Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-xtgtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T21:50:31.742Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

36 - Embracing Opportunity in Heritage Language Revitalization

from Part IV - Heritage Language Education

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 November 2021

By
Maria Schwedhelm ,
Kate Stemper  and
Kendall King
Edited by
Silvina Montrul  and
Maria Polinsky
Silvina Montrul
Affiliation:
University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
Maria Polinsky
Affiliation:
University of Maryland, College Park
Get access

Summary

While some heritage languages enjoy large numbers of speakers and vibrant communities, centuries-old and ongoing sociohistorical and sociolinguistic oppression has resulted in the extreme endangerment of many Indigenous languages. To counter this linguistic and cultural loss, a growing number of communities have engaged in language revitalization efforts that are tied to broader objectives of ethnic reclamation and cultural resistance, aiming not only to maintain but also to strengthen what has been lost. Heritage language revitalization is a long-term project that demands change and engagement across many aspects of community life, work that is ripe with tensions and contradictions. This chapter considers three recurrent questions in heritage language revitalization: what efforts should be prioritized in language revitalization, who should take responsibility in revitalizing a language, and how should revitalization efforts navigate the perceived need to establish linguistic norms and standards while concomitantly supporting linguistic diversity. To date, these questions have been described as tensions or problems that reveal conflicting priorities, often the result of historical inequalities, and that frequently hinder language revitalization efforts. Rather than framing these questions as problems, the present chapter considers how communities have responded to these challenges to create new opportunities for collaboration and new approaches that embrace ambiguity and pluralism.

Keywords

heritage language revitalizationindigenous languagesendangered languagesethnic reclamationcultural resistanceObjiweDakotaZapotecstandardization
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Heritage Languages and Linguistics , pp. 912 - 933
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Albury, N. J. 2019. “I’ve Admired Them for Doing So Well”: Where to Now for Indigenous Languages and Literacies? In Cocq, C. and Sullivan, K. (eds.), Perspectives on Indigenous Writing and Literacies. Boston: Brill, 13–28.Google Scholar
Austin, P. K. and Sallabank, J.. 2018. Language Documentation and Language Revitalization: Some Methodological Considerations. In Hinton, L., Huss, L., and Roche, G. (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Language Revitalisation. London: Routledge, 207–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrett, J. and Cocq, C.. 2019. Indigenous Storytelling and Language Learning: Digital Media as a Vehicle for Cultural Transmission and Language Acquisition. In Cocq, C. and Sullivan, K. (eds.), Perspectives on Indigenous Writing and Literacies. Boston: Brill, 89–112.Google Scholar
Bigelow, M., Vanek, J., King, K., and Abdi, N.. 2017. Literacy as Social (Media) Practice: Refugee Youth and Native Language Literacy at School. International Journal of Intercultural Relations 60, 183–197.Google Scholar
Biolsi, T. 2005. Imagined Geographies: Sovereignty, Indigenous Space, and American Indian Struggle. American Ethnologist 32(2), 239–259. https://doi.org/10.1525/ae.2005.32.2.239Google Scholar
Cobarrubias, J. 1983. Ethical Issues in Status Planning. In Cobarubias, J. and Fishman, J. (eds.), Progress in Language Planning: International Perspectives. New York: Mouton, 4–84.Google Scholar
Cocq, C. and Sullivan, K.. 2019. Indigenous Writing and Literacies: Perspectives from Five Continents. In Cocq, C. and Sullivan, K. (eds.), Perspectives on Indigenous Writing and Literacies. Boston: Brill, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costa, J., De Korne, H., and Lane, P.. 2017. Standardising Minority Languages: Reinventing Peripheral Languages in the 21st Century. In Lane, P., Costa, J., and De Korne, H. (eds.), Standardizing Minority Languages (Open Access): Competing Ideologies of Authority and Authenticity in the Global Periphery. New York: Routledge, 1–23.Google Scholar
De Korne, H. 2017. The Multilingual Realities of Language Reclamation: Working with Language Contact, Diversity, and Change in Endangered Language Education. Language Documentation and Description 14, 111–135.Google Scholar
Domeij, R., Karlsson, O., Moshagen, S., and Trosterud, T.. 2019. Enhancing Information Accessibility and Digital Literacy for Minorities Using Language Technology: The Example of Sámi and other National Minority Languages in Sweden. In Cocq, C. and Sullivan, K. (eds.), Perspectives on Indigenous Writing and Literacies. Boston: Brill, 113–140.Google Scholar
Dorian, N. 1994. Purism vs. Compromise in Language Revitalization and Language Revival. Language in Society 23(4), 479–494.Google Scholar
Duchêne, A. and Heller, M. (eds.) 2008. Discourses of Endangerment: Ideology and Interest in the Defence of Languages. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Engman, M. 2017. Revitalizing Language, Reframing Expertise: An Ecological Study of Language in One Teacher-Learner’s Ojibwe Classroom. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, United States.Google Scholar
Fishman, J. A. 1972. Language and Nationalism: Two Integrative Essays. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Fishman, J. A. 1990. What Is Reversing Language Shift (RLS) and How Can It Succeed? Journal of Multilingual & Multicultural Development 11(1–2), 5–36.Google Scholar
Fishman, J. A. (ed.) 2001. Can Threatened Languages Be Saved? Reversing Language Shift, Revisited: A 21st Century Perspective (Vol. 116). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Fitznor, L. 2019. Indigenous Education: Affirming Indigenous Knowledges and Languages from a Turtle Island Indigenous Scholar’s Perspective: Pikiskēwinan (Let Us Voice). In Cocq, C. and Sullivan, K. (eds.), Perspectives on Indigenous Writing and Literacies. Boston: Brill, 29–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gal, S. 2018. Visions and Revisions of Minority Languages. In Lane, P., Costa, J., and De Korne, H. (eds.), Standardizing Minority Languages (Open Access): Competing Ideologies of Authority and Authenticity in the Global Periphery. New York: Routledge, 222–242.Google Scholar
Grenoble, L. 2009. Linguistic Cages and the Limits of Linguists. In Reyhner, J. and Lockard, L. (eds.), Indigenous Language Revitalization: Encouragement, Guidance & Lessons Learned. Flagstaff: Northern Arizona University, 61–69.Google Scholar
Grenoble, L. Unanswered Questions in Language Documentation and Revitalization: New Directions for Research and Action. In Mihas, E., Perley, B., Rei-Doval, G., and Wheatley, K. (eds.), Responses to Language Endangerment. In Honor of Mickey Noonan. Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 43–57.Google Scholar
Grenoble, L. A. and Whaley, L. J.. 2006. Saving Languages: An Introduction to Language Revitalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hermes, M. 2007. Moving toward the Language: Reflections on Teaching in an Indigenous-Immersion School. Journal of American Indian Education 46(3), 54–71.Google Scholar
Hermes, M., Bang, M., and Marin, A.. 2012. Designing Indigenous Language Revitalization. Harvard Educational Review 82(3), 381–402.Google Scholar
Hermes, M. and Engman, M.. 2017. Resounding the Clarion Call: Indigenous Language Learners and Documentation. In Leonard, W. and De Korne, H. (eds.), Language Documentation and Description, vol. 14. London: EL Publishing, 59–87Google Scholar
Himmelmann, N. 1998. Documentary and Descriptive Linguistics. Linguistics 36, 161–195.Google Scholar
Hinton, L. 2001a. Language Revitalization: An Overview. In Hinton, L. and Hale, K. (eds.), The Green Book of Language Revitalization in Practice. New York: Academic Press, 3–18.Google Scholar
Hinton, L. 2001b. The Master–Apprentice Language Learning Program. In Hinton, L. and Hale, K. (eds.), The Green Book of Language Revitalization in Practice. New York: Academic Press, 217–226.Google Scholar
Hinton, L. 2011. Language Revitalization and Language Pedagogy: New Teaching and Learning Strategies. Language and Education 25(4), 307–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinton, L. 2014. Orthography Wars. In Cahill, M. and Rice, K. (eds.), Developing Orthographies for Unwritten Languages. Dallas, TX: SIL International, 139–168.Google Scholar
Hinton, L. 2016. Hawaiian Language Schools. In Lobo, S., Talbot, S., Carlston, T. M. (eds.), Native American Voices. London: Taylor & Francis Ltd, 482.Google Scholar
Hinton, L. 2017. Language Endangerment and Revitalization. In McCarty, T. L. and May, S. (eds.), Language Policy and Political Issues in Education, Encyclopedia of Language and Education. New York: Springer International Publishing, 1–16.Google Scholar
Hinton, L. and Hale, K. (eds.) 2001. The Green Book of Language Revitalization in Practice. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hinton, L., Huss, L., and Roche, G.. 2018. The Routledge Handbook of Language Revitalization. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hornberger, N. H. 1987. Bilingual Education Success, but Policy Failure. Language in Society 16(2), 205–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hornberger, N. H. 1996. Quechua Literacy and Empowerment in Peru. In Hornberger, N. (ed.), Indigenous Literacies in the Americas: Language Planning from the Bottom Up. New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 215–236.Google Scholar
Hornberger, N. H. 2006. Voice and Biliteracy in Indigenous Language Revitalization: Contentious Educational Practices in Quechua, Guarani, and Māori Contexts. Journal of Language, Identity, and Education 5(4), 277–292.Google Scholar
Hornberger, N. H. (ed.) 2008. Can Schools Save Indigenous Languages? Policy and Practice on Four Continents. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hornberger, N. H. and King, K. A.. 1998. Authenticity and Unification in Quechua Language Planning. Language Culture and Curriculum 11(3), 390–410.Google Scholar
Karan, E. 2014. Standardization: What’s the Hurry? In Cahill, M. and Rice, K. (eds.), Developing Orthographies for Unwritten Languages. Dallas, TX: SIL International Publications, 107–138.Google Scholar
King, K. A. 2001. Language Revitalization Processes and Prospects: Quichua in the Ecuadorian Andes. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lane, P., De Korne, H., and Costa, J.. 2017. Standardising Minority Languages: Reinventing Peripheral Languages in the 21st Century. In Lane, P., Costa, J., and De Korne, H. (eds.), Standardizing Minority Languages (Open Access). New York: Routledge, 1–23.Google Scholar
Lee, T. S. 2016. The Home-School-Community Interface in Language Revitalization in the USA and Canada. In Coronel-Molina, S. M. and McCarty, T. L. (eds.), Indigenous Language Revitalization in the Americas. New York: Routledge, 1–30.Google Scholar
Leonard, W. Y. 2012. Framing Language Reclamation Programmes for Everybody’s Empowerment. Gender and Language 6(2), 339–367.Google Scholar
Leonard, W. Y. 2017. Producing Language Reclamation by Decolonising ‘Language’. In Leonard, W. Y. and De Korne, H. (eds.), Language Documentation and Description 14. London: EL Publishing, 15–36.Google Scholar
Lillehaugen, B. D. 2016. Why Write in a Language That (Almost) No One Can Read? Twitter and the Development of Written Literature. Language Documentation and Conservation 10, 356–393.Google Scholar
Limerick, N. 2017. Kichwa or Quichua? Competing Alphabets, Political Histories, and Complicated Reading in Indigenous Languages. Comparative Education Review 62(1), 103–124.Google Scholar
May, S. 2014. Justifying Educational Language Rights. Review of Research in Education 38(1), 215–241.Google Scholar
McCarty, T. L. 2008. Schools as Strategic Tools for Indigenous Language Revitalization: Lessons from Native America. In Hornberger, N. H. (ed.), Can Schools Save Indigenous Languages? Policy and Practice on Four Continents. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 161–179.Google Scholar
McCarty, T. L. 2013. Language Planning and Policy in Native America: History, Theory, Praxis. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
McCarty, T. L. 2018. Community-Based Language Planning: Perspectives from Indigenous Language Revitalization. In Hinton, L., Huss, L., and Roche, G. (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Language Revitalization. New York: Routledge, 22–35.Google Scholar
McCarty, T. L. and Nicholas, S. E.. 2014. Reclaiming Indigenous Languages: A Reconsideration of the Roles and Responsibilities of Schools. Review of Research in Education 38(1), 106–136.Google Scholar
McCarty, T., Skutnabb-Kangas, T., and Magga, O. H.. 2008. Education for Speakers of Endangered Languages. In Spolsky, B. and Hult, F. M. (eds.), The Handbook of Educational Linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 297–312.Google Scholar
McIvor, O. 2018, November 1. Indigenous Language Revitalization. Learning Transforms - UVic Education [Audio podcast]. Retrieved from: https://t.co/XCPiMXJkOrGoogle Scholar
McIvor, O. 2020. Indigenous Language Revitalization and Applied Linguistics: Parallel Histories, Shared Future?. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 40, 78–96.Google Scholar
Penfield, S. D. and Tucker, B. V.. 2011. From Documenting to Revitalizing an Endangered Language: Where Do Applied Linguists Fit? Language and Education 25(4), 291–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rice, K. and Thieberger, N.. 2018. Tools and Technology for Language Documentation and Revitalization. In Rehg, K. and Campbell, L. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Endangered Languages. New York: Oxford University Press, 225–247.Google Scholar
Rising Voices. 2019, January 16. A Year-Long Rotating Twitter Campaign Will Share the Voices of 50 Indigenous Language Digital Activists. Retrieved from https://rising.globalvoices.org/blog/2019/01/15/a-year-long-rotating-twitter-campaign-will-share-the-voices-of-50-indigenous-language-digital-activists/Google Scholar
Romero‐Little, M. E. 2006. Honoring Our Own: Rethinking Indigenous Languages and Literacy. Anthropology & Education Quarterly 37(4), 399–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shah, S. and Brenzinger, M. 2018. The Role of Teaching in Language Revival and Revitalization Movements. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 38, 201–208.Google Scholar
Shockman, E. 2019. A Minneapolis School is Immersing Students in both Dakota and Ojibwe. Retrieved from www.mprnews.org/story/2019/04/25/a-minneapolis-school-is-immersing-students-in-both-dakota-and-ojibweGoogle Scholar
Skutnabb-Kangas, T. 2000. Linguistic Genocide in Education or Worldwide Diversity and Human Rights? New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Skutnabb-Kangas, T. 2002. When Languages Disappear, Are Bilingual Education or Human Rights a Cure? Two Scenarios. In Wei, L., Dewaele, J. M., and Housen, A. (eds.), Opportunities and Challenges of Bilingualism. New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 45–68.Google Scholar
Smith, L. T. 1999. Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples. New York: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Swinehart, K. 2012. Metadiscursive Regime and Register Formation in Aymara Radio. Language and Communication 32(2), 102–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Circle. 2014. Bdote Learning Center Opens in South Minneapolis. Retrieved from http://thecirclenews.org/cover-story/bdote-learning-center-opens-in-south-minneapolis/Google Scholar
Tollefson, J. W. 2006. Critical Theory in Language Policy. In Ricento, T. (ed.), An Introduction to Language Policy: Theory and Method. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing Ltd., 24–41.Google Scholar
Treuer, A., Jones, N., and Paap, K.. 2011. Ezhichigeyang: Ojibwe Word List. Hayward, WI: Waadookodaading Ojibwe Immersion School.Google Scholar
Urla, J. 2012. Reclaiming Basque: Language, Nation and Cultural Activism. Reno: University of Nevada Press.Google Scholar
Van Deusen-Scholl, N. 2003. Toward a Definition of Heritage Language: Sociopolitical and Pedagogical Considerations. Journal of Language, Identity, and Education 2(3), 211–230.Google Scholar
Wilson, W. H. and Kamanā, K.. 2011. Insights from Indigenous language Immersion in Hawai‘i. In Tedick, D. J., Christian, D., and Fortune, T. W. (eds.), Immersion Education: Practices, Policies, Possibilities. Bristol: Multilingual Matters, 36–57.Google Scholar
Winstead, T., Lawrence, A., Brantmeier, E. J., and Frey, C.. 2008. Language, Sovereignty, Cultural Contestation, and American Indian Schools: No Child Left behind and a Navajo Test Case. Journal of American Indian Education 47(1), 46–64.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×