Adams, G. L., & Engelmann, S. (1996). Research on direct instruction: 25 years beyond DISTAR. Seattle, WA: Educational Achievement System.Google Scholar

Beghetto, R. A. (2013). Killing ideas softly? The promise and perils of creativity in the classroom. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar

Beghetto, R. A. (2014). Creative mortification: An initial exploration. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8, 266–276.Google Scholar

Beghetto, R. A. (2016). Creative learning: A fresh look. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 15(1), 6–23.Google Scholar

Beghetto, R. A. (2017). Creativity in Teaching. In Kaufman, J. C., Glăveanu, V. P., & Baer, J. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity across domains (pp. 549–564). New York: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/9781316274385.030Google Scholar

Beghetto, R. A. (2018). What if? Building students’ problem-solving skills through complex challenges. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.Google Scholar

Beghetto, R. A. (2019). Structured uncertainty: How creativity thrives under constraints and uncertainty. In Mullen, C. A (Ed.), Creativity under duress in education? (vol. 3, pp. 27–40). New York: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-90272-2_2Google Scholar

Beghetto, R. A. (2020). Education and creativity. In Runco, M. A. & Pritzker, S. R. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (3rd ed.) (pp. 417–422). San Diego, CA: Elsevier/Academic Press.Google Scholar

Beghetto, R. A., & Dilley, A. E. (2016). Creative aspirations or pipe dreams? Toward understanding creative mortification in children and adolescents. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 151, 85–95.Google Scholar

Beghetto, R. A., & Karwowski, M. (2017). Toward untangling creative self-beliefs. In Karwowski, M. & Kaufman, J. C. (Eds.), The creative self (pp. 3–22). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Beghetto, R. A., & Kaufman, J. C. (2007). Toward a broader conception of creativity: A case for “mini-c” creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 1(2), 73–79.Google Scholar

Bereczki, E. O., & Kárpáti, A. (2018). Teachers’ beliefs about creativity and its nurture: A systematic review of the recent research literature. Educational Research Review, 23, 25–56. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2017.10.003Google Scholar

Corazza, G. E. (2016). Potential originality and effectiveness: The dynamic definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 28(3), 258–267. doi:10.1080/10400419.2016.1195627Google Scholar

Duckworth, E. (2006). “The having of wonderful ideas” and other essays on teaching and learning (3rd ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar

Dweck, C. S. (2000). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Edwards, J. R., Caplan, R. D., & Van Harrison, R. (1998). Person–environment fit theory. Theories of Organizational Stress, 28, 67.Google Scholar

Glăveanu, V. P. (2013). Rewriting the Language of Creativity: The Five A’s Framework. Review of General Psychology, 17(1), 69–81. doi:10.1037/a0029528Google Scholar

Glăveanu, V. P., Hanchett Hanson, M., Baer, J., Barbot, B., Clapp, E. P., Corazza, G. E., … Sternberg, R. J. (2019). Advancing creativity theory and research: A socio‐cultural manifesto. The Journal of Creative Behavior. doi:10.1002/jocb.395Google Scholar

Glăveanu, V. P., & Kaufman, J. C. (2019). The creativity matrix: Spotlights and blind spots in our understanding of the phenomenon: Creativity matrix. The Journal of Creative Behavior. doi:10.1002/jocb.417CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Halpern, D. F. (2010). Creativity in college classrooms. In Beghetto, R. A & Kaufman, J. C (Eds.), Nurturing creativity in the classroom (pp. 380–393). New York: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511781629.019Google Scholar

Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 111–127.Google Scholar

Hirsh-Pasek, K., Hyson, M. C., & Rescorla, L. (1990). Academic environments in preschool: Do they pressure or challenge young children. Early Education & Development, 1(6), 401–423. doi:10.1207/s15566935eed0106_1Google Scholar

Hoffmann, J. D., & Russ, S. W. (2016). Fostering pretend play skills and creativity in elementary school girls: A group play intervention. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 10(1), 114–125. doi:10.1037/aca0000039CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hollinger, M., & Kaufman, J. C. (2018). The relationship between creativity and feedback. In Lipnevich, A. A. & Smith, J. K. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of instructional feedback (pp. 578–588). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Jackson, P. W. (1990). Life in classrooms. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar

Karwowski, M., & Beghetto, R. A. (2018). Creative behavior as agentic action. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 13(4), 402–415. doi:10.1037/aca0000190Google Scholar

Karwowski, M., & Kaufman, J. C. (Eds.). (2017). The creative self: Effect of beliefs, self-efficacy, mindset, and identity. Boston, MA: Elsevier.Google Scholar

Karwowski, M., Lebuda, I., & Beghetto, R. A. (2019). Creative self-beliefs. In Kaufman, J. C. & Sternberg, R. J. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kaufman, J. C., & Beghetto, R. A. (2009). Beyond big and little: The Four C model of creativity. Review of General Psychology, 13, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Land, G., & Jarman, B. (1993). Breakpoint and beyond: Mastering the future – today. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar

Lewis, M., & Sullivan, M. W. (2005). The development of self-conscious emotion. In Elliot, A. J & Dweck, C. S (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 185–201). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar

Lillard, A. S. (2012). Preschool children’s development in classic Montessori, supplemented Montessori, and conventional programs. Journal of School Psychology, 50(3), 379–401.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Piaget, J. (1976). To understand is to invent: The future of education. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar

Plucker, J. A., Beghetto, R. A., & Dow, G. (2004). Why isn’t creativity more important to educational psychologists? Potential, pitfalls, and future directions in creativity research. Educational Psychologist, 39, 83–96.Google Scholar

Plucker, J. A., & Beghetto, R. A. (2004). Why creativity is domain general, why it looks domain specific, and why the distinction does not matter. In Sternberg, R. J., Grigorenko, E. L., & Singer, J. L. (Eds.), Creativity: From potential to realization (pp. 153–167). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar

Plucker, J. A., & Dow, G. T. (2010). Attitude change as the precursor to creativity enhancement. In Beghetto, R. A & Kaufman, J. C (Eds.), Nurturing creativity in the classroom (2nd ed., pp. 190–211). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Reeve, J. (2009). Why teachers adopt a controlling motivating style toward students and how they can become more autonomy supportive. Educational Psychologist, 44, 159–175.Google Scholar

Renzulli, J. (2017). Developing. In Beghetto, R. A & Kaufman, J. C (Eds.), Creativity across all areas of the curriculum. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Root-Bernstein, R., & Root-Bernstein, M. (2017). People, passions, problems: The role of creative exemplars in teaching for creativity. In Beghetto, R. A. & Sriraman, B. (Eds.), Creative contradictions in education (pp. 143–180). Cham: Springer.Google Scholar

Runco, M. A., & Beghetto, R. A. (2019). Primary and secondary creativity. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 27, 7–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Runco, M. A., & Jaeger, G. J. (2012). The standard definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 24, 92–96.Google Scholar

Russ, S. W. (2014). Pretend play in childhood: Foundation of adult creativity (1st ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar

Russ, S. W., & Lee, A. W. (2019). Pretend play in the classroom. In Charles, M & Bellinson, J (Eds.), The importance of play in early childhood education: Psychoanalytic, attachment, and developmental perspectives (pp. 19–32). London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Schrage, M. (1999). Serious play: How the world’s best companies simulate to innovate. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press.Google Scholar

Simonton, D. K. (2010). Creativity in highly eminent individuals. In Kaufman, J. C & Sternberg, R. J (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 174–188). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Stipek, D., & Byler, P. (2004). The early childhood classroom observation measure. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 19(3), 375–397. doi:10.1016/j.ecresq.2004.07.007Google Scholar

Tracy, J. L., & Robins, R. W. (2006). Theoretical model. Psychological Inquiry, 15, 103–125.Google Scholar

Vygotsky, L. S. (2004). Imagination and creativity in childhood (M. E. Sharpe, Inc., Trans.). Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 42, 7–97.Google Scholar

Zosh, J. M., Hirsh-Pasek, K., Golinkoff, R. M., & Dore, R. A. (2017). Where learning meets creativity: The promise of guided play. In Beghetto, R. A. & Sriraman, B (Eds.), Creative contradictions in education (vol. 1, pp. 165–180). Cham: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-21924-0_10Google Scholar

Alfieri, L., Brooks, P. J., Aldrich, N. J., & Tenenbaum, H. R. (2011). Does discovery-based instruction enhance learning? Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(1), 1–18. doi:10.1037/a0021017Google Scholar

Amabile, T. M. (1985). Motivation and creativity: Effects of motivational orientation on creative writers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48(2), 393–399. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.48.2.393Google Scholar

Bassok, D., Latham, S., & Rorem, A. (2016). Is kindergarten the new first grade? AERA Open, 1(4), 1–31. doi:10.1177/2332858415616358Google Scholar

Beghetto, R. A. (2006). Creative self-efficacy: Correlates in middle and secondary students. Creativity Research Journal, 18(4), 447–457. doi:10.1207/s15326934crj1804_4Google Scholar

Benjamin, N., Haden, C. A., & Wilkerson, E. (2010). Enhancing building, conversation, and learning through caregiver–child interactions in a children’s museum. Developmental Psychology, 46(2), 502–515. doi:10.1037/a0017822CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bonawitz, E. B., Shafto, P., Gweon, H., Goodman, N. D., Spelke, E., & Schulz, L. (2011). The double-edged sword of pedagogy: Instruction limits spontaneous exploration and discovery. Cognition, 120(3), 322–330. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2010.10.001CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bonawitz, E. B., van Schijndel, T., Friel, D., & Schulz, L. (2012). Balancing theories and evidence in children’s exploration, explanations, and learning. Cognitive Psychology, 64(4), 215–234. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2011.12.002Google Scholar

Callanan, M. A. (2012). Conducting cognitive developmental research in museums: Theoretical issues and practical considerations. Journal of Cognition and Development, 13(2), 137–151. doi:10.1080/15248372.2012.666730Google Scholar

Callanan, M. A., Castañeda, C. L., Luce, M. R., & Martin, J. L. (2017). Family science talk in museums: Predicting children’s engagement from variations in talk and activity. Child Development, 88(5), 1492–1504. doi:10.1111/cdev.12886Google Scholar

Callanan, M. A., Cervantes, C., & Loomis, M. (2011). Informal learning. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 2(6), 646–655. doi:10.1002/wcs.143Google Scholar

Callanan, M. A., Legare, C. H., Sobel, D. M., Jaeger, G. J., Letourneau, S., McHugh, S. R., … Watson, J. (2020). Exploration, explanation, and parent–child interaction in museums. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 85(1), 7–137.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Caniëls, M. C., & Rietzschel, E. F. (2015). Organizing creativity: Creativity and innovation under constraints. Creativity and Innovation Management, 24(2), 184–196. doi:10.1111/caim.12123Google Scholar

Center for Childhood Creativity (2017). The CREATE Framework: Learning environments to develop creativity. Bay Area Discovery Museum. Retrieved from https://centerforchildhoodcreativity.org/Google Scholar

Choi, K., Grados, M., & Bonawitz, E. (2019). Observing child-led exploration improves parents’ causal inferences. In Goel, A. K., Seifert, C. M., & Freska, C. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 41st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Montreal: Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar

Crowley, K., & Callanan, M. (1998). Describing and supporting collaborative scientific thinking in parent–child interactions. Journal of Museum Education, 23(1) (pp. 1513–1519), 12–17. doi:10.1080/10598650.1998.11510365CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crowley, K., Callanan, M. A., Tenenbaum, H. R., & Allen, E. (2001). Parents explain more often to boys than to girls during shared scientific thinking. Psychological Science, 12(3), 258–261. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00347Google Scholar

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). The general causality orientations scale: Self-determination in personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 19(2), 109–134. doi:10.1016/0092-6566(85)90023-6Google Scholar

Dierking, L. D., & Falk, J. H. (2003). Optimizing out-of-school time: The role of free-choice learning. New Directions for Student Leadership, 2003(97), 75–88. doi:10.1002/yd.36Google Scholar

Elkind, D. (2008). Can we play? Greater Good Magazine. Retrieved from https://greatergood.berkeley.edu/article/item/can_we_playGoogle Scholar

Evans, N. S., Todaro, R. D., Schlesinger, M. A., Golinkoff, R. M., & Hirsh-Pasek, K. (2021). Examining the impact of children's exploratory behaviors on creativity. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 207, 105091.Google Scholar

Falk, J. H., & Dierking, L. D. (2002). Lessons without limit: How free-choice learning is transforming education. Landham, MD: Rowman Altamira.Google Scholar

Falk, J. H., & Dierking, L. D. (2010). The 95 Percent Solution School is not where most Americans learn most of their science. American Scientist, 98(6), 486–493. doi:10.1511/2010.87.486Google Scholar

Fung, G., & Callanan, M. (2013, April). Pedagogy versus exploration: Parent–Child interactions in a museum setting [Poster presentation]. Biennial Meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Seattle, WA.Google Scholar

Gray, P. (2011). The decline of play and the rise of psychopathology in children and adolescents. American Journal of Play, 3(4), 443–463.Google Scholar

Hadani, H., & Jaeger, G. J. (2015). Inspiring a generation to create: Critical components of creativity in children [White paper]. Retrieved from http://centerforchildhoodcreativity.org/research/published/Google Scholar

Haden, C. A. (2010). Talking about science in museums. Child Development Perspectives, 4(1), 62–67. doi:10.1111/j.1750-8606.2009.00119.xGoogle Scholar

Haden, C. A., Jant, E. A., Hoffman, P. C., Marcus, M., Geddes, J. R., & Gaskins, S. (2014). Supporting family conversations and children’s STEM learning in a children’s museum. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 29(3), 333–344. doi:10.1016/j.ecresq.2014.04.004Google Scholar

Harrington, D. M. (1975). Effects of explicit instructions to “be creative” on the psychological meaning of divergent thinking test scores. Journal of Personality, 43(3), 434–454. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1975.tb00715.xGoogle Scholar

Hawkins, D. (1965). Messing about in science. Science and Children, 2(5), 5–9.Google Scholar

Hirsh-Pasek, K., Golinkoff, R. M., Berk, L., & Singer, D. G. (2009). A mandate for playful learning in preschool: Presenting the evidence. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Jant, E. A., Haden, C. A., Uttal, D. H., & Babcock, E. (2014). Conversation and object manipulation influence children’s learning in a museum. Child Development, 85(5), 2029–2045. doi:10.1111/cdev.12252CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Jensen, H., Pyle, A., Zosh, J. M., Ebrahim, H. B., Scherman, A. Z., Reunamo, J., & Hamre, B. K. (2019). Play facilitation: The science behind the art of engaging young children [White paper]. Denmark: The LEGO Foundation.Google Scholar

Jordanous, A., & Keller, B. (2016). Modelling creativity: Identifying key components through a corpus-based approach. PLOS One, 11(10). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0162959Google Scholar

Knutson, K., & Crowley, K. (2005a). Museum as learning laboratory: Developing and using a practical theory of informal learning (Part 1 of 2). Hand to Hand, 18 (4), 4–5.Google Scholar

Knutson, K., & Crowley, K. (2005b). Museum as learning laboratory: Bridging research and practice together (Part 2 of 2). Hand to Hand, 19 (1), 3–6.Google Scholar

Kurkul, K. E., & Corriveau, K. H. (2018). Question, explanation, follow-up: A mechanism for learning from others? Child Development, 89(1), 280–294. doi:10.1111/cdev.12726Google Scholar

Legare, C. H. (2012). Exploring explanation: Explaining inconsistent information guides hypothesis-testing behavior in young children. Child Development, 83(1), 173–185. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01691.xGoogle Scholar

Legare, C. H. (2014). The contributions of explanation and exploration to children’s scientific reasoning. Child Development Perspectives, 8(2), 101–106. doi:10.1111/cdep.12070Google Scholar

Legare, C. H., & Lombrozo, T. (2014). Selective effects of explanation on learning during early childhood. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 126, 198–212.Google Scholar

Legare, C. H., Sobel, D. M., & Callanan, M. (2017). Causal learning is collaborative: Examining explanation and exploration in social contexts. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 24(5), 1548–1554. doi:10.3758/s13423–017-1351-3Google Scholar

Lepper, M. R., Greene, D., & Nisbett, R. E. (1973). Undermining children’s intrinsic interest with extrinsic reward: A test of the “overjustification” hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 28(1), 129–137. doi:10.1037/h0035519Google Scholar

Liu, C., Solis, S., Jensen, H., Hopkins, E., Neale, D., Zosh, J., & Whitebread, D. (2017). Neuroscience and learning through play: A review of the evidence [Research summary]. Denmark: The LEGO Foundation.Google Scholar

Luce, M. R., Callanan, M. A., & Smilovic, S. (2013). Links between parents’ epistemological stance and children’s evidence talk. Developmental Psychology, 49(3), 454–461. doi:10.1037/a0031249Google Scholar

Meltzoff, A. N., Kuhl, P. K., Movellan, J., & Sejnowski, T. J. (2009). Foundations for a new science of learning. Science, 325(5938), 284–288. doi:10.1126/science.1175626Google Scholar

Miller, E., & Almon, J. (2009). Crisis in the kindergarten: Why children need to play in school. College Park, MD: Alliance for Childhood.Google Scholar

Nakamura, J., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2014). The concept of flow. Flow and the foundations of positive psychology (pp. 239–263). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nusbaum, E. C., Silvia, P. J., & Beaty, R. E. (2014). Ready, set, create: What instructing people to “be creative” reveals about the meaning and mechanisms of divergent thinking. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8(4), 423–432. doi:10.1037/a0036549Google Scholar

Osberg, S. (1998). Shared lessons and self-discoveries: What research has taught Children’s Discovery Museum. Journal of Museum Education, 23(1), 19–20. doi:10.1080/10598650.1998.11510367Google Scholar

Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Puchner, L., Rapoport, R., & Gaskins, S. (2001). Learning in children’s museums: Is it really happening? Curator: The Museum Journal, 44(3), 237–259. doi:10.1111/j.2151-6952.2001.tb01164.xGoogle Scholar

Rathunde, K., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2005). Middle school students’ motivation and quality of experience: A comparison of Montessori and traditional school environments. American Journal of Education, 111(3), 341–371. doi:10.1086/428885Google Scholar

Resnick, M., & Robinson, K. (2017). Lifelong kindergarten: Cultivating creativity through projects, passion, peers, and play. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.Google Scholar

Resnick, M., Myers, B., Nakakoji, K., Shneiderman, B., Pausch, R., Selker, T., & Eisenberg, M. (2005). Design principles for tools to support creative thinking. Institute for Software Research, Paper 816. Retrieved from http://repository.cmu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1822&context=isr.Google Scholar

Runco, M. A., Illies, J. J., & Reiter-Palmon, R. (2005). Explicit instructions to be creative and original: A comparison of strategies and criteria as targets with three types of divergent thinking tests. The Korean Journal of Creativity & Problem Solving, 15(1), 5–15.Google Scholar

Runco, M. A., & Jaeger, G. J. (2012). The standard definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 92–96.Google Scholar

Russ, S. W. (1986). Children’s fantasy play, problem solving, and emotional development. Clinical Child Psychology Newsletter, 1, 5.Google Scholar

Russ, S. W. (2003). Play and creativity: Developmental issues. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 47, 291–303.Google Scholar

Runco, M. A., & Okuda, S. M. (1991). The instructional enhancement of the flexibility and originality scores of divergent thinking tests. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 5(5), 435–441. doi:10.1002/acp.2350050505CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54–67. doi:10.1006/ceps.1999.1020Google Scholar

Schulz, L. E., & Bonawitz, E. B. (2007). Serious fun: Preschoolers engage in more exploratory play when evidence is confounded. Developmental Psychology, 43(4), 1045–1050. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.43.4.1045Google Scholar

Simons, J., Dewitte, S., & Lens, W. (2000). Wanting to have vs. wanting to be: The effect of perceived instrumentality on goal orientation. British Journal of Psychology, 91(3), 335–351. doi:10.1348/000712600161862Google Scholar

Simonton, D. K. (2012). Taking the US Patent Office criteria seriously: A quantitative three-criterion creativity definition and its implications. Creativity Research Journal, 24(2–3), 97–106. doi:10.1080/10400419.2012.676974Google Scholar

Singer, D. G., Golinkoff, R. M., & Hirsh-Pasek, K. (Eds.). (2006). Play = learning: How play motivates and enhances children’s cognitive and social-emotional growth. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Sobel, D., & Jipson, J. (Eds.). (2016). Relating research and practice: Cognitive development in museum settings. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Song, L., Golinkoff, R. M., Stuehling, A., Resnick, I., Mahajan, N., Hirsh-Pasek, K., & Thompson, N. (2017, March–April). Parents’ and experts’ awareness of learning opportunities in children’s museum exhibits. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 49, 39–45. doi:10.1016/j.appdev.2017.01.006Google Scholar

Szechter, L. E., & Carey, E. J. (2009). Gravitating toward science: Parent–child interactions at a gravitational-wave observatory. Science Education, 93(5), 846–858. doi:10.1002/sce.20333Google Scholar

Tierney, P., & Farmer, S. M. (2011). Creative self-efficacy development and creative performance over time. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(2), 277–293. doi:10.1037/a0020952Google Scholar

Torrance, E. P. (1968). A longitudinal examination of the fourth grade slump in creativity. Gifted Child Quarterly, 12(4), 195–199. doi:10.1177/001698626801200401Google Scholar

van Schijndel, T. J., Visser, I., van Bers, B. M., & Raijmakers, M. E. (2015). Preschoolers perform more informative experiments after observing theory-violating evidence. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 131, 104–119. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2014.11.008Google Scholar

Willard, A. K., Busch, J. T., Cullum, K. A., Letourneau, S. M., Sobel, D. M., Callanan, M., & Legare, C. H. (2019). Explain this, explore that: A study of parent–child interaction in a children’s museum. Child Development, 90(5), e598–e617. doi:10.1111/cdev.13232Google Scholar

Wolf, B., & Wood, E. (2012). Integrating scaffolding experiences for the youngest visitors in museums. Journal of Museum Education, 37(1), 29–37. doi:10.1080/10598650.2012.11510715Google Scholar

Yu, Y., Bonawitz, E., & Shafto, P. (2019). Pedagogical questions in parent–child conversations. Child Development, 90(1), 147–161. doi:10.1111/cdev.12850Google Scholar

Zosh, J. M., Hirsh-Pasek, K., Hopkins, E. J., Jensen, H., Liu, C., Neale, D., … Whitebread, D. (2018). Accessing the inaccessible: Redefining play as a spectrum. Frontiers in Psychology, 9(1124). doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01124Google Scholar

Bean, V., Farmer, N. M., & Kerr, B. A. (2015). An exploration of women’s engagement in Makerspaces. Gifted and Talented International, 30(1–2), 61–67. doi:10.1080/15332276.2015.1137456Google Scholar

Bullock, S. M., & Sator, A. J. (2015). Maker pedagogy and science teacher education. Journal of the Canadian Association for Curriculum Studies, 13(1), 60–87.Google Scholar

Byrne, D., & Davidson, C. (2015). Make schools: State of making report. Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon University Press.Google Scholar

Caballero-García, P. A., & Grau Fernandez, T. (2018). Makerspaces and scientific creativity level of middle school students. Global Journal of Arts Education, 8(2), 75–83. doi:10.18844/gjae.v8i2.3767Google Scholar

Carson, S. H., Peterson, J. B., & Higgins, D. M. (2005). Reliability, validity, and factor structure of the creative achievement questionnaire. Creativity Research Journal, 17(1), 37–50. doi:10.1207/s15326934crj1701_4Google Scholar

Chan, M. M., & Blikstein, P. (2018). Exploring problem-based learning for middle school design and engineering education in digital fabrication laboratories. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 12(2), 7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cipolla, C. (2019). Build it better: Tinkering in feminist maker pedagogy. Women’s Studies, 48(3), 261–282. doi:10.1080/00497878.2019.1593842Google Scholar

Colangelo, N., Assouline, S. G., Croft, L., Baldus, C., & Ihrig, D. (2003). Young inventors. In Shavinina, L. V. (Ed.), The international handbook on innovation (pp. 281–292). Amsterdam: Elsevier. doi:10.1016/b978–008044198-6/50019-xGoogle Scholar

Colangelo, N., Assouline, S. G., Kerr, B., Huesman, R., & Johnson, D. (2007, Sept.). Mechanical inventiveness: A three-phase study. The origins and development of high ability: Ciba Foundation Symposium 178 (pp. 160–174). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Colangelo, N., Kerr, B., Hallowell, K., Huesman, R., & Gaeth, J. (1992). The Iowa Inventiveness Inventory: Toward a measure of mechanical inventiveness. Creativity Research Journal, 5(2), 157–163. doi:10.1080/10400419209534429Google Scholar

Dougherty, D. (2012). The maker movement. Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization, 7(3), 11–14.Google Scholar

Farmer, N. M. (2018). Maker meaning: An exploration of the maker movement, career adaptability, and life satisfaction (Order No. 10811828). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global (2070378122). Retrieved from https://www2lib.ku.edu/login?url=https://www-proquest-com.www2.lib.ku.edu/dissertations-theses/maker-meaning-exploration-movement-career/docview/2070378122/se-2?accountid-14556Google Scholar

Fasso, W., & Knight, B. A. (2020) Identity development in school makerspaces: Intentional design. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 30(2), 275–294. doi:10.1007/s10798–019-09501-zGoogle Scholar

Flores, C. (2018). Problem-based science, a constructionist approach to science literacy in middle school. International Journal of Child–Computer Interaction, 16, 25–30. doi:10.1016/j.ijcci.2017.11.001Google Scholar

Foster, C., Wigner, A., Lande, M., & Jordan, S. S. (2018). Learning from the parallel pathways of makers to broaden pathways to engineering. International Journal of STEM Education, 5(1), 6. doi:10.1186/s40594–017-0098-8Google Scholar

Godhe, A. L., Lilja, P., & Selwyn, N. (2019). Making sense of making: Critical issues in the integration of maker education into schools. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 28(3), 317–328. doi:10.1080/1475939x.2019.1610040Google Scholar

Graven, M., Lerman, S., & Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 6(2), 185–194. doi:10.1023/A:1023947624004Google Scholar

Gunnarsdóttir, R. (2013). Innovation education: Defining the phenomenon. In Shavinina, L. V. (Ed.), The Routledge international handbook of innovation education (pp. 47–58). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar

Halverson, E. R., & Sheridan, K. (2014). The maker movement in education. Harvard Educational Review, 84(4), 495–504. doi:10.17763/haer.84.4.34j1g68140382063Google Scholar

Hatch, M. (2013). The maker movement manifesto: Rules for innovation in the new world of crafters, hackers, and tinkerers. New York: McGraw-Hill Professional.Google Scholar

Holland, J. L. (1997). Making vocational choices: A theory of vocational personalities and work environments. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar

Jordan, S., & Lande, M. (2014, Oct.). Might young makers be the engineers of the future?. 2014 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) Proceedings (pp. 1–4). Madrid: IEEE.Google Scholar

Kafai, Y., Fields, D., & Searle, K. (2014). Electronic textiles as disruptive designs: Supporting and challenging maker activities in schools. Harvard Educational Review, 84(4), 532–556.Google Scholar

Kerr, B., & McKay, R. (2013). Searching for tomorrow’s innovators: Profiling creative adolescents. Creativity Research Journal, 25(1), 21–32.Google Scholar

Kerr, B., & Vuyk, M. A. (2013). Career development for creatively gifted students: What parents, teachers, and counselors need to know. In Kim, K. H., Kaufman, J. C., Baer, J., & Sriraman, B. (Eds.), Creatively gifted students are not like other gifted students (pp. 137–151). Brill Sense. doi:10.1007/978-94-6209-149-8_10Google Scholar

Kim, K. H., Kaufman, J. C., Baer, J., & Sriraman, B. (Eds.). (2013). Creatively gifted students are not like other gifted students: Research, theory, and practice. Brill Sense.Google Scholar

Kirkendall, E., & Kerr, B. A. (2013). Lawrence Creates Makerspace. LCM Newsletter, 1(1), 3–4.Google Scholar

Kivinen, O., & Ristela, P. (2003). From constructivism to a pragmatist conception of learning. Oxford Review of Education, 29(3), 363–375.Google Scholar

Lande, M., Jordan, S. S., & Weiner, S. (2017). Making people and projects: Implications for designing making-based learning experiences [Paper presentation]. Pacific Southwest Section Meeting Conference, Tempe, AZ.Google Scholar

Lee, B., & Kim, H. (2019). Exploring the learning process of makerspace-based maker education in school. Journal of Educational Technology, 35(2), 159–192. doi:10.17232/kset.35.2.159Google Scholar

Lichtenberg, J., Woock, L., & Wright, M. (2008). Ready to innovate: Are educators and executives aligned on the creative readiness of the U.S. workforce? The Conference Board, Research Report, 1424, 1–7.Google Scholar

Linn, M. C., & Petersen, A. C. (1985). Emergence and characterization of sex differences in spatial ability: A meta-analysis. Child Development, 1479–1498.Google Scholar

Marsh, J., Wood, E., Chesworth, L., Nisha, B., Nutbrown, B., & Olney, B. (2019). Makerspaces in early childhood education: Principles of pedagogy and practice. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 26(3), 221–233. doi:10.1080/10749039.2019.1655651Google Scholar

Masters, A. S. (2018). How making and maker spaces have contributed to diversity & inclusion in engineering: A [non-traditional] literature review [Paper presentation]. Collaborative Network for Engineering and Computing Diversity Conference, Crystal City, VA.Google Scholar

Newcombe, N. S., & Huttenlocher, J. (2000). Learning, development, and conceptual change. Making Space: The Development of Spatial Representation and Reasoning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Oplinger, J., Lande, M., Jordan, S., & Camarena, L. (2016). Making leaders: Leadership characteristics of makers and engineers in the maker community. American Journal of Engineering Education (AJEE), 7(2), 65–82.Google Scholar

Ord, J. (2012). John Dewey and experiential learning: Developing the theory of youth work. Youth & Policy, 108(1), 55–72.Google Scholar

Reilly, D., Neumann, D. L., & Andrews, G. (2017). Gender differences in spatial ability: Implications for STEM education and approaches to reducing the gender gap for parents and educators. In Khine, M. (Ed.), Visual–spatial ability in STEM education (pp. 195–224). Cham: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-44385-0_10Google Scholar

Sheridan, K. M., Halverson, E. R., Litts, B. K., Brahms, L., Jacobs-Priebe, L., & Owens, T. (2014). Learning in the making: A comparative case study of three makerspaces. Harvard Educational Review, 84(4), 505–531. doi:10.17763/haer.84.4.brr34733723j648uGoogle Scholar

Sjöberg, B. (2009). Design theory and design practice within Sloyd education. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 28(1), 71–81. doi:10.1111/j.1476-8070.2009.01594.xGoogle Scholar

Uttal, D. H., Meadow, N. G., Tipton, E., Hand, L. L., Alden, A. R., Warren, C., & Newcombe, N. S. (2013). The malleability of spatial skills: A meta-analysis of training studies. Psychological Bulletin, 139(2), 352–402. doi:10.1037/a0028446Google Scholar

Vongkulluksn, V. W., Matewos, A. M., Sinatra, G. M., & Marsh, J. A. (2018). Motivational factors in makerspaces: A mixed methods study of elementary school students’ situational interest, self-efficacy, and achievement emotions. International Journal of STEM Education, 5(1). doi:10.1186/s40594–018-0129-0Google Scholar

Weiner, S. (2017). The new democratic innovators: Young makers and the future of user-centered innovation [Poster presentation]. 2017 Society for the Study of New and Emerging Technology (S.NET) Meeting, Tempe, AZ.Google Scholar

Weiner, S., Lande, M., & Jordan, S. (2018). The engineer of 2020, in the making: Understanding how young adults develop maker identities and the implications for education reform. International Journal of Engineering and Education, 34(2), 833–842.Google Scholar

Abbey, A., & Dickson, J. (1983). R&D work climate and innovation in semiconductors. The Academy of Management Journal, 26(2), 362–368. doi:10.2307/255984Google Scholar

Aleksic, D., Cerne, M., Dysvik, A., & Skerlavaj, M. (2016). I want to be creative, but … preference for creativity, perceived clear outcome goals, work enjoyment, and creative performance. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 25(3), 363–383. doi:10.1080/1359432X.2015.1077809Google Scholar

Allen, J., Reiter-Palmon, R., Prange, K., Shuffler, M., & Barber, E. (2019). Leading after-action reviews among emergency responder teams: How perceptions of leader behaviors relate to proximal and distal outcomes. Occupational Health Science, 3(1), 59–81. doi:10.1007/s41542-019-00032-6Google Scholar

Amabile, T. (1985). Motivation and creativity: Effects of motivational orientation on creative writers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48(2), 393–399. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.48.2.393Google Scholar

Amabile, T. (1996). Creativity in context. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar

Amabile, T., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. The Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1154–1184. doi:10.2307/256995Google Scholar

Amabile, T., Hennessey, B., & Grossman, B. (1986). Social influences on creativity: The effects of contracted-for reward. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(1), 14–23. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.50.1.14Google Scholar

Amabile, T., Schatzel, E., Moneta, G., & Kramer, S. (2004). Leader behaviors and the work environment for creativity: Perceived leader support. The Leadership Quarterly, 15(1), 5–32. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2003.12.003Google Scholar

Anderson, N., De Dreu, C., & Nijstad, B. (2004). The routinization of innovation research: A constructively critical review of the state-of-the-science. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(2), 147–173. doi:10.1002/job.236Google Scholar

Arad, S., Hanson, M. A., & Schnieder, R. J. (1997). A framework for the study of relationships between organizational characteristics and organizational innovation. Journal of Creative Behavior, 31(1), 42–58. doi:10.1002/j.2162-6057.1997.tb00780.xGoogle Scholar

Arreola, N., & Reiter-Palmon, R. (2016). The effect of problem construction creativity on solution creativity across multiple everyday problems. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 10(3), 287–295. doi:10.1037/a0040389Google Scholar

Baas, M., Roskes, M., Sligte, D., Nijstad, B., & De Dreu, C. (2013). Personality and creativity: The dual pathway to creativity model and a research agenda. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 7(10), 732–748. doi:10.1111/spc3.12062Google Scholar

Baer, J. M. (1988). Long-term effects of creativity training with middle school students. Journal of Early Adolescence, 8, 183–193. doi:10.1177/0272431688082006Google Scholar

Barczak, G., Lassk, F., & Mulki, J. (2010). Antecedents of team creativity: An examination of team emotional intelligence, team trust and collaborative culture. Creativity and Innovation Management, 19(4), 332–345. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8691.2010.00574.xGoogle Scholar

Basadur, M., Runco, M. A., & Vega, L. (2000). Understanding how creative thinking skills, attitudes and behaviors work together: A causal process model. Journal of Creative Behavior, 34(2), 77–100. doi:10.1002/j.2162-6057.2000.tb01203.xGoogle Scholar

Berg, J. (2016). Balancing on the creative highwire: Forecasting the success of novel ideas in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 61(3), 433–468. doi:10.1177/0001839216642211Google Scholar

Blair, C., & Mumford, M. (2007). Errors in idea evaluation: Preference for the unoriginal? Journal of Creative Behavior, 41(3), 197–222. doi:10.1002/j.2162-6057.2007.tb01288.xGoogle Scholar

Bradley, B., Postlethwaite, B., Klotz, A., Hamdani, M., & Brown, K. (2012). Reaping the benefits of task conflict in teams: The critical role of team psychological safety climate. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(1), 151–158. doi:10.1037/a0024200Google Scholar

Carmeli, A., Reiter-Palmon, R., & Ziv, E. (2010). Inclusive leadership and employee involvement in creative tasks in the workplace: The mediating role of psychological safety. Creativity Research Journal, 22(3), 250–260. doi:10.1080/10400419.2010.504654Google Scholar

Carmeli, A., Sheaffer, Z., Binyamin, G., Reiter-Palmon, R., & Shimoni, T. (2014). Transformational leadership and creative problem-solving: The mediating role of psychological safety and reflexivity. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 48(2), 115–135. doi:10.1002/jocb.43Google Scholar

Chen, M. H. (2006). Understanding the benefits and detriments of conflict on team creativity process. Creativity and Innovation Management, 15, 105–116. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8691.2006.00373.xGoogle Scholar

Collins, M. A., & Amabile, T. M. (1999). Motivation and creativity. In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 297–312). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Conti, R., Coon, H., & Amabile, T. M. (1996). Evidence to support the componential model of creativity: Secondary analyses of three studies. Creativity Research Journal, 9(4), 385–389. doi:10.1207/s15326934crj0904_9CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crowe, E., & Higgins, E. (1997). Regulatory focus and strategic inclinations: Promotion and prevention in decision-making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 69(2), 117–132. doi:10.1006/obhd.1996.2675Google Scholar

Curseu, P., & Schruijer, S. (2010). Does conflict shatter trust or does trust obliterate conflict? Revisiting the relationships between team diversity, conflict, and trust. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, Practice, 14(1), 66–79. doi:10.1037/a0017104Google Scholar

Damanpour, F. (1991). Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. The Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), 555–590. doi:10.5465/256406Google Scholar

DeChurch, L., Mesmer-Magnus, J., & Doty, D. (2013). Moving beyond relationship and task conflict: Toward a process–state perspective. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 98(4), 559–578. doi:10.1037/a0032896Google Scholar

Desivilya, H., Somech, A., & Lidgoster, H. (2010). Innovation and conflict management in work teams: The effects of team identification and task and relationship conflict. Negotiation and Conflict Management Research, 3(1), 28–48. doi:10.1111/j.1750-4716.2009.00048.xGoogle Scholar

De Dreu, C. (2006). When too little or too much hurts: Evidence for a curvilinear relationship between task conflict and innovation in teams. Journal of Management, 32(1), 83–107. doi:10.1177/0149206305277795Google Scholar

de Wit, F., Greer, L., & Jehn, K. (2012). The paradox of intragroup conflict: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(2), 360–390. doi:10.1037/a0024844Google Scholar

Dewey, J. (1910). How we think. Boston, MA: D.C. Heath.Google Scholar

Dougherty, D., & Hardy, C. (1996). Sustained product innovation in large, mature organizations: Overcoming innovation-to-organization problems. The Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1120–1153. doi:10.2307/256994Google Scholar

Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350–383. doi:10.2307/2666999Google Scholar

Eisenberger, R., & Cameron, J. (1996). Detrimental effects of reward. Reality or myth? The American Psychologist, 51(11), 1153–1166. doi:10.1037/0003-066x.51.11.1153Google Scholar

Ericsson, K. (1999). Creative expertise as superior reproducible performance: Innovative and flexible aspects of expert performance. Psychological Inquiry, 10(4), 329–333.Google Scholar

Ettlie, J. (1983). Organizational policy and innovation among suppliers to the food processing sector. The Academy of Management Journal, 26(1), 27–44. doi:10.2307/256133Google Scholar

Fairchild, J., & Hunter, S. (2014). “We’ve got creative differences”: The effects of task conflict and participative safety on team creative performance. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 48(1), 64–87. doi:10.1002/jocb.41Google Scholar

Farh, J., Lee, C., & Farh, C. (2010). Task conflict and team creativity: A question of how much and when. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(6), 1173–1180. doi:10.1037/a0020015Google Scholar

Feist, G. (1998). A meta-analysis of personality in scientific and artistic creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2(4), 290–309. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0204_5Google Scholar

Finke, R., Ward, T., & Smith, S. (1992). Creative cognition: Theory, research, and applications. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Friedman, R., & Forster, J. (2001). The effects of promotion and prevention cues on creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(6), 1001–1013. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.81.6.1001Google Scholar

Galbraith, J. (1982). Designing the innovating organization. Organizational Dynamics, 10(3), 5–25. doi:10.1016/0090-2616(82)90033-XGoogle Scholar

Getzels, J., & Csikszentmihályi, M. (1975). From problem solving to problem finding. In Taylor, I. A. & Getzels, J. W. (Eds.), Perspectives in creativity (pp. 96–120). Chicago, IL: Aldine.Google Scholar

Gong, Y., Wu, J., Song, L., & Zhang, Z. (2017). Dual tuning in creative processes: Joint contributions of intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(5), 829–844. doi:10.1037/apl0000185Google Scholar

Greve, H. (2003). A behavioral theory of R&D expenditures and innovations: Evidence from shipbuilding. The Academy of Management Journal, 46(6), 685–702. doi:10.5465/30040661Google Scholar

Guilford, J. (1950). Creativity. The American Psychologist, 5(9), 444–454. doi:10.1037/h0063487Google Scholar

Hambrick, D., & Mason, P. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. The Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 193–206. doi:10.5465/amr.1984.4277628Google Scholar

Hameed, M., Counsell, S., & Swift, S. (2012). A conceptual model for the process of IT innovation adoption in organizations. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 29(3), 358–390. doi:10.1016/j.jengtecman.2012.03.007Google Scholar

Hennessey, B., & Amabile, T. (2010). Creativity. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 569–598. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100416Google Scholar

Hornberg, J., & Reiter-Palmon, R. (2017). Creativity and the Big Five personality traits: Is the relationship dependent on the creativity measure? In Feist, G., Reiter-Palmon, R., & Kaufman, J. (Eds.), Handbook of personality and creativity (pp. 275–293). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Howell, J., & Shea, C. (2006). Effects of champion behavior, team potency, and external communication activities on predicting team performance. Group & Organization Management, 31(2), 180–211. doi:10.1177/1059601104273067Google Scholar

Hülsheger, U., Anderson, N., & Salgado, J. (2009). Team-level predictors of innovation at work: A comprehensive meta-analysis spanning three decades of research. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(5), 1128–1145. doi:10.1037/a0015978Google Scholar

Hunter, S., Bedell, K., & Mumford, M. (2005). Dimensions of creative climate: A general taxonomy. The International Journal of Creativity & Problem Solving, 15(2), 97–116. doi:10.1037/e518572013-253Google Scholar

Hunter, S., Bedell, K., & Mumford, M. (2007). Climate for creativity: A quantitative review. Creativity Research Journal, 19(1), 69–90. doi:10.1080/10400410709336883Google Scholar

Hunter, S., & Cushenbery, L. (2015). Is being a jerk necessary for originality? Examining the role of disagreeableness in the sharing and utilization of original ideas. Journal of Business and Psychology, 30(4), 621–639. doi:10.1007/s10869-014-9386-1Google Scholar

IBM (2010). Capitalizing on complexity: Insights from the global chief executive officer study. Somers, NY: IBM Global Business Services.Google Scholar

Jaussi, K., & Dionne, S. (2003). Leading for creativity: The role of unconventional leader behavior. The Leadership Quarterly, 14(4), 475–498. doi:10.1016/S1048-9843(03)00048-1Google Scholar

Jehn, K. A. (1995). A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(2), 256–282. doi:10.2307/2393638Google Scholar

Jehn, K. A. (1997). A qualitative analysis of conflict types and dimensions in organizational groups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(3), 530–557. doi:10.2307/2393737Google Scholar

Jehn, K. A., & Mannix, E. (2001). The dynamic nature of conflict: A longitudinal study of intragroup conflict and group performance. The Academy of Management Journal, 44(2), 238–251. doi:10.2307/3069453Google Scholar

Jehn, K. A., Greer, L., Levine, S. & Szulanski, G. (2008). The effects of conflict types, dimensions, and emergent states on group outcomes. Group Decision and Negotiation, 17 , 465–495. doi:10.1007/s10726-008-9107-0Google Scholar

Kahn, S. (1990). What occupational safety tells us about political power in union firms. The Rand Journal of Economics, 21(3), 481–496. doi:10.2307/2555621Google Scholar

Kanter, R. (1985). Innovation – the only hope for times ahead? Nursing Economics, 3(3), 178–182.Google Scholar

Kaufman, J., Baer, J., Cropley, D., Reiter-Palmon, R., & Sinnett, S. (2013). Furious activity vs. understanding: How much expertise is needed to evaluate creative work? Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 7(4), 332–340. doi:10.1037/a0034809Google Scholar

Kaufman, J., & Beghetto, R. (2013). Do people recognize the Four Cs? Examining layperson conceptions of creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 7(3), 229–236. doi:10.1037/a0033295Google Scholar

Keller, R. (2001). Cross-functional project groups in research and new product development: Diversity, communications, job stress, and outcomes. The Academy of Management Journal, 44(3), 547–555. doi:10.2307/3069369Google Scholar

Kessel, M., Kratzer, J., & Schultz, C. (2012). Psychological safety, knowledge sharing, and creative performance in healthcare teams. Creativity and Innovation Management, 21(2), 147–157. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8691.2012.00635.xGoogle Scholar

Kim, K. (2008). Meta-analyses of the relationship of creative achievement to both IQ and divergent thinking test scores. Journal of Creative Behavior, 42(2), 106–130. doi:10.1002/j.2162-6057.2008.tb01290.xGoogle Scholar

Kozlowski, S., & Ilgen, D. (2006). Enhancing the effectiveness of work groups and teams. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 7(3), 77–124. doi:10.1111/j.1529-1006.2006.00030.xGoogle Scholar

Kratzer, J., Leenders, O., & van Engelen, J. (2004). Stimulating the potential: Creative performance and communication in innovation teams. Creativity and Innovation Management, 13(1), 63–71. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8691.2004.00294.xGoogle Scholar

Kurtzberg, T., & Amabile, T. (2001). From Guilford to creative synergy: Opening the black box of team-level creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 13(3&4), 285–294. doi:10.1207/s15326934crj1334_06Google Scholar

Licuanan, B., Dailey, L., & Mumford, M. (2007). Idea evaluation: Error in evaluating highly original ideas. Journal of Creative Behavior, 41(1), 1–27. doi:10.1002/j.2162-6057.2007.tb01279.xGoogle Scholar

Lovelace, K., Shapiro, D., & Weingart, L. (2001). Maximizing cross-functional new product teams’ innovativeness and constraint adherence: A conflict communications perspective. The Academy of Management Journal, 44(4), 779–793. doi:10.2307/3069415Google Scholar

Ma, H. (2009). The effect size of variables associated with creativity: A meta-analysis. Creativity Research Journal, 21(1), 30–42. doi:10.1080/10400410802633400Google Scholar

MacCurtain, S., Flood, P., Ramamoorthy, N., West, M., & Dawson, J. (2010). The top management team, reflexivity, knowledge sharing and new product performance: A study of the Irish software industry. Creativity and Innovation Management, 19(3), 219–232. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8691.2010.00564.xGoogle Scholar

Mannix, E., & Neale, M. (2005). What differences make a difference? The promise and reality of diverse teams in organizations. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 6(2), 31–55. doi:10.1111/j.1529-1006.2005.00022.xGoogle Scholar

Marks, M., Mathieu, J., & Zaccaro, S. (2001). A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes. The Academy of Management Review, 26(3), 356–376. doi:10.5465/amr.2001.4845785Google Scholar

Meyer, A., & Goes, J. (1988). Organizational assimilation of innovations: A multilevel contextual analysis. The Academy of Management Journal, 31(4), 897–923. doi:10.2307/256344Google Scholar

Mumford, M., & Hunter, S. (2005). Multi-level issues in strategy and methods. In Innovation in organizations: A multi-level perspective on creativity, 9–73. doi:10.1016/S1475-9144(05)04001-4Google Scholar

Mumford, M., Lonergan, D., & Scott, G. (2002). Evaluating creative ideas: Processes, standards, and context. Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines, 22(1), 21–30. doi:10.5840/inquiryctnews20022213Google Scholar

Mumford, M., Mobley, M., Reiter‐Palmon, R., Uhlman, C., & Doares, L. (1991). Process analytic models of creative capacities. Creativity Research Journal, 4(2), 91–122. doi:10.1080/10400419109534380Google Scholar

Mumford, M., Scott, G., Gaddis, B., & Strange, J. (2002). Leading creative people: Orchestrating expertise and relationships. The Leadership Quarterly, 13(6), 705–750. doi:10.1016/S1048-9843(02)00158-3Google Scholar

Nicholson, N., & West, M. (1988). Managerial job change: Men and women in transition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Ohly, S., & Fritz, C. (2010). Work characteristics, challenge appraisal, creativity, and proactive behavior: A multi-level study. Process and Outcome: Gender Differences in the Assessment of Justice, 31(4), 543–565. doi:10.1002/job.633Google Scholar

Oldham, G., & Cummings, A. (1996). Employee creativity: Personal and contextual factors at work. The Academy of Management Journal, 39(3), 607–634. doi:10.5465/256657Google Scholar

Parnes, S., & Noller, R. (1972). Applied creativity: The creative studies project: Part 1 – The development*. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 6(1), 11–22. doi:10.1002/j.2162-6057.1972.tb00903.xGoogle Scholar

Perry-Smith, J., & Mannucci, P. (2017). From creativity to innovation: The social network drivers of the four phases of the idea journey. Academy of Management Review, 42(1), 53–79. doi:10.5465/amr.2014.0462Google Scholar

Puryear, J., Kettler, T., & Rinn, A. (2017). Relationships of personality to differential conceptions of creativity: A systematic review. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 11(1), 59–68. doi:10.1037/aca0000079Google Scholar

Redmond, M., Mumford, M., & Teach, R. (1993). Putting creativity to work: Effects of leader behavior on subordinate creativity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 55(1), 120–151. doi:10.1006/obhd.1993.1027Google Scholar

Reiter-Palmon, R., Herman, A., & Yammarino, F. (2008). Multi-level issues in creativity and innovation. In creativity and cognitive processes: Multi-level linkages between individual and team cognition, 203–267. doi:10.1016/S1475-9144(07)00009-4Google Scholar

Reiter-Palmon, R., & Illies, J. (2004). Leadership and creativity: Understanding leadership from a creative problem-solving perspective. The Leadership Quarterly, 15(1), 55–77. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2003.12.005Google Scholar

Reiter-Palmon, R., & Leone, S. (2019). Group dynamics and team creativity: The contribution of Kurt Lewin to the study of teams, creativity, and innovation. In Glǎveanu, V. (Ed.), The creativity reader (pp. 447–462). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Reiter-Palmon, R., Mitchell, K., & Royston, R. (2019). Improving creativity in organizational settings: Applying research on creativity to organizations. In Sternberg, R. J. and Kaufman, J. C. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity (2nd ed., pp. 515–545). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Reiter-Palmon, R., Mumford, M., O’Connor Boes, J., & Runco, M. A. (1997). Problem construction and creativity: The role of ability, cue consistency, and active processing. Creativity Research Journal, 10(1), 9–23. doi:10.1207/s15326934crj1001_2Google Scholar

Reiter-Palmon, R., & Paulus, P. (2020). Cognitive and social processes in team creativity. In Mumford, M. D. (Ed.), Creativity and innovation in organizations (pp. 161–190). New York: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar

Reiter-Palmon, R., & Robinson, E. (2009). Problem identification and construction: What do we know, what is the future? Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 3(1), 43–47. doi:10.1037/a0014629Google Scholar

Reiter-Palmon, R., Wigert, B., & de Vreede, T. (2011). Team creativity and innovation: The effect of team composition, social processes and cognition. In Mumford, M. D. (Ed.), Handbook of organizational creativity (pp. 295–326). Academic Press.Google Scholar

Rodríguez-Sánchez, A., Devloo, T., Rico, R., Salanova, M., & Anseel, F. (2017). What makes creative teams tick? Cohesion, engagement, and performance across creativity tasks: A three-wave study. Group & Organization Management, 42(4), 521–547. doi:10.1177/1059601116636476Google Scholar

Rostan, S. (1994). Problem finding, problem solving, and cognitive controls: An empirical investigation of critically acclaimed productivity. Creativity Research Journal, 7(2), 97–110. doi:10.1080/10400419409534517Google Scholar

Runco, M. A., & Acar, S. (2012). Divergent thinking as an indicator of creative potential. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 66–75. doi:10.1080/10400419.2012.652929Google Scholar

Runco, M. A., & Chand, I. (1995). Cognition and creativity. Educational Psychology Review, 7(3), 243–265. doi:10.1007/bf02213373Google Scholar

Runco, M. A., & Smith, W. (1992). Interpersonal and intrapersonal evaluations of creative ideas. Personality and Individual Differences, 13(3), 295–302. doi:10.1016/0191-8869(92)90105-XGoogle Scholar

Salas, E., Stagl, K., Burke, C., & Goodwin, G. (2007). Fostering team effectiveness in organizations: Toward an integrative theoretical framework. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 52, 185–243. doi:10.2307/j.ctt1djmh0r.9Google Scholar

Schraw, G., Dunkle, M., & Bendixen, L. (1995). Cognitive processes in well-defined and ill-defined problem solving. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 9(6), 523–538. doi:10.1002/acp.2350090605Google Scholar

Scott, G., Leritz, L., & Mumford, M. (2004). The effectiveness of creativity training: A quantitative review. Creativity Research Journal, 16(4), 361–388. doi:10.1080/10400410409534549Google Scholar

Scott, S., & Bruce, R. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. The Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 580–607. doi:10.2307/256701Google Scholar

Shalley, C. (1991). Effects of productivity goals, creativity goals, and personal discretion on individual creativity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(2), 179–185. doi:10.1037//0021-9010.76.2.179Google Scholar

Shalley, C. (1995). Effects of coaction, expected evaluation, and goal setting on creativity and productivity. The Academy of Management Journal, 38(2), 483–503. doi:10.2307/256689Google Scholar

Shalley, C., & Gilson, L. (2004). What leaders need to know: A review of social and contextual factors that can foster or hinder creativity. The Leadership Quarterly, 15(1), 33–53. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2003.12.004Google Scholar

Shalley, C., & Perry-Smith, J. (2001). Effects of social-psychological factors on creative performance: The role of informational and controlling expected evaluation and modeling experience. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 84(1), 1–22. doi:10.1006/obhd.2000.2918Google Scholar

Shalley, C., Zhou, J., & Oldham, G. (2004). The effects of personal and contextual characteristics on creativity: Where should we go from here? Journal of Management, 30(6), 933–958. doi:10.1016/j.jm.2004.06.007Google Scholar

Sharma, A. (1999). Central dilemmas of managing innovation in large firms. California Management Review, 41, 65–85. doi:10.2307/41166001Google Scholar

Silvia, P., Kaufman, J., Reiter-Palmon, R., & Wigert, B. (2011). Cantankerous creativity: Honesty-humility, agreeableness, and the HEXACO structure of creative achievement. Personality and Individual Differences, 51(5), 687–689. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2011.06.011Google Scholar

Sonenshein, S. (2014). How organizations foster the creative use of resources. Academy of Management Journal, 57(3), 814–848. doi:10.5465/amj.2012.0048Google Scholar

Sternberg, R. J., & O’Hara, L. A. (1999). Creativity and Intelligence. In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 251–272). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Talke, K., Salomo, S., & Kock, A. (2011). Top management team diversity and strategic innovation orientation: The relationship and consequences for innovativeness and performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28(6), 819–832. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5885.2011.00851.xGoogle Scholar

Thamhain, H. (2003). Managing innovative R&D teams. R&D Management, 33(3), 297–311.Google Scholar

Tierney, P., Farmer, S., & Graen, G. (1999). An examination of leadership and employee creativity: The relevance of traits and relationships. Personnel Psychology, 52(3), 591–620. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1999.tb00173.xGoogle Scholar

Vernon, D., & Hocking, I. (2016). Beyond belief: Structured techniques prove more effective than a placebo intervention in a problem construction task. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 19, 153–159. doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2015.10.009Google Scholar

Vincent, A., Decker, B., & Mumford, M. (2002). Divergent thinking, intelligence, and expertise: A test of alternative models. Creativity Research Journal, 14(2), 163–178. doi:10.1207/s15326934crj1402_4Google Scholar

Wallas, G. (1928). The great society: A psychological analysis. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Wang, D., & Hong, Y. (2010, Oct.). Word support and team creativity: The mediating effect of team psychological safety. Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, 1873–1876. doi:10.1109/ICIEEM.2010.5645894Google Scholar

Watts, L., Steele, L., Medeiros, K., & Mumford, M. (2019). Minding the gap between generation and implementation: Effects of idea source, goals, and climate on selecting and refining creative ideas. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 13(1), 2–14. doi:10.1037/aca0000157Google Scholar

West, M. (2002). Sparkling fountains or stagnant ponds: An integrative model of creativity and innovation implementation in work groups: Creativity and innovation implementation. Applied Psychology, 51(3), 355–387. doi:10.1111/1464-0597.00951Google Scholar

West, M., Hirst, G., Richter, A., & Shipton, H. (2004). Twelve steps to heaven: Successfully managing change through developing innovative teams. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 13(2), 269–299. doi:10.1080/1359432044400009Google Scholar

West, M. A., & Richter, A. W. (2008). Climates and cultures for innovation and creativity at work. Handbook of Organizational Creativity, 211–236.Google Scholar

Woodman, R., Sawyer, J., & Griffin, R. (1993). Toward a theory of organizational creativity. The Academy of Management Review, 18(2), 293–321. doi:10.5465/amr.1993.3997517Google Scholar

Yoon, W., Kim, S., & Song, J. (2016). Top management team characteristics and organizational creativity. Review of Managerial Science, 10(4), 757–779. doi:10.1007/s11846-015-0175-7Google Scholar

Yong, K., Sauer, S., & Mannix, E. (2014). Conflict and creativity in interdisciplinary teams. Small Group Research, 45(3), 266–289. doi:10.1177/1046496414530789Google Scholar

Yoon, H., Sung, S., Choi, J., Lee, K., & Kim, S. (2015). Tangible and intangible rewards and employee creativity: The mediating role of situational extrinsic motivation. Creativity Research Journal, 27(4), 383–393. doi:10.1080/10400419.2015.1088283Google Scholar

Zhou, J., & George, J. (2001). When job dissatisfaction leads to creativity: Encouraging the expression of voice. The Academy of Management Journal, 44(4), 682–696. doi:10.2307/3069410Google Scholar

Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar

Baldwin, J. M. (1894). Imitation: A chapter in the natural history of consciousness. Mind, 9, 26–55. doi:10.1093/mind/iii.9.26Google Scholar

Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Beghetto, R. A., & Karwowski, M. (2017). Toward untangling creative self-beliefs. In Karwowski, M & Kaufman, J. C. (Eds.), Explorations in creativity research. The creative self: Effect of beliefs, self-efficacy, mindset, and identity (pp. 3–22). New York: Elsevier. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-809790-8.00001-7Google Scholar

Bruner, J. (1999). Infancy and culture: A story. In Chaiklin, S., Hedegaard, M., & Jensen, U. J. (Eds.), Activity theory and social practice: Cultural-historical approaches (pp. 225–234). Aarhus: Aarhus University Press.Google Scholar

Bruner, J., & Haste, H. (1987). Introduction. In Bruner, J. & Haste, H. (Eds.), Making sense: The child’s construction of the world (pp. 1–25). London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Corsaro, W. A. (1997). The sociology of childhood. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.Google Scholar

Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1999). Implications of a systems perspective for the study of creativity. In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 313–335). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Dewey, J. (1934). Art as experience. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar

Feldman, D. H. (1999). The development of creativity. In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 169–186). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Festinger, L. (1983). The human legacy. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Foster, L. (2004). Early influences on creativity in Great Britain. In Fryer, M. (Ed.). Creativity and cultural diversity (pp. 131–136). Leeds: The Creativity Centre Educational Trust.Google Scholar

Gardner, H. (1993). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Gibson, J. J. (1986). The ecological approach to visual perception. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Glăveanu, V. P. (2010). Paradigms in the study of creativity: Introducing the perspective of cultural psychology. New Ideas in Psychology, 28, 79–93. doi:10.1016/j.newideapsych.2009.07.007Google Scholar

Glăveanu, V. P. (2011). Is the lightbulb still on? Social representations of creativity in a Western context. The International Journal of Creativity & Problem Solving, 21(1), 53–72. doi:10.4324/9781315135625-13Google Scholar

Glăveanu, V. P. (2012). What can be done with an egg? Creativity, material objects and the theory of affordances. Journal of Creative Behavior, 46(3), 192–208. doi:10.1002/jocb.13Google Scholar

Glăveanu, V. P. (2013). Rewriting the language of creativity: The Five A’s framework. Review of General Psychology, 17, 69–81. doi:10.1037/a0029528Google Scholar

Glăveanu, V. P. (2015a). Unpacking the triad of creativity, culture, and development: An exercise in relational thinking. In Tan, A. G. & Perleth, C. (Eds.), Creativity, culture, and development (pp. 13–28). New York: Springer.Google Scholar

Glăveanu, V. P. (2015b). Creativity as a sociocultural act. Journal of Creative Behavior, 49(3), 165–180. doi:10.1002/jocb.94Google Scholar

Goertzel, V., Goertzel, M. G., Goertzel, T. G., & Hansen, A. (2004). Cradles of eminence: Childhoods of more than 700 famous men and women. Scottsdale, AZ: Great Potential Press.Google Scholar

Gute, G., Gute, D. S., Nakamura, J., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2008). The early lives of highly creative persons: The influence of the complex family. Creativity Research Journal, 4, 343–357. doi:10.1080/10400410802391207Google Scholar

Hinkley, K., & Andersen, S. M. (1996). The working self-concept in transference: Significant-other activation and self change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 1279–1295. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.71.6.1279Google Scholar

Hviid, P., & Villadsen, J. W. (2018). The development of a person: Children’s experience of being and becoming within the cultural life course. In Rosa, A. & Valsiner, J. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of sociocultural psychology (pp. 556–574). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Karwowski, M., & Barbot, B. (2016). Creative self-beliefs: Their nature, development, and correlates. In Kaufman, J. C. & Baer, J. (Eds.), Current perspectives in social and behavioral sciences. Creativity and reason in cognitive development (pp. 302–326). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Karwowski, M., & Beghetto, R. A. (2017). Toward untangling creative self-beliefs. In Karwowski, M. & Kaufman, J. C., (Eds.), The creative self: Effects of self-efficacy, mindset and identity (pp. 3–22). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Karwowski, M., & Beghetto, R. A. (2019). Creative behavior as agentic action. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 13(4), 402–415. doi:10.1037/aca0000190Google Scholar

Karwowski, M., Lebuda, I., & Beghetto, R. (2019). Creative self-beliefs. In Kaufman, J. C. & Sternberg, R. J. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 396–418). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kaufman, J. C., & Beghetto, R. A. (2009). Beyond big and little: The Four C model of creativity. Review of General Psychology, 13, 1–12.Google Scholar

Kaufman, J. C., & Beghetto, R. A. (2013). In praise of Clark Kent: Creative metacognition and the importance of teaching kids when (not) to be creative. Roeper Review, 35, 155–165. doi:10.1080/02783193.2013.799413Google Scholar

Lebuda, I., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2017). Me, myself, I, and creativity: Self-concepts of eminent creators. In Karwowski, M & Kaufman, J. C (Eds.), The creative self: Effect of beliefs, self-efficacy, mindset, and identity (pp. 137–152). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Lebuda, I., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2018). All you need is love: The importance of partner and family relations to eminent creators’ well-being and success. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 54, 100–114. doi:10.1002/jocb.348Google Scholar

Lebuda, I., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2019). Why researches of professional and eminent creators’ self beliefs need social context. In Lebuda, I & Glăveanu, V. P (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of social creativity research (pp. 585–593). London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Lebuda, I., & Glăveanu, V. P. (2019). Re/searching the social in creativity, past, present and future: An introduction to The Palgrave Handbook of Social Creativity Research. In Lebuda, I. & Glăveanu, V. P., (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of social creativity research (pp. 1–10). London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Lubart, T. (1999). Creativity across cultures. In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 339–350). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

MacKinnon, D. W. (1962). The nature and nurture of creative talent. American Psychologist, 17(7), 484–495. doi:10.1037/h0046541Google Scholar

MacKinnon, D. W. (1978). In search of human effectiveness: Identifying and developing creativity. Buffalo, NY: Creative Education Foundation.Google Scholar

Moran, S., & John-Steiner, V. (2003). Creativity in the making: Vygotsky’s contemporary contribution to the dialectic of development and creativity. In Sawyer, R. K., John-Steiner, V., Moran, S., Feldman, D. H., Nakamura, J., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (Eds.), Creativity and development (pp. 61–90). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Piaget, J. (1962). Play, dreams and imitation in childhood. New York: Norton.Google Scholar

Rogoff, B. (2003). The cultural nature of human development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Russ, W. S. (2013). Pretend play in childhood: Foundation of adult creativity. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar

Simonton, D. K. (1984). Artistic creativity and interpersonal relationships across and within generations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(6), 1273–1286. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.46.6.1273Google Scholar

Simonton, D. K. (1988). Creativity, leadership, and chance. In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.), The nature of creativity (pp. 386–426). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Stein, M. I. (1953). Creativity and culture. The Journal of Psychology, 36(2), 311–322. doi:10.1080/00223980.1953.9712897Google Scholar

Sternberg, R. J. (2002). Creativity as a decision. American Psychologist, 57, 376. doi:10.1037/0003-066x.57.5.376aGoogle Scholar

Stokes, P. D. (2005). Creativity from constraints: The psychology of breakthrough. New York: Springer.Google Scholar

Tang, M., Werner, C., & Karwowski, M. (2016). Differences in creative mindset between Germany and Poland: The mediating effect of individualism and collectivism. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 21, 31–40. doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2016.05.004Google Scholar

Valsiner, J. (2007). Culture in minds and societies. New Delhi: SAGE.Google Scholar

Vygotsky, L. S. (1930/1998). Imagination and creativity in childhood. Soviet Psychology, 28(10), 84–96. doi:10.2753/rpo1061-0405280184Google Scholar

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (Cole, M., John-Steiner, V., Scribner, S., & Souberman, E., Eds.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Winnicott, D. W. (1971). Playing and reality. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Zittoun, T., Duveen, G., Gillespie, A., Ivinson, G., & Psaltis, C. (2003). The use of symbolic resources in developmental transitions. Culture & Psychology, 9, 415–448. doi:10.1177/1354067x0394006Google Scholar

Zittoun, T., Valsiner, J., Gonçalves, M. M., Salgado, J., Vedeler, D., & Ferring, D. (2013). Human development in the life course: Melodies of living. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar