Book contents
- Lessons from Good Language Teachers
- Lessons from Good Language Teachers
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Preface An Overview of Good Language Teachers
- Part I Macro Perspectives
- 1 Teacher Identity and Good Language Teachers
- 2 Cognition and Good Language Teachers
- 3 Intercultural Awareness and Good Language Teachers
- 4 Reflection and Good Language Teachers
- 5 Teacher Autonomy and Good Language Teachers
- 6 English as a Lingua Franca and Good Language Teachers
- 7 Burnout and Good Language Teachers
- Part II Classroom Perspectives
- Part III Instructional Perspectives
- Index
- References
2 - Cognition and Good Language Teachers
from Part I - Macro Perspectives
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 April 2020
Book contents
- Lessons from Good Language Teachers
- Lessons from Good Language Teachers
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Preface An Overview of Good Language Teachers
- Part I Macro Perspectives
- 1 Teacher Identity and Good Language Teachers
- 2 Cognition and Good Language Teachers
- 3 Intercultural Awareness and Good Language Teachers
- 4 Reflection and Good Language Teachers
- 5 Teacher Autonomy and Good Language Teachers
- 6 English as a Lingua Franca and Good Language Teachers
- 7 Burnout and Good Language Teachers
- Part II Classroom Perspectives
- Part III Instructional Perspectives
- Index
- References
Summary
Chapter 2 outlines the issue of teacher cognition, particularly teachers’ beliefs, in their classroom practice. The authors argue that good language teachers are cognizant of their beliefs and align their teaching with these beliefs, and they also report on two cases of experienced teachers’ reflection on their beliefs.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Lessons from Good Language Teachers , pp. 16 - 27Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2020
References
Alemi, M., & Tajeddin, Z. (2020). Reflection and good language teachers. In Griffiths, C. & Tajeddin, Z. (Eds.), Lessons from good language teachers (pp. 41–53). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Baker, A. (2014). Exploring teachers’ knowledge of second language pronunciation techniques: Teacher cognitions, observed classroom practices, and student perceptions. TESOL Quarterly, 48(1), 136–163.Google Scholar
Basturkmen, H. (2012). Review of research into the correspondence between language teachers’ stated beliefs and practices. System, 40(2), 282–295.Google Scholar
Borg, S. (2006). Teacher cognition and language education: Research and practice. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Borg, S. (2018a). Teacher evaluation: Global perspectives and their implications for English language teaching. A literature review. Delhi: British Council.Google Scholar
Borg, S. (2018b). Teachers’ beliefs and classroom practices. In Garrett, P. & Cots, J. M. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of language awareness (pp. 75–91). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Borg, S. (2019). Language teacher cognition: Perspectives and debates. In Xuesong, A. (Ed.), Second handbook of English language teaching. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.Google Scholar
Borg, S., & Alshumaimeri, Y. Language learner autonomy in a tertiary context: Teachers’ beliefs and practices. Language Teaching Research, 23(1), 9–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burns, A., Freeman, D., & Edwards, E. (2015). Theorizing and studying the language-teaching mind: Mapping research on language teacher cognition. Modern Language Journal, 99(3), 585–601.Google Scholar
Clark, C., & Yinger, R. (1979). Teachers’ thinking. In Peterson, P. & Walberg, H. (Eds.), Research on teaching and learning: Concepts, findings and implications (pp. 231–263). Berkeley, CA: McCutchen.Google Scholar
Couper, G. (2017). Teacher cognition of pronunciation teaching: Teachers’ concerns and issues. TESOL Quarterly, 51(4), 820–843.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Danielson Group. (2013). The framework for teaching. The Danielson Group. Retrieved from: www.danielsongroup.org/framework/.Google Scholar
Darling-Hammond, L. (2013). Getting teacher evaluation right: What really matters for effectiveness and improvement. New York, NY: Teachers College.Google Scholar
England, N. (2017). Developing an interpretation of collective beliefs in language teacher cognition research. TESOL Quarterly, 51(1), 229–238.Google Scholar
Freeman, D., & Richards, J. C. (Eds.). (1996). Teacher learning in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Haukås, Å. (2016). Teachers’ beliefs about multilingualism and a multilingual pedagogical approach. International Journal of Multilingualism, 13(1), 1–18.Google Scholar
Junqueira, L., & Payant, C. (2015). “I just want to do it right, but it’s so hard”: A novice teacher’s written feedback beliefs and practices. Journal of Second Language Writing, 27, 19–36.Google Scholar
Kubanyiova, M., & Feryok, A. (2015). Language teacher cognition in applied linguistics research: Revisiting the territory, redrawing the boundaries, reclaiming the relevance. Modern Language Journal, 99(3), 435–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munby, H., Russell, T., & Martin, A. K. (2001). Teachers’ knowledge and how it develops. In Richardson, V. (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed.) (pp. 877–904). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.Google Scholar
Murphy, P. K., & Mason, L. (2006). Changing knowledge and beliefs. In Alexander, P. A. & Winne, H. (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (2nd ed.) (pp. 305–324). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Nespor, J. (1987). The role of beliefs in the practice of teaching. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 19(4), 317–328.Google Scholar
Shavelson, R. J., Atwood, N. K., & Borko, H. (1977). Experiments on some factors contributing to teachers’ pedagogical decisions. Cambridge Journal of Education, 7, 51–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woods, D. (1996). Teacher cognition in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wyatt, M., & Ager, E. O. (2017). Teachers’ cognitions regarding continuing professional development. ELT Journal, 71(2), 171–185.Google Scholar
- 11
- Cited by