Abel, F. (1971), L’adjectif démonstratif dans la langue de la Bible latine (Tübingen).Google Scholar

Achard, G. (1989), Rhétorique à Herennius (Paris).Google Scholar

Adams, J. N. (1973), ‘The substantival present participle in Latin’, Glotta 51, 116–36.Google Scholar

Adams, J. N. (1974a), ‘The vocabulary of the later decades of Livy’, Antichthon 8, 54–62.Google Scholar

Adams, J. N. (1974b), ‘On the semantic field “put-throw” in Latin’, CQ 24, 142–60.Google Scholar

Adams, J. N. (1976a), The Text and Language of a Vulgar Latin Chronicle (Anonymus Valesianus II) (London).Google Scholar

Adams, J. N. (1976b), ‘A typological approach to Latin word order’, IF 81, 70–99.Google Scholar

Adams, J. N. (1977a), The Vulgar Latin of the Letters of Claudius Terentianus (Manchester).Google Scholar

Adams, J. N. (1977b), ‘The vocabulary of the Annales regni Francorum’, Glotta 55, 257–82.Google Scholar

Adams, J. N. (1978), ‘Conventions of naming in Cicero’, CQ 28, 145–66.Google Scholar

Adams, J. N. (1981), ‘Culus, clunes and their synonyms in Latin’, Glotta 59, 231–64.Google Scholar

Adams, J. N. (1982a), The Latin Sexual Vocabulary (London).Google Scholar

Adams, J. N. (1982b), ‘Anatomical terms used pars pro toto in Latin’, Proceedings of the African Classical Associations 16, 37–45.Google Scholar

Adams, J. N. (1983a), ‘Language’, in Bowman, and Thomas, (1983), 72–4.Google Scholar

Adams, J. N. (1983b), ‘Words for “prostitute” in Latin’, RhM 126, 321–58.Google Scholar

Adams, J. N. (1984a), ‘Pelagonius, Eumelus and a lost Latin veterinary writer’, Centre Jean Palerne, Mémoires 5, 7–32.Google Scholar

Adams, J. N. (1984b), ‘Female speech in Latin comedy’, Antichthon 18, 43–77.Google Scholar

Adams, J. N. (1990a), ‘The Latinity of C. Novius Eunus’, ZPE 82, 227–47.Google Scholar

Adams, J. N. (1990b), ‘The meaning and use of subiugale in veterinary Latin’, RFIC 118, 441–53.Google Scholar

Adams, J. N. (1990c), ‘The meaning of uulsus in veterinary Latin’, BICS 37, 153–62.Google Scholar

Adams, J. N. (1990d), ‘The uses of neco I’, Glotta 68, 230–55.Google Scholar

Adams, J. N. (1991a), ‘The uses of neco II’, Glotta 69, 94–123.Google Scholar

Adams, J. N. (1991b), ‘Pelagonius and Columella’, Antichthon 25, 72–95.Google Scholar

Adams, J. N. (1992a), ‘British Latin: notes on the language, text and interpretation of the Bath curse tablets’, Britannia 23, 1–26.Google Scholar

Adams, J. N. (1992b), ‘Notes on the text, language and content of some new fragments of Pelagonius’, CQ 42, 489–509.Google Scholar

Adams, J. N. (1993), ‘The generic use of mula and the status and employment of female mules in the Roman world’, RhM 136, 35–61.Google Scholar

Adams, J. N. (1994), ‘Latin and Punic in contact? The case of the Bu Njem ostraca’, JRS 84, 87–112.Google Scholar

Adams, J. N. (1995a), Pelagonius and Latin Veterinary Terminology in the Roman Empire (Leiden).Google Scholar

Adams, J. N. (1995b), ‘The language of the Vindolanda writing tablets: an interim report’, JRS 85, 86–134.Google Scholar

Adams, J. N. (1996), ‘Interpuncts and the enclitic character of personal pronouns in Latin’, ZPE 111, 208–210.Google Scholar

Adams, J. N. (1999), ‘The poets of Bu Njem: language, culture and the centurionate’, JRS 89, 109–34.Google Scholar

Adams, J. N. (2003a), Bilingualism and the Latin Language (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Adams, J. N. (2003b), ‘Petronius and new non-literary Latin’, in Herman, and Rosén, (2003), 1–23.Google Scholar

Adams, J. N. (2003c), ‘The new Vindolanda writing-tablets’, CQ 53, 530–75.Google Scholar

Adams, J. N. (2005a), ‘The Bellum Africum’, in Reinhardt, , Lapidge, and Adams, (2005), 73–96.Google Scholar

Adams, J. N. (2005b), ‘The accusative + infinitive and dependent quod-/quia- clauses: the evidence of non-literary Latin and Petronius’, in Kiss, , Mondin, and Salvi, (2005), 195–206.Google Scholar

Adams, J. N. (2006), ‘Greek interference in Egyptian Latin: an unusual partitive apposition construction’, Oxford University Working Papers in Linguistics, Philology & Phonetics 11, 1–4.Google Scholar

Adams, J. N. (2007), The Regional Diversification of Latin 200 BC – AD 600 (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Adams, J. N. (2011), ‘Late Latin’, in Clackson, (2011a), 257–83.Google Scholar

Adams, J. N. (2013), Social Variation and the Latin Language (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Adams, J. N. (2016), ‘The Latin of the Magerius (Smirat) mosaic’, HSCP 108, 509–44.Google Scholar

Adams, J. N. and Deegan, M. (1992), ‘Bald’s Leechbook and the Physica Plinii’, Anglo-Saxon England 21, 87–114.Google Scholar

Adams, J. N. and De Melo, W. D. C. (forthcoming), ‘Ad versus the dative: from early to late Latin’, in Adams, and Vincent, (forthcoming a).Google Scholar

Adams, J. N., Lapidge, M. and Reinhardt, T. (2005), ‘Introduction’, in Reinhardt, , Lapidge, and Adams, (2005), 1–36.Google Scholar

Adams, J. N. and Mayer, R. G. eds. (1999), Aspects of the Language of Latin Poetry (Proceedings of the British Academy 93) (Oxford).Google Scholar

Adams, J. N. and Vincent, N. eds. (forthcoming a), Early and Late Latin: Continuity or Change? (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Adams, J. N. and Vincent, N. eds. (forthcoming b), ‘The infinitive of purpose with verbs of motion: from early Latin to Romance’, in Adams, and Vincent, (forthcoming a).Google Scholar

Ahlquist, H. (1909), Studien zur spätlateinischen Mulomedicina Chironis (Uppsala).Google Scholar

Albrecht, M. (1989), Masters of Roman Prose from Cato to Apuleius: Interpretative Studies, translated by Adkin, N. (Arca, Classical and Medieval Texts, Papers and Monographs 23) (Trowbridge).Google Scholar

Aldrete, G. S. (1999), Gestures and Acclamations in Ancient Rome (Baltimore and London).Google Scholar

Amat, J. (1995), ‘Le latin de La Passion de Perpétue et de Félicité’, in Callebat, (1995), 445–54.Google Scholar

Ameling, W. (2012), ‘Femina liberaliter instituta – some thoughts on a martyr’s liberal education’, in Bremmer, and Formisano, (2012a), 78–102.Google Scholar

Anderson, R. D., Parsons, P. J. and Nisbet, R. G. M. (1979), ‘Elegiacs by Gallus from Qaṣr Ibrîm’, JRS 69, 125–55.Google Scholar

André, A. (2010), ‘La concurrence entre is et ille dans l’évolution de la langue latine: étude comparative, de Cicéron à Augustine’, Latomus 69, 313–29.Google Scholar

André, J. (1949), Étude sur les termes de couleur dans la langue latine (Paris).Google Scholar

André, J. (1951), ‘Les adjectifs et adverbes à valeur intensive en per- et prae-’, REL 29, 121–54.Google Scholar

André, J. (1956), ‘Nominatifs latins en -us formés sur un génitif grec en -ος’, BSL 52, 254–64.Google Scholar

André, J. (1968), ‘Les changements de genre dans les emprunts du latin au grec’, Word 24, 1–7.Google Scholar

André, J. (1971), Emprunts et suffixes nominaux en latin (Geneva and Paris).Google Scholar

André, J. (1978), Les mots à redoublement en latin (Paris).Google Scholar

André, J. (1985), Les noms de plantes dans la Rome antique (Paris).Google Scholar

André, J. (1991), Le vocabulaire latin de l’anatomie (Paris).Google Scholar

Arias Abellán, C. ed. (2006), Latin vulgaire – latin tardif VII: Actes du VII^ème colloque international sur le latin vulgaire et tardif, Séville, 2–6 septembre 2003 (Seville).Google Scholar

Arnaldi, F., Turriani, M. and Smiraglia, P. (1939–64), Latinitatis Italicae medii aevi inde ab a. CDLXXVI usque ad a. MXXII lexicon imperfectum, 3 vols. (Turin).Google Scholar

Audollent, A. (1904), Defixionum tabellae (Paris).Google Scholar

Austin, R. G. (1960), M. Tulli Ciceronis Pro M. Caelio, 3rd edn (Oxford).Google Scholar

Austin, R. G. (1971), P. Vergili Maronis Aeneidos liber primus (Oxford).Google Scholar

Austin, R. G. (1977), P. Vergili Maronis Aeneidos liber sextus (Oxford).Google Scholar

Axelson, B. (1945), Unpoetische Wörter: Ein Beitrag zur Kenntnis der lateinischen Dichtersprache (Lund).Google Scholar

Baehrens, W. A. (1922), Sprachlicher Kommentar zur vulgärlateinischen Appendix Probi (Halle an der Saale).Google Scholar

Bailey, C. (1947), Titi Lucreti Cari De rerum natura libri sex, 3 vols. (Oxford).Google Scholar

Baillet, J. (1920–6), Inscriptions grecques et latines des tombeaux des rois ou syringes à Thèbes (Cairo).Google Scholar

Bain, D. M. (1997), ‘Two submerged items of Greek sexual vocabulary from Aphrodisias’, ZPE 117, 81–4.Google Scholar

Bakkum, G. C. L. M. (1994), ‘The second-declension nominative plural in -eis, -es, -is, and the first-declension nominative plural in -as’, in Herman, (1994), 19–39.Google Scholar

Baldi, P. and Cuzzolin, P. eds. (2009), New Perspectives on Historical Latin Syntax I: Syntax of the Sentence (Berlin and New York).Google Scholar

Baldi, P. and Cuzzolin, P. eds. (2010), New Perspectives on Historical Latin Syntax II: Constituent Syntax: Adverbial Phrase, Adverbs, Mood, Tense (Berlin and New York).Google Scholar

Baldi, P. and Cuzzolin, P. eds. (2011), New Perspectives on Historical Latin Syntax IV: Complex Sentences, Grammaticalization, Typology (Berlin and Boston).Google Scholar

Bammesberger, A. and Heberlein, F. eds. (1996), Akten des VIII. Internationalen Kolloquiums zur lateinischen Linguistik (Heidelberg).Google Scholar

Banniard, M. (1992), Viva voce: communication écrite et communication orale du IV^e au IX^e siècle en Occident latin (Paris).Google Scholar

Baños, J. M. (2012), ‘Verbos suporte e incorporación sintáctica en latín: el ejemplo de ludos facere’, Revista de Estudios Latinos 12, 37–57.Google Scholar

Barnes, T. D. (2010), Early Christian Hagiography and Roman History (Tübingen).Google Scholar

Bastardas Parera, J. (1953), Particularidades sintácticas del latín medieval (Barcelona and Madrid).Google Scholar

Battisti, C. (1949), Avviamento allo studio del latino volgare (Bari).Google Scholar

Bauer, B. L. M. (2010), ‘Forerunners of Romance -mente adverbs in Latin prose and poetry’, in Dickey, and Chahoud, (2010), 339–53.Google Scholar

Bauer, B. L. M. (2015), ‘Origins of indefinite homo constructions’, in Haverling, (2015), 542–53.Google Scholar

Bauer, C. F. (1933), The Latin Perfect Endings -ERE and -ERUNT (Language Dissertations published by The Linguistic Society of America 13) (Philadelphia).Google Scholar

Bauer, W., Arndt, W. F. and Gingrich, F. W. (1957), A Greek–English Lexicon of the New Testament and Other Early Christian Literature, 4th edn (Chicago).Google Scholar

Behaghel, O. (1909), ‘Beziehungen zwischen Umfang und Reihenfolge von Satzgliedern’, IF 25, 110–42.Google Scholar

Bennett, C. E. (1910–14), Syntax of Early Latin, 2 vols. (Boston).Google Scholar

Bernand, É. (1988), Inscriptions grecques et latines d’Akôris (Cairo).Google Scholar

Bertocchi, A. (1989), ‘The role of antecedents of Latin anaphors’, in Calboli, (1989), 441–61.Google Scholar

Bertocchi, A. and Maraldi, M. (2011), ‘Conditionals and concessives’, in Baldi, and Cuzzolin, (2011), 93–193.Google Scholar

Beschaouch, A. (1966), ‘La mosaïque de chasse à l’amphithéâtre découverte à Smirat en Tunisie’, CRAI 110, 134–57.Google Scholar

Beschaouch, A. (1985), ‘Nouvelles observations sur les sodalités africaines’, CRAI 129, 453–75.Google Scholar

Beschaouch, A. (2006), ‘Que savons-nous des sodalités africo-romaines?’, CRAI 150, 1401–17.Google Scholar

Bieler, L. (1947), ‘Der Bibeltext des heiligen Patrick’, Biblica 28, 31–58, 239–63.Google Scholar

Bieler, L. (1948), ‘Exagellia’, AJP 69, 309–12.Google Scholar

Bieler, L. (1952), ‘The place of Saint Patrick in Latin language and literature’, Vigiliae Christianae 6, 65–98.Google Scholar

Bieler, L. (1953), The Works of St. Patrick; St. Secundinus, Hymn on St. Patrick (Westminster, MD and London).Google Scholar

Bieler, L. (1993), Libri epistolarum sancti Patricii episcopi: Introduction, Text and Commentary, repr. of edn of 1950–1 (Dublin).Google Scholar

Bingen, J. et al., eds. (1992), Mons Claudianus: ostraca Graeca et Latina I: O.Claud. 1 à 190 (Cairo).Google Scholar

Bingen, J. et al., eds. (1997), Mons Claudianus: ostraca Graeca et Latina II: O.Claud. 191 à 416 (Cairo).Google Scholar

Bischoff, B. (1981), ‘Eine Beschreibung der Basilika von Saint-Denis aus dem Jahre 799’, Kunstchronik 34, 97–103.Google Scholar

Bischoff, B. (1984a), Anecdota novissima: Texte des vierten bis sechzehnten Jahrhunderts (Stuttgart).Google Scholar

Bischoff, B. (1984b), ‘Die älteste europäische Falkenmedizin (Mitte des zehnten Jahrhunderts)’, in Bischoff, (1984a), 171–82.Google Scholar

Bischoff, B. (1984c), ‘Eine Beschreibung der Basilika von Saint-Denis aus dem Jahre 799’, in Bischoff, (1984a), 212–18.Google Scholar

Biville, F. (1990), Les emprunts du latin au grec: approche phonétique I: Introduction et consonantisme (Louvain and Paris).Google Scholar

Biville, F. (1995), Les emprunts du latin au grec: approche phonétique II: Vocalisme et conclusions (Louvain and Paris).Google Scholar

Biville, F., Lhommé, M.-K. and Vallat, D. eds. (2012), Latin vulgaire – latin tardif IX: Actes du IX^e colloque international sur le latin vulgaire et tardif, Lyon, 2–6 septembre 2009 (Lyons).Google Scholar

Blaise, A. (1975), Lexicon Latinitatis medii aevi (Turnhout).Google Scholar

Blänsdorf, J. (2010a), ‘The defixiones from the sanctuary of Isis and Mater Magna in Mainz’, in Gordon, and Simón, (2010), 141–89.Google Scholar

Blänsdorf, J. (2010b), ‘The texts from the Fons Annae Perennae’, in Gordon, and Simón, (2010), 215–44.Google Scholar

Blase, H. (1903), ‘Tempora und modi’, in Landgraf, G. ed., Historische Grammatik der lateinischen Sprache I: Syntax des einfachen Satzes (Leipzig), 99–288.Google Scholar

Blass, F., Debrunner, A. and Rehkopf, F. (1976), Grammatik des neutestamentlichen Griechisch, 14th edn (Göttingen).Google Scholar

Bloch, O. and Von Wartburg, W. (1968), Dictionnaire étymologique de la langue française, 5th edn (Paris).Google Scholar

Blümner, H. (1889), ‘Die rote Farbe im Lateinischen’, ALL 6, 399–417.Google Scholar

Bodelot, C. (1987), L’interrogation indirecte en latin: syntaxe – valeur illocutoire – formes (Louvain-la-Neuve).Google Scholar

Bömer, F. (1969), P. Ovidius Naso: Metamorphosen Buch I–III (Heidelberg).Google Scholar

Bomgardner, D. (2009), ‘The Magerius mosaic revisited’, in Wilmott, T. ed., Roman Amphitheatres and Spectacula: A 21st Century Perspective (BAR International Series 1946) (Oxford), 165–77.Google Scholar

Bonfante, G. (1967), ‘La lingua delle atellane e dei mimi’, in Frassinetti, P., Atellanae fabulae (Rome), v–xxiv.Google Scholar

Bonnet, M. (1890), Le latin de Grégoire de Tours (Paris).Google Scholar

Bothe, F. H. (1811), M. Atti Plauti Comoediarum tomus quartus; in usum elegantiorum hominum (Berlin).Google Scholar

Boucherie, A. (1871), ‘La vie de sainte Euphrosyne’, Revue des langues romanes 2, 23–62, 109–17.Google Scholar

Boucherie, A. (1883), ‘Vita sanctae Euphrosynae secundum textum Graecum primaevum’, Analecta Bollandiana 2, 195–205.Google Scholar

Bourciez, E. (1946), Éléments de linguistique romane, 4th edn (Paris).Google Scholar

Bowman, A. K. and Thomas, J. D. (1983), Vindolanda: The Latin Writing-Tablets (Britannia Monograph Series 4) (London).Google Scholar

Bowman, A. K. and Thomas, J. D. (1994), The Vindolanda Writing-Tablets (Tabulae Vindolandenses II) (London).Google Scholar

Bowman, A. K. and Thomas, J. D. (2003), The Vindolanda Writing-Tablets (Tabulae Vindolandenses III) (London).Google Scholar

Bowman, A. K., Thomas, J. D. and Tomlin, R. S. O. (2011), ‘The Vindolanda writing-tablets (Tabulae Vindolandenses IV, part 2)’, Britannia 42, 113–44.Google Scholar

Boyce, B. (1991), The Language of the Freedmen in Petronius’ Cena Trimalchionis (Leiden).Google Scholar

Bräunlich, A. F. (1920), The Indicative Indirect Question in Latin (Chicago).Google Scholar

Bremmer, J. N. and Formisano, M. eds. (2012a), Perpetua’s Passions: Multidisciplinary Approaches to the Passio Perpetuae et Felicitatis (Oxford).Google Scholar

Bremmer, J. N. and Formisano, M. eds. (2012b), ‘Perpetua’s passions: a brief introduction’, in Bremmer, and Formisano, (2012a), 1–13.Google Scholar

Briggs, W. W. (1983), Concordantia in Varronis libros De re rustica (Hildesheim, Zurich and New York).Google Scholar

Briscoe, J. (1981), A Commentary on Livy Books XXXIV–XXXVII (Oxford).Google Scholar

Briscoe, J. (2008), A Commentary on Livy Books 38–40 (Oxford).Google Scholar

Briscoe, J. (2012), A Commentary on Livy Books 41–45 (Oxford).Google Scholar

Brix, J. and Niemeyer, M. (1901a), Ausgewählte Komödien des T. Maccius Plautus I: Trinummus, 5th edn (Leipzig and Berlin).Google Scholar

