Bibliography

Ryan Martínez Mitchell

doi:10.1017/9781108690157.019

Abbenhuis, Maartje. The Hague Conferences and International Politics, 1898–1915. London: Bloomsbury Publishing, 2018.Google Scholar

Abi-Saab, Georges M. “The Newly Independent States and the Rules of International Law: An Outline.” Howard Law Journal 8, no. 2 (1962): 97–121.Google Scholar

Abtahi, Hirad, and Webb, Philippa, eds. The Genocide Convention: The Travaux Preparatoires. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2008.CrossRef Google Scholar

Acton, Harold. Memoirs of an Aesthete, 1939–1969. New York: Viking Press, 1971.Google Scholar

Afinogenov, Gregory. Spies and Scholars: Chinese Secrets and Imperial Russia’s Quest for World Power. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press, 2020.Google Scholar

Ahl, Bjorn. “The Rise of China and International Human Rights Law.” Human Rights Quarterly 37 (2015): 637.Google Scholar

Alexandrowicz, Charles Henry. “Some Problems in the History of the Law of Nations in Asia” [1963]. In The Law of Nations in Global History, Armitage, David and Pitts, Jennifer, eds. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017: 76–82.Google Scholar

Alford, William. To Steal a Book Is an Elegant Offense: Intellectual Property Law in Chinese Civilization. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Alleton, Viviane. “The Migration of Grammars through Languages: The Chinese Case.” In Mapping Meanings: The Field of New Learning in Late Qing China, Vittinghoff, Natascha and Lackner, Michael, eds. Leiden: Brill, 2004: 223–224.Google Scholar

Althusser, Louis, and Balibar, Etienne. Reading Capital. New York: Verso, 1970.Google Scholar

Alvarez, Alejandro. “Latin America and International Law.” American Journal of International Law 3, no. 2 (1909): 269–353.CrossRef Google Scholar

American Free-Trade League. Some Account of the American Free-Trade League and of Its Purposes. New York: American Free-Trade League, 1869.Google Scholar

An, Zuozhang, ed. Shandong Tongshi, vol. 8, part 2. Jinan: Shandong Renmin Chubanshe, 1994.Google Scholar

Anand, Dibyesh. “Strategic Hypocrisy: The British Imperial Scripting of Tibet’s Geopolitical Identity.” Journal of Asian Studies 68, no. 1 (2009): 227–252.Google Scholar

Anghie, Antony. Imperialism, Sovereignty, and the Making of International Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Anonymous, . “The Life and Work of the Late Dr. W. A. P. Martin.” The Chinese Recorder 48, no. 2 (1917): 116–123.Google Scholar

Association for the Reform and Codification of the Law of Nations. Report of the Sixth Annual Conference Held at Frankfort-on-the-Main, 20–23 August 1878. London: William Clowes and Sons, 1879.Google Scholar

Association for the Reform and Codification of the Law of Nations. Report of the Seventh Annual Conference Held at the Guildhall, London, 11–16 August 1879. London: William Clowes and Sons, 1880.Google Scholar

Attar, Mohsen al. “Subverting Eurocentric Epistemology: The Value of Nonsense When Designing Counterfactuals.” In Contingency in International Law: On the Possibility of Different Legal Histories, Venzke, Ingo and Heller, Kevin John, eds. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2021: 145–161.CrossRef Google Scholar

Baka, Anna Irene, and Fei, Qi. “Lost in Translation in the Sino-French War in Vietnam: From Western International Law to Confucian Semantics: A Comparative-Critical Analysis of the Chinese, French, and American Archives.” In Morality and Responsibility of Rulers: European and Chinese Origins of a Rule of Law as Justice for World Order, Carty, Anthony and Nijman, Janne, eds. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018: 389–390.Google Scholar

Banquet to His Excellency Anson Burlingame and His Associates of the Chinese Embassy by the Citizens of New York, on Tuesday, June 23, 1868. New York: Sun Book and Job Printing House, 1868.Google Scholar

Barbosa, Ruy. “Rank among States Not Determined by Their Military Standing.” The Advocate of Peace 70, no. 36 (1908): 36–38.Google Scholar

Barclay, Thomas. Problems of International Practice and Diplomacy: With Special Reference to the Hague Conferences and Conventions and Other General International Agreements. London: Sweet & Maxwell Limited, 1907.Google Scholar

Barcia Trelles, Camilo. “Francisco de Vitoria et l’école moderne du droit international.” Recueil de Cours de L’Académie de Droit International 17 (1927): 109–342.Google Scholar

Bassin, Mark. Imperial Visions: Nationalist Imagination and Geographical Expansion in the Russian Far East, 1840–1865. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Becquelin, Nicolas. “Xinjiang in the Nineties.” The China Journal 44 (2000): 65–90.Google Scholar

Bickers, Robert, and Tiedemann, R. Gary, eds. The Boxers, China, and the World. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2007.Google Scholar

Bin, Cheng. General Principles of Law as Applied by International Courts and Tribunals. London: Stevens & Sons Ltd., 1953.Google Scholar

Bin, Cheng. “United Nations Resolutions on Outer Space: ‘Instant’ International Customary Law?” Indian Journal of International Law 5 (1965): 23–48.Google Scholar

Bismarck, Otto von. Werke in Auswahl: Reichsgestaltung und europäische Friedenswahrung, 1877–1882. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1973.Google Scholar

Blaustein, Albert, ed. Fundamental Legal Documents of Communist China. South Hackensack, NJ: Fred B. Rothman & Co., 1962.Google Scholar

Bloch, Ernst. “Nonsynchronism and the Obligation to Its Dialectics,” trans Ritter, Mark. New German Critique 11 (1977) [original publication 1935]: 22–38.CrossRef Google Scholar

Bluntschli, Johann Caspar. Alt-asiatische Gottes- und Weltideen in ihren Wirkungen auf das Gemeinleben der Menschen. Nördlingen: C. H. Beck, 1866.Google Scholar

Bluntschli, Johann Caspar. Das moderne Völkerrecht der civilisirten Staten: als Rechtsbuch dargestellt, 1st ed. Nördlingen: C. H. Beck, 1872.Google Scholar

Bluntschli, Johann Caspar. Das moderne Völkerrecht der civilisirten Staten: als Rechtsbuch dargestellt, 2nd ed. Nördlingen: C. H. Beck, 1878.Google Scholar

Bluntschli, Johann Caspar. “Arische Völker und arische Rechte.” In Gesammelte kleine Schriften, vol. 1. Nördlingen: C. H. Beck, 1879.Google Scholar

Bluntschli, Johann Caspar. Gongfa Huitong, trans. Martin, W. A. P.. Beijing: Tongwenguan, 1880.Google Scholar

Bluntschli, Johann Caspar. Denkwürdiges aus meinem Leben, vol. 3 (1861–1881). Nördlingen: C. H. Beck, 1884.Google Scholar

Bluntschli, Johann Caspar. Allgemeine Staatslehre. Stuttgart: G. Cotta, 1886.Google Scholar

Boecking, Felix. “Tariffs, Powers, Nationalism, and Modernity: Fiscal Policy in Guomindang-Controlled China, 1927–1945.” PhD dissertation, University of Cambridge, 2008.Google Scholar

Borchard, Edwin M. “‘Responsibility of States’ at the Hague Codification Conference.” American Journal of International Law 24, no. 3 (1930): 517–540.Google Scholar

Borgwardt, Elizabeth. A New Deal for the World: America’s Vision for Human Rights. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Brière, Yves de la. “Évolution de la doctrine et de la pratique en matière de représailles.” Recueil de Cours de L’Académie de Droit International 22 (1928): 237–294.Google Scholar

Brockman-Hawe, Benjamin E. “Accountability for Crimes against the Laws of Humanity in Boxer China: An Experiment with International Justice at Paoting-Fu.” University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law 38 (2016): 627–713.Google Scholar

Cain, Peter J. “Character and Imperialism: The British Financial Administration of Egypt, 1878–1914.” Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History 34, no. 2 (2006): 177–200.Google Scholar

Carrai, Maria Adele. Sovereignty in China: A Genealogy of a Concept since 1840. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019.CrossRef Google Scholar

Cassel, Pär Kristoffer. Grounds of Judgment: Extraterritoriality and Imperial Power in Nineteenth-Century China and Japan. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Chaisse, Julien, and Matsushita, Mitsuo. “China’s ‘Belt and Road’ Initiative: Mapping the World Trade Normative and Strategic Implications.” Journal of World Trade 52, no. 1 (2018): 163–186.CrossRef Google Scholar

Chang, Claire Shu-Chin. When Confucius Meets Benedictus: The Destiny of a Chinese Politician Lou Tseng-tsiang (1871–1949). Leuven: Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, 1994.Google Scholar

Chen, Kaike. “Qiying Yu Di Er Ci Yapian Zhanzheng Zhong De Zhong E Jiaoshe.” Jindaishi Yanjiu 4 (2009): 60–76.Google Scholar

Chen, Kewei. “Bao Yingshi yu 1871 Nian de Zhong-Ri Tianjin Tiaoyue.” Qinghua Daxue Xuebao (Zhexue Shehui Kexue Ban) 6 (2010): 70–78.Google Scholar

Chen, Li. Chinese Law in Imperial Eyes: Sovereignty, Justice, and Transcultural Politics. New York: Columbia University Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Chen, Li. “Professor James Leslie Brierly and His First Chinese Pupil Li Shengwu at Oxford University Faculty of Law (1927–1930).” Journal of the History of International Law/Revue d’histoire du droit international 20, no. 3 (2018): 373–380.Google Scholar

Chen, Li. “Tracing Chinese Scholar Chen Tiqiang’s Pursuit of International Law Education and His Major Contribution to the Doctrine of Recognition.” Asian Journal of International Law 10, no. 1 (2020): 68–93.CrossRef Google Scholar

Chen, Ti-Chiang, The International Law of Recognition, Green, Leslie Claude, ed. London: Stevens & Sons. 1951.Google Scholar

Chen, Tiqiang. “Shei Shi Guojifa de Pohuaizhe?” Shijie Zhishi 8 (1950): 7–8.Google Scholar

Chen, Tiqiang. “Wei Shenme Bixu Queding Qinlüe Dingyi?” Shijie Zhishi 2, no. 9 (1953): 9–10.Google Scholar

Chen, Tiqiang. “Guojifa Xiehui Di Sishiqi Jie Da Hui.” Faxue Yanjiu 3, no. 49 (1957): 5.Google Scholar

Chen, Yan. Kangri Zhanzheng Shiqi Zhongguo Waijiao Zhidu Yanjiu. Shanghai: Fudan Daxue Chubanshe, 2002.Google Scholar

Cheney, Amanda J. “Tibet Lost in Translation: Sovereignty, Suzerainty and International Order Transformation, 1904–1906.” Journal of Contemporary China 26, no. 107 (2017): 769–783.Google Scholar

Cheng, F. T. [Zheng Tianxi]. Rules of Private International Law Determining Capacity to Contract. London: Stevens, 1916.Google Scholar

Chiang, Hai Cháo [Jiang Haichao]. “La Chine.” In Bibliographie du Droit des Gens et des Rélations Internationales, Strupp, Karl, ed. Leiden: A. W. Sijthoff, 1938: 261–267.Google Scholar

Chiang, Kai-shek. China’s Destiny and Chinese Economic Theory. Leiden: Global Oriental, 2012.Google Scholar

Chiu, Hungdah. “The Position of International Law in Chinese Law.” Annals of the Chinese Society of International Law 3 (1966): 88–97.Google Scholar

