AmE06 Corpus. www.ling.lancs.ac.uk/profiles/Paul-BakerGoogle Scholar

Anglo-Norman Dictionary. www.anglo-norman.netGoogle Scholar

Anglo-Saxon Dictionary. http://bosworth.ff.cuni.czGoogle Scholar

ARCHER = A Representative Corpus of Historical English Registers. Compiled under the supervision of Douglas Biber and Edward Finegan at Northern Arizona University, University of South California, University of Freiburg, University of Heidelberg, University of Helsinki, Uppsala University, University of Michigan, University of Manchester, Lancaster University, University of Bamberg, University of Zurich, University of Trier, University of Salford and University of Santiago de Compostela. www.alc.manchester.ac.uk/subjects/lel/research/projects/archer/, www.helsinki.fi/varieng/CoRD/corpora/ARCHER/updated%20version/introduction.html; for the original sampling frame, see Biber et al. (1994a)Google Scholar

Augustan Prose Sample. http://ota.ahds.ac.uk/desc/0401Google Scholar

B-Brown = 1930s BROWN Corpus. Compiled by Marianne Hundt (University of Zurich). www.helsinki.fi/varieng/CoRD/corpora/B-BROWN/index.htmlGoogle Scholar

BE06 Corpus. Compiled by Paul Baker (Lancaster University). www.ling.lancs.ac.uk/profiles/Paul-BakerGoogle Scholar

Berliner Lautarchiv: British and Commonwealth Recordings. http://sounds.bl.uk/Accents-and-dialects/Berliner-Lautarchiv-British-and-Commonwealth-recordingsGoogle Scholar

Bess of Hardwick's Letters. Project led by Alison Wiggins (University of Glasgow). www.bessofhardwick.orgGoogle Scholar

BLOB-1901 Corpus. Compiled by Nick Smith, Paul Rayson and Geoffrey Leech (Lancaster University). See BLOB-1931Google Scholar

BLOB-1931 Corpus. Compiled by Geoffrey Leech, Paul Rayson and Nick Smith (Lancaster University). www.helsinki.fi/varieng/CoRD/corpora/BLOB-1931Google Scholar

Bordalejo, Barbara 2003. Caxton's Canterbury Tales: The British Library Copies on CD-ROM. Leicester: Scholarly Digital EditionsGoogle Scholar

BNC = British National Corpus. Distributed by Oxford University Computing Services on behalf of the BNC Consortium. www.natcorp.ox.ac.ukGoogle Scholar

Brooklyn–Geneva–Amsterdam–Helsinki Corpus of Old English. Compiled by Susan Pintzuk (University of York), Eric Haeberli (University of Geneva and University of Reading), Ans van Kemenade (University of Nijmegen), Willem Koopman (University of Amsterdam) and Frank Beths (Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam and University of York). www-users.york.ac.uk/∼sp20/corpus.htmlGoogle Scholar

Corpus, Brown. Compiled by W. Nelson Francis and Henry Kučera (Brown University). http://icame.uib.no/brown/bcm.html, www.helsinki.fi/varieng/CoRD/corpora/BROWNGoogle Scholar

Burnley, David and Wiggins, Alison (eds.) 2003. The Auchinleck Manuscript. National Library of Scotland. www.nls.uk/auchinleckGoogle Scholar

Canterbury Tales Project. Institute for Textual Scholarship and Electronic Editing, University of Birmingham. www.petermwrobinson.me.uk/canterburytalesproject.com, see Robinson 1996, 2004; Solopova 2000a; Stubbs 2000; Thomas 2006Google Scholar

Catalogue of English Literary Manuscripts. Compiled by Peter Beal (Institute of English Studies, University of London). www.ies.sas.ac.uk/research/current-projects/catalogue-english-literary-manuscripts-1450-1700-celmGoogle Scholar

Catalogue of Vernacular Manuscript Books of the English West Midlands c. 1300–c. 1475. Project directed by Wendy Scase (University of Birmingham). www.hrionline.ac.uk/mwmGoogle Scholar

CC = Corpus of Changes. University of Edinburgh. www.lel.ed.ac.uk/ihd/CoNE/cone_mainpage.html, under www.lel.ed.ac.uk/ihd/CoNE/CoNE.htmlGoogle Scholar

CED = A Corpus of English Dialogues 1560–1760. Compiled under the supervision of Merja Kytö (Uppsala University) and Jonathan Culpeper (Lancaster University). www.helsinki.fi/varieng/CoRD/corpora/CED/index.html, www.engelska.uu.se/Research/English_Language/Research_Areas/Electronic_Resource_Projects/A_Corpus_of_English_DialoguesGoogle Scholar

CEEC and CEEC-400 = Corpus of Early English Correspondence 1998. Compiled by Terttu Nevalainen, Helena Raumolin-Brunberg, Jukka Keränen, Minna Nevala, Arja Nurmi and Minna Palander-Collin (University of Helsinki). www.helsinki.fi/varieng/CoRD/corpora/CEEC/ceec.html. See Nevalainen and Raumolin-Brunberg 1996bGoogle Scholar

CEECE = Corpus of Early English Correspondence Extension. Compiled by Terttu Nevalainen, Helena Raumolin-Brunberg, Samuli Kaislaniemi, Mikko Laitinen, Minna Nevala, Arja Nurmi, Minna Palander-Collin, Tanja Säily and Anni Sairio (University of Helsinki). www.helsinki.fi/varieng/CoRD/corpora/CEEC/ceece.htmlGoogle Scholar

CEECS = Corpus of Early English Correspondence Sampler. Compiled by Jukka Keränen, Minna Nevala, Terttu Nevalainen, Arja Nurmi, Minna Palander-Collin and Helena Raumolin-Brunberg (University of Helsinki). www.helsinki.fi/varieng/CoRD/corpora/CEEC/ceecs.htmlGoogle Scholar

CEECSU = Corpus of Early English Correspondence Supplement. Compiled by Terttu Nevalainen, Teo Juvonen, Samuli Kaislaniemi, Mikko Laitinen, Minna Nevala, Arja Nurmi, Minna Palander-Collin, Helena Raumolin-Brunberg, Anni Sairio, Tanja Säily and Tuuli Tahko (University of Helsinki). www.helsinki.fi/varieng/CoRD/corpora/CEEC/ceecsu.htmlGoogle Scholar

CEEM = Corpus of Early English Medical Writing. Compiled under the supervision of Irma Taavitsainen and Päivi Pahta (University of Helsinki). www.helsinki.fi/varieng/CoRD/corpora/CEEM/Google Scholar

CEN = Corpus of English Novels. Compiled by Hendrik de Smet (University of Leuven). https://perswww.kuleuven.be/∼u0044428Google Scholar

Centre for Editing Lives and Letters. www.livesandletters.ac.ukGoogle Scholar

CENZE = Corpus of Early New Zealand English. The first version samples the registers covered in the original ARCHER (apart from drama, diaries and journals, sermons and legal texts), covering the 1840s to 1999; for details, see Hundt (2012)Google Scholar

CHELAR = Corpus of Historical English Law Reports. Compiled by María José López-Couso, Belén Méndez-Naya, Teresa Fanego, Paloma Núñez-Pertejo, Paula Rodríguez-Puente, Zeltia Blanco-Suárez, Eduardo Coto-Villalibre, Tania de Dios-Miguéns, Beatriz Mato-Míguez, Paula Rodríguez-Abruñeiras, Iria-Gael Romay-Fernández and Vera Vázquez-López (University of Santiago de Compostela); for details, see Rodríguez-Puente (2011)Google Scholar

CIE = Corpus of Irish English. Compiled by Raymond Hickey (University of Duisburg-Essen). www.uni-due.de/IERC/CIE.htmGoogle Scholar

CLMET = Corpus of Late Modern English Texts. Compiled by Hendrik de Smet (University of Leuven). https://perswww.kuleuven.be/∼u0044428/clmetGoogle Scholar

CLMET3.0 = Corpus of Late Modern English Texts, version 3.0. Compiled by Hendrik de Smet (University of Leuven), Hans-Jürgen Diller (Ruhr University Bockum) and Jukka Tyrkkö (University of Tampere). https://perswww.kuleuven.be/∼u0044428Google Scholar

CLMETEV = Corpus of Late Modern English Texts, Extended Version. Compiled by Hendrik de Smet (University of Leuven). https://perswww.kuleuven.be/∼u0044428/clmetev.htmGoogle Scholar

Clunies Ross, Margaret, Gade, Kari Ellen, Nordal, Guðrún, Marold, Edith, Whaley, Diana and Wills, Tarrin (eds.) 2012. Skaldic Poetry of the Scandinavian Middle Ages: The Skaldic Project. www.abdn.ac.uk/skaldic/db.phpGoogle Scholar

CMEPV = Corpus of Middle English Prose and Verse. Middle English Compendium. http://quod.lib.umich.edu/c/cmeGoogle Scholar

COCA = Corpus of Contemporary American English. Compiled by Mark Davies (Brigham Young University). http://corpus.byu.edu/cocaGoogle Scholar

COHA = The Corpus of Historical American English: 400+ million words, 1810–2009. Compiled by Mark Davies (Brigham Young University). http://corpus.byu.edu/cohaGoogle Scholar

Collection of Nineteenth-Century Grammars. Compiled by Lieselotte Anderwald (University of Kiel). www.anglistik.uni-kiel.de/index.php/cng.htmlGoogle Scholar

CONCE = A Corpus of Nineteenth-Century English. Compiled by Merja Kytö (Uppsala University) and Juhani Rudanko (University of Tampere)Google Scholar

CoNE = Corpus of Narrative Etymologies. Compiled by Roger Lass (University of Cape Town), Margaret Laing (University of Edinburgh) and Rhona Alcorn (University of Edinburgh). www.lel.ed.ac.uk/ihd/CoNE/CoNE.htmlGoogle Scholar

CONTE-pC = Corpus of Early Ontario English, pre-Confederation Section; for details, see Dollinger (2006a). Compiled by Stefan Dollinger (University of British Columbia). www.helsinki.fi/varieng/CoRD/corpora/CONTE/index.htmlGoogle Scholar

COOEE = Corpus of Oz Early English. Australian English texts from between 1788 and 1900. Compiled by Clemens Fritz (Free University of Berlin); for details, see Fritz (2007). www.helsinki.fi/varieng/CoRD/corpora/COOEEGoogle Scholar

COPC = Century of Prose Corpus. Compiled by Louis T. Milić (Cleveland State University)Google Scholar

CoRD = Corpus Resource Database. Research Unit for Variation, Contacts and Change in English, University of Helsinki. www.helsinki.fi/varieng/CoRD/corpora/HelsinkiCorpus/index.htmlGoogle Scholar

CORIECOR = Corpus of Irish English Correspondence; for details, see McCafferty and Amador-Moreno (2012)Google Scholar

Corpus of Legislative Council Proceedings (1858–2012). Compiled from Hong Kong Hansard; for details, see Evans (2014)Google Scholar

CSC = Corpus of Scottish Correspondence. Compiled by Anneli Meurman-Solin (University of Helsinki). www.helsinki.fi/varieng/CoRD/corpora/CSCGoogle Scholar

Da Rold, Orietta, Kato, Takako, Swan, Mary and Treharne, Elaine (eds.). The Production and Use of English Manuscripts 1060 to 1220. www.le.ac.uk/ee/em1060to1220Google Scholar

DCPSE = The Diachronic Corpus of Present-Day Spoken English. London: Survey of English Usage. Compiled by Sean A. Wallis, Bas Aarts, Gabriel Ozon and Yordanka Kavalova (University College London). www.ucl.ac.uk/english-usage/projects/dcpseGoogle Scholar

DECL = Digital Editions for Corpus Linguistics. www.helsinki.fi/varieng/domains/DECL.htmlGoogle Scholar

DECTE = Diachronic Electronic Corpus of Tyneside English. Compiled under the supervision of Karen P. Corrigan (Newcastle University). http://research.ncl.ac.uk/decteGoogle Scholar

