Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T09:39:53.780Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2019

John M. Rist
John M. Rist
Affiliation:
University of Toronto
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
What is a Person?
Realities, Constructs, Illusions
 , pp. 275 - 284
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Albritton, R. 1957. ‘Forms of Particular Substances in Aristotle’s Metaphysics’, JP 54: 699–708.Google Scholar
Anscombe, E. 1953. ‘The Principle of Individuation’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 27(suppl.): 83–96 [= J. Barnes, Essays on Aristotle 3 (1979) 88–95].Google Scholar
Arendt, H. 1951. The Burden of Our Time. London, Secker and Warburg.Google Scholar
Arendt, H. 1958. The Origins of Totalitarianism. New York, Meridian Books.Google Scholar
Armstrong, A. H. 1960. ‘The Background of the Doctrine that Intelligibles are not outside the Intellect’, in Dodds, E. R. (ed.) Entretiens Hardt 5: Les Sources de Plotin. Vandoeuvres, Geneva, pp. 391–425.Google Scholar
Arnou, R. 1967. Le désir de Dieu dans la philosophie de Plotin, 2nd edition. Rome.Google Scholar
Aubry, G. 2008 ‘Individuation, particularisation et détermination selon Plotin’, Phronesis 53: 271–289.Google Scholar
Balthasar, H. von. 1990. Theo-Drama II (trans. Harrison, G.). San Francisco, Ignatius.Google Scholar
Balthasar, H. von. 1991. The Glory of the Lord VI (trans. McNeil, B and Leiva-Merikakis, E.). Edinburgh, T. and T, Clark.Google Scholar
Banateanu, A. 2001. La téorie stoicienne de l’amitié: essai de reconstruction. Fribourg.Google Scholar
Beckett, L. 2006. In the Light of Christ. San Francisco, Ignatius.Google Scholar
Beiser, F. 1992. ‘Kant’s Intellectual Development 1746–1781’, in Guyer, P. (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Kant. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 26–61.Google Scholar
Bello, A. A. 2008. ‘Edmund Husserl and Edith Stein: The Question of the Human Subject’, ACPQ 82: 163–176.Google Scholar
Bett, R. 2012. ‘Did the Stoics Invent Human Rights’, in Kamtekar, R. (ed.) Virtue and Happiness: Essays in Honour of Julia Annas, pp. 149–169.Google Scholar
Blackburn, S. 1994. Spreading the Word. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Blackburn, S. 1998. Ruling Passions. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Blackburn, S. 2004. Lust. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Boersma, G. P. 2016. Augustine’s Theory of Image: A Study in the Development of Pro-Nicene Theology. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Borden Sharkey, S. 2006. ‘Edith Stein’s Understanding of Women’, IPQ 46: 171–191.Google Scholar
Borden (Sharkey), S. 2010. Thine own Self: Individuation in Edith Stein’s Later Writings. Washington, DC, CUA Press.Google Scholar
Børresen, K. E. 1981. Subordination and Equivalence: The Nature and Role of Women in Augustine and Thomas Aquinas (English translation). Washington, DC, CUA Press.Google Scholar
Burke, E. 2003. Reflections on the Revolution in France. Indianapolis/Cambridge, Hackett.Google Scholar
Burnell, P. 2005. The Augustinian Person. Washington, DC, CUA Press.Google Scholar
Cameron, M. 2012. Christ meets us Everywhere. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cavadini, J. C. 2005. ‘Feeling Right: Augustine on the Passions and Sexual Desire’, AS 36, pp. 195–217.Google Scholar
Chappell, T. J. D. 2004. ‘Absolutes and Particulars’, in O’Hear, A. (ed.) Modern Moral Philosophy. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 99–117.Google Scholar
Chiaradonna, R. 2000. ‘La teoria dell’ individuo Porfiriano dell’idiōs poion stoico’, Elenchus 21: 303–331.Google Scholar
