Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-18T11:14:00.023Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References and Further Reading

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2023

John S. Wilkins
John S. Wilkins
Affiliation:
University of Melbourne
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Understanding Species , pp. 138 - 149
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Primary Sources

Cain, A. J. (1954). Animal Species and Their Evolution, London: Hutchinson University Library.Google Scholar
Mayden, R. L. (1997). A hierarchy of species concepts: the denouement in the saga of the species problem. In Claridge, M. F., Dawah, H. A., & Wilson, M. R., eds., Species: The Units of Diversity, London: Chapman and Hall, pp. 381–423.Google Scholar
Phillips, M. K., Henry, V. G. & Kelly, B. T. (2003). Restoration of the Red Wolf. In Mech, L. David & Boitani, Luigi, eds., Wolves: Behavior, Ecology, and Conservation, Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press, pp. 272–288.Google Scholar
Winsor, M. P. (2003). Non-essentialist methods in pre-Darwinian taxonomy. Biology & Philosophy, 18, 387–400.Google Scholar
Winsor, M. P. (2006). The creation of the essentialism story: an exercise in metahistory. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, 28, 149–174.Google Scholar
Zachos, F. E. (2016). Species Concepts in Biology: Historical Development, Theoretical Foundations and Practical Relevance, Switzerland: Springer.Google Scholar
Beeland, T. Delene (2013). The Secret World of Red Wolves: The Fight to Save North America’s Other Wolf. University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Mayr, E. (1942). Systematics and the Origin of Species from the Viewpoint of a Zoologist, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Mayr, E. (1963). Animal Species and Evolution, Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sigwart, J. D. (2018). What Species Mean: A User’s Guide to the Units of Biodiversity, Boca Raton, London: CRC Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkins, J. S. (2018). Species: The Evolution of the Idea, 2nd ed., Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar

Secondary Sources

Cain, A. J. (1954). Animal Species and Their Evolution, London: Hutchinson University Library.Google Scholar
Mayden, R. L. (1997). A hierarchy of species concepts: the denouement in the saga of the species problem. In Claridge, M. F., Dawah, H. A., & Wilson, M. R., eds., Species: The Units of Diversity, London: Chapman and Hall, pp. 381–423.Google Scholar
Phillips, M. K., Henry, V. G. & Kelly, B. T. (2003). Restoration of the Red Wolf. In Mech, L. David & Boitani, Luigi, eds., Wolves: Behavior, Ecology, and Conservation, Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press, pp. 272–288.Google Scholar
Winsor, M. P. (2003). Non-essentialist methods in pre-Darwinian taxonomy. Biology & Philosophy, 18, 387–400.Google Scholar
Winsor, M. P. (2006). The creation of the essentialism story: an exercise in metahistory. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, 28, 149–174.Google Scholar
Zachos, F. E. (2016). Species Concepts in Biology: Historical Development, Theoretical Foundations and Practical Relevance, Switzerland: Springer.Google Scholar
Beeland, T. Delene (2013). The Secret World of Red Wolves: The Fight to Save North America’s Other Wolf. University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Mayr, E. (1942). Systematics and the Origin of Species from the Viewpoint of a Zoologist, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Mayr, E. (1963). Animal Species and Evolution, Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sigwart, J. D. (2018). What Species Mean: A User’s Guide to the Units of Biodiversity, Boca Raton, London: CRC Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkins, J. S. (2018). Species: The Evolution of the Idea, 2nd ed., Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Baker, R. J. & Bradley, R. D. (2006). Speciation in mammals and the genetic species concept. Journal of Mammalogy, 87, 643–662.Google Scholar
Conniff, R. (2011). The Species Seekers: Heroes, Fools, and the Mad Pursuit of Life on Earth, New York: WW Norton & Co.Google Scholar
Cracraft, J. (1983). Species concepts and speciation analysis. In Johnston, R. F., ed., Current Ornithology, Vol. 1, New York: Plenum Press, pp. 159–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cronquist, A. (1978). Once again, what is a species? In Knutson, L., ed., BioSystematics in Agriculture, Montclair, NJ: Alleheld Osmun, pp. 3–20.Google Scholar
de Queiroz, K. (1998). The general lineage concept of species, species criteria, and the process of speciation. In Howard, D. J. & Berlocher, S. H., eds., Endless Forms: Species and Speciation, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 57–75.Google Scholar
