Beville, S. T., Kerr, G. N. & Hughey, K. F. D. (2012). Valuing impacts of the invasive alga Didymosphenia geminata on recreational angling. Ecological Economics, 82, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bockstael, N. E., McConnell, K. E. & Strand, I. E. (1989). A random utility model for sport fishing: Some preliminary results for Florida. Marine Resource Economics, 6(3), 245–260.Google Scholar

Born, W., Rauschmayer, F. & Brauer, I. (2005). Economic evaluation of biological invasions – a survey. Ecological Economics, 55(3), 321–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burnett, K. M., D’Evelyn, S., Kaiser, B. A., Namtamanasikarn, P. & Roumasset, J. A. (2008). Beyond the lamppost: Optimal prevention and control of the brown tree snake in Hawaii. Ecological Economics, 67(1), 66–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carlsson, F. & Kataria, M. (2008). Assessing management options for weed control with demanders and non-demanders in a choice experiment. Land Economics, 84(3), 517–528.Google Scholar

Carson, R. T. (1997). Contingent valuation: Theoretical advances and empirical tests since the NOAA Panel. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 79(5), 1501–1507.Google Scholar

Champ, P. A., Alberini, A. & Correas, I. (2005). Using contingent valuation to value a noxious weeds control program: The effects of including an unsure response category. Ecological Economics, 55(1), 47–60.Google Scholar

Hanemann, W. M. (1984). Welfare evaluations in contingent valuation experiments with discrete responses. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 66(3), 332–341.Google Scholar

Hanemann, M. & Kanninen, B. (1996). The statistical analysis of discrete-response CV data. Working Paper No. 798. Berkeley, CA: Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of California at Berkeley.Google Scholar

Horsch, E. J. & Lewis, D. J. (2009). The effects of aquatic invasive species on property values: Evidence from a quasi-experiment. Land Economics, 85(3), 391–409.Google Scholar

Kompas, T. & Che, N. (2001). An economic assessment of the potential costs of red imported fire ants in Australia. Canberra, Australia: Report for the Department of Primary Industries, Queensland.Google Scholar

Loomis, J. B. & Ekstrand, E. (1997). Economic benefits of critical habitat for the Mexican spotted owl: A scope test using a multiple-bounded contingent valuation survey. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 22(2), 356–366.Google Scholar

Lovell, S. J., Stone, S. F. & Fernandez, L. (2006). The economic impacts of aquatic invasive species: A review of the literature. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, 35, 195–208.Google Scholar

McLeod, R. (2004). Counting the cost: Impact of invasive animals in Australia, 2004. Canberra, Australia: Pest Animal Control Cooperative Research Centre.Google Scholar

Mitchell, R. C. & Carson, R. T. (1989).Using surveys to value public goods: The contingent valuation method. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.Google Scholar

Nunes, P. A. L. D. & van den Bergh, J. C. J. M. (2004). Can people value protection against invasive marine species? Evidence from a Joint TC–CV survey in the Netherlands. Environmental and Resource Economics, 28(4), 517–532.Google Scholar

Olson, L. (2006). The economics of terrestrial invasive species: A review of the literature. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, 35(1), 178–194.Google Scholar

Perrings, C., Williamson, M. & Dalmazzone, S. (eds.) (2000). The economics of biological invasions. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pimentel, D., Zuniga, R. & Morrison, D. (2005). Update on the environmental and economic costs associated with alien-invasive species in the United States. Ecological Economics, 52(3), 273–288.Google Scholar

Roberts, D.C., Boyer, T.A. and Lusk, J.C. (2008). Preferences for environmental quality under uncertainty. Ecological Economics, 66 (4), 584–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Scanlan, J. C. & Vanderwoude, C. (2006). Modelling the potential spread of Solenopsis invicta Buren (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) (red imported fire ant) in Australia. Australian Journal of Entomology, 45(1), 1–9.Google Scholar

Shogren, J. F., Finnoff, D., McIntosh, C. & Settle, C. (2006). Integration-valuation nexus in invasive species policy. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, 35(1), 11–20.Google Scholar

Sinden, J. A. & Griffith, G. (2007). Combining economic and ecological arguments to value environmental gains from control of 35 weeds in Australia. Ecological Economics, 61(2–3), 396–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Taylor, T. & Longo, A. (2010). Valuing algal bloom in the Black Sea coast of Bulgaria: A choice experiment approach. Journal of Environmental Management, 91(10), 1963–1971.Google Scholar

Turpie, J. K., Heydenrych, B. J. & Lamberth, S. J. (2003). Economic value of terrestrial and marine biodiversity in the Cape Floristic Region: Implications for defining effective and socially optimal conservation strategies. Biological Conservation, 112(1–2), 233–251.Google Scholar

Zhang, C. & Boyle, K. J. (2010). The effect of an aquatic invasive species (Eurasian watermilfoil) on lakefront property values. Ecological Economics, 70(2), 394–404.Google Scholar