East, M. (2015). Coming to terms with innovative high-stakes assessment practice: Teachers’ viewpoints on assessment reform. Language Testing, 31(1), 101–20.Google Scholar

Norris, J. (2009). Task-based teaching and testing. In Long, M. and Doughty, C., eds. The handbook of language teaching. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 578–94.Google Scholar

Norris, J. M. (2018). Task-based language assessment: Aligning designs with intended uses and consequences. JLTA Journal, 21, 3–20.Google Scholar

Van Gorp, K. and Deygers, B. (2014). Task-based language assessment. In Kunnan, A., ed. The companion to language assessment. Cambridge: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 578–93.Google Scholar

Wiggins, G. (1998). Educative assessment: Designing assessments to inform and improve student performance. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar

ACTFL. (1999). American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages Proficiency Guidelines. Alexandria, VA: ACTFL.Google Scholar

Adair-Hauck, B., Glisan, E., Koda, K., Swender, E., and Sandrock, P. (2006). The Integrated Performance Assessment (IPA): Connecting assessment to instruction and learning. Foreign Language Annals, 39, 359–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adair-Hauck, B., Glisan, E., and Troyan, F. (2014). Implementing Integrated Performance Assessment. Alexandria, VA: ACTFL.Google Scholar

Alanen, R., Huhta, A., and Tarnanen, M. (2010). Designing and assessing L2 writing tasks across CEFR proficiency levels. In Bartning, I., Martin, M., and Vedder, I. eds. Communicative proficiency and linguistic development: Intersections between language testing and SLA research. EUROSLA Monograph, pp. 21–56.Google Scholar

Alderson, J. C. (2009). Air safety, language assessment policy, and policy implementation: The case of aviation English. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 29, 168–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alderson, J. C. (2010). A survey of aviation English tests. Language Testing, 27, 51–72.Google Scholar

Bachman, L. F. (2002). Some reflections on task-based language performance assessment. Language Testing, 19(4), 453–76.Google Scholar

Bachman, L. F. and Damböck, B. (2018). Language assessment for classroom teachers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bachman, L. F. and Palmer, A. (1996). Language testing in practice: Designing and developing useful language tests. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bachman, L. F. and Palmer, A. (2010). Language assessment in practice: Developing language assessments and justifying their use in the real world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Berben, M., Callebaut, I., Colpin, M., François, S., Geerts, M., Goethals, M., and Vanoosthuyze, S. (2008), eds. TotemTaal: Inleiding en evaluatie 5. Mechelen, Belgium: Wolters Plantyn.Google Scholar

Bond, L. A. (1996). Norm-and criterion-referenced testing. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 5(2), 120–25.Google Scholar

Brindley, G. (1994). Task-centered assessment in language learning: The promise and the challenge. ERIC Document # ED 386 045.Google Scholar

Brown, J. D., Hudson, T. D., Norris, J. M., and Bonk, W. (2002). Investigating task-based second language performance assessment. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai‘i Press.Google Scholar

Butler, Y. G. and Zeng, W. (2014). Young foreign language learners’ interactions during task-based paired assessments. Language Assessment Quarterly, 11(1), 45–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Byrnes, H. (2002). The role of task and task-based assessment in a content-oriented collegiate foreign language curriculum. Language Testing, 19(4), 419–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Byrnes, H., Maxim, H., and Norris, J. M. (2010). Realizing advanced FL writing development in collegiate education: Curricular design, pedagogy, assessment. Cambridge: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Carless, D. (2007). The suitability of task-based approaches for secondary schools: Perspectives from Hong Kong. System, 35(4), 595–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Centre for Canadian Language Benchmarks. (2000). CLB 2000: Theoretical framework. Ottawa: Centre for Canadian Language BenchmarksGoogle Scholar

Chapelle, C. A., Enright, M. K., and Jamieson, J. M. (2008), eds. Building a validity argument for the Test of English as a Foreign Language. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Colpin, M. and Gysen, S. (2006). Developing and introducing task-based language tests. In Van den Branden, K., ed., Task-based language education: From theory to practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 151–74.Google Scholar

Council of Europe (2001). Common European Framework of Reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

East, M. (2012). Task-based language teaching from the teachers’ perspective: Insights from New Zealand. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

East, M. (2016). Assessing foreign language students’ spoken proficiency: Stakeholder perspectives on assessment innovation. Singapore: Springer.Google Scholar

Eckes, T. and Althaus, H. J. (2020). Language proficiency assessments in college admissions. In Oliveri, M. E. and Wendler, C., eds. Higher education admission and placement practices: An international perspective. Cambridge: University of Cambridge, pp. 256–75Google Scholar

Elder, C., Pill, J., Woodward-Kron, R., McNamara, T., Manias, E., Webb, G., and McColl, G. (2012). Health professionals’ views of communication: Implications for assessing performance on a health specific English language test. TESOL Quarterly, 46(2), 409–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Fischer, J., Chouissa, C., Dugovičová, S., and Virkkunen-Fullenwider, A. (2011). Guidelines for task-based university language testing. Graz: European Centre for Modern Languages.Google Scholar

Gysen, S. and Van Avermaet, P. (2005). Issues in functional language performance assessment:The case of the Certificate Dutch as a Foreign Language. Language Assessment Quarterly, 2(1), 51–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haertel, E. H. (1999). Performance assessment and education reform. Phi Delta Kappan, 80 (9), 662.Google Scholar

Hamp-Lyons, L. (2000). Fairnesses in language testing. In Kunnan, A. J., ed. Fairness and validation in language assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 30–34.Google Scholar

Hattie, J. (2009). The black box of tertiary assessment: An impending revolution. In Meyer, L. H., Davidson, S., Anderson, H., Fletcher, R., Johnston, P. M., and Rees, M., eds. Tertiary assessment and higher education student outcomes: Policy, practice and research. Wellington, NZ: Ako Aotearoa, pp. 259–75.Google Scholar

Herman, J. L. (1992). A practical guide to alternative assessment. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.Google Scholar

Khattri, N., Reeve, A., and Kane, M. (1998). Principles and practices of performance assessment. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Lewis, C. and Kingdon, B. (2016). CELBANTM: A ten-year retrospective. TESL Canada Journal, 33, 69–82.Google Scholar

Linn, R. L. and Burton, E. (1994). Performance‐based assessment: Implications of task specificity. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 13(1), 5–8.Google Scholar

Lockwood, J. (2015). Language for specific purpose (LSP) performance assessment in Asian call centres: Strong and weak definitions. Language Testing in Asia, 5(3).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Long, M. (2015). Second language acquisition and task-based language teaching. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Long, M. H. and Crookes, G. (1993). Units of analysis in syllabus design: The case for task. In Crookes, G. and Gass, S., eds. Tasks in a pedagogical context: Integrating theory and practice. Bristol: Multilingual Matters, pp. 9–54.Google Scholar

Long, M. H. and Norris, J. M. (2000). Task-based teaching and assessment. In Byram, M., ed. Encyclopedia of language teaching. London: Routledge, pp. 597–603.Google Scholar

Lynch, B. K. (2001). The ethical potential of alternative language assessment. In Experimenting with uncertainty: essays in honour of Alan Davies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 228–39.Google Scholar

McNamara, T. (1996). Measuring second language performance. New York: Longman.Google Scholar

McNamara, T. (1997). ‘Interaction’ in second language performance assessment: Whose performance? Applied linguistics, 18(4), 446–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McNamara, T. and Roever, C. (2006). Language testing: The social dimension. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Messick, S. (1994). The interplay of evidence and consequences in the validation of performance assessments. Educational Researcher 23, 13–23.Google Scholar

Messick, S. (1996). Validity and washback in language testing. Language Testing, 13(3), 241–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mislevy, R., Steinberg, L., and Almond, R. (2002). Design and analysis in task-based language assessment. Language Testing, 19(4), 477–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Moss, P. A. (1992). Shifting conceptions of validity in educational measurement: Implications for performance assessment. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 229–58.Google Scholar

Norris, J. M. (2000). Purposeful language assessment. English Teaching Forum, 38(1), 18–23.Google Scholar

Norris, J. M. (2002). Interpretations, intended uses and designs in task-based language assessment. Language Testing, 19(4), 337–46.Google Scholar

Norris, J. M. (2008). Validity evaluation in language assessment. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Norris, J. M. (2009). Task-based teaching and testing. In Long, M. and Doughty, C., eds., Handbook of language teaching. Cambridge: Blackwell, pp. 578–94.Google Scholar

Norris, J. M. (2016). Current uses for task-based language assessment. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 36, 230–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Norris, J. M. (2018). Task-based language assessment: Aligning designs with intended uses and consequences. JLTA Journal, 21, 3–20.Google Scholar

Norris, J. M., Brown, J. D., Hudson, T. D., and Bonk, W. (2002). Examinee abilities and task difficulty in task-based second language performance assessment. Language Testing, 19(4), 395–418.Google Scholar

Norris, J. M., Brown, J. D., Hudson, T. D., and Yoshioka, J. K. (1998). Designing second language performance assessment. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai‘i Press.Google Scholar