Dobzhansky, T. (1935). A critique of the species concept in biology. Philosophy of Science, 2, 344–355.Google Scholar
Dobzhansky, T. (1950). Mendelian populations and their evolution. American Naturalist, 74, 312–321.Google Scholar
Joyce, J. (1916). A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man, New York: Huebsch.Google Scholar
Mayr, E. (1942). Systematics and the Origin of Species from the Viewpoint of a Zoologist, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Regan, C. T. (1926). Organic evolution. Report of the British Association for the Advancement of Science, 1925, 75–86.Google Scholar
Rosen, D. E. (1979). Fishes from the uplands and intermontane basins of Guatemala: revisionary studies and comparative biogeography. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 162, 267–376.Google Scholar
Van Valen, L. (1976). Ecological species, multispecies, and oaks. Taxon, 25, 233–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wheeler, Q. D. & Platnick, N. I. (2000). The phylogenetic species concept (sensu Wheeler and Platnick). In Wheeler, Q. D. & Meier, R., eds., Species Concepts and Phylogenetic Theory: A Debate, New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 55–69.Google Scholar
The Nature definition of haplotype is online: https://www.nature.com/subjects/haplotypes#research-and-revieGoogle Scholar
Wilkins, J. S. (2009). Defining Species: A Sourcebook from Antiquity to Today, New York: Peter Lang. [In this book I give the major historical passages and references for species definitions, with a commentary on each.]Google Scholar
Baker, R. J. & Bradley, R. D. (2006). Speciation in mammals and the genetic species concept. Journal of Mammalogy, 87, 643–662.Google Scholar
Conniff, R. (2011). The Species Seekers: Heroes, Fools, and the Mad Pursuit of Life on Earth, New York: WW Norton & Co.Google Scholar
Cracraft, J. (1983). Species concepts and speciation analysis. In Johnston, R. F., ed., Current Ornithology, Vol. 1, New York: Plenum Press, pp. 159–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cronquist, A. (1978). Once again, what is a species? In Knutson, L., ed., BioSystematics in Agriculture, Montclair, NJ: Alleheld Osmun, pp. 3–20.Google Scholar
de Queiroz, K. (1998). The general lineage concept of species, species criteria, and the process of speciation. In Howard, D. J. & Berlocher, S. H., eds., Endless Forms: Species and Speciation, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 57–75.Google Scholar
Dobzhansky, T. (1935). A critique of the species concept in biology. Philosophy of Science, 2, 344–355.Google Scholar
Dobzhansky, T. (1950). Mendelian populations and their evolution. American Naturalist, 74, 312–321.Google Scholar
Joyce, J. (1916). A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man, New York: Huebsch.Google Scholar
Mayr, E. (1942). Systematics and the Origin of Species from the Viewpoint of a Zoologist, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Regan, C. T. (1926). Organic evolution. Report of the British Association for the Advancement of Science, 1925, 75–86.Google Scholar
Rosen, D. E. (1979). Fishes from the uplands and intermontane basins of Guatemala: revisionary studies and comparative biogeography. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, 162, 267–376.Google Scholar
Van Valen, L. (1976). Ecological species, multispecies, and oaks. Taxon, 25, 233–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wheeler, Q. D. & Platnick, N. I. (2000). The phylogenetic species concept (sensu Wheeler and Platnick). In Wheeler, Q. D. & Meier, R., eds., Species Concepts and Phylogenetic Theory: A Debate, New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 55–69.Google Scholar
The Nature definition of haplotype is online: https://www.nature.com/subjects/haplotypes#research-and-revieGoogle Scholar
Wilkins, J. S. (2009). Defining Species: A Sourcebook from Antiquity to Today, New York: Peter Lang. [In this book I give the major historical passages and references for species definitions, with a commentary on each.]Google Scholar
Dawkins, R. (1976). The Selfish Gene, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schilthuizen, M. (2001). Frogs, Flies, and Dandelions: The Making of Species, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
White, M. J. D. (1968). Models of speciation. Science, 159, 1065–1070.Google Scholar
Dobzhansky, T. (1937). Genetics and the Origin of Species, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Dobzhansky, T. (1970). Genetics of the Evolutionary Process, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Eldredge, N. (1989). Macroevolutionary Dynamics: Species, Niches, and Adaptive Peaks, New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Mayr, E. (2001). What Evolution Is, New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
White, M. J. D. (1978). Modes of Speciation, San Francisco, CA: WH Freeman.Google Scholar
Dawkins, R. (1976). The Selfish Gene, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schilthuizen, M. (2001). Frogs, Flies, and Dandelions: The Making of Species, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
White, M. J. D. (1968). Models of speciation. Science, 159, 1065–1070.Google Scholar
Dobzhansky, T. (1937). Genetics and the Origin of Species, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Dobzhansky, T. (1970). Genetics of the Evolutionary Process, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Eldredge, N. (1989). Macroevolutionary Dynamics: Species, Niches, and Adaptive Peaks, New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Mayr, E. (2001). What Evolution Is, New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
White, M. J. D. (1978). Modes of Speciation, San Francisco, CA: WH Freeman.Google Scholar
Bowler, P. J. (1983). The Eclipse of Darwinism: Anti-Darwinian Evolution Theories in the Decades Around 1900, Baltimore and London: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Lamarck’s definition can be found in:Google Scholar
Britton, N. L. (1908). The taxonomic aspect of the species question. American Naturalist, 42, 225–242.Google Scholar
Chambers, R. [published anonymously] (1844). The Vestiges of the Natural History of Creation, London: Churchill.Google Scholar
Cuvier, G. (1812). Discours préliminaire. In Recherches sur les ossemens fossiles de quadrupèdes, Vol. 1, Paris: Deterville.Google Scholar
Dobzhansky, T. (1935). A critique of the species concept in biology. Philosophy of Science, 2, 344–355.Google Scholar
The quotation from John Ray is from:Google Scholar
Lazenby, E. M. (1995). The Historia Plantarum Generalis by John Ray: Book I – A Translation and Commentary, Newcastle UK: University of Newcastle upon Tyne.Google Scholar
Linne, C. von (1964). Systema naturae, 1735, by Carolus Linnaeus; facsimile of the first edition with an introduction and a first English translation of the “Observationes” by M.S.J. Engel-Ledeboer and H. Engel, Nieuwkoop: De Graaf.Google Scholar
Maupertuis, P.-L. M. de (1745). Vénus physique, Paris?: La Haye.Google Scholar
Mayr, E. (1940). Speciation phenomena in birds. American Naturalist, 74, 249–278.Google Scholar
Osborn, H. F. (1894). From the Greeks to Darwin, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Trémaux, P. (1865). Origin et transformations de l’homme et des autres étres, Paris: L. Hachette.Google Scholar
Zachos, F. E. (2016). Species Concepts in Biology: Historical Development, Theoretical Foundations and Practical Relevance, Switzerland: Springer.Google Scholar
The various editions of the Origin of Species can be found at: http://darwin-online.org.uk/contents.html#originGoogle Scholar
Arthur, W. (2021). Understanding Evo-Devo, Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Kampourakis, K. (2021). Understanding Genes, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minelli, A. (2021). Understanding Development, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pavord, A. (2005). The Naming of Names: The Search for Order in the World of Plants, London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Wilkins, J. S. (2018). Species: The Evolution of the Idea, 2nd ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Bowler, P. J. (1983). The Eclipse of Darwinism: Anti-Darwinian Evolution Theories in the Decades Around 1900, Baltimore and London: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Lamarck’s definition can be found in:Google Scholar
Britton, N. L. (1908). The taxonomic aspect of the species question. American Naturalist, 42, 225–242.Google Scholar
Chambers, R. [published anonymously] (1844). The Vestiges of the Natural History of Creation, London: Churchill.Google Scholar
Cuvier, G. (1812). Discours préliminaire. In Recherches sur les ossemens fossiles de quadrupèdes, Vol. 1, Paris: Deterville.Google Scholar
Dobzhansky, T. (1935). A critique of the species concept in biology. Philosophy of Science, 2, 344–355.Google Scholar
The quotation from John Ray is from:Google Scholar
Lazenby, E. M. (1995). The Historia Plantarum Generalis by John Ray: Book I – A Translation and Commentary, Newcastle UK: University of Newcastle upon Tyne.Google Scholar
Linne, C. von (1964). Systema naturae, 1735, by Carolus Linnaeus; facsimile of the first edition with an introduction and a first English translation of the “Observationes” by M.S.J. Engel-Ledeboer and H. Engel, Nieuwkoop: De Graaf.Google Scholar
Maupertuis, P.-L. M. de (1745). Vénus physique, Paris?: La Haye.Google Scholar
Mayr, E. (1940). Speciation phenomena in birds. American Naturalist, 74, 249–278.Google Scholar
Osborn, H. F. (1894). From the Greeks to Darwin, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Trémaux, P. (1865). Origin et transformations de l’homme et des autres étres, Paris: L. Hachette.Google Scholar
