References

Theresa Neumaier

doi:10.1017/9781108936996.009

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 30 March 2023

Theresa Neumaier

Show author details

Theresa Neumaier: Affiliation:
Technische Universität Dortmund

Book contents

Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Type: Chapter
Information: Conversation in World Englishes
Turn-Taking and Cultural Variation in Southeast Asian and Caribbean English
, pp. 272 - 287

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108936996.009 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aijmer, K., 2011. Well I’m not sure I think … The use of ‘well’ by non-native speakers. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 16(2), pp. 231–254.Google Scholar

Andersen, G., 2001. Pragmatic Markers and Sociolinguistic Variation: A Relevance-theoretic Approach to the Language of Adolescents. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRef Google Scholar

Anthony, L., 2020. AntConc (Version 3.5.9 Macintosh OS X). Tokyo: Waseda University.Google Scholar

Auer, P., 2007. Syntax als Prozess. In: Hausendorf, H., ed. Gespräch als Prozess. Tübingen: Narr, pp. 95–124.Google Scholar

Auer, P., 2015. The temporality of language in interaction: Projection and latency. In: Deppermann, A. & Günthner, S., eds. Temporality in Interaction. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 27–56.Google Scholar

Barron, A. & Schneider, K. P., 2009. Variational pragmatics: Studying the impact of social factors on language use in interaction. Intercultural Pragmatics, 6(4), pp. 425–442.CrossRef Google Scholar

Bengtsson, M. & Kock, S., 2015. Tension in co-opetition. In: Spotts, H. E., ed. Creating and Delivering Value in Marketing: Developments in Marketing Science: Proceedings of the Academy of Marketing Science. Washington, DC: Springer, pp. 38–42.Google Scholar

Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., et al., 1999. The Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.Google Scholar

Bilmes, J., 1997. Being interrupted. Language in Society, 26(4), pp. 507–531.CrossRef Google Scholar

Bolden, G., 2006. Little words that matter: Discourse markers ‘so’ and ‘oh’ and the doing of other-attentiveness in social interaction. Journal of Communication, 56(4), pp. 661–688.Google Scholar

Bolden, G., 2009. Implementing incipient actions: The discourse marker ‘so’ in English conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 41(5), pp. 974–998.Google Scholar

Bolton, K. & Graddol, D., 2012. English in China today. English Today, 28(1), pp. 3–9.Google Scholar

Bortfeld, H., Leon, S. D, Bloom, J. E., et al., 2001. Disfluency rates in conversation: Effects of age, relationship, topic, role, and gender. Language and Speech, 44(2), pp. 123–147.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Brandenburger, A. M. & Nalebuff, B. J., 1995. The right game: Use game theory to shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 73(4), pp. 57–71.Google Scholar

Brato, T., 2019. Lexical expansion in Ghanaian English from a diachronic perspective: A structural and semantic analysis. In: Esimaje, A., Gut, U., & Antia, B. E., eds. Corpus Linguistics and African Englishes. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 259–291.Google Scholar

Buschfeld, S., 2020. Children’s English in Singapore: Acquisition, Properties, and Us. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Buschfeld, S. & Kautzsch, A., 2017. Towards an integrative approach to postcolonial and non-postcolonial Englishes. World Englishes, 36(1), pp. 104–126.Google Scholar

Chen, M.-J., 2008. Reconceptualizing the competition-cooperation relationship: A transparadox perspective. Journal of Management Inquiry, 17(4), pp. 288–304.CrossRef Google Scholar

Chinese Culture Connection, 1987. Chinese values and the search for culture-free dimensions of culture. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 18(2), pp. 143–164.CrossRef Google Scholar

Clancy, B. & McCarthy, M., 2015. Co-constructed turn-taking. In: Aijmer, K. & Rühlemann, C., eds. Corpus Pragmatics: A Handbook. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 430–453.Google Scholar

Clancy, P., Thompson, S. A., Suzuki, R., et al., 1996. The conversational use of reactive tokens in English, Japanese, and Mandarin. Journal of Pragmatics, 26(3), pp. 355–387.CrossRef Google Scholar

Clark, H. H. & Fox Tree, J. E., 2002. Using uh and um in spontaneous speaking. Cognition, 84, pp. 73–111.Google Scholar

Clayman, S. E., 2010. Address terms in the service of other actions: The case of news interview talk. Discourse & Communication, 4(2), pp. 161–183.CrossRef Google Scholar

Clayman, S. E., 2013. Turn-constructional units and the transition relevance place. In: Sidnell, J. & Stivers, T., eds. The Handbook of Conversation Analysis. Malden, MA: Blackwell, pp. 150–166.Google Scholar

Clift, R., Drew, P., & Hutchby, I., 2009. Conversation analysis. In: D’hondt, S., Östman, J., & Verschueren, J., eds. The Pragmatics of Interaction. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 40–54.Google Scholar

Clyne, M., 1994. Intercultural Communication at Work: Cultural Values in Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Coates, J., 1996. Women Talk: Conversations between Women Friends. Cambridge: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Corley, M., MacGregor, L. J., & Donaldson, D. I., 2007. It’s the way that you, er, say it: Hesitations in speech affect language comprehension. Cognition, 105(3), pp. 658–668.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Corley, M. & Stewart, O. W., 2008. Hesitation disfluencies in spontaneous speech. Language and Linguistics Compass, 2(4), pp. 589–602.Google Scholar

Couper-Kuhlen, E. & Ono, T., 2007. ‘Incrementing’ in conversation: A comparison of practices in English, German and Japanese. Pragmatics, 17(4), pp. 513–552.Google Scholar

Couper-Kuhlen, E. & Selting, M., 1996. Towards an interactional perspective on prosody and a prosodic perspective on interaction. In: Couper-Kuhlen, E. & Selting, M., eds. Prosody in Conversation: Interactional Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 11–56.CrossRef Google Scholar

