Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Compliance
- The Cambridge Handbook of Compliance
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- 1 Introduction: Compliance as the Interaction between Rules and Behavior
- Part I Compliance Concepts and Approaches
- Part II Deterrence and Incapacitation
- Part III Incentives
- Part IV Legitimacy and Social Norms
- Part V Capacity and Opportunity
- Part VI Compliance and Cognition
- Part VII Management and Organizational Processes
- Part VIII Measuring and Evaluating Compliance
- Part IX Analysis of Particular Fields
- 55 Strengthening Tax Compliance by Balancing Authorities’ Power and Trustworthiness
- 56 Compliance in Occupational Safety and Health
- 57 Intellectual Property Compliance: Systematic Methods for Building and Using Intellectual Property
- 58 Insider Trading Compliance Programs
- 59 Antitrust Compliance: Collusion
- 60 Understanding AI Collusion and Compliance
- 61 HIPAA Compliance
- 62 Biopharmaceutical Compliance
- 63 Transnational Anti-Bribery Law
- 64 Data Security, Data Breaches, and Compliance
- 65 Doping in Sports: A Compliance Conundrum
- 66 Food Safety Compliance
- 67 Global Supply Chain Auditing
- 68 Corporations, Human Rights and Compliance
- 69 Aiming for Integrity with Integrity
- References
68 - Corporations, Human Rights and Compliance
from Part IX - Analysis of Particular Fields
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 07 May 2021
By
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Compliance
- The Cambridge Handbook of Compliance
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- 1 Introduction: Compliance as the Interaction between Rules and Behavior
- Part I Compliance Concepts and Approaches
- Part II Deterrence and Incapacitation
- Part III Incentives
- Part IV Legitimacy and Social Norms
- Part V Capacity and Opportunity
- Part VI Compliance and Cognition
- Part VII Management and Organizational Processes
- Part VIII Measuring and Evaluating Compliance
- Part IX Analysis of Particular Fields
- 55 Strengthening Tax Compliance by Balancing Authorities’ Power and Trustworthiness
- 56 Compliance in Occupational Safety and Health
- 57 Intellectual Property Compliance: Systematic Methods for Building and Using Intellectual Property
- 58 Insider Trading Compliance Programs
- 59 Antitrust Compliance: Collusion
- 60 Understanding AI Collusion and Compliance
- 61 HIPAA Compliance
- 62 Biopharmaceutical Compliance
- 63 Transnational Anti-Bribery Law
- 64 Data Security, Data Breaches, and Compliance
- 65 Doping in Sports: A Compliance Conundrum
- 66 Food Safety Compliance
- 67 Global Supply Chain Auditing
- 68 Corporations, Human Rights and Compliance
- 69 Aiming for Integrity with Integrity
- References
Summary
Abstract: In the last decades, human rights have entered the wide field of corporate social responsibilities and the subsequent standards that corporations have to comply with. While not yet in the form of hard law, international organizations such as the United Nations (UN) and the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) have introduced principles and guidelines for business and human rights. The Special Rapporteur on Business and Human Rights for the UN Human Rights Council has designed the so-called ‘Ruggie framework’ in which corporations have the duty to respect human rights, while states have the duty to protect them. Many industries and corporations have adopted these principles and guidelines in their codes of conduct. While being non-enforceable, these principles and guidelines are often seen as embryonic law. Currently, a binding treaty on business and human rights is being debated by the UN. Also, on the national level, lawsuits against corporations for being involved in human rights abuses, both civil and criminal, have been brought to courts in various countries. Cases even amount to corporate involvement in breaches of international criminal law such as genocide, war crimes and crimes against humanity. As a response to the increasing awareness of the role of business in human rights violations, a plethora of judicial and non-judicial instruments has been introduced to hold corporations and their executives accountable and to ensure compliance with human rights standards. This chapter will first explore the human rights obligations of corporations and the ways in which corporations are responsible for the breach of these obligations. Second, we will explore what is known about actual corporate compliance with human rights standards and corporate involvement in human rights violations. Third, the chapter will discuss available instruments for enforcing corporate compliance with human rights standards and their use, before, fourth, assessing the various regulatory and non-regulatory interventions for potential effectiveness. Integrating contemporary models of business regulation and compliance management, the chapter will end by exploring possibilities to combine and order existing instruments into a coherent scheme of action.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Handbook of Compliance , pp. 989 - 1009Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021
References
Ayres, Ian, and Braithwaite, John. 1992. Responsive Regulation: Transcending the Deregulation Debate. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benson, Michael, and Madensen, Tamara. 2007. ‘Situational Crime Prevention and White-Collar Crime’. In International Handbook of Corporate and White Collar Crime, edited by Pontell, H. and Geis, G., 609–26. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Bernaz, Nadia. 2017. ‘An Analysis of the ICC Office of the Prosecutor’s Policy Paper on Case Selection and Prioritization from the Perspective of Business and Human Rights’. Journal of International Criminal Justice 15(3): 527–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bilchitz, David. 2016. ‘The Necessity for a Business and Human Rights Treaty’. Business and Human Rights Journal 1: 203–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bleker-van Eijk, Sylvie, and Houben, Raf A. M.. 2017. Compliance and Integrity Management: Theory and Practice. Alphen aan den Rijn: Wolters Kluwer.Google Scholar
Blitt, R. C. 2012. ‘Beyond Ruggie’s Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights: Charting an Embracive Approach to Corporate Human Rights Compliance’. Texas International Law Journal 48: 33.Google Scholar
Braithwaite, John. 2011. ‘The Essence of Responsive Regulation’. University of British Columbia Law Review 44(3): 475–520.Google Scholar
Braithwaite, John, Charlesworth, Hilary and Soares, Adérito. 2012. Networked Governance of Freedom and Tyranny: Peace in Timor-Leste. Canberra: ANU E Press.Google Scholar
Brants, Chrisje. 2007. ‘Gold Collar Crime’. In International Handbook of White-Collar Crime, edited by Geis, Gilbert and Pontell, Henry, 309–26. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Buhmann, Karin. 2016. ‘Public Regulators and CSR: The ‘Social Licence to Operate’ in Recent United Nations Instruments on Business and Human Rights and the Juridification of CSR’. Journal of Business Ethics 136: 699–714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buhmann, Karin. 2020. ‘National Contact Points under OECD’s Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises: Institutional Diversity Affecting Assessments of the Delivery of Access to Remedy’. In Accountability, International Business Operations, and the Law: Providing Justice for Corporate Human Rights Violations in Global Value Chains, edited by Enneking, Liesbeth, Giesen, Ivo, Schaap, Anne-Jetske, Ryngaert, Cedric, Kristen, François and Roorda, Lucas, 39–59. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Burchard, Christoph. 2010. Ancillary and Neutral Business Contributions to ‘Corporate–Political Core Crime’: Initial Enquiries Concerning the Rome Statute. Journal of International Criminal Justice 8(3): 919–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bush, Jonathan A. 2009. ‘The Prehistory of Corporations and Conspiracy in International Criminal Law: What Nuremberg Really Said’. Columbia Law Review 109(5): 1094–1262.Google Scholar
Cerone, John. 2016. ‘A Taxonomy of Soft Law: Stipulating a Definition’. In Tracing the Roles of Soft Law in Human Rights, edited by Lagoutte, Stéphanie, Gammeltoft-Hansen, Thomas and Cerone, John, 15–26. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charlesworth, Hilary. 2017. ‘A Regulatory Perspective on the International Human Rights System’. In Regulatory Theory: Foundations and Applications, edited by Drahos, Peter, 357–74. Acton ACT, Australia: ANU Press.Google Scholar
Chen, Hui, and Soltes, Eugene. 2018. ‘Why Compliance Programs Fail: And How to Fix Them’. Harvard Business Review 96(2): 116–25.Google Scholar
Connor, Tim, and Haines, Fiona. 2013. ‘Networked Regulation as a Solution to Human Rights Abuse in Global Supply Chains? The Case of Trade Union Rights Violations by Indonesian Sports Shoe Manufacturers’. Theoretical Criminology 17: 197–214.Google Scholar
De Hoon, Marieke. 2017. ‘The Future of the International Criminal Court: On Critique, Legalism and Strengthening the ICC’s Legitimacy’. International Criminal Law Review 17: 591–614.Google Scholar
Deva, Surya. 2012. Regulating Corporate Human Rights Violations: Humanizing Business. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dubash, Navroz K., and Morgan, Bronwen. 2013. The Rise of the Regulatory State of the South: Infrastructure and Development in Emerging Economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durbin, Andrea, and Welch, Carol. 2002. ‘The Environmental Movement and Global Finance’. In Civil Society and Global Finance, edited by Scholte, Jan Aart and Schnabel, Albrecht, 213–27. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fasterling, Björn. 2019. ‘Whose Responsibilities? The Responsibility of the ‘Business Enterprise’ to Respect Human Rights’. In Accountability, International Business Operations, and the Law: Providing Justice for Corporate Human Rights Violations in Global Value Chains, edited by Enneking, Liesbeth, Giesen, Ivo, Schaap, Anne-Jetske, Ryngaert, Cedric, Kristen, François and Roorda, Lucas, 18–37. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrett, Allison D. 2008. ‘The Corporation as Sovereign’. Maine Law Review 60(1): 130–64.Google Scholar
Garrett, Brandon L. 2014. Too Big to Jail: How Prosecutors Compromise with Corporations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gobert, James, and Punch, Maurice. 2003. Rethinking Corporate Crime. London: Butterworths.Google Scholar
Green, Penny, and Ward, Tony. 2004. State Crime: Governments Violence and Corruption. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
Gunningham, Neil, Grabosky, Peter and Sinclair, David. 1998. Smart Regulation: Designing Environmental Policy. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayman, G. 2009. ‘Corruption and Bribery in the Extractive Industries’. In Transparency International Global Corruption Report 2009: Corruption and the Private Sector, edited by Zinnbauer D., Dobson, R. and Despota, K., 54–56. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Huisman, Wim. 2010. Business as Usual? Corporate Involvement in International Crimes. The Hague: Eleven International Publishing.Google Scholar
Huisman, Wim, Karstedt, Susanne and van Baar, Annika. In press. ‘The Involvement of Corporations in Atrocity Crimes’. In Oxford Handbook on Atrocity Crimes, edited by Barbara Hola, Hollie N. Brehm and Maartje van Weerdesteijn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Huisman, Wim, and Sidoli, Daniel. 2019. ‘Corporations, Human Rights and the Environmental Degradation-Corruption Nexus’. Asia Pacific Journal of Environmental Law 22(1): 66–92.Google Scholar
Huisman, Wim, and van Sliedregt, Elies. 2010. ‘Rogue Traders – Dutch Businessmen and International Crimes’. Journal of International Criminal Justice 8: 803–28.Google Scholar
Huisman, Wim, and van Erp, Judith. 2013. ‘Opportunities for Environmental Crime: A Test of Situational Crime Prevention Theory’. British Journal of Criminology 53(6): 1178–1200.Google Scholar
Hutter, Bridget M., and Jones, Clive J.. 2006. Business Risk Management Practices: The Influence of State Regulatory Agencies and Non-State Sources. London School of Economics and Political Science.Google Scholar
Kaleck, Wolfgang, and Saage-Maaß, Miriam. 2010. ‘Corporate Accountability for Human Rights Violations Amounting to International Crimes: The Status Quo and Its Challenges’. Journal of International Criminal Justice 8: 699–724.Google Scholar
Karpoff, Jonathan M., Lott, John R. and Wehrly, Eric W.. 2005. ‘The Reputational Penalties for Environmental Violations: Empirical Evidence’. Journal of Law and Economics 68: 653–75.Google Scholar
Karpoff, J. M., Lee, J. Scott and Martin, G. S.. 2008. ‘The Consequences to Managers for Financial Misrepresentation’. Journal of Financial Economics 88: 193–215.Google Scholar
Karstedt, Susanne. 2015. ‘Managing Criminal Reputations: West German Elites after the Nuremberg Trials, 1946–1960’. Journal of International Criminal Justice 13(4): 723–43.Google Scholar
Katzin, Donna. 1995. ‘Anatomy of a Boycott: The Royal Dutch/Shell Campaign in the US’. In Embargo: Apartheid’s Oil Secrets Revealed, edited by Hengeveld, Richard and Rodenburg, Jaap, 327–37. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
Kelly, M. J. 2016. Prosecuting Corporations for Genocide. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kyriakakis, Joanna. 2007. ‘Australian Prosecution of Corporations for International Crimes’. Journal of International Criminal Justice 5(4): 809–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le Billon, Philippe. 2012. Wars of Plunder: Conflicts, Profits and the Politics of Resources. London: C. Hurst & Co.Google Scholar
Long, D. M., Wann, C. and Brockman, C.. 2016. ‘Unethical Business Behaviour and Stock Performance’. Academy of Accounting and Financial Studies Journal 20(3): 115–22.Google Scholar
Macdonald, Kate, Marshall, Shelley and Balaton-Chrimes, Samantha. 2017. ‘Demanding Rights in Company-Community Resource Extraction Conflicts: Examining the Cases of Vedanta and POSCO in Odisha, India’. In Demanding Justice in the Global South: Claiming Rights, edited by Grugel, Jean, Singh, Jewellord Nem, Fontana, Lorenza and Uhlin, Anders, 43–67. Cham: Springer International.Google Scholar
Macleod, Sorcha, and Lewis, Douglas. 2004. ‘Transnational Corporations: Power, Influence and Responsibility’. Global Social Policy 4: 77–98.Google Scholar
Michalowski, Sabine. 2015. ‘Doing Business with a Bad Actor: How to Draw the Line between Legitimate Commercial Activities and Those that Trigger Corporate Complicity Liability’. Texas International Law Journal 50(3): 403–64.Google Scholar
OECD. 2011. OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises. OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264115415-en.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, Christine, and Braithwaite, John. 2003. ‘Regulation’. In The Oxford Handbook of Legal Studies, edited by Cane, Peter and Tushnet, Mark, 119–45. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ramasastry, Anita, and Thompson, Richard C.. 2006. Commerce Crime and Conflict. Oslo: Fafo.Google Scholar
Ruggie, John G. 2013. Just Business: Multinational Corporations and Human Rights. New York/London: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
Ryngaert, Cedric. 2018. ‘Accountability for Corporate Human Rights Abuses: Lessons from the Possible Exercise of Dutch National Criminal Jurisdiction over Multinational Corporations’. Criminal Law Forum 29(1): 1–24.Google Scholar
Scherer, Andreas G., and Palazzo, Guido. 2011. ‘The New Political Role of Business in a Globalized World: A Review of a New Perspective on CSR and Its Implications for the Firm, Governance and Democracy’. Journal of Management Studies 48(4): 899–931.Google Scholar
Schoultz, Isabel, and Flyghed, Janne. 2016. ‘Doing Business for a “Higher Loyalty”? How Swedish Transnational Corporations Neutralise Allegations of Crime’. Crime, Law and Social Change 66(2): 183–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schrempf-Stirling, Judith, and Wettstein, Florian. 2017. ‘Beyond Guilty Verdicts: Human Rights Litigation and Its Impact on Corporations’ Human Rights Policies’. Journal of Business Ethics 145(3): 545–62.Google Scholar
Sikkink, Kathryn. 2011. The Justice Cascade: How Human Rights Prosecutions Are Changing World Politics. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
Simons, Penelope, and Macklin, Audrey. 2014. The Governance Gap: Extractive Industries, Human Rights, and the Home State Advantage. Abingdon, UK and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Simpson, Sally, Rorie, Melissa, Alper, Mariel Elise, Schell-Busey, Natalie, Laufer, William and Smith, N. Craig. 2014. Corporate Crime Deterrence: A Systematic Review, Campbell Collaboration.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoitchkova, Desi. 2010. Towards Corporate Liability in International Criminal Law. Utrecht: Intersentia.Google Scholar
UN Human Rights Council, 2010. UN Human Rights Council, A/HRC/14/27, 9 April 2010, para. 3.Google Scholar
van Baar, Annika. 2019. ‘Corporate Involvement in International Crimes’. In Nazi Germany, Apartheid South Africa and the Democratic Republic of Congo, PhD Dissertation. VU University Amsterdam.Google Scholar
van Erp, Judith. 2008. ‘Reputational Sanctions in Private and Public Regulation’. Erasmus Law Review 5: 145–63.Google Scholar
van der Wilt, H. 2013. ‘Corporate Criminal Responsibility for International Crimes: Exploring the Possibilities’. Chinese Journal of International Law 21(1): 43–77.Google Scholar