Zachos, F. E. (2016). Species Concepts in Biology: Historical Development, Theoretical Foundations and Practical Relevance, Switzerland: Springer.Google Scholar
The various editions of the Origin of Species can be found at: http://darwin-online.org.uk/contents.html#originGoogle Scholar
Arthur, W. (2021). Understanding Evo-Devo, Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Kampourakis, K. (2021). Understanding Genes, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minelli, A. (2021). Understanding Development, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pavord, A. (2005). The Naming of Names: The Search for Order in the World of Plants, London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Wilkins, J. S. (2018). Species: The Evolution of the Idea, 2nd ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
ASM Mammal Diversity Database https://www.mammaldiversity.org/Google Scholar
Avibase – The World Bird Database https://avibase.bsc-eoc.org/Google Scholar
Catalogue of Life https://www.catalogueoflife.org/Google Scholar
ITIS: the Integrated Taxonomic Information System https://www.itis.gov/ 2015Google Scholar
The Tree of Life Web Project http://tolweb.org/Google Scholar
Boyd, R. (1991). Realism, anti-foundationalism and the enthusiasm for natural kinds. Philosophical Studies, 61, 127–148.Google Scholar
Brigandt, I. (2009). Natural kinds in evolution and systematics: metaphysical and epistemological considerations. Acta Biotheoretica, 57, 77–97.Google Scholar
Dobzhansky, T. (1935). A critique of the species concept in biology. Philosophy of Science, 2, 344–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dupré, J. (1999). On the impossibility of a monistic account of species. In Wilson, R. A., ed., Species: New Interdisciplinary Essays, Cambridge, MA: Bradford/MIT Press, pp. 3–22.Google Scholar
Ghiselin, M. T. (1974). A radical solution to the species problem. Systematic Zoology, 23, 536–544.Google Scholar
Griffiths, P. E. (1999). Squaring the circle: natural kinds with historical essences. In Wilson, R. A., ed., Species: New Interdisciplinary Essays, Cambridge, MA: Bradford/MIT Press, pp. 209–228.Google Scholar
Hull, D. L. (1965). The effect of essentialism on taxonomy – two thousand years of stasis (I and II). British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 15, 314–326; 16, 1–18.Google Scholar
Hull, D. L. (1976). Are species really individuals? Systematic Zoology, 25, 174–191.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. (1843). A System of Logic, Ratiocinative and Inductive: Being a Connected View of the Principles of Evidence, and Methods of Scientific Investigation, London: John W. Parker.Google Scholar
Mishler, B. D. & Wilkins, J. S. (2018). The hunting of the SNaRC: a snarky solution to the species problem. Philosophy, Theory, and Practice in Biology, 10, 1–18.Google Scholar
Walsh, D. (2006). Evolutionary essentialism. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 57, 425–448.Google Scholar
Wilkins, J. S. (2022). The good species. In Wilkins, J. S., Zachos, F. E. & Pavlinov, I. Ya., eds., Species Problems and Beyond: Contemporary Issues in Philosophy and Practice, Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press/Taylor & Francis, pp. 105–124.Google Scholar
Wilson, R. A. (1999). Realism, essence, and kind: Resuscitating species essentialism? In Wilson, R. A., ed., Species: New Interdisciplinary Essays, Cambridge, MA: Bradford/MIT Press, pp. 187–208.Google Scholar
Godfrey-Smith, P. (2014). Philosophy of Biology. Princeton Foundations of Contemporary Philosophy, Princeton, MA: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Richards, R. A. (2010). The Species Problem: A Philosophical Analysis. Cambridge Studies in Philosophy and Biology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sterelny, K. & Griffiths, P. E. (1999). Sex and Death: An Introduction to Philosophy of Biology, Chicago, IL; London: University of Chicago Press. (This book, although over 20 years old, is still the best introduction to the general issues of philosophy of biology.)Google Scholar
Wilson, R. A. (1999). Species: New Interdisciplinary Essays, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
ASM Mammal Diversity Database https://www.mammaldiversity.org/Google Scholar
Avibase – The World Bird Database https://avibase.bsc-eoc.org/Google Scholar
Catalogue of Life https://www.catalogueoflife.org/Google Scholar
ITIS: the Integrated Taxonomic Information System https://www.itis.gov/ 2015Google Scholar
The Tree of Life Web Project http://tolweb.org/Google Scholar
Boyd, R. (1991). Realism, anti-foundationalism and the enthusiasm for natural kinds. Philosophical Studies, 61, 127–148.Google Scholar
Brigandt, I. (2009). Natural kinds in evolution and systematics: metaphysical and epistemological considerations. Acta Biotheoretica, 57, 77–97.Google Scholar
Dobzhansky, T. (1935). A critique of the species concept in biology. Philosophy of Science, 2, 344–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dupré, J. (1999). On the impossibility of a monistic account of species. In Wilson, R. A., ed., Species: New Interdisciplinary Essays, Cambridge, MA: Bradford/MIT Press, pp. 3–22.Google Scholar
Ghiselin, M. T. (1974). A radical solution to the species problem. Systematic Zoology, 23, 536–544.Google Scholar
Griffiths, P. E. (1999). Squaring the circle: natural kinds with historical essences. In Wilson, R. A., ed., Species: New Interdisciplinary Essays, Cambridge, MA: Bradford/MIT Press, pp. 209–228.Google Scholar
Hull, D. L. (1965). The effect of essentialism on taxonomy – two thousand years of stasis (I and II). British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 15, 314–326; 16, 1–18.Google Scholar
Hull, D. L. (1976). Are species really individuals? Systematic Zoology, 25, 174–191.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. (1843). A System of Logic, Ratiocinative and Inductive: Being a Connected View of the Principles of Evidence, and Methods of Scientific Investigation, London: John W. Parker.Google Scholar
Mishler, B. D. & Wilkins, J. S. (2018). The hunting of the SNaRC: a snarky solution to the species problem. Philosophy, Theory, and Practice in Biology, 10, 1–18.Google Scholar
Walsh, D. (2006). Evolutionary essentialism. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 57, 425–448.Google Scholar
Wilkins, J. S. (2022). The good species. In Wilkins, J. S., Zachos, F. E. & Pavlinov, I. Ya., eds., Species Problems and Beyond: Contemporary Issues in Philosophy and Practice, Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press/Taylor & Francis, pp. 105–124.Google Scholar
Wilson, R. A. (1999). Realism, essence, and kind: Resuscitating species essentialism? In Wilson, R. A., ed., Species: New Interdisciplinary Essays, Cambridge, MA: Bradford/MIT Press, pp. 187–208.Google Scholar
Godfrey-Smith, P. (2014). Philosophy of Biology. Princeton Foundations of Contemporary Philosophy, Princeton, MA: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Richards, R. A. (2010). The Species Problem: A Philosophical Analysis. Cambridge Studies in Philosophy and Biology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sterelny, K. & Griffiths, P. E. (1999). Sex and Death: An Introduction to Philosophy of Biology, Chicago, IL; London: University of Chicago Press. (This book, although over 20 years old, is still the best introduction to the general issues of philosophy of biology.)Google Scholar
Wilson, R. A. (1999). Species: New Interdisciplinary Essays, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Boekhout, T., Aime, M. C., Begerow, D. et al. (2021). The evolving species concepts used for yeasts: from phenotypes and genomes to speciation networks. Fungal Diversity 109, 27–55.Google Scholar
Burke, E. (1865). Thoughts on the Cause of the Present Discontents. In The Works of the Right Honorable Edmund Burke, Vol. 1, Boston: Little, Brown, and Co. [1770], p. 477.Google Scholar
Galtier, N. (2019). Delineating species in the speciation continuum: a proposal. Evolutionary Applications, 12, 657–663.Google Scholar
Schreber, Johann Christian Daniel, Goldfuss, Georg August & Wagner, Johann Andreas (1776). Die Säugthiere in Abbildungen nach der Natur, mit Beschreibungen, Plates 81–165, Erlangen: Expedition des Schreber’schen säugthier- und des Esper’schen Schmetterlingswerkes.Google Scholar
Sigwart, J. D. (2018). What Species Mean: A User’s Guide to the Units of Biodiversity, Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, ch. 3.Google Scholar
Watson, H. C. (1843). Remarks on the Distinction Between Species in Nature and in Books; preliminary to the notice of some variations and transitions in the native plants of Britain. The London Journal of Botany, II, 613–622.Google Scholar
Whewell, W. (1840). The Philosophy of the Inductive Sciences: Founded upon their History, Vols. 1–2, London: John W. Parker.Google Scholar
Whewell, W. (1858). Novum Organon Renovatum: Being the second part of The Philosophy of the Inductive Sciences, 3rd ed., London: J. W. Parker and Son.Google Scholar
Farber, P. L. (2000) Finding Order in Nature: The Naturalist Tradition from Linnaeus to E. O. Wilson. Johns Hopkins Introductory Studies in the History of Science, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Sigwart, J. D. (2018). What Species Mean: A User’s Guide to the Units of Biodiversity, Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Ereshefsky, M. (2000). The Poverty of Linnaean Hierarchy: A Philosophical Study of Biological Taxonomy, Cambridge, UK/New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Boekhout, T., Aime, M. C., Begerow, D. et al. (2021). The evolving species concepts used for yeasts: from phenotypes and genomes to speciation networks. Fungal Diversity 109, 27–55.Google Scholar
Burke, E. (1865). Thoughts on the Cause of the Present Discontents. In The Works of the Right Honorable Edmund Burke, Vol. 1, Boston: Little, Brown, and Co. [1770], p. 477.Google Scholar
Galtier, N. (2019). Delineating species in the speciation continuum: a proposal. Evolutionary Applications, 12, 657–663.Google Scholar
Schreber, Johann Christian Daniel, Goldfuss, Georg August & Wagner, Johann Andreas (1776). Die Säugthiere in Abbildungen nach der Natur, mit Beschreibungen, Plates 81–165, Erlangen: Expedition des Schreber’schen säugthier- und des Esper’schen Schmetterlingswerkes.Google Scholar
Sigwart, J. D. (2018). What Species Mean: A User’s Guide to the Units of Biodiversity, Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, ch. 3.Google Scholar
Watson, H. C. (1843). Remarks on the Distinction Between Species in Nature and in Books; preliminary to the notice of some variations and transitions in the native plants of Britain. The London Journal of Botany, II, 613–622.Google Scholar
Whewell, W. (1840). The Philosophy of the Inductive Sciences: Founded upon their History, Vols. 1–2, London: John W. Parker.Google Scholar
Whewell, W. (1858). Novum Organon Renovatum: Being the second part of The Philosophy of the Inductive Sciences, 3rd ed., London: J. W. Parker and Son.Google Scholar
Farber, P. L. (2000) Finding Order in Nature: The Naturalist Tradition from Linnaeus to E. O. Wilson. Johns Hopkins Introductory Studies in the History of Science, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Sigwart, J. D. (2018). What Species Mean: A User’s Guide to the Units of Biodiversity, Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Ereshefsky, M. (2000). The Poverty of Linnaean Hierarchy: A Philosophical Study of Biological Taxonomy, Cambridge, UK/New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Diamond, J. M. (2005). Collapse: How Societies Choose to Fail or Succeed, New York: Viking.Google Scholar
Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, Fast and Slow, London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
Paine, R. T. (1969). A note on trophic complexity and community stability. American Naturalist, 103, 91–93.Google Scholar
Seddon, P. J. & Leech, T. (2008). Conservation short cut, or long and winding road? A critique of umbrella species criteria. Oryx, 42, 240–245.Google Scholar
Tversky, A., & Gati, I. (1978). Studies of similarity. In Rosch, E & B. B. Lloyd, , eds., Cognition and Categorization, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 79–98.Google Scholar
Warren, C. R. (2007). Perspectives on the “alien” versus “native” species debate: a critique of concepts, language and practice. Progress in Human Geography, 31, 427–446.Google Scholar
Wilson, E. O. (1992). The Diversity of Life, Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, p. 31.Google Scholar
Wilson, E. O. (2000). Vanishing before our eyes. Time, 155, 28–31, 34.Google Scholar
Jepson, P. & Blythe, C. (2020). Rewilding: The Radical New Science of Ecological Recovery, London: Icon Books Limited.Google Scholar
Kolbert, E. (2014). The Sixth Extinction: An Unnatural History, London: Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar
Maclaurin, J. & Sterelny, K. (2008). What Is Biodiversity? Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Stuart, A. J. (2021). Vanished Giants: The Lost World of the Ice Age, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Woudstra, J. & Roth, C., eds. (2017). A History of Groves, Oxford/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Diamond, J. M. (2005). Collapse: How Societies Choose to Fail or Succeed, New York: Viking.Google Scholar
Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, Fast and Slow, London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
Paine, R. T. (1969). A note on trophic complexity and community stability. American Naturalist, 103, 91–93.Google Scholar
Seddon, P. J. & Leech, T. (2008). Conservation short cut, or long and winding road? A critique of umbrella species criteria. Oryx, 42, 240–245.Google Scholar
Tversky, A., & Gati, I. (1978). Studies of similarity. In Rosch, E & B. B. Lloyd, , eds., Cognition and Categorization, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 79–98.Google Scholar
Warren, C. R. (2007). Perspectives on the “alien” versus “native” species debate: a critique of concepts, language and practice. Progress in Human Geography, 31, 427–446.Google Scholar
Wilson, E. O. (1992). The Diversity of Life, Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, p. 31.Google Scholar
Wilson, E. O. (2000). Vanishing before our eyes. Time, 155, 28–31, 34.Google Scholar
Jepson, P. & Blythe, C. (2020). Rewilding: The Radical New Science of Ecological Recovery, London: Icon Books Limited.Google Scholar
Kolbert, E. (2014). The Sixth Extinction: An Unnatural History, London: Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar
Maclaurin, J. & Sterelny, K. (2008). What Is Biodiversity? Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Stuart, A. J. (2021). Vanished Giants: The Lost World of the Ice Age, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Woudstra, J. & Roth, C., eds. (2017). A History of Groves, Oxford/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bradshaw, K. (2020) Wildlife as Property Owners: A New Conception of Animal Rights, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Deigh, J. (2010). An Introduction to Ethics. Cambridge Introductions to Philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162, 1243–1248.Google Scholar
Leopold, A. (1949). A Sand County Almanac, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Naess, A. (1973). The shallow and the deep, long‐range ecology movement. A summary. Inquiry, 16, 95–100.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice, Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Roosevelt, T. (1910). The Wilderness Hunter, New York: G. P. Putnam and Sons.Google Scholar
Sandler, R. (2017). Environmental Ethics: Theory in Practice, Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Singer, P. (1975). Animal Liberation: A New Ethics for Our Treatment of Animals. A New York Review Book, New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Singer, P. 1981. The Expanding Circle: Ethics and Sociobiology, Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
White, L. (1967). The historical roots of our ecologic crisis. Science, 155, 1203.Google Scholar
Wilson, E. O. (1992). The Diversity of Life, Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Attfield, R. (2018). Environmental Ethics: A Very Short Introduction, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Maclaurin, J. & Sterelny, K. (2008). What Is Biodiversity? Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Oakes, J. (2016). Garrett Hardin’s tragic sense of life. Science in the Public Eye, 40, 238–247.Google Scholar
Sandler, R. (2012). The Ethics of Species: An Introduction, Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bradshaw, K. (2020) Wildlife as Property Owners: A New Conception of Animal Rights, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Deigh, J. (2010). An Introduction to Ethics. Cambridge Introductions to Philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162, 1243–1248.Google Scholar
Leopold, A. (1949). A Sand County Almanac, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Naess, A. (1973). The shallow and the deep, long‐range ecology movement. A summary. Inquiry, 16, 95–100.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice, Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Roosevelt, T. (1910). The Wilderness Hunter, New York: G. P. Putnam and Sons.Google Scholar
Sandler, R. (2017). Environmental Ethics: Theory in Practice, Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Singer, P. (1975). Animal Liberation: A New Ethics for Our Treatment of Animals. A New York Review Book, New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Singer, P. 1981. The Expanding Circle: Ethics and Sociobiology, Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
White, L. (1967). The historical roots of our ecologic crisis. Science, 155, 1203.Google Scholar
Wilson, E. O. (1992). The Diversity of Life, Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Attfield, R. (2018). Environmental Ethics: A Very Short Introduction, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Maclaurin, J. & Sterelny, K. (2008). What Is Biodiversity? Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Oakes, J. (2016). Garrett Hardin’s tragic sense of life. Science in the Public Eye, 40, 238–247.Google Scholar
Sandler, R. (2012). The Ethics of Species: An Introduction, Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Geoffroy, M. & Berendsohn, W. (2003). The concept problem in taxonomy: importance, components, approaches. In Schriftenreihe für Vegetationskunde, Vol. 39, pp. 5–14.Google Scholar
Lenski, R. E. (2022). The E. coli long-term experimental evolution project site. http://myxo.css.msu.edu/ecoliGoogle Scholar
Locke, J. (1997). An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, London: Penguin Books [first published 1689].Google Scholar
Mishler, B. D. & Wilkins, J. S. (2018). The hunting of the SNaRC: a snarky solution to the species problem. Philosophy, Theory, and Practice in Biology, 10, 1–18.Google Scholar
Pigliucci, M. (2003). Species as family resemblance concepts: the (dis-)solution of the species problem? Bioessays, 25, 596–602.Google Scholar
Pleijel, F. & Rouse, G. W. (2000). Least-inclusive taxonomic unit: a new taxonomic concept for biology. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences, 267, 627–630.Google Scholar
The source text for phenetics is:Google Scholar