Couper-Kuhlen, E. & Selting, M., 2018. Interactional Linguistics: Studying Language in Social Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Crystal, D., 1979. Neglected grammatical factors in conversational English. In: Greenbaum, S., Leech, G. N., & Svartvik, J., eds. Studies in English Linguistics: For Randolph Quirk. London: Longman, pp. 153–166.Google Scholar

Crystal, D., 2008. Two thousand million? Updates on the statistics of English. English Today, 24(1), pp. 3–6.Google Scholar

Deuber, D., 2014. English in the Caribbean: Variation, Style and Standards in Jamaica and Trinidad. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Dingemanse, M., Blythe, J., & Dirksmeyer, T., 2014. Formats for the other-initiation of repair across languages: An exercise in language typology. Studies in Language, 38(1), pp. 5–43.CrossRef Google Scholar

D’souza, J., 1988. Interactional strategies in South Asian languages: Their implications for teaching English internationally. World Englishes, 7(2), pp. 159–171.Google Scholar

Dunbar, R. I. M., Duncan, N. D. C., & Nettle, D., 1995. Size and structure of freely forming conversational groups. Human Nature, 6(1), pp. 67–78.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Duncan, S., 1972. Some signals and rules for taking speaking turns in conversations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 23(2), pp. 283–292.Google Scholar

Duncan, S. & Fiske, D. W., 1977. Face to Face Interaction: Research, Methods, and Theory. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Eades, D., 2007. Understanding Aboriginal silence in legal contexts. In: Kotthoff, H. & Spencer-Oatey, H., eds. Handbook of Intercultural Communication. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 285–301.Google Scholar

Edelsky, C., 1981. Who’s got the floor?. Language in Society, 10(3), pp. 383–421.Google Scholar

Egbert, M., 1996. Context-sensitivity in conversation: Eye gaze and the German repair initiator ‘bitte?’. Language in Society, 25(4), pp. 587–612.Google Scholar

Eglin, P., 2015. Language, culture, and interaction. In: Sharifian, F., ed. The Routledge Handbook of Language and Culture. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 141–153.Google Scholar

Enfield, N. J. & Sidnell, J., 2014. Language presupposes an enchronic infrastructure for social interaction. In: Dor, D., Knight, C., & Lewis, J., eds. The Social Origins of Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 92–104.Google Scholar

Enfield, N. J., Stivers, T., Brown, P., et al., 2019. Polar answers. Journal of Linguistics, 55(2), pp. 277–304.Google Scholar

Fang, T., 2011. Yin Yang: A new perspective on culture. Management and Organization Review, 8(1), pp. 25–50.Google Scholar

Ferrara, K., 1992. The interactive achievement of a sentence: Joint productions in therapeutic discourse. Discourse Processes, 15(2), pp. 207–228.CrossRef Google Scholar

Figueroa, E., 2005. Rude sounds: Kiss Teeth and negotiation of the public sphere. In: Mühleisen, S. & Migge, B., eds. Politeness and Face in Caribbean Creoles. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 73–99.Google Scholar

Fischer, K., 2000. Discourse particles, turn-taking, and the semantics-pragmatics interface. Revue de Sémantique et Pragmatique, 8, pp. 111–137.Google Scholar

FitzGerald, H. G., 2003. How Different Are We? Spoken Discourse in Intercultural Communication: The Significance of the Situational Context. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

Fletcher, J. & Loakes, D., 2006. Patterns of rising and falling in Australian English. In: Warren, P. & Watson, C. I., eds. Proceedings of the Eleventh Australasian International Conference on Speech Science and Technology. s.l.:University of Auckland, pp. 42–47.Google Scholar

Ford, C. E., 2001. Denial and the construction of conversational turns. In: Bybee, J. & Noonan, M., eds. Complex Sentences in Grammar and Discourse. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 61–78.Google Scholar

Ford, C. E., Fox, B. A., & Thompson, S. A., 1996. Practices in the construction of turns: The ‘TCU’ revisited. Pragmatics, 6(3), pp. 427–454.Google Scholar

Ford, C. E., Fox, B. A., & Thompson, S. A., 2002. Constituency and the grammar of turn increments. In: Ford, C. E., Fox, B. A., & Thompson, S. A., eds. The Language of Turn and Sequence. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 14–38.Google Scholar

Fox, B. A., Hayashi, M., & Jasperson, R., 1996. A cross-linguistic study of syntax and repair. In: Ochs, E., Schegloff, E. A., & Thompson, S. A., eds. Interaction and Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 185–237.Google Scholar

Fox, B., Wouk, F., Hayashi, M., et al., 2009. A cross-linguistic investigation of the site of initiation in same-turn self-repair. In: Sidnell, J., ed. Conversation Analysis: Comparative Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 60–103.Google Scholar

French, P. & Local, J., 1983. Turn-competitive incomings. Journal of Pragmatics, 7, pp. 17–38.Google Scholar

Görlach, M., 2002. Still More Englishes. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar

Gardner, R., 2001. When Listeners Talk: Response Tokens and Listener Stance. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar

Gardner, R. & Mushin, I., 2007. Post-start-up overlap and disattentiveness in talk in a Garrwa Community. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 30(3), pp. 35.1–35.14.Google Scholar

Gilquin, G., 2008. Hesitation markers among EFL learners: Pragmatic deficiency or difference? In: Romero-Trillo, J., ed. Pragmatics and Corpus Linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 119–149.CrossRef Google Scholar

Glenn, P. J., 1989. Inviting shared laughter in multi-party conversations. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 53(2), pp. 127–149.Google Scholar

Glenn, P. J., 2003. Laughter in Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

GLOBE, 2020, n.d. Global Leadership & Organizational Behavior Effectiveness: 2004 Data. https://globeproject.com/results (accessed 28.09.2021).Google Scholar

Goldman-Eisler, F., 1968. Psycholinguistics: Experiments in Spontaneous Speech. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Goodwin, C., 1986. Between and within: Alternative sequential treatments of continuers and assessments. Human Studies, 9, pp. 205–217.Google Scholar

Goodwin, C., 2000. Action and embodiment within situated human interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 32(10), pp. 1489–1522.Google Scholar

Graham, L. R., 1995. Performing Dreams: Discourses of Immortality among the Xavante of Central Brazil. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar

Gupta, A. F., 1992. The pragmatic particles of Singapore Colloquial English. Journal of Pragmatics, 18, pp. 31–57.Google Scholar

Gut, U., 2011. Studying structural innovations in New English varieties. In: Mukherjee, J. & Hundt, M., eds. Exploring Second-Language Varieties of English and Learner English: Bridging a Paradigm Gap. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 101–124.Google Scholar

Guy, G., Horvath, B., Vonwiller, J., et al., 1986. An intonational change in progress in Australian English. Language in Society, 15(1), pp. 23–51.Google Scholar

Hall, E. T., 1976. Beyond Culture. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar

Haselow, A., 2021. Dealing with trouble in conversation in English-speaking cultures: Conversational repair in global varieties of English. English World-Wide, 42(3), pp. 324–349.Google Scholar

Haviland, W. A., 1990. Cultural Anthropology. Orlando, FL: Hold, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar

Hayashi, M., 2004. Projection and grammar: Notes on the ‘action-projecting’ use of the distal demonstrative ‘are’ in Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics, 36, pp. 1337–1374.Google Scholar

Hayashi, M., 2005. Joint construction through language and the body: Notes on embodiment in coordinated participation in situated activities. Semiotica, 156, pp. 21–53.Google Scholar

Hayashi, M., 2013. Turn allocation and turn sharing. In: Sidnell, J. & Stivers, T., eds. The Handbook of Conversation Analysis. Malden, MA: Blackwell, pp. 167–190.Google Scholar

Heath, C. & Luff, P., 1993. Explicating face-to-face interaction. In: Gilbert, N., ed. Researching Social Life. London: Sage, pp. 306–326.Google Scholar

Heldner, M. & Edlund, J., 2010. Pauses, gaps and overlaps in conversation. Journal of Phonetics, 38, pp. 555–568.Google Scholar

Hepburn, A. & Bolden, G. B., 2017. Transcribing for Social Research. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Heritage, J., 1984. A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement. In: Atkinson, J. M. & Heritage, J., eds. Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 299–345.Google Scholar

Heritage, J., 1987. Enthnomethodology. In: Giddens, A. & Turner, J. H., eds. Social Theory Today. Cambridge: Polity Press, pp. 224–272.Google Scholar

Heritage, J., 1995. Conversation Analysis: Methodological aspects. In: Quasthoff, U. M., ed. Aspects of Oral Communication. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, pp. 391–418.Google Scholar

Heritage, J., 2015. ‘Well’-prefaced turns in English conversation: A conversation analytic perspective. Journal of Pragmatics, 88, pp. 88–104.Google Scholar

Hoey, E. M., 2018. How speakers continue with talk after a lapse in conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 51(3), pp. 329–346.Google Scholar

Hofstede, G., 2001. Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations Across Nations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Hofstede, G., 2021. The 6-D Model of National Culture. https://geerthofstede.com/culture-geert-hofstede-gert-jan-hofstede/6d-model-of-national-culture/ (accessed 28.09.2021).Google Scholar

Holt, E. & Drew, P., 2005. Figurative pivots: The use of figurative expressions in pivotal topic transitions. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 38(1), pp. 35–61.Google Scholar

Hopper, P. J., 2004. The openness of grammatical constructions. Papers from the 40th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 40(2), pp. 143–175.Google Scholar

Hopper, R., 1989. Conversation Analysis and Social Psychology as descriptions of interpersonal communication. In: Roger, D. & Bull, P., eds. Conversation: An Interdisciplinary Perspective. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, pp. 48–65.Google Scholar

Horlacher, A.-S. & Pekarek Doehler, S., 2014. ‘Pivotage’ in French talk-in-interaction: On the emergent natrue of [clause-NP-clause] pivots. Pragmatics, 24(3), pp. 593–622.Google Scholar

House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Davidan, M., et al. eds., 2004. Culture, Leadership, and Organizations: The GLOBE Study of 62 Societies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Howard, G. & Ogay, T., 2007. Communication Accommodation Theory. In: Whaley, B. B. & Samter, W., eds. Explaining Communication: Contemporary Theories and Exemplars. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 293–310.Google Scholar

Huang, L.-F., 2019. A corpus-based exploration of the discourse marker ‘well’ in spoken interlanguage. Language and Speech, 62(3), pp. 570–593.Google Scholar

Hutchby, I., 2008. Participants’ orientations to interruptions, rudeness and other impolite acts in talk-in-interaction. Journal of Politeness Research, 4(2), pp. 221–241.Google Scholar

Inglehart, R. & Baker, W. E., 2000. Modernization, cultural change, and the persistence of traditional values. American Sociological Review, 65(1), pp. 19–51.Google Scholar

Inglehart, R., Haerpfer, C., Moreno, A., et al., 2014. World Values Survey: Round Six – Country-Pooled Datafile Version. www.worldvaluessurvey.org/WVSDocumentationWV6.jsp (accessed 09.2021).Google Scholar

Iwasaki, S., 2009. Initiating interactive turn spaces in Japanese conversation: Local projection and collaborative action. Discourse Processes, 46(2–3), pp. 226–246.Google Scholar

James, D. & Clarke, S., 1993. Women, men, and interruptions: A critical review. In: Tannen, D., ed. Gender and Conversational Interaction. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 231–280.Google Scholar

James, W. & Youssef, V., 2004. The creoles of Trinidad and Tobago: Morphology and syntax. In: Kortmann, B., Burridge, K., Mesthrie, R., et al., eds. A Handbook of Varieties of English: Volume 2: Morphology and Syntax. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 454–481.Google Scholar

Jasperson, R., 2002. Some linguistic aspects of closure cut-offs. In: Ford, C. E., Fox, B. A., & Thompson, S. A., eds. The Language of Turn and Sequence. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 257–286.Google Scholar

Jefferson, G., 1974. Error correction as an interactional resource. Language in Society, 3(2), pp. 181–199.Google Scholar

Jefferson, G., 1979. A technique for inviting laughter and its subsequent acceptance declination. In: Psathas, G., ed. Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology. New York: Irvington Publishers, pp. 79–96.Google Scholar

Jefferson, G., 1983a. Notes on a systematic deployment of the acknowledgement tokens ‘yeah’ and ‘mm hm’. In: Jefferson, G., ed. Two Papers on Transitory Recipientship. Tilburg: Tilburg Papers in Language and Literature 28, pp. 1–18.Google Scholar

Jefferson, G., 1983b. On a failed hypothesis: ‘Conjunctionals’ as overlap-vulnerable. In: Jefferson, G., ed. Two Explorations of the Organization of Overlapping Talk in Conversation. Tilburg: Tilburg Papers in Language and Literature 28, pp. 1–33.Google Scholar

Jefferson, G., 1984. Notes on some orderliness of overlap onset. In: D’Urso, V. & Leonardi, P., eds. Discourse Analysis and Natural Rhetorics. Padua: cleup editore, pp. 11–38.Google Scholar

Jefferson, G., 1985. An exercise in the transcription and analysis of laughter. In: van Dijk, T. A., ed. Handbook of Discourse Analysis. New York: Academic Press, pp. 25–34.Google Scholar

Jefferson, G., 1986a. Notes on ‘latency’ in overlap onset. Human Studies, 9(2–3), pp. 153–183.Google Scholar

Jefferson, G., 1986b. On stepwise transition from talk about trouble to inappropriately next-positioned matches. In: Atkinson, J. M. & Heritage, J., eds. Structures of Social Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 191–222.Google Scholar

Jefferson, G., 2002. Is ‘no’ an acknowledgement token? Comparing American and British uses of (+)/(-) tokens. Journal of Pragmatics, 34(10–11), pp. 1345–1383.Google Scholar

Jefferson, G., 2004. A sketch of some orderly aspects of overlap in natural conversation. In: Lerner, G. H., ed. Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 43–59.Google Scholar

Kachru, B. B., 1985. Standards, codification and sociolinguistic realism: The English language in the outer circle. In: Quirk, R. & Widdowson, H. G., eds. English in the World: Teaching and Learning the Language and Literatures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press & The British Council, pp. 11–30.Google Scholar

Kachru, Y. & Smith, L. E., 2008. Cultures, Contexts, and World Englishes. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Keevallik, L., 2013. Accomplishing continuity across sequences and encounters: ‘No(h)’-prefaced initiations in Estonian. Journal of Pragmatics, 57, pp. 274–289.CrossRef Google Scholar

Kendrick, K. H., 2015. The intersection of turn-taking and repair: The timing of other-initiations of repair in conversation. Frontiers in Psychology, 6(250), pp. 1–16.Google Scholar

Kendrick, K. H. & Torreira, F., 2015. The timing and construction of preference: A quantitative study. Discourse Processes, 52(4), pp. 255–289.Google Scholar

Kirk, J. & Nelson, G., 2018. The International Corpus of English project: A progress report. World Englishes, 37(4), pp. 697–716.Google Scholar

Kirkpatrick, A., 2010. English as a Lingua Franca in ASEAN: A Multilingual Model. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Kirkpatrick, A., Lixun, W., Patkin, J., et al. 2020. ACE. https://corpus.eduhk.hk/ace/index.html (accessed 08.2021).Google Scholar

Kita, S. & Ide, S., 2007. Nodding, ‘aizuchi’, and final particles in Japanese conversation: How conversation reflects the ideology of communication and social relationships. Journal of Pragmatics, 39(7), pp. 1242–1254.Google Scholar

Kjellmer, G., 2003. Hesitation: In defence of ER and ERM. English Studies, 84(2), pp. 170–198.Google Scholar

Kjellmer, G., 2009. Where do we backchannel? On the use of mm, mhm, uh huh and such like. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 14(1), pp. 81–112.Google Scholar

Klumm, M., 2021. Nominal and Pronominal Address in Jamaica and Trinidad. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar

Kortmann, B. & Lunkenheimer, K., 2013. The Electronic World Atlas of Varieties of English. http://ewave-atlas.org (accessed 08.03.2021).CrossRef Google Scholar

Kurtić, E., Brown, G. J., & Wells, B., 2013. Resources for turn competition in overlapping talk. Speech Communication, 55, pp. 721–743.Google Scholar

Kwan-Terry, A., 1991. Child Language Development in Singapore and Malaysia. Singapore: Singapore University Press.Google Scholar

Labov, W., 1970. The study of language in its social context. Studium Generale, 23, pp. 30–87.Google Scholar

Ladefoged, P., 1982. A Course in Phonetics. 2nd ed. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar

Lehtonen, J. & Sajavaara, K., 1985. The silent Finn. In: Tannen, D. & Saville-Troike, M., eds. Perspectives on Silence. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, pp. 193–201.Google Scholar

Leimgruber, J. R. E., 2013. Singapore English: Structure, Variation, and Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lerner, G. H., 1996. On the “semi-permeable” character of grammatical units in conversation. Conditional entry into the turn space of another speaker. In: Ochs, E., Schegloff, E. A., & Thompson, S. A., eds. Interaction and Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 238–276.Google Scholar

Lerner, G. H., 2003. Selecting next speaker: The context-sensitive operation of a context-free organization. Language in Society, 32(2), pp. 177–201.Google Scholar

Lerner, G. H., 2004a. On the place of linguistic resources in the organization of talk-in-interaction: Grammar as action in prompting a speaker to elaborate. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 37(2), pp. 151–184.Google Scholar

Lerner, G. H., 2004b. Collaborative turn sequences. In: Lerner, G. H., ed. Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 225–256.Google Scholar

Lerner, G. H. & Takagi, T., 1999. On the place of linguistic resources in the organization of talk-in-interaction: A co-investigation of English and Japanese grammatical practices. Journal of Pragmatics, 31, pp. 49–75.Google Scholar

Leuckert, S., 2019. Topicalization in Asian Englishes: Forms, Functions, and Frequencies of a Fronting Construction. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Leuckert, S. & Neumaier, T., 2016. Copula deletion in English as a Lingua Franca in Asia. 10plus1: Living Linguistics, 2, pp. 86–106.Google Scholar

Levinson, S. C., 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Levinson, S. C., 2013. Action formation and action ascription. In: Sidnell, J. & Stivers, T., eds. The Handbook of Conversation Analysis. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 103–130.Google Scholar

Levinson, S. C. & Torreira, F., 2015. Timing in turn-taking and its implication for processing models of language. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, pp. 1–17.Google Scholar

Levitin, T., 1973. Values. In: Robinson, J. P. & Shaver, P. R., eds. Measures of Social Psychological Attitudes. Ann Arbor, MI: Survey Research Center, ISR, pp. 489–502.Google Scholar

Lim, L., 2007. Mergers and acquisitions: On the ages and origins of Singapore English particles. World Englishes, 26(4), pp. 446–473.Google Scholar

Li, P. P., 2008. Toward a geocentric framework of trust: An application to organizational trust. Management and Organization Review, 4(3), pp. 413–439.Google Scholar

Li, X., 2014. Multimodality, Interaction and Turn-taking in Mandarin Conversation. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar

Local, J., 1996. Conversational phonetics: Some aspects of news receipts in everyday talk. In: Couper-Kuhlen, E. & Selting, M., eds. Prosody in Conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 177–230.Google Scholar

Local, J. & Kelly, J., 1986. Projection and ‘silences’: Notes on phonetic and conversational structure. Human Studies, 9(2–3), pp. 185–204.Google Scholar

Local, J., Kelly, J., & Wells, W. H. G., 1986. Towards a phonology of conversation: Turn-taking in Tyneside English. Journal of Linguistics, 22, pp. 411–437.Google Scholar

Local, J. & Walker, G., 2004. Abrupt-joins as a resource for the production of multi-unit, multi-action turns. Journal of Pragmatics, 36, pp. 1375–1403.Google Scholar

Local, J. & Walker, G., 2012. How phonetic features project more talk. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, Volume 42(3), pp. 255–280.Google Scholar

Local, J., Wells, W. H. G., & Sebba, M., 1985. Phonology for conversation: Phonetic aspects of turn delimitation in London Jamaican. Journal of Pragmatics, 9, pp. 309–330.Google Scholar

Maclay, H. & Osgood, C. E., 1959. Hesitation phenomena in spontaneous English speech. Word, 15(1), pp. 19–44.Google Scholar

Markee, N., 2008. Toward a learning behavior tracking methodology for CA-for-SLA. Applied Linguistics, 29(3), pp. 404–427.Google Scholar

Maynard, D., 2013. Everyone and no one to turn to: Intellectual roots and contexts for Conversation Analysis. In: Sidnell, J. & Stivers, T., eds. The Handbook of Conversation Analysis. Chichester: Blackwell, pp. 11–31.Google Scholar

Meierkord, C., 2020. The global growth of English at the grassroots. In: Schreier, D., Hundt, M., & Schneider, E. W., eds. The Cambridge Handbook of World Englishes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 311–338.Google Scholar

Mesthrie, R., 1992. English in Language Shift: The History, Structure, and Sociolinguistics of South African Indian English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Mesthrie, R., 2004. Synopsis: The phonology of English in Africa and South and Southeast Asia. In: Schneider, E. W., Burridge, B., Kortmann, B., et al. eds. A Handbook of Varieties of English: Volume 1: Phonology. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, pp. 1099–1109.Google Scholar

Mey, J. L., 2007. Pragmatics: An Introduction. 2nd ed. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Meyer, C., 2018. Culture, Practice, and the Body: Conversational Organization and Embodied Culture in Northwestern Senegal. Stuttgart: J. B. Metzler.Google Scholar

Minkov, M., 2013. Cross-Cultural Analysis: The Science and Art of Comparing the World’s Modern Societies and Their Cultures. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Moerman, M., 1977. The preference for self-correction in a Thai conversational corpus. Language, 53(4), pp. 872–882.Google Scholar

Moerman, M., 1988. Talking Culture: Ethnography and Conversation Analysis. Philadelphia, PA: University of Philadelphia Press.Google Scholar

Mondada, L., 2019. Contemporary issues in Conversation Analysis: Embodiment and materiality, multimodality and multisensoriality in social interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 145, pp. 47–62.Google Scholar

Mulder, J., Thompson, S. A., & Williams, C. P., 2009. Final ‘but’ in Australian English conversation. In: Peters, P., Collins, P., & Smith, A., eds. Comparative Studies in Australian and New Zealand English: Grammar and Beyond. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 337–358.Google Scholar

Murray, S. O., 1985. Toward a model of members’ methods for recognizing interruptions. Language in Society, 14, pp. 31–40.Google Scholar

Nelson, G., 2002. Markup Manual for Spoken Texts - International Corpus of English. http://ice-corpora.net/ice/index.html (accessed 22.09.2021).Google Scholar

Neumaier, T., 2023. New Englishes and Conversation Analysis: Turn-taking as a factor in explaining syntactic variation. In: Wilson, G. & Westphal, M., eds. New Englishes, New Methods: Methodological Considerations for the Study of New Englishes. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 65–83.Google Scholar

Nevile, M., 2015. The embodied turn in research on language and social interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 48(2), pp. 121–151.Google Scholar

Ochs, E., 1984. Clarification and culture. In: Schiffrin, D., ed. Georgetown University Round Table in Languages and Linguistics. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, pp. 325–341.Google Scholar

O’Connell, D. C., Kowal, S., & Ageneau, C., 2005. Interjections in interviews. Journal of Psycholinguistics Research, 34(2), pp. 153–171.Google Scholar

Ogden, R., 2004. Non-modal voice quality and turn-taking in Finnish. In: Couper-Kuhlen, E. & Ford, C. E., eds. Sound Patterns in Interaction. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 29–62.Google Scholar

Ogden, R., 2013. Clicks and percussives in English conversation. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 43(3), pp. 299–320.Google Scholar

Ogden, R., 2018. The actions of peripheral linguistic objects: clicks. In: Ginzburg, J. & Pelachaud, C., eds. Proceedings of Laughter Workshop 2018. s.l.:Sorbonne Université, pp. 2–5.Google Scholar

Ogden, R., 2020. Audibly not saying something with clicks. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 53(1), pp. 66–89.Google Scholar

Ogden, R. & Routarinne, S., 2005. The communicative functions of final rises in Finnish intonation. Phonetica, 62(2–4), pp. 169–175.Google Scholar

Oreström, B., 1983. Turn-taking in English Conversation. Lund: CWK Gleerup.Google Scholar

Padula, G. & Dagnino, G. B., 2007. Untangling the rise of coopetition: The intrusion of competition in a cooperative game structure. International Studies of Management & Organization, 37(2), pp. 32–52.Google Scholar

Patrick, P. L., 2008. Jamaican Creole: Morphology and syntax. In: Schneider, E. W., ed. Varieties of English: The Americas and the Caribbean. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, pp. 609–644.Google Scholar

Pekarek Doehler, S., 2011. Emergent grammar for all practical purposes: The on-line formatting of left and right dislocations in French conversation. In: Auer, P. & Pfänder, S., eds. Constructions: Emerging and Emergent. Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 45–87.Google Scholar

Peters, P. & Wong, D., 2015. Turn management and backchannels. In: Aijmer, K. & Rühlemann, C., eds. Corpus Pragmatics: A Handbook. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 408–429.Google Scholar

Philips, S. U., 1976. Some sources of cultural variability in the regulation of talk. Language in Society, 5(1), pp. 81–95.Google Scholar

Platt, J., Weber, H., & Ho, M. L., 1984. The New Englishes. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Raymond, G., 2003. Grammar and social organization: Yes/no interrogatives and the structure of responding. American Sociological Review, 68(6), pp. 939–967.Google Scholar

Raymond, G., 2004. Prompting action: The stand-alone ‘so’ in ordinary conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 37(2), pp. 185–218.Google Scholar

Reber, E., 2012. Affectivity in Interaction: Sound Objects in English. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar

Reisman, K., 1974. Contrapuntual conversations in an Antiguan village. In: Baumann, R. & Sherzer, J., eds. Explorations in the Ethnography of Speaking. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 110–123.Google Scholar

Rieger, C. L., 2003. Repetitions as self-repair strategies in English and German conversations. Journal of Pragmatics, 35(1), pp. 47–69.Google Scholar

Roberts, S. G. & Levinson, S. C., 2017. Conversation, cognition and cultural evolution: A model of the cultural evolution of word order through pressures imposed from turn taking in conversation. Interaction Studies, 18(3), pp. 404–431.Google Scholar

Rosenfelder, I., Jantos, S., Höhn, N., et al., 2009. International Corpus of English: Manual for the Jamaican Component (ICE-JA). www.researchgate.net/publication/268285735_Manual_for_the_Jamaican_component_ICE-JA (accessed 09.08.2021).Google Scholar

RStudio, 2021. R Studio Desktop Open Source Edition. www.rstudio.com/products/rstudio (accessed 09.11.2021).Google Scholar

Rühlemann, C., Bagoutdinov, A., & Brook O’Donnell, M., 2011. Windows on the mind: Pauses in conversational narrative. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 16(2), pp. 198–230.Google Scholar

Sacks, H., 1974. An analysis of the course of a joke’s telling in conversation. In: Bauman, R. & Sherzer, J., eds. Explorations in the Ethnography of Speaking. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 337–353.Google Scholar

Sacks, H., 1984. Notes on methodology. In: Atkinson, J. M. & Heritage, J., eds. Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 21–27.Google Scholar

Sacks, H., 1992 [1967]. Lecture 1: The speaker sequencing problem. In: Jefferson, G., ed. Harvey Sacks: Lectures on Conversation. Malden, MA: Blackwell, pp. 624–632.Google Scholar

Sacks, H., 1992 [1968]. Lecture 3: Turn-taking; the notion ‘conversation’, noticeable absences, greetings, adjacency. In: Jefferson, G., ed. Harvey Sacks: Lectures on Conversation. Malden, MA: Blackwell, pp. 32–43.Google Scholar

Sacks, H., 1992 [1969]. Lecture 9: Sound shifts; showing understanding; dealing with ‘utterance completion’; practical mysticism. In: Jefferson, G., ed. Harvey Sacks: Lectures on Conversation. Malden, MA: Blackwell, pp. 137–149.Google Scholar

Sacks, H., 1992 [1971]. Lecture 4: Spouse talk. In: Jefferson, G., ed. Harvey Sacks: Lectures on Conversation. Malden, MA: Blackwell, pp. 437–443.Google Scholar

Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G., 1974. A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), pp. 696–735.Google Scholar

Schegloff, E. A., 1982. Discourse as an interactional achievement: Some uses of ‘uh huh’ and other things that come between sentences. In: Tannen, D., ed. Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, pp. 71–93.Google Scholar

Schegloff, E. A., 1987 [1973]. Recycled turn beginnings: A precise repair mechanism in conversation’s turn-taking organisation. In: Button, G. & Lee, J. R. E, eds. Talk and Social Organisation. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, pp. 70–85.Google Scholar

Schegloff, E. A., 1993. Reflections on quantification in the study of conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 26(1), pp. 99–128.Google Scholar

Schegloff, E. A., 1995. Parties and talking together: Two ways in which numbers are significant for talk-in-interaction. In: ten Have, P. & Psathas, G., eds. Situated Order: Studies in the Social Organization of Talk and Embodied Activities. Lanham, MD: University Press of America, pp. 31–42.Google Scholar

Schegloff, E. A., 1996. Turn organization: One intersection of grammar and interaction. In: Ochs, E., Schegloff, E. A., & Thompson, S. A., eds. Interaction and Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 52–133.Google Scholar

Schegloff, E. A., 1998. Reply to Wetherell. Discourse and Society, 9(3), pp. 457–460.Google Scholar

Schegloff, E. A., 2000. Overlapping talk and the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language in Society, 29(1), pp. 1–63.Google Scholar

Schegloff, E. A., 2006. Interaction: The infrastructure for social institutions, the natural ecological niche for language, and the arena in which culture is enacted. In: Enfield, N. J. & Levinson, S. C., eds. Roots of Human Society: Culture, Cognition and Interaction. Oxford: Berg, pp. 70–96.Google Scholar

Schegloff, E. A., 2007. Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Schegloff, E. A., 2013. Ten operations in self-initiated, same-turn repair. In: Hayashi, M., Raymond, G., & Sidnell, J., eds. Conversational Repair and Human Understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 41–70.Google Scholar

Schegloff, E. A., Jefferson, G., & Sacks, H., 1977. The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language, 53(2), pp. 361–382.Google Scholar

Schegloff, E. A. & Lerner, G. H., 2009. Beginning to respond: ‘Well’-prefaced responses to wh-questions. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 42, pp. 91–115.Google Scholar

Schegloff, E. A. & Sacks, H., 1973. Opening up closings. Semiotica, 8(4), pp. 289–327.Google Scholar

Scheutz, H., 2005. Pivot constructions in spoken German. In: Hakulinen, A. & Selting, M., eds. Syntax and Lexis in Conversation. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 103–128.Google Scholar

Schiffrin, D., 1987. Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Schiffrin, D., 2014. ‘Oh’ as a marker of information management. In: Jaworski, A. & Coupland, N., eds. The Discourse Reader. London: Routledge, pp. 254–275.Google Scholar

Schneider, E. W., 2004a. Synopsis: Morphological and syntactic variation in the Americas and the Caribbean. In: Kortmann, B. Burridge, B., Mesthrie, R., et al. eds. An Handbook of Varieties of English: Volume 2: Morphology and Syntax. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 1104–1115.Google Scholar

Schneider, E. W., 2004b. Global synopsis: Phonetic and phonological variation in English world-wide. In: Schneider, E. W., Burridge, B., Mesthrie, R., et al. eds. A Handbook of Varieties of English: Volume 1: Phonology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 1111–1137.Google Scholar

Schneider, E. W., 2014. Asian Englishes – into the future. A bird’s eye view. Asian Englishes, 16(3), pp. 249–256.Google Scholar

Schneider, E. W., 2017. Models of English in the world. In: Filppula, M., Klemola, J., & Sharma, D., eds. The Oxford Handbook of World Englishes. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 35–57.Google Scholar

Schneider, E. W., 2018. The interface between cultures and corpora: Tracing reflections and manifestations. ICAME Journal, 42(1), pp. 97–132.Google Scholar

Schneider, E. W., 2020. English around the World: An Introduction. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Schneider, G., 2017. International Corpus of English (ICE). www.ice-corpora.uzh.ch/en/design.html (accessed 08.2021).Google Scholar

Schröder, A. & Schneider, K. P., 2018. Variational pragmatics, responses to thanks, and the specificity of English in Namibia. English World-Wide, 39(9), pp. 338–368.Google Scholar

Schwartz, S. H., 1994. Beyond individualism/collectivism: New cultural dimensions of values. In: Kim, U., Triandis, H. C., Kagitcibasi, C., et al. eds. Individualism and Collectivism: Theory, Method, and Application. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 85–119.Google Scholar

Selting, M., 1995. Prosodie im Gespräch: Aspekte einer Interaktionalen Phonologie der Konversation. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar

Selting, M., 1996. On the interplay of syntax and prosody in the constitution of turn-constructional units and turns in conversation. Pragmatics, 6, pp. 357–388.Google Scholar

Selting, M., 2000. The construction of units in conversational talk. Language in Society, 29, pp. 477–517.Google Scholar

Selting, M., 2001. Fragments of units as deviant cases of unit-production in conversational talk. In: Selting, M. & Couper-Kuhlen, E., eds. Studies in Interactional Linguistics. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 229–258.Google Scholar

Selting, M., Auer, P., Barth-Weingarten, D., et al., 2009. Gesprächsanalytisches Transkriptionssystem 2 (GAT 2). Gesprächsforschung, 10, pp. 353–402.Google Scholar

Shields-Brodber, K., 1992. Dynamism and assertiveness in the public voice: Turn-taking and code-switching in radio talk shows in Jamaica. Pragmatics, 2(4), pp. 487–504.Google Scholar

Sidnell, J., 2001. Conversational turn-taking in a Caribbean English Creole. Journal of Pragmatics, 33(8), pp. 1263–1290.CrossRef Google Scholar

Sidnell, J., 2006. Conversational analytic approaches to culture. In: Brown, K., ed. Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics. s.l.:Elsevier Science, pp. 169–172.Google Scholar

Sidnell, J., 2007a. ‘Look’-prefaced turns in first and second position: Launching, interceding and redirecting action. Discourse Studies, 9(3), pp. 387–408.Google Scholar

Sidnell, J., 2007b. Comparative studies in conversation analysis. Annual Review of Anthropology, 36, pp. 229–244.Google Scholar

Sidnell, J., 2008. Alternate and complementary perspectives on language and social life: The organisation of repair in two Caribbean communities. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 12(4), pp. 477–503.Google Scholar

Sidnell, J., 2009a. Comparative perspectives in conversation analysis. In: Sidnell, J., ed. Conversation Analysis: Comparative Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 3–27.Google Scholar

Sidnell, J., 2009b. Language-specific resources in repair and assessments. In: Sidnell, J., ed. Conversation Analysis: Comparative Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 304–325.Google Scholar

Sidnell, J., 2010. Conversation Analysis: An Introduction. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Sidnell, J., 2016. Conversation Analysis. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.40 (accessed 01.10.2018).Google Scholar

Statista Research Department, 2021. The Most Spoken Languages Worldwide 2021. www.statista.com/statistics/266808/the-most-spoken-languages-worldwide/ (accessed 08.03.2021).Google Scholar

Stenström, A.-B., 1990. Pauses in monologue and dialogue. In: Svartvik, J., ed. The London-Lund Corpus of Spoken English: Description and Research. Lund: Lund University Press, pp. 211–252.Google Scholar

Stenström, A.-B., 1994. An Introduction to Spoken Interaction. London: Longman.Google Scholar

Stenström, A.-B., 2005. ‘It’s very good eh’ – ‘Está muy bien eh’: Teenagers’ use of tags: London and Madrid compared. In: McCafferty, K., Bull, T., & Killie, K., eds. Contexts: Historical, Social, Linguistic: Studies in Celebration of Toril Swan. Bern: Peter Lang, pp. 279–292.Google Scholar

Stivers, T., 2015. Coding social interaction: A heretical approach in Conversation Analysis? Research on Language and Social Interaction, 48(1), pp. 1–19.Google Scholar

Stivers, T., 2021. Is Conversation Built for Two? The Partitioning of Social Interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 54(1), pp. 1–19.CrossRef Google Scholar

Stivers, T., Enfield, N. J., Brown, P., et al., 2009. Universals and cultural variation in turn-taking in conversation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(26), pp. 10587–10592.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Tanaka, H., 1999. Turn-taking in Japanese Conversation: A Study in Grammar and Interaction. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar

Tanaka, H., 2004. Prosody for marking transition-relevance places in Japanese conversation: The case of turns unmarked by utterance-final objects. In: Couper-Kuhlen, E. & Ford, C. E., eds. Sound Patterns in Interaction. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 63–96.Google Scholar

Tannen, D., 1984. Conversational Style: Analyzing Talk among Friends. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar

Tannen, D., 1994. Gender and Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

ten Bosch, L., Oostdijk, N., & Boves, L., 2005. On temporal aspects of turn taking in conversational dialogues. Speech Communication, 47(1), pp. 80–86.Google Scholar

Tottie, G., 1991. Conversational style in British and American English: The case of backchannels. In: Aijmer, K. & Altenberg, B., eds. English Corpus Linguistics: Studies in Honour of Jan Svartvik. New York: Routledge, pp. 254–335.Google Scholar

Tottie, G., 2011. Uh and um as sociolinguistic markers in British English. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 16(2), pp. 173–197.Google Scholar

Tottie, G., 2014. Uh and um in British and American English: Are they words? Evidence from co-occurence with pauses. In: Dion, N., Lapierre, A., & Torres Cacoullous, R., eds. Linguistic Variation: Confronting Fact and Theory. New York: Routledge, pp. 38–54.Google Scholar

Tottie, G., 2015. Turn management and the fillers uh and uhm. In: Aijmer, K. & Rühlemann, C., eds. Corpus Pragmatics: A Handbook. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 381–407.Google Scholar

Tottie, G. & Hoffmann, S., 2009. Tag questions in English: The first century. Journal of English Linguistics, 37(2), pp. 130–161.CrossRef Google Scholar

Walker, G., 2007. On the design and use of pivots in everyday English conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 39(12), pp. 2217–2243.Google Scholar

Walker, G., 2010. The phonetic constitution of a turn-holding practice: Rush-throughs in English talk-in-interaction. In: Barth-Weingarten, D., Reber, E., & Selting, M., eds. Prosody in Interaction. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 51–72.Google Scholar

Walker, G., 2017. Pitch and the projection of more talk. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 50(2), pp. 206–225.Google Scholar

Walker, M. B. & Trimboli, C., 1982. Smooth transitions in conversational interactions. The Journal of Social Psychology, 117(2), pp. 305–306.Google Scholar

Warren, P., 2016. Uptalk: The Phenomenon of Rising Intonation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Watson, D. R., 1992. The understanding of language use in everyday life. In: Watson, G. & Seiler, R. M., eds. Text in Context: Contributions to Ethnomethodology. Newbury Park: Sage, pp. 1–19.Google Scholar

Wells, B. & Macfarlane, S., 1998. Prosody as an interactional resource: Turn-projection and overlap. Language and Speech, 41(3–4), pp. 265–294.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Wells, B. & Peppé, S., 1996. Ending up in Ulster: Prosody and turn-taking in English dialects. In: Couper-Kuhlen, E. & Selting, M., eds. Prosody in Conversation: Interactional Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 101–130.Google Scholar

Wennerstrom, A. & Siegel, A. F., 2003. Keeping the floor in multiparty conversation: Intonation, syntax, and pause. Discourse Processes, 36(2), pp. 77–107.Google Scholar

Wilson, G., Westphal, M., Hartmann, J., et al. 2017. The use of question tags in different text types of Trinidadian English. World Englishes, 36(4), pp. 726–743.Google Scholar

Winford, D., 1993. Predication in Caribbean English Creoles. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar

Wright, M., 2005. Studies of the Phonetics-Interaction Interface: Clicks and Interactional Structures in English Conversation. PhD dissertation, University of York.Google Scholar

Wright, M., 2011. On clicks in English talk-in-interaction. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 41(2), pp. 207–229.Google Scholar

Wu, R.-J. R., 2009. Repetition in the initiation of repair. In: Sidnell, J., ed. Conversation Analysis: Comparative Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 31–59.Google Scholar

Xu, J., 2016. Displaying Recipiency: Reactive Tokens in Mandarin Task-oriented Interactional Styles. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar

Youssef, V. & James, W., 2008. The creoles of Trinidad and Tobago: Phonology. In: Schneider, E. W., ed. Varieties of English: The Americas and the Caribbean. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 320–338.Google Scholar

Zhang, W., 2012. Latching/rush-through as a turn-holding device and its functions in retrospectively oriented pre-emptive turn continuation: Findings from Mandarin Chinese. Discourse Processes, 49(3–4), pp. 163–191.CrossRef Google Scholar

Book contents

References

Summary

Access options

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive