Book contents
- Transition and Coherence in Intellectual Property Law
- Cambridge Intellectual Property and Information Law
- Transition and Coherence in Intellectual Property Law
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Preface
- Greetings to Annette Kur from the Second Floor
- Annette Kur: Toward Understanding
- Part I Transition
- Part II Coherence
- A Intellectual “Property” and its Limits
- 16 The (Lack of) Coherence of Data Ownership with the Intellectual Property System
- 17 The Threefold Fictitiousness of Intellectual Property
- 18 An Intellectual Property Structural Engineer Extraordinaire and Her Lifelong Quest for Coherence
- 19 Open Yet Secret – Trading of Tangible Goods and Trade Secrets
- 20 From Smörgåsbord to New Nordic Cuisine: EUHarmonization of Trade Secrets Protection in the Nordic Countries
- 21 Trade Mark Rights and Parallel Imports vis-à-vis the Never-Ending Evolution of the Behavior of Firms: Transition and Coherence Put to a Test
- 22 Legal Concept of “Exhaustion”: Exhausted?
- 23 Building Coherence in Technological Transitions: Putting Exploitation at the Core of IP
- 24 “Accessory Exhaustion” – and Use of a Work as a Work
- B IP Overlaps
- C (Un-)fairness
- Conclusion
- Cambridge Intellectual Property and Information Law
16 - The (Lack of) Coherence of Data Ownership with the Intellectual Property System
from A - Intellectual “Property” and its Limits
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 29 December 2020
By
Book contents
- Transition and Coherence in Intellectual Property Law
- Cambridge Intellectual Property and Information Law
- Transition and Coherence in Intellectual Property Law
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Preface
- Greetings to Annette Kur from the Second Floor
- Annette Kur: Toward Understanding
- Part I Transition
- Part II Coherence
- A Intellectual “Property” and its Limits
- 16 The (Lack of) Coherence of Data Ownership with the Intellectual Property System
- 17 The Threefold Fictitiousness of Intellectual Property
- 18 An Intellectual Property Structural Engineer Extraordinaire and Her Lifelong Quest for Coherence
- 19 Open Yet Secret – Trading of Tangible Goods and Trade Secrets
- 20 From Smörgåsbord to New Nordic Cuisine: EUHarmonization of Trade Secrets Protection in the Nordic Countries
- 21 Trade Mark Rights and Parallel Imports vis-à-vis the Never-Ending Evolution of the Behavior of Firms: Transition and Coherence Put to a Test
- 22 Legal Concept of “Exhaustion”: Exhausted?
- 23 Building Coherence in Technological Transitions: Putting Exploitation at the Core of IP
- 24 “Accessory Exhaustion” – and Use of a Work as a Work
- B IP Overlaps
- C (Un-)fairness
- Conclusion
- Cambridge Intellectual Property and Information Law
Summary
In the European Union, policy makers and scholars have been discussing whether the modern data economy is in need of data ownership rights for quite some time. The European Commission has so far taken a regulatory approach, in particular considering a potential data producer’s right to promote access to machine-generated data.2 In response to this, the Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition,3 and the author of this chapter as an individual scholar,4 have advised the Commission and other policy makers against new exclusive ownership rights in data.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Transition and Coherence in Intellectual Property LawEssays in Honour of Annette Kur, pp. 213 - 223Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021
- 4
- Cited by