Book contents
- Lessons from Good Language Teachers
- Lessons from Good Language Teachers
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Preface An Overview of Good Language Teachers
- Part I Macro Perspectives
- Part II Classroom Perspectives
- Part III Instructional Perspectives
- 15 Pragmatics and Good Language Teachers
- 16 Vocabulary and Good Language Teachers
- 17 Grammar and Good Language Teachers
- 18 Pronunciation and Good Language Teachers
- 19 Listening and Good Language Teachers
- 20 Speaking and Good Language Teachers
- 21 Reading and Good Language Teachers
- 22 Writing and Good Language Teachers
- Good Language Teachers: Past, Present, and Future Directions
- Epilogue Good Language Teachers – What Do They Do? What Do They Know?
- Index
- References
15 - Pragmatics and Good Language Teachers
from Part III - Instructional Perspectives
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 April 2020
Book contents
- Lessons from Good Language Teachers
- Lessons from Good Language Teachers
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Preface An Overview of Good Language Teachers
- Part I Macro Perspectives
- Part II Classroom Perspectives
- Part III Instructional Perspectives
- 15 Pragmatics and Good Language Teachers
- 16 Vocabulary and Good Language Teachers
- 17 Grammar and Good Language Teachers
- 18 Pronunciation and Good Language Teachers
- 19 Listening and Good Language Teachers
- 20 Speaking and Good Language Teachers
- 21 Reading and Good Language Teachers
- 22 Writing and Good Language Teachers
- Good Language Teachers: Past, Present, and Future Directions
- Epilogue Good Language Teachers – What Do They Do? What Do They Know?
- Index
- References
Summary
In chapter 15, the authors outline three main trends in pragmatics acquisition and instruction studies and highlight the need for teacher education programs to promote teachers’ awareness about pragmatic instruction and assessment.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Lessons from Good Language Teachers , pp. 189 - 202Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2020
References
Alcon, E. (2000). Desarrollo de la competencia discursiva oral en el aula de lenguas extranjeras: Perspectives metodológicas y de investigación. In Muñoz, C. (Ed.), La adquisición de segundas lenguas en el medio escolar (pp. 105–128). Madrid: Ariel.Google Scholar
Alemi, M., & Haeri, N. (2017). Pragmatic instruction through RALL and game-based instruction: Effects on young EFL learners’ acquisition of speech acts. Unpublished manuscript. Tehran, Iran: Sharif University of Technology.Google Scholar
Alemi, A., & Tajeddin, Z. (2013). Pragmatic rating of L2 refusal: Criteria of native and nonnative English teachers. TESL Canada Journal, 37, Special Issue 7, 63–81.Google Scholar
Alemi, M., Tajeddin, Z., & Davoodizadeh, A. (2017). The effect of game-based instruction on elementary school students’ acquisition of request in L2 English. Unpublished manuscript. Tehran, Iran: Islamic Azad University, West Tehran Branch.Google Scholar
Bachman, L.F. (1990). Fundamental considerations in language testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Borg, S., & Sanchez, H. S. (2020). Cognition and good language teachers. In Griffiths, C. & Tajeddin, Z. (Eds.), Lessons from good language teachers (pp. 16–27). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Celce-Murcia, M., Dörnyei, Z., & Thurrell, S. (1995). Communicative competence: A pedagogically motivated model with content specifications. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 6(2), 5–35.Google Scholar
Chen, X., Ye, L., & Zhang, Y. (1995). Refusing in Chinese. In Kasper, G. (Ed.), Pragmatics of Chinese as a native and target language (pp. 119–163). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai’i Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, A. D. (2005). Strategies for learning and performing L2 speech acts. Intercultural Pragmatics, 2(3), 275–301.Google Scholar
Cohen, A. D. (2016). The teaching of pragmatics by native and nonnative language teachers: What they know and what they report doing. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 6(4), 561–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, A. D., & Olshtain, E. (1993). The production of speech acts by EFL Learners. TESOL Quarterly, 27(1), 33–56.Google Scholar
Eslami, Z. R. (2011). In their own voices: Reflections of native and nonnative English speaking TESOL graduate students on on-line pragmatic instruction to EFL Learners. TESL-EJ, 15(2).Google Scholar
Eslami-Rasekh, Z. (2005). Raising the pragmatic awareness of language learners. ELT Journal, 59(3), 199–208.Google Scholar
Eslami-Rasekh, Z., Eslami-Rasekh, A., & Fatahi, A. (2004). The effect of explicit metapragmatic instruction on the speech act awareness of advanced EFL students. TESL-EJ, 8(2).Google Scholar
Ishihara, N. (2007). Web-based curriculum for pragmatics instruction in Japanese as a foreign language: An explicit awareness-raising approach. Language Awareness, 16(1), 21–40.Google Scholar
Ishihara, N. (2011). Co-constructing pragmatic awareness: Instructional pragmatics in EFL teacher development in Japan. TESL-EJ, 15(2).Google Scholar
Johnson, K. E. (2009). Second language teacher education: A sociocultural perspective. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Karatepe, Ҫ. (2001). Pragmalinguistic awareness in EFL teacher training. Language Awareness, 10(2&3), 178–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kasper, G., & Rose, K. R. (2002). Pragmatic development in a second language. Language Learning, 52, Supplement 1.Google Scholar
Kubota, M. (1996). Acquaintance or fiancee: Pragmatic differences in requests between Japanese and Americans. Working Papers in Educational Linguistics, 12(1), 23–38.Google Scholar
Kumaravadivelu, B. (2006). TESOL methods: Changing tracks, challenging trends. TESOL Quarterly, 40(1), 59–81.Google Scholar
Liu, T. Y., & Chu, Y. L. (2010). Using ubiquitous games in an English listening and speaking course: Impact on learning outcomes and motivation. Computers & Education, 55(2), 630–643.Google Scholar
Matsuura, H. (1998). Japanese EFL learners’ perception of politeness in low imposition requests. JALT Journal, 20(1), 33–48.Google Scholar
Rose, K. R., & Kasper, G. (Eds.). (2001). Pragmatics in language teaching. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Taguchi, N. (2011). Rater variation in the assessment of speech acts. Pragmatics, 21(3), 453–471.Google Scholar
Tajeddin, Z., & Alemi, M. (2014a). Criteria and bias in native English teachers’ assessment of l2 pragmatic appropriacy: Content and FACETS analyses. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 23(3), 425–434.Google Scholar
Tajeddin, Z., & Alemi, M. (2014b). Pragmatic rater training: Does it affect non-native L2 teachers’ rating accuracy and bias? Iranian Journal of Language Testing, 4(1), 66–83.Google Scholar
Tajeddin, Z., & Dabbagh, A. (2015). Interlanguage pragmatic test tasks: Does a low-stakes test have washback to L2 teachers and learners? The Journal of Asia TEFL, 12(4), 129–158.Google Scholar
Tajeddin, Z., & Zand Moghadam, A. (2012). Interlanguage pragmatic motivation: Its construct and impact on speech act production. RELC Journal, 43(3) 353–372.Google Scholar
Takahashi, S. (2001). The role of input enhancement in developing pragmatic competence. In Rose, K. R. & Kasper, G. (Eds.), Pragmatics in language teaching (pp. 171–199). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Compernolle, R. A., & Henery, A. (2014). Instructed concept appropriation and L2 pragmatic development in the classroom. Language Learning, 64(3), 549–578.Google Scholar
Vásquez, C., & Sharpless, D. (2009). The role of pragmatics in the master’s TESOL curriculum: Findings from a nationwide survey. TESOL Quarterly, 43(1), 5–28.Google Scholar
Wolfson, N. (1983). An empirically based analysis of complimenting in American English. In Wolfson, N. & Judd, E. (Eds.), Sociolinguistics and language acquisition (pp. 82–95). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Yang, H. C., & Zapata-Rivera, D. (2009). An exploratory study into interlanguage pragmatics of requests: A game of persuasion. ETS Research Report Series RR-09–13. Princeton, NJ: ETS.Google Scholar
Yildiz Eikin, M. T., & Damar, A. E. (2013). Pragmatic awareness of teacher trainees and their reflections on pragmatic practices. ELT Journal, 59(3), 199–208.Google Scholar
- 6
- Cited by