Book contents
- American Criminal Justice
- American Criminal Justice
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- 1 Introduction
- 2 The Federal Structure; Sources of the Law
- 3 Investigation and Evidence-Gathering—The Participants
- 4 Investigation and Evidence-Gathering—Procedures
- 5 Arrest and Pretrial Detention
- 6 The Decision to Prosecute, or Not
- 7 Joinder of Charges and Defendants
- 8 Venue
- 9 Assistance of Counsel
- 10 Trial Rights and Preparation for Trial
- 11 Alternative Outcomes
- 12 Double Jeopardy
- 13 The Trial
- 14 Sentencing
- 15 Appeals
- 16 Corporate Criminal Responsibility
- 17 Internal Corporate Investigations
- 18 Professional Responsibility
- 19 Conclusion
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 08 June 2019
Book contents
- American Criminal Justice
- American Criminal Justice
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- 1 Introduction
- 2 The Federal Structure; Sources of the Law
- 3 Investigation and Evidence-Gathering—The Participants
- 4 Investigation and Evidence-Gathering—Procedures
- 5 Arrest and Pretrial Detention
- 6 The Decision to Prosecute, or Not
- 7 Joinder of Charges and Defendants
- 8 Venue
- 9 Assistance of Counsel
- 10 Trial Rights and Preparation for Trial
- 11 Alternative Outcomes
- 12 Double Jeopardy
- 13 The Trial
- 14 Sentencing
- 15 Appeals
- 16 Corporate Criminal Responsibility
- 17 Internal Corporate Investigations
- 18 Professional Responsibility
- 19 Conclusion
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- American Criminal JusticeAn Introduction, pp. 154 - 161Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
Primary Sources
Secondary Sources
Bradley, Craig M., ed. Criminal Procedure: A Worldwide Study. 2nd ed. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Chemerinsky, Erwin, and Levenson, Laurie. Criminal Procedure. 3rd ed. New York: Wolters Kluwer, 2017.Google Scholar
Dressler, Joshua, et al. Understanding Criminal Procedure. Vol. 1: Investigation. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Dressler, Joshua, et al. Understanding Criminal Procedure. Vol. 2: Adjudication. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Israel, Jerold, et al. Criminal Procedure and the Constitution: Leading Supreme Court Cases and Introductory Text. St. Paul, MN: West Academic Publishing, 2017.Google Scholar
Kamisar, Yale, et al. Advanced Criminal Procedure. 14th ed. St. Paul, MN: West Academic Publishing, 2015.Google Scholar
Kamisar, Yale, et al. Basic Criminal Procedure. 14th ed. St. Paul, MN: West Academic Publishing, 2015.Google Scholar
Kamisar, Yale, et al. Modern Criminal Procedure: Cases, Comments, and Questions. St. Paul, MN: West Academic Publishing, 2015.Google Scholar
Organization of American States. Guide to Criminal Prosecutions in the United States. Washington, DC: 2007.Google Scholar
Worrall, John L. Criminal Procedure: From First Contact to Appeal. 6th ed. Boston: Pearson, 2018.Google Scholar
Barkow, Rachel E. “Federalism and Criminal Law: What the Feds Can Learn from the States.” Mich. L. R. 109, no. 4 (2011), 519–580.Google Scholar
Fallon, Richard, et al. Hart and Wechsler’s The Federal Courts and the Federal System. 7th ed. St. Paul, MN: Foundation Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Fissell, Brenner. “Federalism and Constitutional Criminal Law.” Hofstra L. R. 46, no. 489 (2018), 489–562.Google Scholar
Klein, Susan R. “Independent-Norm Federalism in Criminal Law.” Cal. L.R. 90, no. 5 (2002), 1541–1592.Google Scholar
Richman, Daniel, and Stith, Kate. Defining Federal Crimes. New York: Wolters Kluwer, 2019.Google Scholar
Clancy, Thomas K. The Fourth Amendment: Its History and Interpretation. 3rd ed. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Christine, Hess Orthmann, and Hess, Kären M. Criminal Investigation. 10th ed. Boston: Cengage Learning, 2012.Google Scholar
LaFave, Wayne R. Search and Seizure: A Treatise on the Fourth Amendment. 5th ed. St. Paul, MN: Thomson West, 2012.Google Scholar
Allen, Ronald J., et al. Criminal Procedure: Investigation & Right to Counsel. 3rd ed. New York: Wolters Kluwer, 2016.Google Scholar
Davis, Angela J. Arbitrary Justice: The Power of the American Prosecutor. New York: Oxford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Wadhia, Shoba Sivaprasad. Beyond Deportation: The Role of Prosecutorial Discretion in Immigration Cases. New York: New York University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Cary, Robert M., et al. Federal Criminal Discovery. Chicago: ABA Book Publishing, 2011.Google Scholar
Cline, Richard. Defense Investigation and Discovery in Criminal Cases: A Systematic Approach to Obtaining Information and Preparing for Trial. St. Paul, MN: Thomson Reuters, 2011.Google Scholar
Moisidis, Cosmas. Criminal Discovery: From Truth to Proof and Back Again. Sydney: Federation Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Alschuler, Albert W. “Plea Bargaining and Its History.” Columbia Law Review 79 (1979), 1–43.Google Scholar
Fisher, George, Plea Bargaining’s Triumph: A History of Plea Bargaining in America. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Garrett, Brandon L. “Why Plea Bargains Are Not Confessions,” William & Mary L. Rev. 57, no. 4 (2016), 1415–1444.Google Scholar
Heumann, Milton. Plea Bargaining: The Experiences of Prosecutors, Judges, and Defense Attorneys. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Petegorsky, Michael Nasser. “Plea Bargaining in the Dark: The Duty to Disclose Exculpatory Brady Evidence during Plea Bargaining.” Fordham L. Rev. 81, no. 6 (2013), 3599–3650.Google Scholar
Schulhofer, Stephen J. “Is Plea Bargaining Inevitable?” Harvard Law Review 97, no. 5 (1984), 1037–1107.Google Scholar
Vogel, Mary E. Coercion to Compromise: Plea Bargaining, the Courts and the Making of Political Authority. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Adams, James A., and Blinka, Daniel D. Pretrial Motions in Criminal Prosecutions. 4th ed. New York: LexisNexis, 2008.Google Scholar
Herman, Susan N. The Right to a Speedy and Public Trial: A Reference Guide to the United States Constitution. 3rd ed. Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger, 2006.Google Scholar
Allen, Ronald J., et al. Criminal Procedure: Investigation & Right to Counsel. 3rd ed. New York: Wolters Kluwer, 2016.Google Scholar
Davis, Angela J. Arbitrary Justice: The Power of the American Prosecutor. New York: Oxford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Wadhia, Shoba Sivaprasad. Beyond Deportation: The Role of Prosecutorial Discretion in Immigration Cases. New York: New York University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Cary, Robert M., et al. Federal Criminal Discovery. Chicago: ABA Book Publishing, 2011.Google Scholar
Cline, Richard. Defense Investigation and Discovery in Criminal Cases: A Systematic Approach to Obtaining Information and Preparing for Trial. St. Paul, MN: Thomson Reuters, 2011.Google Scholar
Moisidis, Cosmas. Criminal Discovery: From Truth to Proof and Back Again. Sydney: Federation Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Alschuler, Albert W. “Plea Bargaining and Its History.” Columbia Law Review 79 (1979), 1–43.Google Scholar
Fisher, George, Plea Bargaining’s Triumph: A History of Plea Bargaining in America. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Garrett, Brandon L. “Why Plea Bargains Are Not Confessions,” William & Mary L. Rev. 57, no. 4 (2016), 1415–1444.Google Scholar
Heumann, Milton. Plea Bargaining: The Experiences of Prosecutors, Judges, and Defense Attorneys. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Petegorsky, Michael Nasser. “Plea Bargaining in the Dark: The Duty to Disclose Exculpatory Brady Evidence during Plea Bargaining.” Fordham L. Rev. 81, no. 6 (2013), 3599–3650.Google Scholar
Schulhofer, Stephen J. “Is Plea Bargaining Inevitable?” Harvard Law Review 97, no. 5 (1984), 1037–1107.Google Scholar
Vogel, Mary E. Coercion to Compromise: Plea Bargaining, the Courts and the Making of Political Authority. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Adams, James A., and Blinka, Daniel D. Pretrial Motions in Criminal Prosecutions. 4th ed. New York: LexisNexis, 2008.Google Scholar
Herman, Susan N. The Right to a Speedy and Public Trial: A Reference Guide to the United States Constitution. 3rd ed. Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger, 2006.Google Scholar
Abramson, Jeffrey. We, the Jury: The Jury System and the Ideal of Democracy Rights. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Banaszak, Ronald, ed. Fair Trial Rights of the Accused: A Documentary History. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Brodin, Mark S., et al. Weinstein’s Federal Evidence: Commentary on Rules of Evidence for the United States Courts. 2nd ed. New York: LexisNexis, 2018.Google Scholar
Broun, Kenneth S., et al. McCormick on Evidence. 7th ed. St. Paul, MN: West Academic Publishing, 2014.Google Scholar
Lieberman, Joel D., and Krauss, Daniel A. Jury Psychology: Social Aspects of Trial Processes, Vol. 1. New York: Routledge, 2016.Google Scholar
Lubet, Steven. Modern Trial Advocacy: Analysis and Practice. 4th ed. LexisNexis, 2009.Google Scholar
New York Criminal Jury Instructions and Model Colloquies. New York State Unified Court System. www.nycourts.gov/judges/cji/2-PenalLaw/cji3.shtml.Google Scholar
Saltzburg, Stephen A., et al. Federal Rules of Evidence Manual. 11th ed. New Providence, NJ: LexisNexis, 2015.Google Scholar
Siffert, John S. Modern Federal Jury Instructions. New Providence, NJ: LexisNexis, 2018.Google Scholar
Sklansky, David A. Evidence: Cases, Commentary, and Problems. 4th ed. New York: Wolters Kluwer, 2015.Google Scholar
Spencer, JR. Hearsay Evidence in Criminal Proceedings. 2nd ed. Portland, OR: Hart Publishers, 2014.Google Scholar
Alexander, Michelle. The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness. New York: The New Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Alschuler, Albert W. “The Failure of Sentencing Guidelines: A Plea for Less Aggregation.” University of Chicago Law Review 58 (1993), 901–951.Google Scholar
Bierschbach, Richard A., and Bibas, Stephanos. “What’s Wrong with Sentencing Equality.” Virginia Law Review 102, no. 6 (2016), 1447–1522.Google Scholar
Cassidy, R. Michael, and Ullmann, Robert L. “Sentencing Reform: The Power of Reasons.” Massachusetts Law Review 97, no. 4 (2016), 80–83.Google Scholar
Demleitner, Nora, and Berman, Douglas A. Sentencing Law and Policy. New York: Wolters Kluwer, 2018.Google Scholar
Freed, Daniel J. “Federal Sentencing in the Wake of Guidelines: Unacceptable Limits on the Discretion of Sentencers.” Yale Law Journal 101 (1992), 1681–1754.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Kelly Lyn. “State Sentencing Guidelines: A Garden Full of Variety.” Federal Probation 81, no. 2 (2017), 28–36.Google Scholar
Morris, Norval, and Tonry, Michael. Between Prison and Probation: Intermediate Punishments in a Rational Sentencing System. New York: Oxford University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Sidhu, Dawinder S. “Towards the Second Founding of Federal Sentencing.” Maryland Law Review 77, no. 2 (2018), 485–546.Google Scholar
Stith, Kate, and Cabranes José, A. Fear of Judging: Sentencing Guidelines in the Federal Courts. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998.Google Scholar
United States Sentencing Commission. 2017 Sourcebook of Federal Sentencing Statistics. www.ussc.gov/research/sourcebook-2017.Google Scholar
Garrett, Brandon, and Kovarsky, Lee. Federal Habeas Corpus: Executive Detention and Post-conviction Litigation. St. Paul, MN: Foundation Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Lyon, Andrea D., et al. Federal Habeas Corpus: Cases and Materials. 2nd ed. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Schapiro, Stephen M., et al. Supreme Court Practice. 10th ed. New York: Bloomberg BNA, 2013.Google Scholar
American Bar Association. Criminal Justice Standards for the Defense Function (2015). www.americanbar.org/groups/criminal_justice/standards/DefenseFunctionFourthEdition-TableofContents.html.Google Scholar
American Bar Association. Criminal Justice Standards for the Prosecution Function (2015). www.americanbar.org/groups/criminal_justice/standards/ProsecutionFunctionFourthEdition-TableofContents.html.Google Scholar
Berger, Todd A. “Professional Responsibility of the Criminal Defense Lawyer Redux: The New Three Hardest Questions.” St. Mary’s J. on Legal Malpractice & Ethics 7, no. 2 (2017), 96–159.Google Scholar
Gillers, Stephen. Regulation of Lawyers: Problems of Law and Ethics. 11th ed. New York: Wolters Kluwer, 2018.Google Scholar
Murray, Brian M. “Prosecutorial Responsibility and Collateral Consequences.” Stan. J. C.R. & C.L. 12, no. 2 (2016), 213–248.Google Scholar
Swisher, Keith. “The Judicial Ethics of Criminal Law Adjudication.” Arizona State Law Journal 41, no. 3 (Fall 2009), 755–828.Google Scholar
Bettwy, Samuel W. Comparative Criminal Procedure through Film: Analytical Tools and Law and Film Summaries by Legal Tradition and Country. Lake Mary, FL: Vandeplas, 2015.Google Scholar
Bradley, Craig M. ed. Criminal Procedure: A Worldwide Study. 2nd ed. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Burns, Robert P. The Death of the American Trial. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Damaška, Mirjan R. Evidence Law Adrift. Repr. ed. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Damaška, Mirjan R. The Faces of Justice and State Authority: A Comparative Approach to the Legal Process. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Eisinger, Jesse. The Chickenshit Club: Why the Justice Department Fails to Prosecute Executives. New York: Simon & Schuster, 2017.Google Scholar
Garapon, Antoine, and Papadopoulos, Ioannis. Juger en Amérique et en France. Paris: Odile Jacob, 2003.Google Scholar
Garrett, Brandon L. End of Its Rope: How Killing the Death Penalty Can Revive Criminal Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Garrett, Brandon L. Too Big to Jail: How Prosecutors Compromise with Corporations. New York: Belknap Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Garrett, Brandon L. Convicting the Innocent. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Jackson, John D., and Summers, , Sarah, J. The Internationalisation of Criminal Evidence: Beyond the Common Law and Civil Law Traditions. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Jouet, Mugambi. Exceptional America: What Divides Americans from the Rest of the World and from Each Other. Oakland, CA: University of California Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Langer, Maximo, and Sklansky, David Alan, eds. Prosecutors and Democracy, A Cross-National Study. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Pakes, Francis J. Comparative Criminal Justice. 3rd ed. New York: Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group, 2015.Google Scholar
Roach, Kent. “Wrongful Convictions: Adversarial and Inquisitorial Themes.” 35 N.C.J. Inter’l & Com. Reg. 387 (2009).Google Scholar
Ross, Jacqueline E., and Thaman Stephen, C., eds. Comparative Criminal Procedure. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2016.Google Scholar
The Secret Barrister, The Secret Barrister: Stories of the Law and How It’s Broken. London: Macmillan, 2018.Google Scholar
Stevenson, Bryan. Just Mercy: A Story of Justice and Redemption. New York: Spiegal & Grau, 2014.Google Scholar
Thaman, Stephen C. Comparative Criminal Procedure: A Casebook Approach. 2nd ed. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Thaman, Stephen. World Plea Bargaining: Consensual Procedures and the Avoidance of the Full Criminal Trial. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Turner, Jenia I. Plea Bargaining Across Borders: Criminal Procedure. New York: Aspen Publishers, 2010.Google Scholar
Whitman, James Q. Harsh Justice: Criminal Punishment and the Widening Divide between America and Europe. New York: Oxford University Press, 2005.Google Scholar