Clayton, L. A. 2012. Bartolomé de las Casas: A Biography. New York, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connor, R. A. 1990. ‘Relation, the Thomistic Esse and American Culture: Towards a Metaphor of Sanctity’, Communio 17: 455–464.Google Scholar
Cory, T. S. 2012. ‘Diachronically Unified Consciousness in Augustine and Aquinas’, Vivarium 50: 354–381.Google Scholar
Cory, T. S. 2014. Aquinas on Human Self-Knowledge. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Crosby, J. 1996. The Selfhood of the Human Person. Washington, DC, CUA Press.Google Scholar
Daley, B. E. 1984. ‘Boethius’s’ Theological Tracts and Early Byzantine Scholasticism’, Medieval Studies 46: 158–191.Google Scholar
Darwall, S. 2006. The Second-Person Standpoint. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
De Koninck, T. 1999. ‘Persons and Things’, in Hibbs, T. and O’Callaghan, J. (eds), Recovering Nature: Essays in Natural Philosophy, Ethics and Metaphysics in Honor of Ralph McInerny. South Bend, Notre Dame University Press, pp. 53–67.Google Scholar
De Libera, A. 2007. L’Archéologie du sujet 1. Paris, Vrin.Google Scholar
De Libera, A. 2008. ‘When did the modern subject emerge?’, ACPQ 82: 337–354.Google Scholar
De Lubac, H. 1995. The Drama of Atheistic Humanism (trans. Riley, E.M.). San Francisco, Ignatius.Google Scholar
Denyer, N. 2001. Plato: Alcibiades. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dörrie, H. 1959. Porphyrios’ ‘Symmikta Zetemata’: ihre Stellung in System und Geschichte des Neuplatonismus nebst einem Kommentar zu den Fragmenten. Munich, Beck.Google Scholar
Dodds, E. R. 1959. Plato’s Gorgias. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Donert, C. 2014. ‘Whose Utopia? Gender, Ideology and Human Rights at the 1975 World Congress of Women in East Berlin’, in Eckel, J. and Moyn, S. (eds.) The Breakthrough: Human Rights in the 1970s. Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania Press, pp. 68–87.Google Scholar
Dworkin, R. 1993. Life’s Dominion. Knopf, New York.Google Scholar
Eckel, J. 2014, Die Ambivalenz des Gutes: Menschenrechte in der internationalen Politik seit des 1940ens. Göttingen, Vanderhoeck und Ruprect.Google Scholar
Finnis, J. 2005. ‘“The thing that I am”: Personal Identity in Aquinas and Shakespeare’, in Paul, E. F., Miller, F. D. Jr. and Paul, J. (eds.) Personal Identity. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 250–282.Google Scholar
Fortin, E. L. 1959. Christianisme et culture philosophique au cinquième siècle. Paris. Vrin.Google Scholar
Gill, C. H. 1988. ‘Personhood and Personality: The Four-persona Theory in Cicero, De Officiis I,’ OSAP 6: 169–199.Google Scholar
Gill, C. H. 1994. ‘Peace of mind and being Yourself: Panaetius to Plutarch’, ANRW 36.7. pp. 4599–4640.Google Scholar
Gioia, L. 2008. The Theological Epistemology of Augustine’s De Trinitate. Oxford, Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gracia, J. J. E. 1988. Introduction to the Problem of Individuation in the Early Middle Ages, 2nd revised edition. Munich and Vienna, Philosophia Verlag.Google Scholar
Gracia, J. J. E. 1996. ‘Individuality and the Individuating Entity in Scotus’s Ordinatio. An Ontological Characterization’, in Honnefelder, L., Wood, R. and Dreyer, M. (eds) Individuality and the Individuating Entity in Scotus's Ordinatio: An Ontological Characterization. Leiden, Brill, pp. 229–249.Google Scholar
Gregory, B. 2012. The Unintended Reformation. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Guardini, R. 1965. The World and the Person (trans. Lange, S.). Chicago, Regnery Press.Google Scholar
Hadot, P. 1992. La citadelle intérieure: introduction aux Pensées de Marc Aurèle. Paris, Vrin.Google Scholar
Hadot, P. 1995. Philosophy as a Way of Life (trans. By Chase, M.). Oxford, Blackwell.Google Scholar
Haji, L. 1999. ‘On being Morally Responsible in a Dream’, in Matthews, G. B. (ed.) The Augustinian Tradition. London, Los Angeles, San Francisco, University of California Press, pp. 166–182.Google Scholar
Halper, E. 2005. One and Many in Aristotle’s Metaphysics: The Central Books. Las Vegas, Parmenides Publishing.Google Scholar
Harper, K. 2016, ‘Christianity and the Roots of Human Dignity in Late Antiquity’, in Christianity and Freedom, Vol. 1. New York, Cambridge University Press, pp. 123–148.Google Scholar
Hill, C. 1958. Puritanism and Revolution. Harmondsworth, Penguin.Google Scholar
Hill, T. H. Jr. 1992. Dignity and Practical Reason in Kant’s Moral Theory. Ithaca, Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Honoré, T. 2002. Ulpian: Pioneer of Human Rights, 2nd edition. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hunt, L. 2000. ‘The Paradoxical Origins of Human Rights’, in Wasserstrom, J. N., Hunt, L. and Young, M. B. (eds) Human Rights and Revolutions. Lanham, Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Hunter, D. G. 2011. ‘Augustine on the Body’, in Vessey, M. (ed.) A Companion to Augustine. Oxford, Blackwell, pp. 353–364.Google Scholar
Irwin, T. H. 1996. ‘Stoic Individuals’, in Philosophical Perspectives in Metaphysics. Naples, Bibliopolis, pp. 459–480.Google Scholar
Irwin, T. H. 1998. ‘Mill and the Classical World’, in Skorupski, J. (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Mill. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 423–463.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, W. 1974. Nietzsche: Philosopher, Psychologist, Anti-Christ, 4th edition. Princeton, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Koterski, J. 2004. ‘Boethius and the theological Origins of the Concept of Person’, ACPQ 78: 203–224.Google Scholar
Lacroix, J. and Pranchère, J.-Y., 2018. Human Rights on Trial: A Genealogy of the Critique of Human Rights. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Laing, J. A. 2004. ‘Law, Liberalism and the Common Good’, in Oderberg, D. S. and Chappell, T. J. D. (eds.) Human Value: New Essays in Ethics and Natural Law. London/New York, Palgrave MacMillan, pp. 184–216.Google Scholar
Lamont, J. 2011. ‘In Defence of Villey on Objective Right’, in Ramsey, H. (ed.) Truth and Faith in Ethics. Exeter, Imprint Academic, pp. 177–198.Google Scholar
Lantigua, D. M. 2016. ‘Faith, Liberty and the Defense of the Poor: Bishop Las Cass in the History of Human Rights’, in Shah, T. S. and Hertzke, A. D. (eds.) Christianity and Freedom, Vol. 1. New York, Cambridge University Press, pp. 176–209.Google Scholar
Lewis, E. 1995. ‘The Stoics on Identity and Individuation’, Phronesis 40: 89–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lloyd, A. C. 1970. ‘Aristotle’s Principle of Individuation’ Mind 79: 519–529.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. 2006a. ‘Stoic Philosophers on Persons, Property-Ownership, and Community’, in From Epicurus to Epictetus: Studies in Hellenistic and Roman Philosophy. Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 335–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, A. A. 2006b. ‘Seneca on the Self’, in From Epicurus to Epictetus: Studies in Hellenistic and Roman Philosophy. Oxford, Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacIntyre, A. 1981. After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory. South Bend, Notre Dame University Press.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, A. 1999. Dependent Rational Animals. London, Duckworth.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, A. 2006. Edith Stein: A Philosophical Prologue: 1913–1922. Lanham, Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, A. 2016. Ethics in the Conflicts of Modernity: An Essay on Desire, Practical Reasoning and Narrative. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malo, A. 2017. Uomo o Donna; Una Differenza che Conta. Milan, Vita e Pensiero.Google Scholar
