Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-v5vhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-24T15:01:26.890Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

14 - Publishing Research in Empirical Bioethics: Quality, Disciplines and Expertise

from Part II - Practical Perspectives

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 February 2017

By
Lucy Frith  and
Heather Draper
Edited by
Jonathan Ives ,
Michael Dunn  and
Alan Cribb
Jonathan Ives
Affiliation:
University of Bristol
Michael Dunn
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
Alan Cribb
Affiliation:
King's College London
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Empirical Bioethics
Theoretical and Practical Perspectives
 , pp. 235 - 255
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alderson, P. 1990. Choosing for Children: Parents’ Consent to Surgery. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Alvey, J. 1999. A Short History of Economics as a Moral Science. Journal of Markets and Morality. 2(1):53–73.Google Scholar
Anspach, R. 1993. Deciding Who Lives: Fateful Choices in the Intensive-Care Nursery. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Appiah, K. 2008. Experiments in Ethics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Archard, D. 2011. Why Moral Philosophers Are Not and Should Not Be Moral Experts. Bioethics. 29(3):119–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashcroft, R. 2008. Fair Process and the Redundancy of Bioethics: A Polemic. Public Health Ethics. 1(1):3–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, R., Cribb, A. 2003. The Relevance of Empirical Research to Bioethics: Reviewing the Debate. In Scratching the Surface of Bioethics, Hayry, M., Takala, T. (eds.). Amsterdam: Rodopi. 9–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bosk, C. 1992. All God’s Mistakes: Genetic Counselling in a Pediatric Hospital. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Brody, B. 1993. Assessing Empirical Research in Bioethics. Theoretical Medicine. 14:211–219.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caplan, A. 1982. Mechanics on Duty: The Limitations of a Technical Definition of Moral Expertise for Work in Applied Ethics. Canadian Journal of Philosophy. 8:1–18.Google Scholar
CASP (Critical Appraisal Skills Programme) www.caspinternational.org/?o=1001.Google Scholar
Daniels, N. 2008. Just Health Care. Cambridge University Press, New York.Google ScholarPubMed
De Vries, R., Turner, L., Orfali, K., & Bosk, C. 2006. Sociology of Health and Illness, vol. 28, no. 6.Google Scholar
Draper, H., Ives, J. 2007. An Empirical Approach to Bioethics: Social Science ‘of’, ‘for’ and ‘in’ Bioethics Research. Cognition, Brain & Behavior. XI(2):319–330.Google Scholar
Driver, J. 2013. Moral Expertise, Judgment, Practice and Analysis. Social Philosophy and Policy. 30(1–2):280–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunn, M., Gurtin-Broadbent, Z., Wheeler, J., Ives, J. 2008. Jack of All Trades, Master of None? Challenges Facing Junior Academic Researchers in Bioethics. Clinical Ethics. 3(4):160–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, K., Deans, Z. 2016. Empirical Bioethics and the Role of the Ethicist in Policy Making: Politics, Authority and Expertise. This volume.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farsides, B., Williams, C. 2016. Lessons from Experience: Establishing and Running Interdisciplinary Mixed-Method Bioethics Research. This volume.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frith, L. 2012. Symbiotic empirical Ethics: A Practical Methodology. Bioethics. 26(4):198–206.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frith, L. 2009. Process and Consensus – Ethical Decision-Making in the Infertility Clinic: A Qualitative Study. Journal of Medical Ethics. 35(11):662–667.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gesang, B. 2010. Are Moral Philosophers Moral Experts? Bioethics. 24(4):153–159.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Green, R.M. 1990. Methods in Bioethics. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy. 15(2):179–197.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greenhalgh, T., et al. 2016. An Open Letter to the BMJ Editors on Qualitative Research. BMJ. 2016(352):i563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haimes, E., Williams, R. 2007. Sociology, Ethics, and the Priority of the Particular: Learning from a Case Study of Genetic Deliberations. The British Journal of Sociology. 58(3)457–476.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Herrera, C. 2008. Is It Time for Bioethics to Go Empirical? Bioethics. 22(3):137–146.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hurst, S. 2010. What Empirical Turn in Bioethics? Bioethics. 29(8):439–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ives, J. 2014. A Method of Reflexive Balancing in a Pragmatic, Interdisciplinary and Reflexive Bioethics. Bioethics. 28(6):302–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ives, J., Draper, H. 2009. Appropriate Methodologies for Empirical Bioethics: It’s All Relative. Bioethics. 23:249–258.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jonsen, A. 1998. The Birth of Bioethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kong, W.-M., et al. 2011. Include Medical Ethics in the Research Excellence Framework. BMJ. 343:d3968.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krishnan, A. 2009. What Are Academic Disciplines? ESRC NCRM Working Paper series 03/09.Google Scholar
Levitt, M. 2004. Complementarity Rather than Integration (a Response to Integrated Empirical Ethics). Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy. 7:81–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewens, T. 2004. Is Something Wrong with Bioethics? Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences. 35:121–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lillehammer, H. 2004. Who Needs Bioethicists? Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences. 35:131–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyotard, J.-F. 1984. The Postmodern Condition. Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Maxwell, J. 1996. Qualitative Research Design: An interactive approach. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
McMillan, J. 2016. Empirical Bioethics and the Fact/Value Distinction. This volume.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mertz, M., Inthorn, J., Renz, G., Rothenberger, L., Salloch, S., Schildman, J., Wohlke, S., Schicktanz, S. 2014. Research across the Disciplines: A Road Map for Quality Criteria in Empirical Ethics Research. BMC Medical Ethics. 15:17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, V. 2013. Publishing in Empirical Bioethics: Challenges and Opportunities. Online presentation http://cctst.uc.edu/sites/default/files/files/Miller%202_22%20PM%20Publishing%20in%20Bioethics%202_19_13%20UPDATED(1).pdf.Google Scholar
Moher, et al. 2009. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. BMJ. 339:b2535 DOI 10.1136/bmj.b2535.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Molewijk, B., Frith, L. 2009. Empirical Ethics: Who Is the Don Quixote? Bioethics. 23(4):ii–iv.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Molewijk, B., Stiggelbout, A.M., Otten, W., Dupuis, H.M., Kievit, J. 2004. Empirical Data and Moral Theory: A Plea for Integrated Empirical Ethics. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy. 7:55–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moran, J. 2002. Inter-disciplinararity. Routledge, London.Google Scholar
Murphy, E., Dingwall, R., Greatbatch, D., Parker, S., Watson, P. 1998. Qualitative Research Methods in Health Technology Assessment: A Review of the Literature. Health Technology Assessment. 2:(16).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pierce, S.J. 1991. Subject Areas, Disciplines, and the Concept of Authority. Library and Information Science Research. 13(1):21–35.Google Scholar
Research Councils UK. 2014. Applications across Research Council Remits, www.rcuk.ac.uk/funding/fundingagreement/ [Accessed April 2014].Google Scholar
Salloch, et al. 2012. Empirical Research in Medical Ethics: How Conceptual Accounts on Normative-Empirical Collaboration May Improve Research Practice. BMC Medical Ethics. 13:5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Singh, I. 2016. Evidence, Epistemology and Empirical Bioethics. This volume.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singer, P. 1972. Moral Experts. Analysis. 32(4):115–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spencer, L., Ritchie, J., Lewis, J., Dillon, L. 2003. Quality in Qualitative Evaluation: A Framework for Assessing Research Evidence. The Cabinet Office, ISBN: 07715 04465 8.Google Scholar
Stiggelbout, A.M., Molewijk, A., Otten, W., Timmermans, D., van Bockel, J., Kievit, J. 2004. Ideas of Patient Autonomy in Clinical Decision Making: A Study on the Development of a Scale to Assess Patients’ and Physicians’ Views. Journal of Medical Ethics. 30:268–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strathern, M. 2005. Anthropology and Interdisciplinarity. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education. 4(2):130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tong, A., Sainsbury, P., Craig, J. 2007. Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ): A 32-Item Checklist for Interviews and Focus Groups. International Journal for Quality in Health Care. 19(6):349–357.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weisz, G. 1990. Social Science Perspectives on Medical Ethics. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wenger, E.C. 2006. Communities of Practice: A Brief Introduction. http://wenger-trayner.com/theory/.Google Scholar
White, K. 2002. An Introduction to the Sociology of Health and Illness. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×