DIMEV = Digital Index of Middle English Verse. Compiled by Linne Mooney, Daniel W. Mosser and Elizabeth Solopova. www.dimev.netGoogle Scholar

DOE = Dictionary of Old English. Ed. by Angus Cameron, Ashley Crandell Amos and Antonette diPaolo Healey (University of Toronto). www.doe.utoronto.caGoogle Scholar

DOEC = Dictionary of Old English Corpus. Original release 1981 compiled by Angus Cameron, Ashley Crandell Amos, Sharon Butler and Antonette diPaolo Healey. Release 2009 compiled by Antonette diPaolo Healey, Joan Holland, Ian McDougall and David McDougall (University of Toronto). www.doe.utoronto.ca/pages/pub/web-corpus.htmlGoogle Scholar

ECCO = Eighteenth Century Collections Online. Gale Digital Collections. http://gale.cengage.co.uk/product-highlights/history/eighteenth-century-collections-online.aspxGoogle Scholar

ECEG = Eighteenth-Century English Grammars database. Compiled by María E. Rodríguez-Gil (University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria) and Nuria Yáñez-Bouza (University of Manchester). www.manchester.ac.uk/ecegGoogle Scholar

EEBO = Early English Books Online. ProQuest LLC. http://eebo.chadwyck.com/homeGoogle Scholar

eLALME = A Linguistic Atlas of Late Mediaeval English. Compiled by Angus McIntosh (University of Edinburgh), M. L. Samuels (University of Glasgow), Michael Benskin (University of Oslo), Margaret Laing (University of Edinburgh) and Keith Williamson (University of Edinburgh). www.lel.ed.ac.uk/ihd/elalme/elalme.htmlGoogle Scholar

Electronic Beowulf. http://ebeowulf.uky.eduGoogle Scholar

Electronic facsimiles of the Parker Library manuscripts. http://parkerweb.stanford.eduGoogle Scholar

EMEDD = Early Modern English Dictionaries Database. Edited by Ian Lancashire (University of Toronto). http://homes.chass.utoronto.ca/∼ian/emedd.htmlGoogle Scholar

EMEMT = Early Modern English Medical Texts. Compiled by Irma Taavitsainen (University of Helsinki), Päivi Pahta (University of Tampere), Martti Mäkinen (Svenska handelshögskolan), and Turo Hiltunen, Ville Marttila, Maura Ratia, Carla Suhr and Jukka Tyrkkö (University of Helsinki). Available on the CD accompanying Early Modern English Medical Texts: Corpus Description and Studies edited by Taavitsainen, Irma and Pahta, Päivi (2010). Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. www.helsinki.fi/varieng/CoRD/corpora/CEEM/EMEMTindex.htmlCrossRefGoogle Scholar

ESTC = English Short Title Catalogue. British Library. http://estc.bl.ukGoogle Scholar

ETED = An Electronic Text Edition of Depositions 1560–1760. Compiled and edited by Merja Kytö, Peter J. Grund and Terry Walker. www.engelska.uu.se/Forskning/engelsk_sprakvetenskap/Forskningsomraden/Electronic_Resource_Projects/English_Witness_Depositions. Available on the CD accompanying Testifying to Language and Life in Early Modern England by Kytö, Merja, Grund, Peter J. and Walker, Terry (2011). Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John BenjaminsCrossRefGoogle Scholar

F-LOB = Freiburg–LOB Corpus of British English. Original release 1999 compiled by Christian Mair (Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg). Release 2007 compiled by Christian Mair (Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg) and Geoffrey Leech (Lancaster University). www.helsinki.fi/varieng/CoRD/corpora/FLOBGoogle Scholar

Frown = Freiburg–Brown Corpus of American English. Original release 1999 compiled by Christian Mair (Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg). Release 2007 compiled by Christian Mair (Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg) and Geoffrey Leech (Lancaster University). www.helsinki.fi/varieng/CoRD/corpora/FROWNGoogle Scholar

Google Books Ngram Viewer. https://books.google.com/ngramsGoogle Scholar

HC = Helsinki Corpus of English Texts. Compiled by Matti Rissanen (Project leader), Merja Kytö (Project secretary); Leena Kahlas-Tarkka, Matti Kilpiö (Old English); Saara Nevanlinna, Irma Taavitsainen (Middle English); Terttu Nevalainen, Helena Raumolin-Brunberg (Early Modern English). www.helsinki.fi/varieng/CoRD/corpora/HelsinkiCorpusGoogle Scholar

HCOS = Helsinki Corpus of Older Scots. Compiled by Anneli Meurman-Solin (University of Helsinki). www.helsinki.fi/varieng/CoRD/corpora/HCOSGoogle Scholar

HEL on the Web. https://sites.google.com/site/helonthewebGoogle Scholar

Helsinki Corpus TEI XML edition. Designed by Alpo Honkapohja, Samuli Kaislaniemi, Henri Kauhanen, Matti Kilpiö, Ville Marttila, Terttu Nevalainen, Arja Nurmi, Matti Rissanen and Jukka Tyrkkö (University of Helsinki). Implemented by Henri Kauhanen and Ville Marttila (University of Helsinki). Based on the Helsinki Corpus of English Texts (1991). www.helsinki.fi/varieng/CoRD/corpora/HelsinkiCorpus/HC_XML.htmlGoogle Scholar

HTE = Historical Thesaurus of English. University of Glasgow. http://historicalthesaurus.arts.gla.ac.ukGoogle Scholar

HyperBibliography of Middle English Prose and Verse. http://quod.lib.umich.edu/h/hyperbibGoogle Scholar

ICE = International Corpus of English – ICE-Phil (Philippines component), ICE-Sing (Singapore component), ICE-Ind (Indian component), ICE-FJ (Fiji component), ICE-GB (British component). Coordinated by Gerald Nelson (University of Hong Kong). http://ice-corpora.net/ice, www.ucl.ac.uk/english-usage/projects/ice-gbGoogle Scholar

Imagining History project. Project directed by John Thompson (Queen's University, Belfast). www.qub.ac.uk/imagining-history/wordpress/index.phpGoogle Scholar

Kato, Takako and Hayward, Nick (eds.). Malory Project. www.maloryproject.comGoogle Scholar

LAEME = A Linguistic Atlas of Early Middle English, 1150–1325. Compiled by Margaret Laing and Roger Lass (University of Edinburgh). www.lel.ed.ac.uk/ihd/laeme2/laeme2.htmlGoogle Scholar

LAOS = A Linguistic Atlas of Older Scots. Compiled by Keith Williamson (University of Edinburgh). www.lel.ed.ac.uk/ihd/laos1/laos1.htmlGoogle Scholar

LC = Lampeter Corpus of Early Modern English Tracts. Compiled by Josef Schmied (Chemnitz University of Technology), Claudia Claridge (University of Duisburg-Essen) and Rainer Siemund. www.helsinki.fi/varieng/CoRD/corpora/LCGoogle Scholar

LEME = Lexicons of Early Modern English. Edited by Ian Lancashire (University of Toronto). http://leme.library.utoronto.caGoogle Scholar

LION = Literature Online. ProQuest LLC. http://lion.chadwyck.comGoogle Scholar

LLC = London–Lund Corpus of Spoken English. Compiled by Jan Svartvik (Lund University), Randolph Quirk (University College London), Sidney Greenbaum (University College London) and Knut Hofland (Norwegian Computing Centre for the Humanities, Bergen). www.helsinki.fi/varieng/CoRD/corpora/LLCGoogle Scholar

LMEMT = Late Modern English Medical Texts. Compiled by Irma Taavitsainen (University of Helsinki), Päivi Pahta (University of Tampere), Turo Hiltunen, Anu Lehto, Ville Marttila, Raisa Oinonen, Maura Ratia, Carla Suhr and Jukka Tyrkkö (University of Helsinki). www.helsinki.fi/varieng/CoRD/corpora/CEEM/LMEMTindex.htmlGoogle Scholar

LOB = Lancaster–Oslo/Bergen Corpus of British English. Compiled by Geoffrey Leech (Lancaster University), Stig Johansson (University of Oslo) and Knut Hofland (University of Bergen). www.helsinki.fi/varieng/CoRD/corpora/LOBGoogle Scholar

Málaga Corpus of Late Middle English Scientific Prose. Co-ordinated by Antonio Miranda García. http://hunter.uma.esGoogle Scholar

MED = Middle English Dictionary, see References, MEDGoogle Scholar

MEG-C = The Middle English Grammar Corpus. Compiled by Merja Stenroos, Martti Mäkinen, Simon Horobin and Jeremy J. Smith (University of Stavanger). www.uis.no/research-and-Ph.D.-studies/research-areas/history-languages-and-literature/the-middle-english-scribal-texts-programme/meg-cGoogle Scholar

MEMT = Middle English Medical Texts. Compiled by Irma Taavitsainen (University of Helsinki), Päivi Pahta (University of Tampere) and Martti Mäkinen (University of Stavanger). www.helsinki.fi/varieng/CoRD/corpora/CEEM/MEMTindex.htmlGoogle Scholar

MESTA = Middle English Scribal Texts Archive. Compiled under the super-vision of Merja Stenroos and Jacob Thaisen (University of Stavanger).Google Scholar

Middle English Compendium. http://quod.lib.umich.edu/m/mecGoogle Scholar

Middle English Dictionary, see References, MEDGoogle Scholar

Mooney, Linne, Horobin, Simon and Stubbs, Estelle. Late Medieval English Scribes. www.medievalscribes.comGoogle Scholar

NECTE = Newcastle Electronic Corpus of Tyneside English. Compiled by Karen Corrigan (Newcastle University), Hermann Moisl (Newcastle University) and Joan C. Beal (University of Sheffield). http://research.ncl.ac.uk/necte/index.htmGoogle Scholar

OBC = Old Bailey Corpus. Compiled under the supervision of Magnus Huber (University of Giessen). www.uni-giessen.de/oldbaileycorpusGoogle Scholar

OBP = The Online Books Page. Edited by John Mark Ockerbloom (University of Pennsylvania). http://onlinebooks.library.upenn.eduGoogle Scholar

OED = Oxford English Dictionary, see References, OEDGoogle Scholar

ONZE = Origins of New Zealand English. Compiled by the ONZE project team (University of Canterbury). www.nzilbb.canterbury.ac.nz/onze.shtmlGoogle Scholar

Open Source Shakespeare. www.opensourceshakespeare.orgGoogle Scholar

The Orrmulum Project. www.orrmulum.netGoogle Scholar

Oxford English Dictionary, see References, OEDGoogle Scholar

PCEEC = Parsed Corpus of Early English Correspondence. Annotated by Ann Taylor, Arja Nurmi, Anthony Warner, Susan Pintzuk and Terttu Nevalainen. Compiled by the CEEC project team (University of York and University of Helsinki). www-users.york.ac.uk/∼lang22/PCEEC-manual/, www.helsinki.fi/varieng/CoRD/corpora/CEEC/pceec.htmlGoogle Scholar

Penn Corpora of Historical English. www.ling.upenn.edu/hist-corporaGoogle Scholar

Penn Parsed Corpus of Modern British English. Compiled by Anthony Kroch, Beatrice Santorini and Ariel Diertani (University of Pennsylvania). www.ling.upenn.edu/histcorpora/PPCMBE-RELEASE-1Google Scholar

PPCEME = Penn–Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Early Modern English. Compiled by Anthony Kroch, Beatrice Santorini and Ariel Diertani (University of Pennsylvania). www.ling.upenn.edu/hist-corpora/PPCEME-RELEASE-2/index.htmlGoogle Scholar

PPCME2 = Penn–Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Middle English, second edition. Compiled by Anthony Kroch and Ann Taylor (University of Pennsylvania). www.ling.upenn.edu/hist-corpora/PPCME2-RELEASE-3/index.htmlGoogle Scholar

Proceedings of the Old Bailey Online. Compiled by Tim Hitchcock (University of Hertfordshire), Robert Shoemaker (University of Sheffield), Clive Emsley (Open University), Sharow Howard (University of Sheffield) and Jamie McLaughlin (University of Sheffield). www.oldbaileyonline.orgGoogle Scholar

Project Gutenberg. www.gutenberg.orgGoogle Scholar

Robinson, Peter (ed.) 1996. The Wife of Bath's Prologue on CD-ROM. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Robinson, Peter (ed.) 2004. The Miller's Tale on CD-ROM. Leicester: Scholarly Digital EditionsGoogle Scholar

Salem Witch Trials Documentary Archive and Transcription Project. Created under the supervision of Benjamin C. Ray (University of Virginia) and Bernard Rosenthal (University of Binghamton). http://salem.lib.virginia.edu/home.htmlGoogle Scholar

SC = Salamanca Corpus: Digital Archive of English Dialect Texts. Compiled by María F. García-Bermejo Giner, Pilar Sánchez-García and Javier Ruano-García (University of Salamanca). http://salamancacorpus.usal.es/SC/index.htmlGoogle Scholar

Scase, Wendy (ed.) 2011. A Facsimile Edition of the Vernon Manuscript: A Literary Hoard from Medieval England (Bodleian Digital Texts 3). Oxford: Bodleian LibraryGoogle Scholar

SED = Survey of English Dialects. Conducted under the supervision of Harold Orton (University of Leeds). http://sounds.bl.uk/Accents-and-dialects/Survey-of-English-dialectsGoogle Scholar

Sociopragmatic Corpus = Sociopragmatic Corpus, a Specialized Sub-section of A Corpus of English Dialogues 1560–1760. Compiled by Jonathan Culpeper and Dawn Archer (Lancaster University)Google Scholar

Solopova, Elizabeth (ed.) 2000a. The General Prologue to the Canterbury Tales on CD-ROM. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Stubbs, Estelle (ed.) 2000. The Hengwrt Chaucer Digital Facsimile. Leicester: Scholarly Digital EditionsGoogle Scholar

TCP = Text Creation Partnership. www.lib.umich.edu/tcpGoogle Scholar

Thomas, Paul 2006. The Nun's Priest's Tale on CD-ROM. Birmingham: Scholarly Digital EditionsGoogle Scholar

TIME Magazine Corpus. Compiled by Mark Davies (Brigham Young University). http://corpus.byu.edu/timeGoogle Scholar

TOE = A Thesaurus of Old English. Compiled by Flora Edmonds, Christian Kay, Jane Roberts and Irené Wotherspoon (University of Glasgow). http://oldenglishthesaurus.arts.gla.ac.ukGoogle Scholar

Voigts, Linda Ehrsam and Kurtz, Patricia Deery (eds.) 2000. Scientific and Medical Writings in Old and Middle English: An Electronic Reference. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan PressGoogle Scholar

WebCorp = Synchronic English Web Corpus. Created, operated and maintained by the Research Development Unit for English Studies, School of English, Birmingham City University. www.webcorp.org.ukGoogle Scholar

WOLD = World Loanword Database. Edited by Martin Haspelmath and Uri Tadmor (Max Plank Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology). http://wold.clld.orgGoogle Scholar

YCOE = The York–Toronto–Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Old English Prose. Compiled by Ann Taylor, Anthony Warner, Susan Pintzuk and Frank Beths (University of York). www-users.york.ac.uk/∼lang22/YcoeHome1.htmGoogle Scholar

ZEN = Zurich English Newspaper Corpus. Compiled by Udo Fries, Hans Martin Lehmann, Beni Ruef, Peter Schneider, Patrick Studer, Caren auf dem Keller, Beat Nietlispach, Sandra Engler, Sabine Hensel and Franziska Zeller (University of Zurich). http://es-zen.unizh.chGoogle Scholar

Cambridge, Cambridge University Library, MS Additional 6686Google Scholar

Edinburgh, National Library of Scotland, NLS Adv. MS 19.2.1 (Auchinleck manuscript)Google Scholar

London, British Library, MS Additional 36791 (Speculum Sacerdotale)Google Scholar

London, Lambeth Palace, MS 328Google Scholar

Oxford, Bodleian Library, MS Bodley 207Google Scholar

Oxford, Bodleian Library, MS Eng. poet.a.1 (Vernon Manuscript)Google Scholar

San Marino, Huntington Library, HM 22Google Scholar

San Marino, Huntington Library, HM 55Google Scholar

San Marino, Huntington Library, HM 129Google Scholar

San Marino, Huntington Library, HM 140Google Scholar

San Marino, Huntington Library, HM 3027Google Scholar

Aarts, Bas, Close, Joanne, Leech, Geoffrey and Wallis, Sean (eds.) 2013. The Verb Phrase in English: Investigating Recent Language Change with Corpora. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aarts, Bas and McMahon, April (eds.) 2006. The Handbook of English Linguistics. Oxford: Wiley-BlackwellCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adams, James 2007. The Regional Diversification of Latin 200bc–ad600. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adamson, Sylvia 1995. ‘From empathetic deixis to empathetic narrative: stylisation and (de)subjectivisation as processes of language change’, in Stein, Dieter and Wright, Susan (eds.), Subjectivity and Subjectivisation: Linguistic Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 195–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adamson, Sylvia 1999. ‘Literary language’, in Lass, Roger (ed.), The Cambridge History of the English Language. Volume III: 1476–1776. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 539–653Google Scholar

Adamson, Sylvia 2000. ‘A lovely little example: word order options and category shift in the premodifying string’, in Fischer, Olga, Rosenbach, Anette and Stein, Dieter (eds.), Pathways of Change: Grammaticalization in English. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, pp. 39–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adamson, Sylvia 2007. ‘Prescribed reading: pronouns and gender in the eighteenth century’, Historical Sociolinguistics and Sociohistorical Linguistics 7. www.let.leidenuniv.nl/hsl_shl/Adamson.htmGoogle Scholar

Adamson, Sylvia, Law, Vivien, Vincent, Nigel and Wright, Susan (eds.) 1990. Papers from the 5th International Conference on English Historical Linguistics, Cambridge, 6–9 April 1987. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John BenjaminsGoogle Scholar

Agari, Masahiko 2005. ‘Towards the prevalence of the third person singular -s in Early Modern English’, Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 106 (4): 389–404Google Scholar

Agha, Asif 2003. ‘The social life of a cultural value’, Language and Communication 23: 231–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Agha, Asif 2007 [2006]. Language and Social Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Ahlgren, Arthur 1946. On the Use of the Definite Article with ‘Nouns of Possession’ in English. Uppsala: Appelbergs boktryckeriaktiebolagGoogle Scholar

Ahlqvist, Anders 2010. ‘Early English and Celtic’, Australian Celtic Journal 9: 43–73Google Scholar

Akimoto, Minoji 2000. ‘The grammaticalization of the verb “pray”’, in Fischer, Olga, Rosenbach, Anette and Stein, Dieter (eds.), Pathways of Change: Grammaticalization in English. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, pp. 67–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alexander, Mark and Struan, Andrew 2013. ‘“In countries so unciviliz'd as those?”: the language of incivility and the British experience of the world’, in Farr, Martin and Guégan, Xavier (eds.), The British Abroad since the Eighteenth Century. Volume 2: Experiencing Imperialism Houndmills. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 232–49Google Scholar

Algeo, John 1998. ‘Vocabulary’, in Romaine, Suzanne (ed.), The Cambridge History of the English Language. Volume IV: 1776–1997. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 57–91Google Scholar

Allan, Kathryn 2006. ‘On groutnolls and nog-heads: a case study of the interaction between culture and cognition in intelligence metaphors’, in Stefanowitsch, Anatol and Th. Gries, Stefan (eds.), Corpus-based Approaches to Metaphor and Metonymy. Berlin/New York, NY: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 175–90Google Scholar

Allan, Kathryn 2009. Metaphor and Metonymy: A Diachronic Approach. Chichester: Wiley-BlackwellGoogle Scholar

Allan, Kathryn 2010. ‘Tracing metonymic polysemy through time: material for object mappings in the OED’, in Winters, Margaret E., Tissari, Heli and Allan, Kathryn (eds.), Historical Cognitive Linguistics. Berlin/ New York, NY: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 163–96Google Scholar

Allan, Kathryn 2012. ‘Using OED data as evidence’, in Allan, Kathryn and Robinson, Justyna A. (eds.), Current Methods in Historical Semantics. Berlin/New York, NY: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 17–39Google Scholar

Allan, Kathryn and Robinson, Justyna A. (eds.) 2012. Current Methods in Historical Semantics. Berlin/New York, NY: Mouton de GruyterGoogle Scholar

Allen, Cynthia 1977. ‘Topics in diachronic English syntax’. Dissertation, University of MassachusettsGoogle Scholar

Allen, Cynthia 1995. Case Marking and Reanalysis: Grammatical Relations from Old to Early Modern English. Oxford: Oxford University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Allen, Cynthia 2000. ‘Obsolescence and sudden death in syntax: the decline of verb-final order in early Middle English’, in Bermúdez-Otero, Ricardo, Denison, David, Hogg, Richard M. and McCully, C. B. (eds.), Generative Theory and Corpus Studies: A Dialogue from 10 ICEHL. Berlin/New York, NY: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 3–25Google Scholar

Allen, Cynthia 2001. ‘The development of a new passive in English’, in Butt, Miriam and King, Tracy Holloway (eds.), Time over Matter: Diachronic Perspectives on Morphosyntax. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, pp. 43–72Google Scholar

Allen, Cynthia 2008. Genitives in Early English: Typology and Evidence. Oxford: Oxford University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Allen, Cynthia 2013. ‘Dealing with postmodified possessors in early English: split and group genitives’, in Börjars, Kersti, Denison, David and Scott, Alan (eds.), Morphosyntactic Categories and the Expression of Possession. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, pp. 1–34Google Scholar

Allen, Will 2007. ‘A linguistic “time capsule”: The Newcastle Electronic Corpus of Tyneside English’, in Beal, Joan C., Corrigan, Karen P. and Moisl, Hermann (eds.), Creating and Digitizing Language Corpora. Volume 2: Diachronic Databases. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 16–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alston, R. C. 1965. A Bibliography of the English Language from the Invention of Printing to the Year 1800. Volume 1: English Grammars Written in English and English Grammars Written in Latin by Native Speakers. Leeds: Arnold & SonGoogle Scholar

Alston, R. C. 1967–73. English Linguistics 1500–1800: A Collection of Facsimile Reprints. Menston: Scolar PressGoogle Scholar

Alter, Stephen G. 1999. Darwinism and the Linguistic Image: Language, Race and Natural Theology in the Nineteenth Century. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language 2009. New York, NY: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt (4th edn)Google Scholar

Andersen, Henning 1973. ‘Abductive and deductive change’, Language 49 (4): 765–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anderson, John 1977. On Case Grammar: Prolegomena to a Theory of Grammatical Relations. London: Croom HelmGoogle Scholar

Anderson, John and Jones, Charles 1974. ‘Three theses concerning phonological representations’, Journal of Linguistics 10: 1–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anderwald, Lieselotte 2011. ‘Norm vs. variation in British irregular verbs: the case of past tense sang vs. sung’, English Language and Linguistics 15 (1): 85–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anderwald, Lieselotte 2012. ‘Clumsy, awkward or having a peculiar propriety? Prescriptive judgements and language change in the 19th century’, Language Sciences 34 (1): 28–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anonymous 1755. The Complete Letter-Writer…to which is Prefix'd a Plain and Compendious Grammar. LondonGoogle Scholar

Anshen, Frank and Aronoff, Mark 1999. ‘Using dictionaries to study the mental lexicon’, Brain and Language 68: 16–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Archer, Dawn 2005. Questions and Answers in the English Courtroom (1640–1760). Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John BenjaminsCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Archer, Dawn 2006. ‘(Re)initiating strategies: judges and defendants in Early Modern English courtrooms’, Journal of Historical Pragmatics 7 (2): 181–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Archer, Dawn 2010. ‘Speech acts’, in Jucker, Andreas H. and Taavitsainen, Irma (eds.), Historical Pragmatics. Berlin/New York, NY: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 379–417CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Archer, Dawn 2012a. ‘Data retrieval in a diachronic context: the case of the historical English courtroom’, in Nevalainen, Terttu and Traugott, Elizabeth Closs (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the History of English. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 145–54Google Scholar

Archer, Dawn 2012b. ‘Early Modern English: pragmatics and discourse’, in Bergs, Alexander and Brinton, Laurel J. (eds.), English Historical Linguistics: An International Handbook, Vol. 1. Berlin/New York, NY: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 652–67Google Scholar

Archer, Dawn and Culpeper, Jonathan 2003. ‘Sociopragmatic annotation: new directions and possibilities in historical corpus linguistics’, in Wilson, Andrew, Rayson, Paul and McEnery, Tony (eds.), Corpus Linguistics by the Lune: A Festschrift for Geoffrey Leech. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, pp. 37–58Google Scholar

Archer, Dawn and Culpeper, Jonathan 2009. ‘Identifying key sociophilological usage in plays and trial proceedings (1640–1760): an empirical approach via corpus annotation’, Journal of Historical Pragmatics 10 (2): 286–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arnovick, Leslie K. 1990. The Development of Future Constructions in English: The Pragmatics of Modal and Temporal Will and Shall in Middle English. New York, NY: Peter LangGoogle Scholar

Arnovick, Leslie K. 1997. ‘Proscribed collocations with shall and will: the eighteenth-century (non-)standard reassessed’, in Cheshire, Jenny and Stein, Dieter (eds.), Taming the Vernacular: From Dialect to Written Standard Language. London: Longman, pp. 135–51Google Scholar

Arnovick, Leslie K. 1999. Diachronic Pragmatics: Seven Case Studies in English Illocutionary Development. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John BenjaminsGoogle Scholar

Arnovick, Leslie K. 2006. Written Reliquaries: The Resonance of Orality in Medieval English Texts. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John BenjaminsCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Athanasiadou, Angeliki, Canakis, Costas and Cornillie, Bert (eds.) 2006. Subjectification: Various Paths to Subjectivity. Berlin/New York, NY: Mouton de GruyterCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Auer, Anita 2006. ‘Precept and practice: the influence of prescriptivism on the English subjunctive’, in Dalton-Puffer, Christiane, Kastovsky, Dieter, Ritt, Nikolaus and Schendl, Herbert (eds.), Syntax, Style and Grammatical Norms: English from 1500–2000. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, pp. 33–53Google Scholar

Auer, Anita 2009. The Subjunctive in the Age of Prescriptivism: English and German Developments during the Eighteenth Century. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave MacmillanCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Auer, Anita and Voeste, Anja 2012. ‘Grammatical variables’, in Hernández-Campoy, Juan M. and Conde-Silvestre, Juan Camilo (eds.), The Handbook of Historical Sociolinguistics. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 253–70Google Scholar

Auer, Peter and Pfänder, Stefan 2011. ‘Constructions: emergent or emerging?’, in Auer, Peter and Pfänder, Stefan (eds.), Constructions: Emerging and Emergent. Berlin/New York, NY: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 1–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Austen, Jane 1998 [1798/9]. Northanger Abbey. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar

Austin, Frances 1994. ‘The effect of exposure to standard English: the language of William Clift’, in Stein, Dieter and van Ostade, Ingrid Tieken-Boon (eds.), Towards a Standard English, 1600–1800. Berlin/New York, NY: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 285–313Google Scholar

Auwera, Johan van der and Nuyts, Jan (eds.) 2012. Grammaticalization and (Inter-)Subjectification. Koninklijke: Vlaamse Academie van Belgie voor Wetenschappen en KunstenGoogle Scholar

Baayen, R. Harald 2008. Analyzing Linguistic Data: A Practical Introduction to Statistics Using R. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bachmann, Ingo 2013. ‘Has go-V ousted go-and-V? A study of the diachronic development of both constructions in American English’, in Hasselgård, Hilde, Ebeling, Jarle and Ebeling, Signe Oksefjell (eds.), Corpus Perspectives on Patterns of Lexis. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, pp. 91–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bailey, Charles J. and Maroldt, Karl 1977. ‘The French lineage of English’, in Meisel, Jürgen M. (ed.), Langues en contact – pidgins – creoles. Tübingen: Narr, pp. 21–53Google Scholar

Bailey, Richard W. 1996. Nineteenth-century English. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bailey, Richard W. 2004. ʻThe need for good texts: the case of Henry Machyn's day book, 1550–1563ʼ, in Curzan, Anne and Emmons, Kimberly (eds.), Studies in the History of the English Language II: Unfolding Conversations. Berlin/New York, NY: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 217–28Google Scholar

Baker, Paul 2009. ‘The BE06 Corpus of British English and recent language change’, International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 14 (3): 312–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baker, Paul 2011. ‘Times may change but we will always have money: diachronic variation in recent British English’, Journal of English Linguistics 39 (1): 65–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bakhtin, M. M. 1986 [1953]. Speech Genres and Other Late Essays. Austin, TX: University of Texas PressGoogle Scholar

Baldzuhn, Michael and Putzo, Christine (eds.) 2011. Mehrsprachigkeit im Mittelalter: Kulturelle, literarische, sprachliche und didaktische Konstellationen in europäischer Perspektive. Mit Fallstudien zu den ‘Disticha Catonis’. Berlin/New York, NY: Mouton de GruyterCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ball, Catherine N. 1994. ‘The origins of the informative-presupposition it-cleft’, Journal of Pragmatics 22 (6): 603–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bambas, Rudolph C. 1947. ‘Verb forms in -s and -th in Early Modern English prose’, Journal of English and Germanic Philology 46: 183–7Google Scholar

Bammesberger, Alfred and Vennemann, Theo (eds.) 2003. Languages in Prehistoric Europe. Heidelberg: WinterGoogle Scholar

Bao, Zhiming and Wee, Lionel 1999. ‘The passive in Singapore English’, World Englishes 18: 1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barber, Charles 1976. Early Modern English. London: Andre DeutschGoogle Scholar

Barber, Charles 1997. Early Modern English. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press (2nd edn)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barðdal, Jóhanna 2008. Productivity: Evidence from Case and Argument Structure in Icelandic. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John BenjaminsCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barðdal, Jóhanna 2013. ‘Construction-based historical-comparative reconstruction’, in Hoffmann, Thomas and Trousdale, Graeme (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, pp. 438–57Google Scholar

Barrett, Robert W. 2009. Against All England: Regional Identity and Cheshire Writing, 1195–1656. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame PressGoogle Scholar

Batllori, Montserrat and Hernanz, Lluïsa (eds.) 2011. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 10. http://ddd.uab.cat/pub/cjol/cjol_a2011v10/cjol_a2011v10p1.pdfCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Battye, Adrian and Roberts, Ian (eds.) 1995. Clause Structure and Language Change. Oxford: Oxford University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bauer, Laurie 1983. English Word Formation. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bauer, Laurie 1994. ‘English in New Zealand’, in Burchfield, Robert (ed.), The Cambridge History of the English Language. Volume V: English in Britain and Overseas: Origins and Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 382–429Google Scholar

Bauer, Laurie 2001. Morphological Productivity. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bauer, Laurie, Lieber, Rochelle and Plag, Ingo 2013. The Oxford Reference Guide to English Morphology. Oxford: Oxford University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baugh, Albert C. and Cable, Thomas 2002. A History of the English Language. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson (5th edn)Google Scholar

Baugh, Albert C. and Cable, Thomas 2005. A History of the English Language. London: Routledge (5th edn)Google Scholar

Baugh, Albert C. and Cable, Thomas 2013. A History of the English Language. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice (6th edn)Google Scholar

Bayley, Robert 2002. ‘The quantitative paradigm’, in Chambers, J. K., Trudgill, Peter and Schilling-Estes, Natalie (eds.), The Handbook of Language Variation and Change. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 117–41Google Scholar

Bazerman, Charles 1988. Shaping Written Knowledge: The Genre and Activity of the Experimental Article in Science. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin PressGoogle Scholar

Bazerman, Charles and Paradis, James 1991. Textual Dynamics of the Professions: Historical and Contemporary Studies of Writing in Professional Communities. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin PressGoogle Scholar

Beadle, Richard 1994. ‘Middle English texts and their transmission, 1350–1500: some geographical criteria’, in Laing, Margaret and Williamson, Keith (eds.), Speaking in our Tongues: Proceedings of a Colloquium on Medieval Dialectology and Related Disciplines. Cambridge: D.S. Brewer, pp. 69–91Google Scholar

Beal, Joan C. 1999. English Pronunciation in the Eighteenth Century: Thomas Spence's ‘Grand Repository of the English Language’. Oxford: Clarendon PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beal, Joan C. 2004. English in Modern Times, 1700–1945. London: Edward ArnoldGoogle Scholar

Beal, Joan C. 2008. ‘Shamed by your English? The market value of a “good” pronunciation’, in Beal, Joan C., Nocera, Carmela and Sturiale, Massimo (eds.), Perspectives on Prescriptivism. Bern: Peter Lang, pp. 21–40Google Scholar

Beal, Joan C. 2009a. ‘Enregisterment, commodification and historical context: “Geordie” versus “Sheffieldish”’, American Speech 84 (2): 138–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beal, Joan C. 2009b. ‘Three hundred years of prescriptivism (and counting)’, in van Ostade, Ingrid Tieken-Boon and van der Wurff, Wim (eds.), Current Issues in Late Modern English. Bern: Peter Lang, pp. 35–56Google Scholar

Beal, Joan C. 2010. ‘Prescriptivism and the suppression of variation’, in Hickey, Raymond (ed.), Eighteenth-Century English: Ideology and Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 21–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beal, Joan C. 2011. ‘The example of the French: the influence of French normative ideas on the codification of the English Language’, in Branca-Rosoff, Sonia, Fournier, Jean-Marie, Grinshpun, Yana and Régent-Susini, Anne (eds.), Langue commune et changements de normes. Paris: Champion, pp. 435–46Google Scholar

Beal, Joan C. 2013. ‘The place of pronunciation in eighteenth-century grammars of English’, Transactions of the Philological Society 111 (2): 165–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beal, Joan C., Hodson, Jane and Fitzmaurice, Susan M. (eds.) 2012. Selected Papers from the Fourth International Conference on Late Modern English, special issue of English Language and Linguistics 16 (2)Google Scholar

Beal, Joan C., Hodson, Jane, Percy, Carol and Steadman-Jones, Richard 2006. ‘Introduction’, New Approaches to the Study of Later Modern English, special issue of Historiographia Linguistica 33 (1): 1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beal, Joan C., Nocera, Carmela and Sturiale, Massimo (eds.) 2008. Perspectives on Prescriptivism. Bern: Peter LangGoogle Scholar

Bell, Allan 1988. ‘The British base and the American connection in New Zealand media English’, American Speech 63: 326–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Benskin, Michael 1991. ʻThe “fit”-technique explainedʼ, in Riddy, Felicity (ed.), Regionalism in Late Medieval Manuscripts and Texts: Essays Celebrating the Publication of ‘A Linguistic Atlas of Late Mediaeval English’. Cambridge: D. S. Brewer, pp. 9–26Google Scholar

Benskin, Michael 2004. ‘Chancery Standard’, in Kay, Christian, Hough, Carole and Wotherspoon, Irené (eds.), New Perspectives on English Historical Linguistics: Selected Papers from 12 ICEHL, Glasgow, 21–26 August 2002. Volume 2: Lexis and Transmission. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, pp. 1–40Google Scholar

Benskin, Michael and Laing, Margaret 1981. ‘Translations and Mischsprachen in Middle English manuscripts’, in Benskin, Michael and Samuels, M. L. (eds.), So Meny People, Longages and Tonges: Philological Essays in Scots and Mediaeval English Presented to Angus McIntosh. Edinburgh: Middle English Dialect Project, pp. 55–106Google Scholar

Benson, Larry D. (ed.) 1987. The Riverside Chaucer. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin (3rd edn)Google Scholar

Benson, Larry D. (ed.) 2008. The Riverside Chaucer. Oxford: Oxford University Press (3rd edn)Google Scholar

Benveniste, Émile 1966. Problems in General Linguistics. (Trans. Meek, Mary Elizabeth.) Coral Cables, FL: University of Miami Press. First published as Problèmes de linguistique générale. Paris: GallimardGoogle Scholar

Benveniste, Emile 1971 [1958]. ‘Subjectivity in language’, in Meek, Mary Elizabeth (trans.), Problems in General Linguistics. Coral Gables, FL: University of Miami Press, pp. 223–30. First published as ‘De la subjectivité dans le langage’, in Émile Benveniste (1958), Problèmes de linguistique générale. Paris: Gallimard, pp. 258–66Google Scholar

Berg, Thomas 1998. Linguistic Structure and Change: An Explanation from Language Processing. Oxford: Clarendon PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bergner, Heinz 1998. ‘Dialogue in medieval drama’, in Borgmeier, Raimund, Grabes, Herbert and Jucker, Andreas H. (eds.), Anglistentag 1997 Giessen: Proceedings. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag, pp. 75–83Google Scholar

Bergs, Alexander 2004. ‘Address pronouns in Late Middle English’, in Rodríguez Alvarez, Alicia and Alonso Almeida, Francisco (eds.), Voices on the Past: Studies in Old and Middle English Language and Literature. Coruña: Netbiblo, pp. 127–38Google Scholar

Bergs, Alexander 2005. Social Networks and Historical Sociolinguistics: Studies in Morphosyntactic Variation in the Paston Letters (1421–1503). Berlin/New York, NY: Mouton de GruyterCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bergs, Alexander and Brinton, Laurel J. (eds.) 2012. English Historical Linguistics: An International Handbook, 2 vols. Berlin/New York, NY: Mouton de GruyterGoogle Scholar

Bergs, Alexander and Diewald, Gabriele 2009. ‘Introduction: contexts and constructions’, in Bergs, Alexander and Diewald, Gabriele (eds.), Contexts and Constructions. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, pp. 1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berlage, Eva. 2014. Noun Phrase Complexity in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bermúdez-Otero, Ricardo 2007. ‘Word-final prevocalic consonants in English: representation vs derivation’. Paper presented at the Old World Conference in Phonology 4, Rhodes, August 2010. www.bermudez-otero.com/OCP4.pdfGoogle Scholar

Bermúdez-Otero, Ricardo 2011. ‘Cyclicity’, in van Oostendorp, Marc, Ewen, Colin, Hume, Elizabeth and Rice, Keren (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Phonology. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 2019–48Google Scholar

Bermúdez-Otero, Ricardo 2015. ‘Amphichronic explanation and the life cycle of phonological processes’, in Patrick Honeybone and Joseph Salmons (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Historical Phonology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 379–99Google Scholar

Bermúdez-Otero, Ricardo forthcoming. Stratal Optimality Theory. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar

Bermúdez-Otero, Ricardo and Trousdale, Graeme 2012. ‘Cycles and continua: on unidirectionality and gradualness in language change’, in Nevalainen, Terttu and Traugott, Elizabeth Closs (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the History of English. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 691–720CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bethge, Richard 1900. ʻKonjugation des Urgermanischen’, in Dieter, Ferdinand (ed.), Laut- und Formenlehre der altgermanischen Dialekte. Leipzig: Reisland, pp. 345–91Google Scholar

Bhatia, Vijay 1993. Analysing Genre: Language Use in Professional Settings. London: LongmanGoogle Scholar

Biber, Douglas 1988. Variation across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Biber, Donglas 1992a. ‘On the complexity of discourse complexity: a multidimensional analysis’, Discourse Processes 15: 133–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Biber, Donglas 1992b. ‘The multi-dimensional approach to linguistic analyses of genre variation: an overview of methodology and findings’, Computers and the Humanities 26 (5/6): 331–45Google Scholar

Biber, Donglas 2012. ‘Register as a predictor of linguistic variation’, Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 8 (1): 9–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Biber, Douglas and Conrad, Susan 2009. Register, Genre, and Style. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Biber, Douglas, Conrad, Susan and Reppen, Randi 1998. Corpus Linguistics: Investigating Language Structure and Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Biber, Douglas and Finegan, Edward 1986. ‘An initial typology of English text types’, in Aarts, Jan and Meijs, Willem (eds.), Corpus Linguistics II: New Studies in the Analysis and Exploitation of Computer Corpora. Amsterdam/Atlanta, GA: Rodopi, pp. 19–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Biber, Douglas and Finegan, Edward 1989. ‘Drift and the evolution of English style: a history of three genres’, Language 65 (3): 487–517CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Biber, Douglas and Finegan, Edward 1991. ‘On the exploitation of computerized corpora in variation studies’, in Aijmer, Karin and Altenberg, Bengt (eds.), English Corpus Linguistics: Studies in Honour of Jan Svartvik. London: Longman, pp. 204–20Google Scholar

Biber, Douglas and Finegan, Edward 1997. ‘Diachronic relations among speech-based and written registers in English’, in Nevalainen, Terttu and Kahlas-Tarkka, Leena (eds.), To Explain the Present: Studies in the Changing English Language in Honour of Matti Rissanen. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique, pp. 253–75Google Scholar

Biber, Douglas, Finegan, Edward and Atkinson, Dwight 1994a. ‘ARCHER and its challenges: compiling and exploring A Representative Corpus of Historical English Registers’, in Fries, Udo, Tottie, Gunnel and Schneider, Peter (eds.), Creating and Using English Language Corpora: Papers from the Fourteenth International Conference on English Language Research on Computerized Corpora, Zürich 1993. Amsterdam/Atlanta, GA: Rodopi, pp. 1–14Google Scholar

Biber, Douglas, Finegan, Edward, Atkinson, Dwight, Beck, Ann, Burges, Dennis and Burges, Jena 1994b. ‘The design and analysis of the ARCHER corpus: a progress report [A Representative Corpus of Historical English Registers]’, in Kytö, Merja, Rissanen, Matti and Wright, Susan (eds.), Corpora across the Centuries: Proceedings of the First International Colloquium on English Diachronic Corpora, St Catharine's College Cambridge, 25–27 March 1993. Amsterdam/Atlanta, GA: Rodopi, pp. 3–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Biber, Douglas and Gray, Bethany 2011a. ‘Grammar emerging in the noun phrase: the influence of written language use’, English Language and Linguistics 15: 223–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Biber, Douglas and Gray, Bethany 2011b. ‘The historical shift of scientific academic prose in English towards less explicit styles of expression: writing without verbs’, in Bhatia, Vijay, Hernández, Purificación Sánchez and Pérez-Paredes, Pascual (eds.), Researching Specialized Languages. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, pp. 11–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Biber, Douglas and Gray, Bethany 2012. ‘The competing demands of popularization vs. economy: written language in the age of mass literacy’, in Nevalainen, Terttu and Traugott, Elizabeth Closs (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the History of English. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 314–28Google Scholar

Biber, Douglas and Gray, Bethany 2013. ‘Being specific about historical change: the influence of sub-register’, Journal of English Linguistics 41: 104–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan and Finegan, Edward 1999. The Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: LongmanGoogle Scholar

Biber, Douglas and Jones, James K. 2009. ‘Quantitative methods in corpus linguistics’, in Lüdeling, Anke and Kytö, Merja (eds.), Corpus Linguistics: An International Handbook, Vol. 2. Berlin/New York, NY: Walter de Gruyter, pp. 1286–304Google Scholar

Biberauer, Theresa and Roberts, Ian 2005. ‘Changing EPP parameters in the history of English: accounting for variation and change’, English Language and Linguistics 9: 5–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Biberauer, Theresa and Roberts, Ian 2008. ‘Cascading parameter changes: internally-driven change in Middle and Early Modern English’, in Eythórsson, Thórhallur (ed.), Grammatical Change and Linguistic Theory. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, pp. 79–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Biewer, Carolin 2012. ‘South Pacific Englishes: the dynamics of second-language varieties of English in Fiji, Samoa and the Cook Islands’. Post-doctoral thesis, University of ZurichGoogle Scholar

Biggam, C. P. 2012. The Semantics of Colour: A Historical Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bjørge, Anne Kari 1989. ‘“I poor man is singing”: subject–verb concord in eighteenth-century English grammar’, in Breivik, Leiv E., Hille, Arnoldus and Johansson, Stig (eds.), Essays on English Language in Honour of Bertil Sundby. Oslo: Novus Press, pp. 47–65Google Scholar

Blake, Norman 1965. ‘English versions of Reynard the Fox in the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries’, Studies in Philology 62: 63–77Google Scholar

Blake, Norman 1969. Caxton and his World. London: DeutschGoogle Scholar

Blake, Norman 1974. ‘Varieties of Middle English religious prose’, in Rowland, Beryl (ed.), Chaucer and Middle English Studies in Honour of Rossell Hope Robbins. London: Allen & Unwin, pp. 348–56Google Scholar

Blake, Norman (ed.) 1980. The Canterbury Tales by Geoffrey Chaucer. London: Edward ArnoldGoogle Scholar

Blake, Norman (ed.) 1992. The Cambridge History of the English Language. Volume II: 1066–1476. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blanco-Suárez, Zeltia 2013. ‘The competition between the intensifiers dead and deadly: some diachronic considerations’, in Hasselgård, Hilde, Ebeling, Jarle and Ebeling, Signe Oksefjell (eds.), Corpus Perspectives on Patterns of Lexis. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, pp. 71–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blank, Paula 1996. Broken English: Dialects and the Politics of Language in Renaissance Writings. London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar

Blevins, Juliette 1995. ‘The syllable in phonological theory’, in Goldsmith, John A. (ed.), The Handbook of Phonological Theory. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 206–44Google Scholar

Blevins, Juliette 2003. ‘The phonology of Yurok glottalized sonorants: segmental fission under syllabification’, International Journal of American Linguistics 69 (4): 371–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blum-Kulka, Shoshana, House, Juliane and Kasper, Gabriele 1989. Cross-cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies. Norwood, NJ: AblexGoogle Scholar

Bod, Rens, Hay, Jennifer and Jannedy, Stefanie (eds.) 2003. Probabilistic Linguistics. Cambridge, MA: MIT PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boffey, Julia and Edwards, A. S. G. 2005. A New Index of Middle English Verse. London: British Library PublishingGoogle Scholar

Boling, Bruce D. 2006. ‘A Hiberno-English dialect of West Tyrone’, in Smyth, Anne, Montgomery, Michael and Robinson, Philip (eds.), The Academic Study of Ulster-Scots: Essays for and by Robert J. Gregg. Cultra: NMGNI, pp. 19–38Google Scholar

Booij, Geert 1995. The Phonology of Dutch. Oxford: Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar

Booij, Geert 2010. Construction Morphology. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar

Bopp, Franz 1833–52. Vergleichende Grammatik des Sanskrit, Zend, Griechischen, Lateinischen, Litthauischen, Altslawischen, Gotischen und Deutschen, 6 vols. Berlin: DümmlerGoogle Scholar

Borgmeier, Raimund, Grabes, Herbert and Jucker, Andreas H. (eds.) 1998. Anglistentag 1997 Giessen: Proceedings. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher VerlagGoogle Scholar

Borowsky, Toni 1986. ‘Topics in the lexical phonology of English’. Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts, AmherstGoogle Scholar

Boureau, Alain 1987. ‘Franciscan piety and voracity: uses and strategems in the hagiographic pamphlet’, in Chartier, Roger (ed.) and Cochrane, Lydia G. (trans.), The Culture of Print: Power and the Uses of Print in Early Modern Europe. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 15–58Google Scholar

Bowern, Claire and Evans, Bethyn (eds.) 2014. The Routledge Handbook of Historical Linguistics. New York, NY: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar

Bowers, John 2001. The Politics of Pearl: Court Poetry in the Age of Richard II. Cambridge: D. S. BrewerGoogle Scholar

Bowers, John 2012. An Introduction to the Gawain Poet. Gainesville, FL: University of Florida PressGoogle Scholar

Bradley, Henry 1904. The Making of English. London: MacmillanGoogle Scholar

Brandl, Alois (ed.) 1880. Thomas of Erceldoune. Berlin: WeidmannGoogle Scholar

Brandl, Alois 1886. Samuel Taylor Coleridge und die englische Romantik. Straßburg: TrübnerCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brandl, Alois 1915. Zur Geographie der altenglischen Dialekte. Berlin: Akademie der WissenschaftenGoogle Scholar

Brandl, Alois 1926–7. Englische Dialekte. Lautbibliothek. Berlin: Preußische StaatsbibliothekGoogle Scholar

Brandl, Alois 1936a. Forschungen und Charakteristiken; von Alois Brandl. Zum 80. Geburtstag hrsg. von dem Englischen Seminar der Universität Berlin und der Berliner Gesellschaft für das Studium der neueren Sprachen. Berlin/New York, NY: Mouton de GruyterGoogle Scholar

Brandl, Alois 1936b. Zwischen Inn und Themse: Lebensbeobachtungen eines Anglisten – Alt-Tirol, England, Berlin. Berlin: GroteGoogle Scholar

Brandl, Alois 1937. Vom kosmologischen Denken des heidnisch-christlichen Germanentums: der früh.-ags. Schicksalsspruch der Handschrift Tiberius B. 13 und seine Verwandtheit mit Boethius. Berlin: Akademie der WissenschaftenGoogle Scholar

Braunmüller, Kurt 2008. ʻDas älteste Germanische: offene Fragen und mögliche Antwortenʼ, Sprachwissenschaft 33: 373–403Google Scholar

Bréal, Michel 1964 [1900]. Semantics: Studies in the Science of Meaning. (Trans. Cust, Mrs Henry.) New York, NY: DoverGoogle Scholar

Brems, Lieselotte 2011. Measure Noun Constructions: An Instance of Semantically-driven Grammaticalization. Berlin/New York, NY: Mouton de GruyterGoogle Scholar

Brems, Lieselotte, Ghesquière, Lobke and van de Velde, Freek (eds.) 2012. Intersections of Intersubjectivity, special issue of English Text Construction 5CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bresnan, Joan 2007. ‘Is syntactic knowledge probabilistic? Experiments with the English dative alternation’, in Featherston, Sam and Sternefeld, Wolfgang (eds.), Roots: Linguistics in Search of its Evidential Base. Berlin/New York, NY: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 77–96Google Scholar

Bresnan, Joan, Cueni, Anna, Nikitina, Tatiana and Baayen, R. Harald 2007. ‘Predicting the dative alternation’, in Bouma, Gerlof, Krämer, Irene and Zwarts, Joost (eds.), Cognitive Foundations of Interpretation. Amsterdam: Royal Netherlands Academy of Science, pp. 69–94Google Scholar

Bresnan, Joan and Hay, Jennifer 2008. ‘Gradient grammar: an effect of animacy on the syntax of give in New Zealand and American English’, Lingua 118 (2): 245–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bretz, Frank, Hothorn, Torsten and Westfall, Peter 2010. Multiple Comparisons Using R. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRCGoogle Scholar

Briggs, Asa 1985. A Social History of England. Harmondsworth: PenguinGoogle Scholar

Brinton, Laurel J. 1991. ‘The origin and development of quasimodal have to in English’. Paper presented at the 10th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Amsterdam, August 1991. http://faculty.arts.ubc.ca/lbrinton/HAVETO.PDFGoogle Scholar

Brinton, Laurel J. 1996. Pragmatic Markers in English: Grammaticalization and Discourse Functions. Berlin/New York, NY: Mouton de GruyterCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brinton, Laurel J. 2001. ‘Historical Discourse Analysis’, in Schiffrin, Deborah, Tannen, Deborah and Hamilton, Heidi E. (eds.), The Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 138–60Google Scholar

Brinton, Laurel J. 2006. ‘Pathways in the development of pragmatic markers in English’, in van Kemenade, Ans and Bettelou, Los (eds.), The Handbook of the History of English. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 307–34Google Scholar

Brinton, Laurel J. 2007. ‘The development of I mean: implications for the study of historical pragmatics’, in Fitzmaurice, Susan M. and Taavitsainen, Irma (eds.), Methods in Historical Pragmatics. Berlin/New York, NY: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 37–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brinton, Laurel J. 2008. The Comment Clause in English: Syntactic Origins and Pragmatic Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brinton, Laurel J. 2010. ‘Discourse markers’, in Jucker, Andreas H. and Taavitsainen, Irma (eds.), Historical Pragmatics. Berlin/New York, NY: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 285–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brinton, Laurel J. and Traugott, Elizabeth Closs 2005. Lexicalization and Language Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Britain, David 2005a. ‘Innovation diffusion, “Estuary English” and local dialect differentiation: the survival of Fenland Englishes’, Linguistics 43 (5): 995–1022CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Britain, David 2005b. ‘Where did New Zealand English come from?’, in Bell, Allan, Harlow, Ray and Starks, Donna (eds.), Languages of New Zealand. Wellington: Victoria University Press, pp. 156–93Google Scholar

Britain, David 2009. ‘One foot in the grave? Dialect death, dialect contact and dialect birth in England’, International Journal of the Sociology of Language 196/7: 121–55Google Scholar

Britain, David and Sudbury, Andrea 2010. ‘Falkland Islands English’, in Schreier, Daniel, Trudgill, Peter, Schneider, Edgar W. and Williams, Jeffrey P. (eds.), The Lesser-known Varieties of English: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 209–23Google Scholar

Britton, Derek 2012. ‘Degemination in English, with special reference to the Middle English period’, in Denison, David, Bermúdez-Otero, Ricardo, McCully, Chris and Moore, Emma (eds.), Analysing Older English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 232–43Google Scholar

Broccias, Cristiano 2012. ‘The syntax–lexicon continuum’, in Nevalainen, Terttu and Traugott, Elizabeth Closs (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the History of English. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 735–47Google Scholar

Broccias, Cristiano and Smith, Nicholas 2010. ‘Same time, across time: simultaneity clauses from Late Modern to Present-day English’, English Language and Linguistics 14 (3): 347–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brooks, Christopher 1994. ‘Apprenticeship, social mobility and the middling sort, 1550–1800’, in Barry, Jonathan and Brooks, Christopher (eds.), The Middling Sort of People: Culture, Society and Politics in England 1550–1800. London: Macmillan, pp. 52–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, Carleton and Robbins, , , Rossell Hope 1965. Supplement to the Index of Middle English Verse. Lexington, KY: University Press of KentuckyGoogle Scholar

Brown, Carleton and Robbins, Rossell Hope (eds.) 1943. The Index of Middle English Verse. New York, NY: Columbia University PressGoogle Scholar

Brown, Roger and Gilman, Albert 1960. ‘The pronouns of power and solidarity’, in Sebeok, Thomas A. (ed.), Style in Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 253–76Google Scholar

Brown, Roger and Gilman, Albert 1989. ‘Politeness theory and Shakespeare's four major tragedies’, Language in Society 18: 159–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Broz, Vlatko 2011. ‘Kennings as blends and prisms’, Jezikoslovlje 12 (2): 165–86Google Scholar

Bruster, Douglas 2013. ‘Shakespearean spellings and handwriting in the additional passages printed in the 1602 Spanish Tragedy’, Notes and Queries 60: 420–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bucholtz, Mary and Hall, Kira 2005. ‘Identity and interaction: a sociocultural linguistic approach’, Discourse Studies 7: 585–614CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Buchstaller, Isabelle 2009. ‘The quantitative analysis of morphosyntactic variation: constructing and quantifying the denominator’, Language and Linguistics Compass 3 (4): 1010–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Buchstaller, Isabelle 2011. ‘Quotations across the generations: a multivariate analysis of speech and thought introducers across 5 decades of Tyneside speech’, Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 7 (1): 59–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Buchstaller, Isabelle and D'Arcy, Alexandra 2009. ‘Localized globalization: a multi-local, multivariate investigation of quotative be like’, Journal of Sociolinguistics 13 (3): 291–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Buchstaller, Isabelle and van Alphen, Ingrid (eds.) 2012. Quotatives: Cross-linguistic and Cross-disciplinary Perspectives. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John BenjaminsCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bullokar, William 1580. Booke at Large for the Amendment of Orthographie for English Speech. London: Henrie DenhamGoogle Scholar

Burchfield, R. W. 1956. ‘The language and orthography of the Ormulum MS’, Transactions of the Philological Society 55: 56–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burnley, David 1992. ‘Lexis and semantics’, in Blake, Norman (ed.), The Cambridge History of the English Language. Volume II: 1066–1476. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 409–99Google Scholar

Burnley, David 2003. ‘The T/V pronouns in later Middle English literature’, in Taavitsainen, Irma and Jucker, Andreas H. (eds.), Diachronic Perspectives on Address Term Systems. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, pp. 27–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burrow, John A. 1982. Medieval Writers and their Work: Middle English Literature 1100–1500. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar

Burrow, John A. and Doyle, A. I. (eds.) 2002. Thomas Hoccleve: A Facsimile of the Autograph Verse Manuscripts. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar

Burrow, John A. and Turville-Petre, Thorlac 2004. A Book of Middle English. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell (3rd edn)Google Scholar

Busse, Dietrich (ed.) 1991. Diachrone Semantik und Pragmatik: Untersuchungen zur Erklärung und Beschreibung des Sprachwandels. Tübingen: NiemeyerCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Busse, Ulrich 2002. Linguistic Variation in the Shakespeare Corpus: Morpho-syntactic Variability of Second Person Pronouns. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John BenjaminsCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Busse, Ulrich 2003. ‘The co-occurrence of nominal and pronominal address forms in the Shakespeare Corpus: who says thou or you to whom?’, in Taavitsainen, Irma and Jucker, Andreas H. (eds.), Diachronic Perspectives on Address Term Systems. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, pp. 193–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Busse, Ulrich and Busse, Beatrix 2010. ‘Shakespeare’, in Jucker, Andreas H. and Taavitsainen, Irma (eds.), Historical Pragmatics. Berlin/New York, NY: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 247–81Google Scholar

Butler, Charles 1633/34. The English Grammar. OxfordGoogle Scholar

Butterfield, Ardis 2009. The Familiar Enemy: Chaucer, Language and Nation in the Hundred Years War. Oxford: Oxford University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Butters, Ronald R. 2001. ‘Chance as cause of language variation and change’, Journal of English Linguistics 29 (3): 201–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bybee, Joan 2003. ‘Mechanisms of change in grammaticization: the role of frequency’, in Joseph, Brian D. and Janda, Richard D. (eds.), The Handbook of Historical Linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 602–23Google Scholar

Bybee, Joan 2007. Frequency of Use and the Organization of Language. New York, NY: Oxford University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bybee, Joan 2010. Language, Usage and Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bybee, Joan and Hopper, Paul (eds.) 2001. Frequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John BenjaminsCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bybee, Joan, Pagliuca, William and Perkins, Revere D. 1991. ‘Back to the future’, in Traugott, Elizabeth Closs and Heine, Bernd (eds.), Approaches to Grammaticalization, Vol. 2. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, pp. 17–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bybee, Joan, Perkins, Revere and Pagliuca, William 1994. The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar

Caie, Graham D. 2011. ‘The relationship between MS Hunter 409 and the 1532 edition of Chaucer's Works edited by William Thynne’, in Pahta, Päivi and Jucker, Andreas H. (eds.), Communicating Early English Manuscripts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 149–61Google Scholar

Cain, Christopher M. 2010. ʻGeorge Hickes and the “invention” of the Old English dialectsʼ, Review of English Studies 61: 729–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Calvo, Clara 1991. Power Relations and Fool–Master Discourse in Shakespeare: A Discourse Stylistics Approach to Dramatic Dialogue. Nottingham: Department of English Studies, University of NottinghamGoogle Scholar

Calvo, Clara 1992. ‘Pronouns of address and social negotiation in As you like it’, Language and Literature 1: 5–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Camden, William 1974 [1605]. Remains Concerning Britain. Yorkshire: EP Publishing LimitedGoogle Scholar

Cameron, Deborah 2001. Working with Spoken Discourse. Thousand Oaks, CA: SageGoogle Scholar

Campbell, Alan 1959. Old English Grammar. Oxford: Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar

Campbell, Lyle 2001. ‘What's wrong with grammaticalization?’, Language Sciences 23 (2–3): 113–61Google Scholar

Canale, Michael 1978. ‘Word order change in Old English’. Doctoral dissertation, University of TorontoGoogle Scholar

Carey, Kathleen 1995. ‘Subjectification and the development of the English perfect’, in Stein, Dieter and Wright, Susan (eds.), Subjectivity and Subjectivisation: Linguistic Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 83–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carpenter, David 2004. The Struggle for Mastery: The Penguin History of Britain 1066–1284. London: PenguinGoogle Scholar

Carroll, Ruth, Peikola, Matti, Salmi, Hanna, Varila, Mari-Liisa, Skaffari, Janne and Hiltunen, Risto 2013. ‘Pragmatics on the page: visual text in late medieval English books’, European Journal of English Studies 17 (1): 54–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cawdrey, Robert 1604. A Table Alphabetical. London: I. R. for Edmund WeaverGoogle Scholar

Caxton, William (trans.) 1480. The Description of Britayne, & also Irlonde taken out of Polichronicon. Westminster: W. CaxtonGoogle Scholar

Cedergren, Henrietta and Sankoff, David 1974. ‘Variable rules: performance as a statistical reflection of competence’, Language 50 (2): 333–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cercignani, Fausto 1981. Shakespeare's Works and Elizabethan Pronunciation. Oxford: ClarendonGoogle Scholar

Chambers, J. K. 1995. Sociolinguistic Theory. Oxford: BlackwellGoogle Scholar

Chambers, J. K., Trudgill, Peter, and Schilling-Estes, Natalie (eds.) 2002. The Handbook of Language Variation and Change. Oxford: BlackwellGoogle Scholar

Chaucer, Geoffrey. ‘The Canterbury tales’. See Benson 1987Google Scholar

Cheshire, Jenny 1982. Variation in an English Dialect: A Sociolinguistic Study. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Cheshire, Jenny and Milroy, James 1993. ‘Syntactic variation in non-standard dialects: background issues’, in Milroy, James and Milroy, Lesley (eds.), Real English: The Grammar of English Dialects in the British Isles. London: Longman, pp. 3–33Google Scholar

Chibnall, Marjorie (ed., trans.) 1969–80. The Ecclesiastical History of Orderic Vitalis, 6 vols. Oxford: ClarendonGoogle Scholar

Chomsky, Noam 1973. ‘Conditions on transformations’, in Anderson, Stephen and Kiparsky, Paul (eds.), A Festschrift for Morris Halle. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, pp. 232–86Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding: The Pisa Lectures. Dordrecht: ForisGoogle Scholar

Chomsky, Noam 1986. Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin, and Use. New York, NY: PraegerGoogle Scholar

Chomsky, Noam 2004. ‘Beyond explanatory adequacy’, in Belletti, Adriana (ed.), Structures and Beyond. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 104–31Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam 2005. ‘Three factors in language design’, Linguistic Inquiry 36 (1): 1–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chomsky, Noam 2007. ‘Approaching UG from below’, in Sauerland, Uli and Gärtner, Hans-Martin (eds.), Interfaces + Recursion = Language?. Berlin/New York, NY: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 1–29Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam and Halle, , , Morris 1968. The Sound Pattern of English. Cambridge, MA: MIT PressGoogle Scholar

Cinque, Guglielmo 1999. Adverbs and Functional Heads: A Cross-linguistic Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Claridge, Claudia 2008. ‘Historical corpora’, in Lüdeling, Anke and Kytö, Merja (eds.), Corpus Linguistics: An International Handbook, Vol. 1. Berlin/New York, NY: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 242–59Google Scholar

Claridge, Claudia 2010. ‘News discourse’, in Jucker, Andreas H. and Taavitsainen, Irma (eds.), Historical Pragmatics. Berlin/New York, NY: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 587–620CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Claridge, Claudia 2012. ‘Linguistic levels: styles, registers, genres, text types’, in Bergs, Alexander and Brinton, Laurel J. (eds.), English Historical Linguistics: An International Handbook, Vol. 1. Berlin/New York, NY: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 237–53Google Scholar

Claridge, Claudia 2013. ‘The evolution of three pragmatic markers: as it were, so to speak/say and if you like’, Journal of Historical Pragmatics 14 (2): 161–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Claridge, Claudia and Kytö, Merja 2014. ‘I had lost sight of them then for a bit, but I went on pretty fast: two degree modifiers in the Old Bailey Corpus’, in Taavitsainen, Irma, Jucker, Andreas H. and Tuominen, Jukka (eds.), Diachronic Corpus Pragmatics. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, pp. 29–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clark, Cecily (ed.) 1970. The Peterborough Chronicle, 1070–1154. Oxford: Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar

Clark, Herbert H. 1996. Using Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clédat, Léon 1891. Rutebeuf. Paris: HachetteGoogle Scholar

Clemens, Raymond and Graham, Timothy 2007. Introduction to Manuscript Studies. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University PressGoogle Scholar

Closs, Elizabeth 1965. ‘Diachronic syntax and generative grammar’, Language 41 (3): 402–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clyne, Michael 2003. Dynamics of Language Contact: English and Immigrant Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coates, Richard 2009. ‘A glimpse through a dirty window into an unlit house: names of some North-west European islandsʼ, in Ahrens, Wolfgang, Embleton, Sheila and Lapierre, André (eds.), Proceedings of the 23rd International Congress of Onomastic Sciences. Toronto: York University, pp. 228–42Google Scholar

Colleman, Timothy and Clerck, De, , Bernard 2011. ‘Constructional semantics on the move: on semantic specialization in the English double object construction’, Cognitive Linguistics 22 (1): 183–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Collins, Daniel 2001. Reanimated Voices: Speech Reporting in a Historical-pragmatic Perspective. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John BenjaminsCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Collins, Peter, Borlongan, Ariane Macalinga and Yao, Xinyue 2014. ‘Modality in Philippine English: a diachronic study’, Diachronic Approaches to Modality in World Englishes, special issue of Journal of English Linguistics 42 (1): 68–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Colman, Fran 1984. ʻAnglo-Saxon pennies and Old English phonologyʼ, Folia Linguistica Historica 5: 91–143Google Scholar

Colman, Fran 1986. ‘A cǣġ to Old English syllable structure’, in Kastovsky, Dieter and Szwedek, Alexander (eds.), Linguistics across Historical and Geographical Boundaries, Vol. 1. Berlin/New York, NY: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 225–30Google Scholar

Conde-Silvestre, Juan Camilo 2012. ‘The role of social networks and mobility in diachronic sociolinguistics’, in Hernández-Campoy, Juan M. and Conde-Silvestre, Juan Camilo (eds.), The Handbook of Historical Sociolinguistics. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 332–52Google Scholar

Conner, Patrick W. 1998. ʻBeyond the ASPR: electronic editions of Old English poetryʼ, in Keefer, Sarah Larratt and O'Brien O'Keeffe, Katherine (eds.), New Approaches to Editing Old English Verse. Cambridge: D. S. Brewer, pp. 109–26Google Scholar

Cooper, Christopher 1685. Grammatica linguæ anglicanæ. LondonGoogle Scholar

Cooper, Christopher 1687. The English Teacher. London: John Richardson for the AuthorGoogle Scholar

Cooper, Paul 2013. ‘Enregisterment in historical contexts: a framework’. Doctoral dissertation, University of SheffieldGoogle Scholar

Corrigan, Karen P. 1996. ‘“Plain life depicted in fiery shorthand”: sociolinguistic aspects of the languages and dialects of Ulster and Scotland as portrayed in Scott's Waverley (1814) and Banim's The Boyne Water (1826)’, Scottish Language 14/15: 218–33Google Scholar

Corrigan, Karen P. 2012. ‘GOAT vowel variants in the Diachronic Electronic Corpus of Tyneside English (DECTE)’, in Nevalainen, Terttu and Traugott, Elizabeth Closs (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the History of English. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 90–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coulmas, Florian (ed.) 1986. Direct and Indirect Speech. Berlin/New York, NY: Mouton de GruyterCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Craigie, Sir William, A., Aitken, A. J., Stevenson, James A. C. and Dareau, Marace (eds.) 1931–2002. A Dictionary of the Older Scottish Tongue. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Available online as part of the Dictionary of the Scots Language. www.dsl.ac.ukGoogle Scholar

Crisma, Paola 2007. ‘Were they “dropping their aitches”? A quantitative study of h-loss in Middle English’, English Language and Linguistics 11 (1): 51–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crisma, Paola and Longobardi, Giuseppe (eds.) 2009. Historical Syntax and Linguistic Theory. Oxford: Oxford University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Croft, William 2000. Explaining Language Change: An Evolutionary Approach. Harlow: Pearson EducationGoogle Scholar

Croft, William 2001. Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Croft, William 2003 [1990]. Typology and Universals. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Croft, William and Cruse, D. Alan 2004. Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crowley, Tony 1991. Proper English? Readings in Language, History and Cultural Identity. London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar

Cruttenden, Alan 2008. Gimson's Pronunciation of English. London: Edward Arnold (7th edn rev.)Google Scholar

Crystal, David 2008. ‘Two thousand million?’, English Today 24 (1): 3–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Culpeper, Jonathan 2010. ‘Historical sociopragmatics’, in Andreas, H. Jucker and Taavitsainen, Irma (eds.), Historical Pragmatics. Berlin/New York, NY: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 69–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Culpeper, Jonathan 2011. Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Culpeper, Jonathan and Archer, Dawn 2008. ‘Requests and directness in Early Modern English trial proceedings and play texts, 1640–1760’, in Jucker, Andreas H. and Taavitsainen, Irma (eds.), Speech Acts in the History of English. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, pp. 45–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Culpeper, Jonathan and Clapham, Phoebe 1996. ‘The borrowing of Classical and Romance words into English: a study based on the electronic Oxford English Dictionary’, International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 1 (2): 199–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Culpeper, Jonathan and Kytö, Merja 2010. Early Modern English Dialogues: Spoken Interaction as Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Culpeper, Jonathan, Short, Mick and Verdonk, Peter (eds.) 1998. Exploring the Language of Drama: From Text to Context. London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar

Curzan, Anne 2003. Gender Shifts in the History of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Curzan, Anne 2009. ‘Historical corpus linguistics and evidence of language change’, in Lüdeling, Anke and Kytö, Merja (eds.), Corpus Linguistics: An International Handbook, Vol. 2. Berlin/New York, NY: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 1091–109Google Scholar

Curzan, Anne and Palmer, Chris C. 2006. ‘The importance of historical corpora, reliability, and reading’, in Facchinetti, Roberta and Rissanen, Matti (eds.), Corpus-based Studies in Diachronic English. Bern: Peter Lang, pp. 17–34Google Scholar

Cusack, Bridget (ed.) 1998. Everyday English 1500–1700: A Reader. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

d'Ardenne, S. R. T. O. (ed.) 1961. Þe liflade and te Passiun of Seinte Iuliene. London: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar

Dal, Ingerid 1952. ‘Zur Entstehung des englischen Participium Praesentis auf -ing’, Norsk Tidsskrift for Sprogvidenskap 16: 5–116Google Scholar

Dalen-Oskam, K. H. 2012. ‘The secret life of scribes: exploring fifteen manuscripts of Jacob van Maerlant's Scolastica (1271)’, Literary and Linguistic Computing 27: 355–72Google Scholar

Dalton-Puffer, Christiane 1995. ‘Middle English is a creole and its opposite: on the value of plausible speculation’, in Fisiak, Jacek (ed.), Linguistic Change under Contact Conditions. Berlin/New York, NY: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 35–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dalton-Puffer, ChristianeFisiak, Jacek 1996. The French Influence on Middle English Morphology: A Corpus-based Study of Derivation. Berlin/New York, NY: Mouton de GruyterCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Danchev, Andrei 1997. ‘The Middle English creolization hypothesis revisited’, in Fisiak, Jacek (ed.), Studies in Middle English Linguistics. Berlin/New York, NY: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 79–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Danchev, Andrei and Kytö, Merja 1994. ‘The construction be going to + infinitive in Early Modern English’, in Kastovsky, Dieter (ed.), Studies in Early Modern English. Berlin/New York, NY: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 59–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Danet, Brenda and Bogoch, Bryna 1994. ‘Orality, literacy, and performativity in Anglo-Saxon wills’, in Gibbons, John (ed.), Language and the Law. London: Longman, pp. 100–35Google Scholar

Davidse, Kristin, Vandelanotte, Lieven and Cuyckens, Hubert (eds.) 2010. Subjectification, Intersubjectification and Grammaticalization. Berlin/New York, NY: Mouton de GruyterCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davies, Mark 2010. ‘The Corpus of Contemporary American English as the first reliable monitor corpus of English’, Literary and Linguistic Computing 25: 447–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davies, Mark 2012a. ‘Expanding horizons in historical linguistics with the 400 million word Corpus of Historical American English’, Corpora 7: 121–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davies, Mark 2012b. ‘Some methodological issues related to corpus-based investigations of recent syntactic changes in English’, in Nevalainen, Terttu and Traugott, Elizabeth Closs (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the History of English. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 157–74Google Scholar

Davies, Mark 2013. ‘Recent shifts with three nonfinite verbal complements in English: data from the 100-million-word Time Corpus (1920s–2000s)’, in Aarts, Bas, Close, Joanne, Leech, Geoffrey and Wallis, Sean (eds.), The Verb Phrase in English: Investigating Recent Language Change with Corpora. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 46–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davis, Norman (ed.) 1971. Paston Letters and Papers of the Fifteenth Century, Part I. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Electronic version available at the Oxford Text ArchiveGoogle Scholar

Davis, Norman 1989. ‘The language of the Pastons’, in Burrow, J. A. (ed.), Middle English Literature: British Academy Gollancz Lectures. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 45–70Google Scholar

Davis, Stuart 2003. ‘The footing of dactylic sequences in American English’, in Honma, Takeru, Okazaki, Masao, Tabata, Toshiyuki and Tanaka, Shin-ichi (eds.), A New Century of Phonology and Phonological Theory: A Festschrift for Professor Shosuke Haraguchi on the Occasion of his Sixtieth Birthday. Tokyo: Kaitakusha, pp. 277–89Google Scholar

Day, Mabel 1952. The English Text of the Ancrene Riwle: BM MS Cotton Nero A.14. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar

de Fina, Anna, Schiffrin, Deborah and Bamberg, Michael (eds.) 2006. Discourse and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

de Man, Paul 1986. The Resistance to Theory. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota PressGoogle Scholar

De Smet, Hendrik 2005. ‘A corpus of Late Modern English texts’, ICAME Journal 29: 69–82Google Scholar

De Smet, Hendrik 2009. ‘Analysing reanalysis’, Lingua 119: 1728–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar

De Smet, Hendrik 2012. ‘The course of actualization’, Language 88: 601–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar

De Smet, Hendrik 2013. Spreading Patterns: Diffusional Change in the English System of Complementation. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar

De Smet, Hendrik, Ghesquière, Lobke and Van de Velde, Freek (eds.) 2013. On Multiple Source Constructions in Language Change, special issue of Studies in Language 37 (3)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

De Smet, Hendrik and Verstraete, Jean-Christophe 2006. ‘Coming to terms with subjectivity’, Cognitive Linguistics 17: 365–92Google Scholar

Defour, Tine 2010. ‘The semantic-pragmatic development of well from the viewpoint of (inter)subjectification’, in Davidse, Kristin, Vandelanotte, Lieven and Cuyckens, Hubert (eds.), Subjectification, Intersubjectification and Grammaticalization. Berlin/New York, NY: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 155–95Google Scholar

Defour, Tine and Simon Vandenbergen, Anne-Marie 2010. ‘“Positive appraisal” as a core meaning of well: a corpus-based analysis in Middle and Early Modern English data’, English Studies 91 (6): 643–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dekeyser, Xavier 1975. Number and Case Relations in 19th Century British English: A Comparative Study of Grammar and Usage. Antwerp/Amsterdam: Uitgeverij De Nederlandsche BoekhandelGoogle Scholar

Denison, David 1998. ‘Syntax’, in Romaine, Suzanne (ed.), The Cambridge History of the English Language. Volume IV: 1776–1997. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 92–329Google Scholar

Derwing, Bruce L. 1992. ‘A “pause-break” task for eliciting syllable boundary judgments from literate and illiterate speakers: preliminary results for five diverse languages’, Language and Speech 35 (1–2): 219–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Deuber, Dagmar, Biewer, Carolin, Hackert, Stephanie and Hilbert, Michaela 2012. ‘Will and would in selected New Englishes: general and variety-specific tendencies’, in Hundt, Marianne and Ulrike, Gut (eds.), Mapping Unity and Diversity World-wide: Corpus-based Studies of New Englishes. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, pp. 77–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Devitt, Amy J. 1989a. ‘Genre as textual variable: some historical evidence from Scots and American English’, American Speech 64 (4): 291–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Devitt, Amy J. 1989b. Standardising Written English: Diffusion in the Case of Scotland 1520–1659. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Dietz, Klaus 2007. ‘Denominale Abstraktbildungen des Altenglischen: die Wortbildung der Abstrakta auf -dōm, -hād, -lāc, -rǣden, -sceaft, -stæf und -wist und ihrer Entsprechungen im Althochdeutschen und im Altnordischen’, in Hans, Fix (ed.), Beiträge zur Morphologie: Germanisch, Baltisch, Ostseefinnisch. Odense: University Press of Southern Denmark, pp. 97–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Diller, Hans-Jürgen 1994. ‘Emotions in the English lexicon: a historical study of a lexical field’, in Fernández, Francisco, Fuster Márquez, Miguel and Calvo, Juan José (eds.), English Historical Linguistics 1992. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, pp. 219–34Google Scholar

Diller, Hans-Jürgen 2001. ‘Genre in linguistic and related discourses’, in Diller, Hans-Jürgen and Görlach, Manfred (eds.), Towards a History of English as a History of Genres. Heidelberg: Winter, pp. 3–43Google Scholar

Diller, Hans-Jürgen 2013. ‘Culturomics and genre: wrath and anger in the 17th century’, in McConchie, R. W, Juvonen, Teo, Kaunisto, Mark, Nevala, Minna and Tyrkkö, Jukka (eds.), Selected Proceedings of the 2012 Symposium on New Approaches in English Historical Lexis (HEL-LEX 3). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project, pp. 54–65Google Scholar

Diller, Hans-Jürgen, De Smet, Hendrik and Tyrkkö, Jukka 2010. ‘A European database of descriptors of English electronic texts’, The European English Messenger 19 (2): 29–35Google Scholar

Diller, Hans-Jürgen and Görlach, Manfred (eds.) 2001. Towards a History of English as a History of Genres. Heidelberg: WinterGoogle Scholar

Dines, Elizabeth 1980. ‘Variation in discourse – “and stuff like that”’, Language in Society 9: 13–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Divjak, Dagmar S. and Gries, Stefan Th. 2008. ‘Clusters in the mind? Converging evidence from near synonymy in Russian’, Mental Lexicon 3 (2): 188–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Doane, Alger N. 1991. The Saxon Genesis: An Edition of the West Saxon Genesis B and the Old Saxon Vatican Genesis. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin PressGoogle Scholar

Dobson, Eric J. 1957. English Pronunciation 1500–1700, 2 vols. Oxford: Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar

Dobson, Eric J. 1968. English Pronunciation 1500–1700, 2 vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press (2nd edn)Google Scholar

Dobson, Eric J. 1972. The English Text of the Ancrene Riwle: BM Cotton MS Cleopatra C.6. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar

Docherty, Gerard and Mendoza-Denton, Norma 2012. ‘Speaker-related variation – sociophonetic factors’, in Cohn, Abigail C., Fougeron, Cécile and Huffman, Marie K (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Laboratory Phonology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 43–60Google Scholar

Dollinger, Stefan 2006a. ‘Oh Canada! Towards the Corpus of Early Ontario English’, in Renouf, Antoinette and Kehoe, Andrew (eds.), The Changing Face of Corpus Linguistics. Amsterdam/Atlanta, GA: Rodopi, pp. 7–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dollinger, Stefan 2006b. ‘The modal auxiliaries have to and must in the Corpus of Early Ontario English: gradient change and colonial lag’, Canadian Journal of Linguistics 51 (2–3): 287–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Donne, John 1957 [1621]. The Sermons, Vol. 3. Ed. by Potter, George R. and Simpson, Evelyn M.. Berkeley, CA: University of California PressGoogle Scholar

Dons, Ute 2004. Descriptive Adequacy of Early Modern English Grammars. Berlin/New York, NY: Mouton de GruyterCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dossena, Marina 2010. ‘Building trust through (self-)appraisal in nineteenth-century business correspondence’, in Pahta, Päivi, Nevala, Minna, Nurmi, Arja and Palander-Collin, Minna (eds.), Social Roles and Language Practices in Late Modern English. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, pp. 191–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dossena, Marina 2011. ‘Handwritten communication in nineteenth-century business correspondence’, in Pahta, Päivi and Jucker, Andreas H (eds.), Communicating Early English Manuscripts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 133–46Google Scholar

Dossena, Marina and Fitzmaurice, Susan M. (eds.) 2006. Business and Official Correspondence: Historical Investigations. Bern: Peter LangGoogle Scholar

Doty, Kathleen L. 2010. ‘Courtroom discourse’, in Jucker, Andreas H. and Taavitsainen, Irma (eds.), Historical Pragmatics. Berlin/New York, NY: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 621–50Google Scholar

Durand, Jacques 1990. Generative and Non-linear Phonology. London: LongmanGoogle Scholar

Durand, Jacques, Gut, Ulrike and Kristoffersen, Gjert (eds.) 2014. The Oxford Handbook of Corpus Phonology. Oxford: Oxford University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Durkin, Philip 2002. ‘Changing documentation in the Third Edition of the Oxford English Dictionary: sixteenth-century vocabulary as a test case’, in Fanego, Teresa, Méndez-Naya, Belén and Seoane, Elena (eds.), Sounds, Words, Texts and Change, Vol. 2. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins, pp. 65–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Durkin, Philip 2009. The Oxford Guide to Etymology. Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar

Durkin, Philip 2013. ‘Dating Middle English evidence in the OED’, OED Online. http://public.oed.com/aspects-of-english/english-in-time/dating-middle-english-evidence-in-the-oedGoogle Scholar

Durkin, Philip 2014. Borrowed Words: A History of Loanwords in English. Oxford: Oxford University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dury, Richard 2002. ‘May’, in Gotti, Maurizio, Dossena, Marina, Dury, Richard, Facchinetti, Roberta and Lima, Maria (eds.), Variation in Central Modals: A Repertoire of Types and Forms of Usage in Middle English and Early Modern English. Bern: Peter Lang, pp. 83–128Google Scholar