Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-v5vhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-30T03:03:48.222Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 20 - Educating and Mentoring Medical Students in Family Planning

from Section III - Family Planning Curricular Design & Implementation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 July 2021

Uta Landy
Affiliation:
University of California, San Francisco
Philip D Darney
Affiliation:
University of California, San Francisco
Jody Steinauer
Affiliation:
University of California, San Francisco
Get access

Summary

The chapter outlines the skills required to provide basic family planning care: contraceptive counseling; pregnancy options counseling; advocacy; screening for pregnancy intention, intimate partner violence and reproductive coercion; furthering of professional identity formation; and ethical reasoning. It describes justifications for their inclusion in medical school curricula. To increase the likelihood that the required knowledge and skills will not only be taught but also learned by all graduates, family planning educators need to join other educators in medical education reform, specifically the movement toward outcomes-based education, programmatic assessment and the fluent adoption of active-learning strategies. They should also continue to expand exposure to the more advanced skills required for abortion and contraception as to enhance student learning of basic skills, and positively impact attitudes toward patients and providers. Finally, it reviews meaningful opportunities for mentoring students and providing the role-modeling that nurtures respect for and interest in the field.

Type
Chapter
Information
Advancing Women's Health Through Medical Education
A Systems Approach in Family Planning and Abortion
, pp. 202 - 210
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Steinauer, J, LaRochelle, F, Rowh, M, Backus, L, Sandahl, Y, Foster, A. First impressions: what are preclinical medical students in the US and Canada learning about sexual and reproductive health? Contraception2009;80(1):7480.Google Scholar
Veazey, K, Nieuwoudt, C, Gavito, C, Tocce, K. Student perceptions of reproductive health education in US medical schools: a qualitative analysis of students taking family planning electives. Med Educ Online. 2015;20:28973.Google Scholar
Cessford, TA, Norman, WV. Making a case for abortion curriculum reform: a knowledge-assessment survey of undergraduate medical students. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2011;33(6):580.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Angus, SV, Vu, TR, Willett, LL, Call, S, Halvorsen, AJ, Chaudhry, S. Internal medicine residency program directors’ views of the core entrustable professional activities for entering residency: an opportunity to enhance communication of competency along the continuum. Acad Med. 2017;92(6):785791.Google Scholar
Cooke, M, Irby, DM, O’Brien, BC. Educating Physicians: A Call for Reform of Medical School and Residency. Vol. 16. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 2010.Google Scholar
Hauer, KE, O’Sullivan, PS, Fitzhenry, K, Boscardin, C. Translating theory into practice: implementing a program of assessment. Acad Med. 2018;93(3):444450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, PA, Kern, DE, Hughes, MT, Chen, BY. (Eds.). Curriculum Development for Medical Education: A Six-Step Approach, 3rd ed. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press; 2016.Google Scholar
Liaison Committee on Medical Education, Association of American Medical Colleges, American Medical Association. Functions and Structure of a Medical School: Standards for Accreditation of Medical Education Programs Leading to the MD Degree; 2019. http://lcme.org/publications/. Accessed September 21, 2019.Google Scholar
Stumbar, SE, Brown, DR, Lupi, CS. Developing and implementing curricular objectives for sexual health in undergraduate medical education: a practical approach. Acad Med. 2020;95(1):7782.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boelen, C, Pearson, D, Kaufman, A, et al. Producing a socially accountable medical school: AMEE Guide No. 109. Med Teach. 2016;38(11):10781091.Google Scholar
Mayer, RE. Applying the science of learning: evidence-based principles for the design of multimedia instruction. Am Psychol. 2008;63(8):760769.Google Scholar
Hall, MJ, Schwartzman, A, Zhang, J, Liu, X. Ambulatory surgery data from hospitals and ambulatory surgery centers: United States 2010. Natl Health Stat Report. 2017;(103):1–15.Google Scholar
Finger, KR, Stocks, C, Weiss, AJ, Steiner, CA. Most frequent operating room procedures performed in U.S. hospitals, 2003–2012. 2014. Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project. Statistical Brief #186.Google Scholar
Martinez, R, Minor, D, Lupi, C. Abortion care education: What exactly do students want to see and do, and what do they do? Paper presented at the SGEA Regional Conference, Orlando, FL; 2019.Google Scholar
Association of American Medical Colleges. SP/OSCE Final Examinations at US Medical Schools; 2019. www.aamc.org/data-reports/curriculum-reports/interactive-data/sp/osce-final-examinations-us-medical-schools. Accessed September 21, 2019.Google Scholar
Lupi, C, Mechaber, A. Objective structured clinical examination: contraceptive counseling for long acting reversible methods. MedEdPORTAL. 2011;7:9021. https://doi.org/10.15766/mep_2374–8265.9021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lupi, CS, Ward-Peterson, M, Castro, CA. Non-directive pregnancy options counseling: online instructional module, objective structured clinical exam, and rater and standardized patient training materials. MedEdPORTAL. 2017;13:10566. https://doi.org/10.15766/mep_2374–8265.10566CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mortaz Hejri, S, Jalili, M, Shirazi, M, Masoomi, R, Nedjat, S, Norcini, J. The utility of mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise (mini-CEX) in undergraduate and postgraduate medical education: protocol for a systematic review. Syst Rev. 2017;6(1):146.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×