Protection of Legitimate Expectations in Investment Treaty Arbitration A Theory of Detrimental Reliance
Book contents
- Protection of Legitimate Expectations in Investment Treaty Arbitration
- Protection of Legitimate Expectations in Investment Treaty Arbitration
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Foreword
- Preface
- Table of Cases
- Abbreviations
- Part I Why Do We Need a Theory of Legitimate Expectations?
- Part II What Is the Theory of Legitimate Expectations?
- Part III Application of the Reliance Theory of Legitimate Expectations
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 26 February 2019
Book contents
- Protection of Legitimate Expectations in Investment Treaty Arbitration
- Protection of Legitimate Expectations in Investment Treaty Arbitration
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Foreword
- Preface
- Table of Cases
- Abbreviations
- Part I Why Do We Need a Theory of Legitimate Expectations?
- Part II What Is the Theory of Legitimate Expectations?
- Part III Application of the Reliance Theory of Legitimate Expectations
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Protection of Legitimate Expectations in Investment Treaty ArbitrationA Theory of Detrimental Reliance, pp. 265 - 280Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
Aaken, A van, ‘Primary and Secondary Remedies in International Investment Law and National State Liability: A Functional and Comparative View’ in Schill, S (ed), International Investment Law and Comparative Public Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010)Google Scholar
Alexandrov, SA, ‘Breaches of Contract and Breaches of Treaty – The Jurisdiction of Treaty-based Arbitration Tribunals to Decide Breach of Contract Claims in SGS v. Pakistan and SGS v. Philippines’ (2004) 5 JWIT 555Google Scholar
Allan, TRS, Law, Liberty and Justice: The Legal Foundations of British Constitutionalism (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994)Google Scholar
Alvik, I, Contracting with Sovereignty: State Contracts and International Arbitration (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2011)Google Scholar
Amerasinghe, CF, ‘State Breaches of Contracts with Aliens and International Law’ (1964) 58(4) AJIL 881CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aquinas, T, The Summa Theologica of St. Thomas Aquinas, English Dominicans (trans) (London: Burns, Oates and Washbourne). Repr (New York, NY: Christian Classics 1981)Google Scholar
Aristotle, , Nicomachean Ethics, Barnes, Jonathon (ed) (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1984)Google Scholar
Atiyah, PSThe Rise and Fall of the Freedom of Contract (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1979)Google Scholar
Baetens, F, ‘No Law Is an Island, Entire of Itself: How International Investment Law Interacts with Other Fields of Public International Law’ in Baetens, F (ed), Investment Law within International Law: Integrationist Perspectives (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barak-Erez, D, ‘The Doctrine of Legitimate Expectations and the Distinction between the Reliance and Expectation Interests’ (2005) 11(4) EPL 583Google Scholar
Barnidge, R, ‘The Due Diligence Principle under International Law’ (2006) 8 Int C L Rev 81Google Scholar
Bilder, R, ‘The Role of Trust in International Law’ (1981); available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=912741 (accessed on 10 June 2016)Google Scholar
Bix, B, ‘Theories of Contract Law and Enforcing Promissory Morality: Comments on Charles Fried’ (2012) 45(3) Suffolk U L Rev 719Google Scholar
Bowett, D, ‘Estoppel before International Tribunals and Its Relation to Acquiescence’ (1957) 33 BYIL 176, 202Google Scholar
Brown, C, ‘A Comparative and Critical Assessment of Estoppel in International Law’ (1995) 50 U Miami L Rev 369, 410–12Google Scholar
Brown, C‘The Protection of Legitimate Expectations as a “General Principle of Law”: Some Preliminary Thoughts’ (2009) 6(1) Transnational Dispute ManagementGoogle Scholar
Byers, M, Custom, Power and the Power of Rules (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1999)Google Scholar
Calmes, S, Du principe de protection de la confiance légitime en droits allemand, communautaire et français (Nouvelle bibliothèque de thèses) (Paris: Dalloz 2001)Google Scholar
Campbell, C, ‘House of Cards: The Relevance of Legitimate Expectations under Fair and Equitable Treatment Provisions in Investment Treaty Law’ (2013) 30(4) J Int’l Arb 361Google Scholar
Caron, D, ‘The Interpretation of National Foreign Investment Laws as Unilateral Acts under International Law’ in Arsanjani, MH et al. (eds), Looking to the Future: Essays on International Law in Honor of W Michael Reisman (Leiden: Nijhoff 2010)Google Scholar
Chitty, J (ed), Emmerich de Vattel, The Law of Nations or Principles of the Law of Nature, Applied to the Conduct and Affairs of Nations and Sovereigns (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011)Google Scholar
Clayton, R, ‘Legitimate Expectations, Policy, and the Principle of Consistency’ (2003) 62(1) CLJ 93Google Scholar
Collins, D, ‘Reliance Remedies at the International Center for the Settlement of Investment Disputes’ (2009) 29 Nw J Int’l L & Bus 195Google Scholar
Connolly, W, The Terms of Political Discourse (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 3rd edn, 1993)Google Scholar
Coyle, S and Morrow, K, The Philosophical Foundations of Environment (Oxford: Hart Publishing 2004)Google Scholar
Craig, P‘Grounds for Judicial Review: Substantive Control over Discretion’ in Feldman, D (ed), English Public Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2004)Google Scholar
Craig, P‘Substantive Legitimate Expectations in Domestic and Community Law’ (1996) 55(2) CLJ 289Google Scholar
Craswell, R‘Treaty and Contract in Investment Arbitration’ (2009) 6(1) Transnational Dispute ManagementGoogle Scholar
Crawford, J, Brownlie’s Principles of Public International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 8th edn, 2012)Google Scholar
Crawford, J‘Treaty and Contract in Investment Arbitration’ (2008) 24(1) Arbitration Int’l 374Google Scholar
Cristina, M and Salias, G, ‘Do Umbrella Clauses Apply to Unilateral Undertakings?’ in Binder, C et al. (eds), International Investment Law for the 21st Century: Essays in Honour of Christoph Schreuer (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009)Google Scholar
Cuniberti, G, ‘Enhancing Judicial Reputation through Legal Transplants – Estoppel Travels to France’ (2012) 60(2) Am J Comp L 383Google Scholar
D’Aspremont, J, Formalism and the Sources of International Law: A Theory of the Ascertainment of Legal Rules (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011)Google Scholar
Daujotas, R and Audzevičius, R, ‘The Concept of Legitimate Expectation in Investor-State Arbitration and the European Court of Human Rights’ (2012) 6(2) Bulletin of the International Commercial Arbitration 11Google Scholar
De Brabandere, E, ‘Arbitral Decisions as a Source of International Investment Law’ in Gazzini, T and De Brabandere, E (eds), International Investment Law: The Sources of Rights and Obligations (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2012)Google Scholar
Dolzer, R, ‘Fair and Equitable Treatment: Today’s Contours’ (2014) 12 Santa Clara J Int’l L 7Google Scholar
Dolzer, R and Schreuer, C, Principles of International Investment Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dotan, Y, ‘Why Administrators Should Be Bound by Their Policies?’ (1997) 17(1) OJLS 23Google Scholar
Douglas, Z, ‘Can a Doctrine of Precedent Be Justified in Investment Treaty Arbitration?’ (2010) 25 ICSID Rev – FILJ 104Google Scholar
Douglas, Z‘Concepts of Property’ in Douglas, Z, Pauwelyn, J and Viñuales, JE (eds), The Foundations of International Investment Law – Bringing Theory into Practice (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014)Google Scholar
Douglas, Z‘Nothing If Not Critical in Investment Treaty Arbitration’ (2006) 22 Arbitration Int 27Google Scholar
Douglas, Z‘The Hybrid Foundations of Investment Treaty Arbitration’ (2003) 74 BYIL 151Google Scholar
Douglas, ZThe International Law of Investment Claims (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2009)Google Scholar
Douglas, Z, Pauwelyn, J and Viñuales, JE (eds), The Foundations of International Investment Law – Bringing Theory into Practice (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014)Google Scholar
Dubash, NK and Morgan, B (eds), The Rise of the Regulatory State of the South Infrastructure and Development in Emerging Economies (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013)Google Scholar
Dumberry, P, ‘The Prohibition against Arbitrary Conduct and the Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard under NAFTA Article 1105’ (2014) 15 JWIT 117Google Scholar
Dumberry, P‘The Protection of Investors’ Legitimate Expectations and the Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard under NAFTA Article’ (2014) 31(1) J Int’l Arb 47Google Scholar
Dunn, J, ‘The Concept of “Trust” in the Politics of John Locke’ in Rorty, R, Schneewind, JB and Skinner, Q (eds), Philosophy in History: Essays in the Historiography of Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984)Google Scholar
Dupuy, F, La protection de l’attente légitime des parties au contrat – Etude de droit international des investissements à la lumière du droit compare [Thèse: University of Paris (Panthéon-Assas) and Berlin: Humboldt Universität, 2007]Google Scholar
Dupuy, F and Dupuy, PM, ‘What to Expect from Legitimate Expectations? A Critical Appraisal and Look into the Future of the “Legitimate Expectations” Doctrine in International Investment Law’ in Ziadé, NG (ed), Festschrift Ahmed Sadek El-Kosheri (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2015)Google Scholar
Earl Childress, III, D, The Role of Ethics in International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014)Google Scholar
Eisenberg, MA and McDonnell, B, ‘Expectation Damages and the Theory of Overreliance’ (2002) 54 Hastings LJ 1335.Google Scholar
Elias, P, ‘Legitimate Expectation and Judicial Review’ in Jowell, J and Oliver, D (eds), New Directions in Judicial Review (London: Stevens, 1988)Google Scholar
Elliot, M, ‘Judicial Review’s Scope, Foundations and Purposes: Joining the Dots’ (2012) NZ L Rev 75Google Scholar
Elliot, M‘Legitimate Expectations, Consistency and Abuse of Power: The Rashid Case’ (2005) 10 JR 281Google Scholar
Elliot, M‘Unlawful Representations, Legitimate Expectations and Estoppel in Public Law’ (2003) 8(2) JR 71Google Scholar
Fietta, S, ‘Expropriation and the “Fair and Equitable” Standard: The Developing Role of Investors’ “Expectations” in International Investment Arbitration’ (2006) 23 J Int’l Arb 375Google Scholar
Fitzmaurice, G, ‘The General Principles of International Law Considered from the Standpoint of the Rule of Law’ (1997) 11 Collected Courses of the Hague Academy of International Law 1Google Scholar
Flanagan, R, ‘Legitimate Expectation and Applications – An Outdated and Unneeded Distinction’ (2011) 17 Canta LR 283Google Scholar
Fordham, M‘Reparation for Maladministration: Public Law’s Final Frontier’ (2003) 8 JR 104Google Scholar
Forsyth, CF‘The Provenance and Protection of Legitimate Expectations’ (1988) 47 CLJ 238Google Scholar
Forsyth, CF‘Wednesbury Protection of Substantive Legitimate Expectations’ (1997) PL 375Google Scholar
Francioni, F, ‘Equity in International Law’ Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013)Google Scholar
Franck, T, ‘Word Made Law: The Decision of the ICJ in the Nuclear Test Cases’ (1975) 69 AJIL 616Google Scholar
Fried, C, Contract as Promise: A Theory of Contractual Obligation (Boston, MA: Harvard University Press, 1981)Google Scholar
Friedmann, D‘Rights and Remedies’ in Cohen, N and McKendrick, E (eds), Comparative Remedies for Breach of Contract (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2005)Google Scholar
Friedrich, D and Southwood, N, ‘Promises and Trust’ in Sheinman, H (ed), Promises and Agreements: Philosophical Essays (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011)Google Scholar
Fuller, L and Perdue, WR, ‘The Reliance Interest in Contract Damage (Parts 1 and 2)’ (1936–1937) 46(52) Yale LJ 373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallus, N, ‘The “Fair and Equitable Treatment” Standard and the Circumstances of the Host State’ in Brown, C and Milles, K (eds), Evolution in Investment Treaty Law and Arbitration (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011)Google Scholar
Garcia-Amador, FV, The Changing Law of International Claims (New York, NY: Oceana Publications, 1984)Google Scholar
Gardner, J, ‘Justifications and Reasons’ in Simester, A and Smith, ATH (eds), Harm and Culpability (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996)Google Scholar
Gardner, J‘What Is Tort Law For? Part 1. The Place of Corrective Justice’ (2011) 30(1) L & Phil 33Google Scholar
Gehne, K and Brillo, R, ‘Stabilization Clauses in International Investment Law: Beyond Balancing and Fair and Equitable Treatment’ NCCR Working Paper, No 2013/46Google Scholar
Geller, PE, ‘Legal Transplants in International Copyright: Some Problems of Method’ (1994) 13 PBLJ 199Google Scholar
Gilbert, M, ‘Scanlon on Promissory Obligation: The Problem of Promisees’ Rights’ (2004) 101 JPh 83Google Scholar
Gordley, J, The Philosophical Origins of Modern Contract Doctrine (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991)Google Scholar
Grotius, H, De Jure Belli ac Pacis Libri Tres, FW Kelsey (trans) (London: Oxford Clarendon Press, 1925)Google Scholar
Gutteridge, HC, ‘The Meaning and Scope of Article 38 (1) (c) of the Statute of the International Court of Justice’ (1952) 38 Transactions of the Grotius Society 125Google Scholar
Habermas, J, ‘On the Internal Relation between the Rule of Law and Democracy’ (1995) 3(1) Eur J Int Law 12Google Scholar
Hannet, S and Busch, L, ‘Ultra Vires Representations and Legitimate Expectations’ (2005) PL 729Google Scholar
Harten, GV and Loughlin, M, ‘Investment Treaty Arbitration as a Species of Global Administrative Law’ (2006) 17(1) Eur J Int Law 121Google Scholar
Hellman, D and Moreau, S, Philosophical Foundations of Discrimination Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013)Google Scholar
Hirsch, M, ‘Between Fair and Equitable Treatment and Stabilization Clause: Stable Legal Environment and Regulatory Change in International Investment Law’ (2011) 12 JWIT 783Google Scholar
Hirsch, M, ‘The Sociology of International Investment Law’ in Douglas, Z, Pauwelyn, J and Viñuales, JE (eds), The Foundations of International Investment Law – Bringing Theory into Practice (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014)Google Scholar
Hlophe, J, ‘Legitimate Expectation and Natural Justice: English, Australian and South African Law’ (1987) 104 SALJ 165Google Scholar
Hogg, M, Promises and Contract Law, Comparative Perspectives (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014)Google Scholar
Janis, MW, ‘Equity in International Law’ in Bernhardt, R (ed), Encyclopedia of Public International Law Volume II (Amsterdam: North-Holland)Google Scholar
Jensen, D, ‘In Defence of the Reliance Theory of Equitable Estoppel’ (2001) 22 Adel L Rev 157Google Scholar
Kaufmann-Kohler, G, ‘Is Consistency a Myth?’ in Gaillard, E and Banifatemi, Yas, Precedent in International Arbitration: IAI Seminar, Paris – December 14, 2007Google Scholar
Kelly, PJ, Utilitarianism and Distributive Justice: Jeremey Bentham and the Civil Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990)Google Scholar
Kennedy, D, ‘Form and Substance in Private Law Adjudication’ (1976) 89 Harv L Rev 1685Google Scholar
Kimel, D, From Promise to Contract: Toward a Liberal Theory of Contract (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2003)Google Scholar
Kingsbury, B and Schill, S, ‘Investor–State Arbitration as Governance: Fair and Equitable Treatment, Proportionality and the Emerging Global Administrative Law’ (2006) IILJ Working Paper 2009/6 24–30Google Scholar
Klager, R, ‘Fair and Equitable Treatment: A Look at the Theoretical Underpinnings of Legitimacy and Fairness’ (2010) 11(3) JWIT 435Google Scholar
Klager, RFair and Equitable Treatment in International Investment Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011)Google Scholar
Knight, CJS, ‘Expectations in Transition: Recent Developments in Legitimate Expectations’ (2009) PL 15Google Scholar
Kolb, R, ‘Principles as Sources of International Law (With Special Reference to Good Faith)’ (2006) 53(1) NILR 1Google Scholar
Kolodny, N and Wallace, RJ, ‘Promises and Practices Revisited’ (2003) 31(1) Phil & Pub Aff 119Google Scholar
Kriebaum, U and Schreuer, CH, ‘At What Time Must Legitimate Expectations Exist?’ (2012); available at www.transnational-dispute-management.comGoogle Scholar
Kuklin, B, ‘The Justification for Protecting Reasonable Expectations’ (2001) 29(3) Hofstra L Rev 863Google Scholar
Kuklin, B‘The Plausibility of Legally Protecting Reasonable Expectations’ (1997) 32 Val U L Rev 19Google Scholar
Laird, I and Askew, R, ‘Finality versus Consistency: Does Investor-State Arbitration Need an Appellate System’ (2005) 7 J App Prac & Process 285Google Scholar
Lang, J, ‘Legal Certainty and Legitimate Expectations as General Principles of Law’ in Bernitz, U and Nergelius, J (eds), General Principles in European Community Law (The Hague: Wolters Kluwer, 2000)Google Scholar
Langer, M, ‘From Legal Transplants to Legal Translations: The Globalization of Plea Bargaining and the Americanization Thesis in Criminal Procedure’ (2004) 45(1) Harv Int’l L J 1Google Scholar
Lauterpacht, H, The Function of Law in the International Community (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1933)Google Scholar
Legrand, P, ‘Legal Traditions in Western Europe: The Limits of Commonality’ in de Roo, AJ, Örücü, E and Jagtenberg, RW (eds), Transfrontier Mobility of Law (The Hague: Wolters Kluwer, 1995)Google Scholar
Legrand, P‘The Impossibility of “Legal Transplants”’ (1997) 4 Masst J Eur & Comp L 113Google Scholar
Levinson, D, ‘Making Government Pay: Markets, Politics and the Allocation of Constitutional Costs’ (2000) 67 U Chi Law Rev 345Google Scholar
Locke, J, Two Treatises of Government (1689), Laslett, P. (ed) (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988)Google Scholar
MacCormick, N, ‘The Obligation of Reparation’ in MacCormick, N (ed), Legal Right and Social Democracy: Essays in Legal and Political Philosophy (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1982)Google Scholar
MacCormick, N‘Voluntary Obligations’ in MacCormick, N (ed), Legal Right and Social Democracy: Essays in Legal and Political Philosophy (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1982)Google Scholar
MacCormick, N‘Voluntary Obligations and Normative Powers’ (1972) 46(Supplement) Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 59Google Scholar
Mairal, HA, ‘Legitimate Expectations and Informal Administrative Representations’ in Schill, S (ed), International Investment Law and Comparative Public law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010)Google Scholar
Mbengue, MM, ‘National Legislation and Unilateral Acts’ in Gazzini, T and de Brabandère, E (eds), The Sources of Rights and Obligations in Transnational Investment Law (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2012)Google Scholar
McLachlan, C, Shore, L and Weiniger, M, International Investment Arbitration: Substantive Principles (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007)Google Scholar
McNair, A, ‘The General Principles of Law Recognized by Civilized Nations’ (1957) 33 BYIL 1Google Scholar
Mendelson, M‘The Subjective Element in Customary International Law’ (1995) 66 BYIL 177Google Scholar
Mill, J, On Liberty, Utilitarianism and Other Essays in Philip, M and Rosen, F (eds), (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2nd edn, 2015)Google Scholar
Mitchell, C, ‘Leading a Life of Its Own? The Roles of Reasonable Expectation in Contract Law’ (2003) 23(4) OJLLS 639Google Scholar
Momirov, A and Fourie, AN, ‘Vertical Comparative Law Methods: Tools for Conceptualizing the International Rule of Law’ (2009) 2(3) Erasmus L Rev 292Google Scholar
Moules, R, Actions against Public Officials: Legitimate Expectations, Misstatements and Misconduct (London: Sweet and Maxwell, 2009)Google Scholar
Muchlinski, P, ‘“Caveat Investor”? The Relevance of the Conduct of the Investor under the Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard’ (2006) 55 ICLQ 527Google Scholar
Müller, JP and Cottier, T, ‘Estoppel’ in Bernhardt, Rudolf (ed), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (2003)Google Scholar
Nelken, D, ‘Comparatists and Transferability’ in Legrand, P and Munday, R (eds) Comparative Legal Studies: Traditions and Transitions (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003)Google Scholar
Nelken, D‘The Meaning of Success in Transnational Legal Transfers’ (2001) 19 Windsor Yrbk Acc Jus 350Google Scholar
Nelken, D‘Towards a Sociology of Legal Adaptation’ in Nelken, D and Feest, J (eds), Adapting Legal Cultures (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2001)Google Scholar
Newcombe, A and Paradell, L, Law and Practice of Investment Treaties: Standards of Treatment (The Netherlands: Wolters Kluwer, 2009)Google Scholar
Ngugi, J, ‘Promissory Estoppel: The Life History of an Ideal Legal Transplant’ (2007) 41(2) U Rich L Rev 425Google Scholar
Nickel, PJ, ‘Trust and Obligation-Ascription’ (2007) 10(3) Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oppenheim, L, ‘The Science of International Law: Its Tasks and Methods’ (1908) 2 AJIL 313, 336Google Scholar
Owen, D‘Foreword Why Philosophy Matters to Tort Law’ in Owen, D (ed), The Philosophical Foundations of Tort Law (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997)Google Scholar
Paley, E, The Works of William Paley, D. D. and an Account of the Life and Writings of the Author, Volume III (London: Longman and Co, 1838)Google Scholar
Pandya, A and Moody, A, ‘Legitimate Expectations in Investment Treaty Arbitration: An Unclear Future’ (2010–2011) 15 Tilburg L Rev 93Google Scholar
Paparinskis, M, ‘Analogies and Other Regimes of International Law’ in Douglas, Z, Pauwelyn, J and Viñuales, JE (eds), ‘Good Faith and International Economic Law’ in Mitchell, A, Sornarajah, M and Voon, T (eds), Good Faith and International Economic Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015)Google Scholar
Paparinskis, MThe Foundations of International Investment Law – Bringing Theory into Practice (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014)Google Scholar
Paparinskis, MThe International Minimum Standard (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013)Google Scholar
Paulsson, J, ‘Can “Legitimate Expectations” Ever Be “Rights”?’ (19 April 2016) JOTWELLGoogle Scholar
Paulsson, J‘The Power of States to Make Meaningful Promises to Foreigners’ (2010) 1(2) JIDS 341Google Scholar
Popelier, P, ‘Legitimate Expectations and the Law Maker in the Case Law of the European Court of Human Right’ (2006) EHRLR 10Google Scholar
Popper, K, Objective Knowledge: An Evolutionary Approach (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1972)Google Scholar
Posner, R, ‘The Concept of Corrective Justice in Recent Theories of Tort Law’ (1981) 10 J Leg St 187Google Scholar
Postema, GJ, Philosophy and the Law of Torts (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001)Google Scholar
Potesta, M, ‘Legitimate Expectations in Investment Treaty Law: Understanding the Roots and the Limits of a Controversial Concept’ (2013) ICSID Rev – FILJ 1Google Scholar
Pratt, M‘Identifying the Harm Done: A Critique of the Reliance Theory of Estoppel’ (1999) 21 Adel L Rev 209Google Scholar
Prichard, HA, ‘The Obligation to Keep a Promise’ in MacAdam, Jim (ed), Moral Writings (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2002)Google Scholar
Pufendorf, S, De Jure Nature et Gentium (1672) [On the Law of Nature and Nations], CH Oldfather and WA Oldfather (trans) (New York, NY: Hein Press, 1995)Google Scholar
Puig, S, ‘No Right without a Remedy: Foundations of Investor-State Arbitration’ (2014) 35 U Pa J Int’l L 829Google Scholar
Raz, J‘Is There a Reason to Keep Promises’ (2012) No 12–320, Research Paper Series, Columbia University Public Law and Legal Theory, Columbia Law SchoolGoogle Scholar
Raz, J‘Liberty and Trust’ in George, R (ed), Natural Law, Liberalism, and Morality: Contemporary Essays (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001)Google Scholar
Raz, J‘On the Nature of Rights’ (1984) xciii(370) Mind 194 [reprinted in Morton Winston, ed], The Philosophy of Human Rights (Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, 1989)Google Scholar
Raz, J‘Promises and Obligations’ in Hacker, PMS and Raz, J (eds), Law, Morality and Society: Essays in Honor of H.L.A. Hart (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1977)Google Scholar
Raz, J‘Reply to MacCormick’ (1972) 46(Supplement) Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 80Google Scholar
Raz, J‘Voluntary Obligations and Normative Powers II’ (1972) 46 Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society. Supplementary, Volume 80Google Scholar
Reisman, WM and Arsanjani, MH, ‘The Question of Unilateral Governmental Statements as Applicable Law in Investment Disputes’ (2004) 19 ICSID Rev – FILJ 328Google Scholar
Reynolds, P, ‘Legitimate Expectations and the Protection of Trust in Public Officials’ (2011) PL 330Google Scholar
Riggs, RE, ‘Legitimate Expectation and Procedural Fairness in English Law’ (1988) 36 Am J Comp L 395Google Scholar
Ripinsky, S, ‘Assessing Damages in Investment Disputes: Practice in Search of Perfect’ (2009) 10(1) JWITGoogle Scholar
Ripinsky, S and Williams, K, Damages in International Investment Law (London: British Institute of International and Comparative Law, 2008)Google Scholar
Roberts, A, ‘Clash of Paradigms: Actors and Analogies Shaping the Investment Treaty System’ (2013) 107(1) AJIL 55Google Scholar
Roberts, A‘Power and Persuasion in Investment Treaty Interpretation: The Dual Role of States’ (2010) 104 AJIL 179Google Scholar
Robertson, A, ‘Reasonable Reliance in Estoppel by Conduct’ (2000) 23 UNSW Law Journal 87Google Scholar
Robertson, A‘Reliance and Expectation in Estoppel Remedies’ (1998) 18 Leg Stud 360, 365Google Scholar
Robins, MPromising, Intending and Moral Autonomy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1976)Google Scholar
Rubin, AP, ‘The International Legal Effects of Unilateral Declarations’ (1977) 1 AJIL 1Google Scholar
Sabahi, B, Compensation and Restitution in Investor-State Arbitration: Principles and Practice (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011)Google Scholar
Sales, P and Steyn, K, ‘Legitimate Expectations in English Law: An Analysis’ (2004) PL 564Google Scholar
Samet, I, ‘The Morality of Proprietary Estoppel’ in Penner, J and Smith, H (eds), The Philosophical Foundations of Property Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013)Google Scholar
Scanlon, T‘Reasons, Responsibility, and Reliance: Replies to Wallace, Dworkin, and Deigh’ Symposium on T. M. Scanlon’s What We Owe to Each Other’ (2002) 112(3) Ethics 507Google Scholar
Schill, S, ‘Contracting with Foreigners: International Investment Law Implications’ in Noguellou, R and Stelken, U, Comparative Law on Public Contracts (Brussels: Bruylant, 2010)Google Scholar
Schill, S‘Crafting the International Economic Order: The Public Function of Investment Treaty Arbitration and Its Significance for the Role of the Arbitrator’ (2010) LJIL 401Google Scholar
Schill, S‘Damages in International Investment Law. S. Ripinsky, K. Williams (Book Review)’ (2010) 1 TDMGoogle Scholar
Schill, S‘Fair and Equitable Treatment, the Rule of Law and Comparative Public Law’ in Schill, S (ed), International Investment Law and Comparative Public Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010)Google Scholar
Schill, S‘Fair and Equitable Treatment under Investment Treaties as an Embodiment of the Rule of Law’ IILJ Working Paper 2006/6, Global Administrative Law SeriesGoogle Scholar
Schønberg, S, Legitimate Expectations in Administrative Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000)Google Scholar
Schreuer, C‘Protection against Arbitrary or Discriminatory Measures’ in Rogers, CA and Alford, RP (eds), The Future of Investment Arbitration (New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2009)Google Scholar
Schreuer, C‘Travelling the BIT Route: Of Waiting Periods, Umbrella Clauses and Forks in the Road’ (2004) 5 JWIT 231Google Scholar
Schroeder, M, ‘Administrative Law in Germany’ in Seerden, R and Stroink, F (eds), Administrative Law of the European Union, Its Members and the United States (Gronigen: Intersentia, 2002)Google Scholar
Schultz, T, ‘Against Consistency in Investment Arbitration’ in Douglas, Z, Pauwelyn, J and Viñuales, JE (eds), The Foundations of International Investment Law – Bringing Theory into Practice (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014)Google Scholar
Schultz, T and Dupont, C, ‘Investment Arbitration: Promoting the Rule of Law or Over-empowering Investors? A Quantitative Empirical Study’ (2014) 25(4) Eur J Int Law 1147Google Scholar
Schwebel, SM, ‘On Whether a Breach by a State of a Contract with an Alien Is a Breach of International Law’ in Migliazza, A, Pocar, F, Lamberti Zanardi, P and Ziccardi, P (eds), International Law at the Time of Its Codification – Essays in Honour of Roberto Ago, Volume 3 (Milan: A. Giuffrè, 1987)Google Scholar
Schwebel, SM‘On Whether a Breach by a State of a Contract with an Alien Is a Breach of International Law’ in Schwebel (ed), SM, Justice in International Law: Selected Writings (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994)Google Scholar
Sheinman, H, ‘Promising, Intimate Relationships and Conventionalism’ (2008) 177(4) Phil Rev 481Google Scholar
Shelton, D, ‘Righting Wrongs: Reparations in the Articles on State Responsibility’ (2002) 96 AJIL 833Google Scholar
Shiffrin, S, ‘Promising, Intimate Relationships, and Conventionalism’ (2008) 117(4) Phil Rev 481Google Scholar
Sinclair, A, ‘The Umbrella Clause Debate’ in Bjorklund, AK et al. (eds), Investment Treaty Law: Current Issues III (London: BIICL, 2009)Google Scholar
Sinclair, I, ‘Estoppel and Acquiescence’ in Lowe, V and Fitzmaurice, M (eds), Fifty Years of the International Court of Justice: Essays in Honour of Sir Robert Jennings (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996)Google Scholar
Smith, M, ‘The Value of Making and Keeping Promise’ in Sheinman, H (ed), Promises and Agreements: Philosophical Essays (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011)Google Scholar
Smutny, C, ‘Principles of Compensation in Investment Treaty Arbitration’ (2007) 22 ICSID Rev – FILJ 1Google Scholar
Snodgrass, E, ‘Protecting Investors’ Legitimate Expectations – Recognising and Delimiting a General Principle’ (2006) 21 ICSID Rev – FILJ 1, 25–30Google Scholar
Sohn, LB and Baxter, RR, ‘Responsibility of States for Injuries to the Economic Interests of Aliens’ (1961) 55 AJIL 545Google Scholar
Sornarajah, M, Resistance and Change in the International Law on Foreign Investment (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015)Google Scholar
Sornarajah, MThe International Law on Foreign Investment (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 3rd edn, 2010)Google Scholar
Southwood, N and Friedrich, D, ‘Promises beyond Assurance’ (2009) 144(2) Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition 261Google Scholar
Spears, S, ‘The Quest for Policy Space in a New Generation of International Investment Agreements’ 2010 13(4) JIEL 1037Google Scholar
Steele, I, ‘Substantive Legitimate Expectations: Striking the Right Balance?’ (2005) 121 LQR 300Google Scholar
Stone, J, ‘Arbitrariness, the Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard, and the International Law of Investment’ (2012) 25(1) LJIL 77Google Scholar
Stone, J, The Province and Function of Law: Law as Logic, Justice, and Social Control: A Study in Jurisprudence (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2nd edn, 1946)Google Scholar
Sunkin, M, ‘Remedies Available in Judicial Review Proceedings’ in Feldman, D (ed), English Public Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004)Google Scholar
Suy, E, ‘Unilateral Acts of States as Source of International Law: Some New Thoughts and Frustrations’ in Droit du Povoir, Pouvoir du Droit. Mélanges offerts à Jean Salmon (Brussels: Bruylant, 2007)Google Scholar
Teubner, G, ‘Legal Irritants: Good Faith in British Law or How Unifying Law Ends Up in New Divergencies’ (1998) 61(1) MLR 11Google Scholar
Thomas, R, Legitimate Expectations and Proportionality in Administrative Law (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2000)Google Scholar
Thompson, MP, ‘From Representation to Expectation: Estoppel as a Cause of Action’ (1983) 42(2) CLJ 257Google Scholar
Tienhaara, K, ‘Regulatory Chill and the Threat of Arbitration: A View from Political Science’ in Brown, C and Miles, K (eds), Evolution in Investment Treaty Law and Arbitration (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011)Google Scholar
Tognazzini, NA, ‘The Hybrid Nature of Promissory Obligation’ (2007) 35(3) Phil & Pub Aff 203Google Scholar
Tudor, I, The Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard in the International Law of Foreign Investment (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008)Google Scholar
Vadi, V, Analogies in International Investment Law and Arbitration (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015)Google Scholar
Vadi, V‘Critical Comparisons: The Role of Comparative Law in Investment Treaty Arbitration’ (2010) 39(1) Denv J Int’l L& Pol’y 89Google Scholar
Vanderman, Y, ‘Ultra Vires Legitimate Expectations: An Argument for Compensation’ (2012) PL 85Google Scholar
Vandevelde, K, ‘A Unified Theory of Fair and Equitable Treatment’ (2010) 43(1) NYU J Int’l L & Pol 43Google Scholar
Vasciannie, S, ‘The Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard in International Investment Law and Practice’ (1999) 70 BYIL 99Google Scholar
Vicuna, F, ‘From Preston to Prescott: Globalizing Legitimate Expectation’ in Charnovitz, S, Steger, D and Van den Bossche, P (eds) Law in the Service of Human Dignity: Essays in Honour of Florentino Feliciano (New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 2005)Google Scholar
Vicuna, F‘Regulatory Authority and Legitimate Expectations: Balancing the Rights of the State and the Individual under International Law in a Global Society’ (2003) 5 Int’l LF D Int’l 188Google Scholar
Vitek, W, ‘The Humean Promise: Whence Comes Its Obligation’ (1986) XII(2) Hume Studies 160Google Scholar
Volterra, R, ‘International Law Commission Articles on State Responsibility and Investor-State Arbitration: Do Investors Have Rights?’ (2010) 25(1) ICSID Rev – FILJ 218Google Scholar
Waelde, TM and Ndi, G, ‘Stabilizing International Investment Commitments: International Law versus Contract Interpretation’ (1996) 31 Texas Intl L J 215Google Scholar
Wagner, M, ‘Jurisdiction by Estoppel in the International Court of Justice’ (1986) 74 Cal L Rev 1777Google Scholar
Walter, A von, ‘The Investor’s Expectations in International Investment Arbitration’ in Reinisch, A and Knahr, C (eds), International Investment Law (Utrecht: Eleven International Publishing, 2009)Google Scholar
Watson, ALegal Transplants: An Approach to Comparative Law (Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press, 1993)Google Scholar
Watson, J, ‘Clarity and Ambiguity: A New Approach to the Test of Legitimacy in the Law of Legitimate Expectations’ (2010) 30(4) LS 633Google Scholar
Weiler, JHH and Trachtman, JP, ‘European Constitutionalism and Its Discontents’ (1997) 17(1) Nw J Int’l L & Bus 355Google Scholar
Weinrib, E‘Two Conceptions of Remedies’ in Rickett, Charles EF (ed), Justifying Private Law Remedies (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2008)Google Scholar
Wennerholm, F, ‘What Can You Expect? The Role of Legitimate Expectations in Investment Protection Disputes’ in Hobér, K et al. (eds) Between East and West: Essays in Honour of Ulf Franke (New York, NY: JurisNet, 2010)Google Scholar
Wiener, JB, ‘Something Borrowed for Something Blue: Legal Transplants and the Evolution of Global Environmental Law’ (2001) 27 Ecology LQ 1297Google Scholar
Wongkaew, T, ‘The Transplantation of Legitimate Expectations in Investment Treaty Arbitration: A Critique’ in Lalani, S and Polanco, R (eds), The Role of the State in Investor-State Arbitration (Leiden: Brill Nijhoff, 2015)Google Scholar
Woolf, H, ‘The Role of the English Judiciary in Developing Public Law’ (1986) 27 Wm & Mary L Rev 669Google Scholar
Yeung, K, ‘The Regulatory State’ in Baldwin, R, Cave, M and Lodge, M (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Regulation (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010)Google Scholar
Young, S, ‘Rawlsian Reasonableness: A Problematic Presumption?’ (2006) 39(1) Can J Pol Sc 159Google Scholar
Zeyl, T, ‘Charting the Wrong Course: The Doctrine of Legitimate Expectations in Investment Treaty Law’ (2011) 49 Alberta L Rev 203Google Scholar