Mann, W. 1983. ‘Dreams of Immorality’, Philosophy 58: 378–385.Google Scholar
Mann, W. 1999. ‘Inner Life Ethics’, in Matthews, G.B. (ed.) The Augustinian Tradition. London, Los Angeles, San Francisco, University of California Press, pp. 140–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manning, C. E. 1986 ‘Stoicism and Slavery in the Roman Empire’, ANRW 36(3), 1518–1543.Google Scholar
Markus, R. 1964. ‘“Imago” and “Similitudo” in Saint Augustine’, Revue des études augustiniennes 10: 125–143.Google Scholar
Martin, R. and Barresi, J. 2000. Naturalization of the Self: Self and Personal Identity in the Eighteenth Century. London/New York, Routledge.Google Scholar
Martin, R. and Barresi, J. 2001. Authority and Estrangement: An Essay on Self-Knowledge. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Matthews, G. B. 1981. ‘On being Immoral in a Dream’, Philosophy 56: 47–54.Google Scholar
Mautner, T. 1989. ‘Pufendorf and the Correlativity theory of Rights’, in Lindstrom, S. and Rabinowicz, W. (eds.) ‘In So Many Words’: Philosophical Essays Dedicated to Sven Danielsson on the Occasion of his Fiftieth Brithday. Uppsala, Uppsala University Press, pp. 37–57.Google Scholar
Meconi, D. 1996. ‘Augustine’s Early Theory of Participation’, Augustinian Studies 27: 79–96.Google Scholar
Menn, S. 1998. Descartes and Augustine. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Milbank, J. 2004. ‘The Gift of Ruling: Secularization and Political Authority’, New Blackfriars 85, pp. 212–238.Google Scholar
Milbank, J. 2012. ‘Against Human Rights: Liberty in the Western Tradition’, Oxford Journal of Law and Religion, pp. 1–32.Google Scholar
Miller, J. 2011. ‘Review of S. Borden Sharkey, Thine own Self: Individuation in Edith Stein’s Later Writings’, ACPQ 85: 341–343.Google Scholar
Motta, B. 2004. La Mediazione Esterna. Padova, Il Poligrafo.Google Scholar
Motta, B. 2010. ‘Nemesius’, in Gerson, L. P. (ed.) The Cambridge History of Philosophy in Late Antiquity. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 509–519.Google Scholar
Moyn, S. 2014. The Meaning of Rights. The Philosophy and Social Theory of Human Rights. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nagel, T. 1986. The View from Nowhere. New York, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nédoncelle, M. 1948. ‘Prosopon et persona dans l’antiquité classique’, Revue des sciences religieuses 22: 278–299.Google Scholar
Noone, T. B. 2003. ‘Universals and Individuation’, in Williams, T. (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Duns Scotus. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 102–128.Google Scholar
Nota, J. 1987. ‘Edith Stein and Martin Heidegger’, Carmelite Studies 4: 50–73.Google Scholar
Nozick, R. 1974. Anarchy, State and Utopia. New York, Basic Books.Google Scholar
O’Callaghan, J. P. 2007. ‘Imago Dei: A Test Case for St Thomas’ Augustinianism’, in Dauphinais, M., David, B. and Levering, M. (eds.) Aquinas the Augustinian. Washington, DC, Catholic University of America Press, pp. 100–144.Google Scholar
Oderberg, D. 2005. ‘Hylomorphic Dualism’, in Paul, E. F., Miller, F. D. Jr. and Paul, Jeffrey (eds.) Personal Identity. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 70–91.Google Scholar
Oderberg, D. 2007. Real Essentialism. New York, London, Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
O’Daly, G. 1987. Augustine’s Philosophy of Mind. London, Duckworth.Google Scholar
O’Donovan, O. 1984. Begotten or Made? Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
O’Meara, D. 2010. ‘Plotinus’, in Gerson, L. P. (ed.) The Cambridge History of Philosophy in Late Antiquity 1. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 301–324.Google Scholar
Parfit, D. 1986. Reasons and Persons. Oxford, Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parfit, D. 2011. On What Matters. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pembroke, S. G. 1996. ‘Oikeiosis’, in Long, A. A. (ed.) Problems in Stoicism. London, Athlone Press, pp. 114–149.Google Scholar
Pera, M. 2015. Diritti umani e cristianesimo. Venice, Marsilio Editor.Google Scholar
Ramelow, A. 2013. ‘The Person in the Abrahamic Tradition’, ACPQ 87: 593–610.Google Scholar
Ratzinger, J. 1990. ‘Concerning the Notion of Person in Theology’, Communio 17: 438–454.Google Scholar
Rauschning, H. 1939. The Revolution of Nihilism. London/New York, William Heinemann.Google Scholar
Renaud, F. and Tarrant, H.. 2015. The Platonic Alcibiades 1: The Dialogue and its Ancient Setting. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Riley, P. 1986. The General Will before Rousseau: The Transformation of the Divine into the Civic. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rist, J. M. 1963. ‘Forms of individuals in Plotinus’, Classical Quarterly 13: 223–231.Google Scholar
Rist, J. M. 1973. ‘Forms of Individuals in Plotinus: A Reply to Dr. Blumenthal’, Revue Internationale de Philosophie 24: 298–303.Google Scholar
Rist, J. M. 1982. Human Value: A Study of Ancient Philosophical Ethics (Philosophia Antiqua 40). Leiden, Brill.Google Scholar
Rist, J. M. 1988. ‘Ps-Ammonius and the Soul/Body Problem in Late Antiquity’, AJP 109: 402– 415.Google Scholar
Rist, J. M. 1989. The Mind of Aristotle. Toronto, University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Rist, J. M. 1993/1996. ‘Is Plotinus’ Account of the Body too Etherialized?’, in Lee, K., Mackie, C. and Tarrant, H. (ed.) Multarum Artium Scientia: Festschrift for Godfrey Tanner (Prudentia Suppl.). Auckland, University of Auckland, 1993 [reprinted as Essay XV in Mind, Soul and Body: Essays from Plato to Dionysius. London, Ashgate, 1996].Google Scholar
Rist, J. M. 1994. Augustine: Ancient Thought Baptized. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rist, J. M. 1998. ‘Plotinian Soul, Aristotelian Form and Christian Person’, in Baumgarten, A., Assman, J., Stroumsa, G. G. (ed.) Self, Soul and Person in Religious Experience. Leiden, Brill, pp. 347–362.Google Scholar
Rist, J. M. 2000. ‘What will I be like tomorrow? Augustine vs Hume’, ACPQ 74: 95–114.Google Scholar
Rist, J. M. 2007. ‘On the Original Nature of Christian Philosophy’, in Houser, R. E. (ed.) Laudemus Viros Gloriosos: Essays in Honor of Armand Maurer, CSB. South Bend, University of Notre Dame Press, pp. 13–37.Google Scholar
Rist, J. M. 2008. What is Truth: From the Academy to the Vatican. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rist, J. M. 2012. ‘On the Nature and Worth of Christian Philosophy: Evidence from the City of God’, in Wetzel, J. (ed.) Augustine’s City of God: A Critical Guide. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 205–224.Google Scholar
Rist, J. M. 2014. Augustine Deformed: Love, Sin and Freedom in the Western Moral Tradition. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rist, J. M. 2016. ‘Augustine and Religious Freedom’, in Shah, T. S. and Hertzke, A. D. (ed.) Christianity and Freedom, Vol. 1. New York, Cambridge University Press, pp. 103–122.Google Scholar
Robinson, R. 1948, ‘The emotive theory of ethics’, ASPS 22:79–106.Google Scholar
Rosen, M. 2012. Dignity: Its History and Meaning. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Salas, V. M. Jr. 2011. ‘Edith Stein and Medieval Metaphysics’, ACPQ 85: 323–340.Google Scholar
Schacht, R. 1984. ‘Nietzsche: Art and Artists’, in Honderich, T. (ed.) Philosophy though its Past. Harmondsworth, Pelican, pp. 399–432.Google Scholar
Scheler, M. 1973. Formalism in Ethics and the Formal Ethics of Value (English trans.), 3rd edition. Chicago, Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Schneewind, J. R. 1998. The Invention of Autonomy. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schrenk, R. 1991. ‘Athroisma in Didaskalikos 4.7’, Hermes 119: 497–500.Google Scholar
Scola, A. 2005. The Nuptial Mystery (trans. Borras, M. K.). Grand Rapids/Cambridge, Fortress.Google Scholar
Scruton, R. 2017. On Human Nature. Princeton and Oxford, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. 1982. ‘The Stoic Category of Identity’, Phronesis 27: 255–275.Google Scholar
Seigel, J. 2005. The Idea of the Self. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shah, T. S. and Hertzke, A. D. (eds) 2016. Christianity and Freedom, Vol. 1: Historical Perspectives. New York, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shklar, N. 2001. ‘Rousseau’s Images of Authority, especially in La nouvelle Héloise’, in Riley, P. (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Rousseau. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 154–192.Google Scholar
Smilansky, S. 2000. Free Will and Illusion. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Smilansky, S. 2002. ‘Free Will, Fundamental Dualism and the Centrality of Illusion’, in Kane, R. (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Free Will. Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 489–505.Google Scholar
Smith, S. D. 2010. The Disenchantment of Secular Discourse. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sokolowski, R. 1985. Moral Action: A Phenomenological Study. Bloomington, Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Sokolowski, R. 2003. ‘Language, the Human Person and Christian Faith’, PACPA 76: 27–38.Google Scholar
Sokolowski, R. 2008. Phenomenology of the Human Person. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sorabji, R. 1988. Matter, Space and Motion. London, Duckworth.Google Scholar
Spaemann, R. 2012. Persons: The Difference between ‘Someone’ and ‘Something’ (trans. O’Donovan, O.). Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Starobinski, J. 1978. ‘“Se mettre à sa place”; la mutation de la critique, de l’âge classique à Diderot’, Cahiers Vilfredo Pareto 38: 363–378.Google Scholar
Starobinski, J. 1988. Jean-Jacques Rousseau: Transparency and Obstruction (trans. Goldhammer, A.). Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Stock, B. 2017. The Integrated Self. Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Strawson, G. 2005. ‘Against Narrativity’, in Strawson, G. (ed.) The Self. Oxford, Blackwell, pp. 63–86.Google Scholar
Strawson, P. A. 1959. Individuals: An Essay in Descriptive Metaphysics. London, Methuen.Google Scholar
Strawson, P. F. 1974. ‘Freedom and Resentment’, in Freedom and Resentment and other Essays. London, Methuen, pp. 1–28.Google Scholar
Tassi, H. 1993. ‘Persona as the Mark of Being’, Philosophy Today 37: 201–210.Google Scholar
Taylor, C. 1989. Sources of the Self. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Teske, R. 1990. ‘The image and likeness of God in St. Augustine’s De Genesi ad Litteram liber imperfectus’, Augustinianum 30: 441–451.Google Scholar
Thomson, A. (ed.) 1996. Julian Offray de la Mettrie, Man the Machine and Other Writing. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tierney, B. 1989. ‘The Origin of Natural Rights Language’, HPT 10: 615–646.Google Scholar
Tierney, B. 1997. The Idea of Natural Rights: Studies in Natural Rights, Natural Law and Church Law 1150–1625. Atlanta, Scholars Press.Google Scholar
Tornau, C. 2009. ‘Qu’est-ce qu’un individu ? Unité, individualité et conscience de soi dans la métaphysique plotinienne de l’âme’, Les Etudes Philosophiques 90: 333–360.Google Scholar
Tristram Engelhardt, H. Jr. 1986. The Foundations of Ethics. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tuck, R. 1979. Natural Rights Theories: Their Origin and Development. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tullius, W. E. 2013. ‘Haecceitas as Value and as Moral Horizon: A Scotist Contribution to the Project of Phenomenological Ethics’, ACPQ 87: 459–480.Google Scholar
Vimercati, E. 2007. ‘Tre studi recenti sull’oikeiosis e sul fondamento del morale stoico’, Rivista di Filosofia Neoscolastica 99: 573–608.Google Scholar
Vimercati, E. 2014. ‘Panaetius on Self-Knowledge and Moral Responsibility’, in Destrée, P., Salles, R. and Zingano, M. (eds.) What is up to Us? Studies in Agency and Responsibility in Ancient Philosophy. Sankt Augustin, Akademia, pp. 151–167.Google Scholar
Voitle, R. 1874. The Third Earl of Shaftesbury 1671–1713. Baton Rouge.Google Scholar
Watt, I. 1957. The Rise of the Novel. London, Chatto and Windus.Google Scholar
West, J. L. A. 2007. ‘The Real Distinction between Supposit and Nature’, in Kwasniewski, P.A. (ed.) Wisdom’s Apprentice: Thomistic Essays in Honor of Lawrence Dewan O.P. Washington, DC, CUA Press, pp. 85–106.Google Scholar
Whiting, J. 1986. ‘Form and Individuation in Aristotle’, HPQ 3: 359–377.Google Scholar
Williams, B. A. O. 1973. ‘Consequentialism and Beyond’, in Williams, B. A. O. and Smart, J. J. (eds) Utilitarianism: For and Against. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wippel, J. 2000. The Metaphysical Thought of Thomas Aquinas. Washington, DC, CUA Press.Google Scholar
Wojtyla, K. 1978. ‘Subjectivity and the Irreducible in Man’, Analecta Husserliana VII. Dordrecht, Reidel, pp. 107–114.Google Scholar
Wojtyla, K. 1980 Uber die Möglichkeit eine christliche Ethik in Anlehnung an Max Scheler zu schaffen. Stuttgart-Degerloch, Seewald.Google Scholar
Wolter, M. M. 2013. ‘Karol Wojtyla’s Ethical Personalism’, ACPQ 87: 97–115.Google Scholar
Wood, R. E. 2010.’Art and Truth; From Plato through Nietzsche to Heidegger’, in Pritzl, K. (ed.) Truth: Studies of a Robust Presence. Washington, DC, Catholic University of America Press, pp. 232–276.Google Scholar
Woods, M. J. 1968. ‘Problems in Metaphysics Z, chapter 13’, in Moravcsik, J. M. E. (ed.) Aristotle: A Collection of Critical Essays. South Bend, Notre Dame University Press, pp. 215–238.Google Scholar
Yolton, J. 1970. Locke and the Compass of Human Understanding. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Young, F. 2013. God’s Presence: A Contemporary Reappraisal of Early Christianity. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zarka, Y.-C. 1993. ‘Identité et ipseité chez Hobbes et Locke’, Philosophie 37: 5–19.Google Scholar
Zuckert, M. 2000. ‘Natural Rights in the American Revolution: An American Amalgam’, in Wasserstrom, R., Hunt, L. and Young, M. B. (eds) Human Rights and Revolutions. Lanham, Rowman and Littlefield, pp. 59–76.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • John M. Rist, University of Toronto
  • Book: What is a Person?
  • Online publication: 05 December 2019
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108784160.028
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • John M. Rist, University of Toronto
  • Book: What is a Person?
  • Online publication: 05 December 2019
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108784160.028
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • John M. Rist, University of Toronto
  • Book: What is a Person?
  • Online publication: 05 December 2019
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108784160.028
Available formats
×