Chun, Yu. “Wei Yuan, Lin Zexu yu ‘Haiguo Tuzhi.’” Wenshi Zazhi 4 (2006): 26–30.Google Scholar

Clark, Martin. “Ambivalence, Anxieties/Adaptations, Advances: Conceptual History and International Law.” Leiden Journal of International Law 31, no. 4 (2018): 747–771.Google Scholar

Cohen, Jerome Alan, and Chiu, Hungdah. People’s China and International Law: A Documentary Study. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1974.Google Scholar

Commission on Extraterritoriality in China. Report of the Commission on Extra-territoriality in China. London: His Majesty’s Stationery Office, 1926.Google Scholar

Cosmo, Nicola di. “Nurhaci’s Gambit: Sovereignty as Concept and Praxis in the Rise of the Manchus.” In The Scaffolding of Sovereignty: Global and Aesthetic Perspectives on the History of a Concept, Benite, Zvi Ben-Dor, Geroulanos, Stefanos, and Jerr, Nicole, eds. New York: Columbia University Press 2017: 102–123.Google Scholar

Covell, Ralph. W. A. P. Martin: Pioneer of Progress in China. Washington, DC: Christian University Press, 1978.Google Scholar

Crane, George T. “Imagining the Economic Nation: Globalisation in China.” New Political Economy 4, no. 2 (1999): 215–232.CrossRef Google Scholar

Craven, Matthew. “Introduction: International Law and Its Histories.” In Time, History and International Law, Craven, Matthew, Malgosia, Fitzmaurice, and Vogiatzi, Maria, eds. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2007: 1–26.CrossRef Google Scholar

Craven, Matthew. “Between Law and History: The Berlin Conference of 1884–1885 and the Logic of Free Trade.” London Review of International Law 3, no. 1 (2015): 49–59.CrossRef Google Scholar

Craven, Matthew. “Theorizing the Turn to History in International Law.” In The Oxford Handbook of the Theory of International Law, Orford, Anne and Hoffmann, Florian, eds. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2016.Google Scholar

Da, Li Yuan. Chinese Supreme Court Decisions Relating to General Principles of Civil Law, Obligations, and Commercial Law. Peking: Commission of Extraterritoriality, 1923.Google Scholar

Davis, Hayne. “Legal Aspects of the Hague Conference.” American Lawyer 16, no. 1 (1908): 420–425.Google Scholar

Day, Jenny Huangfu. Qing Travelers to the Far West: Diplomacy and the Information Order in Late Imperial China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018.Google Scholar

Dennett, Tyler. Americans in Eastern Asia: A Critical Study of the Policy of the United States with Reference to China, Japan and Korea in the 19th Century. New York: Macmillan, 1922.Google Scholar

Departement van Buitenlandsche Zaken. Deuxième Conférence Internationale de la Paix, Actes et Documents, Vol. 1, Séances Plénières de la Conférence. La Haye: Imprimerie Nationale, 1907.Google Scholar

Departement van Buitenlandsche Zaken. Deuxième Conférence Internationale de la Paix, Actes et Documents, Vol. 2, Première Commission. La Haye: Imprimerie Nationale, 1907.Google Scholar

Documents of United Nations Conference on International Organization San Francisco 1945, vol. 3. New York: United Nations Information Organizations, 1945.Google Scholar

Tseng-tsiang, Dom Pierre-Célestin Lou [Lu Zhengxiang]. Souvenirs et Pensées. Paris: Desclée de Brouwer, 1946.Google Scholar

Duara, Prasenjit. Sovereignty and Authenticity: Manchukuo and the East Asian Modern. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2004.Google Scholar

Dudden, Alexis. “Japan’s Engagement with International Terms.” In Tokens of Exchange: The Problem of Translation in Global Circulations, Liu, Lydia He, ed. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1999: 165–191.Google Scholar

Dupuis, Jean. L’ouverture du Fleuve Rouge au Commerce et les Évènements du Tong-kin (1872–1873): Journal de Voyage et d’Expédition, vol. 2. Paris: Challamel Aîné, 1879.Google Scholar

Encyclopaedia Britannica, vol. 26. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1911.Google Scholar

Eskildsen, Robert. Transforming Empire in Japan and East Asia: The Taiwan Expedition and the Birth of Japanese Imperialism. Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan: 2019.CrossRef Google Scholar

Eslava, Luis, Fakhri, Michael, and Nesiah, Vasuki, eds. Bandung, Global History, and International Law: Critical Pasts and Pending Futures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.Google Scholar

Eyffinger, Arthur. The 1899 Hague Peace Conference: The Parliament of Man, the Federation of the World. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1999.Google Scholar

Eyffinger, Arthur. “A Highly Critical Moment: Role and Record of the 1907 Hague Peace Conference.” Netherlands International Law Review 54, no. 2 (2007): 197–228.Google Scholar

Eyffinger, Arthur. “Caught between Tradition and Modernity: East Asia at the Hague Peace Conferences.” Journal of East Asia and International Law 1 (2008): 7–46.Google Scholar

Fairbank, John King. “Synarchy under the Treaties.” In Chinese Thought and Institutions, Fairbank, John King, ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1957: 204–234.Google Scholar

Fairbank, John King. ed. The Chinese World Order: Traditional China’s Foreign Relations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1968.Google Scholar

Fan, Xianzheng. “‘Guoti’ yu ‘Zhengti’ Zai Jindai Zhongguo de Yanbian yu Fenhua.” Xueshu Yanjiu 3 (2014): 40–45.Google Scholar

Fang, Ke. Tiexue Gonghe: Tu Shuo Xinhai Geming. Beijing: Renmin Wenxue Chubanshe, 2011.Google Scholar

Fauchille, Paul. Traité de droit international public. Paris: Rousseau & Co., 1923.Google Scholar

Feng, Lin, ed. Xue Fucheng Xuanji. Shanghai: Shanghai Renmin Chubanshe, 1987.Google Scholar

Fenwick, Charles G. International Law, 3rd ed. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1952.Google Scholar

Fenwick, Charles G. “Review: Le Développement et la Codification du Droit International. By Yuen-li Liang. Paris: Recueil Sirey, 1949. 126.” American Journal of International Law 44, no. 4 (1950): 786–787.Google Scholar

Fenwick, Charles G. “Draft Code of Offenses against the Peace and Security of Mankind.’ American Journal of International Law 46, no. 1 (1952): 98–100.Google Scholar

Fenwick, Charles G., and Willoughby, Westel W.. Types of Restricted Sovereignty and of Colonial Autonomy. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1919: 99–112.Google Scholar

Field, David Dudley. “De la Possibilité d’Appliquer le Droit International Européen aux Nations Orientales.” Revue de Droit International et de Législation Comparée 7 (1875): 659–668.Google Scholar

Field, Henry M. The Life of David Dudley Field. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1898.Google Scholar

Finch, Geo A. “The Peace Conference of Paris, 1919.” American Journal of International Law 13, no. 2 (1919): 159–186.Google Scholar

Finnemore, Martha, and Jurkovich, Michelle. “Getting a Seat at the Table: The Origins of Universal Participation and Modern Multilateral Conferences.” Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations 20, no. 3 (2014): 361–373.Google Scholar

Flynn, Dennis O., and Giráldez, Arturo. “Cycles of Silver: Global Economic Unity through the Mid-Eighteenth Century.” Journal of World History 13, no. 2 (2002): 391–427.Google Scholar

Flynn, Dennis O., and Giráldez, Arturo. China and the Birth of Globalization in the 16th Century. Farnham: Ashgate Variorum, 2010.Google Scholar

Foster, John Watson. “Results of the Bering Sea Arbitration.” The North American Review 161, no. 469 (1895): 693–702.Google Scholar

Foster, John Watson. Diplomatic Memoirs, vol. 2. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company, 1909.Google Scholar

Foulke, William Dudley. “Arbitration the Shortest Road to International Justice.” In Report of the Annual Lake Mohonk Conference on International Arbitration. New York: Lake Mohonk Conference on International Arbitration, 1911: 99–100.Google Scholar

Fry, Agnes. A Memoir of the Right Honourable Sir Edward Fry, G. C. B. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1921.Google Scholar

Fu, Limin and He, Minglun. Zhongguo Shangye Wenhua Da Cidian. Beijing: Zhongguo Fazhan Chubanshe, 1994.Google Scholar

Fuches, Walter. “Der Russisch–Chinesische Vertrag Von Nertschinsk Vom Jahre 1689: Eine Textkrische Betrachtung.” Monumenta Serica 4, no. 2 (1940): 546–593.Google Scholar

Fuchs, Eckhardt, Kasahara, Tokushi, and Saaler, Sven, eds. A New Modern History of East Asia. Göttingen: V&R Unipress, 2018.Google Scholar

Fung, Courtney J. China and Intervention at the UN Security Council: Reconciling Status. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019.Google Scholar

Gao, Quanxi, Zhang, Wei, and Tian, Feilong. Xiandai Zhongguo Zou Xiang Fazhi zhi Lu. Beijing: Social Sciences Academic Press China, 2012.Google Scholar

Gao, Shulan. “Xiu yu Qichi de Tongzhi Di Siyin.” Fazhi Bolan 19 (2011): 30–32.Google Scholar

Geertz, Clifford. Negara: The Theatre-State in Nineteenth-Century Bali. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1980.Google Scholar

Geffcken, Heinrich. “La France en Chine et le Droit International.” Revue de Droit International et de Législation Comparée 17 (1885):145–151.Google Scholar

Getachew, Adom. Worldmaking after Empire: The Rise and Fall of Self-determination. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2019.Google Scholar

Ginsburg, Tom. “The BRI, Non-interference, and Democracy.” Harvard International Law Journal 62, Special Issue (2021): 40–65.Google Scholar

Gobineau, Arthur. Essai sur l’inégalité des races humaines. Paris: Didot Frères, 1853.Google Scholar

Goetzmann, William N., Ukhov, Andrey D., and Zhu, Ning. “China and the World Financial Markets 1870–1939: Modern Lessons from Historical Globalization.” Economic History Review 60, no. 2 (2007): 267–312.Google Scholar

Gong, Gerrit W. The Standard of “Civilization” in International Society. New York: Oxford University Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Gopa, Sarvepalli. Jawaharlal Nehru: A Biography, Vol. 1: 1889–1947. Bombay: Oxford University Press, 1976.Google Scholar

Grant, John P., and Barker, J. Craig, eds. The Harvard Research in International Law: Original Materials. Vol. 1. New York: William S. Hein & Co., Inc., 2007.Google Scholar

Grewe, Wilhelm G. Epochen der Völkerrechtsgeschichte. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, 1984.Google Scholar

Guo, Songtao. Shixi Jicheng: Guo Songtao Ji 使西纪程: 郭嵩焘集 [Record of a Mission to the West: Collected Writings of Guo Songtao]. Shenyang: Liaoning Renmin Chubanshe, 1994.Google Scholar

Guo, Songtao. Lundun yu Bali Riji. Changsha: Yuelu Shushe, 1984.Google Scholar

Gützlaff, Karl Friedrich August. China Opened. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Halsey, Stephen R. Quest for Power: European Imperialism and the Making of Chinese Statecraft. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Halsey, Stephen R. “Sovereignty, Self-strengthening, and Steamships in Late Imperial China.” Journal of Asian History 48, no. 1 (2014): 81–111.CrossRef Google Scholar

Han, Chengdong, and Baocun, Pan, eds. Guojifa Jiaocheng. Nanjing: Nanjing University Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Han, Depei. “Women Suo Xuyao de ‘Fazhi.’” Guancha 1, no. 10 (1946): 1–2.Google Scholar

Han, Depei. “Kaiersheng yu Chuncui Faxue.” Sixiang yu Shidai 47 (1947): 9–13.Google Scholar

Han, Depei. “Ping Kai’erxun ‘Fa he Guojia de Yiban Lilun.’” In Han Depei Wenxuan, Jin, Huang, ed. Wuhan: Wuhan University Press, 1996: 602–606.Google Scholar

Han, Depei. “Ping ‘Taiwan Zijue’ Lun.” In Han Depei Wenxuan, Jin, Huang, ed. Wuhan: Wuhan University Press, 1996: 610–613.Google Scholar

Han, Depei and Zhu, Xingqian. “Wei Le Shijie Heping, Women Yao Gei Su-Mei Liang Guo Jian Zuo Yi Ge Meipo, Shi Qi Chong Hao.” Chang Qing Zhou Bao 13, nos. 2–3 (1948): 2–3.Google Scholar

Han, Tie. Feng Yu Ban Jiming: Wo de Fu Qin Han Depei Zhuan Ji. Beijing: Zhongguo Fangzheng Chubanshe, 2000.Google Scholar

Hanes, W. Travis, and Sanello, Frank. The Opium Wars: The Addiction of One Empire and the Corruption of Another. Naperville, IL: Sourcebooks Inc., 2002.Google Scholar

Harris, Henry Wilson. Geneva, 1921: An Account of the Second Assembly of the League of Nations. London: Daily News Ltd., 1921.Google Scholar

Harvey, David. The Condition of Modernity: An Enquiry into the Origins of Cultural Change. Oxford: Blackwell, 1989.Google Scholar

Hathaway, Oona A., and Shapiro, Scott J.. “Outcasting: Enforcement in Domestic and International Law.” Yale Law Journal 121, no. 2 (2011): 252–349.Google Scholar

Hathaway, Oona A., and Shapiro, Scott J.. The Internationalists: How a Radical Plan to Outlaw War Remade the World. New York: Simon and Schuster, 2017.Google Scholar

Hauer, Erich. “Why the Sinologue Should Study Manchu.” Bulletin of the North China Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society 61 (1930): 156–164.Google Scholar

Haushofer, Karl. “Gesamtasiatische Fragen.” In Wörterbuch des Völkerrechts und der Diplomatie, vol. 1, Strupp, Karl, ed. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1924: 390–394.Google Scholar

He, Qinhua. “Wanguo Gongfa’ yu Qingmo Guojifa.” Faxue Yanjiu 23, no. 5 (2001): 137–148.Google Scholar

Heffter, August Wilhelm. Le Droit International Public de l’Europe. Paris: Cotillon, 1857.Google Scholar

Heffter, August Wilhelm, and Geffcken, Friedrich Heinrich, eds. Das europäische Volkerrecht der Gegenwart. Berlin: Schroeder, 1873.Google Scholar

Herrmann, Florian. Das Standardwerk: Franz von Liszt und das Völkerrecht. Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2001.Google Scholar

Hevia, James L. Cherishing Men from Afar: Qing Guest Ritual and the Macartney Embassy of 1793. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Hevia, James L. English Lessons: The Pedagogy of Imperialism in Nineteenth-Century China. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Hicks, Frederick Charles. “The Equality of States and the Hague Conferences.” American Journal of International Law 2, no. 3 (1908): 530–561.Google Scholar

Hilderbrand, Robert C. Dumbarton Oaks: The Origins of the United Nations and the Search for Postwar Security. Durham: University of North Carolina Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Hille, Willy van. “Étude sur la Responsabilité Internationale de l’État.” Revue de Droit International et de Législation Comparée 56, no. 4 (1929): 531–571.Google Scholar

Hirohiko, Otsuka. “Japan’s Early Encounter with the Concept of the ‘Law of Nations.’” Japanese Annual of International Law 13, no. 35 (1969): 35–65.Google Scholar

Hirschfeld, Julius. “Current Notes on International Law.” Law Magazine and Review: A Quarterly Review of Jurisprudence 5, no. 26 (1900): 335.Google Scholar

Holls, Frederick W. The Peace Conference at the Hague and Its Bearings on International Law and Policy. London: Macmillan & Co. Ltd., 1900.Google Scholar

Holls, Frederick W. “The International Court of Arbitration at the Hague.” American Lawyer 9 (1901): 160.Google Scholar

Hong, Xiaoxia. “Chuxi Jiujinshan Lianheguo Zhixian Huiyi de Zhongguo Daibiaotuan Zucheng Qingkuang Shulüe.” Wuhan Daxue Xuebao (Renwen Kexue Ban) 55, no. 3 (2002): 313–319.Google Scholar

Hornung, Joseph. “Note a Propos de l’Application aux Nations Orientales du Droit des Gens Coutumier de l’Europe.” Revue de Droit International et de Législation Comparée 11 (1879): 447–449.Google Scholar

Hsü, Daulin. “Das Mandschurische Problem.” Sinica 7, no. 3 (1932): 81–91.Google Scholar

Hsü, Immanuel C. Y. China’s Entrance into the Family of Nations: The Diplomatic Phase, 1858–1880. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Hsü, Immanuel C. Y. The Ili Crisis: A Study of Sino-Russian Diplomacy 1871–1881. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1965.Google Scholar

Hu, Shih. “Speech at Wellesley College, 15 June 1942.” Contemporary China 2, no. 3 (1942): 3–4.Google Scholar

Hu, Zengyi. Xin Man-Han Cidian, 2nd ed. Shanghai: Shangwu Yinshuguan, 2020.Google Scholar

Huber, Max. “Die Gleichheit der Staaten.” In Rechtswissenschaftliche Beiträge: Juristische Festgabe des Auslandes zu Josef Kohlers 60. Geburtstag, 9. März 1909. Aalen: Scientia Verlag, 1909: 88–118.Google Scholar

Huber, Max. “Beiträge zur Kenntnis der soziologischen Grundlagen des Völkerrechts und der Staatengesellschaft.” In Jahrbuch des öffentlichen Rechts der Gegenwart, vol. 4. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr, 1910: 56–134.Google Scholar

Huber, Max. Denkwürdigkeiten, 1907–1924. Zurich: Orell Füssli, 1974.Google Scholar

Hudson, Manley O. “The Progressive Codification of International Law.” American Journal of International Law 20, no. 4 (1926): 655–669.Google Scholar

Huenemann, Ralph William. The Dragon and the Iron Horse: The Economics of Railroads in China, 1876–1937. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Asia Center, 1984.Google Scholar

Hughes, Charles E., Cabot Lodge, Henry, Underwood, Oscar W. and Root, Elihu, “Conference on the Limitation of Armament.” American Journal of International Law 16, no. 2 (1922): 159–233.Google Scholar

Hull, William I. “The United States and Latin America at the Hague.” International Conciliation 1, no. 44 (1911): 12–13.Google Scholar

Il Conferência da Paz Haia 1907: A correspondência telegráfica entre o Barão do Rio Branco e Rui Barbosa. Rio de Janeiro: Fundação Alexandre de Gusmão, 2014.Google Scholar

Institut de Droit International. Annuaire de l’Institut de Droit International, vols. 3–4, 1879–1880. Brussels: C. Muquardt, 1880.Google Scholar

Institut de Droit International. Annuaire de l’Institut de Droit International, vol. 6, 1882–1883. Brussels: Merzbach et Falk, 1883.Google Scholar

Institut de Droit International. Annuaire de l’Institut de Droit International, vol. 27, 1919. Brussels: Falk, 1919.Google Scholar

Institut de Droit International. Annuaire de l’Institut de Droit International, vol. 28, 1921. Brussels: A. Dewit, 1921.Google Scholar

Institut de Droit International. Annuaire de l”institut de Droit International, vol. 33, 1927. Brussels: Goemare, 1927.Google Scholar

Ishii, Kikujirō. Gaikō Yoroku. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten, 1930.Google Scholar

Ishikawa, Yoshihiro. The Formation of the Chinese Communist Party, trans. Joshua, Fogel. New York: Columbia University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Jacobson, Harold Karan, and Oksenberg, Michel. China’s Participation in the IMF, the World Bank, and GATT: Toward a Global Economic Order. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Jameson, Fredric. Postmodernism, or the Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Jeans, Roger B. Democracy and Socialism in Republican China: The Politics of Zhang Junmai (Carsun Chang), 1906–1941. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 1997.Google Scholar

Jellinek, Georg. “China und das Völkerrecht.” Deutsche Juristen-Zeitung 5, no. 19 (1900): 401–403.Google Scholar

Jiang, Tingfu. Jiang Tingfu Huyilu. Changsha: Yuelu Shushe, 2003.Google Scholar

Jin, Guantao, Qingfeng, Liu, and Weiyun, Qiu. “Zhongguo Xiandai Zhuquan Guannian Xingcheng de Shuwei Renwen Yanjiu.” Ershiyi Shiji Shuangyuekan 172 (2019): 49–67.Google Scholar

Johnson, David H. N. “The Draft Code of Offences against the Peace and Security of Mankind.” International & Comparative Law Quarterly 4, no. 3 (1955): 445–468.Google Scholar

Kahn, Paul W. The Origins of Order: Project and System in the American Legal Imagination. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2019.Google Scholar

Kasek, Elisabeth. Bismarcks Missionare: Deutsche Militärinstrukteure in China 1884–1890. Leipzig: Otto Harrassowitz Verlag, 2002.Google Scholar

Kaufman, Alison Adcock. “In Pursuit of Equality and Respect: China’s Diplomacy and the League of Nations.” Modern China 40, no. 6 (2014): 605–638.Google Scholar

Kawashima, Shin. “China.” In The Oxford Handbook of the History of International Law, Fassbender, Bardo, Peters, Anne, Peter, Simone, and Högger, Daniel, eds. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012: 451–474.Google Scholar

Keene, Edward. Beyond the Anarchical Society: Grotius, Colonialism and Order in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Kelsen, Hans. Das Problem der Souveränität und die Theorie des Völkerrechts: Beitrag zu einer reinen Rechtslehre. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr/P. Siebeck, 1920.Google Scholar

Kelsen, Hans. The Law of the United Nations: A Critical Analysis of Its Fundamental Problems: With Supplement. Clark, NJ: The Lawbook Exchange, Ltd., 2000.Google Scholar

Kirby, William C. Germany and Republican China. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Kirgis, Frederic L. The American Society of International Law’s First Century, 1906–2006. Leiden: Brill, 2006.Google Scholar

Klein, Robert A. Sovereign Equality among States: The History of an Idea. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1974.Google Scholar

Kolb, Robert. “Origin of the Twin Terms Jus ad Bellum/Jus in Bello.” International Review of the Red Cross Archive 37, no. 320 (1997): 553–562.Google Scholar

Koo, V. K. Wellington. The Status of Aliens in China. New York: Columbia University Press, 1912.Google Scholar

Koo, V. K. Wellington. “Bali hehui guoji lianhe guyiding mengyue qingxing zhaiyao.” Waijiao gongbao 1 (1921): 3–5.Google Scholar

Koselleck, Reinhart. “Staat und Souveränität.” In Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe: Historisches Lexicon zur Politisch-Sozialen Sprache in Deutschland, vol. 6. Brunner, Otto, Conze, Werner, and Koselleck, Reinhart, eds. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta, 1972–1990: 1–54.Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, Martti. The Gentle Civilizer of Nations: The Rise and Fall of International Law 1870–1960. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, Martti. “A History of International Law Histories.” In The Oxford Handbook of the History of International Law, Fassbender, Bardo, Peters, Anne, Peter, Simone, and Högger, Daniel, eds. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, Martti. To the Uttermost Parts of the Earth: Legal Imagination and International Power 1300–1870. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021.Google Scholar

Krauel, A. “Applicabilite du Droit des Gens Européen a la Chine.” Revue de Droit International et de Législation Comparée 9 (1877): 387–401.Google Scholar

Kraus, Herbert. The Crisis of German Democracy; A Study of the Spirit of the Constitution of Weimar. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1932.Google Scholar

Kroll, Stefan. Normgenese durch Re-interpretation: China und das europäische Völkerrecht im 19. und 20. Jahrhundert. Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2012.Google Scholar

Kuehl, Warren F. Seeking World Order: The United States and International Organization to 1920. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press, 1969.Google Scholar

Kuhn, Arthur K. “The International Conference on the Treatment of Foreigners.” American Journal of International Law 24, no. 3 (1930): 570–573.Google Scholar

Kunz, Josef L. “The Chaotic Status of the Laws of War and the Urgent Necessity for Their Revision.” American Journal of International Law 45, no. 1 (1951): 37–61.Google Scholar

Kunz, Josef L. “Legality of the Security Council Resolutions of June 25 and 27, 1950.” American Journal of International Law 45, no. 1 (1951): 137–142.Google Scholar

Lai, Xinxia. Lin Zexu Nianpu Chang Pian, vol. 1. Shanghai: Shanghai Jiatong Daxue Chubanshe, 2011.Google Scholar

Lammasch, Heinrich. “Aus Meinem Leben.” In Heinrich Lammasch: Seine Aufzeichnungen, sein Wirken und seine Politik, Lammasch, Marga and Sperl, Hans, eds. Vienna: Franz Deuticke, 1922: 14–17.Google Scholar

Lapradelle, Albert Geouffre de, and Stowell, Ellery C.. “Latin America at the Hague Conference.” Yale Law Journal 17 (1907): 270–280.Google Scholar

Lauterpacht, Hersch. Recognition in International Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012 [original publication 1947].Google Scholar

Lavelle, Peter B. The Profits of Nature: Colonial Development and the Quest for Resources in Nineteenth-Century China. New York: Columbia University Press, 2020.Google Scholar

Lawrence, Thomas Joseph. International Problems and Hague Conferences. London: J. M. Dent, 1908.Google Scholar

Lee, Christopher J., ed. Making a World after Empire: The Bandung Moment and Its Political Afterlives. Athens: Ohio University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Lee, Daniel. “Sources of Sovereignty: Roman Imperium and Dominium in Civilian Theories of Sovereignty.” Politica Antica 2, no. 1 (2012): 79–94.Google Scholar

Lee, Daniel. “‘Office Is a Thing Borrowed’: Jean Bodin on Offices and Seigneurial Government.” Political Theory 41, no. 3 (2013): 409–440.Google Scholar

Lee, Frederic. Currency, Banking, and Finance in China. Washington, DC: United States Department of Commerce, 1927.Google Scholar

Lee, Lai To and Lee, Hock Guan, eds. Sun Yat-Sen, Nanyang and the 1911 Revolution. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, 2011.Google Scholar

Leitner, Kerstin. When Only the Sky Is the Limit: Memoirs of a Nomadic International Civil Servant Working for Global Peace and Development, 1975–2005. Berlin: lulu.com, 2013.Google Scholar

Lepert, Henri. Projet de constitution pour la Société des nations: Projet soumis à la Ligue. Paris: Ligue por une Société des Nations Basée sur une Constitution Internationale, 1917.Google Scholar

Li, Bingnan, Zeng, Jianyuan, and Lin, Zixuan. “‘Dongyuan Kanluan Shiqi Linshi Tiaokuan’ zhi Zhidu Jingyan ji qi Yingxiang.” Taiwan Minzhu Jikan 1, no. 2 (2004): 95–129.Google Scholar

Li, Charles N. The Bitter Sea: Coming of Age in a China before Mao. New York: Harper Collins, 2009.Google Scholar

Li, Dade. “Guanyu Zhou Gengsheng Hu Shi zhi de Lunzhan: Tongyi Zhou Gengsheng Kanfa, Hu Shi zhi You ‘Kong Su Bing.’” Zhongyang Zhoukan 10, no. 9 (1948): 355.Google Scholar

Li, Dong. “Yangwu Yundong Shiqqi Xue Fucheng Jiaru Guojifa Da Jiating de Zhuzhang yu Shijian.” Zhengfa Xuekan 37, no. 2 (2020): 121–128.Google Scholar

Li, Enhan. Beifa Qianhou de “Geming Waijiao” 1925–1931. Taipei: Zhongyang Yanjiuyuan Jindai Shi Yanjiusuo, 1993.Google Scholar

Li, Fupeng. “Weima Xianfa Shehuiquan de Zhongguo Zhuanhua.” Huanqiu Falü Pinglun 42, no. 3 (2020): 133–146.Google Scholar

Li, Guanghe. “Yapian Zhanzheng Qianhou Qiying Dui Wai Jiaoshe Lunshu.” Huabei Meishiyuan Xuebao (Zhexue Shehui Kexue Ban) 2 (1999): 3–5.Google Scholar

Li, Guilian. 1902: Zhongguo Fa de Zhuanxing. Guilin: Guangxi Shifan Daxue Chubanshe, 2018.Google Scholar

Li, Hongxi. Zhang Junmai Xiansheng de Minzhu Xianfa Sixiang. Taipei: Jinian Zhang Junmai Xiansheng Bai Ling Ming Dan Xueshu Yantaohui [Forum to Celebrate the Centennial of Zhang Junmai’s Birth], 1986.Google Scholar

Li, Shengwu. “Juan Tou Yu.” Liu Ying Xuebao 4 (1929): 4–5.Google Scholar

Li, Shengwu. Guoji Gongfa Lun. Shanghai: Shangwu Yinshuguan, 1935.Google Scholar

Li, Xizhu. “Li Hongzhang Dui Riben de Renshi ji Qi Waijiao Celüe: Yi 1870 Niandai wei Zhongxin.” Jindai Zhongguo Zhengzhi yu Waijiao 1, no. 204 (2013): 145–159.Google Scholar

Li, Yumin. “Wanqing Shiqi Guotiguan de Bianhua Shitan.” Renwen Zazhi 6 (2013): 71–90.Google Scholar

Li, Yu-qin. “Analysis of the Establishment and Operation of Hanyeping Company’s Joint Stock System in the Late Qing Dynasty.” Journal of XuChang University 4 (2009): 101–105.Google Scholar

Liang, Jian. “Yang Ru Jiejue Meiguo Paihua Wenti de Shijian yu Gouxiang Shulun.” Xinan Jiaotong Daxue Xuebao (Shehui Kexue Ban) 12, no. 2 (2011): 82–86.Google Scholar

Liang, Yuen-li. “The Pact of Paris as Envisaged by Mr. Stimson: Its Significance in International Law.” China Law Review 5 (1932): 198–227.Google Scholar

Liang, Yuen-li. “Le développement et la codification du droit international.” Recueil des Cours 73 (1948): 407–532.Google Scholar

Liang, Yuen-li. “The General Assembly and the Progressive Development and Codification of International Law.” American Journal of International Law 42, no. 1 (1948): 66–97.Google Scholar

Liang, Yuen-li. “Notes on Legal Questions Concerning the United Nations.” American Journal of International Law 43, no. 1 (1949): 134–144.Google Scholar

Liang, Yuen-li. “The Establishment of an International Criminal Jurisdiction: The First Phase.” American Journal of International Law 46, no. 1 (1952): 73–88.Google Scholar

Liang, Yuen-li. “Women zai Rineiwa de Cuowu.” Shenbao Yuekan 2, no. 8 (1933): 17–20.Google Scholar

Liang, Yuen-li, and Wang, Feiya “Li Shengwu Zhu Guoji Gongfa Lun.” Tushu Pinglun 2, no. 9 (1934): 35–43.Google Scholar

Lieber, Francis. Fragments of Political Science on Nationalism and Internationalism. New York: Charles Scribner & Co., 1868.Google Scholar

Lieber, Francis. Notes on Fallacies Peculiar to American Protectionists, or Chiefly Resorted to in America. New York: American Free-Trade League, 1869.Google Scholar

Ling, Qing. Cong Yan’an Dao Lianheguo: Ling Qing de Waijiao Shengya. Fujian: Fujian Renmin Chubanshe, 2008.Google Scholar

Liszt, Franz von. Das Völkerrecht systematisch dargestellt, 1st ed. Berlin: O. Haering, 1888.Google Scholar

Liszt, Franz von. Das Völkerrecht systematisch dargestellt, 2nd ed. Berlin: Verlag O. Haering, 1902.Google Scholar

Liszt, Franz von. Das Wesen des völkerrechtlichen Staatenverbandes und der international Prisenhof. Breslau: M. & H. Marcus, 1910.Google Scholar

Liszt, Franz von. Das Völkerrecht Systematisch Dargestellt. 10th ed. Berlin: Springer, 1915.Google Scholar

Liu, Andrew B. Tea War: A History of Capitalism in China and India. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2020.Google Scholar

Liu, Dan. “1874 Nian Dajiu Baolitong Beijing Tanpan de Dongyin yu Yingxiang.” Waiguo Wenti Yanjiu 4, no. 9 (2018): 85–92.Google Scholar

Liu, Daqun. Lianheguo Xianzhang Quanshi. Shanxi: Shanxi Jiaoyu Chubanshe, 1999.Google Scholar

Liu, Dasheng. “Shangfang Shi Gongmin de Xianfa Quanli.” Hongqi Wengao 2 (2004): 29–30.Google Scholar

Liu, Gengsheng. “Yixin yu Zongli Yamen de Jianli Shuping.” Lishi Dangan 3 (1990): 93–98.Google Scholar

Liu, Guoming, ed., Zhonghua Minguo Guomin Zhengfu Jun Zheng Zhiguan Renwu Zhi. Beijing: Chunqiu Chubanshe, 1989.Google Scholar

Liu, Lydia He. The Clash of Empires. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Liu, Lydia He. “Legislating the Universal: The Circulation of International Law in the Nineteenth Century.” In Tokens of Exchange: The Problem of Translation in Global Circulations, ed. Liu, Lydia He. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Liu, Yi. “Lun Zongli Yamen de Jianli Ji Qi Lishi Diwei.” Suzhou Daxue Xuebao 3 (1991): 112–120.Google Scholar

Lin, Laifan. “Guoti Gainianshi: Kuaguo Yizhi yu Yanbian.” Zhongguo Shehui Kexue 3 (2013): 65–84.Google Scholar

Lin, Zexu. Lin Zexu Quanji: Riji Juan. Fuzhou: Haixia Wenyi Chubanshe, 2002.Google Scholar

Ling, Qing. Cong yan’an dao lianheguo: Ling Qing de waijiao shengya. Fujian: Fujian Renmin Chubanshe, 2008.Google Scholar

Lingen, Kerstin von. Transcultural Justice at the Tokyo Tribunal: The Allied Struggle for Justice, 1946–48. Leiden: Brill, 2018.Google Scholar

Long, Xiaofei. “Qiying Waijiao Lilun Chu Tan.” Shoudu Bowuguan Congkan 0 (1995): 30–36.Google Scholar

Lorca, Arnulf Becker. Mestizo International Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Lorimer, James. “Prolegomènes d’un Système Raisonné de Droit International.” Revue de Droit International et de Législation Comparée 10 (1878): 348.Google Scholar

Lorimer, James. The Institutes of the Law of Nations, vol 1. Edinburgh: William Blackwood and Sons, 1883.Google Scholar

Lou, Dom Pierre-Célestin Tseng-tsiang [Lu Zhengxiang]. Souvenirs et Pensées. Bruges: Desclée de Brouwer, 1946.Google Scholar

Loughlin, Martin. Foundations of Modern Public Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Luo, Zhufeng. Hanyu Dacidian. Shanghai: Shanghai Cishu, 1990.Google Scholar

Lutz, Jessie Gregory. Opening China: Karl F. A. Gützlaff and Sino-Western Relations, 1827–1852. Cambridge: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing, 2008.Google Scholar

Ma, Do Yün [Ma Derun]. “Der Eintritt des chinesischen Reiches in den völkerrechtlichen Verband.” PhD dissertation, University of Berlin, 1907.Google Scholar

Ma, Yong. “From Constitutional Monarchy to Republic: The Trajectory of Yuan Shikai.” Journal of Modern Chinese History 6, no. 1 (2012): 15–32.Google Scholar

Ma, Ziyi. “Cong ‘Tianxia’ Dao ‘Zhuquan’: Cong Tiaoyue, Chuanjiao Kan Qingmo Shehui Guannian de Bianhua.” Shilin 6 (2004): 15–22.Google Scholar

MacDonald, Ronald St. John, ed. Essays in Honour of Wang Tieya. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1994.Google Scholar

Mahan, Alfred Thayer. The Influence of Sea Power upon History: 1660–1783. Boston: Little, Brown, & Co., 1890.Google Scholar

Mahan, Alfred Thayer. The Problem of Asia and Its Effect upon International Policies. London: Sampson, Low, Marston and Co., 1900.Google Scholar

Mamolea, Andrei. “Saving Face: The Political Work of the Permanent Court of Arbitration (1902–1914).” In Experiments in International Adjudication: Historical Accounts, de la Rasilla, Ignacio and Viñuales, Jorge E., eds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019: 193–210.Google Scholar

Marburg, Theodore. “The Significance of the International Court of Arbitral Justice.” In Report of the Annual Lake Mohonk Conference on International Arbitration. New York: Lake Mohonk Conference on International Arbitration, 1910: 85–89.Google Scholar

Martens, Charles de (Karl von). Xingyao Zhizhang. Beijing: Tongwenguan, 1876.Google Scholar

Martens, Fyodor de. Das Consularwesen und die Consularjurisdiction im Orient, trans. Skerzt, H.. Berlin: Weidmann, 1874.Google Scholar

Martens, Fyodor de. Le Conflit entre la Russie et la Chine, ses Origines, son Développement, et sa Portée Universelle: Étude Politique. Brussels: C. Muquardt, 1880.Google Scholar

Martens, Fyodor de. Traité de Droit International. Paris: A. Marescq Ainé, 1883.Google Scholar

Martens, Fyodor de. “How the Chinese Question Should Be Solved.” The Advocate of Peace 62, no. 11 (1900): 240–241Google Scholar

Martens, Fyodor de. La Conférence de la Paix á La Haye: Étude d’Histoire Contemporaine. Paris: Arthur Rousseau, 1900.Google Scholar

Martens, Georg Friedrich von. Précis du droit des gens moderne de l’Europe, vol. 1. Paris: Guillaumin et Cie, 1864.Google Scholar

Martin, William Alexander Parsons. A Cycle of Cathay: Or, China, South and North, with Personal Reminiscences. New York: Fleming H. Revell, 1896.Google Scholar

Martin, William Alexander Parsons. “La Chine et la Droit International.” Revue de Droit International et de Législation Comparée 17 (1885): 504–509.Google Scholar

Martin, William Alexander Parsons. “Les Vestiges d’un Droit International dans l’Ancienne Chine.” Revue de Droit International et de Législation Comparée 14 (1882): 227–242.Google Scholar

Martin, William Alexander Parsons. The Siege in Peking: China against the World. New York: Fleming H. Revell, 1900.Google Scholar

Martin, William Alexander Parsons. “Une Université en Chine: Le Présent et l’Avenir de l’Ensiegnement Supérieur International a Peking.” Revue de Droit International et de Législation Comparée 5 (1873): 8–10.Google Scholar

Marx, Karl. Grundrisse: Foundations of the Critique of Political Economy. New York: Penguin Books in association with the New Left Review, 1973.Google Scholar

Marx, Karl, and Engels, Friedrich H. G.. Karl Marx Friedrich Engels Gesamtausgabe (MEGA), Part 3, Briefwechsel, vol. 9, Januar 1858 bis August 1859. Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 2003.Google Scholar

Marx, Karl, and Engels, Friedrich H. G.. On Colonialism: Articles from the New York Tribune and Other Writings. New York: International Publishers, 1972.Google Scholar

Maxey, Edwin. “Development of International Law.” American Law Review 40, no. 188 (1906): 188–195.Google Scholar

Mayers, William Frederick. Treaties between the Empire of China and Foreign Powers, Together with Regulations for the Conduct of Foreign Trade, Conventions, Agreements, Regulations, etc. Shanghai: North China Herald Ltd., 1906.Google Scholar

Mayr, Teresa F., and Mayr-Singer, Jelka. “Keep the Wheels Spinning: The Contributions of Advisory Opinions of the International Court of Justice to the Development of International Law.” Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 76, no. 2 (2016): 425–449.Google Scholar

McCabe, James Dabney. A Tour around the World by General Grant: Being a Narrative of the Incidents and Events of His Journey. Philadelphia: The National Publishing Co., 1879.Google Scholar

McDougal, S. Myres. “International Law, Power, and Policy: A Contemporary Conception.” Recueil des Cours 82 (1954): 133–259.Google Scholar

McLuhan, Marshall. Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. Toronto: McGraw-Hill, 1964.Google Scholar

McWilliams, Wayne C. “Soejima Taneomi: Statesman of Early Meiji Japan, 1868–1874.” PhD dissertation, University of Kansas, 1973.Google Scholar

McWilliams, Wayne C. “East Meets East: The Soejima Mission to China, 1873.” Monumenta Nipponica 30, no. 3 (1975): 237–275.Google Scholar

Mei, Ju-ao. The Tokyo Trial and War Crimes in Asia, 2nd ed. Singapore: Springer Nature, 2016.Google Scholar

Meng, Guanghan, ed. Zhengzhi Xieshang Huiyi Jilu, Shang Juan. Chongqing: Chongqing Chubanshe, 1989.Google Scholar

Merlin, Philippe-Antoine. Répertoire universel et raisonné de jurisprudence, vol. 17. Paris: Garnery, 1827–1828.Google Scholar

Millard, Thomas F. The Shantung Case at the Conference. Shanghai: Millard’s Review of the Far East, 1921.Google Scholar

Miller, David Hunter. The Drafting of the Covenant. New York: Johnson Reprint Corporation, 1969.Google Scholar

Ministère des Affaires Étrangères. Documents Diplomatiques: Affaires du Tonkin. Deuxième Partie. Décembre 1882–1883. Paris: Imprimerie Nationale, 1883.Google Scholar

Minzhi Shuju. Bianzuan Guojifa Huiyi zhi Jingguo. Shanghai: Minzhi Shuju, 1930.Google Scholar

Mitchell, Ryan Martínez. “International Law as Project or System?” Georgetown Journal of International Law 51, no. 3 (2019): 623–689.Google Scholar

Mitchell, Ryan Martínez. “Chinese Receptions of Carl Schmitt since 1929.” Penn State Journal of Law and International Affairs 8, no. 1 (2020): 181–245.Google Scholar

Mitchell, Ryan Martínez. “Monroe’s Shadow: League of Nations Covenant Article 21 and the Space of Asia in International Legal Order.” TWAIL Review 2 (2021): 200–231.Google Scholar

Mitchell, Ryan Martínez. “The Human Community of Fate: A Conceptual History of China’s Ordoglobal Idea.” Humanity 13, no. 3 (forthcoming 2022).Google Scholar

Mitsukuri, Rinsho. Kokusai Hō Ichimei Bankoku Kōhō. Tokyo: Nishodō, 1873.Google Scholar

Mizuno, Norihito. “Qing China’s Reaction to the 1874 Japanese Expedition to the Taiwanese Aboriginal Territories.” Sino-Japanese Studies 16 (2009): 100–125.Google Scholar

Morikawa, Hiroki. “In Pursuit of Peace: Zhou Gengsheng’s Internationalism after the World Wars.” ZINBUN 47 (2017): 177–194.Google Scholar

Morse, Hosea Ballou. The International Relations of the Chinese Empire, vols. 1–3. London: Longmans, Green, and Company, 1918.Google Scholar

Mowat, Robert Case. “From Liberalism to Imperialism: The case of Egypt 1875–1887.” The Historical Journal 16, no. 1 (1973): 109–124.Google Scholar

Moyn, Samuel. “From Situated Freedom to Plausible Worlds.” In Contingency in International Law: On the Possibility of Different Legal Histories, Venzke, Ingo and Heller, Kevin John, eds. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2021: 532–541.Google Scholar

Müller, Andreas T. “Friedrich F. Martens on ‘The Office of Consul and Consular Jurisdiction in the East.’” European Journal of International Law 25, no. 3 (2014): 871–891.Google Scholar

Nagao, Ariga. The Red Cross Society of Japan: Its Organization and Activity in Time of Peace and War. St. Louis, MO: Samuel F. Myerson Printing Company, 1904.Google Scholar

Nayar, Pramod, ed. The Trial of Bahadur Shah Zafar. Hyderabad: Orient Longman, 2007.Google Scholar

Nelson, Eric S. “Zhang Junmai’s Early Political Philosophy and the Paradoxes of Chinese Modernity.” Asian Studies 8, no. 1 (2020): 183–208.Google Scholar

Ni, Zhengyu. Danbo Congrong Li Haiya. Beijing: Peking University Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Nippold, Otfried. Die Gestaltung des Völkerrechts nach dem Weltkriege. Zurich: Orell Füssli, 1917.Google Scholar

Nish, Ian. The Iwakura Mission to America and Europe: A New Assessment. Abingdon: Routledge, 2008.Google Scholar

Nishi, Amane. Kanban Bankoku Kōhō. Kyoto: Chikuhōrō, 1868.Google Scholar

Nishi, Amane. Horan Biserin-shi Bankoku Kōhō. Kyoto: Chikuhōrō, 1868.Google Scholar

Norman, Jerry. A Comprehensive Manchu–English Dictionary. Leiden: Brill, 2020.Google Scholar

Nussbaum, Arthur. “Frederic de Martens, Representative Tsarist Writer on International Law.” Nordic Journal of International Law 22, no. 1 (1952): 51–66.Google Scholar

Shigemi, Ōhara to Tomomi, Iwakura, January 12, 1873. In Iwakura Tomomi kankei monjo, vol. 5. Tokyo: Tokyo Daigaku Shuppankai, 1968: 216–220.Google Scholar

Onuma, Yasuaki. “When Was the Law of International Society Born?: An Inquiry of the History of International Law from an Intercivilizational Perspective.” Journal of the History of International Law 2, no. 1 (2000): 1–66.Google Scholar

Onuma, Yasuaki. A Transcivilizational Perspective on International Law: Questioning Prevalent Cognitive Frameworks in the Emerging Multi-polar and Multi-civilizational World of the Twenty-First Century. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2010.Google Scholar

Oppenheim, Lassa. International Law: A Treatise, vol. 1. London: Longmans, Green, and Co., 1905.Google Scholar

Oppenheim, Lassa. International Law: A Treatise, 3rd ed. London: Longmans, Green, and Co., 1920.Google Scholar

Özsu, Umut. “Ottoman Empire.” In The Oxford Handbook of the History of International Law, Fassbender, Bardo, Peters, Anne, Peter, Simone, and Högger, Daniel, eds. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012: 429–446.Google Scholar

Özsu, Umut. “The Ottoman Empire, the Origins of Extraterritoriality, and International Legal Theory.” In The Oxford Handbook of the Theory of International Law, Orford, Anne and Hoffmann, Florian, eds. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016: 123–137.Google Scholar

Özsu, Umut. “The Necessity of Contingency: Method and Marxism in International Law.” In Contingency in International Law: On the Possibility of Different Legal Histories, Venzke, Ingo and Heller, Kevin John, eds. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2021: 60–76.Google Scholar

Paine, Sarah C. The Sino-Japanese War of 1894–1895: Perceptions, Power, and Primacy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Pashukanis, Evgeny. The General Theory of Law and Marxism. Abingdon: Routledge, 2017.Google Scholar

Patapan, Haig, and Wang, Yi. “The Hidden Ruler: Wang Huning and the Making of Contemporary China.” Journal of Contemporary China 27, no. 109 (2018): 47–60.Google Scholar

Peng, Jianying. “Zhongguo Chuantong Jimi Zhengce Lüelun.” Xibe Daxue Xuebao: Zhexue (Shehui Kexue Ban) 34, no. 1 (2004): 104–108.Google Scholar

Pepper, Suzanne. Civil War in China: The Political Struggle 1945–1949. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1978.Google Scholar

Perdue, Peter C. China Marches West: The Qing Conquest of Central Eurasia. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Phillimore, Walter. “Appendix: Recent Schemes of Federation.” In The Committee of the League of Nations, Final Report. Geneva: League of Nations: 1918: 8–24.Google Scholar

Pitts, Jennifer. Boundaries of the International: Law and Empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2018.Google Scholar

Platt, Stephen R. Imperial Twilight: The Opium War and the End of China’s Last Golden Age. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2018.Google Scholar

Politis, Nicolas. Les Nouvelles Tendances du Droit International. Paris: Librairie Hachette, 1927.Google Scholar

Politis, Nicolas. Proceedings and Documents of the United Nations Monetary and Financial Conference, Bretton Woods, New Hampshire, July 1–22, 1944, 2 vols. Washington, DC: United States Government Printing Office, 1948.Google Scholar

Politis, Nicolas. Qingdai Wai Zhai Shi Ziliao. Beijing: Zhonghua Renmin Gongheguo Caizheng Bu: 1988.Google Scholar

Qiu, Zuming. “Zhuquan yu Lingtu Zhuquan.” Dongfang Zazhi 25, no. 23 (1928): 77–80.Google Scholar

Rao, Geping. “Wang Tieya Xiansheng he Bei Da Guojifa Yanjiusuo.” Zhongguo Guojifa Xuehui, May 6, 2015. Available at: www.csil.cn/Director/Detail.aspx?AId=12.Google Scholar

Reimann, Mathias. “The Historical School against Codification: Savigny, Carter, and the Defeat of the New York Civil Code.” The American Journal of Comparative Law 37, no. 1 (1989): 95–119.Google Scholar

Reinisch, August. “Investors.” In Non-state Actors in International Law, Noortmann, Math, Reinisch, August, and Ryngaert, Cedric, eds. London: Bloomsbury Publishing, 2015: 253–272.Google Scholar

Reynolds, Philip A., and Hughes, Edward J.. The Historian as Diplomat: Charles Kingsley Webster and the United Nations 1939–1946. London: Martin Robertson, 1976.Google Scholar

Rolin-Jaequemyns, Gustave. “Notes on Fallacies Peculiar to American Protectionists, or Chiefly Resorted to in America, by Francis Lieber.” Revue de Droit International et de Léglisation Comparée 2 (1870): 354–356.Google Scholar

Rolin-Jaequemyns, Gustave. “Proposition d’Établir un Collège Americain en Chine.” Revue de Droit International et de Législation Comparée 4 (1872): 362–363.Google Scholar

Rolin-Jaequemyns, Gustave. “Rédaction d’un Code civile Japonais.” Revue de Droit International et de Législation Comparée 4 (1872): 363.Google Scholar

Rolin-Jaequemyns, Gustave. “La Diplomatie Européenne à Péking.” Revue de Droit International et de Législation Comparée 9 (1877): 401–404.Google Scholar

Roosevelt, Theodore. “Annual Message of the President to Congress.” In Papers Relating to the Foreign Relations of the United States, vol. 1. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 1904: xlviii.Google Scholar

Root, Elihu. “Basis of Protection to Citizens Residing Abroad.” American Journal of International Law 4, no. 3 (1910): 517–528.Google Scholar

Röpke, Wilhelm. “Economic Order and International Law.” Receuil des Cours 86 (1954): 207–273.Google Scholar

Röpke, Wilhelm. International Order and Economic Integration. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company, 1959.Google Scholar

Rosenne, Shabtai, ed. League of Nations Committee of Experts for the Progressive Codification of International Law (1925–1928): Documents Vol. 1. New York: Oceana Publications, 1972.Google Scholar

Roth, Hans Ingvar. P. C. Chang and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2018.Google Scholar

Ruskola, Teemu. Legal Orientalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Schlichtmann, Klaus. “Japan, Germany and the Idea of the Hague Peace Conferences.” Journal of Peace Research 40. no. 4 (2003): 377–394.Google Scholar

Schluessel, Eric. Land of Strangers: The Civilizing Project in Qing Central Asia. New York: Columbia University Press, 2020.Google Scholar

Schmitt, Carl. Der Nomos der Erde im Volkerrecht des Jus Publicum Europaeum. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1950.Google Scholar

Schmitt, Carl. “Die Lage der europäischen Rechtswissenschaft” (1950). In Verfassungsrechtliche Aufsätze aus den Jahren 1924–1954. Materialen zu einer Verfassungslehre, Schmitt, Carl, ed. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1958: 386–429.Google Scholar

Schmitt, Carl. The Nomos of the Earth in the International Law of the Jus Publicum Europaeum, trans. Ulmen, G. L.. New York: Telos Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Schücking, Walther. “L’organisation international.” Revue générale de droit international public 15 (1908): 5–23.Google Scholar

Schücking, Walther. Die Organisation der Welt. Leipzig: Kröner, 1909.Google Scholar

Schücking, Walther. Das Werk vom Haag, Erster Band: Die Staatenverband der Haager Konferenzen. Munich: Duncker & Humblot, 1912.Google Scholar

Schücking, Walther. “Die frage der Kündigung des belgisch-Chinesischen handelsverträges von 1865.” In Die Reichsgerichtspraxis im Deutschen Rechtsleben: Festgabe der juristischen Fakultäten zum 50jährigen Bestehen des Reichsgerichts, vol. 1, Öffentliches Recht, Schreiber, Otto, ed. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1929.Google Scholar

Schuler, Kurt, and Rosenberg, Andrew, eds. The Bretton Woods Transcripts. New York: Center for Financial Stability, 2012.Google Scholar

Scott, James Brown. The Hague Peace Conferences of 1899 and 1907, vol. 1. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press, 1909.Google Scholar

Scott, James Brown. The Hague Peace Conferences of 1899 and 1907, vol. 2. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press, 1909.Google Scholar

Scott, James Brown. “The Chinese Society and Journal of International Law.” American Journal of International Law 7, no. 1 (1913): 159–161.Google Scholar

Scott, James Brown. ed. American Addresses at the Second Hague Peace Conference. Boston: World Peace Foundation, 1916.Google Scholar

Scott, James Brown. “The Chinese Social and Political Science Association.” American Journal of International Law 10, no. 2 (1916): 375–378.Google Scholar

Scott, James Brown. The Reports to the Hague Conferences of 1899 and 1907. New York: Clarendon Press, 1917.Google Scholar

Scott, James Brown. The Proceedings of the Hague Peace Conferences: Translation of the Original Texts. New York: Oxford University Press, 1920.Google Scholar

Scott, James Brown. ed. The Proceedings of the Hague Peace Conferences, The Conference of 1907, Vol. 2, Meetings of the First Commission. New York: Oxford University Press, 1921.Google Scholar

Scott, James Brown. ed., The Proceedings of the Hague Peace Conferences, The Conference of 1907, vol. 3, Meetings of the Second, Third, and Fourth Commissions. New York: Oxford University Press, 1921.Google Scholar

Sebes, Joseph. The Jesuits and the Sino-Russian Treaty of Nerchinsk (1689): The Diary of Thomas Pereira, S. J. Rome: Institutum Historicum, 1962.Google Scholar

Shaffer, Gregory, and Gao, Henry, “A New Chinese Economic Order?” Journal of International Economic Law 23, no. 3 (2020): 607–635.Google Scholar

Shen, Minrong. “Zhengfu, Shichang yu Jingjifa de Dingwei.” PhD dissertation, Central Party School of the Chinese Communist Party, 2000.Google Scholar

Shi, Jianguo. Lu Zhengxiang Zhuan. Shijiazhuang: Hebei Renmin Chubanshe, 1999.Google Scholar

Shibata, M., and Koyas, T., eds. An English and Japanese Dictionary. Yokohama: Ni-Shu-Sha Printing Office, 1873.Google Scholar

Shih, Vincent Y. C. “A Talk with Hu Shih.” China Quarterly 10 (1962): 149–165.Google Scholar

Shotwell, James T. Extraterritoriality in China. New York: Institute of Pacific Relations, 1929.Google Scholar

Sima, Qian. Shiji quanben: Shang. Shenyang: Wanjuan Chuban Gongsi, 2016.Google Scholar

Simpson, Gerry. Great Powers and Outlaw States: Unequal Sovereigns in the International Legal Order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Singh Chimni, Bhupinder. International Law and World Order: A Critique of Contemporary Approaches. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.Google Scholar

Skinner, Quentin. “Meaning and Understanding in the History of Ideas.” History and Theory 8, no. 1 (1969): 3–53.Google Scholar

Skinner, Quentin. “Meaning and Understanding in the History of Ideas.” In Meaning and Context: Quentin Skinner and His Critics, Tully, James, ed. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1988: 29–67.Google Scholar

Skouteris, Thomas. “Engaging History in International Law.” In New Approaches to International Law, Beneyto, José María and Kennedy, David, eds. The Hague: T. M. C. Asser Press, 2012: 99–121.Google Scholar

Slobodian, Quinn. Globalists: The End of Empire and the Birth of Neoliberalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2018.Google Scholar

Smith, Adam. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, vol. 1. London: Printed for W. Strahan; and T. Cadell in the Strand, 1776.Google Scholar

Speranskii, Mikhail M. Polnoe Sobranie: Zakonov Rossiiskoi Imperii s 1649 Goda, Vol. 3, 1689–1699. St. Petersburg: Tipografiya Ego Imperatorskogo Velichestva Kantselyarii, 1830.Google Scholar

Spiermann, Ole. International Legal Argument in the Permanent Court of International Justice: The Rise of the International Judiciary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Spiermann, Ole. “Judge Wang Chung-hui at the Permanent Court of International Justice.” Chinese Journal of International Law 5, no. 1 (2006): 115–128.Google Scholar

Stead, William T. The Parliament of Peace and Its Members. London: Review of Reviews, 1899.Google Scholar

Stead, William T. The United States of Europe on the Eve of the Parliament of Peace. Toronto: George N. Morang, 1899.Google Scholar

Steiger, Heinhard. “Völkerrecht.” In Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe, vol. 7, Brunner, Otto, Conze, Werner, and Koselleck, Reinhart, eds. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta, 1972–1990: 97–140.Google Scholar

Stranahan, Patricia. Underground: The Shanghai Communist Party and the Politics of Survival, 1927–1937. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 1998.Google Scholar

Strauss, Julia C. Strong Institutions in Weak Polities: State Building in Republican China, 1927–1940. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Strupp, Karl. Urkunden zur geschichte des völkerrechts. Gotha: Friedrich Andreas Perthes, 1911.Google Scholar

Strupp, Karl. Ausgewählte diplomatische Aktenstücke zur orientalischen Frage. Gotha: Friedrich Andreas Perthes, 1916.Google Scholar

Strupp, Karl. Documents pour servir à l’histoire du droit des gens. Berlin: Hermann Sack, 1923.Google Scholar

Strupp, Karl. Legal Machinery for Peaceful Change. London: Constable & Company Limited, 1937.Google Scholar

Sun, Yat-sen. China and Japan: Natural Friends, Unnatural Enemies. Shanghai: China United Press, 1941.Google Scholar

Suttner, Bertha von. “Slow Evolution.” The Advocate of Peace 62, no. 10 (1900): 208–209.Google Scholar

Suttner, Bertha von. Memoiren von Bertha von Suttner. Stuttgart: Deutsche Verlags-Anstalt, 1909.Google Scholar

Suttner, Bertha von. Memoirs of Bertha von Suttner: The Records of an Eventful Life, vol. 2. London: International School of Peace, 1910.Google Scholar

Suzuki, Shogo. “Imagining ‘Asia’: Japan and ‘Asian’ International Society in Modern History.” In Contesting International Society in East Asia, Buzan, Barry and Zhang, Yongjin, eds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014: 51–72.Google Scholar

Svarverud, Rune. International Law as a World Order in Late Imperial China: Translation, Reception and Discourse; 1847–1911. Leiden: Brill, 2007.Google Scholar

Taft, William H. Address of President Taft at the Banquet Given in His Honor by the Americus Club, Pittsburgh, P.A., May 2, 1910. Washington, DC: Library of Congress, 1910.Google Scholar

Takeharu, Ōkubo. The Quest for Civilization: Encounters with Dutch Jurisprudence, Political Economy, and Statistics at the Dawn of Modern Japan, trans. Noble, David. Leiden: Brill, 2014.Google Scholar

Tang, Qihua. Beijing Zhengfu yu Guoji Lianmeng. Taipei: Dongda Tushu Gongsi, 1998.Google Scholar

Tang, Qihua. “Qingmo Minchu Zhongguo dui ‘Haiya Baohehui’ zhi Canyu (1899–1917).” Guoli Zhengzhi Daxue Lishi Xuebao 5, no. 23 (2005): 45–49.Google Scholar

Tang, Qihua. Bei “Feichu Bupindeng Tiaoyue” Zhebi de Beiyang Xiuyue Shi (1912–1928). Beijing: Shehui Keshue Wenxian Chubanshe, 2010.Google Scholar

Tchéou-Wei, Sintchar [Zhou Wei]. Essai sur l’organisation juridique de la Société international. Geneva: Libraire Atar, 1917.Google Scholar

The International Law Association. Reports of the First Conference Held at Brussels, 1873, and of the Second Conference Held at Geneva, 1874. London: West, Newman & Co., 1903.Google Scholar

Thompson, Carol L. “A History of Disarmament Proposals.” Current History 36, no. 209 (1959): 38–43.Google Scholar

Tian, Tao. “Wan Qing Zhishijie de Mibing Shuo.” Tianjin Shifan Daxue Xuebao (Shehui Kexue Ban) 1 (2008): 38–43.Google Scholar

Tian, Tao. “Haiya He Hui zai Zhongguo de Fanxiang.” Tianjin Shifan Daxue Xuebao (Shehui Kexue Ban) 3 (2015): 11–16.Google Scholar

Tomlins, Christopher. “After Critical Legal History: Scope, Scale, Structure.” Annual Review of Law and Social Science 8, no. 1 (2012): 31–68.Google Scholar

Trubetskoi, G. N. Notes of a Plenipotentiary: Russian Diplomacy and War in the Balkans, 1914–1917. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2016.Google Scholar

Tryon, James L. “International Prize Court and Code.” Yale Law Journal 20 (1910): 604–619.Google Scholar

Tso, Tschun Tschou [Zhou Zechun]. Die Reformen des chinesischen Reiches in Verfassung, Verwaltung und Rechtsprechung mit Ruecksicht auf die entsprechenden Einrichtungen Europas. Berlin: Druck von Emil Ebering, 1909.Google Scholar

Tsuda, Mamichi. Taisei Kokuhō Ron. Edo: Kaiseijo, 1868.Google Scholar

Tsutsumi, Koshiji. Bankoku Kōhō Yakugi. Kyoto: Zeniya Soshirō, 1868.Google Scholar

Tsui, Brian. China’s Conservative Revolution: The Quest for a New Order, 1927–1949. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018.Google Scholar

Tuck, Richard. The Rights of War and Peace: Political Thought and the International Order from Grotius to Kant. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Twiss, Travers. Two Introductory Lectures on the Science of International Law. London: Longman, 1856.Google Scholar

Twiss, Travers. The Law of Nations Considered as Independent Political Communities: On the Rights and Duties of Nations in Time of Peace. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1884.Google Scholar

Twiss, Travers. View of the Progress of Political Economy in Europe since the Sixteenth Century. London: Longman, Brown, Green, and Longmans, 1847.Google Scholar

Tzouvala, Ntina. Capitalism as Civilisation: A History of International Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020.Google Scholar

UNDP. Our 40 Year Journey, 1979–2019: United Nations Development Programme in China. Geneva: UNDP, 2019.Google Scholar

Union Interparlementaire. Compte rendu de la XXVe conférence tenue à Berlin du 23 au 28 août 1928. Lausanne: Librairie Payot & Co., 1928.Google Scholar

Uryū, Mitora. Kōdō Kigen Ichimei Bankoku Kōhō Zensho. Kyoto: Chikuhōrō, 1868.Google Scholar

Vattel, Emer de. The Law of Nations, trans. Chitty, Joseph. London: S. Sweet and A. Maxwell, 1834.Google Scholar

Vattel, Emer de. Le Droit des Gens, ou Principes de la Loi Naturelle Appliqués a la Conduite et aux Affaires des Nations et des Souverains. Paris: J. P. Aillaud, 1835.Google Scholar

Vec, Miloš. “Sources in the 19th Century European Tradition: The Myth of Positivism.” European Journal of International Law 16 (2005): 539–559.Google Scholar

Ven, Hans van de. “Robert Hart and Gustav Detring during the Boxer Rebellion.” Modern Asian Studies 40, no. 3 (2006): 631–662.Google Scholar

Ven, Hans Breaking with the Past: The Maritime Customs Service and the Global Origins of Modernity in China. New York: Columbia University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Venzke, Ingo. “Introduction: Situating Contingency in the Path of International Law.” In Contingency in International Law: On the Possibility of Different Legal Histories, Venzke, Ingo and Heller, Kevin John, eds. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2021: 3–19.Google Scholar

Visscher, Charles de. “Revues de Langue Anglaise.” Revue de Droit International et de Législation Comparée 49 (1922): 237–239.Google Scholar

Wade, Thomas Francis. Note upon the Condition and Government of the Chinese Empire in 1849. Hong Kong: China Mail Office, 1850.Google Scholar

Waijiaobu Bianzuan Weiyuanhui. Zhongguo Huifu Guanshui Zhuquan zhi Jingguo 中国恢复关税主权之经过. Beijing: Waijiaobu Bianzuan Weiyuanhui, 1929.Google Scholar

Wallerstein, Immanuel. European Universalism: The Rhetoric of Power. New York: The New Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Wallerstein, Immanuel. The Modern World System II: Mercantilism and the Consolidation of the European World-Economy, 1600–1750. New York: Academic Press, 1980.Google Scholar

Wang, Chung Hui [Wang Chonghui]. The German Civil Code: Translated and Annotated with Historical Introduction and Appendices. London: Stevens and Sons, Ltd., 1907.Google Scholar

Wang, Chung Hui “Peaceful Means for Settling International Disputes.” China Law Review 2 (1926): 336.Google Scholar

Wang, Chung Hui “Jieshao Bijiao Faxue Guoji Huiyi.” Zhonghua Faxue Zazhi 1, no. 2 (1930): 143–149.Google Scholar

Wang, Ding’an. Xiang Jun Ji, vol. 1. Shanghai: Jiangnan Shuju, 1889.Google Scholar

Wang, Heng. “Selective Reshaping: China’s Paradigm Shift in International Economic Governance.” Journal of International Economic Law 23, no. 3 (2020): 583–606.Google Scholar

Wang, Hui. Zhongguo xiandai Sixiang de Xingqi, 4 vols. Beijing: Sanlian Shudian, 2004.Google Scholar

Wang, Huning “Lun Xian-Dangdai Zhuquan Lilun de Xin Fazhan.” Zhengzhixue Yanjiu 1 (1985): 39–45.Google Scholar

Wang, Huning Guojia Zhuquan. Beijing: Renmin Chubanshe, 1987.Google Scholar

Wang, Jian “Modern Legal Periodicals of China.” Frontiers of Law in China 2, no. 2 (2007): 318–333.Google Scholar

Wang, Jingwei, ed. Ouzhou Heyi Hou zhi Shijie yu Zhongguo. Shanghai: Minzhi Shuju, 1926.Google Scholar

Wang, Ruicheng. “The ‘Outward Flow of Power’ and the Evolution of the Late Qing Power Structure, 1855–1875.” Modern Chinese History Studies 2 (2012): 28–46.Google Scholar

Wang, Tieya. “Dulumenzhuyi yu Menluozhuyi.” Minzhu Luntan 1, no. 9 (1947): 3–6.Google Scholar

Wang, Tieya. “International Law in China: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives,” Recueil de Cours de L’Académie de Droit International 221 (1990): 195–369.Google Scholar

Wang, Tseng-Tsai, “The Audience Question: Foreign Representatives and the Emperor of China, 1858–1873.” The Historical Journal 14, no. 3 (1971): 617–626.Google Scholar

Wang, Yanwei and Wang, Liang, eds. Qing Ji Waijiao Shiliao. Beijing: Shumu Wenshu Chubanshe, 1987.Google Scholar

Wang, Yuanshen. Sheng Dao Dong Lai Kao. Hong Kong, self-published, 1899.Google Scholar

Wang, Yuanchong. “Defining Chosŏn: Qing China’s Depiction of Chosŏn’s Status, 1862–76.” In Remaking the Chinese Empire: Manchu–Korean Relations, 1616–1911. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2018: 121–143.Google Scholar

Wang, Yuanzhi, ed. Jiaxu Gongdu Chaocun. Taipei: Taiwan Yinhang, 1959.Google Scholar

Wasserstrom, Jeffrey N., ed. Twentieth-Century China: New Approaches. Abingdon: Routledge, 2013.Google Scholar

Weber, Isabella M. How China Escaped Shock Therapy: The Market Reform Debate. Abingdon: Routledge, 2021.Google Scholar

Wehberg, Hans. The Problem of an International Court of Justice, trans. Fenwick, Charles G.. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1918.Google Scholar

Wei, Yuan. Wei Yuan Quanji, vol. 7. Changsha: Yuelu Shushe, 2004.Google Scholar

Wei-man, Huanggong Bowuguan and Fangzhiguan, Jilinnsheng. Wei-Manzhouguo Zhimin Tongzhi Jigou Tuzhi. Jilin: Jilin Renmin Chubanshe, 2010.Google Scholar

Wen, Zhou. “Tan Tan Zhuquan Lun.” Zhengzhi Hui Kan 1, no. 2 (1932): 40–57.Google Scholar

Wertheim, Stephen. “The League That Wasn’t: American Designs for a Legalist-Sanctionist League of Nations and the Intellectual Origins of International Organization, 1914–1920.” Diplomatic History 35, no. 5 (2011): 797–836.Google Scholar

Witte, Sergei. The Memoirs of Count Witte. Harcave, Sydney, trans. and ed. Armonk, NY: ME Sharpe, 1990.Google Scholar

Wheaton, Henry. Elements of International Law, 6th ed. Lawrence, William Beach, ed. Boston: Little, Brown, & Co., 1855.Google Scholar

Wheaton, Henry. Wanguo Gongfa, trans. Martin, W. A. P.. Beijing: Tongwenguan, 1864.Google Scholar

Whelan, Daniel J. “‘Under the Aegis of Man’: The Right to Development and the Origins of the New International Economic Order.” Humanity 6, no. 1 (2015): 93–108.Google Scholar

White, Hayden. “Foreword.” In Koselleck, Reinhart. The Practice of Conceptual History: Timing History, Spacing Concepts, trans. Presner, Todd Samuel. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2002: 13–23.Google Scholar

White, Hayden. Metahistory: The Historical Imagination in Nineteenth-Century Europe. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

White, John Albert. Transition to Global Rivalry: Alliance Diplomacy and the Quadruple Entente: 1895–1907. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Williams, Edward T. “The Relations between China, Russia, and Mongolia.” American Journal of International Law 10, no. 4 (1916): 798–808.Google Scholar

Williams, S. Wells. “Christian Missions among the Chinese.” In The Middle Kingdom, vol. 2. Leiden: Global Oriental, 2007: 275.Google Scholar

Willoughby, Westel W. China at the Conference: A Report. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press, 1922.Google Scholar

Winfield, Jordan Carlyle. “Buddhism and Insurrection in Burma, 1886–1890.” Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society 20, no. 3 (2010): 345–367.Google Scholar

Winkelmann, Ingo. “Regional Groups in the UN.” In A Concise Encyclopedia of the United Nations, 2nd ed. Volger, Helmut, ed. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2010.Google Scholar

Wong, John Yue-wo. Deadly Dreams: Opium and the Arrow War (1856–1860) in China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Woodhead, Henry G. W., and Montague Bell, Henry T., The China Year Book 1914. London: George Routledge & Sons, 1914.Google Scholar

Wright, Quincy. “The Washington Conference.” American Political Science Review 16, no. 2 (1922): 285–297.Google Scholar

Wright, Quincy. “Opinion of the Commission of Jurists in the Janina–Corfu Affair.” American Journal of International Law 18, no. 3 (1924): 536–544.Google Scholar

Wright, Quincy. “The Outlawry of War and the Law of War.” American Journal of International Law 47, no. 3 (1953): 365–376.Google Scholar

Wright, Richard. The Color Curtain: A Report on the Bandung Conference. New York: World Publishing, 1956.Google Scholar

Wu, Ting-Fang “China’s Attitude towards Arbitration.” In Report of the Annual Lake Mohonk Conference on International Arbitration. New York: Lake Mohonk Conference on International Arbitration, 1909: 67–71.Google Scholar

Wu, Xiping. “Jiu Guojifa zhi Quedian yu Xin Guojifa zhi Yaoqiu.” Zhongfa Daxue Yuekan 1, no. 4 (1932): 1–14.Google Scholar

Xing, Zhiyu. “Cong ‘Shuize Tanpan’ Kan He Guiqing yu Zhongyang Zhengce de Boyi.” Xue Lilun 7 (2019): 135–138.Google Scholar

Xiong, Xiling. “Wei Xiangsheng Xing Lun Cheng Zhang Zhidong.” In Hunan Weixin Yundong Shiliao, Feizhou, Yi, ed. Chansha: Yuelu Shushe, 2013: 223–230.Google Scholar

Yang, Daxin, ed. Beiyang Zhengfu Zongtong yu Zongli. Tianjin: Nankai Daxue Chubanshe, 1989.Google Scholar

Yasuoka, Akio. Meiji zenki tairiku seisaku shi no kenkyū. Tokyo: Hōsei Daigaku Shuppankyoku, 1998.Google Scholar

Yu, Zhong. “Suowei Guoti: Xianfa Shike yu Liang Qichao de Gonghe Zaizao Shike.” Faxuejia 4 (2015): 158–175.Google Scholar

Zarrow, Peter. China in War and Revolution, 1895–1949. Abingdon: Routledge, 2006.Google Scholar

Zarrow, Peter. After Empire: The Conceptual Transformation of the Chinese State, 1885–1924. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Zhai, Qiang. “China and the Geneva Conference of 1954.” China Quarterly 129 (1992): 103–122.Google Scholar

Zhang, Xiruo. “Xin Zhongguo de Heping Waijiao Zhengce.” Shijie Zhishi 40 (1952): 5–6.Google Scholar

Zhang, Yongle. Jiu Bang Xin Zao: 1911–1917. Beijing: Peking University Press, 2016.Google Scholar

Zhang, Yongxin. “Wanqing Zhongguoren de Zhuquan Guannian: Guojifa Shijiao.” Beijing Shixue 10 (2004): 102–134.Google Scholar

Zhang, Zhenguo. “Cong ‘Wu Wu Xiancao’ Dao ‘Zhonghua Minguo Xianfa.’” In Quanguo Waiguo Fazhishi Yanjiuhui Xueshu Congshu: 20 Shiji Xifang Xianzheng de Fazhan ji qi Biange, He, Qinhua, ed. Beijing: Falü Chubanshe, 2004.Google Scholar

Zhang, Zhidong. Quan Xue Pian. Changsha: Liang Hu Shu Yuan, 1898.Google Scholar

Zheng, Guanying. Sheng Shi Wei Yan. Shenyang: Liaoning Renmin Chubanshe, 1994.Google Scholar

Zhongguo Di Er Lishi Dang’an Guan. “Lu Zhengxiang Chuxi Haiya Baohehui Zouzhe Liang Jian.” Minguo Dang’an 2 (2000): 37–42.Google Scholar

Zhonguo Shehui Kexue Yuan Jindaishi Yanjiusuo. Yang Ru Geng-Xin Cun Gao. Beijing: Zhongguo Shehui Kexue Chuban, 1979.Google Scholar

Zhou, Gengsheng. “Juwai Zhongli Tiaogui Pingyi.” Jiayin Zazhi 1, no. 8 (1915): 1–16.Google Scholar

Zhou, Gengsheng. “Zhong-E Jiaoshe Ping.” Jiayin Zazhi 1, no. 10 (1915): 1–8.Google Scholar

Zhou, Gengsheng. “Gonghe Zhengzhi Lun.” Jiayin Zazhi 1, no. 10 (1915): 1–17.Google Scholar

Zhou, Gengsheng. “Zongzhuquan Lun.” Taipingyang 1, no. 10 (1918): 1–13.Google Scholar

Zhou, Gengsheng. “Wanguo Tongmeng zhi San Da Yiyi.” Taipingyang 2, no. 1 (1919): 43–48.Google Scholar

Zhou, Gengsheng. “Zhanqian Zhanhou de Guoji Zhengju.” Taipingyang 2, no. 5 (1920): 1–16.Google Scholar

Zhou, Gengsheng. “Wanguo Lianmeng yu Qiangzhi Hejie.” Taipingyang 2, no. 9 (1920): 1–9.Google Scholar

Zhou, Gengsheng. Bupingdeng Tiaoyue Shijiang. Shanghai: Taipingyang Shudian, 1928.Google Scholar

Zhou, Gengsheng. Guoji Gongfa zhi Xin Fazhan. Shanghai: Shangwu Yinshuguan, 1934.Google Scholar

Zhou, Gengsheng. “Zhongguo de Guoji Diwei.” Mei Zhou Pinglun 146 (1934): 18–24.Google Scholar

Zhou, Gengsheng. “1935 Nian zhi Zhanwang: Guolian de Qiantu.” Dongfang Zazhi 32, no. 1 (1935): 25–29.Google Scholar

Zhou, Gengsheng. “Zhanhou de Nanyang.” Nanyang Yanjiu 11, no. 1 (1943): 79–82.Google Scholar

Zhou, Gengsheng. Xiandai Guojifa de Sixiang Dongxiang. Beijing: Shijie Zhishi Chubanshe, 1963.Google Scholar

Zhou, Gengsheng. Guojifa. Beijing: Shangwu Yinshuguan, 1983.Google Scholar

Zhou, Wei. “1919 Nian Hou zhi Guoji Gongfa.” Xu Wu 35 (1919): 18–21.Google Scholar

Zhou, Wei. Xin Guoji Gongfa. Shanghai: Shangwu yinshu guan, 1930.Google Scholar

Zhou, Ziya. “Yi Ge Zhuyi Yi Ge Zhengfu Yi Ge Lingxiu.” Minyi (Hankou) 36 (1938): 11.Google Scholar

Zhou, Ziya. “Zenyang Yanjiu Guoji Gongfa.” Xin Renshi 9, no. 2 (1944): 13–31.Google Scholar

Zhou, Ziya. Meiguo Meizhou yu Shijie. Shanghai: Shangwu Yinshuguan, 1946.Google Scholar

Zhou, Ziya. “Cong Guojifa Lichang Lun Meijun Baoxing zhi Xingzhi ji Waiguo Jundui zhi Xingshi Guanxia Wenti.” Guancha 1, no. 23 (1947): 4–7.Google Scholar

Zhou, Ziya. “Aobenhai Guojifa Pingjia.” Faxue 1 (1957): 3.Google Scholar

Zhou, Ziya. “Chuncui Fa Xueshuo Zhong de ‘Falü’, ‘Guojia’, he ‘Zhengyi’.” Xiandai Waiguo Zhexue Shehui Kexue Wenzhai 8 (1961): 37–38.Google Scholar

Zhou, Ziya. “Ping Chuncui Fa Xueshuo He Ta de Chuangshiren Kaierxun.” Shehui Kexue 1 (1979): 111–114.Google Scholar

Zhou, Ziya and Luo, Shipei. “Cong ‘Guojia Quanli’ Zouxiang ‘Shijie Quanli’: Gaizao Shijie de Yi Ge Jiben Yuanze.” Zhongyang Zhoukan 8, no. 4 (1946): 5.Google Scholar

Zhu, Chuangyu, ed. Wang Chonghui Zhuanji Ziliao, vols. 1–3. Taipei: Tian Yi Chubanshe, 1979.Google Scholar

Zhu, Xueshan. “Cong ‘Yi Wen Hui You’ Tan Qi: Xiao Yi Zhongguo Guoji Jingjifa Xuehui Zishen Jianshe Wenti.” Guoji Jingji Fa Xue Kan 4 (2004): 417–422.Google Scholar

Zhu, Yuan Yi. “Suzerainty, Semi-sovereignty, and International Legal Hierarchies on China’s Borderlands.” Asian Journal of International Law 10, no. 2 (2020): 293–320.Google Scholar

Zuo, Zongtang. “Preface.” In Lin Wen Zhong Gong Zheng Shu. Shanghai: Shangwu Yinshuguan, 1935.Google Scholar

Book contents

Bibliography

Summary

Access options

References

Book contents

Bibliography

Summary

Access options

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive