Book contents
- Culpable Carelessness
- Culpable Carelessness
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Book part
- Glossary
- Additional material
- Additional material
- 1 Introduction
- 2 The Doctrinal Trend towards the Standard Account
- 3 Consistency in Definition
- 4 From Awareness to Belief
- 5 Beyond Belief: Knowledge and Awareness of Risk
- 6 The Significance of Awareness of Risk
- 7 Culpability beyond Awareness of Risk
- 8 Negligence as Failure of Belief
- 9 Some Practicalities
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 January 2017
Book contents
- Culpable Carelessness
- Culpable Carelessness
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Book part
- Glossary
- Additional material
- Additional material
- 1 Introduction
- 2 The Doctrinal Trend towards the Standard Account
- 3 Consistency in Definition
- 4 From Awareness to Belief
- 5 Beyond Belief: Knowledge and Awareness of Risk
- 6 The Significance of Awareness of Risk
- 7 Culpability beyond Awareness of Risk
- 8 Negligence as Failure of Belief
- 9 Some Practicalities
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Culpable CarelessnessRecklessness and Negligence in the Criminal Law, pp. 292 - 315Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2016
References
Adler, Matthew D., ‘Risk, death and harm: the normative foundations of risk regulation’ (2003) 87 Minnesota Law Review 1293.Google Scholar
Adler, Matthew D., ‘Against “individual risk”: a sympathetic critique of risk assessment’ (2005) 153 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 1121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, Larry, ‘Reconsidering the relationship among voluntary acts, strict liability and negligence in criminal law’, in Paul, Ellen F., Miller, Fred D. and Paul, Jeffrey (eds.), Crime, Culpability and Remedy (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1990), p. 84.Google Scholar
Alexander, Larry, ‘Inculpatory and exculpatory mistakes and the fact/law distinction: an essay in memory of Myke Bayles’ (1993) 12 Law and Philosophy 33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, Larry, and Ferzan, Kimberly K., ‘Culpable acts of risk creation’ (2007–2008) 5 Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law 375.Google Scholar
Alexander, Larry, and Ferzan, Kimberly K., ‘Reply’, in Robinson, Paul H., Garvey, Stephen P. and Ferzan, Kimberly K. (eds.), Criminal Law Conversations (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009), p. 291.Google Scholar
Alexander, Larry, and Ferzan, Kimberly K., with Morse, Stephen J., Crime and Culpability: A Theory of Criminal Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alfano, Mark, Character as Moral Fiction (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alldridge, Peter, ‘Rules for courts and rules for citizens’ (1990) 10 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alldridge, Peter, ‘Making criminal law known’, in Shute, Stephen and Simester, A.P. (eds.), Criminal Law Theory: Doctrines of the General Part (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002), p. 103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allmark, Peter, ‘An Aristotelian account of autonomy’ (2008) 42 Journal of Value Enquiry 41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
American Law Institute, Model Penal Code and Commentaries (Official Draft and Revised Comments), 3 vols. (Philadelphia: American Law Institute, 1980), vol. 1.Google Scholar
Amirthalingam, Kumaralingam, ‘Caldwell recklessness is dead, long live mens rea’s fecklessness’ (2004) 67 Modern Law Review 491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,, ‘Negligence and the general problem of criminal responsibility’ (1971–1972) 81 Yale Law Journal 949.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Archard, David, ‘The mens rea of rape: reasonableness and culpable mistakes’, in Burgess-Jackson, Keith (ed.), A Most Detestable Crime: New Philosophical Essays on Rape (Aldershot: Dartmouth, 1999), p. 213.Google Scholar
Arenella, Peter, ‘Character, choice and moral agency: the relevance of character to our moral culpability judgments’, in Paul, Ellen F., Miller, Fred D. and Paul, Jeffrey (eds.), Crime, Culpability and Remedy (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1990), p. 59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aristotle, , Nicomachean Ethics, trans. Crisp, Roger (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armstrong, D.M., Belief, Truth and Knowledge (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1973).Google Scholar
Armstrong, D.M., ‘Perception and belief’, in Dancy, Jonathan (ed.), Perceptual Knowledge (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1988), p. 127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arpaly, Nomy, Unprincipled Virtue: An Inquiry into Moral Agency (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arpaly, Nomy, and Schroeder, Timothy, ‘Praise, blame and the whole self’ (1999) 93 Philosophical Studies 161.Google Scholar
Ashworth, Andrew, ‘Belief, intent and criminal liability’, in Eekelaar, John and Bell, John (eds.), Oxford Essays in Jurisprudence: Third Series (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989), p. 30.Google Scholar
Ashworth, Andrew, ‘The scope of criminal liability for omissions’ (1989) 105 Law Quarterly Review 424.Google Scholar
Ashworth, Andrew, ‘Interpreting criminal statutes: a crisis of legality?’ (1991) 107 Law Quarterly Review 419.Google Scholar
Ashworth, Andrew, ‘Principles, pragmatism and the Law Commission’s recommendations on homicide law reform’ [2007] Criminal Law Review 333.Google Scholar
Ashworth, Andrew, ‘Manslaughter: general or nominate offence?’, in Clarkson, C.M.V. and Cunningham, Sally (eds.), Criminal Liability for Non-aggressive Death (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2008), p. 235.Google Scholar
Ashworth, Andrew, Sentencing and Criminal Justice, 6th edn. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashworth, Andrew, and Horder, Jeremy, Principles of Criminal Law, 7th edn. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Audi, Robert, ‘Dispositional beliefs and dispositions to believe’ (1994) 28 Noûs 419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Audi, Robert, ‘The ethics of belief: doxastic self-control and intellectual virtue’ (2008) 161 Synthese 403.Google Scholar
Audi, Robert, Epistemology: A Contemporary Introduction to the Theory of Knowledge (New York: Routledge, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, Brenda M., ‘Mens rea, negligence and criminal law reform’ (1987–1988) 6 Law and Philosophy 53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, Brenda M., ‘Theorizing about responsibility and criminal liability’ (1992) 11 Law and Philosophy 403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bandes, Susan, ‘Is it immoral to punish the heedless and clueless? A comment on Alexander, Ferzan and Morse: Crime and Culpability’ (2010) 29 Law and Philosophy 433.Google Scholar
Barton, Joshua, ‘Recklessness in Scots criminal law: subjective or objective?’ 2011 Juridical Review 143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bayles, Michael D., ‘Character, purpose and criminal responsibility’ (1982) 1 Law and Philosophy 5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bayles, Michael D., Principles of Law: A Normative Analysis (Dordrecht: Reidel, 1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bingham, Tom, The Business of Judging: Selected Essays and Speeches (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Birch, Diane J., ‘The foresight saga: the biggest mistake of all?’ [1988] Criminal Law Review 4.Google Scholar
Bok, Hilary, ‘Freedom and practical reasoning’, in Watson, Gary (ed), Free Will, 2nd edn. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003), p. 162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boonin, David, The Problem of Punishment: A Critical Introduction (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Botterell, Andrew, ‘Understanding the voluntary act principle’, in Tanguay-Renaud, Francois and Stribopoulos, James (eds.), Rethinking Criminal Law Theory: New Canadian Perspectives in the Philosophy of Domestic, Transnational and International Criminal Law (Oxford: Hart, 2012), p. 117.Google Scholar
Brady, James B., ‘Punishment for negligence: a reply to Professor Hall’ (1972–1973) 22 Buffalo Law Review 107.Google Scholar
Brady, James B., ‘Recklessness, negligence, indifference and awareness’ (1980) 43 Modern Law Review 381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braithwaite, R.B., ‘The nature of believing’ (1932–1933) 33 Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 129.Google Scholar
Brandt, Richard B., ‘Traits of character: a conceptual analysis’ (1970) 7 American Philosophical Quarterly 23.Google Scholar
Bratman, Michael E., Intention, Plans and Practical Reason (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bronitt, Simon, and McSherry, Bernadette, Principles of Criminal Law, 3rd edn. (Sydney: Thomson Reuters, 2010).Google Scholar
Brudner, Alan, ‘Is negligence blameless?’, in Robinson, Paul H., Garvey, Stephen P. and Ferzan, Kimberly K. (eds), Criminal Law Conversations (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009), p. 285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brudner, Alan, Punishment and Freedom: A Liberal Theory of Penal Justice (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brudner, Alan, ‘A reply to critics of Punishment and Freedom’ (2011) 14 New Criminal Law Review 495.Google Scholar
Campbell, Kenneth, and Ashworth, Andrew, ‘Recklessness in assault – and in general?’ (1991) 107 Law Quarterly Review 187.Google Scholar
Carroll, Lewis, Through the Looking Glass and What Alice Found There (London: Dent, 1929).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carruthers, Peter, Consciousness: Essays from a Higher-Order Perspective (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Chalmers, David J., The Conscious Mind: In Search of a Fundamental Theory (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Chalmers, James, and Leverick, Fiona, Criminal Defences and Pleas in Bar of Trial (Edinburgh: SULI/W. Green, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chalmers, James, and Leverick, Fiona, ‘Fair labelling in criminal law’ (2008) 71 Modern Law Review 217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chan, Winnie, and Simester, A.P., ‘Four functions of mens rea’ (2011) 70 Cambridge Law Journal 381.Google Scholar
Charlow, Robin, ‘Wilful ignorance and criminal culpability’ (1991–1992) 70 Texas Law Review 1351.Google Scholar
Chisholm, Roderick, Theory of Knowledge, 3rd edn. (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall International, 1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarkson, C.M.V., ‘Aggravated endangerment offences’ (2007) 60 Current Legal Problems 278.Google Scholar
Clive, Eric, ‘Codification of the criminal law’, in Chalmers, James, Leverick, Fiona and Farmer, Lindsay (eds.), Essays in Criminal Law in Honour of Sir Gerald Gordon (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2010), p. 54.Google Scholar
Clive, Eric, Ferguson, Pamela, Gane, Christopher, and McCall Smith, Alexander, A Draft Criminal Code for Scotland with Commentary (Edinburgh: TSO, 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coffee, John C., ‘Paradigms lost: the blurring of the criminal and civil law models – and what can be done about it’ (1991–1992) 101 Yale Law Journal 1875.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Daniel I.A., ‘The jurisprudence of unconscious intent’ (1996) 24 Journal of Psychiatry and Law 511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, L. Jonathan, An Essay on Belief and Acceptance (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Coke, Edward, Third Part of the Institutes of the Laws of England (London: E&R Brook, 1648).Google Scholar
Coleman, Jules L., The Practice of Principle: In Defence of a Pragmatist Approach to Legal Theory (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colvin, Eric, ‘Recklessness and criminal negligence’ (1982) 32 University of Toronto Law Journal 345.Google Scholar
Colvin, Eric, and McKechnie, John, Criminal Law in Queensland and Western Australia: Cases and Commentary, 5th edn. (Chatswood, NSW: LexisNexis/Butterworths, 2008).Google Scholar
Conklin, William E., Hegel’s Laws: The Legitimacy of a Modern Legal Order (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Cowan, Sharon, ‘“Freedom and the capacity to make a choice”: a feminist analysis of consent in the criminal law of rape’, in Munro, Vanessa E. and Stychin, Carl (eds.), Sexuality and the Law: Feminist Engagements (Abingdon: Routledge-Cavendish, 2007), p. 51.Google Scholar
Cranor, Carl F., ‘Towards a non-consequentialist approach to acceptable risks’, in Lewens, Tim (ed.), Risk: Philosophical Perspectives (London: Routledge, 2007), p. 45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crofts, Penny, Wickedness and Crime: Laws of Homicide and Malice (London: Routledge, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crosby, Cath, ‘Recklessness – the continuing search for a definition’ (2008) 72 Journal of Criminal Law 313.Google Scholar
Cross, Rupert, ‘The mental element in crime’ (1967) 83 Law Quarterly Review 215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cunningham, Sally, ‘Recklessness: being reckless and acting recklessly’ (2010) 21 King’s College Law Journal 445.Google Scholar
Dan-Cohen, Meir, ‘Decision rules and conduct rules: on acoustic separation in criminal law’ (1983–1984) 97 Harvard Law Review 625.Google Scholar
Dancy, Jonathan, An Introduction to Contemporary Epistemology (Oxford: Blackwell, 1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dancy, Jonathan, Practical Reality (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dehaene, Stanislas, Changeux, Jean-Pierre, Naccache, Lionel, Sackur, Jérôme, and Sergent, Claire, ‘Conscious, preconscious, and subliminal processing: a testable taxonomy’ (2006) 10 Trends in Cognitive Sciences 204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deigh, John, ‘Responsibility’, in Deigh, John and Dolinko, David (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Criminal Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011), p. 194.Google Scholar
Dempsey, Michele M., ‘The object of criminal responsibility’, in Robinson, Paul H., Garvey, Stephen P. and Ferzan, Kimberly K. (eds.), Criminal Law Conversations (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009), p. 283.Google Scholar
Dennett, Daniel C., Elbow Room: The Varieties of Free Will Worth Wanting (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1984).Google Scholar
Dennis, Ian, ‘Reverse onuses and the presumption of innocence: in search of principle’ [2005] Criminal Law Review 901.Google Scholar
Denno, Deborah W., ‘Crime and consciousness: science and involuntary acts’ (2002–2003) 97 Minnesota Law Review 269.Google Scholar
Denno, Deborah W., ‘Criminal law in a post-Freudian world’ [2005] University of Illinois Law Review 601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dillof, Anthony M., ‘Transferred intent: an inquiry into the nature of criminal culpability’ (1997–1998) 1 Buffalo Criminal Law Review 501.Google Scholar
Dimock, Susan, ‘What are intoxicated offenders responsible for? The “intoxication defense” revisited’ (2011) 5 Criminal Law and Philosophy 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doris, John, Lack of Character: Personality and Moral Behaviour (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Dressler, Joshua, ‘Reflections on excusing wrongdoers: moral theory, new excuses and the Model Penal Code’ (1987–1988) 19 Rutgers Law Journal 671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dressler, Joshua, ‘Does one mens rea fit all? Thoughts on Alexander’s unified conception of criminal culpability’ (2000) 88 California Law Review 955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
du Bois-Pedain, Antje, ‘The wrongfulness constraint in criminalization’ (2014) 8 Criminal Law and Philosophy 149.Google Scholar
Duff, R.A., ‘Professor Williams and conditional subjectivism’ (1982) 41 Cambridge Law Journal 273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duff, R.A., ‘Caldwell and Lawrence: the retreat from subjectivism’ (1983) 3 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 77.Google Scholar
Duff, R.A., Intention, Agency and Criminal Liability: Philosophy of Action and the Criminal Law (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duff, R.A., ‘Choice, character and criminal liability’ (1993) 12 Law and Philosophy 345.Google Scholar
Duff, R.A., ‘Subjectivism, objectivism and criminal attempts’, in Simester, A.P. and Smith, A.T.H. (eds.), Harm and Culpability (Oxford: Clarendon, 1996), p. 19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duff, R.A., ‘Law, language and community: some preconditions of criminal liability’ (1998) 18 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 189.Google Scholar
Duff, R.A., Punishment, Communication and Community (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duff, R.A., ‘Rule-violations and wrongdoing’, in Shute, Stephen and Simester, A.P. (eds.), Criminal Law Theory: Doctrines of the General Part (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002), p. 47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duff, R.A., ‘Virtue, vice and criminal liability: do we want an Aristotelian criminal law?’ (2002–2003) 6 Buffalo Criminal Law Review 147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duff, R.A., ‘Criminalizing endangerment’, in Duff, R.A. and Green, Stuart (eds.), Defining Crimes: Essays on the Special Part of the Criminal Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005), p. 43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duff, R.A., ‘Theorizing criminal law: a 25th anniversary essay’ (2005) 25 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 353.Google Scholar
Duff, R.A., Answering for Crime: Responsibility and Liability in the Criminal Law (Oxford: Hart, 2007).Google Scholar
Duff, R.A., ‘Whose luck is it anyway?’, in Clarkson, C.M.V. and Cunningham, Sally (eds.), Criminal Liability for Non-aggressive Death (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2008), p. 61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duff, R.A., ‘Towards a modest legal moralism’ (2014) 8 Criminal Law and Philosophy 217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dworkin, Gerald, The Theory and Practice of Autonomy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988).Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald, Taking Rights Seriously (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1977).Google Scholar
Edwards, James R., ‘Coming clean about the criminal law’ (2011) 5 Criminal Law and Philosophy 315.Google Scholar
Edwards, James R., ‘An instrumental legal moralism’ 3 Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Law, forthcoming.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, James R., and Simester, A.P., ‘Wrongfulness and prohibitions’ (2014) 8 Criminal Law and Philosophy 171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ekstrom, Laura W., ‘Alienation, autonomy and the self’ (2005) 29 Midwest Studies in Philosophy 45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elliot, Carl, ‘Beliefs and responsibility’ (1991) 25 Journal of Value Inquiry 233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enoch, David, Spectre, Levi, and Fisher, Talia, ‘Statistical evidence, sensitivity and legal knowledge’ (2012) 40 Philosophy & Public Affairs 197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feinberg, Joel, Doing and Deserving: Essays in the Theory of Responsibility (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, Richard, ‘The ethics of belief’ (2000) 60 Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 667.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Pamela R., ‘Controversial aspects of the law of rape: an Anglo-Scottish comparison’, in Hunter, Robert F. (ed.), Justice and Crime: Essays in Honour of the Right Honourable the Lord Emslie (Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1993), p. 180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, Pamela R., and McDiarmid, Claire, Scots Criminal Law: A Critical Analysis, 2nd edn. (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferzan, Kimberly K., ‘Opaque recklessness’ (2000–2001) 91 Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology 597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferzan, Kimberly K., ‘Don’t abandon the Model Penal Code yet! Thinking through Simons’s rethinking’ (2002–2003) 6 Buffalo Criminal Law Review 185.Google Scholar
Ferzan, Kimberly K., ‘Act, agency and indifference: the foundations of Criminal Responsibility’ (2007) 10 New Criminal Law Review 441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferzan, Kimberly K., ‘The structure of criminal law’ (2009) 28 Criminal Justice Ethics 223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Festinger, Leon, A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1957).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Field, Stewart, and Lynn, Mervyn, ‘The capacity for recklessness’ (1992) 12 Legal Studies 74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Findlay, Mark, Odgers, Stephen and Yeo, Stanley, Australian Criminal Justice, 5th edn. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Fine, Robert P., and Cohen, Gary M., ‘Is negligence a defensible basis for penal liability?’ (1966–1967) 16 Buffalo Law Review 749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finkelstein, Claire, ‘The inefficiency of mens rea’ (2000) 88 California Law Review 895.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finkelstein, Claire, ‘Is risk a harm?’ (2002–2003) 151 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 963.Google Scholar
Finkelstein, Claire, ‘Responsibility for unintended consequences’ (2005) 2 Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law 579.Google Scholar
Finnis, John, Natural Law and Natural Rights, 2nd edn. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, John M., ‘The importance of Frankfurt-style argument’ (2007) 57 The Philosophical Quarterly 464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, John M., and Ravizza, Mark, Responsibility and Control: A Theory of Moral Responsibility (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, John M., and Tognazzini, Neal A., ‘The truth about tracing’ (2009) 43 Noûs 531.Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, P.J., and Williams, Glanville, ‘Carelessness, indifference and recklessness: two replies’ (1962) 25 Modern Law Review 49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fletcher, George P., ‘The theory of criminal negligence: a comparative analysis’ (1970–1971) 119 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fletcher, George P., ‘Fairness and utility in tort theory’ (1971–1972) 85 Harvard Law Review 537.Google Scholar
Fletcher, George P., ‘What is punishment imposed for?’ (1994) 5 Journal of Contemporary Legal Issues 101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fletcher, George P., Basic Concepts of Criminal Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fletcher, George P., ‘The fault of not knowing’ (2002) 3 Theoretical Inquiries in Law 265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fletcher, George P., The Grammar of Criminal Law: American, Comparative and International (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Fletcher, George P., ‘Remembrance of essays past’, in Christopher, Russell L. (ed.), Fletcher’s Essays on Criminal Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013), p. 269.Google Scholar
France, Simon, ‘A reckless approach to liability’ (1988) 18 Victoria University of Wellington Law Review 141.Google Scholar
France, Simon, ‘The mental element’ (1990) 20 Victoria University of Wellington Law Review Monograph 43.Google Scholar
France, Simon, ‘Reforming criminal law – New Zealand’s 1989 code’ [1990] Criminal Law Review 827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frankfurt, Harry G., The Importance of What We Care About (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988).Google Scholar
Frankfurt, Harry G., The Reasons of Love (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Freud, Sigmund, The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, ed. Strachey, J., 24 vols. (London: Vintage, 2001), vol. 19.Google Scholar
Fruchtman, Earl, ‘Recklessness and the limits of mens rea: beyond orthodox subjectivism’ (1986–1987) 29 Criminal Law Quarterly 315, 421 (published in two parts).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galligan, D.J., ‘Responsibility for recklessness’ (1978) 31 Current Legal Problems 55.Google Scholar
Gans, Jeremy, Modern Criminal Law of Australia (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, John, ‘Criminal law and the uses of theory: a reply to Laing’ (1994) 14 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, John, ‘On the general part of the criminal law’, in Duff, R.A. (ed.), Philosophy and the Criminal Law: Principle and Critique (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998), p. 205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, John, ‘The mysterious case of the reasonable person’ (2001) 51 University of Toronto Law Journal 273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, John, ‘Wrongs and faults’, in Simester, A.P. (ed.), Appraising Strict Liability (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005), p. 51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, John, Offences and Defences: Selected Essays in the Philosophy of Criminal Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, John, ‘Ashworth on principles’, in Zedner, Lucia and Roberts, Julian V. (eds.), Principles and Values in Criminal Law and Criminal Justice: Essays in Honour of Andrew Ashworth (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012), p. 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, John, and Jung, Heike, ‘Making sense of mens rea: Antony Duff’s account’ (1991) 11 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 559.Google Scholar
Garvey, Stephen P., ‘What’s wrong with involuntary manslaughter?’ (2006–2007) 85 Texas Law Review 333.Google Scholar
Garvey, Stephen P., ‘Fatally circular? Not!’, in Robinson, Paul H., Garvey, Stephen P. and Ferzan, Kimberly K. (eds.), Criminal Law Conversations (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009), p. 286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gendler, Tamar S., ‘Alief in action (and reaction)’ (2008) 23 Mind and Language 552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gendler, Tamar S., Intuition, Imagination and Philosophical Methodology (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gettier, Edmund L., ‘Is justified true belief knowledge?’ (1963) 23 Analysis 181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginet, Carl, ‘The epistemic requirements for moral responsibility’ (2000) 34 Noûs 267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, Gerald H., The Criminal Law of Scotland (Edinburgh: SULI/W. Green & Sons, 1968).Google Scholar
Gordon, Gerald H., ‘Subjective and objective mens rea’ (1974–1975) 17 Criminal Law Quarterly 355.Google Scholar
Gordon, Gerald H., The Criminal Law of Scotland, 3rd edn., ed. Christie, M.G.A., 2 vols. (Edinburgh: SULI/W. Green, 2000–2001).Google Scholar
Grant, Isabel, ‘Second chances: bill C-72 and the Charter’ (1995) 33 Osgoode Hall Law Journal 379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griew, Edward, ‘Consistency, communication and codification – reflections on two mens rea words’, in Glazebrook, P.R. (ed.), Reshaping the Criminal Law: Essays in Honour of Glanville Williams (London: Stevens, 1978), p. 57.Google Scholar
Griew, Edward, ‘Reckless damage and reckless driving: living with Caldwell and Lawrence’ [1981] Criminal Law Review 743.Google Scholar
Gross, Hyman, A Theory of Criminal Justice (New York: Oxford University Press, 1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gross, Hyman, Crime and Punishment: A Concise Moral Critique (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haji, Ishtiyaque, ‘An epistemic dimension of blameworthiness’ (1997) 57 Journal of Philosophy & Phenomenological Research 523.Google Scholar
Hall, Jerome, General Principles of Criminal Law, 2nd edn. (Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill, 1960).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Jerome, ‘Negligent behavior should be excluded from criminal liability’ (1963) 63 Columbia Law Review 532.Google Scholar
Hall, Richard J., and Johnson, Charles R., ‘The epistemic duty to seek more evidence’ (1998) 35 American Philosophical Quarterly 129.Google Scholar
Hamer, David, ‘The presumption of innocence and reverse burdens: a balancing act’ (2007) 66 Cambridge Law Journal 143.Google Scholar
Hampton, Jean, ‘The moral education theory of punishment’ (1984) 13 Philosophy and Public Affairs 208.Google Scholar
Hampton, Jean, ‘Mens rea’, in Paul, Ellen F., Miller, Fred D. and Paul, Jeffrey (eds.), Crime, Culpability and Remedy (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1990), p. 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harman, Gilbert, ‘Moral philosophy meets social psychology: virtue ethics and the fundamental attribution error’ (1999) 99 Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, H.L.A., Punishment and Responsibility: Essays in the Philosophy of Law, 2nd edn. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hautamaki, Edward W., ‘The element of mens rea in recklessness and “criminal negligence”’ (1951–1952) 2 Duke Bar Journal 55.Google Scholar
Hegel, Georg W.F., Philosophy of Right, trans. Dyde, S.W. (Mineola, NY: Dover Publications, 2005 [original: 1896]).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hellman, Deborah, ‘Wilfully blind for good reason’ (2009) 3 Criminal Law and Philosophy 301.Google Scholar
Hemming, Andrew, ‘Reasserting the place of objective tests in criminal responsibility: ending the supremacy of subjective tests’ (2011) 13 University of Notre Dame Australia Law Review 69.Google Scholar
Hetherington, Stephen, ‘The Gettier problem’, in Bernecker, Sven and Pritchard, Duncan (eds.), The Routledge Companion to Epistemology (London: Routledge, 2011), p. 119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hieronymi, Pamela, ‘Controlling attitudes’ (2006) 87 Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hookway, Christopher, ‘Epistemic norms and theoretical deliberation’ (1999) 12 Ratio 380.Google Scholar
Horder, Jeremy, ‘Cognition, emotion and criminal culpability’ (1990) 106 Law Quarterly Review 469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horder, Jeremy, ‘Criminal culpability: the possibility of a general theory’ (1993) 12 Law and Philosophy 193.Google Scholar
Horder, Jeremy, ‘A critique of the correspondence principle in criminal law’ [1995] Criminal Law Review 759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horder, Jeremy, ‘Gross negligence and criminal culpability’ (1997) 47 University of Toronto Law Journal 495.Google Scholar
Horder, Jeremy, ‘Two histories and four hidden principles of mens rea’ (1997) 113 Law Quarterly Review 95.Google Scholar
Horder, Jeremy, ‘Questioning the correspondence principle: a reply’ [1999] Criminal Law Review 206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horder, Jeremy, Homicide and the Politics of Law Reform (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hossack, Keith, The Metaphysics of Knowledge (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huigens, Kyron, ‘Virtue and inculpation’ (1994–1995) 108 Harvard Law Review 1423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huigens, Kyron, ‘Virtue and criminal negligence’ (1997–1998) 1 Buffalo Criminal Law Review 431.Google Scholar
Hume, David, A Treatise of Human Nature, 2 vols., ed. Norton, David F. and Norton, Mary J. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007), vol. 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurd, Heidi M., ‘What in the world is wrong?’ (1994) 5 Journal of Contemporary Legal Issues 157.Google Scholar
Hurd, Heidi M., ‘The deontology of negligence’ (1996) 76 Boston University Law Review 249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurd, Heidi M., ‘Introduction: symposium on Crime and Culpability’ (2010) 29 Law and Philosophy 371.Google Scholar
Husak, Douglas N., Philosophy of Criminal Law (Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Littlefield, 1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Husak, Douglas N., ‘Ignorance of law and the duties of citizenship’ (1994) 14 Legal Studies 105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Husak, Douglas N., ‘Reasonable risk creation and overinclusive legislation’ (1997–1998) 1 Buffalo Criminal Law Review 599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Husak, Douglas N., ‘Does criminal liability require an act?’, in Duff, R.A. (ed.), Philosophy and the Criminal Law: Principle and Critique (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998), p. 60.Google Scholar
Husak, Douglas N., ‘Retribution in criminal law theory’ (2000) 37 San Diego Law Review 959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Husak, Douglas N., ‘Strict liability, justice and proportionality’, in Simester, A.P. (ed.), Appraising Strict Liability (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005), p. 81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Husak, Douglas N., Overcriminalization: The Limits of the Criminal Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Husak, Douglas N., ‘Answering Duff: R.A. Duff’s Answering for Crime’ (2010) 29 Law and Philosophy 101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Husak, Douglas N., Philosophy of Criminal Law: Selected Essays (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Husak, Douglas N., ‘The alleged act requirement in criminal law’, in Deigh, John and Dolinko, David (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Criminal Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011), p. 119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Husak, Douglas N., ‘Negligence, belief, blame and criminal liability: the special case of forgetting’ (2011) 5 Criminal Law and Philosophy 199.Google Scholar
