Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T18:27:31.423Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 October 2015

Thomas Natsoulas
Thomas Natsoulas
Affiliation:
University of California, Davis
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Conceptual Representation of Consciousness , pp. 446 - 455
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ames, R. T., and Hull, D. L.. 2003. Daodejing: “Making This Life Significant”: A Philosophical Translation (New York: Ballantine Books).Google Scholar
Armstrong, D. M. 1968. A Materialist Theory of the Mind (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul).Google Scholar
Armstrong, D. M. 1984. “Consciousness and causality,” in Armstrong, D. M. and Malcolm, N. (eds.), Consciousness and Causality: A Debate on the Nature of Mind (Oxford: Blackwell), pp. 103–191.Google Scholar
Bain, A. 1875. Mind and Body: The Theories of Their Relation (New York: Appleton).Google Scholar
Bain, A. 1902. The Senses and the Intellect (New York: Appleton).Google Scholar
Bartlett, F. 1932. Remembering: A Study in Experimental and Social Psychology (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Bergmann, G. 1968. “Diversity,” Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, 41 (1967–1968): 21–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Betty, L. S. 1985. “An analysis of non-symbolic experience: The mystic in everyman,” Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 4 (1984–1985): 193–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bohm, D. 1957. Causality and Chance in Modern Physics (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul).Google Scholar
Bohm, D. 1965. The Special Theory of Relativity (New York: Benjamin).Google Scholar
Bowen, F. 1872. The Metaphysics of Sir William Hamilton: Collected, Arranged, and Abridged, for the Use of Colleges and Private Students (Boston: John Allyn).Google Scholar
Brentano, F. C. 1973. Psychology from an Empirical Standpoint (edited by Kraus, O.; translated from the German by Rancurello, A. C., Terrell, D. B., and McAlister, L. L.; English edition edited by McAlister, L. L., New York: Humanities Press). (Originally published in 1874.)Google Scholar
Bruner, J. S. 1982. “A brain on the mind,” Contemporary Psychology: APA Review of Books, 27: 5–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burkill, T. A. 1963. God and Reality in Modern Thought (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall).Google Scholar
Canetti, E. 1984. Crowds and Power (translated by Stewart, C., New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux). (Originally published in 1960.)Google Scholar
Cattell, J. P. 1966. “Depersonalization phenomena,” in Arieti, S. (ed.), American Handbook of Psychiatry, Vol. III (New York: Basic Books), pp. 88–102.Google Scholar
Chandler, J. 1664. Van Helmont’s Works (London: Ludowick Hoyd).Google Scholar
Dewey, J. 1906. “The terms ‘conscious’ and ‘consciousness,’” Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Method, 3: 39–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, J. C. 1963. “Depersonalization phenomena in a sample population of college students,” British Journal of Psychiatry, 109: 371–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, C. O. 1970. The Subject of Consciousness (London: Allen and Unwin).Google Scholar
Farthing, G. W. 1992. The Psychology of Consciousness (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall).Google Scholar
Federn, P. 1952. Ego Psychology and the Psychoses (New York: Basic Books).Google Scholar
Fingarette, H. 1969. Self-deception (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul).Google Scholar
Frances, A., Sacks, M., and Aronoff, M. S.. 1977. “Depersonalization: A self-relations perspective,” International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 58: 325–331.Google ScholarPubMed
Freud, S. 1953. The Interpretation of Dreams, in The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Vols. IV and V (translated and edited by Strachey, J., London: Hogarth). (Originally published 1900.)Google Scholar
Freud, S. 1957a. “A metapsychological supplement to the theory of dreams,” in The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Vol. XIV (translated and edited by Strachey, J., London: Hogarth), pp. 222–235. (Originally composed in 1917.)Google Scholar
Freud, S. 1957b. Project for a Scientific Psychology, in The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Vol. I (translated and edited by Strachey, J., London: Hogarth), pp. 295–387. (Composed in 1895.)Google Scholar
Freud, S. 1957c. “The unconscious,” in The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Vol. XIV (translated and edited by Strachey, J., London: Hogarth), pp. 166–204. (Originally published in 1915.)Google Scholar
Freud, S. 1958. “A note on the unconscious in psychoanalysis,” in The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Vol. XII (translated and edited by Strachey, J., London: Hogarth), pp. 260–266. (Originally published in 1912.)Google Scholar
Freud, S. 1959. “An autobiographical study,” in The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Vol. XX (translated and edited by Strachey, J., London: Hogarth), pp. 7–74. (Originally published in 1925.)Google Scholar
Freud, S. 1961. The Ego and the Id, in The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Vol. XIX (translated and edited by Strachey, J., London: Hogarth), pp. 12–66. (Originally published in 1923.)Google Scholar
Freud, S. 1964a. New Introductory Lectures on Psychoanalysis, in The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Vol. XXII (translated and edited by Strachey, J., London: Hogarth), pp. 5–182. (Originally published in 1933.)Google Scholar
Freud, S. 1964b. “Some elementary lessons in psycho-analysis,” in The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Vol. XXIII (translated and edited by Strachey, J., London: Hogarth), pp. 279–286. (Written in 1938.)Google Scholar
Gibson, J. J. 1966. The Senses Considered as Perceptual Systems (Boston: Houghton Mifflin).Google Scholar
Gibson, J. J. 1978. “The perceiving of hidden surfaces,” in Machamer, P. K. and Turnbull, R. G. (eds.), Studies in Perception (Columbus: Ohio University Press). pp. 422–434.Google Scholar
Gibson, J. J. 1979. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception (Boston: Houghton Mifflin).Google Scholar
Gleick, J. 2013. “Time regained!” [Review of Time Reborn: From the Crisis of Physics to the Future of the Universe by Lee Smolin] New York Review of Books, 60: 46, 48–49.Google Scholar
Glicksohn, J. 1993. “Altered sensory environments, altered states of consciousness and altered-state cognition,” The Journal of Mind and Behavior, 14: 1–12.Google Scholar
Glicksohn, J. 1998. “States of consciousness and symbolic cognition,” The Journal of Mind and Behavior, 19: 105–118.Google Scholar
Gray, J. N. 2007. Straw Dogs: Thoughts on Humans and Other Animals (New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux).Google Scholar
Hacker, P. M. S. “The relevance of Wittgenstein’s philosophy of psychology to the psychological sciences,” forthcoming in Proceedings of the Leipzig Conference on Wittgenstein and Science 2007. Available at http://info.sjc.ox.ac.uk/scr/hacker/docs/Relevance%20of%20W’s%20phil.%20of%20psychol.%20to%20science.pdf.Google Scholar
Hagstrom, J. H. 1989. Eros and Vision: The Restoration to Romanticism (Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press).Google Scholar
Hamilton, W. 1895. Notes Appended to The Works of Thomas Reid DD, 2 vols., 8th edn. (Edinburgh: James Thin).Google Scholar
Hebb, D. O. 1960. “The American revolution,” American Psychologist, 15: 735–745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hebb, D. O. 1972. A Textbook of Psychology, 3rd edn. (Philadelphia: Saunders).Google Scholar
Hebb, D. O. 1974. “What psychology is about,” American Psychologist, 29: 71–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hebb, D. O. 1978. “Behavioral evidence of thought and consciousness,” Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1: 357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobbes, T. 1914. Leviathan (London: J. M. Dent). (Originally published in 1651.)Google Scholar
Home, S. 2002. 69 Things To Do with a Dead Princess (Edinburgh: Canongate).Google Scholar
Husserl, E. 1977. Phenomenological Psychology: Lectures, Summer Semester (translated by Scanlon, John, The Hague: Nijhoff). (Originally published in 1925.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, W. 1884. “On some omissions of introspective psychology,” Mind, 4: 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, W. 1890. The Principles of Psychology, 2 vols. (New York: Holt).Google Scholar
James, W. 1911. Some Problems of Philosophy: A Beginning of an Introduction to Philosophy (New York: Longmans Green).Google Scholar
James, W. 1912. “Does ‘consciousness’ exist?” in James, W., Essays in Radical Empiricism (New York: Longmans Green), pp. 1–38. (Originally published in 1904.)Google Scholar
James, W. 1925. Talks to Teachers on Psychology: And to Students on Some of Life’s Ideals (New York: Holt). (Original copyright 1899.)Google Scholar
James, W. 1982. The Varieties of Religious Experience: A Study of Human Nature (edited with an introduction by Marty, M. E., Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin). (Originally published in 1902.)Google Scholar
James, W. 1983. Essays in Psychology (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press). (Letter written in 1884.)Google Scholar
James, W. 1984. Psychology, Briefer Course (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press). (Originally published in 1892.)Google Scholar
James, W. 1987. William James: Writings 1902–1910 (New York: Literary Classics of the United States). (Originally published in 1910.)Google Scholar
Jaspers, K. 1963. General psychopathology (Chicago: University of Chicago Press). (Fifth German edition published in 1959.)Google Scholar
Jaynes, J. 1976. The Origin of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind (Boston: Houghton Mifflin).Google Scholar
Johnston, M. 2009. Saving God: Religion after Idolatry (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jung, C. G. 2010. The Undiscovered Self: With Symbols and the Interpretation of Dreams (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press). (Originally published in 1957.)Google Scholar
Köhler, W. 1929. Gestalt Psychology (New York: Liveright).Google Scholar
Kris, E. 1952. Psychoanalytic Explorations in Art (New York: International Universities Press).Google Scholar
Landis, C. 1964. Varieties of Psychopathological Experience (New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston).Google Scholar
Lang, J. 1939a. “The other side of hallucinations, II,” American Journal of Psychiatry, 96: 423–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lang, J. 1939b. “The other side of the affective aspects of schizophrenia,” Psychiatry, 2: 195–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lang, J. 1940. “The other side of the ideological aspects of schizophrenia,” Psychiatry, 3: 389–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laplanche, J., and Pontalis, J.-B.. 1973. The Language of Psychoanalysis (translated by Smith, D. Nicholson, New York: Norton). (Originally published in 1967.)Google Scholar
Lawrence, D. H. 1995. Lady Chatterly’s Lover: Cambridge Lawrence Edition (edited with notes by Squires, Michael, London: Penguin Classics). (Originally published in 1928.)Google Scholar
Lewis, C. S. 1967. Studies in Words, 2nd edn. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Locke, J. 1975. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding (Oxford: Clarendon Press). (Fifth edition published in 1706.)Google Scholar
Loy, D. 1985. “Wei-wu-wei: Nondual action,” Philosophy East and West, 35: 73–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackie, J. L. 1976. Problems from Locke (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mair, V. H. 1990. Tao Te Ching: The Classic Book of Integrity and the Way (New York: Bantam).Google Scholar
Malcolm, N. 1984. “Consciousness and causality,” in Armstrong, D. M. and Malcolm, N. (eds.), Consciousness and Causality: A Debate on the Nature of Mind (Oxford: Blackwell), pp. 1–101.Google Scholar
McCarthy, M. 1942. The Company She Keeps (New York: Simon and Schuster).Google Scholar
McDougall, W. 1908. An Introduction to Social Psychology (London: Methuen).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Medlin, B. 1967. “Ryle and the mechanical hypothesis,” in Presley, C. F. (ed.), The Identity Theory of the Mind (St. Lucia, Australia: University of Queensland Press), pp. 194–150.Google Scholar
Miller, G. A. 1990–91. “The place of language in a scientific psychology,” National Student Speech Language Hearing Association, 18: 66–72.Google Scholar
Mitchell, S. L. 1816. “A double consciousness, or a duality of person in the same individual,” Medical Repository, 3: 185–186.Google Scholar
Moeller, H.-G 2004. Daoism Explained: From the Dream of the Butterfly to the Fishnet Allegory (Chicago: Open Court).Google Scholar
Mowrer, O. H. 1961. The Crisis in Psychiatry and Religion (Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand).Google Scholar
Natsoulas, T. 1967. “What are perceptual reports about?” Psychological Bulletin, 67: 249–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Natsoulas, T. 1970. “Concerning introspective ‘knowledge,’” Psychological Bulletin, 73: 89–111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Natsoulas, T. 1974. “The subjective, experiential element in perception,” Psychological Bulletin, 81: 611–631.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Natsoulas, T. 1977. “Consciousness: Consideration of an inferential hypothesis,” Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 7: 29–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Natsoulas, T. 1978a. “Consciousness,” American Psychologist, 33: 906–914.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Natsoulas, T. 1978b. “Residual subjectivity,” American Psychologist, 33: 269–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Natsoulas, T. 1978c. “Toward a model for consciousness4 in the light of B. F. Skinner’s contribution,” Behaviorism: A Forum for Critical Discussion, 6: 139–175.Google Scholar
Natsoulas, T. 1979. “The unity of consciousness,” Behaviorism: A Forum for Critical Discussion, 7: 45–63.Google Scholar
Natsoulas, T. 1981. “Basic problems of consciousness,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41: 132–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Natsoulas, T. 1983. “Concepts of consciousness,” The Journal of Mind and Behavior, 4: 13–59.Google Scholar
Natsoulas, T. 1984a. “Freud and consciousness: I. Intrinsic consciousness,” Psychoanalysis and Contemporary Thought, 7: 195–232.Google Scholar
Natsoulas, T. 1984b. “Gustav Bergmann’s psychophysiological parallelism,” Behaviorism: A Forum for Critical Discussion, 12: 41–69.Google Scholar
Natsoulas, T. 1985a. “An introduction to the perceptual kind of conception of direct (reflective) consciousness,” The Journal of Mind and Behavior, 6: 333–356.Google Scholar
Natsoulas, T. 1985b. “Freud and consciousness: II. Derived consciousness,” Psychoanalysis and Contemporary Thought, 8: 183–220.Google Scholar
Natsoulas, T. 1986–87. “The six basic concepts of consciousness and William James’s stream of thought,” Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 6: 289–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Natsoulas, T. 1987. “Roger W. Sperry’s monist interactionism,” The Journal of Mind and Behavior, 8: 1–22.Google Scholar
Natsoulas, T. 1987–88. “Gibson, James, and the temporal continuity of experience,” Imagination, Cognition and Personality 7: 351–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Natsoulas, T. 1989. “Freud and consciousness: III. The importance of tertiary consciousness,” Psychoanalysis and Contemporary Thought, 12: 97–123.Google Scholar
Natsoulas, T. 1990a. “Reflective seeing: An exploration in the company of Edmund Husserl and James J. Gibson,” Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 21: 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Natsoulas, T. 1990b. “The pluralistic approach to the nature of feelings,” The Journal of Mind and Behavior, 11: 173–218.Google Scholar
Natsoulas, T. 1991a. “Freud and consciousness: V. Emotions and feelings,” Psychoanalysis and Contemporary Thought, 14: 69–108.Google Scholar
Natsoulas, T. 1991b. “Ontological subjectivity,” The Journal of Mind and Behavior. 12: 175–200.Google Scholar
Natsoulas, T. 1991c. “The concept of consciousness1: The interpersonal meaning,” Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 21: 63–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Natsoulas, T. 1991d. “The concept of consciousness2: The personal meaning,” Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 21: 339–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Natsoulas, T. 1992. “The concept of consciousness3: The awareness meaning,” Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 21: 199–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Natsoulas, T. 1992–93. “The stream of consciousness: I. William James’s pulses,” Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 12: 3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Natsoulas, T. 1993a. “Freud and consciousness: VII. Dimensions of an alternative interpretation,” Psychoanalysis and Contemporary Thought, 16: 67–101.Google Scholar
Natsoulas, T. 1993b. “Freud and consciousness: VIII. Conscious psychical processes perforce involve higher-order consciousness–intrinsically or concomitantly? A current issue,” Psychoanalysis and Contemporary Thought, 16: 597–631.Google Scholar
Natsoulas, T. 1993c. “Perceiving, its component stream of perceptual experience, and Gibson’s ecological approach,” Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung, 55: 248–257.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Natsoulas, T. 1993–94. “The stream of consciousness: V. William James’s change of view,” Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 13: 347–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Natsoulas, T. 1994a. “A rediscovery of consciousness,” Consciousness and Cognition, 3: 223–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Natsoulas, T. 1994b. “The concept of consciousness5: The unitive meaning,” Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 24: 401–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Natsoulas, T. 1994c. “The concept of consciousness4: The reflective meaning,” Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 24: 373–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Natsoulas, T. 1995a. “Consciousness3 and Gibson’s concept of awareness,” The Journal of Mind and Behavior, 16: 305–328.Google Scholar
Natsoulas, T. 1995b. “A rediscovery of Sigmund Freud,” Consciousness and Cognition, 4: 300–322.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Natsoulas, T. 1996a. “The case for intrinsic theory: I. An introduction,” The Journal of Mind and Behavior, 17: 267–286.Google Scholar
Natsoulas, T. 1996b. “The sciousness hypothesis – Part I,” The Journal of Mind and Behavior, 17: 45–66.Google Scholar
Natsoulas, T. 1996c. “The sciousness hypothesis – Part II,” The Journal of Mind and Behavior, 17: 185–206.Google Scholar
Natsoulas, T. 1997. “Consciousness and self-awareness: Part I. Consciousness1, consciousness2, and consciousness3,” The Journal of Mind and Behavior, 18: 53–74.Google Scholar
Natsoulas, T. 1998a. “Consciousness and self-awareness,” in Ferrari, M. and Sternberg, R. J. (eds.), Self-Awareness: Its Nature and Development (New York: Guilford), pp. 12–33.Google Scholar
Natsoulas, T. 1998b. “Field of view,” The Journal of Mind and Behavior, 19: 415–436.Google Scholar
Natsoulas, T. 1998c. “On the intrinsic nature of states of consciousness: James’s ubiquitous feeling aspect,” Review of General Psychology, 2: 123–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Natsoulas, T. 1998d. “Tertiary consciousness,” The Journal of Mind and Behavior, 19: 141–176.Google Scholar
Natsoulas, T. 1999a. “An ecological and phenomenological perspective on consciousness and perception: Contact with the world at the very heart of the being of consciousness,” Review of General Psychology, 3: 224–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Natsoulas, T. 1999b. “The concept of consciousness6: The general state meaning,” Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 29: 59–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Natsoulas, T. 2000a. “Consciousness and conscience,” The Journal of Mind and Behavior, 21: 327–352.Google Scholar
Natsoulas, T. 2000b. “Freud and consciousness: X. The place of consciousness in Freud’s science,” Psychoanalysis and Contemporary Thought, 23: 525–561.Google Scholar
Natsoulas, T. 2000c. “On the intrinsic nature of states of consciousness: Further considerations in the light of James’s conception,” Consciousness and Emotion, 1: 139–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Natsoulas, T. 2001a. “The Freudian conscious,” Consciousness and Emotion, 2: 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Natsoulas, T. 2001b. “On the intrinsic nature of states of consciousness: Attempted inroads from the first-person perspective,” The Journal of Mind and Behavior, 22: 219–248.Google Scholar
Natsoulas, T. 2002. “On the intrinsic nature of states of consciousness: O’Shaughnessy and the mythology of the attention,” Consciousness and Emotion, 3: 35–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Natsoulas, T. 2003a. “Freud and consciousness: XIII. Seeing in the unconscious!?” Psychoanalysis and Contemporary Thought, 26: 517–564.Google Scholar
Natsoulas, T. 2003b. “The case for intrinsic theory: VII. An equivocal remembrance theory,” The Journal of Mind and Behavior, 24: 1–28.Google Scholar
Natsoulas, T. 2003c. “The case for intrinsic theory: VIII. The experiential in acquiring knowledge firsthand of one’s experiences,” The Journal of Mind and Behavior, 24: 289–316.Google Scholar
Natsoulas, T. 2004. “The case for intrinsic theory: IX. Further discussion of an equivocal remembrance account,” The Journal of Mind and Behavior, 25: 7–32.Google Scholar
Natsoulas, T. 2005a. “Freud’s phenomenology of the emotions,” in Ellis, R. D. and Newton, N. (eds.), Consciousness and Emotion: Agency, Conscious Choice, and Selective Perception (Amsterdam: John Benjamin), pp. 217–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Natsoulas, T. 2005b. “The Varieties of Religious Experience considered from the perspective of James’s account of the stream of consciousness,” in Ellis, R. D. and Newton, N. (eds.), Consciousness and Emotion: Agency, Conscious Choice, and Selective Perception (Amsterdam: John Benjamin), pp. 303–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Natsoulas, T. 2006a. “On the temporal continuity of human consciousness: Is James’s firsthand description, after all, ‘inept’?” The Journal of Mind and Behavior, 27: 121–148.Google Scholar
Natsoulas, T. 2006b. “The case for intrinsic theory: XIII. The role of the qualitative in a modal account of inner awareness,” The Journal of Mind and Behavior, 27: 319–350.Google Scholar
Natsoulas, T. 2011. “A dislocation of consciousness,” in Charles, E. P. (ed.), A New Look at New Realism: The Psychology and Philosophy of E. B. Holt (New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction), pp. 127–155.Google Scholar
Natsoulas, T. 2013. Consciousness and Perceptual Experience: An Ecological and Phenomenological Approach (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neisser, U. 1968. “The processes of vision,” Scientific American, 219: 204–214.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Neisser, U. 1976. Cognition and Reality (San Francisco: Freeman).Google Scholar
Neisser, U. 1979. “Review of Divided Consciousness by E. R. Hilgard,” Contemporary Psychology, 24: 99–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nietzsche, F. 1974. The Gay Science: With a Prelude of Rhymes and an Appendix of Songs (translated by Kaufmann, W., New York: Vintage Books). (Originally published in 1887.)Google Scholar
Nietzsche, F. 2003. Writings from the Late Notebooks (edited by Bittner, R., translated by Sturge, K., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press). (Written in 1885.)Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. C. 1994. The Therapy of Desire: Theory and Practice in Hellenistic Ethics (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
O’Shaughnessy, B. 1972. “Mental structure and self-consciousness,” Inquiry, 15: 30–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Shaughnessy, B. 1987. “Consciousness,” Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 10: 49–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Shaughnessy, B. 2000. Consciousness and the World (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar
Oxford English Dictionary (OED), 1989. 20 vols., 2nd edn. (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar
Oxford English Dictionary (OED), 2011. online, 3rd edn. (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar
Penfield, W. and Roberts, L.. 1959. Speech and Brain Mechanisms (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Pippen, R. B. 2000. Henry James and Modern Moral Life (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Popper, K. and Eccles, J. C.. 1977. The Self and Its Brain: An Argument for Interactionism (Berlin: Springer International).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pucceti, R. and Dykes, R. W.. 1978. “Localizationism and dualism: A second look at the paradox,” Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1: 369–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reed, E. S. 1988. James J. Gibson and the Psychology of Perception (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press).Google Scholar
Reed, E. S. and Jones, R. (eds.). 1982. Reasons for Realism: Selected Essays of James J. Gibson (Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum).Google Scholar
Reed, G. 1972. The Psychology of Anomalous Experience: A Cognitive Approach (London: Hutchinson).Google Scholar
Roberts, W. W. 1960. “Normal and abnormal depersonalization,” Journal of Mental Science, 106: 378–493.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rorty, R. 1979. Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Samelson, F. 1985. “Organizing for the kingdom of behavior: Academic battles and organizational policies in the twenties,” Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 21: 33–47.3.0.CO;2-F>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schilder, P. 1953. Medical Psychology (New York: International Universities Press). (Originally German published in 1923.)Google Scholar
Searle, J. R. 1983. Intentionality: An Essay in the Philosophy of Mind (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searle, J. R. 1990. “Consciousness, explanatory inversion, and cognitive science,” Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 13: 585–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searle, J. R. 1992. The Rediscovery of the Mind (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sellars, W. 1963. Science, Perception and Reality (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul).Google Scholar
Sellars, W. 1965. “Scientific realism or irenic instrumentalism,” in Cohen, R. S. and Wartofsky, M. W. (eds.), Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. II (New York: Humanities Press), pp. 171–204.Google Scholar
Shoemaker, S. 1968. “Self-reference and self-awareness,” Journal of Philosophy, 65: 555–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shoemaker, S. 1970. “Persons and their pasts,” American Philosophical Quarterly, 7: 269–285.Google Scholar
Shor, R. E. 1959. “Hypnosis and the concept of the generalized reality orientation,” American Journal of Psychotherapy, 13: 582–602.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shor, R. E. 1970. “The three-factor theory of hypnosis as applied to the book-reading fantasy and to the concept of suggestion,” International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 18: 89–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skinner, B. F. 1957. Verbal Behavior (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skinner, B. F. 1974. About Behaviorism (New York: Vintage).Google Scholar
Smart, J. J. C. 1966. Philosophy and Scientific Realism (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul).Google Scholar
South, R. 1866. Sermons Preached upon Several Occasions (New York: Hurd and Houghton). (Preached in 1664.)Google Scholar
Speer, A. 1970. Inside the Third Reich: Memoirs (New York: Macmillan).Google Scholar
Sperry, R. W. 1972. “Science and the problem of values,” Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 16: 115–130.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sprigge, T. L. S. 1993. James and Bradley: American Truth and British Reality (Chicago: Open Court Press).Google Scholar
Stewart, W. A. 1964. “Scientific proceedings panel report: Depersonalization,” Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 12: 171–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szymborska, W. 1998. “Discovery,” in Poems New and Collected 1957–1997 (translated by Baranczak, Stanislaw and Cavanagh, Clare, New York: Harcourt).Google Scholar
Tulving, E. 1991. “Memory research is not a zero-sum game,” American Psychologist, 46: 43–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uhl, R. 2005. “Hypercathexis,” International Dictionary of Psychoanalysis. Available at http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1G2-3435300653.html.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. 1953. Philosophical Investigations (Oxford: Blackwell).Google Scholar
Wollheim, R. 1969. “The mind and the mind’s image of itself,” International Journal of Psychi-Analysis, 50: 209–220.Google Scholar
Woodruff Smith, D. 1989. The Circle of Acquaintance: Perception, Consciousness, and Empathy (Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodruff Smith, D. 2004. Mind World: Essays in Phenomenology and Ontology (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wordsworth, W. 1926. The Prelude (Oxford: Oxford University Press). (Originally published in 1850.)Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Thomas Natsoulas, University of California, Davis
  • Book: The Conceptual Representation of Consciousness
  • Online publication: 05 October 2015
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139136297.008
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Thomas Natsoulas, University of California, Davis
  • Book: The Conceptual Representation of Consciousness
  • Online publication: 05 October 2015
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139136297.008
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Thomas Natsoulas, University of California, Davis
  • Book: The Conceptual Representation of Consciousness
  • Online publication: 05 October 2015
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139136297.008
Available formats
×