Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pjpqr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-30T16:31:57.018Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - The “Anthropocene” in Philosophy: The Neo-material Turn and the Question of Nature

from Part I - The Conceptual Politics of the Anthropocene: Science, Philosophy, and Culture

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 January 2019

Frank Biermann
Affiliation:
Universiteit Utrecht, The Netherlands
Eva Lövbrand
Affiliation:
Linköpings Universitet, Sweden
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, William M. 2016. Geographies of Conservation I: De-extinction and Precision Conservation. Progress in Human Geography, published online 18 May.Google Scholar
Arias-Maldonado, Manuel. 2015. Environment and Society: Socionatural Relations in the Anthropocene. Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakker, Karen, and Bridge, Gavin. 2006. Material Worlds? Resource Geographies and the “Matter of Nature”. Progress in Human Geography 30 (1): 527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barad, Keith. 2007. Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, Ulrich. 1992. Risk Society. Towards a New Modernity. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Bennett, Jane. 2010. Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Biesecker, Adelheid and Hofmeister, Sabine. 2006. Die Neuerfindung des Ökonomischen. Ein (re)produktionstheoretischer Beitrag zur sozialökologischen Forschung. Munich: Oekom.Google Scholar
Biesecker, Adelheid and Hofmeister, Sabine. 2009. Starke Nachhaltigkeit fordert eine Ökonomie der (Re)Produktivität. In Die Greifswalder Theorie starker Nachhaltigkeit, edited by von Egan-Krieger, Tanja, Schultz, Julia, Thapa, Philipp Pratap, and Voget, Lieske, 16791692. Marburg: Metropolis-Verlag.Google Scholar
Castree, Noel. 2014. Geography and the Anthropocene II: Current Contributions. Geography Compass 8 (7): 450463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connolly, William. 2013a. The “New Materialism” and the Fragility of Things. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 41: 399412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connolly, William. 2013b. The Fragility of Things: Self-Organizing Processes, Neoliberal Fantasies, and Democratic Activism. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Coole, Diane. 2013. Agentic Capacities and Capacious Historical Materialism: Thinking with New Materialisms in the Political Sciences. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 41 (3): 451469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coole, Diane, and Frost, Samantha. 2010. Introducing the New Materialisms. In New Materialisms. Ontology, Agency, and Politics, edited by Coole, Diane and Frost, Samantha, 143. Durham and London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Corcoran, P., Moore, C., and Jazvac, K.. 2014. An Anthropogenic Marker Horizon in the Future Rock Record. Geological Society of America Today, 24 (6): 48.Google Scholar
Cronon, William, ed. 1996. Uncommon Ground. Rethinking the Human Place in Nature, New York: W. W. Norton and Company.Google Scholar
Cudworth, Erika, and Hobden, S. 2011. Posthuman International Relations. Complexity, Ecologism, and Global Politics. London: Zed Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cudworth, Erika, and Hobden, S. 2015. Liberation for Straw Dogs? Old Materialism, New Materialism, and the Challenge of an Emancipatory Posthumanism. Globalizations 12 (1): 134148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demeritt, D. 2002. What is the “Social Construction of Nature”? A Typology and Sympathetic Critique. Progress in Human Geography 26(6): 767–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, Erle C. 2011. Anthropogenic Transformation of the Terrestrial Biosphere. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A 369: 10101035.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ellis, Erle C. 2013. Anthropocene. In Encyclopedia of Earth, edited by Cutler, J.. Washington, DC: Environmental Information Coalition, National Council for Science and the Environment.Google Scholar
Ellis, Erle C., and Ramankutty, Navin. 2008. Putting People in the Map: Anthropogenic Biomes of the World. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 6 (8): 439447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitzsimmons, Margaret. 1989. The Matter of Nature. Antipode 21: 106120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, Nick, and Alldred, Pam. 2016. Sociology and the New Materialism. Theory, Research, Action. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Fuller, Steve. 2000: Why Science Studies has Never been Critical of Science: Some Recent Lessons on How to be a Helpful Nuisance and a Harmless Radical. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 30: 532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giddens, Anthony. 1991. The Consequences of Modernity. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Gowdy, John M. and Krall, Lisi. 2013. The Ultrasocial Origin of the Anthropocene. Ecological Economics 95: 137147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, Clive, Bonneuil, Christophe, and Gemenne, François, eds. 2015. Thinking the Anthropocene. In The Anthropocene and the Global Environmental Crisis. Rethinking Modernity in a New Epoch, edited by Hamilton, Clive, Bonneuil, Christophe, and Gemenne, François,113. Abingdon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haraway, Donna. 1991. Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Haraway, Donna. 2007. When Species Meet. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Hinchliffe, Steven. 2007. Geographies of Nature. Societies, Environments, Ecologies. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirsch, Scott 2012. Cultural Geography I: Materialist Turns. Progress in Human Geography 37(3): 433441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirsch, Scott, and Mitchell, Don. 2004. The Nature of Things: Dead Labor, Nonhuman Actors, and the Persistence of Marxism. Antipode 36: 687705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latour, Bruno. 1993. We Have Never Been Modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno. 2004. Politics of Nature. How to Bring the Sciences into Democracy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno. 2005. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, Jianguo, Dietz, Thomas, Carpenter, Stephen R., et al. 2007. Complexity of Coupled Human and Natural Systems. Science 317: 1513.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lorimer, Jamie, and Driessens, Clemens. 2013. Wild Experiments in the Oostvaardersplassen: Rethinking Environmentalism in the Anthropocene. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 39(2): 169181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marris, Emma. 2013. Rambunctious Garden. New York: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl. 2009. Ökonomisch-philosophische Manuskripte. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
McKibben, Bill. 1990. The End of Nature. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Morton, Tim. 2013. Hyperobjects. Philosophy and Ecology after the End of the World. Minneapolis and London: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Pellizzoni, Luigi. 2015. Ontological Politics in a Disposable World. The New Mastery of Nature. Surrey: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Plumwood, Valerie. 2006. The Concept of a Cultural Landscape: Nature, Culture and Agency in the Land. Ethics and The Environment 11(2): 115150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollini, Jacques. 2013. Bruno Latour and the Ontological Dissolution of Nature in the Social Sciences: A Critical Review. Environmental Values 22: 2542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Purdy, Jeremiah. 2015. After Nature. A Politics for the Anthropocene. Cambridge and London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rosenzweig, Michael L. 2011. The Four Questions: What Does the Introduction of Exotic Species Do to Diversity? Evolutionary Ecology Research 3: 361367.Google Scholar
Soper, Kate. 1995. What Is Nature? Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Swyngedow, Eric. 1999. Modernity and Hybridity: Nature, Regeneracionismo, and the Production of the Spanish Waterscape, 1890–1930. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 89: 443465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, Chris. 2013. The Anthropocene Could Raise Biological Diversity. Nature, 502 (7): 3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Young, Kenneth R. 2014. Biogeography of the Anthropocene: Novel Species Assemblages. Progress in Physical Geography 38(5): 664673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×