Norris, J. M., Davis, J., and Timpe-Laughlin, V. (2017). Second language educational experiences for adult learners. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Nunan, D. (2004). Task-based language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Popham, W. J. (1993). Educational testing in America: What’s right, what’s wrong? A criterion-referenced perspective. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 12(1), 11–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Purpura, J. E. and Turner, C. E. (2014). Learning-oriented assessment in language classrooms: Using assessment to gauge and promote language learning. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Robinson, P. and Ross, S. (1996). The development of task-based assessment in English for academic purpose programs. Applied Linguistics, 17, 455–76.Google Scholar

Ryan, D. G. and Frederiksen, N. (1951). Performance tests of educational achievement. In Lindquist, E. F., ed. Educational measurement. Washington DC: American Council on Education, pp. 455–94.Google Scholar

Shepard, L. A. (1993). Evaluating test validity. Review of research in education, 19(1), 405–50.Google Scholar

Shohamy, E. (1995). Performance assessment in language testing. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 15, 188–211.Google Scholar

Skehan, P. (1998). A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Timpe-Laughlin, V. (2018). Pragmatics in task-based language assessment: Opportunities and challenges. In Taguchi, N. and Kim, Y., eds. Task-based approaches to teaching and assessing pragmatics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 287–304.Google Scholar

Van den Branden, K. (2006), ed. Task-based language education: From theory to practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Van den Branden, K., Bygate, M., and Norris, J. (2009). Task-based language teaching: Introducing the reader. In Van den Branden, K., Bygate, M., and Norris, J., eds. Task-based language teaching: A reader. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins, pp. 1–13.Google Scholar

Van den Branden, K., Depauw, V., and Gysen, S. (2002). A computerized task-based test of second language Dutch for vocational training purposes. Language Testing, 19(2), 438–52.Google Scholar

Van Gorp, K. and Deygers, B. (2014). Task-based language assessment. In Kunnan, A., ed. The Companion to Language Assessment. Cambridge: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 578–93.Google Scholar

Wajda, E. (2011). New perspectives in language assessment: The interpretivist revolution. In Pawlak, M., ed. Extending the boundaries of research on second language learning and teaching. Berlin: Springer, pp. 275–85.Google Scholar

Wall, D. and Horák, T. (2006). The impact of changes in the TOEFL examination on teaching and learning in Central and Eastern Europe: Phase 1, the baseline study. ETS Research Report Series, MS-34.Google Scholar

Weaver, C. (2013). Incorporating a formative assessment cycle into task-based language teaching. In Shehadeh, A. and Coombe, C., eds. Researching and implementing task-based language learning and teaching in EFL contexts. Amsterdam: John Benjamin, pp. 287–312.Google Scholar

Weideman, A. (2006). Assessing academic literacy: A task-based approach. Language Matters, 37, 81–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wiggins, G. (1998). Educative assessment: Designing assessments to inform and improve student performance. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar

Wolf, M. K., Lopez, A., Oh, S., and Tsutagawa, F. S. (2017). Comparing the performance of young English language learners and native English speakers on speaking assessment tasks. English language proficiency assessments for young learners. New York: Routledge, pp. 171–190.Google Scholar

Beretta, A. (1992). What can be learned from the Bangalore Evaluation. In Alderson, J. C. and Beretta, A., eds. Evaluating second language education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 250–71.Google Scholar

Norris, J. M. (2015). Thinking and acting programmatically in task-based language teaching: Essential roles for program evaluation. In Bygate, M., ed. Domains and directions in the development of TBLT: A decade of plenaries from the international conference. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 27–57.Google Scholar

Norris, J. M., Davis, J., and Timpe-Laughlin, V. (2017). Second language educational experiences for adult learners. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Shintani, N. (2016). Input-based tasks in foreign language instruction for young learners. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Van den Branden, K. (2006). Training teachers: Task-based as well? In Van den Branden, K, ed. Task-based language teaching in practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 217–73.Google Scholar

Beretta, A. (1990). Implementation of the Bangalore Project. Applied Linguistics, 11(4), 321–40.Google Scholar

Beretta, A. (1992). What can be learned from the Bangalore evaluation. In Alderson, J. C. and Beretta, A., eds. Evaluating second language education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 250–71.Google Scholar

Beretta, A. and Davies, A. (1985). Evaluation of the Bangalore project. ELT Journal , 29, 121–27.Google Scholar

Butler, Y. G. (2011). The implementation of communicative and task-based language teaching in the Asia-Pacific region. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 31, 36–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bryfonski, L. E. (2019). Task-based teacher training: Implementation and evaluation in Central American bilingual schools. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Georgetown University: Washington DC.Google Scholar