Husak, Douglas N., ‘“Broad” culpability and the retributive dream’ (2011–2012) 9 Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law 449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Husak, Douglas N., ‘Distraction and negligence’, in Zedner, Lucia and Roberts, Julian V. (eds.), Principles and Values in Criminal Law and Criminal Justice (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012), p. 81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Husak, Douglas N., ‘Preventive detention as punishment? Some potential obstacles’, in Ashworth, Andrew, Zedner, Lucia and Tomlin, Patrick (eds.), Prevention and the Limits of the Criminal Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013), p. 178.Google Scholar
Husak, Douglas N., and Callender, Craig A., ‘Wilful ignorance, knowledge, and the “equal culpability” thesis: a study of the deeper significance of the principle of legality’ [1994] Wisconsin Law Review 29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Husak, Douglas N., and McLaughlin, Brian P., ‘Time-frames, voluntary acts, and strict liability’ (1993) 12 Law and Philosophy 95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ichikawa, Jonathan J., and Steup, Matthias, ‘The analysis of knowledge’, in Edward N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopaedia of Philosophy (Fall 2013 Edition), available at http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/knowledge-analysis/.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, Jonathan, Choosing Character: Responsibility for Virtue and Vice (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Johnson, Eric A., ‘Is the idea of objective probability incoherent?’ (2010) 29 Law and Philosophy 419.Google Scholar
Johnson, Eric A., ‘Knowledge, risk and wrongdoing: the Model Penal Code’s forgotten answer to the riddle of objective probability’ (2011) 59 Buffalo Law Review 507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Oliver A., ‘The standard definition’ (1980) 5 Midwest Studies in Philosophy 113.Google Scholar
Judicial Studies Committee, Jury Manual: Some Notes for the Guidance of the Judiciary (2012), available at http://www.scotland-judiciary.org.uk/24/720/Jury-Manual-Published.Google Scholar
Kadish, Sandford H., Blame and Punishment: Essays in the Criminal Law (New York: Collier Macmillan, 1987).Google Scholar
Kane, Robert, ‘Responsibility, luck and chance: reflections on free will and indeterminism’, in Watson, Gary (ed.), Free Will, 2nd edn. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003), p. 299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, Leo, Bad Acts and Guilty Minds: Conundrums of the Criminal Law (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, Leo, ‘Harm and justification in negligence’ (2003) 4 Theoretical Inquiries in Law 397.Google Scholar
Kaveny, Cathleen M., ‘Inferring intention from foresight’ (2004) 120 Law Quarterly Review 81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keedy, Edwin R., ‘Ignorance and mistake in the criminal law’ (1908–1909) 22 Harvard Law Review 75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keiter, Mitchell, ‘Just say no excuse: the rise and fall of the intoxication defense’ (1997) 87 Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology 482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, Thomas, ‘The rationality of belief and some other propositional attitudes’ (2002) 100 Philosophical Studies 163.Google Scholar
Kennett, Jeanette, Agency and Responsibility: A Common-Sense Moral Psychology (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Kenny, C.S., Outlines of Criminal Law, 15th edn., ed. Phillips, C.G. (Cambridge University Press, 1947).Google Scholar
Kenny, C.S., Outlines of Criminal Law, 16th edn., ed. Turner, J.W.C. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1952).Google Scholar
Kimel, Dori, ‘Inadvertent recklessness and the criminal law’ (2004) 120 Law Quarterly Review 548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, Matt, ‘The problem with negligence’ (2009) 35 Social Theory and Practice 577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine M., The Sources of Normativity (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lacey, Nicola, State Punishment: Political Principles and Community Values (London: Routledge, 1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lacey, Nicola, ‘Contingency, coherence and conceptualism: reflections on the encounter between “critique” and “the philosophy of the criminal law”’, in Duff, R.A. (ed.), Philosophy and the Criminal Law: Principle and Critique (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998), p. 9.Google Scholar
Lanham, David, ‘Murder, recklessness and grievous bodily harm’ (1978) 2 Criminal Law Journal 255.Google Scholar
Lanham, David, ‘Wilful blindness and the criminal law’ (1985) 9 Criminal Law Journal 261.Google Scholar
Law Commission, A Criminal Code for England and Wales, 2 vols. (Law Com. No. 177, 1989), vol. 1.Google Scholar
Law Commission, Legislating the Criminal Code: Offences against the Person and General Principles (Law Com. No. 218, 1993).Google Scholar
Lee, Cynthia, Murder and the Reasonable Man: Passion and Fear in the Criminal Courtroom (New York: New York University Press, 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leipold, Andrew D., ‘A case for criminal negligence’ (2010) 29 Law and Philosophy 455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leverick, Fiona, Killing in Self-Defence (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levy, Neil, ‘Restoring control: comments on George Sher’ (2008) 36 Philosophia 213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levy, Neil, Consciousness and Moral Responsibility (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Locke, John, An Essay Concerning Human Understanding (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1975 [original: 1690]).Google Scholar
Low, Peter W., ‘The Model Penal Code, the common law and mistakes of fact: recklessness, negligence or strict liability?’ (1987–1988) 19 Rutgers Law Journal 539.Google Scholar
MacCormick, Neil, Rhetoric and the Rule of Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
MacMillan-Brown, Heather, ‘No longer Leary about intoxication: in the aftermath of R v. Daviault’ (1995) 59 Saskatchewan Law Review 311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marcus, Ruth B., ‘Some revisionary proposals about belief and believing’ (1990) 50 Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthiesson, Sophie, ‘Should the law deal with reckless HIV infection as a criminal offence or as a matter of public health?’ (2010) 21 King’s Law Journal 123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayers-Shulz, Blake, and Schwitzgebel, Eric, ‘Knowing that p without believing that p’ (2013) 47 Noûs 371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAuley, Finbarr, and McCutcheon, J. Paul, Criminal Liability: A Grammar (Dublin: Round Hall Sweet & Maxwell, 2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCrone, John, Going Inside: A Tour Round a Single Moment of Consciousness (London: Faber, 1999).Google Scholar
McDiarmid, Claire, ‘“Something wicked this way comes”: the mens rea of murder in Scots law’ 2012 Juridical Review 283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McHugh, Conor, and Whiting, Daniel, ‘The normativity of belief’ (2014) 74 Analysis 698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mele, Alred R., Autonomous Agents: From Self-Control to Autonomy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Mewett, Alan W., ‘The shifting basis of criminal law’ (1963) 9 McGill Law Journal 124.Google Scholar
Michaels, Alan C., ‘Acceptance: the missing mental state’ (1997–1998) 71 Southern California Law Review 953.Google Scholar
Milgram, Stanley, Obedience to Authority: An Experimental View (London: Tavistock, 1974).Google Scholar
Mitchell, Barry, ‘Culpably indifferent murder’ (1996) 25 Anglo-American Law Review 64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, Barry, ‘Recklessness could still be a state of mind’ (1988) 52 Journal of Criminal Law 300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, Barry, and Mackay, R.D., ‘Investigating involuntary manslaughter: an empirical study of 127 cases’ (2011) 31 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 165.Google Scholar
Mole, Christopher, ‘Attention and consciousness’ (2008) 15 Journal of Consciousness Studies 86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montmarquet, James A., ‘Culpable ignorance and excuses’ (1995) 80 Philosophical Studies 41.Google Scholar
Moore, Michael S., ‘Responsibility and the unconscious’ (1979–1980) 53 Southern California Law Review 1563.Google Scholar
Moore, Michael S., Law and Psychiatry: Rethinking the Relationship (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984).Google Scholar
Moore, Michael S., Act and Crime: The Philosophy of Action and Its Implications for Criminal Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Moore, Michael S., Placing Blame: A Theory of the Criminal Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, Michael S., Causation and Responsibility: An Essay in Law, Morals and Metaphysics (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, Michael S., ‘Intention as a marker of moral culpability and legal punishability’, in Duff, R.A. and Green, Stuart (eds.), Philosophical Foundations of Criminal Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011), p. 179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, Michael S., and Hurd, Heidi M., ‘The culpability of negligence’, in Cruft, Rowan, Kramer, Matthew H. and Reiff, Mark R. (eds.), Crime, Punishment and Responsibility: The Jurisprudence of Antony Duff (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011), p. 311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, Michael S., and Hurd, Heidi M., ‘Punishing the awkward, the stupid, the weak, and the selfish: the culpability of negligence’ (2011) 5 Criminal Law and Philosophy 147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moran, Mayo, Rethinking the Reasonable Person: An Egalitarian Reconstruction of the Objective Standard (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morkel, Dan W., ‘On the distinction between recklessness and conscious negligence’ (1982) 30 American Journal of Comparative Law 325.Google Scholar
Morris, J.M., ‘The structure of criminal law and deterrence’ [1986] Criminal Law Review 524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morse, Stephen J., ‘Culpability and control’ (1994) 142 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 1587.Google Scholar
Morse, Stephen J., ‘Rationality and responsibility’ (2000–2001) 74 Southern California Law Review 251.Google Scholar
Morse, Stephen J., ‘Reasons, results and criminal responsibility’ [2004] University of Illinois Law Review 363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nino, C.S., ‘A consensual theory of punishment’ (1983) 12 Philosophy and Public Affairs 289.Google Scholar
Norrie, Alan W., Law, Ideology and Punishment: Retrieval and Critique of the Liberal Idea of Criminal Justice (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norrie, Alan W., ‘Subjectivism, objectivism and the limits of criminal recklessness’ (1992) 12 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norrie, Alan W., ‘Between orthodox subjectivism and moral contextualism: intention and the consultation paper’ [2006] Criminal Law Review 486.Google Scholar
Norrie, Alan W., ‘Alan Brudner and the dialectics of criminal law’ (2011) 14 New Criminal Law Review 449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norrie, Alan W., Crime, Reason and History: A Critical Introduction to Criminal Law, 3rd edn. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nourse, V.F. ‘Hearts and minds: understanding the new culpability’ (2002–2003) 6 Buffalo Criminal Law Review 361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha C., Upheavals of Thought: The Intelligence of Emotions (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha C., Hiding from Humanity: Disgust, Shame and the Law (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Oberdiek, John, ‘Towards a right against risking’ (2009) 28 Law and Philosophy 367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oberdiek, John, ‘The moral significance of risking’ (2012) 18 Legal Theory 339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Brien, Lucy, ‘Imagination and the motivational view of belief’ (2005) 65 Analysis 55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Hearn, P.J.T. ‘Criminal negligence: an analysis in depth’ (1964–1965) 7 Criminal Law Quarterly 27, 407 (published in two parts).Google Scholar
Ormerod, David, and Laird, Karl, Smith and Hogan: Criminal Law, 14th edn. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owens, David J. ‘Does belief have an aim?’ (2003) 115 Philosophical Studies 283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pardo, Michael S., ‘The Gettier problem and legal proof’ (2010) 16 Legal Theory 37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pardo, Michael S., ‘More on the Gettier problem and legal proof: unsafe nonknowledge does not mean knowledge must be safe’ (2011) 17 Legal Theory 75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pardo, Michael S., and Patterson, Dennis, Minds, Brains and Law: The Conceptual Foundations of Law and Neuroscience (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perkins, Rollin M., ‘“Knowledge” as a mens rea requirement’ (1977–1978) 29 Hastings Law Journal 953.Google Scholar
Perry, Stephen, ‘Risk, harm and responsibility’, in Owen, David G. (ed.), The Philosophical Foundations of Tort Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997), p. 321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perry, Stephen, ‘Harm, history and counterfactuals’ (2003) 40 San Diego Law Review 1283.Google Scholar
Perry, Stephen, ‘Risk, harm, interests and rights’, in Lewens, Tim (ed.), Risk: Philosophical Perspectives (London: Routledge, 2007), p. 190.Google Scholar
Pettit, Philip, The Common Mind: An Essay on Psychology, Society and Politics (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Pettit, Philip, and Smith, Michael, ‘Freedom in belief and desire’ (1996) 93 Journal of Philosophy 429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pickard, Toni, ‘Culpable mistakes and rape: relating mens rea to the crime’ (1980) 30 University of Toronto Law Journal 75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pillsbury, Samuel H., ‘The meaning of deserved punishment: an essay on choice, character and responsibility’ (1991–1992) 67 Indiana Law Journal 719.Google Scholar
Pincoffs, Edmund L., ‘Legal responsibility and moral character’ (1972–1973) 19 Wayne Law Review 905.Google Scholar
Plantinga, Alvin, Warrant: The Current Debate (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Posner, Richard, ‘The jurisprudence of skepticism’ (1987–1988) 86 Michigan Law Review 827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pritchard, H.A., ‘Knowing and believing’, in Griffiths, A.P. (ed.), Knowledge and Belief (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1967), p. 60.Google Scholar
Quigley, Tim, ‘Specific and general nonsense?’ (1987–1988) 11 Dalhousie Law Journal 75.Google Scholar
Rabin, Robert L., ‘The fault of not knowing: a comment’ (2003) 4 Theoretical Inquiries in Law 427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, John, A Theory of Justice: Revised Edition (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raz, Joseph, ‘Autonomy, freedom and the harm principle’, in Gavison, Ruth (ed.), Issues in Contemporary Legal Philosophy: The Influence of H.L.A. Hart (Oxford: Clarendon, 1987), p. 313.Google Scholar
Raz, Joseph, Practical Reason and Norms, rev. edn. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raz, Joseph, Engaging Reason: On the Theory of Value and Action (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raz, Joseph, The Authority of Law: Essays on Law and Morality, 2nd edn. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Raz, Joseph, ‘Responsibility and the negligence standard’ (2010) 30 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raz, Joseph, From Normativity to Responsibility (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reiff, Mark R., Punishment, Compensation and Law: A Theory of Enforceability (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renzo, Massimo, ‘Responsibility and answerability in the criminal law’, in Duff, R.A. et al. (eds.), The Constitution of the Criminal Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013), p. 209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ristroph, Alice, ‘When freedom isn’t free’ (2011) 14 New Criminal Law Review 468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roach, Kent, ‘Dialogue or defiance: legislative reversals of Supreme Court decisions in Canada and the United States’ (2006) 4 International Journal of Constitutional Law 347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Paul, ‘The presumption of innocence brought home: Kebilene deconstructed’ (2002) 118 Law Quarterly Review 41.Google Scholar
