565–70.Google ScholarPubMed
Young age a factor in sterilization regret. Contraceptive Technology Update 1999 Oct;20(10):116–17.Google Scholar
Moseman, C, Robinson, R, Wright Bates, G Jr, Propst, A. Identifying women who will request sterilization reversal in a military population. Contraception 2006;73(5):512–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×