Affleck, M. 2013. “Priests, Patrons, and Playwrights: Libraries in Rome before 168 bce,” in König, Oikonomopoulou, and Woolf 2013: 124–36.Google Scholar

Agamben, G. 1993. Stanzas: Word and Phantasm in Western Culture (trans. Martinez, R.). Minneapolis.Google Scholar

Allen, A. W. 1962. “Sunt Qui Propertium Malint,” in Sullivan 1962: 107–48.Google Scholar

Allison, P. 1992. “The Relationship between Decoration and Room Type in Pompeian Houses: A Case Study of the Casa della Caccia Antica,” Journal of Roman Archaeology 5: 235–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Allison, P. and Sear, F.. 2002. Casa della Caccia Antica (VII 4, 48) (Häuser in Pompeji 11). Munich.Google Scholar

Alroth, B. and Scheffer, C. eds. 2014. Attitudes towards the Past in Antiquity: Creating Identities. Stockholm.Google Scholar

Ancona, R. and Greene, E. eds. 2005. Gendered Dynamics in Latin Love Poetry. Baltimore.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anderson, R., Parsons, P., and Nisbet, R.. 1979. “Elegiacs by Gallus from Qaṣr Ibrîm,” Journal of Roman Studies 69: 125–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Andreae, B. 1969. “Stuckreliefs und Fresken der Farnesina,” in Helbig 1969: 430–52.Google Scholar

Andreae, B. and Presicce, C. P. eds. 1996. Ulisse: il mito e la memoria. Rome.Google Scholar

Anguissola, A. 2010. Intimità a Pompei. Riservatezza, condivisione e prestigio negli ambienti ad alcova in Pompei. Berlin and New York.Google Scholar

Anguissola, A. ed. 2012. Privata Luxuria. Towards an Archaeology of Intimacy: Pompeii and Beyond. Munich.Google Scholar

Arcellaschi, A. 1990. Médée das le théâtre latin d’Ennius à Sénèque. Rome.Google Scholar

Arkins, B. 2007. “The Modern Reception of Catullus,” in Skinner 2007: 460–78.Google Scholar

Austin, R. 1933. M. Tulli Ciceronis Pro M. Caelio oratio. Oxford.Google Scholar

Badian, E. 1966. “The Early Historians,” in Dorey 1966: 1–38.Google Scholar

Badian, E. 1972. “Ennius and His Friends,” in Skutsch 1972: 151–99.Google Scholar

Badian, E. 1985. “A Phantom Marriage Law,” Philologus 129: 82–98.Google Scholar

Bagnall, R. and Cribiore, R. eds. 2006. Women’s Letters from Ancient Egypt, 300 bc–ad 800. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar

Baldassare, I. 1981. “Piramo e Thisbe: dal mito all’immagine,” Publications de l’école française de Rome 55: 337–51.Google Scholar

Baldassare, I., Pontrandolfo, A., Rouveret, A., and Salvadori, M., 2002. Pittura romana: dall’ellenismo al tardo-antico. Milan.Google Scholar

Barasch, M. 1997. The Language of Art: Studies in Interpretation. New York and London.Google Scholar

Barbet, A. 1985. La peinture murale romaine: Les styles décoratifs pompéiens (reprinted 2009). Paris.Google Scholar

Barchiesi, A. 1992. P. Ovidii Nasonis Epistulae Heroidum 1–3. Florence.Google Scholar

Barchiesi, A. 1993. “Future Reflexive: Two Modes of Allusion and Ovid’s Heroides,” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 95: 333–65.Google Scholar

Barchiesi, A. 2001. Speaking Volumes: Narrative and Intertext in Ovid and Other Latin Poets. London.Google Scholar

Barchiesi, A. 2004. “Quando Virgilio era un moderno: una delle più antiche recite delle Georgiche, e il contesto di una spiritosaggine,” Materiali e discussioni per l’analisi dei testi classici 52: 21–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barchiesi, A. ed. 2005. Ovidio Metamorfosi i. Milan.Google Scholar

Barchiesi, A. 2006. “Music for Monsters: Ovid’s Metamorphoses, Bucolic Evolution and Bucolic Criticism,” in Fantuzzi and Papanghelis 2006: 403–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barchiesi, A. ed. 2007. Ovidio Metamorfosi ii. Milan.Google Scholar

Barringer, J. 1994. “The Mythological Paintings in the Macellum at Pompeii,” Classical Antiquity 13: 149–66.Google Scholar

Bartel, H. and Simon, A. eds. 2010. Unbinding Medea: Interdisciplinary Approaches to a Classical Myth from Antiquity to the 21st Century. London.Google Scholar

Barthes, R. 1975. The Pleasure of the Text (trans. Miller, R.). New York.Google Scholar

Barthes, R. 1978. A Lover’s Discourse – Fragments (trans. Howard, R.). New York.Google Scholar

Bartman, E. 2010. “Erotic Statuary in The Roman House,” in Hekster and Mols 2010: 57–66.Google Scholar

Baste, F. L. and De Vos, M. eds. 1979. Proposta per una classificazione del Terzo Stile pompeiano. Archaeologische Studien van het Nederlands Instituut te Rome 4 (The Hague).Google Scholar

Béarat, H. ed. 1997. Roman Wall-Painting: Materials, Techniques, Analysis and Conservation. Proceedings of the International Workshop, Fribourg 7–9 March 1996. Fribourg.Google Scholar

Beard, M. 1993. “Looking (Harder) for Roman Myth: Dumézil, Declamation and the Problems of Definition,” in Graf 1993: 44–64.Google Scholar

Bellandi, F. 2012. “Amour-passion e amore congiugale nella poesia di Catullo: qualche considerazione,” in Morelli 2012: 13–72.Google Scholar

Benefiel, R. 2010. “Dialogues of Ancient Graffiti in the House of Maius Castricius in Pompeii,” American Journal of Archaeology 114: 59–101.Google Scholar

Bergmann, B. 1991. “Painted Perspectives of a Villa Visit: Landscape as Status and Metaphor,” in Gazda 1991: 49–70.Google Scholar

Bergmann, B. 1994. “The Roman House as Memory Theater: The House of the Tragic Poet in Pompeii,” The Art Bulletin 76: 225–56.Google Scholar

Bergmann, B. 1995. “Greek Masterpieces and Roman Recreative Fictions,” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 97: 79–120.Google Scholar

Bergmann, B. 1996. “The Pregnant Moment: Tragic Wives in the Roman Interior,” in Kampen 1996: 199–219.Google Scholar

Bergmann, B. 1999. “Rhythms of Recognition: Mythological Encounters in Roman Landscape Painting,” in De Angelis 1999: 81–108.Google Scholar

Bergmann, B. 2012. “The Flight of Icarus in the House of the Priest Amandus in Pompeii,” in Edwards and Bailey 2012: 13–21.Google Scholar

Bergmann, B. 2018. “At Face Value: Painted Ladies on Pompeian Walls,” in Longfellow and Perry 2018: 142–65.Google Scholar

Bessone, F. 1997. P. Ovidii Nasonis Heroidum Epistula xii Medea Iasoni. Florence.Google Scholar

Bettini, M. 2000. The Ears of Hermes. Communication, Images, and Identity in the Classical World (trans. Short, W. M.). Columbus.Google Scholar

Beye, C. R. 1982. Epic and Romance in the Argonautica of Apollonius. Carbondale and Edwardsville.Google Scholar

Beyen, H. G. 1948. “Les domini de la Villa de la Farnésine,” Studia Carolo Guilielmo Vollgraff. Amsterdam: 3–21.Google Scholar

Bieber, M. 1961. The Sculpture of the Hellenistic Age. New York.Google Scholar

Bielfeldt, R. 2005. Orestes auf römischen Sarkophagen. Berlin.Google Scholar

Blaiklock, E. M. 1959. The Romanticism of Catullus. Auckland.Google Scholar

Blanc, N. and Gury, F.. 1986. “Eros/Amor, Cupido,” Lexicon Iconographicum Mythologiae Classicae iii. Zurich and Munich: 952–1048.Google Scholar

Boatwright, M. 1998. “Luxuriant Gardens and Extravagant Women: The Horti of Rome between Republic and Empire,” in Cima and La Rocca 1998: 71–82.Google Scholar

Boedeker, D. 1997. “Becoming Medea: Assimilation in Euripides,” in Clauss and Johnston 1997: 127–48.Google Scholar

Bon, S. E. and Jones, R. eds. 1997. Sequence and Space in Pompeii. Oxford.Google Scholar

Boschung, D. 1987. Antike Grabaltäre aus den Nekropolen Roms. Bern.Google Scholar

Boucher, J.-P. 1965. Études sur Properce – Problèmes d’inspiration et d’art. Paris.Google Scholar

Bowditch, L. 2009. “Palatine Apollo and the Imperial Gaze: Propertius 2.31 and 2.32,” American Journal of Philology 130: 401–38.Google Scholar

Bowie, T. 1970. “Preface,” in Bowie and Christenson 1970: ix–x.Google Scholar

Bowie, T. and Christenson, C. V. eds. 1970. Studies in Erotic Art. New York.Google Scholar

Boyd, B. ed. 2002. Brill’s Companion to Ovid. Leiden.Google Scholar

Boyle, A. J. 2014. Seneca: Medea. Oxford.Google Scholar

Bragantini, I. 1995. “Problemi di pittura romana,” Annali di archeologia e storia antica 2: 175–97.Google Scholar

Bragantini, I. 2004. “Una pittura sense maestri: la produzione della pittura parietale romana,” Journal of Roman Archaeology 17: 131–45.Google Scholar