Sokal, R. R. & Sneath, P. H. A. (1963). Principles of Numerical Taxonomy, San Francisco, CA: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Cole, C. J., Hardy, L. M., Dessauer, H. C., Taylor, H. L. & Townsend, C. R. (2010). Laboratory hybridization among North American Whiptail Lizards, including Aspidoscelis Inornata Arizonae × A. tigris marmorata (Squamata: Teiidae), ancestors of unisexual clones in nature. American Museum Novitates, 3698, 1–43.Google Scholar
Ereshefsky, M. (2000). The Poverty of Linnaean Hierarchy: A Philosophical Study of Biological Taxonomy, Cambridge, UK/New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hey, J. (2001). Genes, Concepts and Species: The Evolutionary and Cognitive Causes of the Species Problem, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
If you want something meatier:Google Scholar
Slater, M. H. (2016). Are Species Real? An Essay on the Metaphysics of Species, Basingstoke/New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Geoffroy, M. & Berendsohn, W. (2003). The concept problem in taxonomy: importance, components, approaches. In Schriftenreihe für Vegetationskunde, Vol. 39, pp. 5–14.Google Scholar
Lenski, R. E. (2022). The E. coli long-term experimental evolution project site. http://myxo.css.msu.edu/ecoliGoogle Scholar
Locke, J. (1997). An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, London: Penguin Books [first published 1689].Google Scholar
Mishler, B. D. & Wilkins, J. S. (2018). The hunting of the SNaRC: a snarky solution to the species problem. Philosophy, Theory, and Practice in Biology, 10, 1–18.Google Scholar
Pigliucci, M. (2003). Species as family resemblance concepts: the (dis-)solution of the species problem? Bioessays, 25, 596–602.Google Scholar
Pleijel, F. & Rouse, G. W. (2000). Least-inclusive taxonomic unit: a new taxonomic concept for biology. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences, 267, 627–630.Google Scholar
The source text for phenetics is:Google Scholar
Sokal, R. R. & Sneath, P. H. A. (1963). Principles of Numerical Taxonomy, San Francisco, CA: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Cole, C. J., Hardy, L. M., Dessauer, H. C., Taylor, H. L. & Townsend, C. R. (2010). Laboratory hybridization among North American Whiptail Lizards, including Aspidoscelis Inornata Arizonae × A. tigris marmorata (Squamata: Teiidae), ancestors of unisexual clones in nature. American Museum Novitates, 3698, 1–43.Google Scholar
Ereshefsky, M. (2000). The Poverty of Linnaean Hierarchy: A Philosophical Study of Biological Taxonomy, Cambridge, UK/New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hey, J. (2001). Genes, Concepts and Species: The Evolutionary and Cognitive Causes of the Species Problem, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
If you want something meatier:Google Scholar
Slater, M. H. (2016). Are Species Real? An Essay on the Metaphysics of Species, Basingstoke/New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Burnett, D. G. (2007). Trying Leviathan: The Nineteenth-Century New York Court Case That Put the Whale on Trial and Challenged the Order of Nature, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Dewey, J. (1910). The Influence of Darwin on Philosophy, Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Maynard Smith, J. (1958). The Theory of Evolution, Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Shubin, N. (2008). Your Inner Fish: A Journey into the 3.5-Billion-Year History of the Human Body, London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
De Regt, H. W. (2017). Understanding Scientific Understanding. Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Science, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wüster, W., Thomson, S. A., O’Shea, M. & Kaiser, H. (2021). Confronting taxonomic vandalism in biology: conscientious community self-organization can preserve nomenclatural stability. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 133, 645–670.Google Scholar
Burnett, D. G. (2007). Trying Leviathan: The Nineteenth-Century New York Court Case That Put the Whale on Trial and Challenged the Order of Nature, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Dewey, J. (1910). The Influence of Darwin on Philosophy, Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Maynard Smith, J. (1958). The Theory of Evolution, Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Shubin, N. (2008). Your Inner Fish: A Journey into the 3.5-Billion-Year History of the Human Body, London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
De Regt, H. W. (2017). Understanding Scientific Understanding. Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Science, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wüster, W., Thomson, S. A., O’Shea, M. & Kaiser, H. (2021). Confronting taxonomic vandalism in biology: conscientious community self-organization can preserve nomenclatural stability. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 133, 645–670.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×