Robinson, Paul H., ‘A functional analysis of the criminal law’ (1994) 88 Northwestern University Law Review 857.Google Scholar
Robinson, Paul H., ‘Legality and discretion in the distribution of criminal sanctions’ (1988) 25 Harvard Journal on Legislation 393.Google Scholar
Robinson, Paul H., ‘Rules of conduct and principles of adjudication’ (1990) 57 University of Chicago Law Review 729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, Paul H., Structure and Function in Criminal Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, Paul H., ‘Structuring criminal codes to fulfill their function’ (2000–2001) 4 Buffalo Criminal Law Review 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, Paul H., ‘Fair notice and fair adjudication: two kinds of legality’ (2005–2006) 154 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, Paul H., Distributive Principles of Criminal Law: Who Should Be Punished, How Much? (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruimschotel, Dirk, ‘The psychological reality of intentional and negligent criminal acts’, in van Koppen, Peter J., Hessing, Dick J. and van den Heuvel, Grat (eds.), Lawyers on Psychology and Psychologists on Law (Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger, 1988), p. 83.Google Scholar
Ryan, Sharon, ‘Doxastic compatibilism and the ethics of belief’ (2003) 114 Philosophical Studies 47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sabini, John, and Silver, Maury, ‘Lack of character? Situationism critiqued’ (2005) 115 Ethics 535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sartwell, Crispin, ‘Knowledge is merely true belief’ (1991) 28 American Philosophical Quarterly 157.Google Scholar
Scanlon, T.M., ‘The significance of choice’, in McMurrin, Sterling M. (ed.), The Tanner Lectures on Human Values, VIII (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988), p. 149.Google Scholar
Scanlon, T.M., The Difficulty of Tolerance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schloenhardt, Andreas, Queensland Criminal Law, 4th edn. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Schulhoffer, Stephen J., ‘Harm and punishment: a critique of emphasis on the results of conduct in the criminal law’ (1973–1974) 122 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 1497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwitzgebel, Eric, ‘In-between believing’ (2001) 51 Philosophical Quarterly 76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwitzgebel, Eric, ‘A phenomenal, dispositional account of belief’ (2002) 36 Noûs 249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwitzgebel, Eric, ‘Knowing your own beliefs’ (2009) 39(1) Canadian Journal of Philosophy 41.Google Scholar
Schwitzgebel, Eric, ‘Acting contrary to our professed beliefs or the gulf between occurrent judgment and dispositional belief’ (2010) 91 Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searle, John R., Intentionality: An Essay in the Philosophy of Mind (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searle, John R., The Mystery of Consciousness (New York: New York Review of Books, 1997).Google Scholar
Searle, John R., Mind: A Brief Introduction (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shanahan, Michael J., Smith, Paul E., and Ryan, Soraya, Carter’s Criminal Law of Queensland, 16th edn. (Chatswood, NSW: LexisNexis Butterworths, 2006).Google Scholar
Sheehy, Elizabeth, ‘The intoxication defence in Canada: why women should care’ (1996) 23 Contemporary Drug Problems 595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sher, GeorgeWho Knew? Responsibility without Awareness (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shiner, Roger A., ‘Intoxication and responsibility’ (1990) 13 International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shute, Stephen, ‘Second Law Commission consultation paper on consent: (1) something old, something new, something borrowed: three aspects of the project’ [1996] Criminal Law Review 684.Google Scholar
Shute, Stephen, ‘Knowledge and belief in the criminal law’, in Shute, Stephen and Simester, A.P. (eds.), Criminal Law Theory: Doctrines of the General Part (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001), p. 171.Google Scholar
Simester, A.P., ‘On the so-called requirement for voluntary action’ (1997–1998) 2 Buffalo Criminal Law Review 403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simester, A.P., ‘Can negligence be culpable?’, in Horder, Jeremy (ed.), Oxford Essays in Jurisprudence: Fourth Series (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000), p. 85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simester, A.P., Appraising Strict Liability (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simester, A.P., ‘Responsibility for inadvertent acts’ (2005) 2 Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law 601.Google Scholar
Simester, A.P., ‘A disintegrated theory of culpability’, in Baker, Dennis J. and Horder, Jeremy (eds.), The Sanctity of Life and the Criminal Law: The Legacy of Glanville Williams (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013), p. 178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simester, A.P., and Brookbanks, Warren J., Principles of Criminal Law, 4th edn. (Wellington: Thomson Reuters, 2012).Google Scholar
Simester, A.P., Spencer, J.R., Sullivan, G.R., and Virgo, V.J., Simester and Sullivan’s Criminal Law: Theory and Doctrine, 5th edn. (Oxford: Hart, 2013).Google Scholar
Simons, Kenneth W., ‘Rethinking mental states’ (1992) 72 Boston University Law Review 463.Google Scholar
Simons, Kenneth W., ‘Culpability and retributive theory: the problem of criminal negligence’ (1994) 5 Journal of Contemporary Legal Issues 365.Google Scholar
Simons, Kenneth W., ‘Deontology, negligence, tort and crime’ (1996) 76 Boston University Law Review 273.Google Scholar
Simons, Kenneth W., ‘Dimensions of negligence in criminal and tort law’ (2002) 3 Theoretical Inquiries in Law 283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simons, Kenneth W., ‘Does punishment for “culpable indifference” simply punish for “bad character”? Examining the requisite connection between mens rea and actus reus’ (2002–2003) Buffalo Criminal Law Review 219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simons, Kenneth W., ‘Should the Model Penal Code’s mens rea provisions be amended?’ (2003) 1 Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law 179.Google Scholar
Simons, Kenneth W., ‘Retributivism refined – or run amok?’ (2010) 77 University of Chicago Law Review 551.Google Scholar
Simons, Kenneth W., ‘When is negligent inadvertence culpable?’ (2011) 5 Criminal Law and Philosophy 97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singer, Richard, ‘On classicism and dissonance in the criminal law: a reply to Professor Meir Dan-Cohen’ (1986) 77 Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sistare, C.T., ‘Models of responsibility in criminal theory: comment on Baker’ (1988–1989) 7 Law and Philosophy 295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, A.T.H., ‘Error and mistake of law in Anglo-American criminal law’ (1985) 14 Anglo-American Law Review 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Angela M., ‘Responsibility for attitudes: activity and passivity in mental life’ (2005) 115 Ethics 236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Angela M., ‘Control, responsibility and moral assessment’ (2008) 138 Philosophical Studies 367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Holly, ‘Non-tracing cases of culpable ignorance’ (2011) 5 Criminal Law and Philosophy 115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, J.C., ‘Subjective or objective? Ups and downs of the test of criminal liability in England’ (1981–1982) 27 Villanova Law Review 1179.Google Scholar
Smith, K.J.M. Lawyers, Legislators and Theorists: Developments in English Criminal Jurisprudence (Oxford: Clarendon, 1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Michael, ‘Rational capacities, or how to distinguish recklessness, weakness and compulsion’, in Stroud, Sarah and Tappolet, Christine (eds.), Weakness of Will and Practical Irrationality (Oxford: Clarendon, 2003), p. 17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Paul T., ‘Recklessness in dolus eventualis’ (1979) 96 South African Law Journal 81.Google Scholar
Smyth, Thomas W., ‘Unconscious desires and the meaning of desire’ (1972) 56 The Monist 413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spain, Eimear, The Role of Emotions in Criminal Law Defences: Duress, Necessity and Lesser Evils (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spencer, J.R., and Brajeux, Marie-Aimeé, ‘Criminal liability for negligence – a lesson from across the Channel?’ (2010) 59 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanley, Jason, and Williamson, Timothy, ‘Knowing how’ (2001) 98 Journal of Philosophy 411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stannard, John E., ‘Subjectivism, objectivism and the Draft Criminal Code’ (1985) 101 Law Quarterly Review 540.Google Scholar
Stark, Findlay, ‘Culpable carelessness: recklessness and negligence in Scots and English criminal law’, PhD thesis, University of Edinburgh (2011).Google Scholar
Stark, Findlay, ‘Review of Ashworth, Zedner and Tomlin (eds.), Prevention and the Limits of the Criminal Law’ (2016) 10 Criminal Law and Philosophy 389.Google Scholar
Steup, Matthias, ‘Doxastic voluntarism and epistemic deontology’ (2000) 15 Acta Analytica 25.Google Scholar
Strawson, Galen, ‘The impossibility of moral responsibility’ (1994) 75 Philosophical Studies 5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strawson, Galen, Freedom and Belief, rev. edn. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stuart, Don, ‘A case for a General Part: lessons from Canada’s experience with Stephen’s Code since 1892 and entrenched Charter standards since 1982’ (2009) 20 Criminal Law Forum 113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stuart, Don, Canadian Criminal Law: A Treatise, 7th edn. (Toronto: Carswell, 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, G.R., ‘Intent, subjective recklessness and culpability’ (1992) 12 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, G.R., ‘Knowledge, belief and culpability’, in Shute, Stephen and Simester, A.P. (eds.), Criminal Law Theory: Doctrines of the General Part (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002), p. 207.Google Scholar
Sverdlik, Stephen, ‘Pure negligence’ (1993) 30 American Philosophical Quarterly 137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tadros, Victor, ‘Recklessness and the duty to take care’, in Shute, Stephen and Simester, A.P. (eds.), Criminal Law Theory: Doctrines of the General Part (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002), p. 227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tadros, Victor, ‘The Scots law of murder’, in Horder, Jeremy (ed.), Homicide Law in Comparative Perspective (Oxford: Hart, 2007), p. 187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tadros, Victor, The Ends of Harm: The Moral Foundations of Criminal Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tadros, Victor, ‘Fair labelling and social solidarity’, in Zedner, Lucia and Roberts, Julian V. (eds.), Principles and Values in Criminal Law and Criminal Justice: Essays in Honour of Andrew Ashworth (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012), p. 67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tadros, Victor, and Tierney, Stephen, ‘The presumption of innocence and the Human Rights Act’ (2004) 67 Modern Law Review 402.Google Scholar
Taslitz, Andrew E., ‘Forgetting Freud: the courts’ fear of the subconscious in date rape (and other) cases’ (2006–2007) 16 Boston University Public Interest Law Journal 145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Greg, ‘Concepts of intention in German criminal law’ (2004) 24 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 99.Google Scholar
Treiman, David M., ‘Recklessness and the Model Penal Code’ (1981) 9 American Journal of Criminal Law 281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuomela, Raimo, ‘Belief versus acceptance’ (2000) 2 Philosophical Explorations 122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tur, Richard H.S., ‘Rape, reasonableness and time’ (1981) 1 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, J.W.C. ‘The mental element in crimes at common law’ (1938) 6 Cambridge Law Journal 31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uleman, Jennifer K., An Introduction to Kant’s Moral Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vargas, Manuel, ‘The trouble with tracing’ (2005) 29 Midwest Studies in Philosophy 269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Velleman, David J., The Possibility of Practical Reason (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Wallace, R. Jay, Responsibility and the Moral Sentiments (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Wasik, M., and Thompson, M.P., ‘“Turning a blind eye” as constituting mens rea’ (1981) 32 Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly 328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, Gary, ‘Free agency’, in Watson, Gary (ed.), Free Will, 2nd edn. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003), p. 337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wechsler, Herbert, ‘On culpability and crime: the treatment of mens rea in the Model Penal Code’ (1962) 339 Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 24.Google Scholar
Wells, Celia, Corporations and Criminal Responsibility, 2nd edn. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westen, Peter, ‘Individualizing the reasonable person in criminal law’ (2008) 2 Criminal Law and Philosophy 137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, Alan R., ‘Carelessness, indifference and recklessness’ (1961) 24 Modern Law Review 592.Google Scholar
White, Alan R., Grounds of Liability: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Law (Oxford: Clarendon, 1985).Google Scholar
Williams, Bernard, Problems of the Self: Philosophical Papers 1956–1972 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1973).Google Scholar
Williams, Bernard, Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1985).Google Scholar
Williams, Glanville, Criminal Law: The General Part, 2nd edn. (London: Stevens, 1961).Google Scholar
Williams, Glanville, The Mental Element in Crime (Jerusalem: Magnes Press, 1965).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Glanville, ‘Divergent interpretations of recklessness III’ (1982) 132 New Law Journal 313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Glanville, Textbook of Criminal Law, 2nd edn. (London: Stephens, 1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Glanville, ‘The unresolved problem of recklessness’ (1988) 8 Legal Studies 74.Google Scholar
Williams, Glanville, ‘Criminal omissions: the conventional view’ (1991) 107 Law Quarterly Review 86.Google Scholar
Williams, Rebecca, ‘Voluntary intoxication – a lost cause?’ (2013) 129 Law Quarterly Review 264.Google Scholar
Wilson, William, Criminal Law: Doctrine and Theory, 5th edn. (Harlow: Pearson, 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yankah, Ekow N., ‘Good guys and bad guys: punishing character, equality and the irrelevance of moral character to criminal punishment’ (2003–2004) 25 Cardozo Law Review 1019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zagzebski, Linda T., ‘The inescapability of Gettier problems’ (1994) 44 The Philosophical Quarterly 65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zagzebski, Linda T., Virtues of the Mind: An Inquiry into the Nature of Virtue and the Ethical Foundations of Knowledge (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Zaibert, Leo, Five Ways Patricia Can Kill Her Husband: A Theory of Intentionality and Blame (Peru, IL: Open Court, 2005).Google Scholar
Zaibert, Leo, ‘For negligence liability’, in Robinson, Paul H., Garvey, Stephen P. and Ferzan, Kimberly K. (eds.), Criminal Law Conversations (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009), p. 281.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, Aaron Z., ‘The nature of belief’ (2007) 14(11) Journal of Consciousness Studies 61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar