Akrivopoulou, Christina (2012), Ο πολιτικός δικαστής αντιμέτωπος με την αναλογικότητα κατά τον αναιρετικό έλεγχο της εύλογης χρηματικής αποζημίωσης [Civil Law Courts Faced with Proportionality in the Review of the Legality of Reasonable Compensation], in Τoμος τιμητικoς Πeτρου Ι. Παραρa 29 (Athens: Αντ. Ν. Σάκκουλας)Google Scholar

Aleinikoff, Alexander (1987), Constitutional Law in the Age of Balancing, 96 Yale Law Journal 943Google Scholar

Alexy, Robert (1985), Theorie der Grundrechte (Baden-Baden: Nomos)Google Scholar

Alexy, Robert (2002), A Theory of Constitutional Rights (Translated and with an Introduction by Julian Rivers) (Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Alexy, Robert (2003a), Constitutional Rights, Balancing and Rationality, 16 Ratio Juris 131CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alexy, Robert (2003b), On Balancing and Subsumption. A Structural Comparison, 16 Ratio Juris 433Google Scholar

Alexy, Robert (2005), Balancing, Constitutional Review, and Representation, 3 International Journal of Constitutional Law 572Google Scholar

Alexy, Robert (2008), On the Concept and the Nature of Law, 21 Ratio Juris 281CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alexy, Robert (2010), A Theory of Legal Argumentation: The Theory of Rational Discourse as Theory of Legal Justification (Ruth Adler and Neil McCormick, trans.) (Oxford; New York: Clarendon Press; Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Alivizatos, Nicos (2001a), Ο αβeβαιος εκσυγχρονισμος και η θολη συνταγματικη αναθεωρηση [Uncertain Modernization and Vague Constitutional Reform] (Athens: Πόλις)Google Scholar

Alivizatos, Nicos (2001b), Συνολική αποτίμηση του αναθεωρητικού εγχειρήματος [Overall Evaluation of the Reform], in Το Νεο Συνταγμα 437 (Tsatsos, Dimitrios, Venizelos, Evaggelos and Contiades, Xenophon, eds.) (Αthens; Komotini: Αντ. Ν. Σάκκουλας)Google Scholar

Allan, Trevor (1988), Pragmatism and Theory in Public Law, 104 Law Quarterly Review 422Google Scholar

Allan, Trevor (2006), Human Rights and Judicial Review: A Critique of ‘Due Deference’, 65 Cambridge Law Journal 671Google Scholar

Allan, Trevor (2013), The Sovereignty of Law: Freedom, Constitution, and Common Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Allison, John (1996), A Continental Distinction in the Common Law: A Historical and Comparative Perspective on English Public Law (Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Allison, John (2007), The English Historical Constitution: Continuity, Change and European Effects (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alston, Philip, ed. (1999), The EU and Human Rights (Oxford: Oxford University Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alter, Karen (2002), Establishing the Supremacy of European Law: The Making of an International Rule of Law in Europe (Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Andriantsimbazovina, Joël (1998), L’autorité des décisions de justice constitutionnelles et européennes sur le juge administratif franÇais (Paris: LGDJ)Google Scholar

Androulakis, Nikolaos (1972), Θεμελιωδεις eννοιαι της ποινικης δικης [Fundamental Concepts of the Criminal Process] (Athens: Σάκκουλα)Google Scholar

Androulakis, Nikolaos (1975), Τα όρια της ανακριτικής δράσεως και η ‘αρχή της αναγκαιότητας’ [The Limits of Inquisitory Action and the ‘Principle of Necessity’], Ποινικa Χρονικa 1Google Scholar

Androulakis, Nikolaos (1985), Το ‘κράτος των δικαστών’ – ένα ανύπαρκτο σκιάχτρο; [The ‘government of judges’ – an inexistent scarecrow?], 33 Νομικo Βhμα 1505Google Scholar

Anthopoulos, Charalampos (2001), Όψεις της συνταγματικής δημοκρατίας στο παράδειγμα του άρθρου 25 παρ. 1 του Συντάγματος [Aspects of Constitutional Democracy in the Example of Article 25 par. 1 of the Constitution], in Το νΕο ΣΥνταγμα 153 (Tsatsos, Dimitrios, Venizelos, Evaggelos and Contiades, Xenophon, eds.) (Αthens; Komotini: Αντ. Ν. Σάκκουλας)Google Scholar

Anthopoulos, Charalampos (2006), Το ασυμβίβαστο των ιδιοκτητών μέσων ενημέρωσης πριν και μετά το νέο άρθρο 14 παρ. 9 του Συντάγματος [The Incompatibility Concerning Media Owners before and after the New Article 14 par. 9 of the Constitution], in Πeντε χρoνια μετα τη συνταγματικη αναθεωρηση του 2001 313 (Contiades, Xenophon, ed.) (Αthens; Komotini: Αντ. Ν. Σάκκουλας)Google Scholar

Antoniou, Theodora (2012), Η απόφαση της Ολομελείας του Συμβουλίου της Επικρατείας για το Μνημόνιο – Μια ευρωπαϊκή υπόθεση χωρίς ευρωπαϊκή προσέγγιση [The Council of State Plenum Decision on the Memorandum – A European Affair Lacking a European Approach], Το ΣΥνταγμα 197Google Scholar

Arai-Takahashi, Yutaka (2002), The Margin of Appreciation Doctrine and the Principle of Proportionality in the Jurisprudence of the ECHR (Antwerp; Oxford: Intersentia)Google Scholar

Atias, Christian and Linotte, Didier (1977), Le mythe de l’adaptation du droit au fait, Recueil Dalloz 251Google Scholar

Atiyah, Patrick (1987), Pragmatism and Theory in English Law (London: Sweet & Maxwell)Google Scholar

Auby, Jean-Marie (1979), Le contrôle juridictionnel du degré de gravité d’une sanction disciplinaire, note sous CE, 9 juin 1978, Lebon, Revue du Droit Public 227Google Scholar

Audren, Frédéric and Halpérin, Jean-Louis (2013), La culture juridique française: Entre mythes et réalités: XIXe-XXe siècles (Paris: CNRS)Google Scholar

Austin, John (1975), How to Do Things with Words (Oxford: Clarendon Press)Google Scholar

Balkin, Jack (1986), The Crystalline Structure of Legal Thought, 39 Rutgers Law Review 1Google Scholar

Balkin, Jack (1990a), Nested Oppositions, 99 Yale Law Journal 1669Google Scholar

Balkin, Jack (1990b), The Hohfeldian Approach to Law and Semiotics, 44 University of Miami Law Review 1119Google Scholar

Balkin, Jack (1991), The Promise of Legal Semiotics, 69 Texas Law Review 1831Google Scholar

Barak, Aharon (2012), Proportionality: Constitutional Rights and Their Limitations (New York: Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Barber, Nick (2011), The Afterlife of Parliamentary Sovereignty, 9 International Journal of Constitutional Law 144Google Scholar

Beatson, Jack, ed. (1998), Constitutional Reform in the United Kingdom: Practice and Principles (Oxford: Hart)Google Scholar

Beatty, David (2004), The Ultimate Rule of Law (Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Beis, Kostas (1998), Το ελληνικo eλλειμμα κρaτους δικαiου [The Greek Rule Of Law Deficit] (Αthens: Εunomia)Google Scholar

Beis, Kostas (1999), Η αρχή της αναλογικότητας [The Principle of Proportionality] 30 Δικη 467Google Scholar

Bell, Johanna (2019), Rethinking the Story of Cart v Upper Tribunal and Its Implications for Administrative Law, 39 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 74Google Scholar

Bell, John (1986), The Expansion of Judicial Review over Discretionary Powers in France, Public Law 99Google Scholar

Pulido, Carlos Bernal (2007), El principio de proporcionalidad y los derechos fundamentales (Madrid: Centro de Estudios Políticos y Constitucionales)Google Scholar

Bienvenu, Jean-Jacques (1979), L’interprétation juridictionnelle des actes administratifs et des lois: Sa nature et sa fonction dans l’’élaboration du droit administratif (Paris II: unpublished PhD thesis)Google Scholar

Bienvenu, Jean-Jacques (1985), Note sous décision n° 85–192 DC, Actualité Juridique Droit Administratif 485Google Scholar

Bingham, Tom (1992), ‘There Is a World Elsewhere’: The Changing Perspectives of English Law, 41 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 513Google Scholar

Bingham, Tom (2000), The European Convention on Human Rights: Time to Incorporate, in The Business of Judging. Selected Essays and Speeches 131 (Oxford: Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Birkinshaw, Patrick (2003), European Public Law (London: Butterworths)Google Scholar

Bjorge, Eirik and Williams, Jack (2016), The Protean Principle of Proportionality: How Different Is Proportionality in EU Contexts?, 75 Cambridge Law Journal 186Google Scholar

Blanquer, Jean-Michel (2000), Les méthodes du juge constitutionnel (Paris: LGDJ)Google Scholar

Boas, Franz (1898), Introduction, in Alexander Teit, James, Traditions of the Thompson River Indians of British Columbia (Boston, MA; New York: Houghton, Mifflin & Company)Google Scholar

Bockel, Alain (1978), Contribution à l’étude du pouvoir discrétionnaire de l’administration, Actualité Juridique Droit Administratif 355Google Scholar

Böckenförde, Ernst Wolfgang (1991), Grundrechte als Grundsatznormen. Zur Gegenwärtigen Lage der Grundrechtsdogmatik, in Staat, Verfassung, Demokratie: Studien zur Verfassungstheorie und zum Verfassungsrecht 185 (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp)Google Scholar

Bomhoff, Jacco (2010), Genealogies of Balancing as Discourse, 4 Law & Ethics of Human Rights 108Google Scholar

Bomhoff, Jacco (2012a), Perfectionism in European Law, in 14 Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies 75 (Barnard, Catherine, Gehring, Markus and Solanke, Iyiola eds.) (Oxford: Hart)Google Scholar

Bomhoff, Jacco (2012b), Comparing Legal Argument, in 74 Practice and Theory in Comparative Law (Adams, Maurice and Bomhoff, Jacco eds.) (Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Bomhoff, Jacco (2013a), Balancing Constitutional Rights. The Origins and Meanings of Postwar Legal Discourse (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Bomhoff, Jacco (2013b), Balancing Constitutional Rights: Introduction, 22 LSE Legal Studies Working Paper, available at: papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2343536Google Scholar

Bomhoff, Jacco (2017), Beyond Proportionality: Thinking Comparatively about Constitutional Review and Punitiveness, in Proportionality: New Frontiers, New Challenges 148 (Jackson, Vicki and Tushnet, Mark, eds.) (Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Bousta, Rhita (2007), La spécificité du contrôle constitutionnel français de proportionnalité, Revue Internationale de Droit Comparé 859Google Scholar

Bousta, Rhita (2011), Contrôle constitutionnel de proportionnalité: La ‘spécificité française’ à l’épreuve des évolutions récentes, Revue Française de Droit Constitutionnel 913Google Scholar

Boyron, Sophie (1992), Proportionality in English Administrative Law: A Faulty Translation?, 12 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 237Google Scholar

Bogdanor, Vernon (2009), The New British Constitution (Oxford: Hart)Google Scholar

Brady, Alan (2012), Proportionality and Deference under the UK Human Rights Act: An Institutionally Sensitive Approach (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Braibant, Guy (1974), Le principe de proportionnalité, in Mélanges offerts à Marcel Waline: Le juge et le droit public 297 (Paris: LGDJ)Google Scholar

Brett, Annabel (2002), What Is Intellectual History Now?, in What Is History Now? 113 (Cannadine, David, ed.) (New York: Palgrave Macmillan)Google Scholar

Breyer, Stephen (2010), Making Our Democracy Work: A Judge’s View (New York: Knopf)Google Scholar

Brown, Neville (1978), General Principles of Law and the English Legal System, in New Perspectives for a Common Law of Europe [ Nouvelles perspectives d’un droit commun de l’Europe] 177 (Cappelletti, Mauro and Brown, Neville, eds.) (Publications of the European University Institute. Leiden; London: Sijthoff)Google Scholar

Browne-Wilkinson, Nick (1992), The Infiltration of a Bill of Rights, Public Law 397Google Scholar

Brunet, Pierre (2004), Vouloir pour la nation: Le concept de représentation dans la théorie de l’État (Rouen: Publications de l’Université de Rouen)Google Scholar

Brunet, Pierre (2005a), Le juge constitutionnel est-il un juge comme les autres? Réflexions méthodologiques sur la justice constitutionnelle, in La notion de ‘justice constitutionnelle’ (Institut de recherches Carré de Malberg) (Paris: Dalloz)Google Scholar

Brunet, Pierre (2005b), Que reste-t-il de la volonté générale? Sur les nouvelles fictions du droit constitutionnel français, 114 Pouvoirs 5Google Scholar

Cadiet, Loïc (2016), Introduction, La Semaine Juridique, Numéro Spécial: Regards d’universitaires sur la réforme de la Cour de cassation (conférence-débat 24 novembre 2015) 10Google Scholar

de Malberg, Raymond Carré (1931), La loi, expression de la volonté générale: Étude sur le concept de la loi dans la Constitution de 1875 (Paris: Sirey)Google Scholar

Cassia, Paul and Saulnier, Emmanuelle (1997), Le Conseil d’État et la Convention européenne des droits de l’Homme, Actualité Juridique Droit Administratif 411Google Scholar

Cassin, René, Waline, Marcel, Weil, Prosper, Marceau, Long and Braibant, Guy (1956), Les grands arrêts de la jurisprudence administrative (1st ed.) (Paris: Sirey)Google Scholar

Champeil-Desplats, Véronique (2012), Le Conseil constitutionnel a-t-il une conception des libertés publiques?, 7 Jus Politicum, available at: juspoliticum.com/article/Le-Conseil-constitutionnel-a-t-il-une-conception-des-libertes-publiques-402.htmlGoogle Scholar

Champeil-Desplats, Véronique (2016), Méthodologies du droit et des sciences du droit (Paris: Dalloz)Google Scholar

Chevallier, Jacques (2002), Doctrine juridique et science juridique, 50 Droit et Société 103Google Scholar

Chevallier, Jacques and Lochak, Danièle (1978), Science administrative (Paris: LGDJ)Google Scholar

Choudhry, Sujit, ed. (2006), The Migration of Constitutional Ideas (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Christoffersen, Jonas (2009), Fair Balance: Proportionality, Subsidiarity and Primarity in the European Convention on Human Rights (Leiden; Boston, MA: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers)Google Scholar

Chryssogonos, Kostas (2000), Μια βεβαιωτικh αναθεΩρηση. Η αναθεΩρηση των διατaξεων του Συντaγματος για τα ατομικa και κοινωνικa δικαιωματα [A Confirmatory Amendment. The Amendment of the Constitutional Provisions on Individual and Social Rights] (Αthens: Αντ. Ν. Σάκκουλας)Google Scholar

Chryssogonos, Kostas (2001a), Η ενσωματωση της Ευρωπαϊκης Συμβασης των Δικαιωματων του Ανθρωπου στην εθνικη eννομη ταξη [The Incorporation of the European Convention on Human Rights into the National Legal Order] (Αthens; Komotini: Αντ. Ν. Σάκκουλας)Google Scholar

Chryssogonos, Kostas (2001b), Η προστασία των θεμελιωδών δικαιωμάτων στην Ελλάδα πριν και μετά την αναθεώρηση του 2001 [The Protection of Fundamental Rights in Greece before and after the 2001 Reform], 10 Δικαιωματα του Ανθρωπου 529Google Scholar

Clapham, Andrew (1993), Human Rights in the Private Sphere (Oxford; New York: Clarendon Press; Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Clayton, Richard (2002), Proportionality and the HRA 1998: Implications for Substantive Review, Judicial Review 124Google Scholar

Clayton, Richard (2004), Judicial Deference and Democratic Dialogue: The Legitimacy of Judicial Intervention under the Human Rights Act 1998, Public Law 33Google Scholar

Clayton, Richard (2014), The Curious Case of Kennedy v Charity Commission, UK Constitutional Law Association Blog (18 April 2014), available at: ukconstitutionallaw.orgGoogle Scholar

Cohen, Morris (1953), Law and Scientific Method, in Jurisprudence in Action: A Pleader’s Anthology (London: Sweet & Maxwell)Google Scholar

Cohen-Eliya, Moshe and Porat, Iddo (2010), American Balancing and German Proportionality: The Historical Origins, 8 International Journal of Constitutional Law 263Google Scholar

Cohen-Eliya, Moshe and Porat, Iddo (2013), Proportionality and Constitutional Culture (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Cohen-Eliya, Moshe and Porat, Iddo (2017), The Administrative Origins of Constitutional Rights and Global Constitutionalism, in Proportionality: New Frontiers, New Challenges 75 (Jackson, Vicki and Tushnet, Mark, eds.) (Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Cohn, Margit (2010), Legal Transplant Chronicles: The Evolution of Unreasonableness and Proportionality Review of the Administration in the United Kingdom, 58 American Journal of Comparative Law 583Google Scholar

Contiades, Xenophon (2002), Ο νeος συνταγματισμoς και τα θεμελιωδη δικαιωματα μετa την αναθεωρηση του 2001 [The New Constitutionalism and Fundamental Rights after the 2001 Reform] (Αthens; Komotini: Αντ. Ν. Σάκκουλας)Google Scholar

Contiades, Xenophon and Fotiadou, Alkmene (2012a), Social Rights in the Age of Proportionality: Global Economic Crisis and Constitutional Litigation, 10 International Journal of Constitutional Law 660CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Contiades, Xenophon and Fotiadou, Alkmene (2012b), Κοινωνικά δικαιώματα, αναλογικότητα και δημοσιονομική κρίση, θεωρητικές επισημάνσεις επ’ ευκαιρία της ΟλΣΕ 668/2012 [Social Rights, Proportionality and Financial Crisis: Theoretical Remarks on the Occasion of StE (Pl.) 668/2012], 53 Δικαιωματα του Ανθρωπου 27Google Scholar

Costa, Jean-Paul (1988), Le principe de proportionnalité dans la jurisprudence du Conseil d’État, Actualité Juridique Droit Administratif 434Google Scholar

Cotterrell, Roger (2006), Comparative Law and Legal Culture, in The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law 710 (Reimann, Mathias and Zimmermann, Reinhard, eds.) (Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Cotterrell, Roger (2007), Is It so Bad to Be Different? Comparative Law and the Appreciation of Diversity, in Comparative Law: A Handbook 133 (Örücü, Esin and Nelken, David, eds.) (Oxford; Portland, OR: Hart)Google Scholar

Craig, Paul (1989), Administrative Law (2nd ed.) (London: Sweet & Maxwell)Google Scholar

Craig, Paul (1994), Administrative Law (3rd ed.) (London: Sweet & Maxwell)Google Scholar

Craig, Paul (1997), Formal and Substantive Conceptions of the Rule of Law: An Analytical Framework, Public Law 467Google Scholar

Craig, Paul (1999a), Unreasonableness and Proportionality in UK Law, in The Principle of Proportionality in the Laws of Europe 107 (Elllis, Evelyn, ed.) (London: Bloomsbury Publishing)Google Scholar

Craig, Paul (1999b), Competing Models of Judicial Review, Public Law 428Google Scholar

Craig, Paul (2013), The Nature of Reasonableness Review, 66 Current Legal Problems 131Google Scholar

Craig, Paul (2016), Administrative Law (8th ed.) (London: Sweet & Maxwell)Google Scholar

Craig, Paul (2017), Proportionality and Judicial Review: A UK Historical Perspective, in General Principles of Law, European and Comparative Perspectives (Vogenauer, Stephan and Weatherill, Stephen, eds.) (Oxford: Hart)Google Scholar

Craig, Paul (2018), EU Administrative Law (3rd ed.) (Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Dagtoglou, Prodromos (1985), Ευρωπαϊκo Κοινοτικo Δiκαιο [European Community Law] (2nd ed.) (Αthens: Αντ. Σάκκουλας)Google Scholar

Dagtoglou, Prodromos (1986), Δημόσιο συμφέρον και Σύνταγμα [Public Interest and the Constitution], Το Συνταγμα 425Google Scholar

Dagtoglou, Prodromos (1991), Συνταγματικo Δiκαιο. Ατομικa Δικαιωματα [Constitutional Law. Individual Rights] (1st ed.) (Athens; Komotini: Αντ. Ν. Σάκκουλας)Google Scholar

Dagtoglou, Prodromos (2004), Γενικο Διοικητικο Δικαιο [General Administrative Law] (4th ed.) (Αthens; Komotini: Αντ. Σάκκουλας)Google Scholar

Dagtoglou, Prodromos (2005), Συνταγματικo Δiκαιο. Ατομικa Δικαιωματα [Constitutional Law. Individual Rights] (2nd rev. ed.) (Αthens; Komotini: Αντ. Ν. Σάκκουλας)Google Scholar

Dagtoglou, Prodromos (2015), Συνταγματικo Δiκαιο. Ατομικa Δικαιωματα [Constitutional Law. Individual Rights] (7th ed.) (Αthens; Komotini: Αντ. Ν. Σάκκουλας)Google Scholar

Dalakouras, Theocharis (1993), Η αρχh της αναλογικότητας και τα μeτρα δικονομικου καταναγκασμου [The Principle of Proportionality and Coercive Measures in Criminal Proceedings] (Thessaloniki: Σάκκουλα)Google Scholar

Daly, Paul (2016), Proportionality and Rationality: The Debate Goes On, Administrative Law Matters Blog (17 February 2016), available at: www.administrativelawmatters.comGoogle Scholar

Daly, Paul (2020a), The Covid-19 Pandemic and Proportionality: A Framework, Administrative Law Matters Blog (31 March 2020), available at: www.administrativelawmatters.comGoogle Scholar

Daly, Paul (2020b), The Culture of Justification in Administrative Law, UK Constitutional Law Association Blog (6 July 2020), available at: ukconstitutionallaw.orgGoogle Scholar

Dashwood, Alan (1996), The Limits of European Community Powers, 21 European Law Review 113Google Scholar

Davies, Anne and Williams, Jack (2015), Proportionality in English Law, in The Judge and the Proportionate Use of Discretion: A Comparative Study 73 (Ranchordás, Sofia and Willem, Boudewijn de Waard, Nicolaas, eds.) (New York: Routledge)Google Scholar

Davies, Gareth (2012), Constitutional Disagreement in Europe and the Search for Pluralism, in Constitutional Pluralism in the European Union and beyond 269 (Komárek, Jan and Avbelj, Matej, eds.) (Oxford: Hart)Google Scholar

Davies, Gareth (2016), Free Movement, the Quality of Life, and the Myth That the Court Balances Interests, in Exceptions from EU Free Movement Law. Derogation, Justification and Proportionality 218 (Oxford: Hart)Google Scholar

Dawson, John Philip (1978), The Oracles of the Law (Westport, CO: Greenwood Press)Google Scholar

de Béchillon, Denys (2016), Observations sur le contrôle de proportionnalité, La Semaine Juridique, Numéro Spécial: Regards d’universitaires sur la réforme de la Cour de cassation (conférence-débat 24 novembre 2015) 27Google Scholar

de Búrca, Gráinne (1993a), Fundamental Human Rights and the Reach of EC Law, 13 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 283Google Scholar

de Búrca, Gráinne (1993b), The Principle of Proportionality and Its Application in EC Law, 13 Yearbook of European Law 105Google Scholar

de Búrca, Gráinne (1995), The Language of Rights and European Integration, in New Legal Dynamics of European Union 29 (Shaw, Jo and More, Gillian, eds.) (New York: Clarendon Press)Google Scholar

de Búrca, Gráinne (2002), Convergence and Divergence in European Public Law: The Case of Human Rights, in Convergence and Divergence in European Public Law 131 (Beaumont, Paul, Lyons, Carole and Walker, Neil, eds.) (Oxford; Portland, OR: Hart)Google Scholar

de Búrca, Gráinne (2013), After the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: The Court of Justice as a Human Rights Adjudicator?, 20 Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 168Google Scholar

de Búrca, Gráinne, De Witte, Bruno and Ogertschnig, Larissa (2005), Social Rights in Europe (New York: Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

de Laubadère, André (1974), Le contrôle juridictionnel du pouvoir discrétionnaire dans la jurisprudence récente du Conseil d’État français, in Mélanges offerts à Marcel Waline: le juge et le droit public 531 (Paris: LGDJ)Google Scholar

de Smith, Stanley Alexander (1959), Judicial Review of Administrative Action (New York: Oceana Publications)Google Scholar

de Smith, Stanley Alexander (1971), Constitutional and Administrative Law (London: Penguin Books)Google Scholar

de Smith, Stanley Alexander, Woolf, Harry, Jowell, Jeffrey and Sueur, Andrew Le (1995), Judicial Review of Administrative Action (5th ed.) (London: Sweet & Maxwell)Google Scholar

de Smith, Stanley Alexander, Woolf, Harry, Jowell, Jeffrey and Sueur, Andrew Le (2018), Judicial Review of Administrative Action (8th ed.) (London: Sweet & Maxwell)Google Scholar

De Witte, Bruno (1999), The Past and Future Role of the European Court of Justice in the Protection of Human Rights, in The EU and Human Rights 859 (Alston, Philip, ed.) (Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

De Witte, Floris (2013), Sex, Drugs & EU Law: The Recognition of Ethical and Moral Diversity in Europe, 50 Common Market Law Review 1545Google Scholar

Dekleris, Michail (1996), Ο δωδεκαδελτος του περιβαλλοντος. Εγκολπιο βιωσιμου αναπτυξεως [The Twelve Tables of the Environment. A Handbook of Sustainable Growth] (Αthens; Komotini: Αντ. Ν. Σάκκουλας)Google Scholar

Delmas-Marty, Mireille (2017), De l’état d’urgence au despotisme doux, Libération, 16 July 2017Google Scholar

Delvolvé, Pierre (2016), Droits subjectifs contre interdit législatif, Revue Française de Droit Administratif 754Google Scholar

Denning, Alfred (1949), Freedom under the Law (London: Stevens & Sons)Google Scholar

Deumier, Pascale (2016), Contrôle concret de conventionnalité: L’esprit et la méthode, Revue Trimestrielle de Droit Civil 578Google Scholar

Di Manno, Thierry (1999), Le juge constitutionnel et la technique des décisions ‘interprétatives’ en France et en Italie (Paris: Economica)Google Scholar

Dicey, Albert Venn (1939), Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution (9th ed.) (London: Macmillan & Co.)Google Scholar

Dimitropoulos, Andreas (1981), Τα αμυντικa δικαιωματα του ανθρωπου και η μεταβολh της eννομης τaξης [Negative Human Rights and the Transformation of the Legal Order] (Athens; Komotini: Αντ. Ν. Σάκκουλας)Google Scholar

Doris, Filippos (2004), Η αρχή της αναλογικότητας στο πεδίο ρύθμισης των ιδιωτικού δικαίου σχέσεων και ιδιαίτερα στο αστικό δίκαιο [The Principle of Proportionality in the Field of Private Law Relations and Especially in Civil Law], in Τoμος τιμητικoς του Συμβουλiου της Επικρατεiας – 75 χρoνια 229 (Thessaloniki: Σάκκουλα)Google Scholar

Drago, Guillaume (1991), La conciliation entre principes constitutionnels, Recueil Dalloz 265Google Scholar

Dreyfus, Françoise (1974), Les limitations du pouvoir discrétionnaire par l’application du principe de proportionnalité: À propos de trois jugements du tribunal administratif de l’OIT, Revue du Droit Public 691Google Scholar

Drossos, Yannis (1996), Δοκiμιο ελληνικης συνταγματικhς θεωρiας [Essay on Greek Constitutional Theory] (Αthens; Komotini: Αντ. Ν. Σάκκουλας)Google Scholar

Dubouis, Louis (1962), La théorie de l’abus de droit et la jurisprudence administrative (Paris: LGDJ)Google Scholar

Duclerq, Jean-Baptiste (2015), Les mutations du contrôle de proportionnalité dans la jurisprudence du Conseil constitutionnel (Paris: LGDJ)Google Scholar

de Lamothe, Olivier Dutheillet (2008), La Convention européenne et le Conseil constitutionnel, Revue Internationale de Droit Comparé 293Google Scholar

de Lamothe, Louis Dutheillet and Odinet, Guillaume (2016), Contrôle de conventionnalité: In concreto veritas?, Actualité Juridique Droit Administratif 1398Google Scholar

Dworkin, Ronald (1967), The Model of Rules, 35 University of Chicago Law Review 14Google Scholar

Dworkin, Ronald (1978), Taking Rights Seriously (new impression, with a reply to critics) (London: Duckworth)Google Scholar

Dworkin, Ronald (1986), Law’s Empire (London: Fontana)Google Scholar

Dyzenhaus, David, Hunt, Murray and Taggart, Michael (2001), The Principle of Legality in Administrative Law: Internationalisation as Constitutionalisation, Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal 5Google Scholar

Eisenmann, Charles (1933), L’esprit des lois et la séparation des pouvoirs, in Mélanges Raymond Carré de Malberg 165 (Paris: Duchemin)Google Scholar

Elliott, Mark (2001), The Human Rights Act 1998 and the Standard of Substantive Review, 60 Cambridge Law Journal 301Google Scholar

Elliott, Mark (2013), Justification, Calibration and Substantive Judicial Review: Putting Doctrine in Its Place, UK Constitutional Law Association Blog (17 September 2013), available at: ukconstitutionallaw.orgGoogle Scholar

Elliott, Mark (2014), Common-Law Constitutionalism and Proportionality in the Supreme Court: Kennedy v The Charity Commission, Public Law for Everyone Blog (31 March 2014), available at: publiclawforeveryone.comGoogle Scholar

Elliott, Mark (2015a), A Tangled Constitutional Web: The Black-Spider Memos and the British Constitution’s Relational Architecture, Public Law 539Google Scholar

Elliott, Mark (2015b), Proportionality and Contextualism in Common-Law Review: The Supreme Court’s Judgment in Pham, Public Law for Everyone Blog (17 April 2015), available at: publiclawforeveryone.comGoogle Scholar

Etoa, Samuel (2011), La terminologie des ‘droits fondamentaux’ dans la jurisprudence du Conseil constitutionnel, 9 Cahiers de la Recherche sur les Droits Fondamentaux 23Google Scholar

Fatin-Rouge Stéfanini, Marthe and Philippe, Xavier (2011), Jurisprudence du Conseil constitutionnel octobre 2010–mars 2011, Revue Française de Droit Constitutionnel 547Google Scholar

Favoreu, Louis (1985), Note sous décision no. 84–181 DC, Revue du Droit Public 395Google Scholar

Favoreu, Louis (2001), Droit des libertés fondamentales (2nd ed.) (Paris: Dalloz)Google Scholar

Favoreu, Louis and Philip, Loïc (1975), Les grandes décisions du Conseil constitutionnel (1st ed.) (Paris: Dalloz-Sirey)Google Scholar

Favoreu, Louis, Philip, Loïc, Gaïa, Patrick, Ghevontian, Richard and Roux, André (2018), Les grandes décisions du Conseil constitutionnel (19th ed.) (Paris: Dalloz)Google Scholar

Fenwick, Helen (2012), What’s Wrong with s.2 of the Human Rights Act?, UK Constitutional Law Association Blog (9 October 2012), available at: ukconstitutionallaw.orgGoogle Scholar

Flogaitis, Spyridon (1986), Administrative law et droit administratif (Paris: Pichon et Durand-Auzias)Google Scholar

Fordham, Michael and de la Mare, Thomas (2001), Identifying the Principles of Proportionality, in Understanding Human Rights Principles 27 (Jowell, Jeffrey and Cooper, Jonathan, eds.) (Oxford; Portland, OR: Hart)Google Scholar

Forsthoff, Ernst (1971), Der Staat der Industriegesellschaft: Dargestellt am Beispiel der Bundesrepublik Deutschland (München: Beck)Google Scholar

Foucault, Michel (1969), L’archéologie du savoir (Paris: Gallimard)Google Scholar

Foulquier, Norbert (2003), Les droits publics subjectifs des administrés: Émergence d’un concept en droit administratif français du XIXe au XXe siècle (Paris: Dalloz)Google Scholar

Fraisse, Régis (2009), Le Conseil constitutionnel exerce un contrôle conditionné, diversifié et modulé de la proportionnalité, 46 Les Petites Affiches, Numéro Spécial 74Google Scholar

François, Bastien (1990), Une revendication de juridiction. Compétence et justice dans le droit constitutionnel de la Ve République, 3 Politix 92Google Scholar

Friedman, Lawrence and Teubner, Gunther (1986), Legal Education and Legal Integration: European Hopes and American Experience, in Integration Through Law: Forces and Potential for a European Identity 345 (Cappelletti, Mauro, Seccombe, Monica and Weiler, Joseph, eds.) (Berlin: de Gruyter)Google Scholar

Fromont, Michel (1995), Le principe de proportionnalité, Actualité Juridique Droit Administratif, Numéro Spécial 156Google Scholar

Garapon, Antoine (1995), French Legal Culture and the Shock of ‘Globalization’, 4 Social and Legal Studies, Special issue on Legal culture, Diversity and Globalization 493Google Scholar

Gardbaum, Stephen (2017), Positive and Horizontal Rights: Proportionality’s Next Frontier or a Bridge Too Far?, in Proportionality: New Frontiers, New Challenges 221 (Jackson, Vicki and Tushnet, Mark, eds.) (Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Gaudemet, Yves (1998), Les nouvelles méthodes du juge administratif français, in État-loi-administration. Mélanges en l’honneur de Epaminondas Spiliotopoulos 147 (Pararas, Petros, ed.) (Athens; Brussels: Αντ. Ν. Σάκκουλας; Bruylant)Google Scholar

Gaudemet, Yves (2013), Les méthodes du juge administratif (Paris: LGDJ)Google Scholar

Gearty, Conor (2007), Civil Liberties (Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Gearty, Conor (2014), The Tories’ Proposal for a British Bill of Rights Is Incoherent, but They Don’t Care, The Guardian, 3 October 2014Google Scholar

Geertz, Clifford (1983), Local Knowledge: Further Essays in Interpretive Anthropology (New York: Basic Books)Google Scholar

Geertz, Clifford (2000), The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays (New York: Basic Books)Google Scholar

Genevois, Bruno (1988), L’application du principe de proportionnalité aux amendes fiscales (à propos de la décision du Conseil constitutionnel no. 87–237 DC du 30 décembre 1987), Revue Française de Droit Administratif 350Google Scholar

Genevois, Bruno (1989), Le Conseil constitutionnel et la définition des pouvoirs du Conseil supérieur de l’audiovisuel, Revue Française de Droit Administratif 215Google Scholar

Gény, François (1919), Méthodes d’interprétation et sources en droit privé positif (Paris: LGDJ)Google Scholar

Gerapetritis, George (1997), Proportionality in Administrative Law: Judicial Review in France, Greece, England and in the European Community (Athens: Σάκκουλα)Google Scholar

Gerapetritis, George (2005), Στο δρόμο για την θεσμικά ισόρροπη παρέμβαση του δικαστή [Towards an Institutionally Balanced Judicial Intervention], 25 Δικαιωματα του Ανθρωπου 187Google Scholar

Gerapetritis, George (2006), Πρόσωπα και προσωπεία του ελέγχου της αναλογικότητας [Faces and Guises of Proportionality Review], ΙV Δικαιωματα του Ανθρωπου 269Google Scholar

Gerapetritis, George (2012), Συνταγμα και Βουλη. Αυτονομια και ανελεγκτο των εσωτερικων του σωματος [Constitution and Parliament. Autonomy and the Exemption of the Interna Corporis Affairs from Judicial Review] (Athens: Νομική Βιβλιοθήκη)Google Scholar

Gerontas, Apostolos (1983), Η αρχή της αναλογικότητας στο γερμανικό δημόσιο δίκαιο [The Principle of Proportionality in German Public Law], Το Συνταγμα 20Google Scholar

Gerontas, Apostolos (2006), Η αρχή της αναλογικότητας και η τριτενέργεια των θεμελιωδών δικαιωμάτων μετά την αναθεώρηση του 2001 [The Principle of Proportionality and the Third-Party Effect of Fundamental Rights after the 2001 Reform], in Πeντε χρoνια μετa τη συνταγματικh αναθεωρηση του 2001 462 (Contiades, Xenophon, ed.) (Αthens; Komotini: Αντ. Ν. Σάκκουλας)Google Scholar

Giakoumis, Dionysis (2005), Οι αόριστες έννοιες, η διακριτική ευχέρεια του δικαστή ως αόριστη νομική έννοια, η εξειδίκευσή της και η δυνατότητα αναιρετικού ελέγχου υπό το πρίσμα της αρχής της αναλογικότητας [Indeterminate Notions, Judicial Discretion as an Indeterminate Legal Notion, Its Concretisation, and the Possibility of Cassation under the Framework of the Principle of Proportionality], 36 Δiκη 48Google Scholar

Girard, Didier (2015), La France devant la Cour européenne des droits de l’Homme: Contribution à l’analyse du comportement étatique devant une juridiction internationale (Paris: L’Harmattan)Google Scholar

Glenn, Patrick (2004), Legal Cultures and Legal Traditions, in Epistemology and Methodology of Comparative Law: Epistemology and Methodology of Comparative Law 7 (Van Hoecke, Mark, ed.) (London: Bloomsbury Publishing)Google Scholar

Goesel-Le Bihan, Valérie (1997), Réflexion iconoclaste sur le contrôle de proportionnalité exercé par le conseil constitutionnel, Revue Française de Droit Constitutionnel 227Google Scholar

Goesel-Le Bihan, Valérie (2001), Le contrôle exercé par le Conseil constitutionnel: Défense et illustration d’une théorie générale, Revue Française de Droit Constitutionnel 67Google Scholar

Goesel-Le Bihan, Valérie (2007a), Le contrôle de proportionnalité dans la jurisprudence du Conseil constitutionnel: Figures récentes, Revue Française de Droit Constitutionnel 269Google Scholar

Goesel-Le Bihan, Valérie (2007b), Le contrôle de proportionnalité exercé par le Conseil constitutionnel, 22 Cahiers du Conseil constitutionnel, Dossier: Le réalisme en droit constitutionnel, available at: www.conseil-constitutionnel.fr/nouveaux-cahiers-du-conseil-constitutionnel/le-controle-de-proportionnalite-exerce-par-le-conseil-constitutionnelGoogle Scholar

Goesel-Le Bihan, Valérie (2012), Le contrôle de proportionnalité exercé par le Conseil constitutionnel, technique de protection des libertés publiques ?, 7 Jus Politicum, available at: juspoliticum.com/article/Le-controle-de-proportionnalite-exerce-par-le-Conseil-constitutionnel-technique-de-protection-des-libertes-publiques-456.htmlGoogle Scholar

Gogos, Konstantinos (2005), Πτυχές του ελέγχου αναλογικότητας στη νομολογία του Συμβουλίου της Επικρατείας [Aspects of Proportionality Review in the Case Law of the Council of State], ΙΙΙ Δικαιωματα του Ανθρωπου 299Google Scholar

Goldenberg, Léo (1932), Le Conseil d’État, juge du fait (Paris: Dalloz)Google Scholar

Graziadei, Michele (2003), The Functionalist Heritage, in Comparative Legal Studies: Traditions and Transitions 100 (Legrand, Pierre and Munday, Roderick, eds.) (Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Graziadei, Michele (2006), Comparative Law as the Study of Transplants and Receptions, in Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law 441 (Reimann, Mathias and Zimmermann, Reinhard, eds.) (Oxford: Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Green, Nicholas (1999), Proportionality and the Supremacy of Parliament in the UK, in The Principle of Proportionality in the Laws of Europe 145 (Elllis, Evelyn, ed.) (London: Bloomsbury Publishing)Google Scholar

Griffith, John (1981), The Politics of the Judiciary (London: Fontana)Google Scholar

Griffith, John (2000), The Brave New World of Sir John Laws, 63 Modern Law Review 159Google Scholar

Grimm, Dieter (2007), Proportionality in Canadian and German Constitutional Jurisprudence, 57 University of Toronto Law Journal 383Google Scholar

Guibal, Michel (1978), De la proportionnalité, Actualité Juridique Droit Administratif 477Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen (1996), Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press)Google Scholar

Hain, Michael (2017), Guardians of the Constitution – the Constitutional Implications of a Substantive Rule of Law, UK Constitutional Law Association Blog (12 September 2017), available at: ukconstitutionallaw.orgGoogle Scholar

Hale, Brenda (2014), UK Court Rulings Show Move Away from European to Common Law, The Guardian, 15 August 2014Google Scholar

Sendut, Jefferi Hamzah (2019), The Prorogation Case: Proportionality in All but Name?, UK Constitutional Law Association Blog (8 October 2019), available at: ukconstitutionallaw.orgGoogle Scholar

Harlow, Carol (1984), Law and Administration (London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson)Google Scholar

Harlow, Carol (2002), Voices of Difference in a Plural Community, in Convergence and Divergence in European Public Law 177 (Beaumont, Paul, Lyons, Carole and Walker, Neil, eds.) (Oxford; Portland, OR: Hart)Google Scholar

Hart, Herbert (1961), The Concept of Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Hart, Herbert (1983), Essays in Jurisprudence and Philosophy (Oxford; New York: Clarendon Press; Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Hauriou, Maurice (1930), Précis élémentaire de droit constitutionnel (Paris: Sirey)Google Scholar

Hickman, Tom (2010), Public Law after the Human Rights Act (Oxford: Hart)Google Scholar

Hiebert, Janet (2006), Parliament and the Human Rights Act: Can the JCHR Help Facilitate a Culture of Rights?, 4 International Journal of Constitutional Law 1Google Scholar

Hirschl, Ran (2004), Towards Juristocracy: The Origins and Consequences of the New Constitutionalism (Cambridge, MA; London: Harvard University Press)Google Scholar

Hirschl, Ran (2005), The Question of Case Selection in Comparative Constitutional Law, 53 American Journal of Comparative Law 125Google Scholar

Hoffmann, Leonard (1999), The Influence of the European Principle of Proportionality upon UK Law, in The Principle of Proportionality in the Laws of Europe 85 (Elllis, Evelyn, ed.) (London: Bloomsbury Publishing)Google Scholar

Hogg, Quintin, ed. (1989), Halsbury’s Laws of England (London: Butterworths)Google Scholar

Hunt, Murray (1997), Using Human Rights Law in English Courts (Oxford: Hart)Google Scholar

Hunt, Murray (1999), The Human Rights Act and Legal Culture: The Judiciary and the Legal Profession, 26 Journal of Law and Society 86Google Scholar

Hunt, Murray (2003), Sovereignty’s Blight: Why Contemporary Public Law Needs the Concept of ‘Due Deference’, in Public Law in a Multi-Layered Constitution 337 (Bamforth, Nicholas and Leyland, Peter, eds.) (Oxford; Portland, OR: Hart)Google Scholar

Hunt, Murray (2009), Against Bifurcation, in A Simple Common Lawyer: Essays in Honour of Michael Taggart 108 (Dyzenhaus, David, Hunt, Murray and Huscroft, Grant, eds.) (Oxford; Portland, OR: Hart)Google Scholar

Huscroft, Grant, Miller, Bradley and Webber, Grégoire, eds. (2014), Proportionality and the Rule of Law: Rights, Justification, Reasoning (New York: Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Ignatieff, Michael (2005), American Exceptionalism and Human Rights (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press)Google Scholar

Iliopoulou-Stragga, Julia (1996), Ελληνικo συνταγματικo δiκαιο και ευρωπαϊκh ενοποiηση [Greek Constitutional Law and European Integration] (Athens; Komotini: Αντ. Ν. Σάκκουλας)Google Scholar

Jackson, Vicki (2015), Constitutional Law in an Age of Proportionality, 124 Yale Law Journal 3094Google Scholar

Jackson, Vicki (2017), Proportionality and Equality, in Proportionality: New Frontiers, New Challenges 148 (Jackson, Vicki and Tushnet, Mark, eds.) (Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Jamin, Christophe (2015), Juger et motiver. Introduction comparative à la question du contrôle de proportionnalité en matière de droits fondamentaux, historique des travaux de la commission de réflexion sur la réforme de la cour de cassation, available at: www.courdecassation.fr/cour_cassation_1/reforme_cour_7109/introduction_comparative_31563.htmlGoogle Scholar

Jamin, Christophe and Melleray, Fabrice (2018), Droit civil et droit administratif. Dialogues sur un modèle doctrinal (Paris: Dalloz)Google Scholar

Jeuland, Emmanuel (2016), Réforme de la Cour de cassation. Une approche non utilitariste du contrôle de proportionnalité, La Semaine Juridique, Numéro Spécial: Regards d’universitaires sur la réforme de la Cour de cassation (conférence-débat 24 novembre 2015) 20Google Scholar

von Jhering, Rudolf (1985), In the Heaven for Legal Concepts: A Fantasy (Charlotte Levy, trans.), 58 Temple Law Quarterly 799Google Scholar

Jouanjan, Olivier (2003), De la vocation de notre temps pour la science du droit: Modèles scientifiques et preuve de la validité des énoncés juridiques, XLI-128 Revue européenne des sciences sociales 129Google Scholar

Jowell, Jeffrey (2000), Beyond the Rule of Law: Towards Constitutional Judicial Review, Public Law 671Google Scholar

Jowell, Jeffrey (2003a), Judicial Deference and Human Rights: A Question of Competence, in Law and Administration in Europe: Essays in Honour of Carol Harlow 67 (Craig, Paul and Rawlings, Richard, eds.) (Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Jowell, Jeffrey (2003b), Judicial Deference: Servility, Civility or Institutional Capacity?, Public Law 592Google Scholar

Jowell, Jeffrey (2015), Proportionality and Unreasonableness: Neither Merger nor Takeover, in The Scope and Intensity of Substantive Review 41 (Wilberg, Hanna and Elliott, Mark, eds.) (Oxford: Hart)Google Scholar

Jowell, Jeffrey (2018), Proportionality in the United Kingdom, (Speech at the conférence-débat du Centre de Droit Public Comparé sur Le principe de proportionnalité, Centre Panthéon, 8 février 2018) Revue Générale du Droit, available at: www.revuegeneraledudroit.eu/?p=29678Google Scholar

Jowell, Jeffrey and Lester, Anthony (1988a), Beyond Wednesbury: Substantive Principles of Administrative Law, 14 Commonwealth Law Bulletin 858Google Scholar

Jowell, Jeffrey and Lester, Anthony (1988b), Proportionality: Neither Novel nor Dangerous, in New Directions in Judicial Review 51 (Jowell, Jeffrey and Oliver, Dawn, eds.) (London: Stevens)Google Scholar

Kahn, Jean (1973), Note sous CE Ass., 26 October 1973, Grassin, Actualité Juridique Droit Administratif 586Google Scholar

Kahn, Jean (1978), Le pouvoir discrétionnaire du juge administratif, in Le pouvoir discrétionnaire et le juge administratif 9 (Institut Français des Sciences Administratives, ed.) (Paris: Cujas)Google Scholar

Kahn, Paul (1978), The Court, the Community and the Judicial Balance: The Jurisprudence of Justice Powell, 97 Yale Law Journal 9Google Scholar

Kahn, Paul (2004), Comparative Constitutionalism in a New Key, 101 Michigan Law Review 2677Google Scholar

Kahn-Freund, Otto (1974), On Uses and Misuses of Comparative Law, 37 Modern Law Review 1Google Scholar

Kaidatzis, Akritas (2006), Παρατηρήσεις σχετικά με τις ΣτΕ (Ολ.) 1991/2005 και ΔΕΚ C-140/2003, 21.4.2005 Επιτροπή Κατά Ελλάδας [Comment on StE (Pl.) 1991/2005 and ECJ C-140/03, 21 April 2005, Commission v Greece], Το Σyνταγμα 181Google Scholar

Kaidatzis, Akritas (2010), Δικαστικός έλεγχος των μέτρων οικονομικής πολιτικής. Nομολογιακές τάσεις και προσαρμογές στο μεταβαλλόμενο οικονομικο-πολιτικό περιβάλλον [Judicial Review of Economic Policy Measures. Jurisprudential Tendencies and Adaptation to the Changing Economic-Political Context], Constitutionalism.gr Blog (10 June 2010), available at: www.constitutionalism.grGoogle Scholar

Kaidatzis, Akritas (2011), ‘Μεγάλη πολιτική’ και ασθενής δικαστικός έλεγχος. Ένα σχόλιο για τις στρατηγικές τήρησης του Συντάγματος στην εποχή του ‘Μνημονίου’ [‘Big Policy’ and Weak Judicial Review. A Comment on the Strategies for Observing the Constitution in the Age of the ‘Memorandum’], Constitutionalism.gr Blog (21 March 2011), available at: www.constitutionalism.grGoogle Scholar

Kaidatzis, Akritas (2013), Ο έλεγχος της συνταγματικότητας των νόμων στην Ελλάδα, ενόψει της διάκρισης σε συστήματα ισχυρού και ασθενούς τύπου [Judicial Review of the Constitutionality of Legislation in Greece, in View of the Distinction between Strong and Weak Systems], Constitutionalism.gr Blog (9 April 2013), available at: www.constitutionalism.grGoogle Scholar

Kalflèche, Grégory (2009), Le contrôle de proportionnalité exercé par les juridictions administratives, 46 Les Petites Affiches, Numéro Spécial 46Google Scholar

Kalligas, Pavlos (1842), Η εξaντλησις των κομμaτων, hτοι ηθικa γεγονoτα της κοινωνiας μας [The Effeteness of Political Parties, Namely Moral Issues of Our Society] (Athens: Μελαχούρης – Καραμπίνης)Google Scholar

Kamtsidou, Ifigeneia (2001), Η επιφyλαξη υπeρ του νΟμου [The Clause of Legislative Competence] (Athens; Thessaloniki: Σάκκουλα)Google Scholar

Kapsali, Vassiliki (2006), Η αρχή της αναλογικότητας στο γαλλικό δημόσιο δίκαιο [The Principle of Proportionality in French Public Law], ΙV Δικαιωματα του Ανθρωπου 309Google Scholar

Karamanof, Maria (2011), Βιωσιμο κρατος και δημοσια κτηση. Τα oρια των ιδιωτικοποιhσεων [Sustainable State and Public Property. The Limits of Privatization] (Athens: Κυριακίδης Π.)Google Scholar

Karr, Alphonse (1871), Plus ça change et plus c’est la même chose: Notes de voyage (Nice: A. Gilletta)Google Scholar

Kassimatis, Giorgos (1977), Παρατηρήσεις στην ΣτΕ (Ολ.) 58/1977 [Comment on StE (Pl.) 58/1977], Το Συνταγμα 625Google Scholar

Katrougkalos, Giorgos (2001), Νομική και πολιτική σημασία της αναθεώρησης του άρθρου 25 του Συντάγματος [Legal and Political Significance of the Amendment of Article 25 of the Constitution], 10 Δικαιωματα του Ανθρωπου 457Google Scholar

Katrougkalos, Giorgos (2006), Αρχή της αναλογικότητας και κοινωνικά δικαιώματα [The Principle of Proportionality and Social Rights], ΙV Δικαιωματα του Ανθρωπου 141Google Scholar

Kavanagh, Aileen (2009), Constitutional Review under the UK Human Rights Act (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Kavanagh, Aileen (2014), Proportionality and Parliamentary Debates: Exploring Some Forbidden Territory, 34 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 443Google Scholar

Keller, Helen and Sweet, Alec Stone (2008), Assessing the Impact of the ECHR on National Legal Orders, in A Europe of Rights: The Impact of the ECHR on National Legal Systems 675 (Keller, Helen and Sweet, Alec Stone, eds.) (Oxford: Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Keller, Helen and Sweet, Alec Stone, eds. (2008), A Europe of Rights: The Impact of the ECHR on National Legal Systems (Oxford: Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Kennedy, Duncan (1995), American Constitutionalism as Civil Religion: Notes of an Atheist, 19 Nova Law Review 908Google Scholar

Kennedy, Duncan (2011), A Transnational Genealogy of Proportionality in Private Law, in The Foundations of European Private Law 185 (Brownsword, Roger, Micklitz, Hans, Niglia, Leone and Weatherill, Stephen, eds.) (Oxford; Portland, OR: Hart)Google Scholar

Khosla, Madhav (2010), Proportionality: An Assault on Human Rights?: A Reply, 8 International Journal of Constitutional Law 298Google Scholar

King, Jeff (2010), Proportionality: A Halfway House, New Zealand Law Review 327Google Scholar

Kirby, Michael (1998), The Struggle for Simplicity: Lord Cooke and Fundamental Rights, 24 Commonwealth Law Bulletin 496Google Scholar

Klatt, Matthias and Meister, Moritz (2012a), The Constitutional Structure of Proportionality (Oxford: Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Klatt, Matthias and Meister, Moritz (2012b), Proportionality – A Benefit to Human Rights? Remarks on the I·CON Controversy, 10 International Journal of Constitutional Law 687Google Scholar

Klug, Francesca and Wildbore, Helen (2010), Follow or Lead?: The Human Rights Act and the European Court of Human Rights, 6 European Human Rights Law Review 621Google Scholar

Komárek, Jan (2013), Reasoning with Previous Decisions: Beyond the Doctrine of Precedence, 61 American Journal of Comparative Law 149Google Scholar

Kommers, Donald (2012), The Constitutional Jurisprudence of the Federal Republic of Germany (Durham, NC: Duke University Press)Google Scholar

Kontogiorga-Theocharopoulou, Dimitra (1989a), Η αρχh της αναλογικoτητας στο εσωτερικo δημoσιο δiκαιο [The Principle of Proportionality in Domestic Public Law] (Thessaloniki: Σάκκουλα)Google Scholar

Kontogiorga-Theocharopoulou, Dimitra (1989b), Σημεία εργασίας επί της αρχής της αναλογικότητος [Elements of Study on the Principle of Proportionality], in Συμμεικτα προς τιμhν Γεωργiου Μ. Παπαχατζh 889 (Athens: Σάκκουλα)Google Scholar

Koumpli, Christina (2010), Un essai sur la clarification de l’inférence: État de droit – principe de proportionnalité, unpublished conference paper (Mexico, 8 December 2010)Google Scholar

Kremnitzer, Mordechai, Steiner, Talya and Lang, Andrej, eds. (2020), Proportionality in Action: Comparative and Empirical Perspectives on the Judicial Practice (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020)Google Scholar

Kroustallakis, Evaggelos (1999), Ελληνική πολιτική δικονομία και κοινοτικό δίκαιο: άμεσες και έμμεσες επιδράσεις [Greek Civil Procedure and Community Law: Direct and Indirect Influences], Δικαιοσυνη 1457Google Scholar

Krygier, Martin (1986), Law as Tradition, 5 Law and Philosophy 237Google Scholar

Kumm, Mattias (2004), Constitutional Rights as Principles: On the Structure and Domain of Constitutional Justice. A Review Essay on A Theory of Constitutional Rights, 2 International Journal of Constitutional Law 574Google Scholar

Kumm, Mattias (2006a), What Do You Have in Virtue of Having a Constitutional Right? On the Place and Limits of the Proportionality Requirement, 46 New York University Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers, available at: papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=952034Google Scholar

Kumm, Mattias (2006b), Who Is Afraid of the Total Constitution? Constitutional Rights as Principles and the Constitutionalization of Private Law, 7 German Law Journal 341Google Scholar

Kumm, Mattias (2007), Political Liberalism and the Structure of Rights: On the Place and Limits of the Proportionality Requirement, in Law, Rights and Discourse: The Legal Philosophy of Robert Alexy 131 (Pavlakos, George, ed.) (Oxford: Hart)Google Scholar

Kumm, Mattias (2009a), Democracy Is Not Enough: Rights, Proportionality and the Point of Judicial Review, 9–10 NYU School of Law, Public Law Research Paper, available at: papers.ssrn.com/abstract =1356793Google Scholar

Kumm, Mattias (2009b), The Cosmopolitan Turn in Constitutionalism: On the Relationship between Constitutionalism in and beyond the State, in Ruling the World?: Constitutionalism, International Law, and Global Governance 258 (Dunoff, Jeffrey and Trachtman, Joel, eds.) (Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Kumm, Mattias (2010), The Idea of Socratic Contestation and the Right to Justification: The Point of Rights-Based Proportionality Review, 41 Law and Ethics of Human Rights 141Google Scholar

Kumm, Mattias (2012), Alexy’s Theory of Constitutional Rights and the Problem of Judicial Review, in Institutionalized Reason: The Jurisprudence of Robert Alexy 201 (Klatt, Matthias, ed.) (Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Kumm, Mattias (2017), Is the Structure of Human Rights Practice Defensible? Three Puzzles and Their Resolution, in Proportionality: New Frontiers, New Challenges 30 (Jackson, Vicki and Tushnet, Mark, eds.) (Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Kumm, Mattias and Walen, Alec (2014), Human Dignity and Proportionality: Deontic Pluralism in Balancing, in Proportionality and the Rule of Law: Rights, Justification, Reasoning 67 (Huscroft, Grant, Miller, Bradley and Webber, Grégoire, eds.) (New York: Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Laferrière, Édouard (1887), Traité de la juridiction administrative et des recours contentieux (Paris: Berger-Levrault et Cie)Google Scholar

Lambert, Édouard (1921), Le gouvernement des juges et la lutte contre la législation sociale aux États-Unis: L’expérience américaine du contrôle judiciaire de la constitutionnalité des lois (Paris: Giard)Google Scholar

Abdelgawad, Elisabeth Lambert and Weber, Anne (2008), The Reception Process in France and Germany, in A Europe of Rights: The Impact of the ECHR on National Legal Systems 107 (Keller, Helen and Stone Sweet, Alec, eds.) (Oxford: Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Lasser, Mitchel (2004), Judicial Deliberations: A Comparative Analysis of Judicial Transparency and Legitimacy (Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Lasser, Mitchel (2009), Judicial Transformations: The Rights Revolution in the Courts of Europe (Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Latour, Bruno (2002), La fabrique du droit: Une ethnographie du Conseil d’État (Paris: La Découverte)Google Scholar

Laws, John (1992), Is the High Court the Guardian of Fundamental Constitutional Rights?, 18 Commonwealth Law Bulletin 1385Google Scholar

Laws, John (1995), Law and Democracy, Public Law 72Google Scholar

Laws, John (1998), The Limitations of Human Rights, Public Law 254Google Scholar

Leckey, Robert (2015), Bills of Rights in the Common Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Legrand, Pierre (1996), European Legal Systems Are Not Converging, 45 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 52Google Scholar

Legrand, Pierre (1997), The Impossibility of Legal Transplants, 4 Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 111Google Scholar

Legrand, Pierre (2002), Public Law, Europeanisation and Convergence, in Convergence and Divergence in European Public Law 225 (Beaumont, Paul, Lyons, Carole and Walker, Neil, eds.) (Oxford; Portland, OR: Hart)Google Scholar

Legrand, Pierre (2003), The Same and the Different, in Comparative Legal Studies: Traditions and Transitions 240 (Legrand, Pierre and Munday, Roderick, eds.) (Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Leigh, Ian (2002), Taking Rights Proportionately: Judicial Review, the Human Rights Act and Strasbourg, Public Law 265Google Scholar

Lemasurier, Jeanne (1974), Vers un nouveau principe général du droit? Le principe ‘bilan-coût-avantages’, in Mélanges offerts à Marcel Waline: Le juge et le droit public 551 (Paris: LGDJ)Google Scholar

Lévi-Strauss, Claude (1955), The Structural Study of Myth, 68 Journal of American Folklore 428Google Scholar

Lévi-Strauss, Claude (1966), The Savage Mind (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press)Google Scholar

Long, Marceau, Weil, Prosper, Braibant, Guy, Delvolvé, Pierre and Genevois, Bruno (2019), Les grands arrêts de la jurisprudence administrative (22nd ed.) (Paris: Dalloz)Google Scholar

Loughlin, Martin (2003), Constitutional Law: The Third Order of the Political, in Public Law in a Multi-Layered Constitution 27 (Bamforth, Nicholas and Leyland, Peter, eds.) (Oxford: Hart)Google Scholar

Loughlin, Martin (2013), The British Constitution: A Very Short Introduction (Oxford: Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Louvel, Bertrand (2016), Réflexions à la Cour de cassation: Contribution à la refondation de la justice, La Semaine Juridique, Numéro Spécial: Regards d’universitaires sur la réforme de la Cour de cassation (conférence-débat 24 novembre 2015) 1Google Scholar

Machaw, Jerry (1985), Due Process in the Administrative State (New Haven, CO: Yale University Press)Google Scholar

Manessis, Aristovoulos (1959), Deux États nés en 1830: Ressemblances et dissemblances constitutionnelles entre la Belgique et la Grèce (Brussels: Maison Ferdinand Larcier)Google Scholar

Manessis, Aristovoulos (1978), Συνταγματικα Δικαιωματα [Constitutional Rights] (Thessaloniki: Σάκκουλα)Google Scholar

Manessis, Aristovoulos (1982), Συνταγματικα Δικαιωματα [Constitutional Rights] (2nd ed.) (Thessaloniki: Σάκκουλα)Google Scholar

Manessis, Aristovoulos (2007), Οι κύριες συνιστώσες του συστήματος θεμελιωδών δικαιωμάτων του Συντάγματος του 1975 [The Main Components of the Fundamental Rights System in the Constitution of 1975], in Συνταγματικh θεωρiα Και Πρaξη 529 (Αthens: Σάκκουλα)Google Scholar

Manitakis, Antonis (1988), Fondement et légitimité du contrôle juridictionnel des lois en Grèce, 40 Revue Internationale de Droit Comparé 39Google Scholar

Manitakis, Antonis (1990a), Η πολυσήμαντη επιστροφή του Κράτους Δικαίου [The Multifaceted Return of the Ideal of a State Ruled by Law], in Όψεις του Κρaτους Δικαiου 27 (Stamatis, Konstantinos and Manitakis, Antonis, eds.) (Thessaloniki: Σάκκουλα)Google Scholar

Manitakis, Antonis (1990b), Πρόλογος [Preface], in Όψεις του Κρaτους Δικαiου 5 (Stamatis, Konstantinos and Manitakis, Antonis, eds.) (Thessaloniki: Σάκκουλα)Google Scholar

Manitakis, Antonis (1994), Κρaτος δικαiου και δικαστικoς eλεγχος της συνταγματικoτητας [The Ideal of a State Ruled by Law and Judicial Review of Constitutionality] (Thessaloniki: Σάκκουλα)Google Scholar

Manitakis, Antonis (1999), Ο δικαστής υπηρέτης του νόμου ή εγγυητής των συνταγματικών δικαιωμάτων και μεσολαβητής διαφορών [The Judge, Servant of the Law or Guarantor of Constitutional Rights and Mediator in Legal Disputes], 47 Νομικo Βhμα 177Google Scholar

Manitakis, Antonis (2003), Ιστορικά γνωρίσματα και λογικά προαπαιτούμενα του δικαστικού ελέγχου της συνταγματικότητας των νόμων στην Ελλάδα [Historical Traits and Logical Assumptions of Judicial Review of the Constitutionality of Legislation in Greece], in Τιμητικoς τoμος του Κ. Μπeη 3121 (Αthens: Αντ. Σάκκουλας)Google Scholar

Manitakis, Antonis (2004), Ελληνικo Συνταγματικo Δiκαιο [Greek Constitutional Law] (Thessaloniki: Σάκκουλα)Google Scholar

Manitakis, Antonis (2006), Οι (αυτο)δεσμεύσεις του δικαστή από τον παρεμπίπτοντα έλεγχο της (αντι)συνταγματικότητας των νόμων [Judicial (Self-)Restraint Resulting from the Incidental System of Judicial Review of the (Un)constitutionality of Legislation], Το Σyνταγμα 403Google Scholar

Manitakis, Antonis (2007), Η αναγκαιότητα της αναθεώρησης μεταξύ πλειοψηφικού κοινοβουλευτισμού και αναθεωρητικής συναίνεσης [The Need for the Constitutional Reform, between Majoritarian Parliamentarism and Consensus], Το Σyνταγμα 3Google Scholar

Manitakis, Antonis (2015a), Οι θεσμικές παρενέργειες της υπόθεσης του ‘βασικού μετόχου’ [The Institutional Side-Effects of the ‘Major Shareholder Affair’], Το Συνταγμα 783Google Scholar

Manitakis, Antonis (2015b), Η προτεραιότητα εφαρμογής του κοινοτικού δικαίου έναντι του Συντάγματος, η εναρμονισμένη με το κοινοτικό δίκαιο ερμηνεία του Συντάγματος και η τεχνική της αναλογικότητας [The Primacy of Community Law over the Constitution, the Interpretation of the Constitution in Conformity with Community Law and the Technique of Proportionality], Εφημερiδα Δημοσiου Δικαiου 317Google Scholar

Manolakoglou, Kassiani (2011), Η αρχή της αναλογικότητας ως τεχνική του δικαστικού ελέγχου πράξεων διακριτικής ευχέρειας της διοίκησης [The Principle of Proportionality as a Technique for the Judicial Scrutiny of Discretionary Administrative Acts], Constitutionalism.gr Blog (22 April 2011), available at: www.constitutionalism.grGoogle Scholar

Mantzoufas, Panagiotis (2004), Ασφάλεια και πρόληψη στην εποχή της διακινδύνευσης [Security and Prevention in the Age of Risk], in Τoμος τιμητικoς του Συμβουλiου της Επικρατεiας – 75 χρονια 55 (Thessaloniki: Σάκκουλα)Google Scholar

Mantzoufas, Panagiotis and Pavlopoulos, Anastasios (2017), Η μεγάλη απόφαση για τις τηλεοπτικές άδειες και η μεγαλύτερη δοκιμασία της ερμηνείας του Συντάγματος [The Great Case on TV Licences and the Greater Challenge of Constitutional Interpretation], Συνηγοροσ 22Google Scholar

Marketou, Afroditi Ioanna (2015), Economic Energy and the Loss of Faith in the Greek Constitution: How Does a Constitution Function When It Is Dying?, Cambridge Journal of International and Comparative Law 289Google Scholar

Marketou, Afroditi Ioanna and Dekastros, Michail (2015), Report on Greece, EUI Constitutional Change Through Euro-Crisis Law project Country report, available at: eurocrisislaw.eui.euGoogle Scholar

Markus, Jean-Paul (1999), Le contrôle de conventionnalité des lois par le Conseil d’État, Actualité Juridique Droit Administratif 99Google Scholar

Martens, Paul (1992), L’irrésistible ascension du principe de proportionnalité, in Présence du droit Public et des droits de l’Homme: Mélanges offerts à Jacques Velu 49 (Brussels: Bruylant)Google Scholar

Yetano, Antonio Marzal (2013), La dynamique du principe de proportionnalité: Essai dans le contexte des libertés de circulation du droit de l’union européenne (Clermont-Ferrand: Institut universitaire Varenne)Google Scholar

Mathews, Jud and Sweet, Alec Stone (2011), All Things in Proportion? American Rights Doctrine and the Problem of Balancing, 60 Emory Law Journal 799Google Scholar

Mathioudakis, Iakovos (2011), Μετασχηματισμοί του ταμειακού συμφέροντος του δημοσίου σε περίοδο έντονης οικονομικής κρίσης [Transformations of the Cash Interest of the State in a Period of Intense Economic Crisis], Εφημερiδα Δημοσiου Δικαiου 478Google Scholar

Matthias, Stefanos (2006), Το πεδίο λειτουργίας της αρχής της αναλογικότητας [The Scope of the Principle of Proportionality], 47 Ελληνικh Δικαιοσyνη 1Google Scholar

Mazeaud, Pierre (2006), Voeux du Président du Conseil constitutionnel au Président de la République (Speech at Palais de l’Elysée, 3 January 2006), 20 Cahiers du Conseil constitutionnel, available at: www.conseil-constitutionnel.fr/nouveaux-cahiers-du-conseil-constitutionnel/voeux-du-president-du-conseil-constitutionnel-m-pierre-mazeaud-au-president-de-la-republiqueGoogle Scholar

Mazeaud, Pierre (2008), 2, rue de Montpensier: Un bilan, 25 Cahiers du Conseil constitutionnel, Dossier: 50ème Anniversaire, available at: www.conseil-constitutionnel.fr/nouveaux-cahiers-du-conseil-constitutionnel/2-rue-de-montpensier-un-bilanGoogle Scholar

McBride, Jeremy (1999), Proportionality and the European Convention on Human Rights, in The Principle of Proportionality in the Laws of Europe 23 (Ellis, Evelyn, ed.) (Oxford; Portland, OR: Hart)Google Scholar

McGaughey, Ewan (2019), Is There a ‘Legal Measure’ to Judge Parliament’s Prorogration?, UK Constitutional Law Association Blog, available at: ukconstitutionallaw.orgGoogle Scholar

Mead, David (2012), Outcomes Aren’t All: Defending Process-Based Review of Public Authority Decisions under the Human Rights Act, Public Law 63Google Scholar

Merland, Guillaume (2007), L’intérêt général dans la jurisprudence du Conseil constitutionnel, in L’intérêt général, norme constitutionnelle (Mathieu, Bertrand and Verpeaux, Michel, eds.) (Paris: Dalloz), available at: www.conseil-constitutionnel.fr/sites/default/files/as/root/bank_mm/pdf/Conseil/merland.pdfGoogle Scholar

Mestre, Achille (1934), Note sous CE, 19 mai 1933, Benjamin, Recueil Sirey 1Google Scholar

Meunier, Jacques (1994), Les pouvoirs du Conseil constitutionnel. Essai d’analyse stratégique (Paris; Brussels: LGDJ; Bruylant)Google Scholar

Michelman, Frank (2017), Proportionality Outside the Courts with Special Reference to Popular and Political Constitutionalism, in Proportionality: New Frontiers, New Challenges 13 (Jackson, Vicki and Tushnet, Mark, eds.) (Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Micklitz, Hans (2005), The Politics of Judicial Co-operation in the EU: Sunday Trading, Equal Treatment and Good Faith (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Mitsopoulos, Georgios (2002), ‘Τριτενέργεια’ και ‘αναλογικότητα’ ως διατάξεις του αναθεωρηθέντος Συντάγματος [‘Third-Party Effect’ and ‘Proportionality’ as Provisions of the Amended Constitution], 15 Δικαιωματα του Ανθρωπου 641Google Scholar

Möller, Kai (2007), Balancing and the Structure of Constitutional Rights, 5 International Journal of Constitutional Law 453Google Scholar

Möller, Kai (2012), The Global Model of Constitutional Rights (Oxford: Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Möller, Kai (2017), US Constitutional Law, Proportionality, and the Global Model, Proportionality: New Frontiers, New Challenges 103 (Jackson, Vicki and Tushnet, Mark, eds.) (Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Montesquieu (1979), De l’esprit des lois (Paris: Flammarion)Google Scholar

Muir-Watt, Horatia (2000), La fonction subversive du droit comparé, 52 Revue Internationale de Droit Comparé 503Google Scholar

Muir-Watt, Horatia (2006), Globalization and Comparative Law, in The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law 579 (Reimann, Mathias and Zimmermann, Reinhard, eds.) (Oxford: Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Muir-Watt, Horatia and Tusseau, Guillaume (2016), Repenser le dévoilement de l’idéologie juridique: Une approche fictionnelle de la gouvernance globale, in Traité des rapports entre ordres juridiques 169 (Bonnet, Baptiste, ed.) (Paris: LGDJ)Google Scholar

Muzny, Petr (2008), Proportionnalité, in Dictionnaire des droits de l’Homme (Andriantsimbazovina, Joël, Gaudin, Hélène and Marguénaud, Jean-Pierre, eds.) (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France)Google Scholar

Nason, Sarah (2016), Reconstructing Judicial Review (Oxford Portland, OR: Hart)Google Scholar

Nehushtan, Yossi (2017), The Non-Identical Twins in UK Public Law: Reasonableness and Proportionality, 50 Israel Law Review 69Google Scholar

Nelken, David (1995), Disclosing/Invoking Legal Culture: An Introduction, Social and Legal Studies, Special issue on Legal culture, Diversity and Globalization 435Google Scholar

Nelken, David (2003), Comparatists and Transferability, in Comparative Legal Studies: Traditions and Transitions 437 (Legrand, Pierre and Munday, Roderick, eds.) (Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Nelken, David (2007), Defining and Using the Concept of Legal Culture, in Comparative Law: A Handbook 109 (Örücü, Esin and Nelken, David, eds.) (Oxford; Portland, OR: Hart)Google Scholar

Nelken, David (2012), Using Legal Culture: Purposes and Problems, in Using Legal Culture 1 (Nelken, David, ed.) (London: Wildy, Simmonds & Hill)Google Scholar

Neuberger, David (2012), Proportionate Costs (Fifteenth Lecture in the Implementation Programme, Law Society, 29 May 2012), available at: www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/JCO/Documents/Speeches/proportionate-costs-fifteenth-lecture-30052012.pdfGoogle Scholar

Neuberger, David (2014), The Role of Judges in Human Rights Jurisprudence: A Comparison of the Australian and UK Experience (Speech at the Supreme Court of Victoria, Melbourne, 8 August 2014), available at: www.supremecourt.uk/docs/speech-140808.pdfGoogle Scholar

Nikiforos, Dimitris (2012), Η αναλογικότητα ως διάμεσος της εθνικής και της ενωσιακής έννομης τάξης [Proportionality as an Intermediary between the Domestic and the EU Legal Order], Constitutionalism.gr Blog (17 September 2012), available at: www.constitutionalism.grGoogle Scholar

Orfanoudakis, Sarantis (2003), Η αρχh της αναλογικoτητας στην ελληνικh eννομη τaξη: απo τη νομολογιακh εφαρμογh της στη συνταγματικh της καθιeρωση [The Principle of Proportionality in the Greek Legal Order: From Its Judicial Application to Its Constitutional Consecration] (Thessaloniki: Σάκκουλα)Google Scholar

Orfanoudakis, Sarantis and Kokota, Vassiliki (2007), Η εφαρμογή της αρχής της αναλογικότητας στην ελληνική και την κοινοτική έννομη τάξη: συγκλίσεις και αποκλίσεις [The Application of the Principle of Proportionality in the Greek and the Community Legal Order: Convergences and Divergences], Ελληνικh Επιθεωρηση Ευρωπαϊκου Δικαιου 691Google Scholar

Pannick, David (1998), Principles of Interpretation of Convention Rights under the Human Rights Act and the Discretionary Area of Judgment, Public Law 545Google Scholar

Papadopoulou, Lina (2003), Η συνταγματική οικοδόμηση της Ευρώπης από τη σκοπιά του ελληνικού Συντάγματος [The Constitutional Construction of Europe from the Point of View of the Greek Constitution], in Η Προοπτικη ενος Συνταγματος για την Ευρωπη 147 (Papadopoulou, Lina and Manitakis, Antonis, eds.) (Athens: Σάκκουλα)Google Scholar

Papadopoulou, Manouela (2006), Η κοινοτική αρχή της αναλογικότητας ενώπιον του εθνικού δικαστή [The EC Principle of Proportionality before National Judges], ΙV Δικαιωματα του Ανθρωπου 279Google Scholar

Papatolias, Apostolos (1999), Συνταγματικeς επιχειρηματολογiες για την συνταγματικh αναθεωρηση [Constitutional Argumentation on the Constitutional Reform] (Αthens: Αντ. Ν. Σάκκουλας)Google Scholar

Pararas, Petros (1976), Παρατηρήσεις υπο την ΣτΕ (Ολ.) 2952/1975 [Comment on StE (Pl.) 2952/1975], Το Συνταγμα 347Google Scholar

Pararas, Petros (2001), Το κεκτημένο του ευρωπαϊκοΥ συνταγματικοΥ πολιτισμοΥ [The Acquis of the European Constitutional Civilisation] (Αthens: Αντ. Ν. Σάκκουλας)Google Scholar

Pararas, Petros (2003), Το νέο Σύνταγμα [The New Constitution], Το Βhμα, 19 January 2003Google Scholar

Pararas, Petros (2011), Συνταγματικoς πολιτισμoς και Δικαιωματα του Ανθρωπου [Constitutional Civilisation and Human Rights] (Athens; Komotini: Αντ. Ν. Σάκκουλας)Google Scholar

Pararas, Petros (2012a), Κριτικό σημείωμα – Recension Χ. Contiades (Ed.), Engineering Constitutional Change. A Comparative Perspective on Europe, Canada and the USA, 55 Δικαιωματα του Ανθρωπου 895Google Scholar

Pararas, Petros (2012b), Το Ευρωπαϊκό Δίκαιο των Δικαιωμάτων του Ανθρώπου [European Human Rights Law], 86 Δικαιωματα του Ανθρωπου 1131Google Scholar

Pardini, Jean-Jacques (2001), Le juge constitutionnel et le ‘fait’ en Italie et en France (Aix-en-Provence: Presses Universitaires d’Aix-Marseille)Google Scholar

Pavlopoulos, Prokopis (1988), Δικαστικός έλεγχος της συνταγματικότητας των νόμων ή δικαστικός έλεγχος της νομιμότητας του Συντάγματος; [Judicial Review of the Constitutionality of Legislation or Judicial Review of the Legality of the Constitution?], 36 Νομικo Βhμα 13Google Scholar

Perelman, Chaïm (1990), Droit, logique et épistémologie, in Éthique et Droit 619 (Brussels: Éditions de l’Université de Bruxelles)Google Scholar

Perju, Vlad (2012), Proportionality and Freedom – An Essay on Method in Constitutional Law, 1 Global Constitutionalism 334Google Scholar

Perju, Vlad (2017), Proportionality and Stare Decisis: Proposal for a New Structure, in Proportionality: New Frontiers, New Challenges 175 (Jackson, Vicki and Tushnet, Mark, eds.) (Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Peters, Anne (2009), The Merits of Global Constitutionalism, XVI Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 397Google Scholar

Petersen, Niels (2017), Proportionality and Judicial Activism: Fundamental Rights Adjudication in Canada, Germany and South Africa (Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Philippe, Xavier (1990), Le contrôle de proportionnalité dans les jurisprudences constitutionnelle et administrative françaises (Paris: Économica)Google Scholar

Philippe, Xavier, Vidal-Naquet, Ariane, Duffy-Meunier, Aurélie and Le Bot, Olivier (2011), Les délibérations du Conseil constitutionnel – Année 1984, 32 Cahiers du Conseil constitutionnel, available at: www.conseil-constitutionnel.fr/nouveaux-cahiers-du-conseil-constitutionnel/les-deliberations-du-conseil-constitutionnel-annee-1984Google Scholar

Pirker, Benedikt (2013), Proportionality Analysis and Models of Judicial Review: A Theoretical and Comparative Study (Groningen: Europa Law Pub)Google Scholar

Plessix, Benoît (2016), Droit administratif général (Paris: LexisNexis)Google Scholar

Poole, Thomas (2005), Of Headscarves and Heresies: The Denbigh High School Case and Public Authority Decision Making under the Human Rights Act, Public Law 685Google Scholar

Poole, Thomas (2009), The Reformation of English Administrative Law, 68 Cambridge Law Journal 142Google Scholar

Poole, Thomas and Shah, Sangeeta (2009), The Impact of the Human Rights Act on the House of Lords, Public Law 347Google Scholar

Pottage, Alain (2014), Law after Anthropology: Object and Technique in Roman Law, 31 Theory, Culture & Society 147Google Scholar

Powell, Walter and DiMaggio, Paul (1991), The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields, in The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis 63 (Powell, Walter and DiMaggio, Paul, ed.) (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press)Google Scholar

Prélot, Pierre-Henri (2013), L’actualité de l’arrêt Benjamin, Revue Française de Droit Administratif 1020Google Scholar

Prevedourou, Evaggelia (1997), Η αρχή της αναλογικότητας στη νομολογία του ΔΕΚ [The Principle of Proportionality in the ECJ Case Law], Ελληνικh Επιθεωρηση Ευρωπαϊκου Δικαιου 1, 297Google Scholar

Putnam, Hilary (2002), The Collapse of the Fact/Value Dichotomy and Other Essays (Cambridge, MA; London: Harvard University Press)Google Scholar

Qvortrup, Mads, ed. (2013), The British Constitution: Continuity and Change: A Festschrift for Vernon Bogdanor (Οxford: Hart)Google Scholar

Raikos, Athanasios (1983), Παραδoσεις Συνταγματικοy Δικαiου: Θεμελιωδη Δικαιωματα [Lectures in Constitutional Law: Fundamental Rights] (Athens: Σάκκουλα)Google Scholar

Raikos, Athanasios (2008), Συνταγματικο Δικαiο: Θεμελιωδη Δικαιωματα [Constitutional Law: Fundamental Rights] (3rd ed.) (Αthens: Αντ. Ν. Σάκκουλας)Google Scholar

Ramshaw, Adam (2019), The Case for Replicable Structured Full Proportionality Analysis in All Cases Concerning Fundamental Rights, 39 Legal Studies 120Google Scholar

Ranchordás, Sofia and Willem, Boudewijn de Waard, Nicolaas, eds. (2015), The Judge and the Proportionate Use of Discretion: A Comparative Study (New York: Routledge)Google Scholar

Renesi, Nikoleta (2005), Η αρχή της αναλογικότητας στη νομολογία του Ελεγκτικού Συνεδρίου [The Principle of Proportionality in the Case Law of the Court of Audit], 17 Διοικητικh Δiκη 1401Google Scholar

Réveillère, Vincent (2017), Le juge et le travail des concepts juridiques: Le cas de la citoyenneté de l’Union européenne (Clermont-Ferrand: Institut universitaire Varenne)Google Scholar

Rials, Stéphane (1980), Le juge administratif français et la technique du standard (essai sur le traitement juridictionnel de l’idée de normalité) (Paris: LGDJ)Google Scholar

Riles, Annelise (2005), A New Agenda for the Cultural Study of Law: Taking on the Technicalities, 53 Buffalo Law Review 973Google Scholar

Rivero, Jean (1951), Apologie pour les ‘faiseurs de systèmes’, Recueil Dalloz 99Google Scholar

Rivero, Jean (1981), Note sous décision no. 80–127 DC, Actualité Juridique Droit Administratif 275Google Scholar

Rivers, Julian (2006), Proportionality and Variable Intensity of Review, 65 Cambridge Law Journal 174Google Scholar

Rivers, Julian (2007), Proportionality, Discretion and the Second Law of Balancing, in Law, Rights and Discourse: The Legal Philosophy of Robert Alexy 167 (Pavlakos, George, ed.) (Oxford: Hart)Google Scholar

Rivers, Julian (2014), The Presumption of Proportionality, 77 Modern Law Review 409Google Scholar

Rousseau, Dominique (1997), La démocratie continue, 96 Le Débat 73Google Scholar

Rousseau, Dominique (2001), Droit du contentieux constitutionnel (6th ed.) (Paris: Montchrestien)Google Scholar

Rousseau, Dominique (2010), Droit du contentieux constitutionnel (9th ed.) (Paris: Montchrestien)Google Scholar

Rousseau, Dominique (2016), Droit du contentieux constitutionnel (11th ed.) (Paris: Montchrestien)Google Scholar

Sacco, Rodolfo (1991), Legal Formants: A Dynamic Approach to Comparative Law, 39 American Journal of Comparative Law 1, 343Google Scholar

Bonnet, François Saint (2007), L’intérêt général dans l’ancien droit constitutionnel, in L’intérêt général, norme constitutionnelle (Mathieu, Bertrand and Verpeaux, Michel, eds.) (Paris: LGDJ), available at: www.conseil-constitutionnel.fr/sites/default/files/as/root/bank_mm/pdf/Conseil/saintbonnet.pdfGoogle Scholar

Saripolos, Nikolaos I. (1851), Πραγματεiα του Συνταγματικου Δικαiου [Treatise of Constitutional Law] (Athens)Google Scholar

Sauvé, Jean-Marc (2016), Le juge administratif, protecteur des libertés (Speech at the Colloque organisé pour les dix ans de l’Association française pour la recherche en droit administratif, Université d’Auvergne, 16 June 2016), available at: www.conseil-etat.fr/actualites/discours-et-interventions/le-juge-administratif-protecteur-des-libertesGoogle Scholar

Sauvé, Jean-Marc (2017), Le principe de proportionnalité, protecteur des libertés (Speech at the Institut Portalis, Aix-en-Provence, 17 March 2017), available at: www.conseil-etat.fr/actualites/discours-et-interventions/le-principe-de-proportionnalite-protecteur-des-libertesGoogle Scholar

Scarman, Leslie (1990), The Development of Administrative Law: Obstacles and Opportunities, Public Law 490Google Scholar

Schauer, Frederick (1992), A Comment on the Structure of Rights, 27 Georgia Law Review 415Google Scholar

Schauer, Frederick (1994), Commensurability and Its Constitutional Consequences, 45 Hastings Law Journal 785Google Scholar

Schauer, Frederick (2014), Proportionality and the Question of Weight, in Proportionality and the Rule of Law: Rights, Justification, Reasoning 173 (Huscroft, Grant, Miller, Bradley and Webber, Grégoire, eds.) (New York: Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Schlag, Pierre (2002), The Aesthetics of American Law, 115 Harvard Law Review 1047Google Scholar

Schlink, Bernhard (2012), Proportionality, in The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law 718 (Rosenfeld, Michel and Sajó, András, eds.) (Oxford: Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Schneiderman, David (2015), Proportionality and Constitutional Culture, 13 International Journal of Constitutional Law 769Google Scholar

Schwarze, Jürgen (1992), European Administrative Law (Luxembourg; London: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities; Sweet & Maxwell)Google Scholar

Sedley, Stephen (1995), Human Rights: A Twenty-First Century Agenda, Public Law 386Google Scholar

Sedley, Stephen (2005), The Rocks or the Open Sea: Where Is the Human Rights Act Heading?, 32 Journal of Law and Society 3Google Scholar

Sedley, Stephen (2011), The Sound of Silence, in Ashes and Sparks 64 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Seube, Jean-Baptiste (2009), Le contrôle de proportionnalité exercé par le juge judiciaire: Présentation générale, 46 Les Petites Affiches, Numéro Spécial 86Google Scholar

Simantiras, Konstantinos (1990), Γενικες αρχες αστικου δικαιου [General Principles of Civil Law] (4th ed.) (Αthens: Αντ. Σάκκουλας)Google Scholar

Sirinelli, Jean and Bertrand, Brunessen (2010), La proportionnalité, in L’influence du droit européen sur les catégories du droit public 623 (Auby, Jean-Bernard, ed.) (Paris: Dalloz)Google Scholar

Skinner, Quentin (2002), Visions of Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar

Skouris, Vassilios (1987), Η συνταγματική αρχή της αναλογικότητας και οι νομοθετικοί περιορισμοί της επαγγελματικής ελευθερίας [The Constitutional Principle of Proportionality and Legislative Restrictions on Professional Freedom], 28 Ελληνικh Δικαιοσυνη 773Google Scholar

Skouris, Vassilios (2001), Συνολική αποτίμηση του αναθεωρητικού εγχειρήματος [Overall Evaluation of the Reform], in Το νeο Συνταγμα 457 (Tsatsos, Dimitrios, Venizelos, Evaggelos and Contiades, Xenophon, eds.) (Αthens; Komotini: Αντ. Ν. Σάκκουλας)Google Scholar

Sotirelis, Giorgos (2000), Συνταγμα και δημοκρατiα στην εποχh της παγκοσμιοποiησης [Constitution and Democracy in the Age of Globalization] (Αthens: Αντ. Ν. Σάκκουλας)Google Scholar

Spiliotopoulos, Epaminondas (2004), Droit administratif hellénique (2nd ed.) (Athens; Brussels: Sakkoula; Bruylant)Google Scholar

Srirangam, Veena (2016), A Difference in Kind – Proportionality and Wednesbury, 4 Institute of Advanced Legal Studies Student Law Review 46Google Scholar

Stassinopoulos, Michail (1951), Δικαιον των διοικητικων πρaξεων [Law of Administrative Acts] (unpublished monograph)Google Scholar

Stone Sweet, Alec (1992), The Birth of Judicial Politics in France: The Constitutional Council in Comparative Perspective (New York: Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Sweet, Alec Stone and Mathews, Jud (2008), Proportionality Balancing and Global Constitutionalism, 47 Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 73Google Scholar

Stratilatis, Kostas (2001), Η συγκεκριμένη στάθμιση των συνταγματικών αξιών κατά τη δικαστική ερμηνεία του συντάγματος [The Concrete Balancing of Constitutional Values in the Judicial Interpretation of the Constitution], Το Συνταγμα 495Google Scholar

Sudre, Frédéric (2015), La Convention européenne des droits de l’Homme (10th ed.) (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France)Google Scholar

Sudre, Frédéric (2019), Droit européen et international des droits de l’Homme (14th ed.) (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France)Google Scholar

Sullivan, Thomas and Frase, Richard (2009), Proportionality Principles in American Law: Controlling Excessive Government Actions (Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press)Google Scholar