Bragantini, I. ed. 2010. Atti del X Congresso Internazionale dell’AIPMA (Association Internationale pour la Peinture Murale Antique), Napoli 17–21 settembre 2007, Vol. 1. Naples.Google Scholar

Bragantini, I. 2014. “Roman Painting in the Republic and Early Empire,” in Pollitt 2014: 302–69.Google Scholar

Bragantini, I. and de Vos, M.. 1982. Museo Nazionale Romano. Le Pitture ii, 1. Le decorazioni della villa romana della Farnesina. Rome.Google Scholar

Braund, S. and Mayer, R. eds. 1999. Amor: Roma. Love and Latin Literature. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Breed, B. 2003. “Portrait of a Lady: Propertius 1.3 and Ecphrasis,” The Classical Journal 99: 35–56.Google Scholar

Breed, B. 2006. Pastoral Inscriptions: Reading and Writing Virgil’s Eclogues. London.Google Scholar

Brendel, O. J. 1970. “The Scope and Treatment of Erotic Art in the Greco-Roman World,” in Bowie and Christenson 1970: 3–69.Google Scholar

Brilliant, R. 1984. Visual Narratives: Storytelling in Etruscan and Roman Art. Ithaca and London.Google Scholar

Brilliant, R. 2007. “Forwards and Backwards in the Historiography of Roman Art,” Journal of Roman Archaeology 20: 7–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brink, C. O. 1963. Horace on Poetry: Prolegomena to the Literary Epistles. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Brown, R. 1987. Lucretius on Love and Sex: A Commentary on De Rerum Natura iv, 1030–1287 with Prolegomena, Text and Translation. Leiden.Google Scholar

Cameron, A. 1968. “The First Edition of Ovid’s Amores,” The Classical Quarterly 18: 320–33.Google Scholar

Cameron, A. 1980. “Poetae Novelli,” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 84: 127–75.Google Scholar

Cameron, A. 1993. The Greek Anthology: From Meleager to Planudes. Oxford.Google Scholar

Cantarella, E. 2002. “Marriage and Sexuality in Republican Rome: A Conjugal Love Story,” in Nussbaum and Sihvola 2002: 269–82.Google Scholar

Cappelletti, F. and Volpi, C.. 1993. “New Documents Concerning the Discovery and Early History of the Nozze Aldobrandini,” Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institute 61: 274–79.Google Scholar

Carucci, M. 2010. “The Representation of Medea in the Roman House,” in Bartel and Simon 2010: 53–65.Google Scholar

Casson, L. 2001. Libraries in the Ancient World. New Haven and London.Google Scholar

Cavallo, G., Fedeli, P., and Giardina, A. eds. 1989. Lo spazio letterario di Roma antica, v. 1: la produzione del testo. Rome.Google Scholar

Cima, M. and La Rocca, E. eds. 1998. Horti Romani – Atti del Convegno Internazionale, Roma, 4–6 maggio 1995. Rome.Google Scholar

Clarke, J. 1991. The Houses of Roman Italy 100 bc–ad 250: Ritual, Space and Decoration. Berkeley, Los Angeles, and London.Google Scholar

Clarke, J. 1998. Looking at Lovemaking: Constructions of Sexuality in Roman Art 100 bc–ad 250. Berkeley, Los Angeles, and London.Google Scholar

Clarke, J. 2003. Art in the Lives of Ordinary Romans: Visual Representation and Non-Elite Viewers in Italy, 100 bc–ad 315. Berkeley.Google Scholar

Clarke, J. 2005. “Augustan Domestic Interiors: Propaganda or Fashion?” in Galinsky 2005: 264–80.Google Scholar

Clarke, J. 2010. “Model-Book, Outline-Book, Figure-Book: New Observations on the Creation of Near-Exact Copies in Romano-Campanian Painting,” in Bragantini 2010: 203–14.Google Scholar

Clausen, W. V. 1987. Virgil’s Aeneid and the Tradition of Hellenistic Poetry. Berkeley.Google Scholar

Clausen, W. V. 1994. A Commentary on Virgil, Eclogues. Oxford.Google Scholar

Clauss, J. and Johnston, S. I. eds. 1997 Medea: Essays on Medea in Myth, Literature, Philosophy, and Art. Princeton.Google Scholar

Coates, V. and Seydl, J. eds. Antiquity Recovered: The Legacy of Pompeii and Herculaneum. Los Angeles.Google Scholar

Cohen, D. 1991. “The Augustan Law on Adultery: The Social and Cultural Context,” in Kertzer and Saller 1991: 109–26.Google Scholar

Colantuono, A. 1989. “Titian’s Tender Infants: On the Imitation of Venetian Painting in Baroque Rome,” I Tatti Studies 3: 207–34.Google Scholar

Collard, C., Cropp, M. J., and Gibert, J.. 2004. Euripides: Selected Fragmentary Plays with Introductions, Translations and Commentaries. Volume ii. Oxford.Google Scholar

Colpo, I. 2006. “‘Quod non alter et alter eras’. Dinamiche figurative nel repertorio di Narciso in area vesuviano,” Antenor 5: 51–85.Google Scholar

Colpo, I. 2008. “‘Ambienti ovidiani’ nelle case vesuviane? Riflessioni preliminari,” Eidola: International Journal of Classical Art History 5: 65–82.Google Scholar

Colpo, I. and Salvadori, M.. 2010. “Ovidio e la pittura della prima età imperial,” in Bragantini 2020: 277–88.Google Scholar

Colpo, I., Minotti, F., and Grassigli, G. L.. 2007. “Le ragioni di una scelta: discutendo attorno alle immagini di Narciso a Pompei,” Eidola: International Journal of Classical Art History 4: 1000–46.Google Scholar

Connolly, J. 2000. “Asymptotes of Pleasure: Thoughts on the Nature of Roman Erotic Elegy,” Arethusa 33: 71–98.Google Scholar

Conte, G. B. 1986. The Rhetoric of Imitation: Genre and Poetic Memory in Virgil and Other Latin Poets (trans. Segal, C.). Ithaca.Google Scholar

Conte, G. B. 1989. “Love without Elegy: The Remedia Amoris and the Logic of a Genre” (trans. Most, G.), Poetics Today 10: 441–69.Google Scholar

Conte, G. B. 1994. Latin Literature: A History (trans. Solodow, J. B.). Baltimore.Google Scholar

Copley, F. O. 1947. “Servitium Amoris,” Transactions of the American Philological Association 78: 285–300.Google Scholar

Copley, F. O. 1956. Exclusus Amator: A Study in Latin Love Poetry. Baltimore.Google Scholar

Coralini, A. 2001. Hercules Domesticus. Immagini di Ercole nelle case della regione vesuviana (I secolo a.C.–79 d.C.). Naples.Google Scholar

Corrigan, K. 2013. Virgo to Virago: Medea in the Silver Age. Newcastle upon Tyne.Google Scholar

Courtney, E. 1995. Musa Lapidaria: A Selection of Latin Verse Inscriptions. Atlanta.Google Scholar

Cowan, R. 2010. “A Stranger in a Strange Land: Medea in Roman Republican Tragedy,” in Bartel and Simon 2010: 39–52.Google Scholar

Crowley, P. 2019. The Phantom Image: Seeing the Dead in Ancient Rome. Chicago.Google Scholar

Currie, H. 1981. “Ovid and the Roman Stage,” Aufstieg und Niedergang der römische Welt ii 31: 2701–42.Google Scholar

Curtius, L. 1929. Die Wandmalerei Pompejis. Leipzig.Google Scholar

D’Alconzo, P. 2002. Picturae excisae. Conservazione e restauro dei dipinti ercolanesi e pompeiani tra xviii e xix secolo. Rome.Google Scholar

D’Arms, J. 1979. “Ville rustiche e ville di otium,” in Zevi 1979: 65–86.Google Scholar

D’Arms, J. 1998. “Between Public and Private: the Epulum Publicum and Caesar’s Horti Trans Tiberim,” in Cima and La Rocca 1998: 33–43.Google Scholar

Davies, P. 2017. Architecture and Politics in Republican Rome. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Dawson, C. 1965. Romano-Campanian Mythological Landscape Painting. Rome.Google Scholar

De Angelis, F. ed. 1999. Im Spiegel des Mythos. Bilderwelt und Lebenswelt/Lo specchio del mito. Immaginario e realtà. Wiesbaden.Google Scholar

De Rougemont, , Denis, . 1956. Love in the Western World (trans. Belgion, M.). New York.Google Scholar

Della Corte, F. 1982. “Le ‘leges Iuliae’ e l’elegi romana,” Aufstieg und Niedergang der römische Welt ii 30: 539–58.Google Scholar

Della Corte, M. 1922. “Scavi eseguiti da private nel territorio di Pompei,” Notizie degli scavi di antichità 19: 459–85.Google Scholar

Della Corte, M. 1926. “Publius Paquius Proculus,” Journal of Roman Studies 16: 145–54.Google Scholar

Della Corte, M. 1954. Case ed abitanti di Pompei. Pompei-Scavi.Google Scholar

Dexter, C. 1975. The Casa di L. Cecilio Giocondo in Pompeii. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Duke University.Google Scholar

Dillon, S. and Welch, K. eds. 2006. Representations of War in Ancient Rome. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Dickey, E. 2017. Stories of Daily Life from the Roman World: Extracts from the Ancient Colloquia. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Dobbins, J. J. and Foss, P. W. eds. 2007. The World of Pompeii. New York.Google Scholar

Docter, R. and Moormann, E. eds. 1999. Proceedings of the xvth International Congress of Classical Archaeology, Amsterdam, July 12–17, 1998. Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Dorey, T. A., 1958. “Cicero, Clodia and the ‘Pro Caelio,’” Greece and Rome 5: 175–80.Google Scholar

Dorey, T. A., ed. 1966. Latin Historians: Studies in Latin Literature and Its Influence. London.Google Scholar

Du Quesnay, I. M. Le M. 1979. “From Polyphemus to Corydon: Virgil, Eclogue 2 and the Idylls of Theocritus,” in West and Woodman 1979: 35–69.Google Scholar

Dunbabin, K. 2003. The Roman Banquet: Images of Conviviality. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Edwards, C. 1993. The Politics of Immorality in Ancient Rome. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Edwards, M. D. and Bailey, E. eds. 2012. Gravity in Art: Essays on Weight and Weightlessness in Painting, Sculpture, and Photography. Jefferson and London.Google Scholar

Elsner, J. 1995. Art and The Roman Viewer: The Transformation of Art from the Pagan World to Christianity. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Elsner, J. ed. 1996. Art and Text in Roman Culture. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Elsner, J. 2007. Roman Eyes: Visuality and Subjectivity in Art and Text. Princeton.Google Scholar

Elsner, J. and Meyer, M. eds. 2014. Art and Rhetoric in Roman Culture. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Esposito, D. 1999. “La ‘Bottega dei Vettii’: vecchi dati e nuove acquisizioni,” Rivista di studi pompeiaini 10: 23–61.Google Scholar

Fantham, E. 2006. Julia Augusti: The Emperor’s Daughter. London and New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fantuzzi, M. 2003. “Pastoral Love and ‘Elegiac’ Love, from Greece to Rome,” Leeds International Classical Studies 2: 1–11.Google Scholar

Fantuzzi, M. and Papanghelis, Th. eds. 2006. Brill’s Companion to Greek and Latin Pastoral. Leiden.Google Scholar

Faraone, C. 2006. “Magic, Medicine and Eros in the Prologue to Theocritus’ Id. 11,” in Fantuzzi and Papanghelis 2006: 75–90.Google Scholar

Farrell, J. 1992. “Dialogue of Genres in Ovid’s ‘Lovesong of Polyphemus’ (Metamorphoses 13.719–897),” American Journal of Philology 113: 235–68.Google Scholar

Fear, T. 2000. “The Poet as Pimp: Elegiac Seduction in the Time of Augustus,” Arethusa 33: 217–40.Google Scholar

Fear, T. 2005. “Propertian Closure: The Elegiac Inscription of the Liminal Male and Ideological Contestation in Augustan Rome,” in Ancona and Greene 2005: 13–40.Google Scholar

Fedeli, P. 1989. “La poesia d’amore,” in Cavallo, Fedeli, and Giardina 1989: 143–76.Google Scholar

Fedeli, P. 2005. Properzio, Elegie Libro ii Introduzione, testo e commento. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Feeney, D. 1992. “Shall I Compare Thee …? Catullus 68b and the Limits of Analogy,” in Woodman and Powell 1992: 33–44.Google Scholar

Feeney, D. 2007. Casesar’s Calendar: Ancient Time and the Beginnings of History. Berkeley.Google Scholar

Ferguson, J. 1961. “Catullus and Tennyson,” English Studies in Africa 12: 41–58.Google Scholar

Fiorelli, G. 1879. “Roma. Regione xiv,” Notizie degli scavi di antichità 1879: 68–69, 114–15, 141, 179–81, 267–69, 314–15, 333.Google Scholar

Fiorelli, G. 1885. “Roma. Regione xiv,” Notizie degli scavi di antichità 1885: 224, 251.Google Scholar

Flory, M. 1984. “Sic exempla parantur: Livia’s Shrine to Concordia and the Porticus Liviae,” Historia 33: 309–30.Google Scholar

Foley, H. 1984. “‘Reverse Similes’ and Sex Roles in the Odyssey,” in Peradotto and Sullivan 1984: 59–78.Google Scholar

Foley, H. 1989. “Medea’s Divided Self,” Classical Antiquity 8: 61–85.Google Scholar

Foley, H. 2001. Female Acts in Greek Tragedy. Princeton and Oxford.Google Scholar

Foucault, M. 1978. The History of Sexuality: An Introduction. Volume 1 (trans. Hurley, R.). New York.Google Scholar

Foucault, M. 1986. The Care of the Self: The History of Sexuality. Volume 3 (trans. Hurley, R.). New York.Google Scholar

Frazer, A. 1992. “The Roman Villa and the Pastoral Ideal,” in Hunt 1992: 49–61.Google Scholar

Fredrick, D. 1997. “Reading Broken Skin: Violence in Roman Elegy,” in Hallett and Skinner 1997: 172–96.Google Scholar

Fried, M. 1980. Absorption and Theatricality: Painting and Beholder in the Age of Diderot. Berkeley, Los Angeles, and London.Google Scholar

Frommel, C. L. ed. 2003. La Villa Farnesina a Roma/The Villa Farnesina in Rome. Modena.Google Scholar

Fulkerson, L. 2005. The Ovidian Heroine as Author: Reading, Writing, and Community in the Heroides. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Fulkerson, L. 2012. “Pastoral Appropriation and Assimilation in Ovid’s Apollo and Daphne Episode,” Trends in Classics 4: 29–47.Google Scholar

Fusconi, G. 1994. La Fortuna delle ‘Nozze Aldobrandini’. Dall’Esquilino alla Biblioteca Vaticana. Vatican City.Google Scholar

Gabaccia, D. R. and Maynes, M. J. eds. 2013. Gender History across Epistemologies. Chichester.Google Scholar

Gahtan, M. and Pegazzano, D. eds. 2014. Museum Archetypes and Collecting in the Ancient World. Leiden.Google Scholar

Gaisser, J. H. 2007. “Catullus in the Renaissance,” in Skinner 2007: 439–60.Google Scholar

Galinsky, K. 1981. “Augustus’ Legislation on Morals and Marriage,” Philologus 125: 126–44.Google Scholar

Galinsky, K. 1996. Augustan Culture: An Interpretive Introduction. Princeton.Google Scholar

Galinsky, K. 2005. ed. The Cambridge Companion to the Age of Augustus. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Gardner, H. 2010. “The Elegiac Domus in the Early Augustan Principate,” American Journal of Philology 131: 453–93.Google Scholar

Gardner, J. 1986. Women in Roman Law and Society. Bloomington.Google Scholar

Gazda, E. ed. 1991. Roman Art in the Private Sphere: New Perspectives on the Architecture and Décor of the Domus, Villa and Insula. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar

Geffcken, K. 1973. Comedy in the Pro Caelio. Leiden.Google Scholar

Ghedini, F. and Colpo, I.. 2007. “Schema e schema iconografico: il caso di Ciparisso nel repertorio pompeiano,” Eidola: International Journal of Classical Art History 4: 49–71.Google Scholar

Ghiotto, A. 2000. “Il mito di Polifemo e Galatea nella prima età imperiale,” Antenor 2: 29–51.Google Scholar

Gibson, R. 2003. Ovid: Ars Amatoria Book 3. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Gibson, R. and Whitton, C. eds. 2016. The Epistles of Pliny. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Gigante, M. 1979. Civiltà delle forme letterarie nell’antica Pompei. Naples.Google Scholar

Gigli, L. 1952. “Appunti sulla casa romana della Farnesina,” L’Urbe 15: 3–11.Google Scholar

Gil, D. J. 2002. “Before Intimacy: Modernity and Emotion in the Early Modern Discourse on Sexuality,” English Literary History 69: 861–87.Google Scholar

Gold, B. ed. 1982. Literary and Artistic Patronage in Ancient Rome. Austin.Google Scholar

Gold, B. ed. 2012. A Companion to Roman Love Elegy. Malden, Oxford, Carlton.Google Scholar

Goldhill, S. 1994. “The Naïve and Knowing Eye: Ecphrasis and the Culture of Viewing in the Hellenistic World,” in Goldhill and Osborne 1994: 197–223.Google Scholar

Goldhill, S. 1997. “What is Ekphrasis For?” Classical Philology 102: 1–19.Google Scholar

Goldhill, S. and Osborne, R. eds. 1994. Art and Text in Ancient Greek Culture. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Gonzalez, J. ed. 2015. Diachrony: Diachronic Studies of Ancient Greek Literature and Culture. Berlin.Google Scholar

Gow, A. S. F. and Page, D. L. eds. 1968. The Greek Anthology: The Garland of Philip and Some Contemporary Epigrams. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Graf, F. ed. 1993. Mythos in mythenloser Gesellschaft: das Paradigma Roms. Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Greene, E. 1998. The Erotics of Domination: Male Desire and the Mistress in Latin Love Poetry. Baltimore.Google Scholar

Greene, E. 2005. “Gender Identity and the Elegiac Hero in Propertius 2.1,” in Ancona and Greene 2005: 61–78.Google Scholar

Griffin, J. 1985. Latin Poets and Roman Life. London.Google Scholar

Grimal, P. 1963. L’amour à Rome. Paris.Google Scholar

Grimal, P. 1986. The Dictionary of Classical Mythology (trans. Maxwell-Hyslop, A. R.). Oxford and New York.Google Scholar

Gruen, E. 1992. Culture and National Identity in Republican Rome. Ithaca.Google Scholar

Grüner, A. 2004. Venus Ordinis: Der Wandel von Malerei und Literatur im Zeitaler der römischen Bürgerkriege. Paderborn.Google Scholar

Gunderson, E. 1997. “Catullus, Pliny, and Love-Letters,” Transactions of the American Philological Association 127: 201–31.Google Scholar

Gurd, S. 2007. “Meaning and Material Presence: Four Epigrams on Timomachus’ Unfinished ‘Medea,’” Transactions of the American Philological Association 137: 305–31.Google Scholar

Gutzwiller, K. 1985. “The Lover and the Lena: Propertius 4.5,” Ramus 14: 105–15.Google Scholar

Gutzwiller, K. 2002. “Art’s Echo: The Tradition of Hellenistic Ecphrastic Epigram,” in Harder, Regtuit, and Wakker 2002: 85–112.Google Scholar

Gutzwiller, K. 2004. “Seeing Thought: Timomachus’ Medea and Ecphrastic Epigram,” American Journal of Philology 125: 339–86.Google Scholar

Gutzwiller, K. 2010. “Images poétiques et reminiscences artistiques dans les épigrammes de Meleagre,” in Prioux and Rouveret 2010: 67–112.Google Scholar

Habinek, T. 1997. “The Invention of Sexuality in the World-City of Rome,” in Habinek and Schiesaro 1997: 23–43.Google Scholar

Habinek, T. and Schiesaro, A. eds. 1997. The Roman Cultural Revolution. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Hallett, J. P. 1973. “The Role of Women in Roman Elegy: Counter-Cultural Feminism,” Arethusa 6: 103–24.Google Scholar

Hallett, J. P. 1978. “Morigerari: Suetonius, Tiberius, 44,” L’Antiquité Classique 47: 196–200.Google Scholar

Hallett, J. P. and Skinner, M. B. eds. 1997. Roman Sexualities. Princeton.Google Scholar

Harder, M. A., Regtuit, R. F., and Wakker, G. C. eds. 2002. Hellenistic Epigrams. Leuven.Google Scholar

Hardie, P. ed. 2002. The Cambridge Companion to Ovid. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Hardie, P. ed. 2009. Paradox and the Marvellous in Augustan Literature and Culture. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harrison, S. 2002. “Ovid and Genre: Evolutions of an Elegist,” in Hardie 2002: 79–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harrison, S. 2007. Generic Enrichment in Virgil and Horace. Oxford.Google Scholar

Hart, M. L. and Walton, J. M.. 2010. The Art of Ancient Greek Theater. Los Angeles.Google Scholar

Heinze, T. 1993. “The Authenticity of Ovid Heroides 12 Reconsidered,” Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 38: 94–97.Google Scholar

Heinze, T. 1997. P. Ovidius Naso. Der XII. Heroidenbrief: Medea an Jason. Leiden, New York and Cologne.Google Scholar

Hekster, O. and Mols, S. eds. 2010. Cultural Messages in the Graeco-Roman World: Acta of the BABESCH 80th Anniversary Workshop Radboud University Nijmegen, September 8th 2006 (BABESCH Supplementa 15). Leuven.Google Scholar

Hejduk, J. 2008. Clodia: A Sourcebook. Norman.Google Scholar

Helbig, W. 1866. “Musaici di Centocelle,” Bullettino dell’Instituto di Corrispondenza Archeologica 1866: 170–73.Google Scholar

Helbig, W. 1868. Wandgemälde der vom Vesuv verschütteten städte Campaniens. Leipzig.Google Scholar

Helbig, W. 1969. Führer durch den offentlichen Sammlungen Roms 3 (ed. Speier, H.). Tübingen.Google Scholar

Helmerijk, E. 1999. Matrona Docta: Educated Women in the Roman Elite from Cornelia to Julia Domna. London.Google Scholar

Hermany, A., Cassimatis, H., and Vollkommer, R.. 1986. “Eros,” Lexicon Iconographicum Mythologiae Classicae iii. Zurich and Munich: 850–942.Google Scholar

Heyworth, S. J. 2007. Cynthia: A Companion to the Text of Propertius. Oxford.Google Scholar

Hinds, S. 1993. “Medea in Ovid: Scenes from the Life of an Intertextual Heroine,” Materiali e discussion per l’analisi dei testi classici 30: 9–47.Google Scholar

Hinds, S. 1998. Allusion and Intertext: Dynamics of Appropriation in Roman Poetry. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Hollis, A. S. 1977. Ovid: Ars Amatoria Book i. Oxford.Google Scholar

Hölscher, T. 2004. The Language of Images in Roman Art (trans. Snodgrass, A. and Künzl-Snodgrass, A.). Cambridge.Google Scholar

Houston, G. 2013. “The Non-Philodemus Book Collection in the Villa of the Papyri,” in König, Oikonomopoulou, and Woolf 2013: 183–208.Google Scholar

Houston, G. 2014. Inside Roman Libraries: Book Collections and Their Management in Antiquity. Chapel Hill.Google Scholar

Hubbard, T. 1984a. “Art and Vision in Propertius 2.31/2.32,” Transactions of the American Philological Association 114: 281–97.Google Scholar

Hubbard, T. 1984b. “Catullus 68: The Text as Demystification,” Arethusa 17: 29–49.Google Scholar

Hubbard, T. 2015. “Diachronic Parameters of Athenian Pederasty,” in Gonzalez 2015: 363–89.Google Scholar

Hunt, J. D. ed. 1992. The Pastoral Landscape. Hanover and London.Google Scholar

Hunter, R. 1989. Apollonius of Rhodes: Argonautica Book iii. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Hunter, R. 1999. Theocritus: A Selection: Idylls 1, 3, 4, 6, 7, 10, 11, and 13. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Hunter, R. 2006. The Shadow of Callimachus: Studies in the Reception of Hellenistic Poetry at Rome. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Hutchinson, G. 2013. “Genre and Super-Genre,” in Papanghelis, Harrison, and Frangoulidis 2013: 19–34.Google Scholar

Icard-Gianolio, N. and Szabadios, A.-V.. 1992. “Nereides,” Lexicon Iconographicum Mythologiae Classicae v. Zurich and Munich: 785–824.Google Scholar

Ippel, A. 1910. Die dritte pompejanische Stil. Bonn.Google Scholar

Jacobelli, L. 1995. Le pitture erotiche delle terme suburbane di Pompei. Rome.Google Scholar

Jacobson, H. 1974. Ovid’s Heroides. Princeton.Google Scholar

James, S. 2001. “The Economics of Roman Elegy: Voluntary Poverty, the Recusatio and the Greedy Girl,” American Journal of Philology 122: 223–53.Google Scholar

James, S. 2003. Learned Girls and Male Persuasion: Gender and Reading in Roman Love Elegy. Berkeley.Google Scholar

Janan, M. 1994. When the Lamp Is Shattered: Desire and Narrative in Catullus. Carbondale and Edwardsville.Google Scholar

Janan, M. 2001. The Politics of Desire: Propertius iv. Berkeley.Google Scholar

Jansen, L. ed. 2014. The Roman Paratext: Frame, Texts, Readers. CambridgeGoogle Scholar

Jenkyns, R. 1998. Virgil’s Experience: Nature and History: Times, Names and Places. Oxford.Google Scholar

Johns, C. 1982. Sex or Symbol: Erotic Images of Greece and Rome. Austin.Google Scholar

Johnson, W. and Parker, H. eds. 2009. Ancient Literacies: The Culture of Reading in Greece and Rome. Oxford.Google Scholar

Jones, N. 2014a. “Temple Inventory and Fictive Picture Gallery: Painting Between Votive Offering and Artwork,” in Gahtan and Pegazzano 2014: 118–28.Google Scholar

Jones, N. 2014b. “Ancient Painted Panels: Terminology and Appearance,” Mnemosyne 67: 295–304.Google Scholar

Jones, N. 2018. “Starting from Places: Continuous Narration and Discontinuous Perspectives in Roman Art,” The Art Bulletin 100: 7–35.Google Scholar

Jones, N. 2019. Painting, Ethics and Aesthetics in Rome. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Joshel, S. and Petersen, L.. 2014. The Material Life of Roman Slaves. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Karivieri, A. 2014. “Mythic, Public and Private Memory: Creation of a Pompeian Identity in the House of Caecilius Iucundus,” in Alroth and Scheffer 2014: 87–112.Google Scholar

Kampen, N. ed. 1996. Sexuality in Ancient Art. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Kauffman, L. S. 1986. Discourses of Desire: Gender, Genre, and Epistolary Fictions. Ithaca and London.Google Scholar

Kennedy, D. 1987. “Arcades ambo: Virgil, Gallus and Arcadia,” Hermathena 143: 47–59.Google Scholar

Kennedy, D. 2002. “Epistolarity: the Heroides,” in Hardie 2002: 217–32.Google Scholar

Kenney, E. 1983. “Virgil and the Elegiac Sensibility,” Illinois Classical Studies 8: 44–59.Google Scholar

Kenney, E. 1996. Heroides, xvi–xxi. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Kenney, E. and Clausen, W. eds. 1982. The Cambridge History of Classical Literature ii.3. The Age of Augustus. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Kertzer, D. I. and Saller, R. P. eds. The Family in Italy: From Antiquity to the Present. New Haven.Google Scholar

Kilpatrick, R. 2002. “The Early Augustan ‘Aldobrandini Wedding’ Fresco: A Quatercentenary Reappraisal (1601–2001),” Memoirs of the American Academy in Rome 47: 19–32.Google Scholar

Kleiner, D. 1992. Roman Sculpture. New Haven.Google Scholar

Kleiner, D. and Matheson, S. eds. 1996. I, Claudia: Women in Ancient Rome. New Haven.Google Scholar

Knox, P. 1986. “Ovid’s Medea and the Authenticity of Heroides 12,” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 90: 207–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Knox, P. 1995. Heroides: Select Epistles. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Knox, P. 2002. “The Heroides: Elegiac Voices,” in Boyd 2002: 117–40.Google Scholar

Kokkorou-Alewras, G. 1990. “Herakles and the Hesperides (Labour xii),” Lexicon Iconographicum Mythologiae Classicae v. Zurich and Munich: 110–11.Google Scholar

König, J., Oikonomopoulou, K., and Woolf, G. eds. 2013. Ancient Libraries. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Koortbojian, M. 1995. Myth, Meaning, and Memory on Roman Sarcophagi. Berkeley.Google Scholar

Koortbojian, M. 2005. “Mimesis or Phantasia? Two Representational Modes in Roman Commemorative Art,” Classical Antiquity 24: 285–306.Google Scholar

La Rocca, E., 2008. Lo spazio negato. La pittura di paesaggio nella cultura artistica greca e romana. Milan.Google Scholar

La Rocca, E., de Vos, M., and de Vos, A. 1994. Pompei. Milan.Google Scholar

Lanciani, R. 1880. “Roma. Regio xiv,” Notizie degli scavi di antichità: 127–42.Google Scholar

Larmour, H. J., Miller, P. A., and Platter, C. eds. 1998. Rethinking Sexuality: Foucault and Classical Antiquity. Princeton.Google Scholar

Leach, E. 1974. “Ekphrasis and the Theme of Artistic Failure in Ovid’s Metamorphoses,” Ramus 3: 102–42.Google Scholar

Leach, E. 1980. “Sacral-Idyllic Landscape Painting and the Poems of Tibullus’ First Book,” Latomus 39: 47–69.Google Scholar

Leach, E. 1982. “Patrons, Painters and Patterns: The Anonymity of Romano-Campanian Painting and the Transition from the Second to the Third Style,” in Gold 1982: 135–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leach, E. 1984. “Transformations in the Georgics: Vergil’s Italy and Varro’s,” Atti del Convegnoscientifico mondiale di studi su Virgilio, Accademia Nazionale Virgiliana 1984: 96–98.Google Scholar

Leach, E. 1988. The Rhetoric of Space: Literary and Artistic Representations of Landscape in Republican and Augustan Rome. Princeton.Google Scholar

Leach, E. 1992. “Polyphemus in a Landscape: Traditions of Pastoral Courtship,” in Hunt 1992: 63–88.Google Scholar

Leach, E. 1997. “Oecus on Ibycus: Investigating the Vocabulary of the Roman House,” in Bon and Jones 1997: 50–72.Google Scholar

Leach, E. 2004. The Social Life of Painting in Ancient Rome and on the Bay of Naples. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Leen, A. 2000–2001. “Clodia Oppugnatrix: The Domus Motif in Cicero’s Pro Caelio,” The Classical Journal 96: 141–62.Google Scholar

Leigh, M. 2004. “The Pro Caelio and Comedy,” Classical Philology 99: 300–35.Google Scholar

Lessing, G. E. 1984. Laocoön: An Essay on the Limits of Painting and Poetry (trans. McCormick, E. A.). Baltimore and London.Google Scholar

Ling, R. 1991. Roman Painting. Cambridge and New York.Google Scholar

Ling, R. 1995. “The Decoration of Roman Triclinia,” in Murray and Tecusan 1995: 239–51.Google Scholar

Ling, R. 2005. Review of Allison and Sear, The Casa della Caccia Antica at Pompeii, Journal of Roman Archaeology 18: 593–99.Google Scholar

Llewellyn-Jones, L. 2003. Aphrodite’s Tortoise: The Veiled Woman of Ancient Greece. Swansea.Google Scholar

Longfellow, B. and Perry, E. eds. 2018. Roman Artists, Patrons and Public Consumption: Familiar Works Reconsidered. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar

Longo, A. R. 2004–2005. “Eros in Meleagro: osservazioni sulla genesi e il significato di alcune immagini e metafore,” Rudiae 16: 335–52.Google Scholar

Lorenz, K. 2008. Bilder machen Räume: Mythenbilder in pompejanischen Häusern. Berlin and New York.Google Scholar

Luck, G. 1959. The Latin Love Elegy. London.Google Scholar

Luck, G. 1982. “Love Elegy,” in Kenney and Clausen 1982: 109–23.Google Scholar

Lugli, G. 1938a. “Pianta dell’antica casa della Farnesina,” Mélanges de l’école française de Rome 55: 5–27.Google Scholar

Lugli, G. 1938b. I monumenti antichi di Roma e suburbio iii. Rome.Google Scholar

Luhmann, N. 1998. Love as Passion: The Codification of Intimacy (trans. Gaines, J. and Jones, D. L.). Stanford.Google Scholar

Lyne, R. O. A. M. 1978. “The Neoteric Poets,” The Classical Quarterly 28: 167–87.Google Scholar

Lyne, R. O. A. M. 1979. “Servitium Amoris,” The Classical Quarterly 29: 117–30.Google Scholar

Lyne, R. O. A. M. 1980. The Latin Love Poets: From Catullus to Horace. Oxford.Google Scholar

Lyne, R. O. A. M. 1998. “Love and Death: Laodamia and Protesilaus in Catullus, Propertius and Others,” The Classical Quarterly 48: 200–12.Google Scholar

Maiuri, A. 1938. Le pitture delle case di M. Fabius Amandio, del Sacerdos Amandus e di Cornelius Teges. Rome.Google Scholar

Maiuri, A. 1953. Roman Painting (trans. Gilbert, S.). Geneva.Google Scholar

Manuwald, G. 2013. “Medea: Transformations of a Greek Figure in Latin Literature,” Greece and Rome 60: 114–35.Google Scholar

Martindale, C. ed. 1997. The Cambridge Companion to Virgil. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Mau, A. 1876. “Scavi di Pompei,”Bullettino dell’Instituto di Corrispondenza Archeologica 1876: 149–51, 161–68, 223–34, 241–49.Google Scholar

Mau, A. 1877. “Ettore riportato a Troia. Pittura parietaria di Pompei,” Annali dell’Instituto di Corrispondenza Archeologica 49: 268–79.Google Scholar

Mau, A. 1880. “Scavi di Pompei,” Bullettino dell’Instituto di Corrispondenza Archeologica 1880: 73–87, 184–86.Google Scholar

Mau, A. 1882. Geschichte der decorativen Wandmalerei in Pompeji. Leipzig.Google Scholar

Mau, A. 1884. “Pitture della casa antica scoperta nella Villa della Farnesina,” Annali dell’Instituto di Corrispondenza Archeologica 56: 307–32.Google Scholar

Mau, A. 1899. Pompeii: Its Life and Art (trans. Kelsey, F. W.). New York and London.Google Scholar

Mayer, E. 2012. The Ancient Middle Classes: Urban Life and Aesthetics in the Roman Empire, 100 bce–250 ce. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Mazzoleni, D. 2004. Domus: Wall Painting in the Roman House. Oxford.Google Scholar

McKeown, J.C. 1987–1998. Ovid: Amores. Text, Prolegomena and Commentary in Four Volumes. Liverpool and New Hampshire.Google Scholar

Mellor, R. 1999. The Roman Historians. New York.Google Scholar

Meyer, E. 2009. “Writing Paraphernalia, Tablets and Muses in Campanian Wall Painting,” American Journal of Archaeology 113: 569–97.Google Scholar

Miller, P. A. 2002. Latin Erotic Elegy: An Anthology and Reader. London and New York.Google Scholar

Miller, P. A. 2004. Subjecting Verses: Latin Love Elegy and the Emergence of the Real. Princeton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Miller, P. A. 2007. “Catullus and Roman Elegy,” in Skinner 2007: 399–417.Google Scholar

Milnor, K. 2005. Gender, Domesticity and the Age of Augustus: Inventing Private Life. Oxford.Google Scholar

Milnor, K. 2009. “Literary Literacy in Roman Pompeii: The Case of Vergil’s Aeneid,” in Johnson and Parker 2009: 288–319.Google Scholar

Milnor, K. 2014. Graffiti and the Literary Landscape in Roman Pompeii. Oxford.Google Scholar

Moccheggiani Carpano, C. 1981. “Indagini archeologiche nel Tevere,” Archeologia Laziale 4: 142–53.Google Scholar

Mollard-Besques, S. 1963. Catalogue raisonné des figurines et reliefs en terre-cuite grecs et romains ii. Paris.Google Scholar

Mols, S. and Moormann, E.. 2008. La Villa della Farnesina: le pitture. Milan.Google Scholar

Moneti, A. 1991. “Le ville di Tiberio a Capri e la villa sotto la Farnesina. Una necessaria riconsiderazione,” Rivista di Archeologia 15: 89–96.Google Scholar

Montón Subias, S. 1990. “Galateia,” Lexicon Iconographicum Mythologiae Classicae v. Zurich and Munich: 1000–05.Google Scholar

Moormann, E. ed. 1995. Mani di pittori e botteghe pittoriche nel mondo romano (Atti tavola rotonda in onore di W. J. Th. Peters in occasione del suo 75.mo compleanno). Mededelingen van het Nederlands Institut te Rome 54. Rome.Google Scholar

Morales, H. 1996. “The Torturer’s Apprentice: Parrhasius and the Limits of Art,” in Elsner 1996: 182–209.Google Scholar

Morelli, A. ed. 2012. Lepos e mores: una giornata su Catullo. Atti del convegno internazionale, Cassino 27 maggio 2010. Cassino.Google Scholar

Moret, J.-M. 1975. L’Ilioupersis dans la céramique italiote. Les mythes et leur expression figurée au ive siècle. Rome.Google Scholar

Morgner, C. 2014. “The Theory of Love and the Theory of Society: Remarks on the Oeuvre of Niklas Luhmann,” International Sociology 29: 396–404.Google Scholar

Müller, F. 1994. The Aldobrandini Wedding. Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Müller, H. 1994. “Luhmann’s Systems Theory as a Theory of Modernity,” New German Critique 61: 39–54.Google Scholar

Murgatroyd, P. 1981. “Servitium Amoris and the Roman Elegists,” Latomus 40: 589–606.Google Scholar

Murray, O. and Tecusan, M. eds. 1995. In Vino Veritas. London.Google Scholar

Myerowitz, M. 1992. “The Domestication of Desire: Ovid’s Parva Tabella and the Theater of Love,” in Richlin 1992: 131–57.Google Scholar

Nava, M. L., Paris, R., and Friggeri, R. eds. 2007. Rosso Pompeiano. La decorazione pittorica nelle collezioni del Museo di Napoli e a Pompei. Milan.Google Scholar

Neer, R. 2010. The Emergence of the Classical Style in Greek Sculpture. Chicago.Google Scholar

Neutsch, B. 1940. Der Maler Nikias von Athen: Ein Beitrag zur griechischen Künstlergeschichte und zur pompejanischen Wandmalerei. Leipzig.Google Scholar

Nevett, L. 1997. “Perceptions of Domestic Space in Roman Italy,” in Rawson and Weaver 1997: 281–98.Google Scholar

Newby, Z. 2016. Greek Myths in Roman Art and Culture: Imagery, Values and Identity in Italy, 50 bc–ad 250. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Newlands, C. 1997. “The Metamorphosis of Ovid’s Medea,” in Clauss and Johnston 1997: 178–208.Google Scholar

Nicosia, S. 1968. Teocrito e l’arte figurata. Palermo.Google Scholar

Nichols, M. 2016. “Vitruvius on Vermillion: Faberius’ Domestic Décor and the Invective Tradition,” Arethusa 49: 317–33.Google Scholar

Nichols, M. 2017. Author and Audience in Vitruvius’ De Architectura. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Nissinen, L. 2012. “A Bedroom of One’s Own,” in Anguissola 2012: 15–30.Google Scholar

Nogara, B. 1907. Le Nozze Aldobrandini, i paesaggi con scene dell’Odissea e le altre pitture murali antiche conservate nella Biblioteca Vaticana e nei Musei Pontefici. Milan.Google Scholar

Nussbaum, M. and Sihvola, J. eds. 2002. The Sleep of Reason: Erotic Experience and Sexual Ethics in Ancient Greece and Rome. Chicago and London.Google Scholar

Nyenhuis, J. 1986. “Daidalos et Ikaros,” Lexicon Iconographicum Mythologiae Classicae iii. Zurich and Munich: 313–21.Google Scholar

Oliensis, E. 1997. “Sons and Lovers: Sexuality and Gender in Virgil’s Poetry,” in Martindale 1997: 294–311.Google Scholar

Olson, K. 2008. Dress and the Roman Woman: Self-Presentation and Society. New York.Google Scholar

Pagano, V. 2010. L’Andromeda di Euripide. Edizione e commento dei frammenti. Alessandria.Google Scholar

Page, D. 1955. The Homeric Odyssey. Oxford.Google Scholar

Papanghelis, Th. 1999. “Eros Pastoral and Profane: On Love in Virgil’s Eclogues,” in Braund and Mayer 1999: 44–59.Google Scholar

Papanghelis, Th., Harrison, S. J., and Frangoulidis, S. eds. 2013. Generic Interfaces in Latin Literature: Encounters, Interactions and Transformations. Berlin and Boston.Google Scholar

Parker, H. 1992. “Love’s Body Anatomized: The Ancient Erotic Handbooks and the Rhetoric of Sexuality,” in Richlin 1992: 90–107.Google Scholar

Parslow, C. C. 1995. Rediscovering Antiquity: Karl Weber and the Excavation of Herculaneum, Pompeii and Stabiae. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Paz, O. 1993. La llama doble: amor y erotismo. Barcelona.Google Scholar

Perali, P. 1938. Osservatore Romano, February 27, 1938, 3.Google Scholar

Peradotto, J. and Sullivan, J. P. eds. 1984. Women in the Ancient World: The Arethusa Papers. Albany.Google Scholar

Perrot, G. 1870. “Les peintures du Palatin ii Io, Argus, Hermès et Héra,” Révue Archéologique 21: 387–95.Google Scholar

Perrot, G. 1870–1871a. “Les peintures du Palatin iii Polyphème et Galatée,” Révue Archéologique 22: 47–53.Google Scholar

Perrot, G. 1870–1871b. “Les peintures du Palatin iv Vue d’une rue de Rome (Suite),” Révue Archéologique 22: 152–58.Google Scholar

Perrot, G. 1870–1871c. “Les peintures du Palatin v Deux scènes de magie (Suite et fin),” Révue Archéologique 22: 193–202.Google Scholar

Peters, W. 1963. Landscape in Romano-Campanian Mural Painting. Assen.Google Scholar

Peters, W. 1993. La Casa di Marcus Lucretius Fronto a Pompei e le sue pitture. Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Petersen, L. 2006. The Freedman in Roman Art and Art History. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Phillips, K. 1968. “Perseus and Andromeda,” American Journal of Archaeology 72: 1–23.Google Scholar

Pinkwart, D. 1965. Das Relief des Archelaos von Priene und die “Musen des Philiskos.” Kallmünz.Google Scholar

Platt, V. 2009. “Where the Wild Things Are: Locating the Marvelous in Roman Wall-Painting,” in Hardie 2009: 41–74.Google Scholar

Platt, V. 2014. “Agamemnon’s Grief: On the Limits of Expression in Roman Rhetoric and Painting,” in Elsner and Meyer 2014: 211–32.Google Scholar

Platt, V. 2018. “Orphaned Objects: The Phenomenology of the Incomplete in Pliny’s Natural History,” Art History 41: 492–517.Google Scholar

Platt, V. and Squire, M. eds. 2017. The Frame in Classical Art: A Cultural History. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Pollitt, J. J. 1978. “The Impact of Greek Art in Rome,” Transactions of the American Philological Association 108: 155–74.Google Scholar

Pollitt, J. J. 1986. Art in the Hellenistic Age. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Pollitt, J. J. ed. 2014. The Cambridge History of Painting in the Classical World. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Presicce, C. P. 1996. “Penelope e il riconoscimento di Ulisse,” in Andreae and Presicce 1996: 378–95.Google Scholar

Presuhn, E. 1882. Pompeji. Die Neuesten Ausgrabungen von 1874–1881. Für Kunst- und Alterthumsfreunde illustrirt herausgegeben von Emil Presuhn. Leipzig.Google Scholar

Prioux, E. 2010. “Um Libellus Epigrammaton na chamada Casa de Propércio,” Organon 40: 169–201.Google Scholar

Prioux, E. and Rouveret, A. eds. 2010. Métamorphoses du regard ancien. Paris.Google Scholar

Provenzale, V. 2008. Echi di propaganda imperiale in scene di coppia a Pompei: Enea e Didone, Marte e Venere, Perseo e Andromeda. Rome.Google Scholar

Pulcini, E. 1998. Amour-passion et amour conjugal. Rousseau et l’origine d’un conflit moderne. Paris.Google Scholar

Putnam, M. 1998. Virgil’s Epic Designs: Ekphrasis in the Aeneid. New Haven and London.Google Scholar

Putnam, M. 2006. Poetic Interplay: Catullus and Horace. Princeton.Google Scholar

Raditsa, L. F. 1980. “Augustus’ Legislation Concerning Marriage, Procreation, Love Affairs and Adultery.” Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt ii 13: 278–339.Google Scholar

Rawson, B. and Weaver, P. R. C. eds. 1987. The Roman Family in Italy: Status, Sentiment and Space. Oxford.Google Scholar

Renier, L. 1870. “Les peintures du Palatin,” Révue Archéologique 21: 326–31.Google Scholar

Richardson, L. Jr. 1955. “Pompeii: La Casa dei Dioscuri and Its Painters,” Memoirs of the American Academy in Rome 23: 1–165.Google Scholar

Richlin, A. ed. 1992. Pornography and Representation in Greece and Rome. New York and Oxford.Google Scholar

Ridgway, B. S. 1990. Hellenistic Sculpture 1: The Styles of ca. 331–200 bc. Madison.Google Scholar

Riggsby, A. 1997. “‘Public’ and ‘Private’ in Roman Culture: The Case of the Cubiculum,” Journal of Roman Archaeology 10: 36–56.Google Scholar

Rizzo, G. E. 1918. “Dionysos Mystes. Contributi esegetici alla rappresentatazione dei misteri Orfici,” Memorie delle Reale Accademia di archeologia, lettere e belle arti di Napoli 3: 37–102.Google Scholar

Rizzo, G. E. 1929. La pittura ellenistico-romana. Milan.Google Scholar

Rizzo, G. E. 1936. Monumenti della Pittura Antica Scoperti in Italia. Sezione Terza. La Pittura Ellenistico-Romana. Roma. Fasc. iii. Le Pitture dela “Casa di Livia” (Palatino). Rome.Google Scholar

Robert, C. 1876. “Iphigenia in Tauris,” Archäologische Zeitung 33: 133–48.Google Scholar

Roccos, L. J. 1994. “Perseus,” Lexicon Iconographicum Mythologiae Classicae vii. Zurich and Munich: 332–48.Google Scholar

Rodenwaldt, G. 1910. “Mosaik in Wiener Hofmuseum,” Römische Mitteilungen 25: 256–62.Google Scholar

Roller, M. 1998. “Pliny’s Catullus: The Politics of Literary Appropriation,” Transactions of the American Philological Association 128: 265–304.Google Scholar

Roller, M. 2003. “Horizontal Women: Posture and Sex in the Roman convivium,” American Journal of Philology 124: 377–422.Google Scholar

Roller, M. 2006. Dining Posture in Ancient Rome: Bodies, Values and Status. Princeton.Google Scholar

Romizzi, L. 2006a. “La Casa dei Dioscuri di Pompei (VI 9,6.7): una nuova lettura,” Contributi di archeologia vesuviana ii: 77–160.Google Scholar

Romizzi, L. 2006b. “Evergetismo pubblico e magnificenza privata nella Pompeii neroniano-flavia: un percorso per immagini,” Ostraka 15: 97–133.Google Scholar

Rosati, G. 1985. “Forma elegiaca di un simbolo letterario: la Fedra di Ovidio,” Atti delle Giornate di studio su Fedra; Torino, 7–8–9 maggio 1984: 113–31.Google Scholar

Rosenmeyer, P. 1996. “Love Letters in Callimachus, Ovid and Aristaenetus, or, The Sad Fate of a Mail-Order Bride,” Materiali e discussioni per l’analisi dei testi classici 36: 9–31.Google Scholar

Rosenmeyer, P. 2001. Ancient Epistolary Fictions: the Letter in Greek Literature. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Rostovtzeff, M. 1926. The Social and Economic History of the Roman Empire. Oxford.Google Scholar

Rouveret, A. 1989. Histoire et imaginaire de la peinture ancienne (ve siècle av. J. C.–ier siècle ap. J. C.). Rome.Google Scholar

Ruesch, A. 1908. Guida illustrate del Museo Nazionale di Napoli. Naples.Google Scholar

Russell, A. 2016. The Politics of Public Space in Republican Rome. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Rutledge, S. 2012. Ancient Rome as a Museum: Power, Identity, and the Culture of Collecting. Oxford.Google Scholar

Sanzi Di Mino, M. ed. 1998. La Villa della Farnesina in Palazzo Massimo alle Terme. Milan.Google Scholar

Sarkissian, J. 1983. Catullus 68: An Interpretation. Leiden.Google Scholar

Sauron, G. 1979. “Les modèles funéraires classiques de l’art décoratif néo-attique au Ier siècle av. J.-C.,” Mélanges de l’école française de Rome 91: 183–236.Google Scholar

Sauron, G. 2001. “La révolution iconographique du ‘deuxième style,’” Mélanges de l’école française de Rome 113: 769–86.Google Scholar

Sauron, G. 2009. Les décors privés des Romains: dans l’intimité des mâitres du monde. Paris.Google Scholar

Scagliarini-Corlaità, D. ed. 1995. Atti del vi Convegno Internazionale sulla Pittura Parietale Antica. Bologna.Google Scholar

Schauenburg, K. 1981. “Andromeda i,” Lexicon Iconographicum Mythologiae Classicae i. Zurich and Munich: 775–90.Google Scholar

Schefold, K. 1972. La peinture pompéienne. Essai sur l’évolution de sa signification (trans. Croisille, J.-M.). Brussels.Google Scholar

Schmidt, M. 1992. “Medeia,” Lexicon Iconographicum Mythologiae Classicae vi. Zurich and Munich: 386–98.Google Scholar

Scioli, E. 2015. Dream, Fantasy, and Visual Art in Roman Elegy. Madison.Google Scholar

Sebesta, J. 1994. “Tunica Ralla, Tunica Spissa: The Colors and Textiles of Roman Costume,” in Sebesta and Bonfante 1994: 65–76.Google Scholar

Sebesta, J. and Bonfante, L. eds. 1994. The World of Roman Costume. Madison.Google Scholar

Settis, S. 1984. “Images of Meditation, Uncertainty and Repentance in Ancient Art,” History and Anthropology 1: 193–237.Google Scholar

Severy, B. 2003. Augustus and the Family at the Birth of the Roman Empire. New York and London.Google Scholar

Severy-Hoven, B. 2013. “Master Narratives and the Wall Painting in the House of the Vettii, Pompeii,” in Gabaccia and Maynes 2013: 20–60.Google Scholar

Shapiro, H. A. 1981. “Courtship Scenes in Attic Vase-Painting,” American Journal of Archaeology 85: 133–43.Google Scholar

Sharrock, A. 1991. “Womanufacture,” Journal of Roman Studies 81: 36–49.Google Scholar

Shelton, J.-A. 2016. “Pliny the Younger and the Ideal Wife,” in Gibson and Whitton 2016: 159–84.Google Scholar

Sider, D. 2005. The Library at the Villa of the Papyri in Herculaneum. Los Angeles.Google Scholar

Sider, D. 2010. “The Books of the Villa of the Papyri,” in Zarmakoupi 2010: 115–28.Google Scholar

Simon, E. 1954. “Die Typen der Medeadarstellung in der antiken Kunst,” Gymnasium 61: 203–27.Google Scholar

Skinner, M. B. ed. 2007. A Companion to Catullus. Malden, Oxford, Carlton.Google Scholar

Skinner, M. B. 2011. Clodia Metteli: The Tribune’s Sister. Oxford.Google Scholar

Skutsch, O. ed. 1972. Ennius. Geneva.Google Scholar

Sourvinou-Inwood, C. 1997. “Medea at a Shifting Distance: Images and Euripidean Tragedy,” in Clauss and Johnston 1997: 253–98.Google Scholar

Spentzou, E. 2003. Readers and Writers in Ovid’s Heroides: Transgressions of Genre and Gender. Oxford.Google Scholar

Spentzou, E. 2013. The Roman Poetry of Love: Elegy and Politics in a Time of Revolution. London.Google Scholar

Squire, M. 2009. Image and Text in Graeco-Roman Antiquity. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Squire, M. 2017. “Framing the Roman ‘Still Life’: Campanian Wall-Painting and the Frames of Mural Make-Believe,” in Platt and Squire 2017: 188–255.Google Scholar

Stähli, A. 1999. Die Verweigerung der Lüste: erotische Gruppen in der antiken Plastik. Berlin.Google Scholar

Stewart, A. 1990. Greek Sculpture: An Exploration. New Haven and London.Google Scholar

Stewart, A. 1997. Art, Desire and the Body in Ancient Greece. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Stewart, S. 1993. On Longing. Durham and London.Google Scholar

Stewart, Z. 1959. “The Song of Silenus,” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 64: 179–205.Google Scholar

Stoichita, V. 2015. The Self-Aware Image: An Insight into Early Modern Metapainting. London.Google Scholar

Strocka, V. M. 2007. “Domestic Decoration: Painting and the ‘Four Styles,’” in Dobbins and Foss 2007: 302–22.Google Scholar

Sullivan, J. P. ed. 1962. Critical Essays in Roman Literature: Elegy and Lyric. London.Google Scholar

Swan, G. 2017. “Monstrous Allure: Polyphemus in Pompeii,” Art Inquiries 17: 118–37.Google Scholar

Swetnam-Burland, M. 2015a. Egypt in Italy: Visions of Egypt in Roman Imperial Culture. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Swetnam-Burland, M. 2015b. “Encountering Ovid’s Phaedra in House V.2.10–11, Pompeii,” American Journal of Archaeology 119: 217–32.Google Scholar

Swetnam-Burland, M. 2018. “Marriage Divine? Narratives of the Courtship of Mars and Venus in Roman Painting and Poetry,” in Longfellow and Perry 2018: 166–90.Google Scholar

Syme, R. 1939. The Roman Revolution. Oxford.Google Scholar

Taylor, R. 2003. Roman Builders: A Study in Architectural Process. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Tennyson, A. 1899. Poetical Works of Alfred Lord Tennyson. London.Google Scholar

Thomas, R. 1979a. “New Comedy, Callimachus and Roman Poetry,” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 83: 179–206.Google Scholar

Thomas, R. 1979b. “Theocritus, Calvus and Eclogue 6,” Classical Philology 74: 337–39.Google Scholar

Thomas, R. 1981. “Cinna, Calvus and the Ciris,” The Classical Quarterly 31: 371–74.Google Scholar

Thomas, R. 2000. Reading Virgil and His Texts: Studies in Intertextuality. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar

Thompson, M. L. 1961. “The Monumental and Literary Evidence for Programmatic Painting in Antiquity,” Marsyas 9: 36–77.Google Scholar

Touchefeu, O. 1981. “Aias i,” Lexicon Iconographicum Mythologiae Classicae i. Zurich and Munich: 312–36.Google Scholar

Touchefeu-Meynier, O. 1992. “Kyklops, Kyklopes,” Lexicon Iconographicum Mythologiae Classicae vi. Zurich and Munich: 154–59.Google Scholar

Touchefeu-Meynier, O. 1997. “Polyphemos i,” Lexicon Iconographicum Mythologiae Classicae viii. Zurich and Dusseldorf: 1011–19.Google Scholar

Treggiari, S. 1988. “Home and Forum: Cicero between ‘Public’ and ‘Private,’” Transactions of the American Philological Association 128: 1–23.Google Scholar

Treggiari, S. 1991. Roman Marriage: Iusti Coniuges from the Time of Cicero to the Time of Ulpian. Oxford.Google Scholar

Treggiari, S. 1999. “The Upper-Class House as Symbol and Focus of Emotion in Cicero,” Journal of Roman Archaeology 12: 33–56.Google Scholar

Tutrone, F. 2013. “Libraries and Intellectual Debate in the Late Republic: The Case of the Aristotelian Corpus,” in König, Oikonomopoulou, and Woolf 2013: 152–66.Google Scholar

Ulrich, R. 1993. “Julius Caesar and the Creation of the Forum Julium,” American Journal of Archaeology 97: 49–80.Google Scholar

Ulrich, R. 1994. The Roman Orator and the Sacred Stage: The Roman Templum Rostratum. Brussels.Google Scholar

Ulrich, R. and Quenemoen, C. eds. 2014. A Companion to Roman Architecture. West Sussex and Malden.Google Scholar

Valladares, H. 2005. “The Lover as a Model Viewer: Gendered Dynamics in Propertius 1.3,” in Ancona and Greene 2005: 206–42.Google Scholar

Valladares, H. 2006. Imago Amoris: The Poetics of Desire in Roman Painting. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Columbia University.Google Scholar

Valladares, H. 2007. “Four Women from Stabiae: Eighteenth-Century Antiquarian Practice and the History of Ancient Roman Painting,” in Coates and Seydl 2007: 73–93.Google Scholar

Valladares, H. 2011. “Fallax imago: Ovid’s Narcissus and the seduction of mimesis in Roman wall painting,” Word & Image: A Journal of Verbal/Visual Enquiry 27: 378–95.Google Scholar

Valladares, H. 2012. “Elegy, Art and the Viewer,” in Gold 2012: 318–38.Google Scholar

Valladares, H. 2014. “Pictorial Paratexts: Floating Figures in Roman Wall Painting,” in Jansen 2014: 176–205.Google Scholar

Van Buren, A. W. 1938. “Pinacothecae,” Memoirs of the American Academy in Rome 15: 70–81.Google Scholar

Vance, N. 1997. The Victorians and Ancient Rome. Oxford and Cambridge.Google Scholar

Varone, A. 1994. Erotica Pompeiana: Inscrizioni d’amore sui muri di Pompei. Rome.Google Scholar

Varone, A. 1995a. “L’organizzazione del lavoro in una bottega di decorator: le evidenze dal recente scavo pompeiano lungo Via dell’Abbondanza,” in Moormann 1995: 124–39.Google Scholar

Varone, A. 1995b. “Pompei: il quadro Helbig 1445, ‘Kasperl im Kindertheater’, una nuova replica e il problema delle copie e varianti,” in Scagliarini-Corlaità 1995: 149–51.Google Scholar

Varone, A. 1997. “Pittori romani al lavoro. Materiali, strumenti, tecniche: evidenze archeologiche e dati analitici di un recente scavo pompeiano lungo Via dell’Abbondanza (Reg. ix ins. 12),” in Béarat 1997: 199–206.Google Scholar

Vasari, G. 1986. Le vite de’ piú eccelenti architetti, pittori et scultori italiani, da Cimabue insino a’ tempi nostri. Turin.Google Scholar

Verducci, F. 1985. Ovid’s Toyshop of the Heart: Epistulae Heroidum. Princeton.Google Scholar

Veyne, P. ed. 1987a. “Marriage,” in Veyne 1987b: 33–51.Google Scholar

Veyne, P. 1987b. A History of Private Life: From Pagan Rome to Byzantium (trans. Goldhammer, A.). Cambridge and London.Google Scholar

Veyne, P. 1988. Roman Erotic Elegy: Love, Poetry and the West (trans. Pellauer, D.). Chicago and London.Google Scholar

Von Blanckenhagen, P. 1957. “Narration in Hellenistic and Roman Art,” American Journal of Archaeology 61: 78–83.Google Scholar

Von Blanckenhagen, P. 1968. “Daedalus and Icarus on Pompeian Walls,” Römische Mitteilungen 75: 106–43.Google Scholar

Von Blanckenhagen, P. and Alexander, C.. 1990. The Augustan Villa at Boscotrecase. Mainz.Google Scholar

Von Blanckenhagen, P. and Green, B.. 1975. “The Aldobrandini Wedding Reconsidered,” Römische Mitteilungen 82: 83–98.Google Scholar

Vout, C. 2012. “Un-finished Business: Re-viewing Medea in Roman Painting,” Ramus 41: 119–43.Google Scholar

Vout, C. 2014. “The Funerary Altar of Pedana and the Rhetoric of Unreachability,” in Elsner and Meyer 2014: 288–315.Google Scholar

Ward-Perkins, J. B. and Claridge, A.. 1978. Pompeii ad 79. Boston.Google Scholar

Wallace-Hadrill, A. 1985. “Propaganda and Dissent? Augustan Moral Legislation and the Love-Poets,” Klio 67: 180–84.Google Scholar

Wallace-Hadrill, A. 1994. Houses and Society in Pompeii and Herculaneum. Princeton.Google Scholar

Wallace-Hadrill, A. 1996. “Engendering the Roman House,” in Kleiner and Matheson 1996: 104–15.Google Scholar

Wallace-Hadrill, A. 1997. “Mutatio morum: The Idea of a Cultural Revolution,” in Habinek and Schiesaro 1997: 2–22.Google Scholar

Wallace-Hadrill, A. 2008. Rome’s Cultural Revolution. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Wallace-Hadrill, A. 2011. Herculaneum: Past and Future. New York and Los Altos.Google Scholar

Waywell, G. 1982. “A Roman Grave Altar Rediscovered,” American Journal of Archaeology 86: 238–42.Google Scholar

Waywell, G. 1986. The Lever and Hope Sculptures: Ancient Sculptures in the Lady Lever Art Gallery, Port Sunlight and a Catalogue of Ancient Sculptures Formerly in the Hope Collection, London and Deepdene. Berlin.Google Scholar

Webb, R. 2009. Ekphrasis, Imagination and Persuasion in Ancient Rhetorical Theory and Practice. Farnham and Burlington.Google Scholar

Welch, K. 2006. “Domi Militiaeque: Roman Domestic Aesthetics and War Booty in the Republic,” in Dillon and Welch 2006: 39–61.Google Scholar

Wesenberg, B. 1988. “Zur Io des Nikias in den pompejanischen Wandbildern,” Kanon: Fetschrift Ernst Berger. Basel: 344–50.Google Scholar

West, D. and Woodman, T. eds. 1979. Creative Imitation and Latin Literature. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Westall, R. 1996. “The Forum Iulium as Representation of Imperator Caesar,” Römische Mitteilungen 103: 83–118.Google Scholar

White, P. 1978. “Amicitia and the Profession of Poetry in Early Imperial Rome,” Journal of Roman Studies 68: 74–92.Google Scholar

White, P. 1982. “Positions for Poets in Early Imperial Rome,” in Gold 1982: 50–66.Google Scholar

Wilkinson, L. P. 1955. Ovid Recalled. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Williams, G. 1958. “Some Aspects of Roman Marriage Ceremonies and Ideals,” Journal of Roman Studies 48: 16–29.Google Scholar

Wiseman, T. P. 1982. “Poets and Patrons in Late Republican Rome,” in Gold 1982: 28–49.Google Scholar

Wiseman, T. P. 1985. Catullus and His World: A Reappraisal. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Wiseman, T. P. 2019. The House of Augustus: A Historical Detective Story. Princeton.Google Scholar

Wirth, T. 1983. “Zum Bildprogramm in der Casa dei Vettii,” Römische Mitteilungen 90: 449–55.Google Scholar

Woodman, T. and Feeney, D. eds. 2002. Traditions and Contexts in the Poetry of Horace. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Woodman, T. and Powell, J.. 1992. Author and Audience in Latin Literature. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Wyke, M. 1994. “Taking the Woman’s Part: Engendering Roman Love Elegy,” Ramus 23: 110–26.Google Scholar

Wyke, M. 2002. The Roman Mistress: Ancient and Modern Representations. Oxford.Google Scholar

Wyley, S. 2006. “Roman Replications of Greek Art at the Villa della Farnesina,” Art History 29: 213–32.Google Scholar

Yalouris, N. 1986. “Le mythe d’Io: les transformations d’Io dans l’iconographie et la literature grecques,” Bulletin de correspondance hellénique. Supplément 14: 3–23.Google Scholar

Yalouris, N. 1990. “Io i,” Lexicon Iconographicum Mythologiae Classicae v. Zurich and Munich: 661–76.Google Scholar

Zanker, G. 1987. Realism in Alexandrian Poetry: A Literature and Its Audience. London and Wolfeboro.Google Scholar

Zanker, P. 1988. The Power of Images in the Age of Augustus (trans. Shapiro, A.). Ann Arbor.Google Scholar

Zanker, P. 1998. Eine Kusnt für die Sinne: zur Bilderwelt des Dionysos und der Aphrodite. Berlin.Google Scholar

Zanker, P. 1999. “Mythenbilder in Haus,” in Docter and Moormann 1999: 40–48.Google Scholar

Zanker, P. 2002. Un arte per l’impero: Funzione e intenzione delle immagini nel mondo romano. Milan.Google Scholar

Zanker, P. and Ewald, B.. 2004. Mit Mythen leben: die Bilderwelt der römischen Sarkophage. Munich.Google Scholar

Zarmakoupi, M. ed. 2010. The Villa of the Papyri in Herculaneum: Archaeology, Reception, and Digital Reconstruction. Berlin.Google Scholar

Zarmakoupi, M. 2014a. Designing for Luxury on the Bay of Naples: Villas and Landscapes (100 bce–79 ce). Oxford.Google Scholar

Zarmakoupi, M. 2014b. “Private Villas: Italy and the Provinces,” in Ulrich and Quenemoen 2014: 363–80.Google Scholar

Zeitlin, F. 1996. Playing the Other: Gender and Society in Classical Greek Literature. Chicago.Google Scholar

Zetzel, J. E. G. 1982. “The Poetics of Patronage in the Late First Century bc,” in Gold 1982: 87–102.Google Scholar

Zetzel, J. E. G. 2002. “Dreaming about Quirinus: Horace’s Satires and the Development of Augustan Poetry,” in Woodman and Feeney 2002: 38–52.Google Scholar

Zevi, F. 1964. La Casa Reg. IX.5, 18–21 a Pompei e le sue pitture. Rome.Google Scholar

Zevi, F. ed. 1979. Pompei 79: raccolta di studi per il decimonono centenario dell’eruzione vesuviana. Naples.Google Scholar