Bryfonski, L. and McKay, T. H. (2017). TBLT implementation and evaluation: A meta-analysis. Language Teaching Research, 23, 603–32.Google Scholar

Byrnes, H. (2019). Affirming the context of instructed SLA: The potential of curricular thinking. Language Teaching Research, 23, 514–32.Google Scholar

Byrnes, H., Maxim, H., and Norris, J. (2010). Realizing advanced L2 writing development in a collegiate curriculum: Curricular design, pedagogy, assessment [Monograph]. Modern Language Journal, 94.Google Scholar

Carless, D. (2007). The suitability of task-based approaches for secondary schools: Perspectives from Hong Kong. System, 35(4),595–608.Google Scholar

Davis, J. McE. (2015). The usefulness of accreditation-mandated outcomes assessment: Trends in university foreign language programs. In Norris, J. M and Davis, J. McE eds. Student learning outcomes assessment in college foreign language programs. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai‘i, National Foreign Language Resource Center, pp. 1–35.Google Scholar

Davis, J. McE (2016). Toward a capacity framework for useful student learning outcomes assessment in college language programs. Modern Language Journal, 100(1), 377–99.Google Scholar

East, M. (2012). Task-based language teaching from the teachers’ perspective: Insights from New Zealand. Vol. 3. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Ellis, R. (1997). The empirical evaluation of language teaching materials. ELT Journal, 51, 36–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Ellis, R. (2015). Teachers evaluating tasks. In Bygate, M., ed. Domains and directions in the development of TBLT: A decade of plenaries from the international conference. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 247–70.Google Scholar

Ellis, R., Skehan, P., Li, S., Shintani, N., and Lambert, C. (2019). Task-based language teaching: Theory and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frechtling, J. A. (2007). Logic modeling methods in program evaluation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar

González-Lloret, M., Nielson, K. B. (2015). Evaluating TBLT: The case of a task-based Spanish program. Language Teaching Research, 19(5), 525–49.Google Scholar

Iizuka, T. (2019). Task-based needs analysis: Identifying communicative needs for study abroad students in Japan. System, 80, 134–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Keck, C.M., Iberri-Shea, G., Tracy-Ventura, N., and Wa-Mbaleka, S. (2006). Investigating the empirical link between interaction and acquisition: A quantitative meta-analysis. In Norris, J. and Ortega, L.. Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 91–131.Google Scholar

Kim, Y., Jung, Y., and Tracy‐Ventura, N. (2017). Implementation of a Localized Task‐Based Course in an EFL Context: A Study of Students’ Evolving Perceptions. TESOL Quarterly, 51(3), 632–60.Google Scholar

Lambert, C. (2010). A task-based needs analysis: Putting principles into practice. Language Teaching Research, 14(1), 99–112.Google Scholar

Littlewood, W. (2004). The task-based approach: Some questions and suggestions. ELT Journal, 58(4), 319–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Long, M. H. (1985). A role for instruction in second language acquisition: Task-based language teaching. In Hyltenstam, K. and Pienemann, M., eds. Modelling and assessing second language acquisition. Bristol: Multilingual Matters, pp. 77–99.Google Scholar

Long, M. (2005). Second language needs analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Long, M. (2015). Second language acquisition and task-based language teaching. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Long, M. and Norris, J. M. (2000). Task-based teaching and assessment. In Byram, M., ed. Encyclopedia of language teaching. London: Routledge, pp. 597–603.Google Scholar

McDonough, K. and Chaikitmongkol, W. (2007). Teachers’ and learners’ reactions to a task-based EFL course in Thailand. TESOL Quarterly, 41, 107–32.Google Scholar

Norris, J. M. (2006). The why (and how) of assessing student foreign language programs. Modern Language Journal, 90, 590–97.Google Scholar

Norris, J. M. (2009). Task-based teaching and testing. In Doughty, C. and Long, M., eds. The handbook of language teaching. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 578–94.Google Scholar

Norris, J. M. (2015). Thinking and acting programmatically in task-based language teaching: Essential roles for program evaluation. In Bygate, M., ed. Domains and directions in the development of TBLT: A decade of plenaries from the international conference. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 27–57.Google Scholar

Norris, J. M. (2016). Language program evaluation. Modern Language Journal, 100(s), 169–89.Google Scholar

Norris, J. M., Davis, J. McE., and Timpe-Laughlin, V. (2017). Second language educational experiences for adult learners. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Patton, M. Q. (2008). Utilization-focused evaluation. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Pica, T., Kanagy, R., and Falodun, J. (1993). Choosing and using communicative tasks for second language instruction. In Crookes, G. and Gass., S. M. eds. Tasks in a pedagogical context. Bristol: Multilingual Matters, pp. 9–34.Google Scholar

Prabhu, N. S. (1987). Second Language Pedagogy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Shintani, N. (2016). Input-based tasks in foreign language instruction for young learners. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Swan, M. (2005). Legislation by hypothesis: The case of task-based instruction. Applied Linguistics, 26(3), 376–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Van Avermaet, P. and Gysen, S. (2006). From needs to tasks: Language learning needs in a task-based approach. In Van den Branden, K., ed. Task-based language education: From theory to practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 17–46.Google Scholar

Van den Branden, K. (2006), ed., Task-based language education: From theory to practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Van den Branden, K. (2009). Diffusion and implementation of innovations. In Long, M. and Doughty, C., eds. The handbook of language teaching. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 659–72.Google Scholar

Willis, D. and Willis, J. (2007). Doing task-based teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Ellis, N. C. (2001). Memory for language. In Robinson, P., ed. Cognition and second language instruction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 33–68.Google Scholar

Ellis, N. C. (2005). At the interface: Dynamic interactions of explicit and implicit language knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 305–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Godfroid, A. and Kim, M. (2021). The contributions of statistical-implicit learning aptitude to implicit-second language knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 1–29.Google Scholar

Kang, E. Y., Sok, S., and Han, Z-H. (2018). Thirty-five years of ISLA on form-focused instruction: A meta-analysis. Language Teaching Research, 23(4), 428–53.Google Scholar

Beretta, A. and Davies, A. (1985). Evaluation of the Bangalore Project. English Language Teaching Journal, 39, 121–27.Google Scholar

Burwell, G., Gonzalez-Lloret, M., and Nielsen, K. (2009). Evaluating a TBLT Spanish immersion program. Paper presented in the colloquium: Evaluating task-based language programs. Third biannual conference on TBLT. University of Lancaster, September 13–16.Google Scholar

De la Fuente, M. J. (2006). Classroom L2 vocabulary acquisition: investigating the role of pedagogical tasks and form-focused instruction. Language Teaching Research, 10, 263–95.Google Scholar

De Ridder, I., Vangehuchten, L., and Sesena Gomez, M. (2007). Enhancing automaticity through task-based language learning. Applied Linguistics, 28(2), 263–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ellis, R., Loewen, S., Elder, C., Erlam, R., Philp, J., and Reinders, H. (2009). Implicit and explicit knowledge in second language learning, testing and teaching. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

Gass, S., Spinner, P., and Behney, J. (2018), eds. Salience in second language acquisition. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Godfroid, A. and Kim, K.M. (2019). Not aptitude but aptitudeS: examining the relationship between implicit- explicit learning aptitudes and implicit-explicit knowledge. Paper presented at the 29th conference of the European Second Language Association. Lund University, August 28- 31.Google Scholar

Gonzalez-Lloret, M. and Nielson, K. (2014). Evaluating TBLT: The case of a task-based Spanish program. Language Teaching Research 19(5),525–49.Google Scholar

Granena, G. (2013). Individual differences in sequence learning ability and second language acquisition in early childhood and adulthood. Language Learning 63(4),665–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jiang, N. (2012). Conducting reaction time research in second language studies. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Keating, G. D. and Jegerski, J. (2015). Experimental designs in sentence processing research. A methodological review and user’s guide. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 37, 1–32.Google Scholar

Kuiken, F., Vedder, I., and Gilabert, R. (2010). Communicative adequacy and linguistic complexity in L2 writing. In Bartning, I., Martin, M., Vedder, I., eds. Communicative proficiency and linguistic development: Intersections between SLA and language testing research. Eurosla Monographs Series, pp. 81–100.Google Scholar

Kuiken, F. and Vedder, I. (2014). Rating written performance: What do raters do and why? Language Testing, 31(3), 329–48.Google Scholar

Kuiken, F. and Vedder, I. (2016). Functional adequacy in L2 writing: towards a new rating scale. Language Testing, 34(3), 321–36.Google Scholar

Li, S., Ellis, R., and Zhu, Y. (2016). Task-based versus task-supported language instruction. An experimental study. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 36, 205–29.Google Scholar

Loewen, S., Erlam, R., and Ellis, R. (2009). Implicit and explicit knowledge and second language learning: testing and teaching. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

Long, M. (2015). Second language acquisition and task-based language teaching. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Long, M. (2017). Instructed second language acquisition (ISLA): Geopolitics, methodological issues, and some major research questions. Instructed Second Language Acquisition, 1, 7–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marsden, E., Thomson, S., and Plonsky, L. (2018). A methodological synthesis of self-paced reading in second language research. Applied Psycholinguistics, 39(5),861–904.Google Scholar

Pallotti, G. (2009). CAF: Defining, refining and differentiating constructs. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 590–601.Google Scholar

Paradis, M. (1994). Neurolinguistic aspects of implicit and explicit memory: Implications for bilingualism and SLA. In Ellis, N., ed. Implicit and explicit language learning. London: Academic Press, pp. 393–419.Google Scholar

Paradis, M. (2004). Neurolinguistic Theory of Bilingualism. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Rebuschat, P. (2013). Measuring implicit and explicit knowledge in second language research. Language Learning 63(3),595–626.Google Scholar

Sharwood Smith, M. (1993). Input enhancement in instructed SLA: Theoretical bases. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 165–79.Google Scholar

Sharwood-Smith, M. (1981). Consciousness-raising and the second language learner. Applied Linguistics 2, 159–68.Google Scholar

Shintani, N. and Ellis, R. (2010). The incidental acquisition of English plural -s by Japanese children in comprehension-based and production-based lessons: A process-product study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32(4),607–37.Google Scholar

Shrout, P. and Fleiss, J. (1979). Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin, 86(2),420–28Google Scholar

Suzuki, Y. (2017). Validity of new measures of implicit knowledge: distinguishing implicit knowledge from automatized explicit knowledge. Applied Psycholinguistics, 38, 1229–61.Google Scholar

Whong, M., Gil, H.-G., and Marsden, E. (2014). Beyond paradigm: The ‘what’ and the ‘how’ of classroom research. Second Language Research, 30(4),551–68.Google Scholar

Dörnyei, Z. and Ottó, I. (1998). Motivation in action: A process model of L2 motivation. Working Papers in Applied Linguistics, 4, 43–69.Google Scholar

Révész, A. and Gurzynski-Weiss, L. (2016). Teachers’ perspectives on second language task difficulty: Insights from think-alouds and eye tracking. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 36, 182–204.Google Scholar

Robinson, P. (2011). Second language task complexity, the Cognition Hypothesis, language learning, and performance. In Robinson, P., ed., Researching task complexity: Task demands, task-based language learning, and performance. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 3–38.Google Scholar

Sasayama, S. (2016). Is a ‘complex’ task really complex? Validating the assumption of cognitive task complexity. Modern Language Journal, 100, 231–54.Google Scholar

Skehan, P. (2009). A Framework for the implantation of task-based instruction. In Van den Branden, K., Bygate, M., and Norris, J., eds., Task-based language teaching. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Torres, J. and Serafini, E. J. (2016). Micro-evaluating learners’ task-specific motivation in a task-based business Spanish course. Hispania, 99(2), 289–304.Google Scholar

Baralt, M. L. (2010). Task complexity, the Cognition Hypothesis, and interaction in CMC and FTF environments. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Georgetown University, Washington DC.Google Scholar

Baralt, M. L. (2013). The impact of cognitive complexity on feedback efficacy during online versus face-to-face interactive tasks. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35, 689–725.Google Scholar

Candlin, C. N. (1987). Towards task-based language learning. In Candlin, C. N. and Murphy, D., eds. Language learning tasks. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, pp. 5–22Google Scholar

Dörnyei, Z. and Kormos, J. (2000). The role of individual and social variables in performance. Language Teaching Research, 4(3), 275–300.Google Scholar

Dörnyei, Z. and Ottó, I. (1998). Motivation in action: A process model of L2 motivation. Working Papers in Applied Linguistics, 4, 43–69.Google Scholar

Keller, J. M. (2008). First principles of motivation to learn and e3‐learning. Distance Education, 29(2), 175–85.Google Scholar

Kormos, J. and Dörnyei, Z. (2004). The Interaction of Linguistic and Motivational Variables in Second Language Task Performance. Zeitschrift für Interkulturellen Fremdsprachenunterrichte, 9(2), 1–21.Google Scholar

Long, M. H. (2015). Second language acquisition and task-based teaching. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Révész, A. and Gurzynski-Weiss, L. (2016). Teachers’ perspectives on second language task difficulty: Insights from think-alouds and eye tracking. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 36, 182–204.Google Scholar

Révész, A., Michel, M., and Gilabert, R. (2016). Measuring cognitive task demands using dual-task methodology, subjective self-ratings, and expert judgements: A validation study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38, 703–37.Google Scholar

Révész, A., Sachs, R., and Hama, M. (2014). The effects of task complexity and input frequency on the acquisition of the past counterfactual construction through recasts. Language Learning, 64, 615–50.Google Scholar

Robinson, P. (2001b). Task complexity, task difficulty, and task production: Exploring interactions in a componential framework. Applied Linguistics, 22, 27–57.Google Scholar

Robinson, P. (2011). Second language task complexity, the Cognition Hypothesis, language learning, and performance. In Robinson, P., ed. Researching task complexity: Task demands, task-based language learning and performance. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 3–38.Google Scholar

Sasayama, S. (2016). Is a ‘complex’ task really complex? Validating the assumption of cognitive task complexity. Modern Language Journal, 100, 231–54.Google Scholar

Skehan, P. (2009). A Framework for the implantation of task-based instruction. In Van den Branden, K., Bygate, M., and Norris, J, eds. Task-based language teaching. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 83–108.Google Scholar

Torres, J. and Serafini, E. J. (2016). Micro-evaluating learners’ task-specific motivation in a task-based business Spanish course. Hispania, 99(2), 289–304.Google Scholar

Willis, J. (1996). A framework for task-based learning. Vol. 60. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar

Yanguas, I. (2011). The dynamic nature of motivation during the task: Can it be captured? Innovation in Language Learning and Technology, 5(1), 35–61.Google Scholar

Colpin, M. and Van Gorp, K. (2007). Task-based writing in primary education: The development and evaluation of writing skills through writing tasks, learner and teacher support. In Van den Branden, K., Van Gorp, K., and Verhelst, M., eds. Tasks in action: Task-based language education from a classroom-based perspective. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, pp. 194–234.Google Scholar

Norris, J. M. (2016). Current issues for task-based language assessment. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 36, 230–44.Google Scholar

Rea-Dickins, P. (2006). Currents and eddies in the discourse of assessment: a learning-focused interpretation. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 16(2), 163–88.Google Scholar

Van Gorp, K. (2018). Task-based language assessment for L1 and L2 speakers in primary education. Designing a useful task-specification framework. In McE, J.. Davis, J. Norris, Malone, M., McKay, T., and Son, Y. A, eds. Useful assessment and evaluation in language education. Washington DC: Georgetown University, pp. 131–48.Google Scholar

Van Gorp, K. and Deygers, B. (2014). Task-based language assessment. In Kunnan, A. J., ed. The companion to language assessment. Volume II. Approaches and development. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 578–93.Google Scholar

Bachman, L. F. (2002). Some reflections on task-based language performance assessment. Language Testing, 19, 454–76.Google Scholar

Berben, M., Callebaut, I., Colpin, M., François, S., Geerts, M., Goethals, M., Vander Meeren, K., Vandommele, G., and Van Gorp, K. (2007a). TotemTaal. Themahandleiding en kopieerbladen 4A. Mechelen: Wolters Plantyn.Google Scholar

Berben, M., Callebaut, I., Colpin, M., François, S., Geerts, M., Goethals, M., Vander Meeren, K., Vandommele, G., and Van Gorp, K. (2007b). TotemTaal. Inleiding en evaluatie 4. Mechelen: Wolters Plantyn.Google Scholar

Berben, M., Van den Branden, K., and Van Gorp, K. (2007). We’ll see what happens: Tasks on paper and tasks in a multilingual classroom. In Van den Branden, K., Van Gorp, K., and Verhelst, M., eds. Tasks in action: Task-based language education from a classroom-based perspective. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, pp. 32–67.Google Scholar

Carless, D. (2007).Learning-oriented assessment: Conceptual basis and practical implications.” Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 44, 57–66.Google Scholar

Colby-Kelly, C. and Turner, C. E. (2007). AFL research in the L2 classroom and evidence of usefulness: Taking formative assessment to the next level. Canadian Modern Language Review, 64(1), 9–37.Google Scholar

Colpin, M. and Van Gorp, K. (2007). Task-based writing in primary education: The development and evaluation of writing skills through writing tasks, learner and teacher support. In Van den Branden, K., Van Gorp, K., and Verhelst, M., eds. Tasks in action: Task-based language education from a classroom-based perspective. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, pp. 194–234.Google Scholar

Departement Onderwijs (1998). Ontwikkelingsdoelen en eindtermen. Informatiemap voor de onderwijspraktijk: gewoon basisonderwijs. Brussels: Afdeling Informatie en Documentatie.Google Scholar

Devlieger, M. and Goossens, G. (2007). An assessment tool for the evaluation of teacher practice in powerful task-based language learning environments. In Van den Branden, K., Van Gorp, K., and Verhelst, M., eds. Tasks in action: Task-based language education from a classroom-based perspective. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, pp. 92–130.Google Scholar

Duran, G. and Ramaut, G. (2006). Tasks for absolute beginners and beyond: Developing and sequencing tasks at basic proficiency levels. In Van den Branden, K., ed. Task-based language education: From theory to practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 47–105.Google Scholar

François, S. (2005). Naar een nieuwe taakgerichte taalmethode voor het basisonderwijs: behoeftenonderzoek. Unpublished research report. Leuven: Centre for Language and EducationGoogle Scholar

Graham, S. and Perin, D. (2007a). A meta-analysis of writing instruction for adolescent students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 445–76.Google Scholar

Graham, S. and Perin, D. (2007b). Writing next: Effective strategies to improve writing of adolescent middle and high school. Washington DC: Alliance for Excellence in Education.Google Scholar

Graham, S. and Perin, D. (2007c). What we know, what we still need to know: Teaching adolescents to write. Scientific Studies in Reading, 11, 313–36.Google Scholar

Harding, L., Alderson, J. C., and Brunfaut, T. (2015). Diagnostic assessment of reading and listening in a second or foreign Language: Elaborating on diagnostic principles. Language Testing, 32, 317–36.Google Scholar

Hattie, J. and Yates, G. C. R. (2014). Visible learning and the science of how we learn. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Jones, N. and Saville, N. (2016). Learning oriented assessment. A systematic Approach. Studies in Language Testing 45. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lokale inburgerings- en integratiemonitor (2019). Retrieved from: www.statistiekvlaanderen.be/nl/monitor-lokale-inburgering-en-integratie.Google Scholar

National Reading Panel (2000). Reports of the National Reading Panel: Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction: Reports of the subgroups. Rockville, MD: NICHD Clearinghouse.Google Scholar

Norris, J. M. (2009). Task-based teaching and testing. In Long, M. H. and Doughty, C. J., eds. The handbook of language teaching. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 578–94.Google Scholar

Norris, J. M. (2016). Current uses of task-based language assessment. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 36, 230–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rea-Dickins, P. (2006). Currents and eddies in the discourse of assessment: a learning-focused interpretation. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 16(2), 163–88.Google Scholar

Sadler, R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science 18, 119–44.Google Scholar

Samuda, V. and Bygate, M. (2008). Tasks in second language learning. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Slavin, R. E., Lake, C., Chambers, B., Cheung, A., and Davis, S. (2009). Effective reading programs for the elementary grades: A best-evidence synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 79, 1391–466.Google Scholar

Slavin, R. E. (2013). Effective programmes in reading and mathematics: Lessons from the best evidence encyclopaedia. School Effectiveness and School Improvement: An International Journal of Research, Policy and Practice, 24, 383–91.Google Scholar

Turner, C. E. and Purpura, J. E. (2015). Learning-oriented assessment in the classroom. In Tsagari, D. and Banerjee, J., eds. Handbook of second language assessment. Boston, MA: DeGruyter Mouton, pp. 255–73.Google Scholar

Van Avermaet, P., Colpin, C., Van Gorp, K., Bogaert, N., and Van den Branden, K. (2006). The role of the teacher in task-based language teaching. In Van den Branden, K., ed. Task-based language education: From theory to practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 175–96.Google Scholar

Van den Branden, K. (2006a). Introduction: Task-based language teaching in a nutshell. In Van den Branden, K., ed. Task-based language education: From theory to practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–16.Google Scholar

Van den Branden, K. (2006b). Training teachers: Task-based as well? In Van den Branden, K., ed. Task-based language education: From theory to practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 217–48.Google Scholar

Van den Branden, K. (2010). Handboek Taalbeleid Basisonderwijs. Leuven: ACCO.Google Scholar

Van Gorp, K. (2018). Task-based language assessment for L1 and L2 speakers in primary education. Designing a useful task-specification framework. In McE, J.. Davis, J. Norris, Malone, M., McKay, T., and Son, Y. A, eds. Useful assessment and evaluation in language education. Washington DC: Georgetown University, pp. 131–48.Google Scholar

Van Gorp, K. and Deygers, B. (2014). Task-based language assessment. In Kunnan, A. J., ed. The companion to language assessment. Volume II Approaches and development. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 578–93.Google Scholar

Van Gorp, K. and Versteden, P. (2020). Advising linguistically diverse schools on developing a school-wide language policy. In Beerkens, R. M., Le Pichon-Vorstman, E., ten Thije, J. D., and Supheert, R. G. J. L., eds. Enhancing intercultural communication in organizations: Insights from project advisors. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 83–92.Google Scholar