Brix, J. and Niemeyer, M. (1901b), Ausgewählte Komödien des T. Maccius Plautus IV: Miles Gloriosus, 3rd edn (Leipzig).Google Scholar

Brix, J. and Niemeyer, M. (1907), Ausgewählte Komödien des T. Maccius Plautus III: Menaechmi, 4th edn (Leipzig).Google Scholar

Broadhead, H. D. (1960), The Persae of Aeschylus (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Brown, V. (1970), ‘A Latin letter from Oxyrhynchus’, BICS 17, 136–43.Google Scholar

Buchheit, V. (1962), ‘Ludicra Latina’, Hermes 90, 252–6.Google Scholar

Buck, C. D. (1904), A Grammar of Oscan and Umbrian (Boston).Google Scholar

Bulhart, V. (1955), ‘Ausdruckweisen für das prädikative Verhältnis im Lateinischen’, WS 68, 47–64.Google Scholar

Bulhart, V. (1967), Gregorii Iliberritani episcopi quae supersunt (Corpus Christianorum, Series Latina 69) (Turnhout).Google Scholar

Bülow-Jacobsen, A., Cuvigny, H. and Fournet, J.-L. (1994), ‘The identification of Myos Hormos: new papyrological evidence’, BIFAO 94, 27–42.Google Scholar

Buridant, C. (2000), Grammaire nouvelle de l’ancien français (Paris).Google Scholar

Burton, P. (2000), The Old Latin Gospels: A Study of their Texts and Language (Oxford).Google Scholar

Burton, P. (2007), Language in the Confessions of Augustine (Oxford).Google Scholar

Burton, P. (2011), ‘Christian Latin’, in Clackson, (2011a), 485–501.Google Scholar

Burton, P. (forthcoming), ‘Analytic passives and deponents in classical and late Latin’, in Adams, and Vincent, (forthcoming a).Google Scholar

Cabrillana, C. (2011), ‘Purpose and result clauses’, in Baldi, and Cuzzolin, (2011), 19–92.Google Scholar

Calboli, G. (1962), Studi grammaticali (Bologna).Google Scholar

Calboli, G. ed. (1989), Subordination and Other Topics in Latin: Proceedings of the Third International Colloquium on Latin Linguistics (Amsterdam and Philadelphia).Google Scholar

Calboli, G. (1993), Cornifici Rhetorica ad Herennium: introduzione, testo critico, commento, 2nd edn (Bologna).Google Scholar

Calboli, G. (1999), ‘Zur Syntax der neuen vulgärlateinischen Urkunden aus Murécine’, in Petersmann, and Kettemann, (1999), 331–44.Google Scholar

Calboli, G. (2006), ‘Encore une fois sur les tablettes de Murécine’, in Abellán, Arias (2006), 155–68.Google Scholar

Calboli, G. (2009), ‘Latin syntax and Greek’, in Baldi, and Cuzzolin, (2009), 65–193.Google Scholar

Calboli, G. (2012), ‘Syntaxe nominale et subordination en latin tardif’, in Biville, , Lhommé, and Vallat, (2012), 439–51.Google Scholar

Callebat, L. ed. (1995), Latin vulgaire, latin tardif IV: Actes du 4^e colloque international sur le latin vulgaire et tardif, Caen, 2–5 septembre 1994 (Hildesheim, Zurich and New York).Google Scholar

Callebat, L., Bouet, P., Fleury, P. and Zuinghedau, M. (1984), Vitruve: De architectura concordance, 2 vols. (Hildesheim, Zurich and New York).Google Scholar

Callebat, L., Gros, P. and Jacquemard, C. (1999), Vitruve: De l’architecture livre II (Paris).Google Scholar

Camodeca, G. (1999), Tabulae pompeianae Sulpiciorum (TPSulp.): edizione critica dell’archivio puteolano dei Sulpicii, 2 vols. (Rome).Google Scholar

Campanile, E. (1971), ‘Due studi sul latino volgare’, L’Italia dialettale 34, 1–64 = Campanile, (2008), I.337–83.Google Scholar

Campanile, E. (2008), Latina & Italica: scritti minori sulle lingue dell’Italia antica, 2 vols., edited by Poccetti, P. (Pisa and Rome).Google Scholar

Campbell, B. (2000), The Writings of the Roman Land Surveyors: Introduction, Text, Translation and Commentary (Journal of Roman Studies Monograph 9) (London).Google Scholar

Caplan, H. (1954), [Cicero]: Ad C. Herennium (Rhetorica ad Herennium) (Cambridge, MA and London).Google Scholar

Carnoy, C. (1906), Le latin d’Espagne d’après les inscriptions: étude linguistique, 2nd edn (Brussels).Google Scholar

Cavalca, M. G. (2001), I grecismi nel Satyricon di Petronio (Bologna).Google Scholar

Cèbe, J.-P. (1998), Varron: Satires Ménippées XII (Rome).Google Scholar

Cèbe, J.-P. (1999), Varron: Satires Ménippées XIII (Rome).Google Scholar

Chahoud, A. (2010), ‘Romani ueteres atque urbani sales: a note on Cicero De Oratore 2.272 and Lucilius 173M’, in Kraus, C., Marincola, J. and Pelling, C. eds., Ancient Historiography and its Contexts: Studies in Honour of A. J. Woodman (Oxford), 86–97.Google Scholar

Chahoud, A. (forthcoming), ‘Verbal mosaics: speech patterns and generic stylisation in Lucilius’, in Breed, B. W., Wallace, R., and Keitel, E. eds., Our Lucilius: Satire in Second Century Rome (in preparation).Google Scholar

Chamberland, G. (2012), ‘La mémoire des spectacles: l’autoreprésentation des donateurs’, in L’organisation des spectacles dans le monde romain (Fondation Hardt: Entretiens sur l’antiquité classique 58), 261–303.Google Scholar

Chantraine, P. (1963), Grammaire homérique II: Syntaxe (Paris).Google Scholar

Christenson, D. M. (2000), Plautus: Amphitruo (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Cignolo, C. (2002), Terentiani Mauri De litteris, De syllabis, De metris, 2 vols. (Hildesheim, Zurich and New York).Google Scholar

Citroni, M. (1975), M. Valerii Martialis Epigrammaton liber primus: introduzione, testo, apparato critico e commento (Florence).Google Scholar

Clackson, J. ed. (2011a), A Companion to the Latin Language (Malden, MA, Oxford and Chichester).Google Scholar

Clackson, J. ed. (2011b), ‘Classical Latin’, in Clackson, (2011a), 236–56.Google Scholar

Clackson, J. and Horrocks, G. (2007), The Blackwell History of the Latin Language (Malden, MA, Oxford and Carlton, Vic.).Google Scholar

Coleman, K. M. (2006), M. Valerii Martialis Liber spectaculorum (Oxford).Google Scholar

Coleman, K. M. (2012), ‘Bureaucratic language in the correspondence between Pliny and Trajan’, TAPA 142, 189–238.Google Scholar

Coleman, R. G. G. (1971), ‘The monophthongization of /ae/ and the Vulgar Latin vowel system’, TPhS [no vol. no.] 1971, 175–91.Google Scholar

Coleman, R. G. G. (1999), ‘Poetic diction, poetic discourse and the poetic register’, in Adams, and Mayer, (1999), 21–93.Google Scholar

Collinge, N. E. (1985), The Laws of Indo-European (Amsterdam and Philadelphia).Google Scholar

Collins, R. (1998), ‘The “reviser” revisited: another look at the alternative version of the Annales regni Francorum’, in Murray, A. C. ed., After Rome’s Fall: Narrators and Sources of Early Medieval History (Essays Presented to Walter Goffart) (Toronto), 191–213.Google Scholar

Colson, F. H. (1924), M. Fabii Quintiliani Institutionis oratoriae liber I (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Cooper, F. T. (1895), Word Formation in the Roman sermo plebeius (New York).Google Scholar

Corbeill, A. (1996), Controlling Laughter: Political Humor in the Late Roman Republic (Princeton).Google Scholar

Corell, J. (1993), ‘Defixionis tabella aus Carmona (Sevilla)’, ZPE 95, 261–8.Google Scholar

Corsetti, P.-P. (1989), ‘Un nouveau témoin de l’Ars ueterinaria de Pelagonius’, Revue d’histoire des textes 19, 31–56.Google Scholar

Courtney, E. (1993), The Fragmentary Latin Poets (Oxford).Google Scholar

Courtney, E. (1995), Musa lapidaria: A Selection of Latin Verse Inscriptions (Atlanta, GA).Google Scholar

Courtney, E. (1999), Archaic Latin Prose (Atlanta, GA).Google Scholar

Courtois, C., Leschi, L., Perrat, C. and Saumagne, C. (1952), Tablettes Albertini: actes privés de l’époque vandale (fin du V^e siècle) (Paris).Google Scholar

Crawford, M. H. ed. (1996), Roman Statutes, 2 vols. (Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies Supplement 64) (London).Google Scholar

Cugusi, P. (1972–3), ‘Le più antiche lettere papiracee latine’, Atti della Accademia delle scienze di Torino: II, Classe di scienze morali, storiche et filologiche 107, 641–87.Google Scholar

Cugusi, P. (1981), ‘Gli ostraca latini dello Wâdi Fawâkhir: per la storia del latino’, in Letterature comparate, problemi e metodo: studi in onore di Ettore Paratore (Bologna), 719–53.Google Scholar

Cugusi, P. (1983), Evoluzione e forme dell’epistolografia latina nella tarda repubblica e nei primi due secoli dell’impero con cenni sull’epistolografia preciceroniana (Rome).Google Scholar

Cugusi, P. (1992), Corpus epistularum Latinarum papyris tabulis ostracis servatarum, 2 vols. (Florence).Google Scholar

Cugusi, P. (2002), Corpus epistularum Latinarum papyris tabulis ostracis servatarum III (Florence).Google Scholar

Cuomo, S. (2011), ‘A Roman engineer’s tales’, JRS 101, 143–65.Google Scholar

Curbera, J. B., Sierra Delage, M. and Velázquez, I. (1999), ‘A bilingual curse tablet from Barchín del Hoyo (Cuenca, Spain)’, ZPE 125, 279–83.Google Scholar

Cuvigny, H. (2003), La route de Myos Hormos: l’armée romaine dans le désert oriental d’Égypte (Institut français d’archéologie orientale, Fouilles 48/1–2), 2 vols.Google Scholar

Cuzzolin, P. (1997), ‘Quelques remarques syntaxiques à propos de ecce’, in García-Hernández, (1997), I.261–71.Google Scholar

Dahlén, E. (1964), Études syntaxiques sur les pronoms réfléchis pléonastiques en latin (Stockholm, Göteborg and Uppsala).Google Scholar

Dalby, A. (1998), Cato on Farming: De agricultura (Exeter).Google Scholar

Danckaert, L. (forthcoming), ‘Variation and change in Latin BE-periphrases: empirical and methodological considerations’, in Adams, and Vincent, (forthcoming a).Google Scholar

Davidson, J. (1997), Courtesans and Fishcakes: The Consuming Passions of Classical Athens (London).Google Scholar

Delamarre, X. (2003), Dictionnaire de la langue gauloise, 2nd edn (Paris).Google Scholar

De Melo, W. D. C. (2006), ‘If in doubt, leave it in’, Oxford University Working Papers in Linguistics, Philology & Phonetics 11, 1–4.Google Scholar

De Melo, W. D. C. (2007), The Early Latin Verb System: Archaic Forms in Plautus, Terence, and Beyond (Oxford).Google Scholar

De Melo, W. D. C. (2010), ‘Possessive pronouns in Plautus’, in Dickey, and Chahoud, (2010), 71–99.Google Scholar

De Melo, W. D. C. (2011a), Plautus I (Cambridge, MA and London).Google Scholar

De Melo, W. D. C. (2011b), Plautus III (Cambridge, MA and London).Google Scholar

De Melo, W. D. C. (2012a), Plautus IV (Cambridge, MA and London).Google Scholar

De Melo, W. D. C. (2012b), ‘Kuryłowicz’s first “law of analogy” and the development of passive periphrases in Latin’, in Probert, and Willi, (2012), 83–101.Google Scholar

De Meo, C. (1983), Lingue tecniche del latino (Bologna).Google Scholar

De Vaan, M. (2008), Etymological Dictionary of Latin and the Other Italic Languages (Leiden and Boston).Google Scholar

De Vogüé, A. and Antin, P. (1978–80), Grégoire le Grand: Dialogues, 3 vols. (Paris).Google Scholar

Dickey, E. (1996), Greek Forms of Address from Herodotus to Lucian (Oxford).Google Scholar

Dickey, E. (2002), Latin Forms of Address from Plautus to Apuleius (Oxford).Google Scholar

Dickey, E. (2006), ‘The use of Latin sis as a focus-marking clitic particle’, Oxford University Working Papers in Linguistics, Philology & Phonetics 11, 21–5.Google Scholar

Dickey, E. (2010), ‘The creation of Latin teaching materials in antiquity: a re-interpretation of P. Sorb. inv. 2069’, ZPE 175, 188–208.Google Scholar

Dickey, E. (2012), The Colloquia of the Hermeneumata Pseudodositheana I: Colloquia Monacensia-Einsidlensia, Leidense–Stephani, and Stephani (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Dickey, E. (2015), The Colloquia of the Hermeneumata Pseudodositheana II: Colloquium Harleianum, Colloquium Montepessulanum, Colloquium Celtis, and Fragments (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Dickey, E. and Chahoud, A. eds. (2010), Colloquial and Literary Latin (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Diehl, E. (1910), Vulgärlateinische Inschriften (Bonn).Google Scholar

Diels, H. (1899), Elementum: Eine Vorarbeit zum griechischen und lateinischen Thesaurus (Leipzig).Google Scholar

Diggle, J. and Goodyear, F. R. D. eds. (1972), The Classical Papers of A. E. Housman, 3 vols. (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Dokkum, T. (1900), De constructionis analyticae vice accusativi cum infinitivo fungentis usu apud Augustinum (Groningen).Google Scholar

Domergue, C. (1983), La mine antique d’Aljustrel (Portugal) et les tables de bronze de Vipasca (Paris) (extract from Conimbriga 22 [1983], 5–193).Google Scholar

Dover, K. J. (1968), Aristophanes: Clouds (Oxford).Google Scholar

Dumville, D. N. et al. (1993), Saint Patrick, AD 493–1993 (Woodbridge, Suffolk and Rochester, NY).Google Scholar

Dunbabin, K. M. D. (1978), The Mosaics of Roman North Africa: Studies in Iconography and Patronage (Oxford).Google Scholar

Dunbabin, K. M. D. (2010), ‘The prize table: crowns, wreaths and moneybags in Roman art’, in Le Guen, B. ed., L’argent dans les concours du monde grec: Actes du colloque international, Saint-Denis et Paris, 5–6 décembre 2008 (Saint-Denis), 301–45.Google Scholar

Dyck, A. R. (2004), A Commentary on Cicero, De legibus (Ann Arbor).Google Scholar

Dyck, A. R. (2008), Cicero: Catilinarians (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Dyck, A. R. (2010), Cicero: Pro Sexto Roscio (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Dyck, A. R. (2013), Cicero: Pro Marco Caelio (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Ebeling, H. (1885), Lexicon Homericum I (Leipzig).Google Scholar

Eck, W., Caballos, A. and Fernández, F. eds. (1996), Das senatus consultum de Cn. Pisone patre (Munich).Google Scholar

Eklund, S. (1970), The Periphrastic, Completive and Finite Use of the Present Participle in Latin (Uppsala).Google Scholar

Elcock, W. D. (1960), The Romance Languages (London).Google Scholar

Ernout, A. (1914), Morphologie historique du latin (Paris).Google Scholar

Ernout, A. (1928), Les éléments dialectaux du vocabulaire latin, 2nd edn (Paris).Google Scholar

Ernout, A. (1949), Les adjectifs latins en -ōsus et en -ulentus (Paris).Google Scholar

Ernout, A. (1957a), Recueil de textes latins archaïques, 2nd edn (Paris).Google Scholar

Ernout, A. (1957b), Philologica II (Paris).Google Scholar

Ernout, A. and Meillet, A. (1959), Dictionnaire étymologique de la langue latine, 4th edn (Paris).Google Scholar

Ernout, A. and Thomas, F. (1953), Syntaxe latine, 2nd edn (Paris).Google Scholar

Étaix, R. (1976), ‘Sermon inédit de Saint Augustin sur l’amour des parents’, Revue Bénédictine 86, 38–48.Google Scholar

Evans, T. V. and Obbink, D. D. eds. (2010), The Language of the Papyri (Oxford).Google Scholar

Ewert, A. (1943), The French Language, 2nd edn (London).Google Scholar

Farrell, J. and Williams, C. (2012), ‘The Passion of Saints Perpetua and Felicity’, in Bremmer, and Formisano, (2012a), 14–23.Google Scholar

Fedeli, P. (1980), Sesto Properzio: il primo libro delle Elegie (Florence).Google Scholar

Fedeli, P. (2005), Properzio: Elegie libro II (ARCA, Classical and Medieval Texts, Papers and Monographs 45).Google Scholar

Feltenius, L. (1977), Intransitivizations in Latin (Uppsala).Google Scholar

Fensterbusch, C. (1964), Vitruv: Zehn Bücher über Architektur, 3rd edn (Darmstadt).Google Scholar

Ferri, R. and Probert, P. (2010), ‘Roman authors on colloquial language’, in Dickey, and Chahoud, (2010), 12–41.Google Scholar

Fischer, B. (1977), Novae concordantiae Bibliorum sacrorum iuxta Vulgatam versionem critice editam, 5 vols. (Stuttgart).Google Scholar

Fischer, K.-D. (1980), Pelagonii Ars veterinaria (Leipzig).Google Scholar

Fleury, P. (1990), Vitruve: De l’architecture livre I (Paris).Google Scholar

Flobert, P. (1975), Les verbes déponents latins des origines à Charlemagne (Paris).Google Scholar

Flobert, P. (1995a), ‘Le latin des tablettes de Murécine (Pompéi)’, REL 73 (1995), 138–50.Google Scholar

Flobert, P. (1995b), ‘Traits du latin parlé dans l’épopée: Lucain’, in Callebat, (1995), 483–9.Google Scholar

Flobert, P. (1996), ‘Les verbes supports en latin’, in Bammesberger, A. and Heberlein, F. eds., Akten des VIII. Internationalen Kolloquiums zur lateinischen Linguistik (Heidelberg), 193–9.Google Scholar

Flobert, P. (2003), ‘Considérations intempestives sur l’auteur et la date du Satyricon sous Hadrien’, in Herman, and Rosén, (2003), 109–22.Google Scholar

Flobert, P. (2011), ‘La coriander: du mycénien au latin’, Revue de Philologie 85, 245–50.Google Scholar

Fordyce, C. J. (1961), Catullus: A Commentary (Oxford).Google Scholar

Fortson, B. W. (2007), ‘The origin of the Latin future active participle’, in Nussbaum, A. ed., Verba docenti: Studies in Historical and Indo-European Linguistics Presented to Jay H. Jasanoff by Students, Colleagues, and Friends (Ann Arbor), 83–95.Google Scholar

Fraenkel, E. (1951), ‘Additional note on the prose of Ennius’, Eranos 49, 50–6 = Fraenkel, (1964), II.53–8.Google Scholar

Fraenkel, E. (1961), ‘Two poems of Catullus’, JRS 51, 46–53 = Fraenkel, (1964), II.115–29.Google Scholar

Fraenkel, E. (1964), Kleine Beiträge zur klassischen Philologie, 2 vols. (Rome).Google Scholar

Fraenkel, E. (1968), Leseproben aus Reden Ciceros und Catos (Rome).Google Scholar

Fraenkel, E. ([1922] 2007), Plautine Elements in Plautus (Plautinisches im Plautus), translated by Drevikovsky, T. and Muecke, F. (Oxford).Google Scholar

Fraser, P. M. and Matthews, E. (1997), A Lexicon of Greek Personal Names IIIA (Oxford).Google Scholar

Fruyt, M. (1987), ‘Interprétation sémantico-référentielle du réfléchi latin’, Glotta 65, 204–21.Google Scholar

Fruyt, M. (2011a), ‘Latin vocabulary’, in Clackson, (2011a), 144–56.Google Scholar

Fruyt, M. (2011b), ‘Grammaticalization in Latin’, in Baldi, and Cuzzolin, (2011), 661–864.Google Scholar

Funaioli, G. (1907), Grammaticae Romanae fragmenta (Leipzig).Google Scholar

Gaeng, P. A. (1969), ‘The extent of Germanic influences on the vocabulary of the so-called Fredegarius Chronicles’, Romance Notes 11, 1–6.Google Scholar

Gaertner, J. F. (2007), ‘Tum und tunc in der augusteischen Dichtersprache’, RhM 150, 211–24.Google Scholar

Galdi, G. (2004), Grammatica delle iscrizioni latine dell’impero (province orientali): morfosintassi nominale (Rome).Google Scholar

Galdi, G. (2012), ‘Again on as-nominatives: a new approach to the problem’, in Leiwo, M., Halla-aho, H. and Vierros, M. eds., Variation and Change in Greek and Latin (Helsinki), 139–52.Google Scholar

Galdi, G. (2014), ‘Some considerations on the apodotic use of atque and et (2nd c BC–2nd c AD)’, Journal of Latin Linguistics 1, 63–91.Google Scholar

Galdi, G. (2015), ‘Some remarks on the language of the Itinerarium Antonini Placentini’, Listy filologické 138, 41–63.Google Scholar

Garcea, A. (2012), Caesar’s De analogia (Oxford).Google Scholar

García-Hernández, B. ed. (1997), Estudios de lingüística latina: Actas del IX coloquio internacional de lingüística latina, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 14–18 de abril 1997, 2 vols. (Madrid).Google Scholar

García Leal, A. (2008), ‘El orden de palabras en las pizarras visigóticas’, in Wright, (2008), 453–62.Google Scholar

Gerber, A. and Greef, A. (1877–90), Lexicon Taciteum, 2 vols. (Leipzig).Google Scholar

Geyer, P. (1898), Itineraria Hierosolymitana saeculi IIII–VIII (CSEL 39) (Prague, Vienna and Leipzig).Google Scholar

Gibson, R. K. (2003), Ovid: Ars amatoria Book 3 (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Gignac, F. T. (1976), A Grammar of the Greek Papyri of the Roman and Byzantine Periods I: Phonology (Milan).Google Scholar

Gignac, F. T. (1981), A Grammar of the Greek Papyri of the Roman and Byzantine Periods II: Morphology (Milan).Google Scholar

Gildersleeve, B. L. and Lodge, G. (1895), Gildersleeve’s Latin Grammar, 3rd edn (London).Google Scholar

González, J. (1986), ‘The Lex Irnitana: a new Flavian municipal law’, JRS 76, 147–243.Google Scholar

Goodwin, W. W. (1898), Syntax of the Moods and Tenses of the Greek Verb, 8th edn (London, Melbourne and Toronto).Google Scholar

Goodyear, F. R. D. (1972), The Annals of Tacitus I: Annals 1.1–54 (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Gordon, A. E., Gordon, J. S., Jansen, U. and Krummrey, H. (2006), Corpus Inscriptionum Latinarum VI.6: Fasciculus tertius, grammatica quaedam erroresque quadratarii et alias rationes scribendi notabiliores (Berlin and New York).Google Scholar

Gordon, R. L. and Simón, F. M. eds. (2010), Magical Practice in the Latin West: Papers from the International Conference held at the University of Zaragoza 30 Sept.–1 Oct. 2005 (Leiden and Boston).Google Scholar

Gougenheim, G. (1929), Étude sur les périphrases verbales de la langue française (Paris).Google Scholar

Goujard, R. (1975), Caton: De l’agriculture (Paris).Google Scholar

Gowers, E. (2012), Horace: Satires Book I (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Gratwick, A. S. (1982), ‘Latinitas Britannica: was British Latin archaic?’, in Brooks, N. ed., Latin and the Vernacular Languages in Early Medieval Britain (Leicester), 1–79.Google Scholar

Gratwick, A. S. (1993), Plautus: Menaechmi (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Gratwick, A. S. (2002), ‘A matter of substance: Cato’s preface to the De agri cultura’, Mnem. 55, 41–72.Google Scholar

Gray, C. (2015), Jerome, Vita Malchi: Introduction, Text, Translation, and Commentary (Oxford).Google Scholar

Greene, D. (1968), ‘Some linguistic evidence relating to the British Church’, in Barley, M. W. and Hanson, R. P. C. eds., Christianity in Britain, 300–700 (Leicester), 75–86.Google Scholar

Greimas, A. J. (1968), Dictionnaire de l’ancien français jusqu’au milieu du XIV^e siècle, 2nd edn (Paris).Google Scholar

Grevander, S. (1926), Untersuchungen zur Sprache der Mulomedicina Chironis (Lund and Leipzig).Google Scholar

Griffin, M. (1976), Seneca: A Philosopher in Politics (Oxford).Google Scholar

Grocock, C. and Grainger, S. (2006), Apicius: A Critical Edition with an Introduction and an English Translation of the Latin Recipe Text ‘Apicius’ (Blackawton, Totnes).Google Scholar

Haag, O. (1899), ‘Die Latinität Fredegars’, RF 10, 835–932.Google Scholar

Habermahl, P. (2006), Petronius, Satyrica 79–141: Ein philologisch-literarischer Kommentar I: Sat. 79–110 (Berlin and New York).Google Scholar

Hadas, M. (1929), ‘Oriental elements in Petronius’, AJP 50, 378–85.Google Scholar

Haffter, H. (1934), Untersuchungen zur altlateinischen Dichtersprache (Berlin).Google Scholar

Hahn, E. A. (1953), ‘Vestiges of partitive apposition in Latin syntax’, TAPA 84, 92–123.Google Scholar

Hall, F. W. (1923), ‘On Plautus, Miles Gloriosus 18’, CQ 17, 100–2.Google Scholar

Halla-Aho, H. (2003), ‘Scribes and the letters of Claudius Terentianus’, in Solin, H., Leiwo, M. and Halla-aho, H. eds., Latin vulgaire – latin tardif VI: Actes du VI^e colloque international sur le latin vulgaire et tardif, Helsinki, 29 août – 2 septembre 2000 (Hildesheim, Zurich and New York), 245–52.Google Scholar

Halla-Aho, H. (2009), The Non-Literary Latin Letters: A Study of their Syntax and Pragmatics (Helsinki).Google Scholar

Halla-Aho, H. (2010), ‘Requesting in a letter: context, syntax and the choice between complements in the letters of Cicero and Pliny the Younger’, TPhS 108, 232–47.Google Scholar

Halla-Aho, H. (2012), ‘A historical perspective on Latin proleptic accusatives’, De lingua Latina 7 (Revue de linguistique latine du Centre Alfred Ernout, Université Paris-Sorbonne) (available at: www.paris-sorbonne.fr/rubrique2315).Google Scholar

Halla-Aho, H. (2013), ‘Bilingualism in action: observations on document type, language choice and Greek interference in Latin documents and letters on papyri’, in Marganne, M.-H. and Rochette, B. eds., Bilinguisme et digraphisme gréco-romain: l’apport des papyrus latins (Actes de la Table Ronde internationale, Liège, 12–13 mai 2011), 169–81.Google Scholar

Halla-Aho, H. (forthcoming), ‘Left-detached constructions from early to late Latin (nominatiuus pendens and attractio inuersa)’, in Adams, and Vincent, (forthcoming a).Google Scholar

Halla-Aho, H. and Kruschwitz, P. (2010), ‘Colloquial and literary language in early Roman tragedy’, in Dickey, and Chahoud, (2010), 127–53.Google Scholar

Hallén, M. (1941), In Scriptores historiae Augustae studia: commentatio academica (Uppsala).Google Scholar

Hallett, J. P. (1977), ‘Perusinae glandes and the changing image of Augustus’, AJAH 2, 151–71.Google Scholar

Halphen, L. (1967), Éginhard: Vie de Charlemagne, 4th edn (Paris).Google Scholar

Hanson, R. P. C. (1968), Saint Patrick: His Origins and Career (Oxford).Google Scholar

Hanson, R. P. C. (1978), Saint Patrick: Confession et Lettre à Coroticus, with the collaboration of Blanc, C. (Paris).Google Scholar

Hanssen, J. S. T. (1951), Latin Diminutives: A Semantic Study (Bergen).Google Scholar

Harris, M. (1978), The Evolution of French Syntax: A Comparative Approach (London and New York).Google Scholar

Harris, M. (1988), ‘French’, in Harris, and Vincent, (1988), 209–45.Google Scholar

Harris, M. and Vincent, N. eds. (1988), The Romance Languages (London).Google Scholar

Hartel, W. (1886), ‘Lucifer von Cagliari und sein Latein’, ALL 3, 1–58.Google Scholar

Hassall, M. W. C. and Tomlin, R. S. O. (1984), ‘Inscriptions’, Britannia 15, 333–56.Google Scholar

Hassall, M. W. C. and Tomlin, R. S. O. (1987), ‘Inscriptions’, Britannia 18, 360–77.Google Scholar

Hassall, M. W. C. and Tomlin, R. S. O. (1989), ‘Inscriptions’, Britannia 20, 327–45.Google Scholar

Hassall, M. W. C. and Tomlin, R. S. O. (1992), ‘Inscriptions’, Britannia 23, 309–23.Google Scholar

Hassall, M. W. C. and Tomlin, R. S. O. (1993), ‘Inscriptions’, Britannia 24, 310–22.Google Scholar

Hassall, M. W. C. and Tomlin, R. S. O. (1994), ‘Inscriptions’, Britannia 25, 293–14.Google Scholar

Hassall, M. W. C. and Tomlin, R. S. O. (1996), ‘Inscriptions’, Britannia 27, 439–57.Google Scholar

Hassall, M. W. C. and Tomlin, R. S. O. (1999), ‘Inscriptions’, Britannia 30, 375–86.Google Scholar

Haverling, G. V. M. (2010), ‘Actionality, tense, and viewpoint’, in Baldi, and Cuzzolin, (2010), 277–523.Google Scholar

Haverling, G. V. M. (2012), ‘Latin tardif littéraire et latin tardif parlé’, in Biville, , Lhommé, and Vallat, (2012), 91–102.Google Scholar

Haverling, G. V. M. ed. (2015), Latin Linguistics in the Early 21st Century: Acts of the 16th International Colloquium on Latin Linguistics, Uppsala, June 6th–11th, 2011 (Uppsala).Google Scholar

Havers, W. (1928), ‘Zur Syntax des Nominativs’, Glotta 16, 94–127.Google Scholar

Headlam, W. and Knox, A. D. (1922), Herodas: The Mimes and Fragments (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Heffernan, T. J. (2012), The Passion of Perpetua and Felicity (New York).Google Scholar

Heidemann, A. (1893), De Ciceronis in epistulis verborum ellipsis usu (Berlin).Google Scholar

Heraeus, K. (1929), Cornelii Taciti Historiarum libri qui supersunt I: Buch I und II, 6th edn revised by Heraeus, W. (Leipzig and Berlin).Google Scholar

Heraeus, W. (1900), ‘Die Appendix Probi’, ALL 11, 301–31.Google Scholar

Heraeus, W. (1937), Kleine Schriften, edited by Hofmann, J. B. (Heidelberg).Google Scholar

Herman, J. (1957), ‘Cur, quare, quomodo: remarques sur l’évolution des particules d’interrogation en latin vulgaire’, Acta Antiqua Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 5, 369–77 = Herman, (1990), 289–97.Google Scholar

Herman, J. (1963), La formation du système roman des conjonctions de subordination (Berlin).Google Scholar

Herman, J. (1989), ‘Accusativus cum infinitivo et subordonée à quod, quia en latin tardif: nouvelles remarques sur un vieux problème’, in Calboli, (1989), 133–52 = Herman, (2006), 43–54.Google Scholar

Herman, J. (1990), Du latin aux langues romanes: études de linguistique historique (Tübingen).Google Scholar

Herman, J. ed. (1994), Linguistic Studies on Latin: Selected Papers from the 6th International Colloquium on Latin Linguistics, Budapest, 23–27 March 1991 (Amsterdam and Philadelphia).Google Scholar

Herman, J. (1995), ‘Les ardoises wisigothiques et le problème de la différenciation territoriale du latin’, in Callebat, (1995), 63–76.Google Scholar

Herman, J. (1996), ‘À propos du si interrogatif: évolutions achevées et évolutions bloquées’, in Bammesberger, and Heberlein, (1996), 296–307 = Herman, (2006), 65–75.Google Scholar

Herman, J. (1997), ‘À propos du débat sur le pluriel des noms italiens (et roumains): à la recherche d’une conclusion’, in Holtus, G., Kramer, J. and Schweickard, W. eds., Italica et Romanica: Festschrift für Max Pfister zum 65. Geburtstag (Tübingen), 19–30.Google Scholar

Herman, J. (2006), Du latin aux langues romanes II: nouvelles études de linguistique historique (Tübingen).Google Scholar

Herman, J. and Rosén, H. eds. (2003), Petroniana: Gedenkschrift für Hubert Petersmann (Heidelberg).Google Scholar

Hinand, F. and Dumont, J. C. (2003), Libitina: pompes funèbres et supplices en Campanie à l’époque d’Auguste (Paris).Google Scholar

Hine, H. M. (2011), ‘“Discite … agricolae”: modes of instruction in Latin prose agricultural writing from Cato to Pliny the Elder’, CQ 61, 624–54.Google Scholar

Hofmann, J. B. (1924), ‘Syntaktische Gliederungsverschiebungen im Lateinischen infolge Erstarrung ursprünglich appositioneller Verhältnisse’, IF 42, 75–87.Google Scholar

Hofmann, J. B. (1951), Lateinische Umgangssprache, 3rd edn (Heidelberg).Google Scholar

Hofmann, J. B. and Ricottilli, L. (2003), La lingua d’uso latina, 3rd edn (translation with supplements of Hofmann 1951 by Ricottilli, L.) (Bologna).Google Scholar

Hofmann, J. B. and Szantyr, A. (1965), Lateinische Syntax und Stilistik (Munich).Google Scholar

Holford-Strevens, L. (2010), ‘Current and ancient colloquial in Gellius’, in Dickey, and Chahoud, (2010), 331–8.Google Scholar

Hoppe, H. (1903), Syntax und Stil des Tertullian (Leipzig).Google Scholar

Horrocks, G. C. (2010), Greek: A History of the Language and its Speakers, 2nd edn (Malden, MA, Oxford and Chichester).Google Scholar

Horsfall, N. (2000), Virgil, Aeneid 7: A Commentary (Leiden, Boston and Cologne).Google Scholar

Horsfall, N. (2003), Virgil, Aeneid 11: A Commentary (Leiden and Boston).Google Scholar

Horsfall, N. (2006), Virgil, Aeneid 3: A Commentary (Leiden and Boston).Google Scholar

Horsfall, N. (2008), Virgil, Aeneid 2: A Commentary (Leiden and Boston).Google Scholar

Housman, A. E. (1931), ‘Praefanda’, Hermes 66, 402–12.Google Scholar

Ihm, M. (1892), Pelagonii Artis veterinariae quae extant (Leipzig).Google Scholar

Iliescu, M. and Marxgut, W. eds. (1992), Latin vulgaire – latin tardif III: Actes du III^ème colloque international sur le latin vulgaire et tardif, Innsbruck, 2–5 septembre 1991 (Tübingen).Google Scholar

Iliescu, M. and Slusanski, D. eds. (1991), Du latin aux langues romanes: choix de textes traduits et commentés (du II^e siècle avant J.C. jusqu’au X^e siècle après J.C.) (Wilhelmsfeld).Google Scholar

Jackson, K. H. (1953), Language and History in Early Britain: A Chronological Survey of the Brittonic Languages, 1st to 12th c. AD (Dublin).Google Scholar

Jannaris, A. N. (1897), An Historical Greek Grammar Chiefly of the Attic Dialect (London).Google Scholar

Jeanneret, M. (1918), La langue des tablettes d’exécration latines (Paris and Neuchâtel).Google Scholar

Jocelyn, H. D. (1967), The Tragedies of Ennius (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Jocelyn, H. D. (1999), ‘Catullus, Mamurra and Romulus cinaedus’, Sileno 25, 97–113.Google Scholar

Johansen, H. F. and Whittle, E. W. (1980), Aeschylus: The Suppliants, 3 vols. (Copenhagen).Google Scholar

Jones, M. A. (1988), ‘Sardinian’, in Harris, and Vincent, (1988), 314–50.Google Scholar

Josephson, Å. (1940), Casae litterarum: Studien zum Corpus agrimensorum Romanorum (Uppsala).Google Scholar

Junkelmann, M. (2008), Gladiatoren: Das Spiel mit dem Tod (Mainz am Rhein).Google Scholar

Kahle, W. (1918), De vocabulis Graecis Plauti aetate in sermonem Latinum receptis (Münster).Google Scholar

Kajava, M. (1994), Roman Female Praenomina: Studies in the Nomenclature of Roman Women (Rome).Google Scholar

Kaster, R. A. (2006), Marcus Tullius Cicero: Speech on Behalf of Publius Sestius (Oxford).Google Scholar

Kay, N. M. (1985), Martial Book XI: A Commentary (London).Google Scholar

Kay, N. M. (2010), ‘Colloquial Latin in Martial’s epigrams’, in Dickey, and Chahoud, (2010), 318–30.Google Scholar

Kenney, E. J. (1996), Ovid: Heroides XVI–XXI (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Kiss, S. (1972), Les transformations de la structure syllabique en latin tardif (Debrecen).Google Scholar

Kiss, S. (1982), Tendances évolutives de la syntaxe verbale en latin tardif (Debrecen).Google Scholar

Kiss, S., Mondin, L. and Salvi, G. eds. (2005), Latin et langues romanes: études de linguistique offertes à József Herman à l’occasion de son 80^ème anniversaire (Tübingen).Google Scholar

Kißel, W. (1990), Aules Persius Flaccus: Satiren (Heidelberg).Google Scholar

Klein, H.-W. (1968), Die Reichenauer Glossen I: Einleitung, Text, vollständiger Index und Konkordanzen (Munich).Google Scholar

Koehler, L. and Baumgartner, W. W. (2001), The Hebrew and Aramaic Lexicon of the Old Testament, revised by Baumgartner, W. W. and Stamm, J. J., translated and edited by Richardson, M. E. J. (Leiden).Google Scholar

Köhm, J. (1905), Altlateinische Forschungen (Leipzig).Google Scholar

Kortekaas, G. A. A. (1984), Historia Apollonii regis Tyri: Prolegomena, Text Edition of the Two Principal Latin Recensions, Bibliography, Indices and Appendices (Groningen).Google Scholar

Kortekaas, G. A. A. (2007), Commentary on the Historia Apollonii regis Tyri (Leiden and Boston).Google Scholar

Koziol, H. (1872), Der Stil des L. Apuleius: Ein Beitrag (Vienna).Google Scholar

Kramer, J. (1976), Literarische Quellen zur Aussprache des Vulgärlateins (Meisenheim am Glan).Google Scholar

Kramer, J. (2001), Glossaria bilinguia altera (C. Gloss. Biling. II) (Munich and Leipzig).Google Scholar

Kramer, J. (2007), Vulgärlateinische Alltagsdokumente auf Papyri, Ostraka, Täfelchen und Inschriften (Berlin and New York).Google Scholar

Krebs, J. P. and Schmalz, J. H. (1905), Antibarbarus der lateinischen Sprache, 2 vols. (Basel).Google Scholar

Krohn, F. (1912), Vitruvii De architectura libri decem (Leipzig).Google Scholar

Kroll, W. (1915), ‘Literaturbericht für das Jahr 1912’, Glotta 6, 348–80.Google Scholar

Kroll, W. (1929), C. Valerius Catullus, 2nd edn, 1st edn 1922, reprinted with addenda 1968 (Stuttgart).Google Scholar

Kroon, C. (1995), Discourse Particles in Latin: A Study of nam, enim, autem, vero and at (Amsterdam).Google Scholar

Kropp, A. (2008a), Defixiones: Ein aktuelles Corpus lateinischer Fluchtafeln (Speyer).Google Scholar

Kropp, A. (2008b), Magische Sprachverwendung in vulgärlateinischen Fluchtafeln (defixiones) (Tübingen).Google Scholar

Krostenko, B. A. (2001), Cicero, Catullus, and the Language of Social Performance (Chicago and London).Google Scholar

Kübler, B. (1893), ‘Die lateinische Sprache auf afrikanischen Inschriften’, ALL 8, 161–202.Google Scholar

Kuhn, C. T. (2012), ‘Emotionality in the political culture of the Graeco-Roman East: the role of acclamations’, in Chaniotis, A. ed., Unveiling Emotions: Methods for the Study of Emotions in the Greek World (Stuttgart), 295–312.Google Scholar

Kühner, R. and Gerth, B. (1898–1904), Ausführliche Grammatik der griechischen Sprache II: Satzlehre, 3rd edn, 2 vols. (Hanover and Leipzig).Google Scholar

Kühner, R. and Stegmann, C. (1955), Ausführliche Grammatik der lateinischen Sprache: Satzlehre, 3rd edn revised by Thierfelder, A., 2 vols. (Leverkusen).Google Scholar

Kurze, F. (1895), Annales regni Francorum inde ab a. 741. usque ad a. 829 (Scriptores rerum Germanicarum in usum scholarum ex Monumentis Germaniae Historicis separatim editi) (Hanover).Google Scholar

Laes, C. (2003), ‘Desperately different? Delicia children in the Roman household’, in Balch, D. L. and Osiek, C., Early Christian Families in Context: An Interdisciplinary Dialogue (Grand Rapids, MI and Cambridge, UK), 298–324.Google Scholar

Landgraf, G. (1898), ‘Nugas = nugax’, ALL 10, 225–8.Google Scholar

Landgraf, G. (1914), Kommentar zu Ciceros Rede Pro Sex. Roscio Amerino, 2nd edn (Leipzig and Berlin).Google Scholar

Landi, A. (1983), Il contributo dell’archivio puteolano dei Sulpicii alla conoscenza del ‘latino volgare’ (Naples).Google Scholar

Langslow, D. R. (2000), Medical Latin in the Roman Empire (Oxford).Google Scholar

Langslow, D. R. (2005), ‘“Langues réduites au lexique”? The languages of Latin technical prose’, in Reinhardt, , Lapidge, and Adams, (2005), 287–302.Google Scholar

Langslow, D. R. (2006), The Latin Alexander Trallianus: The Text and Transmission of a Late Latin Medical Book (Journal of Roman Studies Monograph 10) (London).Google Scholar

Langslow, D. R. ed. (2009), Jacob Wackernagel: Lectures on Syntax, with Special Reference to Greek, Latin, and Germanic, edited with notes and bibliography by Langslow, D. R. (Oxford).Google Scholar

Laporte, J.-P. (1994), ‘Notes sur l’aqueduc de Saldae (Boujie)’, L’Africa Romana 11, 711–62.Google Scholar

Laughton, E. (1951), ‘The prose of Ennius’, Eranos 49, 35–49.Google Scholar

Laughton, E. (1960), ‘Observations on the style of Varro’, CQ 10, 1–28.Google Scholar

Laughton, E. (1964), The Participle in Cicero (Oxford).Google Scholar

Laurand, L. (1936–8), Études sur le style des discours de Cicéron, 3 vols. (Paris).Google Scholar

Lazzeroni, R. (1962), ‘Le più antiche attestazioni del nom. pl. -ās in latino e la provenienza dei Coloni pesaresi’, SSL 2, 106–22.Google Scholar

Lebek, W. D. (1970), Verba prisca: Die Anfänge des Archaisierens in der lateinischen Beredsamkeit und Geschichtsschreibung (Göttingen).Google Scholar

Ledgeway, A. (2011), ‘Syntactic and morphosyntactic typology and change’, in Maiden, , Smith, and Ledgeway, (2011), 382–471.Google Scholar

Leeman, A. D. (1963), Orationis ratio: The Stylistic Theories and Practice of the Roman Orators, Historians and Philosophers, 2 vols. (Amsterdam).Google Scholar

Leeman, A. D., Pinkster, H. and Rabbie, E. (1989), M. Tullius Cicero, De oratore libri III III: Buch II, 99–290 (Heidelberg).Google Scholar

Lehmann, C. (1988), ‘On the Latin of Claudius Terentianus (P. Mich. VIII, 467–472)’, Cuadernos de Filologia Clásica 21, 11–23.Google Scholar

Leiwo, M. (2010a), ‘Petronius’ linguistic resources’, in Dickey, and Chahoud, (2010), 281–91.Google Scholar

Leiwo, M. (2010b), ‘Imperatives and other directives in the Greek letters from Mons Claudianus’, in Evans, and Obbink, (2010), 97–119.Google Scholar

Leumann, M. (1921), ‘Part. perf. pass. mit fui im späteren Latein’, Glotta 11, 192–4.Google Scholar

Leumann, M. (1959), Kleine Schriften (Zurich).Google Scholar

Leumann, M. (1977), Lateinische Laut- und Formenlehre, 6th edn (Munich).Google Scholar

Lewis, M. J. T. (2001), Surveying Instruments of Greece and Rome (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Liechtenhan, E. (1963), Anthimi De obseruatione ciborum ad Theodoricum regem Francorum epistula (Berlin).Google Scholar

Linde, P. (1923), ‘Die Stellung des Verbs in der lateinischen Prosa’, Glotta 12, 153–78.Google Scholar

Linderbauer, B. (1922), S. Benedicti Regula monachorum (Metten).Google Scholar

Lindholm, E. (1931), Stilistische Studien: Zur Erweiterung der Satzglieder im Lateinischen (Lund).Google Scholar

Lindsay, W. M. (1900), The Captivi of Plautus (London).Google Scholar

Lindsay, W. M. (1907), Syntax of Plautus (Oxford).Google Scholar

Lindsay, W. M. (1922), Early Latin Verse (Oxford).Google Scholar

Lintott, A. W. (1968), Violence in Republican Rome (Oxford).Google Scholar

Lloyd, P. M. (1987), From Latin to Spanish I: Historical Phonology and Morphology of the Spanish Language (Memoirs of the American Philosophical Society 173) (Philadelphia).Google Scholar

Lodge, G. (1924–33), Lexicon Plautinum, 2 vols. (Leipzig).Google Scholar

Löfstedt, B. (1961), Studien über die Sprache der langobardischen Gesetze: Beiträge zur frühmittelalterlichen Latinität (Uppsala).Google Scholar

Löfstedt, B. (1976), ‘Zum spanischen Mittellatein’, Glotta 54, 117–57 = Löfstedt, B. (2000), 169–211.Google Scholar

Löfstedt, B. (1983), ‘Rückschau und Ausblick auf die vulgärlateinische Forschung: Quellen und Methoden’, ANRW 29.1 (1983), 453–79.Google Scholar

Löfstedt, B. (2000), Ausgewählte Aufsätze zur lateinischen Sprachgeschichte und Philologie, edited by Berschin, W. (Stuttgart).Google Scholar

Löfstedt, E. (1907), Beiträge zur Kenntnis der späteren Latinität (Stockholm).Google Scholar

Löfstedt, E. (1911), Philologischer Kommentar zur Peregrinatio Aetheriae (Uppsala).Google Scholar

Löfstedt, E. (1936), Vermischte Studien zur lateinischen Sprachkunde und Syntax (Lund).Google Scholar

Löfstedt, E. (1950), Coniectanea: Untersuchungen auf dem Gebiete der antiken und mittelalterlichen Latinität (Uppsala and Stockholm).Google Scholar

Löfstedt, E. (1956), Syntactica: Studien und Beiträge zur historischen Syntax des Lateins I, 2nd edn, II (Lund).Google Scholar

Löfstedt, E. (1959), Late Latin (Oslo).Google Scholar

Löfstedt, L. (1966), Les expressions du commandement et de la défense en latin et leur survie dans les langues romanes (Helsinki).Google Scholar

López Eire, A. (1996), La lengua coloquial de la comedia aristofánica (Mercia).Google Scholar

Loporcaro, M. (2011), ‘Phonological processes’, in Maiden, , Smith, and Ledgeway, (2011), 109–54.Google Scholar

Lorenz, A. O. F. (1869), Ausgewählte Komödien des T. Maccius Plautus III: Miles Gloriosus (Berlin).Google Scholar

Lumpe, A. (1959), ‘Elementum’, RAC IV, 1073–1100.Google Scholar

Lundström, S. (1943), Neue Studien zur lateinischen Irenäusübersetzung (Lund).Google Scholar

Lundström, S. (1948), Studien zur lateinischen Irenäusübersetzung (Lund).Google Scholar

Maccary, W. T. and Willcock, M. M. (1976), Plautus: Casina (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Mcginn, T. A. J. (1998), Prostitution, Sexuality and the Law in Ancient Rome (Oxford).Google Scholar

Mcglynn, P. (1963–7), Lexicon Terentianum, 2 vols. (London and Glasgow).Google Scholar

Mckitterick, R. (1983), The Frankish Kingdoms under the Carolingians, 751–987 (London and New York).Google Scholar

Mclachlan, K. (2012), Verborum ordo – ordo verborum: The Placement of the Dependent Genitive in Classical Latin (DPhil thesis, University of Oxford).Google Scholar

Maiden, M. (1995), A Linguistic History of Italian (London and New York).Google Scholar

Maiden, M. (2011), ‘Morphological persistence’, in Maiden, , Smith, and Ledgeway, (2011), 155–215.Google Scholar

Maiden, M., Smith, J. C. and Ledgeway, A. eds. (2011), The Cambridge History of the Romance Languages I: Structures (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Malcovati, H. (1948), Imperatoris Caesaris Augusti operum fragmenta (Turin).Google Scholar

Mallinson, G. (1988), ‘Rumanian’, in Harris, and Vincent, (1988), 391–419.Google Scholar

Maltby, R. (forthcoming), ‘Analytic and synthetic forms of the comparative and superlative from early to late Latin’, in Adams, and Vincent, (forthcoming a).Google Scholar

Manessy-Guitton, J. (1964), ‘Facinus et les substantifs neutres latins en -nus’, RPh 38, 48–58.Google Scholar

Marichal, R. (1988), Les graffites de La Graufesenque (Paris).Google Scholar

Marini, A. (1836), Vitruvii De architectura libri decem (Rome).Google Scholar

Marini, E. (2015), ‘Les verbes à incorporation de l’objet en latin: essai d’aperçu typologique’, in Haverling, (2015), 117–32.Google Scholar

Marmorale, E. V. (1961), Petronii Arbitri Cena Trimalchionis: testo critico et commento, 2nd edn (Florence).Google Scholar

Marotta D’agata, A. R. (1980), Decreta Pisana (CIL XI, 1420–21) (Pisa).Google Scholar

Marouzeau, J. (1910), L’emploi du participe présent à l’époque républicaine (Paris).Google Scholar

Marouzeau, J. (1921), ‘Pour mieux comprendre les textes latins: essai sur la distinction des styles’, REL 45, 149–93.Google Scholar

Marouzeau, J. (1949a), Quelques aspects de la formation du latin littéraire (Paris).Google Scholar

Marouzeau, J. (1949b), L’ordre des mots dans la phrase latine III: Les articulations de l’énoncé (Paris).Google Scholar

Marouzeau, J. (1962), Traité de stylistique latine, 4th edn (Paris).Google Scholar

Marshall, P. K. (1985), Cornelii Nepotis Vitae cum fragmentis (Leipzig).Google Scholar

Martin, R. H. (1976), Terence: Adelphoe (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Mauersberger, A. (1975), Polybios-Lexikon I.4 (Berlin).Google Scholar

Mazzarino, A. (1982), M. Porci Catonis De agri cultura ad fidem Florentini codicis deperditi, 2nd edn (Leipzig).Google Scholar

Meader, C. L. and Wölfflin, E. (1902), ‘Zur Geschichte der Pronomina demonstrativa II’, ALL 12, 239–54.Google Scholar

Meiser, G. (1998), Historische Laut- und Formenlehre der lateinischen Sprache (Darmstadt).Google Scholar

Menéndez Pidal, R. (1944), Cantar de Mio Cid: texto, gramática y vocabulario. Primera parte: crítica de texto – grámatica (Madrid).Google Scholar

Merguet, H. (1892), Lexikon zu den Schriften Ciceros, second part: Lexikon zu den philosophischen Schriften II (Jena).Google Scholar

Mihăescu, H. (1978), La langue latine dans le sud-est de l’Europe (Bucarest and Paris).Google Scholar

Milani, C. (1974a), ‘Aspetti fonetici del ms. Sang. 133 (Itinerarium Antonini Placentini)’, Rendiconti dell’Istituto Lombardo 108, 335–59.Google Scholar

Milani, C. (1974b), ‘Problemi di morfologia e sintassi nell’Itinerarium Antonini Placentini (ms. Sang. 133 e ms. Rhen. 73)’, Rendiconti dell’Istituto Lombardo 108, 360–416.Google Scholar

Milani, C. (1977), Itinerarium Antonini Placentini: un viaggio in Terra Santa del 560–570 d.C. (Milan).Google Scholar

Mohrmann, C. (1961a), The Latin of Saint Patrick: Four Lectures (Dublin).Google Scholar

Mohrmann, C. (1961b), Études sur le latin des Chrétiens II: Latin chrétien et médiéval (Rome).Google Scholar

Mohrmann, C. (1965), Études sur le latin des Chrétiens III: Latin chrétien et liturgique (Rome).Google Scholar

Moreda, S. L. (1987), Los grupos lexemíticos de ‘facio’ y ‘ago’ en el latín arcaico y clásico: estudio estructural (León).Google Scholar

Morgan, M. H. (1906), ‘On the language of Vitruvius’, Proceedings of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences 41, 467–502.Google Scholar

Moritz, L. A. (1958), Grain-Mills and Flour in Classical Antiquity (Oxford).Google Scholar

Mørland, H. (1932), Die lateinischen Oribasiusübersetzungen (Oslo).Google Scholar

Moussy, C. (1964), ‘Grātus et iūcundus’, REL 42, 389–400.Google Scholar

Mullen, A. (2013), ‘New thoughts on British Latin: a curse tablet from Red Hill, Ratcliffe-on-Soar (Nottinghamshire)’, ZPE 187, 266–72.Google Scholar

Müller, C. F. W. (1895), ‘Zu Caesars Bellum civile’, in Festschrift zum fünfzigjährigen Doctorjubiläum Ludwig Friedlaender (Leipzig), 543–54.Google Scholar

Müller, C. F. W. (1908), Syntax des Nominativus und Akkusativus im Lateinischen (Leipzig and Berlin).Google Scholar

Muller, H. F. and Taylor, P. eds. (1932), A Chrestomathy of Vulgar Latin (Boston).Google Scholar

Munro, H. A. J. (1886), T. Lucreti Cari De rerum natura libri sex, 4th edn, 3 vols. (London).Google Scholar

Musurillo, H. (1972), The Acts of the Christian Martyrs (Oxford).Google Scholar

Mynors, R. A. B. (1990), Virgil: Georgics (Oxford).Google Scholar

Nash-Williams, V. E. (1950), The Early Christian Monuments of Wales (Cardiff).Google Scholar

Németh, G. and Bounegru, G. V. (2013), ‘Cursing the nomen’, ZPE 184, 238–42.Google Scholar

Neue, F. and Wagener, C. (1892–1905), Formenlehre der lateinischen Sprache, 4 vols. (Berlin and Leipzig).Google Scholar

Neumann, G. (1980), ‘Lupatria in Petron c. 37, 6 und das Problem der hybriden Bildungen’, WJA 6a: 173–80.Google Scholar

Niermeyer, J. F. (1976), Mediae Latinitatis lexicon minus (Leiden).Google Scholar

Nisbet, R. G. M. and Hubbard, M. (1978), A Commentary on Horace Odes Book II (Oxford).Google Scholar

Norberg, D. (1943), Syntaktische Forschungen auf dem Gebiete des Spätlateins und des frühen Mittellateins (Uppsala).Google Scholar

Norberg, D. (1944), Beiträge zur spätlateinischen Syntax (Uppsala).Google Scholar

Norberg, D. (1945), ‘“Faire faire quelque chose à quelqu’un”: recherches sur l’origine latine de la construction romane’, Uppsala Universitets Årsskrift 12, 65–106.Google Scholar

Norberg, D. (1956), ‘Contributions à l’étude du latin vulgaire’, in Hommages à Max Niedermann (Collection Latomus 23) (Brussels), 251–7.Google Scholar

Norden, E. (1956), Agnostos Theos: Untersuchungen zur Formengeschichte religiöser Rede (Stuttgart).Google Scholar

Norden, E. (1958), Die antike Kunstprosa vom VI. Jahrhundert v. Chr. bis in die Zeit der Renaissance, 5th edn, 2 vols. (Stuttgart).Google Scholar

Nuti, A. (2015), ‘The syntax-semantics interplay of stare in late Latin and phenomena of functional differentiation of stative verbs in Romance’, in Haverling, (2015), 530–41.Google Scholar

Oakley, S. P. (1997), A Commentary on Livy Books VI–X I: Introduction and Book VI (Oxford).Google Scholar

Oakley, S. P. (1998), A Commentary on Livy Books VI–X II: Books VII–VIII (Oxford).Google Scholar

Oakley, S. P. (2005), A Commentary on Livy Books VI–X IV: Book X (Oxford).Google Scholar

Odelstierna, I. (1926), De vi futurali ac finali gerundii et gerundivi Latini observationes (Uppsala).Google Scholar

Oder, E. (1901), Claudii Hermeri Mulomedicina Chironis (Leipzig).Google Scholar

Ogilvie, R. M. (1965), A Commentary on Livy Books 1–5 (Oxford).Google Scholar

Olson, S. D. (1998), Aristophanes: Peace (Oxford).Google Scholar

Olson, S. D. (2002), Aristophanes: Acharnians (Oxford).Google Scholar

Oniga, R. (1985), ‘Il canticum di Sosia: forme stilistiche e modelli culturali’, MD 14, 113–208.Google Scholar

Önnerfors, A. (1956), In Plinii maioris Naturalem historiam studia grammatica semantica critica (Uppsala).Google Scholar

Önnerfors, A. (1963), In Medicinam Plinii studia philologica (Lund).Google Scholar

Önnerfors, A. (1975), Physica Plinii Bambergensis (Cod. Bamb. Med. 2, fol. 93^v – 232^r) (Hildesheim and New York).Google Scholar

Opelt, I. (1965), Die lateinischen Schimpfwörter und verwandte Erscheinungen: Eine Typologie (Heidelberg).Google Scholar

Otto, A. (1890), Die Sprichwörter und sprichwörtlichen Redensarten der Römer (Leipzig).Google Scholar

Panayotakis, C. (2010), Decimus Laberius: The Fragments (Cambridge).Google Scholar

Panayotakis, S. (2012), The Story of Apollonius King of Tyre: A Commentary (Berlin and Boston).Google Scholar

Parry, M. M. (1991), ‘Le système démonstratif du cairese’, in Kremer, D. ed., Actes du XVIII^e congrès international de linguistique et de philologie romanes, Université de Trèves (Trier) 1986 (Tübingen), 625–31.Google Scholar